Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout83-50 REZONES 9 OF 22Nov., '1982 r..�ry ti i y„ BUTTE COUNTY ADVISORY AGENCY Mi1VtiTES Page .lg` ; November 2 82 1 9a 9 2. Obtain state encroachment permit and -construct public road approach at Humboldt Rd. and. Hwy. 32 13. Pay off ;assessments,. 1�F Meet the requirements of_the utility companies (i.e., PG&E, Pacific Telephorde, water) sewer.) 15. Pa an delinquent taxes Pay y 9 , -1,6.' Developer shall provide all required traffic aafeiy" signs including stop signs. 1.7. The westerly interior road that provides emergency access to the north to its terminus at 'Humboldt Rd, to be offered for dadi;cation but riot to be accepted at the time of filing the final map. Health Dept. conditions are; 18. Provide a community domestic water supply that complies with the California SUcte Safe Drinking Water Act and the Code of Butte County, r19. Provide community sewage collection, treatment and disposal facilities that comply vrth California State Regional Water Quality Control Board, the Code of Butte County, California State iealth and Safety Code and other applicable codes and regulations governing the design, construction, and opera,tion'of the facilities. Provide a service and maintehahae district or other legal entity or entities adequate to insure the cohstruetion, maintenance, repair or improvements of the dome§tic water supply system and the community sewage collection treattent and disposal facilities, Planning Deptconditions axe; X21. Record a covenant, running with the land, agreeing to inclusion within ' Fire Protection Assessment Districtwhich may, be established ' by the Board of Supervisors at a future time. 22, Applicant taus t+also, comply with al} other applicable State and local statutes, ordinances and,regulations, 23. Applicant- to. apply far and diligently pursue zoning that con forms to the Specific Plan. The following mitigation measures will also be cO:adi.tiens of approval;, X24. CTtilitd standard erosion control and constrtAetion practices to minitize oroaioni and other construction imvicts, :N6 v, 29, 3.989 I fc'i 51 a„ Its BUTTE COUNTY ADVISORY AGENCY lknwU E$ Page 20 November 29 1982, .25, Design anri construct the structures with. adequate lateral -.reinforcement'. to withiltandl an earthquake with intensity VTIZ on the Modified MercalU Scale per the Uniform; Building Code. X26. Minimize potential damage from;rockfalls by: (l) Locate; dwellings and other structures away from, the base of steep bluffs. (b)' Avoid probably areas of future rockfall activity where concentration of rockfall debris occur. (c) Construct low walls of `native stone on the uphill side of dwelling sites where the area shows evidence of occasional rockfalls of small boulders., Mark the important archaeological site by survey monuments during the roadconstruction phase. V� 28. Grant an easement for archaeological site CV -II to the Society for California Archaeology OR if preservati on rif the site is not feasible, an extensive scientific investigation is required prior to filing_ the final subdivision map. X29. Locate roads and dwelling units so as to minimize the amount . of vegatatioi removed or disrupted, avoiding Habitat interfaces whenever possible. ' Retain riparian vegetation wherever possible. Locate dwellings and roads 50 to 100 feet from stream channels except at bridge or culvert crossings._ 30-provideRestrict fencing to homesites to corridors for wildlife movement. ."3. Limit the construction of dwelling units within 35Q ft. from the ce,rj.terl ne of Highway 32. For dwellings proposed to be located within that setback area, architectural design of the btlldings and placement on the parcels! to conform with the landscape. '` 32. pCalifornia Department of Obtain strea�ubed alteration permit from Cali Fish and Game for creek crossings.' 33. Utilize energy conservation iie-asures.of the teniform Building Cade and as required by`Section 66413.1'of the Subdivision Map A::to c:r34. The stab`ilizatIon ponds shall be protected from any washout or erosion of levees and from :nun dation which could 'occur as a 'result ai w floods having'a predicted frequehcV of once in 100 years.. 35 Building permit applications far .residences in this subdivision shall be subject to`any school mitigation fees established by an ordinance enacted prior to the filing of such applications unless a Community l,X)� Facilities Act of 1982 District is created pursuant to California ' Government Code Section 53311, et. seq. covering the project area prior to the issuance of any building permits. Nov. WTTE COUNTY ADVISORY AGENCY MINUTES Page 21 NoVariber 91 82 2 system on Blitt' Creek h 4r its Juncture with 56# Improve the, leve; e the Sacramento River and/or. pay: 'a Proportionate share,, based on f generated improvements the amount of runoff toward downstream to alleviate flooding;, and minimize inundation. 37 All pond design and maintenance procedures to be reviewed by the ,Abatement District. Vegetation control Butte County mosquito�Abate for -,-ndp and livestock, grazing practices, to. be,;followed 64 described' on page 19 of the, EIR Supplement. B. TENTATIVE PARCEL MFP'' VOA CONSIDERATION-. 2. Ronald L. Shute, AP 5623,61, It parcels approx., :2400 ft. east of _��tte_HWT 32 and Garland Rd. intersection. Garland Rd,. inters I ects parcel. Forest Ranch area. Engineer: Lippincott/QuthAssociates. (continued frobi Nov. 1, 1589) Mir. Mend6nsa said that this item was continued for more comment from the Dept. of Fish and Gamei A letter dated 'Naso, L8., 1982 was received, which was the result of an on -m -site, meeting with Mr. Streeter,,, Jim Snowden, Ronald,Shutes Mr. Shute's son, and Jim Dodson, a neighbor). mj?i Streeter said that the letter referred to placing the hohiesi.tes ­­ little Niher,6 indicated on the map b . y lo red squares. , :This map was no sent with the i6tter. It had been discussed putting the homes''ites near the bluff line or else by the road: HEARING OPEN TO THE, PUBLIC Ronald Shute;,said, he. received a, copy of the, letter: from Mr.';Streeter. ', There was talk of clustering the homesit6s which he, opposes There in still no proof r of deer in the area. Platin the', homesites close together 9 9 is not 'attractive 'to buyers and not, conducive to deet .pqths. S hut ei I sp engineer would discuss the issp.e of proof of vater. Also there is a new Wou item about deed restrictions.that meanthatsotdone could not split the :951 -acre piece to 5 acres, which is in the 0eftoral Plan? Mr Streeter er said that, the Fish and Game Depti has moved'from.a position d I n­qftq Val to red,0mmendi,hg approva f re"do 1 1 if' there is clustering. t Rel He scussea Mr Shute said he would like the clustering ci defined. Al he would like to see some , actual data regarding the ddorhetd,i T here, s discussion Of ol 3.,g and the fact map Ith,red, was that the squares was not available* ieu6mmended a One week 'continuance in order t6obtain 'the Mr., Mendbn8a i bap in, clueItioh, Mr. Reid said he,iwou1.,,1_ like a clarification of deed tedtridtions., Nov. 29, X982 Inter-Depar m mal 'me orandui ` Board of Supervisors fROiA• Planning ;. SuS4,EtTI Ga yo Park i��tazes � PA -;P -;,;Rezone;, OAT F-4 July 15, 1,982 .k �A n•.. i' A >i.. �t ; ,,�7 n �i'r A s., K. _ R• .v p""` Y,. i; A e. • Theartached comments were reeved fromr,he StateClearinghouse ._,sport .second °circulation a£ °the, NfiIR:. The three responses >' rr roceiv. drwexe from Cal�forn ,a. Department ;Cons,ervAtion, the California rfi;,, Departmenti,o'f Pjs.h, and;.Game, an1�`-the,.:Qa�lfornia Department of cans p - cards to ortation Diva cion of Aeronaut,cs ;;,: Qur',;comments wsth re the thiree letters are as follows Y, Letter from Esther Maser, California be Conservation. �'. ,..• T ,'�,A " "t ,w a � �s'� 3° ',7� w � Wry; � a . r ;r aspo�ise �Ve. ,;previmp 1, r composed a rosp,onse to t the A concerns of the Department of Conservation as indicated. The Planning De.partme,nt response i's., identified as item �. V.b. of Append i; .. ] 0 in, the EIJ No, fur,ther response is required. 2',. Let�ter;•from E . , C. Rullertan t' Cali.fornxa ; D,epartment aof Fish and Gage . We have 1 NJ, Response. prey, ous,ly+ receav'ec1 verbal ,input ,from the Department, of;.F4s,h and AGame ,that ,the revised tdevelop e.;menu plan wars' designegir so,.as to minimize impacts to t.5 , mx g�r�.atory w1ldl,i,f6 . The ori gi:nal deve� opment plan 'for II,O ilhomesites;,,was. not as,desarablek. After meeting with four representatives Fnf the De,par.tment ,5`nf ,Fish and Game on May 6, 1982, they concluded that ;tie. rev64 development•' p1anT for ,109 home,si tes .was accept- NA a The;recomm©tided ��tigation:measure.wxll be,considexed for ,„adoptx.on already ,There , s a mxt�gatiori measure to '!Qbta .n: a, strd'%a'mbed al;teraiion Permit from California F�shr and Game, for ,reek crossings” which in part,*, the ,concerns abUut the sewage a would address„ , ea The mi'ti anon oxidation ponds �,n the fl:oodZiilain ar g easure propgsed,.: Board ij of Su er xs'orsx, f�fi, rt ' Canyon' Park Estates PiiiwC Rezone, 91'-31' Page -2_ w 4 ; July is, 1982qW 3 Letter ,from Burd. Mi1l:err, _C lifoxir' at -Department °=oF Transportat3an Division of Aeronautics ,> Response: The comments from Caltrans Division of Aeronautics are acknowledged, As indicated', the'; potential efi"ects of the two airports is not, expected to be. a significant ;r i altar t}iis: ca§e `, At ari'e'� point ie project proponents fot �Bi`cweTl ;Hei"glatls to the noa�theast were t, 'cons'dering'the establ`ish::ienjt of'�an' 'air "strip for use by' smell' aircna'ft Th�6se' plans° have` been` abaindaned tioto out-knoRlodge stems you have received "n recent weeks include - Three other ed i 1. Letter received June 8, 1982, from Kelly Meagher regarding rural :.� subdxv41 saon`' moratorium' `p;riding fi'sca'l' la'aet azal.ysa�s. I L Lettir''dated June 22l 19'8'2`, 'from „dere o1ster of Drake Homes regards ng cum41 t#ive, k xtpactsa 3, Report received on June 29, 1982 from J. Richard Recht entitled ►1Rev`iew a£" Piac`a.Z ° wxnformat"i'on:' C"anyon • Pa, tstates;.a" Information presented regarding fiscal impacts of the Canyon Park Estates proJec't alias` -not' We_ n,, d6t by (any means.` -"Tile cost/revenue afidlyi,is I repared, W in "a short time', 'Yi p" st"off ,of the Planning Department was challenged'?as <<to° som'e' of itis `'asstrrptionsand information, The evalfiataon, rrece�ved" from Mrs 19820 while not totally agreeing viit}i the meth accurate ,ods,Fmfiri'd�cd,ed `thaC the ,conclusions were gen- °' era7�lyf g <' l f• a K f 4 '6 � A _a r. .I The lette'r`F subirtxtted by `Jere"`'Balst'e'i'; datedJ-une 220 19&2, sets forth mit.gation.measures .far cumulative impacts for other development projects,in the: Doe Mill Ridge atea. The Board of Supervisors should " give ;careful` cansz'derat�on tb thea}r input,` iiut realize,. at the same time;`^thatxCounty Aft-', i"', °would be°I�'eyu�.red to implement some of tite'mitiga ion heas�dres' ° k Poyr instance,�uf ei"establ shment of Community k°' ' `Service Areas" would, req. ir's'Faction by thel�Loca ency Formation ' Commzs'ssoni and %he Board of, supenvxsbrs .Additional review of this psxticular� leter�'fould be approp"a,ateasp-oth+�x project are reviewed r' 'by the County thru the�xpublic hea rang' process The Bidwell Heights il project' will` be beforE .the planning �ommissscin on July 29, 1982. In the coming m6nths, `the -Donny is''ep.ected}`to receive a proposal for ' the Isom -Hall property on 960 acres+ to the north of the Canyon Park -uj a0 tl h Nryi� „ B'statb" site C ter• N t•` `11" I, 'I 777777777777F7 ­ 77 �MEf�IUttANDUM�. 1 UPUA'TQ. ON CANYON PARK i ATE5 SDS, �i:`R.�'��' Rr .i •. BUTTE COUNTYPage -2- r V � 6. Anderson Gdotechriical Consultands, inc, of Sacramento did a site 1,nv,estipti,on.„;.They jndicated, that the mai �KV,e m'ater'ial °`coU1d'°6e' Mixed"ani compot e by sheepsfo0 and water in 6 -inch 1 ayter,s to form, the high l eyees, ,f;,o'n ponds 15,, and 6 z E i hey re ar>te F r �' tlla ca ''tion` Iro1.1 d lie, dj f �qu,lt in the Volc+pnic En id fla,�v ►Q +� } 1 ate ala the canyon i wad s • ,They ,recomTended ,surface dr,�. ge a P "7chs at^ound 'the ponds ,end suburface eutpf�f::dr;a�n,s►�fieepge was o.erved he'ciut ,r�. A SUMMARY,' u The eng made s,ubsi;anti,a1, progress on tjle design. of .the,sgwage disposal #►goerhas system;'bu 'the 'r'eport'f waste discharge cannot be be complete until the above i of ormati on i s submitted. AN,Qi,S,, ,��E4 r ro, Area '>nginrer r` a, AdLici5 (� � F i' ac: Mr.,- Tom°`Ri ed, Butte cou�y' �(l th hep artment ; , , Mr. Steve Str�e`etr; Butto county P'1'annii'g`°Qepartment j I t o .Y ij .il i �V9 r 14i 1 ry iI„ 1 IL: i 1 C q I f4 I i. 5 I N F 4 l 4 i -777 777777�� 777777777 i , t Y s . �"'K r �r 'Recommended Mti ag tio..• 3 � V An.t.y ,should ;P s aplz sb a requ ement io,r .clustered . , the t .. .0 develop ment a.nd use .a,,egetated,,�x�, ,pr.e:crepning zs ,par _. of a r�-vi nd .I�'op'th 71< Re,sident p.ne:, pr 9:rx. F I. F y 5 imcre;sed; •Remand ,fox P,ublzc,, Sexvi c.es (�,ps� i 1_i ci�nts `iox fire pro tection are ,co�ieed a 8,utt0 County 'has continued to provide a combination of rural and urban s-rvi,de' 'ieve] s without regard te;ocaiornor. distance :from existing areas being served . Other =MtTOs in r rate, areas lic,-` dtsc.cint .need ox, limb tech ►anyk sexvades, mot. cnediatel.y, a,ft x' th,0, passage pf Prc�pcasi.t<<a on, � P L yeaammended Mz t gat. m t Se5 �ca1 .fpm ,mxv oaFroas, or P . .usabl�shmeri, assessments.;madem at the;,,t�me of,rza%;.ng, or te4 ative tract1 ,?Lpprpva1,• , . ;Funds,,, a�etdr�c�ua �c�cl at this ,earl y + time the` demand stage to presvide services or equipment at thy; fax "service or equipment is created) J' ; Additaon building, standard$ �.ha•t,,:requ;.re buildings . ,ai e esti a rePX6O,: :� an,daxd; pti4i d; n ; secu,i� ty bt�� e�: nd � � ,_t,o n�mcr, � �� . ordrn antes are al ready- cava x,able <and acre, ki i.n,g„used, ,n om- munities ;throughout this state. 3, Caunty inspection service ee ;shata;Id „be xevise! to delo' ment;s"moxe include mileage and travel time costs. 'SOT” ev fha. i5-5 mi°lesxom the Caunty�raice; 1pQv�dng, that s.ervice', y schedules should blp� devela'edta,prav;de Y �i # U n ` 4 ,. ,.impact ifgef i .`r HA w1 .k✓dam 5 levels ` if requested r the fee would depend upq�a the Or ice curren capa- lev ,service requested (above the Co � s ;. o tant, framF i,he� agency . araux a,", service, bil tty) and s A _'S. j .6.T'1e Hazar A f t ti; ' r a 6n " lia $�r hazard ncrease �r tb� dev�elrne�t i.A m rqheart ly -op vegetae1 withµ Y�nc ea.sed�dist;ancet,rim+.,x`e ysttaons. ;aeas.aud Recommended Mi;tigations, :, �,; , �8tabal s �! , .pev dei adi�t,ionaire,St�.ions. as esnbto �'� or upgrclexxt, .g; 1 aced; �o „the Gnexal plan , hard use n � ,aa �:� �2:= �.�,�_� s;r "Canyon; Par k'st'a'te"s 81-31 a SCH'#80122511 APPENDIX 16 r May 28, 1982 & I, Supplement nn Cumulat5.ve Impacts - June ,22 1982, State Cleara.nghouse Iette-rs with letters from the Department of Conservation., the Department ;of x ish and Calans-`vison of Aeronautics and Game tr b. Planning Department responses to the three letters .from State agencies> Memorandum from Anthony J. Landis Regional water Quality: Control 13oaTd, entitled "Update on Canyon Pa:k Estates Sewage 'Dispo:sal System, Butte County" July 160 1982 I'v. Letter from M s C. Rolls of Rolls, Anderson and Rolls to the Regional wator Quality Control Board -, July 21, 1982 - 1 n - '+ FILE NO BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING Co�fi�{ I SS:X C1N II _ r STW�'F k'TND];NGS May 9, 1.98 OPLICANT: Z�r-aE�e/ Isgn�' 0WI\IER;1 J. H. Hal I, A. L. Hal l , W. H. Isom, and R, 11 IlAtsOM PIEQUEST: Rezoning to -C and A -r- A -SR, Sf -1/? or 5k-1/2 +eom A•-2 and S -H AF' NO. 46-35r04, 23p 46 71--17 and le C ptn . } 5I'ZE; 1 Bast;) acres-/�-- LOCATION: Sast exde of Highway tit and Humboldt Road, 5 miles northeast ,from Highway 99E, east g•F Chico, ZONING HISTORY: Zoned A-•2 Au' 29, 1955 (ord. 52i) g por'•tian a1'ong zoned L�--H Jin. 177 .highWay 1967 (01-d. 91�) , zoned PA -C 4uly19132; thenr sci tided lay Fc�ard of uper•visors. SURROUNDING ZONING- A-2 to the nartl %hd westS-I.I alant ' Highway Z'21,, TM -4t.) +Luther neai^ h, A-• 160 to east and : outheast, A:! 60 �-And: A -1u to south, 1 SURI"CtWIUDING' LAND USE: open and Gr•aMit,g L�And% �,cAttor•tzd retsi dohco�; At rural, den i ti es. GCNIzkAL. PLAN .nrzSIGNATI(]N: Fl,c�r•icttlttlral Residential APPLICABLE REGULATIONS-' Canty General P1an, Ci�nyari Parr Wtte 1.t tats Sp0aj+ 'c Pla , OUtte, County Code 5e ti erns 4-' , 'thru 29, ".14-66, 24-871, 24.99, 2.4-112, 24-147 1 _24--1-61 24-160 COiit�E'N'1`S t;F_`CEIUEb: PLtb1 i r=L"aa) Lrs: F of e,r to memorandum dated March; 61 198$ t.ammenti ng on the dr n ge st on a the 1�1R. rv�canjn��1z "'Na ab iect�,rin �(pzcine i s eta campy y with l anni r1g .pep�rtment` condi ti ori ca•4' � rnval For the �,t•ibdi vi sr tan map pP to app,ly + a 'd diligently purstce zoning Lhat c:cinftarms to the spac.i fii~ plan. boe recamriiended r nditian Of apprUval SM 1,3t_tld bb; Campl,y With 411 Healt(i: be ar~tment odnditiane p - tai appi av�l Adapted hy' t�7e ward a TABLE ,OF CONTENTS' IMPACT SUMMARY INTRODUCTION, � PROJECT DESCRIPTION EN.VI'RONMENTA , SETTING (EXISTING CONDITIONS) Topography 6 6 Geology $ Soils - Hydrology 8' Surface Water Groundwater Airshed` Climate - o Air Quality 10 Noise to Habitat 12 Wildlife 13 Archaeology 13 Land Use General Plan and Zoning 14 14 Accessi and Traffic 1G Public Services' Schools 1" Fire Protection 16 Sheriff' 17 utilities 11 Gas and Electric 17 Telephone 17 Water Supply _ DISGUSSION'OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATIONS Geologic and Seismic Ha"t a:, s Water Quality 20 Air Quality Wildlife and Habitat 20 Archaeology Potential Conflcts,with,State "arid Local Land. Use Policy 22 Viewshed 23" Access and Traffic Public.Service� 27 Uti.l.ities K'8 Public Health Adverse Impacts Which Cannot i3e Avoided if the Project i?s' Impl.eme'uted 30 ISJL r H ANALYSIS OF IMPACTS �., .,.i ALTERNATIVES 32 - GROWTH INDUCING LMPACTS 35 APPENDICES 1. PERSONS AND ORGANIZATIONS CONTACTED 361 2. REFERENCES - 37 39 3 GEOLOGIST'S REPORT 4. GROUNDWATER REPORT 56 S. PLANT SURVEYREPORT64 6 WILDLIFE SURVEY REPOR,--' 7,4 7 ARCHAEOLOGIST'S RwPORT 79 8. MOBILE SOURCE EMISSIONS ANALYSIS 85 9. PROJECT INITIAL STUDY 87 10. COMMENTS ON DRAFT EIR AND RESPONSES 11. PUBLICS HEARING COMMENTS ON DRArT EIR AND RESPONSES 12. LIST OF THOSE COMMENTING ON PROJECT AND DRAFT E'l R 13, COSH'/REVENUE' �SNAL�'Sx5 14. SPECIFIC PLAN FOR CANYON PARK ESTATES ® 15, COMMENTS RECEIVED AT THE JULY 20, 1982 BOARD MEETING AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT RESPONSES 16. SUPPLEMENT ON CUMULATIVE IMPACTS, LETTERS FROM STATE AGENCIES, RESPONSE8, SELVAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM UPDATE LIST OF FIGURES 1. REGIONAL LOCATION 3 2. PROJECT AREA 4` 3. SITE PLAN 5 4. SITE TOPOGRAPHY'' S. PERCENTAGE OF EMISSIONS FROM MAJOR1 STATIONARY AND'AREA SOURCES WITHIN BUTTE,:COUNTY 11 6. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENTS IN THE PROJECT AREA Z,5' s d' IMPACT SUMMARY This ;eport addresses the potential impacts ofddeyelo:p- n lx three -se re resident al lo t, on. a 1, 056 arc: irc 6 mileseast of Chico. The project would require construction of about 7 miles of access roads, the installation ,Of utilities and tie, pr pa�r,,a;tio.n of house, �i,xes," Homes woulA „then be -,built. The re a' ining land would be held. an -commo t by a, hotneowhers as-- sociation, A small reservoir is planned for Little C}tico Greek; the dam would also serve as a bridge for; the main access road. Project impacts. generallyfall <into ' 'thxeO categories : con-- s'tructian"relaedi:e; vegetation removal 'and erosagn/sedi_ mentation}, travel related (i,e�, gasoline consumption and air Io'llution) and habitation related (demand for public services, domestic energy and water; sewage disposal £acili.ties, exposure -of humans -to, geolagiG, _4az'wrds and specific pub;lic�health prob- ]:ems,, and', long-term effects on ,In °the opinion of the report writers, all. of these impacts can' be,',reduc.ed; to an i.nsi level....Proba:bly of".more, s�gnificanee "ate, the cunt- .ifican"t. ulative effect this and al1 other low density, developments within the foothills of Butte County will have on public ser vice agencies$ wildlife habitat, and motor vehicle anergy con- sumption and air pollution. In general,; foothill developments are less efficient from an energy standpoint and are more dif- ticul:t to provide with puplid services than are urban develop- mems. Specific impacts of the project are summarized below:, Detailed discussions are inci'.uded in the text and appendices. 1.. Structures built on the site would be subject to earth -- quake ground shaking of Intensity VIII on the Modified h�ercalli. Scale.; Mitigation; Design and ;construct structures with adequate lateral veiriforcement to withstand an earthquake with in, - °tensity VIII on the Modified Mercali Scale. Generally, adherence to the Uniform Building Code would be sufficient. Two story dwelliiigs may, require special design. L'. Dviel:ling 'units and other stY..Itiettires could be subject to damage from rockfA-lls.; Mitigation, Dwelling:units:,and other structures should be constructed away from the base of steep bl.itffs and other areas "subject to rockfalls,, _ or low barriers should be con- Structed to protect homes. R y k 3.► , "oils truct.a0 act�Ya�t�.cs would G,�usa a,- t,tp por4py ncrease- in oT1 ite, e,�2s4 o?? Cc�nstrution s�cruld°,be, laili..ecl to,-,tho dry —;seasox��., 1'.r.oper' cons ruc ian pTratt oti =suc1,i the uso to p rim ter: ierms� r.ei artinc; .���x;.,doryoti�er ;xound covers on disturbed areas; minimizingTT t�Yc�..u'�O: of bare "ground exposed at any one time anal kis III , .sto 'inwat�er �;ncygy dissipators at roadside ditch outfalls inid strcain crossing r.. culverts should be p 1,, of :, Not allxlots have adequate sb1 fox leachio:ld disposal, 10w .ssure e l luont ,syst "hi to pump Miti,r.tlon: Use a, pre ef'f`luent rom lots with .inadequate soils to a comminity leachfi.eid S. An incremental increase.l Ti mobYln SollrCo efil� s$� ons ,wQIAj4 roccuT Mit-igation,: Promote carpoolb;,r• , Road construction activities could disturb or destroy ail important archaeological site. Mitigation: During the road construction PhA80, nmrk the site by survey monuments to Prevent accidental .destruction or disturbance. 74 Construction: of roads and dwelling 'Units wou'lcl result in a reduction of wildlife habitat. Miti. a� tion: Apads and dwellings should belaced in 'of s xateglc positions to reduce, the amount vegetation removed or disrupted.' No dwellings should be allowed within 1:00 ft. of stream channels;. Riparian vegetation' should be preserved whenever possible,. Roads should riot be located within 100 ft. of streams except at bridges or culvert crossings-. 8. Highway 32 in the vicinity of the project site is dos- igna;ted as a scenic highway. A 35.0 foot strip along that roadway is zoned Scenic Highway (SH). Mitij;ation: No dwelling unit should be constructed within 350 t. ;o the highway, or, if witlin this distance, should be out of viA'W of the road or designed to blend with the landscape. 0. Approximately 1,0;00 daily trips would be added to th.e cur- rent traffic volume on Highway 52, west of the project tt iv t.7777'Y :.�. ., ,•. r 10, Demands on public serraces Wau],d incrpas' e'cn��irrtcndt �e'ns off'' 1dS ao��c d tVithrc'5pe t Mt'i''gtrin security and fire pxotd;e A`oii' ha'vd �tice,n ,inCludcci to access, .n,the cutrre,n d'ds�gn�'o' `�t x�s st�1a iVixs' on, Che alta ]i r assessed va'2ue .Q f; a11�' new' cons" ruc:tii�{i1 ]t x'"ov c�`, 1tto�te in� me per`s dWellzn�� uri'it th:�n �do'e o�itit�I11 (taus"rig];, :tttci =1 ho�xlct :aid Eii1®of'ge'tta,ng-',Cbst;' of deve ].opm'ent o, W " The demand fox eectnica'° enet'g,y e�dt�d lncext;d Mitgat on: Design all dwelling. units 'to be ons gyi.suf- �i c' end Ret�uire• adhereride ta'�n1 en'e'rgyvatiott 'A6 rea't �remerits of tha,. Ung form ]3ti:ildxtg 12. Residents of the site. Woui . have a, hit1tat1' average e,x].'osure rate to certain public healt]i problem:,, assoc i of ori s triu1a- qU 1 i,c Kit. � Thee hotneownex be vacoi'nitr1 andbnfin`od to °tho itanto- ,Fat a1] pets site when unattended: I y a • r y 4}y7 ,.y r v' p n t I t tip .S 7,777 �WOM•'klC.W.{YT'fiC a.F-Y.U'.GT4 k4.i'i'n'. .».1 LJ. �n <.:i J,.iKA+4fJ.J..'h.1"�. xYiYSIF'.J.4A ..F.iV 't },:... t. a.Ir JSA.:" Y iN ..e'.lRf<...... ,. Ix C11 '.J.i�'Z Mf.,a. >•.TF.:' YNW.! _x....V1,.3YV..}.}PY.ki'#.VComvu^Meta.. kti,LJY: Y:-•{v'y�gykk `y ENVI RONMENTAh SETTT.NG ,t. (EXISTING CONATT ON$) ToPOG RAPII[ FA The site is generally » 'i ar,a tenized• tt5 a hload, �purh= westerly sloping upland surfacc that has ':bb mi and `a,ts eroded by south-soutliwe t 5 lowi,»ng, Little ,Chi c;o Ci•oe1. t►;itd, tribut'aries. ltemrians` of :the original `upland Surfaoo ;Soi�iu a north-itrending, ridge- a10' 9 .the tvestor.n odgo o� fhp pr.ojie»rtY M J and nb:rtheast ,.ra dges through the ,eastern' Halfof ; .-txencing the site- pl`evata on ranges ,,from 440 ei et on:' xhd °c!anyon � ilieor to about 1,360 feed x�Pax tyle riot':, heal t CQr,.er of ' ri o.c ur on the can on'<`floor andori less than,''20 pence , Y d ridgy tops Canyon Wdlis and o ,��ep ai' ly steep, e caadi'ni; 7th, percent; `i slopes ,in places, and avera arig an excess of 50 p6r�`en' t1%ra�.ltl - out mach sof th'e si'La a :'(See,, Appon ix Y,and l� i;gtlre 4),,", r GEOLOG W­dott(ilod discussion of regional 'a'n, si to ccs nclu,de6 as Appenda,x 3 ') There and four geologic U, t$ e: pp -d 0d on` t 1 1) o��ot tt}+s Eram a7 d"est to; you:Rgest they ares' Chico Formation - `a 5004 ` ft thick seri es ofeas,ly a. eroded marine, claystorles, silts.tones: and sands,tone� 7ht;s'e racks a> e exposed in seyert, 1o:cat�.orls alc5ng.;.thei' liot`ton� of''M " la.ttl:e GhGo Creek canonn. zie'r. the iartiern' edge oJ' Gl»e Prop'er,ty; L' "'Joy' F�oTmatxoxi a f5�?^150th. ek l y�e :`of > . r,esa =tans, f actured ibasalt ovcrl ys ng the Oli9 co, k conn t The Lovejoy basalt`»fo'am's laxge flat bo' tel} ti"e, ca Y0410, ,rhes bottom; it s ;neax�.y`4. mp'ermeabJ e, anti seep ,at>,d' g11tal'1 ; Apr trigs are common along, ftsf contact .wif' e ev'er.ly,irig 1-uscan 'o'rma¢ti on.. ` y N f • n. Formatii`on ,- this gently dz ping ss .cif vol can r c 1 - -5 mud,1 ows and At voj`canic "sediment"ary." racks forrgs cation ra.Y1s and ridges on ;'the property. The'edme,'ntary layers are nasi,1y dis'tingu>xshed ,fYom `the intea^vening mu'dflow� because, they are mire-prvrirleable And support tTdos an U- sa���rhs ivhiach form sub'horizontaI stripes ai.ong the .c4hyon walls , a x • 4 _ low