Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout84-6 DEER HERD COMMITTEE 24 OF 33f a._ permittee take more than two deer each ' In no event shall an hunting ublic or private lands: either p year anywhere in California, on tconcietelytfillaout Im:nediatel uvon kany animhle huntertshalhe t �he Y. 0 issued to them by the icersee, sr _e tie- Lag ana attach It to the carcasLa lands wildlife man aeLnt f om the p e r __ the carcass tran�portin9 portion of t~he ag to th may surrender the report ,� .._.---- portions tr area, 't a hunter icensee or c.deslcnee who shallva a oaeaf��al the mQbho of the tag, or shall have the to f thethe FLS and ,Game Code. The carcass �� by Section 4331 of until it is proceed• tag shall remain with the meat p licensee she'? pay the department the followin The q3) Baa Fees: - t a perrt�t'-?: seal sued - ees_for each tac ana 10.00 (A) Deer tag CJ (31 ;pic mag S 1.00 (C) Bear tag .• �p (D) Elk tag 5 15.00 (£�") Antelope tag 5 5.00 rp) Tur.kev tag • a 25 tG) other Uol nd Game seals Lands dIife ganacementAecc operation of a private bv licensee _ —_d 1) Posting: Wildlife management,areas-5aC1inteoalsancit )es by placing signs :.�rbiaosnc .respa� "'_A Ps and at all rocas and Lnree to the gn a�.-•-lo all exterior'"_ �rai1s enternc such paras, records_of alltaacu Records: 'The licensee shall_ maintain a�cu«ot�he c'enartme�i. � -upon -'-ecoras available regloilal office _bv HDrll 15 +�� and seals and make such _ to appropriate "ecuest and submitbcUr and s� a is u.er = o� all hunting tags,olv a �..---_----------- ate accounting of sass each veer an ac the previous dear, s s��_ all' seer shall pad �c�r may as �enewed� for that area —----- an seals pe fore the license Re'`.,O-ation�of Licetlses antes: len as wildlife management licerisetmentbthat_ the t1 License!, A private ,.he depa- a tievoked by the commission Upon � �......OhV_1 t1 been�met� or, a on corivictin n met, tezm o the ��cense nave not , the Fish �ncl,�e .rode t�,r >_.r—Y -n of nor a vio ataon of any orov sion_� br,sv dei .0tice and a hcarinr regu atLons made pursuant the.,e.te _ has beets orven to the licensee. t - his designee, Or any einployee of the depart:neot licensee_ hUntin (2! Tags: The wiPev Le manage area a private lanes law ar egulation4 may revoke Fish and Gable .. for a.viblation o� 'any ,--�.�-�—..- Gams sildlife or tag s of the private and or the ..tems .conditions a e ent Asea .license. Code;. 3.01 � 340�d 340fi, E`iot1 and name � ��t� Sections "late., AuthOr ty C`ited!' dish and Game ace• 3400 - 1404, 5406 � 3ao�, '4331, Re erer,�P 5ect�6ns r GENERAL GUIDELINES FOR MANAGEMENT PLANS ON PRIVATE LANDS Management Plans inform the fish and Game Commission of the intent of the applicar'it when he enters into a Habitat Management Program. The plans must indicate what ability the land.might possess as potential for wildlife development and what the applicant is willing to do to realize anis maintain this full potential4 often the Couu;lission must judge this capacity based solely upon the information included in this ,plan. it should be as comprehensive as possible and include at least the following information: 1. Introduction Generally summarize the applicant's long and short term objectives for the ranch as a gameharvest unit; Include a brief history of the land uses on the ranch with emphasis on the grazing history. Describe the current land uses as well as any plans for change. 2. Minimum Inventory ?ata Required a) Include a state and county map location along with the legal description of the management area. b.) Include a map of key wildlife habitats in terms of acres of vegetative types showing current conditions, such as fields of decadent brush, areas of high beef or sheep production, commercial timber plots, areas of oak mast production, etc+ , c) Summarize the previous hunting harvests_. d) Minimum field data requirements include; 1) Deer herd compositioncounts A. Post season counts in December for buck -doe -fawn ratios. b. Spring counts in April to determine recruitment rates. 2) Brood counts 3) Pig litter sizes when they are hunted on the ranch; S, Establish Measurable_ Resource Obieotives Such As a) Improve deer or elk habitat by burning a specific number of acres of brush. each year. b) Maintain a ratio of 20 bucks per 100 does (or a specified ratio) c) Maintain a specific ratio of fawns per 100 does, d) Create 25 (or other specific dumber) of fawning units each year. e) Harvest 100 bucks and 75 antlerless deer annually (or s041e other number)W f) Harvest a certain number of pigs per year. g) Harvest a specific number of quail per year. 4 Management Recommendations for. Achieving Annual Ubiectives Such As a) Describe the cooperative program that the ranch plans to use in order to perform the planned burning; effort. 1) Chaparral Management Program of the California Department of Forestry. �) California Forest improvement Program 3) Cooperative Resource Management Program of U. S. 00,pnrtment of the InteO,or or Agriculture 4) Cooperative County Programs b) Provide u.ap of the potential burns and prioritized listings e) Provide a specific number- of proposed new water developments d) Provide mapped location of proposed new food or cover plancings e) Fence certain acreages or linear distance of riparian WAter courses 5. Review and Monitor a) Summatize data from wildlife habitat improvement programs b) Summarize data from the harvest programs c) Evaluate theprogram d) Update the 'management plan and develop the next yearly plan i r• Inter -Depart Planning t "em0randuc, g Commission Planning sur�,rE•�r Deer Herd tanrE, November 21, 1985. t't was decided bided at Y Bob Mapes the last committee L�epartmont of Pishand Jerry Mensch and Dougwhich was a1. tc�. Would continue Game, that Updike the wildlife to identif both the from t.xJi It was also to and heh°Se areas of conflict nd St�a! c� e�Perienced agreed that encroachment Of develo betw(jelj deve those areas that pmeot, Of greater than development would be had already 15. sd.o. e identified and p would also be mapped. mapped - The Plantiir!ar�!as prepare theg �`'nartment Utilizing r� tri four month Project ' pl oect w$l�htakIntO will rn Program« to complete. PPro c.imatem hic and Game willthree, which should work with IV consideringbe considered for to determine ekisting pascal s' more rote those areas sizes, Intense development Staff has Prepared a Resldential des i map deli'eatin winter ran e gnatiq g the areas of acres and $ corridorsn oparce general plan Agricultural 10 to ' 1 sizes ran in overlain with Deep, and should be •`0 acre enlargement mailable at the commis ranging from Q to 10. areas have been delineated hAl�'; ; Gaon tin .sett meeting an becembet-, Local Empq..- New-type pTduras National Forest has a At the resident camp', which large impact on the com-- was. designed to provide en- munities within. the Forest vironmental education' RV CO because of the number of through a work -and -learn . people who depend upon the program, the 5G YCC members '� RV campers have everything Forest to make their living. built .trails, cleaned camp�� -s needed to be serf sufficient PT umas NF has 389' ful T time grounds, helped with wild- - � ...or do they? P1 umas NF employees and. 73 who are life habitat in, $'_ ,.� F: - has built a campground at Tess. than full time., projects and timber thin-� Lake Davis to see. if this. Seasonal, and temporary em- ping <�f' } r '` - is truly the case or not. ployees range from; 400 to 500persons each summer. Seniors 55 and older worked _ Lightning Tree Campground on part-time doing maintenance the east gide of the lake In 1979 the Young Adult and mechanical; work as well *� has 55 level sites for RV's, ,, Conservation Corps (YACC) as clerjcai=-rt, L,; t<� but no hookups, no water and for 1=6 through 24 year-olds no toilets. The campground had: 5Q enrollees. There Trainees under the CETA �� has individual sites similar were another 50 in the Youth program did trail maint- to those in customary family Conservation Corps (YCC) at enance, timber stand im- ' campgrounds, but RVers will the eight-week resident camp provement2 worked on fuels ' reduction prof; ects , and some be expected to utilize their at Canyon Dam �: were trained in clerical own fresh water supply,their own cooking stoves, Uineteen° persons took part jobs.. and their own bathrooms. in: the Senior Community Services Employment Program, Due to budget reductions If this concept is accepted and CETA er-Yrkers totaled there will not be a Ypr camp r by the RVers it wil'1 be 35`0` this year. The CETA program will remain at approximately possible to construct the same level as it was in _ campgrounds for RVers at YACC members worked on less costthan those for s 1979 as will the program for survey crews,, timber stand r tent campers and others who improvement,, timber marking senior citizens. There are depend upon the campground aria fuel` reduction, and as YA persons enrolled se d to the t? for a water supply and for clerical help., ACC program as oppose 50 last year. restroom,. - s, s 41A79 Fewer Fix.In xv ---- Last year was a good year Many local residents, loco 1 for PI auras fire crews be industries, 1 oggers, PG&.E as • _ -. -. - ' W stat cause there e a were fe�aer fires workers,, and than the average for the crews, the Gal i forma previous nitre years despite county ySherPatrol iff'�s Department i lower r tha normal preci p P were i n . �.=.: tion. As an example, pre- e hel pful detecting y . - - - and, reporting fires, as well cipltation in the Quincy r' area up to the beginning of as in providing assistance. fire season in April arras 27.46 inches versus a normal In addition to this help in ion, PI auras fi r of 40.24 i rc�ies. In 1979 fire etectj d there were 85 fires that crews cooperate in mutual and 75 ago with the California were caused by peoplethe Division of Forestry, r� that were caused by T h L and To abe L '. lightning. While there were severe ,. burning conditions at various times, these times were infrequent and usually of a short duration. The "Will" fire near Greenville occurred during a time of severe burning conditions. That pl us the fact that there were houses , peopl e _ and buildings in the area complicated the control �...... 6 effort. a Ue: assert _T National Forests, with the I Nevada Division of Forestry I and with numerous local fire districts. And while fire is always feared in the Forest it also has been. studied and utilized as a management tool. Prescribed burning continues to be used for range improvement, wildlife habitat improvement and to reduce fuels on the forest l oor. Trails Built,, Plicitneu While this work was done to improve wilderness rec- reation, the engineering department remodeled and paved campground roads in the family campgrounds and built the Lightning Tree RV campground at Lake: Davis. Contracts also were approved for campground road maint- enance. Between October 1, 1978 and September 30, 1975,.: eight tractof land were acquired in the recreat4nn zone of th,L- Kioole `ark of the Fpath.�r Wild -and Scenic Ri er. T Midale Fork was 1.968 as a Wild and Scenic River, the first in 'Califorri;i� to, be so cles- ignated. The eight parcels of land acquiree totaled 140-73 acres: and cost a total of 5243,100 or an overage of $1,327 per acre. In ad- dition to the purchase of these tl'dCtS of land two scenic easements on the WiTd and Sceni'r- River were ac- quired. Under this type of easement the Tandowner receives a one tine payment, and while retaining owner- ship of the land guarantees that it will. be kept in its present state. The easement process is often a less expensive way than buying the land to guarantee that there will be no development along the river. It al so allows the landowners to keep and use their land under the condition that no improvements are made. The two scenic easements acquired in 19797 were at Clio and near the La Porte Road at the. Middle Fork bridge. J, Aof ea 111Z Size - T_,161,G1O ' acres (1,815 square miles) Road System 3,500 mT -- Trail System 280 imi I es Highest Elevation 8,300 feet Streams, Rivers More than 1,000 miles Lakes 14,000 acres Feather Falls At 64e feet, -this Plu-..as NF waterfall ranks as the sixth highest in the world Feather River The Midd e Forkof the Feather was designated a Wild & Scenic River, by Congress in. 1963. Visitor, Use - n 1979 Plunas NF ranked 43rd in popularity of all National Forests in the 50 states. U.S.F.S. 75th Anniversary P1 as N.F. Supervisor's Office PO Box 1500 Quincy, California 95971 (916) 283-2050- A backpacker trekking bridges--orm across Bear through isolated stretches Creek and the other across, is, of P71 upas NF scarcely the Middle Fork --were 90 at -tare of the many peopTe %hio percent completed. The work to des1grr and build the Hartman Bar, Trail Bridge trails be v;aTks. The best collapsed during the severe known trail in the Forest is 1978-710 winter and th4t the Pacific Crest Traill bridge had: to be repaired: (PCT) and, by the end of the it was reopened last year. I 19SU construct -fon season al but 2 1/2 miles will have Once a trail is engineered: been completed_ Engineers, it usually goes out to bid recreation, specialists, and this requiresthe ser - office clerks and finally vice of t,he contracting the trail contractor ail department. Contracts for vitlT have made it. happen. 19-38 miles of trail con- scruction,, the two bridges In 1979 the Engineering de- and repair of the Hartman partment of the Forest Bar Bridge were approved in' worked on four sections of 197'9. Total val ue of the the trail: Fowler Peak to, bid vtork was $203,536. then Quincy / La Porte Road, from Quincy [ La Parte Road Last year 23 miles of PCT to Johnsvflle Road, from contracts were compl. eted. JohnsvilTet Read to Gibraltar The two nevi bridges that Saddle and from: the MiddTe were begun, in 1979 plus 7.4 Fork to Bear Creek.- One miles of trail: are to be hundred percent of these completed this year. sections were completed with the exception of the, Quincy/ And once a trail is open to La. Porte Road to JohnsviTle use the job doesn't end. No Road Seventy percent of matter how well designed or that portionwas completed.- built the: trail may be,, it must be maintained. Last The 2 112 miles of trail year- Forest work crews and that are not expectedto be CETA crews covered 95 miles compTeted are from north of of trails, cutting dead- Gibral-tar to the "A"' Tree on falTs, rebuilding: washed out the Tahoe National Fores'.- sections and trimming veget- boundary. ation.In 1980 approx- imately 200 miles of trails Not_ only are there trail's to ory the Forest will:, be worked' build, but trail bridges as on by the maintenance crews. well. In 1979 two new trail Between October 1, 1978 and September 30, 1975,.: eight tractof land were acquired in the recreat4nn zone of th,L- Kioole `ark of the Fpath.�r Wild -and Scenic Ri er. T Midale Fork was 1.968 as a Wild and Scenic River, the first in 'Califorri;i� to, be so cles- ignated. The eight parcels of land acquiree totaled 140-73 acres: and cost a total of 5243,100 or an overage of $1,327 per acre. In ad- dition to the purchase of these tl'dCtS of land two scenic easements on the WiTd and Sceni'r- River were ac- quired. Under this type of easement the Tandowner receives a one tine payment, and while retaining owner- ship of the land guarantees that it will. be kept in its present state. The easement process is often a less expensive way than buying the land to guarantee that there will be no development along the river. It al so allows the landowners to keep and use their land under the condition that no improvements are made. The two scenic easements acquired in 19797 were at Clio and near the La Porte Road at the. Middle Fork bridge. J, Aof ea 111Z Size - T_,161,G1O ' acres (1,815 square miles) Road System 3,500 mT -- Trail System 280 imi I es Highest Elevation 8,300 feet Streams, Rivers More than 1,000 miles Lakes 14,000 acres Feather Falls At 64e feet, -this Plu-..as NF waterfall ranks as the sixth highest in the world Feather River The Midd e Forkof the Feather was designated a Wild & Scenic River, by Congress in. 1963. Visitor, Use - n 1979 Plunas NF ranked 43rd in popularity of all National Forests in the 50 states. U.S.F.S. 75th Anniversary P1 as N.F. Supervisor's Office PO Box 1500 Quincy, California 95971 (916) 283-2050- MIM 0 Lloyd R. Britton, r Plum, asNm"LE Past, Present Supervisor, PI =as N.F. j As -a pubTlc agency serving In the last decade signif- have risen while the dol- _ icant 1 egisTative and ad- 1 ars needed to operate the United States the Pl unas W ministrative requirements Forest have been reduced. takes advantage;: of every have complicated the man- Al so , there have been opportunity to inform and agement of the resources; of - ceilings established invoTve the public. Pi umas National Forest throughout all departments 1 The RARE iI evaluation,. of the L.S. Government to II still' in progress, has control the number of 1 �� stopped for the time being people employed -1r timber companies, supplying the use of resources found 1 x on a portion of the Forest. The p�;;bduction of timber, r j , ;:.41water pleted by June 1983', and forage on these ` n 4, ► Before We can utilize the public lands is vital not y products of the Forest, only Tocally, but nat 3 . _ much more time must be ' iovally as well The f " spent than previously re-- challenge of the immediate ; �; qui red i n completing pre- years, ahead i s to produce - a = liminary assessments. This the goods and services derv- , RPl is being required to ensure anded of the Mas ifat- - 4 `- that-nnaximcan use is pro=R Tonal Forest both` effi-- vided by the Forest and, ciently and' econnically y that these uses are rote- Ile must accomplish this t .. -- - gratedin such a way that while still considering the Y one use is not provided to public interest as ex- z n, the detriment of all .F s l a. ws pressed through others. recommendation and support. We notY have been dig ected Through the pages of this to consider.-. the .rare pl ants publication we. have attemp- and animals found inthe ted to share with you not Forest as well as sites of only a view of the trees,: aµ; ` ✓ archaeological and histor- . but of the whole; Forest. ical significance. Soil lie want you to know what w --.: and watershed requirements have accomplished and tshat - s- -,-"� - must be considered as well we Lo pe to accomplish in - - as the effect any action managing a resource that � is l fri11 have upon the wildlife to be .used as well as pro- tected in order that it n .. might be available to our 1 = Cost of management and the children and the9 enera- ' number of people required tions to follow. to carry out these mandates r1annIn. Process Underway As -a pubTlc agency serving even more complex when the responses will be con- I all of the people of the Forest must provide for ;the sidered as the planning United States the Pl unas W present as rrell. as future process proceeds • 1 takes advantage;: of every generations. opportunity to inform and _ In order that those: in- invoTve the public. A Manning Team repre- terested 'in the planning senting- al T of the spec- proce-ss be kept informed Resource Management suchas i aT fists entrusted. with of progress, a newsletter, providing,- raw materials for Forest management is pre- "Forest Planning Update," timber companies, supplying sently working, on a Forest was begun in April. Sub- grazing Tand for ranchers Plan. that is to be com- sequent issues of the and recreation: opportun- pleted by June 1983', newsletter will be made ities for weekend. boaters available throughout the and campers is no small Involvement of the: pubTic process. feat. ManagErrent becomes Eras sought and written inventory Emil An important wildlife- man- . _ agement activity is corn _ ` ducting field surveys or i nventori es . Fifty stream { PI uTras W has a st,_ f of surveys were completed , seven persons who have been _ ,,�. � during the summer of 1979. trained. to manage the wird- _ :� - Two nesting sites for bald f T ife in the Forest.. Six of ' . -� ,� sd eagles were discovered these staff people a.reduri � ,- �,�;� � ng the year, .bringing wildlife bioTogists and one.: the number of bald eagle is a fisheries biologist.: nesting territories to There also are several_ seven. Three young eagles people hired as temporary were raised through their 1 employees, who 4rork on this y � = T r ` a t 4 initial flight stage. facet of forest management. Approximately bald The Forest is divided',, for - f, ,� _ �eag7 es spent the 1 nter at the purpose of org;ani za- tion,. into East and. West r e s d rive reservoirs an -- i n or a cent to the f Zones with field biologists, "' '` s _ Forest . wo osprey nests , in each zone. A biologist ' ' on pr ie .falconr nest, may handle both. wildlife x and 17 spotted owl and fisheries utork on a "Two osprey nests, one prairie falcon nest, and T7 spotted territories were located in project coordination basis., oVrl territories-were Tocated in 1979. 1979. Impr- Ovin Wildlife, Habitat In 1979 the engineering: s 200 acres: of grassland 05 acres'of alkali bulrush Both deer hunting and trout staff ca-operated with the burned to remove standing were planted at Frenchman fishing are important re- .fisheries biologist on Op dead grass and to make near Lake to improve waterfowl creational activities in erat on. Swim-up. Basically grass growth available to habitat. PI unas National Forest. The this is part of a program both c:ildT ife and; live- deer kill fluctuates yearly ~ being conducted throughout stock s 3 acres of deer winter depending upon various: the Pacific Southwest range were planted frith factors such as faun sur- P.egion to correct culvert 0 35G' acres prescribed wedgel eaf ceonothus as vival, prior hunter harvest,_ nstallatiorvs that hinder burned=pant of a timber sale. seasonal weather patterns, fish migration. g hunting pressure and by ®'154 acres of browse re- 0 354 acres of grass were state hunting regulations. An, EnvironmentalAnalysis juvenation. done in a seeded for erosion control C overing all proposed Swim= timber plantation in con- and to improve wr ldl,iferij�: up projects far the Forest junction with silviculture habitat on timber sales.hf r �7% was written in. 1979 and: treatment., Herbicides, '.- _ x. five problem areas were hand work and fire were The other side of the coin r corrected on the West Side. all used-is the damage done by y �� �r Operation Swim-up is to be , wi;,• fe.. Porcupines kill �w x completed by the fall of 0 '60 acres of time ees and a1 so damage 1982. were burned t*. -r Gophers can de- logging slash. ,rascate a young tree pl ant Waterfib%4 seek the Takes, result, 30 acres of wild- ation. When too man r y po r- marshes and meadows life openings or escape cupines or gophers build up throughout the Forest for routes were created.: in ar area., considerabl e' breeding and for forage- damage is done. The only �- To encourage wood ducks at ® 100- acres of openings and solution is to remove some Snake Cake, near Quincy, 30 brushpiles were com- of the animals where damage sem. eight nesting boxes were pl eted on tra vrest side of is occurring. In the. Green built and installed by the Forest. Thee openings ville District 40 acres were the Youth Conservation Provide escape routes • and. treated to control gophers; _ *A'.`•} Corps:.(Ycc i n 1979. the brushp :les provide cover for some species. Hunting and fishing are ad Forest animal s require } q part of yril tflife management sheTter, food, crater and w 22 acres on the GreenvilTe and to some extent can. re- 3 escape routes to survive. District iwere prescribed. place the killing of animals Much of the following work burned to- improve deer by predators and accidents, Was done last year with winter rang_ through disease or by these needs. in. mind,. Mary weather 'fl actuations. of these projects accom- - piished more than one L purpose: _ r C P om u-ter ery - •SY - -4 The Pl rmas. National Forest entry could be done b _ 'r a.a P _ n 2- The K`anger Ci strict Hardware Specifications hShared as �Lic 7m i emeatzen v,ossed t °cpssfng„ then systems are set up to P Ranger D strjcts Y P .o data processing operate independently but processing system:. This for required calcul a- ; Particular term means that tions, then back to word processing being done on a1 so with word and data: Digital Equipment Company the same equipment that is processing for final Work- Station 7 , with 16,000' used for word Processing is rintir� the same equipment. The also used for data P in report integration comes in b diskworddr memory, two floppy - format. the two systems canmuni- qua' ty rives, one letter Processing, thus avoiding the need for two separate c c ati,? p Printer, and con = - g via hone lines. municatons interface. w systems- This :Weans that a piece of information stored on Software specifications Ttie system is set up in two either system can be Both Systems u separate but integratedPassed to the other for configurations: s z use orrintin P 9• Programming languages I- The Supervisor's Office_ Hardware 4 available at the present ,ecifications time are Fortran IV and s system is used by the �. Supervisor ice Basic. The word Office Services Wo -9 processing Processing Section for is accomplished via program Digital Equipmen Company control called WPS11M. most of the typi ng . Data System 570 with 128,000 Workload and by Computer words of memory, two 67 At the present time the Services for the data megabyte changeable disk equipment is being utilized processing workload. drives,. one magnetic tape Primarily for tiro rd Both uses share data drive, one high speed line cessin pro- files and can pass 9, while data pro- printer, -and communications cessing applications are information back and interface. This equipment being developed for attain- forth. An example would c is capable of handling up to ment reporting, Purchaser be a report requiring 48 terminals, running either road credit, map digitizing, some calculations The mord or data processing, veh%tie accountabilt report format and data simul taneously.; Y� and a timber sale a<p,praisal a process.. r z rrees K P1 urras NF is managed: by the trees' were kill: Department of ed by in- US _ �tigricul ture sects. A high sap oritch under a Congressional dir- 1'eveT is a part of p the ective calling, for the re- trees natural defense K ` sources to be used in such a against in ects and when r way that they tti+iTI be avail there was not enough mois- able to future generations.. ture to maintain the` normal This also means" that the sap level, trees were unable Forest is managed for util i- to combat these ongoing zation rather than being insect attacks. r locked u and are protected as ; national Parks l ands. The greatest number of trees Timber is harvested, mining died in 1978 with somewhat_ e; is permitted, grazing i s. fewer dying fn 1979 and allowed and a variety of still fewer expected to die_ recreational opportunities this year. If the dead and are made avail able. dying trees are not har- t vested promptly (withi prom n - The Plunas NF is an espec aPPrdximately six months to ' ia1Ty important timber a i- z Year) their value i s * _ , Producing forest., Irr. 1979 a greatly reduced and event- feet 124 mi1T'rn►, h`n_� uall.y the wood i s not A feet of green timber were' Suitable for lumber. harvested as well as 11.3 i ` _, ill tan 6nard fPi of;,1 This situation called an a va e timber. mob it izi ng of USF4 reso urces Y to speed up the safes of the Two drought years, 1976 and infested timber. In 1975 1977? caused serious damage the contracting department and upset the normaT time- solo 170 million board feetK } tabl'e' of timber saTes. of green timber_' ^s � plus 118 Because of the drought some mil I'fon board feet of sal- trees died from an actual nage timber. `' •- g' lack of moisture,, but more 1-MM^a-w4;` P � � 1 4-1 sale areas as well as :other areas where the ground: was �- nz�! r..� apt to be disturbed or trees - removed. Goals of these In- vestigations nvestigations t:ere to locate - pre -historic sites as. wellas those sites showing activity by man since Euro[Arrerican settlement. ._,& s f..g,, a� f Past Preserved sites have been located plus W1111111111111pp� 382 historic sites. Thirty- It is only in recent years grave sites also have been recorded. It is expected that vie have given emphasis that, 2,500 pre -historic and: While these sophisticated 2,,000 historic sites will be landscape. to locating and preserve is compl eted_ the years. And several Tyr order to .hel p Tocate areas of the Forest that ares possible places where men to locate pre -historic settled in the Forest the: timber sales and other pro - of historic value. tee 71 SC areas,. a great deal of conj unctien with. PT umas W j'ects that took high resolution aerial have become concerned tr'tn photographs of selected' site in the RichBar Ceme- areas. The photos were beauty of the the beauty of the Forest and help preserve the historic time of the winter equinox. Forest. to: show the areas that re- ceived sunlight during the have attempted to maintain short days of winter- It - was reasoned that the people Branch of the North Fork of its natural': look t.:herever 'N; the past depended upon sur. - light much: more than modern possible. residents and sought those r -- areas as home and village v sites. Last year archeologists in- ng center in the: mid- vestlaated proposed timber 1 4-1 sale areas as well as :other areas where the ground: was �- nz�! r..� apt to be disturbed or trees - removed. Goals of these In- vestigations nvestigations t:ere to locate - pre -historic sites as. wellas those sites showing activity by man since Euro[Arrerican settlement. ._,& s f..g,, a� f Engineering Engineers gave technical In addition to roads and. support for 66 salvage trails, technical support is timber sales as well as 26 also supplied for all the green timber sales, surveyed constructed and maintained'. 303 miles. of road', designed improvements on the Forest, 215 mof roadway and such as,;, dater and sanita- performed route reconnais- tion. systems-, administrative sance on 350 miles of poten- sites, buildings, 1 oo ko ut tial roadways,: They had a structures and anything Part in building or re requiring feasibility analy building 151 miles of road sis, design, construction or and expect to, see about a 10 maintenance. percent increase this year in aTT of their road activ- ities. To date, 4479 pre -historic sites have been located plus 382 historic sites. Thirty- four known cemeteries and grave sites also have been recorded. It is expected that, 2,500 pre -historic and: While these sophisticated 2,,000 historic sites will be landscape. located_ by the time the work is compl eted_ the years. And several Tyr order to .hel p Tocate 'wri l l be given to possible places where men to locate pre -historic settled in the Forest the: timber sales and other pro - Nevada Air Hational Guard in areas,. a great deal of conj unctien with. PT umas W j'ects that took high resolution aerial photographs of selected' site in the RichBar Ceme- areas. The photos were beauty of the taken in December at the help preserve the historic time of the winter equinox. Forest. to: show the areas that re- ceived sunlight during the furnished by the USES. short days of winter- It - was reasoned that the people Branch of the North Fork of who Tived in the Forest in 'N; the past depended upon sur. - light much: more than modern areas that were important& residents and sought those r -- areas as home and village v sites. Engineering Engineers gave technical In addition to roads and. support for 66 salvage trails, technical support is timber sales as well as 26 also supplied for all the green timber sales, surveyed constructed and maintained'. 303 miles. of road', designed improvements on the Forest, 215 mof roadway and such as,;, dater and sanita- performed route reconnais- tion. systems-, administrative sance on 350 miles of poten- sites, buildings, 1 oo ko ut tial roadways,: They had a structures and anything Part in building or re requiring feasibility analy building 151 miles of road sis, design, construction or and expect to, see about a 10 maintenance. percent increase this year in aTT of their road activ- ities. While these sophisticated cleaning debris left through landscape. Special emphasis aerial • techniques vrere used the years. And several this year 'wri l l be given to to locate pre -historic local. miners built a fence timber sales and other pro - areas,. a great deal of around the earliest grave- j'ects that have a potential manual labor was. extended to site in the RichBar Ceme- to mar the beauty of the help preserve the historic tery using - supplies Forest. site of Rich 'Bar on the East furnished by the USES. - Branch of the North Fork of Through such efforts the 'N; the Feather 4i Ver. ,It was an areas that were important& r -- extremely' important gold' during this country's dev-�E- ng center in the: mid- el opnent, will be protected nineteenth century- -Not and preserved for future a�, onlyimportant was it p ortant generations. because of the amount of * gold produced', but it was Objectives for maintaining"., MITA ' Tett i the home of a talented lady the visual quality of areas writer, Mrs. Louise Amelia throughout the forest were Knape Snith Clappe. Mrs refined this ' year. The goal ` CTappe l'ivcd with her doctor of this proje...�: is to ensure . <1 husband at Rich Bar -from that an attractive setting 1851-52 and wrote one of the is maintained vherever the f best accounts of early life visual resource is of par- --`� -. in the mining camps. ticular importance. This`,=. s could mean that roads wil 1 Last year the young people be engineered to blend into 4-, ,t from Canyon Dam YCC Cam f the hillside rather thank spent time at Rich Barear a as a scar across the i pp � Engineering Engineers gave technical In addition to roads and. support for 66 salvage trails, technical support is timber sales as well as 26 also supplied for all the green timber sales, surveyed constructed and maintained'. 303 miles. of road', designed improvements on the Forest, 215 mof roadway and such as,;, dater and sanita- performed route reconnais- tion. systems-, administrative sance on 350 miles of poten- sites, buildings, 1 oo ko ut tial roadways,: They had a structures and anything Part in building or re requiring feasibility analy building 151 miles of road sis, design, construction or and expect to, see about a 10 maintenance. percent increase this year in aTT of their road activ- ities. x "A 0 Camp-ing Family camping and other In addition to the many op - types of recreation; are im- portunities for recreation portant uses of the Plumas in the Forest there are NF. Making the camping additional facilities in the experience available re planning stage. In 1979 quires the skills, talents USES acquired 1,200 acres of and labor of many different land at Cold Lake in the persons who work for the Lakes Basin area. Plann1ng, Forest. - the use of this land. is to-, be completed in 1980 and In addiition-to fishing, will determine campground hiking, hunting, bird locations and other_ watching -photography, and recreation v:ai v ities . camping in the Pl u-nas NF's 41 improved campgrounds it At Frenchman Lake -in the also is possible for Forest eastern part of the Forest visitors to camp away from two sites are to be altered the regular caniporcunds in to accommodate handicapped places of tt:a i r own campers. At Bucks Lake choosi€fig. Termed "o,--Spersed a there also will be con` - recreation" by the Forest struction under the Service this policy is in- direction of the USFS. tended to handle the Par_�fic Gas & -Electric holds increasingly Large numbers a Federal Energy Regulatory of campers without calling Commission (FERC) license to for additional public ex store water at --'Bucks Lake as penditures. a part of Feather River i North Fork hydroel ectric Plumas Forest visitors must generation project. The secure fire permits and be i FERC license specifies that equipped with a shovel and recreational facilities will then they are free to choose be constructed' and managed many sites adjacent to by the utility 'under Forest _ Forest roads that are Iittle Service directio►l, more than wide spacr.t= Under the FEkC•license, PG&E I Visitors who ' prefer the will beg'.., this year a group improved campgroun.j:: will campground near Sundew Camp - fired 1,008 sites at the 41 ground and will build a campgrounds to choose from. trail and vault toilet at In 1979 there were 1,836,400` Three Lakes; car top boat i visitor -days in the Forest. I'aunch area, parking far-- A visitor -day is a measure- ility, trail . and vault ment of one visitor spending toilet at Grizzly Forebay; one da.y in the Forest.. and five self-contained _RV Campgrounds measured 452,C00 pads at Lower Bucks Lake. visitor days of use or 24.6 percent of the visitor days Pl umas W-- also is working total with' a state agency, the California Department of If all the improved' sites in Boating and Water�ys, to PI ulnas -campgrounds were build a car top -launching filled there would' be a ,pop- pad and, a bot launching ulation of campers approx ramp with parking space and i'mately equal to the member pit 'toilets at Lake Davis. of people living in Quincy. Additional- -boat launching The estimate of campground facilities atLake- Davis - capacity is 5,797' persons. also are being studied. The Forest Rights -of -Way facilities thereupon have Section acquired eight Road grown considerably. Today Easements, required to log; this fairground has the six Timber Sales, totaling' reputation of being one of 81 MMBP. All the easements the finest such Facilities acquired were over existing in the state. roads. and totaling 39.38 miles: In addition the. Starting in the early Right -of -Way Section 1960's, the forest decided , acquired 69License to try and: work out an Agreements needed to provide exchange of land with the access for 29 Insect. Salvage County and get out of the Sales. The Salvage Sale fairground business t ch by Program requiring` the most this time had groYr) to 25 access needs were on the La. acres, several buildings and Porte District. numerous recreation type facil hies. This exchange In regard to our Old Deed effort was continued over Project we completed 25 the intervening years with cases. -that required Regional noksuccess:. approval and eight cases that required quitclaiming The numerous Forest Officers to the record fee owner road that have been involved with easements that were no this effort will be pleased longer needed by the Forest. to know that on ne - 24, We also granted. one USDA 19W, Fc rest S� ~.3 Easement to PT upas County. Lloyd Britton deTivered a Quitclaim Deed to tP.e"County Back fn 19402 PI uma.s Board of Supervisors and in National Forest, Supervisor, turn received a check for Dave Rogers, issued a five payment in ft-T'l fes -he acre permit to PTumas County£ Natio„-_-!1 �ForeV, rand 'in- for use as- a County volved. This was accomp- Fairgrounds site. Over the Iished' through the National intervening years, the size Forest Townsite Act, and was of this. permit and' the the second deed ever issued number of fai rgro uaa under this act.. x "A 0 Camp-ing Family camping and other In addition to the many op - types of recreation; are im- portunities for recreation portant uses of the Plumas in the Forest there are NF. Making the camping additional facilities in the experience available re planning stage. In 1979 quires the skills, talents USES acquired 1,200 acres of and labor of many different land at Cold Lake in the persons who work for the Lakes Basin area. Plann1ng, Forest. - the use of this land. is to-, be completed in 1980 and In addiition-to fishing, will determine campground hiking, hunting, bird locations and other_ watching -photography, and recreation v:ai v ities . camping in the Pl u-nas NF's 41 improved campgrounds it At Frenchman Lake -in the also is possible for Forest eastern part of the Forest visitors to camp away from two sites are to be altered the regular caniporcunds in to accommodate handicapped places of tt:a i r own campers. At Bucks Lake choosi€fig. Termed "o,--Spersed a there also will be con` - recreation" by the Forest struction under the Service this policy is in- direction of the USFS. tended to handle the Par_�fic Gas & -Electric holds increasingly Large numbers a Federal Energy Regulatory of campers without calling Commission (FERC) license to for additional public ex store water at --'Bucks Lake as penditures. a part of Feather River i North Fork hydroel ectric Plumas Forest visitors must generation project. The secure fire permits and be i FERC license specifies that equipped with a shovel and recreational facilities will then they are free to choose be constructed' and managed many sites adjacent to by the utility 'under Forest _ Forest roads that are Iittle Service directio►l, more than wide spacr.t= Under the FEkC•license, PG&E I Visitors who ' prefer the will beg'.., this year a group improved campgroun.j:: will campground near Sundew Camp - fired 1,008 sites at the 41 ground and will build a campgrounds to choose from. trail and vault toilet at In 1979 there were 1,836,400` Three Lakes; car top boat i visitor -days in the Forest. I'aunch area, parking far-- A visitor -day is a measure- ility, trail . and vault ment of one visitor spending toilet at Grizzly Forebay; one da.y in the Forest.. and five self-contained _RV Campgrounds measured 452,C00 pads at Lower Bucks Lake. visitor days of use or 24.6 percent of the visitor days Pl umas W-- also is working total with' a state agency, the California Department of If all the improved' sites in Boating and Water�ys, to PI ulnas -campgrounds were build a car top -launching filled there would' be a ,pop- pad and, a bot launching ulation of campers approx ramp with parking space and i'mately equal to the member pit 'toilets at Lake Davis. of people living in Quincy. Additional- -boat launching The estimate of campground facilities atLake- Davis - capacity is 5,797' persons. also are being studied. NOTES DEER HERD COMMITTEE November 6f 1985 Present_: Karen Vercruse, Carl Walter, Steve Streeter, Star Brown Wildlife Management for private lands - We discussed approaching large property owners in the Foothill and Mountainous areas; owners would receive money for hunting privileges as with the Sugarloaf Ranch in Yuba County; Land Trusts are another option to consider along with wildlife management plans. Karen V. thought that $20,000.00 has been appropriated for telemetry tracking of deer in Butte County. The committee is interested to know how the Deer. Herd issues are being handled in adjoining counties - Plumas, Yuba and Tehama. What parcels are built on in ,less than 10 acre area's? We reviewed copies of -The February 1983 memorandum with number of parcels by Planning Area. What relation is there -between number of parcels and census data/population projections? Population numbers of migratory versus resident deer; what are reasonable numbers for both? A Mother Lode Resident Deer Herd Management Man was cited as a reference. The committee decided to request DFG to provide information about resident deer in the County. What are the deer herd figures before the construction of the Oroville Dam and after construction of the Orovil.le Dam? What percentage differences have occurred in the deer herd number -s? The three areas where deer occur in the: County ara the timber lands, grazing lands and lands designated agricultural residential by the general plan. The committee thouahtit would be valuable to contact major timber holders and see what cooperation there would be for managing migratory doer herds. (Note: The emphasis to date has been on the areas of the County designated for Agricultural Residential Use; the timber mountain and grazing/ open land categories have 40 acre minimum parcel sizes which coincide with DFG recommendations for migratory deer herds.) The committee wished to meet with OFF about private land management/funding sources and other issues prion to the November 21, 1985 Planning Commission meeting. Range management is currently handled by CDP. When will DFG be iii the range manay-meat business? Number six on page nine of the April 1985 letter. We are also interested in an update on all the legislation listed in the April 1985 ,letter on page 6: r NOTES Continued Page Two fencing requirements, clustering/ A dog control ordinance,, homesite locations, parcel size and transportation. corridors are subjects addressed in the deer herd sturdy panel report. Of these items, the dog control ordinance and fencing requirements could be agreed on, but the other items require further review prior to adoption of policies by the County. The deer migrations windows identified by DFO are reflected on four separate maps. Land in the vicinity of deer, migration windows should be checked on the AP pages to see if the parcel sizes prohibit the effectiveness of the windows. The ,RC (Resource .Conservation) zone was proposed for revision to include specific standards that would address nii(tratory deer. Identification of target areas for private wildlife management plans was a task proposed for completion. SAS:jmc NOTES ON FISH, AND GAME RESPONSE TO BOARD OF SUPERVISORS 1XT'1'J.R 1. Except for the specific text of previously mentioned 'logislation and the agreement text for the American River projeej,, none of the documentation is r.ew information. ?. None of the documentation, except for Deer Kill, is specific to Butte County, and most information on the two Butte County herds was conducted on public lands, Ninety percent of lands affected in Butte County are privately owned. No information specific to those lands is available. With regard to response to specific questions: 1, It is apparent from the discussion that there are mativ factors affecting herdpopulations beside parcel sizes. All. these factors combine in a situation that is dynamic - not static, - from year to year. No prioritizing of factors was mentioned. Also not mentioned was the fact that for the Eastern Tehama flerd, the single most limiting factor was the summer- range - a point made during the hearing process. The summer range for this herd is outside Butte County boundary line., much of it publicly owned. h. Harvesting w Although Deer Kill numbers are available. for Butte County, the Department admits that they are not accurate indicators of population trends since changes in hunting zones and season make the harvests difficult to equate. Illegal harvest seems to be a major factor in limiting herd populations, but no indication is given for this factor. No figures exist for illegal harvesting although the Department admits that it is one of the single most limiting factors of herd population, d, No specific information exists for resident deer herds in Butte County, Residont deet are the same species as migratory door, The Department admits that resident deer compete for thrry sane: wirrtesr range as migratory deer. No information exists as to the interaction between resident and migratory deer in Butte County.. Population levels of resident deer are not known, Harvesting numbers do not distinguish between resident and migratory door, Resident deet` appear to have a great potential for affecting migratory deer populations. Information about resident: door should figure prominently in establishing herd management priorities on private lands. Any policy established for BLItte Countywithout resident deer herd information would appear to be incomplete and, therefore, ineffective, iiOT98; Continued e. Physical Barriers - Oroville Reservoir is identified AN a major obstacle in Butte County to deer movement, and more importantly as the largest single factor to Loss of winter range. The Department admits to requiring project sponsors to camponsate dor .Losses of habitat, and gives as an example the agreement for the American .River, No such compensation was required of DWR when the Oroville Dam was built. Although it may not be practical to rectify this situation now, it should be noted that hand owners in Butte County cannot be expected to make up for losses caused by DWR. ;y �h I y t STATE OF CALIFORNIA THE RESOURCES AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME GUIDELINES FOR CONSULTING WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME ON PROJECTS SUBJECT TO CEQA THAT MAY AFFECT ENDANGERED AND THREATENED SPECIES by Earle W. Cummings and Stephen J. Nicola Environmental Services Division Administrative Report 86-1, February 1986 luct,on ACKNOW�,EbGMFNTS Process °'E these 33pg begun in 19, uidelines re ► Costa) to with the presents the Federal Endanger Incorporate manynoi°duction ° culmirir7tion a and Depa several pecies Act the Of f le�I'latio of partment of memberG into state desirable 1 n (AB with Fish and Game the legislaLulaw. T1 �atures c+E the the iz'ou conServaLi Fish and Wil and other st re an`d their -C 1984 contributed and dev dlife Serv• ate agencyr staEf, the ibuted theseenL we than t,o eguidelinesinterestser and privte aEEf sect woz-kin. Assembly Catherine. Hackney, For drafted Sector that y 'Mater kneY, Eor th"xr the legislation held F)rks and merly princi special conte, and it goin the whole nr Wildlife Co pal consultant blonnn who ke g' fete B°n °cess mmit su:ltant ht findin taoe1li t�ge'ther and ° was the to the tVillia 9 solutions � ► Special tthee 'Wcatal glue's develo ions Assistant YSt" thg Spottspmentein er Geyer Assoc at emingly nsol to the Direct ye at Of interests °F t s who het � = hrmblemsor► DFC, the "heat" Defender, dgot u� r` I ldl .* fQ r�aha °f the eSolu t Convince skeptical Although z4.de► �� I�h om the beihns► and al 9h many Pe gInnin Richard these ruidel. Ple rev`o we Would haveg►Lapnlied for t1�eir ine$ °Lhe We wish ytod and L'IY;p; ,..� rwIse. substantial III and VI: bee Co. tribUtngle °1rt the-, '�., ` •'C1us drafts of pr°aucti° Waren ions:foZIA4,, .rt 150 • n of Ycia A Sus Loch ? rz i =► duals Pat O' Appendix VI' ppendices t7 rane extremel Briep °E the in graphic form and VIII, ° PTs enabled helpful and Chevron Co m with t�` John Ellis cons us detailed •rporatioii w iSiC.alc ons consult t1°n o more cl,ea cri ti who on an yF� cons ion availableoY distingui5he °f an earpiovlded an ultal all betwee Y draft {. Caltrans provided and the n the which Whichwho Iden tiF for state lean more details informal Hausslee had not d several agenc1es• d Formal considered ih Possible outs Craig Martz of consi suggrs� ions f the Calth or earl r omes clearer to' make nil Ener d, aft guidelines• consultation review sand more useful co nsultation°mmission who Bob °£ he andards that t° state lea nroresS and Offered hel proceduzesernor's Offices eguivalentdtogencies wi9hidelines pful Admin' 'rativeilable to inc Of Plan with and Hous oronmental. Hing and We Manual; porate then Research who in Carlyle e Who in ped thank those identified help. er, c°ntribu the State Hnwev tors Arid and um .ss ions in this utdoors alone as ye other res ponsipondehts Eor enti was ble their For any errors VislCale is a trademark of Vis;Cor p. :iii iv y. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.000 Introduction . . . . . Page 1 1005 Critical Features . . . . . 1 1010 Provisions . . . , l 10..5 Consultation , . . , . . 2 1020 Classifications. . . . . 3 1030 Federal and State Acts . . . . . . . 3 1100 Procedures ,'. 6 1110 Preliminary Review/initial Study. „. 7 11.20 Negative Declaration . , . . . . . . . . . 8 1130 Notice of 'Preparation . . . 8 1140 Draft ETR . . g 1150 Notice of Completion/Availability . . -9 1160 Final BIR . . . 10 1200 Assurance of Compliance . . . . . 10 APPENDICES 2000 Appendix I. Consultation Process Outline 3000 Appendix II. Information Needed for Jeopardy Determinations . . . . . . . 4 . . . i . . . . . 15 4000 Appendix IST. Survey Guidelines . . . . . . . 16 5000 Appendix IV. Altering Previous Determinations . . 20 6000 Append -ix V -a. DFG Contacts . . . . . . j , . . . 21 7000 Appendix V -b. Checklist of DFG Concerns . 23 Appendix VI. Flow Chart of Consultation Process . 26 8000 Appendix VII. Working Definitions . .-, 21 8010 Jeopardy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 8020 No Jeopardy . . . . ; . . . i 27 8030 State Lead Agency . . . . . y . 28 8040 aeopardy Determinat;<ion Report . . . . . ' 28 9000 Appendix VIII. DFG Consultation Polices . 30 10000 Index . . 6 . . . . 0 3 . . . 1 « . . . 32 iv 1000. Introduction On January 1, 1985, legislation (AB 3309, Costa) took eEEect th,,q' is intended to improve the Protection afforded endangered and threatened species affected by development proiects subject to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The California Endangered Species Act (CESA) (Chapter 1240, stat. 1984) calls en and emphasizes early consultation: it ps a sunset of July 1, �r 1987 and is intended as 6 Pilot program - The off and Game (DFG), trustee agency for endangered andDepartma-nt threaten ed Fish species under CEQA, and other state agencies now have 6 more clearly defined mutual reSponsibi and resolve actual conflicts. responsibility to avoid Potential conflicts 1005- Critical Features CESA distinguishes between lead agencies (and project Snonsors)j who may consult informally with DFG, and State lead aqOncies for whom consultation is required. When a state lead agen,:.-y, OFG is consulted formally by findings regardint, CESA requires the Department to issue written the effects of the Project, whether , habitat destruction, takitiq of, or jeopardy to, any threatened or endangered species. If a state lead aqency receives a Written determination of jeopardy from the DFG, it will still opportunity to consult 11 have an further and develop measures capable of avoiding jeopardy, Or Of providing substantial Mitiqation. The is directed specifically at projects subject to CEQA and affecting endangered and threatened speci intent to les, It is DFG's into incorporate the provisions of the Endangered Species Act its existing Project review activities. when DFG provides a determination on whether or not there is jeopardy, it Will be doing 80 only in the context of the legislation as it applies to species listed as endangered or threatened by the Fish and Game Commissioni 1010. Provisions The legislation requires DFG to Provide guidelinos for informal consultation. The Purpose of the informal c i OnSUltaL'on is to aid Project applicants or lead agencies to identify ondahqOred species concerns as early as possible, pteferably before they decide whether or not to Prepare an 8h,vironmental Impact Report '(EIR). The legislation also ttquiros State load agencies to adopt reasonable and Prudent alteenaLivet, or if those are mitigation and enhancement meas infeasible, reasonable mi found project which would minimize adverse impacts or Its habiltabi 11hen to the listed species Whenever DRG is consulted formally by a state lead agency, DFG Must "issue a written finding whether a 3/ Pending tlOgiSlatlOh (As 524)e if enacted sunset (late to July l, 1988. ► Would extend the V proposed project would jeopardize the continued existence of any endangered or threatened species or -result in the destruction or adverse modification of habitat ev4aatial to the continued existence of the species." (fish and game Cede Section 2090). This requirement is to encourage consultation at an early stage in the review process, so that potential conflicts can be ide;.tified and avoided. To help private applicants for state -permitted projects understand their options, and to enaUlo state agencies to fulfill their obligations under the new legislation, the Department of fish and Game has prepared these guidelines, 1015. Consultation These guidelines are designed to explain both informal and formal. consultation. Informal consultation is available ration request to all. lead agencies including local governments, an,1 to projei,Jt proponents. It is distinct from formal consultation leading to a jeopardy determination provided to state lead ar1Pncri,es. informal consultation is described in Fish and Game Code Soction 2093, and is available to any project sponsor or lead agency when it makes its determination of whether an Environmental ImpAct Report or a Negative Declaration shall be required'. Informal, consultation is intended to encourage the earliest possible resolution of. conflicts. The conflicts which might arise include projects affecting joint federal and state -listed species or difficult choices among several alternatives. Conflict resolution at the informal consultation stage would normally be through an appeal to the Director if an informal consultation produced an unacceptable recommendation; Formal consultation refers to meetings or -written comments provided to state lead agencies during their preparation of an environmental document which would ultimately lead to a formal jeopardy determination report. Fish and Game Code Sections 2090 through 2092 establish this process and relate it to the Environmental Quality Act. The process for informal consultations will be essentially the same as for.the initial steps of formal consultation except that it may not involve a written determination, and will be completed :at the preliminary review and initial. study stage mentioned in Section 1110 of these guidelines. A state agency should consult with the DFG on any project the agency initiates or for which it ?s a lead agency, and that is not statutorily or categorically exemtjt from C80A. The CEQA Guidelines (,Section 15065(6)) state that a project -caused reduction in the number or range of a rare or endangered plant or animal requires a finding of significance and preparation of an E1R. This mandatory finding of significance overrides categorical exemptions (CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2.) 2' t 1020. Classifications The California Endangered Species Act also revised the categor on of officially listed species. There is no longer a category fol' rare animals. All animals designated as rare by the Fish and 01.1ime Commission prior to January 1, 1985, were automatically reclassified as threatened by the legislation. The act did nO. 60 the same for plants, however, and until the Fish and Game Commission acts to list plants as threatened, there are none new (January 1986) so designated. The stale agency should contact the DFG for a current listing of endangered or threatened species. The legislation also creates a new legal. category of protected animals and plants, candidate species. A1" --hough candidate species are not subject to the same consultation requiremonta, as endangered and threatened species, the nWw legisl.al;ion encourages informal consultation between DFG and other. stale smrlencies. The purpose is to work out potential conflicts prior. 1•„ra initiatinq the CEQA process in case tb, species becomei oft ici.al.l.y listed as endangered or threatened prior to completion of thea CEQA process. Section 15380 of the CEQA Guidelines also requires consideration of species as dictated by their actual rarity or detlree of endangerment, and does not depend upon their listinrl. 1030. The Ielationship Between the Cali.orn_ia_Endange,red .Snecies Act and the Federal Endangered SO-icies Act, and Coordination Among the Department of Fish and Game, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and National Marine Fisheries Service The provisions ons of the California Endanqered Species Act (CESA) and the Federal: Endangered species Act (ESA) of 1973 as amended (50 CFR, Part 11) will often be activated simultaneously. Manv species are both state- and federally"l.istedi Projects involving both a state lead agency and federal leafl agency or other federal involvement are quite common. "'rake," i;rcluding "incidental take” of either state or federally -listed endannered or threatened species activates the provisions of either or both Acts regardless of whether the "taking" is carried out v;r a federal agency, a state agency, a local agency or a privat.�, individual: The. relationship between CESA and ESA is rat`,er complex. There are nine distinct cases in which a project carrierl out or approved by a state and/or a federal lead aoency may negatively affect a state- and/or federally"listed endangere�-' or threatened species. Additionally if "take" as defined by CES, and/or ESA is involved, then additional possibilities for acti.vaijhq either or both acts are generated. Rather than attempt to d}:scrine each of the nine potential cases in this text, these cases are more easily illustrated in the table below. The `19" in a liven bolt indicates activation of the provisions of CESA and/or ESA. 5 Lead Agency ** Threatened OF 'Species Consultation If Sec. 7 Sec. 2090 ESA "Take" and/or as Defined by DESA is Involved Endangered Which May Be ESA CFSA Sec. 10 Sec. 2080 Adversely AffectedCSA r„ CESA J., Federal/State Federal./State x x 2. Federal/State Federal Only X x 3. Federal/State State Only x x 4. Federal only Federal/State x x 5. State Only Federal/State x x x 6 Federal Only Federal Only x x' 1. Federal Only State Only x 8. State Only State Only x 9, State Only Federal only x Under terms of a mob with Fish and wildlife Service, Department of Fish and Game wardens act as agents of the Federal the provisions of the Endangered species Government to enforce Act which prohibit take of federally listed species in California. �* For purposes of the ESA, consultation is required not only of federal lead agencies, authorizes, funds, but for any federal permits, or carries out agency that activities that may affect a listed species. s ro .sO6 by either anent that projects p n affect table it is app negativc+l y SAeC`ies From this enc des which could n10 threatened 2Q9Qr listed en( state or federOr federaYprovisions of either C'F'�SSQ(CFRtLpart 17) either state" activate the consultationOr ESA (Section 7, GaTe Cases 7 and 9 would activate the California Fish and and 9.coda only if "take" were except for cases 7 respect activate activate the of. CESA and ESA► case which would provisions the only and ESA is Case 1, why which involved. Further, both CESA federal lead artencY consultation provisions of state and state and proposed by both a that is both projeot is prop affect a species in this case, would negatively endangered or threatened• isted as urequest the Uni.i-OdtheStates ter federallY-1 of CE instructs DFG to to Section 2095 Fish and ��7 ldlife Seat 006atcr and pepa.rtment of the Interior, whichever is ,,I,)a A Fisheries Service► ndangered Sp extent National Marine pursuant to the E t0 the greatnnt. initiate consultation p to ",participate to initiate �-%�e Department 4n the federal consultation• ali other cases practicably and N�iFS fog CCSA► but ar�onq tr-e DFG ► USFWS r s nuncirequired h'J these required Coordination table above o6iag among (�-9) presented i n the subject of a memorandum oF, will establish interna subj revisions Of CESA will be the s that the p agencies, cies . The memorandum o°heipd ass ureding and wildlife a9 agen fish procedures and contacts fashion= as well as state and federal and ESA, well-coordinated work together in a 'ts activities with the to coordinate 1 or proiect The rcquiremcnt for DFC �lieve the state agency requirement to compiY with ESA. USFWS and Nm does not r. state-listed sponsor from its req ject would impact a to the of whet,Ier a given pro eciesr it is clearI consultation Regardless ,ally-listed �p or federal species Or a fed','' onsors if state and% e' . t O� protect sponsors itlarY. Rev ted .Study. stag. benef i the P eiim l sted is completed in a federal] /- aware that if if a project also beis involved► and th.An state agencies should species of the species► ered or `threatened any individuals endam a taking a federal Sect would result in will be required to obtain the project ency the taking before agency would have in the state ag author'zi'ng ermlt► a state ag for approval 1Q(a) p 2(A)l Unless In Order to obtaana[section l0 (a) vice. ss to submit a consetvation p and Wildlife 'Sand Wildiife to the U.S. Fish Fish the lication satisfies he U.S' would be issued, its aPp ermit there were no this conservation 'Plan that a n lied if in welch Service► there is no could only be apT� lfl process or other aUthori�a�ans�t. at on (see= federal. Section 10 pQrmit a rection federal, agency subject to case the project would be above) 5 a. 11.00, procedures. flowing is an explanation of thCertain aspO01 ssteps c3o ntzecl and. The follow other appendices ampifY pper►dix I; encies 911 endrin projects for process. DEG will.. consult- with state aq r wi1J. d species as part of DFG' s overall rev,�1w DfGp l threatene p a'll fish and wildlife resourceso their effects on uidelines,1nd wilLrw�okmake monitor tY►e implementation of these gr^onsors, and Others closely with state agencies, project appropriate changes, 1110, in 'Cer SUMMARY OF CONSULTATION STEPS KEYED T(7 Ch0A S`T'AGFaS Pre inary Review/initial Study Stade Functional 'Fe", q valent Programs) b r F„.yG State agencies should, and project informally with the DEG at hePreliminarrs may, consult y stage to determine what wildlife resource information eview orlistiol noodoStud dIor available and where and how the necessary information can bo obtained. To aid planner environmental Concerns(Appendix A ► the DFG has prepared a checklist of conducting biological surveys when field dsamplingnis need ed (Appendix III). DFG regional staff, wall complete such a ichc�ckl.z 1.t during informal consultation and provide it to anyone seeking advice to help identify and resolve concerns at the earliest In the planning of a project to be initiate] by an a ►M staff should; and project sponsors may, g ncy, agency N in the DFG Natural DiversityDataBase�elvPs of the guidance is needed, the DFG Environmental Services an If further and Threatened Species staff A Endangered consulttion at this stage leads ptodan informal Ydet contacted. If Jeopardycould result, an ETR nt for that certzfxed functional equivalent comparable document for to be prepared. In this event, early tons ultationlwi,llemake it to identiFy, reasonable alternatives or mitigation easier t would make a D8IR acceptable. If DPG �termihes that ardy would not result, a mitigated negative declarat on ,may be b4 ,icient for CEQA compliance. Fish and Game Code Section 2090 requires the DFG to issue written findings based on the best existing scientific information. To avoid an unexpected determination of review, it is critical to the consu;ltationrd}, late in project Process at this informal stage for the DFG to have adequate data by which to determine if a proposed project could Tates t ire an endangeredor threatened species.* Appendix TI indicates the tvpe of information more detail than necessary for needs from the applicant or state agency In order to assess the effect of a Proposed endangered ,and threatened p project on species. If adequate information is not Provided to the DFG regarding the project or the endangered or threatened species affected by the project, the legislative Policies stated in Fish and Game Code Sections 205 through 2055. and the consultatic� to provide a formalorinformalprocess ldeterminaled for ti,onoof2093 require DFG jeopardy. State CE,Potential7A Guidelines (Section 1505) direct lean.. agencies to make findings of significance and to a rare or end8IR if . specie's Could be affected. TJIs, toadisclose impacts and resolve concerns under the circumstanceu of inade x quate a.nform:at�.on, bFG Will ask that an EIR b� prepares):. Thfotmal consul-tation with woule� normally be Complete Project, his point,nsorsPormad lead agencies l consultation *State agencies should not accent applicaty appr()priate information on listed ons as Complete unless i itctuded or available Or outss ide ources. or candidate species is either S I i with state lead agencies would begin with the subsequent stades of. CiQA compliance 1120. Negative Declaration Stage (or Comparable Stare for Functional Equivalent Programs) Thejob of formally determining whether or not there will be eo ardy to endangered or threatened thecvequsitebe much infoCmatioalon p ative Declaration stage at the Neg species the proposed project and on the endangered and threaten�:t��i affected has been provided during the previous Preliminary 'tial Study (or equivalent) stage. The DFG and the RevieWedns'tate agency already will have consulted informally on the initial Study equiva.lent scomparableep and ndocamented ��shouldether ahe Negative Declaration, an EIRr oris prepared, If a Negative Declaration (or equivalent) proposed sufficient, the DFG will be prepared to reply f. no jeopardy, provided there have Negative Declaration as sent via the State Clearingh+t�se (SCH with a formal determination o he conditions or circumstances that led to the been no changes in L DF G's conclusions regarding the Initial Study data in the first lace. However; if any of the circumstances described in Appendix TV should arise between the time of an informal response to an Initial Study and a formal response to a proposed Negative Declaration (or equivalent), then the aO�G tillhe negot"iationlonen ne In t is ► determination of jeopardy alternatives or mitigation would be resumed 1130, Notice: of preparation Staqe ays to respond to a stt by ate agency SM an�l NotIce of The DFG has only 30 d certfierl preparation (of an EITt) oetit yha.vensimilar time constraints. functionally equivalent programs lted n the o Therefore, if DFG has not already been otheustaaelagency should Preliminary Review/Iniiia] Study stage, the DFG directly as far in advance as Possible of SCH notify This will allow the DFG sufficient notice or other legal notice. opportunity to identify th�alte nativeslto be considered in habitat issues and mast suitableof a contract with a the EIR or project document. A copy m of Consultant to prepare an EIRis one rovidet and which omight wenable tDFG to lead agencies could easily p further better identify issues and alterndainclude,j�orareferencea(when b�'G response, the "state agency shoal provided it), all of the detailed information it obtained during nd after the Initial study (or comparable singe). liminary an NOP tf the DFG has not been consulted during the upon raceiving Review/Initial Study stage (or equivalent), with our (or comparable notice); we will provide endiXiv- b)aand�survey checklist of environmental concerns (App en .guidelines (Appendi; SSI). we will also dive our preliminary assessment of the potential for a jeopardy determination and advise of the need for consultation with DVG s of favaion .proto jeavo d effects and possible alternatives that may jeopardy,. 1140. DEIR ('or Comparable 'Project Document) Preparat,wrin Stag At the Draft ESR preparation (or comparable) stage, 0111 DFG and the state agency will confer to evaluate the potential effects of the protect on endangered, threatened, and adversedidate effectspareeli.kely, this review continues to indicate th. DFG- then the state `,Ienc, sluto thest s��urrentlt hpDEposal deG and �tifiedeby DEG. reasonable altern If none is feasible, CESA requires the inifrpncidental taking of satisfactory mitigation (section 2090)•an endangered or threatenedclthenaallcnnotpartesbe avolwoduld�l)erexpected agreed-upotr project seena1Or to agree upon Nabitatnbenal]mowed,oandother the conditic�r�r includedlin incidental taking would a memorandum of understanding. The state agency will be expected to incorporate into the DEIRto (or project document) whatever agreeseme. ifathereached agreementshful.�?yroffset endangered and threatened speEIR (or the impacts, the DFG will be able to redeterond to sP minationDduring the project document) with a "no jeopardy" next stage in the CEQA process. it isreachedoWiahLregardetotothergency will also incorporate agreements important wildlife and wildlife communities and habitats. 1150. Notice of complet1on/Avaf.J6bility Stade Because of the short time allodo oGompletionyofthe a DEIR (agency is encouraged to send the Notice comparable notice) directly to the affected region or regions of DFG shown on Appendix V -a. The notice should also include the DESK (or protect document)► and if. not included in the DFIR or document itself, relevant inF.ormation on the project and resources affected. The information must be sufficient for the DFG to make a judgmen t on whether or not the project would jeopardize en�angerec or "threatened species. d it consultabion has occurred anproceeded satisfactorily up to ce the occU this point, and no changes have ctorrahouldnbe ah.leltotprovideeace p endix IV), then the Mire (see3�, . " determination. However, if endangered or threatened species would be harmed, and if the opC, has not been consulted un dod With adequate to this point, or if it has not Meed-uponeen �tneasures adequate to information, or ifrevLously aq avoid jeopardy have not been included in the DEIR o0 other document, the state agency will likely receive a jeoC�ardY determination. The state agency should then consult with DFG to i identify, develop and incorporate alternatives or miti.r1,ltion measures designed to avoid jeopardl.,ing the listed sp()c;irs. 1160 Final EIR (or Other Final Project Document) Stctr7e The Final EIR (or other final., decision document) stage can be routine and non -controversial if the state agency has adequately carried out its consultation obligations and incorporated measures or alternatives which avoid jeopardy to listed species. TE it has, there will be no last-minute surprises or conflicts that would delay certification and approval of the Final EIR or project document. However, if the DFG believes that endangered or threatened species would be jeopardized, it will reaffirm its Jeopardy determination and appeal pursuant to Section 21167 of the Public Resources Code (CEOA). 1200. Assurance of Compliance When a project has been: reviewed by DFG and adequate eviCence supports a determination of no jeopardy, the 'Director of DFG will provide a written statement concluding that ko jeopardy exists and setting forth the basis for the conclusion. This finding will certify f the compliance of the project pr designed with the Endangered Species Act as longas the oject is implemented as agreed upon. DFG may reinitiate consultation, if among other things, the project has changed or unreported adverse effects are revealed (Appendix IV). APPENDIX I Outline of the Process for Consulting with the Dem:lrtment of Fish and Game on Projects that May Affect Endanget:ed ,and Threatened S;)eci( 2000. Preliminary Review/Initial Study (or Certifier) Functional Equivalent) Staqe 2000.1, Project sponsor, local or state agency prepares project proposal, concept plan. 2000.2. Agency staff (or Environmental Review Team) determines that project is not statutorily or categorically exempt. (CEQA Guidelines, Section 15065) 2000.w,; agency staff (or Environmental Review 'team) determines whether sufficient information its available on the project and endangeredand threatened species to determine whether broiljert has the potential to substantially affect (reduce the number or restrict the range) an endangered or threatened species 2000.4. If information on (�ndanjered and threatened snecie.s is insufficient, agency contacts DFC Natural Diversity Data mase and/or Endangered Species Program Staff (Appendix V -a) and/or conducts necessary surveys (Appendix ITI). 2000.5. agency begins review (Initial Study, or equivalent) of project, and endangered and threatened species, to determine if projecthas the potential to jeopardize an endangered or threatened species,. 2000,6. Agency initiates informal consultation with DFC (Regional Manager, Director), providing Copies of project proposals, information on project, wildlife resources in project area or project impact area;, biological survey or study results, Natural giversity Data 'Sate reoarts, etc. 2000.". DFG (Regional or Headquarters Environmental. Services Sunervisor) reviews material provider by state agency. if federally --listed species and federal agency involved, DPG (Director) notifies 1,S IW and requests joint review of proiect and biological data. Federally -listed species involvement w.11. Add a federal consultation step to all subsequent stages. 2000.5, DFG stafE works with project sponsor, local agency or state agency to evaluate project, eEEects potential. alternatives. 11. 1000.9. DFG (Director) informally advises sponsor Or agency in writing (letter o� memorandum) whether or: not project could jeopardize endangered or threatened species, the conditions or mitigation mea,suimp, required to avoid jeopardy, and whether or nol-, a Negative Declaration► SIR, or other project document should be prepared. Ordinarily, a determinal,jon of no jeopardy at this stage will complete the Endangered species consultation process. Thn recipient of an informal determination of jeooardy may appeal to the Director for further review, 2001.0 This is the final step in informal consultatiOn. 2010:- Negative Declaration .(or Equivalent) Stage 2010.1. State agency provides a copy of a proposed MogR,.tiv e Declaration to the affected regional office directly, or through the State Clearinghouse, to the DFG Director, including a cony, if any, of nPi",'s informal, consultation letter or memo responcino to Initial Study information provided previously by state agency. The proposed Negative Declaration should include a description of any changes made in the proposed project to avoid jeopardy to endangered and thre,;tened species. 2010.2. DFG (Director) provides formal written determination within 30 days as to whether or not proposed project would jeopardize endangered or threatened species. 2010.3. Negative Declaration (or equivalent) approved by state agency. 2010.4. Notice of Determination (or equivalent) filed by agency with Office of Planning and Research (OPR) or, for functionally equivalent programs - Notice of Decision filed with Secretary for Resources. A 0.5. DFG has 30 days to appeal. 2020. Notice of Preparation (or lquiyalet►t Notification) Stacie _ 2.020.1. State agency sends Votive of Preparation of an FIR (car comparable notice) directly to DFG (Director), with copies of project proposal, information on project relatedprojects in the area, endanqered and threatened species in project area and project impact area, biological survey or study re0orts, Natural Diversity Data Base reports; etc. Earlier and additional notice or contact- are encoul:aged, such as through copies of contracts for EiR preparatio , and copies of notice directly to affected regions. S2 2020.2. Director forwards material through Environmental ` Services Branch (ESB) to affected region, or if more than one, dPF4gn,aces a lead region, or coordinates directly foes stiTiewide projects. 2020.3. if the data in 2020.1 (above) are not provided or are insufficient to prepare a detailed response to state agency, then DFG (regional or headquarters environmontal services functions, district or unit biologist) obtains whatever information is available in the Natural Diversity Data Base and/or contacts Endangered Species program staff, DFG species soecial.ict, or othersp and develops draft response, 2020.4. DFG (Ho or regional ESS) reviews regional response to NOP (or equivalent document) to be sure it includes the following items: a. Description of project and affected environment b. Concerns. c. Checklists. d. Need for biological surveys, studies. e. Potential for jeopardy to endangered or threatened species, f. Request that agency biological staff or their consultants consult with DFG staff to evaluate project, effects, potential alternatives. g. Persons or organizations with whom to consult in preparation of DETR. 2020.5. DFG (Director) responds to state agency within 30 days from date NOP sent by 5CH. 2030. DFiR (or Other Project Document) Preparation Stage 2030.1. DFG and state agency confer on a) alternatives to project as proposed; b) mitigation, if feasible alternatives can't be found; and c) conditions for incidental taking if such taking would Occur. 2030.2. DFG and state agency agree on alternatives or mitigation, and execute a memorandum of understanding if, incidental taking could occur. 2030.3. State agency prepares DE'IR with alternatives or mitigation and agreed upon memorandum of understanding► 2040. Notice of Comr)l.etion/Ayailab lity of 08 R (oz Other project Document) Stage 2040.1. State agency files a Notice of Completion of DESR (or comparable document) with the Secretary for Resources or the State Clearinghouse, or as prescribed by its equivalent process. state ac�encY sends.... 20-10.2 t the same time as 2Ci40 •1 above parable document) copies o£ Notice and Others C anon. The project DFC, and otriers involved in nedotiatic�n directly `t0 D► review of alternatives i mode project area and doc lament or gFiR is to include theop anon on t1�t proiectI wildlife resource ological survey or sty►tV the project i:mu, area► rep oris, ktatuxal Diversity Data Base reports, analysis o effects an eecorrespondenoeri f tont speciesr and co,pie.s of relevant the De�?a tm�nt of Fish am Game to the aaencV Pub lith as specified in equivalent pr,oOtamr 2,040.3. Notice p or sent out by SCH, rine If data in the DE'IR (or comparable thenlDFGo(regional or 'H 2040.4• obtains ineormatio insuftici4nt or nadequa r Bred Sraecies �rorjram DSS,, district or unit hioEndang) from species soec ali$t5aseaaand ethers: Natural Diversty e �o 2040.5. 2040.6- 2050- 2050-1. 040.6- 2050•2050 1. Or CSS) prepares resp -- regional DFG MQe ulvalent notice) Nt oc 00A Cor functionally q envy within 45 DFG Ctirectax) responds to state aq from date UOC Cor comt�azab Le and rov idesent hY days rescr�bed)r soli (or published as p rural Writ d.etermina.tio� angeredtorrthreatenede p Or not t eopardize en project would i species: Gor oletedr oaect document) .Stade inal sip, Cor Bred or ' eocardiAl endangered or DFG In order to ,,eci , the state agencyat d incorporates ��ciesr threatened sk.. `eoPardY r determinations reoadln9 ? a'tic�n measures not those alternatives tar mi�ncider►tal take could incorporated I< or permits as already understand nd ,occur memorandum a the Fish and Game Co.ie prescribed by Section 2t)S1 0 should be executed and ntorg�0 ate" in the Final SIR c r cert`i.f les Final El's Cor equivalent 2(150.2: State anen � feted in compliance with document) has been comp CIPIQ�• 2050;x. State agency* app 'es pro1ect. i,, s d�o��ice of Deterrnnat'on With O1?R 2050.4 . state agency as prescribe ) • Cor files other: y Section file an w ar'� as prescriber b 2050.5 • D;'G may p,egources Code iti it determines 211.67 of tete Vu roiect as .,oved would ieanardizer��ndangered that p r• c'r throatene 14 AFPFND���C Sx f proposed 1pro7 ct ine Whether e to Teterm nd Threaten`i a ation Rewired Fndanc3ered � Sn€orm Could jeopardize species Game needs detailed ish and the D% artment o£ £uliy and accur�zed and 3000, The D p order to ect on endang require information In osed pro] there is n° ascnted� effects of a pr°p Nithough syr... threatened spec1ewng data must be clearly the follo project area and pro'jec`t format► the description of s 3000.1• A foil including map impact area, of endangered.and aistrib tion t area and project xno��n and potential he the p surveys (see 3(1Q0 • species recent F.ie]d threatened Abased on ,idelines) imp for survey 9 Nppendix STS distribuL icon end species Scientific data Additional information. on A upon literaturex:peras. X000.3,• based roiect habitats ari�� di5CU5sion5 w�,th rev iew ► of the pron+seci p of possible effects cumulative efF�r�cts. analysis ancludsnc� 3,000.. on listed. speciesr ned to reduce or alternatives cles�q and threatened sis °f p to endangered 3000.5. �anal� impacts eliminate Q5$'bier species. early as ri the conflicts as ed to provide otentia7. encourag. To resolve i? strongly the Initial 3010. state agencies are to pFG during arable) stake above information gevieW tot comp Study/S'reliminar is lr� ,NPPENDIX "I Surveys to Obtain the Information Guidelines for Gendamctinc� ial Of Proposed Pro4eots to Needed to assess the Potent Threatened Specie# Jeopardize Endangered hwhodetermine and ' 4000. The following is intended to help t+�ranne evaluate proposed oroiects subject ose when a biological survey is needed, who should how ,- ual i f ied to conduct such survey's - conside .ed. q field surveys shuoud the survey report. information shQ guired aftd 4000.1. Because es eral ndan to take en gered and threatenedrspecies, a e0cx staff and con.s�shnandare Ganeurged fortguidancecontact onhs�pecific Department of permit requirements for their studies and ,tui""YS4 determine thP� 4000.2. Surveys that are conducoEea proposed project -,should environmental effects otential endangered Wid address all kn�aWn and Q threatened spec es, including species listG•i as the Fish and Game Com.-nission, candidate species by requirementsd meet And those which woulee CEC�AGuidelineSt listing Section by the COMMission (S 1S38a, California administrative Code1,� .3. It is appropriate to conduct a biological field 4000 to determine ifp or the extent that, survey species might be affected endangered or threatened by a proposed p-rOlect when: 1t appears the project may alterhabits` 'where a. an enr3angered or threatened species is ,kelx to be found have b endangered orbeene identified �ons the ntcit-ct area histOricallx or impact .area? but recent surveys have not been ists; done; or suitable but unoccupied habitat ex or ` ical survey has nev�eerede1oa'cthreatenedonducted nd. c. biological it is unknown whetr be her endangered species or their habitat ek'ist at the project site or project Impact area. z is should be selected on the 4000.4• 5ioloolcal consultants basis of pbsses5ion of the following gualifeatons (in order of. importance) 16 4000 •5 - er� e"c�,ce Feld n f ield sam�l ing investigator oxp a. in and field methad"�; desig knowledge o` species '.Taxonomic exner��ence and b ecology; of the area► d the sneci'es r 40, an with threatened spe C. Familiaritendangered and including riate state nnil Familiarity with 'theelated to collect d•' statutes r, -_ federal in a manner s should be conducted ered or Field sitrv�yts to locate any endang which sent, - attempts that may be present ed specieshould be'. threaten surveys s Specifically, o year an' hen endaftg0r't^d time "",evident" at��1 conducted at the both he snall4juled a.. or threatened speci.essurveys should t , ,ble -Field breedin(l or identif Ide with the aaprO0rila maIs wh.n then' to coincl stage of t�,ith pelrrerint other life hi-sbe e,4ident► sec henr�1n?- ical are likely to bdurng periods oto identify a psLiods and/or are necessary development that plant sr)edies of concern • it �rhich predict surveys b Ci 'cal. 'lpred.ctive based on, the ,3iolo of species physical the rjceurrence or other OE habitat actu��l field occurrence rather thb" bhe use.i as the sole. features' should not very species ,inspection) F to ���' hn... for impact assessmVbe idem _ipd is method in the should whether field ne it mated to de t extent necessary e�rd threatened or endang jai -b that is consistent in a manner • Collections of �onduc i on s ec,'tes • w of. the p ". , species mrtst be in pro e4 state and ecieral listed Or canth ao,,licable state listed accordance with p• collection of permit r'egu'lations ( emorandum of wires a netmit , llection Of species requires wise a the pG; reg �, understanding s ecics may �tted only fedetallY�-l..,, ,p will be perm cies Collections ��ce-sat for sqe the ,permit actions /re would not jeopardize plan when such and. or ulat on. Fir ydentifieatian of the dap used to v stenC. raphY should be ossible► continued e, hQtog Whenever € c�entficident ont and,habolation cannot d'aCliment V�Y1ell the, s ecimeds; h It es�eCi CIU eCtln vouCiler p withstand 1,; d Conducted USIng a ppropr ate field technicues in all gats of the site: to ensure a reasonably thorough coverage of potential impact areas. Techniques maV be prescribed, as part (,)f the state and federal permit authorizing Ilty h activities., e Well-, ocumented When an endangered ,or, threatened species is located, a Calirornia. Native 'Species (or Natural Community) Field Survey Form or equivalent written for. completed and submitted to the Natural. )ie�itageuld e Section (CDF'G, 14161 Finth Street, Roam 1225, Sacramento, CA 95814) for inclusion in the Natural Diversity Data Base. 4000-6. Reports of field su.rvevs should be inclurinel in the material provided by the state agency duri.nel the Preliminary Review/initial Study stage of t.11e CSnA process, and should contain the following information; a. Project description, including a detailed map of the project location and study area. b. A written description of biologi al SA'ttinq, including a vegetation map. c. Detailed description of survey methodrlogy, d. Danes or' field surveys. e. Results of survey,q including detailed maps, the occurrence of threatened and endangered species and other inportant wildlife, or natural communities and Habitats, f An assessment of potential impacts: g. Discussion Of the relative importance OF the Project to threatened or endangeredoecies with consideration of nearby or induced , devel.00ments, species occurrences and statewide distribut!on, h. Recommended measures to avoid jeonardizinq endangered or threatened species. i, List Oe all species identified. j. Copies of all California Survey Npjelrative SPeci.es Fie.id FormForms or t'tatural Community „,urvey 1 k. Name of field Investigator(S) 1. s cited, hermits held, Persons Reference contacted, museums visited, and location of all specimens ,kpPENDIX IV Conditions cinder t4hich the DFG Jay Alter a r—-— That a Proposed Protect Could Not jeopardize Determination Endangered or Threatened species «;Io jeopardyR will not be altored 5000. A determination of ,. witn the State unless. and until DEG requests aeating may be made Lead Agency to discuss a change.occur' if one or more of the following 5Op0.1 . The alternatives or Mitigation eabasis fo�nadux i nq consultation and which were determination of ,� � are not incorporate � . into the project d Ln 00.2. The alternatives Or Mor are 50 cons4ItAtion wegative Declarat�o�eed upon dur�na those which were aq Impacts are revealed 5000.3. in the ?iegative Declaration or. DEIFY that were not knohe Department of Fish and Game during consultation. ecies Ghat occurs in the prt c . he project 500p•4. A so and Came impact area is newly listed by prior Commission as endangeor hofatheeMegativeto Gertification and/or ao proval Declaration or EIR. 5pp05. There has been a chang e in the z�roieot or in the information presented and considered during consultation.. declines to meet with DF'G 5010.6. I; the State Lead Agencydeclines rescinded and a the previous determination may new determination provided within ail days, 20 APPENDIX V -a DFG Consultation Contacts 6000. State Headquarters Department of Fish and Game 1416 Ninth Street, 12th Floor Sacramento, California 95814 Contact: Consultation Coordinator (916) 445-1383 6010i 'Regional Offices Department of Fish and Game ,legion 1 601 Locust Redding, CA 96001 (916) 1-25-2371 contacti Fnvironmental Services SuperVisor Department of Fish and Game Region 2 1'701 Nimbus Road Rancho Cordova, CA 95670 3 j "5-7030 C o,,n c it-': " Environmental Services Sopervisor Department of Fish and Game Region 3 P. o. Box 47 Yount,villet CA 94599 (701) 944"2011 Cohtacti tnvitonmental Services Su7e,evisor Department of Fish and Garfte Rea ion 4 1234 East Shaw Avenue Fresnot CA 93716 (209 ) 222-3761 Contacti. 8nvironm,efttal Services supervisor Del Norte, Humbolf1tr Lassen, Modoc, Shasta, qi,;kjyou, Tehama, and Tran ttv counties Alpinej Amadort 3utter Calaveras, Colusa, -sastern. Contra Costat El Dorado, Glenn, Nevada, Placer, Plumas, Sacramento, San Ioacuin, Sierra, eastl—n Solanoj Sutter, Yolot and Yuba counties Alameda, western Contra Costa, La4L-t Marin., Mendocino, Monterey, Na0a, San 8eriitoi San Luis Obispo, San Rateo, Santa Clara, Santa Crus, wk�stern 8blano r.nd Sonoma counties Fresnot IKernj XIhqz,. Madera, mariposap Merced, Stanislause Tularep a,hd Tuolunno counties 21 DImperial, Inyo, Los Angeles, Department of Fish and Game Mono, Grange, Riverside, San Region 5 Bernardino, San Diego, Santa 245 W. Broadway Barbara, and Ventura counties Long Beach, CA 90802 (213) 590-5177 Contact: Environmental Services Supervisor ..6020... Endangered and Threatened Species information Department of 'Fish and Game Natural DiveraitY Data Base tiatural -raritage section 1.416 Ninth Street Sacramento, CA 95314 (916) 324-3812 Department of Fish and Game Endangered. Birds and.LNtanmals Program 15161 Ninth Street Sacramento, CA 95814 (916) 322-1260 Department of Fish and Game Endangered, Reptiles, Amphibians, and lnvertebratk�s Program 1.701 Nimbus Road, Suite C Rancho Cordovay CA (816) 55-0842 Department OE Fish and Gane Endangered Plant Program Natural Heritage Section 1416 Ninth Street Sacramento, CA 95314 (916) 324-3814 iX, S Fish and Vj ldl%te Services Sacramento Endangered Species Office 2800 Cottage Way Sacramento, CA 95825-1546 U. S. Fish and iFtildlife Service Ecological. Services 24010 Avila Road Laguna. Niguel, CA 9267 APPENDIX V-b `7000. Checklist of DFG Environmental. Concerns Activities That May Cause Impact 7010, 1-iodification of River or Stream. Channels 4 plow Regime Exotic fauna and flora introductions tiodification of habitat in water or on barlka Alteration of ground cover drology Alteration of ground water by Alterati�*.7 of drainage channel network density River control: and flow modification Canalization irrigation withdrawal incremental irrigation return water ;watershed burning surfacing or paving 7.020. inland 'Transportation and Construction Highway sidecastinq Urbanization gighways and bridges Roads and trails Fish hatcheries Culverts and aprons Railroads Cables and lifts ;nelines, and corridors Transmission lines,- Barriers - including fencingand 5traightenin.g yavigation channel dredging Channel revetments canals and locks Dams and impoundments Recreational structures Cut and fill Tunnels and underground structures Turbidity and sediments 70 0 • Resource Sxtracti€ n Cil and g eothermal eXploratiDn NA-td. ¢ rodvctkor Suction dredging. Clear-cutting anr' other lumbering Commercial fishing and hunting 23 Mining Wind energy extraction 7040, Processes Farming product preparation Power generation Mineral processing Feedlot operations Petroleum refining Chemical production Lumbering Pulp and paper Placer or hydraulic mining 7050. Land Alteration Agricultural conversion of wildland or wetland Erosion control and terracing Mine sealing and waste control Strip mining rehabilitation Landscaping Marsh fill and drainage Pre-con,truction clearinq or grading' 660. Resource Renewal Cloud seeding Reforestation Fish and wildlife stocking and management Fertilization Prescribed fire 7010. Changes in Traffic Routing through sensitive habitats, such as deer winter range River and 'canal traffic Pleasure boating it fishing areas Higher speeds or shorter view distances 7080. Waste Emplacement and Treatment Export or, transport intrastate Land fill Emplacement of tailings, Underground. storage spoil, and avarburde.;n Junk disposal Cooling water discharge Municipal waste discharger ,ncluciinq spray irrigation Liquid effluent dii scharges Stabilization and oxidation ponds Septic tanks, commercial and domestic Spent lubricants 24 ► 7g90 • Chemical or 3ica:l Fertilization ogical Treatment of the tanvir{tir e, 1 �tsn Genetically engineered Organism use Biological. control Programs Ints rated pest management Chemical de-icing of highways, etc. Chemical stabilization Cf soil. Weed control Insect control Rodent control Predator control Rough fish control Forest vegetation control 7100. accidents Collisions Spills and leaks Operational failure APPENDIX VT 8ta.to Agency+/DFG Consultation Flow Char; 11115 -Ki K'1.17Rp�It .X 'Ila t11t 190111,11 N,ifCillllilltt i --MI.INTI -'I�1 ^^"""�•�"'i! Itftg1l6ntillim S3iltttxl i till a IN xlt: vital mAm tnitl ts rasrsnuts St all Al i t t?l/ailf f S1010 MIMI$ 3 ps -+—Illsll ltlttl — 5+ilfh --+ hSSi4t llllfl (11:It +--►-rd �qIR■ 4111" ;"Wim. alt. f Tit I SII!( PwIa NDA11S ta%IAlilt A% 111RIX11 Y S illi,tasm to"ii* It mxcl 11timo( 1 lot MR M1111lal On I :7t (MISS I'm ttp[ntlgUll SKIJq' �—fit yt 411"its".fit-+----11'111. V's Y'1 +='1.1=11'1 KiIf 111 �P�LS, 11110h P11tvilKi, 1:1101 tliit gllth tel All"11141 1111MIX *IrfS iskr a, =tt It ui affil 1"Atl C'All tiCl - 141Ml4R,I 0I101 IN Sum tp'SS41111e.IV$ 11111R1Rt'<7iltir:'a 1 It f1i mitt° -111 z'tttl r---f-*ISttUrttt vi!im a a trdtt r ttltlll't Arlroi Pit It 11111101 US of RhUffs M4 txsutiil.vIain Of 001(101 XtKill y IWIN I all I to f art'A IJI R It wv IQ KT Tl tl7 t MAII"70115 tlila[i t1 mtm( • Sit is n+a 1 t itp.virr xtlttl �t SIMs 1111'44 1 tKlLtSlip -1St WI Ili. 4 tit 111C71 —4-1011 ldlfT Ntllilt ;It NVa'! ti;eY r tit v ttvtsl of 1rtli to tlRpa oWIiK lla�t11ti1 dy,yy K its ltnlin;rtln.t M1 ISOtZNI afi>rt 71r►1eY Y ll ISS - INIA114 Isl Ullt 1211111 IitP401111 '+S au Stilt Maul N NR oil Kv1mvl of jl ifltp1III $ I AYIIIAIIli WK Q(Iilall" I( -•7U (l �-� Wm NN It. "INlit 111*11l W.111ltr11111if" 0 "*1 flom loot 111 Ngtuyt - 'Ulu Nt RtaHa1 IlRea11K1, Mijoflti of 11111 +t lTiNtMts AV IV I[M01 lost) RltNII wi" Al11Ri11m I t;AAM : I 1 tot too I>rMix lei k1lltaltd'erl All{Gtl1•.,.ltt �+�AllltAi{�71,;tt---a. �t>itwl`l3 .., 1a�7 (UtS lIkOLI i! ((tSAWRI ! 1!111 141 tectal 4U1IA 3110111% alt,l M tnilllp -AI m Iillulim, lit V Stili mrsi R 4YO IYIMfY -. r blRiSI11A 1101 WO to III Yt1, if irmt "m 1 dila!»libi it 01 MRlrp i 10+11 Hilt tllfrik IRY, i t ONIO 'AIM x11111 I(II IMI iii l pt 1f Al IM 011111 Si (04 'dI€t tUKY ttittty-R--tea Ak I-= ltir t trait khat lit'00voailll Rtlivs tet xilmoolill I Roo tiCanaaltt+i SilJ WRT WHIM tMiml Mil Ow t1SIt'14KY KtIlls It I eitori(K* s1 i ifiMllKt milt IU0 vffkt h I1�S �K1 %1 itMt�( 11th! Of x$ofAl MISON + ta11s1i rn�iS� �1µahi Stf +'� now 11 v lilitlit W xtIMItKS t�71t1 eS . t 0 At"011mlic kk 1. i llistlla It SK'ti"xli[i. 010Ilmnt1;11 I, ►til 1I11K mixtdllli t ILI!tuisot mt 11H1M, t. a llttil"0 1 Oritillt S iirwIlims mlttlti i k hitims K110 -1i i, tNFti tilt vii Ltd. t hAtitsll; 01. ml MIKOa tt((tli klKlst(lat. f 4 8000'. APPENDIX VIT working Oefinitions These definitions are used for the purpose of Imolementing the Endangered Species Act. Where different from ordinary interpretation,, then will be modified as eXnorionce shows there are better defi,il-tions. 8010. JEOPARDY A "Yes" answer to any of the following questions will be, considered Ca basis for an initial presumption that a threatened or endangered species. would be Jeol),irdized by a proposed project. $011. Would a vlable or recoverable poDulation be eliminated,, or would a significant proportion of a population be adverseiy affected by the nroleclt_ or the project's effects? 8012. would the ranqe of the species be sinni'01cantLv diminished bVthe �Droiect? A. 8013. Would habitat used by the species be reduced in quantity or quality by either the immediate or Future effects of the project? 8014i I-Iould a szecies' access to its habitat be, reduced or tendered more batardoUs as a result oLc the project? 8015, would the project adversely affect current or future providing efforts aL,-, .I. 1 ing protection for the species? 8016. would plans for recovery and eventual de -listing of the threatened or endangered species be adversely affected by the project? 801.7. tJoUld the project interfere with reproductive or other behavior of the endangered or threatened species? 8018. Would the orolect cause extinction of the species? 8020. No JEOPARDY A "No" answer to all of the above questions will be the basis for a provisional o*ihioft of no jeopardy to the affected species, STATE, LEAD AGEI%'C-y t o L ed Siaction 2065 defines State Lead Agency by refentreance iron.meal Quallityia Aet Agency as defined in the CaNlifornia Env Section ,(Section 21000 et seq. Of Public Resources Code) - -iricy s OP �ith "a 21067 of CEQA iCenI ' ryinges the Lead AgenoutaorOapprovinq t"i-h's principal responsibili-AV for car project." L340. JEOPARDY' DETERMINATION REPORT A jeopardy determination is a written statement by the Dito--tor indicating whether or not a proposed project would ued existence f liste(jn(lnarod jeopardize the continportd wi'llabeqa or threatened species. The determinatoionare seoarate document to be attached to the De-parhroant's rosj)onse to an Agency—proposed Negative Declarationf *�Jt,)tice of preparationt or . an FUR. Notice of completion/AVailability Of A Department—written determination shall addr"'Ss the following - 8041. Summary of' project proposal a. What Will take place and where. 8042. Summary of endangered or threatened soecies staLus and occurrence a. occurrence - General.. distribution of Species" us of species as a whole. bi status ce Status of spec*oG in the project area and project impact area. of scientific information d. Appraisal of the quality regarding the species and its habitat, 8048. Reference Ot experts consulted to make th,P- determination't sources of inEormation 8644. Description Of project effects a. tiow project ect Will, directly ffect endanqere,d or I theiar habitat-, in the thteaten'!id species and proiect area Or Pro ect impact area, inciudinq bioiloaY, life history, and habitat be yet effect of project on the species as a wholet ndividua including number Of I8 and/or populationsistribut'llOnt effect of, range or Affected, viability of species. it P • ` • I , �� C . Dete `miila.tio.n of Whether the net effect on sr"; -cies is sufficient to cause jeopardy. d. Studies which might be performed to boLLer evaluate the effects of the project on listed species. 8045. .If jeopardy is determined, a descr:i•otton of reasonable and prudent alternatives to the project; that would prevent jeopardy. 8046. If alternatives are not feasible, an explanation as to why they are not feasible and a description of appropriate mitigation and/or enhancement measures and haw they will benefit the: species. 8047. if the project invtAves incidental take, a descriation of the reasonable and prudent measures naces:sary to min!mize the adverse impacts of the incidental take. 8048. A statement as to whether extinction of, in endangered or threatened species is likely to OCCIA-i 8049. If jeopardy is determines, a %tatement Oat the DFG will oppose or appeal the proiect if a tocommended alternative is not adopted by the state agency, or in the absence of a feasible alternative, if reasonable mitigation isnot provided.. P • ` • I , �� .I • M I • 4e. • A APPENDIX V!1r 9000. Department of Fish and Game Policies, Regarling State Agency Consultation on Endangered and Threatened SpeCi . es 9001. Jeopardy Determination Reports will bo prepared for both "jeopardy" and "no jeopardy" determinations except that reports need not be prepar04 in those cases where there are no endangered or threatened species in the project area or projert impact area. 9.002. Quantitative jeopardy standards that woold general1v apply to all species will not be preDared because they do not exist. The conditions that would lead to jeopardy vary from species to soecies and over time. 9003. According to section 2090 of the California Endangered species Act; the Oepart,ment must base A jeopardy determination on the best existing scfQni�ic information. A detemination of jeoPaVIV will in, each case be based on all available inform,'AtJon. Although ed additional scientific information could be obtai,*. "th 1 based on W�. I further studies, a determination will be a fair argument using all Information wailable. If there is a reasonable possibility that additional scientific information could result in a cha.,,qe in U. - determination, he Department of Fish and G"'me will includenation Report an in its eooardy retermi- appraisal of the data used to reachits determination. of course the Department will be w.A.iling to examine any new data and to continue to consult and seek alternatives., 9004. A determination Of whether or not jeopardy Would Occur should involve an analysis of three effects: the degree to which the proposed -project would increase the ri-ok of extinction, limit 1t the options for irrd-aedi4te Protectior., and decrease the likelihood of future recovery. 5005. Analysis Of the effects of a prop6sed proiect on "habitat essential to the continued existence of an endangered or threatened species " (Sectlon 2090 will not be an issue 5coarate or `patt from the analVsis OF the effects on the soecies 11Nself- The two are inextricably linked and t'r.,efe can be no consideration OF the effects on a soeciet,1, that does not include its habitat. 9006, When reviewing a project in which A species de-iiqnated by the Fish and Game COMMIssir «a a"candidate species" is involved, the Department will advise the 30 1 State Lead Agency than the species vay not he taken, but that it is not subject to the consult----ion requiremen::s of Section 2090. However, we il! also advise the agency that i` it wishes to .n*::)*-nal'lV consult with the Depart-nent on the oossihle a oro ect on the candidate species, we will do so. WFC wi].1" also advise the Stata Lead Agencv that- shoull candidate species become listed as endangared or threatened by the Commission prior to oro=%jct a00Vf)VztI and SR (or Negative declaration) certi`icat=on, tho State. Lead agency will be requi.red to z:ocmally cnnfwlt with the DFG.