Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout84-45B GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 11 OF 21DFi.AFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT APFLICATION #84-45 (MOOSERRY - BURRELL) THE FOR ' HELL-14Un PROPERTY SCH #84061909 �i -Frepared Pori -- Butte County Board of Supervisors 25 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 March, 1986 Prepared by. EARTH NETRICS INCORPORATED 859 ddwaii Roam '! Hurlingamej CA 94010 (415) 697-7103 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS - Page Section PREF;ACE....................... ................ 1, PROJECT DESCRIPTION ......••.•.,•••• Location and Character of Project Site .................... .; 1 1. 1.2 Project Characteristics. 1-5 .. 1.3 'Intended Use of the EIR., . .•;;.•. •....... 2. SUMMARY.. 2.1 Project Impacts andMitigation Measures.... ••• ..••,,. •... 2-1 2.2! Alternatives Evaluated .......... 2.3 Areas of Controversy/Issues to be Resolved r3;' ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING, SIGNIFICANT ENV IVONMEITALTHEFECTS,, AIM MITIGATION MEASURES RECOMMENDED T SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS ...... ',. 3:1-1 3.1 Land Use and Planning.•..•.•.3.12-1 3.2 Traffic an d Circulation.. .....s« . 3.3-1 , 3.3 Geology and Hydrology ...................:... ............. 3.4 3.4 Public Services and Utilities.... •• 4-1 ..,. ALTERNATIVE. TO THE PROPOSED'PROJECT :.........:.••..• ••'•`" 1 4-1 i4:1. No Project Alternative.::••••• •••••••••• ............ 4-2 14.2 Expanded Project Area Alternative..:-::•• �••• SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS WHICH CANNOT BE AVOIDED IF 5-1 5 :.......... THE PROJECT IS IMPLEMENTED.... ,.....:..••..••..•••• 64 GR6IWTH INDUCING IMPACTS OF THE PROPOSED ACTION..••••••• •::•` 6--1 7-1 IMPACTS... . ....:.................:...... .7. CUMULATIVE .. 8. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN LOCAL SHORT TERM USES OF'MAN�S ENVIRONMENT AND THE MAINTENANCE AND ENHANCEMENT"OF !••1 LONG TERM PRODUCTIVITY.:..:.:.:.....:.:..........,::......:..: 9 IRREVERSIBLE ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGES. AND•IRRETRIEVABLE•..Y�..+++. gra COMMITC�f "11 OF RESOURCES....:. . r .... 10. EFFECTS NOT FOUND TO BE SIGNIFICANT.:...::.•:• 6144•y•�••••• 1. REFERENCES PUBLICATIONS AND.. PERSONS CONSULTED.....••••.•••:+• 11-1 12: PREPARERS OF THIS tPORT:.:: : r �a o LIST OF FIGURES Page Figure 1.1-1 Regional Setting o£ the Project Site. ....... .•.•:••..... .•.. 1-2' 1.1-2 j .....,.. Local Setting of the Project Site.................... 1-3 1.1-3 Location of Parcels Involved in the General Plan Amendment.... 1-4 3.1=1 General Plan Land Use Designations in the Project Vicinity.;... 3.1-2 3.1-2 Zoning Designations in the Project Vicinity— ........ ........ 3.1-4 3.1-3 Location of'the Chico: Area Greenline ..................;....... 3.1-9` 3.2-1 20 Year Circulation System Improvement Program 1980 to 2000... 3.2-3 .. e 3.2-2 Recommended Street System at Full Buildout.................,.: _ 3.2-5- 3.2-3But County Circulation Element Diagram.......... 3.2-10 3.2 -44 Bikeways Plan of the Chico General Plan. 3.2-12 4 3.4-1 SoSem Facilities Required in the 3.0-3 Dr�nage ;Nor h ChicoArea .... ......... .�..........:... ............. iii LIST OF TABLES P&e_ _Table 2.1-1 Summary of project Impacts and Mitigation Measures ........, 2-2 3.2-1 Description of Level of Service for Intersections .............. 3.2-2 3 .2-2 Existing Levels .of Service at Applicable Intersections in 3.2-6 North Chico During the P.M Peak Hour Period..:!.44 3.2-3 'Existing And Projected Traffic Volumes on Major Streets 3• - 7 2 - in the Project Area,.. ...........,.......................... 3.2-4 Estimated Future Daily Traffic Increases Associated With the _ 3 2-1 . Proposed Project .................. ........... .......::. t" 3,2-5 Existing and Projected Traffic Volumes on Major Streets in the Project Area With and Without the Proposed Project:....... ■ iv PREFACE The Butte County Planning Department has determined that an Environmental Impact Report is 'Irequired for tthepCaliforniaroposedneral EnvironmenPlan talnQuality ment eAct, thlated e the Bell -Muir Property. Un purpose of an Environmental Impact Report (PIR) is to provide objective information to public deci sionmakers and the general public regarding potential environmental effects resulting from project implementation,, Butte County can then institute methods of reducing adverse impacts or consider alternatives to the project. This Draft Environmental Impact Report has been prepared for Butte County in conformance with the California 'Environmental Quality Act of 1970'(CEQA) as amended. The degree of specificity required in an n the 'underlying activiact tort - corresponds to the degree of specificity involved in the underlying t s, The proposed General Plan Amendment doees not involve ort isemoresgeneral th-ipectthe therefore) the analysis presented inthis anal's is which could be required,if then project were a specific development s Impact Report: regarding the, proposal. CEQA Guidelines Section 151u6 staves the following degree e of `specificity of an Environmental i (a) An EIR on a construction project will necessarily be an moreodetailed in the specific effects of the proj ect, than 'Will be adoption of ,a local general plan or comprehensive zoning ordinance' because the effects of 'construction can be predicted with greater accuracy; (b) An EIR on a project such as the adoption or amendment of a a comprehensive zoning ordinance or a local general plan should focus on the secondary effects expected to .follow from the adoption, or amendment, but the EIR need not be as detailed as an EIR on the specific construction projects that might follow. The Resources Agency of California has adopted amendments to the Guidelines for Envirocir+ mel Impacts Reports, which incorporate the recent _changes in 1 n EIR 4h CEQA. The Elia guidelines allow the preparation in Departmentidentifiedaaddresses n y significant project effects. Butte County Planning a on the number of areas in which the project could. have significant effects envieonme-Oto including land use, F lanningy traffic, Soils, drainage, econuwics, public services and utilities Z`see Appendix 13.1, Initial Study). Also included in the amended guideliea(Section suresshalll5126 distingushsbettaeen the ion that "the discussion of mitigation min measures that are proposed bynProjeeot c uPrObhettaouldbbeto ei1y reasona l the protect bexpected to and other measures which ar reduce adverse impacts". Accordingly, all mitigation measueSs recommended otherwise reference within this EIR are `nWhereeapproprincluded ate dthia ElReProject incorpora esess by ref. nee with specifically note dbouments that are readily available to the genera). public, in aceorda Section 15150 of the Guidelines. - v 1._ PROJECT DESCRIPTION: 1 .1 LOCATIONAND CHARACTER OF 'PROJECT SITE The properties involved in the proposed General Plan Amendment are located in County, adjacent to the western. side of the City of Chico, California. ia. Cour approximately 270 acres of the unineorpo 400 acres within the area bounded byaBell Road,, involves Muir Aenue, Alamo Avenue;, East Avenue, and the Southern'Pacific Railroad tracks. The Henshaw Avenue, regional and local setting of the project area are ;presented in Figures 11-1 and 1.1-2, respectively. The project area and affected parcels are identified in Figure 1.1-3• The affected parcels are listed in Append ix 13.3 by Assessor's Parcel Number and acreage. The; project area is currently used for residential and agricultural purposes. Portions of the r.ject area have been subdivided into one acre parcels for residential uses, which is inconsistent with the existing General Phan Land . f 1 Use and zoning requirements in the area. However, the majority of the pro�,ieot area is developed With 'walnut, orchards and other agricultural use:: on larger parcel's.. 1.2 __PROJECT.CHARACTERISTICS The proposed project is an amendment to the Butte County General Plan Land Use Map and a revision to the Chico Area Greenling. The amendment would change the county's land, use designation from "Agriculture: Orchard and Field Crops" (five acre minimum parcel size) to "Urban: Agricultural i- Residential" (one acre minimum parcel size). The amendment is an administrative action and would not involve construction. The proposed'�Jrbani Agricultural ivide ntial land use designation will encourage private property owners to, subdivide existing' parcels for residential development. Approximately 30 residential total anon units currently exist in the project area. The existing land use design of 50 would allow for the construction of an ,additional 20 units, for a _ residential units With buildout of the area. The proposed General Plan Amendment would allow for the construction of y residential inzits for a total. of 300 residential- units; ap,proximatel 270 'new re"sid ` with buildout of the area. Development of additional urban uses in thr project area would require 'relocation of the City of Chico/County of Butte Greenline, which is known is the Chico Area Greenline. The relocation at the Greenline would be considered the proposed poo3ent and prothe vides des�sting,terureenlintiond III, fofes the rlimits pof fut p rt of agricultural ure urban development tte County4 The project area "Study Area Number 1" liescuithin an areacdefned aaes in the Cthe Chico Arehico Atdia Of auGreenlgond Policies): (See Section 3.1; Land ,Use; Planning, Applicable plans EoweVer; the Greenline revision would not be the same as the line defining The new Greetiline would follow the boundaries of the Study Area Number '1 . parcels affected by the General Plan Amendment (see Figure New development allowable under the requirements of the proppsed General Plan r ■ Amendmentmay require an extension of a sewer trunk Line from the City of Chico to the project area to minimize the addition of more nitrates into the mo a� a 1� +� 2, SUMMARY MEASURE 2.1_ PROJECT IMPACTS AND MITIGATI ON S The investigation conducted for this report inc luded 'an examination of the environmental it�pacta. The hf major impactproject is no�:edsalongs�hrthearequiredTable or 2.1-1. The significance o each recommended mitigation meas noted. TThesollowingcimpact e of acategories ware used in without mitigation (PS) potentially Table 2.1-1: beneficial impact;: (N�, nut,, significant impact; act icannot be'preeisely assessed or possibly s iKnificant impact (an imp at this time) and (S) significant adverseimpact. 2.2. ALTERNATIVES EVALUATED The No Project Alternative ani' the Expanded Project Area Alternative are evaluated in Section 4 of this reportw . Undbe erhe No avoidedooreAlternative, most substantially of the impacts of the proposed Project to reduced. Howeve a long tern! er, the ainpexistin8roject 1and:irnplannetative agrowth y not binducing activities alternative due to cert The Expanded which will affect residential demand in the proj act ,area. Project Area Alternative mould involve ncesa(60rmorearesidencesand ithan wouldonal be allowing development of 330 new resi This alternative would incrementally allowed crease the the proposed project)significance of most impacts. However, this alternative Would be he considered more logical and stable than the condition presented by the proposed project. L2. AREAS OF CONTRAVERSY/ISSUES TO BE RE SOLVm The Butte County Plannin& Department has identified land use and planning; circulation, •.►Iter quality geology, hydrology and public' services as areas of controversy potentially significant environmental impacts to be addressed in this EIR (see Appendix' 13.1)• public concern in response to the information provided in this Draft FIR will be addressed in the Final EIR ssus to be resolved involve interpretation of the Green The primary iet line Policy as it ssues to "Speci'al Study Area Number 1" and determination of the need for specific s6wer and storm drainage infrastructure in the project area to mitigate nitrate contamination.Of area groundwater. r _ r AND MITIGATION MEASURES TABLE _2.1-1• SUMMARY OF PROJECT IMPACTS p4]:TIGATION MEASURES (Significance After IMPACT. Mitigation) (Significance) ,w LAND USE PLANNING APPLICABLE PLANS AND POLICIES Not Mitigab:le. (S) ra ect wrage- The proposed p would encou Project 27 0 the development of approximately new dwelling units in ren area of Prime increase agricultural laud and would of .adverse the frequency and magnitude. QA)mpatibility impacts With land use � ricultural activities. (S) is the subject of this proposed project Would alter The Prop J area. Thisimpact Environmental ImPAct Report. improve other project fannere d land uses iri the P The resulting pattern of land use Measures tc posed. in and services are Proposed in other to improve designations would not be COsite The subject sections of this report with zoning and logical or stable. to be consistent with the five consistency development criteria -. (PS) appears site des 1.11 1. on criteria fon the designation„ but use proposed land ent with incz�ri�tdeve].opment_ appears to be conditiona]: zoning -_ criteria. (PS) S Not mitigable. (S) Development in the ProJ eat area would he city's not be cot,sistent. "'ith . intent to encourage- locations in '6he 'Ch' Qo urban oche' Area. (S) Not mitgablee (Si 1 The Amendment of the Chico Area P anon.. Greenl'ine would foster0ul population- Green a constraint d would remove growth an Project area. (S) on growth in the prof", e ( ended• B) The proposed General Plan Amendment None req aired or recommended. Would increase the supply of and competition among higher Priced (B) residential units. nifcan`t'(Adverse) Not Sig, S Significant (Adverse) (Adverse): NS g geneficial' PS Potentially :SignjfiCant (CONTINUED) 2-2 ; e e s 0 TABLE 2.1-1 (CONTINUED). SUMMARY 'Or PROJECTIMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES MITIGATION MEASURES IMPACT (,Significance After (Significance) Mitigation) ' subdivisions or developments are reviewed by the county, rights of way for each of these intersections should be reserved, as necessary, as a part of adjacent subdivisions or developments. Realignments should be required on a case by ,.case basis with the objective that ,all realignments be completed with buildout of the area. East Avenue should be widened to its ultimate Width including installation of curbs; gutters and sidewalks by developers with: front- age along East Avenue. (This re- quiremant is not the responsibility of the applicants, but should be implemented as development occurs in the project area and vicinity.) Butte County should require the ` Project applicants and future developers in he project area and vicinity to ,iistall traffic signals at the intersections, of East Avenue with lGuy�rn'>� and Nord . Installation the ;signals should be completed With buildoUt of the Project., (NS) Access by emergency vehicles (large See previous mitigation measures for realignment. M) five truclts) would be hindered byintersection Unconventional intersections. (NS)' _ e t Si nificant (Adverse) S Significant (Adverse) _ NS No g PS Potentially Significant (Adverse) 8 Bene ficial, (CONTINUED) Z-4 MITIGATION 1NJEASURES (CONTINUED). SUMMARY OF PROJECT IMPACTS AND ' 1 TABLE a,,1- MITIGATION MEASURES (Significance After IMPACT Mitigation) (Significance) use intensification , Access to the future extension of Road should be provided via The proposed land encourage the extension of Eaton would to the Eaton Bell Road. Intersections with Nord should not be . � potential which Presents Road; 1 Nord, �yy,and Alamo wa�or"north/ Guywn and Alamo encouraged unless additional land make south connectors. (PS) use intation and irelated ensific improvements occur, prior dway toaitension of these roadw ays. to e (NS)' for conflicts Pedestrian crossings should be considered along East Avenue where Increased potential between bicyclesn pedestrians, and Avenue. (NS) � routers and P rimae pedestrian a motor vehcles,along`East meet givet. Special sattenti�nhshoultiAbenue. s near J. Partridge to safe crossing (NS) Elementary School. GEOLOGYJHybROLOGY Specific engineering design and resent _a Site Soils,and geology P - ., construction techniques recom he soils engineer should ' moderate;shrinkjswell potential allowable soil pressure, mended by t to be incorporated, as nelsded:, in moderate al and seismic, loH`erosion potential the :project design.' Building with seismic hazards. (PS) design should comply requirements of-the current, e an dForee the Uniform Building Recommended Lateral by the $equrements prepared Structural Engineers Association of California. Standard-eonsteUation methods and should bit erosion control measures implemented (including dry weather season grading, erosion control revegetation, and devices to plans, NS Not Significant (AdVerse) S Significant (Adver se) Significant '(AdvEr`se) B Beneficial y PS Potentiallt (CONTINUE) r� TABLE 2.1-1 (CONTINUED). SUMMARY OF PROJECT IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES MITIGATIONMEASURES (Significance After (Significance - IMPACT (Significance) retain sediment within the con- struction area) to minimize potential erosion impacts. Foundation supports and utilities should be designed to resist and induced..ground .withstand earthquake _ shaking• (NS) 'Development of the site would increase Butte County and the City of Chico should continue to jointly develop the amount of stormwater runoff in the. project area and would and drainageplement ain the rproject Plan oarea generated incrementally reduce the amount of (NS) as mandated in the Nitrate Action groundwater infiltration. Plan. individual. review of subdivisions and site plans sh%.)uld focus ,on measures to reduce on site runoff. Measures such as semipervious should walkways and parking lots be considered. (NS) (hydrocarbons, None required or reerimmendedA (NS) Urban pollutant levels rubber and metals) could be increased as a result of development allowed by the proposed project, (NS) Nitrate contamination of groundwater Butte'County and the City of Chico continue to jointly develop from septic tanks could be increased. by should and implement a Master Plan for as a result of development allowed (P5) storm drainage and sanitary drainage Plan. the proposed project. as mandated in Nitrate Action If the use of individual sept,ie tank end leaehfield systems is necessary,_ the systems should be designed to satisfy stand6t ds and (Adverse) i No .: N t Significant tAdverse') S Significant Significant (Adverse) 73 Herieficial PS Potentially (CONTINUED)' 2�7 t t EFFEGTS_DETERMI ED-TO BE SIGNIFI CANT OR 'POSSIBLY SIGNIFICANT: AND MI EXISTING SETTING IMPACTS MITIGATION ;1 LAND USE PL NJ'G APPLICABLE PLANS AND: POLICIES EXISTING SETTING for agricultural and residential. ro ect area is used but `other Land Use.,. land in the project uses in the area are orchards, purposes. The primary agresent. Residential uses ara pasture land and vineyardCl stets of dwelling units are located uses 'such as Pa area. (2) along the west located throughout the project Along the rest side of Rodeo Drive;... and (4) alun8 in four locations: (1) Avenue; end of Muir Avenue; (3) along the south W,f of Nora Bell Road near Guynn Avenue: project area are similar to those within the project the proj uency.;and density to the south Laced jhes surrounding. es increase in'freq railroad line area, however, residential us rtatic�n Company and east. The main Southern Pacific TranspoThe ,railroad taracks are located forms the project situs western boundary• ercial- land uses have been Industrial and comm ro ect area, Large parallel to State Route 32� eco re ed along bothsidesof State Route 32 west of P P developed project area are used for a8,' parcels north of the and Vicicd v. The Project area and Pro These soils and ocher factors, such ieultural Character of ro tiveesoi s combine to make this vicinity y P of inexpensive water, contain high as climate and the availability ghly conducive to agriculture' area and much of Butte County + biggest industry, is a rculture, the aunty s Chico and the Butte The of coutanued viability of+s economy. Both the City riculture and address the vital component of the cauntze-the importance of d- t wary land Caunty General Plans recogn policies 'and proeedure.�� A P spec land use planning Po 11cy, is c eser3bed an tY►e` issue with aP the citylcounty Greenline Po use planning tool, Plan policies- .following l of discussion under General ra eoti area dir ypica c:ulturai Lands Within'=the F 3 direct The, character of the agr urban areas: The incremental f agricultural lands on the edge of are affecting the economic liability ve for' direct and indirect impacts affect the indirect impacts of urban a+�tivity a incentive production. T'he follolwi ricultural ro ect site and increase th vgiabilitp of agriculture on the P 3cultural production in order to caPientize be realized by urban lopffi property awneIrs to discontinuing ch can Cesuosuch as on the short`term eeonic re rtY values, urban nuisan h the reel sizes, increasing P smoke and noise. smaller Pa acts of easing prral activates on urban uses, vandali`smi and impacts eneration of dust, a eater they have Application of pesticides and the B ricult 'al uses on ul Although these imp acts .are Affecting ag ect area for agr3.eulture to the not prevented productive use of the P 3 present tiine4Land Use 'Plan Butte County's Chico Area "Orchard and ., i',ne? Land Use pesi9na-tions. n es With five acre 118 designates the project rcex sizes hich are less ha 20 ecrees Plan land minimum parcel sizes. Pa Eaciatiin'Ar conditionally consistent with this designaareopresented in Fi' ure 3i1-1•' On nations in tYie project vicinity use de'sig_ 3-1-1 :q Y AIRF ORT •v=� \ __ RURAL RES • --- AGRICULTURE LbW DE 4 NSITY RES. c e TERI STREET ^•� MEDIUM DENSITY ART CTOR STREET COLLE THOROUC%FARE COMM a '+ �•� = w� GREEN'LINE •\� SPHERE OF ;INFLUENCE r ' ORCAI&RD AI3D ' FIELD CROP , �PROJECT,91TEw ra 5� WIDE SF�OACK �,••+' �' /u, `� _. 80THs('i�i7 S OF ►iWY/!2 :• , -� �_____--._'.� d Y^i a pr' .amu • �. � > � r •Y � �IAy� t *" AND cOgNV `GENERAIl FIGURE 3.1-� CITY nESIdNaTiOt�s PT AN LAND IN THE `'PROJECT VICINITY SOALE� nth' metrics soba' f .,. per parcel with additional housing for on site employeesingle smisythe erequired maximum density for properties subject to this designation. Primary uses in this zone involve cultivation, harvest, storage, processing, sale and distribution of all plant crops, especially .annual food crops: The five,primary criteria for determining -whether an area should be subject to the Orchard and Field Crop designation are as follows; - soil conditions well suited for ;plant crop operations; adequate water supply, predominant parcel sizes of five acres or more; used for crop production or secondary uses; and adjacent uses compatible with primary and secondary uses. The three conditional, zoningand development criteria for the Orchard and ,.. Field Crop uses are: - predominate 6.kisting parcel sizes range from 5 to 10 acres; - adjacent to or in the general vicinity of urban boundaries; - present status of agricultural production will not be significantly impaired. !� The six zoning factors for the Orchard and 'Field Crop uses are: existing parcel sizes and dweiing densities; proximity to urban development;' effects on adjacent uses; - -potential for pest insect breeding; _ economic viability; - local desires. , The project sit0 s existing Orchard and Field Crop designation appears-to be and aevelo tent cror designating the site and the threeseonditionalhzonng primary crpteria.fiteria. However,, the designation may not be, consistent with two of the six zoning 'factors (economic viability and local desires). Economic viability was discussed, previously Underthe heading "Agricultural Character of the Project Area and Vicinity". it local desires includes the desires of local property owners, then the existing designatiork is clearly inappropriate relative to this factor because the project applicants are all local property owners; Zo ing. The pro-feet area is subject to the requirerden'�6 of the Butte County Comprehensive Zoning ordinance Number 1750: The ;Butte County zoning map indicates that the requirements of twv zoning districts; (A-5) Agriculture and,, t5-R) Suburban_Residential, apply to the area within the dark border in Figure 36j"26 The parcels affected by the proposed General plan Amendment are within the A-5 District. The requirements of this zone are presented in Appendix 13:11. Permitted uses are consistent with the General Plan and use ] designation of "Orchard and. Field Crop' The minimum lot area required is five 'acres (see the previous discussion of7;oning and development criteria and zoning factors)« Oban DeyeJnoment Trends and Patterns. Urban development in the Chico area' has been directed with public and private investment to properties within the, existing urban area and to locations north, south and east of the city core: 3,1-3 1- - m ■ f,9 In addition tt, this investment, the Nitrate Action Plan for the Greater Chico ' Urban Area also encourages development in the existing urban area, particularly within those areas served by the city's sanitary sewer system. The Nitrate Action Plan recommends that development be limited in areas without sewer connections (Butte County and City of Chico, 1985) Two large private projects, Foothill Park and Rancho Arroyo, have been approved in northern Chico. The Foothill Park development includes 551 ,acres of residential and office uses (3,?00 dwelling units, 15 percent have been sold) and 244 acres of industrial uses (Palmeri, 1985). The Rancho Arroyo project includes 750 acres of residential uses (4,600 dwelling units, none have been sold at this itime) and 25 acres of commercial uses (Palmeri, 1985). Development in southeast Chico has included residential, commercial and light industrial uses, primarily south of State Route 32 and east of Park Avenue. Development West of Chico has been directed towards infill of existing parcels y y efforts, the lack of. sewer service planned for urban uses by local planning e. HoweVar, large parcels of underutiliizedalandl�are available foredevel ` � ting Chico Area Greenline: development within the ex s The population of the Chico Area was approximately 64,000 persons in 1985 and ie estimated to increase to 102,000 by the year 2000 and to 171,000 after stud prepared in 1982• The population of the project Urban Area Transportation as th buildout of the General. Plan according to the Ch'o Ut vicinity defined as the area north and west of Bell Road, Cussick Avenue, Lindo Channel (Traffic Zone _0 of the Chico Urban Area Traffic Study) is expected to increase from 2,006 persons to 2,114 by the year 2000 (Chico Urban Area Transportation Study; 1982) . n � -- General Plan Policies CAICO AREA GREENLINE. The City of Chico and Butte County have established a boundary to define the limits of future urban development which may occur on Agricultural lands in the Mico area of Butte County: The Greenline is ' delineated in Figure 3.1-1. "rhe project site is not included within the Urbain boundary line, but has been designated as "Study Area Number '1." The designation 'would allow the County Board of Supervisors, after making appropriatefindings and providing a simple majority vote, to, revise the location of the Chico Area Greenline so as to place the affected parcels within Study ' Area !lumber 1, in the urban. portion of the Chico Area Greenline. FoxJever, the special policies and procedures related to the Greenline, as described in the Butte County General plan, would apply'to any amendments related to this area. The Chico Area Greenline Policy is presented in Appendix 13.54 The purposes of the policy and procedures for amendment and review of the Greenline Ave summarized as follows. -� Purposes of Greenline Policy, The purposes of the Chico Area, Greenline are: ! uture urban development which may tic a) To define the limits f f cur on L of Butte Countyz agricultural lands in ,he Chico area fib) To provide for tbd long term protection of Agricultural resources of the Chico area of Butte County: r POS ds by urban C) To mitigate the threat to agricultural resources . P onversion Of agricultural lan encroachment into and cds in the Chico area of Butte County• nfliet"s in the Chico area of Butte ' d`) To reduce agricultural/urban co County V cooperation with the City of Chico in land use e) To establish Count n and agricultural lands located in the Chico area 'planning of urban of Butte County. urban development Limits in or near agr useioflaucertaral inds f) To identify rs Chico area Land Use Plan by within the county bald dashed boundary line• .- clear,poliey,text -for Butte County's gj Will To establish a certain ;and enhance anal uphold the Chico Ai"ea Land boundary mline ent �and hpolicy text. aforementioned of establish certain land use designations for the Chid area line and h), To es with the aforementioned boundary Butte County in conformity r policy text. e or Amendment of the-Greenline Folicy. The Butte County s f through a Procedures amend the Cuico Greenline Policy supported by Board of Supervisors may written findings of fact, supe majority vote after adopting ub'lic record:, showing the following' substantial evidence in the P agricultural land to iblic benefits of converting the ag ed (a) that the P� outweigh the urban p land substantially-ublic benefits of continued ag `cultural production; and ri other urban or suburban lands reasonable available and ('b) there' are no 'table for the proposed development:. sua procedures for Review of the Greenliae Polioy•' The Greenline Policy states that the location of the Greenling shall be reviewed 2uld in five years to insure that local. land use yniedduef the evaluated every met. The first rev�.ew of the P etition Griioa area are being also states that a! individual including a 1987 ,0 uwofeSupervisors for a General Plan Amendment, the polio- the B in accordance with the change in the locatiaolcies of frButte County and the State of California applicable laws acid P pendia 13.51• (see Ap have adopted Housing ot'chiro and Butte ;County measure to implement the IOUSING.'EL NT. The City brie primary lands for Elements as part of their General Plans: which reserves la Element defines the policies - Element is the Genera].. Plan hard Use �aP' reusing The city in the city: Residential ases. ion of housing ' of Chico Housing and recommendations related to the provision programs s 11 ling pted to summarize The following text from the CitY Element was oda ' Chico housing policies: 3.1-6` f I g for all t and e Chico In planning for the provision primary goal isito provide for anvarietyuo£rhousing residents, the city s primary gand of types in an atmosphere conducive to the well being housingyrang n8nin}cost. particularly to provide for an adequate supply demands of students, low and moderate income persons, the to meet thespecial needs of the elderly and handicapped, and to provide an opportunity for first time home buyers. The Housing Element recognizes the constraints of today's housing market such eds'buildng costs, mortgage interest rates, the preservation of agricultural 'land, provision of sanitary sewers, storm drainage and ' streets,, the Provision of ot'ner public services such as police and fire facilities and parks; concern for design, preservation protection, school of'ne:ighborhoods and historical structures, as well as concern energy conservation within housing units. The Housing Element states that all of i these factn,,s'must `be considered in concert with one ,another, and ro single item can be emphasized at the expense of another if Chico is to pursue a balanced and realistic approach to the provision of housing for ' current and future Chico residents (City of Chico, 1985) Housing Element also defines policies, programs, and The Butte County recommendations related to the provision ofhousing. The following policies 'apply to the project area. A governmental framework shall be established and maintained which encourages, 'andfaeilitateaccommodatpingfthehousingthe needsprivate the county's honiebuilding. industry in current and projected population. Planning and zoning'-cotsiderations affecting housing production shall be ~ applied in a matter Which seeks to balance the meed for protecting and enbanoing the environment with the need for housing at affordable prices. New housing construction shall be encouraged in locations with ar reasonable 'proximity to centers of employment and shopping facilities, and Which respect the conservation of energy. The private homebuilding industry shall be encouraged to give priority consideration to developing Within eX sting urbanized areas or in locations adjacent to such areas (Butte County, 1984)• , IMPACTS Land Uses• The proposed General Plan Amendment Would 'not directly affect developed land uses; however, it Would encourage private property and for residential development: oWnerto subdivide prime agricultural lAn s t additional, 210 new residential units could be allowed in the project area if the project is approved (Tuttle 19 5)• Without approval of the project, only 20 additiohal residential Uftit3 could be .developed in the project area. The conversion Of additional agricultural land to urban uses mould increase the frequency olid magnitude of adverse land use compatibility impacts -between within and around the e. 'fhec hcrPmentaldandaCtnulat vealosseof agricultural a the remaining ag land is project sit. SA a� significant local, regional, state and national concern due to the importance: of Zgricultur6 in the economy. Agricultural production levels can be reduced to the point where the economic feasibility of agricultural activities or support services such as.processing, packaging and transportation can be threatened. Once regional production reduces to costsrmainthreshold increase, oreservicespport may bEereduced. Inrvices may the service y , y o area, the reduction of parcel sizes and the encroachment of urban uses has had an incremental effect on reducing production levels. The proposed General Plan Amendment would also incrementally affect production by encouraging reduced parcel sizes and by encouraging further applications for General Plan Amendments within the revised GreenlinP (see Section 4.2., Expanded Project Area Alternative; Section 6, Growth Inducing Impacts; and a later discussion tin this section regarding the Chico Area Greenline). Planned Land Uses. The proposed project would revise the. General Plan Land' Use and Zoning designations on the affected parcels. The designation of adjacent properties and properties almost surrounded by the affected parcels would not be changed. The resulting land use pattern would not be logical or stable .com compared to a project involving ;all of the parcels in the project area, P or a project with better boundary delineation, such as roads or creeks (see Section 40 Expanded Project Area and Section 6i Growth Inducing Impacts);:, The new land use designation for the project area would be "Urban,: Agricultural Residential" with one acre minimum parcel sizes. The applicable zoning designation could be 8R-1 (see Appendix.. 13.4). The secondary impacts associated with these revisions to planned land uses are the subject of this report. Urban beyelopment Trends and Patterns. The proposed General Plan Amendment and subsequent development of residential uses in the project area could result in the development of up to 270 additional residential units and app,-."imately 648 persons at 2.4 persons per residence). beyelopment in this are4i-rould not be consistent with the cityfs intent to encourage development in other locations in the Chico Urban Area. The addition of 648 persons to the project area would exceed the population projected in l,be Chico 'Urban Area Transportation Studer by approximately 31 'percent of the population projected year,P-006 and, bewould representzoneibyfbhe year2006the projected numbereof people 6 (648 vs: 106),. Although the addition of the 648 persons to the project vicinity would not be considered a significant adverse impact; the expansion of the 'housing market into prime agricultural land at the expense of focusing development in other areas with existing sewer connections would be considered a significants a GrPenline)+ (see following discussion on the Chico Are adverse planna.ng inconsistency Chita Area Greenjine. Approval of the proposed Geherai Plan Amendment would regMire relocation of the Chico Area Geeenline within Study Area Number i The change is shown in Vigure 3.1-x. This relocation of the Chico Area Green line must be supported by substantial evidence in the public record, ' shorting that t the public benefits of the agricultural land to urban land substantially outweigh are no other urban or suburban lands reasonably production; and that there the public benefits of continued agricultural ,pp M • � r J � Vti=�, t_ 1y1���� nu 7t.' rrtt4 r'.yrC' Mfr ♦♦ ,� ,,,, , � �,�' J Yr fii) iM• c! 'r A:"t ' , r s fie, y, ,.•�•, tit '�,. 7 e� ��� :r •. � S YJ yyrr'S.i'•?. :, ;*ri h4 t2 ,:.. `. '•tJ"f7s L �/� . ,. •lt-� ' .t+ 1'�i� i. J` i { rt.tt` i1...: rt r . 1 , ♦"•q•� )'M� � �, iy Lf�y �t 'L� 4 t �: ref f '�iI4Tt{ r�•J+ •f+ 1y{„.'� li•%iiit �,"iiJ�,, '��� �L � ittit�l�LFt�fii i` fR�Yf ",i'�'JreW t` {� i d r t.: cY' .� Y��r1 ,drLy<y r rrri avn tFr- rfr v� �.,J{3r yJ;�jy i! .,,?, r✓{yt'��,.� � v � r .l �c�,—"i'"y, r '' ,4 rj tl+1F "�", J i}",•'�•• 5n• r �.:s yfa iyk i• ,y YvirW_ i fr" t Nj rti�l+r 4}},,,, •��h�l"L'1�rc?,rl,r : �� � `�y:� . • ,�• , � ,` •.aSr , ;,{ �„ . L ,%4 ���'�' �k� + ,,:'�kc+r�Yt• + '%fir^' �i" �� ,:r�� t ff rr�1►t'►f� r Z '~iAlL�i !lx �i1 si°fFY�` w''stfr cf (Ji S• t. .L ♦S Cjirfrd' frrtl: :C: R� ;r�r<4 z 1 , �, 4 J�, � . nrM f L. i,�,,�r'o+i3'�.,d 'Nt• • q�Ft ? 'ti. • +`` `C� f _ - r r . 7yY ' r t�' P Try • : �' .-'C "� "Y�V „��:.., �/Jnr ^'�` � •lF r� 1 ��� rJM�;+ � 'i , s t� bks L{f • f OS EXISTING GREF NLINE AREA OF G'. P, A. , BOUIV �EEENLINE DARiES OF' RgVISEb ' ALTERNATIVE AREA IIiIII1If11N GREENLTNE' WITH ALTEMATIVE AREA �i 66c►Ch metrics M SCAV FIGURE 3,1-� LOCATION. QF .t'HE GHICO ARTA G�tNLI N available and suitable for the proposed development (see Impacts on Land Uses). These findings are to be made by the County Board of Supervisors. The amendment of the Chico Area Greenline could be considered growth inducing by directly fostering population growth and by removing the Greenline as a constraint to growth (See Sis still expected to-occur in 1987+ection 6, Growth Inducing Impacts). Review of the Chico Area Folic Greenline Housing. The proposed General Plan Amendment would increase the supply of available residential land in the Chico Urban Area. The future residential units would not be expected to serve students or low to moderate income persons, but would increase the supply of and competition among higher priced units. This impact Mould be beneficial. At this time, the conversion of this peousih policies, which indicate 4he neednot be consistent with ' citorycProm ountyaghriculgtupal uses to residential uses may to balance Y preservation of agricultural land and/or the environment with increasing the Trends of housing. The previous'diseussion� pertaining to Urban Development supply r s and Patterns and the Chico Area Greenline indicate that the loss of the subject agricultural land is a significant impact and that the availability of housing in.other areas of eastern and northern Chico may not justify the proposed General flan Amendment at this time. MITIGATION-MEASURES. The following significant adverse land use and planning impacts identified in this section would be unavoidable if the project were approved. No mitigation measures are feasible. The No Project Alternative is discussed ;in Sedtion u of this rep(rt'. Unavoidable Im oact§� 1. The proposed project would encourage the development of approximately 270 new dwelling Un, s in an area o£ prime agricultural land and would increase the frequency and magnitude of adverse land use compatibility impacts with agricultural activities (Cumulative financial loss of county crop production; and related impacts to support industries and employment). 1 24 Future development consistent With the proposed lard t=se'designation may hot be consistent with Conditional zoning and dev#ll�pment criteria for the Agricultural and T=,:�gi ential Use`Designa'tien. (This is the subject of this Envit6fimental Impact Report. Measures to improve ' ihfrastructure aad services are proposed in other sections of this report to improve consistenty kith zoning and development criteria.) ' 3: Development in the project area would not be consistent with the cit;lts and county'ci. intent to encourage development in other locations in tlae Chico Urban Area (undetndines efforts to redirect growth by not allowing the east, side of Chico to realize its development potential). 4. The amendment of the Chico Area Greenline would foster population growth and would remove a constraint on growth in the project Vicinity 1 by weakening the Greehline policy as a f irm'geowth iaahag6bent tool. 3:1-o A-2 RAFFIC AND_ CIRCULATION EXISTING SETTING Roadway S"te�n_ The roadway system within the project area is presented in Figure 1.1�-2. Roadways serv�8 the project area include: Muir aceessAvenue, roadwaysBell Road, Alamo Avenue, Guynn Avenue, Nord Avenue. The primary serving the project area are East Avenue, State `Route 32 and The 'Esplanade: Muir Avenue, Bell Road, Alamo Avenue, Guynm Avenue and Nord, Avenue are two lane local roadways, East Avenue is,a two lane arterial south of the project site, but widens to four lanes just to the West of The Esplanade intersection. east/west arterial in northern Chico: State Route East Avenue is the primary Orland, Interstate 32 is a two lane highway providing access to Hamilton State Route 32 is aRfour '1 5, and southern Chico (see Figures .1-1 and 1.1-2)• lane :roadway southeast of First Street. ending to Stateeor Routet99ewhiehnprovides oute 99 is a primary north/south art (to the south). The Esplanade also provides -access t and Southern California access to. north south access to Red Bluif, Redd ing (to the north) and to camme,cial areas including downtown'G hico Most of the intersections in the project vicinity are the conventional, 90 degree angle type, but some of the intersections have an angle of incidence which is significantly less than 90 degrees. These intersections and the e typically able to substandard construction 'of the associated roadways ar accommodate fewer vehicles than conventional intersections and standard roadways. Project area roadways can also present unsafe maneuvering, onventional ctions are located intersein the conditions. The following une Bell/Alamo, Bell/Jones, ' project area: Be11/Muir, Bell/2tord, Be11/Guynn Kennedy%State Route Tlell/Elkwood, Bell/Butterfly, Bell/Cussiek, dori riot roadway 32, and Rodeo/Nord: The following roadways do not meet .county standards: Alamo, Gwynn, Nord, Rodeo, henshaw _ and Muir. Local Trai'fie Conditions and Levels of Service. Table 3'.2-1 provi es: a description of levels of service for intersections, Existing traffic volumes on roadways within the project vicinity produce acceptable levels of service (relatively free flow)• However, levels of servind are being incrementally reduced by increasing traffic volumes at the following intersections: East/ State Route 32 East/The Esplanade, East/State Route 99, )ast/Cohasset and The Esplanade/Cohasset (see Figure 1.1-2)- Table 3,.2-2 ,provides the existing P.M - Peak hour leve]s of 'service at these intersections. At some locations, the level of service is estimated based on observations rather than calculationL,. Areawide Traffic Conditions. In 1.,82, the City of Chico prepared an areawide . o the trsnsporiJR tation study. For purposes of documenting "the traffic setti K and Chico Urban Area Transit 5tudv,(CAT5), prepared for the city Y Associates, is hereby incorporated by reference. The CATS has not been adopted by the county', Some of the assumptions/findings presented in CATS may not be current;, prudent, or accurate. This EZR recogniizes and aecownts for these inadequacies to the extent feasible. The Lotuit will cooperate and encourages the city to refine ..the CATS , The objective of the Chico Urban Area Transportation Study poet to predict n the Chico area and identify transportation future traffic levels i - . improvements, that will be hecessary to accommodate this future travel demand e13'z'l The CATS information is to be updated and revised based upon the most current data available and represents a basis from which cumulative traffic analyses can begin. For purposes of cumulative traffic impact analysis in the project area, the CATS assumptions represent all reasonably foreseeable projects in the area of potentially environmental impact (Palmer, 1986) Table 3.2-3 presents existing and projected traffic volumes on°>aajor streets in the project area. Figure 3.2-1 shows the major improvements required by the year 2000 according to the CATS. Figure 3.2-2 shows the major improvements required by buildout of the General Plan capacity according to the CATS,. The following are the primary improvements identified in the CATS for the project area. These improvements are expected by the year 2000 - `Jidening of East. Avenue to four lanes between State Route 32 and The Esplanade. - Vi dening of East Avenue to six Panes between The :Esplanade and State Route -=99. {Butie County questions the feasibility of this improvement. ' The maximum feasible width of East Avenue in this location is expected -mss Videning would eliminate on street parking along to be `fire lanes ,a East Avenue in this location.) Intersection improvements at Lassen/The Esplanade, Lassen/State Route 99, and The Esplanade/CohasSet. The additional primary improvements in the project area identified in the CATS for buildout of the General Plan capacity would be - A new four lane connection between State Route 32 and State Route 99 via Lassen Avenue, including a new :interchange at State Route 99• A new two lane connection between State Route 32 and. State Route99via Eaton Road -_ The following taxt from CATS clarifies traffic conditions and planned involves the area north of 11th Avenue and west the Narthwest Chico improvements in the Northwest Chico Subarea. Gena west of eoNorthw: subarea "The major bottleneck in, the Northwest Subarea will be East Avenue, Where traffic of up to 55,000 vehicles per day is forecast • East Avenue will have to carry all east -west traffic between the commercial areas on Nord Avenue (State Route 32) and Cohasset Road. To avoid massive widening of East Avenue, Lassen Avenue should be extended West to Nord Avenue and be made a four lane arterial throughout. The existing sections of Lassen Avenue Would be widened frog► 40 to 48 feet except for under the freeway, where the bridge abutments are only 52 feet apart. Such a parallel road, which would also be linked to the Route '99 freeway,; would "attract as much as 30% of the East -Avenue traffic. Further relief could be provided by extending Eaton Road west 'to Mord Avenue, This would divert about 5,000 external trips a day between Route 32 and northeast Chico as well as two to three thousand trips between Route 32 and the Route 99 freeway. Thus, with the Lassen and Eaton extensions, about -000 trips would be diverted to Eaton;_ and around 15,000 trips would be, diverted ' trips on East Avenue to Las"sen, leaving only around 27 000 TABLE 32-2iEXISTING L'EYELS OF P.M. SERVICE AT APPLICABLE PEAK HOUR INTERSECTIONS IN ,NORTH CHICO DURING THE P.M. PEAR HOUR INTERSECTIONa) LEVEL OF'SERVIGE A (b) East/SR 32 A (b) East/Kennedy ■ SR 32/Kennedy A '(b)' ■ East/The Esplanade: NA East/SR 99 -._ A (.u7) North Ramp A (.57) South Ramp B (A2) East/Cohasset tThe The Esplanade/West Shasta A (b) Esplanade/West Lassen A (b) The Esplanade/Henshaw B (b) : The Esplanade/Cohasset C SR 99/Eaton NA Not Available -1 for desoriptions of levels of (a) See Table 3 • service for intersections. _ (b) This level of service is turning movement assumed by the city volumes,[beeause based on observations the no recent county have ')rather than. been pe,rforzhed (Derrick, µ 19 85 Source: Derrick, 1986 3.2-6 ■ TABLE 3.2-3. EXISTING AND PROJECTED TRAFFIC VOLUMES ON MAJOR STREETS IN THE PROJECT AREA EXISTING FUTURE (2000) STREET SEGMENT DAILY VOLUME DAILY VOLUME' 1981' (a) 1986 (b) EAST AVENUE - SR 32 to Dixon/Cussick 8,800 9,'116 Dixon/to The Esplanade 10;400' T1 ,257 15,500 26,700:Cussick 14,800 16,340 29700 Esplanade to SF 99 tot 11,300. ' 12,u76 18,600 C SRe99tooh THE ES�ANAA...�• 7,400 8,170 18,500 s Eaton 'to Lassen 13,300 14,.684 26,800 Lassen to East ,,056 23,600 26East 25,806 (c) to Cohasset STATE ROUTE 32 NA NA 12 00 North of East $,700 9 ,606 yi,.400 South of East (a) Source. Butte County Circulation Element, 1984. increased by two percentyear for five years; Derrick,, (b) 1981 volumes _per (e) Indicates underestimated future volume or overestimated 1986 volume. NA: Not Available Sourde: Earth Metrics; 1985; Butte County`Cireulation Element, 1984; and Derrick, 1986; Pierce, 1986: est of The Espl EspTnnade; (wEsplanade). East of the The the ,traffic on East intnrchaneebeeen will be further `reduced by the proposed Lassen Avenue Thus, trafPlo along East A�en will divert much local traffic. Nord and Cohasset Mould probably range fray .,".x;000 to 30000 vehicles per to (west day, with traffid on Lassen ranging from 15,00U (at Nord) l be freetJay) vehcl es per day. Thus, East Avenue may still be able to of the funetioln as a four. lane road, ;although it has been shown as a 6 land the Lassen ant Eaton roadt�iay `ori Figure 19 to be conservative. In any case, done first, and Avenue only widen e o extension projects shouldnbe ,East ..six. an es if Congestion o East still occurs. 8.2-7 r ■ 77 Other necessary improvements in the Northwest Subarea include widening Cohasset Road to four lanes between The Esplanade and Mangrove (adequate .right of way exists along most its length), and making,FAton Road a four lane roadi between The Esplanade and Cohasset" (City of Chico, 1982). Another improvement which is not mentioned in the CATS, but is anticipated by the City of Chico, is identified in a CALTRANS`"Route Concept Report" related to State;Route 32. 2n the project -vicinity, thin improvement Would ,involve the Widening State Route 32 to three lanes, including a central two vay left turn lane, and the construction of bicycle lanes. Transportation Elemerit of the Chico General Plan. The Transportation Element of the Chico General Plan is directed towards achieving a balanced transportation system, which ensures convenient access for all Chico residents* serves the proposed patterns of land use, and minimizes disruption of the environment. The discussions focus on: 1) the implementation of a coordinated multi modal transportation system accommodating private and public motor vehicles, bicycles, and pedestrians; 2) the scenic enhancement of the highway landscape; 3) the abatement of noise generated by transportation systems; 4) safety; and 5) separation of modal 'systc!ms. Noise Was not found to be a significant environmental issue fox the proposed project, according to the Initial. Study prepared by Butte County (see ;Appendix 13.1) The followirig policies summarize the Transportation Element. Insure that the existing and proposed circulation systems accommodate the multi modal traffic functions they are intended to serve with a minimum adverse impact on the environment of the city. Coordinate all systems to maximize safety and efficiency and minimize conflict between modes (see following discussion on the Chico Area Transportation Study, Traffic Setting)w Develop a public transit system responsive to the needs of the greater Chico community'. Actively promote the system as an alternative to automobiles. (The Chico Area Transit System is an existing service). -Develop a system of bicycle facilities that provides* where possible, separate access to major destinations and assures the safety of all. see Y Y discussion on Pedestrian rian and bicycle facilities) ., Protect and enhance the scenicqualities of State Routes 32 and qg and other major entry ways to the city. All new commercial development' adjacent to State Routes 3? and 99 bhould,ie adequately landscaped. Circulation Element of the Butte -_County General Plan. The Circulation Element of the Butte County General Plan was prepared in 1984. The Element is a guide to managing and-'developing'the future transportation and circulation system in the county. The intended timeframe of the Element carries to the year 2000,* With analysis, evaluation,and planning focused on policies and prograims Within five and ten year timeframes. The Element: is orgahized into three basic components. The first component, Part One -Basis This Policy* is intended to be an analytical and descriptive basis for developing a transportation Polieyi Transportation Issues and Policies, sets forth Butte Countyis countywide and urban area transportation goals, objectives, policies; and, programs to the year 2000. The Appendices of the Circulation Element contain e 3,�_a additional information and data supplements referred to by the previous "text, including the Element's environmental impact report. The Butte County Circulation Element Diagram is presented in Figure 3.2-3, The improvement shown in F primary Figure 3.2-3 that relates. to the project area is the:. Eaton Road extension which would :be constructed additional east/west capacity in North Chico, after the year 2000 to provide The following policies programs and requirements of the Butte County Circulation Element specifically relate to the project area and, proposed General Plan Amendment project's 2.1.2 Butte County will encourage and support sincere efforts by county residents to form assessment districts for road maintenance and road drainage, 2.2.4 The count will P impact model or -program; includingfor traffic oreroadive fiscal. y pursue the development of a com Y r road impacts, to assist in the analysis of cost, and revenue balances from proposed development projects. the Y Kill study, develop and implement, as feasible 2:P Program: The count following road -related f' ' fiscal programs,. over time: 1) Road assessment districts for maintenance of new development. 2) Development fees for off site traffic impacts caused by new development. This program should first develop plans and schedules for specific developments that will contribute to the impact of circulation in surrounding locations. A long term goal of a countywide drweloper fee program for traffic impacts should be studied and implemented ata later -date. Comprehensive. road development fee programs, should be jointly developed between the county and the cities of Butte County. 3) Drainage assessment districts in problem: areas. Enforceable road development agreements. 4.1.4 Right of tray needed for new roads or expansion of existing roads shall be planned for; land uses that would preclude the timely of such right,of Way ;shall be prohibited. development beneficially serve the needs or ail parcels. located as to most 4 1.6 Usable road easements of adequate width shall be p .1: Private atesubdivision roads will be built to full county stand arils And they will be privatel maintained as 60ch through h their maintenance 4:1.10 New land divisions should be held responsible for their fair share of the off site road impt'ovements needed to handle the traffic increases that they cause. 3.9-5 i 4,1.11 The county. Should encourage the utilization of development agreements as one way of ensuring that road development standards and plans .are met. 14.1.1 .The county will maintain the integrity of the Chico Area Greenline adopted in.1982,' ' Pedestrian and Bicycle Facilities. Pedestrian and bicycle activities generated from within the 'project area are relatively low due to the low density of development in the area, No sidewalks or ,formal bicycle lanes exist ; along roadways in the area, but the low traffic volumes and low residential density make walking and ..icycling relatively safe activities. Henshaw Avenue, Lassen Avenin, and Cussick Avenue, south of Bell Road, are designated r with' -no on street right of wayy equivalent to a bike route sgbr improvements,eQuiv as long range Class III bikewa Public Transit. The Chico, Urban Area is served by the Chico Area Transit by Route 1,, which serves East Avenue and The Esplanade, ea the project area e System, Regular scheduled bus service is provided near and south of the project area: The route sPrve,4 North Valley Plaza Mall, both Chico hospitals, and the Social Security office. The .capacity of this route -is equaled during peak hour periods. No route changes are anticipated in the near future. InteIsification of development along 'East :Avenue and the increasing importance of East Avenue as a key arterial, however, may result in a_modification of Route 1 or the addition of a nev-�•oiata serving properties along East Avenue, between The Esplanade and State Route 32. No schedule for this improvement has been adopted (Derrick, 1986) The closest bus stop tk� the perimeter of the project area 3a located at the intersection of East Avenue with The Esplanade apPPoXimately one mile east of the projact area. Bus service weekdays is ';provided between 6:30 A.M. and 7;30 P.M. Saturday service is available between 8:s0 A.M. and .6:30 P -M. Most transfer points are located in the downtown area. Regional transit service is provided by Butte County Transit, which operates routes from tho'City of Chico to Butte College and the .community centers of Orovill;e and Paradise. Emergenev Aeces,s. Access routes to and throughout the project area are Presented in Figure 3.2-1. No emergency vehicle access restrictions currently exist within or around the project arraa. HoVei�.'r, the unconventional intersections identified previously in this section present minor obstacles to large vehicles, buc?a' as fire trucks, IMPACTS ,p.G ner�t on. The proposed General Plan Amendment would allow up to 270 new residential Vl!, to to be approved in the project area. These residences would generate appr6ximately 2,700 trip ends (inbound ori outbound) per day, based upon: a trip generation -,-,ate of tel trip ends per residence per day (institute of Transportati0ft ETigzneelr,) 1982) . peak hour trt-,p generation from the 270 residential uni.q would, be a�proximately 270 trip ends during each of the A.H and P.M. P peak hOUr peri6&i. The L,Mk., and M. pk'ak hour per; ods are tho nne hour periods with the highest, traf`f'ic 'Volumes betwF,en 6:30 wtd 8:30 h.Mw and 4.A0 and 6.00 P.M, - 3:2-i1 000.1r T. wr ,• rna'r rof rrfrf - y fry.. ti10 •. rii.• . ,+ Oil ' I19 •�•, \♦p •S ,1Y} y\ HW ;.. •i• �•♦ �•. q4d�ifHnui..un nuYYi ` C C.� f r f z..i..r I,q - _ r '+♦♦\\/•'y if r� an ryFY': �°` o.� .Yy 4 i♦rf " r= r i ,,,y♦r �P� �'bLM •'A rill T G :�:� r M! r. 3+" t M ♦\♦♦\`♦•\• < a ✓ + p }F i^ t k Z:. k r a :+` c i ,'f t, Jr\f\\yr.i ` r1i\� a►j �!,♦\♦♦� d Co �yNYltlfriiC' ,1 t � ,,,t.�r !,' i4 ♦ "�`i1�," , " ri • r ♦\♦ ♦ \' ��, ✓ r,�.z4`'y . S- +++,. Jr , � wytjj�;,r f f � � r y ♦ <T�r ���i Il r •, *"i r ' �r` �Af`� s++ •1� � �■` �.nC � w.�',f�f�hifYl '1� '„�' jf• `�ey - w � ` � ij d fi+t �. •Iii o\ y ".•��:.f'% .'4. .r1111tiiu•sC jf n�i � r`^ w^„a r,.,.e:1FtYlrnr.yyy t J G' i,:;Fl%et dy�s �• • r� ��n =�r 9¢.>�'♦ ,�♦. °. 6•\f__ y ^ %tai 'r3 �` : I c tl,la �.. M , �-• Clef r�':.Fv \�,\♦ y .:: A �',♦'. T ..ECIC t r d j a r - - rim ,.:•:: ..? r r•"t,.M V tJ �1+ .!`�yryr� �, ' �r ..ii 'Y :��f 1Nrs)dJ11��,y -- j �'+�.i" W`�r'♦l� a a� \r+ `, •'�4 � JL •� ' '•;,: '".'l,j,, _ \x.. ,P � ,l=t--i� re1�1f.,. F} ��'+4 •I a�i�.�r• � �`7 .:���""�«,•t! ? +w� �y ��+� i fi- ^" `rS f ,yy1iir 1 �sP"7� rf ��r�°},/ �nfrf� xM L t.� '�� a � �. v •� 'y- y♦.. w•, 4r x, w + ♦ � .. rA ilflfrl W it♦♦`,,, ��x{.., � P r.� h+�,. "'Vy�r♦r rI.'�gc y�.\ j� �.. i �1� d`f �' �" �, '. r1 is rpr j!" tl Ily. y .: M N `S �""r���J'y iii. r w is �, %' �.F Sr!i� 4' •Y ♦\� t`..'j♦. Ep ±'•T. a, ♦ • e,,.....w�... ♦ +' •yt.�"v„+r +4 �.rn- " h,,�i♦-+.y►.��l=$i. i4J � 's�X+' '�'� ki.4`f\ •ifsT � t :t�� •♦ i �.r�rl,;k. spooe ,,. �ly '�, "r` •' d'diij :� �d'r � 't �?'' ` raid Ory, 4'` `:' , �• �i ` !. �`� ' ► ti rt a:�1r+, • ys� \' P'fr'•.erd(y. cc x. ; �•ir,. �. r �.`\� M .+� _v:``r_ �4'r rtr4 ''�1 r�k t�y� trf ,•• d - ir,.�•f., ••� i +, •+om _+<'•.:y�Y,G, i ,!\ •i {a.+$•1 f' f• \♦ r + 4:wt,�32T d y,t' d f • r J �f� }nr. x�,. + as "` }r,,, •� "` rn ..;5 :+' '�..! .p�.. � ' Y1•' ,� �+,r t.."�:.�`* �'I r"�i�' �{�♦ h'. y�+rt. f��'r!/1� ,^""a� �' ,.,.. '�. ^'� „�' - ,.�- r �J -- `,�t: .r .r I• ' .t. ci Y ,`4P.6 ♦, � " �� r\,.♦`M ♦r, t.�,: k .�" {",.'y "ice t , ..� r foo, 0,INA t• `� � Gtr' ;�. 4`°�= .r.'+r;��, _ ; r'� .. `�, a �sl._ �M '� � ` ,�� �; � ,-(,••►'�'`� #, ,y♦,; T �,.+,�r''� ���1"``, � ♦ ` � �X �+;,. `j � } � r J•, _._, rl • J y ��i � ,,.,. ��+ �� � n, i 1 l.� r �.C�fiff'd' f ems" 1u �S L i; �s._7sf Ctii,Lr AQP•°� . f 1 td � "'a ♦ 34 �,w yX4,6 t�,_. ".♦ rbr N .rrlre.y 1 �rr� f f f 04 !�? ._ -.,. , .��..:...._ .....,.... � trt. •fA _�,'. }„ , ,;. .,•�: ��fryiwffrYrYrf P 1 r�OO�• i GLASS I (PATH) ,� r\`\ ���•1'�y.�, • ���' f1 rij..��i Eit�4�� t e SY�ii p �� 79 r i r Y' r 1 � S (R O117E 1 ��;L rteI` =,.x ��.,�,•'� ' .!��r'�' 'ri7�,t�.i� ,�. »C•- dr,♦9 �+�$,!,'�'.fL�'.�tr�r, '"��� ', 1•N ' f, +Jtt4 i,C1♦5J'111LANEII iiririiiiiirii tClAss li) r � •� "`=�• "i.+r-� �� :�{j d ay,�• y �!... 'Vta ,�" rji �� � .ZL,.�1� , ! 6 � ry ��°.i+.,, i A, � e'. i ✓1 8 � .� 3 wi, tkt y. %iy � ' 1•ri 1f yyi.. y�jr t''" ir�f �. fx"1rx �j'r`.`r ^r'+�, }' i'k ♦ +'r r. x t r4rh♦ . ,y'r ^Iyy.rk t�'r y�.w f►q•• • f • t� �I +`� i R JCiJQUM { , * r � y,, yrijl br�4 ' .4ry♦ qio y 1 IN 7NOUSANb", 00' Pik C tX f `y ,. _, ••••i. rpq• •`tet • . e obfr+thURE BIKEWAYS 'PL op TJA CHICO GENt RAL ''PLAN FIG3.��4 Trip Distribution. The total number of trips generated by the proposed mb Project (2, 7D0 trips) were distributed within the 'existing roadway system by meIing general assumptions about where new vehicle trips would be destined. The primary assumptions were as follows: Five percent of all trips would use State Route 32 north of Muir Avenue. outUaF East Avenue. 20 percent of all trips would use. State Route 3L 1 70 percent of all, trips would use West Shasta (10%), West Lass sen (10�) Henshaw (15p) and East Avenue (35$). FweP ercent of all trips would use Guynn Avenue (2.5%) and cussiek' - - Avenue (2.5%) south of East Avenue. Table 3.2-4 presents the expected in increase in vehicle volumes projected to Occur from 270 afive+iimaaeteexpected lWith and without its in the othe ject area. Table 3.2-5 presents the rel stem• proposed project on the circulation sy Traffic Conditions. The addition of up to 270 residential units to the project area would incrementallyoltraffic wouldeaddt�toraffic volumes projected volumesainathe roadways. This additional Of service at affected project vicinity and would decrease levels intersections. The following discussions clarify where impacts could occur as r ed by the project in one future year a result of the additional trips generated (2060). STATE ROUTE 3 1 2i The additional trips generated by development allowable under the,proposed General plan Amendment would -increase the number of _left turns Avenue to State Route 32, would increase traffic on the east/gestate Route / ortion of ^ from East, Kennedy Avenue, the Althoughdtheseeiinpactsase rwould fid treduce ttravel capacity p Muir Avenue intersectio someHhat along State Route 32, they would not be,consi.dered significant an. would not require mitigation, s involve and theals rremaini rturn emainings, due o Capacity of relatively low traffic volumes intersect onsof Plan edlane(twowerm tea ay left turn l ffic improvements, such as the 'ane} along State Route 32 and constructs ceptable levels of other east side connectors, are expected to maintain ac - service in the future. Other measures to reduce conflicting traffic mov-Oti0fis Of ements, succi; as those associaed ted withater in thisdbhvtion�tolimprove elevels of Kenn edy Avenue, are recommend service along State _Route ,32+ EAST iVENDE. East Avenue would carry a large portion of the trips generated by the urban growth anticipated`by the year 200Qtraffied the dattthe WestiAl end allowable under the proposed "project. The Additional of East Avenue generated by the; proposed project would not be significant. (See the previous discussion pertaining to State Route 32.) t3owever, the h 146rdt t the ibt additional traffic createcldaState Rout e�ers99twouldiOhS oreduce levels off rga8t Avenue service:at, Gu"ynn and The Esplanade an these lbcationsi previously planned and recommended roadway imPx-mplemen ed related measures identified at the end of this section should be implemented to maintain acceptable levels or service in these locations 3_ 3 TABLE 8..2-4. ESTIMATED FUTURE DAILY TRAFFIC INCREASES ASSOCIATED WITH THE PROPOSED PROJECT PROJECT GENERATED' ROADWAY SEGMENT VEHICLE TRIPS (a) EAST AVEN•JE 500 Max SR 32 to Cussick 950 Cussick to The Esplanade 500 The Esplanade to SR 99' _ _ _- 450 SR 95' to Cohasset eTHE ESPLANADE 100 Eaton to Lassen 500 Lassen to East 1040 East to Cohasset STATE ROUTE 32 North ;of Muir 135 100 Muir to East South of East 540 270 WEST SHASTA 270 WEST LASSEN 400 HENSHAW - 70 GUYNN (Soot b of East) CUSSICK ''West Shasta t o Henshaw 150 20 HetshaH to East 70 South of East eereasd it' (a)Represents incremental traffic in both direetiohs on by the proposed project. theseroadways dUetothe1deVlopment AllbWed Soureei Earth Metrics Incoripor•ated; i9SS� 3:2-1 EXISTING AND ONMAJORSTREETS IN THE PROJECTED TRAFFIC VOLUMESO TABLE 3.2-5. PROJECT AREA WITH AND WITHOUT; THE PROPOSED STREET SEGMENT EXISTING 'VOLUME '(a) FUTURE (2000) DAILY VOLUI9`E FUTURE (2000) DAILY VOLUME DAILY W/O PROJECT (b) W/ PROJECT EAST AVENUE SR 32 to Dixon/Cussiek 9,716 15,500 26,700 16,000 27'fi50.::. Dixon/Cussick to The Esplanade 11x257 16,340 29,700_ 301200 The Esplanade to SR 99 12,476 18,600 19,050 SR 99 to Cohasset THE ESPLANADE 18 600 n to Lassen Eaton 8,170 14j684 18,500 26,800 , 27,300 Las8eu to ;East 26,056 25,800 (b) 26,840 East'to Cohasset STATE RObTE 32 12,835 NA 1 2,7b 0 North f East gi160� 11 , 400 11,,940 Souti, of 'East teased by tt"o percent per year for five years; Derrick, r (a) 1981 voltunes � 1986 'Element, Circulation C ireulatian Elee (e) From the 1984,y overestimated existing volume. ated future or (, ) Ind3cates$unrares imy, Nle Not Available , Earth etrics, source: M 1085 ii Butte: County Circulation 1986. Element, i9843 Derrick, 19863 ,and Pierce, 3 ,2-15 THE ESPLANADE. The additional traffic generated on West Lassen, West Shasta, ersectionsy The impacts of this Henshaw, and East Avenue would affect travel,capacity along The Esplanade by increasing left turn conflict3 at main int traffic at The Esplanade intersections With West Shasta, West Lassen, and Hganshaw would not be considered significant and would not require mitigation caacity due to the relatively low traffic. Volumes involved and Lhe remaining of these signalized intersections. However, the loss of travel capacity at ' and The n would the intersections of Th�inedaithe CATS.ade/East Esplanade/Cobasset require mitigation asdf Cons istency'with Local Transportation Plann n The proposed project does not present any significant impacts which would substantially alter the data bases utilized for transportation plannifig in the Chico area. However, the existing data bases did not anticipate the proposed development density In the project area. The construction of the Eaton Road extension would not be affected by traffic in ed development bu' ;could encourage hrdensit GandrwouZdal ainereaseent or related project area in the ,future. urbanY gated prior to approval The impacts o7 the extension would be examined and mit of such a project. The proposed General Plan Amendment appears to be inconsistent with the policy in the County Circulation Element which a Green7,ine (see Section 3.1, indicates that the county will Use, maintain the integrity of the Chico Are Planning, Applicable Plans and Policies for -a discussion of the Chico Area Greenline). The Circulation Elementts intent in maintaining the Chico Area Greenling is probably to reduce trip generation in areas of low urban density Greenlinedi would require d.stantial improvements to meet county standards. would require and requirements presented in the Existing Setting of The remaining P of these measures this report address financing of roadway improvements: �y apply directly to roadway improvements recommended as mitigation-measures in: this report. icycle Facilities. The proposed project would increase Pedestrian and B " by allowing increased urban density, in the pedestrMi- d bicycle activities p, j et area. The projected increases would not be expected to create ro e significant safefry impacts or vehicle conflicts on local roadways, such as � Hens haw Avenue. Safety impacts Along major arterials Would not be project rela6ed bicycle activity and motor vehicle significant, however, the p � pedestrian street trips would increase the need for appropriate bikew<<Ys and crossings along 'major arterials, such as East Avenue, especially near schools such'as J,. Partridge `Elementary: The Chico bike rotate along Henshaw Avenue would not be significantly affected due to the small increase in.Lraffie projected for this street: P blie Transmit+` The `proposed project would allow development which could increase patronage of Route 1 of the'Chieo;Area Transit System, However, in re se the distance between most of the project area and the closest bus stop is more than one mile, maily of the residents may not utilize the bus service. impact's from the future development are not expected to be significant, but would ittcrementally increase transit dema"rd along the, East Avenue corridor. If cluster 'development ,is proposdd# Measures toencourage ' transit patronage' should be required during site plan revi EmerBency'Access. The additional dwelling units allowed by the :propo'sed General Plan Amendment would increase the need for emergencyserv3cc access to i the project area. Unconventional intersections in the project area sho•ald be evaluated and modified, as necessary, when specific subdivisions are reviewed by the county. MITIGATION MEASURES. The following measures are recommended by the staff of Butte County and the City of Chico to mitigate the traffic impacts identified in this section. Measures identified in the Butte County Circulation Element should be implemented, as necessary, to acquire appropriate funding from developers, the Federal Highway Administration (such as aid from gas tax revenue and funding), and from CALTRANS for appropriate ,traffic mitigation measures identified in the CATS and in this report. The safety and capacity of the unconventional intersections in the project area to convey vehicle traffic and emergency vehicles should be evaluated and modified, as necessary, when specific subdivisions or developments are reviewed by the county. Rights of way for each of these intersections should be reserved, as necessary, as a part of adjacent subdivisions or developments. Realignments should be required. on a case �y case,basis with the objective that all realignments be completed with buildout of the area: The standards defined in the Butte Count _ Y Circulation Element (page 35) and in the Butte County document entitled: "Improvement standards for Subdivisions, Parcel Maps and Site Improvements Pursuant to CY►apter 20 of the Butte 6unty Code", should be required for the roads A the project area: The applicable standards involve road types R3 -3A and SRS -1, depending on specific development proposals. These improvements would •not e required for the proposed General Plan Amendments, but would berequired when subdivisions or development is proposed. The thecity orcounty, whichever are more stringent. Cityof Chioo would request that these roadways meet tha standards of _ Left turn pockets should be constructed and .on street parking should be eliminated on East Avenue, between Connors Avenue and The Esplanade, and. on The 'Esplanade, between Lassen Avenue and Rio Undo Avenue. These projects should be implemented as development occurs in the project area and vicinity with the objective that the projects be completed with ' buildout of the project area: East Avenue should be widened to its ultimate width, including installation of euObs, gutters and sidewalks' by, developers with frontage along East venue. (This requirement .is not the responsibility of the applicants, but should be implemented as development occurs in the project area and vicinity.) Butte County should require the project applicants and future developers in the project area and vicihity to install traffic signals At the , intersections of East Avenue with'Guywn and gorcl: Installation of the signals should be completed with buildout of the ,project area•, Site design criteria which increases opportunities for transit patronage should be encouraged if specific development proposals-invol."ve clusters of development: 8Z16i7 Access to the future extension of Eaton.Road should be provided via Bell Alamo should not be encouraged T', Road. Intersections With Nord,. Guymon",acid lon and related roadway improvements unless future land use ntensifica ' occur prior to extension of these roadways. - Pedestrian crossings should be considered along East Avenue where primary pedestrian "routes and bikeways meet with East Avenue. w 3,2-1 8 GEOLOGY/MUROLOrY EXISTING SETTING olo The project urea is iocaated on a broad alluvial Plain. o Palley between then as the Chico Fan, Gh �which is la:ated in'the northern Sa Sacramento River to the fleet and the Sierra Nevadafoothills alluvium consisting TOf he project area is underlain by Recent Age coarse gr ravel and cobbles. The coarse grained alluvium is unconsolidated! silt, sand, g Sierra Nevada' overlain by a loamy surface soil layer and is underlain by "volcanic rocks, foothilla project area are composad :primarily metamorphic and curring in the P j SOILS. Surf inial sto s t ). The Vina of loans` belonging to the race Fizzed good natura7.Gdrainage, , moderately slcnr . Farwell association is characterized by B to moderate Subsoil pecrmeability, slc7itt to medium runoff and no erosion hazard. The Vina Farwell association also possesses a moderate shrink/swell change of a soil with a change (expansion oteent�and amod rate alloxabe of the leesoill pressure rating, a measure in moisture content, � .; pressure. is ,; �,�;�„.;,Lity of a soil for foundation The Soil. Conservation Service identifies ° ultural potential and rates the "a&i' and limitations oi° soils into eight land capability classifications - and in are considered agricultural: and soi.ts in Classes V to VIII Classes I to. IV possess' characteristics which limit �rtiont The Vina�Farwellbsoils haveebeen for forestry, range, wildlife ar recreation. identified as Class I and II prime agriculture] soils. Portions Of the project area also contain surficiai soils composed_ of clay s association. The Conejo Berrendos loam's belonging to the Cenejo Berrendo cod.natural drainage, moderately B16W _ association soils are csharacterized by g rmeab.lity, Slott runoff and no erosion hazard. However, to slow subsoil pe become highly impermeable (Edell, when these Boils ere rampacbed, they can shrink/swell. 1086). The. Conejo B�errendos soils also possess moherCone jo B ate to high soils potentiod al and moderate allowable aril pr are Class III, prime agricultu_'^al soils. SEISMICITY. The Chico"area does not have a history of severe seismic activity ' ctive faults or (City of Chico, 1976) There are no active or potentially, Sea ' ch ii1clude6 Alquist priolo Spe e3,a1 5titdies Zones located in the CLioo ar tu the project 'area: There is no record of surface histoound fail Occurrsnughin�Chieo. In OtUre addition, there ��s'n° eadiment lurching f and differential settlement in liquefaction, lateral bpr n8r Chico. The Cleveland Hi.l fa known active fault in But+moo County is " t�� the only "0 miles southeast of the�projeet area. Movtdont alonglocated hoer Scale) the Cleveland Hi ,l fault was "responsioie for thy. 5.7 mag august f 1975 The Orovill.e earthquake was felt' in Oroviiie earthq,�iake in o damage as rocoeded. A series of Oce- miles noethVest of the trending inactive faux Chico but no dam a �,. roxi.mateiy is are located apP project area, 3 i�r1 1 In addition to the 1975 Oeoville earthquake, ground shaking from earthquake picenters outside th;e .immediate area has been felt previously,'in the Chico area. However, the greatest intensity of ground shaking recorded in Chs o was 5.0 on the Richter scale and there is no historical. evidence .of any significant damage having occurred. A statistical estimation of earthquake Richter Scale magnitude, as a function of "`Estimated return:pariod for California, indicates Chico could experience an earthquake! of :magnitude 13.0on the Richter Scale once every 40 years. Other studies, have, however, sui,19ested smaller maximum intensities (City of Chi o ► 197 �drolo�y DRAINAGE. The overall topography in the project art -,a slopes gently `to the, northwest toward Mud Creek, whilch is. located approximately ane mile rthwest of the project area,. Lindo Channel is located Approximately,0.75 miles south of the project area. At present, there are no existing storm drainage facilities within the project area. Overland runoff ;in the project arc%a ponds and percolates into the soil. There are no well defined surface drainage nour:ses In the ;project aroas See Section 3.4, Public Services And Utilities, +Gr �Sisaiisbion of existing and planned `storm drainage i'acilit►;es in the project area. A storm drainage study completed for, the north Chico Brea, including the; project area, has recommended installation, Of collector storm .drain lines just. south of the Southern Pacific Railroad and along Bell Road in order to accommodate potential urban development of the storm dreinage study area (see Figure 3.4-1).` These collector ]lines would flow by gravity to Shasta union Drainage Assessment District (SUDAD) channels which Would ultimately 'dibdharge into Aiud Creef (Rolls, Anderson and 'Rolls, 1985) . The proposed collector lines have been designed to carry 100 year storm flows, in accordance brllth Butte County Public Works Despartment and Butte Coanty Improvement Standards. Annexation to 'SUDAD Would be required prior to the use of their facilities. c area Which includes 'thebub,parcels (see Sectir plan for 'the nol th Chico on The county and city are currently jointly develo ing a storm drainage ornate p 3.4, Public Services and utilities). FLOODING. The subject parcels are not located in the 100 year floodplain' (u.s. Department of dousing and Urban Development, 1974). Mud Creels and Lindo Channel are modified ephemeral channels designed to provide flood c;ontrcl for Big Chico Creek. The projeut urea may, however; be subject to minor,, localized stormwater ponding Niue to the lack of" drleinage inPrastructur+e and soil compaction. GROUt�D�TATER. The project area and Chico 'vic,.nty is underlain by eartensive groand�tater supplies of the Sacramento Valley groundwater basin (California DcOartment of hater Resoitlrces 1980)• Section 3.4, Puhlia 5ervfees and Utilities, contains a discussion of water supply and distribution in the »o�gCt ;area. There are three water bearing zones beneath Chico: these zonas the shallow intermediate, and deep guifers. Groundwater generally moves }, deep, uifer. the *,w� de to intermediate aquifer and From. intLc k� dicta � �w pd�x�n the shal;leM 3.3-