Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout84-9 TRANSPORTATION 7 OF 9y 1 to�r"i p. it,'; _ r � �:;'f +r Ski ` •• 1 U •.Y n ; s GOURT OF VIE S!I'ATE 0 ' C11LxL•'ORNIA x,N. TME SUPERIOF. S Z 7i?Di�F-VAD11„ n 9 ) PiO ?393 10 STAiyLEY 'i:, GOLDS rilTfi � ,Y DF DrClS. Piaini,f 1Z VJ 13 COUidT'i CF' P?D`J? r ) ) Des encla�i .. � 14 ) 16 COQtgVI Ol` � Crops -Cor< 7-z'na.nt, ) ,. 17 ) 19 ST_;IyLI'� f• 'GCLtD.S:+i7TI, ) ) 20 7.1h;een this r3�,cis�on have Pet forth 7'I�e �Cacts gov Yni;nc� { 2'. n a SJ i :ten S tlotilation fi c:a U the �a�'tie P . 2 it ! of a�tnc.n a. r0riixrorpen P TI. 2 condition of t"fie a rov"a7. o a s e ►�1.%in 25 ` ti atiori eYs m� , 2\rticle t I (A) 1 cad �r n aX" ` r�ta.tYi Ln the mc.<znir�g cons,t gue.sL•'ian zlao uoa. of tlye 'Gu1 i uc,rria "CQ;nsta ttxt3on. 27 . aF th .- miti:c���tin fees u'nclex" e e�,a;ct.a.on with it the Airi az' �at�n. t � 4 1 ity any Ocal 6r4inancd. CI; and the au,tho.r.. The dispute arises, partly becausethere, is not Yetl 'f the C'Onst3- tu.- definition Of 4 sPdc;i'-Al. f_, a y. within A h-lme.aning 0 4 e- n isi-on above-referred to. A good ejxtr, an to the tional,pr-ov.. A, d3 Ided in, Lli_11S v -scussion PrOVI 3d, 65G at Page 660 'Tax is a term without fixes definition.7 'it :be constti, na-ro�jly or broadly The, word L-d 8 depending on its; pattic-Ular., contest (-tn the 9 purpose for" which the dGini'ton s *'0" be 'tit& (cine Ctrawf Ord v. fler2�L� U978) 85 Cal', Apri 3d 544, 548-55i 149 �Cal . 578) of 12 8Cal. d , , 93 Gl,�n, ale, Va 2d Sr 13 9,9-100 (309 P.! 2 - 4 X_ its broadest sens6, 14 a tax jnc,ludeq :all charges upon persons or 15 property f the support of government ;or f Ot, 0 1.6, public, :of �jad--arq V,- It 17 181, Cal, 06, 37.0-31 (184 P. 397) 18 1 ec1. 1971) Webster L rna-t- icto (3c 19� 0, �r the 2345,.) 1 n n,a 'tqo rd. ha s ��Ier con,ex S 10, bedh, cons trued 0dxclucja,� dha.Zges to par �1!" 21 'wilich: do not eXcadd, the f. t '('0- if errect mt, A , b1l I I ." 1 the j, i value" ,Of co 23 6 0- d" to tho-indivicl- U*9011.��O t 'the: 6�ervide. -,d-na, 'r, 24, Lbf !iho IN4 als (C u U11t._ Y 1 �97 Ai �,9 0 app. U'U 6 777)J t n 21 2S1 5And,t :charges npp% 4C,a P) against pzrticular ilcliva.duals for c�ouerx��- 2 " mental regulatory act,i.,vities:;where alta Eras 3 involved donot wxceed the reasopAbl a _oxponde ,, 4-- of °the ;re. latox Ung t.c'r1 llusi y. activities ness (� _ 5' Cori: ,v. City .of ;San biegoa (1979) 91 Cal. App G 3d 156,- 165' (154 Cal Rptr: 2,63)) " 7 The County hos pointed out that, there are a numher of g areas �rh,ore r-%act'ions rho not constitute special ta:.es. The 2cilnt<,7 9 of Fresno v. 'IL-L1mstrom 94 Cal, APp. 3c�' 974 pPi.rits OU t, at page 9 4 �a ^ecicharc: to teal pr ozerty oirfor 11 benafa th'at the property has recWive(local, i.mprovenent ' 12 aril strictly' speaking is not a tax--. Al sp^,c al assea;sment is a -_ 13 e?larCle for a be of it and, cannot Oxceed, t1ie bezieft 'the as-sess'od 14. - praL5crt; r.eGGives: 15 A rec�ulator;r :Ce,e is an, a.),propa:ia,te exercise of police 16:pcvje'r, nat a special tax, as la'ng as it doep not e.cceerl, a stL�1 17 reasonably .n0ceUsary to cover the co^t of alae regulatory nur�:ose 18 sour�lit. An1r it s is a spcal -tax. Millsv. Count�r a� 7'ri11it�� 20 '1'wL'llt tlnrer3it11, ,Inc., v: C'a t?J, of �: i)arc � 124 Cal. 1117'p. 3G. 21 31.7 teaches us at- pa 321 that the exacti6- o,f a ysch6ol facility, 22 fee ftW,I the su11)d,1 idur i.s nota ,necial tai; prow r? f� CEQn anc uid::r the gene al police Power voted in the Cots 7, i Tho adoption of Resolution 19--108 after. the i:0t±a1.)].ish- 2 anezat of the nitigatior. f eco; in 'this,casA_ and its s tbscquont roci- pion bar Pesolutiion dated August 6 has l 'title kiear tatg .on the exaction i this case., That Resolution iva5 aimcd at a far broader apjplicatio-n and. Was' not related to specific and partiGulax' j�rgjpc,t ! . 6 Its short life, had no effect upon the mitigation £ees ' already 7 imposed. 8 9 1"Iaving found tl-ia:'t: the I' j, tigation ee iS not a sreci'�a y 1 af'' the facts having been p ' ' o by the patties ia...and al �ti ulat�d 10 there is no need for the Court to rule. on the ind'ividixal clefenar;s 11 asserted by the Counter, Judgment therefore 'hall be entecP�7. for, 12 the County of odvar a on the Complaint and for the County of 13 t. *" the Cross --Complaint. on 14 DATED: July1982. 15 16 1 ;nh,N1G t7.-;;tlwC.I ' IS FRANK D. 1Pn��ICIS �ltdae ofthe Superior Court 19 20 21 - 22 23 24 My 27 . 2s rr y x ti t s1,+ arf51 Aj'^�'u+��f ,tl`F *"3,•jt^�,J �h'?IO ����y�at'���r x �,�C - .�i •.'� �'. rn+r`+ t« ,� �e4y r, , r' . "l,•, ..- '. 1 ,.. ru�r a. W` .9 !p+ +X 91 7," r b - ` i sli•rn + �� t`K w ,it � r �'� . r 71 �" t,.', }�' a'} 1V 1 , » ».1., w s �'9 e. + G S + �^"5 �^� }l,s�y ✓;(�k�$•i��+yr1S i7�ittT kaw' R.+r ik'i... rt,4. t r. +;ry '� "J 'x r�Hk r L �,' i w 6µi'' '^ ... � ybv:t+qty;,plc�Fip,9,{+'.,,,yuL��.»eNSks iL�r+ [[[)plj�ySe 1Y»M1:a"'• ''C , RCC`` S��'Jt,�WRY'. y +, ft NJ �i�♦��'t��lyy(( .' ,w h, , 44 zi Senate Bill '-o,, coti ((,te�t r C4, P,P!N HY4 CHAPTER R 1438 ``? Y�`�a"� '+ �t� ✓ �"1�+5;4'1 An, act to amend Section 63587 of and to tCld Sccl}c�i1 65580s to, I 'Tthe Gover;intent Code, and to Ladd Section 21004 } llle T'ilhlic Re- YfG» r�o r � Or r «ar ��"^, �r SOUrces,Code, rollating t0 lanC} LISP, y k,+;,¢f +` (ApproveCi bit Coernor Se�pptember 27, 18w 1'"fIr$+I iVith t� Secretary orSuite 56hterriber 27, 1p.132,1 LEC:I$LATIVE C OU�4SGL-S DICT ,{ SB 2011 Greene, Lend use; toning: densities, ;i nvironmrentitl _ ` 4.4 quality fees and exactions, 9 A; ; (1) Cxisting law generally requires counties find cities to adopt genettl plans I'or the physical development of the county or city, The r< r , a+ x yU� geTleral plan tS rCC(Uired to contain, among otllors, i! lftrid USC eleillent which illclttdts, among other things,a statement of :the standards of a ,f population densihr recommended for the territory covered by the plan, and ti housing element which generally consists of an identification and analysis of existing and projected housing needs of all Economo segmenks of the community. Etfstirig' law does not specify the grounds upon which a loetil-agency is required to base a 1 decision to disapprove to housinb.development project or to opprove ti dens Gyon the condition that the project be developed at a lower n it a `r i This bill would require a local agency.w>hich proposes either to F ' disapprove a proposed housing development project which i, n ^� A q4 coinpliance with applicable planning, zoning, anti development policies, or to approve that project upon the condition that it b developed nt it lower density, to base its decision egnrciilg the proposed housing deyelo15n16i1t project upon written findings; e spectlicd, 44(2) Ex}sking ]nw requigi4t} each county or city, whet getlerttl' law or chartered to )ring its ho z,,ing elenient into compli1. 1ance with state law oil :or before October 1, 1881, and provides that A. court! review of the roirlphtance -of`a housing element,�v th th'e state law` + , extends to whether the housing eielnent pis in rertsor�aile Compliancewith state law, This bill vvould rcdturc .t county; city, _or city ani! county to bring' .J any action which is required -k6 be consistent with Its, general plan, z but floes nbt comply with its housing eletment, into compliance tvftll. its ho,tising element within ti specifi,'etl kiine period upon tt deterrntnilt}oat by a oourt that stick ttetion;was no inca»�pliance with, 'its howihg element. (3) Under the Cttltforni t 14'nvironineittal Quality Act, geiterally, an: etl)?IConmetltill impact 'report is, required be -repare o a, discrettotlnrv` io ect v [ I for �t p .� thick lllily have r sign}i'icant effect on the "OMPL�hti lt$` a I YAA A }"� t �l.�iJ J I », �» i , x 3rij rt wf�'r't ^M}gd6 wr`+'K+Y,rr 7�'Y r%'`�r'"✓�'�+MsW..jy d�i�y',*x lm ri.r,��,114'aw�7;a.'. S� »`� � � � M.». ..y.•µ .;ra i ' at + , � Y ,. q» r ! �...� t'd r '' '!�YA+Vi.�'f5 i,' MJ ++4 �i x . a ���, :i j,�.y, .,.ys,,5 S. r tyr � ' " + `$x^ y' a. 3: 2..''.�SS "`M' d }.. ;.� , °5r * i#,:.'a. �;. .�b,.. Esti, Pr .'✓!•r, ��tifG;+ , ,. niv. torxw,,r,tR :.".$J+s!h, ("p�Kl',,,,t+`. `Y$I: JPwd am �.e.,�rh^. w✓ t �,rr ti't r. sJ Yu�ur2uF,r.�w>°ti?,t/ik�$°!??�J?a1aWx,°°,�Ya.<?�`� d 44 ,. , . _—•--rr.wwGrr �"° Za�iri'y�t'di ice- °,..:�3�.:.,r� � 4q, ,,✓ H i1R({ '�tV ,g�'� 7j [) 40 ' }'F'• V .r . t 1'�Y'J .+ t j1'�, 4 M. l"�fle/kJ'Iwt, »!V .HS!}t':i.�W.3°YY• • # , :. �,a� N V ,,�,�t t •i � '. "J{ 1. i ......��+;r�u5>rw^ Ch,: 1438 —�— t >" 1 t�+ r�`aa'ti�.t J V I'Ms 1-0, , 1C' 1,,_.,k �'t{ ,bw�v'.�4 , y N,. i F p 1���'� • •` f environment. ` al p, " 'Phis bill «+ould provide thAt a public agency may exerClyt only .'. ' t�>k,ti �� :. rovided b law other than the act , those ekpress or implied [ ,. p Y iri 'mitigating or avoiding a significant effect of a project t1t1 the 'b ('nc[ ti�4 �;�3 ,i `°, Ya , er►vironniOht. The bill would, however, declare that.a public agency `�rRa'y', mad usediscretionar�r:powers provided bysuch other law ion the purpose of mitiQatin or avoiding a significazit effect oil the '7Y4 -A environment subiect �to the express or 'implied constraints or, ' •' �` � �F[�"ri liiiiitatiozs that may he provided by law, The bill would [hake legisiutive findings and declarations dealing with these provisions of s rthe bill and the act. (4) article lIII 13 of the California Constitution and Sections 2231�tdr&ik; ad 2234 of the Revezlue andlaxation, Code require the state to ' reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state; .Other provisions require the Department of )+nance'to review statutes disclaiming these costs and provicic, in certain .cases, for tnaling claims to' the State Board of Control for reimbursement, This bill would ,provide that no appropriation is made by this act J w for the purpose of making reimbursement 'pursuant to the constitutional mandate or Section 2231 or 2234, but would recognize that local agencies and school districts may pursue Eheir other available remedies to seek reimbursement for these costs; µ"This bill would provide that notwithstanding Section 2231,5 of 0 i the Revenue and Tai aHon Code, th's act does not contain a repealer, b that section;` therefore, the pxovisions of the act would r as require y in effect unless and until they are .amended or .repealed by ti� a remain a later ten aeted act, The of the State of 011MOrnirt do enact as Follows; people SECTION I, Section 65581 of the Government Code is amended to read; 'Each city and county shall bring its .. , .' 65087. (a} :city, county, or, by subdivision (c) of Section 65302 into •. housing element, as required conformity with the requirements of this article on or beforef, ;t 4#v October 11 1981, No extension of time for such purpose may be , granted ptirsuant to Section 65362.6, notwithstanding its pravisons to the contrary, art to review the brought by any interested party ¢ , y (b) riny action with theprovisonc ol` this article of any housin, c-lerrient F ; conformity thereof or revision thereto shall be brought pi+rstiant to or portion Section 108' of the Code of Civil Procedure; the court's revie�y of compliance with the provisions of this article shall extend to whether r the lyousin, element or portion thereof or revision thereto requirents of this.article. reasonalily complies with the me 1f a. Court finds that an action of;a city, �cqunty, or city and steg, does' which is required to be coilsirit with its eneral plan cotint,y, 91 80 I x , A � W' xa•1!!4 IJ%�V1irJ'/fi('wx },iiMI1 ��yM� '31Ms(/i 'f/Y K ulY'tu hk. ";,{rr s r N+.•*"n2Y` ,r M tl ltl�,,,n ♦. ,, /YVx.w t,Fk n1t t�i- iiik ��',,..E ` �:,� a,� ,1�„.r:,'�1�„{'4 R rSikW�Y. ,(,I� � n�'. , t ry�� 'y4�1t�5` yqt+,✓,'05 � ��„ Iv �t4 �' •7 W�' t, - 1k {I:rx,,1Ny'f�Y 't1�'t.Jy �:(k'?rla. � !H R�j+t'�,�M,E,R/FSVFl ,� �.�Jl.r••T,.�Y ,�f'�Y}t •^ � S'Yr' � .^rR,7. 2,y. wa:'y�"e.,•vttl.`'!!4!7ff"u:2s!c'f!.M "ai..`E.'4 1� TIM x � r �, Il h r... {� � .. * E ?� .. ;•'E. a't^ t,{' Py ,t e+ ti y � � rat , , v, n m"i't ;. �.d1+4Y+;1'?�7.3a'�r Gita,d',.f.r"•J� SJ�,� ', .M1 _ 1 , r � - - f 1 .p � r # ., V a «s.a.,.L:if.aY,.SSG M� '•+Mw+. F ^f '��Tkry'a�frAl+�`y.,t" Tl 1 7�s ✓ , v .mat �Iyf� 0. ,.. �inhtF�..1�y�,��y���'r•"5��nA hl n Cl, 1438 r r�iti not comply with its housing element, hlie city, couitfy, or city and •„{yf; f, ,f, , , county shill bring its action into 'c0Ii1p11a1lCt' tvitliin 60 days.' "' w r±$� s s d However, the cotift; shall retain jurisdict]on thrQu hoot the j)Griod ' -PYA' u for complianae to enforce its decision, u' J r 4 t,vVrl,,r jrN [14)Otl rile-COilrt'$ ,�r},; determu.atron that the 60•day period for compl"s1nce Would place. an undue: hardship on the city, county, or cit r ancount ) ),the court iuii}f attend the timeperiod for compliance by an iitichtionill 60 cin}js, , -fit; igtj?�f� SEC. 2, Section ;65580.5' is added to the Governriient Code, to r µk tiU4 , read: 65589,5, When,a proposed liousii? devc�l � + ?? o inc nt project. complies with the applicable general plan, zoniri;, rtrlcl developmeat, pOhCies in effect at the time that the ho in develCli9r'tClit u'r.. ' Project's application is determined to be com fete "brit t complete, , ��n local agency t � proposes to di the. project or to approve it upon the a3Nr+���,� �; b i' condition that the project be developed at a lower CIp� "�w'�„ •+k N1, r.'s3`, n 9�, new -.,7. J 0llsil.y, the local A;Sdw ,� a'A `. } agency shall base 'its decision regarding the ro p %ed housing .. , de 10 project upon written ffridings sup portct"by stibstantfal evidence on the record that both of tho Tollotviiig eot dikfons exist, (a) The housin develo menu g p project would lithe a specific;, adverse impact upon the public health or safety unless the project is disapproved or approved upon the condition that the project be developed ata lower density. (b) There is no feasible method to sttkisfactorly mitigate or avoid the adverse impact identified pursuant t0`subdivision (a),other than the disapproval of the housing development project or the Approval " rxof the project upon the condition -that it be developed at a lower density, SEC I Section. 21004 is added to the PubIle Resources Code, to ` Bread: 21004, In mitigating or Avoiding,a significant effect of`a project on the environment, a piblie agency may e�ercfse only those express or z implied powers provided by law other. than this ziivisien. However, a public agency may use discretionary powers provided by such' other law for the purpose of mitigating or avoiding a significant :effect on the environniei t subject to, the express.:or implied,; constraints or limftatioris thatinay `be provided' by late;' SEC, 4, ThLegislature `finds and declares as (+allows: (a) The enaotrnent of Sectio2 1004.ofthe Public Restlurees G:ode by this' act is intended to clarify the scope and nieanfng of various Z", t' provisions Of Division 13 c'ommencin i' ( g hath Section 21000} of the Public Resources Gode, Such clarification is iieeessai%y because of coiltolitiozls that the provisions of Division 13 (coirimeneing with Section 2I000) of the Public Rdsouices :ode, by :themsuiv,i, confer ori public agencies itidepeiidentauthority to levy fees, impose exuetiotis, trod hake other i clions `p it order to comply jvitli hhe gcri,eral reKluircm'ent of that division that, sigiiifictu t effects t5ti the envi'ronruent be nyiti�;tik0 Or Aloidod when ever it i's fear )1e to do so, .�I, Ilir - . ids Ci•.. .., ru »� f ' » i "r° kQb ri; ^bi:F+AI�.,:�f�i'!„'N� r,{nafgra�IA s3nS;"a'•N,�nteaxy ``3$ ti�i L� Vo i 't@ ,.4 zn i8,.8;�.��V'E�.:ti"r,.,,x,v:�'".�"��"fo�dx„iv`,'±:��,,^,.yyp..x R'y��"1rY4,6�*�..�'�',�,. •ra1�'d .',:ey v,4.n P: arl i.,q.y, M.'t4i.Ir 'tAi,t .h}, {' a,F r. V,rAioY r 4” .p , P+l , �, �i•+q»rx ..,iar;JeM+f1, . jr!., � ,?vt. L;k�'r�d - s.��ti?r r�..�.�m X1'� •; 4�it� '� kt r* . 4�,�a. P�1& �., �.J4 ..,�;•� h`Tti �°*,`' .y. 'i-�Na • w ,+x faro' +.�•.: zr:.� tw ,,» ,i � � y s, i.,r„d�r,N .. s+,l:: � � +ray .rte ��'!a:� r� ..� _ r k 19�irr�l6Xd ¢94+ yrL yc at«"' p y 9 v y1:'a{ i,�f^'i4xi {F•� r k A C r�y "r � '�,�.i»>+r�,�,+;-C?a'+`n ;1 it M� 4114 R, 8r , d �y, Y I Y�r ,,. 193' ;h �,`�re y,: � urs f A.� � , b - 4 ` Yr � Hca � t ire'-�.��i , ��s7� 't, " r The j„ ovjsions of ,Division 13 y a the P.zfic peso lrces (commencing 7 ectio67 21040 Code c. Vith S ' ) of Rather, he ,.., Onfer I10 5ucl pendent Y .i r ",'trd ". ;.•1 ;r' l �' J 'F $ S'�i i ,�'.({p�filY Yµ', 7 t. pray ISIons. of that di ' l Jade ,at�tharlty, �W «, , G, conjunction with discretionar VIS1On are intended to be ' lt,,� k used in other law in order to achieve 11e ab rsgranted to Public atgency,by iy"i r f. g h ' nificant effects oIl elle �eetive of miti 4 „� mijigati- TM „r a,� . Compliance gutin o M r, re r g rto do sg �t ,• �,�'�. � ^���`�' �� env'i ontnent when � >�df p ace with the it is feasible to do sa, 7t,r qulrellicnEs aF that, division identifies the wrZ;,y manner II1 which ,si n' avdided g 'ficial( effects of a ro eat can, e mit' tib r and im ones p n' b dated or. W<� «fl �,,a mill atizl p an �tdditionr caj�,,rx , g 8 ar avoiding 71 requirement that these so. 'In order to actions be taken a^�r�rY' ftilFill wherieyer it is feasb) * required to seleek Froze t latter requirement, a c'hi'c to do the various Pct�0y is xA�� conferred upon it by other law, thane which t.deh1ch huv " appropriatel o boon w Y. an legally terminoy rf'itiy be 6 i 1 W 4 G � g Y exercised t :. • * s signlficanE�-eFfecks'. of the o a4oid or mitir� project as required. `ctr the Thus, for example if the by that divislon staEute; or some other lay g CalJForrua Constitutiol, a oht�rter, t1 authorit enerally con%rs upon a pu y to levy a fee. or to .im one k�dic.ao1lcy the : public welfare ur ones that p Another t e p. p S p of exac! i0t1 for expressly or impliedly permitted public agency may,. to thy, extent y such other law, ehoosc tf Jirtpose t11af fee or ,., exaction for the Pupose of mitigating car tivoidxng ,r7u� t significant eFfect on the environment which has been icjctz n . A , pursuant to Division 13 (commencin �7, ed Public,Tlesaurces Code, Or- if a public (Commencing genes x1110 of the to exercise the ' r " � power of coodemnat on it n1ay, aoYtheh xiied expressly or irilpliedly permitted by such other law extent ' in order to mit' ate or ,hoose to da so $ which has been idenHf edipurs significant to that, on the environment The pxovisions of Section 21004 of the Publ' n,. not modify the holdings expressed in Golden Ga ©e}3rdces Code do` V, Muzzi (1978) 83 Cal. app; 3n 707; and San Diego Ti^ust Savin s Bank v, Friends of Gill (1981) 170 Cal, A t etc. Dist, g5 »'22 7h77,: 7ya .y.t •r Pp. 3 „ ib} ere currently, lJtgation the nest on ofVthe DJvisioll ,l3 (Commencing with Section. 2100p) w Cheer or not Resources Code, prior to its`amendment:b Public confer on Y this act, d public agencies an authorization to in ose roe or does not, exactions, which is w2toll p roes and o rws�cr a Vic; + ther . authorxzatioil conferred ons such (agencies db Pendent From any Legislature, tllereforN, declares that, bye adding Seetiorl 21pp}� other law,. The' nivisiari l.3 (corrirnencing with Section 21000} of th 4 to Resources Code, .it makes no staterrient, eikher directlyor indirect" as to, whether that division o Por be by this act, did or did_ not crifer on Prior to it, arnendnient by authority to im,pase fees or other exactions, public agencies independent r- Sr 5, Notwil'hstandin -Sea x+ California ConstitUti4n aJzd S.ection12231 a�2239 tofltllc Revd nuc Code,,no ap ropriaEion is rnude:.h , this,XIi113 of the nuc and of nicking reimbursement pur�uailt iii the so t for the ptirpose It !t is JI 111 Y•1 M+1'Ft"w lkSxif y",filkh,jRWliS"4=7.rlieYY ay�dZYw .7, =r 1w�.r *r 4 1„, k "�, �a 4V^�a;,�' r • . ''y��.'�[ ; i('��r+'"7 "f f" t t. d._t. i ,y.j'.AyHy'Sar7•L,. T` �t'��+-r.r`t✓^M�,Li{ry+'.- <h rO Pf�t S^IEiq •pf,,: Y ,y.,W+eI L{ IY... .,.r:t1 ,,,�(� 5 Pi '%'A •y�.,•�1;.> °{. �y y� try �v'i}_ mwAj,rr A�}rkkrny � t1X�+.N •�.irtV� .. 1� f •. r(7�1 >r r �1N,�(i' r .r '*7:'Y• +'Y ,� r4^7r; {{t,,��+i'y� �3 n 7r1 W- -'K F•' r ` Y} �7� rt •��4,�'f;�'!%M'°�"� i �' 77ry:�'>,;, d1 Zur'T'b.�li�i3'l . }t y•j 3s4NklG�,'t� �, �•1W F -�1 A+{Iw�,.�'u'r"",-. �x x?saaYw+t �,1.WY+P.4c4li�ariiri>�eW., . r d'V➢7,` 9Yi�S.+1Lur i i �tJ 01,. i. at.k p I r-®eparta�ental e9Jior— del , ro: Craig Gi mors, iiutte AIaCU FROM; Mark Radabauah, Senior Planner -wK.. Su9JECr! Butte County Vehicle 1411es' of Travel (VMT) Forecast and Vehicle Emission Forecast oarE April 15, 1933 Per our conversation earlier this weekI am provIding, the following WIT information needed to forecast: ftiture vehicle emissions in Butte, Couity. All information .is basad :on dit,irttal conditions and it is assumed the forecasts igi),1 tye aeneratoa through the California Air Resources Board's, ( RII) Uxbemis program. The baseline year Will be 1.981 and tho forecast' year Will be 2000. The 1931 forecast should use an Aim as vehicle niodeJyear mix for that year, and the 2-0`00 forecast shoulcx be based on a fleet in compliance with 1985 California. vQ111,CIP emission standards, 1, [rave included :Forecasts for both county-1vide and Chico urban area WIT County -wide V°IT: 1981 = 2,272,650 WIT/day of which 49,07 percent is in urban areas and 50.03 percent is in rural areas. 2000 = 3,,4619100 VNIT/;flay, of which 40.40 percent is in urban areas and 50.60 percent is in rural areas. County'-w1de WIT Growth is assumed to be 3.0'pe'rcent per,year_. Heavy duty vehicles include 10 percent of tlie' tote-:lmiles e Chico. Urban Area 'V,IT: 1981 = 607004-0 UliT/tlay 2000 = 90.x0 VDI'I'/clay, Chico urban area VIMT aidwIth is assumed to be 2. S percent per year: }Icavy duty vehicles include 5 percent of the - total miles. If you have any nue.stioiis, or need more data, please let 'me know 'tifR': s'U r a I&A-Departmental To; Clay `Castleb�errY, ,''Public Works 'Director FROM}' Mark "Radabaugh, Senior Planner suaj"rr Transportation Element Summary - Prelimi'nary Draft QAT : 1Jarch 23 1983 Attached for your information and rivow is a copy of a Transportation Element Summary - Preliminarv., Draft.. Thisardsummary has been forcyarded, to each member of the Ba of :Supervisors, as well as each member of the Plann.ng Commission, and will be utilized in, citizen participation workshops. to ire head in the near- future. If you have any, comments or Questions, please call me;. r+iR:sb Attachment r March 198 J J I OUTLINE OF GENERAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND MTTIGAT1.ONS TRANSPORTATION E1,EA9BIVT SUMMARY - PRELIMINARY DtAI�T Environmental Impact -----= Potential Impacts Air Quality General. Miti ations . .. ' Slightly in.Creased Count" mobile source emissSons Continuo' implententati`aIi of inventory state vehicle` emissions control program Violation of NAAQIS :for, carbon monoxide (CO) in Ciitpr'o>fe traCCic flows the Chico urbali: area' C]IZco are"a and develop' gther trar►sport'ation measu=res Which help mltigal`c the _ potential for high. CO 1Vconcentrations atex^ Qual ty Roadway ruliof f contamination a.Iito waterways Publ c education o E con- taminatiori potential • koadrvay design techiliqu`es to limit contamination'; I�'otential during lOW water p'exiods ' • Cumulative e F Cecirs o C ac o:C 'more ' P'VOPe'V installation. incl' development usan non=mo elopiiatiort seex? wastewate.x m' tenatice of on-site or package wastewater dslaosal techtiic�ttes faci;l.ities Pro 8 i°n Roadway erosion paa7tcularly in foothill and mountalareas Develop gradin' ordinance and :from' pooxly constritctecl private dirt, toads Miti.gatc in upcontin Natttt,al Resources l;l cmeri.t reirisaatr Require Orosioll, coliaIts for ne.'4V deve'10pt►ient' , r OUTLINE OF GENERAL ENVI RONMEN'TAL IMPACTS AND MIT Z GATI ONS' TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT SUMMARY - PRELIMINARY DRA%'! Environmental Impact Potential Impacts General Mitigations Drainage Increased runo f fromn new Provide adequate drainage and drainage plans dur�ig development construction . Continued drainage problems • Create drainage assessment in certain existing :areas districts • Mitigate in upcoming Natural Resources Element revision Vegetation/Fish and ' W Idl -'c Habitat Reduct3.ion of hab� tat clue to in � Preserve habitat a:cc'ess and avail'ab� lty In sersitve _ extensive development rural areas and increased -road re- species areas . a" affecting aquatic lhabtat ainage nd lmnlement dr erosion m tigations above Archaeo7 ogyca], and T('isto'ical Resources AccoTmnodatiori of c�evel op�nent Perform site spec c naafi% thlcaten signi;ficani study :dor, p�ropos.ecl ne�v' arch,aeologit al resources' development andprotide g. , essary m� t "ations When ne c . Demolition o the G ane11 s Ef,fo is to j� l eservc the Bridge histlo iq'b , Gianella Bridge shot, It! ho colisidered by the Cali Corny to 'Cr �nsp6 vt'L t';i,onr coil Iml s s 1,01 OUTWNE OF GE'NE'RAL, ENUIRONMT'NTAL IMPACTS AND MIT'IGATTON$ TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT SUMMARY PRELIMINARY DRAFT E11Vronmenta7 linpact Potential Impacts General Mitigations Visual and Scenic Quality' • 'Reduction oi' scenic lY�gh�vay Req ir'e idon ificit'jon and qualities es po siblc clue to pr.eserv�ation of sccn� c increased rural. developments highway' qualities for pro- posed nolo developmen1.ts AWL Forntal`ly clas,i,;nate in Scenic Highways El.e tient county hi.glway5 wherc sceni c highway qualities exist and provide implementation tools' - to pre erne scenic status Land Use •'Transportation Element Transportation Element corresponds to the County suggests certain areas Land U's,e El:enient For" sped Al study based: on ` need for better corxelation betweenci°rculation' and land' use plans hrlme AgricuIt.uVal r:osources Some urban conversion of Now road `construction shall pxi tie agricttl.tural l and in not occur in areas where I* Chic o airl Gr dley areas e Z o r� e non -'a ricultu,ra it may c u ag b 1 development on prime agricultural lands not designated i or Eutuxc ub'an development Na so .' Aml7iont noise levels avill Impl einerit a catiitty noise increase' in .urban areas s' e u `' ix b of dinance a x c �� where substantia] tra:Ci is the Noise 'Element „, gxoi th a,:s I'a ,' 'asted OUTLINE OF GENERAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND MI`lICIATTONS TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT SUMMARY PR'SUMINARYfiRAFT Environmental Impact p ,::i, Potential Ianpacts General A4iti a o ns Transportation and circulation Total vehicle miles will Ti`ze TtansportAt;i oh E]:emcnt increase significantly identifies arOA,`dlere during the planning period, circulation in1� -ovt lents cai.lsing need for street will be needed' and. 'develops andd enhighway capacity plans and mechs:lt ,30111s to • Reased in specified 'respond 'to these 110-eds urb-an and rural locations Transportation F u Consumptiofl Increased population will Encouragestricter CAFE use more transpo-rtatlon standards fuel despite decreasing per capita conslamptio'n Prt�mote public raisit;` and increasing, vohitle bicycle use and ridesha=wing fuel efficiency Fiscal Impacts Road Maintenance budgets Develop clear priorities will fall increasingly for, allocating increasing behind road maintenance sh-ortage of 'road mainte;fiance requirements' revenues Service cost inequities Develop',and implement. over time; may exist between different 1)'Road assessment districts kinds 0f development :In the',for new development County 2) Off -bite leve opment :Gees 3`) Stead drainage„dsses'sme , 's ko,r probom aro as 4.), >Jnforoeab. c road clevei:op- ment agreements • Su ort e:floxt s t,o'; balance uppox g;aso1 ne taxes and: returned, gas,tart revenue ' De'velop compre'liens ve ;fiscal 1�11��ac 1n0de1 0'1, P r 0 r, IIi� clttdini;c?r rf)d impacts, 1..11 'er to Tlc],p ;shote how tip. orc to �tigate sei^vi'ce Costs_ ap-,O . cost L11eCil]1,t1aS . 10 W, e + Y C f j . Tr I �i . t S - sl Marjjej a, est ,.2 �.� % a>� � tptt Writer ars more wllllfig to, Soend monoy' pal facilities. Dicyciin6 wasn't a fa'or la:trans- Blryciists: suppoi t 'rflexiimo" cation planning a w years ago, work schedul s because It allows thtit is itb'tonge a case, a city them to miss the peak commUtih8 lilc engineer' t d cyeting enthust• times ;when cycling tp work°ia tho . Saturdays, - most hazardous, 'There !s _ me`misapprdhi nsion: Supervisor Ilia Nun said the i bicgcl aren't` token into con.. (' Unty`'has adbptod flextime solos, iratlb . Bicycltsts.are part of the btrt Councilwomo'n Lynn Roble said' fent process," Dtck Polkers of tho clty has not', "There is absolutely c y Traffic Engineers Office no reason it could ilotbeworked out tiforum of about iQ0 blcyctt5f In the city," she said - he Sacramento County`, Board of Collin who 5aid.she comes from a erylsnrs cl amtrels; °background" of commuting byb1cy- :lizabeth beakin, Of the Universi cle, said! '') t is absolutely bizarre rf ,Callfornia, Berkeloy, `Institute that we have' this fitness mentality rransportation, said that "bicy going' around where people go out iri t have always fallen through the the morning and log,flue tulles„then cks. > nil[ recently, we didn't go bonne, take a shower and drive to n colledt data on hour many pea• work, instead' of Just jogging tO werebicyCiing” worlt," Participants in the foritrn saidShe? urged workers to negotlate �nittes succi' as showers and lock- ,for, cyctists' amenities through their for cycllsts',at the cork place and union bargaining units, !red parking facilities is ':shop- Bryco'warried employees, howev- eenterrs are becoming more er, not to take advantage of employ- iman as' a growing platoon of ars vitro' grant Them concessions, °If cfe co'mml ter§ has'wen allies in You don't have;fleXlrours, dont ltse- hd localgoyerninent. your bicycle commuting as an t x= as'bicycifn has grown from a ruse' for coming to woFk late,",she eatibnal activity'tnto a popular said !n§; of daily commuting, the °Yoy d6h'tr want people to have iaf'd for athenities'has grown as' gym clothes hanging°in'thdir offices ,,;Tire cyclists were told:they and people drying their hair ln'tho become better,organlzed in Office: Try and maintain some'''pro' �r,to :win more concesslom :from tesslonallsrrl . , . Don't make employ- foyers and'`local $otrernme'nts. rmY+'This was a bad tdeat " :lty planner Sheryl Patterson one of the Issues raised at satur'- the city is cansideri!lg,an ordi- day' ts forum was the fact that amehl- ;e 'that would allow developers ties such as bike lanes are iun(ed ovlde 1lewer automobile parking largely Through 'ttie gasoline fax paid + e.9 if They provide :showers and by autonibile users. !,facilities fon bicyallsts. The bicyclists many, of diem ►all Bryc'e� an eAvlronmental, apparently offended byethf� issue =- ner for Aerojet General Corp;, argued fhat host of them thefri;:ilse automob#fes as well as bicycles" " that firm"haq encopraged' em- "There are Borne major miscon- 0es to cyci'e lns'teat of d`ri've to ceptions when 'you ,calk ;aborti b'icy c. She 'said cycling enthustas ctisfs riot paying'user tees`,"'sald,oile_ Id.push-their employers for;flek Member of the ai'u Ience,�, Work hours! 'secure stafaoe+f don't feel 'we should }lay 'tt%e s, showers lockers andeven a same a"mount as "an -automobile pr a l service for their vWorkers'who iruckbecause ttte impact (of a bic bicycles to the job. qle), is yey br'r sand onewoman - yce said'the "wellness'' atfltude' Participants also argured that ming Arevtrient across the t ouh� bicyclists` benefit socfe�ty hs a whole �hauid :�,1hke employers inose because, they geheratd� less ipollulon itive fo. cyclists' needs She said while putting less of- a, ;burners ,;¢h r,healtl! promotes higher pro• health care and;,heaitlx insulrane, vitt'° a11d should' tiialte employ- prografti5. "" 13 i11 Clia.r,'E, I' �h71 Work's rpt. t 7 c1 « a�Jlutuxi~ ro 'Id o. p IC'j.t}� e l7at`i iotl aaLis od hy' iotr population. Ix you 61avc any gticstio-a= `nn Mly ploast Contact J. Ilte . i Table b7 ' 8utto Cou^rrt,y Rapid Uainte4arlce anal Cons tructiQ1!t .Roveztue Source Amo Uttt : lli li,tJay 1:lscrs ?Z, 7L GJ. X 4.7 Foros t Rc.st rn, 215 000 4.6 ICU) ;VIAIII(N 89 600 1, � SB"i52. G 1,490,8G 1 Misr 5I1105 18 , ap Q d, tlornqits2 13 1 9 K rl j) In to re s t^. 11 VQ ���'' 7� �� : ?0 R' Fi.Alts s and Fo-rCe,ItlYre z �70 Q 0ri t. `i4 5 0 000w , !Yo taJ ,,G3 5 38`1 Fund BaIanco 81G,,S4 (ca�ryover .from provi us P ") dote ;: All PiguV.05, are as,ti;r���ttcs 1)a:e 1 o f �l�c IrY 19 8 2/�� 13i"tate CULilltY 1 Mir ,r r V,