HomeMy WebLinkAbout84-6 DEER HERD COMMITTEE 23 OF 33F
4,
-�
.--T'�44/
.-
}
j�
y
iie
W, 49�-
t .,. .d4'L�i,',. ��� '�F{•���ta1��' I'1'�'1'W( ��,Vii' r ��'bi/%.`C-�'�°` ,�a'���1 f„i'�'wtA� �4�YX.",".+',�.,,'�
`E'I^�
,�� t ��7 4 G L t qtr•, w�I wcti71 rxGFs= �t.9G
k
rV6° v %h
---W/
'tllw I ILUfa,
0-4
/PvL
I
1pv g�.
rr
L� r I
r
. YA
�j, ,Y�, YJILr , EJCR�J.�;1Ce�`
Alm
I
Awv�
Milk % 'L
r �
7er
.
)yam �^j(/�
14",
t
9 n . p�`w.
� t �� ��� t via
,�
��� - W
�,�
p
� "fit ,r �,�%"�� r�
.�
ice,, '' ���Lh: ,r.•+'GVi1� � l kS �� �' ��+(
��u
! l ,, �, �'
i•
A
,.,
�,
��-�
�� 1 � f ��'.
�
jA�F��`
9
_
rt 1���
a
����
�� �
r �� Z�,,,
������ �
,�
i1'.It l i1 e 1,,D S'I,U1) Y ljf'1.` I f,
MINUTES - December I Z, 1903
C Evans, S. Strevtor, M. Pierce,��.
�.>nondclr
Pit►l,c„ ra A.
vch, and J.
/13SHINT: J. PorbcVg, B. Ccfllinss A, Avis
/�V
J mouth C�.'LCrI `I.C1r1 ('(Cl S^+ 3,�,'•8`i) granted by Board.
. ',wCJ i1s5;1..('.l Cations op roads 't O be Provided by
Pj xlna ing l)t`jl."4
[`' i1Eent .
B. Mapes to obtain dog control WS. Food &
Mont cede. VIS. .Stractor to
Iii,. lcult.uro l
livestock harK►hs,
send out.
Overlays urate A -1t (P) and critical wint or
range UP=
red.
Y----=*- Atl•. 0s t. ropy of rod area for each membor' ;s
Mo.
Discussion of Ii. Mapes dx•a:r.t ch......
Members to consider habitat management tee
structure, e, C'N. to l.litp -
e ont.
Chair requests individual reports COMPIctud
A.S.A.P. for
circulation,
Chair to invite Craig Carter (CDP, Vegetation
meeting.
qtr►r►aX.or,►ent
Map) to a
Next meeting 1-9-84 in Chico.
A. back to obtain ,study by V C t
s�
o'YI� GGGcc�--- pr 36 Allc
i , w ti, r
,J
I"
ac. u°} VV`` V✓v - + +„J
``` 1 aa-` A' L 'L �w ✓ f... Itel
i
p,{y �� � ru
4davL
(29
v
rll� cam, yam.
r
ee--v� 4,-0, 4 �-Jz
-moi ..._ ...
4alw � 5,1
I
t
A-
-�._; �,�'L�_ �,,ti`j , fi•�.t`�`,�Lf�..`'`%�; t'h`Tc' ?�s.�'�,-�' �' 7-'Lr`L'�--
`f
r f
2Zlit ,eel
~ E
lz-
co
n yy
w�
-..., � {.4r S. _ r• ,� :7"�Yf'L;L"%¢ -,r�� f�f.� _ r':'.K ��•�_ F�A":' �':C' `�'E�.,�,�� � '�♦..y.�•;
vv4 c&4��jAA,Pt L' Iv- Zi -l-.5--3
4
t
7L
r
P } }j ✓ f` t^ V" a J'�I'G.r'Cr' �%/%�: '� Y �VY�I y-
E
� t F
t 71
fl '
fit
s J
k
V&7 7
v - Calk /a % j vt Ink"
•
014",dwlip 11)
.ac
V ' �Ilk
� _ SVT—j3�•
kv4
u- 1
4/14
_ r ,
CA
/0-7 M#/>��
7o-,
'hlle tAtA,--.-4 a- 6'% 0
1CA,.,�--
qb _ r?FN
a
A
M
�/O, C-.;, P A
pal
tip •�.+'�
Population
pµer
Dod"nesFacing
lwcr
«inr hi h-
plsappearing habitat, g
"Areas suitable for dear arc
fewer and smaller,"
t t v ; way mortaitty, legal and illegal
becoming
a report by the depart -
ns i.T' kills and fosses to predatory
states
Ment, "and many of those that
`Tha animals are contributing to
cr's
ner%,. sharp decreases in the Califor-
remain are deteriorating in
ouality, Consequently,
i .. Ail deet Population.
Ttte primary Cause tit the
deer are poorly nourished and
the of fa�tim survival is
ae rate
1r decline in deer numbers, Accor
ding to the pepartment of Fish
quite Fish and Game Department'
It ` and G;tme, is poor fa ,m sur-
to�: vival attributed Intgely to
Director E.C, Fullerton recen
fly announced a state deer
decreases 'In and the quality
quantity o
61 f habitat for
management plan designed to
the 10 year long decline.,
Jet. , , _
reverse
In deer numbers, improve
habitat, maintain a suitable;
balance between animals and
habitat and provide for diver- is
slfied recreational use of the t
re,ource.
Fullerton said that the plan is
currently undergoing final '
review by department person- t,
nol before being released for
discussion in a series of public
hearings. dates, tittles and
places of hearings,, will be
aimounced soon, lie so d-.
The director indicated that he k
realizes the department is
taking on a difficult task In
attempting to reverse tile do`v'n=
ward trend in deer populnftis.
tie noted that the complex
undertaking Involves
soclologleal, economic and
political Issues as well as
biological considerations,
Elements of the plain 1n41ud%y
lntutagement of deer herds as
separate units because of No
ferences in habitat and oilier
survival fztctor% and stepped up
law enforrrment.
5FCONU.
NAl;11VILLig, Tenn, tUPD --
Henry Wood ,if Atlanta and his
chestnut gelding Conserje won
the three -mil , 3401 annual
lroquols Steeplechase .SAtUr•
day
l
i
I
r
f
_
T
LL
All,kivoaA ovu
r a°
r
�4-t
wev4 .
14
M
inter -Departmental Memorandum
TO, Charlie Woods, Mark Radabaugh
FROG'. Debbi Hossli (Intern)
SUBJEM Inventory of rural residential parcels in Butte County.
DATE; February 11, 1983
Attached is an inventory of all rural residential parcels
in Butte County by planning area. Assessor's parcel maps
location and number of parcels
forty
were used to determine the
less in size,'Ehe information was then placed on
U.S.G.S.
acre* or
Quadrangle maps (DWR 1981 Land Use Inventory maps) with areas
of contiguous parcels being combined. The acreages were
divided into the number
metisurc;d
of
with a planimeter land the totals were
parcels involved for an average parcel size for that area.
The averaged parcels were placed into three categories: 0-5
totaled by planning
acres, 6-20 acres, and 21-40 acres, and
area.
This inventory excludes agricultural land because of the
diffi-
culty involved with differentiating between agricultural
ope'r-
ations and rural residential parcels.
nu -i ber of parcels to'L'*al acreage
Honcut-Bangor Planning Area.,
0-5 306
6.20 11399 15;410.4
984.2
21-40 63
1,656.9
Palermo Planning Area..
0-5 -0"
-0-
6.20 877
5 0585
21-440 _0-
;0:.
Ormii l le Planning Area
0.5 1019
41588.6
6-20 126
10218.4
2140 17
38,0
Berry 'Creek,Rurleton
planing Area
5,724,3
6-20 1,873
15, ►16.1
21-40 67
1;018,3
Durham Planning Area
d_5 1
2.5
6.20 41
525
21_40 2c
646.5
y
memo C. Woods and
M. Radabaugh
Re; inventory of rural residential
parcels
February 11, 198`3
number of Parcels
total acreage
Brush Creek/Feather
Falls
Planning Area
0-5
388
526.1
6.20
435
30280.8
2,1-40
31
1,221.2
Table Mountain
Planning Area
0-5
23
72.3
6-20
429
4,150.6
21-40
65
1,956.7
Butte College
Planning Area
0-5
12
60
6-20
464
4,214
21-40
1
24.2
Chico Planning Area
,
0 _
-0-
Nord Planning Area
0-5
-0-
6-20
200
1,458
21-40
-0-
-0=
Stirling City Planning
Area
0-5
l00
319
6-20
58
858.5
21-40
39
969.4
Paradise Planning
Area
.0.
.0-
9
1.47.7
..0-
4 -
Upper Ridge
Planntrig Area
0-5
562
1,862:7
6-20
244
2;424.7
21-40
.0-
0-
-2-
Woods and M. Radabaugh
MeInventory 983 l parcels
Re::nventor
ar 11' lof rural residential
Febru y
number of parcels total acreage
Cohasset-Forest Ranch
planning area
0-5 851. 3,029., 7
0- -20 649 5,867.8
220 80 2 ,800.5
Concow Planning Area
0-S 392 10336.6
6-20_ 394 3,S70.1
21-40
1 42.-S
Gridley -Biggs 'Planning Area
4.5'
1 g
1 24
Doe Mill Ridge
0-5 �0.. -0-
6-10 1,920
11-20 159 240
- 21-40
Isom 'Hall
Canyon Park
Bidwell
DH/ sb
CAW'
(IRNIA.—THE RESOURC" AGENCY
GEORGE (MUKMOIAN, G(j�vfpjuf,
DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME
601 LOCUsr STREET
REDDING, CA 96001
(5'16) 246-15511
lip
a
September 22, 1983
Rr. Robert K, Sorvaag, DIVIctor
Lassen County P.1 anning Department
COLItthou6o Annex
Susanville, CA 9-6130
Dear Mr. Soj7vaag:
14c 'have reviej,7erj till., Notice Of prer PatatiOn of a Draft Ey
I,
urea the pittville
Plan in light of- tit County's selected preferred alte�lt:wlaLfvd
On August 15, '.983 we a tended a meeting with your staff aryl the consultant
in Chico to djacuss t lie Department's response. We were requested to address
the wildlife impacts of the three alternatives, the pret-erred alternative,
the significant impacts and zitigatioil measures to reduce these Impacts to
an accentable level, and clustering concepts.
The Department of Vish and Game's authority is
, to Pr
Orlhance the fish* and wildlife resouttes or �otect) Maintain and
the State or Californi.1 - tae are
WAY concerned with what is best for these resoorce.,, and what preserves
their habitats.
We have t0-U4111'ated the Otigitlal three alternatil.ves covered In the Pittville
AtL,i Planning luternatives Study and beli,-ve tbat Alternative, . No. I and 2
Would CaUGL' 1,11signiftcant ivildlife imPticts, but Alternative Nr), I would
cause a significant adverse wildlife
the PtefeIrred Altevnatj,ve tqj-lj CaLlse 'mPact' Furtb�',rlt101°e, we believe that
�,
"nificant adver8o w.Ljdj:Ijr
The Preferred AlLernative is a M, .1 impacts.
IJOr deP.Arture from Ajt,(,r Itive 2 in
that it addO two R,5 -Nil a):uatq north of State ijiF n�
areas which W.111 atlotq Planned Ilt,,ay �o) 99C, and turo ltirge
1 M1,11'Way 29913, ts (PUDs) between Vlftville
and St8tL Unit DOVeloprien
1n Our OP'll"on, 010 SLMOPIX-arkt aflver
, , "L _q(* t.)f the proferred
111t0rTl,1t'LkTe, can bo mAlti.,atLij it t1 10 de , t
velovmL it Mpacts in
Ltie, R-5-NIJ area.,, and the PUD Option —,Tre;-jr, arLt rest t(,,) 20
t1le total area and tlla�. 80 percent OF the ' -- � - .1—
�Otal ...... onc CIE
Vurtherinorv, 0�ft Ln 0[)en 8[4100.
any 'lddi"0110. (IOVelOI)MOuLA Propoqed that tietIt 111n1mr denaities
it' tile stl) nreag Lhatl thos*e
significant adverGe %qjjdljfe "OPted it' the Proferrod Alternarlv(!, Ltil.1 cause
inlp�actt� tlli,t can not b(N
G
Mr. Robert K� Sorvaag, Director. -2- SePtombfir 422, 1983
The clustering aon .�pt of development is the best way to rechtow project
impacts to an acceptable level on deer habitat. Information gathered
recently regarding the impacts of h.0USCS on wintering deer indtruites Oiat
this concept) if properly, appl.ied, has considerable merit. We agree that
it coulct offer landowners an alternative while still protOCLIjig wildt,lfa
VOSOUrces.
We would therefore support, under certain conditions, allowing a portion
of some lands to be intensively developed. The remaining undeveloped acres
woutd, be placed in common ownership to be retained as open space.
VL6 this concept in mind, we have worked out a sarics of "clustering"
options based on various land size tate-or.ies within each critical. wildlife
area of the Pittville Planning Area. The table was formulatud by using
deer displacement data gathered near occupied residencus. ClUSiter, deve.lop-
meat sizes shown for each acreage category wee calculated to have
approximately the same level of impact as full build -out on 804 40, 20 and
lj-acre parcels. These alternatives are attached.
Please note that we 'have chosen not to recommend development ttmi.ts for the
suggested cluster parcels, because we consider the cluster parcel to be
totally lost as deer habitat.
The Department of Vish and Game wishes to condition its support of this land
use planning concept with the following stipulations:
1) Each concentrated development 'must be approved only them theem
r ain-,Li-rg
acres are placed in Joint ownatnhip and preserved as open spice.
2) Mien feasible, development sites should. be locaLed along land, parcel
boundaries, This will provide the opportunity to further cluster
development on subsequent adjacent Lad division proposals,
3) Miere. possible, sites should bo sel.ecLed adjacent to existing developmenta.
4) W-partment if Fish and Came flol.d biologists should be giveft the
OPPoftuftlty to recorvand sites for cluater dOVC1OPMr2nL. '['hit,, would) In
maty cases, allow considerable rcdtletton in wijdljrc Ltap.icts by 'i L„
areas of lower habitat value,
1
5) No proposed development site should eliminate or sigoi.f.tc.int'Ly rcducc n
critical. habitat e'k!wont to any coil-Alift specioni t:ate plos t.;ouLd Include
wildlife watering sLt.-,es, winerajl springs, b-cy thormal otmir areas, roost
,Itesi nesting concantraLion areas, etc, Those concernti would normally
apply only when the habitat In qilostinn is known to bo cruetal to the
wildlifia In the area and limit int; population lovoUq.
C
Mr. Robert K. 8orvaag, Director -3- SePtembor 22, 1983
6) No cluster development could have an adverse impact on any species
Of animal, fish, plant, bird, amphibian, reptile or insc.c.t officially
designated as rare or endangered by the Fish and Gawp Commission.
The clustering concept on five -acre parcels in the R -5-N11 areas, are more
;limit ing,in that parcel dimenSions are critical, to redun.e tho impacts to an
occaptable level. along with building setbacks and vegetation retention..
In out judgement, the five -acre parcels should be long, narrow, rectangular
stuipe with the dimensions of 165 feet wide, by 1,320 feet long,
Thoso dimensions, plus a 50 -foot building setback from the road, will reduce
they carrying capacity of the five -acro parcel by 16 Percent. A 1,00 -foot
setback from the road will reduce the carrying capacity or tho five -acre
parcel by 19 percent.
The third criteria to be met for Live -acre, parcels 1.5 that tht, romaining
-native vegetation be vetained on the property, excluding th,E� hoitse, yard
and garden and, in no case should the vegetation on the rear four acres be
disturbed.
Inaddition. to Clustering, there are some items Oftell listed In CC and Rs
that are beneficial and others that are unenforceable. We recommund thot:
1) Fencing standards be required for perimeter fences which will allow free
movement of doer on and off the property. Deer -proof fencing may be
constructed around the house, yard and garden, aq long as the area does
not exceed one acre in the UVO-acre parcelg or does not exceed the
intensive development area in the cluster housing, arons in larger parcels.
2) Cover retention is or utmost Import ajjce in the opon Split'.0, COMMO-11 014norship ►
lands that are not df-veloped. Tharetore) the nat..".ve vegotation .weeds to
be proteoted.
,3) 1�u believe'that in the R-5-Ntl areas, that no farm Animals be- allowed to
be raised such a6 horses, cows, sheep, pt4;s and goats which would require
altering the natLve vegoLation, on these., small, pamels rand reduce or
ellminat,e the decr values below the allowable 20 percent,
4) Leash laws or rastrfx*tions on number of dogs Its, do:iirablebecause many
problotrig with daer carryfug cilpacity are "Insdetated wLth. ot.'rondary irlpncts
such as dogv,. However) our e:KpPr1en0,C sho%-,18 thaL Lhoiv uondilballs VIAMA
unenforceable,
Finally, Sao recommend that )Jiv "N -11"i Natural Habitat Cuiiihiulug Distriat ba
applied to all the sub art,.ns which occur within h-[gh or value deer
fall) winter or spring habLtous.
I
Mr. Robert K. Sorvaag, Director -4-- SON (' uiber 22, 1985
If you have any questions regarding our con%,tmts, p:lea, e C011taC',L' Torn. Stone
of our Redding oFfice. at (916) 2416-6544
Vary truly yours,
A. E. Naylor
Regional. Manager
Region 1
80 -Acre Yin mtlrt
P rC—E-'.0 Sirs
CoAvent ional
M us tered
-.,— .r
Division
_._--
<160
None
Nene
x.60 <240
240 C520
Z
5 acres
320 0400
3 � 5
XO acres
400 <450
5 lots
15 acres
1180 "560
560 640
6 lots
20 ciGrrE°.>
640
7 jots
20 nrt.res
r
8 -plus lots
20 acres per 640 i
k
40-Acre Minimum Parcels
Options
Conventional Clustered
Parcel Size
Division __ Division_
8Ct
None None
80 < 120
2 x 2 3 'acres
120 <160
3 x 3 5 acres
1.60 <200
4 a 4 10 acres
200 <240
5 lots 12 acres
240 <280
6 Lots 15 Acres
230 x520
7 Lots 1.5 acres
320 IF
8--pints hots 1.5 acnes par 320 acres
*Under this recomne
ndati.on, a 400-acre parcel could be divided `
or -clustered
in, a variety of ways, 1t would be SpIIL, for
example, into
one 320-nncre piece and one 30-c,,c re pcarcol . Under:
this meLbad,
15 acre+.z; at thch larg; r lot could ba developed,
nAth 305 acres
t,a talnecl as open space. `r:°ha retraining 80 ac cos
could be split
ittto two pare:el s, or ,clustered on three: ac;ru ,
faith 77 acm8
1rutained. If the "double cluster" option. is used,
we recomwettd
that the intensively developud parctAs, be aontigunuit,
t
20 --Acre Minimum Parcels
`
2ptioas
.a ..
Conventional. Clustered
i'tirtea sLz
Invision Division
40
None Nems
40
60
2 x 2 4 acres
60
< 80
3 x 3 5 acres
80
< 100
4 •, 4 6 acres
:JQO
C,120
5 lots 7 acres
120
< 140
6 :Lots 8 acres
140
<160
7 lots 9 arses
160
<180
8 lots In acres
i
1.80
--12-00
9 acres
200
<220
:10 lots 12 arms
220
<240
11 lots 1.3 acres a
240
<2.60
12 lots aeries
260
<280
1.3 lots 15 acres
2810
<300
14 to is 16 acres
300
<320
15 lots 17 gcrus
320
+
16-pjt. 3 lots 20 arres per 320 ac:mn
i
10 -Acre Mnimum Parce1s
Conveational.
Clustered
i visa on
DivisiOrl
None
*None
20
2 �: '�
4 ae.Te;
2(1 { ,30
� 40
30
4 4
ilcres
40 <50
< 60
5 lots
acres
50
4,706
lots
6 Lev's
60
<$0
7 lots
9 acres
70
-< 90
8 lots
10 acres
80
X100
5 lots
11 acres
go
X110
l0 lots
17 acres
100
11 logs
13 at -,res
1a,o <120
lots
;1.4 acres
120 -<1301.2
13 lots
15 aerea
130 <140
14 lots
Iia acres
1k'+0 150
µ
15 totr,
17 acres
150 � ���
,
�6-plus 1� s
20 acres Per J:if1 a,►tr��s
160 •f
WI'LDLIFE MANAGEMENT PLAN
TABLE OF CONTENTS
i• DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY
Paine
•ii:
k IL. PROPERTY HISTORY
AND BACKGROUND
....... ii,.:
III' INVENTORY OF ;"ILDLIFE
RESOURCES
IV. RESOURCE MANAGEMENT GOALS AND
OBJECTIVES
A. Landowner's Overall. Goals
I Increase wildlife habitat.
2. Demonstrate sound wildlife
practices ,
3. Utilize new ideas and-practices in
wildlife Management
B. Priority
Objectives
I. Deer
2 • Turk ey
34 Quail
d, Dove, pigeon and
, non-game bird
S• Water s and marumals
6• Fire management
t V. PROJECT ANALYSIS
A; Proposed Practices i. i
. i:,
B. Specific Practices,
Locations, ani; Quantities...
1. Deer ...,+.. .•• 7
2. Turkey
3. Quail
4* Love, Pigeon and
; non-game birds and mair a
S. Water is
6i Fire managemen
r
Ci Generali Overall Plans and Idns i,..
. i , ♦ 1 i
VI ♦ PROJECT" PLANS AND PHASES . • . i • ': ` . •` ` i , ... ♦ 13
A. darkest Recbmmiendations
..i
B i Mana i i. •,i i YS
gement Policies
• i i
C, Phase I (l9Bd-$S) ..•.}}i,..�i...; 16
•..b•..iiiii}!:•iii}..♦i•,tFYi,i'••,'4.,♦i..i':}..,. l.,
VIII EXPECTED RESULTS
OF PROJECT AND MONITORING
A. Expected Results
I•. i , } ♦ b �. • i • ! i i i , • • b • i 'i i ; • • v Y . i � • ) i , i i ♦ A . ; i
B.i Monitoring17
i • . ; -
• • i• Y i i •.'♦:} i♦ Y i. i} . •.♦ 'F } i i} w 8 i. i '� 'b i♦! i a: b l i t !' i i 1 3 r
11ITIi APPENDICES 18
k l. Section 601 is repealed and added to read:
601. Management Of Fish and Wildlife on Private Lands..
(a) Definition and Score: A Private wildlife
:AA, cement Area --U an
c--
area of OrIvate ..lands, for which the landowne�:.�r nis de,,'ianee has cm
itolanthat active 1.11 enarluracies the orocaqa"_.'_O,-,
oieted a wi Ldlif a managemer
of tne -__,sh and -La t _10 n -L-0
d
conservation and wise use
,land. Such areas shawl be licensed annually by the deoartment.
Noolication Process:
(1) Acolication .orm andManacement ?lan: The acolican- for a li:ense
manaqement area shall submit a coma'ate
t ,�-
oaea-e a wildlife
t of Fish and Game, the aboroarLAce
form to the Departmen at h
—_ -tall
I
office as listed on the 300112,at,'LOn. The a0OLIc3n't_�11
include a Uenetal manacement cyan contalnlna atLeast the
7rTZ-r—n., 4-7--
A. A legal desctintlon of the land to be included in
manademOnt .5rea,
B. An estimate of affected wildlife and haoitat inclu6inc an
indication OE animal, densit'l and ranee condition based on
;i0ce_7 -is sex and ace __.0tIOs-
statement of manacement oblectIves,
manaaernent rptommenda-11_0r'S
(2)
n
A0611cants shall be Lndj�16ual
-nan D_
aderient obt
5roorate l3ndowners Or _tne'r
License A
LiceFees, nonrefundable fee lof $300. shall be subrii-tted
— elicense thill be
with the applida,tion
— ------- for a revocable license,,
------
valid for the_oeriod jujv 1. throuch dune _30 —And sUh2l- -Q
Sjoo
annual review and renewal by the Commission, The:�Ijl
r license period. . This fee_9.'M_a'-I_
tee c56`ver!i the in
three�..yfta
icense renewal aool..I
LA_�..IODAt t e
again be it
ent tjNtee year period. This license sha'
beginning Ot -,-late land -
Ln be requi,red, Of ot
-In-_pT-ac`e,0r any othI5.r de pursuant the
e h � latiohs mathemowners —_b_yt h Fish and Qame _ 3 - Coe 0ru d to eXem�t anzone
S I ec, 1 1,
on s nOti Ee '�O licenseS_anc
- requirement
The depAt
t,-,jeht, after evaluating the APplic2tjo� jLy a
r ...........
9-p-p7t—catiOno or aisapprove it and return 'it to the12
app �- disapprove
denied - J_the
I I - leant I
ny
a n t �w
.�jr. , application has been
department may appeal that decision to the C6mmlst.lon.e
orae the
caMt.
tcd
(4) issuance of Area Licensei Upor
clan, the department, tith apor
license for the taki-jq of any f
wildlife management area puxsua
approval of the general management
val of the Commission, may issue a
sh, came bird or mammal i,n�said r
-t
Commission and the terms and conditions R , Che.--pe—,t-
(5) Annual Reviewt Upon receipt of the annual rgnewal application and
full payment of fees for the 'preceding veal the dppar_,.ment shall
review each plan to determine that the licensee has 9,ulfilled the
obligations as prescribed in the management plan,—The annual review
shall evaluate the followinc:
A. Management activities carried out durir,o4 Che precedingy_
earanM
their results,_ including habitat_i_mD_rovement wildjlife production
and copulation levels, hunter use and avvest }of wii:Ili_`, e with
an accurate a;count of all hunting oerma,sseals and b came
tags.
B4 Recommended changes in the general mans 2me%t clan.
Tags;
(l f ofv : �. E;":;` ;; :i^.. a.rfy on a private lands wild-
(2)
il
(2)
life management area shall have in his imme late p
California hunting license and the: aporopriacq tagI ssuen,,^ ,
licensee or his authorized agent. :'he taes shall permit hunting fa-'
the period specified, or until revokedby the licensee or tie
deoarrment Hunting permittees shall only take or oossessthose
species and number of each species as specified by their huntl.ng
tags as approved in the management plan. This does not apoly to
game species not included in the management_ clan which :ray.' only ce
taken in accordance with regulations adopted by :the Commission,
Hunting permittees while on the wildlife management area shall ca
su57ec_ to a terms and conditions oul the license- ��
Tao Procedures: The department shall furnish each license w,.th tie
appropriate tags required b eachmanaement plan. With lanoow;;e"
-_-pri ._
approval and_;pay•ient of the additionaltaa fees, tags issued
1° censee may be exchanged for a tae for the _sP_ie spec=µms for use
on any other licensed private lands manacement area for the
the same species: Any deer hunter who has been issued; a rtao bar � "e
aepartment and wishes tel hunt on, a�private lands wildlife mahacere,'.t
area shall exchange an unused taq Cr tags of the current license t;k.:
fora private +9 wildlife manacement area tate orrt:acs at the area
he chooses to hu,., and restrict ruyther t'luntinq to 11censed Private
lands wildlife management areas._.A hunter may also Obtain a url',a�:e
lands wiltiliEe management area tag from a licensee by preSentin
a Cur»E'ilt deet tdQ a:L711ratiCln oY__a Gag fY17It1 _another private lands
wildlife manacement area,