HomeMy WebLinkAbout85-19B GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 4 OF 4x
Aft
ttO1�TING
CIty 4 .� HICA
Co-Plan,mrigC
� ITER OFFICE �
si"016 b'WREp
7GMORAN
i, . Mm t. iCMtS
— lit
;W. (5;7M1t Iit It ,
It �
T(7 : Brrttye IZil ober
a rte jute) aridt�tum
tk atyr +a , rw
0(001o� -W torsi
t ti'�S xl>o re.tit►s
,
Cil
R:Iitra;c Action Part Zana use oesignati
nvst( �►� tend
' �ttiz Y C
Act. Sg indi eatedd
T7
Attadhd is a c� af4 memo to the:" tits Ntanage
ie seproaess
At1Pz
describing the a�.e s- of- difference in the:
Tor yaur(nto,a�ti(e
IAu�k�:'iah cb R
city arid Country land use d+asiQnatians. I
YYour s(t3rtaturerctui d
ndai Y rs
believe ail the, information ,cozies onds with
Flown trkser9dyr
ter' tr�l s "iectk
what, we have g e�riously sent oc�e to Laua a
Per, ow s u gs
oti e t
.
This memo was c iscUssed at a_ , meeting ;helc
ciriulzte.
roi*n aind Cal&Oe11u1y and copies
si)ards
PIAM�0, ticei' "
Caere oviciea . b, otFler ,Staff mein�er5
"ParkVrW4ar
Oncd acgai"n!i �,, ^ i s draft , If you have,
Pi1§60 Wt br,
any aoftimen,ts aZ Concerns, please het lilt'
t
kn0, n addition, as is Ynclicatecl a'n tile.
TICKLER: .
E
memo, We Fa 11 be going to Pj,annirtg Oommiss.ion
August, eta izitiae the change �rhicYi
,
stay has agreed toe i
t51�+.aY71 .
Worn Lando
�l�pattFte4�t
�iann"ing
l)aM
7/`5
e ,.
ApEAS "o F` D FERSNCE t-TWEV
CM' & COUNTY
G1,0F.RA1, Pf,,AN$,
SEWER' 4
STORM, DRAINAGE.' FLOW `CALCU'LAT'IONS
STORM
0�{ht
AREA
ACRES
01TY
SEWER FLOW #
DRAIN FLOW
COUN'1'�`�` SEWER Pt�bW ►t �, IlRl1IN t'f OiS
2-RESGLVEI
------3:-0---
_1g,p-
Na...,it�dtzstria
DIFFERENCE, PLANS
J
3
238
Agriculture
Industi. l
14 , 0
] 3 3
4
8o
Oraz.ing
rhdastncil
2u0,,(i
44,., 80
�5
16$
Rural "Res r
504.E 0
41, ; 16
940 .!.$
58 : 0
60
M. D:. R.
84:.0
4,20
Gomm�c�a
56.0'
5.60
7
3,
M: D.,R:
25.2
1 . 2'
L. b.,11,_
16.8
1 `• 0 5
8
21
H. D'. R.
268...811.0'
t�I:b.f .::.
17(, x,
81
6i.6'
92:4
4:62
10
5.5
L.D R.
30.8
1 .9'3
I:ndttr t ial.
16,5
3;:08
11
25
L.D.R. (H.D.R.)
120.0.
13:13
1.b,R;
320.0
13,: 13
12
3
L.D.R. (ii.:D.R.;)
38 di
1,58
X 'D
X5,2'
1.26
13
67
b,,. (H.DYR.)
7,7
32
Commercial
1:8
34
14
5 : 5 .
L, b„ R:
39 Al
commercial
3'-. 08
15
H , D;, R ,
5 l'. 2
2.10
h1. D. A
33 6
1 i,618
•
3.4
32
.70
Commercial.
6.O
:1 12
18
3•,7
H.bR:
44
x.94
30
19
i.6
L.DR.
g.0
•5:6
H::D.R;
20.5,
.84
20
9,3
Indtistrial
279:0
52'.0+8
Commercial,`
2�g.p'
2 �,0$
21
1
L. D. R:
67
4 6
C,ommer"tial
36.0}
6, 72
X4I D i ,`
75•
3; 78
w
1
ki.D;.R.
179•'2
7.35
C'onuuercial
42;0
7 84
24
I
L :D. R.
6,;7
, 4250
25
4;'. 2
eomiueu ciao2
, 52.3`5
1.. b, R.Y
23.5
14 7.
X0o"Rural
Re"s�� . ,.�;.
7 566:0
35.0
L D:R
$60."0
0(�
i
7
.6
M.DR
13tr
..fi
N to [�
20
y
28
r��5
Crdz3ng (t b.R'.
i 4o04.:Q"
50. Z,
I.�.D.ii..
4004.1
2 0, 25
413
L.bR
224,;b
14.'ob
1tirs Res.
120'.
Genera. Plan Des,igh t
` l
thousands
o't;",pria p'er. day
O 'b
.3c. f het :per se.ccin,d
(11..D".R-Deaignat3ori to ba used x`or calculazditsAl
AREAS OF DIFFERENCE BETWEEN CITY AND COUNTY GENERAL PLANS
TENTATIVELY
CITY:
COUNTY`
AGREED UPON.
ARE,
ACRES
DESIGNATION'
DESIGNATION
DESIGNATION
_` 'No S'.
nelas sial_--
7;6ew-gea9 ty---
- �dtist ia;
Industrial end Commercial. are,, in fact, .the exi'pting
Count d'esi.natidns
y .,� for No, l and 2.
�'ESOLVED
COUNTY "D;RAFTING
ERROR
3
238
`
Agzxculture
Indu strial
Indu" 1
stria
_
4
80
Grazing'
Industrial
Industria
5
168
Rural Res.
Low Dens.ty
Lqw D'ensi'ty
5
10
Medium Density
Commercial
Camtriercial
7
3
Medium °Density
Levi Density
I,ow Density
City has a sewer' agreement £or Low Density ,Re'siclental
for No. 7
8
21
High Den sxt y
Medium Dens it, y
Hi h Dens�t
g y
cuirentl. a,nnexin - seiner available for High
Fortiori y g
a
Density`Residential for Na. 8
g
11'
Law Density'
Medium Density
,
Medauin Density
10
5.5
Low Densa.t y
I ndustrial
`Industrial
Present mini -storage: (No. 10)
use a.s
1.1
25-
Residentaal.
High Density
o 1 12 , e c `lculated fo . se er storm drama
N 1, & 13 tq a r w / 9.
atHigh Denbiiy Resi ent al level.,
Res.ideritial*
Medium Density
Residential*
Commercial
-No Agreement -
1'4
5a5
Low Debt
Commercial
No Agreement=
Caunty `recently amended' General Phan for No'. 14;
* City,.:5 General Plan .," erina.ts' High Density, Ressde.ntla� �
<' o : l
rr`' 1
' ;cand;'ltl c� �
forth ,se areas.
e
i
Areas of`
Difference between City and County General
Plans
h
Page 2
TENTATiVELY
CITY
CQUNTY
QESIGNATI'ON
AGREEDUPON
bESIGNATION
NOTES',
AREA
ACRES .,
DESIGNATION
High DensityMedium
De nsty
Medium Density
Presently develop at; Medium Density. (,No. 15)
e
15
9
. 6
Low Density
High Density
High Density
Commercial
No Agreement--
Cotintiy recently amended Genera] Plan for bio. 17.
17
2
Low Density
18
3.'T
High -Density
Low Density
Low Det ity
19
1.6
Low Density
L
Hugh ,Density
High Density
Industria]
COmercia],
-No Agreement-
General, Pla
ount recentl amended Gene n for Noe 20,,(No
County..
y y m
for sewer servico/storm
20
93
difference in calculations
drainage; y
21
12
'Lo Density
Comttierc.ial
-No Agreement-
22
g
i;ow Density
Medium. Dens ity
-No Agri ' gent -
develo ed (with residential
Area primaril and commercial
y p
2`3
14
High Density
Commercial
-No-
uses). Sewer/storm drainage calculated at higher useage=
High Den it".``Residential for No. 23.
Low, i)ens xay
Mediilm' De"nsity
fro'` Agreement-
County recently amended Genera -1 Plan for. No". .2,4.
4
1.2
25
X4;2:
Gommer.ci�al
Low De';nsity
Commercial
1p0
Rural. Res.
Low Dens t'y
� _
-No Agreement,
Cite General Planwas amended as reduested by re�sidento
take , calcu
'( fated at Low
26.
�
of the .area :, Ho�ever
e)
DensitRes�dental for s.ewery store drainagNo. 26 )
Y _�:
2j
1, 6.
Medium, Density
High, Density
High DenCa.ty
"s.xt
Cit, has; a ' ewer, service agfeeinenf:' foto ,Low,Dens:t.
s
,28
715.
G"raz�a.ng
De
ir�Qw n. Y
ns:� 't .rar'
.. d .at that -de. 3 y ;
�Res��idential to �, be ca Gula e"
_
N _ 28
Areas of
Page 3
Dfference'bet, ween City
and CCountyGeneral Plan's
TENT.ATZVELY
AREA
ACRES
C.Y
DESZGNATIO N
C4UNTX
DESIGNATION
AGREED'UPON
DESZGNAT,ION
_
NATES
29
40
� Low Density,
Rural Res.
Rural Residential.
S
High lensty
Industrial
Hi, h Densi:t
g
Pro, ert owner
Y
propose use f.ar, No. 30,
3.
4:6 `'
Medium Density'
Law Density
To be'
resolved
drainage to be
as part ;.,of Specific' P;lan,. Sewer worm
calculated at Medium Density Residential..`
32
25
Loki Density
Medium Density
To be resolved
as part ,of Specific Plan:: Sew er/s'torm
drainage to Ue caleulat_ed at Low'Density Res%dental:1.11
33
4
Law Density
?'ndustral
Jndustrial
3
I
14'c
Industrial
P U kJ l'1 C.
Ex1st
ting
U g _ se is
Public 1
is Fair ground s (Na. 3dj
35
119
Rural Res,-
Public
36
31.5
Rtira]. Res .
Indust "tial
-N0 A':greement-
Iia difference in calculations forsewer s e ce s
rvi arm
dr"az;nage for No.
36,
37
3
Low DO0s.ity
Public
Lasa Iiensi t Y
Exi s°ting use i5
Qrivate residences . (Na.
3$
1
Low Density
Commercial
Na A regiment-
g
cit*- to change
Y pursue
.to Itdustxiafi for '�Ia. •3$ :to
39
$
Gratin.
9
Industrial
-:No agreement-
ronfor_m with the
remainder of the parcel,
i
,
I
V ,
1
r
C
I
r
SEWER
TARM D.RAI,NACE
FLD'
CR[,CIiLA;'I`I4NS
ARri
SEWERow
STORM;.
DRAIN VLoW - GaUNTY�
SE:W�;1; F`�,ot�
S'!�?titt'
l�1iAIN
T`l,t�H'
64 . 0
2 63
Ind, usGx aZ
1 r . Q
, fl o
30,-6
L�A,fi:
5.f
32
'
$.?5
24
,61
3,3"
p
LD.R..
22,4
1.
A:;
0
1a:3o
3
1
Yu blit,
3. 0
Tnoug trial
1 Y' , Q
35
1
. 5t5.
x r
/ryq
.56
6 '
31 5
Rural Res.
57 ..0
4&6
iyub, I ic
5. 0
is . C
�7
,
Rural ries ,
54'. 5
7 72
xnr�t;r�.�i �
�u64
� ��r;� �.
38,68
3.
L.D
16:8`
68
39
$
L. D.1i,.
�-
. 3 ,
GommcrcIal
3 D
Grac thg
Iniaetr�.al
24 D
4.�
i
Grial Plan Designation
nettiaus�,ilds`
k
ri . t�f
a i m s pe -r, day
',,..
,
7'a : Laura Tuuttl:e
_ Page
�xea
teres City Count
8
21 High Density Residential. Medium. Density 12e5i.dentia.
Mostly developed, +rith apartments and PQ t, in
anneacata tan
process - ,no chance in City desicn,ati an .
9
l,� how Density Residential Msum Density Residential,,
City to :pursue change' to i�ledi.lrtt Derisi ty..
l.QDensi
ty :Residential l�t�stral
City to :pursue cYange to industrial - exis,tng land "
use is mini--stotag6 ,
11
25 Luca Density Residentiay
l Hi H �bensi,
g' Residential
No change it City desig.na i6n (City has ` a condi-
tional po"licy for areal but tai, be calculated at
high- density;
12
Low 'Density ResidentialI�iedium,nensity Residential
�=
Ma change, inCity designation :CCity has ' a� conal -
tiona"l, policy dor areal but to, be calcglateu at ;
high:` den ity
13
.-6 Low Density Residential Commercial
No change in City designation (City ha a Candi-''
t%oal.alicy` fore axea� bua t,o be
calculated' at
high; density.
Lacy Densty.esident'a lC6mmercial
No cha�zge in City° desi gnat .oti -developed area..
i5.4
high Density Res,ideritial -'Median Density Res�cleritial'
Na change. in City, designation devslogarl area.
i6
6, Loth Densi"ty Residential High`Density Resiaential
City to Sur,su-e "change . to li'i gh dOnsity -� ;develapecl
apartments
17
Law `Liens`,i ty 'Res dentia Commercaai
lVo change in .pity designatit�n
o
High 'Densit Resid
Y �nt,al Lour Density Residential
to pursue change to Zoxq �3ens3
l 9
l.�"' Law Density Rosidezttia Rig'; pens'aty".esicle.ntal
'
C� t oto rev
Y seta existing lazd
>i ,
.. MMMUNNMWA
TOC Ldura Tuttle
Area Acres
Com^
Coir
4
20
Industrial riun
Cer`a a
Na change .iri. City design —61 rio di,:�ference
in sewer cal'.culation ..
21 l2
Law'' Density Residential Cottumercal
City to review exist149 land us
2 9 `
Low. Density Residential lKcdl�flit bensity Residential'
City to, 'review existing laird use .
23 Ie,
Higk Densit y,. Re, sa-dent�iarcial '
No change in. city desa. gnatiar mostly ;aeveloped -
trend is towards residential.
24. 1.2
Low 'Densit i2esiaential
y ; �Iedluin De�isity ""Residential
NO change in .,Ci y cies gnata on but to be calcu.�.ated
at MediuM T risity ''"";
2a 2
m
Commercial Low
�Density Residential
Coun to
y pursue change to Comri►ercial.
26' I0.0
Rural P,esiden'tia, il Low Density A.01sldential
._
N,. l
o change xn Ci 4y des nat,sorn. %ut to be calc.ula.ted
at low dens
Z I.6
iedium Density Residential/ 1,5h Density 'Resit ent a
No change. in City aesgnatian =developed, 'area,
28 715g
Graz n. LowDensity.Tk idential
ci realisagreemen:'t -_ sewer servioe agreement '
fior property - to ,be calcu] atecl' at S,nw
Density.
2 401Lowensity
R�idential Rural Residential:
C;ty "to uxsue cham,ge to
30 5
h Dens't
g Y Re;sideritial Ind�ist ial
k
**1.,
1V than e in
�' C�.,ty des�.gna�,aa�n,
31 6:
ixm ediDensity ResentiaixrLoN4 I7ensi;ty R side�►�ial
Na change. in citX dee ignat%'cn .
Low Density Residential meum Lehsit,` .Resi.deatial.
:
resolved by^ S"pec, fi 'd Plari _ to be calculated at
LowD�ens�y.
33 4
;ow Dns,ity Resident�'al lndustraa;l
,
Ci v `ta pursue; c -,ge + to Tr ditstr� a1:
f
96UTtN(3
ClYY OFrntn
t6 aQT. atr, =omit. panus(..
ITE.*;®�7-_E i����l��la..
ACT1Ct)y DE5IRr:D
Cray Manager
(DeputyCf.tymgr«'
Reutt tCxit�tt rT
Laurallf mi op"610) t r►1
City Clark,Cal
CttyAttarney
Attached is
to rig
�
the c�iart 1..St.ing, the Gi:no� �]
P.lai 6han.ges, tkie; Cit ` t—�A
y 2. 1
e3i v dr
+Arl estn�d � ani
ACh �� I
Adm Tectt,Cb
c � k the pur;S ue .; �
rtrl7r✓17tpleas2
Y Agreed -CTpon
DeSxgnatian"
Pteas pra es
Pub, tufa
column to make sure
and fill in ,the blanks you 0. r ee
t if 0081 ib,le
Fbr rittty.,�itlr�
Your sit mat requ pec!
rcdn.
Cttkefof POfibe
The marked -u co - .
A OPT indicat'es the arms ,
the City is
i Ratt,rn to seeder" . -
61r.IPub,%Yrks,
tnaitCu
will n
we undeYr.stoo the gountamond` and wh�i.t ;
would
Per ourreaaes
Cfrcurete
dfflr
Pit# Chiefryot
have y amer?d, We
com letely made c;ec s ans
No
Posi on guiletfn t3aards
t�.t+rk Difecte f
. 13 and iVa . 35., on
Pt' tntn t]frectorl
�+e�xata
Pleaseres�arid as as
gat soon You �h
l] Can rril
PILE
1 _
TICKLER:
':Front (Slgnaturel
,
s u -z an n e bopartmO
Date
ttLa.� taatt
P]nn� ng//
85
AREAS OF Di'i'ERENCE, BETWEEN C:iT�t AND COUNTY GENERAL' PLANS
TENTIIT.IVEGY
CITY
coUNTY
AORI;ED. UPON
NOT:
ARE4A
ACRES
DESIGNATION
DESI,GNAI'IO.N
DE5IGNATI'ON.
Industrial a rid Gottimereial are, in fact Ole e:� sti.ng
-
�z�elestr�a �,
County designations ,£or No. 1 a cl. 2:
'
RESOLVk:p
CO JNTY DRAFTSNG i
ERROi
--Gemmereial
3
238
Agriculture
Industrlsi
-Indo strial
gp
Grazing
industrial
Industrial
,, 5.
168
kural Res ,:
Law Den szty
Low Density
6
16
Medi"um Density
Commercial
Commercial
Low Deity Res..idenial
3
Medium Densa�ty
Low Density
Low Density
City has a sewer agreement. for
for `Nb. 7;
�,
Hig h Dens�t y
Y sewer ava
Portion currentl annexing - ilable gar High
High. Dens itl i
Medium Density
' � Res�.den tial £or No;. 8 .
Dense.. y
g
11
Low Density
Medium Density
Medium Density
Low Density
industrial
Iitidustral
Preserit .iise is mini --storage.,
TO
5'.5
N'o: 11., 12 13 tocalcu] ated £or sewer/storm drairs'age
25
Residential*'
nigh Density
at "Hugh Den"sit; Iiesideritiall Teve1.
121
de.rit.al*
Medium Density
,
i3
.6
)tesidential*
Commercial
General:Plax' for Na:
5.5
Low Density
Commere ia]
-No Agremerit- ,
Country recently emanded
1
•-
Clays
General Plan ermts Hc}h
` Residential
D efts i ty
rea
aord�.tz £or these as.
onall
1
i
I I
I
4
I I
1
I
area's of
Differmnce between Ci'tyT and county -General Plans
Page 2
'PENTATIUEI,'Y
CITY
COUNT '
AGREE'b UPON
AREA
ACRE -S
DES'IGNATXON':
DESIGRATZON "'DESIGNATION
NOTES.
15
4
High Den.
Med.iuin bensity
Medium Density
Preseht7y cieveloped at Medium ljensity,: (No15)
lG
G
Law De msity
High Density'
High, Density
IT:
2
Low' Densit�
Y
Commercial
No A' reerrent- `
g
Co:unt rece,htl` amended; General -Plan for 'No. 17..
y
18
37
High Density
Low Density
Low ,Density
Ash
19
1,6
Low Density
High Density
J High Density
20
93';
Industrial"
Commercial,
- No A'reement-
Lount recentl amended Goneral Plah for No. 2,0. (No
y y
df£erence, in calculations for sewer service/stor,m
drainage. „.
_ 21,
12
Low Density.
Commercial.
-No Agreement-
22
9.
Lo.w Densit y
Med ium Density
No Agreement -
23.'
14
High .Densi.ty
Commercial
Asea primarily .ilevel.oped (with residential and commercial.
uses ),_ Suver/ torm drainage calculated at, higher useage=
High ,.Density Resi.dentia -1 far "No• 2,3
24' ,
1.2
Low Dens it Y.
Medium Dens it y
No A reeinenta
5
County rece'iit ly amended Gene ral Plan: fo No: 24.
25
4:2
Commercial
Law Density
Commercaa]
`
2G
100
Rural Res .
Low' Density
-No Agreeirient-
ed b>< resident
C''ity Uener,al P';lan was amended a request y s
of ttie area.. (However; to tie ,calc.ulated at Low'
Density Re'siclell tial for• se�var ( Na 26 )
2T;
1 6
Med ium Density
High Density
Nigh Density
„ .
,28
715
Gratin g
Low Densit Y
-
---
Cat has a, sewer service agr`eeMent for Law "Densit
y
R;esidentia:t o be calculated at that densit-y or
,
s
A
K
a£
Diffdrence
between Citt
and Gounty Gen,e:ral
Plans
gas
Page 3
TENTniv Ly
zTY
GOUNTX
AGREED` UPON
AREA
ACRES
DESIGNATION
DESIGNATION
DESIGNATION
NO'PES
29
40
at
Lai; Dens' y
Rural. Res
Rural Residential
3Q
5
High Density
Indus -trial
Prope rty owner
proposes residentaX tts,e foz' Nci. 3�1:
3l
4,6
Medium Density
Low Density
To be resolved
as part of Specific Plan • S°ewer,/stnrm
drainage to be
calculated at Meda uzn Derasit,y Resfide,ntialL
32
25
Lo w: Den"
sity
liedium Dei7sity
To be resolved
as part of Specific Plan., Se�vez�storm
--
drainage to be
�.alculated at Low Density Reside`ntia] .
33
4
tp.%4 Den"slaty
lndusfria1
Industria 2_
34
1
;Public:
rndustr:ial,
PubIic
Existiftgi use is
;Public - Fa r:grounds.'34 )
5
19
Rural Res.;
Public
3"b
31.5
Rur;a1 Res.
I Tndustrial
No Agreement-
No:;.ditference
in caloblat ions far'sewer service/storm
drainage for No. 36.
37
3
Low bene'ity
Pubic.
I;.ow Density
Existing use i5 priu:ate residences: (No• 371y
a8
1
Uocv Densit y
Commercial
Cit to ursue
changa td Rural Resdenil 'fdr, IVo. 38 to,
form with the reM Index of the parb61 lo:cat:ecl in area 3fi.
cony
-
39
8
Y g
Grazi.n,
Udustrzal
-. g en
No A z eem
i
r,
d
i
:
3: t
i
i
r t
1
C`
SEWER &
S;TORM DRAINAGE FLOW CAC CULA'ITI.QNS
ARBA
GORES
CI�'Y
STORM STORM
SEWER FLOW DRArN FLOW' CQUP1!CY SEWC R FLOW DRAIN FGO"
2
35
industrial;
L3b.'ft.
2
7
G'ominercial
L,D:,`R.
3
238
Agriculture
rndu.striai.
$0
Ing
Indt�atria:l
.5
5
1�8
Rural Res.
L.p.,t.
6.
10
M,,b.R:
C.c?mhid"rcial
7
3
M. D:
M. 0,.�i.
10
5.5
L.D.,R.�
zndu'btria
R..
ii. D.;R:
22.
3
M.D'rR,
13
:6
L.D.R.`
Commercial
14
5 5
L,m.,DIR,:
Commercial
15
4
M,D:'R.
L,,D.R..
17'
' C"ammerci�,ti
1$
3...7,
H.:DT. R"
L.D.R.
19
L 6
L::D.R.
E.
20
,.
93
Industrial
G ommercial
Cbm�ie^tial'
22
M! D.R.
23..
14
H, D. R.
Commercial
L.D."R.
�5�#.2
Qoinmerc al
26'
0
R up, TRd a..
L1D.R.
�7
2.6
M D R�
D i', .
7a5 -
Grazi ng
�L, 6..R.
a
+ftuz+��.> Rcsii.er�tial
SEWgq & STORM DRAINAGE FLOW CAt,4,-1L' ATIONS
STORM
�� : , STpRm
AREA
ACRG3
CITY.. SEXIER PLOW :' DRAIN FLOW
COUNT SEWER FLOW pRAIN 'FLO'�' .�
39
5
1ndua't ivi a
3x
Q.b
M.D.R.
L. b, -A..,
32
25
L."D'.R.
hi. D. R. ,
33"
4
L.D',R.
Industrial,
34
1
Public
IndustpLs.1`
35
19
Rurs Res: -
Public
36
31.5`
Rural Re.e.
InctusG'.t!.
31
3
'L.Di R.
RUbX c
38.
i
L. D: R,
COmmer4i,31,
39
8 i
Grazing
Industtrisl:
��tnrcoc
nbm 01='- (� dIl t. ,e General P to t�mendiiien Qn SeP ,eittb z , 1985
�1DMi- 7EGN. t
S?Cfti'E"mlI .n '}3Y THE CZ�'.k.L CDUI�CIT, �3:, Ti3.t.�'�'
TO: . CHICO
PLANNING CO'NOISStom
R C fiY/COUiVfiY GS�'ERAI PLAN' INCO1tSISfiSYCIES
PAGE 2
Area Ac es
Cl ty
Desi�
Cou n t.y
Desinaton .
I�.
CblriltiG'n ls '
Sl , 6�
beii um
Deixs� t}*
Loth Aens ty Areas #31 anal 32 are- in C is iifar nei hbo h'
g r raod,
County is: iii �roces o Prep,,jr ;na and ado', z
Skr-il is Plan.,tihat will
35 35
Rural
ea.nb id0 these areas.
AG—Reside ntial A s n811 portion
Resldert�al
of ht s a'Ml vias deslgna' ed as
Industrial i ndu;strial to reflect ong.t:lrrte.
exisi u
m ses.
r•(ajority o are a is. conslsttiq L- ,
Tom Hay
TH PbAssoc
aLe planner
C.CSA
Manning
-hector
Attachments
r
I
•
I
I
_
I;
�p
u