Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
84-4 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS 3 OF 5
51,LJE OF CALIFORNIA—WO', RESOURCES AGENC� OFFICE UE HISTORIC PRESERVATION DEPAITAAENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION F.'15f OFMCF Dox 2390 SACRAMEWO, CALIFORMIA 95811 REPLY TO: HUD 830907-•T30C ,E' GE DEUKMEJIAN, Governor fk� October 4, 1983 guH©Cu. P1�nnlryil �.m�'' OCT ? 1J$3 Ms. Laura M. Tattle s�alifnrn}a Assistant Planner Qcov�Mf�E Butte County Alarming Commiosi,on 7 County Center Sira ve Orovlle, CA 95965 Dear Ms Tuttle: Thank you for consulting Vrith us regarding your upcorn ng OD13G projects. We find that these projects do not involve National. PPelster or eligible properties: Sewer lines: B, Beech & Boucher Streets (E) Street Reconstruction, Curbs, Gutters, etc., B, Beech & Boucher Streets (0 With regard to the county's residential rehabilitation program (B) we find the project will have no adverse effect on any National. Register listed or eligible properties properties provided the following conditions are met: 1i, The County Will provide the opportunity for this office to review and comment on any individual projects involving structures built prior to 1910. Initial screening may be satisfied by submitting a photo and construction date for any such property. 26 If any National Register or eli%ible properties are identified, the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Historic ppeserva- tion Projects All be employed in any work undertaken on, those propertiesa If you agree to the conditions outlined above, please sign the concurrence block ab the bottom of this letter and return one copy to this office. If you have any questions or comments, please phone Maryln'Bourne Lottie, staff historian, at (916) 342.-6086, Sincerely, J. concur. Ara ntl dellen. C �g�n )�� � 2 , � 31 - l 1�State Iftstoric Preservation Officer atu c CC)'SO ixrbrit"o`ltTl I�ianagor be UAL O' )._:tr a"e C e p rcr. (Iw)A NOTICE OVERSIZE DRAWING r, HAS BEEN REMOVED AND FILMED ON 35MM AAk UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Wx V+'4dppol REGION IX 215 Fremont Street San Francisco, Ca. 941 US Bu"o co, Mooning Comm OCT 3 1 1983 ()r0V1110' Caufoolla Laura M. Tuttle, Assistant Planner Butte County Planning Commission County Center 7 County Center Drive orovillet CA 95965 Dear Ms. Tuttle: Subjects Proposed Chapmantown Community Development Block Grantt Butte County; Environmental Review Record and Finding, of No Significant Impact The 0. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9 has no objection to the subject project. This is based on a telephone conversation with Mr. Joseph Henau of the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control 'Board. He informed as that the Chapmantown area was included for future hookup when the present wastewater treatment plant was constructed. The concerns we expressed in our letter of September 28t 1983, have therefore been satisfied. If you have any questions, please call Valerie Cooper of my 'staff at (415) 974-8262. Sincerely yours David B. Jones Chieft California Branch Water Management Division cc., stiave Baker Connerly & Msodiate8 %215 218t StrOet ,Qactamentot CA 95818 UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION IX 215'Fremont Street San Francisco, Ca, 941 05 SEP 2 9 1983 Laura M. Tuttle, Ass HuLte istant Planner County Planning Commission County Center 7 County CeAlter Drive OrOville, California 95965 Dear MS. Tuttle: 'Dufl a Co. Planning C s EP �3 0 1983 oroville, CallforhlA SUBJECT: Proposed Chapmantowh Community Development BlOck Grant Butt, County;EnvIr tOnMental Review Record and Find, I -Ing oo f N Signifl-cant Impact. EPA has reviewed the subject documents and recommends that the capacity Of. the Chico sower be assessed immodiat to handle increased collection adequately t elY,' the ability of the a8se-ssea, treat the additional 10 n al Wastewater tt0a.'Meht Plant to should also be The present onsite nalYzedt i.e,, are sewage c'-collection/treatment should be e present "failed" failed Or do they threquire Pumping out? Systems actually based on this evaluation Should be co, A management system nsidered . appreciate the opportun have any quest* ity to reviOw the d 10"r Please contact me at OcUments. If You (415) 914 -8188. Sincerely youe$, 7 Ale Loretta Kahn gar8amian, Chief 81S Review Section e GEORGE DEUKMEJIAN CovenNon OFFICE�OVgRRIOh'S OFFICE OF PLANNING AND 1400 TENTH s -I -Ree kSSEARCH SACRAMENTO 95814 Butte G otultlr t'�.annin� (51 G�'4.45.,061�� octobor 7 �1983 ()ravilI . Ca -liter Drive i'.Xe, M 9S96S V000 Co. �l�hnfng ttrr�s. i ' ► 1983 4►ti+willa, �alrfar�� Subjeot SCH# 8309 605, (aummunit), tehJ�zit7;t°.ca. Dear tsar' The State Clearinghouse selected statta a Emitted the state gcncies for r the above named age cies have y ' The vevi� environmental dcc comment period is closed umeon to This letter certifies and none of revie<a ruir�rtents only that: you have cot California Environrnentr Draft enviro Tlted with the State applicable, this s Quality Actnmenta' documents, pursu Clearinghouse authorityhould not: be construedlR Guidelines ant to the. or title interests of t Section ]5151 he St ed as ar�waiver of any b Where The project alitarnia. l Ju,.isdictional authority or ju still req approval from state the virran Iehtal diction bye law. if so a the stategenciea with permit mediately after Document i,n their decision agencii�s the Votice of the document rrlaking, wi11 have to use Of overrid na xs finalized with a Please contact them Determination, ado �. crnsideratians, adopted mitigation copy of the final doe tne,�sures, end went, Once the document any statement and if a`decisicn is adopteo 1S mace to Negative DeciaYatirn must be filed with t aprove the Pro ) or certi,tiecl approval from an he Oo; ty Clerk J t� a �.0tiCe (fiflal E1Ry with the Secretarystate agency - It the Droject rc , ,, of �eter�,tnation 155 , or fiesour the :Votice o1uiiss cisco �h) 7 . rces (EXR Cuidelir�ter'-"inatlon must q 'Onary' Sincere x, ,R j pec tir�ns 15083 � be filed and Terre Rot;ert s I:ar;aser Stag �" -a rz1;hC�uE int r,titirt.. MCNIN ''jc. ams rl,r!T n 1.Amfjr co.i3 t`r st", tyy, ,. r ') Laura M, UL'M, AustsbRntt V14nnor; HuLLv County Pl,o)atling Co lld[1.Ea:'iion Comity Cont or; 7 County Cruntor P. vt. or ovillo, CA 95905 Wss`la': Ns. T ut.t lu r Sul.rjuc k Pru ,°rc,od Mpmratown C'csra m"rla, t,y vf.:vC.lr)}rfint> 91 ` uk Grant, , t utt e County; y lInvi�(3�Y1:1^ lnta �, Onvir:;'f; �:C�t:ord .and Finding of NaIir1:ic�aa'i : 'i t`:,,r \', IItnpitct'. The U. S. r;nvirran nt al. ProtacLion Agenay, Region 9 ham no oi>jetrUin tri tho ::;ulaj K Project. This is based an a tc :i.ophono c: over i , nn with Mr. :Irk:.; aph I1C, nou raiz` tho Central V alloy RuCJ'1.o3'1,, I Water er Quality Cant«rod. Iae ird. He iayfo?~mod um that LK CIxaIzanot unn aa'on wom included for tutur a hookup t;h oo `.ii� pz-r.:nent wastewater tra tri a t Plant wa l oO►1KrUCt.od, The cancer as wo C yros od .in. our le tor: of SoptGmb " pm; 1933, irr: vo t hor-ytore boon s at•isfivdk If You ;my Vr 01 valor io coopot= o'f my r%tnij, at (415) q ki262. la a.Ta4•�t-,� f f David 11a umpss i M 7. C; E, Ca l J .i urIll a Branch Iianariem,;lit Commlm l y a Amnue I. (m 2215 21n t )t..rro t, ITEM ON WHICH ANEGATIVE DECLARATION REGARDING ENVIRUNMIENTAL I, AC 4 U SS73114 A ", ON'1yfE IWtte County Board of Supervisors Acceptance or �ttbnc comments and review of environmental document oi) ^V;lte proposed Chapmantowil Community Development Blo(:j� f rti7tt, to be published in the Chico Enterprise Record. t Mai?to• scare Clearinghouse, 1400 Tenth street .r~ Rm, 121, Sacramento, CA 45.814 NOTi COMPLETIORM ON AND ENVIRONMEFITAL DOCUMENT F r j 4 See="'T'1.' 1, PrNett Title: 7 `7 3 •-�.�� /�7t fir` SCH L_V ;l? Lead gency:_i��_�___f-; a f �• J i yiI `3a arr et Addres/ ) 3 Contact Person-,_. 3b City:_i 3d. Zip; ---__�,. 3e. Phone-..,_ j" , P 0 Ci 1!IP!Ti0=1 4.CgUhty: �'/ ` one:,„, /( 4b.(0ntiunal) Assessor's Parcel Ilo, "-"" / �' 4a. City/CorrVnunity;,('/ a, Cros4 Streets: 4c: Section 5b For Rural, �TWp " Range _ u. wYtliin 2 miles of~ a, glare Hwy 110.nay N Nearest CoMunity: CtltlltdtN_T�TYPE -- b• Airports _ 8. LOCAL ACT tYPE '-- c• Waterwtys' j����q � PPfiA OL _,___General Plan UpdateJ1 10. O'cVELOPMNT�T YpE — 02 O1 Res —Residential, Unit' Acres _„„Early Cans Rew ElemOnt .,, 02 .Office; Sq.Ft. 03 General Plan Amendment 03 D3 _K!?eg Doc Acres FdpplpYuuw 04 —Master Plan 04 ,_,,,_Ornft Elq 03 ,,�5poppir,gJComnerctal: Sq.Ft, 06 _.._1nneXa tion OS Supolenent/O6 gore, - ; - _ ------._ _ Empluyrtrl Subsequent EIR - -Specific Plan (if so, prior SCN #OT 04 Industr:al., Sq,Ft, .,Redeve)opment Acre, 08 ...,Rezone Emplgyeg5 05 NEPA —Sewer: MDD 09 Land Division 06 Notice of Intent Subdivision, Parcel Map, tl6 Rater: MGD,_ Tract Map, etc, 01 _Envfr, Assessment/ 07 .....:._Transportation: Type 10 FONSI „, Use Permit 08 ,`Mineral Extpactton A ltnerol Dd DraftCaricel A Preserve EIS 11 �-- 9 ��. '`fir , a 6h 09 —Power Generation; Wattage DINER 12 ,_Other- • { `t i A, a .,. Type: 09 _Information only 14 9• L 10 HTOTAL _jihal Document 11 Other_ fr37 /�dGtiJ '7 r 11, PROJECT ISSUES DISCUSSED 1N DOCUMENT 31 Aesthetic/Visual, 08 ,Geologic/5eismid ,15 y� Sewer Capadity 02 ,-Agricultural Land 09 i ,,:,,, Jbb3JNousing balance ! � 22 .:Water Supply 16 a3 _.__,Air Quality 10 Minorals —Sol! Ernsinn , 73 Wetland/Rtpariah ital/ 9 HiStnriCal 11ybiso 11 _:,,_,.Solid Waste 24 W ldlife ---^ i OS.��oas�allo 12 „� puhlfr Services es 13 „_;_,_;Toxic/Hazardous 25 GrotVth Inducing 76 _,y,w„cire Hazard 13 19 X,„Trafftc/Cfirculatibn 26 � _ nrampa'tible Lard,; e ,�Schaols »7 , FldodingfDralnago 14 Sy5tems 20 _, Vegetatidn 27Gumulative Effects , _Septic Fllia[�IGWOMX.) 'rede,rdl S 21 , Water 7uat3 y 27 Other , State S Total S t-ANOt1Slr ;At10 ZONi.NG: cc 17 :4. PRJJCCf P",; c 7TiQ�r�I Xh'1,t31 < "','L. 15, SIGNATURE OF LEAD AGEIICY REPRESENTATIVE ..__ _ Date 'Ia7E: C F ringhouse will asst1h, identiFicatidri numbers for all new pro eCtC, (e"�, frCm d +14tic of Prepa>aCion Or previous draft dbcurw_nt) a SCN +Vum40) already aXistS for PRAM R✓rVlSEb 1/il3 - REPLACE, CAib4 please filf it it in. a prdsez- t MARK DISTRIBUTION all qggSt I ' rx Resources Agency _�.�.. 9 Y CTRPA (Ca TRPA) , Air Resources Board TBPA (Tahoe :RPA) Conservation Fish and Game Coastal Commission Caltrans District Caltrans Planning Caltrans Aeronautics '..,California Highway Patrol Boating and Waterways Forestry State Water Resources Control Board - headquarters N� Regional Water Quality Control Board, Region Division of Water Rights (SWRCB) Division of Water Quality (SWRCS) Department of Wates Resources Reclamation .lard Solid Waste Management Board. Colorado River Board Bay Conservation & Dev't Comm Parks and Recreation Office of Historic Preservation Native American heritage Comm. State Lands Comm Public Utilities Comm X Energy Comm Food and Agriculture Health Services Statewide Health Planning (hospitals) Housing ,and Community Dev't j Corrections General Services Office of Local Assistance Public Works Board Office of Appropriate Technology (OPR) Local Government Unit (OPR) Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy Other cnn cru i ier nw v .. fu & Al L A t" C, F J-: PLANNING COMMISSION a COUNTY CENTER DIRIvE . OROVILI E. CALIFORNIA +0,%5 PFICNE Std do='I September 1, 1983 Ms. Marilynne Lortie R94 Proposed Chapmantown CDBG State Office of Historic Preservation Project State of California P; 0. Box 2390 Sacramento, CA ""Ll bear 1~is Lorti E. r Enclosed is a co,v E the proposed ChapMantown C.D.B.G. Project. Please comment i, � historic properties in the Chapmantown Project area and procedures for ing with your regulations. Sincerely, Laura M. ;,,'uLtle Assistant 'Dl,anner Baae P t A N I I CbF �i/, i PLANNING COMMISSION T COUNTY C',N k.R E:pIv,Y r)ROVILUi rAt, IFORNIA 97 lvq PHONE 53+1-.tho) September 1, 1983 .bane Dolan, Chair RF: Chapmantown Community Butte County Board of Supervisors 25 County Cente- Drive DevClopmenL Block Grant Orovil e, CA 95.065 Dear Supervisor Dolan: The Planning nepartnent will file a finding of no significant impact and Environmental Review Record for Chapmantown in compliance with N,F,p.A. on September 8, 1983: The 9RR is available for review at the Planning Department office, 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, CA 95965,, between 8!00 aim, and 5:00 p.m. Monday - Friday. Sincerely, t Laura Iii" Tut t f�--� � LMZ:ksr Assistant Planner Bum j(/yw%Jg Ci W.' i, LAND OF PLANNING CflR,IMISSION 7 CC. NTY CENT!': [)R� VF • 4iftOM 1, F, CAUFORNIA 00e6 PHO NL' 5. t 1101 September l., 1783 Ward Connerly RE; Chapmantown Com1r (aiiL•y Connerly and Assoc., Inc. Development Ba.ovk Giant 2215 21st Street Sacramento, CA 95818 Dear Mr. Connerly: The Planning Department will file a finding of no significant impact and Environmental Review Record for Chapmantown in compliance wixl! N.E,.P.A,. on September E) 1983. The ERR is available for review at the Planning Department office, 7 County ;enter Drive, Orovil.le CA 95965, between 8:00 a.m: and 5:00 p.m.,, Monday Vriday. Sincerely, Laura M.(Tuttle Assistant Planner 114T `lest fr X46 pile �:.. 'Cog I I`. L A r,1) O F rs t I F J a� PLANNING COMMISSION 7COUNTY Ct NTE ' DRIVE OROVII I F, C;Al 11 C11RNIA 9576E PHONP 53.1 d6o September 1,, 1983 E 11 fiegional Office RB: Chapmantown Commul-F.f Ly 100 California Street Development Blocic (;[.r:jjjt San V ancisco, CA 94111 EPA Head office 01 m Street. S.Wi Washington, D..C, 2.0024 Gentlemen: Enclosed is an ERR on finding no significant impact on the proposed Chapmaatown Community Development Block Grant, Butte County, California. The contact person, for questions is Laura bI Tuttle, Assistant Planner of Butte County Planning Department, y County Center Drive, Oroville, CA 95965, telephone no, (916) 554'-4601. The Chief Executive Officer is Ms. Jane Dolan., Chair, Butte County Board of Supervisors, Second Supervisorial District, 25 County Center Drive, Oroville, CA 95965. - Sincerely, Laura*Tuttle kAssistant Planner sr Encl. � "ti f ENVIRONMENTAL REIVIEW RECORD A Butte County Board of Supervisors 25 County Cemex Drive Oroville CA 95965 (916) 534-4224 Chief executive Officer; Ms. ,lane Dolan, Chair, Butte County Boanj or Supervisors B. See California State Community Development Block Grant Program ApplLctation Program Narrative. C. See California Calixffon of Neighborhood," State C.D.B.G. Program Application Needs .�3tntement, "ceneral D. No comments reCeivea. r The proposed public facilities improvements and housing; rehabilitation is consistent with. both the City of Chico General Plan and.BLitte County General Plan. The City of Chico has identified Chapmantown as within its prima.- sphere of influence for projected urban growth and need for public services,. ;AMMMEMMMMWIN ENVIRONMENTAL RATING TACTORS Itetri >! J on the following farms Have been rated in accordance with the foll�twjn? criteria: A. The factor is acceptable. There are no special problems associated with this factor. Adverse impacts are negligible; other eCfecta are neatral or beneficial. B. The factor is questionable. Problems associated wiL h this factor call for discretion in granting environmental approval to the P),*0,jnct. AmelioratiVL measures should be pursued and may be mandated by specific environmental or program policies. Conditions and safeguards may be a p1:t,requisite for a-nroval C. The factor is undesirable or unacceptable. Problejj1H tlagociated with this factor are serious and rejection may be mandated by S)tOO;liic environmental or Program policies. Ameliorative measures should be VigOVpusly pursued. Ap!Aroval. should be allowed only upon specific conditions or sa.f(-x Uards, and only tnen by a careful, examination and comparison. of alternatives, N/A - the factor is not applicable to this project, F. SITE STRUCTURE -DESIGN SUITAI M Pro)ert has been examined with ILL PHYSICAL, FACTORS. reference to the effect on the (N!aiters Afftctitcg the Project) The + with the folluwing results: pro ect of ) enc ._h of the r,"Mors indicated below, s F'ACT`OR; RATING SOURCE/ BOCUMENTA,TION (1) Slope Stab.Iity A ; 1 (2) Foundation Conditions A 2 (.) Terrain A 3 (4) Soil Permeability (S) Ctound Water A 4 (f) Natur;.l Hazards A S (!) Idan-Made Hazards A (8) Nuisances A 7 (9) Compatab;lity in use and A 8 scale with environment A 9 (10) Neighborhood Character l A • See. U CFR S8,3(c) 24 CFR 58.1.5(b) 0 f` �,�,•,�• G. SITE•STfiUL•TURE•DE5IG41UITAI3U..iTYt SERVICE DELIVERY FAItS; (Riattcrs Affecting the .gra Project) The project has been examined with reference to the effect on the project of each of the factors listed below, both as such 'factors now exist and as they are programmed to exist, with the following results: .1 FACTOR: RATING SOURCE./ DOCUMENT.- ,.JC):V EXISTING PROGRA-MmED (I) Elementary Schools N/A N/A N/A (2) Junior and Senior High Schools N/A N/A N/A (3) Employment B A 11 (4) Shopping N/A N/A. N/A (5) Park, Playground and Open Space N/A N/A N/A. (b) Police and Fire B A "12 (7) Health Care and Social Services N/A N/A N/A (5) Transportation 0 A 0 (9) Water Supply System N/A N/A N/A (10) Sanitary Serer System C A (1 l) Other Services (specify) (1 1) Storm Sewer System C A 15 (I�) Solid waste Disposal A A 1.6 (14) Other Utilities (specify) (15) Paved Access to Site A 17 (lb) Radio and TV Reception N/A N/A N/A �PCTS ON SURROUNDING ENMoNMENT: PHYSICAL The project has been examined with FACTORS, t?datters Affected by the h� respect whether or not the Project will have P j any effect on the to ea�.ar o the surrounding environment factors listed below, with reference to with the following results; FACT0Rt RATING SOURCE/ DOCUMENTATION es or (]) Impact on unique geo7stabMty ;csources N/A WA (2) Impact on rock and so (3) Impacton soil erodability A I>3 (4) Impact on ground water (level, flow, A a - quality) A 20 (5) Impact on open streams and lakes (6) Impact on plant and animal lire A 21 (7) Impact on energy resources A 22 (S) Impact ,n, aesthetics and urban design A 23. r' A 24 See; 24 CFR 58,5(c)(d) t ( s See; 24 CFR 58,5(c)(d) 24 CFR 58,15(b) 7 M i 1, UIPACTS ON SURROUNDING ENVIRONMENT: SERVICE D the Project The 1 EUVERY FACTORS, (Mntler Affected by I project has been examined p with respect to each of the factors listen below, both as such factors now exist and as they are progranuned to exist, with reference to whether or not the project any effect on the surrounding environment, have with the following results: will — PA CTOR t RATING SOURCE/ PROGRAMMED DOCUMENTATION (1) Elementary Schools' (2) Junior and ;Senior High N/ /A Schools N/A N/A (3) Employment 7/A (4) ShoppingA 25 (5) Park, Playground and Open N/A N/A Space N/A N/A (6) Police and Fire A 26 (7) Health Care and Social N/A N/A N/A Services (8) Transportation C (9) Other Services (speclty) a. 27 (10) Water Supply System (l l) Sanitary Sewer System N/A N/A N/A (12) Storm Sewer System C A 2 (13) Solid Waste Disposal C A 30 (14), Other Ut'1ltles (specify) A A 3 i w (I S) Paved Access to SiteB (16) Radio and TV Reception A 32 N/A N/A N/A See; 24 CFR 58,5(c)(d) 24 CFR 58,15(b) 7 M i f. ti I1(PACTS pjv " SURROUNDING E Project) The project ph � been examined with res 1EN`r L: SPECIAL FACTORS, NYIRONAfE 'T to the effect of the project on such special h rc'Pc t to c (Matins of 21tc special factors listed bvloj v, with�eerencte { the fo11oWing results: AFFECTED BY PROJECT - * YESNOT (11 Flistur'c Properties ** NO NOT " ............. X 33 "Gari-,; out and document procedures sat forth at 36 CF *"Document this conclusion R Part $pp`"° FACTOR: RATING SU (1R CE/ bOC�1rtBN (2) Individuals and Pamtlles; 7ATIO:V (a) Displaced (b) Emplaced A N/A 34(3) impact on Social Fabric and Community N/A Structures A (4) Other Special Factorss 35 � PeciE}) N/A NIA See, 24 CPR 583 c 24 CFR 58J5(b) 8 F ; 1, The safety element map of the B.C.G.P. identifies the arta as having no potential for landslides. The area has slopes of 0-2% - C.S.,,,S., N,E.1/4 Chico 15' Quad, 2. The safety element - expansive soils man or the B,G.P, shows the area soils have no potential for expansivity, 3, U.S.C.S. N.E,7/4 Chico 15' Quad shows site has 0-2%Q slope, 4. U.S.D.A; Soils Man, Chico Area, CA,1925, shows site located on, vin.a ltsnm: characterized as well draining and stable. 5. Safety Element Erosion Potential Map BX -G -P, identifies site is located over area of 'heavy groundwater withdrawal. Groundwater has historically been available in large quantities in the Chico area. 6. No natural hazards are i,dent lied on site. Seismic Safety Map, Safety Element Map, Erosion Potential �1ap, Expansive Soils Map, Natural fire hazard Map of B.C.G,P. 7, "Project Design"s Man -,.wade hazards to be eliminated by the project include dilapidated, or unsafe, houses, flooding resulting frotr, lack of storm drains health hazards caused by failing septic systems.. g Field Observation. 9. & 10 Project Design a.zd field Observation: The project will be revitalizing the existing neighborhood and enhancing its positive characteristics. The public infrastructure improvements and housing rehabilitation will result in increased civic pride 11, Project development will, create jobs in both public and private sectors, exact figures are currently unavailable. 12 Program Designr, Police oliStudies on e shoran that neighborhood improvements may reduce the demand foce protection by eliminating blighted and deteriorated,. neighborhoods where high crime rates occur, 13. Butte County Public Works Plan: The project will install infrastructure improvements - street widening] curbs, gutters, sidewalks, storm drains and sewer lines, on portions of three roads: 'toucher, "B" and .Davis. 14, program Design specifies sanitary sewer lines will be placed on Boucher, "B", and Davis. The sewer lines will replace individual septic systems in an area of repeated septic failure, 15. Program Design specifies storm drain installation on Boucher "B" and Davis, to alleviate existing flood Hazards, 16, Solid waste Disposal, System is provided by private sector: The project will not directly make an impact on these services, An improved transportation system will indiroctly benefit the waste disposal suppliers through decreased vehicle maintenance and labor time, 17, Program Design includes transportation improvement", 18. The U,S.D.A. Soils Map, Chico area, California, Shows Project 10t.'Wed on vina loam soils. Vina loam is a recent valley alluvium, Found on 0-2'/', �,'tlopas with little or no surface rock present. 19. The Safety Element E..-osion Potential Map, B.C.G.P.,illdi,catos no erosion potential on site. 20. The Safety Element Erosion Potential Map, B-C-G,P., 1111OW? project site located over a large area of heavy groundwater withdrawal, 41-4 Lorica I ly, groundwater has been available to the Chico SoM.S.A. in JOI'me quantities. The project Will not impact the flow of groundwater. The lcvf,,,l 'K)f groundwater may be altered insignificantly by the construction of stoj,,111 (Irains, An existing health hazard caused by failing septic systems will be 01111111ated by construction of sanitary sewer lines, thus improving groundwater quality, 21. Impact on streams and lake can be separated into tWO 'Jognients., (a) flow levels and (b) water quality, (a) Storm drains will not alter the flow into Little Chico Creek, but will decrease the time -required before storm water -,;aches the creek. Anderson and Rolls, Engineers of the Master Drainage, Plan for Ch!PrauntOwn, commented that the storm loads carried by the Chapmantown outflow would reach the creek before upstream storm flows. This would repult in A sei)dr-lltion of peak flows'. thus limiting any Possible flood hazard, (b) Water quality will be the ''mpro"6 :rOm the Placement of sewer lines and elimination of failing septic systems. The Sphere of Influence study for the City of Ikico, lApCo, "Federal and State iqater duality 1979, y Standards mandate that Walogical oxygen demand (BOD) and suspended solid removal for a secondary Lre�7tmoLjt plant exceeds 85% removal, In 1.977 average BOD remov6l08 92% and avc-wrge Suspended solid removal was 94%," 22, The project Proposes infrastructure improvements for an already urbanized area, The nearest Plant and wildlife arca is located in and Alolig Chico Creek. The project -will not have a negative impact on the creek, (See 21 (a) & (b). 23. Project design specifies housing rehabilitation to be conducted in , with Chico Housing Impro -ooperation VOMent Program (CHIPS) and P.G, and E. Zero interest Program, (v1p). Tho P,G, and E. assistance to Persons of lowimodeincome Protlid�-38 zero interest loans and for insulation and other ener ratetechnica I gy conservation measures, The usage of energy resources will decrease as a result of the P,Gj and E. ZIP effort, 3. 24, Project design will result it, 0 Positive impact on aesthetics and urban design through the rehabilitation of substandard structures, 25, See No. 11 26, See No, 12 27, see No. 15 29. See No. 14 30. See No. 15 31. See No. 16 32. See No, 17 33. Ms. Marilynne Lortie State Office Of Historic Preservation P. 0, Box 2390 Sacramento, CA 95811 (916) 324-6086 Has given Butte County an initial clearance for prL)joct approval. It is unlikely any historic properties exist in the area, (Ann fterrington'Director of CHIPS)* However, -vie w:11 be complying with ani., y rerjul.-cillopt$ imposed by the State office of Historic Preservation. 34. Project design stipulates that "housing rehabiliti.1tiovi financing will be offered to homeowners, as well as owners of rental property, W1,10 agree t county's requirements regare'ng limiting rental rates and guaranteeing o 0 the aff'otdability of improved ten' ongoing rental units to the targeted income group.o Only housing units occupied by households in the targeted income group will be eligible for housing rehabilitation assistance.. Ann Herrington, Executive Director Of CHIPS)(916) 891-6931, feels the project will not have any ncgative effects causing the displacement of families pS past experionce with hosing rehabilitation i . CHI indicates most PrOPW-4-y owners will remain in their rehabilitated houses and home prices rise only OL term, x the long 35* Project implementation will have a Positive impact On social fabric and community structures in Chapmantown, k. There are to adverse impacts associated with, the, project. 0 f 0 a will be the revitalization of a declining neighborhood through B ne-ii I impacts improvements and housing rehabilitation, ugh, public infrastliLature Treatment of tnvitonm%:.,ntal rmraeta None required, M. Alternatives to the Project; '"L% alternatives discussed included (a) not acteptilIg tho grant) or (b) expanding the target area, Both are nor- feasible at the Projected level of funding il visible results are to be achieved, N. Conditions and Safeguards: NO conditions Or safeguards tare necessaryfor this 01 Level Of Clearance V.I.nditg., A request action significantly HtJD for release of funds for the described t. ificalltly affecting the quality of the human onvir Project is not In is requited, Onliler�t and nQ t-18 0. Level of Clearance Finding (Sontinued) Ti,e reasons supporting the above finding are;. (;1) 0110 target ars±; is n�; existing neighborhood with extensive development. (2) The proposed activities will improve living conditions for tis+ residents. Cleararce Procedure: (l.) A notice of finding of fto significant effect on the env;t.r0nni0t:it has been published and disc°aminated and a true copy of same is attoched> hereto as Exh Lbit 3. "2.) Public Hearings will be scheduled after the Initial Study and: IRR have L ,..en circulated by the State Clearinghouse and responsibly; �rt;ertcies have commented, Pi Certi.0 catio-: and release of funds; 1. A five-day notice was published on September 8, 1983y specifying that a request for release OR funds and certification Mould be submitted to HUD on. September 24,1.983,a true copy of the notice is attached as Exhibit 4. 2. Request for release of funds was submitted to iIU'n on September 24, 1983, and a copy of same is attached hereto as Exhibit No. 5 (VII), S. Approval by HUD of the certification and request for release of funds was received on r,�Ct`r 1 t i ' a.: 1. Duscribo the prol(,)sed urogram vias velecteti, CtLt't;ot 1 iricctne group. l STATS OF CAL11-tORNIA Butte county (Applj,7vCDW an t) RAId F'���EN�rative �. of Pj'ogram, including which identified rr�:C�d(s its anticipated ''� ----.� Impact on the need ) aro adds,,,�3red why , ��) , and its ilnpila' I on '��1�;�, The community development neighborhood improvement 'policy of Butte Count by high concentrations Of urbanized Y is to implement g n i zed areas of the Programs rams a and public facilit and moderate -income county which are charac�,, areas e deficiencies, This persons crazed been chosen in order to polfcy of nei poor fiousin deteriorating eas of achieve the neighborhood -tar conditions, of housing the County,greatest impact possible getting has g and fur lot" a and to preserve the ,s revitalizing income fami'lie5, county,s exist, inventory Butte County contains aver Very large 1oNr.income Population which suffer Problems of overpaying for housin housing is a major problem ' g and substandard hous�'ng cond' than the 6.4 substandard in Butte C . from tl7e the of figure re aunty: Housing canditions�arensi (Substandard Y recent survey of housing ported by the 1975 Census. much worse 9 conditions county -gide, This census is ----�..-. s however it seriously 2. Briefly describe how (Continued) all other i �ienti.fied needs will be Public facility improvements which are no completed addressed. In later years, howeve�� t comploied in 1983 Will ' 1983 will substant7a11 � each have to be with subsequent funding. Y increase the feasion O the � , Project which is improved �y of �amplet7ng the project. The Chapmantown-%lberr efforts of tioluntar Y Advisory Council is interested in Y labor to achieve additional improvements such Wide clean �;p, and Walk-ways'nstitutin9 Neighborhood for Children to the Chapmantown Elementary n neighborhood hoot, escribe local land use adversely pflli.ci:e Y affect s and other .. the program, local activities that could a) The Pacific Gas positively or their QIP loans and directectricweathed Chico Housing Iinprovolnent Program 6 Company has made a commitment t n granas to the ChapmantowriargeatiNg b y 9 will be performing outreach for t - The Git of Chico has :structured ` Offer housing rehabilitation financings Yob The other the count Iin ts 1,98 inc�orportedVelopment�Programvtces. Y and city programs will , portion of Cha 's impact in 'mprovin Complementin and p►aahtown, 9 Chapmantowr. gs n will enhance oath c Ghapm mora was a target arca under the count The 19$3 prograrnWill serve to complete , p Ys C08G program i.h 1977-r' . rovements started undj r their (Coli'rrlued) Butte County CDSG Pr( In'- Program Narrative Zx,a_ Cod Hued ...._ 40 suft undercounts the severity of housing deteriorate,.;. local surveys conducted county -wide which report a r,Thi higher incidence conditions than. the 1975 Census. T'hrs has been i`evealecl i,(rl"rrugh new housing for lower income IrouseThe ountyac4 rv" !. grsof ffu(,sj,arrdard Y pur.,urys programs to cc :Eruct housing represents erre most feasible sup r•fre existing inventory of and improvement of this supply pply oi' lo�vE -cont housing) and n"'nl.rrrt,ance nt y is central to the coonty's 7aliCy of housing provisions for the lower-income segment of the population. utt Housing Clement, page I1I.9 (Sen Program 5 b e County are central to the county's)housi�hborhoodu�ml�roverr►ents of in themselves have a meaningful impaPtlunle ; s hr,ue Public facility deficiencies ging mprovornc�rlts cannot are also corrocted, s- ..erious defcienc(,K, in the environment The Chapmantown neighbn"hood has been chosen far tf,c County', �r,,, development effort be P �• 'e i t is anc of two ,�rcas tY '' ,,)"3.t community concentrations of los income households, substandard housirrc deficiencies that pose a seriou,, threat to flie the County with the greatest i,e neighborhood ellvimidr0npublic facility Cmantowrr Nei hborhood TmP_rovem pro rar, Community devel ple't� act itres wi11 be concentrated of the Chaprnanto�vn neighbo►ihtie west of Jac; in a sevonte~en�-block area In order to concentrate activities son Street. This area has been chosen maximum program impact. Needs to benadhe a- ed of greatest need and to achieve which characterize 50% of the 150 dWellangs in thiti substandard housing c?nditions and public facility deficiencies; including lack o�' POrt*on of the ' and adequate Infrastructure. This comprehensive program of housing sewage collection, and public facility construction and re ► drains, sewage collection, will correct health and safety deficiencir� ng improve�,ent, With other activitiess in the tare 9 ill ation listed b parr rrt support aoea�na reh+ A11 activities will primarily benefiasha maJ ldsoicetin revitalizingthearea, Who comprise 90% of all households in the iieighborhood, targetted income group Anticipated rn act on identified needs; Of sever— 1�-`ty ve deficient Mousing units in the Project area through CDBG-'financed housing rehabilitatiRSn activities, forty will be treated units receiving minor repairs, and twenty receivilig major Gveatherization Program which'has been targetted ep1i i. Thew. twenty with CDBG housing rehabilitation, and will r repairs; The PG&E n this area; Will be combined the co,�unti,y development programa Federal dfunds soaddress the r,ot treated by also be maximized by use of an om. builder^ 1e GOdG program will homeowners to perforin part or all of housir) rehabilitation w reducing labor costs in each rehabilitati program, which allows qualified Particularly Interested in this cdmponent oft ork, thus substantially on p, o�ect. ChaCrmantoWn residents are he program, Housing rehabilitation financing will be ofrered to homeotivners of rental property who agree to the County's requirements regarding ' rental rates, and guaranteeing the afforaaequ s as well t, owners to the targetted income 9 9 17miting group, Only housing urritstoccupi„edr�byehoue�holdunins the targetted incorn”; group Will be eligible for S Occupied 'rehabilitation It is estimated` that; over half of the substandard units. ih th receive treatment through chis program, s ,dart housingtheproject ct tjssistance, weatherization assistance th►~ough PGS r n Prodi area will Program. &L s ZIP prograoi at�e,:t' urrlts Will receive m and weatherizatipn grant Page ;l Ot 4 . Public facility imprOments will include the most coefFective extensions, '. of existing improvements which were financed under the previous comr,,mlty divVlopment program in Chapmantown (1978). Sewer lines, storm dr&ins; and street improvt!III(s will be installed along three arteries in the project area: Boucher tAtreet, Davis (Beech) Street, and B Street. Improvements along Boucher Street will benuC'IL all residents of Chapmantown, as this is an entrance artery to the neighb(Thood. All three arteries are subject to flooding, and this condition will be cori lic ted through the community development Program. Impact on the targetted income 9LLuR- Community development activities will primarily benefit households in the Largetted income group. All beneficiaries of housing rehabilitation will be households in the targetted income group, Ninety percent of the beneficiaries of public facility improvements will be households in the targetted income group, as JCI% of all households in Chapmantown are below the targetted income limits. Expected benefits include removal of housing health and safety+ probl>~,rrrs and code violation;. unproved standards of living; guaranteed ongoing affordability of housing, roduction OF flooding in the neighborhood; removal of health hazards ouused by inadequate sewage collection, and improved pedestrian and vehicle safely through street improvements. 10 E 0 Bu4te County Cp�G Prj im iund Program Narrative - #3 Co( page g of 4 #6 ' earlier program d y e interest d) neighborhood Chapoadtoesidelbsrry Advisor Council was formed (1931 through in ihfluenc7ng the development dit°ec�'onrfoghthhs neighborhood The CMAC group is Very much in support of the county's community development program in Chapmantr+n, and will be instrumental in publicizing theprogramN nt in encouraging volunteer efforts to enhance community development improvements in the neighborhood. vand e) The. County Public Works Department has developed streetp ements that utilize only existing right-of-ways, and incorporateallis in ntot�n a 30 -foot street width: These designs will be more cost-effactiVe and more r to the residents of the neighborhood, as the need to remove improvements to yard set -backs will be avoided. acceptable trees or acquire front f) The count's rehabilitation program for Chapmantown will offer an owner -builder component, wM(h allows owners to perform all or part of rehabilitation v ,, thus reducing labor costs and increasing the impact of program funds, ro.k, 9) The Chico Area Recreation District is undertaking a mayor project in th Ce ter, and neighborhood, including renovation of the Chapmontown Recreation Center, and development of an adjacent park on land donated b , a cr'cation h) The County Public Warks Department has allocated Count y private developer. eneral be used for public facility improvements to compliment; CDOG program ffunds undi to ng. 4 �0 11 ' KM STATE O.F CALUMNIA. Butte Caunt _ CDbr, GRJ9 (Applicant) ) Activity Descriptjon Attach one form for each activity, .` 1. Activity Title: public Fac 2. Amount of r nni- 3. 4. 5. funds regUested for this activity: Activity h'unber S 205,000.00 'l'otaJ, nuilber of�.� Persons/households to benefit; 374 persons/4q� households Total nut�ber of ``` °-- persons/household's in targeted t income T,group to rauneiit; 337 persons/Total number of persons/households in lowest targeted inccmo att427 house o s g p to benefit:220 perso Fi Desc-ibe the activity, including its relationship to the ,hn��cpP the mast serious and basic need(s); and the nature of he applicant s 7 above. P,"obram and to s benefit to those i.dentifled Street improvements, sewer lines, and storm drains will be construct: I the project area: Boucher Street, Davis (Beech) Street, and B Street ed on three arteries Flooding will be eliminated along these streets, and offsite sewage col replace leach lines and septic tanks which frequently overflow(See n will in the neighborhood. Designs for street improvements have lection will all improvements within e;cistin r; and cause health problems yard set hacks or remove trees.g right-of-ways, been completed which alloy y a prPrludng the need to acquire front sidewalks on one side only. Streets will be 30 ftp+ in width and v.111 f,ave y. All residents in the neighbo,,hood will benefit, L00 of 7 Identifyany Y Potentyal environmental prnbletns associated with the actin aPP1 cant's plans to mitigate theme ' ,an, the Increased drainage runoff into Little Chico Creek Will require environmental but no sign' impact isM expected. Capacity of Chico sewer to handle increased collection will have to be assessed, but Mo problem is expected, assess„tent Pago — Of 2 8• Zdetitify other funds will be co(rrnitted to this activity during the grant Period. A• Cederal B State C. Lxal 0i Inecme from b;Igoing CntX activities '. Private Amount Source $ 12,000County General Bund whom are in the targetted income group, and 59% of whom are `in the lowest targetted income group. These improvements will compliment housing improvements and are an integral port of the neighborhood revitalization procss, They will remove serious threats to the health and safety of target zrea residents.. Since Boucher Street is an entrance street to the Chapmantown neighborhood, all residents will benefit from its improvement: Y STATE OF CALIF MI �E�►� 1 Butte County CDLGbGpAM (Applicant) Activity Description Attach one torn for each activity. ].. Activity Title: Activity Nunber 2. Amount of CDBG funds requested for this activity:r � 357 �,C1f7,00 3. Total ntrnbjr of persons/households to benefit: 4. Total number of persons/households in targeted income grow g p to benefit; l0G nerscns S. Total number of persons/households in lowest targeted inccrne group to households arson 6. Describe the activity, including; its relatjotiship to the applicant's program and to the most serious and basic need(s), and the nature of its benefit to those identified above. riith n the designated target area, 5001d of the 150 dwelling units contain code violations Fort; of the deficiant units Will be brought up to local building code standards through the housing rehabilitation program. Twenty units will receive minor repairs averaging $4,000 each and 20 units will receive major repairs averaging Rehabilitation services connected with the program will total $32'000 each. $32,500, (Continued) ?. identifyL any potential tential envirr►vmental problems associated with tbi 'Activity,*and the applicant's plans to "Mitigate them. None 8. identify other funds will be committed to this activity during the grant period. AMun Source A Federal $ 6;000 Office of Community Services B. State (Rehab Supervisor) C. Local. n. I.nccme from ongoing CD 3S activit%es y 8ttimated repayments of 'ow ihteri loans oriOOOJr gillated with thi,s fund, Ir E. Private 1551500 P.G. & E ZIP Loans & Weathoei ati( F= in Kidd $100;000 Property owner labor (estimated at *includes amount for Chapmantown neighborhood, onside at $10)000 for° 10 units) immediate target areak Butte County CDBG Prf am - Activity Description -/ .inti nued Housing rehabilitation financing will be structured to be affordable to both the ��" targetted income group, and the lowest targetted income group, Lo�.1 interest g g p g tL loans and deferred loans will be offere Owner occupants and owners of rental hroperty will be eligible to apply for loans, as long as all beneficiaries ale ouseholds below the targetted income limit. Rent limitat;iolis will be requirod in connection with loans for rental property. PG&E TIP loans and direct weatherization grants will be targotted also to the ChapmantoWn neighborhood. These services will be used in combination with DDB G- funded loans, and to address units not addressed by the CABG program: The housi;g rehabilitation program will offer an owner-builder component which allows qualified property owners to do all or part of the rehabilitation work themselves. This will save on labor costs for each rehabilitation project. The CcnSUlting firm of Connerly & Associates, Inc., a firm speCializing in housing and community development and experienced in implementing housing programs will be retained to provic:e rehabilitation delivery services as well as providing general administration. In addition, the Chico Housing Improvement Program, (CHIP) a non- profit organization, will provide low cost rehabilitation supervision and assistance for houses rehabilitated under this program. y 1( } Page 1 'cifFCR E 1, State of Ca+ fornix STATE USE O?YI,Y , . , Butte County CDf3G Program Grant ht;mbar (Applicant) Grant Effective Date General Administrative Activity tach one form; for such activity. Total Budget Personnel Supplies/ ,ServicesWteria�.ls Services/ Utilities Contracts Capital Travel O�Etlnys Other Other Ot G, x. State, b. Federal 7.5 1 00 cr Other State d.. Local e. Program Ineorre f. Private g, `I'tyrAL 1 000 3.- Projected Quarterly is r. 2n ' r. Expenditures (State CDBG Only) J A S 0 N D 3r r. 4:t4 Q r. 5t J M Ar FS J d I <r. 6t r. 7t A r. 8th r. ytt� r. l0 h A I S 0 N D 10,600 17,600 24,600 31,600 33,500 37,500 Envi ronmew:aT Assessment. On-going Administration: X-=�__- _�----- - --- -- ----- --- - ------ ---X Audit woe 1 � 1 SME CFC11 UCU RR SME`LRE,, COY I. Butte County _�3G A�,a�4 Activity Rti `y Gmnt Effective ate _ tCPI1TrIY IdiYtiIR AN) MUR 3, lbtal' ajiget. a.; State CLQ b.. Feda7al c. Otf ger State d. Thi e. 2P- gt2m Incom f. Ft- vate . Genzr-,711' �dm� ni stration37,500-- -- 37, 500 I Housing Rehab iTitati_on 624,000' 357,500 6,000 2 Publ c FacflitiL,5 100,000 5,000 155,50 Improvement 217,000 205,000 12,000 4 1LJPAL' a• 600, 000 b. 6, 000 c d112, 00 e. 5, 000 x.155, 50 E D IT1 ! Cs E Cts C Y 5- 15t ' 2rzi 3zti 4th 5th �� 7th ` 8tr9th Qtr - loth Qtr ' 50.6'00 5r' � Page: 1 STATE OF' CALIFOMIA, 2. Activity # I FUZ STATE USE ONLY Butte County CDDG'; "pROGRA, Grant �Numher CAPPlicunt Grant EI fedi°.e l,tte 3'.: Activity Name: Activity Budget and Schedule Housing Rehabilitation Attach one form for Total. Personnel Supplies/ Services each.:vl.vit / Capital y- Budget Services tinter als Lftilities contracts IYavel Outlays , m x 4. a. State CDBG 500 h Federal 6,000 1 000 32 500 324,000 c. Oilier State 6 000 d- Locaji 100,000 - - e-. Program Income 5 000 10 f Private ,. g. TOTAL 155,500 4 000 5,000 x_2000 .1,.000. ' 42,500 130,000 350 500 I lin --n 10: Proj;ecteci CrLtarterl it lst Qtr..2nd qtr. 3rd Qtr. 4th Qtr. 5th Qtr. 6th Qtr. 7 Expenditures (State CUf3G Only)- — th Qtr.,Sth Qtr.. Qtr. ,1 40,000 140,000 240,000 320,000 357,500 bttlestones J A S 0 N 0 J' E F i M+ A M j J JAS 4 R 0 a. Outreach/Marketing; x-------' -------- b_ Receive Applications -- -------- -- ---X c: process A plica. P tions x------- -------- d.; BuiTding Inspections ------- -------- ----------- - -x e-r Loan Approvals K--- --------- ----------------- 1- Cons;truct%'on x---------- -------- g.. Inspections X- -------- ----------------- --- - -x h. Final Inspections X- -------------X ---- ---------- -------X I -------- ,- -��- Qtr. ,1 STATE- OF CALTMMIA c BUTte COUnt Activity ' FE?? STATE USS 41'LY Y CDBO PftOGP,AM' Grant Number Act �it�ntj 3 Activity Ft�rne'' Gra?)t Effective Geste ' y'Budget and Schedule Public Facility Imprar-Ments Attach one form for Total Personnel Su each activity. Ppiies/ Z;t,V Budget ices% Ctal Services hp Materials Utilities cbntracts Travel 0 0_jtlays Otter Other a- State �P�G h. P�eral. 05' 000' in 00Q .- 175 000. cr Other State d. Local Prla : e. Program income 12 000 f, Private g TGTA.I, 217 000 30 000' 187,000 15. Projected Quarterly Ekpendiiures (State :'►JBG. Ist tr, 2nd Qtr. 3rd Qr. 4th Qtr. 5th Qtr. 6th Qtr. 7th Qtr. 5th Only} ttr. Q 9th Qtr. 10th G. Milestones 5,000 140,000 205,000 J A s o ry o J F M A M J J�--- a. Engi'neerirrg A S [ b'. Bid ]Documents Prepared, x ----X C. Sid Opening X -----X d.. Bid Award x R - A Cons r fr Final inspection X---- X X BUTTE COUNTY CUBG PROGRAM 0r 3 NEEDS STATEMENT General D s i� _,.-.~-----c ri tion oft_ h� Nei i hbo rhea d Chap+'nan Conn i s a eastern f�ortion omedium-density residential she neighborhoodthe City of Chico neighborhood which ty,it is City and the adjacent uninc r iriclode, tllu south- Butte county, it is economic; situated within the tett, the Cit mically, sociall a itorialpr� Isd arfon Although y of Chico. Originall y and Politically ,Jul"i�sdictian of characterized by extreme residential vdecd 11870'sy very n►ucli a Of public facilities n the , Chop,,r+,rtt,c Is of traffic circulation , substandard aye environmental presently and tonin substandardclotns bl iGll�t a severe controls patterns lack of in('r�r,1;►"ucturefaulty sizes, and ir7asf�+rlu��te In 1980, approximate) Planning pts►":tion of G�ha Y 1.,000 persons in 449 In unincor Pmancown. According households resiclry Pasted Chapma 9 to the 1980 Census -30.2% d ih the county level', Of the 449 houselio l ds ern rthe is in o 30. X a f in the targetted n household i persons residing in the lowest targetted reg. ncmes below the stoup (belo►,� 402 (89:5„) had household poverty In 1980 was Betted income 17 000) and 264 incomes 7443. group (below $9,450)• T15e mediaad household In addition to the low Income n household income de the The 1980 es of area age or older, households census in that 53.'� the .cousin a private c Over 70x6) of the 4% y stock is vasty essp001 or 489 housing units in of !nits were 40 years of sur veY co ducted in February, tank, for sew! e the neighborhood 40/ of nits were deficient When _ 9 collection, A huus�n utilize Luilof l irr unincorporated Chapmanto4�n indica 9 ' of the Uniform en measured a 9 condition Housing Code, against Chapter 10 ted that Chapmantown r y Substandard of lower i rich J one of two areae It hat me household ” �n Butte Count been identified b s, deteriorated y with the greatest area ,•nom y the 8utte C housing, and Public. concentrations community deVelopment effort., County Board of facilit Slr'�brViSorS a5 3y deficienciPS', Priority a STATE OF CALIFORNIA Butte County CDBG PROGRAM (Applicant) Needs Statertnt I. Brici.ily describe and c,ocument the serious and basic housing Although all of the Chapmantown neighborhood � dwellingunit conditions. are ,- d contains older, tatiter-iorated frriusing, _ worst in the unincorporated sccLion of the neighborhood. A survey completed in February, 1983, indicated that 40% of all units in Unincorporated Chapmantown were deficient when measured against standard, of the Uniform Housing Code (Chapter 10, Substandard Buildings). Ing problems, including inadequate foundations, and facmlitye4� (�unc ies were structural of the dwellings were not Performed, g ion, inshazpections remises, and fault materials rrned�nwtr�ct7on. Although interior inspections y because of the age of the structures. �4 majoridtylufbthe dvCl1ireigs1area40 cearsni Of age or older. y Deteriorated housing conditions are concentrated in the western Portion of t he 2. Briefly describe and docirnerit the serious anc basic eccnWIL devejopmen�- needs; (Cont: Y. 1. ar~epneededntosincreaserilY rasdenti neighborhood: While employment•;,:. of the neighborhood is tedmes of to theheconomydofithehCi�treo�' the employment�A�seun��jes the ,jurisdiction of a community development effort inythe unincorporatedis oarea de � of Chapmantown. Programs to improve housing and pu"blic facilities in the should incorporate efforts to Offer such work to local residents whei•lev- neighborhood er possible, 3. Br-efly describe and doctment the serious and basic public facilities needs: The neighborhood's lack of adequate infrastructure and public racilities ' in its urban setting surrounded by the Cit of Chico is dramatic Is the overall factor prohibiting incorporation of the neighborhood the City of Chico. p f ,.Sew aoe Collection: the ma,icrrity Of structures In on private sewage disposal systems, consi8tjng ofCsepticttankown ��and�lea�h�1 are Septic tank and leach line failures have occurred and can be expected to benas problem in'the future The iratensity of development in the neighborhood re .1 1quires 44 tviefly describe and docunent the other serious and basic nucds; Cont,:' Land Use & 7oin Controls; The Chapmantown community is literally a "dumping ground" for land uses considered undesirable elsewhere. zoning controls coupled with the transition of the neighborhood lack of adeqat to ghbprhood from -a rural artOrientation) tdshrJhkiyards substan dardtrailers, andautodsmalersthlocaet�ugott the nelghbu,kood i Pagca r l7J ricighborhood, west ackson Street, W 50 ere over ' the units are substalidard. • The to+v incomes of area residents mak cantly Public assistance is needed e private rehabilitation financing fare Payment rehabilitation loans, as a majoriin ty ofrloterloncomeehost and deferru�cfo� overpayjjlg for housing. y Assistance is needed for owner-occupantsi�ancdlsfQ► Birt ad Of rental property who agree to limit rental rates to affordable condition of receivJ19 a rehabilitation loan. About one -ha levels as Ci Chapmantown are 'renter -occupied: if of units 'iri Needs Statement #3 Continued; that a sewage system be :onStructed' as the pr" sei�t s' sewage collection is a tnreat to the health and safsItuaty tIoj,jOV inadequate individual A sewage collection system, tonce instal lei,, could be conn u' c.1r nts. Chico sewer system, Engineer - the reports on the cost ectecl to the city of the 152 -acre Chapmantown area indicate project cost would e of sewer iwonstruction in cost estimate), Local funding through the formation of an assessment would be impossible, because of the ht incomes of m xseed 1,Q0istri (1978 most residents. district Infrastructure- 'E ;,p neighborhood's infrastruct;ire is Completely inadequate; streets are tao narrow and are in need of repair ;and in some th,a neighborhood has no storm drainage system and flooding is ca months; and curbs areafi are impassable; gutte s and sidewalks are nonexistent, rrmon during winter A stcr--, drainage study completed in 1977 indicates that drainage system could be constructed to provide gravity era•` an underground storm drainage with discharge 'into little Chico Creek, The constructionvitmage from oast to Was begun in 1979 witia tile assistance of C08G funds long four sure neignborhaod: Pari the rest of Cha ma, of this system along streets without ct;rbs or butters for 2500 Leet ttor'mwatero etc in thep rtawn, however, must flow overland The absence of defined drainage channels or water�cours reach little Chico Creek, isolated basin during storms"; es makes each street ars street resurfacing and curbs automobile and pedestrian traffic and to aid in storm dr gutters and side;�alks are Glso needed to facilitate Will also L•ncourage private invest in the neighborhaalna e,, p 9 Such im ravements repair of e>�isting ds,ellings and new enns�ruction of units1anhancang stcck the area, , including vacant lot in h FC�4MAT VI is `7 NOTICE OF FIND)NG OF NO SIGNIFICANT EFFECT ON Ti -IE I ENVIRONMENT' 'Date.:, 9/8/83 _ Butte County Tioard o.0 Su ervi:5ors 25 County' Center Drive oruvillo, CA 9596- Name4224 (91G) 534 ( , Address, zip Code and Telephone Number of Applicant) TO ALL INTERESTED AGENCIES, GROUPS AND P1= RSONS; The above named (City) (County) proposes to request the U,S. Department of Housing and Urban Department to relErase Federal funds under Title I of the Housing arid Commnr )ty Development Act of 1974 (PL 93.30) to be used for the fo1)owi11s project: Chapman I totnl (PROJECT, TITLE OR NAME) Community Rehabilitation (PURPOSE JR NATURE OF PROJECT,) Chapinantown, Butte County, CA (LOCATION -CITY, COUNTY, STATE -OF PROJECT) S878,,5oo, (ESTWATED COST OF PROJECT) It has been determined that such request for release of funds will not nGrst)tute an action signlfi• candy affecting the quality of the human ensiron• m-ent anti; accord!4Y, the nboye•narrted (City) •insert flat` or first put•,lkadg)m 22 (COJnty has coed riot to prepare an Envirestt, `' t mental Impact Statcrrterat tinder the National t:rt= Vi;onmental P(Ilicy, Act (if 1969 (PL 91.190); The reasons for site), 6"Ision not to pt l ;ire suc} Statement arc as fol o,. (1 The target arr,r,r; in an existittp Eel' hboxhoad with t`ss t ctjsive develr� trtcat t,. (2) The proposecl nvtjvities Twill �itttprove living t (�t' the resid+entt-,q, (Set forth reasons for An EnvironmNntal 1'Zerr�w Rccord respcctng the project has beer, hr,it)eby the above-named (City) (County) which dur.,,,rritrivs the environmental review of the project find mute fully sets fort reasons why such Stt�tc�trrent is h the not re u; fort This Environmental i:ev)ew iter ofd is on rile at lite above address acid is avail,ible for public e;tamina- ,tion and Copying! upon rcrlua,,,, at Room eutro Comity between the 1^.., R of8-a1:L—arid 7 County tnter I)r•, - iPanning .Dept, braville, CA 95965: (If applicable) No further cnvirortmental review of s"eh project is prox,ed to be conducted, prior to the request for release of Federal funds. All interested agencies, Woups and persons dis- agreeing with Oil$ decision are invited to subm)t Written comments for catL"lderation by the (City) (County) to the (office of the undersigned) (other specified place), Such written comments should be received at (the address specified) on or before conflate a All csuc)t commtnts so received will be onsidered and the (City) (Count will not request the relr.ase of Federal funds or Like any admin)s- trative action on the within project prior to the } date specified in the preceding sentence. Ms. Jnne_Dolan, Chair liuttte County board of SuperVti.aors 25 k"ounty Centre Drive `Uzo`v`a 0 s (516) 5,14-4224 (Name and Address of Chlcf P'xecutive Officer of Applicant) •Gnat lrss thnn IS days after data of W1 publlcatlo& 112 A -Ey1I7131 T #5 FORMAT VI NOTICE E TO PUBLIC OF REQUEST FOR RELEASE OF FUNDS Butte County Hoard of Supervisors. 25 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 ---------------------- (916) 534-4224 (Name, Address, Zip Cccie of Applicant) and Telephone Number TO ALL INTERESTED AGENCIES, GRoUp.S AN PERSONIS: On or about(date) the above-named (City) ,(County) will request the U -S, Npartment or Haus. frig :and U; in Development to release Federal funds under 'Title I or the Housing and Community Devel- oilmen t Act or 1974 (PL 93.383) Fort the following project, Cha t5ntantoorn (PROJECT, TITLE OR NAME) Comraunity Rehabilitation (PURPOSE OR NATURE OF" PROJECT)., Chapmantown, Butte County, CA (LOCATION=CITY, COUNTY, STA11r•q S $878,500. (ESTIMATED COST OF IiI70JECT1 An Envirortme.ntal Review Record respecting the "4thih project has been Made by the above -inured (City) (County) which documents the environthrrital review of the Picilbct, This Environmental Review Record is on rile at the above address and is available for public examination and copying, upon request, 23 (Name or applicant -will undntal;c. t h described above with Block Grant Wndsfrom �jthe U.S. Department of Hou$ing and Urban D^;;nlop. ment (HUD), under Title I of cite Housing Nod Community Uavelopment Act or 1974, (twjite of ap llran-) is certifying tD hitifs tliat (nolle(, Of aPp/lcanr)and (chief exerdrNe 4"�t"['icep or othet or pi. Cer of npplica,ar ePfrrt)+,ed by m'tGJl7l, in his/her orficial Capacity as (ojf,"cej, consent to accept the Jurisdiction of the Fcderal courts if an action is brought to enforce responsibilttier, In relation to enriraruner,ta! teviews, decisfonrital tttl„ and action. and that these resp ;)nslh lttlo* h;trey l)ccn satisfied. The legal erfewt of the ccrtifij acinic h that upon its approval, ,rnam.e of applic,znq ,,y use the Block Grant funs s, and HUD will h;tve salis(Ied its re� sponsibilities under the Nation,ti Satisfied its t.e. Policy Act of 1969. HUD will accept an objection to its approval of the roemc of Funds and accep- tance of the certification duly if Ll 1,� of, one of the following banes: (a) T'nat the certification was t,ot In fact executed by the chief exc4utivc officer or + other officer of applfcant approve(, by hfUD; or (br that applicant's environrrteMal review record :far the Project Indicates omission of a required decision, finding, or step applicable to the project it, the environmental review Process, Objections must be Prepared and submitted in accordance with the required ptecedure (24 CIR Part SS), andmay be addressed to HUD at (complete Dred office address, or the Denver kegtonul Office address in Region other othr Objections to the release of funds on bases than those stated above will not be considered by HUD. No objection received after (d(7tF_ of last day in the 1544Y period) 1A41l be considered by HUD, ris , .Jane Dolan. Chair Butte County Board of Supervisors 25 County Center Drive Oroville CA 55965 (916) 534-4224. (Name and Address of (.hlef E,xecu"tivc Officer of Applican t) 9/2/53 PF:ESS RELEASE (To be released 9/$/83) NOTICE TO 141B PUBLIC The Butte County Board of 91,ipervisors, 25 uounty Center Drive, Otoville, CF1 95965 proposes to request the U.S. Department oC Hu,"sittg and Unc,111 Development to rel Fu 'Federal Funds under Title I of the Hosing and Qommunetise ity 1iovK `l.t,tl�ttent Act ofrcl (PL 93-38) to be used for the following project;Chapmiti.t,t)tvil �;tinutiuruiy Itehw�L�lit�ttr�ii, Chapmantown, Butte County, CA. $stimated Cost of Project; $8 °t 78;.500 The Zi.vironmental Review Record for this project is on file .fit the Butte County Planning Department, 7 County Center Drive, Oroville Ort 9596"l, � E`ttaeet► the hours Of 5:00 a.m. and 5:00 p:m. Monday through Friday. All interested agencies, groups s and Persons disagLee ngi'tks this decisiona1, invited to submit Written comments Por consideration by the County to the Butte County Board of Supervisors, 25 County Center Drive, Oroville, CA 9,5965.. Such v written coctirrtents should be received at said address on or before S,epttumber 24, 1.9831. All such com=rents so received w;C),1, be conaidered and the. County tui ,l. not request the release of Federal funds or take any administrative action on tilo within project Prior to the date specified in the preceding sentence, a. POO NOTICE OF FINDING Or-- No SIGNIFICANT EFFECT ON THE ENVIRONMENT RuLt--e-COUnLY Board of 5�'!,Lq�7visors 25 Coanty Center Drive OrOville, CA 95965 _(11.6) 514-41L4���� I TO ALI, INTERESTED AGENCIP.S, CROUPS AND PERSONS, Tho above'natned (City) (county) Proposes to request the U4 Dezpart.rnent of Depart Housing and LJbaai rtent to release Federal funds Under Title or the 140USITIR and Community D"Ve Of 1974 (PL b 10Pment Act project, 93-�83) to be used for the 1,0110MrIg ChrnPMantovn Community' Butte Co fl t .--$878�50o, (E-STIMATZ0 COST Or PROJECT) It has been determined that such request for release of funds Will not constitute All action signifi. cantly alTecting th,, nlrnt �wld. acoor&qUallty, of the human environ. 91yo tfr0 AbOVO-Jlamed •tnsrrt date OtAvxt PublicatIOIL (County has aww'*'d not to Prcl)arc an Envir mental Impact S, 01 VirOhmental Policyatell'30111 under the National 1,1;. ?Ict Of 1969 OIL, 91,190). Tho rcpsol)s for such det;lsion not to P SVI Statement are as follow (1 '11 le target: nal iborlionei 111P, W L11 0_\tC!1 (2) lq�L�nt. The PrOPosed activiti., twill 3'Mprovc! living 'Onditions re ell ts (set forth 1 reasons for decjsIuj An EnVironmentgI p within a �q. project CCOtd resptclinq ale county) has been M-Ddo by tile atlo��aqlanled which doctinjent' revi of the P tine 611VIrorunenla, project and 111ore MI 10"Ons why such ,,, Y -',Cts forth the *r""t 's Not r6clu" ed, Thu; Environmental thtL ir above address and Record is On Me at the )d is avall4ble 6 .tion and copying, upon ,,u,,r0r public extunin I a as between the hours or��UL_and 0 ' "oom -EL-UP- County � D -Ulll— Planning 7 county CenteT Dept. (if applicable) No ru�therj OrOville, CA 9 or cn�.Iroru 5965. such tell L31 review projo.ct 1 5 P"iPosed to be conducted o the request , prior for release of Federal funds, I-eSte(l All interested O'ge"ICS groups and Persons dL- agreeing with this decision at-- invited to submit Written comments for consideration by t]he (City) (county) to the (office Of the Undersigned) (o I Y) specified place), Such written Lller rece"ed at (1.110 Pddress pc0tmank Aould be (*date). Ajl t1l,, .'h ecified) all commorents so received walbefore be .12 4 Considered anti (Ile , the release (Cit)') (Count)) will inot request or pp�-101;11 funds or 'e ;i')Y 9drnirds- tratlye RCLIOD 011 (ht, %, trtK date SPecirled in �Ihin Project Prior to the the Preceding sentence. -tl—s Jin� Doloh, Mar Butte c �nt--- ouy bon . r (1 0 f S U. P e 25 obunty Celltcr Drive (916) 5A-4224 (Name and Address of Ci Iaf Executive 0al of-pplicant) not Icss t}t" 15 days hfIct d"d of this publlcadoti. *Dato correctod r -1-011I nc)ticc, Pub't 4 0l UNITED STATES POSTAI. v 00MCIAL 13U01Nm cr, ' r CENALtY Con OANAte SENDER INSTRUCTIONS .0 , USE to AVolb PAYMW Print ytiur namo, addrass, and ZIP Code in a mm Comploto Items i, 2, And 9 oft th worse, "+t`s MAIL a +' Atimch to front of ortlele it silica perm3u arharwiro mffix to bark of mrtioia, Worm articlo 4otum hocmlpt Requestoul edideotit to Irumbot. IRETUEiN TO'Ct. (Num of SCt1t2u) J % c i s t n t: t Ty WMr41JTMA Ortwille ; CA. 95'9 ?VrAul� l (City, Stilte, and ZIP Coda), -RASI t4 w" a4`itf CnrapTera items 1, Z and 1. _ Add your ad dress In 0W -REnMN TCrsP2— a. 0 1_ 'Iht; fotlou'iR4:•tr'rirc Is rca'}nesled (:.fust one,)' �ac, Show to whomm sr.: state ddtvered. ........ —(t Show tet Wzkom, date s t3 address o[ delivery— RESTRICTED DELrVTRY m Show to whom and elate delivered.----- ._.. ©', RESTRICTED DEIAVERY' Show try whom, dam, and address of dcivery;S_...- (CO-,4SULT' Po ---D A..`TER FOR f BFB :Z AATiCCEAODRESSED`tTyOs?.;y[�. +- M REGISTERED NO. CERTIFIED NO' ( JNSUREII NII 7q-71 q,61 m - 'S {AI-naysobtain sipnaWts:of'r dressaeota9an!}. .m.I M : 1 harm received the article described above SiG-7ATuRE QAddressea QAuthad ed agmt, a ADDRE54.1CO-Piem WAX If mow; F1 *GPO: ` 1879+28$.848' FORMAT VI #A NOTICEOF FINDING OF No SIGNIFICANT EFFECT ON THE ENVIRONMENT `Gate: Butte County Board of Su ervisors 2a CaunLy Center Drive Crovil].c, Cr1 95965 (916) 534-4224 (Name, Address, lip Code and Telephone Number of Applican t) TO ALL, INTERESTED AGENCIES; GROUPS, ANIS PERSONS: The above-named (City) (County) proposes to request the U -S, Department of Housing and Urban Department to release. Federal funds under Title I Of the Housing andCommunitor y Development Act project: (PL 93-353) to be used for the following pr Chnprn, ntotrn (PROJECT, TITLE OR NAh1E) Community Rehabilitation e (PURPOSE OR NATURE OF PRt)J Tj Chaprnantocan, Butte Cout�V 'CA (LOCTION,CITY, COUNTY, STAT&OF p p E $878,5oo. (ESTLkA'i . COST OF PROJECT) It bas been determined that such request for release of funds we' not constitute an action sip,nifr• cantly affecting the quality of the human envlront anent and accordingly, the above.namad (City) 'in3crt date bf fist Publication: 22 ast (County has.ded riot to prepare an tnvirt�tt• menta: Impact Statoment under the National 1:nR vfronn)cntal Pulicy Act of 1969 0"L 91.190)„ The reasons for such decision not to pfel)rrte such Statems: Statement .to as follow (1) The target areas is an existi,11a hborhood with e;.t an8ive devel�rL?met�:t. (2) The prr,posecl act vities �a11I inr grove living conditions for the re irl)%nt rr (Set fort!) reasons for decrsrtyn) �~c An Environrns:r►tatl lhor•�ry Reeord r_esp4ctit)i, tl)e Within project has been rn:rde by tine abcvc•named (City) (County) i.hfch docur)ictits the environmental review of the project and vinic fully sets for(he reasons Why such Siriternrnt is rlot requ;red, This Environmental I evieW Rer,ord is on file at the above address Lind is ivatiable for public examina� tion and copying, upon request, at Room _Zli tto County between the hours or&,11>r811d 7 County Centex .Dr,. �"' Planning Dept, rovilleCA (If applicable) No further emirnm ntal,, review 95965. Of` such protect is ploposed to be conducted, Prior to the request for release of Inderal funds, All Interested agencies, groups and persons dis� agreeing with tliis decision are Invited" to subrrut Written cornmer)ts for consideration by the (City) (County) to t}re (office of the undersigned) (other specified place), Such Written comments should be received at (the address specified) on or before 60risl die �Jl such comments $o received Will be the release and the (City) (County) will not request the release of iltrl fundS or LAC .any adminis. trative acUnr) onedelthe v4t1gn project Prior to the date specified in the preceding sentence. NI�Jane Dolan.Ch Butte County J30a e, of Super,iso—' rs 25 County Center Drive nova e, (916) 534-4224 (Narhe and Address of Chief Executi Applicant) Ye Officer of ••not less t}lari 15 day, tter dStr Of this pubucaubtt< 9/24/87 Olin FI B, a me, LAND 0 F NATURAL VILAI 'I'll AI.t.f tif ALj ry PLANNING COMMIMON 7 COUNTY CV,ITER DPIVE - OROVIt I [, LA41F1jPN1A 01065 PHONE 1;110001 AUgIlSt 9, 7.983 Connorly 0, Associates, TTIC. 2215 - 21st Stl-Lct Sacramento, CA 95818 :attention; Steven IV. Baker Deal' Steve: The initial environmental review Study has bean Completed for the Community Development Black Grant, ChaP1117ntown Housing ReLabilitation and Public Viorks activites, and a Negative Declaration is be"119 recommended. We are forwarding the original checklist to you for your use. Shoald you have any questions, PlOsSe contact Laura Tuttle who is an Assistant Planner in our office, SiAcerel,p, A. Kircher Planning Director tAK:lkt Enc. Cc: Jane Dolan cotinerly & associates, inc. ward connorly COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT HOUSING STUDIES COW14 LINSAN PLANNING uUlioca 4) 1, 'J OTOVI'lot July 27, 1983 his. Bettye Kircher, Plunning Director Butte County Planning Department 7 County Corter Drive Oroville, Culifornia 95965 Door Bettye: As You may be aware, Butte County was awardo(j (j Community Development Olook Grant for housing rehabilitalJon and public v,orks activities in ChOPMantown, One of, the grant requirrmonts is an environmental review or thra program's impact under both NEPA and CEQA, which I UndervLand will be performed by your department-. In the past, this grant program was odmini8terod by the federal governmenti however, the state took Over, administration OF the CDBG program for the First time oris year, As a result of delays associated with doing the program For the first time, the state has not Yet issued the management manual which details their requiromenta For the environmental review and also contains the forms the state will want used. The CDBG staff has indicated that the environmental review will essentially need to meet both CEQA and NEPA) and, although the rOvOls are not out yet, "Lhe questions to ask and people to 001-IbOct will be essentioily the some,, r,,.g any other environmental assessment. We would like to avoid waiting until we octijally receive the appropriate forms 1-orore starting the environmental assessment (although obviously we will have to receive these forms �O finish the asuossmonL) 80 L`at we can begin the rohobiliEotion proqrnm as 800M as possible. I have enclosed a copy or the full aPPIic0t,iOn 08 approved by t1,10 state and sections or Other documents which are applibablo. Wolild you please review this information and let me know if you need anythingfurther to start Public Wo art or) environmental 03300sment* The rka Department can boat anbwet your quoscions 011 the public worj<8 improvements and you m8Y cOntOOL me For further in�ormotio-n an the rehabilitation Portion or the program, 2216 21st STREET SACRAWNTO, CALIFORNIA 06818 (916) 466-4784 CONSULTANTs, Ms. Bettye Kircher Butte County Planning Department July 27, 1983 horde two Please let me know how Z can best assist you ' i this 1)r0jnct. I will forward immediately any nfarm:pLf.(,ir7 wo rec�._ve from the state on the envie A nmental aa:)(,ssmej L Thank you for your assistance. Sinctrely, �W, l:even E3ak�r SWB/ks Bncls cc: Supervisor Jane Dolan -0 11 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ADMINISTRATION CENTEr' 25 COUNTY CENTER 'RIVE . OROVILLE, CALIFOR141A gjqf�S Talepholia. 916/534-4224 ALFRED J, "ARACEN1 ;ANE DOLA4 13EFZTHA hM$CL.t-Y District I Disloci 2 01*11141 4 HILDA WHEELER CHAT"; LEN PULTWj District 3 D'oticl 5 March 10, 1983 Pulln (-'0- Planning Cfttl%l Sheri Byrd 3 1983 State CD8G Program 1001 0 Streeto Izoom S03 Orcvitie, Galltow,4 Sacramentoj California 95814 Deat Ms. Byrd: Enclosed is the Butte County application fjr a Community Development Vlock Grant under the Small Cities Program. The program Outlined in this application involves housing tetlabjliiatioh, public works improvements and the eliminiatiz)n of blight in Chapm6ntk)wn, This program will enhance the county's efforts to correct the most seve-re housing rehabilitation and public works needs, The activities outlined in the application are designed for the primary benefit of 10W and moderate income persons, We look f0rWZird to your favorable review of this do6umeht. sincerely, j. Jane 1'01.ah, Chair butt,a County Board of Supervisors 8B/rt 10 nndlobuleg STATE OF CALIFORNIA CDBG PROGRAAi A lication� y, 1. APPLICANT;---------� . - -- ... y ' o ». o f 2 City (X) County Butte ' d Ck�nl`,tict F�cr ;r3rt Steve Bakerb. Pa 5oard of Si.�pery7 su1^t ---- .. e. Title Cr�ri,lil giant c, Street P.0, 1 25 County Center .----- Drive` f. Phone City , o roy i 11 e---_� ZIP 95965 - ---............... '"YPE OP APPLICATION _--------� �, a. (X1 On Appl t,ant's avn F lit f' 4 r x) ror ala b, ) Joint Application., t;;'Iditl6 C;yclr' and Poi' Twp a t`undi►ig Cycles a' i On ,rPP"cant's O,vn Behalf and on Behalf of d. C ) On 8ehal f of only [ ) On Behalf of C'Mcentrat-ions t Native American tnctialls ill the following jUri,sdiction _ -- =� _. 3. L1alISLATIVI Ctl=,P1�ESk�N'IiA`I�IVrsS : hthw;nh'Lr OI the Assembl — :.M . y State Senator a. District Nunbet^ [1.5. ate resentatz b Na,ne Stan Stati n�'I":._.'. bist Dict Number �� Dist;i+zct Nu;�ber tie F et gee^ 3 Name Ray �lohttaon 2 Name i� 4i PRWtW.1 SagLiAkY; �. The Chapmanto►vn N(ighborhood tn'provl~r,len Program Will comb ` Program and hof facilities *eOven,mnts rehabilitation ch in a 17 block arc neighborhood o>" Ch��nlantbivn �vhtch a;houts ifi City cfh�h��ng,reh� P.� ra tee GF Chino to _ {ulnA7ncjo. the sou' __theist c rA 3 0 Ot 2 APPLICA'4JON CHECKLIST, [XJ Application Sumiary Form [X] Local Data Form tX1 Needs Statownt M Program Narrative b. ATTACKMENTS : (XJ h"tp(s) Of JLtPisdictlOn Showing All Required Infoxnation (XI Resolution by Governing Bod% Approving Application ),Additional Oata (if applicable) — --------------- [X] Activity WScr1,j*t.iOns [X) Act'V'ty Budget and Schedule (?,I I Activity Budget &mna-ry 1x] Assurances tfitters RUCUINId and Response,,., (if applical)j (�) I I Joint Powers Agrouneit (if applicable) ( ) L'.'Lc-rs Of Intent (if applicable) 8, Has applicant enacted limitations or, residential construction? X) no C )yes 1. OFFICIAL AUTH01tIZr,,D To SUBMIT APPLICATION Name Jane Dolan Chair; Title: Cutty County Board qf—SUPo;r%lisors Signature Oate ------------ 8, MR JTAT8 USP,, 011,1Ly ------------ Awerty Inde,% Percentage 8ianefit TOTAL POIN,i,q Cbst 2'ffecsti�eness Overal I impact APPLICATION Niimtjp.R a a STATE OF CALIFORNIA Pago 1, of Z Butte Count_- _ ,_ CDBG pROGWI (Applicant) Lcx;al axta Note, it the requested data is in the applicant's housing element or othol, document(s) submitted with this application, it need only be r'efuj,vjj0(., i by title and page nunber in the "reference" space. Use the most cau.t,:t,ant data available to 'Icmplete the following data it; ins. Consult `t;hc► Training Manual for data sources. l.. VACANCY RATE -. 1.. a. For all dwelling units: 1 7_ 15p �,t;ALA Dopt. a. Reference; �nn of Finance 11111 . b. for rental units, 2 % page il ,, .� .,.. C. For owner units.: ry 4J ate of ReferenceM/��Y0Ujj.enti Period covered in ;reference doeument: 2.. MELL,ING UNITS _ State sept of Finance 111182 a. Total units,65,93 1 .-��-•Ce—H ,.erence,, 3 1975 Special 0. Elr..f Census b. "U of units delapidatedi r -- 6,4'7 2 �; gage 1 �34 C. p of units suitable fox, rehabilitatic n: 5.5° 2 Date of 1`aeference Docunent: d. Total Projected Units: 420 550 3 Period Wverryd in reference docunent; (Genes 1 Plall�holding capacity) 8. HOUSEHOLDS a. Total misting Households! � 6a, 71;81 b. of renter households; 36.2" '2 c. of Mier househr:lds, 63.8<, 2 d. Ntmber of renter household„ who are in targeted income groups 14, 23 (Based on income limit $14,150 - 1980) e. % of targeted income group ren Eer househoks who are paying moire than 850o of innate for housing, 72,8%, f. 'INtwbor of rentei` households living in overt,,0 dedconditions; r 1065` E. % of renter households living in k lererovAied conditions,, h: Amber of owner households who are in targeted income group, 1'O�b4G2 ('Based on income limit $14,150 - 1980) 7 Page _ 2 of 2 " i. $ of targeted inure group .owners who ;are Raying more than 25%, of income for i. housing. J. Nunber of owner hOusehol.ds living in overcrowded conditions: �9�C 2 k. $ of owner households living in avercrowcied condition,,•, 1. NLmber of projected households who are in targeted ir,L tie group; 31,).0963 M. % of households heads by age: 2 Younger than 4L 7gG 25 34: 35 -- 44 W. X:X)Wv 60-64 s42400 65 and Older: 14.534 n. Reference: tate Dept: of Finance 111/82 Page .1980 Census, April 1980 ---- Butte 1.County Housing Element; Appendices ( Date of reference docunent: Period covered in reference document: m_ _ M F,17 Statistics for Cha mantocvn N>>` Mulberr p i9hbcr{fond, Unincorporeted Butte County (C.T, i y (1875) 4997�rt) STATE OIC' CAL,IF(MIA 0 Fage `� of Un t of Butte CDI3G PROM" Lca1 Data Note: If the requested data is in the applicant's housing elemen� or docunent(s) submitted with this application, it need on1 b other by title and pa,gc nunber in the "reference's Y e refereliced data available to ccrnplete the following datap items. Use the most current Training t&nual for data sources g ODn,Sult the I. VACANCY RATE a. Pur all dwelling writs: 5.3 Cr 3Cr d. Reference,, 1980 Census Summary Repora- b br rental unj.ts_ 6 Page 1�: a. For o;Mer units: 4.6 Date of Referejice COCUMent April, 1980 Period Covered in reference document: 2. GELLING UNITS a.. Total Units: 48951.1 ------- e. Reference: 11980 Census, April, 1980 b. N of units delapidar--j4a2 page, C. a of units suitable 2Local Survey, 1983 for rehabilitation: 40.12 Cute of Reference: Docunent: d. Total projectaj Units; Period coveredin reference document; ------------------------- HOUSEHOLM a. Total Ex'eting HOUsOl olds: 463 b, 4 of renter househt�lds; i ............. c. of owrl%3r nousehOlds 51.2% d. Ntxnber of renter households tubo are in targeted inconc: group, (Based on in.o►ne limit of X14 198d) 0 0_ 2 e. of targeted income group tenter househbids who are for housin � g': ._ 7b, 9_._.�' I YU9 more than 25% of income f ,� T uabor of rentor househoi ds living in overt Total 6 hodseholds living iq overcrowded condition;iconditions. odble akdo,ow----..�:-- g. % of renter households living in overcrowded cr litiitioi�s non aviner renter) h Number of oWmer households� ___�___•--� Who are in to 'geted itcr�nie group; 145 (Bast' tin income limit of $14,150 1988 Page _ � s of Z i. of targeted income group owners who are ` `sousing ; 4 3 . s g n paYing more than 25% of incarne fc,,a j Nunber of owner households Living in overcrowded conditions: See F k• % 01 owner households living in overcrowded conditions: ~ 1. Nunber of projected households who are in targeted Inco, - J (Represents existing households; no nrojeCtion availabel for tis 3�7 m. `� of households heads by age; his census trac — HUX$IX 59 .-11 ,ANX-XW., EQ-b4 1- 4 --. 65 and Older: 138 n: Referei-,•;e 1980 Census; _April,, 1980 Page # Da. y'e o.f reference docunch t ; Nriod covered in reference docunent; 3 STATE OF CALIFORNIA of 3— Butte County CD13G PROGRAM (Applicant) Needs Statement 1. Briefly describe and document the serious and basic housing needs: Although all of the Chapmantown neighborhood contaiis older, deteriorated housing, dwelling unit conditions are worst in the unincorporated section Of the neighborhood: A survey completed in February, 1983, indicated that 40% of all units in unincorporated Chapmantown were deficient when measured against standards of the Uniform Housing Code (Chapter 10, SubStdndard Buildings). Most common deficiencies were structural problems, including inadequate foundations, and facility Weatherization. hazardous preinlqes, and faulty materials of construction. Although interior in'.Z,Ctions of the dwellings were not performed, wiring and plumbing deficiencies are common, because of the age of the structures. A majority of -the dwellings are 40 years of age or older, Deteriorated housing conditiolis are concentrated in the Western portion of the (Ci-nt, cIle seriuias and Uasic ecinUnk development needs,, Chapmantown is I Primarily residential neighborhood. While mployment opportunities are needed to increase incomes of households in the area, tho employment basp of the neighborhoo,` is tied to the economy of the City of Chico, and is outside the jUrisdictior of a community development effort in the unincorporated area of Chapmantown, Programb to improve housing and public facilities in the neighborhoo" should incorporate efforts to offer such Work to local residents whenever possible, 8. 13xiefly describe and document the serious and basic public facilities needs: The neighborhood's lack of adequate infrastructure and public 'facilities is dramatic in its urban setting surrounded by the City of Chico. The lack of public facilities is the Overall fa,,tor prohibiting incorporation of the neighborhood as part of the City of Chico, Sewage Collection: The majority of structures in Chapmantoi,n in .1980) are on private SL,,-' age disposal Systems, consisting Of Septic tanks and leach lines, Septic tank and leach line failures have occurred and can be expected tr, be a problem in the future: The intensity of development in the neighborhood requires 4i Briefly describe and doctment the other serious and basic needs; Land Use _& ZOin9.C,ojtroJ$: The Chapmantown community is litoralit a "dumping dumping ground" for land uses considered undesirableelsewhere, The lack of adequate zoning controls coupled With the transition of the neighborhood from a ft"al to an urban orientation) al.counts for junk yards; sub8tanda,d trailers, and auto dismantlers that are located throughout the neighborhood, Butte County CDBG Pro am Needs Statement #!1 Continued at 10 Pogo 2 of neighborhood, west of Jackson Street. Here over 50% of the units are 'substandard. The low incomes of area residents make private rehabilitation financing far too costly. Public assistance is needed in the form of low-interest and deferred; payment rehabilitation loans, as a majority of Tower income households o;e already overpaying for housing. Assistance is needed for owr•p—occupantw and for ownor] of rental property who agree to limit rental rates 4. affordable levels as a condition of receiving a rehabilitation Mao, About one-half of all units in Chapmantown are renter -occupied. Needs Statement ;#3 that a sewage system be constructed as the present situation rrf inadequate - sewage collection is a threat to the health ;and safety of rorjidents. A sewage collection system, once installea,, could aL r onnoc'Led to the City of Chico sewer system. Ervine.. ' n,; sports on the cost Of sewe:rd construction in the 157 -acre Cha=ntown area indicate project cost woold uxweed $1,0oo,C00 (1978 01 001XV. 4uual funding through thy: formation 0 V nv.,,�Sment district world be impossible, because of the low incomes of most residents. Infrastructure: The neighborhoor, s infrastructure is completely inadequate: sheets are too narrow and are in need of repair and in some areas are impassable,. the neighborhood has no storm draonage system and flooding is common during winter months; and curbs; gutters and sidewalks are nonexistent. A storm orainage Study completed in 1977 indicates that an underground storm drainage system could be constructed to provide gravity drainage from east to west with discharge into Little Chico Creek, The construction of this system was begun in 1979 with the assistance of CD8C funds, along four streets in the neighborhood. For the rest of Chapmantown, however, stormwater :rust flow overland along streets without curbs or gutters for 2500 feet to reach Little Chico Creek, The absense of defined drainage channels or Water -courses makes each street an isolated basin during storms. Street resurfacing and curbs, gutters and sidewalks are also needed to facilitate automobile and pedestrian traffic and to aid in storm drainage. Such improvements will also encourage private investment in the neighborhood's housing stock; including repair of existing dwellings and new construction of ,►nits on vacant lots in the area