HomeMy WebLinkAbout84-7 HOMESITE SEGREGATION 2 OF 4YES
4 • PLANT, LIFE:' Will, the proposal r ..u in suh,s.tantial.:
nge<in the diversity
NIA
of spec3.es; or'numlier
of any; species Of plants ,(inclt4ding trees, `
shrubs
tcrops,,
grass and aqruatic plans}?
b, . Reduction .a:£ the numbers a f ►
an unique`,, raze
o,r endangered species of ;alar, ss?
--
c• Tntrad61..oI of ;new spEries of plants into an
ax'ea, ar iri'.a barriex
to the normal replenish-
of exastiai;'' species?`
dment
Reduction an act,, eage, of any agr.icultuxa.l cxop7
''
S. 4NTM.AL LIFE; iUz11 the proposal result in subs:
a. Change in the diversitantial
ty
of species, or`numbers
of any species o animals (birds, land animals
including
reptiles, fish and she11'fish
benbhic organisms or ' insec`ts,) ?' '
b. Reciuc,tio.n i.nr the-nurribers of any--unique,° r:4ara
Oxi, endazigerei species of
_..W.
animals?,
c. Intxhducti.on. of new species Of anim'41s
—-
,n,ta
an area; c result ih a barrier to "th& migration
or movement o'f animals?
..,
d.;Deteriarat'ion to'existing fish or wzldlfe_
habitat?
N
6•' NOISE.'Will the prbposal result in sub$'tuntial:
T Increases in
existing noise leti�els?
b: ,Exposure` of people to sevvere noise levels?
7. LIGHT AND GLARE. �Vi,11 the `proposal produce '
ss gna„��.cant 1 lght
and glare?
g. -- LANb USD Vl the proposal result in a
s`u sTi'tanCial alteration
of the present or planned
land use of an ares?
9. NA Tt�RAL W• pr
X11 t3ie opoal restrl.t'' im
7
StiTistantRESOURCES:
:L
a.Increase'In the rate of use a any natural
reso rtes?
b. Depletion,of any non-renewable natural
res6urces?
.
10 : RT SK. Op DPSET Will: , :. .
the p'roppos;al involve :
ab s ale
Ari X losion or t h
o relehae o hata, t
ous substances �nc1
`
e Clod �btit not
(
oil, pesticides chemicals or radiat>iontot a
e�rent; o°f ari accident } tie
br
y • i
upset conditions?'
'b: 'poss�.ble �.ntexfererice with. ah erierenc" •--- C—
'response g �'.
e _ ..
ar e. mPr ehc
Plan g y atian, plan?'
e'Vacu
,
11. p0t7LATlONUi1l the proposal alterthe lbct,in
o
zstr u ion,, densitTY, or'
grai�►th date af'rrrtheahuman
popLllati�n'�
23 UOtiSNG. ` �V311 the proposdl affec o;w�txn rinti;�iyg,
a demand for
or create addi tion L housin;
i
:
�^
YES
MAS
13,
TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULAT.ION.. Will, the proposal
result in
a. Generation o£ substantial additional vehicle
movement?
'b. Effects on existing parking `facilitie's-, or
demand for new parking?
c. Substantial impact on existing transportation
systems?
d. Significant alterations to present patterns
of circula`tUn or movement ofpeople all
goods?
e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic?
Increase in '
'"—"
E: traffic hazardsto motor vehicles
'`
bicyclists or pedestrians?
14.
PUBLIC SERVICES. Will theproposal have',an effect
upon, or result in a need for new or altered,
governmental services:
Fixe protection?
b. Police rotection?
c. Schools?
d. Parks or other recreational facilities?
e .laintenanc;e o£ publ c facilities including
roads?
f. Other ovexnmental sery
g zees?
-
�
15.
ENERGY. 11111 the proposal result in
T Use of substantial amounts of fue,l,or ever ? '
gy
b,. Sub tial increase in demand upon eX*st�ng '.
sources o£ energy or require the development
of new sources o£ energy?
16.
UTiLITIE5; �9i11 the pro sal result in a heed,£or
new systems, or substantial; alterations to the
a. Powwtfollowing: or n atur,al gas?
Ib . Communications systems?'
X
C, . Water ava .lability:
d. Sewex, or s optic tank's
e. Storm water drainage?
f: 5o1adi, , Waste andj disposal?
_
X
1.7.
tIUMAN !EAL H. 1, Will the proposal togult in;
a. Creation of any health hazard or'potontial
health hazarde�tcludinI mental healthy 7
b: Ekposure of people to potential health
-
hazards?
181.6
AtSTRETC80 Jill the proposal' �result t in the
o struct n of any steidc- nista oJ� view open to
the public. or Wxll the proposal r6sult in the
orNtltlon of an aesthetically offensive site open
to public V1614
�
F
{
YES
MAYBE NO
19. RECREATION. Wi1,1 theproposal result in an impact
upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational
opportunities?:
2 CULTURAL RESOURCES.,: ; ;-
a, r73:11 7he-proppp:ali result, in the alteration
Alt
o£IOr. the destruction of a pre oris or;
historic archaeological 'site?
b-. Will, the prppasal result inadverse physaca]
or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or
h st0r. J.' 'building,, striucture :or o'uject3
c:. Does . t4i proposal have the potential to cause
d physical -change which WL�u1d affecta
tlni ue
ethnic cultural velues?
d. jV:11 the proposal restrict existing religious
or sacred uses within the potential impact.
ea?
ar4-1
V. DISCUSSION CSF �NVTRONMENTAL EVALUATION 84=07
See attachme'rit -
r
P ti
,
h
�.
�� � a.
,..; � � '.