Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout83-50 REZONES 14 OF 22ii 7S , re i rile. WO. 01.322—sl 9 dune '1952 x.__ OEOT 4C:IIHICAL, ULPQIi.T 1. The Site zor the proposed Capt,+an nark Sewer. Disposal Ponds is located east ux the' coi,Ainulrity o ico, rs;ut.te County,'Calikornia, and al.00cl Littl.c Chico crock. Two to three (;iaste%"I ter disposal ponds are propasecl. The si te, at the Lime ur your ;; i eZd' exploration (*z Way 1982), va5 vacant abet wras not: being utilized for agxic;ultural or other cUl.tural lsurtayscs 2. T to appr.os iwate la-oatioI18 of Lh.e tlrent -two test trenches e:Mcivated on the pgopert-y is shown on the site xylan, Figure 1 in tare hprsehdix. The te8t pit; locations Were estima.tad from the topogeaphic maP 'upitlied to us by the project ;consultang eilg:infers, 110,11s,► Anderson Fr Pol.lS, 3. Ili the evuri;t that arty odour 1..11 the: nature, design►- or: location of the str uutures, the cor,Iolusi'oris arici L'eoojjjmcii;dati:on cobtained ill our report QUI iiot be conuiuerea valid unless the r hanger rrre r(:vic tred anLI c:orie:lusit 118 of our roport modified or vaciri ~d in wvitifig : 4. Ou;r proilessiorlal se .view were per9or-rived our iindii ys obtitinedo ztnol Our tccoimiwu notations prej�a,red in, accordance with goiterally accepted ge otc-chttioal encJ *; e_'er' ' Icj pr i.n.ciples artU practices. Trri" warranty is ill lieu of all other warranties, eltbtr expressed or implied. Y 5 c`+ ` f p Y i S. The 'site it uriderliain b pyruclastic. voicariic� `rocks c+�nsisting of ra11c'esitic: mUcltlov deposit ar`lc volcanic tufti These rocks w.ect, prn►<:a' uur ttc the l?13x eric t;jaoch (3 to 1t) iui.1liorr years aclo) and can be c:orr'14t0d With file I•le-hrte'tr Por.rc►ation. Y 1. k ANDERSON GEOTECHMICAL CONSULTAM` S INC. une iN-OLACE CK4 5AMP'LI� LOG 4 UC TION n+ran Mu•t OEBCgIpTIGN M t�i,Y)Ef A& x Of aodrr 0 T Date Excavated: 5/7/62 DaL Y 46aYE►� 1. Test Trench 1 . Dark brown, very moist, ,ti f CLAY -'SAND vii�th gravel r Z• / 3• o' o 4 . • %'. •, m' %•' 2,rown, cobbly, clayey ` SAND, mo<i st, � •,°• ° dense i / • jf 1i Q �yy(t V • y 4•i Tan very dense tuff g ��. 4'ne6vi • i2. ' Trench terminated at 1145 feed i , i ct* gure 2 Ldg of Test; Trench 1 , 'Dark' brown, moist, staff CLAY -SAND lr with minor scattered grave ;;•; •: Tart, moist, very dense_, weathered tuff 3. .,•;. 4 60 7 f `french terminated at 6.5 feet _ Date excavated: 5/7/$2 _ Test Trench D ':,.;a•; ark brown, very mol st, erase GLI�Y- P� �,.,. with 0ravel z; Grey• -brown, cobbly/nravell;y CLAY with sand 3« !a. p 0 on, Tan -brown, y 'moi t � dense, cobble/ qravel with clay -sand matrix (50% rock ' 50% soil, n 7* '`�`�• w a�Ab Tan, 'dense, wet tuff Trench terminated'at 10' feet Figure 4 - Logs of Test.'Tren ches 3 and 4 14: Y, �....�r '.^ ' is .' � 1+'ik -r: •,v ,... 9 utt e; A9 $-2 „ 'IN--'PLACE OTH SAMPLE LOG Q fr(pji6A gESC81PiFON` fN NO.. i1)CTf6N or- i3e3ii/aG ony FW14'/une, ►£ET UMPLE BFo.n/FF Date E-X C a v a t e d: 5 %'.7 jF 8 2' GLNSiTY - CONTENT Of! %a� aF. Test Trench 5 ::. Dark brown, numerous roots moistt ightly firm CLAYt sl -SAND,>wi > gravel up t0 2iF 0 Brown-tan moi st, firm, 'clayey SAND ,SPB5- ��`'°' with many cobbles and graycl B. 60 ,, • a,a o Tan, moist, very dense tuff 81 ;µ Trench termi dated at 9 feet Oate Excavated;` 5/7/"$2_ Test Trench 6 Dark b'r•owh moist, firm 'CLAY-SAND with some minorgravel of , J • • O•, qv i 3. Brown,. few scattered cobbles, 5i1'ty ,• , w , 'ANS (*eathered duff?) 4• • p 5• 6� Yw1 daa Tan weathered tuff ,; i� 7, Trench' terminated at 6.5 feet Figure .5 - Log K .e,f T,est Trcnc'hc9 5 ahd' 6 w. . du'te 19$Z ;b" SAMPLC LO6 0 rr4o�roA Oa SCRIVTIOM IN-OLACC ..me IN fKCT N0. UrWl0N, 0!r NaitPakr pay hgIYTUNC 5Ak1PLC' 81wr/14 Ddte Exr+ava'ted: 5/7/82 - OCNSITV CONTC►Ir ? °h dry at. p. Test Trench 7 Black, vet, stiff, sandy CLAY 1 ' 2. ' :',Ar an, weat Bred, Very dense tuff 3• Trench terminated at 3 feet ' Date Excavated: 5/7,/82 r 0. Test Trc.ncl, 8 "PB8-1 - CII to 8,1 black clay, very wet 1• .• ' 44P4 At ledge Very hard, unweathered tuff below tan, Weathered to f f Trench terminated at 3 feet d y Date Excavated. 5/7/82 p. _fest Trench 9 y l 1 41Olack,9reY, moisf, c1aYeY SAND ► • $o;°�;be' Tan, very dense tuff Trench't0rminated at 3 feet jgdre 6 - L'o9s of Test Tr6nChes 7, 80 and g i 1;6: op IT k (Lt fyi iI . VA �I I. } Cf +fy y`} IN+PLACE Opti> UMPLE Loa q troNaa MCAIPTION` IN No. _ IA.AT1011 h3it t+pl ORY MOISTURE kKlf O6 - QIo.nJflOENSITY Date Excavated 5/7/82 pa CONTENT % o,,,►. Test Trench, 10 i .;• .-, Dark b,r--own., very mai st, s0i ff CLAY-9AND Tan brown, moist, dense, sliOhtly clayey SAND with gravel s a " 4' �• o, + . as 5. Trench terminated at 5 feet . Date Excavated+ 5/7/8 INIM —Mum= Test Trench 11 0� •®. °'• Dark broWn;5050 mixture of clay -sand and gravel -cobbles 1" p' .. • r k a4odd Tan, moist, very douse, weathered tuff 410 .;,'dA Highly cemented layer 6" thick at 4 „ Qva.,!�. feet .' 5-' Trench terminated at 6 feet ' Figure 7 Lpgs of` Test Trerches l0' and 11 sF 17' ...�..e..��....w........r_r.s�v+-urvrA•..-Yrh'nt ^I 1!hr .. .,,. til Np G,132 -'sl IN-PL4CE 101A SWPLE LOS a, mcmP?to! IN ko, =M lom ! Atatitam DRY OiSYunel r s"s �"'rhh Date EXcavated: 5/7/82 aNs,rr Pel.' ccNrtrrr %dry at, Test French 12 0• ,:. Brown t moi s , sti ff CLAY SAND R ,. •r J • Tin; highly cqeathered„ dense tuff - p •b P ap, 40 . v'v p 4 3 y „ ij{f Flo • J. . 1 . y ^y t'1 • .. Water ,enteri og hole 12• bDbb�. ^"= Very dense layer of WeLlI ce'mote tuff 13' �`I'•'.� Les s �veathered tan tuff e .1.4 • ,9p4 ,. + 1, p.4��b ' j6 t b;Ap•'QQ � Trench termi na ted at 18 feet xr figure 8 = Loo of Tdt,t Trench 12,11, 71 �"�i le bio Gl 322•-5;1 ,>, �� a:.4ne� . ( INPLACE-7M SAMPLC LOG 0 tr04a . DC9CgIPiIOK 8N wm,, UXATIOk Rnhtwa ORY MOISTURC, act' elOwv0 Date Excavated: 5/7/'82• OENSIT co��iEr�r OCA ",b arj wt 'Test Trench 13 0 Dark•, brown CL.AYwSAND with gravel Interlaye-r�s ofs of dense tuff end welded tuff (looks like .siltstoite) 3 s f,bbP b 4 A��4P 5 'apA9 Very dense P_•.�{, and difficult to excavate t b • i:p�4F { •pap , 6 .� �A •; Trench terminated ,at lq feet Date `Excavated'i 6/7/'82 T:est Tre.nc:h 14. _ j Brown, Lobbly-gravelly4Clayey SAND f pr��Ca Grey,' mOlst,, �'I;�.ry dense, Volcanic 2• ° P',•b mudfl'ow • .•a Merht.en fr` ~cagy a 4• o ; i c, _ Trench Termina��tedat 4 igUre 9 Logs o' Test Tr'enChes 13 ------ ---- .1:.- ' 'q F1, i eN o T3 3 J'6ne 1982 i i" H SAMPLE b0; L00 @' IDCA ON trsfioA f1�YlrmaN IN LACE MCRIPTIONI ;: suI,IPi.c' Oto.s/ft CRY MD13jURL' D ate Ex ca v a t e d5/T/82 � DeNsi rY comunr ' oc.L % Mr` •f, o. Test Trench 1 5 ji5 off:; Brown, cobhly-gravelly-clayey SAND 1. 2.••• "aap p° BroWn-,gre moi st, Y► Volcanic mudfl`oW %J OVA- 4 - o DIVA�°° , 5. pq a on 8• ca. ' o, 9. Trent termina a a', ee Date 8xc6vated� 5/%/82 ` o• Test Trench `i 6 ` 7`01 Brawn, `cobbl - raven e Y g Y.c7ay y SAND j, , II 1• x. 0'O ' r Buff-9rOY Vol ca01 C 1n. df1 a, • Tench terminated at 3 feet • i, 1 r. r gure 1b 4g l.o 15 o lest Tre"che`s 15 and 16 r :zp ,r � ' F i l e Xoi,7 ? w•y 7� i7t n' rl fir:. t �� 9 3une 19 8 Z' r I 'l$rl�d �R-pt ACE VIA UMP",Loc b •rton t1 aCp!@TIaN .e>e... $ IN , NO. LWAVC)" fh.(el om , OftV A►419TURC FEET tv In Date Ekcavated: SJ7/82 _ DENSITY corMOT RRf.' %'� •f. 0 a Test :'french 20 �.. • /�;•.+ Brown, dry, stiff,' clayey, SAND with nw.r�.u•wrr t 1;• ,..; /'�'+•' roots 2, flA°pnTan-yellow, moist,, very dense Volcanic �p mud.floW ► LPi320- o e� e Trench termin4.ted at 4 feet j Date Excavate - 5/7/82 Test Trench 21 • Dark 'brown, dry, slightly clayey SILT 2+; X-;. Drown, moist, firm, slightly clayey SAND with cobbles/gravel/boulders 3 .. ., • 61 o 6 • « ''4� : �I Drown,, wet, firm to loose, slightly g . s-1: 1 ty SAND with Minor clay: and some + ,.. ravel, • t ry v Very wet, grey-br'o�n, Firm SAND -CLAY .9 layers with some g "ravel Wat'er seepin'g into battorrr of trench 10. } a Trenc'h terminated at 10 feet Figure 12 - Lb q ;of Test Trenches 2�, and 21 22� TVLAh • 9: d"Uric 19.82 7'i iH i"PLE Old dFre: hntron t7N AjCt M1t No.. tacATaOt4 KaS'47k�tE r „4/N Oate Exc avated: 5'/7/8'2 DEN917Y' GONTENi' aat:;' •y,.o�•A►;{` p MY Test Trench 22 • RY pj;; Y'�a Y Brow► dry, firm, �i l ty SAND wi t i ti� .•,: • o•r• cobbles (r,ounded)"to 61r to 8,� � R. o y Brawn, very moist, firm; cobbly, 3. gravelley, 5_alidy SILT with clay 4 c 5• R a , 6 { At 6'feet soma boulders up to 24" � �' R Tan, moist, Very ease, s ig by cemented tuff wit�i carbon deposits (1a ers) ;. g ••:.• Trench terminated at 8 feetmamma f i w R� i -.j Figure 13 w 1:og' of Test Tr'enCh 22 23 m �N:iR_. w.Y,YtiWB„w,fF1F4;�T?l, , y / file No. G,1322 -S1 {' Jun- 1.982' t TA8L `I Summary, of ,Laboratory Test i esulL8 Grant Size birescL Shear Angle of ' Sa,mjple Gravel Sand Situ °Clair Pei ntcry<��yfailyari ,y�� Unit -ohesiort internal ta a i . 140 ZI Zl;'. t 1) ���CfTI/JGYI . • S r L_�1 ��r��i ReCj ree . LPE2- 0 96 4 0 2.2xIV 1406 53 SPS5--`1 GL 22 7 3 I,PE6--1 7 30 46 17 9.2x10-8 500 10 8'PDU-;1 0 43 32 25 l t' Spa"..A-1. 5 n Q 29 6 SPB15-1 2.2 41 28 9 , LP82,0-1 54 33 11, 2 J .OxZO-5 92 ] 200 rwiltcldeo to 90t aiogyLatuunt ma tor COntc.rtt j w � .24 k ,����� ....�.1tIL•MY1lYfhllaYlrtuuttrtrse.niaria.',�w.w.....tee.'..:-.::.......�.......: '�mf.�._..._.... .;:...,.< ..;. ...: .. - a �®sem rrwwrstrww■rWsa�w�wsw ■■rr.w Wr.ersrtwlf: Nwwwrrr .ew.ta� rwr .�® � • iiw■�Ws■ewarMINE ■®w�G'�iii■'�'i��i■�i �i►siu� u ■■w■ ■w Ww�s=i.W■ wllwwrW■r■sWtwlwl■W■ ■ wsosaremrrrr:ww®w� rosllrroarrr.W1®Wrw•r■�1r { ■��=�w°1�iwa::�w ¢ .rrwera rr.wriW�Wn■rtwr� s■r..et.f r�.r*rer®n® � ®w■IrF��wwtW■i1f�Wl�wi ww�■elri u�■�iwWri■e� Anle WE wwWWw■ 0 Ww■www = 'rrwsrrrn w rrrr nr.itMrHr ��� ii■ ■®ei®Ilwwr■ w �iww �isaWrwW■n.rws . °: - � rw■wiw��Wwl w nw nni wnWW1 wnwr■ tww WWnlsrlrr■wwW11 ■■ r. W ■ wrwrwlsrrB 1�a w wrr■w■wswrr rrr ®B.rrr�.�re +e wirnar.■�aslswniwwWeurw x�iwWImm=tea` ► or ■ .u® ■■Wlw■nlsw ■1®wsrwewrw■ ��■■�■■snewnwewwwwws wnrrrWl�■srrrro®ws ■■ rr/rrrr■r�rr�rweo� ww�l m W—w mmo s El t` • ® ■t�1IM[■W■( rommumemmi m=ff in ■pww HoUM w1W■e IllummWw ww uu� 111■ IWWWrW■■N■w■w m rrwWlWnr w rerrewrre® 00 W■Wwnw�r■� w■ww■r.l wrwr�ra ® yy�lnlwlom aMAN IW■1■WMm ■ ■>EwiOrwrwOnlwlYltwwnl� ■ rIM■I�nwl� ■ � • rlrrl�.tr.rll.Irr.1 �r�.rllrrr..or�r�o z� .er_'rtr�rrrstnrr�rrrr®®r��or®n�et ■■ � w NnrW�1w■I� I■�n1�nw�Wm � w m WwwWAw■lnllr■w�INwHwl® n■InWwW arrrr.sA®rr r Br.reUlrrrirww rrrri.w■�rsisrwwl.mmU"a rrr��e2ww �a ar�rrrrw.rrrrrrrrsirwwrr �rrs�rr�tirrr�® 0 aeawwalw®ss®wsrrs��l�w)w ®r®wawse®�aemw iwwsAa;ewwrwes rwwwwee4®�res■w�we�s� �w.�.w�.�. ■w■wrl■■®wW IW■p w1iw1OAlWww! ■id• e�w/s■o ■wWln�w■wl■�W■ww�awwMlw wnH .Wrwsln■■ssWw�rc�®ww ar�.ww 1rrW w.Wl v�rrsa ■sn®i.r�sr.rs rw..Nr.siraairw.�r .■1ra�ars.rsa.ri ts...wWterewW �a�®nt pror■s■. wrMWrw.■■r .w.r.w�n wrr�arr®..r.1® ' N ®.wwwl'Ww■ea ■illmom B►lrw srW®®n..uro.rwue■W®WW 'a. minumrrr.er�is �.rwrse�isr.ar..®.eo®rrr®■.hs sommmm"muamm�Wslr■®Wti■wiwlwlMWWII�Y IW■1■®wt1■i\r■■■1 ■BWI Wwnsw®ww® ■wwwlmwl.Wsers ■onom ■WWW wwnWwnmmlo w■ lnnnw Wwmmml.m wlnw mono Ww■nWnW� ■■wnWwwwwW■wwlwl rsw..e..■.au.. ur .rW�wwrwns ■mmumo mr�awr. .W no Is ■w- _■a+�rww..rnar�®...e� n _ _ rtw��r�wrr�rsrr��r�rr*tu'®® �rrr>r®rasiwsrrrurrw tam 20901 r 01 m® �� fsr/® ^®°+�.®■�.iers■ l�lr�tll�ar ao®®■IIIA'=—M11I�_®��N � ■!■■er�■r■1■■1 rrl ■w■ �ii® �■eN/ � ���■■a■i■■s�sr■eCs®�■ � t irte,■s+�i�ren�eiea'�iwi�'i �•w■Tii■■■�rt i�iiA i 'r Cryo ■nirrr®��offi �is1e■�r r.rr r�. n4rrs■la�■,r■ ei■I�■�r■ n �� r�u`�C�isw`s■re'I■ mnliir'�iei E®■N ..�sCCC:�,'�;�"u'�nCCCC�'�r'�i'.�'w"'■'w■■w ■s r ■■w�ir.■�r■,.�■ s■■r ■nsaa■.�w.r■w■.u�■,r�■a�,iii®r pii'..CC::®�:� ■rsrrai■rr.■Nr nr■■I■uer® �/t■uisw /u�.e■■./■ �reA�l■/sl!■I� ��, ®�111M,1® Aosur�■r� in NOR r..rrau�rew■,al■n�■ta ■ ■■r■■isw■rr■i■ei■■a�ii ■■■a■■s■r■■ r■au■�e.■e■.■ CCuI�■�■��■,I�rfrl aisrie■ra""°""' s' i wl1l.C��1116�1Ag11�� � wi�i"��n■H■�®�1■e rr � � µ • �NS a =a mm E n/l/�inl� 1■NE;" ■M4■�MONSOON ■■1�r1w11�111■1 �i��II� CCs■'ii�ist�wu■en■Cw►,e�ne■■„■�.win�so■® so■■+®asrer■t/t■ MIMUNINW13=� ,•h■rr®rlse■li■ulr®wer ■ 1 A■.. e■��.s,.,r�ew�we�esaoew�r■w,rr sCClaii,®,r s sllMaflt�MCC�nsW:■Ir 0 r�■■■ ®rn'��� ■w.�. ' �I Ae®wti . �,nn ®I� ��MP<M �t x1111 !�N�tMpllllr� C,I� �I[Ir4:1� s aes�r■r■■rar�sss r�r■■r�ar►■■■■■ r1Mr■s,M Mnr ®M ,1■■i■■-■�r�r 11rt®■■ Mrr■■rrr �+r�/e.dr//r■` Hu■■■r■ur■■■■ ■s®■■■s/ r ��lttrr■1re ■Nwr■��■■°� erwe■■e■/r/� t .C.wC■mo■�■wr.a�■i■uim .nr®w11�111.�I■swam� ®■AA®�r�n■n,.�r�■■■ /wrsr■o■s�y � 'CSC ''C®CC : �.■.■ �.. u■■/®ns..sw/■ °�■■r■■� rrsr■a.■ ® � ��1I■■r■■■■rr11 ■■w■■■rr,.ss 3 �.�rr■isl�■Csa1� a/.■s.■s�;;�. �s+r■../■../� _ wrs ur■ ia,,,■w ®ee �,r wr■erien�rr ■.rr •a1e■■a■demr■r�■r �u /Cis"is■a�■'°.w■.e■■■w/r,. I■ww®�■ru■tr r�®■p■ws`��eo■.■.r■r+■w■a■■a�swt..■.i■ �C■■C p�y� n wit■ ■n■ �Y�aerisoi■aAs.,■■.yarwsu ■../,■. ��Irfl�r/M11/■1/■Iw7INNINNaie�■C■�■ a®sr■e■ �■a■.,�■■ « d®r■■a■■i■■�'M1e'° uA ..ee.■■rean■:a�r®Cw��a�ie'■1,-; Vpll�u�®elt4■e.■■■.■/■■C./re■�i ��A �■sraulr■■s v'.o/��!t°!■wrrs.r■.■■.�rr.e...��.._.. ..�...�r.:_.-�•...®��- ���ser®® ..■.® 7 0 �, '0 `� � � 1 � � :� ��� � � TQM �� . � � �II � 0 �, '0 A - h Y wi..... ..„.. ...�r.&;;u�..J..t�`..:�,ti..,,,. rb,sw_.. ..,,, r....� ..,.,.. .. �':?,',=„?•x ..._,....er ......e'w��+»v.. .v at....b,, ,<_..5. ._.»�, ..., ..nw. I .. • - .... .. ... .. .. . � e �� .. y . .. � - - � - igtr e 'L1, a c1b Mpg `tIbn to ury e �� 7 '1 I I'k M � � r i Af �M Y�� wi 4 b'rt� L+'�V.p � �� 4 i� �� {{` ``;� �> 1 �� 7 te:` irk: "u��c ► r : , C i Additional homes, in the County do mean theprobability of additional police calls.. Our experience suggests that i>t is unlikely that the calls ; i per residence from a development such as Canyon Park Estates would exceed the average :throughout the unincorporated area of the County.; A department spokesman indicated that additional residences matched by the ' same increase (percentage wise) in budget resources would improve the service capability of the department. Alternatively, the same level of service could' be maintained at a smaller cost per household4 In other words, there would be economies of scale. r Road Services A number of homes would be built on Humboldt Road, a County road. The road was not built to County standards and it is also -recommended that it. and the intersection with Route 32 be improved. The EIR indicates that r.' the County may pay one-half of the estimated $60,000 cost .of these improvements. This expense ,appears to be the only major front-end cost that the County would incur. Public front-end expenditures have the t particular problem that if poor market conditions inhibit the building of homes in the project, the County may be in the,'position of having' expended funds and yet not be receiving, the revenues anticipated. The remainder of the roads in the project will be privately constructed and maintained. Since from'the, beginning the County would have no responsibilities for these roads (;in contrast to fire services) it WOU1d not appear that future residents Mould seek County expenditures on these , roads (as they might for fire services. Since the County is responsible a for maintenance casts on the large majority of residential roads in the County, these homes would probably cost,the County less per home than the County average. i This observation and some of the other' information about the Sheriff's Department was supplied by Richard Stenberg. ;a k protect the County from subsidizing inefficient s,ervi.ces, the County protects its ability to meet existing service commitments., 9 p p ,. lith regard, to the, fiscal impact of new development an :the County, the charge is sometimes made that "New development doesn't pay for itself in a post -Proposition 13 would" The statement is generally not true; in our judgement it is, not true in Butte County. Rather, tie County will suffer fiscally if new development is not accepted. The'reasons are as follows. The County must plan on revenues continuing to grow less slowly than ti population and inflation; federal and state programs are being reduced and the two percent limitation on Proposition 13 holds down assessed I ' values. As a result, the level of services is likely to be forced down. New development at least has an initial full market value assessment � k which only slowly erodes, New buildings are generally of better than average quality/condition and thus command above average market values;; : they therefore have'a higher than average assessed value. With regard to , service costs, the.. County requires that the infrastructure for the new - development -- roads, sewer, water, eta, --- be built to a good standard. Most existing county roads, for example, are not b!jilt to present standards and many need repairs or will, need them in the near` future. Finally, County review can insure that (1) if the County accepts �{ the res onsibilit for :,responsibility pt I di ng a .service, i t will be able to do so i efficiently and (2), if not, the County -will, not be called upon to fiscally support the project in later years.;' Tn summary then, nevi development in general raisesCounty (per capita) ,w revenues above what they ;would be otherwise, thus allowing for a higher ,'. level' of services. The below average service costs of appropriately reviewed new development leaves even mare resources to provide services to the existing population. 1n a period of revenue cutbacks, the effect of new development is to Keep the level of services from deteriorating as much- as they, would have without i t, .. .. ��,.�r , _..-.4 ,. .0..w",.�`'j�;.S%1n"`L�'""'.fi•Y1L{{AaGtC'19Yi#lll"YY3r.'4ar +! (y ...,..y .i.__...k�'It4{qQ.i'R4_._R:Y!`+'"w�_•'PMYh•Y".+^..•w...Yk t1. ......� J�- _^ce%i^_L'+..�_._c=.1tia. �si_s„V...s, .,. ,;_. .. ,...__ .. iq, ���• .k 'P� J e, ��► F,��;, ► BUTTE COUNTY DEPARTtII:NT OF, PUBLIC t• QWS LAND DIVISION REVIN' F.EQUU T To„ Division of Fdrdst DATE: 9-27-82..__ t 46-35,04 2 � and �}6-71-17 & }8 �� n.} RETURN �Y;; 10-1'8-82 �.. E Noy ; -- ''AIL CANYON TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP p;pa,1ECT DESCRIPrxoN: r D. Drake and Howard Isom APPLICANT:John .. Rolls Anderson & Rolls ENGINEER:NEER: _ r CONIDITICNS AND/OR COMENTS;: Eire 'Protection Requirements ` but no less than /= macre wi.thii this ro eat area_ medicate a `sit of ene acre �1 for a fire station. Developer to conttruct a fire ,station upon complction.of � 20 dwaillings, on this project. Fire protection will be provided by format'I a� to Caun��i�c^ Arca, and "�'�iici: Cr�.la become apart of Butte County Fire Dr Mont, uusin� 11ol.1intee,r Vire Company). a� Mveloper will Provide fire appsratis in tiie form of a fast-attack type of Sx .ire engine. evc, open to pce ��n a:• irE s u aan i�rn_ are cn�zne tta nocPssr�r�% i'ircf�hti.zt� aguipmen$. _ - .� Z•1- •e for fire protection Developer mill' ;provide ttaa `�C�,nt70 Gallon ,-toraPe at r tan .s- on proder. .a r�`" i y ran y aonnectan, t.c G rz e type, where riat t�Gvt lo,ancl. Fire hydrant 1 &p0 feet a part, where land is developed, rune .r _,_..r... _ r t r r rias ns ,i on su aivaszon trap. ra . �o a-ia ans.i c e cr; iI nt: y ., min: num si:-o'e. 500 GVM flow for 2 }tot+�rs duration. Pressure no IoSci than 20 p . S� asa nor �zore i ,aan 1'� s E . +.. % 5 i�ecot"s,�:cid-ran-•flamr>ir bl.e tape roofs on a.11, otr, cture C?"1 c�nstrucirxan eauzpm�:nt`, It IfteryF c.aa.n snws, air— coniiti;essar.;, e„c. the construction or deVe,lopment of this prajcci will requara rtrt 'i working On " spar arr :tea"r an tie x wusi:"sys zm. c er a a .G�rni a` '`uo��c c,ppr v= r"e - Code �i!Y_�1, ,,:end 41hP-.5 and C4liforni,a i?eelt,h:;nd 8Afety cSoGrc �._ .Sections .�f��42, C07T Section r agmmenci 4,raC � ?�!ta=tE —n 0-0- s aaztutructe o_n th::s prof act Yinrc d f7 rc� d�:f:art- ' or .- ."�t�tnctard -lint caaniikc i a�srasr r iutte Public 1�,� our.>;it��cY�artmen�.of - .x.- ,-,f• to N xt y I", i78 cnEanos. k -.11 welding opchiatitonz an this �art�j�Lt ll be c611ductc101 In' nce tint w_c�i,a an ,"�° 0 t o� i Y:f.- C„li Arnie I er1] th nn6 E:,f6tyr Cocie. r�ecammenti cutrioor wt;ttir s in' ltr r--at3ms bc: zY'tstajli itti '+ • 0 r r7 a qv . , A + . n 3 All bridDes must. be able, to withstand a minimum load,limit of,8O,OCQ lbs. to withstand.a fire transport and bulldozer. Bridges should not be narrower _ than the driveway port.',on of road serving each end of bridge. y Roads to be all-weather with a minimufn of two ingress-egress routes; to safely handle evacuation and allow emergency equipment ready access: Nta�Qe.red '90 foot 'diameter islands.along roadside to be established and strategically spotted on Map, by CDIF/BCF'D for the purpose of relieving traffic ,congestion ,during any, ' evacuation, All roads to be named and clearly marked so as to be visible from travelled roads. To facilitate fire location and to avoid"delays in fire responses all structures should be clearly numbered so as to be visible frons travelled._ roads. All chimneys, flues, stovapipes, barbeques or other devices that burn any solid or liquid fuel, shall be equipped with a spark. arrestor device, constructed of nonflammable material. 12gauge minimum 1Jelded or wovern ,Wire mesh, with, Yx" openings or cast iron plate,; 3/1611 minimum thickness. .k All;flambable vegetation must be cleared a minimum of 30 feet in diameter from �s each structure. Refer to California Public Resources Code Section ;4291. Not � included are ornamental trees/plants which will not.rapadly transmit fire to any structure. Response tine for first three fire engines to this area ,is as follows: Station 44, Chaco 8 minutes hyo,` Station 42,, North Cbico 9 minutes station t+S, Durham 17 minutes 1 This area is classified as an eXtremc,and high fire hazard area. 1` Ij I 4•. COU na `r ;lax•den , w , z URE ' P o. $ox 1701,4 2680 F r her River Blvd.. OrOville. CA 959 a 5-33-1473 , . ' to MUUM, Mao ftc,mrrma nt Som tfowxm tGIp4lO. R Oin.4 13OF400 #AQO* OW 1N[ OM/PA 1, 09 STRIAS 1lti ►atflC" y I Novefuber Et, 1982 Butte County Supervisors Hilda Wheeler, Chmirmaa 25 County Center Drive Oroville, Ca 95965 h Pear Supervisors. Director® of the 9utte County Fara Bureau would likes you to rapprove r~hst ftp- posed Quail Canyon project near Chico, subject to qual.Yficat ons..Krutbers of ' , our Board and our Land Use Committee have studied the Proposal and v%ated 'bhe €sight on three differeazt ocemsions. We do not think the land in stion ue© could economically be Beed for agritultutax purpoges. We believe the developer, has minimized the financial iimpact of the project through the private security Uhich:the land owners will fund and the volunteer fire programa,; We think the "Breen line:" west of Chico will "`► cause ptO9surr6 for development elsewheres This project seems well planned and therefore we support it subject to two qualifications. One qualification is that the problem of downstream flooding caused by in, creas�:d runoff from paved streets be addressed and resolved. This could be done by improving the levee system- on Tittle Chico Creek near where it joIjId the SacramenCg River at minimum cost. The d�velaPer has told our members he would agree to shim. The second qualification is that yotaTmake as' certain a possible that the open space, in the project will remain open is pd, rpe2tuity. Our endorsement is for this pro, ec`t only. Wes will take no Position about either' projects without as thorough a study as tae hive ,., taken on this one.. We urge you to approve the (wail Canyon project with the qualifications we have mentioned. Very trul." your e E ECM/ml t E$ McT.eughlia, Pteedjdoat , Butte County Farm Bureata cc . 1ldvisor y Agency, Board of 'Directors Plasiriing com ias, on ,u i �a A' WASTE DISCHARGE, REQUIREMENTS CANYON PARK ESTATES "HOME OWNERS ASSOCIATION, Bi1TTE;CGUNTY 9. 11hen the normal irrigation season is over, the runoff from the first, rainstorm or first 0»25 inch (0.`6 cm) of rain, whichever is less; shall be coilected and returned to the stabilization ponds: Subsequent rainfall 4 may be allowed to follow the normal drainage course. r 10. {err erosion control plan should be subwItted to this office and approved by the Executive Officer before the discharge of, any waste into the ponds. 11. There shall be no earthwork construction .between 1 November and 1 Aprf l annually] and all exposed earthworkshall be winterized antlrevegetated prior to 1 november annually, 12. Hydraulic continuity with underlying ground water shall be restricted by at least 2 feet of existing soils or by imported pond lining material with' a permeability of 1 x 10-6 cm/sec or slower. Such a: barrier must be ` confirmed by in-situ testing or otherwise demonstrated to the satisfaction of this Board's Executive Officer° prior to discharging wastes. l 13. The stabilization ponds shall be protected from any washout or erosion of levees and from inundation- which could occur as a result of floods having a predicted frequency of once in 100 years. Such protection must be demonst.rateo to the satisfaction of this :Board's Executive Officer 'prior to discharging wastes. C. Provisions: 1. The discharger may be required to submit technical or, monitoring reports as directed` by the Executive Officer; 2. The Discharger shall comply, with the Standard Provisions ani] 'Reporting Requirements, dated 21 September 1979, which are a part" of this Order, I. The Discharger shall report proMptly to tile Board any material change or proposed change inthe character, location, or volume of the discharge., 4. In the eventof any change in control or ownership of land or waste disc charge facilities presently owned or controlled by the Discharger< the n scharger shall notify the succeeding owner or operator of the existence of this Under by letter, a copy of which s,llall be forwarded to this office, 5: Discharger shall` record pond free board and flow `readings monthly and submit report quarterly. 6, The Board dill review this Order` periodically and may revise requirements; when nece-ssaryy: