HomeMy WebLinkAbout86-25 REZONE U TO M-2 3 OF 4r
Deciaration (Ft^'fends or B street v. C.1"ty of
App. 3d 998)
05Ca.,.
ilayWar,d (1.80) 1>
In, ibe marginal cases whave i•t, is
3'
not ::lear whether there, is s:ubstaniaii evldellcc
•that a prof=Oct may nav,ea s:`ignlficdrl effodt
- on •Elle: o,n:v i ronme,ht the Lead; Agepay slhai> lie
guided' by the fo11awing Ia'!t;ors,
5
If there is seriot»t PUbiit.
6
controversy over env ronme-n't o o�f
a.prajec"t, the Low, Agency sh,a11 �411aCdOr "Elie
ef�fOct or effects su�bJe.c 1r0 th.u, dontrov�prsy,.
it
ta' be significant a;nd shall preparO`:an
g
Coi"nt�royersy unrelated to. an environmental
issue does 'not 1^e.quiire preparation of an C,IR�
If there i s d 1 sagree;ment
between experts ov"er the signifi.cancC of art
q
e,ff,,ect, on the envi ronme'nt, Che Load A 'ency
shall treat th,e offct as si'gnif�_car�°t and �sltal
1
�C�Q A 6uid01A
prepare an'EIR.�r nes $.ectian
15064 (9) & (h)')
131
Th'e question rej8.0d by the first ca.ose of action in t"his
14
petition i;s whether respondents properly det.erM Ined that na: Eli'
15
Wa necessry..
Judicial review of the resp;,ndeti't's dec'sio�n� is
Resowhich directs
governed by. Public, ili«ces Code` Section 21166.5,
18
that the i'nqu i ry slia 11 extend to whether there. was' a Pref ud;i c:i a 1
1.a
abtb:at 'abuse of
`tlse of discretia..n, Tfie section provides
20
d iscret1j,ort i s. established i f the agency has trot proceeded i n a
1
t. supported by
' e .. decision s no
manner required- by law or zf th,
22
sCibstant�iah evidenCo,
i _
I1 is pEt�tanei^s' c.o:htentian respondent ilas
-� it h`41a.s .not
not proceeded In a manne'.r requ.i'red ,by IAV
25
prepared."the requisite E"IR.o. s, further° contention
the evi,denc�;" When t;a.refully balanced against. th'e 'put^po5o:s
that"
;7.
01 GQA andthio 6udieines, pt^avxtl"e.s subs"t;t�ti'a1 reasons" for
preparI;ng an 1R1. In' sham tliero ,eiti'�vs ""subsc;antial" ev`iden.ce
tha� (the`) pT'Di'det may h.aYe a i h'� ' ican�: �fifect
Z
�
env,iPwAehtajly.
3,,
The e'nviro;ninental Impact re;por't (CX(Z) is tl�� me hbd'
- 4'
chosen Eby the legis a,ture too refi rect its, �' prci 0ctive p `ir 4�es.
5;
Ing ofd C,CQA, f;he :ac ion 0110ing mecfla0ism
Tha,. E 1 R is the hear0110'"
6
serving no only to ehsu,rd alppr 0p ,Iat0' p���'1P�n'��ng ut to
de �on.strata to 0& pUb i',e th��at the goTi rPn 0104 �4 decis`i n9
based onali reas:onably ay;lable data. (OutddO''ines $oe:tion
9
15003).
iThc
E'IR J. ument
s a f'u1.1 dIscl�USUre, informational. d0c
"` on makers acid the general
meant to inform both public decisi
public"' of the effects. on that .public G°f projects which the
^
. M',
-
dec:ision�makers approve. (:Guldeli;nes Section 15003).
14°
The SIR serves tie function of rlf at^ming decision
15
makers and; affected citizens of the consequences ofi' the proposed
�6
aGti6n= `ibis gotal of communication be'tWeen government and' pub.lic
17
cannot be attai',ned Where no I�1R h,as been prepaMOe a negative
t his
deciaraj�tion> should the°reface be; us<ed Only whew`e ere
VIrtu'al.�1,y ho impact on'� the env ronment and vq, 6re t'h'erO is no'
public contrnvrPrsy..
;
'T;he leaain`0 case an the d.ec`is;iari to ip,repare an EIR is
2?.
Rai, 0i 1 ;Inc. v. Cii�. of Los Angeles; (197'4} 1, Ga;1.3 65. the
5u,prem'e 0,ou'rt r'ield `that Gh.e t au;rt errrwd its Sn'erpebing'k°
"A'
Word ''signifi`can't' 'ih Rttblis Re o.urces Go-de ;S bion 2X00
being "imprortant" "or ''mornentoiis":` Rather theaui^t: slated:
„
Thus,' We conclude as did Che cnurG aunty
27
of Ingo V Y"arty; that` an agency, shoili"iI p.tepar.e
n �E,1R Whenever i.t, p�rec.liv , s.om�o si bt,tani�ia r
evidence that a pro3eC MAY °alc3ni;fIcant
d'ffect eriVirbnmentaXly;" C32 Cai.App.3d at
r ,,
9
r ,
' 1
As stated by Judge J. Skelly Wr'igh"� in
;States (0 D:C, 1972) 4"6
S:C.R.A:_P. v.: ,Un`ited
F. Supp• 1$g, 91, an environmental, impac.b
2
report, should beprep:ar.ed'tiwhe_never the action
eln,v anmental
3
ar uabl.' wi 11 have an adverse
impact.: (Emphasis .i n; original).
4
F.urt�hermore, the existnece of serious publlq
TI i rn ng tha e'f f ec` �
controversy ;co.eny'ironmei1'tiCt
Of a project. in itself, dicted intlia.'1,
Cine
6
preparation: of an Elft is desit'aUle. mato►{
[ri 5I'R is�� to inform other govern.marl't�
purpose of
agoncies, and the public generia,ly of.eha
impact of a' proposed` -T, (stia'
g
environment.,
Gount of I'tl o v. �Yort� ; u .ra, 27 C I,.App 3d
--��--'� " "_ and �to a ionst to to an
g
9 , 7 07-. ,
apprehepaive 'citizenry that the �ac�ericy has int
considered the ecological
10
't analyzed and
f a,
�mpl,icatiari ar %ts action. Asimple resoalti.on
`i�ha-t tho
or neg.a:tive declaration stating
ro ect y1.i1, have no signi. icant environmental
11
efifect cannot serve this 'fun;cOn'i
12'
the Fir-st Distrlct Court o'f Appea,,., t 4 Court
3'.(1:980,
suc;cinc;tly held in Frds of a3 Street v,. Na ward, 106
14'
GaI.App. 3d 9>3.g at 1003,
1�
11 if there was SU, bstantial evidence I:hat the
proposed project might have Alsignificant
16
env.ir�onme.ntal imapct, evidence 10 the contrai^y
decision to
17
is not sufficient to sitpp`o
dispense ��ith preparation of an EIR and adopt
a negative'declaratn, Uecause it ceul.d be
o
Sifairl`y argued' th'a. the project might have,;
a significant environmental impact. Stated;
i9
the�r v�ay, ii. the .` tria., court �perceive,s
substantia:, evidence that tiro ct might
20
havq'. such pan impact,, but the required; agency
to preparation of` they, required.
21�
fai led secure,
EIR; the ag,eticy s action is tobe se't aside
its f7 jt
because the agency abused .discretion
1:a i l' ng to proceed 11 i n ,a manner ,requ i r`ed by
23
i
law: (I'ub: Res. C: Section 21168.5)
2"
%/
25
Tj�e p`ro�'eCt un.'der .con'si-derai:io,n fofWitile` cirzens .
26
a sdu ht re' aration o ar`.IR was a
St�^eei;y- sUr_► 9 p p
_
L7
P roposed street' i.mprovecnt
28
The Seco'rid gserict .Court of Appeal' alfers guidance to
1
neg"atrive declaration its allowe',d to proceed on a pra,eu't w'i.tl7 the"
2
intpaCts described iri the admini:s'trat1ve record, ctVan as. iti leged.ly
3
mi`ti'gated, the usefulness of EIR's 4.l'1 be seVerbt 1±144It0d� The
4
use sof a'.mitigate.d neg��ative declaration'"as, "d,0tnpafe0 to n ��R :has
5
env i ronrne
:manyshout-comings. Pirst, the obJectivIt of f ui 1 ntal
6'
anal°ysi> is 1ott 'to the subjectivity t�1' the `selected
7,
doeuine'nt'at i or; required bay the p l a,`nn i ng sto f:", I n tl�e i nstant
8
ming is hi'ghlightod' b the f�acf; Itat'the
sltuatioh, this short�co. y
9
ciocu`men, tation ,of ehviro.nme:ntal. impacts prepared fey the" apop iicant,
10
DOUGLAS ' STARR, or a nd relied u' ott the 5O'ARU was
t his.request. a p
11
not c rcu I.atod fo;r scruti ny and comments uhder C,QA pr`odedure.s
12
descri tion is vague, obf`llscating
Second, the project- P
13
and indef inite. If an EIR Weare roquire:d, it w'ould`,becone clear
14
to deop
how RICMAR'0 PE"T'E'RSL CXRT 80U MOUNTAINEERING i.nte -4, vel
15'
th.e subject' propet allowing the specific; Rrnject tc be
1.6
evaluated and` allowing the analysis oi' cumulative impacts to° be
17
de,t,ermined.
18°
Third, the Negative Deelara:ti.on I5 note` Yri�d,eI
1J
c i rcu l ated to the public :and other agenc i ea for cornme,n r,, ' qn.e of
the corn'e,rstortes of C;EQA is the requirement that the, lead agency,
21
respond in Writing';to public dominent, thus tryst;alliz�'ng the
22
iss'ues.. The preparation of a negative declaration voids titin
23
t^equ i remertt
om. a'
rcurth; ori aiterriatiye ahalysis is., deleted` f125,
riegativ'e: d-eclaration, Zh ,: this facti si.tuaG.i;c"i an ana:Yysis of
x
to" may' very wel"1 'been the inforlrft�o11 tiec'essaray to
alr,na,tiVes .hate
,;.
re.qui.re- more def,. n,v e and more m,eaningful, niiti`ga ion.
28
',
Fa'fth he, prepar•ai.iori' of an EIR triggers the' f indirtg,s
12
requirements of CEQA and forces the agency to balhnce. potential
2
significant env ronnienta-'1 impact against ecA17011ie, incl social
3
necessity: Thee- findings're q,iai 170,Mont, a 1 s.o fie �i i 09 0 a,geny to
m G c
4
examin.L all feasible ;�miti'gation measures in an �dl�Leinpt to r'educe�
_ _
the potential impacts. to ars acceptable leve7esou;rce
6
Code Se'etion 21.1"=01, CEQA 'Guldoline Section 169 1},
7'
The case at btr presents a �c0mpeliirig Gxa'mple' of when;
g.
an El shout -d be` prepared;. The BOARD -based its con c'1Ll' sions of no
9
siginficant impact upon the findings conta>;ned `iri the mitigation:
10
measures Iistedin the Butte' County St;afif findings 'dated Apri l 9
11
1986, At no time were the' c.umulatye impacts or Mie close
U,
scrutiny that is provided; by a complete Elft. utilized:
13
-
Th:e` Legislature. specifically indicated' in Pub1io
14
Re 0urces code So,ction 21001:;
15;
that the procedures rer(uired by this
division wre i entlod to assist public agencies
iri systematically identifying both the s.i riificant
effects cfi�, prop4e'd ro "`'e�c�ts� a �'t 1e f as Ie
alternatives or fea,Sl,ble', mit,xgaat o�n measures`,
4f hi will avoid o– r sub stant;iall —T ssen .;such
_
significant e ect." ".emphasis adc`fed"f�""
�0
By using the"mitig�ate.d negatv,e decl.aratioh,, the`
mitigat; on i ensures .are taken on to, sUP osedi�y_�, .lessen potet ttal:
impacts despite; the tact that the true extent of that im act is
22
.,
riot sys,temati_ca.11y; identif:ie-d at, theti1e� cdnd.it'io;n's` or1.
Mato ions are, proposed:": Furthiermo!re; aX'Lernattves Fare rigyor,
,
disc�is.s,ed, or ca':ns�dored..; r✓nmula,tive impacts,,�arerat`exah�nPd,:
Response 'to''coment$ is .not 'r.eu`ired.� Obocl,iVoaaa, lysis xs ;lost
:because th'e le.'ad .ageric'y` can pick and choose ,ghat it Wishes to .
analyze and allegedly ;miti°gat'' The use , ;o;f the '�,`�n'�tigated'
� a l I, v
pegatv:e declaratibn.i! the, ` s.tatutory . ob�cti.Ve of
13.
AOL
dissemina;ti.on of in,fo.rmati.o,n to the general puhli;G to bo11�Ii'"etl,
(Public Resources Co do.Sectians.2100;0, 21061,; GoUnt OfYMI
3
l.ns An el;e:s (1977)''71 Ca1.A'pp ;id 1C.5). Finally, 'O' 51ic Rus0i�r ;es
4
,
Code Section21102.1; and Guidelines Section; 1Fap91 req.LI:!P? the''
5
prepara,ti,'on of findings which either rniti a'L t oyerri the
6
1mpaCts identified, in the ' EIR. A �'rni hiciated Cje alive
_..
7
decIar'ari:on is not tied, to any such o,bj'ective rar'talysis. Mather;
a "m tlgat0d negative declai^ation" allows al kecle'd Init ga Ions to
9
be attached to unanalyzed impacts in, ial comple'tt�l.y illogical and
10
-,
destr,u.ctive manner`,.
11
Additionally, federal case law l supportive. In
12
Citizens far ke. sponsib.le Area. Growth v: C (19 79) 447 F. $u :p.
_ ._ . ---
1
994 at p. 1004, the lead agency of erlSeveral independent
14
;studies, adopted the federal equivalent of 6 Negai;ive Declaration
15
and stated that several' identif edra,Verse impacts :of the :prosect
16
(a1rp.ort expansion) had be00 mitigated. by the addition of :certain
17
conditions: The Co,Urt of 'A;ppeai reversed apc redGired' a,n SIR and ,
18
stated:
1�
"Nio,�reove:r, EDA's - final n.egat� va ;���1eGlaral;i':.on
20 .
rests, on' the capa;city, of t'h-e p;at^tie;s toy agree
Vmiti,gatecertain adverseeffects by
plan, to be approved by EUA, se that 1l(tbb
proj'ect)'' w0U: d not effect ,(sic) the' gUaiity of
22
the h�-man environment ' piece'rheal evaluations
to prevent anticipated a.dyot^se . ei`f eels of
23
Pro9__riams. c� earl'ycannot relieve ai it ations
that extst, under, 4ZU..S$4 t�22)
24
iC)• �?Jor can pr °vale ag,reeme'nts between
parties �iei ay the app cat'1 n of t f1r; ta�.ute
25.
"fhie, EDA assessment. unmrsta;kabIy cor�liide� that,
wi N;llout add ustment,ebanon s pro%oa,,l; would
26
meet the 42 U.S.0 5ecti'on„ 43.32(?)(G)
,tlire.shoi.d
of signif�eati't ef'fect� �1�7�st'rategks
27
to .bvpass, a,nEIS,� s b;lea.rily incoth
the intent of NEPA �n(x)t is cleat that
2$'
enV ironmenta Y, l.aw req. u,'res that a federal.
+
agelicy invoive i elf early in ':d c;onwi�n�ously
411
1
agency; fp�(2) -A summary, of tho d;xpate d
environmental e.ff"ects with spepifio re"6re66es7
2
to additional informatiAn'where that inporm a.
tio�n i s avai b le , an;d C,p7 re#a��fhab i�e
Ii
3
analysis of the cumi lat, i.ve imp&Q,Ls of tft0
q
relevant proj.ects." San Franciscans V° Citi
and Count o S.an Franc i sco, 81(
Rptr� at page b J, 9,.
5
.e uate cum0la ive� anal ysis rc(U'ries,�+ fist bf
An adq
5
s,
projects producing related or cumulative Imp4aatS (Guideline77
section 15023.5,
"
The; content:,. of such a dist mush, 16cl,ude _ clos`e1y
9
,
related' past; present and reeasonable farsee�able .pr.obable; future
1p
proj'eCts, (Guidelines sect on 15D23,5,
In the; case of +San Franciscans v.; iii: and, Caun�+. of
1�
;
San Fr�anoisc.c-, s'upr.a; the c.o_ur�t in eXamininc� 1:lie vAlxd ty ofi' an
13
Environmental I'M pActRep,art found the El to,,ina�dequat� for
14'
failing to explain t_he cumulativA of of a pro.poosed project.
15;
The court stated:
16
1rProjects undr ryevie;w aro ind,epe`n.de.nt ;en,deavors,
17
and their ;eve.la.p ers, aggressively seek, in:divid-
d
ua aproval. Th.iS independence .and individualw_
ig
i'ed patentia,l approval makes: it ail :the rriore
important that theye cumulatively consitlered
because; un'11ke� tine deve`,opme,nt of �georthermal
resources, ..-which involves a fa,1ri°f ied arid,
2p
concerted coordination a> individual projects
wells, p"ip`el�nesf product.ian units;,
21 `
stora'ge fa.ci l.it�ies) > the` development of ddwn-
town Stan Francisco gener'all�'occurs pit by
No; one- project may appear to cause a,xgnificant
22
amount' of adv.er e effec�:s, Howovers without
3'
a' mechan�s�m , far addressing the cumula,tive
'
effects. of zndi:Vidual pa^�ojec,t th0pe c;ould>
24'
never`. be any, ' aw'arenes`s of or ;:control over
the speed and mann.e'r of dp,wnto,wn c1c'Velopm'ent.,
25
Wtliaut such' control; pae,cemeal deVe'lopment
rt: l ever
wou.ldinevtabl'y cause havoc in va ua"y Y
26'
aspect' ofi the urbara'e:nviranm.ent:►"
27`
Public comments and reports irul the': Plinnin':9 staff,
Department of Transpart.atron, and reports friom tiie EnviraOne n`tal`
15'
Fldalt:h pepart.ne,nt' , indicate tha.tt cumulative impacf�s'-a��e a real
2
concern to any developne.�lt aion ti1E Skyway,- near 4I111 Gi�y of
8
w ured
Chico sphere o in"lue0ce. A cum,u.lat .��e i'mpact nt l sZ is r(.0
4
5
CONCLUSIONS
6
CEi�A made environmental protection a pari: Of `tffc manda're of
7
all public agencies. It provides deci.sion�C�aker9 With, Mouts.of
8
insuring tht the vaiups they are charged to pratoct ��re► a
9
m... ed ar►.d consade'ru0 C- EQA
inimum,' adeguate y drscuss0d, disclos
1q
has givonevery 'citi,xen a method of ,making !itis or her concerns
11
for the environment known and hopefully acted .upon. The rui bare
12
to prepare an El fora project, which has o,byi0U.5 sign ific trtt .and
, 13
long; term effects in Butte County viol:utes the letter 40d the
14
spirit of CEQA.
r5
The: record before this Court wi.11'shoe that Respondent
16
Board has not complied with the mandatory requirements of GEQA
ancf has failed to all174 ow thy, project to have the fu�1 benefit' of
18
pubi:ic input, and puklic disclosure necessary to t:fie iann,ing
process.
20
Respectfully submitter
21
22
23
Bar,r� M.ar� 1eye:rs
24;tor4e:y
f", tione.r
25
26A
2T
28
I
k
-7 _._ .
G
APPENDIX
NE 'q�;CLARATTON,.:R1?GARDTNG BNV,IRONMENTAL IMPACT '
.;
NO` IC, 1,`S 11 eq "W hag
1X.�3Y 'GI11F.N tharovisilonsro �a fxhesCalb o n�aed oEnviz tai!.
to the
nviewed, pursuant p tj
it not h.avo u C�'Iz 1
uaiity pct of 17O (Public ResourcesCoc1e 21100, t.' sc�a. �+dmiration
56te,has been made that wi17 ,ign:1
e CeGt Ripon thenva �onment.
Loi {� 85=12'702 Byre 8:i��a"
APO 40-02-8,7
2.
W SCRIP l CON 0P PROJECT
Rezone; from "U" to
3,
LOCATION OF ';PROJt
Weft' nide of the Sltyw y opposite the ;�.ntersedt 0i 11 0 HW
Road, Chico .
NAI. ANDADbRPSs Op PROJECT AI7��l,iGAri't
:,
RIithard, Peters Roils; AndersWl ROIJIjs"
30 NorthWoo,d Commons Pl. 9S`5 Fir Steeti�
CA 59Z
C�h oo Cl- °95926
"
1�1` '�I'iOATTON MtASUR'P,S,; see. attached
�i
n copy, o�c the a zip tial study regarding the envirpnmen1�al, o,l feet
'7 Courtty' Center Drive' 4'tcc�vi.11c.
Of this project, is on file at
This study Inas
v Adopted as presented.
Adoted tiaith chantges . Specific moth t iGatioris and
�' �'u aPbrtxn reasons are; attach.
1 �
7
A 'public hearing ori this Negative> Decl�axatian was held t5y the
deciS,aOn malting body',
l axing6dy B�.*tte Count- Board o Stiyervisors -_
1J3Ito b De.term,nat,on June 17,, 1986'
'
Detexm'inati;on. �;�
On the basis 'df bhe i'n,xia. .study o en'v�xonmentl impact, the.
n the
ynfa`xmat on p esonted;at hearings comments reaeaved on', -
knowled 'e; and �idepend,erit researq .
p roposal incl, ;our own
We, i ai nd thb propa ed pray Oct 'co"OU) NOT havb a sa dna f c�nti
a �NEGATIU' T�ICLAiATi"ON s
of"l ebt an the en�r� ronment, incl
z� el)y adoptea
lV'eTinti tlit the Prrr ect GOU,I) Have a s ar�3� giant :e sect
c.rt --the enviran'n;oti.t ,but wal gat .i tha s
a tache11 lt� on.:`meas;�xos� doso;r�bed ift ��zaf�t'� al?ove ` .
.m�t�
rha ch ;are by th,; e exenco made ... :aond.ita orr.a pyo j;ect
s her
a,pY bit'a1. A t dz�da,tana' N�GAt,['lUi;C,A7A`i`ON
�
adote� . Y
119
1Jd McLaughlin, Ch,kirman .
t Boot- n Su` ervlso
Butte Celan. y � � -
June 19 1986
ORDINANCE,. X5`30
AN ORDINANCE ZONING A. PQRTION 0 THE, C uky OF BUT'T'E STA G
OF CALIFORNIA; ,AN M-=1 (LIGHT INDISTRIAL) pISTRICT, P(1R$iJ�1N'1'
TO MIAPTERt 24-29.
1
The Board of Supervisors of the; County of Hutto,; Stain iii" California
under and pursuant to Chapter 24-2.9 of the Butte County Code g#ajd CoUnCy DO,
3
ORDAIN as follows:
4
SECTION 1. The heteinaf terl describes area s.it�iuts in. i�jia ;Ununty of
Hutto, State ofCalifornia, sh'al1 be: and it is hereby � had as 'art l (Light
8
Industrial) District, and. such: 'a to the "estrict;ions and
7
restricted uses grid'regulatipns pursuant 'to Butte County Cade Sac, 24-111+,
8
' Said area so zoned being located in the unincorporated arca of ii'titte
g
County, Chico; mote,parit1bu1ar1.y describedas, follotis:
A portion of T22NR2.t Sec. 32 and T21N RIE'Sec. 5 MDB&M,, more
particularly described.asi
12
Beginning at the intersection of the centerlines of Brace Road and
'rhe Skyway; thence southerly al"ong.Skywayls
12.1
centerline to its
ntersectfon.with the centerline.o-f, Comanche Creek app.rnximately
2760 ft.; thence
Y $_
wpsterl Alon said centerline of Comanehe Creek
to its intersection with the flood .control 'channel
14
approxiriately,
1$.00 ft. ; said flood control channel loc�ited on' ;the west line
of the E ha:1f
15
of Section 5 T21N R2E MDB&M;'therice northerly along
said W line. 1800 ft:; thence coriiitutig nor hotly
along the W
line afc the E l/2 of.Sec, 32 T22N R2E',MDH&M app'roximaely 600 ft.
to the
l�
point of be3nnir%g.
lq
Contan3. ingi6 acres, mare or less, Chiao.
Ig
SECTION 2. This 'Ordinance ".shall be anti it is hereby declared to. be in
19
fu11 force and effect from and after thirty (30)' days:after the date of its',
20
passage; and before ilio. expiration of fifteen (7S) days after It,3 passage, this
21-
Ordinance shall, be pullx sheii once with the., names;i>tic.mbersf t�;$. Boars of
22
Supervisors voting for end against it iii, the Chico I;ntc�rJirise ReCord�
,a neiaspaper
23
?ublished Tri tre'Counfiy"of Hutte; St4te of California.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by 'che Board of Supervisors of';the Coudty;of Butte,
2Sda
State of California, on',the 17.th .
y'; of ��June 1986;� by the folln,Wiitg vote:
fig.
AXES: 5uper�isoi^s Dolan,, F�ilton, MdIntUrf, ,WheeJer• Intl Chairman McLaUgh, lfh
,�
r,:; - �;.
interaadmotraMemorandum
r1, ',. m'�,''hF�v�;.�,az...-����3w�,�3�. •w.' .0 ,, 'l_ .e,(«��,y.�\y,
4 �n`."Niw.k.,9.S{+,�^;. its„" •wtl"'.w�'1'..r.� � v'aa�.''Pi � It71 ?y - iq,0i'fCq�4' r,s 7„. r.,'. � r.1'r :.a.. ,, � �✓ '
"'�,r;���,;,(^ + �,'1 :�i.r`�r�..✓,�y�, u J ,✓��'�
a1- "''H;M1 ** ` .,„, „r•--`.'i-i^- "4 •�' - s” ,''„`,-.•-,:.- p, pi"}�* ,F�*'`,:r'^ ,aN' �dw,"� �,
7 } '�, � .. Th , .s, W `rd. ,� r .. ,, .:. n y,y ,+�,�• �, � �::•R.. s A2,�• � � � n i{
,: Y t� : vy ".:_. �'u�i.. �,Yfi"„ yy'L" � la ':,�t$+- ". al'�G,:1�'«,, Ca w...,`t..S"y. p ;- .IGnku:Aa>s»•.a ;i''r�. �r"!i" /, %,r: � �;,; {,. o air
,
i• k . -+a.yxa4d�4.,,. •. r., w M1,£-,_,. Ma
y '
w
+
( zv
~�,,. �f,4, +sTrw,yvp' till + I l 3 'r 9 �.,r' '✓.y'': rT ,ry
r
d
�
C
r
y 1 I
on
d i r ia' 1 y ,� y+ _ :w f r it li ✓ r I
{d
1 s,
,. IIS.: \\ try �;., .-.'wa,ai �a'ih_jw,».,»:n 7P i ifl{�' S, '*k,`„�s,w>r•""»mmta r�'���. 4�'k: ...i��`-1' '!, 7 ,I. _�.'vn i :' •1qP' 'Y �::
,
rt �����J►`�i'6\fi(( � ! * ".� :;� „n„� � � ,� ��yk �pll 1 �+t” i 1�'l:fiH'
fr - t ,d. A'x.�c• nFFV , c�eM:, >,w--+w+-.y,r.;^"...;r:".Y 14,.`.V(r.lrj•,�y¢ .7.1x,r"At
*r» ,�1 ,.y ra: ,�' ', ta�'i,YF P� "{`j k e' ��_r`��s��.i■ �%'� r/'1 \'�r'� M ip�•u'':,s•"t"' '
j. r' II � },, ,i':'� ,til ra t) •sl t. ,.✓+i� . '• � " r�i�T�� � �' � J Z,f �,
,�'�e'" �,' pyj''� t W ,,w� �( y{• i eCl 'J
- A B 1. 5k�.r.r'j ' y ` k• t+.✓1..�
wrsw S,per f` �r _� �, •yiy�" r �, , r 1 j l d f1 i,f, ^ ,I� r d'
%q .
,p,' �.. ,110 �.`"�,. .Ct. .."� e,'"�6 � /' r�.,,J� '°'�•-rr '`, 9'�".r. t:x f";�qt;(. '` ° ( i -'/ r/' ... k1c1��1
a.�
✓��NJw;:"t'%' �• r . +� f✓a,� ,�+i r I e j %� i '�ilP _ 1+i��h �
'
, ,� ✓ . i}.. . � i .,;,. «.u..»,-+���✓� 1 ,y ' t l ' '' '�.1 4 d .a:'l5 ..,.,+�..�c ✓' kms. y} �,r� �+1V,•� r�.�.
r f
✓
R
32.. ��.�✓ {' 1 {! r l ��� .»5>' " ,.P" E' r` " 1 I'I .M1" .',yk'�IM1')'Cd1'�''"�'�, �'
r %64✓
py .
1 I, I.N Q'�
`t_� �_ h'. A / A 1 � / • jr� _I» •a_ xr j �»�`"»��` " I � �J' - 1 ' r, ' � /('j-�-i� e, ��
�, .�^;tiiy '^,�,..� '1� r ^rr;� .� ,i•�.. yyyy lr` ,`�Wh �•-r ',r, " "� ",�p,�j' ,rM � �qg�
�l ..i :UG ..f: r' �t ,,.�'�' ! • %' 6 , "Y i 'c. . '4 , ,�*�/" .. �^"y. '� ; q . k, _ -;❑
,f'is�Y r»... �_-nrtk({�--...=x"� •"r n i� ,,,„,.;,,.� � �s f"'n,...,+^. a r � r r. aC"'� , '�. T,'•'4 } ... :r y r _
.A Sl snsilt9:.C,.r �.,.r.. ,.,rr n +•
A �::r
s4r._,,w,N,c"" --., ..ar:+:...:r,Mt^r .P` ,rd A. .'a �.,• ,:,�» �.M.R s;.� .. .r[711s
"" �,y„��.. x «.%«» ..,: �(� �iry616`C � ' �'';w"b--1`�..F: � : i a'' a'� i i �' �G:r N n� `,rv�"r � � ��z� a � � » �.: •, r +y r r � "�F � �. a „0 .1,.. q' 4:
.�t"✓
..:...4 } , `M, �^�Y 1 J J�? r,�i' 1T✓
f4tvAv dal
GGI `•� i r„�jlyy""'""r'''rW'h`+.tit,2,,.§..;�� ,� "'` � �! bra. Y i�� t _k 4
,� -.13 #. .:" � i '-T � �.'•. r�✓tr ,+ +�f Y +'1 � .,.y •� � r . p.
s i , �t ,, {,,,� •bk ar °'� s ,r ✓ J,,-- ;.M' f *i' f r:k' I t !
s .( rs {' r k.,
f 1 � l\ 1� IY, 1x11` ,G, 6'
(7C t'c,It,i1CUlrre. -�ti .a )4 :ttiF�: l�,.. •)°, 1iKt7 rYFW
;.y } 11lCa{ IIt�fVt1C1�QIl {ill(�Ld �#',:'�
t i� k ✓ �'^l
fE "">anc!';,1��,,.Gj'"","+a l �
tow .P nt� ,�fr
r"" r �Pr n"+;SCR'i� 'yr•�,.,.� � 1. d � rr •r:
} y„ra�,. � ✓ + d \\ .r • " T
�� �.'i'",�+. L, it'yk'Yr 'T"3 '31A ...,/ r �i'S: �'s 'i".a .'� �^..y+K* 1, iiddl ' 4.�. � '� #i,�, ? ' r. +un, .ay/Pi � .'� rY✓i i � F 1 tp `.:i
71
t ,,� � Vii' '-..y,Z-pna"+-';"r•�1�,.1, �F6��1�` ' ' `~ � , r :k �° � �
. 4
-
.',u� ,r:.. �ra..G.M � i ° �. �� �, *��c4 � � �, •`fit, � +"7 ��+�� � �, x�,,,.n» �+��
Y a" '�* + �,4f rid, ,iso � j`, � *��Y. '•� ill °�' '�� 1�,.. FI �' � !'�" y; r � � '
. � w.+T.• q. iv � � Vii.;'°'.-�.n'„>�,.,+.""" ��i� � � �, +n,` � �" �. �, 3 ' � - 's hy' II r�+r:��� �>�'^ r�
!y"°•P4i�7
u
v ,
,
'
vn+'%"' :r,J1. amveyx;.., Y. tjt �. 1 4 ��.., . :, '}1 � {` �y : A`r" i W'""'. n' n�,•I" s` y yf • I,, ii rt�}* s�;�,,,��i 'I' �k�,+� �
. �r�ry�,:;,. f U � a `A, 1 � ' •'wt �r 11 � ���,,, „4 � 7 1 i 5 ,i', t �!"r ' q .�
I ' � '" c7 1 �,!<•r :�I ,,e, r 1 r it }j,,: .� s„ ,""` ''i� '4 � �� yr' �, --k � � y rV ,r ' �s^"`" ' ,µ+. *^°
R�'�r y 4 _� .E .X, y„� •,: *F;y� :,.r„I. 5f�,<, u'p + i �
rt! � r /� j �/� _ 1 '( C rilh• '3'. J;�. s � i � �, w°" � ' � - , �, �}
't« '� s.F �� } rs.,'k. .ice. 1 JiV � ^•"+2 d i r'C +^ r^ �� y'
1,'
r ,
x
,
e t-ar_ t
I (RA
00., i..o �; `•� itJ.4 (' ' : ,., ,+�(t tr°• q °�r �f`�',�� �t6�.' t,,'.'r" �'"r. y� r4E jj` j,y°'�
r '
HQtJ
1 t, d� . r"� �,� .f• 3 Al-• , 4..`: /p �� ani . +4y t S4 t ' .�t�..^",f ,/�'.'� ,�
r t
J�!A 1�nW,, 71 l r3q {�, 7!�� 14� 4rp', y✓ 6/� t
;a��i
I?Qf(
-mk =t�1 M�
_w.o -.,.
w :. � f 4� , A b .+, tii . F" !a»n t t: '0:3•;� w...4..y a m � r
+ +� t�C«."'. �tl ` F H `'F
t
n+ w
�
�.���• .t '��. � �o�taf�A�t(nul rQ �� ,� �n
Plant 7adidrr CtardCli
µ ,1
. �; nth � � �� aY, K''t �(.F. ` ."y�i� ,t :f "`'l,R '' • /� -/+ nr � i... „t1 S °,E tl"� .+' ,/ � �' :;�
3ht
I�YA��
rA,� A u�r' 1� erir �y6d�. u
1
r--.a.•— u,� '+'T°'t'i^t-,++:++ nt �+' ' t E ti �k
�<. � ..,R .-E���. � �{� � t t r• i�rr' :, t w�'^a��w " '4 t �Y� .r�"� . f
� 1 _ � . � j I c � � ! E S '�-,..: ill ,+�+• 1
f � • it
4
gRfPl`+� t5
°'r sarxvuc±..rs FtrpA'�nm mut=V �ri •�aN_ 's to-vuta,�7 ti'a �x n' y (Y .� � '� �{/4��: ,i``.�= ..." � �. S -
�
Y �= t
�+
of t P
I a
r y`
fi5 w,R
bill
n i
i
14
17
+. uwtwr a,• rW di �i.+ry I` „I �iuw`k� �,
'� I�
_.
i�idMM/rgYR�,}R
11 'I'q4I y k
ern,
D°Ite
go rd Ac100n Data 6/17/$6
....o. �I. x0
Referral
L1{•I•T�3;�
OF GURU. i1�E BOARD
OF
impartment
pocuri� nt
Acct on q� (,J W
Administration x
Agreements)
i cats on (s)
�Fi1e
Inforitf ti en
gra cul ture �....APPI
`Assessor
Budget Tran. fer(s)
.� .Tleces ray Action -
Auditor
CertifiedI�a'nutes
` xCl�t,airiSi 9bitures
County Clerk/�lecti ons
County Counsel
Claims°1eaamtiliitttli:iori
Correspondenceltecnrd
Di st,ri ct Attorney
Deed (s)
!Rotice(s) of completion
Icpart w o E'iaard
�� Ileturn Cape
nvarpnrl�ental Health
�i rc, bepa'rtment, ,�
Ordi'nance(s ):
C]enal ty -Abatement Requests
to (;OB
x,Return Qri g7 nal
Library
Mental Health ;esalu;taon(s)
to COB
Erc1 osure
""Persanne.l.
-li/0
x pi anni ng/LAFC.6
Probation
_
=ublic Health
00.04c Works
I�4aroha.s7 ri;g
'flocorder
Buf a a..l bnn ngt�canm6,
'�Ri k Management
"ho"iff/C;oroner
JUL Ij 1"86
surer'/Tax EollectorT
;aroville Califorpla
Wel''fare
A idit1'anal 'IflfomatlaYh:
Peters Zo.nin'g Agreement;
Ater copies` are returned,
ti a
certf7ed copy of r enol u n
w'1 1 be rovi;ded
p
with attached executed ,?agr,ee,emnt:
,
Interim e armenial dwoednd'um