The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About87-30 SITE PLAN REVIEW 1 OF 1{ Oe i sy Q R, { d � • 1 B { i{' _ 87-02-10-01 Y S 3mlmT 87-30 Lcg No. File No. Marry ,Holt applicant representative ADDRESS. 796 East -Avenue Chico, CA 95,926 545.-8'2 8 PHONE": Same property owner ADDRESS- pR TcT�scr�xT�or c Site Plan Review to allow conversion of a residence to an office, an property zoned CC Located north side of East Avenue approximately 7501' west of Cohasset Road identified as AP 07-11-0I town/area: Chico GENERAL PUff DESIGNATION Copra- ercial DATE PRE -APP FZ9 PAID-, RECEIPT ftM.. : APPLICATION' ACCEPTED;; FINAL APP. PAID-- ' .. RECEIPT NUMMR: REZONING PETITION SIGNATURES CHECKED PERCENTAGE: %; MAILING LIST PREPARED MAE:-OUT NOTICES WRITTEN NOTICES ur.Tt.F,D _ NUMBER~ LEGAL DESCRIMOIT PREPARED PUBLICATION'NOTICE WRITTEN DISPLAY AD PREPARED` - NEWSPAPER PUBLICATION 0 P G_ B R, DATE OF PUBLICATION- INITIAL STUDY PREPARED ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: Categorical Exemption FILED: Negative Declaration FILED: Mitigated Negative Declaration FILED: Environmental Impact Report CERTIFIED. - Other. STATE CLEARINGFIOUSS NUMBER:: APPLICANT/REPRESENTATIVE.NOTIFICATION OF ENVIRON,MENTA1, DETERMINATION PLANNING COMMISSION HEARiNI G(s): BOARD OF SUPERVISORS HEARTNG(s) RESOLUTION NUMBER (GPAs) ADOPI'r : ORDINANCE NUMBrk' ADOPTED;' NOTICE, OF'DETERMINATION (Appendix''.H) FILED The Site Plan review for Harry Holt was pulled offof the consent agenda and discussed separately: Chairman Walter asked if Mr. Holt had received an easement for access to the property for parking? - Staff stated that the parking was still an issue. Staff recommended there be a; condition regarding the easement for parking. This review was continued to later in the me"ening. Harry Holt Site Plan review - continued from earlier in the meeting. Staff stated,that the parking is to be in the rear of the property, that: the Commission may want to add a condition "off street parking to be provided to the rear of the property." Mr. Holt stated that the conditions were satisfactory, that he had parking for at least 10 to 12 cars, but that he would like to keep his garage for storage, Mr. Holt wanted all the parking in the back. He stated that the offices would be insurance, real estate type offices. The hearing was closed. It was moved 'by Commissioner Forbes, seconded by Commissioner Lambert and unanimously tarried to approve the site plan to allow the conversion of a residence to office use on AP 7-11-1 (Harry Holt) subject to the ,following conditions: 1. Meet the requirements of the Butte County Parking Ordihance4 2. Repair sidewalk in front where tree has raised it.' 3. Applicant must also comply with all other applicable State and local statutes, ordinances, and regulations. 4. All parking area must be in the rear of the fadility. ht1rt Ct?t1NT i? NNI'NG COQ Nl aS bi4-j lull tg februgty 0 � �: '1� f 1� Oak LAND OF' NATURAL WEALTH AND 13ZAU'TY PLANNING COMMISSION 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965.3397 PROM x>MXtbq 538-7601 Harry Holt February 26, 1901 796 Bast Avenue Chico, Ca. 95926 Ret Site Plan Review, File 87-30 Dear Mr. iiolti: At the regular meeting' of the Butte County Planning Commission held February 25, 1987, your site plan to allow conversion of a residence to an office on property zoned t -C located on the north side of East Avenue approximately 750 feet west of Cohasset Itiad,, Chico, was approved subject to the following conditions: 1 Meet the requirements of the, Butte County Parking Ordinance, 2. Repair- si6ewalk in front where tree has raised it. Si Appiicant must also comp'y with all other applicable State and local statutes, ordinances) and regulations, 4. All parking 4rea must be in the rear of the facility. Should you have any questions regarding this matter,, please contact this office between 10:00 a.m. and 3.00` p.m, Sincerely, A, Kircher Director of Planning �Ait: lr cc: Building Department Inter -Departmental :Memorandum to, Planning Commission FROMT Planning Staff SUBJECT' Site Plan Review Harry Holt (AP 7-'11-.1)1 File 87-30 DAM February 18 1987 plan review to allow the conversion of a single family This is a site p_ residence to office use in the C -C Zone. The parcel is located across from the North Valley PV za Mall and is adjacent to the shopping center on the northwest corner ,f East Avenue and Cohasset Road, Chico. The n of this residence for offica purposes applicant has been using a portio 19$2 and. has just recently m as a home occupation since before residence residence to Orland. The Butte County Public Works comments are as follows: 'Repair sidewallt where it appears tree has raised the sidewalk-" No other Comments have I been received at this time. res This area has been gradually convertPillsbury . commercial int residential i1ses to still from residential: (See exhibit) uses since 1974: Presently of the 12 lots from Psroad to the 1t Safeway a matter of time until the Mill is only Shopping Center and 3 ahese'remaining residences are converted - This roject will require 8 P^� ,."g Pl in spaces. It appears that there is p enough room for the spaces in the rear if the garage is utilized or removed. the Butte County ParkingOrdinance requires an l8' driveway for lioiaever, i two-way parking access and there s only just over 9'shown on the site plan. In the past the Commission hag approved site plans along this area where itedi In riveway widths two combined side yards are uticzeated attdtusedhis rnbyntwoer dadjacent businesses: that '.range from 13 to 15 ateY above the Sit this case t he Staffefeelsparcel thatithealt existing�access t,otthedrear is not doe not apply, , pose a hazard: Tho applicant has adequate for two-waytraffic and may the following options. 1) Obtain aVariance to the Butte County Parking Ordinance to a1lo� the existing aisle width; 2) Obtain additional driveway width from the shopping center in the form of an access easetneint; 3) Obtain a different access to the rear of the parcel from the shopping center Reeommendatiott,Y 1, App rove the site platy to allow the conversion of a residence to Office use on AV 07-11-01 (14arry Molt) subjomt to the following to M' a. Meet, the 'requirements of the Butte County Parking Otdi ranee or obtain a variance to the packing requirements, b. Repair sidewalk in front who tree has t"ailed if c, Applicant must also comply With all other applicable State and local: statutes► ordinances and regulations CB:Ir cci H'atry Bolt qIISTRIBUTION;.; L'..�, FOR REUIEIr RE UESTS / u'nty Public Works County Env. Health IRRIGATION WATER ,Aity of :Biggs -%� g'gs- , ridley Water Dist. ,. ✓ City of Chico- Butte Water Dist Gity of Gridley- Durham Irr. Dist. City of Oroville �T` Oroville-Wya'nd. Irr. Dist. Town o� Paradise �T-' Pavadise jr. Dist. County -___� Richvale Irr, Dist. .. Table Mtn, Irr. IC WATER Dept, ---7— Thermalito I Dist. _ rr, Dist. ateTransportation Berry Creek !tater Co. �'AT166N FACILIT I E§ Bloomer Mtn. Mutual Water Co, --- Chico Area Rec. b Park Dt. Brush Creek Estates Durham Arca Rec. &Park Dist. Butte Water District 7"- Feather River Rec. & Part Dict. r% CA Water Service Co. (Chico — Paradise pec, & Park D1st� urban area & Part of 0eoville Richvale Rec. $ Park Dist.. I Del Oro Water Co,. '- State Parks & Rec Dept. (Paradise Pines) State Fish & Game Oopt. Feather Falls(Louisi'ana Pacific) SCHOOL DISTRICTS' Forest Ranch Mutual / Biggs Unified Gran 'Mutual Skansen Sub.) Butte Community College Greene. Acras Glenwood Dr,_Chico — 'Butte County Sup. of Schools Gridley Farm Labor Camp ) CA State Univet�sity, Chico Lake Madrone Water Dist. o Chico Unified Magalia Co. Water Dist, - � Durham Unified MerryMtn tn. Mutual (Clipper �%`'FeatMer Falls Inion ~fir Gridley Feather Union Mulberry Water SE y Hi ( Chien) `"� Gridley Union Northwoods Mutual (Forest Ranch S ) �%� arovi'lle Elementary Rprings of WatersOPOVIlle Union non High(Richardson Springs) Palermo Unified .-_.L.<.. Stirling City Palermo Union (Diamond Interoatlonvl Pioneer Un'ion Vista Mute^al (pur�ham) Thermalito Union COMMUNITY SERVYCES DRALime Saddle Comm. Serv. SEWERS INAGE Dist. Richva Sanitary anita,ry Dist. `_/ Butte Creel; Drainage Dist. .�.. N• Burbank Pub. Utility Dist. *LECTRiCpLP— OWER (S. 01-oville & Kelly Ridge)) & Elect-ic — �- Skansen Sufi. (68A 21) FIRE PROTECTIONSterling City Seder 1461nt. Dist. ..._.(,..� E1 Medio Fire ps?otect. Dist. -�--- Thermalitte rrr.` Dist. (CSA 26') .._.�,: County Fire RESOURCE MANA6EMEt State division of Fdres"try ~� State Water �tespurces Dept, MOSQUITO ABATE.ME4T DISTRICTS ''T� U.S. Forest Service Durham, Orovi 1 l e M or Butte County ` . .. U »<S . Bureau 'of Land Management POLICE PROTF,C`PION g ay Patrol bT—HE R Count Sheriff BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION, L COUNTY CENTER DRIVE OROVILLE CALIFOR sut+e�.��►g PHONE 5 N r 95O6S.;, MAR 131957 1,101IN !".!T'Y OF C City of Chico `"... HI-C...�. } G7ccv►lle, 'f i P.O. BOX 3420 MAR ) 1187 D TE February 10, 1987 Chico, CA 992 PLANNING OFFICE PROJECT REVIEW Arris m CITY OF CHICO ENVTROIVtiENTAL EVALUATJ ON' Enclosed is preliminary data rur office has received or generated con cernin the following y project: Harr Holt AP#07-11•-01, Lo #87-02-10-011 file#87-30 - Site Plan Review - to allow conversion of a rosidehcc to an office, located on the' nom rth side of East Avenue approximately 750 feet West of Cohasset Roam, Chico, We are making an assessment of possible environmental1pa cts and preparing ari environmental document, either a NegativeDeclarationj ill Negative Declaration or an Environmental Impact Report, gated Please provide any factual statements, ideas for investigation or o i ' YOU can offer in your area of concern or expertise that relate �to eathei.ons Physicali social, at this or economic impar r.s that project' May generate. Plea8e respond within, 14 days of the above -noted date. If no response is generated by this in tiiry, there it shall be assumed that there are no significant environmental impacts which are potential from the project. We appreciate any assistance you can provide. _> Sincerely, Craig Sanders Planning Technician March 12, 1987 comments: The pity of Chico has the ;following concerhS: �. The proposed driveway may create a, hazard due to its close adjacent sho in center drivetva to the east proximity to the and ► e in the width of East Ave. at this location. e b he trnn i,r,n Other. alternatives ma exist such as; additional parkin idem v' 8 spaces and 'the adequato manuevern area deeded.'` Pa lot access �tiver an ad`acent parcel. obi Obtaining 3. Nroht yard landscaping should be requi.redi 4, The driveway as proposed .at 9'2'' is not ode nate fors I�tvr�-tiva _.ecce 8u, nne Myons, Asst Planner �n s (Write or type r 9au� Y p roviled & return this ghect ) F _ NOTICE