Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
84-45B GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 8 OF 21
c7 Isuper isor Hilda Wheeler August 24, 1984, page Z 3, prop the Board -initiated amendment and leave area in agri- cultural designation and still zoned A-5- 4. A11ow the pxoperty°mean proposal to or-hired someonein the utoawr�te' manner. This would an EIR and when that is done hearings are scheduled. 5. Define the area proposed ,for SGP and zone change, specify what GP designation and zoning is ,, oposed, develop a Plan for '►andlir►g drainage and traffic, determine a per parcel charge, and set tip the procedure allowed in state law to have property okrners reim- burse the county for the cost of the plan and pay their pro rata P -hare for improvements as they develop. . Select a consultant to prepare an ETJt for the property owner application, require the Board -initiated application to bn analyzed as an alternative and require those signing the zoning petition to pay these costs. This is what the department recommended and we tabled July 17.E I recommend 45• Since a drainage plan is already underway, it could be said this proposal has been started, albeit piecemeal. This choice does not answer what to do went the existing small lot on than 1, 2, 3,4, or 6 in settling certainly gets paying Bell -Muir a ing their share. of necessaryimprovements, but i ce us further along 4. controversy. I must say that my first choice would be #3:., Them, is much support, from property owners in the area to ]cave thinog rt fox'as tthatafroin all would say th-t there would be teinendous bHowerer, X recognize a who travel N. Esplanade and W. vast Ave. strong desire on the part of many property owners (clearly 270 acres worth) to have the opportunity to divide their property. these, reasons: of property recotnmenrl for. I :air to honor the requestP _ P erty owners for us to 1, It is fair consider'changing the 'GP and zoning in the area. 2 It is unfair to burden the taxpayers with the cast o the legally requred EXR, planning analysis; etc. , necessary to honor this request. _ appropriate, fiscally 3. Since 't ha been a long 'established, approp , conservative'be s otic of Butte County to have development y P y'Policy pay their Own way, st would seem a public and an inappropriate allocation of public resources to sUbsid- ize development in this area. - `^r interests must seek answers We as representatives of thy' punk 4. + be to, at least, the drainage tend traffic impacts that t+ri� 1, N,.. 16.2=5 84-583 Discussion on choosing consultant for preparation of an environmental (2605) +•+ e rt for impact report ` as amend �• the Bell.-Muir area pursuant to Resolution 75-57r 0 Potion: REAFFIRM • THE FACT THAT THE BOARD HAS GIVEN DIRr^CTION TriAT THE BELL-MUIR AREA BE CONSIDERED FOR CONTINUED ST13DY:AND CONSIDERATION OF A GENERAL PLAN CHANGE AND RE2ONF. AND ALSO THAT THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY BE CONDUCTED IN-HOUSE BY STAFF. M S Vote: a .- _ _ 2 35 STAFF To GO AHEAD AtJD 84-583. kation Amended'. TO INCLUDE THAT WE DIRECT + CDi:TRACT WITH EARTH METRICS TO DO TRF. EIR FOP. THE BELT.- (Cant'd) kTUIR STUDY' ARMAc Vote. 1 2 34 5 , , •` AND 'HEEhEF. TO 4'ORi( TOGETHER TO TABL_ � BE5T IAEIREC 'L (T ATIO IS�`ONIWWAT 114 ORDER FOR PEOPLE TO DEvtLOP 1 ACRE PARCELS.) j 4 BOAh.D Or 1PERV�SOttS AtI't`4 TE"5 - .Iu�y 17, 1951 _ lb JPQRiA11QN A $TATE OF CAtr 4iA•—TRANS C',I' J _ Ciomroce _-- ��,� •^-- GEIJ*tGE DEUK?�E11AN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DISTOCT 7 r P.CJ ECVX. 411, MARYSVIIIE 95901 s Telephone ( 916) 741-427 March 21 198Q Uta�il�^., Gatuu,r.; 03 -Bat -32/919 Chico Area Greenline GPA1 Mr. Rick Rodriquez, ButteCounty Plarin, ini; Department 7 Count, Center Drive Oroville, CA 9?65 Dear Mr. Rodriquez:, Caltrans,, District reviewed the go feral. plan amendment eppiications for amendments would a11o;� urbanization of property currently in agricultural� three separate ro ... ties on the we. tcm ce of the Chico urb,' n ares. Ttp uses. T1r1e extent of future circulation imFmcts as at remilt of these l nd use changes co.,d. d vw—y greati.y with the type of proposed develop qnt. in considering the :3ppl clt on:�, tt, 00001,Y,21at>1c1 rtrid;rt�,j;s �ar►1•�It.—C;1 tr1XVC impr*16t to otate Roues 72 and o and heieded ro•AdwtiE - mltigitioft Pteosures.- Caltre-ns n.,�pr�riate being ini'ormvd of 'land wo, cttnn pz in thr. vicinity of Sstu3e�ja�.n�dJc�r,,pJei�.:�cudevelo�.m�ntopropc�sal�oforveo�� �r��pquent en�irar�mental" q pF y s eh of there properties. If YOU have any quest4.ons on these commonts, please contact Jeannie Faker .at l the alaoVr_ad8ress or tele p hont~ t9,16 ' ) 74,14M. Sino rely, bis girt Director of .Tr,ansportatian Prion Jti S�ith Chief, Divironrcnbi 'qrowh 16, !:..n Y BUTTE COUNTY FIRE DEPARTIEN FIRE PROTECTION STANDA1105 REVIEW DEVELOPMENT NAME EIR- NO. 8437_ Ala#— Log 84-01-1,3-02 LOCATION_' East Avenue area, Chico DATE 2' / 21 r84 Calif. Department of , This project must Heel the requirements in the Uniforr.; t Forestry Building Code amended to Butte County standards. Y Department Bulla Count Fire De CooperaPlve Firo Pr In accordance with Section 13.00 (Fire Standards) of the Improvement Standards, the wager requirements for this RICHARD D. TILLER parcel/project are: (Applicable standards are checked). ( ) 13.01-1 Requirement Class 1. A. water supply for Batfalian Chief fire protection will not be required, { ) 13.01-2 Requirement Class 2. A pressurized water system with adequate numbers of hydrants is pre OFFICE 1916) 89147Cferred, but if this is not feasible, the following option will satisfy, the fire department require- ment for water. ( ) a. Hater storage .tanks with a capacity of 14,000 gallons or more:, equipped with direct 611 weather access and fire department connection {s-79); ( ) b. In ground swimming pools equipped with a drafting connection or drafting access,, or, ( ) c. A dry standpipe system plunrted to o reliable dater source. Such standpipe system will not exceed 1,000 feet in length, There must be at least 10,0130 gallons of water available ,ind strategically located for each 10 dwellings,, or portions there->4.xample.. ]l dwelling:, t7ov dl require -two se arated•sourfes). Provisions must be made to insure that the water, stored is always available, and acccssible,for use under all weather, conditio { 13,01-3 Reouirement Class 3, A pressurized co.•rmiunity water system is required, Tentative hydrant locations are indicated o? the attached preliminary map., Final locations must be exactly indicated and recorded on the final r,.a, Number of hydrants required r;ax mun hydrant; to hydrant spacing_ feet, hydrant size 5-27 and requirementI. s G,F fi+local `.titer agency. Required to Ituttc `County —Public HurNs ?.ps•ciftcation + a�nctn.t.l e`�red ff+oe flows are gallons per minute. Mitigation o in flows listed under other conditions. { ) quirement Class c, Water for fire protection is ,equired, The preferable system is a hydrant- W system capable of hr:eting the fire flow reyuirttmunts. If :this is not feasible, a sy5'tein involving inde- pendent pumps, static water storage and dry standpipes ray lie substituted. Such a system it 'subject to, the approval of the fire department. The available waLur flow from such a system mutt flow�� gallons per minute, The minimum volume of water` in .stlora`gO must be 961`lons. Provisions must be made to insure the system provided is maintained to ,ts design capacity, ( ) 13.0165 Requirement Classy, Pressurized water for fire protection is available within 1,000 feet of the created parcels, In lieu of bear-ing the cost of installfng a fire hydrant(s) the developer hay pay into the fire departtient hydrant fund, Pay in -lieu fee into. hydrant fund based t per frantaae foot, Fr. (twin, in non th on 51.25 Frontage i5 indicated by the red line on the attached map, Approximate fee is. S 'Final frontage calculation to be= made by surveyor and ret:ot-ded on final map,' Fronta!le, calculation.will int'luJow both sides of thO street on included streets, ( ) Required water system for fire 'protection must be installed and oiterating prior to building tonstrut:tion KX) Other Condi'tions-__' No objections. y ( pesponse times fo- the first 1 fire engines it as follows; CDFIgCFO l Station o 21 Station lr minutes S #nute�s ihthe Safety afet tl emdelt of the Butte County General P this project area is'clas00 116d as a tied to Mc�c,ltl. �.�• 'C,ozhrt� tan, WILLIAM C; TELE ,3 , , County Fire iiateloh ,w f ay, '. C'•cr, `"� V -r ,ut+"`�Battalion Ghie-f - q._. y� 2-10 r�bre LticWO._ five: 11 kateN agetir re uiremeitts #ar hydrants may 60 'restric www... I.w. VF .-.w T_ •. . x , ��• _ `--Maw'. a= .` .. 1 SS n� i BUTTE. COQ -NITY PL'- ItIG CC�'by-r'?rSS1t"t,l Q. . ` �tlr, Co. Pipnr+tnj Canm.- 7 COUNTY CEOTER D.HIVE - OFZOVILLE. CALIF010,011 950-6.'j lti 34 Oroville, C;ali`t�rr�a O Lynn Vanhart, Env. Health DATE February 14, 1984 RE: PROJECT REVIEW AND E,'4V P0',"iFNITAL EVALUATION Enclosed. is lsrai.mirar� c'ata otu` o fiats' N�.� rr~cc`i�'r<d or mpetatbd concerning . file �o1Jo.tine project Board oC Supervisors G:enera� Plan �lrtertdrient fron orchard allcl tje•ld ci-ojtis to the urban sic le o.E=by 1(t'he groen' ine I-U�4� rt 1 t s►Art ttirc ► us.tsx vs I ttc. G� the sar(tt 'b�• 8`d-st FVtA ii[ieand ttenshlti4 Pacific is Railroad t clacks , on , , Y•- on tr3-T tj ;tT trait Y r.. �IaYif1 voliv 7 a'n Crn the 11dT'C ( i ,c x0z ,�ncte atYd Muir rkvuiitte in No r`htve � Cl"tC0 - "20 . 84- 37 I.o 01841 01-1 y- llx We at -a aft a s# -,z -m---nt of possible erli'l Ormte'ntal itip'lietc, and wi.11 be, r�rLparin ct:"r. @rityl,r•o;y:, nuA1Z tiy! �'lS"«�r:t, BI:t.,4'.�.C' F N -''g tiVr' Z'Z'�F.IC°atlCrrlS �•ilt�_].(',ili • y i �: t frl. -n t1�`e I'r-� 'lt'z1� ��� o> �.� ur1� 1 0 �L. t- tat Ir xc t � p;otiic?e Win, Fart rol r;t• trr:l�+tii: , itl •:rj for in:Yrwa`ik;�t o:ty or op,n f , i rY i•r. L . i^ Lint :t rClC1�C t0- Cit'.? r, You Coll ofl'or in V:✓11: iJs i t CtA, Cq�ir t t" 1 L)- �". . L1 i wj�1Yv'Ll� C1111rY, of t!COP.�?':: �1:,^•:L+°`f.�S tIt:lt LEtluC5?^C?�..« ri1iilJ!^Lciti. t`4bt'a:r-nntt'l 1.r rig re:spor!*Sc'_i I '* frt.i.,�11 t�i3� thory are ho t �,:�F�CI-cltl'CI f'j yi `.i li yt .iI s •`y� Lw c y•• .3T `r�ifiCat'I Lr�" .A. t: 'n 1 �v A't?Y i Y,L L ,, :ao%a=�c•ait-Xl �r::,�'7:L�i�ifirLG�i, �t:LF,'IyJttlr=i L+'(� 1�otit t~il>w prtl,jectf 'k ar,•re-i zti_ , aai r �.�s to..cc _ 6t( c:;trt provi.dt. 5 in C :•rG'`l nl woeCo. mv. y C �OV)LYFr� rv1�-8.1•i t/C, C1W6 `1Mtai •�v(L}t+claStay3}�an oxbvtb�a� si��}tra�ckslr+s +off' w-Nn'yv► +Il+c."ki y►i�/! &s t t{ ea ulell `}ejt+ Li4c+tt%�e*sem-�di-l.�t�.. j�iza�rrn._v,.l�►l l i w�:A 9�s dorsr? as JUU-A A 4iAtZ J44ii-ib A&V 6" . Detec i cxc►�l2 —ax 'it t ►�yFr'1 ! C (,Sit kY•l..w.. i ly ir�. ;F!r� w�l:••iTi Y �a �',;� t yS.;tS: rS :t�t•,yy,r W j , fiE, COUNTY jINhMMNG CoiNNISsl0;i . -�� CO UINITY CENTEt,J11 t �rL el�c� �t�tr ; c � Ito t�� ►95065 r 5134 )01 TO: Farm AVistu - DAT,r. May 18 , 1984 � ! •�b�c ) Jerry Smith Hit.: P1:0,Ts,CT RE,VU74 MAD Ercl.Orcd is trblt' of aryl ,daata o:.vv offic'_' lieu rtrC-,v.d OI' ,f`ner'aieCI corcerning the .,ot]owir, ° , t sots Ge ncra PJ an mcri lrmt:ttt , Pr I o il%I O C Sttpo r•t from orchard atacl f qM crop.5 to the ttrb,-In side of the9rec l i ne Pacific Railrc►: ��atks;, on the south by East AvC11,ueP and IlenshttW tiYc'Iltt£'� Ontilt' Cfls t 1j• r .ii�l(? tAl`E it tit; t;tc� on the n01 v 6-y e d-T( acid htt Le .1y-omw in P;orthuc.sz. Chico-,.No. 84-37 I,ngt 4094-01-1.3-02 We arc r. ir: i,t an ' t,00Srl •nt of pos.' ible environmental irp:+c is and, AA11 be prcp:trwrtv an tIrvirc .:-nta�l. �rncttr:t ttt� Citi►Lr a flegtttivr Declarrationi M'iticated l:t'�7 t lt'E> rrr'.t Cti'rn; cCII or w.I r ttV] a'Ott6%t"ll% 11 Zf wt'`.^Z t;t �t tit t, Plenjo" "PI'O a`li t on sc' ctl t.x• , I„t�e:l:i for 'live �� �•'i � J.OII � Lir opinions you con offer in Yc"n.z` arra of Con.A'Z i,ii or cxj.:tri tso t'Stat relate to o'Lljor phy.--i . 1, w)aj .1 lic • t.: tltnt tltf„s pro jc.:'t may g,,cheraftii Plcn.-c` ,rcrq-OnI titin, lit v:Lyi of ;tlt5" ;rkbo.to-notvd dotc". If no rt'_pou�st ie, by 't::.1:. l.r.ri t ry, flit"n T13. bo zru.mwtw,fiat tiled` Ove no F,rti '6 It r,.:i:'i:.A,;,ktil it7fra t� 1vlti�}i vro I►tstotfir1.1 1`ro^.1 tlt,-� proje-f, "ny c1y:'2:itOk10E` you mein provi&. 53 Me Co. Pltnnin roer�-1� y _ �#g C"H, OUt; t 4 � /,? Orovilfo, Calitern;a Rsc� _,odr it t10,. Planning Tecl:niti"an -� t , At LIU a t �� �i'%(''�tlitr ttt. t'4fvNlil a;►�1.it 1�r91'1':1S1j.�y�.7 �'� 'i4t�ftt`R tt,l:��:tlf�"k:�.c� A. _T; , �C BUTTE, CO i '' MG co lj SSWIL .- _ ' % COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROV I LLE, CAL 15ORN IA PHONE: 534-4601 TO John btendonsa, Public 1+corks DA'I.'i:+ Fe:bi•uary 14, 1984 - FIE: PROJECT REVIE14 M'4) vtnm +L-,-)P-1rNTAL EVAL1JAZ' ON r �� _t o e1',concerning, ncza�e'd is p:elzrin r' data our o�ftce has rece�r.ed or eherat ,+ `Ect. Board of Sltrjcrvi,;ors General plan Amendment the following P OJE y to the, ul`'uart sidrr o+' the greenl'ine - J from orchai.' attd fie l ti crops ' t �� uCstt UI ia� lCi e tt:tit UIr Vt,' t Lill.; ,j a t1 tr' Coad 3c1 �> c Ra°Llrt).tct tt;icks, ot1 t}tC 4otttit t) ' I ,ist 11� orTtle z11d }Icnshal a , . d, t=c Clue, ori t to t,us L y ` arto uc�ltic: atr� ott ttrc, r r I, a,id �jutr a%\,Clwe 111 ��rtrtttivost, .Cltlto ?�'o. F+1-37 1.0 ,"8i1 -O1 -13 -OL _pooblc euvran";ental impact': and will be �+ . ".a} e arc taa�tin, <ti. R� t .�f: _lt oiet, Mitigate .,�nttil doer:^'re�r.t, etttKr � 2.+zE,ativ�: Bec1a1"uti.sr, v or Fat"t �:;cV,��`Oti'il�+il.t:1�. ��•^.}::iCL �L}.`aY'C:. � e?`"C t ��Ld- +1tiR !3 'iu:Il tcl�ti ? 1t� t lt}h+ii:: fr�r iin-.'a:rti3O*'�ilt)n, or opinions ,. ur ;'nt't+,t of Cmik-ot•n cit x �+ r•E iF ` thrtt rr.Late to ei010t itt"i tit } ,J�tl �;rt1 � t •tr t}1i� r;•aJi.ct nay EE?her:ite. , ar t=ccnacctzr. �it:a}�a^t:.^, F Fti-Jr. t o t�„fir- t wi.t�t;lt 1i, ti:ty:; t+; th#i ,a fKt��t -trey► �t r3:tLr. 1.f nb resp+,no in +' t i l�t"n 1i' :y}f: t. be d:,rm'01104 that t}l�t'E' arc no �f ELrr .+rats ? b, tl .:; itt , +1 J+, lE'y;li t.r':1't7,.rrA�• r . �� (:1 the�jir7,]ECt. �+xl at.: tc..• wh,j., t.nte.rrt i-tl fro vi aasreciw"`t e +'tt+ a>estartce cru can g'rovitic. pVonning C°rrun oroVito, Calitorni6 RlG�: �ey�i' 1 �11E'r Plrt;nin .'1'clttlic inn . L5 i �t .3�. z .je.1• r st i.lr . �r rE lrrrn t z ��ti�t�t to t,,. t:.Vt•. 6 24.3 M BUTTE O',I,TY CoNhllsS1C,'� GUumv CENTa:i L'iE i`' - OINDVI L.J_E CALL OiINIA Frrtamc `311-11601 TO: County Sheri EJ= mteco. Planning Comra. 1; ,TE: F,V'Ortttary 14, '1954' Y : G'.�. 24:,.'!� ,y l_I. �i"I AN -D C.rovillo,'Calilornia'1!1'I+ EE'ALlJPlTIO.d C! «r,.l Cil.t_ 0rt-.,ti' h " rte !� t',_",'w C, r nermed. concerning CC*n tiiC' fol1Gt' it, „A.C}r. 1ct Loard Qin 117j1C r I it � r i� �llilfl �tFt.�.sdment IFICMA Crrchard add H 0 W Crops to the ortial! S i,°1l- or the Preenline 1ULLLLR;I. Ui' x'.'11 t r I J.l. 60IV 1 0U;. „o L't. U,� !'2 leo I�nC:I i.l �.+! L] Cl7:i;. �. r".;..� a , r I fart' -;ol J. tl;. l.,t ,X ^ tiaa� HenshawI LIC z"nto Ci s L .' .:.e ;'ia i t L'f+lre ,.i;.41 0:1 t U... j''.,' 1711 Ey Bell }:054 Mili in ;d,� � k:l..:; t Chick, 1 3 l_1,Frp t i _ 15 - 02 a!id r A. ota,u r �1" .184- p ° : . . t ! -; 1c t• Cln-1 t•ri;.l be 4Ja are r� "-.� ,"- � .} •, ,r`!�ra�, a�` p.%LAW., •� ,t" c• •., `` " , , sill �`"i,.',.. s+. ,Y4 V.i�1 '/t. 1.{y.'t !r �'L^.� .f., �- C:.. ,... ', - r»"� "`"l ,a, R��. '�',�y•lrz1L1�-�� 1•t ti �Le or 'In '�; pleas"� :• ".xc;. ,r��. `;IC*ILU.t7. you CG1 rf.Uf"-C+,, t''P1 1+'" t*� 1'i" i !F 't•�'l "i �C3 OiUhit C -tic: iut,'l :"!„,` L1. "i .'lj :it':."'l, tt:'T. Iry.�.`•a:.0 7 _4 , s, .r1 * '. ;1 1l! Cl J (tir �} " iLa e', •' -* F� ii l «� x'. L r1"CS S tea [ :a Lr 1 -:tE.:Y� } r l -r}+J e 11'. �r x,11 L; -i¢ "jr1A r F L :.a 2 1itl 4 1, :1,.S��C cii"ac:-In, A,-. CA's v., I t -°.rt,_^ 1 .z. v,tc. 1,►,ir11, ;ll, n?),w r!, 1.� f'rc..r thL, .pro.ierr We aper& i iit i, .-y Y ts°F 1�41'1 r.r'0V L';�,. Sit1t<�� ei 3`y r tC r�•l i♦ZI.Jti 1\1��;1 �`�l+Tw u f` -`•,rte PLlnning 'I'iirrilnil� ctn, Where A.s nopatrol ac;tit�i p o.� ici ri to the proposed pt:oject _'kli`ty b the B tt`e—t6u� . eri`rf" ti tient' "ntsxie "��e vi -c_ ;_ - ---- establisildci residential areas near' th<`" project is. provided on ah J -s:--- -"t&i tht,, t rare ot7_�nre" - Would be at least 15 m1hut6s. Given crYrreh4 resources; and with no pr6jrrtt:16 �,ignl ificant increases cirri to-�r�getztry�--tianstt�ittts; •��.it:e se"'�� ��� *tc�° �ay�..t,: fie'rlt would not he cheater � 1'1±'11: hn cr+l`tYont "5:t! �►� .�l()tlei3 area receives. � r -G 3 S- O S@l` '3 C'• X34 re -.,O t 0 ' 1*J S c.0 'G'�-O n1_hL-Wn1i �d f5irtho; strain e ti�tiro�r ne3 vok ilot, t-,^".."o,r t `s ability to meet ftq rog0tira its mandated t;8v tin1'hi l it.y ;,c; ,� j 1 ,'; r �,t,.: r entire unincorpQ te! area, , P , 14 AP�'ENDTX 16 .E LISA OF PARCELS INVOLVED IN THE GENERAL PLAN AMENMAENT ASSESSOR 'PARCEL NUMBER ACRES 042-02-21 022,42 28 042-02-10 20 i 042-02-20 10 042-02-54 042-02.-17 - 2 042-02.-6: 7, 101 30.3 042-02-9, 10 10 042-02-6, 7, 101 w 042-02, 2 -23 04242-16 2 042-02-90 4.8 r 042-02-99 5 ■ 042-02-19 18,.5 042-02.89 o42-05-38 9.9 042-05-33 042-05-14 7.3 042-05-34 9 042-05-15 10 042-05-35 62 Mineral Only 5 042-06-56 042-05-24 2.5 -04 5-66 5 042.',5-6= 5 _ 042-02-27 4' ASSESSOR PARCEL: NUMBER AM Fs 5 042-02-918 4.6 042-05-67 2 042-02-3` 4.8 042,-06-77 4.6 o42-06-76 1A 042-0743 042-05-61 5.1 16-3-2 APPEAR ,: 16 �4 1�,FP>;ICABLE ZON`iNG REGULk',`I� � ONS ' Sec. ,24.72. A-5 (Agricultural) Zones. (A) Uses permitted: (1) One single-family-dwelling per parcel; (2) General 'farming, horticulture, commercial livestock, poultry production, warehousing and storage; (8) Accessory buildings and uses pertinent to the permitted uses, including agricultural processing plants; (4) Housing facilities (including mobile homes) to accom modate only agricultural employees and their farnilies employed by the owner or operator of the premises and provided .further that such housing facility shall be considered accessory to the main building 4Lnd shah conform to the provisions pertaining to required yard' and open; space for dwellings; -(5) '110bile homes to house one :family when such mobile home is the only housing facility located on the prem- ices, provided the following conditions are conformed' to (a) The floor area Within the e mobilel home shall not be -- less -than five hundred-(500)_square-feet: (h) The parcel of land conforms to section 24-72(C) (Minimum lot area of five (5) acres), or a smaller parcel of land lawfully created. requinng g `mits The following uses ure a permitted subject ermito securing?a use permit in each case.' P (1) Golf courses and .country t1dbs; ie hg' (Z) f ho`uscs hos atxl9bland1 clinics c parr and cher,, p play_ public � s � itrsuarit fast ' 8rounde, schools utaiity buil , he require, m Segregation of .homesi , p q (3 m e nts of section 24-54; — 4) gegregat on of agricultural processing uses, pursuant to the regUirements of section 24-55: (5) ,',ming quarrying, commdrti.a1' excavation and wood processing plants. 16.44 i (C) Minimum lot area required: The requirements of section 24-33 of this Code notwithstanding, il. minimum lot area in: A-5 zones shall not be less than five (5) acres. (Ord., No, 1750, § 1; 8.31-76: Ord. No. 2167; § 1, 11-25-80) Secs, 24-73, 24-74. Reserved. Sec. 24-75. A-10 (Agricultural) Zone. ` (a) Uses permitted: (1) One single-family dwelling per parcel, including mobile homes;, (2) General agricultural rfarming, horticulture, commercial livestock, ,poultry production, growing and harvesting forestry products, warehousing, and storage; ■ (3) Accessory buildings and uses pertinent to the permitted. uses, including agricultural processing plants; i • to accommodate (4) dousing facilities (including trailers) - - only .employees and their families employed; by the owner or ope, ttor of the premises, ; and ,provided further:, that such 'housing facility shall be considered accessory to thy: train building and shallconform to the frovnsions p;�,taning to required' yard and open space 1? for dwellings O n 1irlltrg; quarrying, commercial iexdAvation and wood p rocessng plants, e which (6) Hunting and 'fishing amps, including those accommodate recreational vehieles and travel trailers, providing that said recreational vehicles and travel trailers shall riot be used for year4ound occupancy.> (b) Uses requiting Use permits: The following uses are permitted subject to securing a use permit in each case; (1) Segregation of .homesites, pursuant to the require- meats o sec tion 24-54, ` p g ursuant (2) Segregation of agricultural rocessrn uses, P to the re uiremnts of section 24-55. 16.4--2 ,_., _. _. ,ter.... •.: -.�_ ._ '. . . r � (c) Minimum tot area required: Minimum lot area shall not be leas than ten (10) acres. (d) Fru'itt yard setback: Minimum front yard setback shall be fifty (60) feet from the ;,inter line of the road; except where the road is classified by the county "a, Federal Aid - Secondary Road, the minimum building setback require- menta shall be :fifty=five (55) feet from the center line of the road. y cited: Minimum (e) gide acid rear yard re q ' _ side and rear' yard shall not be less than ten (10) feet., (Ord. No, 1750, § 1 $-31-76; Qr=ij. No. 2167, § 2, 11-25-80) 16.4.3 C. 24-162, SR=I (Suburban F:41dentlal) Zone, . , (A) Uses permhear (1) One single -family dwelling per parcel, not ,including tents, trailers or mobile hent 'ding s peril the pe rMittecl uses; ( 2) Accessory buil (3) Agricultural uses excepting' a minimum lot area o f forty-three 'thousawi five hundred aixty (43,5613) square feet to be devoted to residential use and the following for each: animal keit on the additional requirements premises ; _ (a) iK oz each 'horse or head of cattle or svnine over hundred one year of age-Eight thousand one twenty-five (5,125) square feet* (b) Eor each sheep nr goat—Two thousand' square feet. ,, a following 'uses [are erm�tt d]esubj subject t e ur ng aLuse permit in each case; Pe (1) Golf courses and country clubs; Public and quasi-public uses including churches, fire- and playgrounds, schools and houses, hospitals, parks public 'utility buildings (3) Sales tract office, 24 33 shall apply except- (C) .Site requirerrienis] Section - ng-lot-width and lot aroa:_ 8*01ing unit shall not be (1) The minimum lot area per the provisions ons of section 24-33 less than one acre; notwithstanding: ' (2) The minimum lot 'Width= shall not he less than one - 30) feet, the, provisions of section hundred thirty (1 (Ord, No, 1750, § 1 S-31-76) 24-33 notwithstanding• 16,4 01.4 APPENDIX 16.5 CHICO'AREA GR;EENLINF POLICY VT. CHICO AREA GREENLINE Tn'addition to the other policies of the Butte County General Plan, the following policy is applicable to the Chico Area 'Land Use 'Plan: A., PURE s":. The purposes of this policy are: a) To define the ;limits of future urban development which may occur on agricultural lands in the Chico Area of Butte County b) To provide for the`long-term protection of agricultural i resources of the Chico Area of Butte County, c) To mitigate the threat to agricultural resources posed I� by urban encroachment Chico Area-of't into and conversion of agricultural lands 1n the � Butte County;. d) To reduce agricultural/urban conflicts in the Chico Area of Bdtte County. e) To establish County cooperation with the City of Chico in land use planning of urban and agricultural_ lands ,located in the Chico Area of Butte County. f) To identify urban development limits, in or near agri- cultural lands within the County's Chico Area Land Use Plan byuse of a certain bold dashed boundary line. g) To establish a certain and clear policy text for Butte County's Chaco Area Land Use Element which will enhance and uphold the aforementioned boundary line and policy text. h) To establish certain land use designations for the Chico Area of Butte County in conformity with 'the afore- mentioned boundary I:irie- and- policy text. Bs FI DOINGS The Board of Supervisors of Butte County hereby find and determine that: a) Butt.,e Bounty possesses valuable agricultural lands with prime and non-prime soils and one of the finest growing ciimates in the world, b) Agriculture and its rely-ted businesses are critical to Butte Couhtyis economic stability. Inappropriately placed urban development in the Chico Area of Butte C untyy threatens the continued economic v.abilty and cultivation practices of commercial agriculture in the Chico Area. c) At present) the Chico Area of But County is substantially surrounded by agricultural lands on its northwestern, western, and southwestern bonders. These agricultural lends playa vital role -in the overall. economic 'vitality. of Butte County and must, be canserved,p d) The Chico Area of Butte County has ex= erienced the continued conversion of* valuable agricultural land to urban and suburban development: Unless the Land Use Klement of the Butte Courlty General Plan, as it pertains to the Chico Area) is ;amended to include an urban limit 'kine and a clear policy text; it is likely that the Chaco Area of Butte County will continue to experience sUch conversion in the future, with significant adverse effects on the viability of agricultural uses in the Chco,.:Areaz i6'S-1 e) II is critically important to the citizens of Butte Greenline' be established in order' Count that the Chico Area County that agricultural }.. and to ensure that the agri�- to conserve cultural viability of agricultural lands in the Chico Area inappropriate is not,,permanently destroyed by premature and conveersion to non-agricultural uses. of Butte County will the Chico Areahe fjrli population of The City ,of Chico General Plan estimates continue to grow. an urban area pop.elation range of from 56,500 to 71,100 'will in urbanization individuals by the year 1995, which ,result of ui to 1,600 acres in the Chico area. There exist in the Chico Area of Butte County .productive agricultural soils to fzxture urban and suburban development., already committed as well as less prodducttivvesoils capable of supporting future Such less productive soils urban and suburban development. located easterly Of the urban limit line line is are generally established by this ordinance. Unless an urban limit productive agricultural lands established to protect uncommitted in the'Chico Area of Butte County, it is likely; based upon grywth will •:historical trends, that future urban and suburban directed towards those lands which are alrea committed not be to or capable of supporting urban and suburban land use. of Butte. County that g) It is the desire of the people future urban :land development required to accommodate planned be directed and r population growth in the Chico Area shall the Urban Side of.the Chico Area Greenline. accommodated on Such direction and accommodati.on of. urban lane development the con- is hereby declared to be an essential component of of uses. tutalsofethe Agrthel servatiob. of agricultural people Gr;e.enline. It snfurther desire the Chico Butte .Area of Butte Count that public officials of theofoGhicoof Y officials of 'the City cooperate with public Planned population that this polic s purposes of accommodating p P �' Chico Area growth and of canservnng agricultural lands in the are carried out. ro onents Of: Nothing herein 'is intended to relieve the p p. in the Chico Area of all proper future urban land developments reasonable assessments fees Or charges required in order urban land and Providing public services to such to fund the cost of r developments or the residents thereof. C. DpBTNITI'ON5 Por purposes of this r the following Words and phrases ,vezy,ascribed to them by this golie p shall have the meanings rc,Y> s ect�. section hic areasho�w•n oil the a)°C}►ica Area" mean`s that geograp Y Lana the Butte Count Chico Area Land Use Plan MaP, apart of Use Element. r i b) "Official Chico Area Greenline Maps" means the Chico Area Land Use Plan and that large scale map certified by the Planning Director and on file in the Planning Department office located at`7 County Center Drive, Oroville, California. c) "Chieq Area Greenline" means the boundary line established by this policy and delineated on the Official Chico Area Greenline Map which line separates urban/suburban land uses from agricultural land uses in the Chico Area. d) "Butte County Land Use Element" shall refer to the Butte County General Plan Land Use Element, which element was adopted and as amended from time to time. 30, 1979, b the Butte Count Board o£ Supervisors on October e) "Agricultural" land use designation on and "Agricultural mean the "Primary Uses and the "S and Uses" " '" Bary ,Uses, set forth in the "orchard, and Field Crops" land use designation of theButte County Land Use Element as it existed on March 1, 1982, and as amended from time to time. f) '!Agricultural Residential" land use designation means the "Agricultural Residential" ,land use desicnation of' the Butte County Land Use Element as it existed on March 1, 1`982, and as amended from time to time. g) "Urban/Suburban Land Uses" means all lawful uses of land (including agricultural and agricultural residential land uses). h) "Agricultura'l Side of the Chico Area Greenline" shall 1 refer to lands within the Chico Area which are located westerly of the Chico Area Greenline. i) "Urban Side of the Chico Area Greenline," shall refer to lands within the Chico Area which are located ;easterly' of the Chico Area Greenline. D. ESTABLISHMENT :OF, CHICO AREA GREENLINE The General Plan of the County of Butte is hereby amended as follows a) 'There is, hereby established the Chico Area Greenline which shall be located as, shownonthe Official Chico Area Greeriline Map, The Official Chico Area Greenline Map is incorporated into this policy by this reference. b) 'Should a dispute arise or, ambiguity appear as to the exact location of the Chico Area Greenline., the following rules shall be applied in determining the exact location of such :lime. 1) The Greenline shall be identified in the Chico Area Land with p large Scale 'maps, Use Plan with a bold dash line as shown on the Chico Area Land Use Plan Map. The Greenline is s.ecafic certified by the Planning Director ,shall be consulted in the event of a dispute: t i. ' 2) N°here the Greenline is inidcated as approximately fol owing l Street,, alley, railroad tight yof-way, creek or channel _lines the centerline of such street, alley, railrbad right-of-way; creek or channel lines shull be cons'truedto be the location of the Greenline, 16:6- 3) Where the Greenline is indicated as approximately lot line shall be cons rued to following a lot line, such be the location of the Greenline. 4)' With respect to property that is n of subdiv.ded,,and Chico Area Greenline bisects a lot or parcel, the where the location of the Greenline, unless the same is indicated by the official Chico Area Greenline Map, dimensions shown upon the use of the scale ; Appearingon the shall be us • ethe Chico Area Gx h10 official constitute the boundary Chico Area Greenline shall c) The between the "Urban Side of the Chico Area Greenline' and, Greenline". "Agricultural Side ofthe Chico Area d) Agricultural Residential land uses may occur on the Agricultural Side of the Chico Area Greenline only within for Agricultural Residential use on those areas,.designatee the Official Chico Area Greenline Map . (d), of this e) Except as provided for in subsectior. section, all land use on the Agricultural Side of the Chico "of Agricultural land uses . Area Greenline shall consist solely by the Orchard and Field Crop designation. as provided f) Land use's on the Urban Side of the Chico Area Greenlline of the Land Use Element and shall be guided by the policies the applicable urban land use des'gnati on at ' contained in the Land Use ;Element: E. ESTABLISHAlENT QF 'CHICO AREA LAND USE POLICIES In order to Illinj:mize or eliminate the adverse effects which to urban/suburban land premature and inappropriate conversion t`o the agricultural lands in the Chico i Use uses are likely to cauthe follo�ting policies are hereby adopted f Butte CC policies Area o. County General part of the Land Use Element of"the Butte Chico Area of Butte County: icable to the to conserve pian, appl of Butte,Count 1) It shall be the policy in the Chico Agricultural and protect for Use the lands on the Agricultural Side of the Area that are situated Chico Area Greenline be th e palicy of Butte County to accommodate 2) it shall in thCh future urban/suburban g°SidecofArea the incthe- Urbane siurs of Butte County on lands tuated Ghico';.Area. Greenline. F. RESERVED G ZONING REG=TIONS airy out the purposes Si this policy, a In order to c icultural Side of the Chico Agr e • propert eL S .located on the sha11 subsequently be zoned or rezoned in Aria Greenline accox'dance with this policy as follo«s : ,fI 1) All areas irhich are zoeddcon5iten0 wiIL th1tthsfpolicy. dal e of this policy art'deem . sire+sho1:n a5 Agricultutd! Resxdentsal A 1 areas rihich the Chico Aria Greenline 'bJdp shall hereafter be x'ezorted an �.6 ► 5�4 to a consistent zone ora conditionally consistent zone, as the same were listed as of NI. rch 1, 1982, in the Agricultural Residential land Use Designation of the Butte County General Plan. Rezoning shall, be.accomplished by the Butte County, Board of Supervisors in the manner prescribed by law. 3) Aft-Ler the effective date of this policy, except as sped fled ipi this subsection (a) no ;property on the Agricultural Side of the Chico Area Greenline shall be rezoned to an A-2 A-5, or .A-10 zoning district calssifidat on. 4) All lands located on the Agricultural Side .of the Chico Area Greenline that are not affected bN the above (a) shall hereafter be °zoned or rezoned, consiste�zt. with this policy. Such zoning or rezoning shall be done by the Butte County Board of Supervisors through the exercise of its discretion and In, the, manner prescribed by late. b)'All references t0 A-2, A=5; A-10, A"210, a-40, and A-'160 zoning districts, as 'urell as references to the consistent and e conditionally consistent designations applicable to the Agricultural Residential. Land Use Designation, shall be dee-med dto meaft esired those same zoning district designations and terms as ` in Cttapt',ed. .",,'4 of the Butte County Code as the same read on NarCh i,, 19&2, ar,d as amended fron time to time c) Any existing legal lot alf record located on the Agri, - cul tural gri,-cultural Side of the Chico A. -ea Greenline which, as a result of the adoption of this Policy, dues not conForm hiith the man- imum size required by the -zoning,' distr Ict designation assigned by this policy shall be a I conforn ng lot and shall ble entitled to the benefits and the restrictions of .onconforh, -- - -lots as established by l;aw d) Nothing contained in this policy'sha 1. be deemed to prohibit the application of the agricultural nuisance ordinarice (Butte Count�� Ordinance Number 2238) or the agrieultural segregation ordinance (Sections.2'4-S4 and 2 _s'S of 'Ch Lpter 24 of the Butte County Code) , as the same nay now exist air hereafter be ame,rded. 14 ZONING CONSISTENCY AND Ti t!tING li. The Chico Area hand Use Plan establishes land use designations which depict desirable future land use patterns= State last requires consistency between general plan policies and zoning. In order to'encourage an orderly, transition of land use from the existing to the desired pattern, the .County shall undertake to rezone those lands consistently' -with the Chico Area Landwise: PZ areas shall be upgraded through time Zoning in these me with a, commensurate showing of need, Adequate, services, drainage, etc. as provided for in the Butte County Land�'Use Element Zoning in these areas .to less than the maximum provided for in the Plan's designations shall be considered ;consistent with the Butte County's General Plan by i virtue of policies directed at Orderly beve, ,1opment (page 36), and Residential Development (pages 53-34) Priority shall be given to those area's with infrastructure capacity. I'. AMEN MENT AND REVIEW' The above Greenline policy may be amended as follows: 1) By a majority vote of the Butte County Board of Super- visors provided- however, that it any such, amendment involves a chiffige in the location of the Chico Area Greenline, that e the Board of Supervisors shall approve -such. amendment only aftbr the adoption ofwritten findings of fact, supported by substantial evidence in the public record, showing. a) That the public benefits of converting the agricultural land to urban land substantially outweigh the public benefits of continued agricultural production; and b,) There are no other urban or suburban lands reasonably available and suitable for the proposed development. 2) The Greenline it establishedfor the period covered by the General Plan, 20 years. To insure that the land use needs of the iChico Area are being met. the location of the`Greenline shall be reviewed and; evaluated every five (5) years. For this purpose the Board of Supervisors commits itself to ini iate such a review at the time interval specified above. Any changes or amendments shall be made only upon the findings specified in subsection l above. Nothing in this policy shall prevent. an individual at any time from petitioning the Board of ,Supervisors for a general p:1an_amendment including a change in the location of the Greenline in actor& with the applicable p y ate of California. law., andpolicies of r the Count of Butte and St ?) Study Area No. 1 The. area 9cneral;7y JcnOSvn its the,Dell-►lair area located in northWest Chico (bou dcd on the utast by 1:1,cSouthern Pacific Fnilroad Tracl:,s, on the ,tooth by East A:en(re and IHE:nshh i ;It-ciloc; on the eai;t by Alamo Avenue and on rhe north by ]hell Road and J• ul € .Ak Ll,C) is designated as a "Study Are�C No: 1`'.' This designation, shall �r in adtiltion to that shown on the Chico Arca Land Use Plan Map, This AYen d luted as a Study Area Noy. 1 shall be sab j ect to the ,specigl pol i e:`,1 es ni this saction. . a. The Board of, Stlp_>rvi;sars, b), i:ia ority vote, may revise the location ox the Chico A-r2E G, t'cnl int so as to place the Study Araa No 1 on tl o Vrb: �y Sido cf tJ�- Chico A`YPa Greenti1)a 163=6 �: DATE PRINTED 04/29/85 BUTTE COUNTY PAGE 4 POPULATION ESTIMATES FOR JAN 1" FOR CITIES AND COUNTIES IN CALIFORNIA i CENSUS Y (TOTALS1980 MAY NOT EQUAL 1981 SUM DUE TO INDEPENDENT 1982 1983 1984 1985 ROUNDING.) BIGGS •-------------- --�--.-�.._._-1_473-- 11390 1,390 1,420 1,43Q 1,460 CHICO 26, 716 MOO ` ------ -- --- ---------- -_•-'_------ 28, 1,50 28, 550 29, 650 31 1-0' CRIDLEY _ 3,982 3,980 - --- --- --•--------------------------------�:.-_ 4,080 4,090 4,210 4,280 - 1LLE -• --._... 8 ,683 9,100 --•---•--•------_,_ - --- --- --- --- 9,350 --------- 9 825 , 9,975, . y 22, 700M _ ------« __• ••-- -••.. —.24 ___ ----- 23,200 23, C,50 24,000 24,200. NNk#({KMKkIF{11FN4KNM%k%a NiliRkkKMN#MMai Mit#k MKaa#1lMa RMtl1l IGaKRRRMM%�K R aR66IN`00#aNKd►6I#500 4+• :. `TOTAL INCORPORATED 63 365 ) 64,800 ,_ _ _.. � _ _ ' 69,100 71,100 #KKMK.KMNaKMKMNKk.MMa1k#i/iRtla{#KMktlKRRppNtlkKMNaKNKRaRKKk ' � ' AM#k1�RMatli#KNNkiaM#KR#aKMMMK#kN•4a3f °. N ' _ ... UNINCORPORATED 80)486 82,060 �O 84,700 86,500 68006 89,9 ,00 � v tlNNtl11ItM#�lN1F 1/MKalo/f1►NNKRi1iRMNaFKlIKkN#aMtlKN11M1►NNKkkMK1!#KK�FK#KNMM9dMNNNMNNNfF.R tFk11NKMlKNkk1111 p{kK/1 . i#MkaMakaN1►MNNMkf{MIltlNMkI1NRNa1FMa KY � r KkIFNNKRk1ikNNK1131NaKtl M}1atTktlall%tltlRRlltlitlK }. TOTAL COUNTY 143,9PO 146,000 150 800 154,000 15'1,900 r )161)000 w q a y POPULATION RESEARCH UNIT' SUMMARY REPORT DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE''` STATE OF CALIFORNIA BUTTE CONTROLLED COUNTY POPULATION ESTIMATES FOR 1,-1--85 PA 4 DATE PRINTED"0AGE' /26/85 -_-_------ POPULATION ------------ ----------- HOUSING 'UNITS------..----..-_._�� ---__ - POP. CITY HOUSE- TOTAL HOLDS' MOBILE GROUP, PER ERS 5 OR MOBILE OCCU- Z HOUSE - HOMES QUARTTOTAL SINGLE 2 Tp 4 MORE HOMES PIED VACANT HOLD B1GGS-_...-------------------1459 1459 - 90 0 562 466 42 15 39 531 5 52 2.748 --- -- --- CNICO 31163 28288 --_ _. » --------------------------••-------- b1 2875 13344 6't10 1992 ---------- - 99 4606 3d 12!199 6.33 2 263 GRIOLEY ..,- -- 4283 41 _. �- �_ - --- -� ----------------------------------�----_-". --_- 10 18t1 1'i52 108- 145 6 -= 1649 --- 92 - 8.95 2.542 OiZO�! I LLE 9963 9652 -"24194 -'93681- �_-r----_ _•------... 320 31 4540 2633 1176 234 41.98 7.53-_ 2.299 ------------- 497--- PARADISE---------------- -- --,--- -- ---- -------------..._ _ --- - 3287 51z 10833 +2.346 7T86 576 507 1964 10194 6.82 #NMN%ItK%KNM1F%KIlM%I/KNNkNMkNNMN%MIF%%%N#RkNK./1AkkNNf�1?k##N6kN#kMiFNK#k4N11#K##i11F11N/1k%Nk#kMklFkk#k#11NNN#11�##N%1►�i#Nkkl{kNNN#{1%1F#Ifk/,Ikkkikl►kN##K TOTAL, INCORPORATED .. 71062 67271 3766 3791 31090 19147 3215 6449 2279 28971 6.82. 2.322 E � � NNNNNMNMNNNM#N4Gk Nlik NKNN16 #k�IMKN#KIF###HNA#NkN#N•_N#NMN#N11##NII«INk-k�♦kk##kkalkkNkklN#k#N#N#NN#NNk##fi ' t UNINCORPORATED 89909 89361 9 89361 16185 548 38681 24873 2664 2610 8334 35237 5,90 2.536 N NNNN�IMNNKIIMKII#N111l4444II444MN#NANN###91NKNilNIINKKNk%k#MNNM4NKN%%NN#IF%NNNkNNNN}FN#N%kN#kklFk%%NNI►NIIK#Kk1FN#Mk*kNMN�#11NNk#11k N%qN%MMKNNIr.I!%MNKkNAMKKN%%NIIKNRNkIFNN k1INKfiK %11NNkN #:#ION}F%Nk#MIIMIFM -.I1MN###M#kNf/#M#kkNN�NkNkM11k##k##YN #NMMY;J•#NM" 1}/1#k MfPNk#!1�11k##f TOTAL COUNTY 160971 156632 19953 4339 69771 440;,w 5879 9259 10613 64208 7.97 2,439 m an�� �PPFNDTX 16-9 REASON A .v ANTrCTPATED FLiTr1AE PROJECTS IN THE AREA The following list identifies proposed or reasonably foreseeable all city and in the county projects which are currently area bounded by 'Lindo Channel, State Route 32.the proposed Eaton Avenue extension and Esplanade (a). TRIP ENDS Ann North Valley Plaza Vartous Commercial 5,964 GPA/REZ BCP C (Chico Area GP) Various Residential (91 du) 904_ RE! Marshall 42-34-49 Residential 0 du) 40 TPM Nagy 44-79-06 Residential (2 du) _, -. 20 _ TPM Rottshalk 42-34-47 Residential (3 du) 30 TPM Puller; 42-34-49 Residential (2 du) 20 TPM Marshall 42-03-14 Residential (4 du) 40 TPM Fletcher TPM 42-0948 Residential (3, du) 30 Nichols 42.34-26 Residential 0 du) 40 TPM Brown 42-01-35 Residential (4 du) 40 UP Chico Iron Works 43-20-05 Commercial 105 VAR Jacobs' 42-07-38 Residential (24 multi 240 Units) REZ Arnold Pacif is 06-15-71 Commercial 8,439 TPM Hall: 42-34-21 Residential (4 du) 40 TPM Marshall 42-34-124 Residential (7 du) 70 `UP Ashby 66-17-29 Residential (120 du) 1,200 TPM Showbii-d 42-34-110 Residential (4 du) 46 TPM Brazell 42-34=25 Residential (2 du) 20 TPM Crawford 42-07-57 Residential. (2 du) 20` TPM Maron iu g 42-34-83 Residential (2 d u) 20 TPN! Ohs 142-34-05 Residential: (3 dna) 30 TPM Meester 42-311-49 Residential (4 du) 20 16.9-1 t r a, K E Y % s Fm AREA TO ,ABANDOtT/SELL r r f AREA. TO ACQUIRE/BUY PROPOSED REALIGVENT EXISTING' 'ROADWAYS 00 .. •' ' W' ..�900.0O p 01 Opp C�apppbfln p J - I .�► - �,�,r. o°p°a'°eg6�oo°o�qp°o" low O �1 �O°6gbaaa°°°a}°oma°apaa v°c°o°'O°cac O`O"°6a°o°o°°°a°aOpy6aaa I"~°oQo�Qatrpo°°°po�3.03 aoq®© r' 000000000 000baa°a°ap .0op .'001 OW .+ oa 0b xt0 a p a trP6o p p O a p a tr p0a°0a a ,:. +,� { ,/" /� o�+n•f4l0a,p oap0a6a p°a°a°O°bop°aHa0ps.0Oppa °06p0 JQaa0O appapOtr°Dp0o 00a0OtraapbppabGsC3'� - `2� ✓ "• •'.•°'s°a°�tioapoar'u s o a b n p o°a°a°c � ••► o O o o a p a a tr �a°°6°o°a°b°a°Oar 'pApp°a0 3�Oa°QoQ0Oa900 Oa6°dbO06°9QC70d°CEQa°OG�0ap°0 O�O C�a�p0�°°'p7p_�°n�gCtrob� rapW0° aopa0ppp0 tra°appan0pp1 .p`. r °bOb pop9p�a•0o pa0°a0,0000 c o'sOtraOp°p'a°6000 000. ' �aaoabow°n0 0. z RMT OP WAY o oaabo o°o'Oc °ap°� 00 a. 0� earth. sCAttE 1,71 G1e'L10 = 201 F`IGtJRE 1.10- L APPROXIMATION 0 tC.s N ROADt,AY REALIGNI9T REQUIRfNT5 ? Left Turn Pockets and Parking Restrictions $21,132; Esplanade at Henshaw: 300 feet of 148 footwide paving at $1.25 persquare foot $18,000 ' Esplanade at Lassen: Str2,500 Signal imping provements $15,000 x _ 675 _+27a p 20,700 + 750 + 675 + 270 Alternative (Expanded Areal $1.5,000 x 825 + 330, 20,700 + 750 + 825 + 330 Source, Earth Metrics Incorporated, 1986, Edell, 1986:. Widen EalAt Avenue = $132l643 Required standard $81,123 11 (sidewalk, curb and gutter would be paid for by property loners along East Avenue). Alamo, half way to Gu nn: 675 feet of 13 foot. paving at $1.807square foot $15,785 SR32;, half way to Guynn 1,1460 feet of 26 foot paving at $1.80/square foot $68,328 Pro rata share of 900 feet of 27 inch storm drainage culvert at $115 per lineal_ foot = $1,093,500 to drain East Avenue: 500 0 - 10,216 x $1,093,50 - 0 $53 �5? , 1986• Source! Earth Metrias Incorporated, 1986; Edell, - j i_ 1 1. r 1610- 1 R/W Acquisition _ 105,000 = 20 Surface Drain Crossing $ ,000 Total (in 1984 dollars) = $$,165,x00 Five percent ;increase per year for two years (1986 dollars) _ $4,592,133- Additionally, the Storm 'Drainage Maintenance Fee would be $4 to $5 per dwelling unit per ;year, Source. Earth Metrics IneorPorra ed 198; Edell, 1986� Rolls Anderson Rolls, 1984; Bird Connection to Sewer = $3090,500 (a) Infrastructure - Main Line Extension Fee and Sewer Lines through the.Site PIPE UNIT LOCATION OF LINE LENGTH DIAMETER COST AMOUNT Treatment Plant to Site 26,i3o ft. 36" $80 $2,090,400; Alamo -Bell to Henshaw 2,700 ft.. 6" $22 $ 59,400 Guynn-Bell to Henshaw 3,600 ft, 6" $22 $ 79f200 Nord -Bell to Henshaw 4,500 ft. 61, $22 $' 99,000 Rodeo -Muir to 1,500 ft. southeast 1,500 ft. 6" $22' $ 33,000 Muir -Bell to Rodeo 1,800 ft. 1Oil $25' $ 450,'000 Bell -Trunk Line to Alamo 61006 ft: 10" $25 $ 150,000 Total $2,961,000 Annexation None (a) Cost = Treat"meht Plant Expansion Fee _ $850 per dwelling unit = 229:500 (a) Refer to Response to Comment H.1. Source; Earth Metrics Incorporated, 1986; Edell, 1986; Roils Anderson Rolls, 1984 16A6.4 a -z401 o $U; - i JANE DOLAhI .2_ �p(� Su►t�•�so� storooist�it� s� 059 r o,+nw 340«i i�tatr ww'"iA c��� i would ask: that the Board direct staff to inform the Regional z Aprii 20i t086 Stater Quality Control Board that, the board views Implementationof the the Nitrate Action Plan along the following provisions of W,g V prforfties. x H C R E C E' S V E i, tatensfon of a coamonity water system throughout the urban urea and to high altrate areas. 0 Board of SL�ervi3ors, - Count of butte n ''i'} "' l� - = This Will entail information froze and the Cooperation of Cal k� y5 Couunty Center Drive the one water purveyor in the community. Yater, it may Z �J orovllie. CA 95965 Oir nick will need to uest the Assistance the wan thin tlmpl �1 a �"'CO fina cingeacceptable to tommu p� nSth menting A h Dear Board Membersi GY It may also mean assisting the nelghborhnbds outside the 's urban area in forming mutual water companies, CSAor save a p , Re. 'Nitr+tr Action plan other enc Sty to (finance and operate a water supplY. , H > At our Neeting of April 1. i66, we directed the Administrative attached letter to the kgidnal Mater quality ((icer to send thethe 2, ,As soon as it is available tr ,county, In cooperation with he city, will sect the most affordable means to implement ri iy Control Board. Our fictions, and the reporting of thea: have !led people stoha drainage pia n, This must immediately eatail to be concerned that we are abandoning the Nitrate Action Plan and our s to solve in Lhico. eThis,tanclusfbo systematic elimination of existing dry wells. Cq eg and water prablens is " founded. a: Development of Alternatives 'to severing the entire 'urban arca and Continued investigatfon of financing methods 'other hot thaw an areaWide assessrcent df strict. G`+ / i stili have a iitrate-Action Plan and are continuing td, 9 operate Aerate under i[s provisions+ Septic permits are con"tfnuing n Summar , t y the Board takes the fact of 'nitrite contamination_ H w5 to be authort:ed based on the Pians ;and its interim standards, In owr grountl Water +i a serious matter. lie` also retognite that any solution s) we seek to implement must reflect the needs and ti nances- f " What we did abandon was the formation of an assessment district of our communit y t that would require the peoplt of the unlncnr orated area of Chico rp a 6 to pay the entire, Cost of sewer.fi storm drains And Water treatment Sinterel'ys plaht ekpihsibn: We did this becaute those people could not afford these ittfans and It is not fair to ass, thea to do to, p ` i-,, We will contlnue to ,work to develop, aiternative plans in cbn= Jane Dblan .• suttatibn With the Regional Water Quality Control Board, the + Lit of Chico; and the of the Chico urban area. y supervl,sor District 2 p ',� people ` e w nee to review anti rev * � Clic Nitrate p -v of the rovis Aetlbn PIAn JDllmrr cc Chief A inf f h dm stratfVc Officer tive, The deadlines fora rovase to n brtter reflect current i forms tion and perspers Approval, of 'sewer• and storm drain plans city Council ^� r~ torn drain plan is not must be changed mostly e ih2 S rE+ Completed, Th g over which the delay, is soaethln o Board has .rtity ti+nager County Plannin Di Yet g Director had no eontrbli's Control, Without this 'plan It it impossible 'to develIt 'County public Yorks Director 'County Public healthiDirector (ince my alternatives and tmplementaElbn timelines+, Same is true With extension of community Water supply throughput the County Environiiehtal Health Director �cr urban area and to high nitrate areas: t i 16.12 DISCUSSION OF ;PUBLIC DIPRO�TEMENT FINA14CING METHODS Fiscal Matysl&- PUWC Service COSU and F%W=bv MeoudT General Gavemment FINANCING METHODS When current taxes cannot cover costs, local governments must finance most capital improvements on a long-term basis either through. 'bonded indebtedness or public leasebacks from nonprofit corporations. Total, bonded debt resulting from a proposed develop- ment is estimated on the basis of the. cost of, specific. capital improvementp aneed. It is, however, necessary for budgeting power to estimate the annual interest and principal payments, or lease payments, associated with specific capital improve nents. The timing of future revenues, in relation to the 2 N N i 16. lisccIlibtic 9rryict Coria Md MnMCbVAlso wds F&MebV Nethod5 timing of payments for long-term obligations, also becomes an when preparing capital improvement plans important consideration and approving specific projects. Bonded Indebtedness Local jurisdictions sell four types of bonds to finance capital obligation b:.•7ds, assessment bonds, tax improvements: general allocation bonds, andrevenue oayment (full gaithsand credissued it) are cityor r county with a guaranteeP obli ation (G.O.) bonds. Because they offer good security a,ef the s e1—.e on eis less-bonds an tax-free interest, the interest rate , th han thatcof the jurisdiction) cost of the debt to, the 1roved by bonds must be app other types of bonds. General obligation Special provisions, however, can be two-thirds of the voters. created by the _State Legislature for unusual situations. For ► j bond issue District's ma or instance the Bay Area Rapid Transit the voter � required approval by 60% of tk ital !s used in California to finance"cap' The assessment bond often landowner i a the !m rpvements. Each the rata share of served bonded pro is assessed p _s of as capitalimprovementInthere are two type lIn indebtedness.California, bond 1911 (aka 1911 Act Bonds)! 1~ach bond is lrri rovement Act 'of against a -specific parcel for, its pro rata share of the sends a issued The city or ,ounty Treasurer total indebtedness. ' separate billing to each parcel owner twicetyearly for principal to the bondholde�i and interest due, and transmits the money .r s only recourse;, is , In the event of delin4U1e cy, ' r to foreclosing a mortgage*b°ndholdr similar Im rovement Act of 0151 (aka 1915 Act Bonds): These are 5,000 issue against the whole 1,� e. ,000 serial nds g_,liled on the est are assessment district. ha d i ierfl t amounts). In the tax rate, regular fair bill not c the city or county cnay sell the event of delinquency, are also required --!f t delinquent properties to ralse funds, and are not sufflclent--to levy a tax rate that and other resources . y .: Y to $O.lo throughout the cit or count to meet the of up delinquency: ' Municipal Improvem�;nt Act `of. 1913 authorizes bond The M P 'Improvements and differs from the 1911 Act' 1 issues for municipal tmpr 'the timing of assessments and bond sales. rincipally on basis of: Bonds, not issued urrder this Acta however, are 16.1'2-2 ' ,, P431 AnalyAv FuMc Service Costs a"A FtnancbV 1(eUwXIa Flr,o►fctnp A(ethods Although interest on assessment and G.O. bonds is limited to 8%, the ; bonds can be sold at less than par (their face value) to make them - marketable. Effectively, the bond pricediscounted to raise the ompetis yield,in order to make the bond issue competitive with alternative y Investment opportunities. The issuance of assessment bonds in initiated by either the owners of 60916 of the land California may in question or a legislative body, such as a city or county or certain special districts. While a publicr utility distri& may not do so, the county may issue assessment bonds.on the distriCt's behalf. A mandatory procedure exists for special assessments initiated by legislative bodies. Because the exact amount of the special is not assessment and its apportionment among property owners designates an assessment area, the jurisdic- known when an -agency tion must hold a protest hearing once the costs are determined. Financing initiated by a legislative body may be negated by protest from owners of 50% or more of either the I value of land to be assessed or the front footage. An exception occurs 'When the County Health Officet ha:i, recommended the project as necessary to the public health and there ,is a four-fifths affirmative vote of the g y overruling the protest. legislative body The third form of bonded indebtedness is the ta)t all cation Nind. for which certain; tax revenue is allocated to Then' bonds are ones pay for service.Redevelopment agencies using talc Increment bond. ftdebt - Anand g- a tax funds for iepaying this type of th Bond bu;ers are, therefore, greatly concerned about the security of tax allocation bonds. Since no agency guarantees debt service on t.evaluates the security of the 'bond hese bonds, the potential buyer on the basin of the certainty of the projected tax revenues. Bond buyers are "usually not familiar with the economics of the area issuing the bonds and thus adopt rather conservative criteria for One consequence of this is that bond buyers will their evaluoon. not purchase bonels until the improvements that 'dill bring in the projected tax eevenues have been completed. Likewise, they usually tax revenues be more than sufficient for debt require that projected service, 'usualijr L5 times the debt service. California statutes set limits on the amount of bonded indebtedness a. focal jurisdiction may incur for bonds to be repaid by general The limit for cou nties and indi i school ,.ct'tax revenues. while for disrot rts is 596 of the local jurisdiction's assessed value] w cities this limit is IA and 'for uhif led school districts 1096. 8 search; ,6conomic Source. California Off 'de of p;latznftt" and Re pt~ac'f6ril . �iOff-& ]X84. 15 J, �V 15 i DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT WORT` rGENERAL 'PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION #84-45 (MOOBERRY - BUR HELL) . FOR THE BELL-MtiIR PROPERTY SCH #84061909 for: Prepared -- Butte County Board of SOpe&isors 25 County Center Drive OroVilid, CA 95965 IHo rah, 19,16 1 Prepared by r EARTH HETRICS jNC0RP6RATED 4 d . Co�an B 85pi 8401 b AR irl3 n , (415) 697-7103 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page-_ _ ge- Section Seed r - , PREF'ACE...................:.......• ... 1. PROJECT LF:SCRIPTION ••.•• " 1.1 Location and Character of Project Site......••.+ . 1-1 1.2 Project Characteristics..... ...•..:...•...• .,.,. 1-5 1.3 Intended Use of the EIR.•:,•.................... ..... 2. SUM"1ARY• anon Measures...2-1 acts and Mi�iB •.."';.• Project ISP .... 2-1 2,1 •. 2.2 Alternatives Evaluated....••.. ...................... ". 2-1 A .•.;....�,., 2.3 Areas of Controverayllssu.es to b_ Resolved.• NTAL,SETTING, SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS, 3 , ' MINIMIZE THE MITIGATION MEASURES RECOF4ME2JDEP'TO MITI 3.1_1 ANNDDI SIGNTYICANT EFFE • � Planning. ....:. ....... ...:.. .. 3 1 Land Use. 'and ..:..... 3.1_1 3.2-1 3.2 Traffic and Circulation* ....... :.. ,• ,... ...... 3•'3-1 3.3 Geology and Hydros.ogy....-.f........ .... 3.4-1' 3•�+ Public Services and Utilitiesa..� ...,•..:.....:....,...... 4-1 TO THE PROPOSEfi PftOf1EC ,...•••.•• 4: ALTERNATIVES 4-1 4.1' NolPeoject Alternative.•.••••••• ••• 4.2 Expanded, Pro eet Area Alternative..•••••••• 'i°� ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS WHICH CANNOT BE AVOIDED IF 5-1 SIGNIFICANT THE PROJECT IS IMPLEMENTED•..:.,.. ..... •.••'•"••••.••1•• i 6 . GROWTH INDUCING IMPACTS OF THE PROPOSED 'ACTION..•.=•••�••••'•"' S-•1 7-1 7• CUMULATIVE tMPACTS..f•1. ..:.:.....:...... AL OF MAN'S 8, RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN LOC NT OF ENVIRONMENTANCETANDRENHANCEME 8W1 MNPRODUCTIVITYINTEN .••.•:•.:,.a..•f,:;; .....:... .....: IRt1EVERSIBLE ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGES AND IRRETR..L LE9-1 9: COMMITMENT OF RESOURCES....:6....406....:.........461..:4,.• 10-1 EFI:ECTS NOT FOUND TO BE S�GNhFICA2rT:...►...►:...:+.•�•••••,+••• 10. 11-1 RSONS CONSULTED..::....., NS A ::••••► NA PUBLICATIOPE 11. REFERENCES: • 12•-1 12. PREPARERS Off' THIS REF�ORT...:...................i:..,....... i TABLE OF CONTENTS (CON'T'INUED) Pae Section 13. APPENDICES ............... .6... 13.1 Initial..-......<..... Y •to 13.1 13.2 Letters inuResponse Notice of Preparation ........, the General. Plan Amendment ... 13.3-1 13.3 ListofParcels Involved in 13.4-1 15.4 Applicable. Zoning Regulations .,,..........:............... 13.5-1 13.5 Chico Area Greenline'Policyft.••+,,....:•..•.•..•........... Plan Land Use 13:6 Minor Revisions to Figure 3.1-1, General 13.6-1 Sap.......................:„.. •.. . . ... . . . .... .. .:: i .. . . 13.7.1 13.7 population Data it Butte County ..... :.......,.: .... ..,,. 13-8-1 13.8 Demographic Data in Butte Count .....•.• r{ 1i LIST 0? FIGURES Figure Page 11-1 Regional Setting of the Project Site .......:................... 1-2 1.1-2 Local Setting of the Project Site— i ......... , .'', . . . ..... . A , . • 1-3' 1 r1-3 Y,ocaton of Parcels Involved in the General Plan Amendment.... 1-4 3.1-1 City ;and County General Plan Land Use ,Designations to the Prpjeot Vicinity. ............ a ..................... .. 3.1-2 3.1-2 Zoning Designations in the ProjAct Vicinity .... ,,,, .... .. 3.1-4 3.1-3 Location of the Chico Area, Greenli.ne,:....... ....:.... ......... 3.1-12 3.2-1 20 Year Circulation System Imorovement Program 1980 to 2006.... 3.2-3 3.2-2 Recommended Street System At Full tuildout. ............,..... �,.2-5 3.2-14 Butte County Circulation Element Diagram,. r....,.....,....;... 3.2-10 3.2.3 Bikewt�ys Plan of the Chico ,General Plan.... 3.2-12 3-.4-1 Summary of Storm Drainage Facilities Re uired in the • . ... . • . .� . . . i',i i Norm Chico Area. ....:......;......_.,..... ..... 3.�4-3 i LIST OF TABLES Pam ble_� Ta ,. 2.1-1 Summary of Project Impacts and, Mitigation Measures ........... 2-2 3.1-1 Projected Buildout Population of the Chico Area BacGd.on•••.+. Use Map ,.a.••:.`.. 3.1-6 the Chico General Plan Lknd ....•.. 3. 2-1 ice for Intersections......... ...• Description of Level of Service 3.2-2 Levels Service at Applicable Intersections in Existing s o 3"•2-6 3.2-2 North Chico During the P.M. Peak Hour Period.................. 3.2-3 Existing and Projected Traffic volumes on Major Streets 3.2-7 in the Project Area ...... ....... ......, ......... 3 2_t} Estimated Future Daily Traffic increases, Associated with the 3.2-1 Proposed Project ...................... ................ .....;... r 3 2-5 Existing and Projected Traffic volumes on Major Streets in Proposed Project.-4-leo 3.2-15 the Project Area With and Without the �' iv PREFACE The Butte _County FlanniLg Department has determined that an Environmental T Act, the Impact Report is .required for the proposed General Plan Amendment related to the Bell -Muir Property. Under the California Environm%ntal Quality purpose of an Environmental Zmpaot Report (EI'R) is to provide objective informatblic regarding ion v public deeffeects esult ngthe fromenera projectuimplementation. Butte p environmental e County Pan�then institute methods of reducing adverse impacts or consider alternativesJelm,aet Report has been prepared for to the pro '.:Butte Count y in: This Draft Environmental p Act of 1970(CEQA) as conformance with the California Environmental Qualityactivity. ended. The degree of specificity required in an Environmental Impact Report am involved in the underlying activity' corresponds to the degree of spec'ficit.y The proposed General Plan Amendment does not involve construction of prof development I therefore, the agen nalysis presented in this report is more specific level than the nalysis which could be required if the 6p9tates theefollowin8ire�sardinS the proposal. CEQA Guidelines Section 151 degree of specificity of an Environmental impact,Reportdetailed in tion Project eet will necessarily be more An EIR on a construc the specific effects of the Planeor"comprehensive oning ordinance adoption of a local general p because the effects of construction can be predicted with greater accuracy. (b) An EIR on a project such as the adoption or amendmentral Plan should foetis oia comprehensive zonings°eXiected to follow nance or a lfrom e he adoption, or the secondary that might follow. n Projects an EIR on at�endment � bstrU°t10EIR pneed not be as detail..d as spec�.fic eon The Resources Agency of California has adopted amendments e herecent chuange ins. for Environmental �paets ReportsI which incorp_ tment, identified A Environmental EIR guidelines allow the preparation of an EIR Which addresses only, CEQA, The planning Depar significant project effects, gutsctCcould have significant effects on the number of areas in which the Pj traffic, soils, drainage, environment, including land use, planning; initial 'Study . public servioes and utilities (see Appendix 13.1, economics; p s the provision Also included in the amended Bu delW-Das eeseshall,distinguish, 'between the that "the discussion of m3tigatiuyv m.asure osed by Project Pro; ne could be reasonably expectedto measures that are prop de Project proponents to be included in he pro X11 mitigation measures recommended and other measures which are noy i Project unless other Rise reduce adverse impacts". Accordingly, d in the Proj' within this EIR are not Or inelud;� reference speoifieally noted. Ulhere aPP NPriate� this EIR incorporates baad ordance with documents that are readily available to the general publiei in Section 15150 of tie Guideline's: r v 1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION LOCATION AN Ci#ARACTER OF `.PROJECT SITE erties involved in the proposed 'General Plan Amendment located in The prop side of thee C City of unincorporated Butte County, adjacent to the Western Chico, California. The affected area involves approximately 270 acres of the u00 acres within the area bounded by Bell Road Muir Avenue, Alamo Avenue, 00Henastir' Avenue, East Avenue, and the Southern ,Pacific Railroad tracks '''h,-1 Project area and at parcels are regional and.. local. setting a identified - respectively. The..p the area are presented in Figures and 1.1-2, resp radix 13 3 Y in Figure 1.1-3• The affected parcels are listed in Appendix er and acreage. Assessor's Parcel Numb used for residential and agricultural purposes. The project area is currently acrepa for Portions of the project area 'have been subdivided into one ac residential uses, which is inconsiistenP�t.witBhox However, the imajority d the ng Genera Plan project Use. and zoning requirements in the area. area is developed with walnut orchards and other agricultural uses on larger parcels. 1':.k PROJECT 'iKARACTERISTICS y, amendment would change e The proposed. project is an amendm �a Green].inetteT4�war� neral Plan Land Use and a revision to the Chico s land use designation from "Agriculture: Orchard and Field Crops* the county' " iculturfal - Residential' (one (five acre minimum parcel size) to Urban. !►an acre minimum parcel size). The amendment is an administriculturalrative iRes dential Would not involve construction. The proposr vateeproperty cwners to subdivide land use designation will encourag- I'_ Approximately 30 residential existing parcels for residential development . Units currently exist .n the project area. The existing land use designation Would curallie for the construction of an additional 20 units, for a total, Of 50 residential units with buildout aP the area. The proposed General Plan Amendment would allow for the construction of esidential units, PP a roximately 270 new residential units, for a total of 300 'r with buildout of the area: ect area. would require Development of additional urban uses in the prof inetwhich is known as relocation of the City of Chico rCloeation �Ojjhty Of a tthe Grete enline would be oonsider.ed the Chico Area Greenliae. Th a primary Fart of the proposed pf�oject because the exi'stingrrpro ecticnf or limits of 'Future urban development and provides long theThe project area agricultural resources in defined the Ctl�e Chico AreauGreenliney"Study Area Number 1" lies within an area def Applicable Plans and Polic'e►4). (See Section 3-if Land Case; Plan) ng of , However, the Greenline revision iWould not be the,same as the lire defining ud Area number 1 eenline would follow the boucd"» les of the St y The new Gr gure1:1-3)► parcels 'affected' by ,fie General 'Plea Amendment (see F New development Towable lander 'the requirements tri linefromthe City c�: e General Plan Amendment may require an extension of a sewer trunk - into tb 3mize the addition of more nitrates Chico to the project area to min i1 A , vi.