Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
83-39 REZONE A-SR TO PA-C 2 OF 5
0 Staff Findings, 6/16/83 FILE NO '83-39 act repox't prn,,laxed exist.. sta..tes Subdivision, to the wrest of tita.5 �)`Poject, It was , also found that the environmental imp e s with cs )vt on for the Big Chico Creek E the impacts of this prof , lenient impacts that Of Baas prepared and circtAlated Boas adequate for addressing minor exceptions. House. Comments received from that rov'i.ew iChrough the State Clearing have been addres.ed and are adequate. RE COMM.MAT I ON s t the requirements of the California andico sailor ldeinal. Note that Act (CEQA7 have been completed duality note that the previous 1?T.1t cer` and making this decision, ery sorsa on January 2,$ 1980;a'nd ofied by the. Board of Sup including rezone conforms to the policies, Find that the' e text and. map of the Butte County General Plan; and the rove the rezone Recommend that the Board of SuP. Nos. 43a2a-12, 43-27-0$' and of 20.74 acres to PA -C, for A. a portion of 43_29-15. (Halbert) Subject to the following conditionsc a plans to the Department of"Public 1. Submit road and drana g works for approval and install the required facilities. 2, Provide 20-fto radius property line retu'rn's apt all street intersections. 3. Provi tight -of -way ri ht -of -way for standard No. S-5 at all street intersections - 4i. Indicate a 5 p_ft. building setback line from the centerline Of Sacramento Avenue. Street signs sfiall be provided by the developer at all street intersections Per County requirements. (Submit five alternate street names far roval�ofestreetet to tnames)he y address coordinator for pp 6. Deed 30 feet 'ftOnl the centerline of Sacramento Avenue to the County of B1,1tte. Av nue to utter, and sidewalk curd street vection on Sacramento 5 3.:A ro�tri sJ,�4n tical curt, 9 7' Construct on�.��hal f street section fd seal and 95� relative rind 2" AC- 80 A8, SC 250 prime, 9 nom action: Construct full street stativecmapn on all interior • streets to section shown on ten -.. .. as required by the Department of Public 8. Proved. monua►cnta'f�or� LE Mn 83-23 Staff Findings, 6/16/83 Page' T Fo worKs in accordance with accepted standards. ades Cty Ordinances, and other features shall comply with t{7e Butte -g Street gr design resolution and other accepted oun engineering standards. 10, vide permanent solution for drainage. Pro 1l. inal map. All,easements of record to be shoYrn on the f f the Butte County Fire Department or reuirements o` 12. Meet the q other responsible agency• shall be provided in accordance withand dt B emendations utte 13. Street lighting acCeptud design criteria, County requirements, + of PG&E. 14, pay off assessments. 15. Meet the requirements of the utility compan1es (i.e, PG&E, Pacific Telephone, water, sewer). 164 Pay anydelinquent taxes. 17. Filo a tentative and 'final subdivision map and pay appropriate fees. 1$, Developer shall provide all required traffic safety signs, including stop signs. ... 19. Construct emergency access roaria'r: Farb: d cn Victo CT E!gj,,awa)r gage on Drive to R S• -LD -1 and con. ,tuct ndwell Avenue• al Health Meet reouiremcn'ts of 'Butte County Environment' 20. nepartment )Or dwelling unit. 21. provide 2 off-street par%Ing spaces I ,ou nd utilities are to be provided 'to each lot de the 2 Unadrgrment suhdiv5ion.' Retain some of the: almond trees to SL3P,P landscaPing on the lots. 2 �Jeri.fy that the storm drain sy stem for ,Big Chico Creek Estates Unit �3 is adequate to handle .the inr�ea�hdcorCreeke against xs Un rotection of Big subdivision./ provide.P runoff discharges•duting period of loiw creek flow such as summer flows. Maintain the dry wells .(Or,other, means of File No. 83-3' Staff Findings, 6/16/83 5 Water quality protection) on a yearly basis. 24. Utilize the following measures, as necessary, to reduce con- structon imp?�cts: a) Watering to prevent dust. b) Restrict construction-related vehicles to the main ,streets. c) Limit working hours to the daytime. 25. Building permit applications for residences in this subdivision shall be.sub;ject to anyschool mitigation fees established by an ordinance enacted prior to the filing of such applications or a Community Facilities Act of 1982 District will be created pursuant to California Government Code 953311r et. seq., covering the project area prior to the issuance of any building permits.' Provide a permanent solution for drainage, including the pro 26. Lection of downstream properties wY;ich may be affected by surface water runoff gonerated from this ,development. Verify that the flood-carrying capacity of Big Chico Creek is adequate to accommodate the projected amount of runoff ;at buildout. 27• Contribute pro rata share toward traffic signal at the inter- section of West Sacramento Avenue and Highway '52 or agree to future inclusion within a traffic assessment district if created by the Board of Supervisors for such purposes. 28. Applicant must also comply with all, other applicable State and local statutes) ordinances and regulations., HD/hd Attachments Location Exhibit Site Plan Environmental Document Letter-Chico Unified School Dist CHICO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT December 2, 1982 1163 EAST SEVENTH STREET CHICO, CALIFORNIA 05926 AREA COOE 916-' 891-3000 --- John. Mendonsa, Assistant Director Butte County Department of Public Works 7 County Center Drive Orovi'lle, CA 95965 SUBJECT: Environmental Impact for the Swallow Tail Subdivision Dear Mr. Mendonsa: At the December 1, 1982 meeting of the Board of Education, the Board reviewed the potential impact of the Swallowtail Subdivision and its potential impact on student housing. The Board was presented with data indicating the number of students who would be generated by this subdivision and also data for other subdivisions in this area which have previously been considered by the Board. You will note that in the case of the Swallowtail Subdivision that"the student`s generated from this subdivision, when combined with other subdivisions in the area, would place Rosedale Elementary School and Chico Junior High School 4.5 and 11 students beyond their respective capacities, Because of the potential impact on student housing, the Board took a position that it is recommending the Swallowtail Subdivision not be approved pending - agreement between Butte County and the school district on possible ways of financing for the housing of students in this area. Sincerely, + 1" Robin G. Thompsoni Business Manager/Co►►ptroller RGT,;vv ct! Robert Jeffries jettyo kircher t+ , c Phyllis Ftu;ssey ' Ivan McDowell 1 ,J. N1. Nrice Rt 1, Box 704' Rt. 2, Box 103 13715 South Carus Rd Oregon City, OR 970-45 ! Chaco, CA 95926 Chico, CA 95926 AP 43-26-1 AP 43-29-15 AP 43-39-4 Douglas Warnock !f J. Ward $ Lancia BaileyJ. & M. Keyser P 0 Box 1233 ` Rt 2, Box 198 828 Carr rove Court Chico, CA 95927 Chico, CA 95926 Chico, CA 95926 AI' 43-26-2 AP 43-29-16 ATS 45-39-5 riuriel Turner F. f, C. Ci apponi 1V. t, f,. Flegemier 498 E. Sacramento Ave I Chaco, CA 95926 �, Chico:, CA Rt 2, Box 194 95926 ►, T' 0Box 3771. Chico, CA 95927 AP 43-26-3 AP 43-29-59 Ai) 43-39-6,7,9 Douglas Grant Rt 2,, Bax 96 Wendy Brown 1438 Bidwell Avenue R. el F. Morgan 851 l` Carxove Court C111co, CA 95926 � Chico, CA 95926 Chaco, CA 95926 Ali 43.27-4 AP 43=29_91 r AP 4359-8 R. &A. Craig T. 11, & S. Ri Bailey D.B. & D. D Cargile Rt. 2 Box 98 Rt. 2, Box 198 Chico, CA 95926 811 Carrgrove Court Chico, CA 95926 Chico, CA 95926 AP 43-27-5 AP 43-29-92 AP 43-39-10 J, F, B. Flowers Dennis & Susie Durkin Big Chico Creek Est. Rt. 2, Box 99-F Rt4 2, Box 199-D Rt 2, Box 199 D Chico, CA 95926 Chico, CA 95926 Chico, CA 95`926 43 31 3'4 '5-13,24- AP 43-27 AP 43-29-96 AP -'-6 - ;33 Marion Spencer Michael Ward J. 6 D. Mattavish Rt. 2, Box 100 389-D Connors Ct. 832 St. Amant Dr. Chaco, CA 95926 I, Chico, CA 95926 Chico, CA 95926 AP 43-27-7 AP 43-29-97 AP 43-39-12 Halbert Jay y Viol.ot Quiring � G. $ L. Watters Rt. 2 Box 102 Rt. 2, Box 195 1425 Winkle Drive Chico, CA 95926 Chico, CA 95926 1 Chico; CA 95926 AP 43-27-8,43-29-12,1.5 �; AP 43-29-115 AP43-39-2,8 43-29-117 Richard Je5See H. & J. White x! 1 R. 5 F. Andersen 1.212 W Sacramento Ave Pebb'le�doocl•-�Pi.nes,f 3035 Top Mand Court Chir, CA 95926 Chico, CA 95926 Chico; CA 95926 AP 43-28-8 AP 0-20-1.1:8 AP 45439-29 L. & E. -Rudolph �� Guy Downing J. F L. Zi.mmers 1280 1V Sacramento Ave Rt 2, Box 196 Woodbridge Dr Chicon CA 95926 Chico, CA 95926 Chico, CA .95926 Chi CA9S AP 43=28-1.0,11 AP 43-29-119 AP 43r43-2 Marian Dill.ey Shastan Company Inca P. e, R Moore 82$ Karen Drive P. 0. Box 41.43 14.7 Scottsdale Ct. Chico, CA 95926 Chico, CA 95927 1 Chico, CA 95926 AP 45-28-12 AP 0-29.120 AP 43.45"-3 .� +y � " �i � 9 CL PLICATION FOR REZONING CU'Re CO, Plan"1110 Comm. BUTTE COUNTY PLh%%IHG COMMISSION NOV 15 1982 follow instructions as get f orth on reverse side of this, form. Orovillof CaWotnia APPLI,CANT'. Read and fo Phone No--, 891-0,132 JaV Halbert Applicant's Name Applicant's Mailing Address _jiegeral lane j�n ��ppjlcant,g in in propertl/ (owner, Lessee, Othel) g_ ±� O� ___pql=0132-- nersl"110 Phone N j n i I m,+,P.ri Part owner's Wtby owner's Address Parcel Number ber (S) 43-2-9-12 43-27-08 and a ort I 20 o Assessorsf A— SR REQUESTED ZONING Present Zoning Parr.E dimens-ons and size of area (s) to be'rezoned Location, dimensions WA nhl�itld - ---------- 4- -4- - 0*1 H 0 H reason's lot rezoning App flot, :3;x ta&ied sin le famil, I 10 t Ll Zlzl—t as am ------------ read 9116 understand tile instructions and that the foregoing p P I hereby declare under Penalty Of perjury that I have f� my knowledge and betlef true, complete and correct to the best 0 9 gtalemants are ey Dated Applicant"S 'OnOtut 6/ W AP, Number(g) Legal DescrIM1011 01 Cn ownership t IS Maps of Area Proof of, Agency (it needed) Present Zoning dGy 6� 2- �09- 6V ecalpt No. r L LL $ Date Application i'l ecamd 0 1,, Application 'taken by INSTRUTiONS TO REZONING APPLICANTS 1. If applicant is riot the owner, written authorization by the owner or ether proof of agency must be submitted in order for the applicant to legally sign the application. Application shall be considered void if not signed by the rwner or legal agent, 2. All items on application shall be Milled it as completely as possible, If an applicable, please indicate by the term 'NA'. itern is net 3. It is ver im ortaiit that tl,e application include an occur ate and of the property pn iposed for each requested zone. The application will note description until we receive the follouving information about the orea(s) to be rezoned - a. processed a. Assessor's parcel number (s) (from the tax bills or Assessor's Maps), b. Street addresses (if available). c, Distances and directions to named streets, bodies of water or railroads, d. Legal description (subdivision lot numbers, fractions of sections or distances and bearings of perimeter dimensions), e, 6 copies Of map with rezoning area(s) outlined (Assessor's map, subdivision map, zoning Pna ) or other map showing parcels), 4. Application on mustinclude a completed 'Appendix B•Gnvironmental Information Form'. 5: California Government Code Section 65500 at seq. requires local zoning ordinances to be consiste+lt with a jurisdiction's adopted ganeral plan, County approval of a rezoning request mutt be supported by findings of consistency with the Btte County General Plan. Applyants r1ay request changes in General Plan designationsuby filing an cation for (,eneral Plan Amendment'. 'Appli• G, The 'Applir:atiort for Rezoning' is subject to public hearings and approval by both the Planning Gornmission and Board of Supervisors, The procedures for County action on rezoning applications are stated in Chapter 24 of the Butte County Code, Wtfr 7, Application fees as of,, (dote) are $ Fees may be paid in cash or by check made payable to 'Treasurer of Butte County'. 8, all Before submitting a rezoning application,: applicant is requested to discuss with staff General Plans and the Provisions ofgex'istingrand requeuestionabout LItplication re,Countstedrocedurzon ng as, conclan fisistency with the cations. I Cuite Co. PiAnn ng co" Form No. 1o56.4 v .5 1982 All Policy Forma SCHEDULE C Oroville, Callfotnl, State of Califon -1 a and Is described as f011ow� l , The land referred to in this policy is situated in the S Countyof Butte shc>um on that certain Map entitled, "HOWARD BLOCK! Lots 1 and 2, as was recorded in the Office oo the 0RecondBook4 of Map6, atf which Map Butte, Stag of California, on March 1 page 29. • usu—=M�'.- Receipt # Proj ect APPENDIX E Duiie Co, Planning C*"O� Date Filed Environmental Information Form ON 16 198Z (To be completed by applicant) OrOVA104 Calljornifs GENERAL INFORMATION 1. Name and address of developer or project sponsor: JaV Hol,hort 8 tilif. 95926 C]x 102, Chiro, 2. Address of project: Rt. 2 Box lot Sacramgrltn Ave. Ghi Co CLI - Assessor's Block and Lot —Numboar n oF 43-29-15 3. Name, address, and telephone number of person to be contacted concerning this project: ia�/ Halbert -Ht- e) Box 102. Chiqn 891-0132 4, Type of project, (ie. rezoning, subdivision) Ragone from ASR to PAC 5, List and describe any other related perv, and other public project, inch those require approvals required for this prod by city, regional, state and federal agencies: sh end dame fl,arl-nit to wiity-storni dra.inacie into Chica !reek I 6. Existing toning district ' A -SR 7. Proposed use of site-. Small Single F3mil PROJECT DESCRIPTION 8. Site size. 20.74 Amis 9, Square footage of building(s). Five mOO815 rt-r'gtrlrl "Orn dbu ZO J.L. 10. acuare feet Number of floors of construction. 2 11, Amount of off-street parking, provided. four per unit unattachind homes attochod homes tu$o per ut%lit 12, Attach site development plan. 13, proposed scheduling, Build twn to FOUr uqidc1r, by junu 30s 1982, Remuln- a contruLt hasis OnIY- Inq horpL?$1 to be h1jilt,oil 14, Associated projects. N W18 15. Anticipated incremental development, revert phr3ses Appendix E - page 1 of 3 APPENDIX E 16. If residential,, include the number of units, schedule of unit sizes, and type of household size expected. 17. If commercial, indicate the type, whether neighborhood,, city �® or regionally oriented, square footage of sales area, and loading facilities. N/A 18, If industrial, indicate type, estimated employment per shift, andloading facilities. N/A 19, If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per shift, estimated occupancy, loading facilities, and community benefits to be derived fromthe project. N/A 20o if the project involves a variance, conditional uoo or rezoning' application, state this and indicate alt-arly why the application is , required. Rezone application to chsnrtr: from A-SRto Nlartnor.l Area Cli.isLor Are 'the following items applicable to'the project or its affects? Discuss below all items checked yes (attach additional sheets as necessary). YES NO. �X 21: Change in existing features of any beaches, lakes,, or hills, or substantial alteration of ground contours: X 22 Significant change in scenic views or vistas from ex sting residential areas or public lands or roads. X 23. Significantly change pattern, scale or character of general area of project. X 24. Significant amounts of solid waste or litter'. X 25. Change in dust, ash; smoke, fumes or odors in vicinity. r. X 26; Significant change :in lake, stream or ground Water quality or quantity, or alteration of existing drainage patterns. X 27. Substantial change in existing noise or vibration levels in the Vicinity, X 28. Site on filled land or on slope of 30 percent or store. X 29. Use or dispoual of potenti.al.l.y hntardous materials, such Las toxic substances; flami-nablas or explosives: 9 YES NO • X_ 30. Substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, 'sewage, etc.,). x 31. Substantially increase fossil fuel consumption (electricity, oil, natural, gas etc.). X 32. Relationship to part of a larger project or ser is of, projects. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING 33. beormation ontopography,soil before the project, including project it stability, plants and animals, and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on the sit:, and the Ube of the structures. 34. Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etcJ, intensity of land use (one -family, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc.), and scale of development (height, frontage, set -back, rear yard, etc.) CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements :furnished above -and in' the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability., and that the facts, statements, and information pzesented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Y'4 ter: ��,+/7C� Date l m r ..; +� „e r <. /(Signature) For Y�r ##1C��"C "���� .bj�.3�� Appendix E page 3 of 8 1 r All roilcy roar, SCHEDULE C Policy is situated in the State of California and i 1 1.✓ G Reul Falgte Development"z Cons"Ctio, Ff� Llcertse #382749 P.. O. Box 4143, Chico; CA 9592 9161891-0132 February 3, '1984 Zir. John 1-4endor4a Director of Public works County of Butte 7 w miry Center Drive (7rovi.11e, CA 95965 Re : Waterford Subdivision_ �`I_ °-`- Dear i. Jars ; tetter is to inform you that 54 Bradford Peear trees have been planted ".ibis of the Waterford No in calioar and 8' tall. The trees will an '23' centers along the westr>_xn.-mast brnm xn development. The trees measure 1 a' base 3 and Sutherland be irrigated by d.-�..�n system cAl�-rh will be ans�alled this s�n�nn�. '-ructidm an Waterfordphase 3 - 4 years we anticipate cora:.,, nc�scanxn� assures us that thetaW trees will %ave c o a sufficient eaflessnfor tem Ali hon,B radford Pear trees are, decid L'o , '�' o veer in Bid? Cha_cn monthr? i wintertime . Discuss an w th i ora epi Creek Estate s 1.1, indicated that this r_osed no problc , Very truly Yogis t A Z,n',MTED -P•ZRIERS141P BY,, SHASTM CCYPAW DTC, ? Sf uATIEPT p E5S � j5l q c J r... Auditor's of:Cice Dcave Kelly Planning; - El"vironment ,l Review 480-005 su��� 'CT: '1'7•nns fer Of B.I.R. Trost Funds n,rrrc I)coenibor 14, :1.08,5 ] J.eE�sc transfer .I't}1e fol owing funds Exam � Pund -11.:10 to the :foll.c�cv,Ln r lasted )lc� 13. 1. R. Trust �, revtrrttic account. ldaterford #J, Tentative Stil7ciil` ;iest AP 113-27-08, etc. I09, 53-00-16-0-3 Receipt # 675I •yC?0.0U - - _ 0 0 _617 202 21. Water.Ccyrc1 PA=C - - r AP 43-29 -12, etG. LUg # 82-11-15-02 X3:30 .Environ- Rev: e%v Receipt # 48379 - - - - $300.00 tO P-10 617702. Expense Accountin Fo For E . I . R -____ e araton and Subdiis7p PROJECT: Waterford PA -C n,i tial Studies 'I'Sitit , 43-27-08 �S� z 2,15, 1.:17 SUDDI�/TSIa�i Tl�I7I/�L STUDY EXPEPI5ES P �--- SS-3� 1_acJ 42_17-15-0? Professional & Specialized Services SS n i�)13 Staff Work completed: --------_ � hours @ $_ ho u r @-'-------� $---<- hours @ p$ Initial Study Total X 2 �.'. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT PREPARATION EXPENSCS; Professional F� Specialized Services^�` Staff Work completed: DE[ 1.2 ours � SASh o u rs`�'-----1 ` SEtS 14 3 4 hours @ 16:2 ..____rh o !� is @ $ 17.02 2,S --' --- Total X 2 111SCELLAtiEOUS EXPENSES $ 4 '$ 880.30 Typing costs @@ 8 Printing costs (Initialrer Spudy)(Initial Study) TYPing Costs @ 1.82Printing rinting costs Per' Page a'ft Typ(Draft g) is@$1.82 per page (Final EE•II.R.) )Printingcosts (Final E,I,Leg R.) Xeroxhces 3J2485 -----$ -G�.._iCirculation- (InitialStudy0praFtorFinal ' EIR $~ 2 0 Total Misc Expenses Administrative 0i�Orhead Cost ACTUAL TOTAL DEPIIEZT`hiEPl T EXPIa�`55 .�9f�$3 98.83 8? : Oa. $1,0,61 14 .k Total E,l.R Expenses Total Initial Study Expenses1 061 14 TOTAL A10UrJT aEF'tlITEO To DATE ---_" Amout to he to Amount Owed by Appl i can t tilt case of subdivisi $�� Visions, 7ncludbs actua n t of i't17'tia] study: Date BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING; DEPARTMENT ,n vision of Eiiv.i.ronme ital. 1jow Expense Accounting Form For E.I.R. Preparation and Subdivision Initial Studies Jay rralbert rr PROJECT: Waterford PA -C Ap# 43-29-12, etc. Log # 82-11_-1.5-02 SUBDIVISION INITIAL STUDY EXPENSES; Professional & Specialized Services Staff work completed: hours @ $ = hours @ $" =$ hours @ Initial Study Total X 2 $ Eh1VIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT PREPARATION EXPENSES. Professional & Specialized Services: $ Staff work completed: DH 8's hours @4 2 1 TS—.—U—YT —SAS hours @ $ 76.22 = __LT.06 SA513�-, hours @ $ 17 02. $ 225.52 hours @ $ =$ h1)ur5 @ $ =$ @ $ ,. �1U'1�i ti E.I . R. Total X 2 $ 360.65 =$^ 721.: S0 MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSES: Typing costs @ $1.82, per page (Initial Study) Printing costs (Initial Study) Typing Costs @ 1.82 perpage (Draft E.I.R.) 1 $ _1..82 Printing costs (Draft E.I.R.) $ 20.67 Typing costs @ $1.82 per page (Final E.I.R.) $ Printing costs (final E.I.R.) Xerox $ 56.64 Legal Notices 3/24/83 $1.6.50 Circulation - (Initial Study, Draft or Final EIR) $�` Total Misc Expenses $ 98.83 =,$ 98,85 Administrative Overliead Cost 62 Or' ACTUAL TOTAL DEPARTMENT EXPEPISES $ 902.141 Total EiI.Ri Expenses $ 902,14 Total Initial Study Expenses $_ TOTAL AMOUNT DEPOSITED TO DATE $ 300.00 Amount to be Refunded $ Amount Owed .by Applicant $ _ 602-1.4 (In the case of subdivisions; includes actual cost of initial Date 7 2' 14 85 study}) BUTTE CO'UN'TY PLANWINd DEPARTMENT I)`v. s:i on of lMV3.V011mental lZ olv 0 Elense Accountinn Fo For E.I.R.Preparation and SubdivisionTnitial Studies shastan Co �� PIOJEC'f: 1y,it,orf'orcl ala AP�� -2J-1.;,1:1.7 �a Loci # 83-09-16-03---- - c -- SIJBDIVISION INITIAL STUDY EXPENSES; Professional & Specialized Services: $ Staff work completed:___.__,.. hours hours Ct $ - hours Initial Study Total X ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT PREPARATION EXPENSES: Professional & Specialized Services: Staff work completed: D14 3'zif o1;,s�� q7�-- — S As 11- hours @ _1,7. 02hours @ hours -» �'i.nurs @ E;I.R. Total X 2 MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSES Typing costs @ ;1.82 per page (Initial Study)_ Printing costs (Initial study) Typing Costs @ 1.82 per page (Draft E.I.R.) Printing costs (Draft E.I;R,) Typing costs 0 $1.82 per page (Final E.I.) R `) P $ r i n t� n g costs (Final n a l E. I. R. ----- $� ..---: Legal Noticos Circulation - (Initial Study, Draft or Filial Elk) Total Misc Expenses $ �r LCT LI TO'T'AL DEPARTMENT EXPLNSE5 Total E .I . R. Expenses `I Sri. no Total Initial Study EXperlses $ TOTAL AMOUNT OtPOSITEU 1'O DATE $�no, o Amount to be Amount Owed refunded by Appl i cant $_ __.__ �..�w4._. 731 , 00 'fo bo a,plO ied to VA -G 83- (In the case: of subdivisiot)s, yO inc1ud0$ acf, �'"'° u�i1 cost o� 1nitial study,) LA I Pan X �r."'"`` n LAUD OF NATURAL WEALTH PLANNING COMMISSION 7 COUNTY LINTER DRIVE -• OROVILI F, CALIFORNIA OP05 PHONE! 534-4x111 De- ccmbo.r 14 , 1983 Jay Halbert t Route 2 Box 102 Cil i:co, CA 95926 RE: Financial Accounting and. Billing Waterford PA -,C 83-39 Waterford 411 Tentative Subdivision, AP 43-27-08, etc.. Dear NIT Halbert IVe have compl.cted the processi.».g of the onvi.romnontal nevi My documents for the above-named, projects. The PA -C for Waterford 1vas approved. by the Board of Supervisors on. Aue,ust 23, 19.83. The Tentative Subdivision Mip for Waterford #1 was approved by the B.ttte County Advisory, Agency on October 24, 1,953. 11r cce;ssi.ng costs incurred by this department are detailed on the 4t'tachod form. Since thoso co ;ts "" cood'ed .the amount deposited, wo tivoulct appreciate yoU;r rem tt:inn the balance dile of $371.:14. Tii,ank you for your attention in rhis matter. if wo, can lir of ;Curthcv assistance, please c,otlt0r*t this office. SinceToly B. A. URCIlBlt I)il'ecto'r of, planll-ing �t i�lie7 A. Strcotol* Senior PJ a,nner $AS : 1.1,,t Eric, ccs; A e1 Q F.119111LIt.rin ORDINANCE NO. 2369' � i' AN ORDINANCE ZONING A POR'T'ION OF THE COUNTY OF BUTTS:, i SIATE OF CALIFORNIAA PA -C (P ANNED AREA CLUST}'R) I DISTRICT, PURSUANT TO CHAPTIIR 24-29. 1 The Board of Supervisors of the County of Butte, State oLI .` California: under and pursuant to Chapter 24-29 of the Butte County "Code of said County DO ORDAIN, as follows: SECTION 1. The hereinafter described area situatod in ;r 5 tlic aunty of-BButte, State of California, shad L be and it iF hereby C 6 I zoned ,ns a PA -C (Tanned Arca-Cluster) District, and such area. shall. 7 be subject to the restrictions, restricted uses atd regulations ; 8 11 pursuant to Butte 'County Code Section 24-126: 9 10 1.1 12 15 14 16 20 21 22 23. 2 25 26 Said area so zoned being located . the unincorporated area of Butte County, Chico, more particularly described as follows All that certain real property situ8to in the Count)' of Butte, State of California, described as follows A portion of Lot 14, as shown on that certain map entitled "Map of the Second Subdivisian of the John Bidwell Rancho, near Chico, Butte County, California" which map was filed in the office of the Recorder of the County of Butte, State of California, September 17, 1900, in Book 5 of Maps at Page 27, more parijcularly described as follows; Beginning at the MV corner, of said Lot 1.4, being a common corner of Lots 14, 150 16, and 17 of said Second Subdivision thence N 890 51' 59" B a distance of 330, 00 f 4 thence S 0' 1.8 29'' B a distance of 1154:22 ft, thence S 690 30' 21," 'N, a distance of 17853 ft.; thence S 890 59' 07" IV, a distance of 163.,91 ft, thence N a distance of 1.215,98 ft. to the point of beginning: Being a d�.�rsionPt of the John Bidwell ts 13 14 o,I' the SeGontt. Sub + oRancho, 3.r) Section 28, T22N RIE NID13 ,Nt described as follows, as shown on that certain paTeel map recorded in the ,office of the Recorder of tho County of Butte, State ; `;alifornia, on October 8, 1981 in Boob 86 of parcel. I at Pago 35 and 36, Containing 20,74 acres, more or less, Chico, (8'3"30`) �1� II �1 I ff' I� SECTION 2. The use and development of said property sha.l.li 2 ibe in accorcl with the development plan submitted by the applicant, 3 :�as conditioned and incorporated herein by reference. Said condi- 4 �,tionecl development plan collectively consists of the following ! ,I ,5 j!documents 6' 7 8 9 10 11 11 13 14, 15 16 17 18 19 20 9i 228 23 24 25 26 Exhibit (A) Development Plan (showing the location of buildings, streets, parking, future recreation facilities, road t template and other major features of the project, fire hyd.ra.nt location plan, and street lighting plan.) SECTION 3. Notwt.1thstanding the provisions of Chapter 24- 126 of the Butte County Code the following provisions shall govern � the use and development of said property: i (a) The dwellings as shown on the development plan shall be limited to residential uses and activities; and (b) The storage ;of materials and objects around the residential dwellings an, recreational facilities as shown on the development plan shall be limited to those which are necessary to, appurtenant to and customarily associated with the residential and recreational use of -t e development; and , (c) The height of all principal structures as shown on the development plan shall not exceed a height of two (2) stories or 35 feet; and (d) The keeping of livestock including horses and the development of stable's shall be prohibited, and (e) Signs shall be limited to an identification of the development not to exceed two (2) in number with a maximum size of 2 8 ed for sale, the developer shall establish a homeowners association 9 to be responsible for the maintenance and upkeep of the utilities, 10 roads, and all othler property owned in common. The developer shall 11 assume 'responsibility for the unsold, remaining memberships until. 12 such time as the homeowners association can reasonably assume the 13 financial responsibilities for the maintenance and upkeep of the 1.4 utilities, roads and all other real. 'property owned in common. To 15 ensure that the homeowners association is adequately formed to meet 1.6 these responsibilities, the developer shall submit copies of said 1.7 homeowners association agreement to the Butte County Planning 1.8 bepartment for review and approval pr;or to the recordation of any Y9 subsequent map authorizl.ng the sale of any real property in cony 20 junction with this development. 21 SECTION S ♦ This Ordinance shall be and it is hereby 22 declared to be in full force and effect from and after thirty (3O) 23 days after the date of its passage, and before the expiration of 24 .fifteen (15) days after its passage, this Ordinance shall be 25 published once with the names of the members of the Board of 26 Supervisors voting for and against it in the Ctlica Enterprise, a r ? 50 square feet each, except that signs advertising the devel opme,t t 2 �and sale and/or rEital of units may be permitted until 85 percent 3 , of the dwellings are sold and/or rented or until a period of five 4 ,; S� years has elapsed whichever is fit`st. The developer shall be 5 ,Iresponsible for the removal of all signs associated with the sale 6 l land/or ,rental of said property, 7 1 SECTION 4. In the event the residential units are offer-, 8 ed for sale, the developer shall establish a homeowners association 9 to be responsible for the maintenance and upkeep of the utilities, 10 roads, and all othler property owned in common. The developer shall 11 assume 'responsibility for the unsold, remaining memberships until. 12 such time as the homeowners association can reasonably assume the 13 financial responsibilities for the maintenance and upkeep of the 1.4 utilities, roads and all other real. 'property owned in common. To 15 ensure that the homeowners association is adequately formed to meet 1.6 these responsibilities, the developer shall submit copies of said 1.7 homeowners association agreement to the Butte County Planning 1.8 bepartment for review and approval pr;or to the recordation of any Y9 subsequent map authorizl.ng the sale of any real property in cony 20 junction with this development. 21 SECTION S ♦ This Ordinance shall be and it is hereby 22 declared to be in full force and effect from and after thirty (3O) 23 days after the date of its passage, and before the expiration of 24 .fifteen (15) days after its passage, this Ordinance shall be 25 published once with the names of the members of the Board of 26 Supervisors voting for and against it in the Ctlica Enterprise, a �a er Published in the County of Butte, 'State of California. 1 ;1 newsl , p � 2 PASSED AND ADOPTED lay the Board of Supervisors of the 4 August, !. 3 +� County of Butte, State of CaJ,a.£orna, on the 23rd day of Aug 4 1983; by the foll,01%,ing vote; I 5 fIAYES Supervisors Fulton, SaracOni, Wheeler and Chair rk)lan 6 ► NOLS ; None 7 ABSENT: supervisor Moseley NOT VOTING; None 9 CeIA iairu --- ]� Hoard of Supervisors 11 ATT> ST 12 MARTIN J. NICHOLS, Chief Administrative (Officer and Clerk of the Board of 13 pervi o`r , 1 ].7 19 2 0II 21 II 2 2 13 2 25 I 26 I _4w Inter-Departmental Memorandum _7Ot, Butte County Assessor's Office FROW Butte County :Planning Department SUBJECT! Jay Halbert DATE% September 21 1983 ant Section 653 863.5 of the Government Code, the m arcels identified: as 43-27"`08, 429 Puxsu following PA= /n 43-27?_ s�(«as/jgere ..Sp, to PA-C, zoning district.. X Rezone from Granted a variance to Issued a conditional use permit for ------------ cc i �P x�ere..Qiea: r APPENDIX H A, NOTICE OF DE'TERNMINATTON TO ©Secretary for Resources :1416 Ninth Street, Room 13:11 L KE' F Sac*ramcnto, CA 958.111 U County Clerk, County of Butte AUG 3 Q 1983 25 County Center Drive Orovil;l.e, CA 95965 ELEANOR M. BECKER, County Clerk FROM: Planning _Department By _� CdAIO-QPfST Deputy 7 Coun*v Center Di ive ( iloci) Orovillc, CA 95965 SUBJECT: Filing of Notice or Determinatiori in Coinplionco with Section 21108 or 21152 o.f the Public Resource;: Coclo _ 82-11-15-02 —A3-39 Project Title AP 43-29-12,15 Jay 11,o bort Rezone from A -SR to PA -'C 43 7-08 Wato.l".(CjLd _, State Clearinghouse Number (If submitted to State C10,.1171nghouse) 79080708, Contact person Telophope N. ' ^r B. A. Kircher,Plannin Director .(916) 834-4601 Proj,.�ct Location Approximately 900 feet west of Oak I,awri Avenue, o', the south side of West Sacramento Avenue., Chico. Project Description; Re2one :From A=SR to PA -C of 20.74 acres to alloid a 98 unit residential development. This is to advise that the Butte County Board Of SuUervi.sors (Lead Agency) has made the following determinations regarding the above-described project, 1 The project F-� will have a significant effect on the environment. FE will not 2. An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA, and was certified as required by Section 15085(8), 14 California Administrative Code. A Negative Declaration was prepared for this proj ect pursuant to the provisions of CEQA, A copy of the Negative Declaration may be examined at the planning Department, 7 County Center Drive, Orovill.e CA 95965: 3. A Notice of Exemption was filed indicating this project is exempt from environmental review. 4. A statement of. Overriding Consideration i�" L�J Jas, � was not; adopted for this project, 54 Mitigation measures adopted by the Lead Agency to reduce the impacts or the approved project r See attached 619lyatLlo Stephen A. Streeter A ugust 24, l98� j ' Senior Planner Date TY.tle r NIitigation Measures AP 43-29-72,15 43-27-03 Wnter.Card I Underground utilities are to be provided to e,,ch lot in tho subdiv .slon. Retain some of the almond trees to sLipp lement landsC,'Ping on the lots Verify that the storm dr lin system, for Big Chico Creek Eb k ites Unit, #3 is adequate to handle the increased drainage from t:l1..s subdivision. Provide protection Of Big Chico Creel: against runoff discharges during period of loin creek :Clow such as summer flows. Maintain the dry wells (or other means of water quality protection) Or a yearly basis. 3. Utilize the following measures, as necessary, to reduce cox- st*ucti:on impacts: a) Watering to prevent dust, b) Restrict construction -related vehicles to the main streets, c) Limit working hours to the daytime. 4. Building permits for residences ;will be subject to any school mitigation fees established by Butte County Ordinance enacted, Prior to the filing of applications for building permits unless a Community Facilities Act of 1982 District is created, pursuant to California Government Code Section 53311, et. sec{., covering the project area, prior to the issuance of any building permits. S. Provide a permanent solution for drainage, including the pro- tection of downstream properties which. may be affected by surface water runoff generated from this development, Verify that the flood -carrying capacity of Big Chico Croek is adequate to accommodate the projected amount of runoff at buildout, 6. Contribute pro rata share toward traffic signal at the inter- section of West Sacramento Avenue and Highway y 32 or agx..se to future inclusion within a traffic assessment d"IstricIt �f created by the Board of Supervisors for such purposes. t if)R�y 4T -c-r ,L4rY 'k,,y M ^a ,r„�� , C+1Y G✓.W 18N i�CvSi f COUNTY ADMINISTRA`l"Ivs OFFICE Administration Cooler 25 County Canter Drive Oroville, Caiiforniii 06965 Au�gUSt 24, 1983 Jay Halbert Route 2, Box 102 Chico, Ca. 95926 Re: Rezone File 83-39 Dear Dir. Halbert At the regular meeting of the Butte County Board Of Supervisors held August 23, 1983, Ordinance 2369 was adopted which rezones from A -SR to PA -C 20.74 acres to allow a 98 unit residential development on property located approximately 900 foot west of Oak Lawn Avenue, on the south side of West Sacramento Avenue; identified as AP 43-27-08, 43-29-1.2 and 43,-29-15 (portion) , Chico, subject to the following conditions - 1. Submit road and drainage plans to the Department of public Works for approval and install the required facilities 2, Provide 20 -ft. radius property line returns at all street intersections S. Provide right-of-way for standard No S-5 at all street intersections: 4. Indicate a 50 ft6 building setback line from the centerline of Sacramento Avenue, So Street sign! shall be provided by the developer at all street intersections per County requirements. (8tibmit five alternate street names for each street to the County address coordinator for approval of street hdmes. 6. Doed 30 ft from the Centerline of Sacramento Avenue to the County of Butte. 7. Construct one-half street section on Sacramento Ave:, to RS -3-A road standard with vortical curb; gutter, and slaewal,k and V AC, 8" AB, 5C 250 prime, fog seal and 950 relative compaction. Construct full street section on gll interior streets to section shown on tentative map. 1 r .TaY Na] bort Page -2- August 24 1953 • $= Provide monuilaentatio» as required by the Lie Works in accordance with accepted btaalcl?z D parlularr� of Public 9* S t"O t . grades and other featu7•es shall. Comply County Ordi.n��inces, design resolut:ion anti other cerin � p y with the $tine g standards. accented eng.l}tw 10 Provide permanent solution for drama c- 11, S 1 easements of record to be shown on the fi,na,7. 12, I�}`,et the ret{uxrements of the Butte ntap. other respons,ib.le agency. County Fire llcpartment oy, 13. Street lighting g shall be provided in ;ir County requi accepted 'dance with Butte tions of PC4i; pted design criteritr, and recommender 14. P��.1 Off assessments 15. Hoet t( 16 17. 1S. 19, 20, 21. 22; Pacifre requlreme,zts of the utility companies Ci, e, ic Telephone, water, seer,) PGiap> Pay any delinquent taxes. File a tentative and Final subdivision s map feeand pay appropriate Developer shall eluding stop sigPsovide all required traffic safety r y signs, in Meet requirements of Butte County Environme Provide 2 ntal Health Department off=street parking spaces per dwelling units, ibdivis1on, Rs . Underground trtl utilities are to be sl provided to each lot in the lGndsca in v twin some of the almond trees to p g n t}e lots, supplement Vera f .r y that the storm drain. system for Bi Unit is adequate to handle the increased drainage subdivision. 1 ,g Chico Creek Estates Provide protection of Big nage from this runoff discharges durin flows; g period of iotvgcChico Creek against Maintain the dry we11s or reek flow protection) on,a other means of such as summer yearly basis. water quality ,r wy Jay Halbert Page -3 August 24, 1983 23. Utilize the following measures, as necessary, to reduce con- struction impacts; a) Watering to prevent dust, b) Restrict construction -related vehicles to the main streets, c) Limit working hours to the daytime. ,. 24. Building permits for residences will be subject to any school. 111itigati,on :trees estab'l fished by Butte County Ot~d i nance enacted prior to the filing or applications for building permits unless a. Community Facilities Act of 1932 District is created, pursuant to California Government Codo Section 53311, et. seq., covering the project area, prior to the issuance of any building permits. 254 provide a permanent solution for drainage, including the protec- tion of downstream properties which may be affected by surface water runoff generated from this development. Verify that the flood -carrying capacity of Big Chico Creek is adequate to accom- modate the projected amount of runoff at buildout. 26. Contribute pro rata share toward traffic signal at the inter- section of West Sacramento Avenue and Highway 32 or agree to future inclusion within a traffic a-ssessment district if created by the Board of Supervisors .for such purposes. 27: There will be a 30 ft. building setback Line from the westerly boundary line adjacent to Big Chico Creek estates. 28. The development on westerly lots not to exceed l 1/2 story residences. 29. Planting of tree�3 along westerly boundary of Big Chico Creek tstates to be maintained in a living condition and to be planted immediately. 30 Applicant must also comply with all other applicable State and local statutes, ordinances and regulations Should you have any questions, please contact this office. Sincerely, Martin J. Nichols Chief Administrative Officer and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors biJN1r cc A 8 Q Engineers 1280 tact 9th St., Chico. I BUTTE COUNT' PLANNING CORMISSION N�TTBiB I Notice is hereby given by the Butte County Planning Commission that heriwill be heir) on '1`huTsday, duly 21, 1983 in the Butte public hearings County aof ill visors' Room, Administration Center•, 25 C.�.)unty Center Drive, Orovi Jlle California, regarding the following items at the following times'. 7;55 P -M- Jay HAlbeTt w Rezone fvom "A -SRI' (Agri.cultutai - Suburban Pwsi.dential.) to "kA -C41 (planned Area Cluster) of 20.74 acres to allow a 98 unit 'resident;i.al devel.opynQnt on pxapext; locatod approximately goo feet west of Oak 'Lawn. Avenue, an tilde sough side of lvest Sacramento Avenue q identified as AP 43-27-08, 43-29-12, and 43-29-15 (poTta,an) more part Cul.asly described AS: All that certain real ptopertg. situate in theCounty of � Butte. State of California. descmi.bed as follows: n on that certain map entitled A portion of Lot14, as shown t�ron of the John gi,dwell Rancho, tap of the Second Subdivision visa Haar Chico,, , liuttr County q. Cttli.r orna a q °' which map was filed in the office of the Recorder of the County of Butte, State Of California q September 1.7 , 3 900 q ata Book 5 of Maps 'Page 27, more particularly described as follows Beginning at the NW cornea, of said Lot 14 being a commnn corner of Lots 140 15, 16, and 17 of said Second SubdivisiOl thence N 89" 510 S9" E a di stance of 330,00 ftp ; thence S 0 180 ?g+r Ba rli.starace of 11.54 .z2 ft ; thence 5 fig°Q 210 Via a ditt.anco of 178.53 ft . ; thence S 89® 59' Q7" 1f o a. dis,4.atce of 1.68457 ft:. thence i3 a distance Of 123.5.98 ft to the point of beginning. Being a portion. of Lots 13 and 14 of the Second Subdivision of the Foran Bidwell.µ Ranchot in Semi 011 28t T22N Alt MUNI described as f6110118 Pa�cel 1, sv shown on that certail9 Parcel. 'Map t0cdrded in the Cff ce of the Recorder of the count)'? of Butte q State e of +' i.fox'ni.a on Octobor so 1041 in Doolt 56 of F'atcel. 14P$ at page 515 and 56 Containjn,g 20.74 Acres, more or losso Chaco (Pa. e 3w :15r. y p.ma Butte Count Board of Supervisors Referral back to the ,...-]RIanaaing Cmimissi.on for public hearing for consideration and recommendation to the Board of Supervisors of sewage di.sposa", Y . , Methods thai would be a.1teTnate to hook -tip or the Catty sewer for the following project: Johns Shelton and mill St. Clair - Rezone from A -SR (Agricultural Suburban Residential) and SR -1 (Suburban Residential - acre pa cols) to PA, C (Pl9nned Area Cluster) to allow the development of a 328 unit residential develop- ment Of 85 acres on Property located on 'both skies of. Sycamoro Creek, on tho north side of Eaton Road, approxi— mately 200 feet east of State Highway 99, identified as AP 44-04.100, 3.41, 10?, Chicoo (82-19) The above mentioned app3lzations, maps, negative re ort , and environmental impact reports are on file and availa�10 for public Viewing at the office oi the Butte County Planning Department, 7 County Cantor Drive; Orovilld o California. Environmental Impact Reports are al.r.1, available at college and comity libraries BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMISS.ION go A6 KIRCHER, DIRECTGI,OF PLaANN11,1G TO BE PUBLISHED ITS THE CHICO ENTERPRISE RECORD ON THURSDAY, JULY 7t 1983. F,) REZONE REPORT APPLICANT: J8.y Halbert Waterford Subdi'vision PA -C OWNER; Tan 101vood, A Par tile rsll7.p _ REQUEST.- -.Rezone :f r o rn A- SR (AgricUl tural -Suburban -loos i c1011 t; i 11 ] to PA -C (Planned Aroa-Cluster LOCATION: On the south side of, 1Vest SacrY7►nen.to Av enuc, aPPr�a°irnatel.y 900 foot west Of Oak Lawn Avenue, oil the �artit sicicof Chy------ •.. DATE ACTION REQUESTED: 11/82 •------:- AP Nos, 43-29-•7:2, 45-27-08 f 1�ort7.on PLANNING COMMISSION FINDINGS: o:; Acreage: 20:711 a:erc�s A. Note that the r ecliliremerits of the C�tI iforrxanv arime'nta CC-EQA,) have been completed and considered in ntal:inr C1 Q�iality pct €, th7,s decision, and note that the pretiritats B'IR was certified by the l3o.orcl of Su e C p iv'isors on B. • 1�i.nd that ;t4" ro �oseci e ,f te:�t and ma ol` the T3utt� Count, Ge11era 1 P7 PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: C . Recommend that the hoard o1" Su �er�risors ar acres to PA -C Pot, A ; Npsove the rezone of 20._74 . 43 -2P -`i.2 4.5-7,7-08 crtici a •�ort:•ti.on _of �1S-2D-75. VOTE.- 0 AYES Conrrtr5 ss i onel•s Avis; �Scl�rader NOESi Bennett Behunill, Umber Kt1� l t;iio7.tm:n No one ABSENT; rlo one ABSTAIN: NO one DATE OF LAST HCARING WITH PLANNING COMMISSION Ju1� 2:[ � t 1983 SUPPLVMENT TO ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT for BIG CHICO CREEK ESTATES STIBDIVTSInN and including WATERFORD SU'3DIVISION PA-C AP 943-29-12 43-27-08 43-29-15 Project Applicant' Jay Halbert Prepared by: McCain Associates Po 0. Box 2178 Chico, California 95927 Y February; 1983 Reviewed by'- Butte y:Butte County Planning Department 7 County Center Drive Orovlle California 95965 Revised: March 1983 Revised. May 1983 Revised: Jane 1983 planning # 83=39 SCH 79080708 (Big Chico Creek Estates Subai.vis ion Log, #82-11-15=02 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page SUMMARY . . . . . . DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT . . . . v• . . . • . . . . •' • 2 A) Location . . . . . . . 2 2 B) Description, . . . . . . i C) A Statement ofObjectives Sought by the Proposed• Project• • • . . . . . . . . . 2 D) General Description of the Project's Economic, Technical and Environmental Characteristics, considering the Principal Engineering Proposals 2 RELATIONS81P WITH OTHER DEVELOPMENTS IN THE AREA . 9 DESCRIPTION OF ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING . . . • • • 4 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT OF THE PROPOSED ACTION TOPICS Or, 4 PRINCIPAL CONCERN . . . : . . . • . • - , . . . . 1 . . A) New Residential Units in an Agricultural. Area . . 4 5 B) Riparian Vegetation and Orchard Trees • • ,. • . 5 C) Water Quality Degradation in Big Chico Creek . . . . . . 5 D) Sewage Dispos�ll Methods . . . . E) Potential Loss of Agricultural Production.,,nd Land . . • 6 F) Increased Population Effects on C.U•S.D. & C.A.R.D. 6 G) Traffic • . . i . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 H) Water Quantity Impact . . • . ANY ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS WHICH CANNOT BE i'N70I ED 1F 7 THE PROPOSAL IS IMPLEMENTED . • _ + • • . . • MITIGATION MEASURES PROPOSED TO MINIM ADVERSE IMPACTS . . � ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT • • $` GROWTH INDUCING IMPACT OF 'TIE PROPOSED ACTION . . _ i 9 ORGANIZATIONS, PERSONS AND REFERENCES CONSULTED . . : • 10 APPENDIX A . .. . . . . E1nyIvx,ironmental. checklist Form (Butte County) t{r APPENDIX13 i i' i i f , i i • i i i i • : . i i 1 Y i 1, • i • l��Il2 lOr the 11 g Clgc;o Creek pst:atos Tentatl'..Ve Ltbdivis�ony SCIA #70080708 i 11)? A2=i5-3! �, 7, �1; �27�01 �i i2, 45.29-19 Vi 22 l.octi'l. and sate a noes anL upon �.otluest, (-,ropwardOd to refer to Section 1.5067:5(4) of the UQA Guidol:l,nos) APPENDIX C piscal Impact Aft-gjysls - Aptil VM -5 Cor re spondionce : r dt11 S1 Atte Clea ringhouso 1208ponsc to COTTespondefitc:e , CoTrespondlonce �t'TOM P011t, ol- Public Works t5utte, I County SU MARY The purpose of this suppl.emen.tal env ralm ental imp,'qct report is to explore the potential significant effects of this 98 lot PA -C residential, si,�,divis on that were not examined in the Big Chico Creek Estates Subdivision Enviroi�ntal Impact Report. This development ent to creates 98 detached singleve lin feet 20,587 0 , 587est acres Highway ac he West Sacramento Avenue approximately density equates to 4.76 units per acre which is in corLfolTr 1C0 with the General. Plan's low density designation for the area. There will be dual accesses to the subdivision off of West Sacrarento Avenue. The interior roadway system wi.l oconsist cod forffuttuurea] loops and short cul -desacs. Two access ways are p access to the east ultimately connecting with West Sacratwnto Avenue. The interior roadways will be private. Road widths will primarily be 34 feet, with some xoackaay and cul-de-sacs at 24 feet in Hridth, Envirorxmcntal umacts discussed in this supplemental report include the effect's of storm water runoff, water quality in Big Chico Creek, sewage disposal, loss of agricultural land to production, traffic impacts, and the effects on the school district and C,A,R.D. Currentlythere have been three subdivisions approved in this area totalling 283 lots. APProval of this project will bring the total to 381 residential dwelling 'X"ts . The subdivisions are listed below 1: This prof �- project Waterford Subdivision - PA C, 98 units; 2. Big Chico Creek Estates (170 lots) 450 feet West of ths�project 3, Walnut Woods (73 lots) across West Sacramento Avenue northilest of Big Chico Creek Estates. 4. I e surewood Estates (40 lots) North of Walnut Woods on Oak Way. proposed stibdivis on are discussed, several alternatives to the p e lots and 7lese include no Project, standard subdivision lot: large alternate design :for this project, t DESCRIPTION or, PROJECT A) to Cation: The project evolves the development �- Wes t: Sacramento Avenue and Bidwell Avenue a pmant of 20,.87 acres between Oak Larhnn Avenue PPmX-mately 750 Alet Tiest of B) Description: The project proposes creation of 98 sing'.e_ri)IIILIy units The site is designated as A:,sessor s dwelling Nos: t and 43,29-15, The area is presently zoned A -SR, Agricult� r.,,'1 Suburban -27-08 29� Residential.units pee acre), General Plan ro • design d, es the area as %aw I�'Itlity Residential Plan: ,ihe project site presently has one-singleect fano lIs in �tLy with the General untended 60 -year old almond orchard, Y rC45idence and is an C) A Statement of nt, e:,�•�; ,_. �e objective Of family residential, units on 20,587 acres, allosed 88 acresidential, Plan edt is to create 58 �le- Cluster concept. This rdl1 result in an average densi of Area - per grc.)ss acre, ty 4.76 duelling units D) General 1. Economic Cons`i,deration; The project i mmlVes development of a 98 unit Planned that a cid foresveloper' ha:, undertaken a market ,analysis and determined is Area u type of clevel0a. hent exiis Years to lYldeSsigned. it is estimated that Project will take. ts on the Chico area L� oto Construction employment will be provided through term of development. Estimated cost of construction for the entire project _ the is $9,000;00? excluding land costs, 'he follow �,n estimates for the project; g .mates are made of the: economic factors I i,nership pf cVaa�l e of dwelling units, including underlying land and $128,000 to 458000 x 98, Vor 98 cbmiling units the following figure is derived; 98 x 143,000 (median Value) Total Value = $14,0140000 ^A fiscal clysis hasbeen pz'epar'd by a representative for the `Ihi:s analysis is available, applicant -2 r [king a market value of $14,000,0008nd a County tax rate of 1� of market value, the property taxes raLurned to .the County would be approximately 514,000 a year at coMpletion of the Project. Additional revenues may be realized in the future by special taxes or bond payments which may be applicable. The existing almond trees on the site have been neglected for several years. The ache of the trees (50-60 years old) affects the crop production and present production is nagl Bible. In order to bring this land into commercial production, Lhe orchard must be replanted entirely. It is estimated that it Mould be approximately seven years before a significant yield could be realized, The general area is known for the pretence of Oak Root Fundus which can be severely damaging to almond orchards. Commercial orchard production would be possible, though difficult:, given the land use incornpatibil,ities which could result. 2. Technical Consideration a) 98 new residential units w.LLI becreated, re- taining the streets and common °areas under joint ownership, b) Sewage disposal will be provided by on-site septic tanks and conventional leach fields. Service Co. Inc. C,) Water will be provided by California Water d) Sacramento Avenue will be reconstructed to Centerline to County Standards (R82 -A) along the project frontage. Emergency access will be constructed between the project and Bidwell Avenue. e) Storm drainage will be 'collected in an under- ground system and directed to Big Chico Creek. The creek serves as a drainage collector for several developments upstream from this project as well as for three developments downstream. 3. Environmental Consideration! a) The project will require removal of a small amount of riparian vegetation in Big Chico Creek to accommodate the storm drain otitfall.. b) The project will. provide 98 residential units and wilwl provide an increase in traffic on West Sacramento Avenue and State Route 32 c) The project will be low density residential it an area which is primarily low density residential. There area few untended orchards in the immediate vicinity of the project. Several nearby parcels are larger than one acre in slze -3- d) The project will provide storm drainage for the Project only and will not drain areas to the North or West, There is. a possibility of degradation of the water duality in Bin Chico Creek with storm drainaqe runoff. e) The project's sewage disposal method will be by septic tank and conventional leach fields. f) There will be a loss of potential agricultural production and agricultural land. G) The proposed increase in�aovulation may adversely effect the capacity of Chico Unified School D?strict's existing facilities. Area The proposed increase in population. may adversely effect the Chico ea Recreation District's ability to provide recrea- tional :services. i) The additional storm water runofL that will be directed to 'Big Chico Creek may contribute to downstream flooding problems Each of these considerations is addressed in detail as a supplemental topic of principal concern. RELATIONSHIP WITH OTI•IER DEVELOPMENTS IN THE AREA -There are several other residential development$ in the area. New subdivisions, such as Wa'nut Tloods, Birk Chico Creek Estates and Leisurewood Estates, are developing as single-family homes. These are located westerly and northerly of this project; Several apartment complexes have been built'easterly and northeasterly from the proposed project. This project, although more dense than the new ..subdivisions, is considerably less dense than the apartment complekes. The project will act as a buffer zone between the two types of development. An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for Bic Chico Creek Estates which addressed many of the 'PlPacts that occur when development is implemented in agricultural a 01reas (Loa 478-12.21 DESCRIPTION OF ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING Refer to ,"appendix A in this 'report, the Butte County En viroh riental Checklist, and the Sig Chico Creek Estates 8,1.R. for information-eUardinq the envitonmental setting, ENVIA0nhMENTAL IMPACT OF T14E PROPOSED ACT100 TOPICS 01.1 .PRINCIPAE CONCERN A) New Residential Units in, an Agricultural Area: Construction of y 98 new residential units May have an the immediate vicinity, of the project are untended and old, s in a verse 'm act on a ricultural areas nearby. The almond orchard M This development may encourage further development in orchards which presently have a minimal economic yield. The addition of 98 dwellincl units in this area will bring an estimated population increase of 228 persons, based upon 2.33 persons per dwelling unit. Since the land in question presently harbors no population, this is a Oi nifica.nt increase. An estimated 5.. children can be expected to attend Local schools, with approximately 36 children enrolling at Rossdale Schoc)l.. Accordincr, to Chico Unified School W strict officials, Rosedale Scl't()cal `s capacity will be exceeded by proposed developments that have already been approved by Butte County and the City of Chico. B) Riparian Vegetation and Orchard Trees.: Riparian vegetation alona the banks of, RiR Chico Creek. is a significant wildlife habitat in the area. This project would destroy a small portion of that habitat with the introduction of a The storm drainage outfall structure in the north bank of the creek. native berry and drape vanes in the area should quickly grow over the structure. The outfall pipe diameter will be 30" or less. The present orchard trees have no economic value other than as firewood. The trees do, however, have some esthetic value and the developer will make every effort to preserve' and incorporate the trees into the project landscaping,. C) water duality Degradation in Big Chico Creek - it is that will not exceed s15pcf_sdduring krunoff during al0-yearstormnd 2 a 2l cfperiods, storm drainages during a 100 -year storm. Water quality damage occurs primarily during the First storms of the season. It is during this period that during the oils and other contaminants ate flushed into the dra mage hersystem. The developer proposes to install a grease and sediment trap similar to those installed in the Big Chico Creek Estates and Sacra- mento Avenue Assessment District projects. in addition, the developer proposes to use open joint pipe in areas where the drain is not under roadways in order to eliminate pollutants during low flows. It is felt that these two methods will effectively eliminate water duality degrada- tion in Big Chico Creek: Vest Sacramento Avenue drains natura�,ly to the West. Lands North and Dast of t1,e project are in; the 5adt-Imento Avenue Assess- merit District which provided storm drainage facilit�Les for the area. D) Se Ataae Disposal Methods ' The project proposes to use septic tanks and conven- tional leach lines as the method of sewage disposal. The soil within the development area is Vina loam and exhibits a Meth percolation rate. Ground water is found at depths of between l5 and 20 feet, The soil type has shown excellent treatment qualities and is of sufficient depth to thoroughly treat sewage effluent. Nater will. be supplied by Calif Water Service Company, Inc., so well contamination within the project will not occur. Estimated total effluent from the deVelopinent will be approximately 44;000 gallons per day. n E) Potential Loss of Agricultural Production and Land; This project will remove approximately 20 acres of 1. 1. from agricultural use. The proximity of high and low density resi- dential uses partially limits the agricultural use of the land. Sprays, dust and ,noise associated with agricultural use are not compatJ.ble with surrounding residential uses: The land is contained within the urban limits of Chico as designated on the Butte Count=y General Plan. in additions the soil in the area contains nak Root Pupous which is detrimental to many root types. The existing alrlond orcriard on the property is not economically productive. The trees are well past thc�Jr prime produc- tion years. Last year's crop production was insLnnificant.. F) Increased Population Effects on C,.U.S.D. and C.A.R.D.- The C.U.S.D. Board and staff has indicated that the many new developments proposed for the Chico area will have a serious effect on the district's ,ability to house stridents. Several developers have entered rote an agreement. with the district to pxoviie fund, T Joy" the development of future school facil,tiesu The developer of this project intends to also Cnter into an aareement acceptable to the district. Each new development that is approved project; a cumLt- lative impact on the C.A.R.D. facilities and procA,.ams. This proposed development of 98 dwelling units will only provide approximately 1, 750 in tax, -!s for C. A. R. D. each year The C. A. 1 . D. Board of Directors is presently investigating methods o,: implementing development fees but to date to firm conclusions have been reached: G) Traffic; Present averade daily traffic: (Aur) on West Sacramento Avenue is approximately 2500 vehicles per day. The ADT ori Highway 32 at west 'Sacramento Avenue is approximately 11.,000 vehicles per day. The anticipated i=ncreased traffic that will be generated by this project and theotherpr`ojerts that have been approved in the area is approximately 3050 ADT (8 trips generated per household). The traffic ,generated by "this project will use West Sacramento Avenue for access to the project: Accordinct to the Chico Urban Area Transportation study dated November; 1982; which was prepared for the City of Chaco jy JiR & Associates of San Franc-isco a "C'' level of service occurs on an improved twos -lane roadway at 12,800 vehicles per day. The "C" level is one in which a stable traffic operations exists and only minor delays occur. This is the levet' typically associated with urban' design 'Practice, if the roadway is not fully improired, there is a reduction in capacity on the roadcMY : West Sacramento Avenue is only partially improved and the ''C" level of service for this roadway :is reduced to approximately J,0,000 vehicles per day. The Public Work8 Department has plans to widen and improve Sacramento Avenue, between Glenwood Avenue and,Highw;ay $2, during fiscal year 1981-84. -6- Existing volume and anticipated volume combined amount to approximately 5750 vehicles per day, for an "A" level of service. The proposed private roadway within the project feet in width and will permit two-way traffic with s 34 side of the street. Curb and led alo on he gutter will be installed along the road- way throughout the project. The entrance to the project.' is .24 feet in width and no parking will be permitted within the entrance area. A traffic signal is not presently warranted at the newly revised intersection of'West Sacramento Avenue and Highway 32. The intersection is under the jurisdiction of the City of Chico and Caltrans; there are no current plans for signalizing; the intersection_: H) Water Quantity_ impact; Present stormwater runoff on the project site for a storm with a 10 --year frequency is approximately 8 cubic feet per second (cfs). When the project is fully developed, the same storm will produce an additional 7 cfs for a total Of 15 cfs The majority of the present rai;lfall runoff is contained on the site and percolates into the soil. Runoff does not presently .reach Bich Chico Creek. Big Chico Creek's flow is regiulated by flood gates at the Hooker Oak recreation area. These gates allow a maximum inflow through Chico of 1500 cfs Aadi''-ional drains downstream from the flood gates increase the flow to approximately 1800cfs in the vicinity of this project. The project's drainage discharge -of a maximum of 21 cfs during a 100 -year frequency storm does notsionificantly change rPoBig Chico Creek's characteristics. The discussion of downstream flood-- contained in the Big Chico Creek Estates E.I.R, applies to this ject also. Flooding, when it occurs, is caused by the rise of the Sacramento River and not by excess-ive discharge into Bice Chico Creek. ISiTMPT,:MrMmrnVy uNtN1 N'L'A�,- EFFECTS WHICH CANNOT BE AVOIDED SAI, I. Approximately 20 acres of V'ina toam soil will be with- drawn from agricultural use and converted to :vesidential use. 2. There will be a net increase in stormwater runoff. 3. There will be an increase in demand for public services including schools and recreation facilities. 4 Theproject will increase the local energy demand for operation of utilities, motor vehicles, etc: 5. There will be an increase in Local traffic flow with a possible increase in 00naestion on West Sacramento Avenue. 6. Some degradation '�.Lv water duality in Big Chico Creek may occur from storm drainane runuff ..1 I MITIGATION MEASURES PROPOSED TO MINIMIZE ADVERSE IMPACTS 1. widen and improve west Sacramento Avenue along the project frontage to Butte County Standard RS -2-A. 2i Install crease and sediment trap in drainage system to reduce the possibility of water degradation. in Big Chico Creek. 3. Use open joint pipe in areas that are not under road- ways to further reduce water degradation in Big Chico Creek. 4. Building permits for residences will be subject to any school mitigation fees established by Butte County Ordinance enacted prior to the filing of applications for building permits unless a Community Facilities Act of 198`2 District is created, pursuant to California Government Code Section 53311, et_.seq., coverinq the project area, prior to the issuance of any building permits. 5. Place all utilities underground and landscape opan areas, making maximum use of existing trees. 6. Implement, to the greatest extent possible, the energy conservation measures set forth in the uniform Building Code and Sect -ion 66473.1 of the Subdivision reap Act. 7. Provide a homeowner's association with adequate author- ity ta, maintain, operate and repair the facilities owned in common,. 8. Install properly engineered septic tanks and leach fields for sewage disposal. 9. Make use of dust palliative or water to reduce the nuisance caused by dust during construction. Limit working hours to daytime 10. Make use of architectural. control in the covenants, conditions and restrictions to insure construction of esthetically pleas- ing dwellings: ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT , 1. No Project The land could be kept in agj:i.ultural use, although not necessarily as aft orchard; The present otdhard does not produce sufficient income to justify its retention. Other agricultural Uses such as kiwi production, walnut production or row crops could be realized on this land. The nearby encroachment of residential dwellings makes agricultural use of the land undesirable. Ensuing dust and pesticide sprays that axe a necessary part of farming are not c=patible with relatively dense residential uses nearby. The developer has performed a market s+irvey for the type of residence that he proposes to build. He has determined that . lli e dweently a shortage in thechico Area of detached, single h ngs with common area maihbdnance, a 2. Conventional Subdivision: This alternative would require lots that could sup[Ort an individual septic system and meet the lot design criteria of ialto Subdivision Ordinance and the Zoning Ordinance. Minimum parcel Vize would be 65 feet wide and probably approximately 1/4 acre in area. Street widths would be 40 feet from curb face to curb face, instObd of the proposed 24 feet to34feetianitssattthe mostiha itiAspxQvade bo oad Re DU/AC or less or approximately *� the subdivision in the urban area will yield the samesedensities. If project could be connected to a sanitary y noxi - could be as small as 65010 square feet resulting in densities of aPp mately 5 DU/ AC or 104 units: 3. Split Duplex Subdivision: if such a project used individual septic systems, the resulting densities would be the same as a conventional subdivision, using septic systems, or no more than about 4 DU/AC. if the project was connected to a sanitary sewer system, then lots could be as small as 4000 Square feet resulting in approximately 7 DU/AC or 145 units maximum. 4 fined septic of this nature utilizing a commonly owned. and mainta` p could yield the maximum density allowed by the General. Plan designation of 6 OU/AC and provide common facil - ties such as a swimming pool, tennis courts, barbeque Pits, RV storage, etc. Clustering could also be used to minimize impacts on neighbor- ing properties. GROWTH INDUCING; IMPACT OP THE PROPOSED ACTION Several developments nearby along with the proposed develop-- Ment encourage additional conversion of agricultural land to residential use. Recent action by Butparcels of a Butte County to rezone several pianorth and east of the Project R7'3 also encourages dev�:lopment of agricultural land in the area: ORGANIZATIONS, PERSONS AND REFERENCES CONSULTED County of Butte Planning Department Public Works Departwent City of Ch...o Public 'Works Department McCain Associates Rolls, Anderson & Roll's Chico Area Recreation District Soil Survey of the Chico Area, U.S. Department of Agriculture, .1.929 Onsite Wastewater Treatment and Disposal System, EPA, 1980 Urban 5tormwater Management; Special Report 449,APWA, 1981 E.T.R. for Big ChiJlo Creek Estates ERD Log #78--12-21-01 , APPENDIX F Chico CA 95926 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORD (To be completed by Lead Agencv) 5: Name of Proposal, if applicable Rezone II. 'ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 83-39 T BACKGROUND NO ERD Log # 82 ;l'L415-02 A. Unstable earth conditions or in AP 43-29-121 43-27-08 1» Name of Proponent 7 bent pin �Proponent: 43-29- 1.5 , 2. Address and Phone Num er o" - _ ----------- Rt. Rt . 2. Bow 107. , tion of any unique geologic or Chico CA 95926 3: Date of Checklist Submitted 4» Agency Requiring Checklist 5: Name of Proposal, if applicable Rezone II. 'ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required on attached, sheets.) YES MAYBE NO 1. Earth. Will the proposal: result in significant: A. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? b. Disruptions, displacements, com- paction or overcove*�,ing of the soil? c, Change in topography or ground sur- face relief features or removal of to soil? d, Desiru.ction, covering or modifica- tion of any unique geologic or physical features? ex Increase it wind or water erosion of soils, 03thur on or off the site? f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in silta- tion) deposition or erosion which MAY modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or fake? X gLoss of prime agriculturally proms dt cti've soils outside designated urban area;? Appendix F - page 1 of 0 4,% h. Exposure of people or property to YtaS MAYBE NO geologic hazards such as earthquakes; landslides, mudslides, ground failure, or similar hazards? 2i Air. Will the proposal result in: a. Substantial deterioration of ambient or local air quality? b. The creation of objectionable odors, smoke or fumes? c. Significant alteration of air movement, moisture or tempe��atu or any change in climate, dither ti locally or regionally? 3 Water, Will the proposal, result in substantial, a. Changes in cllrronts, o� the course or direction of water movements? b, Changes in absorption rates, drainage Patterns, or the rate and amount of surface tater runoff? C. Need for off-site surface drainage improvements, including vegetatin rnne emoval.; chalization or culvert installation? k a. ;Yltera.tions to the course or flow Of flood waters' e. Change in the amount of :surfar water in any water body? E- Discharge into surface waters or in any alteration of surface ' tra:ter qualityilicludin; but not limited 'to temperaturo; dissolved oxygetl or turbidity? x g, Alteration of the direction or nate of 171nw of ground waters? h. Change in the quantity or quality Of groundwaters, either thrr�ugh direct additions or withdrawals OV through interception of en aquifer by cuts or excavations? 2S\ ettrl�.x '-Page 2of'5 YES MAS NO i. Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? j. Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as fla: iding? Plant' Life. �4i7 i thy, proposal result in substantial: a. Loss of -vegetation or changer the diversity, of species or numb Er of any species of plaits (including trees, shrubs, grass, e:rops, m'Croflora and aquatic plants) ? G b, Reduction of the numbers of any rare or endangered species unique, IK of plants? C. Introduction of new species of in barrier plants into an area, or a replenishment of to the normal existing species? d, Reduction in acreage of any ,gri cultural crop? ~- 5. Animal Life. Grill the proposal result in substantial: a; Change in the diversity of species, of or numbers of any species (birds, Land animals animals including reptiles, +fish and shell- fish, 'benthi.c organs sms, insects or microfauna) ? -- b- Reduction of the numbers of any endangered species unique, rare or of animals? C. l.ntroduCtion of new :MOci es of or result i.n animals into as area, a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? d, Reduction of, encroachment n, or fish deterioration to existing wildlife habitat? Appendix F page 3 of I 6. Noise; Will the proposal result in substantial. ;a. Increases in noise levels? G b .� ]Fxposure of.' people to severe noise levels? 7, Li ht and Clare. Will the proposal G7" icant light or glare? pio uce ...gn , 8.. Land.Use, Will the -proposal result in a significant: a. Alteratioa of the planned land use of an a-!: ea, or establish a trend which will demonstrably lead to such alteration? —, b. Conflict with uses on adjoining propo ties, or conflict with estab l�--hrld recrea:tiona1, educa- tional, religious or scientific rises of an area? Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in substantial: a, Demand for, or increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? b. Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? 10, Risk of Uet, ]does the proposal. Involve a risk of an explosion or the rel,�ase of hazardous substances ( nclud, n , but not �:imitod to Oil., pesticides, chemicals Or radiation) in the event of all accident or upset /` conditions? ---- 1 i�t�ptiyation. Will the proposal "significantly alter the location, distribution, dens:i.ty, or `growth xate of the human: popular a.on of an a� es. off. physdivide en. C, ,zcall-,t es tab listed ct�mmun I ty' �.- 12, Hous.inR, Will the proposal, sis n dandy affect existing housing, YDS MAYBE N0. 13. Transportation/Circulation., Will the PrOP08al result in: a. Generation of substantial adc i inn8l vehicular movement? IV b. Significant effect's on existing parking fa,eiliL:ies, or demand for new parking? x C. Substantial impact upon existing transportation systems? d: Significant alterations to present patterns of circulation or IIluVement of. people and/or goods? Se e, Alterations to ,waterborne, r,Iil or air 'traffic? t, increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pede trian.s' 1.4, Public Services, Will the proposal have an e .;ect upon, or result in a substantial need for new or, altered governmental services in any of the following areas: a: Fire protection? b. police p7•otection? c. Schools? d. Parks or other recreational facilities? e. Maintenance Of public facilities, including roads2 f. Other 9OW-nmental services' X 15. Ep2tWill the proposal result int a, Use of substantial, amounts of fuel or enerey7 b, Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? s __ Anuendik r. Appendix F - page 6 of 9 YI;F MAYBE NO 16 . utilities, Will the proposal result sub- in a ne-eTrfor new systems, or stantial alterations to the following utilities a . power, or natural. gash _ . , X b: Communications systems? X c. Water? d. Sewer (will trunk line be extencled, providing capacity to serve net. development) 'f e. Storm water drainage? �.. 17, Human Health. 1 -Jill the proposal result ir. a. Creation of any health hazard or Dotontia.l health hazard (excluding mental. health) ? b, Exposure of people to potential. health hazards? _. 18. Solid Waste, Will the proposal result in any significant ulpacts associated with solid waste disposal or litter x ? _ control? 19, Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in e obstruction of any' public. designated or recognized scenic vista open to the public, or will the proposal z�esult in ;he creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public View? 20, Recreation, Will the nropo,sal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of exist~igg public recrea- tion facilities? 21, Archeolo icaI�histoY.ical. Will the proposal resu t xn an alteration of a significant archeological or historical site, structure, object or building? -_ Appendix F - page 6 of 9 Y]RS MAYBE No 22. MandatorV Findin s of Signify, a. Does the project have t 11 h^ potential to degrade the duality o,: the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, causefish or wildlife ,a population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant -or animal, com- munity, reduce the -number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California 'history or prehi:st:ury? b, Does t��n 3rt� , ; .. t: have the potential to achieve short term benefits to the detriment of publicly adopted long -terns environme?it:..l. ,goals? �. X c• Doer, project have impacts which Ul:c individually limited, but Cumulatively considerable? (a project may impact on two or more separate. resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant,) d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, 0-,Ither directly or indirectly? %C