HomeMy WebLinkAbout84-70 GENERAL PLAN & REZONES 3 OF 5• t
r , r.• � ... r �`'' Y. r. "rF= ..,.' t.:,{� a i':lei` "rF. •
r
�. ,.• , .I r � , : ..�1 `.f^,1 _ '� .' �,F t l�w..:.�.....ea ..+�1. ..,1L. � L �-I ` • �' � I � ��` !: .:1� ,
' 1 ' '. 1. •. j � r ° h � r ' t
+:
t '
f
l'' 1
�•4' r . w
1 j 4
e `• I. k * °° j Jj� �'1 ,R;
� d. 6 61 sr ,ir"�''�,+�` � h � � • ,; i r � I• r r r y „ 7. ,i y- _ , i
,
r r 1 r
Y'
n
I
� t
f 'l
y ^�.I� t •Y,a i tt �. I• .i�C-Y '� >y ti� '..t� I.• 1•'-.:....e •i ♦., r;f,
-
t' I r
-rs �-•+ WA s 1'r is .,_.k• 5�r ,t.. . �. $r 1 �:
. l l
, i MH..,, r—,-_ _. r .. ,re.:r ...t" +v _� ____:mow, J.,., _.. �. _^... E� - j t . - t �• � .{•_ 2.v, r '.0 ` 1 �'?S :•�-. 7 �" - n ,
II
tY •
Iq"' r is � e •'• �,. �: ..S' '';, �\ :� ..1 I•w'it �'R ril ''1� f •"n h'�+ - <i
'? • pro- r r-�4�_ r� '� 1' �i � i<:
r a• .,• a ;.e . ,
ry� 1
-;.' ,.-'i."v; ,ip, w,a r f, '.,.a �o i`t. tl�,; f. i I'i.,• r";v-- '•^ MN t:'
r
"
1
s.i. A,-,_.... _... ..i L. _ _l _ _. .- b . .. r ._ . ., ..� � „;, _ - ti ��_i_.• n
��� I�YiA1�11it(®ate®®IBa..ui. ®arse
MEMBERS OF THE BOARD,
AL SARACENI
MARTIN J. NICHOL5 JANE DOLAN
GRIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER HILDAWHEELLR
BERTHA;MOMLEY
July 19 1984 U N FULTON
Karl Ory, Mayor
City of Chico JUL ?
P. 0. Box 3420
Chico, CA 95927ro�nl�,, s.9llw.f
Dear Mayor Ory
Reference is made, to your, recent -letter, to the board of Supervisors
regarding. the 1and,use study for Easy Avenuewhich is under consideration
by the PlanningCommission. Please be advised that your letter has been
referred to the Planning Commission for input into the process; The
Board of SUpervisors asked that I extend their appreciation forr your
information;
v-4yt.uly .: urs,
APZ'� . i
Aft
ao the
undersigned residents and/or property owners", approve
of and petition
Cor a rezoning on East Avenue to C-1 (light commercial).
East Avenue has become one of Chico's three (3) main arteries
with a; high
traffic count. It is now undesirable and unsafe for
residential
living. The present zoning also restricts any possibility
Qt selling.
'Che proposed zoning would restrict it even further.
Present
ex sisting use of West East Avenue and East East Avenue
reflect commercial and multiple units,
NAMC
ADDRESS OP PROPERTY. MAILING ADDRESS N}(f)NE
t
Z.
41.
b.
i.
g.
l0.
'R I
We, the undersigned residents and/or
property owners, Approve
of and petition for a rezoning on East Avenuis
to C-1 (11ght commardial').
Ea6t. Avenue: has become one- of Chico's
three (3) main arteries
with a high tratfic count. It is now undesirable
and unsafe, for
residential 'living. 'r:he present zoning also
restricts any ponaibi.lity'
Q9 oellingi The proposed zoning would restrict
it even further.
Present exisisting use of West. East Avenue and, EaOt East Avenue
reflect commercial and multiple units.
NAME ADDRESS OF PMPEPTY
MATIAM ADMESA PHONE
-03
--�
a
Lg, `�
3.
4.
6
1.
8
11;,
We, the undersigned residents. and/or property owners, approve
of and e
p titian for a rezoning on East Avenue to C-1 (light Cowmiercial).
sbcoone of Ch.ied's three (3) main arteries
8ahiAvIenutrae ha
with countm o s now, undesirable and un$age
residential living. The present zoning; also restricts any "poosibility
for
of selling,. The proposed zoning would .restrict at even further.
Present exiiisting use of West'East Avenue and East Last
ref lect Commercial and multiple units.
Avenue
NAME_ AUVR� SS OF f�ROPERTY
MAILING ADDRESS
P}IONE
2--7j—
�--? � Misr-/#r•� .
1
n
ticyRD C�%2�
1�-.�f?5
G,H icy, ��
ell F i�JxG�
� �
%� 'CSL°',•(
---�iLc�..�!>`"�.
Y'C
3.
s '
Nr'�ilf"�bt.
s a?�n'
iux
51/141�m 10
C ` gfft m QN?fYr 4
6.
r
46 4(je
OW
CX4
4 ML
Ln
116
+L
{v\
,,� J
We, the undersigneO residents and/or property owners, approve
of and; petition for a rezoning on Bast Avenue to 0-1 (Light commercial).
East Avenue has become one of Chico°s three, (3) main arteries
With l high traff.id count. It is now undesirable and unsafe for
residential living. The present"zoning also restricts any possibility
of selling The proposed zoning would restrict it even further
,Pres( ex sistiug use:. of West East Avenue andr t bast Ave
refloot commercial and multiple units,
NAME, ` AI)DftESS OF PROPERTY hIAILZyG ADI)RiSSS PTION8
1,
l
n5t>
LVfiliO�
ILL+ ' '4O
3,
% ! 77✓zi
./
qS'-l U R j
�( l
4L
M. �.
L0.
r.
Inter-Depart est 'IMerandum
apt a rtmeilhl
Cottane Yax•n/C:Lrnez�l Ropar' troite accupaion5
t
Grad Ma?'s
n tite coxn6T o E Ramada Nay', �vatxts conunercia
�f
1058 'Eas;
y
S. G Bu .!Oanr�
A�ai'rt
[ayes
3.050 .Sant^
again, wants design sLnciards, contmexcaa tivaulcT
Carl Lurldgr ea
stiintx3 ate him to improve his' p opexty
1Q56 Eas'C
on East F1ora7. `IN'E co'rneae,. R'z'rx't s G_1
Nichols
Foster Autolnativ'a4 wants commercla'i
Ly1E Fostex
1695 East Ave;
f, Spat Zoning, n tra
Ia�arcls o�tos
Vran`� Brazzel
aOfilllll5S7Oy`1
proposal to Plannano
on East Avenue .
..
p -ropos.tI, feal!j a specx:°:�:i c. plan
Chink nelson
is navoxo
. _
as 1 step �n, the right, direction.
�vanders about scope ofproposal
Ed Palmeri
e.
1 k r r.
r
, 4
Infer- e�artmenta9 Memoranda
Rey-Departmentat
x
ro: - Planning
Coimnission
FROM Panning,
,
suojEcts Ceneral Plan Amendment And Rezone for. property loc�tL'ed an both sides of East
Avenue, 'File 84•40, Project History
DATE'
February
li 1985
5 1.84:
//
Su ezvisor Wheeler moved and Board unanimously carried motion to
P
refer 'the area on East Avenue from Highway 99 to Hooker Oak Park
for review and rezone to Planning Commission.-
W/84-
Planning Commission �4.Utiated rezone to zones cons:49tant with the existing
General plan.
6/7/84:
Planning Commission referred item to Chico- Sub -Oa m ittet. for specific
recommendations,
9/6/84:
Planning Commission accepted report on City/County General. Plain con
s:?stancy, General Plan Amendment initiated to Medium Density Residential
for Existing duplex development west- ,of mall;
11/8/84:
Planning Commission held public hearing on rezone proposal.;
11/13/84:
The Hoard initiated a General Plan Amendment for the Planning
Commission to hold hearings to consider bringing the area from
the Freeway (Highway 99) to Pleasant Valley High School into
conformity with exiting land use.
12/6/84:
Planning Commission held hearing on rezone. Requested public workshop
to discuss second board referral,
1/3/8.5:
Workshop held in Chicot majority of persons spoke in favdr of commer-
tial development Staff discussed specific plan concept.
1/10/85:
Planning Commission discussed possibility of specific plan and
initiated a Gonaral Plan Amendment to Commercial and'Rezane u)
Ne;.ghborhood-Commercial on Properties "north and south of East Avenue
between Highway 99 and Colasset as a ,first phase:
1/24/85:"
Planning Commission adopted a motion o.0 intent to approve ,A General`
Plan Amendment to Commercial and, re orie a portion to N -C fox' the
first phase; from H;i.gl' ay 99" to Cohasset Toad:
AML
Bast Aventie, File 84-70, Rezone Motion
A. k:Lncl that the planning Co(nm',issiott co,lsideved 6 variety of rezone
proposals On the subject properties, held hearings and y opted
p,0 l Lc input and determine.cl that the recommended zoning; dta
suitable for thesonat'th t ta:Ll.,�iveri the highr vo:l.utnee and pr,oxim:
i
g
tial; £.
ty toH.tghway 99 a
rind that the requi Cements of CEQ4 have been completed acid aons.�cle"red and
recommend the Board of Supervisors adopt a 1`Tegcitive 'CJeo�.�1'trcttJ.ot�; and
C. hind that the proposed project meats the requirement's of ttie Butte County'
Cade Sections 24-33 n
, 2448, and the, Butte County Ge:erAl ,Plan pages 50, 51.,
and 53; and
U. pecntnmend that the Board of Supervisors adapt an ordti;Ct ntcet rezoning' as
proposed 'the propert�,es designated on the attached map f► Uni A=2 and R-1.
to N -C; A-2 to R--1.; s and C -C to R-2 f G v-tL ?—A �V ham•
f't
®1
`.
t 1l,, ►
�
r
3'' azG , Cl 4h `x.K. l - 4w o
� f K' K I6YGl��t 4� I" O,)j,; -
�"
Lk
re
C,
��.
cCA
WN kLdfi-,4
-
1 r
f't
Inter-Dpartental em
m
orandui
AML
APPENDIX F
COUNTY OF BU,`CTi
ENVIRONMENTAL CHVCKhIST FORM.
(to e complete.. by Lead Agency)
1,o 1184-06"05-04
r� BACKGROUND All - 118, 44, 46, 48
1. Name of proponent Butte County Pxani_ in a Cotqlossaori :
2, Address of proponent and reprGsenta Live (if
7 County Center ari
���-...�,.�r
�.
Orovil�.e:, Ca, 95065
5. Project description Rezone anti General PJlxi1 Amendment_
1 MANDATORY 1~INDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE YE5 MAYBE No
a, Does the project have the potential to degrade the
quality of the environment, substanti,all)t recitlCo
the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a
fish or wildlife population to drop below self-
sustaining levels; threaten to eliminate a plant or
animal community, reduce the number or .restrict the
range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or
eliminate.important examples of the major periods
of California history or prehistory?
b. Does the
project have the potential to achieve
short-term benefits to the detriment of long-term,
environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the
env ment is one which occurs iii a relatively
aH
brief period OC time while long -terns impacts will
endure into the fixture,)
e4 Does the project have impacts which are individu-
ndividu-ally
al lylimited., but cumulatively considerable? (A
?
project may impact on two or more separate resources
VI
where the impact on each resource is relatively
small, but where the effect of the total of those
impacts on the environment is s1gnificant,)
d, Does the project have environmental ePf;"ects which
will Cause substantial < adverse effects on human
baings,, either directlyor indirectly?
T' I DETiIR� DWT T'NATTON (To be :ompl aged by the Lead Agency)
On the basis oC this -initial. evaluation
1/'IW find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect
on the environment, and; a NFGATTVE DECLARATTpNwill be prepared.
1/1111 find that although the proposed projact could hav& ? sign'P'
"
caiat effoct on the efivironment, them; will not be a significant
effect in this case 13oCause the MITZGATTON MEASt1RCS described on
the atta,chod-sheet have boon added to the prajoet A NEGATTVE
PFCLAhATION Will be prepa red ,
I/WE find the proposed project MAY have a sini(SiCant effect on
"
the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL, NPACT'REPORT is required..
f1AIl:. OctZi�b sl,M„�9�4�.. a ., C DRPAttTfNIiN7'
GOLTITY OF BUT'I`Ti L'L.AD N I N
A.
Laura M,'I' Tuttle
As9'ociate P7 aniier
ltev i awed by c
-4�-
d' 13
TRANS PORTAI TON/CIRGULATTON. Will they propos al
result in:
a, ` Generation of substantial adAitidnal vehicle
movements
b. Effects on existing parking facilities, cr
demand for new parking?
c. Substantial impact on existing transportation
systems?
w----
� ,
d, Significant alterations to present patterns
of circulation or, movement of people and/off'
goods 7
.�..
e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic.? -._
f . Increase in traffic kla2ard.s to motor vehicles,
bicyclists or pedestrians?
y _
14.
PUBLIC SERVICES. Will they proposal have an effect
upon, or result in a -need ;dor new or altered,
governmental services,
a. Fixe protection?
b. Police protectioxa.a
c. Schools'?
d. Parks or bthex recreational far,,,il ties?
e. Maintenance of public facilities, inecludiag
roads
_...
f. Other governmental servicers'?
15.
ENERGY. 1V�,1x the Pxc�posa,l result in:
a Use of substantial aviounts of fuel or ,energy?'
b. Substantial increase in demand xtpoll existing
sources of energy, or require the development
of new sources of energy
16.
UTTLITIF8. Will the prop,sal result in a need for
new systems, or substantial alterations to the
following:
a. Power or natural gas's
�, . communications systems`?
rt
o Water.rt
d. Sewer or septic tank?
e. Storm water d.rain.Age?
ff Sold waste and disposal?
17
HUMAN HtALTH� Will the proposal result in:
a fr"eat o� of all health hazsrei 'Or pot`enti az
health hazard (exgluding dental health)?
b Exposure of people to potontia1,_`health
L
haZards?
18.
ARSTHETICS_. i W,lI th;� ;C ropo»s'9�r'.,fir resin L �.. Fche:,
obstTa on ref ani" ?ren c vista or Vile r pento
the public, o',r will the px'oaosal result �n the
creata�on of an aeatlteticely� o ffensc: site open
to public view?
-4�-