HomeMy WebLinkAbout84-9 TRANSPORTATION 9 OF 9DKS.' AssoC� atEs
August 27, 19$2
page 2
.. A t �a:f f c forecast fox the Chico urban area wii'L be comms
pleted in the near future.
T hope the above; information is
adequate to determine generally
what set o .1r foxecast techniques
Coulcl be valid fox use in a
We would be
1
sEin:i-xu a1 jurisdiction such ias
in hearing of both manual.
Butte County:
and, computer modeling
interested
techniques avail able, xf T can
assist you by provi ding; any
further information, please write.
Thank you for your time and cooperation
Sincerely,
r"'64, S
(/41'
A4ark Rad.abaugh
Senior Planner
P+IR: sb
Attachments
■
Exhibit.B
- Research and Data Collection
Pol,icy
1.
Determi.nat" n of lead planninf agency.
2.
Legislative Review -
- State Planning Law Requirements
Other Related State Law
Related PeiexalLaw
3:
Ilistory of Butte> County C rctalation Planning.
4.
Review o;f af fected local government general plans and rel- .-ant
policies.
5.
Coordination of plans with CAITMNNS jurisdiction..
G.
Review -and ':use and housing element for consistency.,
7.
Incorporate specific relationships between circulation
element and o;; en space, conservation, and scenic highways
elements.
$.
Study need for specific area plan in cixcu:latiOn planning.
Data Cplleo.tion''
�.
Callection and coordinati:on of circulation data from cities
and CALTRANS.
2. "
Review of past AIT trends: throughout counter:
3:
inventory of designated land use holding capacities.`
4.
Review of tx 11 needs a:ssessmeAts anti Pro�r4nls.
5.
12eview acrii.d t Irate data.
17.:
fieview tran,s1)prt_a, Ion Capacity criteria and leVe $.'>
7.
licycTe u'se` issues and, data,
$.
P dest'i'iarl use issues and data:
Aarlort and' air servico issues and data,.
4,' Eychibit
B (Cont' d)
l0.
Railroad issues anddata.
114
Utility lines issues -.'and data:
12
Review parking criteria and data.
13.
Determine need for preferential transit survey `
14.
Determine desirable. modeling techniques and project �utuxe
circulation, need
l5w
Study erosion and ,water quality problems c6us04 by roads
and develropmexit in. mountainous areas.
Discal Relations ips
l •
Reviei+ history of actual capital investment: W1,(1 capital
improvement programs. affecting the county''9, c;lrculatioll
infra$t,ructure:
2.
Review county methods of 'allocating funds dor transportation
projects..
3-,
Review ;cotin.ty road maintenance requirements versus avaiY-
ability. of :f inarici;s
40
Reviei+ kinds of funding avail,, able' for maintaining and building
the circulation 'infrastr acture, including projecting trends'
Of ` funding sources
5.
Study the cost relationship between, new ��nt existi' trans-
portation de'velop.ment.
G•
Coanpare actual tranoportation project allocation history
versus '►Wi.si list" hi,staryreviet+r of local ani. stato TrP's) .
70
pscal' issues in 'urari and rural 'transpotati,on planning.
5a
.
taariy circulatiOA system cads city for haridlirig emergency .
5�'rvices•
2.,teview
C�rPldsi;r�ated hazardous �'a5te c'orrictor plans:
Exhibit C - Strategy. Selection Guidelines
1.
Revision shou7 it be In coordination with local
and state comprehensive general plans.
Z.
Transportation systems; to the fullest oxtol It
Should be planned to utilize:existing; :facilities anil. right-
ight;-of-ways
of— . Ways.
3.
No maj;ox transportation system should be planned atjtsiae
of, urhaxx area boundar yes azo primo a;ra cul Cuxa]1hc1, unless
no feasible alternative exists.
4.
Tr nsportatataii system plans shottj::d consider the carrying,
capacity of the air, 1anr1,and water resources as a maj;ox
terminant. in no case should tran$poxtatiarr plaits lead
to groti+tli that can e cceecl theca.rrying capacity a the,
environment,
S.
The Circul,atia11 ';Blement shoulc;t pro ride fox: a dot a* leci
management prapraM to assignrespective implem mtatiojj roles'
over time to those governmental, agonci os aiyeratng in thy?
p1a'nning area and Ilaving interests in ma nairig 'development
in 'thei.rrespective areas: