HomeMy WebLinkAbout83-88 HOMEBUYER FEE TASK FORCE 5 OF 5t
-
F
A 17
nbt intentional, penalites school districts more than Revenues from Sarpltts SchbollSites
other local governments. School districts have an economic disincentive to
Both the public and legislators need to be better raise revenues from surplus school sites if "those
informed and persuaded of the. importance and sites were acquired through state aid, Upon the sale
broadbased community and state support for school
of such a site, for example, the proceeds generally
facilities, for without such support education pro- revert to the state. Instead, local districts should be
granas cannot be carried out effectively. encouraged to sell or lease surplus school sites to
At the same time some common, minimum Stan- generate local revenue. There are several ways to ac -
dards of need must be used to compare the relative c,omplish this:
and absolute plight of school districts. This common . If the facility sold or leased was acquired
measure would serve as the basis for allocating state through a state loan, the school district' would con -
aid and determining the leve -1 of fees school districts tinue to make regular payments on the 'loan but peep
coauld charge to developers. any excess revenue from the sale or lease of.,stirplus
a Special state mandates which require separate
facilities should have different standards. property.
. rito parties could be given a tax incentive on
State strategies for Facilities Finance their 'investment in school property, such as he
celerated depreciation.
In a study prepared for the Riverside County
Building Industry Association, Strategies, for Pro-
viding Adequate School Housing, the William C.
Lawrence Company identified a number of state and
local strategies for alleviating the school facilities
financial crunch, This section will address these
strategies, offer some additional strategies, define
their practical significance, and outline legislative
changes which would be necessary to accomplish the
strategies.
State strategies include the allocation of General
Fund revenues for school facilities, the clarification
of using revenues from +surplus sites locally, the
amendment of SB 201 to allow this fee to be used as
the 10% local match required under the Lease=
Purchase Program, and the use of tax increment
revenue for the local share in the Lease -Purchase
Program. The strategies suggested by the Lawrence
Company provide a good starting point, and their
possible accomplishment will be discussed in fur-
tha— detail, In addition to remedial action on the part
of the state, a more fundamental change is necessary
to give school districts more power to raise
revenues.
Allocation of General Fund Money
As previously stated, a lack of programmatic
legislation is not the chief problem in dealing with
school facility finance, However, the major building
aid programs have depended on special revenue
sources which In the past few year's have either
fallen below expectations or have been diverted to
other purposes. The state should make a broader
commitment to building; aid programs by using the
General Fund as the major revenue source for aid to
school districts, While the General 1~und would not
shield s+:pool building pmg;rtos from the vagaries of
state finance nor from :oRnj:ietltion with other pro-
grams, at least building; aid programs would have a
greater source of reveiaue with which to compete,
• Local districts would be allowed to trade high
value surplus sites with a lower value privately
owned' site and keep the excess revenue derived from
the trade.
• Local districts would be allowed to trade, or
lease at a very low cost, surplus sites to private
developers in exchange for their construction of new
school facilities,
• School districts would be allowed to keep
revenues from surplus sites to finance the repair and
maintenance of other school facilities.
The Local Match for Lease -Purchase Funds
As with any limited funding source, competition
for Lease -Purchase Program funds are intense, As a.
result, several ways of screening applicants have
developed, Most prominent are standards of need us-
ed by the State Allocation Board and the 10% local
matching funt,�requirement. School districts without
many options for raising the local match money
should be given as many opportunities at possible
for participating in the Lease -Purchase Program,
School districts should be able to use a variety of
local revenue sourc4% to raise the local matching
funds, Two revenue sources suggested by the
Lawrence Company are SB 201 fees and tax incre-
Ment revenues. Other possible revenue sources are
surplus school site proceeds and special taxes ap-
proved by a majority of a district's voters -
A Change in the Constitution
it is important to provide a permarient, broad,
based state system of support for school building,
But equally important is giving local districts suffi-
cient financial tools to raise revenues locally so that
they need not depend 100% on the "winds of
fortune" in state finance. At the state level, this will
require a rethinking by Californians of the purpose
and effects of Proposition 13. It is supposed that two
primary motives 'of the electorate in approving Pro,,
Local Strategies
Within the current limits of state law and the Con
stitution, there are several options local school
districts can pursue to expand their revenue sources
without state aid, The Lawrence Company and the
State Department of Finance report such strategies:
as,
M using 3B 201 fees' more effectively;
using special taxes more effectively;
using revenues from surplus school sites,
entering into private agreemehts, such as 1 -,011 -
profit or corporate leaseback arnt ngeiments;
Creating community facilities districts,
• Per unit fees assessed against all property in a
district, but not on an ad valorem basis,
• A tax assessed against all households with
children enrolled in a district,
P,psidents in new developments should be ex-
pected to support a reasonable share of the cost of
building and n a,htalning sclityols, It is not
reasonable, though, to expeet new schools to be built
solely from taxes or fel on new development,
Revenues frons Surplus School Sites
This optioh has becti examined previously, i`dr a
school district to realize sa,abstahlial rrvenue froh7
surplus sites, school officials may have to seek
p6sition'13 Nvere.
9 establishing developer reimbursement schemes
. To cap rapidly rising property taxes that follow-
contingent on state funds becoming available;
ed the spiraling, 'inflation -created values of homes in
and
California.
• using existing facilities more efficiently.
• To limit .local government expenditures by
All of these local options have their merits and
limitinglocal governments' chief source of revenue,
their drawbacks as previously reported,
1" CotN%ithstanding the merits of these motives and
the levels of success of Proposition 13 in achieving
SB 201 Fees
voter expectations, several unfoctun•,,te and pro-
This fee should be used only when other, more
bably usiinten ed side-effects have occurred:
• It has transferred much local discrett-An over
broad-based or state revenue sources are
spending matters to the state.
unavailable and then only for interim facilities, as a
local match for state aid, or as a temporary funding
• Schools were adversely affected even more than
measure for permanent f.tcillties until state or local
other local governments because of tht.ir almost
revenues are avai',Able to reimburse the developer.
complete dependence on property taxes as the local
School districts must take steps to mitigate the need
revenge source,
for new facilities, such as through an increase in
* Local voters cannot raise ad valorem property
class size, transfer of students to other schools; or
taxes beyond the 1% level (except to finance in-
sharing arrangements between districts,
debted-ness authorized prior to Proposition 13) even
Two examples are; using SB 201 fees to provide a
if i045 of the residents in a community chose to do
1046 match or otherp local match for state aid and us.
s '
To correct these deficiencies without diminishing
in SB 201 fees to rovide portable
the construction of a permanetable facilities during
facility,
the intent of Proposition 13,, Article XIIIA of the
,
'11ie fee is not a permanent school finance solution.
California. Constitution should be attended to .allow
and should not be treated as such, But because SB
local voters to raise ad valorem property taxes
201 fees have state controls, whereas "voluntary"
beyond 146 for specific purposes (such as to incur in-
builder contributions do not, SB 201 fees should be
debtedness to finance school facilities) if the majori-
given priority over nr�n�regulated private
ty of the vocal voters agree. It is inconceivable that
agreements.
voters in a community, school district, etc. should be
Any development fees which are levied should app•
prohibited from taxing themselves for specific pur-
ly to all new development, not just reoidetitial
poses if the majority of the voters approves of the in.
development,
crease in taxation, (As a corollary, a majority of the
voters should be able to remove a propwrty tart
Use of Special 'hazes
enacted for sa special purpose) The State Senate has
introduced a similar proposal (SCA 30),
School districts should avail themselves of this opo
Additionally, the Legislature should define the
tion before seeking more specialized forms of local
procedure for using "special taxes," which
revenue, such as development fees. Special taxes can
presumably includes any tax which is not an ad
be used in those instances when SB 201 fees cannot.-
annot:valorem
valoremproperty tax, With a clear definition of
for school repair and maintenance. Special taxes
special taxes and the authority to raise property
should be broad-based to reflect the total community
taxes, local voters would have much more flexibility
benefit derived from a sound school system. Special
in financing overwhelmingly desired school building
taxes levied on new development only would be little
expenditures, School districts would not, then, de-
different in effect than 513 201fees, Two examples of
pend so heavily on the largesse of the state's coffers,
special taxes are.
Local Strategies
Within the current limits of state law and the Con
stitution, there are several options local school
districts can pursue to expand their revenue sources
without state aid, The Lawrence Company and the
State Department of Finance report such strategies:
as,
M using 3B 201 fees' more effectively;
using special taxes more effectively;
using revenues from surplus school sites,
entering into private agreemehts, such as 1 -,011 -
profit or corporate leaseback arnt ngeiments;
Creating community facilities districts,
• Per unit fees assessed against all property in a
district, but not on an ad valorem basis,
• A tax assessed against all households with
children enrolled in a district,
P,psidents in new developments should be ex-
pected to support a reasonable share of the cost of
building and n a,htalning sclityols, It is not
reasonable, though, to expeet new schools to be built
solely from taxes or fel on new development,
Revenues frons Surplus School Sites
This optioh has becti examined previously, i`dr a
school district to realize sa,abstahlial rrvenue froh7
surplus sites, school officials may have to seek
A
- 19
c aeraflon from local government officials to en
st=school sites are not kept artificially low in value
tom-,, h zoning. School districts should be exempted
,,;,fes statel law requiring right of first refusal by
bcztasing or recreational agencies.
c4 plus school site revenue should be used before
sR z1D1 'fees.
pte Agreements
wool districts should only seek private agree--
Ets ixnder the following circumstances,
After SB 201 fees have been levied.
• When searches for other revenue sources --
sty oid and local taxes -- have been exhausted.
w When one or more developers propose a large
deropment(s) which could substantially or com-
p$etjly fill a new school, facility. In such large pro -
,,:a developer should be able to provide financing.
fia?,r the facility and their lease it back to the school.
diaact-
+� When the private party could realize significant
benefits (such as tux benefits, the use of surplus land
at, ow cost, etc) which would reduce the cost of
doping n schooi facility.
r When a private profit or non-profit organization
cnn be structured so that it can market bonds at com-
petitive
om-p titive interest rates to finance school facilities.
Prwi ate agreements can be extremely complex and
not a 'universal solution. But such agreements
provide an additional option in a limited number
of cases.
NVbere private agreements include builder con-
tribution of land or facilities, reversionary clauses
,;hoaild be required so that if facilitiesllanel are not
u.�ed for school purposes, the property will revert to
the contributor.
Conimunity Facilities District
Commtinity facilities districts mould work best in
developing areas with few property owners if
a significant tax increment can be realized from
new development„ and
a special taxer, can be raised to support school
building. The taxes would be levied on future
residents after existing undeveloped parcels of land
are subdivided,
I)eveloper Reimbursements
Short-term arrangements with developers (such as
u=e of SB .201 f, es) are possible if future funding
from state aid or focal taxes is teasontbly certain,
Under a developer reimbursement scheme, the pro-
yect proponent would construct sir finanee the con`
struction of school facilities, The developer would
then be reimbursed as local tax or state 91a revenue
becomes available,
More Effective Use nl` Existing Facilities
The public school system in California is a
neighborhood/community-based system, School
districts typically coincide with Identifiable com-
munities, several communities, or counties. Within a
district, individual sehools serve discrete
neighborhoods. The neighborhood/community
school system has provided several advantages:
• schools are often within walking distance of
m est pupils.
The public school provides a neighborhood focal
point for educational, recreational, and cultural ac-
tivities.
e The neighborhood school is often a positive con-
tr butar to, property values.
However, the chief disadvantage of the neighbor.
hoo&comrnunity-ba tied school system is its extreme
sensitivity to population changes Population shifts
and the aging of the "baby-boot;i" generation have
required the closure of many schools, even in grow-
Ing ('California communities. Asa result, it is not un-
common for a school in one Untrict to have excess
capacity while in the ;neighl;oring district, a new
school may be needed.
School boundaries do not follow population
changes. one Way to reduce some of the need for new
facilities is for school districts with excess capacity
to share this space with neighboring districts which
have excess student population. Accomplishment of
this will require greater cooperation among'
neighboring school districts, One requirement of ap-
plying for state funds should be a prior feasibility
study of reducing facility demand by sharing
facilities with another district or consolidating
school distir11cts. Considerations that would enter in-
to a sharing study includo:
• the cost and time involved in transporting
students;
•
the type of facilities available in the neighboring
district and the r-ducational program; and
e the savings that would result froiti not construc-
ting a new facility.
If sharinglcomsolidation would be less costly than
construction of new facilities, the former alternative
should be required.
Defining Facility Needs
The problem of determining facility needs has two
components;
predicting the additional number and type Of
students to enter a school district as direct and In-
direct Consequences of new development ("student
generation rate"); and
41 translating the additional number of students
into additional needed classroom space and other
building space, fixed equipment, land, etc,
Stadent Geineration Rates
Intuitively vie know that single-family homes
usually house, more children than apai tments, that
the number of children is closely related to the
number of bedrooms in a unit, and that price/rent of
new housing determines who can afford to live there
and therefore what type of family will occupy the
unit,.
Review of past housing developments within a
district or in neighboring districts also allows one to
compare historically the number of new children
entering a district and draw conclusions about the
probable effects of new housing development on
school enrollment,
However, without a model with which to quantify
and measure the manyfactors which affect the
"child generation rate" of new housing, the use of in.
tultive :measures can lead only to guessing and to
estimates that may vary substantially from actual
new enrollment.
The factors to consider in setting up a model for
calculating housing effects on school enrollments
are:
• the numl er of bedrooms iii a unit;
• the size of a unit;
the unit type (single-family, duplex, garden
apartments, etc.);
the unit price (as a proxy for household income):
• the percent of new residents who will reside in
the new units versus the percent of existing residents
moving within the district to the new units. There
may be differences in family size between new
residents and existing transfers, and this difference
should be accounted for in calculating expected
enrollment:
- the net gain in housing units from development
(i.e., is the development creating ;gin entirely new
block, neighborhood, etc„ or are some existing units
beim replaced by the new units?):
- a "dummy" variable, which is merely the effect
of all either factors not included aboveor not quasi-
tifiable which may affect the number of children
generated by new lit,astng; and
- the percentage of expected elementary, junior
high/intermediate, and high school students.
Several models presently exist which employ the
type of information and methods just discussed to
estimate student generation rates.. Rather than
preparing an entirely new system ror analyzing
school impact, the use of an existing system might
make more sense, one such system is MIS, "Cost
Revenue Impact System," CRIS was designed jointly
bv,the City of pairfield and the Association of Bay
Area Governments, CRUS uses several "types of
population, land, and economic data to develop
models which can predict the net fiscal effect, ser,
vice and facility needs, and other aspects oC flew
development of interest to local decision makers;
Nan -computer techniques can also be used, such
as calculating generation rates bnsed on neighboring
districts experience, using the generation rates from
the latest development within the district, or using a
dwelling unit count for school enrollment rates.
Each of these methods have their strengths and
weaknesses, and their use is documented by the
William C. Lawrence Company,
Calculating Facility Need
It is beyond the scope of this study to determine
what standards ought to be used in calculating facili-
ty needs. The lack of uniform standards has been
docu„tented earlier in this report, The state should
specify acceptable methods for calculating the ef.
fec.,s of new development on facility needs,. The
unitorm method of calculating impact should in-
elude a uniform definition of overcrowding. Con-
sideration should be given for overall high growth
districts versus those with papulation pressure in
certain parts of a district,
However, a uniform spatial standard, the
minimum space necessary to achieve basic educa.
tional goals, should apply to any request for state
school building aid or development fee fol, school
facilities. if a school district wishes to exceed the
minimum state standard, it roust do so from its own
• funds and without placing the burden completely on
new development to improve school facilities,
The State Allocation Board currently uses a gloss
square foot standard cif relative need to rank applica,
tions for school building aid, A drawback of this ap•
proach is .hat it includes spaces not usable for in-
structional purposes and penalizes schools with In.
adequate classroom space but with large hallways,
storage areas, auditoriums and cafeterias, and
similar nomclassroom areas.
The uniform state standard should differentiate
facility needs for special state•regitired programs
from other facility needs,
V
Legislation Needed
:Following is an outline of the legislation which,
v►could be.necessary to, accomplish the above recom-
'mendalions.
• Change building aid programs to allow school
districts to keep the revenues derived from the sale,
lease, or exchanIIe of surplus properties provided
that they Cate maintain the payment schedule of any
state lodn's used to acquire the: property.
;Provide taxincentives to private parties in-
N,^t:sting in or financing school facilities, such as ac-
cclerated depreciation; deferred income taxes; and
property tax relief for that portion of a mixed use
site not used for school purposes,
• ,'allow SB 201, tax increment, and special tax
revenues to apply toward a required local match for
state building aid. programs, Allow S$ 201 fees to be
used as a temporary funding measure, subject to
,reimbursement, for permanent facilities. Strengthen
requirements for school districts to adopt mitigation
measures before levying fees:
Allow local voters, on a majority vote, to raise ad
valorem property takes for .pecified burposes (e.g..
to finance a new school or school maintenance); this
would require; a Constitutional Amendment.
Define procedure for using "special taxes"
allowed by Article XIIIA of the Constitution. Define.
"special taxes" and how they may be applied.
• If Item 4 is accomplished, allow increasedrate
of ad valorem taxation to be applied in a community
facilities district, which could be all or a portion of a
school district.
v Establish conditions for school sharing
agreements or consolidation among school districts.
A district tatting students from a neighboring area
might be eligible for special state; aid or defray added
costs. The study of the feasibility ;of sharing ar-
rangements should be required before building aid
can be received.
o Establish a minimum spatial state standard for
classroom and other space, and space for special
p►.,ograms and relocatable facilities, A uniform
method by which to calculate school impact should
also be establi khed.
AGENDA
HOME BUYER FEE TASK FORCE -MAY 1'9- 1983
9:00 A.M. CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
REPORT AND DISCUSSION ON CITY/COUNTY JOINT MEETING (DON CLOUD)
2. OPEN/CLOSED MEETINGS (ORRIN STRATTON)
3. DISCUSSION ON DATA
A. GRUEN, GRUEN, A ASSOCIATES REPORT
B. FINANCING SCHOOL FACILITIES
C. MELLO-RO08/201 FEES
D. STUDENT HOUSING REPORT
E. LETTER TO FRED DAVIS
4. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION NEED -ED
5j FUTURE MEETING SCHEDULE
6. OTHER BUSINESS
Co.
MAY 18
13
Bettea Kircher
autte CoUntyj Planning Cirecto� ;
i County Center brive
. •_ W Orovil l e, CN 55955
{
Y
COUNTY AOMINISTRATIVC OFFICE
Administration Conlor
25 Comnly Contor Drive
Orovillo, Calitornlo 05085
(9 16) 534.4753
May 5 1983
To Butte County Home Bayer Fee Task Force
From County administrative Officer
subject: Meeting notice
This is to advise YOU that a meeting has been scheduled to di9cuss
current and pending legislation as it pertains to new home buyer fees.
The purpose of the committee will be to examine the need of thesefees
as presented by the school district, and develop proposals for polsihle
solutions.
Date: Monday, May g 1583
Time: 2:00' in.
Place: Council Chambers
Chico Municipal Building
The B�Ard of Supervisors has asked that your committee develop within
a folar we=ek period information and a suggested course of action prior to
thl, patting of a public hearing. We are attaching for you), information a
V`� ting of the appointments the Board of Supervisors have made and a copy
of the legislation.
Mike py a t v
�n�`"���
C'a�°V\Coy
BUTTE COUNTY HOME BUYER qE TASK FORCE
Don Wilson
General Contractor
Dost Office Box 1853
Chico, CA 95927
345-2425
Dave Jones
Sun Realty
680 Rio Linda Avenue, Suite 2
Chico, CA 95926
891-1644
Dan Cloud
Chico Unified School District
1163 E. 7th Street
Chico, CA 95926
891-3019
Tom Lando
City of Chico Planning Dept,
post Office Box 3420
Chico, CA 95927
895-4862
Bob Boehm, City CbUnsel
City of Chico
Post Office Box 3420
Chico, CA 95927
895-4825
Bettye Kircher, planning Director
County of Butte
7 County Center Drive
Oroville, CA 95965
534-4501
Del Siemsen, County Counsel
County of Butte .
25 County Center Drive
Orovill e, CA 95965
534-4621
Orrin Stratton
Butte County I -a payers, Association
Route 2 Box l8
Chico, CA 95925
342-6039.
Lee Cobly, Developer/Planner
Wynoka Homes
post Office Box 1600
Oroville•, CA 95965
533-2738
Jerry Bolster, Developer/planner
[bake Horses '
1,350 Lassen Avenue
Chico, CA 9Fg26
895-3931
Judy Kelly, president
Hooker Oak Council of PTA
1088 Tracy Lane
Chico, CA 959.26
343-8540
Karen Vercruse, Legislative Rep.
Chico Chamber of Commerce
Route 5 Box 21
Chico, CA 95925
891=-1973
arnnntn��'
c�ttEati�`
r«
CH1GC, '
5555 skyway
Paradise, CA 959
April 25, 1983
Don A. Cloud, Ph.D.
Assistant Superintendent
Administrative Services
Chico Unified School District
1.1.63 East Seventh Street
Chico, CA 55926
Dear Dri Cloud
Rey Retrospective Application of School
;mac Fee Ordinance
Reference is made to your question regarding the
retrospective application of the school impact feu ordinance to
project] already approved by
the Planning COMMiSsion and/or
City Council, specifically, tentative maps- Once a tentative
p
map has been approved, the approval of the final map is a
ministerial act (Government Code66474.1). sube couionlmapst
approve the final map if it conforms
imposed by local ordinance
act and any other conditions, if any,
"at the time of approval." (Government Code 566458).
It is my opinion that sohoolaafees under the
aditact ion.al condition
proposed ordinance do not constitute an
approved tentative map. The impact foes are ea
upon any such
part of the saapp lan review or a building permit p
es provide authority for this opinion.
Several recent cas
Avco Community Developers, Inc. V. south 38G, 553 P.2d
Regional Com: (1977? premelCourt8case3involves the retrospecive
546] ► a California Sup
application of a permit requirement contained in an amendment
e of the
to Public Resources Code ad2obtainedY1 gradinglr to epermit gfrom the
amendment, a developer h royal of a final tract map* it had,
county and had secured approval
f se�fjvt ve date improvements and
also j commenced grading, i nof the .0-
$2,000,000
expended over $2,000;000 before the
sources Code ,t.mendment: The ofronisthe�CoastaldCommissionCoe rovied that adif
veloper need not obtain a permit
the builder had obtained ai"vesten goodd ai h and d ligentl.yycommenced.
secured a building permit
construction and performed substantial Work in thereont ob
before the act became effective. Avco had not
Don A. Cloud, Ph.D.
Page 2
April 251 1983
building permit. The Supreme Court provides an excellent
discussion of the "vested rights" theory at common law and
under the Coastal Commission Act. .Avco contended it was
entitled to a building permit because the County would have
been compelled to issue it upon application, a ministerial,
nondis retionary act. The Orange County Building Code pro-
vided that a building permit may not issue unless the site
plans conform not only to the structural requirements of the
Code, but to "other pertinent laws and ordinances." The
court, at page 795, stated:
"This. provision codifies the general law that
a builder must comply with the laws which are
G effect at the time a building permit is is-
sued, including the laws which were enacted after
application for the permit. (citations omitted. .)
A land owner which has not even applied for per-
mit cannot be in a better position merely because
it had previously received permission to subdivide
its property and made certain improvements on the
land."
The City of Chico has adopted. the Uniform Building Code, 1973
edition, by reference in its Chico lAthicipal code Chapter 16.12.
1 do not have a copy of this edition, therefore, I cannot in-
form you at this time as to whether the language addressed by
the Avco court has been incorporated in your building code.
in January, 1982, the California Appellate Court,
Second District, decided the case of Haton-Inv Development,
Inc. V. City Of Santa Monica (1982) 128 Cal.App.3d 1. In this
case the City Planning Commission had approved tentative sub-
division maps submitted by four different landowners for con
dominium conversions. In each case the approval was condi-
tioned on a reduction in the number of dwelling units. The
City subsequently adopted a rent control ordinance which pro-
hibited removal of control rental units unless a tent control
board established in the ordinance issued a permit ror such
removal.. one day before the rent control law was adopted one
of the landowners obtained a building permit. Subsequent to
the adoption of the ordinance, the City issued a "stop notice"
for all work being done under the permit. The sole issue on
appeal.. was "when a landowner holding a tentative tract map
conditioned on reducing the number of dwelling units in a
proposed condominium conversion is required by subsequently
enacted legislation to obtain a permit from a newly created
rent control board. . .18 such requirement an impermissible
impairment of the subdivision process7" The court held there
Don A. Cloud, Ph.D.
Page 3
April 25, 1583
was no impairment and discussed Youngblood v. Board of Suuer-
V .cors (1978) 22 Cal 3d 644 [150 Cal. Rptr. 242, 58.6 P.2d 5561
and El Patio v., Permanent Rent Control Bd. (1980) 110 Cal.App.3d
915 [168 Cal.Rp'rr. 276) at length.
In Youngblood the Board of Supervisors had approved
a tentative subdivision map for one -acre residential lots.
Subsequently, the land use element to the general plan was
amended .requiring two -acre minimum lot sizes. The Supreme
Covrt held that the Board acted properly in approving the
final map for one -acre lots on the ground that the final map
was required to conforin only to the general plan in effect
when the tentative map was approved. Youngblood involved the
"vested right" argument. The court reasoned that where the
developer had expended substantial sums to comply with condi-
tions attached in the tentative map approval "it is only fair
to the developer and to the public interest to require the
governing body to render its discretionary decision whether
and upon what conditions to approve the proposed subdivision
when it acts on the tentative map. Approval of the final map
thus becomes a ministerial act once the appropriate officials
certify that it is in substantial compliancy^ h the previously
approved tentative map."
in El Patio, :supra, the developer h 7btained a
tentative map before a rent control act was, P ped. The
developer applied for an extension and was g id same condi-
tioned upon it obtaining a "certificate of e ..ion or a re-
moval permit or a determination of vested ri,, from the
rent control board prior to approval of the s i tract map.
E1 Patio held that the provisions of Governme, Code sections
66473 and 66474 which precluded the City from imposing addi-
tional conditions once the tentative map is approved could not
be ignored.
in Bazon-xny.Development, Cnc. V. City of Santa Monica
supra, the court opined that the Youngblood and El Patio cases
were distinguishable and at page 9 statedt
"While it is true that the removal: permit re-
quirement did not exist when the tentative maps
were approved, it is also true that the condi-
tions of the tentative Maps required reduction
in the number of units, These reductions neces-
sitated building permits, and were, therefore,
subject to the requirement tinder general law and
building Code section 303(a) that appellants comply,
with laws in effect at the time of issuance of the
building permit."
i
Doii A. Cloud, Ph.D.
Page 4
April 25, 1983
The Building Code section is part of the uniform Building
Code adopted by reference by most cities.
I
Hazon reasoned that El Patio does not address the
question as to whether the developer could actually proceed
with the intended project. No building permit was needed in
the El Patio case. The El Patio court stated, at page 927:
"If the City were asked to issue, a bWA0.-'-hg
permit, thu issues in this case would be
different. However, here the building is
completed and no building permit is heeded."
The El Patio court continued by stating:
"Accordingly, our conclusion is extremely
narrow in scope. We hold only that the City
could not impose additional conditions after
the conditional approval of the tentative map.
Nothing herein should be construed as a deter-
mination that -�Iie approval of a tentative main
would allow a.property owner to proceed without
obtaining other permits which the City might
impose if it were not relying upon the Subdi-
vision Mat - Act. "
HaZot, at page 10j statt-,s that, in effect, the tl
Patio court concluded that, had a building permit been neces-
8ary, Avco would have been controlling and the requirement of
a btil-ding permit would be independently enforceable.
in conclusion, based upon the foregoing, it is my
opinion that, if the school impact fees are imposed as a
condition to Si-hc-nlan approval or a building permit, the
subdivision map act will not be controlling. The rationale
of the Avco court and the Hc&Zqn-iny court retj,�'.ving an applicant
to complywithall pertinent javg� and ordinances it iffeot at
the time the 'ny ld
but ' I _ permit is to be 4.ss.ued will cuhl-,nl
Very truly yours,
Claude L. Biddle, dti
CLB: ec
4A
Doii A. Cloud, Ph.D.
Page 4
April 25, 1983
The Building Code section is part of the uniform Building
Code adopted by reference by most cities.
I
Hazon reasoned that El Patio does not address the
question as to whether the developer could actually proceed
with the intended project. No building permit was needed in
the El Patio case. The El Patio court stated, at page 927:
"If the City were asked to issue, a bWA0.-'-hg
permit, thu issues in this case would be
different. However, here the building is
completed and no building permit is heeded."
The El Patio court continued by stating:
"Accordingly, our conclusion is extremely
narrow in scope. We hold only that the City
could not impose additional conditions after
the conditional approval of the tentative map.
Nothing herein should be construed as a deter-
mination that -�Iie approval of a tentative main
would allow a.property owner to proceed without
obtaining other permits which the City might
impose if it were not relying upon the Subdi-
vision Mat - Act. "
HaZot, at page 10j statt-,s that, in effect, the tl
Patio court concluded that, had a building permit been neces-
8ary, Avco would have been controlling and the requirement of
a btil-ding permit would be independently enforceable.
in conclusion, based upon the foregoing, it is my
opinion that, if the school impact fees are imposed as a
condition to Si-hc-nlan approval or a building permit, the
subdivision map act will not be controlling. The rationale
of the Avco court and the Hc&Zqn-iny court retj,�'.ving an applicant
to complywithall pertinent javg� and ordinances it iffeot at
the time the 'ny ld
but ' I _ permit is to be 4.ss.ued will cuhl-,nl
Very truly yours,
Claude L. Biddle, dti
CLB: ec
Aae
EMOi(MTDW4
' TO Butte County ifalas-Pflt;tyer _cee Task Force
FROM: Jere Bolster "ba rman
SUBJECT: Data Regarding;Various Aspects of Fees/Needs/Facilites
You have all previously received from the County:
I 1. The memo from Gruen, Gruen & Associates'.
f Re: Fee schedule for funding construction of new
relocatable classrooms. (Dated April 12, 1583)
2. Draft Ordinance, providing for fees and/or land
dedications for interim school facilities.
3. Draft resolution,.implementing the draft ordinance.
I transmit herewith, the following: additional documents:
1. Financing school facilites - A _report prepared
by Connerly F Associates for the California
Building industry Association.
2- yKighlights of the "Mello -Koos Community Facilities
Act of 19821' Government Code Section 53311 et.seq.
Prepared by Marianne Heenen.
3. Chapter 4.7 of Division 1, Title: 7 of the Govern-
ment Code: providing for acquisition of temporary
classroom facilities.
4. Student Housing Report - December 8, 1982 from: CUSD.
S. Letter to Famed Davis, dated October 12, 1982, with
attachments "All through "E as noted therein.
Our next meeting has been RESCHEDULED, for 9:00 a.m,, Thurs-
day, May 19, 1983, in.the Chico Chamber of Commerce Office.
If you have questions- that you would ?�kG discussed at our
itc t meeting, please delver therm to my office: at 135"0 E.
Lassen avenue (building at the rear),. by 5:00 p.m. Friday.
I will distribute them along with an agenda, andwill have
City and County staff attend our meeting if they can re-
spond to any of those questions.
u. �t
Q_
. FINDINGS B�SCi Oh DIST`'Fti��'.
ca 1 SECTION .,_,y,!{; .t.,,;,,, `�.�.. �-----
t 1
ltlr Government Code Sect4.$ns�Pl
Ci n
tl o ' Gbverri: loardl'o tl d Chico Un � ieci `Schoo3 f� D tricst has sled
r.
wiii, the Cra 1a t" 'Board 'o Supexvi'sars written .ndaxrgs �supportec by'_
� ti J'� r.g;'r� � >
cle vans convancarig .err"''�.lat:
r r F: a, Gondtxrf�lbf ove+xcxowdxr'' wil eu,trom
plannd� xesidontia5 dpcive�.opment in, the school d .�,_ �, wha h
wjlj impair th,& ndq.val functioning of ''education" 'I'.� .s gx`ams
an
C
--.. Ii,
� ,
�-�4sona.lj�.,e methods fov naita.g ng" and ti on
o 'bvercxojqdin�:have ,been evaluateO.,a' grid no fe��e method
dor reduce ng ,such conditions exis ti The mitigat
t�iict ride; developex' secs or �tk�s�
supported by the dis, equi,r a t,
ton
t t
W11 e s S aGOI1ly1lLlTl��. t ,
pace iit `
Act of 1982 b s 10 at,d;
�. e S
qy
MTION BY CbUNTY BOARD 'VISOP'
If" r e� .r.
f+
A to Veva +t,i� ? the School b1. trict f�ndl;�.g. _thea. `a
.,%,., h re5`oluti on aftex, ;sub'
Board E411 decia.te, VU concurrence '
hoar iiig. WhereBoarsT has declared its concurrence that "
Condition's of overcrowding exist, the Board -,hall not approve
an ordinance r �anang property to a residential u o gram
d scretionar hermit oxo tes' de�ts.al use or approve a. tentati"
subdiv�.sion map for residenta d puxposos, ter thin such ai^ea
unless the tO,Ard requilres, las a condition of approval of new
developmOnt within the attendance are -a:''o£ an impacted' school
4 Pa�.. e3of
HT1
xr ,
M 'a{•J$
'�� i�"R'Y�ny� Fy s. i7",��r �`At 4,n .y�, ., yob: F^ [J 1n;�w� J 1" ,. W' �LT ��'!�
'�'�}�"
i'�AP�' �y :.7""� H�'�w M'yY'In �JFuj�
���;4 H^ 4 � y�
Q41,
1
tT
r
c
-SECTI-o
kASSAS
�✓,
y
r
r
i
.'.
414 e YisoAwls
l.}haiv 'BoAl a Wf
,
Y
(
`
t�r
IF
Page 6 69 6
Y
1�
• RESOLUTION, \0.
OF THE BOARD OF SUpERVISORS OF THE GOUNT1'�J(� BUTTE
RE80LUTIO\ NG ORDXKANGE
t
CHAPTER NO. PRO' `IDING .5OR
TIvjPOSITION OF SEES AS A CONDITION
OF SITE �LAjq kpPRVAL FOR
MPACTED SCHOOL DI
ISTRICTS
WHERE -AS, the Legislature }las enacted Chap4er 4'- of
Division 1 of ti
Division 0f the Go1�r.rnment Code autilari ilg t"1�'
" ountNt to require payment of a fee to impacted s 'i�aal
C .dist<i4~s
a5 9va1 of residential develOPMent a atici
conditian of appr',
WIMEAS; the County. Board has recently enacts,
Ordinance Chapter No• prt)viding fox impositio'l0f fe es
�o��al for rosd.entia]. de�'el.c,�t;�e �.>
by resolution on on site plan app.,,
and
IVIHEREAS, there is a neLdto provide 11e1� s et
' g p .���_y . `Nub a
alter.*iat.ing conditions of o�er0rortid�.n � in public �c�.lnols
yam,
by rapid residential development tr thin the CVMt� �- B"t`"''
j has received and Teviewec
IVHEREAS; the County. Baer+
•-Ian of the C1�ico:
Resolution N1o. 36-52 of ,the Board of Education
Unified
School District; declaring conditions of
findin"s set forth in the ,iecl ar
and concurs
in the ation o
impact.,
NOIV, TI ERERoktE tlLe Board oI Sul zr�•isaxs , f t1Y
County of Butte does hereby resolve aso�oa«s
The County Bo ld hereby concurs in the fi11dings se
Earth
in the declaration of impact rc:forrod to abovoe aril
declares that no app �
�,ov8Lt� R �
I of an ndr� xe5 ciential Lle"lo"'L�;t
Page l 0f 6
y
i4'ithin the bounty bun'daries `shal.l be issued by the Count; ,of
Butte' unless t,he payment. of Fees, `kas been made at, the time
of applying for ;a building
Permit mit aror all neck de14'100itents
atnpactinq school. Overcrowding, as declared by thq .school
district BoaT'di ofEducation on June 1, 1992.
I. Fees Retiuirecl as .a C6ndition of Sam plan A ,ol a1
In that the school district has bee,a reclAx'ed an "impacted
School Eistrictt, '�P0 situ plan apI'rov�a or construction o
r
a residential dwelling unit shall be is �Ued with'n the
boundaries of, the school tr ct u��less a dee is paid to
4
the school district a or pratirision oir intexint school ,
facilities
;i
a.,
General Method o1' Calculation b raa
Such average fee per residential divell ng unit shall
be calculated by multipj� ing the state 'a.11otaa.nce for
each child (SA/C) by the numbor of students that ca
typically be handled per classroom (C/ G,) times the
countyiNlide average number of students per d%vellit g
unit based on the 1980 But; -be County Federal census
(S/D) times the district'si cost per boot for interim
facilities (C/SF) divided by number of dwelling units
r
necessary;
to generate 1;IL! 11uml)'er oar students that can
typically be handled
per classroom (D/G),,oz (C/S)
divided by (5/1))
U
(SA/C) (G/5) (S/))) (C/G.) (n/U) =Contribution per
&Ol.ling unit for interim school facilities.
Page 2 of 6
The Board oj 'Ed7tication of the Chico Unified
,School District has determined COVnAty
N
numerical Values fo'r the f9110wing constants- i
,4he above formula:
(p
tt
SA/C e_ f Education Code Section 16047)
C/S 30
SSD .43 (children p
er household (ages
1980 census)
C/Sp = $83.50 (information fuTllishOd b. State
Dtpar.tment of . Education aid LawtencO
Thomson, District Architect)
constants into the
(2) Substituting these co
equation in (a) above) the resulting formulas
required contribution are as
to be w$ed for the
follows,.
30 = IGSO square feet 88.50 146)02b
70 $2,086 average per 6welliII9 unit I for the
impacted school district:
C, rhe formulas above reflect only the aVeTage fee
per dwelling unit for interim facilities A schedule
of specific fees based upon the exact charatter 01
the res,aejjtjql development ls,,.attachod hereto) r"ar"ked
Exhibit "All and inCOrP orated by this reference.
page, of 6
d.: Modifications in Po'rmulas
A
(1) The vilue of .the constants provided in
subsectlon'(b) above may be revised by the County
'Board, or the GoVerning, Board of Education of,
the Chico Unif:Ud School District if directed
tl,,' Boardi not later than July Ist of each
year to reflect more current in: ormatlton
available at that time,
(2) Noiwithvl-anding subsections (a) (b) and
(c) aboveo the fees shall be adjusted annually
to reflect any .increases oi, decreases in tfi'e
building price iiidex.
levied pursuant to this resolution shall
be paid by x1evelbper directly to the Chico Unified
School Disttict, to be p1tac,ed in a special fund.
f. If overcrowding cond'tions nuj..,-1,!�er el%-ist, tile
County shall cease levying any fee ptirswan.t Ftoi,sj"
r '�solution.
2. Dedication of Land in Lieu of Foes
A developer may, if requested by the district, be required
to dedicate land in lieu of fees. The location and, amount
of land to be dedicated shall bear a reasonable relation-
ship and be limited to the need of the school caused b�'
the development. The fair market value of the land to
dedicated shall be equivalent to the amount of fees
otheTWise required, A developer may, in lieu of tho value
Page 4 of 6
t
` n
of the fees, at his option and epenP�o� /tprovide interim
facilitiies at,, a location de'signa'ted by the
district.
3. Agreements to.Pr ar) Facilities
The Board of Education of the Chico Unified School
Di,s,trict may enter into agreements ��i t1� dei;e7 o��ers
whereby temporary use buildings will be reaged to or xor
the benefit
of the District Or such buiivapv" Owned ?'
the developer may be used, The value ofl� the lease 's.all
be at least equivalent to any fees that Would be i%POSO '
The developer may also furnish a deed of trust or of er
agreement creating a len on the propert)f `Co satisfy,• the
foregoing requirements subject to the approval of t'h
school district.
4. flit at on of Cumulative ImDact
Although the fees, land dedications, dedicated '8c"i tie's,
or any
other condition provided for in this re:SolutiZ
,
will not wholly mitigate the CUmulatiV0 impacts` or= resii
dential developments in the Chico Unified School Dist.rict,,
such contributions will mitigate those impacts below the
level of significance. Additional necessary funding to
meet these impacts will be sought through the possib-e
impldmentation of the ;Ntello-Roos Community' I�aci.li ties Ac`-
of 1982, Statutes 1952, Chapter 1459,; Section 11 and
Chapter 145.1, Section 1 (Government Code Sections �a�l1j
S s
et seq.)
or other means determined appropriate by the
Chico Un fied School r)i.stxict upon further stu,dY at a
later time.l
f G
Page o
Resolution Number 236.82
RESOLUTION NOTIFYING THE CHICO CITY COUNCIL
.,d ALIO THE BUTTE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF
- FINDING BY THE BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE
CHICO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
THAT NO FEASIBLE METHOD EXISTS TO MITMATE
CONDITIONS OF OVERCROWDING .IN 111E
CHICO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
AND ,REQUESTING ENACTMENT OF AN ORDINANCE
PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE 565974
WHEREAS, adequate school facilities are absolutely essential to
promote the general welfare of the residents of the Chico 'Unified School
District through the maintenance of a quality educational system; and
WHEREAS, new residential developmenthas proceeded and will continue
to proceed at a rate that exceeds the Chico Unified School District's capa-
bility of providing adequate school facilities, and
WHEREAS, the number of new residential unit:, r.rojected is 18,803
and the number of new students projected from said neer units is 10,907
based on data supplied by the City of Chico and Butte County Planning
Departments as of August 12 1082; and
WHEREAS, Government Code §65973(a) defines "conditions of over-
crowding" to mean that the total enrollment of a school, including enroll-
ment from proposed development, exceeds the capacity of such school as
determined by the governing body of the district; and
WHEREAS, the schools of tine District have a rnmbined capacity of
10,487 and a current enrollment of 8,259 and a projected enrollment on
completion of said new units of 19,166; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Education has considered and evaluated all
reasonable methods of mitljating said conditions of overcrowding; and
WHEREAS, the State Legislature enacted Government Code §65970
et,.p_eq. which authorizes a city or county to require dedication of land
or fees, or both, for interim school facilities where conditions of over-
crowding exist and there is no feasible method "to reduce such conditions.
NOWj THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Education of the
Chico Unified School District hereby notifios the Chico City Council and
the Butte County Board of Supervisors that.
8/82 � 9,6:1
r»
I. Conditions Of overcrowding exist in one o
I more attendance
areas tri thin the district Which will impair the normal functioning of
educational programs as a result of current and propLsed residential
development; and
2• That all reasonable methods of nitirgating conditions of over-
crow6ing have been evaluated and no feasible method for reducing such
conditions exist.
BE ITFURTHER RESOLVED, that the Chico City Council and the Butte
County Board of Supervisors are hereby requesting to adopt an ordinance
pursuant to Government Code §65974.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 18th day of August, 1982, by the Board of
Education of the Chico Unified School District at a regular meeting of
said Board, by the following vote:
AYES: Euoua; Bina, Ross, Houx, Sherrard
NOES, t` ne
ABSENT:Tone
President --�
Board of Chic
ied School District
8182. 9,6.2
s tai
tJ 11
1
Pa?AtM QV SUPERVISORS
COUNTY OF BUTT;
PX- FERRAL IVOT'TCE
Osie October.'tr. 193 1
o: �Plannng Ce nmiss3,'ran
Subject;
—Sewer ina -n the North `
r
� .�i•.%��(j'" a ,. j
east_Chioa area and school fee
proposal (Min,: tie Or .ie 83-838. Octok�er8 r 198
—.: _,,
has been referred to you.
XX Please ,st.•tidy they matter.
Buft Co, Planntng Cotwu
Fo% your informe,tion. OCT 2 4 1983
XX Please take the following action:
Orovillv,, "fw
`°ise Board
Report to Board on
Advise Peach taken) sign below, and return this notice to the
clerk 0" the e 13oezd o Supervisors,
o
Signature of neparttlollt Head
cmi* ADMIIST,,xSTRATIVODFFICE
COUNTY OF BUTTE
25 COUNTY CENTER DR. 1 OROViI-M- CALIFORNIA 05966-!33801(916) 534-4031
WRTIN J. NICHOLS
CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER'
Board of Supervisors
County of Butte
25 County Center Drive
Oroville, CA 95965
Dear BoardMembers
October 14, 1983
Re Octoort ber n Interg vernmental. Relations Committee meeting13� 19
MEMDER6 OF THC p(,'AnD
AL SARACGNI
JANP.DOLAN
HiLDA WNCELFR
D1 RTNA'AOSPI;EY
LGN FULTON
Supervisors Dolan, Wheeler and rwself met with the City of Chico's
Intergovernmental Relations Committee on October 13, 1983. As a result of
this meeting two items need to be considered by your Board.
1. Sewers for the northeast Chico area. The Intergovernmental
Re_ations Committee continued a�{ciiscussion of the Ravenwood
Pro3t and the City's desire for the County to consider
sewers for the whole northeast area of Chico. The Committee
explored the concept, of forming a service area and assessment
district to fund these improvements.
It iS recommended that the Board auth6ri2e the Chief Administrative
Officer and the Public Works Director to work with city officials
to determine What options the Board may have if it wishes to
consider the installation of sewers in this area.
2. School ,fees. At the Intergovernmental Relations Committee a sub-
group of the Board's Home Buyer Fee Task Force presented the
attached report that proposes an interim fee for three years
with a voter approved permanent solution. It is recommended
the Chief Administrative Officer be authorized to work with
city and school district officials to determine the operational
details of this proposal:
'1.
Martin 5. Nifiol s
Enclosures
Chief Admi strative Officer
cc Chico City Manager
Superintendent, Chico Unified School District
Public Works Director
Director of Planning
Director of Public Health
t
10K ,,Wit
.�zl
E-4-t7'H WOFZV-
S! `lam W C +rz.k.
s�o
Sul L OlH CT-- I oda
�r� ►M=gr l��--�
:�.W._.,.
`�, ,2 Z 5.
At
I
I
.� . MY/Y'��Y.. ter... s.r r• � y. � `Y Y
Y.a .. a ♦. �`y. 4 N
_ AY
.a�'►fir'"... �I.JIL,:�.C?l�`iC„�- 3�j 5F����'a
'LG�Mt�IN -
y,` rH IIIc
—1�
tz-r.Hi-'
Tev'7s!:..L
W 'J 4A/ �„ fo'� at `'x/3,5
P',"'ESENTAN BEFORt,, 1' f' jqitRGOVERNATAL COMMITTEE
OCT6BER,13, 1983
FROM: Jere Bolster, Planning Administvator, Drake Homes
1. The Home Buyer Fee Task Force, in its report to the
Board of Supervisors, listed 9 points of concensus
reached by that committee.
2. A subgroup Of that committee has continued to meeto
with the goal of recommending a solution to 0-6
school overcrowding problems
3. This subgroup makes the following recommendation:
ta) Establish school fees to provide ClOSSTPom fa-
r:jlities to help meet the district fs immediate
reeds. These foes would be assessed against
all new construction at an amount sufficient
to house all elementary students that would be
generated by the new construction (statisti,
cally accurate to the CUSD).
(b) This interim financing mechanism would expire
in three years.
(c) Support a votet-approve.d permanent solution to
the problem of providing needed classroom space
in the CUSDo including, but not limited to
A. minimal, annual, per parcel assessment
(not ad -valorem tax):
0 A Melio-Roos community facilities districtk
(a) This recommendation is predicated upon ik COW,
mitment by both the City Council and the Board
of Supervisors to support the olecticin stated
herein.
The following persons participated 3L, this subgroup:
Karen Votcr"So
Matyta Vvqua
Robert Jeffries
Dave Jones
Judy ) All ly
Jane King
Tom McRba4Y
Bob Ross
Shen Matthews
Jere tolstor
POPULATION GROWTH
Notes
The City Planning Office expects Chico's population to grow at
1.75%, or 3% if a major, new employer were to locate in the area.
The State Department of Finance has .found 2.267 persons per house-
hold in Chico (4/29/'83 Data)
There will
be .23 elementary aged
school
children
per household in
CUSD (CUSD
Data) .
POPULATION
HOUSEHOLDS
NEW
STUDENTS
ELEMENTARY
YEAR
LOW
HIGH
LOW
HIGH
LOW
HIGH
1983
60,000
600000
1984
61,050
61,800
463
704
106
182
198S
62,118
63,654
01
818
10,8
188
1986
630205
6S,S63
479
842
110
193
1987
64,311
67,S31
488
867
112
199
1988
66,437
69,656
496
853
114
205
1989
66,582
71,643
SOS
920
116
211
1990
67,747
73,792
S14
948
118
218
1991
68,932
7`6y006
S23
916
120
224
1992
70x139
78,286
532
1,005
122
231
1993
71,366
80,635
541
I,035
124
238
�i•''1 pT ��SGQ C1��`��;�dY•
�liLm �fip
.L, _`, .^�.'ti'�1y✓�`P :4� ._.
» '..`pp A 9 w� :w{ �n-. t, ,�M f _ H� [d
tr
/ [
�y
7O'%rci tri'. v !~ r St tai ° °
u c.+t'� ur►D
r TTO ,
le47
1108s
C
,47
15-�7
klv- �t2
5:11
s3q
v
r
w
---------------
w r.
5
far ���,.� _ S„� ►iz�e:...�.ui:�� � a�,� u ti,,
rL,. z .:. ► bre.+. n -ro4m
r
L Y
x
. . tlw:.w.g ��.+ww•wn. Wren -.'i. �wc.yr -- .. ..... .. + r +� ..
w
a
-�na wayyrawYa•+a-c:�.aon:.a:. _arw:s':w:rw �:4:..r.s-me-.
--�=.i::�+nM.'n4'+wrwwiu. as v-yc m+ +ewe'.wr.Wwa�..uailr..,AYrJ.+r� ••
k r
.=ay.»"via awtu.�r •. ... a w.u.
1
GH7~.0 UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
tral Attendance Office
1 3 East Seventh Street
Chic,, California 95926
1915) 891-3010
May 20, 1983
MEMORANDUM TO; Don Cloud
FROM•
Central Attendance/Pat Chambers �
RE ; •
Enrollment Pattern Over Ten -Year 'Period
Year
Elementary Secondary TotalG°�a� _�
1953--84 .Projected 451.4 �
4003
1982-83 $5l7 /.,S— ........_
4421. r 391:28517
1981-82 4346
3913 8259 1, 2� 2 /•
198Q-81:
42$2 3877 81.59 , z4� r
1.979-80 4186 27,6gil 27 t
1978-79
3953 8139 �u z6 m /,)
4020 4045' j
1977-78 8065
41..7.4 4249 8363
1976,,77. 4147 d'3
4301 J'
. 8448 --/,77 �l�t �` 3,7 .,
1915--76
4217 4384 360], ^. �•
1974-75 �b0s a
4202 4429
• 8631 • �3,3�� ,_..
P
cot
� � � til �;,�Ah at,, •
r K
»
P '9' 1983
Pmco
•
1 1
I
;r
0
�.>...r.e1�le,{
b"w�1rIAYPq} Ad,m.>r.y r.::YaMwa
-.r...
a.s Kul-: Nau'MrK^G1k •+ LP,.,r
^ +:»:�vtfnw4ehaAywwwr.- a, -�. ..
a. ": ..
Yw'� ,,` > w
..a,,, `. ���
e•'•
;
977
�;"�¢'�*x*ira� �A">tarP•,..->«�„ «^ r �
.. �,4 4 ,y
�'^aM*°-.yrla+rnw...masNk+M.-�Ww'mixuw
�jj
R, ^ � r Y
+.mnv.«+..:r+wws
+►ry }
- ,fi/F �,.
.r►ry
✓
�....�¢.`•".'unw.+n,..�.nar ezY-sus r. ,.�. .4x riK ¢ a
V-17
q
`•.
a
n� v. aru. rx „� • .•ea;',aa-+ra:.a. Nae.z n.
e. ery-..nr..r _..• ..na wM.ara. »+ctFwan. � .+laa
/ P
aaa,
.anx,v
.naw*msfi
�
,
-. :. w �
..
.. »Y - ipi A•.wseyfwr fit+ a'.y�
a�f. wrt6s5.f_wYF,�tii.4"rr.a>+Yi.... }
♦ .. a..+ra4ay.a,c s.t:bthA'yrr.--.
e...,..,0....
,..
a,Fgsa. x. ,*q ,.,p.f ♦s •..,
il, :
m,: A
�rtviWM4t',wrw.h4>t.*P+.4akn4+4raLNi`�..aye.
kwar".ate^wAw�TwM.wes
f v ..:.
mh
., aiM.t_..u+m#rate +Ra
a a'. a `ha•+rvae.m,r�aa 4aV=..:, v .:aa.W •. •va�xxiMiF.
a ' r ,i. ae=q,_ •. F
r "16„b'4aiwia,:hA^AtaW♦.CWW'i IrW:MYrMa�rtruyawiiyin a ..,.. ' .
r
�
.n4.LL'heNrthgaAf�yyyyh�'4Aa
!
n+f1YI1w
b
'
n
a •+.
,.... a•
J•w-rtd-- . l ,
,, • r""�"�+P+.ar.+w'"y'""`�ryre,,uya,.ya r' i
.. ;u ,.xfay-+_. ,_:ut• a
w �^^k�W+vM.iiN"a^awiiNwM,
.N� v .i:aeur•.e...Px� - iiaa .
a..-
9
♦._+.,f-wy..a awe.. i.,1.+'_. n.a a.. aaer.c,.a.v,aryyy.y, 14it+v,.:.x:tlrNa¢w<aT_+:A+ra\+lyayrt�F.w.,�� I
'
a:�,
Yew:.tu{�M'4Y.wN'i,yrw„1+-YPI'wwd astawW nc�+';tY�..iw '_Ah:b.
i a4 .M +F h aKrw <.4a_.:Ati4n ate -+:+ash Wn.:.at,b+W s -ss
,
rr
ROUTING
CITYOF CHIC®
-�acr.!
INTER-OFFIC VE�, A�
pit.
NiJM
ON IDESIREDe
City Manager
C putt' city �9t:
City clerk
SMOKE WITH ERVAN RODRIQUEZ OF THE CAL DEPART O
FACILITIES PLANNING ABOUT THE F EDUCA
Review (�mm �i it
w�arolxtate) a,xltum
can/see
# toet'
55 S
FIGURE FOR ELEMENTARY STUDENTS. THE 55�SQs FT
ALLOCATED AS FOLLOWS:
o to INS,
t1Y s i ate ate
/F'l7
ISNT
Act es' Indicated
Adm. Tach.-ce
'Adm. -Toch,-Pers.
31 Sg • ft
2 • C1 d SS rtORt
Please process
f=or our into,/tl ie
' iet of P,"llco
'ti,T.Pub:wrks,
7 Li b ha ry space
Multi-purpose/K tch;en
Your si ature required
Retum tosende
11nanceOfficer6
moil
Office Space
Per our est
�r� Chief
Coveted walkway
� J► ..:and cctrri do rs
Toilet
circulate
Director
38nnin t]irecfer
,'-- r Stora9e/Eusi;odial
Post on Bulletin Bcaards
�t
THERE IS NO MANDATED OR LEGAL REQUIREMENTS ON S
THESE ARE A GUIDELINE FOR PERSONS Q`T.
FILE
TICKLER:
141SHING TO DESIGN
FACILITIES f riAT WILL BE FUNDED 1JITH 'SOME
OTHERWISE THE FACILITY MONEY,
MAY BE DESIGNED HOSTArF-
DISTRICT WISHES. _ ER. THE
ature)
Dotwr}ment
AII-S S -5Z loom
r?
haf�
v
�s
4�
kaa
xs
xt
3$
i6
x7
xD
vw
p�
Ila
2j
34
d 1•
+i A
l7
29
Ase
14
sa
33
SK
3:.
30
37
39
1'r
A�
All
A2'
4)
AA
AS
AO
47
ar
a1n
31
12
53
54
5)
5"
S,
so
S4
24 2% 19 30 44 4s e4 ►tiff ul
63 • OVe6 TOTAL 101AL 1ti1►�
l+ aLahtoA "Alt IfS3S I. "ALI FINAL! "ALIO FINALI' iiALI 14NALt "ALC IY"ALC L4 it N.Al.
v:2
LP 14 011 )3S 601 7t6 1,630 10422 s}7 052 llt.-
bull% 00 l 1)' : 13 $3 20 20 l 3 Ina 3.69i 1 i,irs
4ALAVAAAl. 00 131 124 137 1n9 1t♦ ! 64, 1) 17
a iDLUSA 660 1?0 10 t 17 1, as 110 I1 1! tis Y a 371 4ir 1, 14
tGN1AA t011A e0 412 3>1 460 412 1,014 9Y9 47) Ir4. 12 71 11
Nu61t
S4 444440 as
60 Its 122 111 0 S4 39 30 2e ° 17 2.)07 t.lxr �,44�
YR1SNti 60 179 20? 21. 193' 44r ISO 12 1St - 1� S 1s6. 17 151
`aLtNhIt 21' tato bSb sSl7
NUh0n4s1 ♦0 lis 1'at 27 • 13 9 's. 34 1.249 911' 2�,.i1�
i1
1�►tAlAt 60 41 11 's2 r3 1t4 66 S2 26 6 )a 147
Ii t
ctOk lava 00 32 26 32 114 62 69 14. $!t 493 1 041
40. 32) 200 300 22 43 As 32 22 11 11 143 I age 191 �4ti
A.Ar't 60 60 7t 141 Sas 416 131 270' 6°
•a AAt 31. S3- 60 S4 1.491 1,104. 1 oh
A. t4N ti' 21 2.1' se 40 32 2/ t 251 iii
A. ANGLt2 60 4 205. 1 ♦4 17.. it 1St it
*1
33 21 S3 )Q 1�
*'ArtMA 60 • 32 •129 a,494 4.. 030 t.e" 6,tar 4,0 3 11♦ !tf
>aar1N O 166 13% tt13 " 21 • 1.1). M1t al. IS It.iO4 41,1''
w,►r1PD1A 17 D 1A 192 ♦ie ♦12 117 1a1 10 6
YAt*000140 12 t4 137 127
33 47 1i 1° t 9 1,010 996
Molooc AO 1]0 S1 110 e4 43 4 1 61 S; i.V1
Mo►Df °1 116 111 160 164 i♦ 49 11 197 2s7 11
«er0 60 9 14 2J 17 12 1% 11
'*ON1tAtl AO 13 1 6 11 7d 449 �5 V1�
1 12
%tvAAl-A 60 341 3*1 1ks S2 317 33r !S2 S4.2 100 14s 3 43 lj.
4,tVA66 pp e1 6t S9 63 123 104 pt 60 A2 3t 1,414 1 30•
'DrJ N64 60 $7 43 1.20 ti 49- 2) 14 X293 2., At
'.14AttR 60 t,e31 1,479 1.b62 1,644 34240. 2.753 I,s2s 1 297 t 336' ♦�_
127 124 i0 IS 31r 2S9
rLuMAI 4u soo 411 2zo his lin I �� cif 311 t'e4 70)0 16,11
RIslRtibt 60 27
'SOtNANIhTO 60. 571 416 $AS
ere 119 ♦41 4SJ s 7 113. 1' °
taN 11CNIlD '!1 it
Sia )13 936 4!0 223
1 12 SVOt 1,.l4 3S7 11 101
107
ASN rUlk4o 1N0 :d0 e76 491 14 0 4 2
2.7v3 2 7
IaN b1tL0 `769 Til 1,JS7 1,173 6 1 4 2,90) 2, S.
I I X39
USAN 1RANftltq 60. 2,170 1.70E 2,423 ,Olt 3.4>0 : 67!9
SAN IOAQUIN 293 1t9 647 Sol S2rS 1;327 1,141 `G9 19° f, ppt 40 3,4U. t
S Lull n41t►n e0 212 146 1e8 r.2e120
134 i4 ,i1 p.l10 t.iti 1r;Y
tet 13b 150 111 162 199 07 •711 ;.34
lAN NAit4 124. �91A
14.14 6AROARA AO 3,12.
60 3t2 37S 709 i9 4
912 J64 77
4
SaN7A tLARA 60. 301 359 369 473 101 a33 too 10%
SI s44 sue 1;uF
AN1A t9Ul 40' t4. CSt I'j 1.020 2,101 1 914 199: so ' !6 1'905 10.919 1,10
127 123 1t4 ,244 92S 944 114 iss 1.SIS 1,432
SwAl1M 40 273 lot S,1S4 4.491 02,14
1ItaR'A 60 12.1 101 111 211 144 ioi 1.01 42 '74e 671 t;i1
SlsalvbU 40 7j 3 6 6 7s Si 26 tots 1. 1D
SOLANo 245 too 262 37 161 •e 7.1.. ii - 1i ._1 2S
30NOhA sn 221 ksilot 499 1$6 113 15 2t6 237 !1
SlANI1LAU1 -6U 109 I'70 iii 127 100 Sao Iia 129. 3e 43
111114. 60 179 -)p 33 19' 1.,141 972 1-11
1ChA.�A A0 30 36 46 d2S 116 6a oeF 934 t`V
47 2t, 31 12 to al t 2d 7A♦ 623 1'yb
lu1i1N11Y' 60 144 it 2A 41 26 21 6 S 159 '3;
bLuA 60 to in! s 06 6 0 4 ISb ia0 it
1untUhwt p0 20 2so ipp 1.11
VtN1UrA 60 494, 26 JO 91 34 t
YfrlG
60 141 Sri 150 Ae 2° Ile 10 to iso 112 I.Gi
0D 102 430 its f109
/GrA s0 22 t` 2i
?%,AL'I IGkilia
66 70 9 14]
60 0 0 �0 66 990 100
1n
69
2t 1'tf
F.tt3
2410•
421
f..2i
0
t9UN71 bUi DI ItA1t
A
�p
a b
2SAO67
0
2170
91
)
10.774 14,212 19,411 1e.924 5 ,011 t4.04
t154e0,•
ii.936
AP4.01i3
3,104
VQ sle
71.47;
116,0
ra...NO*
'RY�4iaL1 COUM9Y MI4A Al1Qh AEPOk1�-�w�
N4Y CQUNI• FRbh. OLD COUMTF
INT �lit0 f0UN11
11
-
RIN041 000 TNI
COUNTY Of OUT OF S14111pf
v
�s
4�
kaa
xs
xt
3$
i6
x7
xD
vw
p�
Ila
2j
34
d 1•
+i A
l7
29
Ase
14
sa
33
SK
3:.
30
37
39
1'r
A�
All
A2'
4)
AA
AS
AO
47
ar
a1n
31
12
53
54
5)
5"
S,
so
S4
24 2% 19 30 44 4s e4 ►tiff ul
63 • OVe6 TOTAL 101AL 1ti1►�
l+ aLahtoA "Alt IfS3S I. "ALI FINAL! "ALIO FINALI' iiALI 14NALt "ALC IY"ALC L4 it N.Al.
v:2
LP 14 011 )3S 601 7t6 1,630 10422 s}7 052 llt.-
bull% 00 l 1)' : 13 $3 20 20 l 3 Ina 3.69i 1 i,irs
4ALAVAAAl. 00 131 124 137 1n9 1t♦ ! 64, 1) 17
a iDLUSA 660 1?0 10 t 17 1, as 110 I1 1! tis Y a 371 4ir 1, 14
tGN1AA t011A e0 412 3>1 460 412 1,014 9Y9 47) Ir4. 12 71 11
Nu61t
S4 444440 as
60 Its 122 111 0 S4 39 30 2e ° 17 2.)07 t.lxr �,44�
YR1SNti 60 179 20? 21. 193' 44r ISO 12 1St - 1� S 1s6. 17 151
`aLtNhIt 21' tato bSb sSl7
NUh0n4s1 ♦0 lis 1'at 27 • 13 9 's. 34 1.249 911' 2�,.i1�
i1
1�►tAlAt 60 41 11 's2 r3 1t4 66 S2 26 6 )a 147
Ii t
ctOk lava 00 32 26 32 114 62 69 14. $!t 493 1 041
40. 32) 200 300 22 43 As 32 22 11 11 143 I age 191 �4ti
A.Ar't 60 60 7t 141 Sas 416 131 270' 6°
•a AAt 31. S3- 60 S4 1.491 1,104. 1 oh
A. t4N ti' 21 2.1' se 40 32 2/ t 251 iii
A. ANGLt2 60 4 205. 1 ♦4 17.. it 1St it
*1
33 21 S3 )Q 1�
*'ArtMA 60 • 32 •129 a,494 4.. 030 t.e" 6,tar 4,0 3 11♦ !tf
>aar1N O 166 13% tt13 " 21 • 1.1). M1t al. IS It.iO4 41,1''
w,►r1PD1A 17 D 1A 192 ♦ie ♦12 117 1a1 10 6
YAt*000140 12 t4 137 127
33 47 1i 1° t 9 1,010 996
Molooc AO 1]0 S1 110 e4 43 4 1 61 S; i.V1
Mo►Df °1 116 111 160 164 i♦ 49 11 197 2s7 11
«er0 60 9 14 2J 17 12 1% 11
'*ON1tAtl AO 13 1 6 11 7d 449 �5 V1�
1 12
%tvAAl-A 60 341 3*1 1ks S2 317 33r !S2 S4.2 100 14s 3 43 lj.
4,tVA66 pp e1 6t S9 63 123 104 pt 60 A2 3t 1,414 1 30•
'DrJ N64 60 $7 43 1.20 ti 49- 2) 14 X293 2., At
'.14AttR 60 t,e31 1,479 1.b62 1,644 34240. 2.753 I,s2s 1 297 t 336' ♦�_
127 124 i0 IS 31r 2S9
rLuMAI 4u soo 411 2zo his lin I �� cif 311 t'e4 70)0 16,11
RIslRtibt 60 27
'SOtNANIhTO 60. 571 416 $AS
ere 119 ♦41 4SJ s 7 113. 1' °
taN 11CNIlD '!1 it
Sia )13 936 4!0 223
1 12 SVOt 1,.l4 3S7 11 101
107
ASN rUlk4o 1N0 :d0 e76 491 14 0 4 2
2.7v3 2 7
IaN b1tL0 `769 Til 1,JS7 1,173 6 1 4 2,90) 2, S.
I I X39
USAN 1RANftltq 60. 2,170 1.70E 2,423 ,Olt 3.4>0 : 67!9
SAN IOAQUIN 293 1t9 647 Sol S2rS 1;327 1,141 `G9 19° f, ppt 40 3,4U. t
S Lull n41t►n e0 212 146 1e8 r.2e120
134 i4 ,i1 p.l10 t.iti 1r;Y
tet 13b 150 111 162 199 07 •711 ;.34
lAN NAit4 124. �91A
14.14 6AROARA AO 3,12.
60 3t2 37S 709 i9 4
912 J64 77
4
SaN7A tLARA 60. 301 359 369 473 101 a33 too 10%
SI s44 sue 1;uF
AN1A t9Ul 40' t4. CSt I'j 1.020 2,101 1 914 199: so ' !6 1'905 10.919 1,10
127 123 1t4 ,244 92S 944 114 iss 1.SIS 1,432
SwAl1M 40 273 lot S,1S4 4.491 02,14
1ItaR'A 60 12.1 101 111 211 144 ioi 1.01 42 '74e 671 t;i1
SlsalvbU 40 7j 3 6 6 7s Si 26 tots 1. 1D
SOLANo 245 too 262 37 161 •e 7.1.. ii - 1i ._1 2S
30NOhA sn 221 ksilot 499 1$6 113 15 2t6 237 !1
SlANI1LAU1 -6U 109 I'70 iii 127 100 Sao Iia 129. 3e 43
111114. 60 179 -)p 33 19' 1.,141 972 1-11
1ChA.�A A0 30 36 46 d2S 116 6a oeF 934 t`V
47 2t, 31 12 to al t 2d 7A♦ 623 1'yb
lu1i1N11Y' 60 144 it 2A 41 26 21 6 S 159 '3;
bLuA 60 to in! s 06 6 0 4 ISb ia0 it
1untUhwt p0 20 2so ipp 1.11
VtN1UrA 60 494, 26 JO 91 34 t
YfrlG
60 141 Sri 150 Ae 2° Ile 10 to iso 112 I.Gi
0D 102 430 its f109
/GrA s0 22 t` 2i
?%,AL'I IGkilia
66 70 9 14]
60 0 0 �0 66 990 100
1n
69
2t 1'tf
F.tt3
2410•
421
f..2i
0
t9UN71 bUi DI ItA1t
A
�p
a b
2SAO67
0
2170
91
)
10.774 14,212 19,411 1e.924 5 ,011 t4.04
t154e0,•
ii.936
AP4.01i3
3,104
VQ sle
71.47;
116,0
.. 061 ..
Rpt
t
I.,AA1
lte vllyMlll
-1
0
-1 1
s1:
* yt►1�RI
1D Out lU1.;iItit dir
t
a114ti Iter iHl tUv�rih
1v
0
2
.;
71
•iw i' 1•
21
•3f»,
aull6Y
lhlu00-0 144)
16
�I
ey
A
r♦i
�ra,At,r hl1 t1�Uhtt NItc6AtlOa 1lRaR1
et ale tou4lout at 41414
OG rAll tt3r
/1 ` 2t 23 2• 30 tL Ag +, 64 61� M OVIO 101A1 7D1AI
M� 14 Aht6Y. �h Alt 1.6pA11. hA\t 1lhAlt hrll 1o1A1
+ yL61M1 0Y -1x133 »101 -e♦1 -yet -111 it►lAll MAIC I.MAIL 14"A14 44LI /IMAM
fbz ►hkRO. 02 3 0 1 1 !1 21 to? Y9 646 h t !
+v 10111 03 ) * J S0 3 0 .103
6 -2 io -4646-l.u++,
ru tI,kutk A1, O1 -1 7 gt ST i 2z t) 11 6 6 IS? tU �2
+.7 tolYti Olt 0 1 2 1 =0 1l� 277
+0 tOMtAi itittA `i9� -22Y -)b_4 .323 2p
4 11k 00110' 04 t 10 -1x115 -137 •iR972..
+.1 It rC1114 Ci9 9 t 1 • » iS 112 to 14 1y
29
as 10tt6i0 10 -1246 -bS y61 61 66 211 44 101
+a 3ltlMl 1 1: `3 1 20 13 1,3 a7S
i 11 -) Os 446 )49
+►0 MUw1bt.01 2 ♦0 iS s 14 40
1w►t 111 Al 1S -Si X77 •id .�S ,ip =� 16 i7
+0 iw10 16 10Wa 4611 111 2Se
+.1 W. 114% to -♦21 -341 4144 -1.01 »tb0 -gip 21 A 10 »i6 alb
42 134
4Q a,Aaa. "`1.34. -460 -ay. -g; .31. -1♦ •.30 16 ')46 i -74* -522..
110 t AtltIDS ,h 1> .e .1 0 t2 S »g -20
S »12 .t0`42
1 � -4
I1.1 10
43 wA0{tcicll'Cl NV -7,)01 -4,4 so -l.bS9 -2,%vs .1�2C� -1t♦6e -30 1+2to 01
5 AOS $97 -14 021 78 ISr,
+b willbu 7. , -7,♦466 -2),466♦
+ti MAtlots a 22 -10? -f 5! -146463 »103 -146! ./ " 1� S 24
+4 w.l2vcl+tt, 3 0 3 23 C 1 -IYP -5461 `1.034
+Ce wllilB 23 -, .7.5 1 -?Z -=9 10. t1 19.
C3 woh0a 24 -t♦b -b1 y S3
+� t•O�o tS ,1 1 0 .l w11 1o,.104
it
a0 Moallt;l♦ 211. 1 -10 10 t4 yj • 7 -) -a0�
•91 -101
w� MAf6 p » a1 •222 -2SS -104 -101 r /1 -j 0 .1 S A
w0 +rtvAbA 2S -2♦ -1j •11 1G p2 10 6 1 S -6'1
lv Cb
29 7 it 26 15 27 Ye 12 -1 - 1 -3a,7 -1.114
♦rS O.Aw♦t 12 .2-a17 _1,41 -1,5»e�7 »1,110 -760 -1d� 12r l3 S9 ar lr is
M4
M6 At 31 ;)
+� ►IU+1A1 x S5. 51 a0 2 1` -A.g27 •3.209 -9. 227
ed ilirk r$14c 3.1 -♦46}6 -S1e -..tir is 2►46
+w {it"141,h10- . ]a -e?a -411 •21' ::11j .j1e. `S0 -l9 4 -64 -37 ♦e
ieIR 1{011v »2 .r -1 -2f )0 4 »6x3 -a9�
+r lM 61"AM4lMO 36 -9♦0 -&19 - -13 -1s -1 ♦-218 1 .962 -670 •1,4)2
+ LAM ol160 37 .a,a�d -2,65! -1,12464646 »46,0♦7 »1,702 -002 -490 4! 73 is -1,301 •-29
e� 1A.22
r ar►Atltco 1a -1.01? -74e -t«0.7 -4462 -115 - e . 1l -g22 -220 »134 -4,434 »5,1,V Ia,is7
+ lAM JOAYUih 39 -57 -75 »S3 -322 1♦4 31
1r t, I.UIg 06llbo Aix -a♦ -S2 P. i♦ 17 l 1
41 .4 1A1+ t+A110 =514 +4621 -140
as • - 146
"Zio-♦-77C7
+w 1Ah1A rARhArr 462 -41
•y 77 -3464 -239 200 »l19 1l
+. 1Yai6 11YMA « 2.)17 .1,♦90 51,4619 -'19 146 -151 .16 .15
-1146 »14 81 -346
-7l y -1,�oi ->oi J1
•15v -1346 -22 7J0 546.293 -g2) S2 itr $O ♦V -I; CS% +2,511 +lir
4. ii awe 1A Vp
ewe %IIt A 46 3a Al yg b7 40 A7 41 to 7 it -lea `ss -144
A: 1lSatlUu i` SS 10 46'00 11 Yj 460 `4 »3 0 155 203 1V1
44. tuft AM0 -m -24Us -45 29 19
a2 IUhOMr -6S •11 -1V »St -� 6 121
-3
•w s1AR1►IAU% a9 -14 »146 -47 le -7 ,2♦ -160 -26a -!7�
•i lUtllr %o -.Re _
st =21 »tr 10 as -2f0
s;n 1twiMA S2 t1 -7 2 ♦ 20 16, • •r -246 -7). •Syl
a IRlrltt S3 1 3 10 • 20 S 0 »9 1p -S
+v IirlArl S♦ -20 «34 3 10 7 3
1 5 i yip
a� 1UOlUMh1 Ss 1 26 3 i ) 2 ii ° at
i, Y1h1YRh Se -Sua =)SS -2)1 . 1 - ♦0 24 11 2U 2 `t 3 21 211
+0 �Ottr Sr .9l . 114 222 »71 4 77
►v au►A r6• -463 -2t .• •110 1 1 .iS "SkS -1,4464
19 -idS ,yg 21 wM.,wllS''•....rTd`-»+w71w.<a,.wngwra,,.w.y -15296
+4,r+1,t 1GA 1Ht toUrli out 01 ltAil ` - :SS
-04,162 »16,124 •11,ViV •l, lig ;ii,A27 -1,111 2ut1 v6 .a 26 AF1 eit3 b)0-SI,SSr-26,7ea •fr,b2S
w�• 012` +ro
)) 6ko
Ntf-bA1 too 14t t0Uw1Y O1 Oullt
t[11w1] 'C01)Nlr g14MAiLOM fltfOrl W44 CODUti 000% Ot• Louw.l'R �9 •A •� A 00%
R1Lt tOltNiN Ot it - lk 2S ai
30 � AA
rQitAot "ALI r�tw�ee
MALI ItitAU MALI it11"Lt
iMAL= 1tM.ao1 pAys 0 0
2D 0 0 1 Q
bo )O u 0 i 1
ID2 'aLaglDt, 00. / a 1 0 1
atL.a.sow o4 _ • 1 0 1 1 1 0
r 32 t3 9
¢a cci4+\AqA!� o •s a )it, at 24 SS 0
a
MT `L'vwl.0A 1,0!14 OA 1a' 7 1 1 ! • 16 -a 1
,1175 OIL wb•lt 0A 7 9 1Ot t7 ! 7 10 6 ;
TIP IL •brAbA OA. 11 11 10 10 a.• 1
04 t• :
% !atlRO 0A 26 1• 1� A ) G Q
as iLi.n OA la. It 6 a 0 0
!� ►oL6t o
13. ')RtINI&L 0` 4 2 3 3 S ON W-4
A 6 A
'!'t. !♦RG .. t ►YYr�NiM011Nrtir
1a al.c! 6 Q e 3 ` a
as LAkt oA 13 i7 7 0 9a 111 3{
!artltw ai •� rS #• 50 IOA
_a z
tet Aa4ntt 04 o
7ka i<ansrA Ot 21 10 0 o s 0 ! 3
ax s►t11�OtA 0L i t 7 t 3 3 0
z to a 7 + 1
�! artwo0t1w0 Ob t e • 2 2 1 0 0
;►rntati9 OA t 9 0 1 0 '1. { a
w060L 04 ) 0 0 0 !3 A A 1
x +Aoro ob iA it • • 3 •
Tt a r«tlAtl I6 t t 4
ok 6 S
It. r0.••A_ OL 9' S. # ; hi 31 AO 9 "
r .tvA•A 3! 31 $ 9
iS 11
30 aaaMct at 1' 19 1` 1a 1s 11
ai �LAtlr #
Sg ►LtitiA! 10 /A to 3o a2 6U 10 2s /tl/i
S1. `rcivtrilOt, 0t S1 SO
$4 ZatrAMtb10 0A '31 3) to 13
ri !aM 1t"110 04 20 rs t3 9
3• ita •tNNAN61w0 04 3S 39 SA 19 as 20 9 0
31 !AM 01140 04 13 1r 7 7 1) 1A S
36 4A% INA"Citt0 Ok to 19 a 9
39 !Aa aOAaullt Ok 9 S it as X= 16 1s
411, t LUlt Orll►O b 20 11 It t D la 3!
4y %At@ "Alto 10 11 1r Aa 11 •6 Ae
a,2 toili4 rARr44A 04 QS 7L kb y 10. 4
As taMl► [LANA Ok la19 11 20 310 t• 14
0.A laNNA LNUi: OA 26 Aa 160 1s 1
01 0 t
#! tNAlt� OA 0 e 9 3 1 )
0.6 IttkNA - I♦ 1e .
!7 Stl.itOU l ) 12 10 r
OA IA 1» 6 0
it tOLAwO OA ii )S p 19 '4 [ •
a4 loMOwA 0A • S 11 23 ay 11 a
!►0 �IA%ISLAu1 0016 S 11 to r A
tS 20 1t
it tulitt 2 2l iZ 9 ) 0 a 0 0
t1 a I t A k"A
?►� lr1w111 0A 1 ; A ) t i O 0
0.
luL kilt 7 0 r` 1) is A
!! ubLUMwt ok 1� r4 i3 1) 1+ 11 • 0
S6 vtrluN4 i7 I1 tA� 26 I9 IO
Ok 13 7 •
S? COLO OOo 11 l2 i10 0 0 t9
3,! IUSA 121 119` ��
39
Its I!T to 3G
•0 Sul ui )1411 04 JtlLatt IHru 40M 191
1,065 1,17) IOt bko 11,031 1b6 6114 04 279
Notal► fUY tMI COUw1► •u111
•
i
s1
ilAML1 tbuelt MtOg4110N rthON1 MtW tO011 fab% Ol0 tOUNir
11 • Zk
wt bl"o tpuwll bG
%ALIT Ilh1)t MALS Itlt4tt
Net &1,4040, at t 0 0
a1 rtrlwl ! ) 0 i
w4 ►wt.•Ub as
OS 2 1 Q 0
a roll! Oi u 1 r
vc tuLulA S • 1
of 4 tot IA of o 0 1
a Dl� hL4il 01 2
a 1L buv+VU 0) i 2 a 2
1,. 1a111i0 01 0 0. 1 '0
US 0 0 t tl
- q.�ya�i•{ uS n � 0 0
e ,ttF14E4. us 0. 11 0 0
V i
u y o
lbiok.
MAL1
IY;
•
•
30
zoo
11
+i
44
9
to
phot bob
1014'4 NOTAL
1117Dt
M
)•0
i1
7
!i
169
D27
11
t
V
u
ftp *Y4ns_w 0D
U
u
�i�
W
0
V -
73
p
14
v�
r,!b WWI a! ilall as
it
f
"
y
1•
196)
J1fLMat
1hNu
1.1
,aaSk tl,� sox AN1 OWNIt
A1yr1A
It
1N
113
tOf FOa
I►t
6
tD
Gwr
tOS w
)) 6ko
Ntf-bA1 too 14t t0Uw1Y O1 Oullt
t[11w1] 'C01)Nlr g14MAiLOM fltfOrl W44 CODUti 000% Ot• Louw.l'R �9 •A •� A 00%
R1Lt tOltNiN Ot it - lk 2S ai
30 � AA
rQitAot "ALI r�tw�ee
MALI ItitAU MALI it11"Lt
iMAL= 1tM.ao1 pAys 0 0
2D 0 0 1 Q
bo )O u 0 i 1
ID2 'aLaglDt, 00. / a 1 0 1
atL.a.sow o4 _ • 1 0 1 1 1 0
r 32 t3 9
¢a cci4+\AqA!� o •s a )it, at 24 SS 0
a
MT `L'vwl.0A 1,0!14 OA 1a' 7 1 1 ! • 16 -a 1
,1175 OIL wb•lt 0A 7 9 1Ot t7 ! 7 10 6 ;
TIP IL •brAbA OA. 11 11 10 10 a.• 1
04 t• :
% !atlRO 0A 26 1• 1� A ) G Q
as iLi.n OA la. It 6 a 0 0
!� ►oL6t o
13. ')RtINI&L 0` 4 2 3 3 S ON W-4
A 6 A
'!'t. !♦RG .. t ►YYr�NiM011Nrtir
1a al.c! 6 Q e 3 ` a
as LAkt oA 13 i7 7 0 9a 111 3{
!artltw ai •� rS #• 50 IOA
_a z
tet Aa4ntt 04 o
7ka i<ansrA Ot 21 10 0 o s 0 ! 3
ax s►t11�OtA 0L i t 7 t 3 3 0
z to a 7 + 1
�! artwo0t1w0 Ob t e • 2 2 1 0 0
;►rntati9 OA t 9 0 1 0 '1. { a
w060L 04 ) 0 0 0 !3 A A 1
x +Aoro ob iA it • • 3 •
Tt a r«tlAtl I6 t t 4
ok 6 S
It. r0.••A_ OL 9' S. # ; hi 31 AO 9 "
r .tvA•A 3! 31 $ 9
iS 11
30 aaaMct at 1' 19 1` 1a 1s 11
ai �LAtlr #
Sg ►LtitiA! 10 /A to 3o a2 6U 10 2s /tl/i
S1. `rcivtrilOt, 0t S1 SO
$4 ZatrAMtb10 0A '31 3) to 13
ri !aM 1t"110 04 20 rs t3 9
3• ita •tNNAN61w0 04 3S 39 SA 19 as 20 9 0
31 !AM 01140 04 13 1r 7 7 1) 1A S
36 4A% INA"Citt0 Ok to 19 a 9
39 !Aa aOAaullt Ok 9 S it as X= 16 1s
411, t LUlt Orll►O b 20 11 It t D la 3!
4y %At@ "Alto 10 11 1r Aa 11 •6 Ae
a,2 toili4 rARr44A 04 QS 7L kb y 10. 4
As taMl► [LANA Ok la19 11 20 310 t• 14
0.A laNNA LNUi: OA 26 Aa 160 1s 1
01 0 t
#! tNAlt� OA 0 e 9 3 1 )
0.6 IttkNA - I♦ 1e .
!7 Stl.itOU l ) 12 10 r
OA IA 1» 6 0
it tOLAwO OA ii )S p 19 '4 [ •
a4 loMOwA 0A • S 11 23 ay 11 a
!►0 �IA%ISLAu1 0016 S 11 to r A
tS 20 1t
it tulitt 2 2l iZ 9 ) 0 a 0 0
t1 a I t A k"A
?►� lr1w111 0A 1 ; A ) t i O 0
0.
luL kilt 7 0 r` 1) is A
!! ubLUMwt ok 1� r4 i3 1) 1+ 11 • 0
S6 vtrluN4 i7 I1 tA� 26 I9 IO
Ok 13 7 •
S? COLO OOo 11 l2 i10 0 0 t9
3,! IUSA 121 119` ��
39
Its I!T to 3G
•0 Sul ui )1411 04 JtlLatt IHru 40M 191
1,065 1,17) IOt bko 11,031 1b6 6114 04 279
Notal► fUY tMI COUw1► •u111
•
i
s1
ilAML1 tbuelt MtOg4110N rthON1 MtW tO011 fab% Ol0 tOUNir
11 • Zk
wt bl"o tpuwll bG
%ALIT Ilh1)t MALS Itlt4tt
Net &1,4040, at t 0 0
a1 rtrlwl ! ) 0 i
w4 ►wt.•Ub as
OS 2 1 Q 0
a roll! Oi u 1 r
vc tuLulA S • 1
of 4 tot IA of o 0 1
a Dl� hL4il 01 2
a 1L buv+VU 0) i 2 a 2
1,. 1a111i0 01 0 0. 1 '0
US 0 0 t tl
- q.�ya�i•{ uS n � 0 0
e ,ttF14E4. us 0. 11 0 0
V i
u y o
lbiok.
MAL1
IY;
•
•
30
zoo
11
+i
44
9
to
phot bob
1014'4 NOTAL
1117Dt
M
)•0
i1
7
!i
169
D27
11
91
••
Ad
19
•9
Nat
29
73
�
30
60
1•
t)7 3,126
S
a}
13
30
lis
60
%)
lot
fa 9
1)U
30
2a
iS
5k7
it?
is
t$
6L
46
95
64
6
1•
6
626
360
1i6kt
A
sa
19
s
12
i
3yt
121
h9'
kit
6
1ff
at?
101
a0
b7
17)
is
$39
a1
aa`
ft
Ilk
r1
let
139
s
9
1�
is*
794
1o3f0
r4I.t aoi
h110N1 1011 rwl tOUwtr Of CALAVAf14f 1014E a! k%.
a kc 43 ■ 64 a1 r► bv1N I01AL
ItM4lt M WMAS! 1lhAa/i %ALl +IhAI( NAL10 II►14lrb nA i eb 6
6 3Q a0 0 j 33 t! kb
cl 6 + 3 ! o t { ti
i a 1 1 i o 01 yo It1
a
10 30 10 0 13 9 2v S S D ? o to y tl
t
0
0 ' o 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
1
0 0 0 p 0 0 1 1
1 l 2 : ►A
1
«:oatwLl CVJM11 N_14b41iGN M11,00 oLb LOvmty to Mtu tovltil o4ob*t toil iht COU411 60 LAtAtAOVIR 101AL 1bl'aL 0I AL
ut ai11 CbuaeF Mc 1.6 " 24 23 29 3b � 41. 1t e! � , 1
hALI ithAa► Mit, 1tiiA2E holt TIhALt ii4L` wiati, wALa 1ihALo aw20 1taj1! sL
r1 tt.Atat4 'O1. 0 1 1 i 11. q 0 t2 2 t
1u a ' + i i x 1 i i!
ss .h b6t U1 3 i 0 2 2
! rutil 0 1 ` 0 2)
V a 0 U
d1r .VLuts qb ` s. 01 to
t N'.1FA ebllA a7 0 0 t 0 0 D a0 0 1r1 4
u i,► kryYti tit 0 `a 2 12 0 U 4
t 2 2 4 a
t� 4441,6 Uii 3 t o a o
.wilt 1.0 0 0 0
ID
.
G U I 1 I 0 tl J w
t ~► . r) 0 b h 1� 0 0 P
T
^!P E.Wi31
1t 'A4�.Y,w A.
N'aL•.�tti: .tit
J
0 -. ..
i
6
•y lei
s't'
4t9yyLUwAtt
t
l
S
1
1
x
1
t)
x,
v1;E SN
Z
wvs nawn0 4�
J
p
Itj
t
s
��
Tt
kful SIAL% bo
is
Is
it
,3
33
20
to
2 Y!tNri,49: Her 1t•1 t94atY
"At bR
141041. ,lw�U Ah.A
V4 of
1`33
IT.
#iv
172'
rt-
71
161 1.!1
-.
...
-
rAr.t
'.04
ry.'!1L?Mai COaatr N16bAt/OM
bthtltl Otb
totlhit
lb Rt4
t6Ua11
Attobl
rot 1Mt
COU>r11
O1
:built,
loll.
ibIAL
iOt4♦
x4
2t 79
3q " 44
•3 a6
63 ! Ova"
+ilii. �L1Y 'tOUN:I lit
to
tlhf;\E
11A1t t611ALa
04A13IthALi
MAL3
ilt.11l
tU6
i. t i
MtIE ftMALt
MAIC, 1tMALt
MALI
;a
1.10
10
4
1
1x4
t
Ott •A A*ttYA a1.
41
3a
31.
3.1)
��
4
��
0
1
3
2
O
1
a
I
i3w a.ro0b of
v;r tatrvttA! 01
2
b
i
4
C
x
e
_
20
1;1
tqi
2
bir 4L talo Ob
UT
46
9
39
$a
30
34
26
4
1
0
6
It
'0c to�tAA 1 LSA
E 0b
0
3
3
t
t
13
6
0
2
3v
" ►tta. MOd1
zd Er roaAbo 0`1.
it
i2
to
!
"
13
4
16
�
+
2t
•0
Si
t6#
4k iatsro 10
11
IL
1t
32
is
12
Xx
It
11
4
Ie
�,
s
0
44
34
a0
s
CICt:Ytatr 11
'w�Abot 61' 12
t0
1.0
't
0
C
3
t..
a
1
1
0
1
x
0
0
0
:
xs
7a
ba tit 0A �L it
12
1
1Q
10
t
to
7
6
a
1
0
°
is
+G ILARa �s
'
it
4
3
3
j
:.
it
t4
4!
♦T
a:K =Salt
0* erNfAl Vt
4
S
3
4
0
1
.
x3
201
til
S1
It
ibc �attEN.. I
19
a
61
S
3b
7
so
S0
ST
39
t
1
1
A
1
4
It
Ci `a+t AaGn6L3
4
U
s
i
1
i
2a
6U
isr MrrEnA 20
i0
19
IO
0
3
°
a
0
!
31
Ot 1+rb21
7a
i
0
0
x
tt
2U
wAb1PA3'A 22
Olt
10
6
t
1
!
'
2
1/
7
14
,Ot: tetab4TIw0 as
`a
_
2.
'.
6
4
1
a
6
i3r •taCtb
23
6
i
t
T
i
2
t
0
C
q
3
3L
t
lac �tloc'a
w ►i.MO to
;
1
0
ais
iS
y
3
x
1
21t
s
at
Ypt Mba/tPLi 27
b
1 t
t
11
S
2
3
y
Z
y�
6!
A+. aar4 xb
s
b
b
i
15
13
3
iS
13
0
6
lir
ba
i74.
OC
Cds 1A4i1�bA 29
30
2T
3t.
21
17
10
3
t
7
4%
46
ss
fll ArnAa.4E
3t
6
17
la
•
is
7
x
2
42
Or tLAt4A
km "u." 2
23
a
3
t
12
it
3as
a
x1f
24s
4e1
G4 +k1+til%, tIt
bb
a0
97
eo
1
20
ib
0,
s
3
b
04 ;atA,AM.hlo st
et
x
2
1
Vi
1f!
oil tAit R►ati0 )s
1
:0
1S
iY
1.5
1S
•
IT
it
i
YvA
IvM
G4 Sa ri1_ArA�b11e0 36
!f
16
13
1s
12
6
1
a
46
44
7�
Dir tAa 11.46
l6A4t1ctb
11
1T
17
10
6
3
;31
64
s. tAa Ii
39
+
ii
6
i4
1s
;
;
it
03
iii
Q4 SAa J01kou1h
40
it
11
12
S
1!
i�
`
04 t Lull 6blt It
MA 113 1.1
21
1,
ix6
17
ib
!
3
ill
)TI
0A tAa
v4 1Aa11� 14404ht1 42.
F1.
73
4!
=6
!1
11.
1.6
,b.
a
_ 1.
_
169
L tAa'tA CLAM4 i!
47
T
67
t?
%
1.3
3
6
4
b2
66
i10
L
cni sAht. Citvl 44
22
16
t3
/s
3T
3t
0
a
t
`4 AMAIIA 4)
at 46
r
1
1
�
p
0
t
a
3
it
1
t1
iltt0A
+ 1ltntro4
i2
9
10
i3
it
i
1
2
70
1Lt
}Y 1bl Aa0 a
1!
1 6
ii
16
22
to
it
29
6
1'
2
, 31
;i
61.
1 it
wi4 1V+abaA r1.
h ttnr,►tL9uti SU
!
itit
1 L
12
2a
1
it
it
a
It
92
MrS
1.1t
t1a t6it.A St
1.30
AL
is
1b
32
23
t
c
Gc ItaAh► tt
IU
0
0
2
1
1
+
222
is
Ir
3
,
3
1
0
e
,
Ot tbLAh1 54
11
s
i
t
s
0
4
2
31
21
L6
1�t
L tuo\vaat
SU
®
i2
it
s
!'
6
Cts. wtatut4
Ot rb\6 11
ib
tz
14
14
13
1T
2U
1b
10
12
iq
b
6
t9
tT3
aVy
t+wlb
S. iUbA Sb
it
15t
21
1x4
437
1q9
it6
tit
16
ba
t3
1.4 bul of Slot! is
Jui,02
ia6u
11hM 19e
112
l,ii2
?,466
CiJt)
1alaLt ebb IM tbV%I!
bully
p11
Mq@
f411
016
ita2
344
341
tl2
«:oatwLl CVJM11 N_14b41iGN M11,00 oLb LOvmty to Mtu tovltil o4ob*t toil iht COU411 60 LAtAtAOVIR 101AL 1bl'aL 0I AL
ut ai11 CbuaeF Mc 1.6 " 24 23 29 3b � 41. 1t e! � , 1
hALI ithAa► Mit, 1tiiA2E holt TIhALt ii4L` wiati, wALa 1ihALo aw20 1taj1! sL
r1 tt.Atat4 'O1. 0 1 1 i 11. q 0 t2 2 t
1u a ' + i i x 1 i i!
ss .h b6t U1 3 i 0 2 2
! rutil 0 1 ` 0 2)
V a 0 U
d1r .VLuts qb ` s. 01 to
t N'.1FA ebllA a7 0 0 t 0 0 D a0 0 1r1 4
u i,► kryYti tit 0 `a 2 12 0 U 4
t 2 2 4 a
t� 4441,6 Uii 3 t o a o
.wilt 1.0 0 0 0
ID
.
G U I 1 I 0 tl J w
t ~► . r) 0 b h 1� 0 0 P
T
_ &Aul
1,1a11 '6w
°,qrt s4 i,,:r 5tw1 M1iitlM{1
S
AF.
Irk•/rl At
«,
YR
„
JLtfi�:3
-
Ke we♦ ,,
4!
`�,l
•�
"4' I
Iit1G
►A41
014
lR+aa'* at.> to�Att NI�tM�11Ob
T✓!.!"0�1
10TAk 1011
s tgwAtat
dt
- '7.t
2S 21
)0
LL
t! M
•S i, OVIf
1Olsr4
s
1f
Yir•A`:t
gAlo
ItNA'/.
MAIC
ItNA�I
AAI.I IIM4LA
+{Al.l
(1NA�i
h 4 0
NA[l 16�»�l.
wA1,t
0
0
a
0
,.�
+r
to :».Arai•
03
0
0
-2
+2
d
0
0
`1
0
Q
0
,y
t« w 3
04
-2
0
0
0
'd
0
0
0 U
0
'+
"+
tiwt'a,MrfY`Ma1
01
0
0
0
�?
Q
U
0
to atnr »!x
'4t%Ia
06
07
0
0
.1
.)
2
2
.1
1
i. ;tastrr
1
k. *%
O6
0
b
1
0
0
0
._
r0
0
``
.t
na n.a1. a4
0
0
0
.-2.
.1
0
0
0
0
0
t
'1
0
'Rh stitt•>s
'Ra
t1
�,
0
1
0
�3
+tawtNut.E1
to 1f.atate:t
to
`
stta
tw
.t
0
-1
0
(�
1
0
wa «rr1
{7
-0
1
0
0
0
0
0
3
w0
+�
0
1..10
920.
Ai
4Y0
2
10�
is ,r1ar:
BrtltS
Is
t4.
•>'
'-S
Y
T
30
16
1S
10
la t.trf
20
1
Q
''1
b.
0
0
++
-1
0
0
Q
'1a -&silks
0
1
1-
0
0
0
1
x
0
.0
►
0'
0
1
p
1
0
4
1
wrrIro%4
�]
0
1
0
0
r
n
=1
x
1
w« «c.rccttta�
1
0
b
o
'«�440t
it
•a
to .wrjtat
ar'
1
0
2
0
0:
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
as
0
8
0
0
0
0
•1
0
0
+1
1
0
'1
0
0
�2
23
to +rlr4ls
2•
0
2
+3
I
1
10
4
6
)
-t
«1
1f
S
.a
1 tirrt.at
0
.1
1
•1
0_)
0
0
00
p
w -c ►rr{[■
It
+`
0
.3
))
-2
p
1
.3
p
.;
�p
i
.:
10
9
14 rflYtns111
-t
A
+2
1
3
S
W2
b
ja: ;r;sakatst0
)t
0
0
0
0
D
3
Z
l
12
21
5c 4rr •ky'110
35
0
0'
'1
4
t.
1
.1
Ila. 'ir *t*%X061ma
36
)
.6
y♦
1v: yar 6Iti0
17
'3
0
0
0
0
0
to t►!+ xf.attilStO
ti Oar .1044olrv,
-a
It t I..ti11 ObItM0
40
0
0
0
1L 1at. a
'+
0
`i
0
.1
3
3
1
i
6
1t
bat
�a lArir ►rrf►eA
44.1
G2
G
2
-1
%
16
.i
is, $+h1r -VLirA
l)
-$
0
1
t
l
1
"
t4 VA%Ift tout
44
.1
%
+
2
-4
t{ 1>•r11A
45
44
0
0
0
0
0
0
•2
-:
O tttrtA
t7.
,0
0
0.
0
'1
�1
.b
.j
0
1c ttS4116y.
40
1
-1
0
1
0
2
2
14 s0ipir0
4V..
2
0
r1
'1
a1
2
0
-1
0
0
1a It:r6ra
0
1
1
0
4
.2
0
.7,
0
0
0
tr itrr3146t11
30
-1
0
o
h
�i
0
0
0
U
•2,
tc 1uvit6
S1
�1
0
{
0
0
0
.1
0
-3
Ya ttwat+4
:t
0
0
Q
0
+0
0
,2
0
is vaibtly
S3
t
1
Y
0
>1
•1
Y
0
0
0
7
1
tt lvartt
S4
1
1
0
+1
0
t
p
1_
»1
0
tc tuot.0«rt
SS
!♦
..1
1
{
1
01
.1
.3
t
1a. rllr1.46A.
S)
rl
"6
�,�
0
»1
1
0
0
.1
1
.a
1
as lain
AL 1UfA
!�
0
-1S
=1
-1D
b
�I•
0
«21
it
-p
0
`•
»10
-t2
-62
.{it
1c otlt t,k i1Alt
60
lt0
-t0
.16
ta,trai ko6 INI tOUatt
1410
i
111Lf�2
13
1NMU
33
A►t iVi+S
6
S
is
1
S7
+a6
=23
'12
i
)S
rAr GOI! ir!
'
—maw...".+wit,.,., f,�e.►��+� 0.4 r:�" t�/.w�R��a-r..+......�au�'�� ^ � y f ,tr.+«.abF a-
n,: {"J�� j d �'I'e k:`., +!�,.� 1M�.4n✓ � srwnr�..��w. A! 1 T,., � s�-' Y«.t,'.
4A
•LMM4 �u:art.1e1. w• rrrirl � • '� '-4i �,,.. '
-JIf ).' g.,y�•,`..-w'rYi.sYw. �.YKn-rN. h .. -. 44t4s.NM1Yn-av*'.1FMY' ""?flhd#yur '..... wmLr._.�paIT.�'.r.M.w1\rr...,:
1 w f f
f k 'L.x •' ti u�'F.J�"�T'1"` } k May x`1 n "n
70
.tet..
n. ♦
R� " �@.A .'�5`� '`�_zv ,dii ..NL C[ .;•.1
, r
+..nx..1v ar�L�w+rwtiu.gc,,mx wV=: �u!.4.. k•aMW lw,k.q.� .
w
- rrrr�rf w�'wr.l.a rrf+f+4.•f.�+.akYiY.Wr,"—-'.'ya.rrgmrfyyy.F _ .... iV.1+k 4 m, ,. V.-..aK. ea
"y.
1
. n '
r +.
1.77
n .
iIrk
ii
1
r A .: ..r �;-� �' s r �` R t .m'�,y v . ." a. 4 '{�t� r. ,�, ° < an, —•---.+.....—+•
Y H u,y
a
,
S
:
Y Y
f
• x,:'. y.. .. q..py.My„e.:.y.- ,V1WYrt4.ti. ... H .—... �, .. -. .. yjwyi -.r w:t..'�- mom`
�4�k;�+'-a+svuy'MrwN:F+iM+.MY+vianLi,n ylWa,Yln-ys'w..st-\{:Itr'a .:.
',.�J,+c�.S.++ra :�edt�:7r:'A.t'_.k._wstl:ra .uk R...�tr_'"._.n:, .,�.._s..:_.w:.. .aC..w e.sAM_..':�hsYGxi,Ew:'".s+��*-.y..�-i..:.".H.45¢^Wuk.F:..:•u .s ....4�1aa , .u.s._..s. .;'+.:+1A ..v'.v�.,r a�Cr ...��.
e
IN
( ,.. ..
lir
F46UTINGi
1 CITY OF CHICK?
INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM /
ACTION DESIRED
�+ KG • srr, ,ball.
City Manager
Raview (Comment It
Deputy city Mgr.
ItyClerk
SPOKE WITH ERVAN RODRIQUEZ OF THE CAL DEPART OF EDUCA
FACILITIES PLANNING ABOUT THE
C01I//5eo me re thisappmpriate)andretum
City Attorney
55 SQ.' FT. PER STUDENT
FIGURE FOR ELEMENTARY STUDENTS. THE 55 SQ. FT. IS
est a d to t
CDC
ALLOCATED AS FOLLOWS:
Act as indicated
R/Po
Please process
Aclm.Tech.-Co
31 sq. fit. Classroom
For ourinfo./tfle
Acitn:TeM,-Pers.
2 Library 'Space
Your si ature required
Iel of Pollcr
7 Multi—purpose/Kitchen room
Retu to sender
ir,Pub. Wrks.
Office space
Per our- uem
f- tnanceorricer
6 Covered walkway and corridors
Circulate
Fire Chief
3 Toilet
Post on Bulletin Boards
Park Director
Piannln
3 Storage/Custodial
55
Director
Sexat
FILE
THERE IS NO MANDATED OR LEGAL REQUIREMENTS ON SQ. ET.
THESE ARE A GUIDELINE FOR PERSONS WISiING
TICKLER:
TO DESIGN
FACILITIES THAT WILL BE FUNDED WITH SOME STATE MONEY,
OTHERWISE THE
.
FACILITY MAY BE DESIGNED HOWEVER THE
DISTRICT WISHES.
..Isianon,ral
DeParfinertt
Date
zl!;
C�'Ai-8
8-82 LOOM
4
CA, arr',Cjibp ON a r -c".
y RLD CCD
. � m.- .-.--... -.�=
,
f
ro5 �►� i 1 r��4�
24`1
,i>N+Cd
.0
7��1 awi
��s,e.r '
.t�dc•��'a
r
u u�,n
197041, Iq �d talo
. I'1$o
G: �.a
.►dam
`ylp
l:1—kp
k1U-112
zZ
M
� .i �t _ ; pry• �.. .�p� w\ ... '
f
f)+ r
T .
0npx-
d'
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
'DNI INISTnAl' ION 08NTEF
�5 COUNT± t17Ct� Rivl` OVALE, cALIt`ORNIA 9SO66
�Qr��l,u+r� n'16,j5;ia.a22s1
ALPRtD 3, SARAC,tU IAi4C DOL,Art
Dovtjet t L�2 t1Eft11iA hi%" L11aY ,giritl
HILbA �HEEi t R CHAiiY
Dasine! April 21 UN EULM4
.a ! 1...,9b3.. t�iSittgl_$ -
Mm Jaile King
Route 1 Box 444-K'
Chico, CA 95926
(Dear Jane.-
1
.lane:I have recently received input
assessment figures for new school const�uctiohI am s,hhaveistut•bed, b
g , been developed.
Before this goes too. much further, I believe it Will be necesst
to sit dtitivrt and ►�utual ly develop a forum to i Iron out
they develop. ��y for us
Problem areas before
All of us surely recognize the long range benefit
is attempting to accomplish, but at the same t' the school district
theamaerketitla eoduehto will prevent first timehomebu hot want to
believe, however, that We can vedI ch al construction �co ti rom `"ntc�"ing
of hnW the assessment is going to be applied
ih establihein I
Parameters
cats. Along t(�ese lines; I am P'rOPOsing that a of APl c�fnmi ttee
pplied or not applied to new housing;
established, h1cmberShip of the committee ,sat be as be
1 • Representative from the school districtfoY follows.,
2)
2. The Planning iDrector for t
he county and city; and
Legal staff; city and county.
In recoi trending this committee I o de
meeting with the editor of the local nWould like
discrepaML10,q that have recentlewspy surfaced,apertto lay our planned
we can TrOS61ve the
Please be advi shut that I would like to submit this
to the full board of supervisors oh Tuesday, Aril -� cb�
uttee pt•opoW
p 2b i4r M) their concurrence,
�^ Adminirtrxilve Oaico
1163 LAWSEVEIVT,0 S e 99ET
C111CO, CAL1F0F1 A 959-.6
A►oa Code (916) 891.3000
April 20, 1983
,lane Dolan, Chair
Butte County B0'of Supert<isorS.
.25 CotintY 'Center Drive
rOrowille, Cis 95965
Dear Msi, Dolan
This is to advise that the CUSD Boaitd of Education met in special Meeting an Motlday,
April 18, 1983; 4M p.m,, At this meeting the Board tools the ,following action:
7 move that, we contact the. Chair of tile_ Butte County
Board of Supervasors to xenuest that mtt item be
placers on the agenda for the second meeting 111 May,
frrrrnally requesting them to adopt ati ordintnGe
establishing boil.der fees consi'sttwnt with he .ia gtrr es
we havepresented, as aceotding to our needsr s.;1d
formally requePting them to adopt a resolution 4.9
pursustrt 'to the law; all of the figures being jaub-
Initted are as per documentations
MSC lioux/Vurtua Unanimous Mote
Therefore, We etre writing to request placement on your agenda for May 10, 1.963:
As you know, it is imperative that the school district wore with both the 'City
of Chico and Butte County in this matter: Our district staff it prepared to
pork with the county and city jtaCfs as soon as possible toll.owing this meeting
in riay
14e ore enclosiag teal copies of a memo from Gruen, Cruet & Aw,;ociates, giving a .gee
schedule for funding, construction of new relocatable classrooms; a sample county
ordinance; a sample county t`esc�]ut on. and :b,solution #23.6--82, which was sent to
the county in bccetnber � 'Chess art: for d�.stt o utiov to the Board members and
'staff;
C,te would appreciate it if you would lot us kt'tott It there is any problem in planing
this on the agenda.
sitldereiy,
.�y
fe)W «+i rte P!� Don Ar Cloud
�T4ki1
�1� IV ��
� ` A88or3ai•a Superintendent
Vot
cc dan,g�?,.t5 Cit
�'G�ISll
Boar "d Of gdttcptiot
r
Resolution Number 23682 °
RESO.LU,TION NOTIFYING .T CHICO CITY COUNCIL
eM. ..•r „ ' Y
AND THE',
HFBUTT E COUNTY BOARD OF SUpERV ISOR'S OF
w= ,, FT1IDI.N8, BY THE BOARD OF EDUCA`f ION OF THE
CH
i.CO UNI
THAT NO FEAO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
METHOD EXISTSTO MIT
I3GATE
CONDITIONS OF OVERCROWDING IN THE
CHICO UGIIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
AND REQUESTING "ENACTM'ENT OF AN ORDINANCE
Pel"SUANT TO GOVERNMtE1jT CODE §65974
WH81"Vsi adequate schoolfaci7'tie8.,,ane absolutely essential � ntial to
o
orornofi�� the general welfare of the residents of the' Chico Unified Scfoo7
District through the 'maintenance of,a quality educat onal system; and
i•IHEREAS ne;
i residential 00Vv toR ment has protpeded and fwiII continue
toioroceed ata rete that exceeds. the Chico Unified School Dista^ict's cap s-�
taility of providing adequate school facilities; and
WHEREAS, Mie number of new residential units projected ed is18,503
and the'number of wo students projected front said new units is 10,907
based on data supplied by the City of Chi:o and'3utte County planning
Departments as of -ugutf 12', 1982; and
HEREi?S,'Government Code �65973(a) defines "conditians of oven-
crop;ding" to maah that ti=e total enrollment of a school, including enroll
p.. p ,
ment ft'•om ro osed development, exceeds the capacity of such school a;
determined by the caverning body of the district; and
1*15REAS, the schools of the District have a combined. capacity of
10,487 and, a current enrollment of�8,259 and &,-projected enrollment on
coMplet.ion of said new units of 15,166, end'
WHEREAS, the Board of Education has considered and evaluated all
rtasonahle methods f mitigating said conditions of overcrowding and
S:NEREAS, the State Legislature enacted Government Code §65970
seq. Which authorizes a +city or county to require dedication of land
, ,oth, for ihterir
or 'feesor ht scliool favi l i ti es where conditions of over-
-crowding exist and there is no feasi'hle method tor
reduce such condttt,an
Sy
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Education of the
Chico Unified School District hereby notifies the Chico City Council and
the butte County Board of Supervisors that;
8%$2 5 5 ,
V
i
r
Ir ,
tl
�. 1. Conditions of overcrowding exist in one o1• more attendance
tj impair the normal functioning c
educa �itol�a l n ra•ardmc �as ct �'�fll ch ave l l
Proposed residential
developrlent; and a result: of current and ra ased
�. That all reasPnable methods of mitigating conditions o-cover-
c!o�;d'ing bha�e beeh evaluated and no feasible method for reduoinD such
conditions exist.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, thP,t the Chico City Council and the Butte ,
County Board of Supervisors are .ht�reby requesting to adopt an ordinance
pursuant to Government Code §6597��;
PASSED AND ADOPTED this. 13th day of Augusi, 1932, by the Board df
Educatiah of the Chico Minified School District at a regular Meeting cf
said Board, by the follOW n3 vote:
' AYES;
Fuqua' Kn Ross, Houx Sherra►^d
Nohe
1BSEN-4 ;lone
Presiden�
' Board o"
1 ChinoUni ied School bistrict
„I
i
I
r
a