Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout83-43 REZONE AR-MH TO M-2 2 OF 60 i Mitigation y #3C-4- The Cit shall bring to fruition - the integration of the Oroville. Wyandotte Irrigation District and California Water Company sources of supply at the 2 million gallon storage tank; thereby providing emergency backup water supplies for each water. purveyor. 4. Water Quality The Setting; Surface waters on the project site consists primarily of surface drainage during rainy periods which flows into Wyman Ravine, an intermittent strea�a. In winter months water flows about 10 miles south to Honcut Creek which then flows 3 miles west into the Feather ld ver. IMPACTS AND MITIGATIONS Impact #4A: There will be an increase .of pollutants in surface water runoff due to increased human and industrial activities. This includes, but is not limited to gasoline, oils, grease, fertilizers, chemicals, pesticides, litter and other industrial wastes. Mitigation 04A-1 See Mitigation #lC-•l and JflC-2. Mitigation 44A -2c individual developments must contorm to Performance Standards set forth in the City's Zoning ordinance. Impact #4B: Use of leach fields or other on-site methods of sewage disposal could adversely affect ground and surface, water quality: Mitigation #4Br-1 The City's public sewer system shall be extended to the site and utilized for restroom and cafeteria facilities and other effluent acceptable for treatment by the Sewerage Commission -- Oroville Region regional trea11ment plant. Mitigation ##4B-2 See Mitigation #1C-1.. the use and disposal of large amounts of water may Mitigation #4B-3• Industrial developers re requiring develop individual on-site waste treatment systems with appropriately treated effluents being disposed of in an approved recycling water course. These systems must conform to all Federal; State and local guidelines, 5: vegetation The Setting.- The etting:The project site is covered with annual grasses that provide seasonal grazing for cattle. There are also several hundred mature oaks which are primai;ily located south of Wyman Ravine and east of the Western Pacific Railroad. 23 Vegetation is minimal adjacent to the banks of Wyman Ravine. There are no rare and/or endangered plant species recorded for the site. IMPACTS AND MITIGATIONS Impact #5A: 'Development of the site will r(,_,ault in the of ,annual grasses and may require tlremoval of q �o reduction some mature oak Free. Mitigation 05A-=1: Remaining vegetation a4jacent to Wyman Ravine should remain undisturbed except when it is necessary to clean or modify the channel to alleviate flooding or erradicate mosquito breeding habitat. Mitigation 05A-2: Mature trees shall be preserved whenever possible. Mitigation #5A-3 Street trees and landscaping shall be required pursuant to t -he reluirements of the City's Parks and Trees Director and City ordinances. Mitigation #5A -4s To assure that there are no rare and/or endangered specie5 on-site, a botanical clearance shall: be, obtained from a qualified botanist prior to development. " The Setting: 6. Wildlife The site is considered primarily a grassland type habitat with seasonal vernal pools. This type_ of habitat' ' support's about 89 bird species and 24 species of mammals. Some mammals common to the site are the mole, hare, gopher and mouse. There are no known endangered species on-site. ,1. IMPACTS AND MITIGATIONS' the ' impact 46A: Development of project site will cause a { displacement of Wildlife into adjacent open areas. The competition among species resulting from this displacement will resUl.t in a general reduction of wildlife. Mitigation #6A -l: Refer to mitigation measures in Section 5 on Vegetation. 7. Cla.matology/Air Quality -- The Setting,: Refer to the. DEAR prepared for the 1982 Orovlle General Plan revision: IMP=VS AND MITIGATIONS The development of the project site and the attendant traffic volumes will result in increased roadside pollutant 1 2-4 �. t concentrations. The amount of pollution gF•eratea by vehicles will vary widely depending on t,, types o industrial development to occur. This range varies from 5.2 trips per acre to 55trips per acre. For the purposes of this report, which is for a prezone to allow an as yet unknown type of industrial use, an overall average trip generation factor of 39 trips per acre will be used:; I/ An average one-way trip length is estimated at 5.2 miles for locations within the Oroville Area. (Oroville General Plan - ^ZR ) Assuming full build -out of the site, excluding rights of way, easements and Wyman Ravine's main channel, about 39,8 acres will be available for development. Using the above factors, at full industrial build -out, the site will generate 70,936 average daily vehicle miles travelled. 2/ This is approximately 13% of the 540,029 ADVMT projected for the year 2000 in the Draft Environmental Impact Report prepared for the Oroville General Plan Revision. Assuming full build -out by the year 2000 and using Composite Emission Factors (CEF) developed by the California Air Resources Board, 3% the project generated traffic will create the following emissions: Projected Emissions for the Year 2000. Mobile Sources Exhaust Exhaust CEF In Emissions in Emissions in ADVMT Grams/Mi Grams Tons TOG 70,936 1.7 120,591 .13 CO 70,936 16.0 — 1,134,976 1.24 NOx 70,936 2.2 156,059 .17 The composite emission factors are based on the assumption that emissions are declining due to more sophisticated pol:luta.on control measures and a reduction in the number of older cars. The specific air quality impacts of the industries Which would locate on the project site cannot be assessed until plans specifying their exact nature are known. unless specifically exempted, each of the ihdustries would have to obtain a permit to operate from the Butto County Air Poll.utiOh Control District (BCAPO). t. 5 Impact #7A-1: There will be an increase in pollutants resulting from increased vehicle miles travelled. Mitigation #7A -l: Car pooling and van fools by on-site employees shall be encouraged by the City. Mitigation #7A-2: If an area wide bus system is in operation and full: development of the site has taken place, the City shall request routing on Onhir Road to terve the site and adjacent indlostrial development. Impact VB: 'There will be an as yet undefined increase in stationary service emissions. (Refer to Appendix 20, Oroville General Plan DEIR, 1983.) Mitigation 07B-1; Emissioncontrolrequirements will be set Forth by the BCAPD as a condition of the Permit to Operate. The New Source Review Rule, Section 4-5, Standards for Authority to Construct- and onstructand Permit to operate restricts allowable emissions to not more than 250 pounds per clay for any pollutant for which a national ambient air quality standard (NAAQS) exists, excluding carbon monoxide'. The Permit to Operate will also require sources subject to the above rule to apply best available control technology to processes which emit air contaminents. Mitigation #7Br-2: The City should diligently pursue the reevaluation and elimination of Butte County's designation as a "non --attainments" area for certain federal air quality standards. Impact #7C Dependent upon the amount and stypes of development to occur on the project site, localized temperature and wind patterns could be affected: A single large scale development could alter wind patterns. On-site temperature could rise due to heat retention on impervious surfacing and metal buildings and heat emission ;iron► vehicles and industrial. processes. Mitigation #7C=lc neciduous trees should be planted generously throughout the development to pleven,ts solar radiation gain during the summer, but petmif sunlight to enter during the winter. The planting of trees around parking areas will also mitigate heat absorption and retention The City Zoning Ot6ihance contains provisions for landscaping in and around parking areas, including a regla rement that 50% of parking areas be shaded within 15 years of development. 216 i D i 0 8. Land Use The Setting: Reference should be made to the DEIF prepared for the recent revisions to the City's General Plan to obtain general information regarding population and land use.. .At present the only improvements on the project site are Western Pacific Railroad trackage, a livestock feeding shelter and access roads: Rural residential areas with 5 to 10 acre parcels are located northwest, west and southwest of the site. South of the site is agricultural with rural residences. More densely populated residential and commercial uses are located to the northeast, east and. southeast along Lincoln Boulevard. North of the site is undeveloped lane zoned for industrial. development. There are; ,also several existing industrial uses in the Ophir Road area. The map in Appendix 2 shows the General Plan designations recently adopted by the City for the site and surrounding area. The M--2 zoning and industrial development proposed for the site are consistent with the industrial. designation and reflect the following policies in the Land Use Element; "Designate sufficient land to allow maximum develLpment of manufacturing and assembly uses. Encourage development of a complete range of site ;sizes for industrial development. Encourage industrial uses requiring direct rail service where such service could be developed." Adjacent lands to the west and south ar- designated rural. residential in the City's plan because of the existing 'dovelopmentj lot sizes and Jack of community Nater and sewer systems. The easterly ,property line of the site is the limits of the City's general planning area, and there are no City recommendations or proposals for land use east of the site. The site and surrounding area were designatedas low density urban residential by the Cow-.l;,y in 1.971 on a very generalized County -wide map: it �zder to facilitate industrial use of the site, the Coca ,,-.y Board of Supervisors recently initiated a General Plan amendment for an industrial designation for the site and "rezoning to M-2 Part of the site has been zoned M-2 by the CotAnty since' 1957 but most Was rezoned to Ail -MEI in 1.975 at the property owners request. County zoning on all adjacent lands to the east; 'south and 'Wes"t is A-2 (unclassified)► a general zone which would allow all uses. 27 IMPACTS AND MITIGATIONS Impact 48A; Proposed heavy industrial, use of the slL'e conflicts with the. County's present General Plan designation and the present zoning on most of the site. Mitigation #8A-1: The City should support County approval, of recently initiated proposals to amend the County General Plan and change county zoning to allow industrial uses. Impact 08B Industrial use of the site could have a variety of adverse effects on adjoining non -industrial properties which could discourage existing or planned use of those areas. This general type of impact could in turn generate complaints and pressure to limit the use of the site. mitigation measures recommended under implement Mitigation #8B-1• The Cit shall 5 under Vegetation, Noise, Air Quality, Circulation, Aesthetics, Human Health and Light and Glare: Mitigation 488-2: industrial development shall be prohibited on the portion of the site south of Wyman Ravine and on both sides of the railroad. Mitigation #8B-3: Pursuant to policies in the Land Use Element of the General Plan, the City should not allow the subdivision of the site or similar rail -oriented industrial sites into small parcels. Maintai:nin-i large parcel sizes tends to keep per --acre acquisition costs down and increases the economic feasibility of providing sufficient open space and buffer zones around site perimeters adjoining non -industrial uses. Mitigation #8B-4: The City should prezone adjacent areas designated as Rural Residential for minimum parcel sizes of no less than 10 acres. Mitigation 48B -8i The City shall request the County to change their General Plan designations and zoning to match the City's as closely as possible, Mitigation Generous open Space ecorrido) shall ,intfuture project;3 especially along the eastern and western boundaries of the prezone area. Mitigation JOB -7 The clustering of trees and shrubs throughout the project site as a part of lane"soaping requirements shall be used to establish and maintain a parte like setting in open areas and 9.o shield rural residential uses from industrial u8e4` 28 D n I 1 c 29 Impact #8C: Large scale industrial development of the site could induce .industrial., commercial. and residential ' development of nearby Lands, and other areas of the Croville area. induced development will depend on the in-migrating required services, by-products and numbers of employees related to industrial use of the site. The areas designated for various uses by the City's general plan should be adequate in size and location to accommodate the related development induced by development of this site and other nearby sites designated for industrial: This impact is discussed further in the DEIR for the City General Plan amendments in the evaluation of Population and Mousing impacts in this report and in the discussion of growth inducing impacts in Section IX of this report. i Mitigation #8C-1: Same as 488-5. Mitigation #8C-2c The City shall zone all areas of the City consistently with the designations and policies of the Oroville General Plan. Mitigation 48C-3 The approved mitigation measures in tht, General Plan EIR shall be required and mplemented wherever appropriate for discretionary Cti0ts by the City. a. Noise - The Setting: Included in the proposed 1.982 General Plan are existing and estimated distances from nearby street's to the 60 LDN noise oontour based on 'traffic volume. A noise survey was not conducted on the project site. •r 29 TABLE 1 1982 1985 2005 Dist. to Dist. to Dist. to Location ADT 60 LDN ADT 60 LDN ADT 60 LDN Baggett-Marysville Road East of Power House Mill Road 30000 55' 3,500 60' 5,000 701' Ophir Road at the CO abandoned Southern C) Pacific Railr^ad 2,000 55' 2,400 60' 3,200 701 I - Lincoln Boulcvard North of Oph.ir Road 5,500 105' 6,700 120' 9,500 150' State highway 70 South of Pa et :--Mar svil.l e gg y Road TOOU 240 1 7000 26.0'1 12,500 350' PL N Noise levels in existing industrial areas to the north, including the Western Pacific Railroad yard and the Pacific Coast Producers Cannery exceeded 65 db(A) less than 5% Of the time. From information gained during the noise analysis, it appears that the noise of heavy trucks, which exceed 75 db(A) 10% of the time, and general vehicular traffic are the major noise producers in industrial areas. The noise level adjacent to the Western Pacific Railroad track is about 65 db(A) 650' from the source in the industrial areas. These contours will continue to spread as rail volume increases. Residents on Custer Lane, northeast of the project site, have complained recently of objectionable noise being created by the Sierra Pacific Lumber Mill,, which is located a quarter mile north of the site between the Western Pacific Railroad line and Railroad Avenue. Noise generated by the mill :is loud and sporadic., which 11,ntensifies the. irritation. Noise :impacts related to industrial development of the site would originate from activities or sources, causing an increase in the ambient noise level of 50 db(A) Ldn on the west side of the site and the 70 db(A) Ldn on the east side. IMPACTS AND MITIGATIONS Impact #9A: Construct,:ion noise from machinery used to prepare the site and construct improvements could generate temporary noise levels of 90 to 1.00 db(A) 50 feet from the source. Mitigation #9A --1c Site preparat.ioll and construction should be restricted to daytime hours. Mitigation 09A -2r All construction equipment should be in proper working order and used in accordance with OSHA requirements. Impact 498;c Increased noise levels related to the actual operation of the industrial uses will vary according to type. Mitigation #9D -le On --site noise levels affecting on --site employees will be monitored and controlled. to safe limit's by OSHA, Mitigation #98-24 .if necessary to maintain acceptable noise levels presented in the Noise Element of the City's General plan, buffering between industrial uses and surrounding residential Lases shall be required: Sound barriers such as berms, galls or suitably heavy tree belts are 31 U recommended. Noise levels . site sha11 not exceed the st the Ci perime6e, of the Y's Noise Ordinance. standards specified in the Impact #9C Increased volumes Will increase noise levels on of passenger cars and trucks and highways in the area: the site and along streets Mitigation #9C-1 Residential development nearbyatruck alon�ouHi hwaY 70, Ophir Road anhould be other Mitigation #9C-2: Same as #7A-1 and #7A-2. Mitigation #9C_3: Operational access to trucks and other large vehicles shall_ the nortl, from ga site by Railroad AvenueandRoad be from the Road, Ophir Road or situP.iions only Permitted in Occidental Y from Messina Avenue, Ca man emergency stria Avenue and other Y Avenue, ets traversing public or g non..=industrial areas.: Private. Impact P 09D: Increased use of t , Railroad line and/or the he existing Western Pacific ;"ill increase noise levels expansion Ofthexisting "" ilities � \ f Mit" prOJes' �.. gation #9D-1; Refer to Mitigation #913-2 Mitigation, #9D-2; a.nsulation r;a Additional building ,, td Y be required in residences or r constructed near the project site railroad. t °S adjc�ient t, e Mitigation 09D-3: Train speed within Urban' is regulated. Lower speeds reduce noise benazed a has vets. 10= Circulation- The Setting; The e`esting vehicle circa prezone area is adequate at Iatian system in improvements thI time and the industrial develo Proposed in no major are p the near future unless major Of Ophr' toad Pent occurs. Lincoln Boulevard vehicles has a l9sl avera e Just north and State kTighway 70 o daily total of 5,500 1981 ADT level of south of Ophir.Road has a both Lincoln 7,200. The current level li service Lincoln. 13oul.evard and and State Highway 70 on Count ,`'gas recent! Y from Mon Y recd 1s good. �oule ns now consists of etswo idveianeswithrl trusted hY Butte lane at Ophr Road. Y to shKusel Road and oulders and a turn Oshir Road, the main east -west arterial appro�;imately 1-1/2 miles near to the site, Highway 70 to Lincoln boulevard. long and eas'torl C )nhects State Y to I,ov�er wyandotte An extension of Ophir Road Road is scheduled for 1984. -32 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 i However, due to funding limitations, it would not be reasonable to expect the extension to be doveloped, for several years. This extension, if developed, would become a critical link in the movement of industvi,al./commercial employees from the industrial area to the residential areas in the east foothills To the west Lone Tree Road is designated as a collector in the Circulation Element of the City's General. Plan and is paved but narrow'and rough in places. The actual ADT is unknown at this time. Due to the low density of existing development in the area, mostly single 'family homes on five and ten acre residential parcels, curre;trt vehicular movement is probLbly low. Wyman Avenue and Occidental Avenue are unpaved local roads which serve rural. residential and agricultura:1. areas south of Wyman Ravine and north of Palermo Road. During periods of heavy rain, Wyman Avenue, Occidental Aventio and portions of Palermo Road experience severe flooding. Any continuing use of these roads by industrially related traffic would not be feasible until such time as flooding is eliminated and roads are upgraded to industrial standards. Baggett Palermo Road and Railroad Avenue are located in the eastern portion of the site along side the railroad fine. They are substan0ard, dirt and gravel roads which would have to be developed for industrial use. They now provide the only developed access routes from the interior of the site north to existing indu,�t-tial development, Ophir Road and Kusel Road. The Western Pacific Railroad line is also located in the eastern portion of the site. A full description is located in the proposed 1982 Oroville General Plan, Circulation Element and DEIR. There are no sidewalks or designated bicycle routes on the site or in the vicinity. The Oroville Municipal Aatport is located five miles northwest of the inLersection of Ophir. Road and Baqgett Palermo Road, via State Highways 10 and 162. Connecting Baggett Palermo Read aid Railroad AVen.lf with a grade crossing of the rai.iroad might bave some, benefitt3 for traffic circulation but would recreate a hazard which tbe County, railroad and Public Utilities Commission removea. Such a grade crossing existed for many years where Baggett Palermo Road now ends, but the Public Utility Commission gave the County `money 'in 1080 to develop Railroad Avenue from Palermo to Kusel Road as a replacement route to the grade crossing could be removed. Any new grade crossings would require approval by both the Public Utility Commission and the railroad, and; according to County Public 'Works staff, Stich approvals are very unlikely in this case. 3 IMPACTS AND MITIGATIONS Reference should. be made to Section 7 on the :impacts of traffic on Air Quality. Vehicle trip incroases are discussed at some length ,in that section. Impact #lOA:: Full industrial use eofathe site will ll generate as many as 13, 640 vehicle trips p Y will depend on the number of on-site employees. Mitigation flOA-1 Refer to Mitigations 47A-• and 2. Mitigation #10A-2: All development will. be required to provide sufficient on-site parking areas, per requirements in the City Zoning Ordinance. Impact 410B: Public roads providing legal access to the site include several unpaved�oads4, tr versicq reSidestial areas. increased heavy inaus Avenue, Occidental Avenue and Wyman Avenue would only be possible with major reconstruction and would generate same significant impacts ontourandustrialtsusenofuprivate e roads comments would apply leading from Lone Tree Road to the site and to Lone Tree Road itself: Mitigation 410B--1: operational truck traffic to and from the site shall be from the north only and shall be prohibited on Messina Avenue, Occidental Avenue, Wyman Avenue and Lone Tree Road. Mitigation 4JOB`24 Employee access to the site via Messina Avenue shall; only be allowed if Messina is reconstructed east to Lincoln Boulevard. ,Impact #�lOCe The substantial vehicle traffic generated by this project miffst be routed, pursuant to mitigation ulOB�l above, via Baggett Palermo Road or Railroad Avenue, Kusel Read north to Ophir Road an,rl `7 thence east. and n westtion w1to Lincoln Boulevard and. Highway distance well serve the majority of both klowever, bath BaggePalermo local along Railroad trips; , Avenue are unpaved at this time and inadequate for heavy paved on industrial use. �)udstanh the area. oftruckaf fic airborneunddust inroads the would also inoi.e area. Mitigation #1..0C"I: The City shall require the reconstruction of Baggott Palermo Road to industrial. standards from Oph�r Road to on -=site development west of the railroad. N itigati on #�I OC_2 c. Industrial development; on the site shall not be allowed to use Railroad Avenue until it is paved to Messina Avenue or Xusel. toad.. 3 t 1 Fire protection is now provided by the BUtte County Fire Department % California bivision of Forestry (BCFD/CDF). The hearest station is located in Palermo on Palermo Road, from one to three miles via different Coutes from various portions of the site. t impact #10D: Baggett Palermo Road is the Only legal or developed access to the main portion of the site west of the railroad and north of Wyman Ravine, from Ophir Road. However, two access routes to this area from Ophir Road would separate traffic from Highway 70 from the site related traffic coming from Lincoln Boulevard. Two or more raccess routes would also be essential for employee evacuation and adequate vehicle access during fires and other emergency situations. Mitigation 410D�1. Industrial development oC the site area 'west of the railroad shall be accompanied by construction of a second paved access road from Ophir Road to the site and looping through the site to Baggett Palermo Road.. The new road should intersect with Ophir Road at or near the present intersection of Ophir Road and Baggett Marysville Road. Impact #10Er ;increased traffic will increase hazards for vehicles,, pedestrians and bicyclists, pai:ticularly° at S ntersections of main roads. Mitigation 410E-1: Turning lanes should be required w:.-ve site access, routes intersect with Ophir Road, 1 Lincoln Boulevard and Highway 70. Mitigation #loE-2: Traffic signals or blinking warming lights should be considered by the City and i County for installation at the intersections of Ophir Road with Highway 70 and Lincoln Boulevard. Mitigation #p10E-3; Bicycle lanes and/or sidewalks should be 'installed along all of Ophir Road and Lincoln Boulevard, Impact 410p: Industrial development of the site may generate an increase in aircraft operations at the Orov lle Municipal Airport. Mi.tigati.on 4I0F-l. No additional mitigations are required over and above the nxisting measures stated in the Circulation, Land Use and Noise Elements of the General Plan. 1.1. Public and Quasi -Public Be.vices 1 ,A. Fire - the Sett-ingc Fire protection is now provided by the BUtte County Fire Department % California bivision of Forestry (BCFD/CDF). The hearest station is located in Palermo on Palermo Road, from one to three miles via different Coutes from various portions of the site. t Upon annexation, the City Fire Department would be required to provide first response. There is a mutual aid agreement in effect wherein the BCFD could be called upon for back--up assistance. The city's new Police/Fire Facility, operational March 1983,,is located on Lincoln Street near Mitchell Avenue in the center of the City about .dour miles from the site. Because response times to the site and ' nearbyindustrial areas would not be, adequate for industrial development, the City plans to construct a fire facility in the Ophir Road area. IMPACTS AND MITIGATIONS impact #11A--1: The response time from the Police/Fire Facility is not adequate for the proposed industrial area. Mitigation 411A-1a: The City shall construct a fire station in the Oph.r Road area prior to completion of industrial development. This mitigation has already been -made a condition of approval for M-2' prezoning and annexation of the area north of the project site in 1981: The fa:ility must be operable by 1986 according to the measure in the adopted Negative Declaration. Mitigation 411A-lb: The City shall continue its mutual aid agreement with the County. i Impact 411A-2: New industrial development may ,introduce to this area new types of fire hazards requiring specialized+ forms of faire fighting capabilities. Mitigation #1.1A-2at The City fire department is t informed of types and amounts of hazardous materials used by industrial developments. Special training ' sessions should be given in new methods or procedures for newly introduced hazards. g he City may need to collect a Miti ation #11A-2b T special fire assessment in order to provide adequate service to some types of industrial developments. This determination shall be made on an individual project basis by the local fire department. (Generally an extra assessment is necessary, when a development performs an unusual activity necessitating the fire department to obtain additional or specialized equipment.; B. Police - The Setting: ,The site is now under the jurisdiction of the Butte County Sheriff's Department. Upon the +annexation policing authority would be vested in the City of OrovIlle ' Police Department, The prezone site is expected to contiftVe 3 e D i t to be patrolled from the Police/Fire Facility on Lincoln Street. Response times would vary according to the location of patrol vehicles. Additional staff is not anticipated for the primary impact of industrial development; however, the secondary growth to occ,.., such as housing, schools and support services will eventually generate an increased need for additional police sere yes. Should the "worst case" in-migraticn and population increase of 4,000 occur, there would be a needed increase of about 8 officers. A more realistic estimate based on probable increase of 1,000 persons and a need for about 2 officers per 1.,000 population, would be 3 additional officers.. Offsetting the need for additional officers is the reduction in several categories of crime that would accompany the employment of 1000 fo 1500 of the currently unemployed and distressed 'workers. IMPACTS AND MITIGATIONS Impact #11B: The d-velopment of the project site and the resulting secondary growth will. require additional police services for traffic surveillance, responses to accidents, burgulary and other crimes. Mitigation #11B-1: Major industrial developers sha11 coordinate with the police department regarding the installation of alarm systems and the retention of private security guards and/or patrol, Mitigation 0118-2: Ad"vanc-d planning by the. Police Department administration should carefully consider growth projections as included in U.1,'S report and in. the General Plan EIR. C. Sewage Disposal - The Setfinq: The. prezone site is undcxveloped Adjacent parcels utiJ12 e private waste dispos,,l system of septic tank and drain field systems. The development of the site will require the extension of a trunk line from its existing location which terminates at the intersection of Georgia Pacific Way and 5th Avenue. The City has applied for EDA grant funding to extend the trunk line southerly on Baggett Marysville Road to Ophir Road. Development south of Ophir Road will require a lift station to pump sewage north up a gentle gradient to Ophir Road and thence north to the regional sewage treatment plant (SC -OP). The SC�OR treatment plant has a capacity of slightly in excess of 5 million gallons and it currently operating at, about 60% of its design capacity: IMPACTS AND MITIGATIONS Impact 011e -l: Dependent upon the types of development to 31< D. Public Water - The Setting: The City's presently anticipates that water lied to the site by the Cali`tornia Water will be supe plans to extend one or more Service company (CWS). The City rom a 12" existing main 900' south water mains to the site f and ]3aggett of the intersection of Georgia isPatof extend}' this main to a .Marysville Road. The City proposes aggett Marysl"ille Road and site between Ophi-r Road, is planning a two gaggett Palermo Road, where the City mi; lion gallon steel. tank erareavw ll be�su ficient fire volume and pressiate to th protection purposes at1d most consumptive industrial uses. estimated California Water Service now services acti've service population of 11,000 through r connections-. The majority of water is Obtained from the west branch of the Feather Rivet and botergnod,frandloare wells. Caster gizantaty and quality expected to be adequate for projected visage during the nett 20 years. 38 w i treatment and disposal nconunitted b occur, the remaining uldd be largely absorbed by facility coue cav�acitY of the sC-OR waste volume produced on the site. the potential Large developments should mitigation system for restroom and ublic sewage public utilize the p facilities. if large amounts cafeteria to be used for processing P disposal. systeisshall be reclamation, treatment and er to state, law send Reg developed Put-AUant Quality Control Board guidelines. Mitigation #llc-lb: Developments shall incorpoi:ate desagnecl to major landscape elements that are use significant amount�i of receive and efficiently treated effluent during the summer months. Mitigation #11C'=1c: Extensive wastewater recovery clingon sate. and recy shall be used 411C-2 On-site water reclamation systems may Impact increase mosquito breeding habitat. Mitigation 11C -2a Future developments shall onosquto squito Abatement coordinate with thadsuto reducir►gunty abita District for meth and implement recommended procedures. D. Public Water - The Setting: The City's presently anticipates that water lied to the site by the Cali`tornia Water will be supe plans to extend one or more Service company (CWS). The City rom a 12" existing main 900' south water mains to the site f and ]3aggett of the intersection of Georgia isPatof extend}' this main to a .Marysville Road. The City proposes aggett Marysl"ille Road and site between Ophi-r Road, is planning a two gaggett Palermo Road, where the City mi; lion gallon steel. tank erareavw ll be�su ficient fire volume and pressiate to th protection purposes at1d most consumptive industrial uses. estimated California Water Service now services acti've service population of 11,000 through r connections-. The majority of water is Obtained from the west branch of the Feather Rivet and botergnod,frandloare wells. Caster gizantaty and quality expected to be adequate for projected visage during the nett 20 years. 38 w t e .1 i IMPACTSAND MITIGATIONS Impact #11D: There will be a significant;', increase in overall water consumption which could r0auce service capabilities elsewhere in the '„ system. Mitigation #11D-1: Require the development of the proposed 2 million gallon water tank to the north prior to occupancy of the site. :Mitigation 0110-2: All industrial processes, landscaper irrigation and other on-site uses of public water supplies shall be designed to winimize consumption, evaporation and waste of water.. Mitigation #:1.1D-3: The City shall e11courage recycling of water on the site wherever feasible, and on-site or off-site reuse of water for landscaping, agriculture and other beneficial, uses. Mitication #111-4 The City shall coordinate emergency backup wager sources that shall interconnect the distribution facilities of Oroville Wyandotte Irrigation. District with those of California Water Service at the 2 million gallon reservoir. E. Schools The Setting: The precise impacts that will occur to the, local school districts will, depend upon the numbers and distribution of employees relocating into the Oroville and Palermo areas.. Local: schools have been experiencing stable or declining enrollment since 1970, and all area schools, with the ekceptionof Ophir Elementary school, have available classroom space. IMPACTS AND MITIGATIONS Impact 4111: Based on the assumption that site development could bring in --migration of anywhere from 35 to 1740 new families, those fami'llot could be expected to contribute h school students and 2 to 104 hi from l5 to 766 elementaryg school students. Should the higher estimates occur, the impact: would be significant, esp ociallY if new residents tend to residents concentrate res.de'in Ono theOkbvillee Assuming that all ad 'in , Tn hermalito and paltrmo`Element+ary School. Districts and in the broville Union High School District, the increase could resultri an increased need for classrooms, teachers and bussing. Dxsting sources of revenue to school districts may not be adequate for heeded expenclituret, Mitigation 411E --lc School districts should be notified as early as possible regarding the development of any large industrial use that is r induce significant migration of families expected to to the Orovil.le area. uh Mitigation #11E-2: School districts shov<ld be 4 encouraged by the City to develop the Information justify and implement the collection of necessary to fees from developers for required of construct-ion to.p y expenditures. F. Solid Waste - The Setting: The disposal of solid waste 'in the oroviese area is largely a function of private collection Waste is transported to a ooadt. It Sistltthen�hauled htolthe Avenue south of Cal Oak R fill on Neal. Road east of State County's only sanitary Land is in the process of Highway 99 near Chico. The County site in order to developing new landfill on a nearby fulfill the County's future disposal requirements: IMPACTS AND MITIGATIONS Impact #ll F: Solid waste inc-reases could create a p stem. The significant impact on theeXiS the quantity and to degree of impact.. woulddependeGted of waste materials to be call shall be encouraged for Mitigation or by --products produced roduced by industrial all wastes or by processes. Mitigation 411Fregulated-2: On-site storage ,and disposal of some toxic and hazardous materia.�s will r pollution by the County Health Departmette Control Board Water Quality Control Ana Boat ty, Regionaltment. off-site disposal of Fixe Dep be a requirement as yet, unknown hazardous wastes may of one of the above agencies. r G. Footer The Setting: Natural gas and electricity wild. be provided by ibn Pacific Gas & Electric �1'G�`net Ofethe �s'ite east smofsthe lines cross the southeast cornet Nettezn Pacific Railroad s trashelter. sNaturai�gas �lines 1are serve the livestock feeding t located on. Baggett Marysville Road to the Werth and along I.incoln Boulevard to the east, IMPACTS AND MITIGATIONS ment Of the site will. x Impact 110"". Industrial developI . _ ower facilities I the area and require the expansion of p �M t 40, i major extensions of service. Mitigation 417G -la None. Extension of goo and electric service has been anticipated. There Is a 12 KV power line on the project site. Should natural, gas be a requirement of future uses, a high 1r7ressure south from gas main would. need to be extended Industrial Unit 42 or west from Lincoln noulovard. impact #110-2: Development of the site will require the use of a significant amount of electrical energy and natural fuels. The nature of allowed activities (the manufacture, storage and distribution of gaan assemblage, processing, d as well as the provision of food, lodging$ supply transportation needs are all high energy consumers. In ustrial build addition,the on-site indings, wal-ohouuses, and offices will require lighting, heating and cool„i,ng. Mitigation #11G -2a: Energy conservation measures should be incorporated into development plans. This mould include,, but .not be limited to: a. The use of solar energy for heating and power; b. insulation at or above existing requirements; c. Landscaping to prevent solar radiation gain in the summer, but to permit sunlight to enter in the winter months; d. The use of energy efficient lighting systems; e. Co -generation of electrical po:•ter when feasible. Hj Communications Systems - The Settings a Telephone service lines of the Pacific Telephone and. Telegraph Company (PT&7') exist near the project site on both Lincoln Boulevard and Messina Avenue. Viacom Cablevision provides cable TV and FM radio service to the oroville area. Both servicer share poles and can be extended to the site as needed. The methods and. financing for service extensions for both utilities are regulated by the Public Utility Commission. IMPACTS ANb MITIGATION Impact #'l1H-l; There shall be coordination with the or cable tsystems in the area. To assure existing telephone that the tele communication system desired by the industrial user of the site are available and compatible with the basic systems now in place: expansion of the basic Impact #1.�=H`2 scheduling and , P each system community system shall. be maintained by 4 r management. 12. Population and Housing - The Setting: The recently adopted Housing Element of the General characteristics plan summarizes the area wide population supply. The `Land use Element reviews past and the and housing nd states average growth trends a se. The direct future population designation for each general type of u industrial. uses on the. surrounding effects of proposed is addressed under "Land Use" above. residential. uses IMPACTS AND MITIGATIONS r 'Impact 412A; The amount of population growth directly the site will. depend on the induced by development of of on-site employees relocated to Oroville by the who move number developing firm(s) and the number of other pecnle fill new job openings. Based on the to to Orovlle hoping oriented sites in northern development of other large rail" 6 ed California, it 1's asbetweenel eanda10tperhe nugbc�sso developable obe f wen the site will and will thus total 8 to 30.IOrovi�lleufromhaother acre move43-o to 50% of these employees be need to provide housing for 3 communities, there will a and their families. to 1740 new residents Total in -migration in much of that range would create a filled by the area's housing need which could not ,be housing stock. there approved 2�but , existing unitsu lotsVeor residential: subdiv18iOft area at present. In Orovlle planning not built in the the vacant sites designated for residential uses addition, han othusre thas . by the General. Plan nsould be aeveloPOd ov Veit 30,000 additional housing ' housing needed by onsithe te ` to provide the moving'to Oroville and their .fainiifes i. employees The indirect and growth 'inducing impacts of the sites rin SO X of xsite proposed development are discussedfurtheof pingtthis imp , this repuxt. The cumulative and other nearby areas planned for industrial use are report. The general finding esented in Section VI of this p at the Oroville area has the capacity both sections is that housing needs of in to accommodate the population growth and mon the)°eetoant�icipatedtain pldevelopmenectof new residents who move to th or indirectly related ' designated industrial areas; r Mitigation #P121-1:. With advance notice and accurate 3 of new employees, Information on the housing needs in the Orov'i11e area should be housing developers ut significant j s those needs vices t able to meet or other. adverse rental prices incxeases in sales o final residents. prior to any ' effects on local �` 42 i . .1 approval of plans for site development, the City shall thus require the developer to provide estimates of total on-site employment, the number and housing needs of employees who would be transferred to Orovill'e, and the timing or- such relocation. Mitigation 12A -2e The City shall communicate the above information to the media, Chamber of Commerce, Board of. Realtors and others involved in the total housing market. Mitigation #12-3: The City shall encourage industrial users of the site to hire local residents. 13. Risk of Upset - The setting; the only present on-site activity which has significant potential for explosion or release of hazardous substances in the event of an accident is the freight traffic on western Pacific's rail line. IMPACTS AND MITIGATIONS Impact #13A: The risk of upset from hazardous materials will increase dependent upon the amount and types of industrial development to occur. The movement of hazardous materials by rail is strictly regulated by the Department of Transportation. All local Fire Departments are provided with information regarding precautionary measures. Mitigation #13A: see Mitigation #1C-1 and #1C-2 Impact 413B: Development of- the site may obstruct emergency response and/or evacuation if developments employment and traffic levels reach projected levels. Mitigation #13B: When A nma'br 'industrial development is proposed for the site, the prospective employer, in conjunction with local emergency service representatives, shall: coordinate and develop: adequate evacuation and emergency response plans. 14. Aesthetics The setting: staff isnot aware of any expressed community sentiment that the site 'is of significant scenic value or that its development will obstruct any scenic views, Due to topography�s nab highly. visible fromthe east; south or areas northwest tree most of the siteis but is clearly visible from the north and southwest: 43 p IMPACTS AND MITIGATIONS Impact #14A: Because of the rural theiproposed industrial the site and surrounding areas, with surrounding development will contrast sharply development in appearance and function. This contrast will be most visible from the Crurahe l residential. area to the southwest and Ophir Road Mitigation 414A-10 prior to development of tho site, all plans for site layout, building exteriors and the landscaping shall be reviewed and approved by City's Department Review Boardi Mitigation measures oil Mitigation #1.4A-2: g preservation of existing vegetation in sub -'section 5 on vegetation and measures on landscaping in sub= 0 Mitigation 416A: Lighting in proxi;mit to residential areas mut snib be mn s Zethe scattereOt'l light otherwise designed to mini visible to residences. impact #16B: The metal. buildings frequently used for P roduce very s Tong reflections 1 industrial. development can p and glare.. y Mitigation ##16B The City shall Encourage the use of nd bonded earth tone f1.ishetion andaotherildiarms sof the use of trees, v g shielding of metal reflective surfacing. 1� f 1p 4 a It is important to note that many of Lie significant V. SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS WHICH CANNOT BE AVOIDED The mitigation measures recommended in the pr.+avioU s section designation and zoning would allow an urban intensity of are intended to reduce the potentially significant impacts residential development which wou!6 create many substantial of the project to acceptable levels of .i.mt)ot:tance or intensity. The purpose of this section is to determine government services. if the zoning to M-2 recently which potentially significant effects can be mitigated to initiated by the Butte County Board of Supervisors is an insignificant level and which will remain significant despite the implementation of the recommended mitigation this report may still occur or be more difficult to measures. The classification of impacts in this fashion, as mitigate. . ' stated below, is a convenient summary which can be referenced by decision makers in making necessary findings about the sufficiency and effectiveness of mitigation To Acceptable Potentially measures. Level Significant It is important to note that many of Lie significant environmental impacts identified in this report may be. unavoidable even if the proposed prezoning and annexation are not approved. The existing County General Plan designation and zoning would allow an urban intensity of residential development which wou!6 create many substantial adverse impacts, particularly ,in the areas of drainage, traffic, aesthetics, growth inducement, utilities and government services. if the zoning to M-2 recently initiated by the Butte County Board of Supervisors is approved and industrial; development of the site is allowed by the county, many of the additional impacts described in this report may still occur or be more difficult to mitigate. . SUMMARY OF POTENTIALLY SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS Mitigated ,Mitigated But Still To Acceptable Potentially Level Significant r g n Solis 1. Gradin and. excavatio wild. result in increased erosion and deposition of sediment. X 2. Conversion of seasonal cattle graze to industrial u$es. X 5, Exposure to ground shaking from eatthq cake activity. X 4. Exposure of Soils to chemicals and other wastes. X 5. Increase of storm water Mows into Wyman Ravine and downstream flood patential 4 �. 6. Exposure of surface water and underground water to a variety of pollutants. X ' 7. Removal of vegetation and displacement of wildlife. X 8. Degradation of.local air quality. X 9. Adverse impacts on nearby residents pastoral life style. X _10. Inducement of additional off-site industrial., commercial and residential uses. X 11 Temporary and long-term increases in noise levels from construction and plant operation. X 12. increase in traffic and rail related noise levels. X 13. Increase in the number of vehicle miles travelled annually. X 14. Increased use of existing unpaved roads, X 15 Inadequate access roadway_ from Ophir Road to the site. X 16. Increased traffic hazards. X 17. Increased fire hazards,. X 18i Increased need for police SEry ices. X 19. SC -OR sewage treatment and, disposal capacity for other users may be reduced. X 20 On-site reclamation processes may affect mosquito breeding habitat: X 21.. Increased water consumption. X 22. Increase in school age children. X 23 Increase in solid waste generated. X 47 r a4.. Increased energy use. x 25, Increased need for housing. X 26, Increased risk of upset. X 27. Conflict with emergency ' c.-racuation and responses. X 28. Visual perspectives will be altered. x 29. increased night lighting x and glare. 30. Cumulative effects of gelated and similar industrial X a development. V . e 4 fs �1 VI. ALTERNATIVES A. No Industrial Annexation The "no project" alternative in this situation consists of the City not prezoningand annexing the project site or any other large site for industrial. development. This alternative was considered and rejected because it did note, meet the basic project objective of creating a site o.0 approximately 600 acres within City limits which could. be acquired and developed by one or more large industrial operations requiring direct rail service. Although there are approximately 2,500 acres of industrially zoned land within City limits at this time, there are no areas within the City where it would be feasible to put together such a site. The previously annexed area north of the project site t and south of Ophir Road is otherwise suitable but only contains 240 acres. There is enough vacant level acreage in the Industrial Unit No. 2 area and other industrial zones further north of the site, but it is widely scattered, separated by roads, existing industrial uses and public I� facilities, and split into many parcels of varied size and ownership. The potential environmental impacts resulting from development of the above two areas were addressed in the EIR for Industrial Unit No. 2 and the conditional Negative Declaration for Industrial Unit No. 3. The types of impacts identified in those documents are very similar to impacts described in this report; the major differences relate to . differences in soil conditions and distance from protection services. Since the significance of many effects of industrial development is related to the site acreage, development of smaller sites would reduce overall impact. Any reduction in the amount of land available for industrial development would also reduce the potential for new jobs, increases in tax revenues, new construction, service business and other economic benefits to the community: Since neither the areas described herein nor nearby sites outside City limits adequately fulfill project objectives, the "no project" alternative would leave the only suitable site in the Orovill.e area half in the Cit and h ale such a outs�.de, ndustria�. site ' Integrated idevelopment, _ .,.of would be extremely difficult, with permits and approvals req uired fromy both the Cit and the Coant`.= The provision fire and police protecti.on, apd other Of utilitiesrp overnment services would also require extra courdin,\tion g q and special agreements, $. Industrial Annexations in Other Locations- There ate no other unincorporated areas adjacent to City limihs which could be annexed to create an industrial 49 j site of sufficient size near the Western Pac,i..i';i.c Railroad. , C. Reduction of Project Site: Although the main purpose of the proposed annexation is to create a large industrial site west cel: the Western Pacific Railroad and north of Wyman Ravine, the proposal was not Limited to this area for several reasons. Near.l.y I all of the 60 acres of privately owned lane! east of the railroad and most, of the 48 acres south of Wyman Ravine and west of the railroad is part of one parcel, of 306 acres All of this parcel and two smaller adjacent parcels we,rC included in the proposed annexation in order to "square up" the boundaries, to prezone to M-2 the limits of the area considered appropriate for industrial use and so designated by the City's General Plan and to provide adequate acreage for "buffer" zones, No objections to industrial zoning of the site have been voiced by property owner, nearby residents or public officials at either the City Planning Commission hearing in November 1982 or the December 1982 LAFCo discussion of the need for an EIRi if no industrial development occurs east of the railroad or south of Wyman Ravine, the potential for significant adverse effects on nearby residences and agriculture will be reduced in the fields of noise, traffic and drainage. However, if these two portions of the site are not annexed to the City, they can still be developed according to County requirements. The zoning and General Plan designation now applied to most of the site by the County will allow new residential development close to industrial development, creating the potential for adverse impact.i,s which may be even more significant than those generated b, the project under consideration. if the County zoning and General Plan designation on the site were changed to allow industrial uses and only part of the total site were within City boundaries, the entire site ' could be developed industrially and the potential environmental impacts would be very similar to those caused by development entirely within City limits. However, ' mitigation of those impacts could be complicated by the ' 5uri86ictional boundary and the lack of a County noise control ordinance. Developmeht of railroad connections and channel improvements would also be made more difficult if both sides of the railroad and Wyman Ravine are not entirely within City limits. _ b. Enlargement of Project Site, The westerl southerl and easier ' y boundaries of the project site comes and to boundaries p J p aries between the industrial designation and other designations on the itand Use Designations" map of the General Plan. Surrounding areas are in various types of agricultural and resid��ntial use and are so designated by the Plan. No $Uch areas were included in the project site because of the nbove reasons, because no additional land was needed to achl.eve project ' objectives, and because industrial develapment of such areas would require high acquisition costs and generate increased environmental impacts. t, v l VII-. SHORT-TERM USES VERSUS LONG-TERM EFFECTS A Short -Term Considerations The only project related actions proposed at this time r are the prezoning and annexation of the project site. The immediate short-term effect of approving these proposal; will be to add 366'acres to the total of 2,500 acres now 1 zoned for industrial use within the City limits. More specifically, a gross area of 366 acres will be added to ' the City's present supply of 1,900 acres which arta undeveloped and zoned for industrial use, an increase or, 19%. The project'site will comprise about 9% of the 4,125 acres now designated. for industrial use in the City's General Plan. d There are several reasons why prezoning and amiexation of the project site is proposed now rather than at some later time. Responding to high unemployment rates, the seasonal nature of local industrial employment and community attitudes favoring growth, the City of Oroville has devoted substantial energy in recent Years to attracting and preparing for new industrial development. This effort has been evidenced by the formation of a Redevelopment Agency and plan, applications for federal grants, approval of h industrial development bonds, and coordination with the Orovilie Industrial Development Corporation and County -level efforts. From the many recent contacts with large corporations and others involved in industrial development, local people have learned of a need in Northern California for large sites where direct rail, service can be developed;. Prezoning the project site is appropriate at this time because the M-2 zoning will implement and be consistent with the recently adopted Industrial designation in the 'City's revised General Plan. Completing prezoning and annexation procedures within the next few months, along with certification of the final version of this report, will strengthen Local, marketing efforts and will allow much faster processing of permits and approvals when specific ' development plans for the site are actually proposed. H. Long-term Effect's The long-term effects of the proposed project would include all adverse effects which are related to the future use of the site by a large industrial operation, as opposed to the temporary impacts of initial site development and building construction. Impacts which could significantly affect the future use of surroending areas or pose long+term risks to health and safety are presented in Sectlon M 1 21 ' C. Cumulative Effects Nearly all of the environmental impacts discussed in the preceding sections will be caused directly or indirectly by development of the project site itself. However, from the larger cale viewpoint of the entire Oroville community, it is more important to, look at tho total impacts of all of the related industrial development; which is planned for the area around the project site. Tho analye%is of cumulative impacts required by State Guidelines is particularly appropriate in this situation because the project site is the southern most extension of a large i.ndustriallzoned area and is directly related by utilities and access to other industrial development in the Ophir Road area. It is the City'S intention in proposing this annexation that the portion of the site west of the railroad be ` developed as an integrated unit with the 240 dares to the north. y major industrial development of this total site of 480 acres would undoubtedly generate a need for related services and thus cause development of some nearby industrial sites both inside and outside of City boundaries. The nearby areas designated for industrial uses in the City's General Plan are shown in Appendix 2. For purposes of this analysis, it is assumed that industrial development similar to this project could occur on most of the industrially designated land south of Georgia Pacific Way and east of Highway 70. Including the annexation proposed herein, about 800 acres of this area would be inside City Jimits and about 1,000 outside. About 1,200 acros, or two-thirds the .jf gross total, is relatively undeveloped and probably available for industrial development at some point in time; The environmental impacts which could result from development of the area described above have been evaluated sevett,.l documents in the past few years, including: ?� yin 1 Y COnditional Negative geclaration for M-2 pr.ezonng of 970 acres and annexation of Industrial Unit No. 3 area (City -• 1981.): 2. Conditional Negative beclaretion for Northwest Pacific Resources subdivision between Ophir Road and Rusel Road. ( County .. 1580). 3. Ntgative Declarations for industrial zoning and General Plan designation for two sites on Lincoln F3oul,evard (County 1979 & 1981). 4. Initial Study for Wyman. Ravine Drainage Maintenance District (County 1982). a The effects of nearby industrial development as described in the above documents are very similar to the project impacts described elsewhere in this report. The most significant impacts identified concern traffic, drainage;, waste disposal, fire protection, water supply and noise. Impacts resulting from development inside City Limits will differ from impacts of unincorporated devel.opmpnt because of the availability of City sewer lines and nater, lines. The total development of the 1,200 acres described above could result in the following types of significant cumulative impacts: 1.. Soil erosion and deposition of sediments in Stream channels, 2. increased surface water runoff into Wyman Ravine and other drainage channels. 3. Increased downstream flooding. 4. Pollution of groundwater and surface water. 5. Displacement of wildlife 6. Increased traffic volumes and related hazards. 7. Air Pollution,. 8. Discouragement of residential development on nearby g p ' properties_. 9. Inducement of additional industrial and commercial development within the community. 1`0i objectionable noise levels from construction, vehicles and industrial processos. lli Need for. additional fire and police protection services, 12. Need to eXpand and extend facilities for sewage disposal, water supply, electrical power and other utilities. 13. Increased and decreased mosquito breeding habitat. 14. Increased consumption of energy and fuels. i5. Increased economic activities in the otovill.e area resulting in needs for housing, schools, parks and other services and facilities. 54 1 t 1 L Measures to mitigate the above impacts are contained in Section IV. Many of the above impacts will be mitigated by the measures recommended in Section IV of this report, by mitigation measures it, various conditional negative declarations adopted by the City ai,u,County, and 'by normal requirements by both agencies: The type project accurately and respond of impacts most difficult toto quickly are those related to migration of new residents to Oroville. If it is assumed that the 1,200 vacant acres desgribed above are developed to a similar intensity the as project site, the total number of new industrial employees could range from 11200 to 12,000. A mid.-range figure consistent with OIDCo analysis of the r project site would be 6,000 new employees in the industrial areas south of Georgia �'aci.fic Wa Application of the previously used assumption that 10% to 50 of the new jobs Would be filled by people who do not now live in the Oroville area, 600 to 3,000 industrial workers would relocate here. Doubling those figures to account for new service jobs created and the migration of unsuccessful job seekers results in an estimated cumulative migration to Oroville of 1,200 to 6r000 workers and their families. As pointed out earlier in the evaluation of impacts, the Oroville area has the�p`land,onutilitiehsusand other ' resources to provide the required housing and other services over the 20 year planning period used in the, City's General Plan. The biggest problem that the Oroville community will have to face related to industrial development of the project site and sim.;ilar areas is the rate of development and in-migration. If the total buildout of the 4 000 acres designated for industrial use in the takes place in a CitY's general plan relatir* Y 9tadual fashion over the . Ott'20 year plo msdoubt that d eslatre Ionshouang fees,facilities,serviCes andattitudes modified as necessary to accommodate the projected physical development and population growth. If, however, much of that industrial developtnent occurs in a short period of time, the City and other public service agencies are going to be hard pressed to provide adequate levelsof service. Because of the time and ." money required to increase staffs► design improvements, build roads e.ttend utilities, expand face l� ties and provide housing, quick responses ' to rapid p growth will not be likely, No one simple measure can eft'ectivel.y mitigate all of the disruptive effects of rapid gr6wth; but it is obvious that all local , �p public agencies must antics"ate possibility that and be ready With the r necessary y plan's and financing mechanisms. Implementation of financing mechanisms directly VIII. SIGNIFICANT IRREVERSIBLE ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGES This section evaluates the significant effects of the environmental project which would not be 1t'e4sible to be mitigated at some later. date. Irreversible effects considered include the consumption of natural resources, the commitment of land to proposed uses, for health hazards. and the potential Some of the project's significant environmental effects are unavoidable because they are related - natural resources during the initialthconstrucptiont� industrial r oof facilities on the site. f development of the industrial site will consume arrdProposed use of the following natural resources. Prevent alternate r 1. Land and space; 2. Soil which could grow crops, grass for livestockand other vegetation; 3. Natural,as g , petroleum products and el.ectricii 4. Water; 5. Oxygen; 6. Construction materials (met - gl.ass, concrete, other minerals, (metal, Petroleum products, As long as industrial use of the sit hysidal development continues, all but one of the above resources W. continue to be consumed or committed in fair.'ly Significant quantities. The consumption of construction materials is a temporary impact which will be. followed by the continuing consumption of whatever physical substances are needed for the 1 type of industrial processes taking place on the site. of could be e nbut ucthe recycled and nlaur�als reused elsewhere and electrical resources listed quiupo above are consumed use and are not available for reuse except through recycl the heat or steam produced. ing of Perhaps the most significant use of natural resources project is the commitment ihis of Land and space to industrial development. The City's c. Ube of the site has y'initiiatedent to industrial already been ith the recent adaption of a major General Plan revision which designates this site for industrial use. ion of General Plan designation of industriaptiise Proposed for the the Couhty will.. pt6V de a similar y commitments state a clear d0mmitment, Both site, implement adopted preference far :future use of the P policies, and express the findings the site '1 meets many of the locational needs of industrial activities and is not needed for other types of 5 N use during the 20 year planlu ng period. These commitments will allow and facilitate a vel-'-yintensive form of development with a high ratio of investment and value per acre, and a low probability, Of being, converted to less intensive uses. Once comploLo industrial development of the site takes place, the sitols location, history and value will make future conversion to residential or agricultural uses an extremely difficul,(, costly and unlikely possibility. Even if all industrial facilities on the site were totally removed at some time in the future, the project related investments in utility extensions, road improvements and adjacent. ,ndustri.il development to the north would create strong pressures to again develop the site for industrial use. Other irreversible significant impacts of thio project and industrial development in general include the adverse effects of pollutants, toxic materials and noise on the health of humans, wildlife and vegetation. 'These types of physical damage to living organisms can be healed or ' reversed at a later date, but a lot of time and money may first be required and some organic damage may never be totally counteracted. Mitigation measures to minimize consumption of some natural resources and decrease the probability of irreversible environmental damage are recommended in Section Tv of this report. The irreversible removal of 366 acres from Oroville's inventory of large vacant sites available for other uses is not considered significant, because of the availability of vacant land in all General. Plan use designations. . I IX GROWTH INDUCING IMPACTS The purpose of this section is to review the ways in which the proposed project could foster economic or popVl.a'tion growth and to evaluate the significant environmental impacts of that growth. Industrial development of the site will first require the expenditure of many millions of dollars for design and construction of buildings, pavement, railroad connecLions,. utility extensions, landscaping and other physical improvements. Much of the work could be performed by local firms with only temporary increases in numbers of employees and little need for any employees to permanently relocate here. No matter how many local residents are used, any large construction related expenditures would produce a large but temporary "shot in the arm" for the local economy. The initial development of the site requires the construction of major off --site improvements which will facilitate industrial cTrowth on the 240 acres het.ween the site and Ophir Road to the north. .Improvements in that area will include two paved access roads to Ophir Road and. extension of water, sewer, natural gas, electrical and telephone lines. Following the proposed annexation that area and the project site will probably be developed as a unit with one or more large industrial r,nerations. Many of the environmental impacts generated. will thus be related and similar in both areas. However, many types of impacts will be less significant in the 240 acres already in the. City because that area has less contact and visibility from non -industrial areas and does not adjoin Wyman Ravine. The type of development induced by this project on nearby sites is anticipated to be mostly industrial and commercial. uses which provide direct services to on-site operations. Such services could include the extraction; processing and transportation of raw materials; the manufacturing of parts, equipment, machinery] containers and packaging wholesaling and storage-, maintenance, cleaning, repair utility delivery and printing services; and retail stores and services catering to industrial. employees. Depending on the type of processing or manufacturing operations to occupy the project site, the directly related services listed above could easily occupy as much area as the 480 acre site herein proposed for coordinated industrial clevt>lopmsnt Many, of hot most of these service uses could be located in the Ophir Road industrial area, and there is no doubt that far more industrial and commercial uses can be accommodated by the 2,500 vacant acres designated for industrial use in the City�s General Plan. 'The creation of addit ,al industrial employment Opportunities will reduce oke major obstacle to tnigra,l- on 5 to this area and should induce increased growth rates fot M several years before, during and after ac;:ual 81Ae development. The project description in this report contains a local estimate that total development of the 400 acres between Ophir Road and Wyman Ravine will requiro a ' relocation of 200 to 1,000 families to O.rovill,e,. If it ,ts' again assumed that actual in -migration will be at leat,t double those figures because of new service jobs created and the unsuccessful job seekers who choose not to leave, from 400 to 2,000"families could be expected to move here. If that development occurs in one concentrated period, a population "boom" of several years is quite possible in the oroville area. The magnitude of a sharp increase in growth rates is dependent upon the number of employees relocated here, the types, of direct services required, the duration and value of constructionj and the hiring preference given to existing residents. ■ 60 X. ;REFERENCES City of oroville, D.EI.R, for Revisions to the Oroville General Plan, January 1983. City of Oroville, Revised Oroville General Plan, January 1983. Butte County, Wyman Ravine Drainage Study, 1981.. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Survey of the Oroville Area, 1926 Series. Arizona Department of Transportation, Trip Generation Intensity Factors, 1978. i:ity of Oroville, Zoning ordinance, 1982. City, of Oroville E.D.A. Application, Exhibit D, 1982.. Cook Associates, Aerial Photograph of Site, 1982. Snowden, Jim, Butte bounty Habitats, 1981. Butte County, Butte County General plan, Seismic Safety, Safety, Noise and Scenic Highways, 1977; and Land Use Element, 1979. City of Orovi.11:et Prezone -Initial Study for the Proposed. Site, November 8p 1982. Butte County LAFCo, Initial Study for the proposed Rezone and General Plan Amendment, E.R.D. Log 082-12-07•-03, January 13, 1983. ' Cook Associates, Assorted file information received from OIDCo and the oroville Chamber of Commerce,, 1981-1-982. State of California, Office of Planning and Research, Economic practices Manual, 1978i, T.B. Housing and Urban Development, riederal. Insurance Administration Flood Hazards and Zones. 61 I XI POOTNO".SFS 1/ Source: Trip Generation Intensity Factorst Transportation Planning Division, Arizona Department Transportation, 1979. o1 2/ 39.2 trips per gross acre x 348 acres x 5.2 miles per trip = 70,936 ADVMT Althoughe Air Resources Board has not calculated CEF'sfor yearsafter 1995, a guesstimate figure has been derived for the year 2000, based on the average decline for - each factor during the period 1980 through 1995 (Butte County DEIR Chico 'Land Use Moment), ,t XII. APPENDICES 1.. Vicinity Map 2. industrial Unit No. 4 Annexation and Sphere of Influence Boundaries. 3. Industrial Unit*No. 4 Annexation Map 4. Orovi,l.le City 'Limits Vlood Zones 5. Topography and 6. Soils Map 7. Initial Study by the City of OroVille 8. M-2 District Zoning 9. Federal Standard Industrial Classification Manual r 0 r t i � BUTTE COUNTY _ ' "VICINITY MAP " - �Y• -.: -f -r ..t.CY". ...tr,. Al�'x �: }, >.r., ,1.^ rrrt ,'M�,7.✓ `' �..,.t' .��;..,. \�\ ,\,,a �'§ `,. ''titi \`..� _- ti - \ . t s i�r.. d;. ,.,,�: aw. � tVdiri>;, ,�. r ^r., , `',.'#•Sa,'� +1;.. + ,,.v+r, ,1f ..,, ti: \r tb ., .. `<. r ,,��\ , rA-'.f" ' I1# _�_. a.i+,, ✓,"rtes:.r1r.a'rn�I,"rkw'fe,Ai• 'tt\,!«r . �,+r�."".„A.+e{,"h.ic i•r,tf..`''�e` n'.Yd""ar.�p"�e��,�qY+• ..°'.,",'y,w.f>"rY,�4y,r+ v..r^'�/, ..rSs..' �rti,..1r, y. -•a W„,•+.A,.+�r '""i�:f`.a}'t1`.-....•+�.!•,'+� :•t,xF.,(,Y",dln.i'Yr.w,4-. W"`a"qqYl•° .'"�.wr..+,p^a.w,+,Y~r,..'Yh'.:�r,.rti:,-..rf,.: ,.�".,Yy''#.��+,"•N-2-. Wr'mY.„•y;. dit x . .m,s * r.!.,.axt�Y.'.i�.D« .4�..',, `*Vr� rY' .P"(r`N"n',w •,,`krYee Mt'mx>+.a';�,fiY.n,>, Yu<I>•,tyM5.ar ."4.,:rr, e..�e;+bsy tY. ,<'.'TaA!N.Xf.°y°�� '!",.� i.^.'r"?"v,T.l�' 0.,�.' . `�a"l.•,r,1�•,�•p .''..h`•',mI:. ,,r..�i.y!' „„+,.,�t..t•f'brt �,'f."�v.�..rt.�l".,,�.a",a p.: +'n+�1 ,r.,=r'�.!�'.,•.:.. •'«...:�~+..}^,'!m w. w".,S,W-rr ",,.r�3 ,'�.,r:.m.Y �.rr^,,rr w� .td•"f•i :-f �Y1�yy4i^.,.�, .:drv�.-.. x� ,T.qMi.,, r�"-,.�,.rx, .Y. .. . ��,�i,..r''r'.„ 1,✓'1., :r�,"n..:sf mi.�,«#..•p....::3t....`�u ,A�a*. Y.r4F,m..e_, .�y,,w,yrY._q,.brgy',: u',f��.k+..R.r�,+o ,p.rr..!b`.xS. r>a~yrb•<rx,a.i:M.fi, 'e•,r•., :!.� r+a ,-� ,Mx.p'.Y„.. .>t�#pb^,m"ntt,.0a.>.... wA.`, OROVILLE Y..:r .•4wx,lm•.r Yd>°..r..a^"nSF;„..f„', W. a- }v.d,-� •, �;,r.t;•;,x.,"ryw°Y.+ :::b, ,� :.•F,e'r_o.','f.'fiS, .. .y. 3 ,,: .”.., qt�4ps.rr,'..Y{,,tn.«.#•i<...r.t` ,,.p.,„.:•..4x., t�.S's�i..',,n":e.I..atr.i'..w ♦4:Y.1•m1:rs�M�'�,�.ry^.h..• ..•z•h 4.r qre".a>' a- .,•. ,,',,,., ",�a:' -,r..s, A,'YI,in^ ',f,«\,„;.."r:-�•..,q , w •:�✓,,•S� •:.:. Yr, . w�> .".GENERAL ,"r;a»,.xn"C K,rr•...::n.a .:,. >i7�q`, ,:, t. :" , S., p°',,'1SY� Yr.ta�.>'.a,},r'r..+,...Y...Ryt,m„.,. Yc,•4F d,s .r^ . ,,.' r ," `• ,.ru• ,C/,^ar �.'.M. ,',r.,�e..;, ,,mr ,.,'t _ "'rr..A,,._�a".-':.:•;, ' s «x. " ., �r,.d.a'm.Yt,tr.' �,....::: �.1p.�,::,:�.•.. m . ' ' e',..._/?w.. ;� ,: .p: t, •..ritL }rr. .•`:.,.>„,.,tr,r :11r✓F`,t} >.f.o+♦,"r4,•t Ys.u}'-rf.}t:„,,r".r`,/1'f:ryr,•#'-°I tr,,;e{' }.A.,,t:'�-,>+�_.,§•'.d4 . Y , 'Y,a',r6:°,:p.,E,."..eff•�1,.,.Pi',:�r•r,a.r ",.. •4,,rsj,YP',;. � '..•r:.>i.•r'•�.N..?.'r.. a Y>.' Lr.w,.tF+ .^.:+L'4,;rd .d,x.�n•,,�.Yr� ?A",as' •..”. :.n rf,'.' , b„w� .'�:.E;.a:t. a.:e..,a"�•,.,n.��Y�,<e. ♦.r ,s ,'. N LANA USE DESIGNATIONS . i.�'aw.,.J• r. ,- ,-,•. - . r.„. , r, ,C'," W•:+ ` 4 °.y`,.a .r, . Cf .,.,•Y>q,.!Jr„• /-' f !:.,"f +s .� r ,�,!.: .r,A" it „, .«/, !`'. „��,' •„�f,., ”' �..7f_,";'G,..� r`<•:.F ,.:',..t.t .:}'r• . �.�3.abrN.:.; .,.'q�,:G#.,.,. " r -'.l. .,..��,:,s. fi• ,.,Y''+f.•::,'r.,,.. ,••.l t.�ir,pa'tt .GR , t•r}'.:.".k'm^{.:'dtY,:,[, "g4y'1..,`itL't., :,: i �4.'tr��..�i:,.,k., d.v„,• ,,ar. ':r,„,if:*na ";�,.�4ri,..'., �'' ,.�::Y,?_-..a1::-4 w.rl:' ;.✓.. '':'^. r`::;:” , .,'`.',,:.,....,,r:Y:�,..+n .,r .'.,:..:M:.»::'.rr."u ., :r!;4 p.,s' Y '• ,.,};R.rs•>a :„. a t •.Yf'�e ay akr.N :� ,�',S T4,,3s :i £4,�x�F,-+Aa0.}rs.•,.,:y.frtr,�1 r,,�7•Sp. ,;a:y,,' , a'Axi,F, '3."F, "� yp:,}r�.' .,:/_+.-i.`•';':a-, ,',a f.s.'. "'_-''7...ac,;�,,::'�K ,I :, .,S".'rx a•ar Y: PER AMENDMENTS ADOPTED FEBRUARY , .•�MiFi �,A"r.. ^.At,•L :.,_M. -.x .— :. ..rr. _S,fl•� :i .., m:•.�`,.i:.=x�I�ti,*:,;Ar,” "r..'A.,';. , -,. : R,•, v.- 'Y+,,i3ry_,.,"y .,`,x�. ;•�,»,>. -, J ,t-,'�.n"y,.';t....,.','p�.,�,.r..±:;.�.r., -;. b .:.h.r�n.,�r a- ..,�M,1ly.�1A,r} �,Y'Mr�t . •�'H.� :.-,a;..',,;".a .,,N . . ,.'. «":,", ,.:a :>-� '„ �� ,.. " r.✓ , r,..'.`,,.e•,6::•.:��,.n. >,,•�d.<amry,, s k.y....,�,,„ a+ : .�.:,'ar, •x ,. : . r.�..^ " :✓ x d,..n�_.:.. ,",,",, '.'•.,�!.i,.,c, ,,- -.rs,�:. 's.,,,'.s,',..'. A; .,: ,.a"1 ' • ,51 ;.xy ,.`hre ,S..s�3[,, ,•_;. 1 , ,.. � ,rF,.'�.,,',.. •. ,,. .Y�nft�'t�: .",wti'�"v,:\.y�tk/yy,,,..;.•�4\("�_i5 4 ,,.*,qq, "�. ,�\ti\,.\e. ,.S."y°,.-. +��y'��'\y'�.S ' ,a \\."'- t{�"_\",4, -�#\,a'',��'e\r,A",er,yr"\b.4r't\•t.•:':..vn ,".'�a+°.�'a4cr;a,...,4'w <1ti""•, 'afik� y�,, .t. '..: ,,\'1 , �.\.�ey,.,\((i�r"\\� ."u• .*''', ,1:+ .k•:'"`e.4, \'tia \�Ze�iµwy'#. , a '' 4.\�\'\,".-,\. . •:.. , ,.\.' ;\,:r/ -" �♦�,K�a','x*.,",_•.\,+,\+�'\,r.�\„=a, , \l4'.,Yt.,�.` ♦4r4}.,ti�.,.i•.,p�`:,�.. �a1,'"\^,, �y '\'�.jf\.'��ia4�'\♦�„'A, \�.LA r.i},:,`p: n,1\♦\4s,im.i-�n.,t ' 1♦4, r4, � --t4. .. 1t ' #.:,p,� w.• •,A"'. N, '�n-. ,w„�+.Y ,i •rY+ ,°,..t�]tt♦'y«-_.x,vy'•:: -'�Yw: Y . ....;�w•-.., -.•�3,1983 BY COUNCIL. aRURAL COvMERCIALRESIDENTIAL RBAN RESIDENTIAL INDUSTRIAL LOW DENSITY :t ,\N a� OL UREA TIAL RESOURCE ANAGENENT UM DENSITY . URBAN RESIDENTIAL LIC HIGH DENSITY ,ut F yt�Y♦iwr{# •,i,.�p:t•�.riv,f;d' Planning Area Boundary n .{�µ f�l}sb A . SPHERE OF IV.�M��'rF'r:�.�fii,.�N- �...S "',`rti•� •itSW`E{. '°Pa.."+fwr,y,`•a�e 4l'a.0f,.�' $r„t"U,c'!.'v• ,,"Y�,��,;B�.'�r.•-`��#"t.4{w (6�l"k/.,,rrE p •, ,�f.p. '� ���'w'�^xR 4i„��•'. N'@•}tlt4(yt4}1a�l�r"•.1' „C ,`" A+ ir.•S•Fi.ma.'^i�T}Y.l. . -,le 1`. t ,C; ,B>,?°�r S}.r:>:tl^.y'.'r e.°�•a �”.t-.'+i .:tiS'” ''i'.. fta•„. ,,E ' s w.- em• w.sµ,.,• = .yB .®, Ud'. °N:;.�. , \4�4D�s, .Y "ntkV p,,„.,„ArY ttn .rYFz .' R a' d1 ^,YI3!4`v . 1 E FOR THE /ITY OF yq 1 M", $ PIED BY EXISTING © •iYSTHE BUTTE COUNTY 4;T! Iy FORMATIO eAL -4�GNCYLU COMMISSION IN APRIL1974, ropVYe PROPOSED EXTENSION _.. . .�,�t-jY,�:aS.K.✓,,.r 'd,��t.I'4i aai,a"i�} knr"(:a FA't '.H;,:!,dG.i.'Yat. '�f.f j�'t:t' .. . , rw.J :ys•,N� �.." iw.t, .• �,L4,ir4�r�y,t'4 .Y�Y a s .f ',,�r� ^Y�,''rea,F.t,.S,,'.^.,.•.:,,�,%,+.nsw..,.::z.w3;:W-.ca , ,v. wv,.r"r,..Y•',sa.r.i,,'t�r., s.,p"'.,,tyM1.A..:.,.',.T.r: .x...'.>.>.5.vi..''s:..<,+;.,, 7:.-;.y,i,.^w. .C„ .w, . -ro'+R.w•$,",u„,,"V,�•.G< ?. -..a, t..+1..x.,E.e>,,.,pryaa.3^:„..:�.-}.e4:",��.•j�.1.,.a,„:,.�i": p..'.M.:..a-�.,,.:, h ..'i:,.x,.yfi. .'•XS„vM .: �...",,i+.'.,3,.'st x ,, 4 t..a�.r:•*�...•^":---i{:S.;.1,,',txW_:.,< .ro•,, . .n,yy�..5...„:, •., Fw�_.x,F, �` ,4 :" - _.,',twFy ,. .�Y,_•.,. . vF.; ° -,.,. . . . :a'-'.` r . iK . ,.,.5 ,a ?rx,at...zw,,,,:,.,.:fa...�;,. .,.::,,:.7s.;.:,,.Gr'.'�P+.i:',,aZ--. '. .d.',}^^,:n'w,�A^.5+ 4.5;ra:N6li..,,,,•.,. ',.,„�3r,s:i.r.,.'^..r,l�.i::.,GY.C:-,": : .'° r, -' .. :.:r .,«� , ,.�.ao, '".tA,aL.f5 ' .,y•',,.. .y r2,,.F4�+nv"H.o�Y.,,7qy�.',#{-.,. .,:',.,,.',S.� .:-> :''q_i'..•; 3 :.,::`..: .n�:.,.� .'',&.�,4•..9x,'�m-.,, 4 �,.,g,v.„`.�; ,„. s , ..va.,q(•,..,i.r.x.f,;••`.,. . A'. ;tarti-$,.1 .: 'o: 9,. .•. . ke , u} F Ai , fiLstttr,,;E�.Rtk. .t�;'r>tsA,,^.•'° L}f:iu.ris:;�Yae."-,. a',.."w. t,tr:x`.x y ` V ,x>Ms.,i k4d')a<`k4fr� •'. ,�xi:��1Y3 4 '1 �• r , x "l„•'e' �µ�:T• Y �. N enexa INDUSTRIAL IT Area NEXT.:. Prf!{jfJr y i frh:..,.-J•.te;.iY.• . ”„� r , . ., e , ,”. 1:_I.-," '`,:, . a..n„ * t :ki .. "rI'�,e. ,. r ' r.�f,,*°-i,,s',.....:;..a.?: ,`"4 :t;,.. ,f ( '. ,. .,. a �i,'.-;r:„4,#..:..4e; 2. art4 ,ei tt:� .~wsViu..;;t:5,,++,:.t,• ,. r., .,r . ,t "°a F•-",:,': h't�r �'�� M AVeI I zoo o, `Seh SC ArE.a: ' f — ,:”, 3 �..: ..,., .. N.st,.•:� r ..x L. s . '..e., .�,. Y. �.,. ... :.,.. Rh , ,i'r�.,.,,,, :., ,.. A. ., 3 ,, •r aE , ,,>.s`.. .:, ..;...:. ... . .:i,.'c >," -x. . {..kt.:4:,�.:...„-:.. f 3 ...r...w.,._.,.r.,. . e+.,,'„ p. „ ,,. : r .., :' - • ,„.:,.,•. ,x. 3;,_r<.• , .•,,.,„a.. . , : 4. ,. r. .:......3. .`.,. . ... 'w.. r;. .... ,.. ...,,. W,. .,, .,, ..., ,,l . ...r .: . .,.,..,, ... ,:s-. :.::. , K. ,. ....,., .. ..:.. a .,..,.,.•,,.. .r ; ::,, r. f.� . . k,:,. ,A.......7....;...:._;„.,, ,.. i.w..' . ., t., �,Lkc ci ,r,,•.,.n. ,.,.,,:Y;..a'. , r,ft ,R,i,.t.,ds.nk .,. ..,.,'t,.;. .:.,,...,.# q't.i!Yct r.�,1,.. . <;`.'• '. A� ax lrt....,fi, r ,{1 3 H.4G3pa iiNi±titA4lkg ngnN:NBt ULTAnNn TH n J anuo.Y ^tKAVENtG 83 f •"„. a`r x s `i.�{` �`, ” , y •,.'' :s t��` h, t'M' xd.. ,k. a. .'•p r'�id. ..A. ►tbr ' _ _.83452 APPIEWIX 2_ *Oe Pot IT k d t s= r 1. � ,+ r , I w, F y ,ITYOF 1, { ORO V11, LE k, W ... PARCEL DATA I A: R N0• OWNER A C, 4 /1 a 26.01+0.062 FEROUSON 306,13! ��i t !103 26.61 0.033 BITTN6R 40,001 �w,fy+?26+01°e� 015 WESTERN PAC1F)C R.R, 9.00f xs 9 1 .^L, Y`S i +1J5h `r S .ce� ..,..,.... + rLf `�}f ) "�D 26.01.0014 STANLEY 2,32 I.. �J. Ny1,�,Y.�iizy''fl 1 akP+�*��-yy a, Z ` ` ,�,, t e_ ,` LJ 26-01.0+05' SOUTHtM PACIFIC KA 109 Vf ROAD RIGHT OF WAY 955* ➢. _ }I "A a a� u� r 1 ° #<7y, �1�� 11tiiF ".'P" 6 ^7 it h r 4 47 1" a t- �� y ds; fre Ia'+Ped Il" IIS I U. d 'TOTAL 366.06; �. _u ., , . _ ...,�«,,...,s 44d ii r {raj �4,f`}",, i I} I ,I,ro 'i3 �,�r �•'.60 36-+50 0.00 BLAkEMORE STANbARO R2ALTY 1'S DEV, j4O.o9 tD 36°26.0,010 OUFRAN6 80.0 ��ks td,,�tti 21 1 s. ( E' COMBINEO TOTAL 607.49} , .J ; LEGEND. P �} x� ANNEXA7ioN AREA t"� �.. ( i�ffw aVi r o- e iY��q�fP1 'e f a .�.,•��. EXISTING CITY BOUNDARY M -a CITY MNING OR PRf2ONING j} �."`_'y a '" a a t'� 11 � ry �n .f r' � � 111 � . 1 a • t , 1 +, w I I w p l 1 t { a INDUSTRIAL UNIT NO. ANNEXATION CITY SOF 01WAL.LE r IIIc f4 ��� '(`�' m Pr10VE Oxawx�P0 BY 6xEEf- 1x �5_i..�a � � � �c >k !'°.' ... ^'"5( IL r ,.., -• �}j�,'+"'1 fl #Yp �" wr l otr I t4 ._ I I wf;. _ . �d :�,. ❑0l401NlNtE wain *83452 t LwwEodutlON APPENDIX 3 .... ,,,.;.: -._.,: R.T-• ." - •'e- - .. ... .z.y _,:..n,...�..r.u...tvw:-.. .air.. + u�rxr 'r 'wAMR''`.` AREAl •. _... ,.:. .+; _. ...-: ,... ,. .: ,,, ,. -, -r.-. , . ,. :..............,_-,r-�_,«-.-..,.:-,<-«_w..,. I .._..,.�— _ '„� ,..,.w....,... � ..� �.. �', F 014117111W, !t I. A. ,,,st: ,.u'.,.«:e n.h-_.`•._.,..w,-:.,,.:.....,yw.....,.�.;......_.,,,-..._.r:.... .e x I I A,mmlal' 1. V vvl%vGw%i'...:,., r• ti �..��.. "',� 1 �. '7' ! •in" `, 114tt(fR o. A NIIr hIhf:Citll'l �,.. ,,,;,.r; :,:..;:r .....,4rw.._d,a'•w ... . -, a- ».,» ,r...•....;., .. M. ti,x./�.rr�wr 1 i I T, ,.. t... '� ! r, Ck\ilK : 9jW u..a� .3. CA's1 ON RECREATION AREA "fa . /i n l r is �. \ c.\�ttJ� . t i t'-�.!.. �. �j OiiOVILLE I7 rrS.r •' O ery TtxYrpN,rr � / DAM I�Olil II 1 y 11/ !' ctc t 1 I' xksca ` FYxh AJ l `!Kr Y(Yln Fl, kctiir TIM"S 4u 1 F �.,. ' �13TDANN'lrc a r!r'r� r•,•...I r. 1. 9 CANN' t•. � t y r W „» 12GCRFr�' r , \1.45 ,..•+••-� �1 •'tom., 'GAR DR. OL'EVARb ��4ra• ROr f .riry. 2( jFj .+�'e a %a.Dr p.. rr`r wil t4.12EA w.� •••...•». �, � •!.�.�, ,r '.l'^' � .,. :rtl.r � ,,, , �. ,k . e '� aW .Vo.th. � •,. Y nqd' � _ �? O 1 _ � ,rrtidw(l'ral'.r.•r� 1.-.!...,r •,.., . ,r,/'�' t , HlrenUrr Wnd R!vd I. f �.a" p,"Irasc `� ,`i .v 4• i r ;i`- >r � S � •r A.=''r�� �' � BOAC -. .rte ^",, --Ct14ht1'�-�. xoAr RAMP r v.P:• 4„ "`..�..•.�. AAMv,r". �. C:bh rFaY-- .• .v- 4rv�- I F � nAAt YN«F Dr � unY in''"rr „�., / /��. ti. r c% .t�cy�M N r r y 7 1�rJ U �•• nr� „+ E � . C1 .Y, (... ,4. . �.:,,�. ts.Wt.* r,.r �. Sr° '.` , �' %�' `• ,,, u ,dr:. Au, (nlrr C , a: -....: •r p, "=.'�._ r• !• r Rr4a• A i:c n, :tr. � M � j:/ '• O� � 'n � J�� ��;': �. . - .� �• ,r. _.-, .—�., .. .�.....�Qj� � L...... _ c -❑ r `^..., � Y,rs, �'. � � a + 11 r ,S tmnure (� S �• .• .,1 r. tee« � 5�.-w' Q' / ; Ilnri•, Iku1 .,rr' � — �-- '• tal,r D,rdJuF '= a R,: J o+ � a �. - A � �(�,'r_• �% A ': , ,..,.. ,..•-,. - . , rol - ,.. a ay..k n t'a,ry rh tr. ,�,cr`ree r: 4 •, T. ca,, v OC. `�,i v L ', '*•xll� NELSON,,-,"— ELSON�•._. NELSON" AVENUE_ cf! v 1 1)+,dl1 cr. /,,,,, - Hl:rr m Fartrhl 4¢' ,1iv' 9 " �i~•� r'^T t: /1 I tit Hk11mOn Pai!< ItadJ l•,y,.r.l I rt Drr4,r Arn{, ➢/ .;" � , "^.,,,, �t 82 5vl:urtai+ Dr. ,� us I Ir _ t rpmmm+, PSE, s �. (R+ r ,4.= � t5 i �'� " HERMAL1TO , ` \ (/c y ryr,• `. � K �P.h.u�.rr ;r'h A� alalnmu e: `' ,.1. v n ^t;,h I � � �. asrr 'j ti;rt 9��VC S AVE c ;\ rr rj�L�lA i' � ♦... Q Plumdt A. I : {'hy,rs\ _ AVM - - /rrr r) t rarrr Cl, 3 n „ „ lt. ti r /*k \ r • 9> a. _. c3 i 1 4'+\ �. 7 A ,PeY �„ • ,,.e . r IZ 1 a't' l\ ., f �� Dr a V17 . '. a / 1 i r *� •/, ,"�' O�. 1 r • Burn in.. v� in tF.i.h lY ri. _' 6 < r, fi �..'..ii� G ,.',r a r. I Bi tt d a y 1.• 4 � ' 7lra 1 Vit, ' y Oql* OROVILLEOP WctGW ' ' fllrYutiGtr . ;,I }' Y Gteal Dr. �^• - r�l•Y , y PnNvr Il.Ynl,. ••'. � ......•^'"n' ,, b �, ,.. '. _., VE.. 5 afi' (�\r) O ❑ F�Ja v t• � (' tM 1� t A 57E A'1: /r .la. r..:y!: t'.'','.'nrs ,+, .r 'a°v r 1^ pr 4roryv: c«• sqr ! ,/ 1! �. til ARE 1'�.. 4 r TOha'rn $ s - \ ` Avfl Py. lMMr N� A Arg • r.' ttylt' :r i �: y ' 'r,}A'-' i� . KY111(Yld t,SN rh^Y,pr ^ gk 3' (r" ReWtvard �y vrlatu . 1 Iii' 1 E 3 �( w1 r .l P 7 rte\. 1 C Art. -/ d 5rI"R f� " S{ n }YY raft r,'r,� rLt ` 'slk tlh,• ��� G \ � V '' ��JIn41'.'. ao- O ,L' N Y.. •rr� "' 1 j �.: p1 1 iT /.n � O, \1' �vv •a ., Y 1. !I,c �� Pn{,lar 5t,; W n'z/r, Av-;1 r, i sr t"h �.;.•� £ f: ry t '\.. +• N W yr v d •>7 i.. ., eDArRairn...•'' -' s s CvhhFA. Avv Yrinara r.n� .. o�,a n - ..�� d M ^ -` .. ._,,. y ...;-1 wi. ¢ to AI'ID ,,a O` r; ',;r -. \� .r ; ., v ? ,. r. , ., ;< '1 ;., _, SiJ6' - r. b ,t„rlrS OR A. ./' a y da. a f r�Y. �� p -•r. '�\ ;r. .,, ' ,. .,.,,., rn �.A.: � rn t•.� U(pC + N nc+,epua , { ".,, thk+vJ,:r.r Ars rn 4+1* , . m t ti•., .;, - � h -. v : . �..:". `•. '\4 c.>t (, Vc.Y'� }} .r ;�r„r, u. Oct wire � t MO\ ', `. r : % , � .j'• .. . ,; 7„ -; -. ,.: �, - t A,.+ a Jv7� n 8 �' I rr+ : � '• Itgq 1 i t 1, ;jr2„ 4+$. 4 t li M',^.F tiL Ulf: 'Trry V•as., Rr,a,. • l.. r! �” 1`:-L- tm ;l." a..L. ::;t i* I. . aI _ 'r r. , '' ^..r, P :,C r. 4 r. E� c) r w.yr: h7lrmh tlor. 7c r4 1 1 ,.. nirr •:°a Are , s ..,. ..+5. IHL12\IALI.TO 1!OI:LBA1' v :,Ya..A. r _ wl »s• - �,_ �h ,w c�' r,,Inra.Dr r �� tr,�l 'tn 1 a I C l ¢ : ; A; a r 7 t i �SlZ� . :. ; rf ga t. /� BLVD Ar 4\a t X1 !_ R.%CIII•AT10� Al2r A F�ath,rr �nry*.:n I s \: ; s m kcNWAY �, t r�q W ty 5 A O pY .,r'r r.. Vnsrl .}y, q i j Ke..eYit nrY •' — ws+yty rhr�. » N t O NW I D: Lt1 Q G O cam. a ¢ 11 In �� a \IrJx;larrytrrlhyyaltl •'1--. t11G 'ted .5/ * y W.,Y p,• r,* uwY.4 \\ r 11 s t� r4rrI p tuiranlG �t1 IVB e O��V AWA ^�^rnc AImA St li:. Ara ,•1 Jrkl+h g . 1C@'hnuvl t '04 P Y p , r q 4rnter sri 1 amsr++r > M... 'je. Ltt ••e Q 1 W `E v url :r Y ,. rr.r; :Dph4 ialr,rJ Oh,. :%. 4 c �✓'' \L 'T"' v A+ u.! ltsralmvy7a O 5 9 dr �, S ;L%¢t. V I \ 4ra,,. !y a r �O 9 h_rr lir{ Y _. �1�?.� >; . 0 �..`• tFkM .tee ' ~s 3 E d� x'rr F i,,,'•.y. II d. T. O �6 �Yr �{\ . .,,K , r: �;,`_ i• ,. w .7m%Ar A W Are N'wy:t� :W a �., 4 j � �' " F t �.OROVILLELDAIA 't ry Y BOULEVARD.:., aa. ar ....WEST t^ / 'r 16{•. i a ¢ U.—_ sd:0 re..« r v u.qe C xc r -c , .°' C�, "tr a�". Wv ",I� R . ' 4 ( 11., wr _.- re rJrae^r na I'"t �nH/'4 rr 6 o o 1 ' � �""-',•r ... K �.. t 7 •, r`.� � � }. F. f° e�.,.k � .:• t7 _ � b H tY`if,.iY T- �Y. / �,j, r" 'C y� �, ► t F.M.re,.. Av. t , GaI CJrs: nevi r r^; '..�ta/«:+: 70 �- k ` /� aj,r V r Ad. ' btunril. .. .Y I' rTtiT I r�) r r•\RLE' 1101'. tall �^' �r.., 71 :{211 Il �,t,t ,Adl r1.7p s.� a n w nu c 1 E cnt tt ,E ! ' rye yr' t U O 8rnv ltt tr 2' * a. ttix e O ��; 2 d `. I IadYd. (t,41 r... rt 7 Q E 1101 Fool 2T.tCt nu 1-P^ n r1T21:::� Fun t3 >arraJt,tAML t io OI2O1'II,I.h. irru.t ° .- 4.rw. S o°, w,i^ " 71 S ¢ ae>4T/A rwT li 4315.mv34a1li'x' W '• -, o AIRPORT ,V i , e11`k r i V6 :¢ Rautl.. o` j a � y.ts cs ^>"� > ''fir• �OpO 'S O i r5svtoSJ'S' ktnm T,L OFUCOM ' 7�, .. at?81YA 0 1 ate TrnliArat p.p n o p� w rand C py'ra at °t. rC*1 i plly b Av GOLD DREDGE 2 d � r> P 1\' Y O Lxna p } A r Oakr.tw _Cf 1 'iu yrs p f� y'^- ` �r x+. „-..-,ra� - / C h�TJ. �� > a Heure ". � r y.�-f rpt Ana. :4r. �! � .OAF Kn01' u Wey `'"r .1# \D y _ _ - •1�� f•, ¢ � ,r,t;. tm _.fi`d :d 'QR Crr;'eDrrt.��r` sir .. r �� a z� n > A, e� �4 w 1 A ILLr z arx!a =u, w a,' - -fit r� y 1Z c m 3 /- (�1 it • J n ; D rq WIN A, � wry, t, �. UGDR �iG r`� lua 4 : F ORO F• ALI..t L;r STATE .;l•'V �t a GlFej �J( �jT rV.,'-{v. AREA RQIA..P CI 1 x hl z O NVXLDLIFlsa ARI' A ., �' �-•.• u 7 11 NAYr Mr,,:lllkh t<h' �.ua ';.�. �.-.. prUughesn Of ., k. a 1.,teGt+ij, # yM•,Ih 4Jtt ryl{.ri y t A t ... ' _ t Yr`- 'r � �. /�' N'Prip":...�,nur' .✓ � Y Q 1 iY Y.n`�+r It -• r Y 2. sw �y r1p11! (i()Ab '' ` r j,Yd�t •' r ..e..�,Or AU �� r 1 / air^ tl ��c ✓ r. err +v aD a , a l " 1 ✓.i,. 4P�� - N �t�,+r`R y s Kustl+1S,Q.p / . df 1 " s..-•-_-�._' yr a.,..,�" ,.s^�y:..,+.;,,, ,w-> , >.�,� y... �,r` d ' of � F= d't� � .,,� Mfet a i 4 OT TE ?4 :/ ,.....• I ` A > a.w r Yrtar.t Acn � �.1' rr �a d. l ✓ „ a ^ --- `-,e:: Utrl wtr :::!:{r Try. :y V t ' �•�•�•//ry • _ T � � J�•tl .;�,` Ypy. LIMITS may] ' I FREE151A:ty SLPm aA rCdi CHH ��� Lt • �x� CRC'��).'� qC INtEHStATE 5TATEAN D FSGen At 16 2' h 1 ,r • brs �• '. CUtar 4x i It K MAIN THAI) ROUTES CITY STREETS1-1 F: Fein t CITY LIMITS Acsif_l4 vtd laswwpgnite' it; a �h� p ,p��y� - _1 , Ad m ~' r i)v ClT?ti it I I„91 V! 4a7 0 �i I P a s o f n l{ �.. sa • I. t ( s a m r b I Cx� ii ' ' i,P, L- t b v o l _ , y \ F�1� 1111 RC1 v •at sC11Gp4s GOLF CJURtlE7 FAA%" tIVICDUII[IIY+tiS �F.'i'q'` A p�q yQ�n.. ❑ ..1 L' " - L� AMA .... Iii 1 O CaM. —t' - . _ )CATION .. �krAaL nlSTppICALLA725t}p% rig 1 � Sm �' ��� R tl A'" ' ' ` �.. _ r=.. .:-..-•a t.,• ^ 4 I �`'4,I ' : 1Sjs..-� .�..;.-..:... _ , .,. SIT taw � T<r.tla ia1A 41>ik) saw, � "' " ye - CY fI M11.Ei 't A rt _ .ti• / N Vyllx Ire.. '3 N:o «.,r Arx d A .., L fpq' a' 11 �: _ra APS' L N V � ly;. Y C kYL9utftgY l .. a b •"• y, i♦ w �` _ ,. - .r. Caur•, 8 r M Cyarruod Vtnt. tnz, a . , •, . r.ra yy, At '.9'r CAr F• vliS x.111 jjIIIIRATn ty 'FiDAtT w Fr nm,4h a . r - .PAL O ` ,�r ��s re a i b3 rx n It n,a. GOR h 4 +, ...� �� axV 1 p. • � O G � ` PRESENT n u t �. " .CITY LIMITS m ree �. r 0 p x y l G Y � . a 1 � ryg , r+- t*Q 1 p,,.�+(M"� r rL YF>x f � i+r;;1 i'• y ,��h„ 04 J. �� r...,a� 4 ,� •; �a ,y k ,y�'�.�"�^."'r� 1 tea ®r ti,`,� a.t`�al �_ Y `""^,�„� l '' , i '� I � ��� �r,,.y,Tp.•f,1„�d,.i'4�•-in" I �\+.+d�^ Ir e M AT'jt y � tea, a ' FNS? y� � „� rf ..«,. ,��V•?rF� ,;' � �,,yyw,+tsn,r r,g � r I ,�_.__�,�,,,o{W���������� fwdssb �, ` FLOOD , A E Y = •' n U�- � 9 r , v'IxAflz It .. �w,u,..w � I ., 1 I R4 5. r • q •�.p ..w•s..c—...tv��'. EI�� l.f, (*`i�tS;aa I 1 ` xla ,tea .w.• � III p. S V ..� J.,,.,w»^.....M44f,,�. ip 1 Cohfoulr InfiaNdrs 10' ..... TOPOGRAPHY Ek FLOOD ZONES S`OUROEI OiDbd Hdtoed laounddry MOO APPENDIX beptx of Heusino 6.Utban Development � eder 'I lojuedh6e Adininlafrdtion r 8t,462 d - vi t t ...: a t. ..:'. .. � PRESENT ' t. , , � v' , a v CITU v s L'1MITS WA v (g) �} v R ding Gravelly Loam KI) nd Gr elly Phage fv PROPOSES !v 1 ANNEXATI !'N v >fi ) AREA � _ st:' k� '✓Vr, V, t V V ■ _ � " ,Ng) �« .. 1. t•tt:ttt,ttat?tt, 5 •v ti J r y. is -'I",.!- ;. S`�• n '«• 5: : . '>.4�fi Y.} ' 1,i as _ - �"}` -* ,,, '4`' »:, r ,"'M� :„}:^*, t�'�" �'n.,•t,r r� wv^ a>•y-'-,"ya � kAr-. -:. l , v �'�j � i�� Wyrr.an GraVell � k �, t�Loom a 'i a. .�.r tl rj' e Y,. • v K u rr'+f. v, r,A.. (KI vy rK i m -'611 r {" T � t' s t } • t iY r � ...r s. R �Qai.€tiLoom>- tt' '( 4tif }4iJf V x } wt + t- .t I « SCiL.S REPERENCE. ricultra SOI LS M AP' Tli� Whiled Stdtes Depta o�Ag. APPEN[�l �.. �t��ea� o� CheMistry end .,hits -- CITY or 011OVILII ENVIRONME11TAL EVALUATION GUIDE 1, BACKGROUND 1. ?lame of proponent City -of. Qrg.vi 13e 2. Project description pra�o»c,� nf-2, i�n�iexrit.,1„r1G. ntJ ,nt�er:�. �.j_, Influence Change for Industrial Unit 14o, 4 3. Date evaluation completed DeceinUer 2, 1(i_?, 4. Person preparing evaluation Robert. Gaisoll K. Recommended determination t, I. R�i's ►wnrilli,3 ed. I1. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICAHCC YES MAYBE NO a. Does the project have the potential to degrade tlie quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife popula- tion to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten or eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or ondonpehed lrlmit or ani- mal or eliminate important urzmples of the major periods of Californii history or prehistory? .. b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on. the environment: is ane which occurs in a relatively brief definitive period of time while long -tern impacts will endure well into the future.) c. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources Inhere the impact on each resource is relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant.) ...., a_ d, does the project have environmental effects which Will cause substantial adverse effer.ts on humah bein.0si either directly or indirectly? x III. DETERMINATION (To be ttemleted by tho Lead Agency) m On the basis of this initial evaluation: 1 1/1 -JE find the proposed project COULD NOT have b significant offect on the environment, and a NEGAI M', DECLARATION will be prepared. I/NE find that although the pror).;sed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in " this case because the MITIGATION, MEASURES described on theattached sheet have been added to the project, A NEGATIVE DECLARATION wiil be prepared, IME find the proposed project MAY have a Iignificant effec+'. on the environment, and an EMMON140TAL IMPAO REPORT is requirbe,, DATE: ricoomber. 0, 1082 Cl*,Y OF bRDVIL E- BY rC] FlYtoil , n� ArW; bi:t or i council i i e 't t . I , uwanunr¢it�r+r. irirvwi ,.,wn�ta. xp anatil, s of -all " yes" and "maybe" answers are required on attached sheets) 1. EARTH. Will the proposal result in; YES MAYBE LM a Unstable earth conditions or i'n chLngcs in geologic substructures? b. Disruptions. displacements, compaction or overcovering of the soil? ✓. c. Change in topography or ground surface relief ✓ features? o d. The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? e, Any increase in wind or water erosion of soi'l's, either on or off site? f. Changes in desposition or erosion of beach SINS, or changes 'in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream Ar the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? _ g.Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards y such as earthquakes, landslides, mudslides, ground failure or similar hazards? 2. AIR. Will the proposal result in: T7 Substantial air emissions or deterioration of,: ambient air quality? "� b. The creation of. objectionable odors? ✓� c. Alteration of air movement, moisture, Ur toimiaeeature, or any change in climate, locally or regionally? 3. WATER. Will tha proposal result in., a. Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements in either marine or fresh Waters? b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff? c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? r d. Change in the amount of surface Water in any water body? _.. ._ e, Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface Water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? f. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground Waters? g, Change in the quantity of ground Waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through ✓ interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? r �,, h. Suhstantllal reduction in the amount of grater other- wise available for public water supplies? _ .� ✓ ,. i. Exposure of peonse or property to water related hazards such as flooding :7r tidal Waves? C PLANT LIFE. Bill the proposal result in a. Change in the diversity of species, or number of any species of plants (including treesb shrubs, gro.4t, crop's, anal aquatic p)ants)? b. Redrnction of tht, numbers of any unique, rare or end:.i,gered species of plants? ..._. ,_ c. In.rreduction of new species of plants into an area, ,or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? d, Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? _, ✓ ,. ,; S. ANIMAL i_IFE, Will the proposal result in,. Yo qe in the diversity of species, or numbers of arV species of animals (birds, land animals includ= in.g reptiles, fish and shellfish► benthic organisms or insects)? b. Reduction in the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered; spr.,cies of animals? c. Introduction of hew species of animals into an area, or result iti a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife Habitat? G, BOISE, tiill the�peoposal result in- a;`i ncreaces in existihd Noise levels!„ b, tRoosure of people to severe noise leVels2 7. LIGHT APDGLARE. Will the proposal produce new dight and glares._ 8, LAM USE, Will the; proposal result in a "substantial al= teras on of the present, or planned land use of an areal -2 APPEUDIX i 0 ,._ 9, JJATURAr _ ___R�SOORCE5. Bit lrate the pe of al resul t n: a. IncrG e, n theletionof ofanynonrcnewablelnaturatGe? y. subsvrintial dep ---- '"'" resource? 10. RISK OF UPSET: Will the Propof osal involve: ase or the elimitedhtoa�'oil, bstanOT cesdous e(Pncluding. but notlosion a. surr in the event qe stances, chemicals o. radiation) .. upset'conditionsZ of an accident or b. Possible interference With an emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? Vliil the proposal alter the location, distri- 00 Ulat'o 11, POPULATION. butv;jm ,tensity, or growth rate of the human housing, 1'2, HOUSTi�G. 411 1'1 the proposal affect existing demand for additional housing?oral or create a resUl't in: TRANSPORTAT?(`N CIRCULAtag Will the prof entZ ✓� �- 13. a•, eneratlu�, o su demandstanar11 existing p kingtlfacilites�hor� on Bing? b, Effects FY existing transportation .� sGcros_ for neer pa sent patterns of circulation or Al�se�antial impact on d. a^;nbns to pre P d, goods? fiovemeni of people and/or g t ,. ei vc .— r hazartatbornedsrtorymotor�vehiclesc7 fIncrease is traffito bicyclists or pedestrians? effect upon, or lh. he proposal have an pUaCTC SERVICES. Will t altered governmental services: resu t rr► a need for new or a. fire protection? ---- b. Police protection? �. c. Schools?--- d. Parks or other recreational' facilities? facilities, including r oads?' _►j _, e. i4aintenance of public ._-- Other governmental services? f, 15. ENERGY. Will the proposal result ihi substantial amounts of fuel or energyZsources xoftnew ✓ a. Use of sources b. substantial increase thin edevelomand Ppinenton of energy?nrjW UTILITIES Will the proposal result in a need for T, 16. to the followinr�t -- systems, or substantial alterations .� natural gas? -- � __-- a; Power or b, CORmUnications systems?_ - c Water? -- d. tank? sewer or septic ,. drainage? k�. Storm water f. solid waste and disposal? lye HjAAN HEALTH. Will the proposal result n tial health —a-- health hazard or p Creat on of any hazard (excluding in health)? to health hazards? .-- - ..-- b. Egobsure of people potential n lg. AESTHETICS S• . Will etol the publicthe bsoruWill scenic vis tahorpviewsopenal of anyin the creation of an aestheical y ✓ the proposal result offensive site open to public view? act upon the osal result in dill thnfPexPstrng recreatioan_imp 1g. REGREATI0t1: nal oPportijni qua ity ar quantity 2Q. CULTURAL RESOURCES.� It in a�the aofrasU historaicorehistoricf or j ✓ w -r destruction archaeological site? b. jaesthe't a1otthi'stot An ac rice rhhistoric _✓ apeffects to building, structure or ob3ect? paffect ✓/ c. physithe cal changeawhich�wouldthe Uniqueethnic cultural values?religious or d: Bill the proposal restritt existintial g rol arca? ---- °-" Sact-ed uses within tho P 3 p,,p��GNO1X D s .1 1P 26-68 INDUSTRIAL M-2 The provisions of Sectio, 26-42 through 55 of tha.s Chaptej are made applicable to all M-2 Districts, subject to the specific provisions of this Sectio». a. Intent . To provide working arras AvIthin the City far the ma~cture, assembly, repair. and fabrication goods ds and products;' to protect areas approp.riai c: for. industrial uses from intrusion of an uses, and to provide the opportunity for certain t , beneficial locations, type uses to locate in mutually b. Use Reulations. In the M-2 District, no building or land 'shall -be used and no building shall be erected or structurally altered, unless otherwiso� - except for one or more of the folloWingnusesdect herein, f C. Uses Permitter. • All uses listed under manufaeturl,ng in the Standard � Industrial Classification Manual. 2. All uses listed under Transportation and Public. Utilities in the Standard Industrial Classification Manual.. 1 ].n the 3. Standard Industrial Classification Manual. All. uses listed under Wholesale Tract 4.. All uses listed under Cons truct.on in the Standard t Industrial Classification Manual, 5; Accessory buildings and uses subordinate ".ted inci- dental to the principal tIse of the premises. d. Conditional Uses Requir' Ing a Use Permit,. le Melling units, I 2. Hotelst, motels: S. Alcoholic beverage sales: 44 Bars, cafes and restaurants. 5. Public buildings, public -Utility buildings, and substations. 6. Any other use of lana not othcrwise specifically set forth in tiiis section that is compatible with tho intent of this "section, 7. Danlos . C APPENDIX 8 � Page! of 3 26-G8 8. Uses allowed under, commercial 3A.ght manufacturing C- L- M. e. Development Standards, 1. Lot Area, There shall be no minimum lot area. 2. Lot Width: There shall be no 'Minimum lot width. 3. Height Regulations: a. The maximum height of any rlai°n building or, structure shall not exceed sixty—five (65) feet. u. Accessory buildings shall not exceed fifteen (15) feet in height. c. Additional height may he peri,d.';t.ed i.f a Use Permit is secured in each case 4. Yards: a. Front Yard. No minimum except where the front- ront-age agein a block is part ally in a. residential district; in which case, the front yard shall be the same as required in such residential district or i,lay be indicated on the official piaster Street and Highway Plan or other' City ordinances. b, Side Yard. No minimum except where the side of a M-2 use abuts a residential. district, in which ' case; a siide yard of ten (10) feet is required-. C. Rear Yard. There shall be no minimum rear Surd unless the rear of a lot abuts a resi,denti.al, distMet, in which case, a rear yard of twenty (20) fee shall be required. 5: Lot Coverage: There shall be no minimum lot coverage. Parking, General provisions of Section 26-49 shall aplltt'. g Fences and Hedges. General provisions of Section 26-45 shall a!1p1y,, h Signs. See Ordinance No. 1289, J. General Regulations, 1, All use's in which open storage 1- regtd red shall conduct such open storage behind ;-L sol JO sig (6) foot wall, either of masonry or Wood st.ruc:tUre design so that none of the outside storage is visible from either the street frontages or from adja.cent properties. APPENDIX 8 Page 2 of 3 x a 3i industrial activities shall be of such nature as not to damage or substantial jeopardy to the health orusafety of persons, animals, vegetation or other forms of property. d Nater supply, drainage, rubbish and waste disposal, systems and practices shall refleat conformance with all applicable codes and standare,s relating to public safety, health and sanitation and public works of orovill.e: , y . 1. site Plan and Dei°elopment lm� sf ,uct�on in an 1i_2 District sl allact Roview. All. neer con- �be subject to the aPP"Oval Of a site plan and developmont impact review by the De�-elol)- ' meat Review Board. procedure for such submittal and approval t, tis found under Sections 26-83 through 26--95. ' APPENDIX 8 ! Page 3 of 3 V16-68 , 2, Uses, opera+'ions or products within this di:st.)kict shall be permitted within this district unless :such uses are or may become obnoxious or, offensive by reason o the emission of odor, dust, smoke,noise, gas, fumes, cinders,, vibration, glare, refuse mattor or water- c,a.rried waste. F J. Loading Area. Private off-street loading space i'or the handl.i.ng of all goods, materials, and equipment shall be provided with the location and design of each off-street loading .space_ being no less*than ten feet 'by twenty-five (10 x 25) feet with a minimum fourteen (14) foot clearance. The loading area shall not be a part of the required Off- street parking space. The number, location and design of off-street Loading space shall be approved in advance by the Development Review ;Board. k. Performance Standards. All. uses permitted in thc; M-2 District shall be subject to the foll,owi.ng regulations and such regulations shall be conditions of All permitted uses in this section; 3� :1. l��_�u o L vib ration created by or resulting from any industrial machinery, or process shall not be dis- cernable wi.thout instruments at the lot boundaries ' where it abuts residential uses; and odors, glare or heat created by or result,-Lnd directly or indirectly from any use shall not b- perceptible at any point beyond the lot boundaries: 2, Discharge into the atmosphere of air contaminantsincluding, but not limited to, sulfur compounds, smoke, charred paper, dust, soot, grime, carbon, noxious acids, fumes, gases, mist, odors or particulate matter or any combination thereof, from any single source of emissi,oia whatsoever shall be permitted which exceeds the legally permissible discharge limits) if any, established by Stage or local code and enforced by the air Pollution Control. District of the County. a 3i industrial activities shall be of such nature as not to damage or substantial jeopardy to the health orusafety of persons, animals, vegetation or other forms of property. d Nater supply, drainage, rubbish and waste disposal, systems and practices shall refleat conformance with all applicable codes and standare,s relating to public safety, health and sanitation and public works of orovill.e: , y . 1. site Plan and Dei°elopment lm� sf ,uct�on in an 1i_2 District sl allact Roview. All. neer con- �be subject to the aPP"Oval Of a site plan and developmont impact review by the De�-elol)- ' meat Review Board. procedure for such submittal and approval t, tis found under Sections 26-83 through 26--95. ' APPENDIX 8 ! Page 3 of 3