Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout87-38A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 1 OF 3j ■ I . 8,i -Q3 -•i3'-64 ` PRC7J�;CT SUrvMq-A IRR SFjMjMrV 87-38A o� Na. Jere Bolster i ! 1 'S) r� j IY��� •IK �� ��� ,T ��� � j4 4 u � � t •, -' i � ! 1 dY y . t V� � f dere Bolster ,. 9-7 PROJECT NAME SCH AP#42-14-73,114; AP # '�og'� 87-03-13-02 . FILE # 30 Day Review period Ends _ SCH'Review Period Ends OUT-GOING ACTIVITY ' Date Action LS . 7 y 0 Ixr7, i . ,... - �`-mac.__..' ...- " 4 II a AP'PLYCAtlsT FOR GENERAL PAAN AMENDMENT BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION UF ft 0-PtanntngCcmm MAR 5 "1987 APPLICANT, Read and follo%v Instructions as north on last page of'this rortn„ ��b' Caltforntn Applicant's name Jere Ti Bolster Phone number 345-4485' Applicant's malting address 1503 Manzani'ta Avenue, Chico CA 95926 Applicant's interest in property (Owner, lessee, other) went owner's name and address. Teresa CGeorge, 1925 Nord Ave,, Chico Contact person for project (it other than applicant) Assessor'sparcelnumber(s) 42-140-,73',& 114 Strectaddress 1925 Nord Ave., Chico Present General.Plan designation Medi Um . Den5 .y Resi denti a 1present Zoning C-2_&_ S-R REQUESTGENERAL PLANDESIGN.,kT"ION Commercial Z Location, dimensions and size ofarea(s) to be amended Located . a1 ong the sou t west s i de Of SHR 32; Chaco, approximately 200 feet west of Jak, Way. The area is 2 acres in size (4$0' x 240').(5ee attached map) Applicant's reasons for amendment Lot ;immediately, east. of property zoned C-2__ _ With existing engihe rebuilding business AP 42-140-73 also zoned C=2 at present. Proposed scheduling / Assoclate(i projects (formation of service districts etc.): h0he . Anticipatedincremental development (future development plans subsequent to General Plan Amendment:- AP 4# 42=140-114: 7s tlll`rOhtly 00ht a'hd.Will be sold for commercial devglo meht. Existi ig I proposed sewage disposal methodt t00ti c tank Prokimity of power and phpne lines;ad a j tbht Distance to tiatural rvhier coarse or storm drain: 1 m i 1 e .. _ Watt t sottrcet well - l �;r^#rYoxinnity of water for fire fighting purposes (hydrants, ponds, etc.). 600 feet (Cal Water)—.— i. twVWill excavation or grading be necessary? Cubic yards (estima(e); no List and describe .any other related perinits and. other public approvals required for this project, including those required by city, regional, State and Federal agencies: rezoning to C-2 ENVJ RONMENTAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES Identify potentially significant environmental impacts associated, with the General Plan Amendment, What project dcsi,,;r features or special conditions of ;approval (mitigation measures) areproposed to alleviate potential, environmental impacts? Development is so small that the incremental traffic volume increase will be hegligible, Soil is capable of septic disposal, Storm water disposal via leach trench.: a w _. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING U Describe the roJect p site as it exists before the project] in.tluding-information on topograf�hy, soil stability, p lents and animals, and an cultural- historical or s cenic aspects, Describe any existing structures on the site, and the use of the structures.y Topography: flat; Soil: vina loam, some Clay;Existing residence and orchard:>no yawn Cultural historic or scenic aspects: Describe the surrounding properties, including information cn plants and animals and tiny cultural, historical _ or scenic aspects, Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc,), intensity of land use (one= faniiiy, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc.), and scale of development (height, frontage, setback, rear yard, etc.), pro perties southeast are residentialjcommercia uses: property east (adjacent] is tomwinial, aemaining land is tghard ,. w Du�teo C'o. Piannirg Comm I hereby declare under penalty of perjury that [ have read and understand the instry MkRs5wd j9@V the ' e, complete and corre Foregoing statements arc, fru t or my know, e. Dated. A,pplica.nt's signatUr ; �,,,,rovl]104 Galiforalm Dated Property,owner's signature Project: file number Request: General Plan Amendment to kA c r h e- Location and size of'pareel(s): A701 Ac X, :.. ��'L"' ,j fd� � I� .��. y G1✓Y :- ✓� � I'� ! F4.CX �Q4.,� �"� % fV r: O W Veri fy; [% A.P. Number(s) t----Loca:tion Description V Ownership r Legal Description of Area C3 Proof of Agency (if needed) Maps of Area and Reproducible Master . Present Zoning and General Plan Designation Date otApplration Received, �' ��� r'7 tv ofJ S� _ . _ � � Receipt No. j Application taken by •�-- --•- • a ,INSTRUCTIONS TO APPLICANT FOR GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT -771 1. If applicant is not the owner, written authorization by the owner or other proof of agency must be submitted in order for the applicant to legally sign the application. Applications shall be considered void if not signed by the owner or legal agent, 2. All items on application shall be filled in as completely as possible. Very few items should be marked not applicable by the terns "N/A" 3, It is very important that the application include an accurate and complete description of the property proposed for amendment. The application will not be processedd, until we receive the following information about the area(s) to be amended. a. Assessors parcel number(s) (front the tax bills ° 's Maps), ' or assessor b. Street.addresses (if available), c. Oistances and directions to stained Streets, bodies of water or railroads. d. Legal description (subdivision lot numbers, fractions ofsections or distances and bearings of perimeter dimensions). e. ✓ _ copies of map with arca(S) outlined (Assessor's map, subdivision. map, zoning map,or other snap showing parCJs) ,Ind a reproducible; toaster of the map, 4. Because the California Government Code requires that local general plans be integrated and Internally consistent, amendments to the Land Use Plan Map(s) of the Butte County General Plan must be consistent with written poli. fes and standards contained in the adopted elements of lite plan; S. The "Application for general plan Amendment" is subject to public hearings and approval by both the Planning Commisslon and Board of Supervisors: 6. Application fees as of (date) are , Fees may be paid in cash or by check made payable to "Treasurer of Butte County'>. 7, Before submitting the application, applicant is requested to discuss with staff all questions about application requirements, Co.tnty procedures, site designation criteria and policy considerations. g• Applicant is requested to be has complete as' possible in stdting the reaso?is for the application and encouraged to discuss in writing tile pr'oposal's conMrtipance with the policies and criteria or' the Lanai Use Clement of the Butte ..aunty General Plan., R spm R/O l/✓ELL 21 d1-22AI R. BK S1J •;, Y� F, '�I08 fit o �4 LCJ M ED .,. < , / ' �' . r • '' ; r E,J n ' ' `� `�: /moi'+ �d 4�1 *'l )14� N. Ile- B�43 -v a. , ,` I c 't Ji d yJ' cti • � ? s�� bo ��, s r v� VO �GCEN N.:V�N §i �C `�Jtj r .5r�0 C� c a � ��' v ai6•r�s b y: Pfl-Ititi 69 , E311 /17 eco dli0 Sv,/ �lit� my 1� �.ro 4J k O•K a �• a. Isd 85 a� sf� s 54 t ) - iJs �'tO7i bl.>Y� i(j�j a tO)o 1♦ , O,Jlf 4' V /�. ' �, '\ �(� J Y 1 t to , v,rt� � � tl.t�s'.2 � iYir � ry>, i � ! � ,� •'�,t �; � ice,/ � �p p � c).:,. , „ � nu,i5,y.;.,., oa,r�• uaY .-,r � � flq ">, y, 107 it, t t t d00 t t Z r 8K'43 w t. =C.1w r i tt +SSE`«!t1 i rt, y� , -. e."cir'.i �.I JJ«;� �..+r�)�.sC; JO.?'u'' sJC y. i~ a iY..., . tlg.• `✓W tff iWl .s..,. LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR THE TERESA C. GEORGE GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT "All that certain real property situate in the County of Butte, State of California more particularly described as; Parcel A. Parcel 1 as shown on that certain parcel map filed in the Butte County Recorder's Office on the 30th day of October, 1981, in Book 86 of Maps at Page 66. Parcel B. The northeasterly 462.0 feet (measured from the center line of Nord Avenue) of Lot 16 as shown on that certain map entitled 'Map of the Second Subdivision of the John Bidwell Rancho, near Chico, Butte County; California'; which map was recorded in the Butte. County Recorder's Office on September 17, 1900 in Book 5 of' Maps at Page 27+ EXCEPTING THEREFROM Parcels 1 and 2, as shown on that certain parcel map filed in the Butte County Recorder's Office on the 30th day of'October, 1981 in Book 86 of Maps at Page 66 ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM the following descr=ibed paecelt Beginning; at the easterly corner of said: Lot 16, which point lies at the center line intersection of Nord Avenue with the center line intersection of Oak Way,, thence north 6015 44' west along the center line of Nord Avenue, a distance of, 200 feet, thence south 296 11' west, a distance of 240 feet,: thence south 600 44' east, a distance of 200 feet to a point in the center line of Oak Way, thence north 296 11' east a distance of 240 feet to the 'point of beginning, containing 1.1 acre, more or lessyi! Bulb Cv. Phinn6o can& MAR �5 1981 0046, C.alifwa 4 7771.l} .1.. ...!Y . p ;o With mitigation osed S4.e 'at v gecl arae mend en Gen fir.. -P-, Bolstnr prop imPact and-�--� t IOcated Jerrdin9 environmental ro er Y - to Commerciaa�prox`imately X40 fbet measures ret Residential 32� a-�i14 and frog, Medium "DensEtY Sir ate Highway wAP 424 BF13 and 42--Commerc al or. the StuofWOak Way identified (General northwest Suburban Resident iala t'oChico• (File 87-38 A and Re�_e from 5 i dent t f i ed as Ap 42-14 for property B) Tof the St T"nding _ s he Commission warved the reading �.,tb l i c . was opened to the P to sell off vacant lot -The _hear -i n9 I- trying i n a no i sY area stated that Mrs. Georg proper was th i s' p He stated that, `i n terms of Jere Bols house. He stated th8 O n9• use of the next to her Idential best zane and best and not suitable for r, c mmercial is the to all of th' the property to sign a marketing the nine conditions wouedisiWt9'in9 1 and • He felt that F1e said that Mrs. Georg comments receiVd zoning agreement' Inst" d of C-2. ,sower Lambert discussed C_l zoning COMM! He suggested G-'2 to be more is C-1 opposed to C'l• that if the other lot MrA Boister was not He stated With what is there. table compatible Zoning Would be accep lot and then the C'' on the toning of the adjoining they would check 1 Staff statedthey lunch. area. ee'd with report back theHe ,agr" �T�al stet discussed future. sc��er sere ice i n Mr. . ��, Meet the the conditions. so felt thatef an ested adding to condition Lambert su99 an.,� She also stations then the nmissionts of the NitraatroAction plan to the as the reltu i remen rata share de of the tracK.s `w0iication Was paying p me si Should be located on; the Same fy're station on :Highway 32. aPP cant•, the Etre station 1 i 4 ,1iOUl d be 1 ocated Mr. Bolster felt charged a ted thAt if the new station tat hould not becharged on Lambert sta i.hen the appl i can Commissioner of the tracks, the West side ae. f to after lunch, this hearing Was Cont i ruer� open ,� tii'�-� G011I3'�'� ,.'�`I�A%l���G Cgt�IN'1rSSIC�'� M��tt}']•�$ y r i COMMISSIONER PEABODY WAS ABSENT AT THIS TIME Jere Bolster Continued from earlier In the day: The hearing was.. closed. djacent tat was determined, to be zoned staff stated that Mrs. George's a C--2 i the exhibit was in error. Puf all Workstandtion Caltransures and conditions Chairman Walter questioned cover all the concerns of . 'There was a brief discussion on the, comm el is from the Highway Patrol Commissioner Lynch stated not etpenalized for the problems they hare rnot eao but the applia cnt should no P responsible for cE+,.asin9. Commissioner Lynch stated that the only prrobl;em with C-2 :anin9 is mit ornadditionalge of nconditions.esses that caHe9Preferred without any further Use Per the C'-1 zoning Commissioner Lembert discussed the Wali s naise'buffer to the a. Y �, rt adjoins to the west ner Lynch sta'ced that eaten with 'C-1 a 104- of uses can go i n grope. Commissio He suggested adding a coed i t i on for sound with only a building Dermit walls to be constructed between the commercial zone and residential zone Chairman Walter suss e i', tied changing Condition ? to read "Owner to sigh a covenant runn i ng w i th 0-K' hand that enonsiB m gas i necessa yes , including an B foot masonry sound iaal'1 Will b_ Catnm iss i ober Lambert as ked If they needed to insert a 'figure in Condition b• Staff stated that they would Have t6 cwithheck with CdF: Staff stated that l ted by Caltrans. Cond t i on B wa bert ski l d she would like staff to Took at th i seareg for Gommissigner L m a SysaciFi<c Plan considering the urban i^r eserve aoo5a the hlg W Y �t was moved by Comini ss i Sher Lambert, seconded. by Comm i ssi ones Lynch, and carried for a- 'recomme►dat i on of a.pp rovai as fo 1 l c -Ws _ ►.� i t-dmenis of CEOA have been pOto l bted and A . F i nc that t'he reg considered �'n m�l<Cno this decision and recomm wed ,h6t the Board of Supervisors adopt a Negative Declamation with mi:igtioh measures and attached•, � w �IIN��G Ggi�'ixS�xOi`i MINL1Ti;b ,� ,���� 13i, ,`l�8'� ' ✓,'� + '�� ,. y :,, 8. Find that the General Plan ,amendment to Commercial complies with site designation criteria set out in the ',Land Usa Element, Circulation El,ement;, and all other elements of the Butte County General Plan, specifically because of the conditions set forth in the Nitrate Action P1 an and because of compatible uses in the neighborhood; and C. Find that a Rezone to C-1 is necessary to implement the new al Plan s ignatin complies neral biltyandconsiJstencyith vbetween Geent renqui'rements ofcompatii Plan designations and zoning districts; and Adopt a Resolution recommending the Board of Supervisors adopt 'a Resolution approving a General Plan Amendment to Commercial on AP 42-14-73 and 1149 and E Recommend the 'Board of Supervisors adopt an Ordinance rezoning to C-1 t,bt property identified as AP 42-14-73 and 42-14-i14;;and F. Recommend the Board of Supervisors adopt a Resolution approving the Agreement <uere. Bolster)-. said conditional rezone agreement will be subject to the following mitigation measures (M)artd-conditions: 1, Owner to ttgn an, agreement to participate in a drainage assessment district when and if the lodal agency ostablishes said district in the future and meet the requirements of the Nitrate Action Plan. 2: Any hew development or ddhVersio'n of the e.tI$;Ahb 'single family residence to be served by Cal Water 3 Both Parcels to be 11mited to one common driveway access easement from N i ghWay 32 at the 'rcommOn prt)perty line; 4. install oUrb, gutter, sidewalk and drainage upon conVersion of the existing single family "structure or development of AP 42-14"114 5. Wonstruct a two-way left turn lane with standard tapers to Department of California Transportation reyuiremetts►,' 64 CohtrIbute a pro rate share to the cost for the new west side fire station fund as detern i rtecby the CCF for commercial zon i n9(!M ) ?. Owher to sl on a covenant runniriO With the land that noise mitigation measures includIhg an 8 ft. masonry sound W611 will: be Ihstalled:as h6de'dsl-be'Y' t6 that development and operation of commercial uses -WI 11 not generrite more than 60 dB at the northwest and southwest property 'lines: CM> uiimm#. c^,iil'YLAAIt�I BUTTE COUNTS PL NG COMMISSION STAFF 'FINDINGS - July 8, 1987 APPLICABLE REGULATIONS: Butte County Code Sections 24-23.8, 24-26, 24-28. Government Code Sections 65860, 65862. COMMENTS RECEIVED: Department of public_ Works: "Development permits may require the installation of urban i ;n,)rovements and sto r i ainage facilities • Caltrans: "Obtain an encroachment permit froth Caltrans and install the following improvements-• 1. Construct a two-way left turn lane with standard tapers,. 2. Install curb, gutter, and sidewalks along the projects frontage. 3 Utilize a common driveway for both parcels. Public Utilities Commission: "We note that 2 at -grade crossiings, West Lindo'Avenue and West 8th Avenue would be affected by any development in the vicinity of Oak Way and State Route 32. Since development plans Are unknown at this time; the staff can not respond specifically. However, because of the numerous train operations to the area, any traffic analysis prepared in the future must evaluate traffic volumes, congestion and delays at these crossings. The accident potential must also be reviewed and impact found to be significant must be eliminated or reduced by proper mitigation measures." Highway State Patrol: "It is suggested that the density of motor vehicle traf a at the site of the rezone and traffic circulation patterns be studied and evaluated in conjunction with any application p g ,. y y a is already heavi travelled and at time'con ested in the vicinity of the rezone. for future develo ment. Ha. 32 in is are ANALYSIS_i Highway 32 a.s a major arterial through the Chieo Urban Area. Over the asingly' congested. Increased traffic volumes J years; it, has become s.ncre on ooll(Ittor streets, and indiv-idual driveways sewing multi=family on: Average daily traffic on Hild1'ftg 32 ise11�1O0 bated to the congestion, g Traffic volumes is one of the zoning factors listed under the Commercial desipati 'g on in the Land Use Element {Page 5"3 Generally speaj�ing, as traffic olumes increase, it becomes mo vre difficult to dsi provide a suitable living environment for low deertYtt moreidesirablesfor Increased traffic volumes do make the plop office and commercial purposes. The i for i commercial uses, 'These are. anon criteria comm General Plan establishes six site design 2 BUTTE COUNTY PL NG COMMISSION • STAFF FINDINGS - July 8, 1987 1. Needed for commercial development within 20 years: 2. Good road accessibility to service area or traveling public. 3. Adjacent or near utilities, walkways and: commercial development. 4. Less than 207 slopes. 5. Adequate. fire and police 6. Adequate waterpPl su and sewageprotection. disposal ca abilities4 y Y g p g The project can be conditioned to comply with all but adequate sewage disposal capabilities. Sewer service is not immediately available. Development will be constrained by sewage flows permitted under the Nitrate Action Plan. Land uses in.the Highway 32 corridor are mixed. South of Sacramento Avenuej lsp of mento Avenue the dominant landuselisrmulticfmily housing,North ahetherarpartment buildings . or multi -single unit structures. Commercial encroachment in this stretch is still evident. The question, therefore, becomes what is the appropriate land use for this corridor. Clearly, it is not suited fay low density residential uses. Ms. George, the property owner) owns approximately 5 acres in three contiguous parcels. A small apartment complex.could be established, provided that community water and sewage was extended,. As part of the Chico Urban Area consistency project, the Planning Commission amended the General Plan designation on the orchard immediately north. It, was revised from Industrial to Commercial with an urban reserve overlay, Controls have been placed on, de�.ielopment to insure that future commercial uses will not generate excessive traffic) safety hazards, and will provide necessary infrastructure improvements. ble conditions of the Urban Reserve overlay and lthat measppureslare implemented) with the Butte the proposal can be coinpatible mitigation - County General Plan. The conditions and Mitigation . measures are necessary, to implement the General Plan's goals and policies regarding orderly growth and circulation. The Public Utilities dbmm'ssion has expressed concerns about at -grade crossings over ra�lro. racks. These sings can pose safety hatar ds for motorists throughout the community. At -grade crossings are a regional problem which should not be addressed ,on a specific project4 RECOMMENDATIONS. A• Rind that the requirements of CtQk have been completed and ng this dec considered in makiision and recommend that the Board of supervisors adopt a Negative Declaration with mitigation measures attached; and B. Find that the General Plan amendment to Commercial complies with criteria set out in the Land Use Element) Crculaesignation ' ation.Element, Arid all other elements of the, Butte County General. Plan, specifically because and 3 f. BUTT: COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF FINDINGS - July C;, Find that a Rezone to C-2 is necessary tc implement the new eht Code General Plan designation and cconsstencyomplies with betweeneGeneral Plan requirements of compatibility and designations and zoning districts; and t a Resolution recommending the Board of Supervisors adopt a D. Adopt a General Plan Amendment to Commercial on AP Resolution approving 42-14-73 and 114:; and. Recommend the Board of Supervisors adopt an Ordinance rezoning tq property identified as AP 42=14-11.4; C-2 that pthe Board of Supervisors adopt a Resolution approving F, Recommend the Agreement (Jere Bolster). Said conditional rezone agreement will be subject to the fallowing mitigation measures (M) and conditions: 1, Ovines to sign an agreement to participate in a drainage assessment district whenandif the local agency establishes said district in the future: g g iy 2• Any erved by Cal Water. new development or conversion of the existin stn 1e am res residence to be parcels to be limited to one common driveway access easement 3, Both ;p ro est line: from Highway 32 at the common p p Y end drainage upon conversion of the 1�, Instar curb; gutters sidetaltc a structure nt of AP 42=14-11.4:. existing single family o me P or Bevel With standard tapers to 5 Gortstruct a two-way left turn lane Department of California Transportation requirements. Contribute a pro rata share to the cost for the new west side fire b, station fund (M) n n a covenant cunni g with the land that noise 74 Owner to sig so that mitigation de ices a wino. beih§tAcommetciald uses willnotgenerate develapment and open (M) more than 60 at at the northwest and gbUthwe"st property lines; All structutes shall be, locate a minimum of 2�i feet from the '84 of highway 32, southwest tight-of�way 9: Dxterior light ing shall lie shidlded Froin "q 904y 32. 4 �.. a " CHICO AREA LAND USE PLAN 32 corridor provides both opportunities and constraints to development The Highway of frontage properties. Approximately 50 acres now in orchard are slated for commercial development. In and policies regarding orderly growth` order to implement the General Plan's goals following policies apply to all development proposals. and circulation, the 1. A11 properties on thanortheas side of Highway 32 between Lindo Channel and be as an urban reserve. 660 ft. north of East Eighth shall, managed 2: Permitted uses under the urban reserve include 1 d.u./10 acres, agricultural uses permitted by the A-10 tonin g district. y operations and accessory proposal to ramve the urban reserve designation shall be coordinated with s Any prop drainage and fire hydrants. of community water, sewer extension , 4. Circulation: _ Parcels 42-14-17, -7$ shall take access from Undo Avenue. ao Y y 42-14=95, -103, -104, shallbe allowed one access each ontt� Highway adv b Parcels , 32: I; Along Highway 32, a 1 ft, no_access strip shall be deeded to Butte County, j; with the exception of approved encroachments. Subdivision of.the parcels shalt' 6e coordinated with construction of $ d,- g p ed "access points « frontage road �etweerl a prov e bdvelopment shall contribute its fair share (as determined by the Director enue the Hireali 32/Sacramentoornal of Public Works) towards improvement of zation includes widening. 8 intersection: Improvement be located a minimum of 25 ft from the northeast right=of-uay 5. All structures shall � cif Highway 32 6,, Lighting shall be shielded from H ghvay 32: following high traffic generators are specifically prohibited _n this 7. the area: j ao gasoline stations Pa'st�-food operations (docs not include delicatessens, cafes or restaurants). b: a c: Dry, Gleanersi d: gAnks, e: Coln laundries. { to contribute fair share to Westside Fite Station improvement 8. DeVelo meet p fund for establishment of a h`t4 fire stations �1! for zoning within the city. Such zoning shall become effective at the same time that the annexation becomes effective. Pursuant to Section 54790, those cities subject to such provision shall completeprezoning proceedings as required bylaw. If a city has not prezoned territory which is annexed, it may adopt an interim ordinance in accordance with the provisions of vection 65858.: (Amended by Stats.' 1980, Ch. 11320. vzoning consistency, 65860. (a) County or city zoning ordinances ,OkhMgenera1­plaw shall be consistent with the general plan of the county or city by January 1 1974, A_zoning ordinance shall be consistent with a city or county general plan only if (i) the city or county has officially adlopted' such a plan, and (ii) the various land uses authorized by the ordinance are compatible with the objectives, policies, general land; uses, and programs specified in such a 'plan. (b) Any resident or property owner, within a City or a county, as the, case may be, may bring.:`.' - an action in the superior court to enforce compliance, with the provisions of subdivision (a). Any such action or proceedings shall be governed by Chapter 2 (cammencing with Section 1084) of Title 1 of Part 3 of the Code of civil Procedure. Any acti.6n or proceedings taken t r: pursuant to the provisions of this subdivision shah be taken within 90 &ys of the enactment of any 1104 zoning ordinance -o; the amendment of any existing zoning ordinance as to said amendment or amendments. (c) In the he, ev..ent than a toning ordinance becomes nconsistent with a general plan by reason of amendment to such a plan, or to any e1w� wF.7t of such a plan, :§uch zoning ordinance shall be annrnded within a iceasonable time so that it is consiztent with the general plan as amended. (d) Notwithstanding Section 65803, this section shall apply in a charter city of 2,000,000 or more population to a zoning ordinance adopted prior to January 1, 1979, which toning ordinance shall be consistent With the general plan of such cityy July 1, 1982. (Amended by Stats. 19791 Ch. 304.) Procedure without 65861. When there ih no city planning commission c►i ssiony the legislative body of such city shall do all things require- or authorized IV this Chapter of the city planning commission, (Added by Stats. 1965, Ch. 1880.) {{ r�earirlgs for 65862. Men inconsistency between the general 1 inconsistency of plan and toning arises as a result of adoption of -106 •,_ $�aral�pl anc` r. oamendment to a general plan, or any element hearings held pursuant to Section 65854 za�inq. th-reof , or 65856 for the purpose of bringing `zoning into consistency with the general plan; as required by Section 65860, may be held at the same time as hearings held for the purpose of adopting or amending a general plan, or any element thereof, However, the hearing on the general plan at the discretion of the local: amendment may, agency, be concluded prior to any consideration of adoption of a zoning change. It is the intent of tide Legislature, i,n enacting this section, that local agencies hall, to the extent possible, concurrently process - applications for general plan amendments and are needed to permit zoning changes which develtopment so as to expedite processing of such applications. (Repealed and added by Stats. 1980, Ch. 1152.) Notice to assessor 65863.5. Whenever the zoning cowering a ope' is changed from one zone to another ora p y zoning variance or conditional use permit is g _ rt the :granted with respect to any Pro a P shall:, governing body of the city or county, of y y assessor within 30 days, motif the count such action. Notwithstanding Section 65803, this section y shall apply to charter, cities. Stats. 19801 Ch., 4111 Effective (Amended by Garth limitation July 11, 1980.) 65863.6. in carrying out the provisions of shalt cbnsi ;er 01 1:ance -findings. thin chapter, each count; .and city the effect of ordinances adopted pursuant to this chapter on the housing needs of the region in which the local jurisdiction is situated and balance these needs against the public service needs of its residents andavailable fiscal and Any ordinance adopted environmental resoUrces. pursuant to this chapter which, by its terms, limits the number of housing units which may be contain constructed on an annual basis shall findings_ as to the public health safety t. and welfare of the city or county to be promoted by adoptiono£ the ordinance which justify- the reducing the housing opportunities of the region. (Amended by Stats. 1981, Ch. 714.) proposed mobilehoar 65863.7, (a) Prior to the convers'h of a rsuant to another usej except pursuant park conversions mobilehome park to the Sukidivis`ion Map Act (Divis,ori 2 (commencing with Section 66410) of Title 1)1 or 'or prior to closure o£ a inobilehome park atioh o£� A mob*le��ome use o£ the land as. entity propbsi'ng the park, the person or char ,.n u`se shall file a report on the impact i i07 11 n All 1'I:NIy'CX h liNUT Rt)NNI1.NTA1. CII CXL'1-'r FORM( rnij�lrtc' by%f,ear Ag ney! 1,0g H 87-03-13-02 Ap # 42-14-73,`114 Eile 110. 87-38A r B Name tib' plopl)lwnt DERE Qk-PTER r� �u--�---- rFstntirtl�"e (ifi pplirable) Addrees or proponent ailcl rcp Jere Bolster . Avenue ._ 1503 Manzana.t±a _ Chico:; CA 959.26 Plan Amendment & Rezone--•.. - G eral •- + ' =rt kl��w;crapt�c�ii ei?,�.�.,..._�...�.y....�_., ti. 1 rts�c YIiS Tl O �Y131 yT 1A� 1.T �yL T r x tirN11�TC:,1�CI: aotent i.ta'1 to degrade the : Ili 1 ronmcrnt , subs t,antial . recluse ii, llcae4 tltr pt`rtic�rl ;haaa•c: the 1 ,� muse a �lttal>t1' taf tltx self - the haabitait til .t 'li iho I'latitinittitdlopptiClow�self- ti Or i� hill i 1 r �ici1 t1 iw.taiinlOS thre t�inri�level, itc^lre�luecttl;+wen ttirtmbeinlartrestrictttlie unimil t Or endxnered faixnt at` anintl or i,ange til a rar�j , . r a eriCicl ; t�liman•atc° iinport:int exaiwr t of the nnj�ric p v cit' t"alil'uiniat history _a.` rehistclry7 �n. rii;ect have the ltcitential to achieve 1's. Y,1tac.5 the f~ � term, ;bort-term b(.ne lts. sttc�! t�l erttt impact non the t•nvirenmental l •nv Y rollment i s` timecurs in a lens -term "pactsewill brief' timed ul u_. >ri ure into the f`uturcr r ► acts which a.re individu- t,„d C r Doe IS the project have.,. ilrwp €ally T lmited, but ru.mulatively� cons icle�ra%1.e7 � CIV prr5leCt Ina igrip at=t on tltiro or more separate resr,urees where the 101 It the effectce isrr�f�the�totalaorvtha,se small, hilt t t" impacts on t1IC' ellviron� ont { ; ihni r c aitit 11 1. litre thr paotc'c.t 11'caviiva.onmvll,fcwt, oil xt�ln�Xcli # ;tth5t�ant i,a rse e mill 4tarsc r or Indirectly! i)tslnl;sa trither dirr� tly 1 T i r lif .'l'1 ppt� !ill 1 Its C'' a� b� c:cir€pl steel by t17tr lead Ai;r'nr+y'1 p proposed tli tilt hC' h;a�is t+i tlta initiv°'l eval'rasttic�]at +ia tittYfriC.tnt e('l`oct incl a 13Y:Car\�"1Vt: t1ticLAIIATION will iie preprtred, 7�'ttiYi (l rN 'projectClllilrSl NCl'I '}ttive~ a �i� s. crn the onv i ronment , that althcul;}1 flag lytrupri;r d project could Ylyl�nllirKi�it�tl tY l,/W1i Tin+1 th there will not bt: 'a Cant e 1 f e t on tVic� environm ni , „' °�Tt(Tf bWWSU12ti`l' cle ;�'r abed 'C�lr e t ret~t ill this c.a tc; l�eetica�,c the 1"1T 1 i i,s YIr:C:I.c,ttcced to the lyios ect. A 11fid %beet hive,be the ;ttaci�lllact ed AT�flv �fri�n'rlvl=; i1nirir:atnt �'C"f`oc:t do I'1tit: l'Iitd, flab Yarnpcisc*ti Project MAY have ti C� b ,--� rna�rlt : laud an I:N�L 1 ftUtii`tl`:1�'C"F�l. C1<li'ACT. ►tl.l'�llri' is 4rcxilCii I'trci r.N the Unv a� rtiia i �, Ytf.l AIrIM 1.4 19 87 c't�lf t1T Y 0t: rl LlU`t ,- t�yr t;e pannex e A8 k.iVi,t ti by t Yk�"11'a IV: ENVIRON•MENTrI ACTS't�y es►, and '"maybe" answers are required o a ra_n_at:Lons . xpL attached sheet(s)) Y„, S MAYBE NO on 1 EARTH. Will the proposal result in significant: conditions or in changes in X a. Unstable: earth geologic subs b. Disruptions, displacements, com act` » overcovering of the soil? Change in topography or ground surface c.. relief features? d, cowering or modification of any Destruction, sical features? eino indQp erosion• of soils, e, `Increasgeologic or water --- either on or off-site? f. Changes in deposition or.exosion of.beach in deposition _ sands, or changes siltation, which may modify -the channel of OT erose on river or sere-am or theybed.af the ocean of x a t or• lake? Loss be of inlerime•.agriculturall productive soils p g L outside designated urban areas! of people or property.to geologic h Exp osure hazards such as earthquakes, landslides mud hazards? slides, ground failure or similar 2, AIR. Will the proposal result in substantials or deterioration of ambient » a. Air emissions air quality? b, The creation of objectionable odors, smoke or fumes?. c: Alteration of air movement, moisture, or change in climate,. temperature-, or any locally or regionally? borantial 3, 1+TA„ TEII� jv'll the proposal he 4uxseIft a, of waters chandt in movements in either - direction marine or ;Fresh waters? atterns,, in absorption. rates, drainage b, Changes or the rate and amount of surface runoff? su��a�onrremoval.,mchannel- o. Need for off-site mes$ including veg m ization or culvert i:nstailat on? to, the course or flow of flood terations waters' e. Charkge in the amount of _sur rtace water in any water body?,or in. any f, Discharge into surfaceWaters, qualiincluding 'ty� alteration of surface water but not l ' Mited to temperature, ” disso3.ved - . b Cvg�ri or turbiait ? y= f flaw Alteration of the d.rect on or rate o g . Of ground waters 7 ro�incl waters, in the tluant� ty or quality bf ,tf e h. bhang; or with= either through direct additions or through'intereeptior of an drawals, agtti fe r by cuts o r 'e tc a at i ons'? :---, in the amount Isteuppl*Eerwise i� deduction t a a� fable `dor pplo orw propertywater _ o�. roperty to t;�posure of people related hazards such as f1OO WIN YES MAYBE NO 13 TRANspoRTATION/CIRCULATION. Will the proposal, a.Generation of substantial additional vehicle ; movement" ---- b: Effects on existing parking facilities or demand for new parking? c, Substantia.. impact on existing transporta;:,on systems? d. Significant alte.ations to present patterns of circulation or movement ofea le and/ori p p goods? e. Altrations to waterborne rail or air traffIc? # f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians NES. r 14� PUBLIC SERVICES,Will the proposal have an effiwct or result is a need for" new -or altered governmental services; a., pare protection? — b, police protection" c. Schools?' recreational fac'li.tles d„ parks or other ? --- e, Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? f. Other governmental services?. -�-:;- 15. ENERGy,. {Pill the proposal result in; Use of substantial amounts of fuel .or ene�'g? a. b, Substansourcestoflincrease - opmerat energY,Orlre�uireatheodevelopmOr - -` of new sources of energy,- lb. UTYLTTiES, Will the proposal result in a need for nety Systems, or substantial alterations to the following a. Power or natural gas? b.. Communication$ systems? c. water availability, JL d. Sewer or septic tankl e. $tort water drainages, f. Solid waste and: disposal? 17. 14MLkN:.NEALTH. Will: the proposal result in« Of any health hazard Or. potential a. C17eatYon health hazard (e%cluding mental health)? of People topOtential health b, Exposur z? haards 18. AE5`,rHETICS. Will the proposal result in the to 'oEt tructlon of a#ry 'weft c 'sista Or VidW Open in the ti1ep ublic, Or will the proposal result site open creation nest heticall)r offensive tonof a t%, public vidn U4 S YES' MAYBE. NO 19. RECREATION. N. (Kill the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? 20. CUL' -'URAL R)ISOURCES; a. W111 t e proposal result in the alteration of or the destruction of a prehistoric or historic archaeological site? b. Will the proposal result in adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prohistor,c:or historic buildings structure or object? c, Does the proposal have the potential to cause a Physical change which would affect unique eethniccultural.valtes' d. Will the proposal restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? , V. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL'EVALUATION File No. 87-38A & 8 see attached , is ' YES MAYBE NO 4 . PLANTLITE, Willresult nsubstantial:: a. n�in species, or number of any species of plants (including "gees, shrubs, grass, crops , and aquatic plants) ? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? c. Ir, eduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenish- ment of existing species? d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? 5. ANIMAL LIVE. Will the proposal result in. substantial:' a. Grange in the dive rsity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shell fish, benthic organisms or insects)? b. Reduction in the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals9 C. introduction of neer species of animals into an area, or result in a: barrier, t I ;he migration: ormovementof animals? d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife.' habitat? 6. NOISE. Will the proposal result in substantial, r� a. Increases in e:cisting noise levels? p people b. ExosUre of to severe noise levels? 7. LIGHT AND GLARE. Will the proposal produce significant light and glare?- 8. LAND USE, Will the proposal result in a s"Bstai tial alt0ration of the present or planned land use of an area'? 9. NATURAL RESOURCES: Will the proposal result in substantial; a, Increase in the 'rate of use of any'natural re.�o�.�rce5? b. Depletion of .any non-tenewable,natural resources? 10. RTS OVUP8M Will the proposal involve: Ai Xplosion or the release of hazard- ous substances (including, but not limited to, Oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? b. Possible interference with an emergency "— response plan or emergency evacuation plan? �. ll, POPULATE, Will the proposal alter, the location, istra utlnn, density, or growth rate of the human population? 12, HOUSING, Will theproposal affect existing hog: usin, off` c�l0 to a demand for additional housing? , UISCLJSSION,Or ENVIR NMENTAL. EVALUATION FILE NO. 87-38A and B Pro iect LSr i p t ion General Plan Amendment from Medium Density Residential to Gommerc i a l on a acreslocated to the west of l -i i ghway .32. l he project ar a is In two distinct parcels,one of 'which Is already zoned 't:--2 1'he other parcel Is zoned S -R and w i l l requ 1 re a Rezone to C72 pr 101' to commercial developmert,. Discussion of Checklist I ems lb: The property is currently developed with one single-family house and an _orchard Convers ori to commercial use Is expected to disrupt and overccver the majority of the soli surface. 1 a So l 1 s on site are of the t-arwel 'l Loam Series, which has 1 slight .erosion potential Erosion is only of'concern if drainage Iv not Properly acKcommodated and runoff is generated onto adjoining properties: 28: Use of the properties for commercial activity, can generate two different kinds of air pollution impact, point and nonpoint. point sourcds include repair garages, paint shops and some food establishments IJc,npoint sources Include vehicle emissions, point sources shall mee`s the Yiequirements of- the Air Pollution Control District at the time of building permit issuance (gonpoint sources can only be contro'll'ed at the regionai or :national 'level. .9b, c, 1 Se : Construction of a new commercial building on property now pland development of parking lots will generate a sign ti f' i f anted In �damountaof storm water runoff. There are no community drainage facilities in the vicinity nor any community service areas p fsacilitieDrainage will have to be provided on s1te, Dralhaoe�trenches are one means to Provi'do a temporary solution to drainage. the ultimate solution would be to tie into areawlde facilities. Development on site will heed to meet the requirements of the Nitrate Action P"Iah. wh1ch w1 I1 Include sIOr' iMG an agreement to 081-t1clpate In future drainage districts: aho16de Wells in the vio,Inity of Oak Way have been tested by the Itr6t6s. l Water NItrateQuality l'eveIt in�theserweIIs havefound exceededcontaminated 60 m iIIIgramswith nitrate per Iiter j far In excess 0 the federaI standard of 46 M1.1i,grams Per liter. 141tr6tes pose a serious health hazard to infants� ph'egnant women and the e I deaf y: l`he pr i ltlat°`Y danger' from dr i nig i ng waver 0ohtb,min4ted with nitrates is the haat that the nitrates limit the oxygen absorption capaditY Of red b1obd celis CalIf�rm1a Water ervice DampanY lines should be extended. r�r If California Water Service Company lines are not extended, there Is a potential to eXpose future tenants of the Property to health hazards. 4at VeOetat)OM On site includes an aid orchard on the northerly Parcel and urban landscaping at the hoMesite. Trees will need to be k-emoved Pr'lOr to development. Since the habitat on site not natural, this impact Is not significant. Is man made, 4d: A 1 -acre orchard will be converted to urban use. This Impact was fully addressed In the,Chi�co Urban Area Land Use Plan Environmental Impact Report, 1q82. Conversion Of ag"icultural solls to alternative uses is unavoidable Within the urban area. '5dt Surrounding development to the West or Highway 32 hasMPromised the wildlife value of these properties. Further, development these properttes will have no measurable Chico Urban Area, tmPact on wildlife habitat In the 6ajb. The C-2 zoning district allows a number Of uses such as Cocktail lounobss bowling alleys and r'ePair oar6ges, which may generate excessive noise levels. Absolute noise and peak noise levels are one factor to consider In making a no second factor Is the duratio noise impact assessment. A M of the oolse) and the time at Which It ,occurs. More benign COMMOrclat uses,, Including an equipment rental shop or retail store, May generate objectionable noise Only because they are Open for longi I periods of time and may generate high I ib f,f Ia., oVels, of, tr 9109le-family and m(.4tti-family residential uses are located to the north and West. A 'buffer, should be developed betWeea th and residential lots so that noise . exposure Is e. commercial redutod., A noise buffer may include a solid Masonry or stucco wall or a large landscaped berm. 7a6 Exterior s Properties, ecuf�'Iby 1 1 ght 1" may sP *1 Il Over onto adjacent As noise and I I ohb I eve"i sIn a neighborhood I ncreate More reqUOstt are Made for, changes in land use designations 8: The present, 18Md,use Is a single -f8 orchard. The Gener-al FlanMIIY resIdehce and I -acre designates these Proporties 4� density residential uses. Tor Medium pe.,he at 01)0c -t Is a General Plan Amendment arid 'Nozono to a'l'low commercial Uses On Sit -be The General r l=lomeht Identifies siri x site desigatibr-t triter Ia Plan Land Use for, cons idbiration In a Cdmmerajal General Plan Amendffieht. Ihose are, Needed for comma development Wthi "rl 210 years.. Good road access I b 11 1 -by to tery I ce area or travel nO public,' ubIIc, Adjacent to or ho6r U7-Il)tI1as,, Walkways and commerc�jl development, 4. Lett than 209 slopes 5. Adequate Lire on r- police protect fon: b. Adequate water supply and sewage disposal capabilities. Lonversion of this land to commercial uses would not comply with site designation criteria 3 and bo Criteria 2 and 5 can be met through project design. Specificallyt safe access by means of providing a lett-turn pocket and approved driveway approach will be necessary, See Item 13 for traffic comments, and Item '14 for fire comments. 12: SinGIe-+amIly residentla ' I uses are located to the nortNtost and southwest of the project site: These adjoining residences may be negatively impacted If both parcels develop with commercial Uses. Impacts to neighbors Include Increased traffic) nolso, glare and genet -at activity generated by the project. IS. Since the develooment plans are not known for this property, traffic est I mates neit� to be Made from the range of uses permitted In the C-2 zoning district. After excluding those uses which have a high water demand (re8taurants, fast-food estabi Ishmentz) health cl loics and 'hotels), permitted use,-; are estimated to generate' between 417 and 1y573 vehicle trips per day. A typical office would generate 417 trips, while a shopping area would generate 1500 trips Pee' day. The State Highway Patt-ol has expressed a concern with the traffic which may be generated by the project. t'hey request that traftic circulation patterns be studied and evaluated in' conjunction with any future development on the property. they note that the corridor Is, heavily traybTed and at times congested. 13b, Opf-street parking will need to be provided at a ratlo of one space per 200 square feet for retail uses and one space per 300 SqUat-O feet for professional offices, Other parking standards are found in butte County Code Section 24-86, l3cift Additional traffic generated by this property onto the Highway 82 corridor could geoee-btO significant traffic safety problems. At the very mlnitnum, the applicant should contldor the installation of common dt�lveWbY,, JiE§ft-tur n pocket or'left-turn lane and approved driveway -Appt,,oach. Specific cond I ti ons of approval will be at the discretion of Cb!TraOsi which has Jurlsd,lctIon over the State Highway, If the State ldent lfle-i; a heed for other improvements or traffic t Ign8l s through the corridor, the aPP I 106ht thA 1 1 tontr I bute a Pro 114a F Ire protect Ion 18pr�-ov I ded by the Gb I I f oro I a 000artMO]ht of Forestry. thoy do not now operate iEA station West of the railroad trodks,- redeVal ouldel Ines, allow a train to block an Intersection in --xc(§8g of 'H5 mlMutes, Hooevor") a standard structure can be engulfed in as few as 8 mlhutes4 The lack of fire protection Ill'the West Chico Area Is iSOVOrea In order to address this problem, Lbrr has r6quiested, a pro rata cohtribut ido from oil developers 1oc8ted west of The, EtpJbh6dd, F'rbvl8lon Of COMIOUnItY Water and hydrants WOU'ld also serve to offset fire -rd ibted lmptcts, 'l4boe: Development and occupancy of iahis property Wlll resent in increased calls for police protection and demands for road maintenance. Because this property is within the urban area', albeit. on Its fringes, this impact; is not considered significant, ,isic: Construction will be subject to school improvement fees. 16d6 Individual septic systems have been proposed to serve development on these Tots. Use of septic systems will be subject to l of the ental nt trequihe of the Nitrate rnHealth ActiionPlan* DeSewagewillnbethimited to 1,00o gallons per acre per day. High-water land uses will not be permitted on septic tanks under the Nitrate Action Plan. Uses which may be consideredinclude retail and genera) offices. 17b The Regional Water Cuallty Control Board has tested wells In ` not the area and found them to be contaminated with nitrates. By extending California Water Service Company lines$ future tenants and ,. occupants of the property will be exposed to potential health hazard's. 20a: A records search will be required from Chico State University to determine whether or not an archaeological survey should be prepared. The appilcatt should contact the University directly at the address included in the cover letter and request that a copy of the results be sent to the County Planning Department, T1t MANDATARY FT'NDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE r; There is a w111 Potential refuir-izdp'otdeterm1neewhetherlornotaSurvey resources. records ;search w l 1 q shall be prYepared. r 1 Pp' ulster, Assessor's Parcel A5� Applicant.' i cant= Jere B 42-111-73,114 Log it 87_03-13-02 File No. 87-38A and 8 DATA -'SHEET A. Pro"iect Descr �,t i on 1. Type of Project= General Plan Amendment and Rezone. 2. Br l of G escr i pt i on ` General Plan Amendment from Medium Density Residential to Commercial on 2 acres and Rezone from S -R ( Suburban -Res i dent i a1) to C-2 ('General iCommerc i al') on 1.06 acre. B. Location. On the southwest side of Highway 32 approximately 200 feet north of Oak Way, Chico. 4. Proposed Density of Development. Urban 5. Amount of Impervious Surfacing- Low percentages. 6. Access and Nearest Public Road(s)" Frontage on Highway 32. s'. Method of Sewage: Disposal-. Septic tank proposed 8. Source of Water Supply- California Water Service Company (7), la diinos" On site. 10. Potential for further land. divisions and. development." Extensivea` B. Environmental Setting Phy-sleal'Environment- 1. Terra i n a. Genera l "i'opograph I t: Ci yaracter. Level va l 1 ey 1 and : c. Elevation: A approximately 173 feet a.;-ove Sea Level, d. Limitine'Factors None. 2. Soils a. Types and Characteristics Farwell Loam, 1"S feet, granular, frlable retains moisture we! I, subsoil to +5 feew, level and smooth surrfacey good surface and subsurface drainage, well suited to agriculture= Limitingb. 3 Natural Nazardscofrthe None Land � 64 Earthquake Zone. hloderate; b. Erosion Potential «' Slight, c.-4ands1lde Potential 'None. d. Fire Hatood. Undlassifled e. ExpansiVe Soi'i Potential Moderate 4, HydroldoY a. Surface Water= None In iinurediate vicinity, bw Groundwater' Area 6f heavy 'i^ouridwater 'wI tl�drawal , nitrste concern. c. ural nage Characteristics. Outside of Urban drainage district; _10,, d. Annual Rainfall (normal) 22-24". e Limiting Factors Lack of drainage 5. Visual/Scenic Guality Urban, 6. Acoustic Quality: ! or. 7. Air Quality Fair to poor. Biological Environment: a., Vegetation: Urban ornamentais on AP 42-14-73, old orchard on Air 42-14-4114. 9. W! 1dlife Habitat: Limited by development in area. Cultural Environment: 10. Archaeological and Historical Resources in the area'; Records search, -.requ l red . 11. Butte County General Plan designation Medium Denslty Residential. 12„ Existing Zoning: C-2, S-R. 13 � Existing L:-and Use on-site: Onearce l vacant, cine parcel l P developed with single -family residence. 14 8urroundin9;Area: .a Lanai Uses. North: orchards. Northeast: res i dtht i a i and commercial. East: commercial, South: vacant West; residential b. Zoning: C-20 S-R, A"10, M-2« C. Ben. Plan designations.- Medium Density Residential, commercial, "Low tens i ty Residential, d. Parcel Sizes: 69500 .sq.. .ft. to 10 acres. 6. Popul at i on Medium densities= 15 Character of, SIto and Area= Urbil3n i zed t jrr l dor a Toho Highway 82 16. Nearest Urban Area: Chico 17 Relevant Spheres of Influence= CsA #24.4 City 'af Chico 18. Improve'ments' Standards Urban Area. Pull improvements required. 1 9,w Fire Protection Service 64 Nearest County ( State) r i re S :at i on : 444> 8-1/2 tiles south; 442, 3+ miles 'east, b. Water Availability: Engine capacity, hydrants 20Schools in Area.- Chico Uo i f ► ed School 'b i str i ct -1Y i ,v eY ' AKS V i' 1+ the proluct t-4 cundltionod tp M16 t the tuqutrnmencw sdC Nro ,Lit 1n the; Nltrota Ai tlo3e Plntr+ .s 'the irojuc::: tri 11 alIdu land uses vhitji are ecrmpatible frith surrowmtling development patterns along .Nigh ay 32. w' r; ,',� �.° ",;i« a • " 3. P.esidwitial-use$ to 'thtt s00thuest:vi11 bo ptOLrttod ftort cxcussi�e noise lovels by noise t,iOpti'on measures uttauhGd to the rezone lmplotmziting the Coneral Flan Amen&ent. 6•. The prajeCt site' has d,fraaC iaqcgnss to 414way 32, magyar artatialt And '}{ERS'+ the Butte ' CoUrity do`ard of Supervisors find tN o,7i"i wvmxl ptoposed winendment os shot{i an Eiihlbit $-1, tomlles tri"th X11 hlameht�," of this Rutto county generat plan and Comprises an overall internally �'tonsi��tent trNtSle, sp�citiGaliy: i� fihe p>u�ett complies ulth the On;licies of the sand'Use' i lilnmupG and the Housing Eie:#4t as.apglxcd to existing davelepment, a r 2.: the Viand i>1r' its p'resgnt statC, is no sUikblc fac `�du+ Ge1� �•a ;��i agttcul"tural _xbsidential tJs;e. The.pcojact 's4 L 01 ha# 8ixec't Aeces to Ee1I,Bldge Road, a designated roliectar. i hOH THEE ORE BS:i 'RE50LV Eiltatt Bt .. h the arti__:Rf isupervlsoxj�;_ _ - doe0l hdraby'l adopt ands ceitifw the 'Negative Dat.jatarfons fbc -Ne _detterrdi plate Aracndmenth pursuant to, the dailforhia Envirttiutenpal Quality Aat. k NOIR-„ TliOl1NRC st it Pftt}[ER: RtOMD that the land use designation chap tx 61 ah& v frvLi Meci , from Agl`loultutal Residential to Lou bctl`sity Rasldehbial for thosd. 'aret,h identiiod inn Exhibit 4=1 andaLtaehed hiskeo and sheaf atated i rR"thence and Eideab ado EI d a I d a"' n ed K t and i rV the p �Y �` 1? - U Rp by h. of Supetvisorn' of Lhil CtYutity of Rptte as an ,actelidrtoot to tha butte- t.��,*,.p' r K{' '� .' k' � is Cnunty enera1 s. An [.find Use kiemenf,t g.hid :4melidtickit to be tN.e 1 'nd Usa pblle y+';fer the UoUnkY pf iitiiCEe° i't tila aEt'abted'..ar, for all f '.ndings mfgoAnt Lb 14. i bE tfi YUbtRPR Pl W, vED That puauantto �ntt1'dfrih,ej7t Gage �lruetldti'� 01 Ai ' Lha G'+okier.11 -"Ylah of the uhty ��if butte is eh�lf�tsbd to + shot+ L b the abad a" d6d s . . b. t an n nt e_. bael � , h e �ip�sroudd b� the i�jaatd of +�`uhdttilserh. r � _ i ASM Fs+ Ir _ i t A I I 1 t ' � ` 3 'JAS r gut„1t , Board zaF au �x .. a , G t'4 x � .. bn the 1 L day or s,ept,. W 110drF by tied to!tow[irg votVr xym' : Supp-rV150'rs dui;ori, tdc inturf1. 1442aughligt Vercruse andi Chair Doi an.. A NoBss iJ+ tie , , SEINIT' ;td ne V F, +a"i' t' 117T C.t3: ifglyP ✓ Butte County Board 6 BUpe.rv;is8rs d I w � Chief inYnitYtrawiv� h'iXESTi MAvlv J, NrCNOt5 M pp ,yrs I r r , 'Z%f rt i SMC W ri yNhq 1. i { l � y I I r 2 I tf" i 1 I i I I i � I I r r ACTS :" answers are require 1,4 ENvjgoN�tE`TAL ,,o)eS'► and "maybe tonxp nasoi attached sheet(S)) YES btAYt NO EARTH . Will the 'proposal result in significant: conditions or in changes in a.'— Unstable earth geologic substructures? displacements, compaction or b. Disruptions, O,, er,covering, of the soil? in topography or ground surface e C. Chang ..�.�. relief features? or madificatinn of any caverznh d Destruction, sisal features? unique geologic or physical —"" erosion of souls, e, Increase in ,wind or water off-site? either on or f beach. f, Changes'in deposition or•erosion oosition in siLtatithe sands, or changes channel of which may modify Or eros do the ocean or a river or stream or the-.bed .of any bay, inlet or ,.ake.. . agriculturally productive 'soils r ! Loss of prime $� outs-ide designated urban areas, or geologic . . osure of people property,to `h Exp hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, muds hazards? - slides, g or similar . � round failure �--. L. AIR. Will the proposal result in substantial: or deterioration of ambient a. Air emissions .___.. air quality. h,: The creation of objection able odors, smoke or fumes?moisture, or, c; Alteration of air mochange �in climate,. temperature, or any regionally? locally. or 3. WATER. W.ili the proposal result in substantial: the course or a, Changes in currents, or direction of ~Mater movements in either i marine or, fresh waters? drainage patterns, b. Changes in absorption rates, citnoff? - or the rate and amount of surface C. Need for surface drainage improve- removal, channel- including vdgetation meets, including. culvert installation? �---' itatior or d Aiterations to the course o r flow of flood waters? e. Change in the amount of surface water i'n any water body?anV f, Discharge into surface maters, or in, including alteration of surface ��er-tuatot realdissolv'ed 1-mi to temp but not e direction or rate of flow oxygen or tof the of t .. AlteratYon .._.-. ou n fheers?gcaant tyor qua1'.by ofycjrourd haters; �.%. h. Chaground either through d�.rpct additions or with- interception of an or through a awals, _ ackrifar by cuts or exeavAtions? of mater otherwise Reduction an the amount i. public t,tate:r supplies # for p avai1ablc ty t 0,water J. t;x�ir�strrr, of pco171c c�' proper fysard.q suolt as t'loody ng7 rt' les t L' YES NO a. pL�NT LIFE. Mill the proposal result in substantial: of species, o.° number a< x ange in the diversity of any speox�=s ai plants (including trees, _- rays, crops, and aquatic plants)? shrubs, S of any unique, rare the numbe b , Rec:uc :ion o<f or endangered ,;pecies cif plants? of plants into an c: Introduction or" new species barrier to the normal replenish- Y area, or in a ment of existin- species? ricultural crop?� of any ag �M SI d. Reduction in, acreage S, ANI2^iAL IL l5'ill `+:he proposal result in substantial: NIMAI diversity of species, or numbers age in the of any species of animals (bi'rds,'land animals fish includi.rxg reptiles, fish and she11 insects)? be: ;►rganisns or in the numbers o£ any unique, rare v h. Reduction or endangered species of arinals? ---- of a�:o animals, —P.- C. ntroductiTniesultof ��npaCbarreries migration a an area, o or moveraent of _animals? ting fish or'' wi ldlife d.. Deterioration to exis.r� habitat? 6. NOXSE. Ijill the proposal restit ih substantial! levels? a;—Tncreases in e-isting noise exposure of peOple to severe noise lE'ets? JLe b, LTGH'� AND GLr�RE j jjndl theProposaln rodeo � -- ? . lgn; scant lig t a g 8. Ocal the ton of he present or planned LAND u�� � lj��Itera�i u stantia land use of an area? U 'RCES Ni7:l the prodos a1 result in NA T�FSAt7 NATURAL, 9. su stant�al: in the rate of use of any natural a. Increase resources? ewable; naral non-rentu b. Depletion of %.�7y .._.- y resources? 1C1.. RISK QF UpS�T, jY 7l the proposal involve`, A� r�' 1st o explosit�n orthe eriot limited to; a; butre ous ubst.anres (includ g► cher6icals or radiation) in the oil,. pristicides, ins 2 an at or upset conditi event of b, possible interference with en emergon;cy evacuation plan? r response plan or emergency the t�roposal alter the location; IAT 1014, {°.ill , gtOWth r-ate o the 'Iumar� uistri itron dons' or _. popu� riti�sn? pro affect existing housing, I-rill the p p c�sal 12 Hc�t�S14G. demand for addlt,iotial housing _ . or cro,:ite a YES MAYBE NO 13. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Will the proposal result in a. Goneration of substzatial additional vehicle movement? b. Effects on oxisting parking facilities, or demand for new parking? c. Substantial impact on existing tr�-:,sportation systems. X r� d. Significant Significant alterations to present pattern of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? ' f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles ,. bicyclists or pedestrians? 14:, PUBLIC SERVICES. 1411 the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for' new or altered governmental services: a.. Fire protection'? b. Police protection?� c. Schools? d.Parks or other recreational facilities? e. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? f. Other governmental, ,services? 1.5. ENERGY, ?.'ill the proposal result in: a Use of substantial amounts of £uel.or energy? b. Substantial' increase in demand upon existing ._�.. sources of energy, or require the development of new :sources of energy? lo. UTILITIES. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or substantial alterations to the following. - ollowing:a a. Power or natural gas? b. Communications systems'? C. Water a:vailabiiityi d Seaver or septic tank? o. Storm water drainage? f. Solari waste and disposal? 4- 17. HUW.N HEALTH. Will the proposal result in: a: Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (exdJuding mental health)? br xposut`e of people try potential health hazards? 18 AESTHETICS. Will the proposal result in the olitru nor any scenic vista o r view' open *,n the publlt ;or will the proposal result in tho' rreati.ott of an aesthetittilly offensive site open to public vow? 4 Ir.` `fid NO YpS MA1 }3E the prppnsal resuJ t in' an i Wi, ll lg EtFCREAT'IO Y Y7 eereaonal qlt or nuantt of exist3n ti. u. upo;n'th oppo rtuni'ties? , 20.: CULTURAL RES'OURGES. °e' alteratlon t e proposal; result the • , a, i11 of ^r the delstruction'of a pre l `iStoric or his'toricl'. archaeol'oiical site? al ilp ro osal. result in advexse 'phys!�c b Wa the p _ • or aesthetic.' effects to a prehistoric .or' bject? - - historic buildin'g'j st-,Ucture or o the have the potential to :cause c. Does proposal a p}iysical change which would affect unique X I ethnic cultural values? d. I the proposal restrict existing re, 3 i;givu er sacred rises 4r thin the potential, impact r — a r-e a.? DTSCUSSIOt� OF ENYIRON}�IEN'fAL EVALUATIaN. Fi a No.. 87�38.A &; D V. --,; - I see att,achdd. r, _ I I I I I i I I i I I I •i J I I W I I I r I 1 _ =- UUN F ILE NO. and 8 Ueneral rian Amendment +rOm Medium Density Residential On zacres located to the west to CoMmer'Clal I of Highway 32. 1he project t- are atis in two distinct parcels, one o+ which is already zoned C-2. Theohe parcel Is Zoned S -R and will require commercial development. to Rezone to C-2 Prior to Vis cussl ac lbs The property is currently de, Moped W, and an orchard. Convers Lh one Single-family house to to: -commercial ,al,,use is expect ed to disrupt and 6varcoy6r the major 1 ty of the so I I sura ace. to: SO I I s On s to aire of the rsr�401 I Lown Ser I es, erosion potem WhI*ch has a slight timl. Erosion Is Only of :concern if dral-nmoo Is not PrIoPer I y accommodatedV and runoff IS generated properties. onto adjoining 2a: Use bf the properties for commorclal di+fereht kinds of air pottution activity can generate two sOurccs IMCZIUde repel ImPacto Point and r-0nPoInt,, PC) I nt. r 06raOesl Point shops and some food estab, 1 4 shMetlts Nonpo i nt sources Include veh I c I e emissions. point sources shal I Meet the requf-rembrts Of` th6 Air Pollution 'Control District at the. tlmd of bulldlhQ PermIt Issuance. Non- I oin P _t source._ can O0tV be controlled at the i-egional or national 1e el. 8b,c,16o.' Construct10n Of 43 new Planted In an orchard and d clot building on Property now s eyelopmen�. of Parking lots Will generate a Significant bM6unt of storm water - runoff. 'There are no community rblhAde fad,11 - ltld.s in the vicinity nor any torhmunlk,4 siat-iv dice areas f or� the PrOv I s I On Of + ac 1 1 1 t I es, Ora 1 nboo w t I I hove to be provided on Drathbod trenches 6rl-e one rTiebht to provide b to dra I nage. t'dmOorary Volution a �Illtles. to 6reawido c rhe ultimate solution would be to t,o in, Dove I opmemt ren 'F 1 to "I I I heed to Meet t he rdqUIrdMomtt Action Plan which jil III tncludo sIgh1h of the Nitrate future drainage district's. an aoreemen� to Pdrticlpate in qhs l6c Wells in the vi cItIltY of Oak Way have been tested by thin Reg 1one i Water duality Cbntr6i bobtkd �11 �1 I trates. � Nitrate Ieve)s I h these d found to be dont6mina' ed With have ex"-eded 60 hi I I I I -ams Per I ter, far 1. n excess of the +edbrdl�"standard + 1 141trate5 pose a terlbUt 0 rn I I I ot_otns per health hazard to 1 WOMOM and the elderly, nfaintLs�o ProL,4ndht �-d whit tfl n I trbtes offi de- I hk I no water d6hbaMIh8tkt ie PrlMar�y danger +r it the fadt Oxygen bbt�oj�y rpt bap6dlthat the nitrates *d blood tolls. lr�lt tho Dery f cii k✓OMPahy I IMOt, shou I d be oxtondodb hi Wate i*i 6 1+ l a I I {aril i s Water Sory Ice GOmpany 1'nes are 00b extended, there 1.7 a Potential to expose future tonants of the property to health hazards, v Oeta'tIon on site includes an old orchard on the northerly Parcel and urban lanoscapin2 at the homesite. Trees w I I I need to be removed prior i,c development. Since the hat)itat on site is man made, not natural, t.1-11simpact is not significant,. 14d:, A 1 -,acre orchard will be converted to urban use. This s i meati was fully addres%ed in the Chico Urban Arf„la Land Use flan CThis I mental Impact Report, 1988, Conversion o agricultural sol!_ to alternative uses is unavoidable within the, urban area. 5d Surrrounding development to the West of Highway 3.2 has compromised the wildlife value of these properties.. Further devoiopmt.5It of these properties will hava no measurable. impact on wildlife habitat in the Chico Urban Area. 6a,b* ll C-2louhgzoning district allhWs a number of uses such as cocktbowiinq alloys and repair garages, which may generate exxces are one 'r`eces to consider noise 19VIRl s. Absolute n,')i se and peak 'no l so l eve l s s i der i n m& •its a noise impact act assessment,. A second factor i's the duration of the nose, and the tlmo zit j4hich it occurs. More benign commercial. uses, Including an equiPmont rental shop or ratai1 store P may generate objectionable noise only because they bre open for Ions periods of time and ma traffic. y generate high level°s of Single-family and multi -family residentibi uses are located to the north and 'West. A buffer should be developed betweon ills commercial and t^cas i cleat l a i lots so that noise oxpo ,urs Is reduced. A -noise 1 andscaped berm. ' -buffer may Inolude a solid masonr or stucco wa i 1 or 1 ergs y g 'o msP I l l over' onto gad.latent propert i es er I orA,senoise and light evfs'1 s in a neighborhood Increase, �- more requests are made for changes In land use deslgnatlons Theg present land use is a sin le -family residenco and 1 -acre or;hard: rho uener•a1 plan designates thotb density residential uses. 1'he d proPet^t i es for medium kOtche to a I 1 ow commercial uses .on ache s 7'h+eeGonarhl Ibn (b i anmehdmoh6 and �> ^ . Thesc' �leornnerctdaltl+enera��PlantAtnendme��tion tri. are for consideration in a C 1 .. Nodded !`or commercial development, W i th In 2d K yf r?i 2. Good road ,bcca-tib lity to servidcr ansa ar traveling g public.' 2. Adjacent to or near uti1ltlds, waikwa y�o dovelaarhent. and commercial 4o Less than 20:9 SloPes. w �,w ano PC) I 1 ce Pr't)t rt I 1 01*1 . , e dlspbSal caPabtlNtie5, b, �>dectuate br supPlY and scwa�j with site Criteria e and 5 can be Pref through this b- to commcrclal uses would not comply _Onver5 1 O1, Ot and b Crproviding a riatlo0 er tarda Yate access by means of de5'g pecitically+ des 1 gn apProact w i i I b+ rlecesSa►"1' pro.lect roved driveway f ir+j oomments. 1,_ f t� r„urtl pockqt and approved nd Item 14 for 5cje Item 1.3 for tra;ttic comments; a the northwest. and idencas may be residential uses are located res h 12: Slogle-family r site. These adjoining ra ect at�Ais develop with commercial uses. so�lthwest Of the P � re and negativelY impacted if both Pat' n.oiser 918 e Impacts to neighbors include Increased traffic,, the project. genl-cal activity generated by for this Pro'PertYl trent plans are not known e o} uses Permitted In ,�rat.f cnce estthe imates�need to be made from the rang health have a hien Aft excluding h n 4nics district. st-food estabiishments� those uses which a e �.- zoning nfl . a vo 11 and the generate betwee water demand k restaurants e i ener`ate 41'7 Us are estimated to `� would g and hate l t) ; perlii ► teed tyP i ca I office vehicle trip P day, A per day. 1ob?s s shopping area would generate 15©U trips P rips. while a a traffic da' .concern w i tlti to , , the 3tajt*Q Highway Patrol has exPresse that traffic which ma'v be generated by the project. They request pa the tae studied and eve 1 urato�e 11, hatn tha'cCo�tn~ i with Is ny`. c i rcpt l at i on P ► hey n future development tmenandnathtimespcons�osted. heavilyratio 9 f Ot'e w i I i meed to be provided at a ratio of ori°i'r^e space Pet' oris Ing ace P I fib= ut f-st"rnat P s 11•► spa e- e" square feet for r"eotheruParkin3 one feet for P fret es:s l orta 1 of t I res . str;�dar�ds are noun Butte UduntYgods sect ion 24-354this pr .,, �» ty onto the Highway generated by „ Problems- At l8c'f= Additional ever to ant should considersChetinsdtaalpatton of a corridor cotjtd generate sign very mmums the applicant ifiGant rovod the turn. Pocket or 1 of t -turn ► ate an P at the common tertVOWO left-.P®c1fic Conditions of apPr'ovaI wi11 to® dr l veW8Y 6porobd • wh i c:h has .1 t t on over the `Mate Highway I f es a need' t or other! l c ut i s rnveme-hts Cr tr ttf f l c. discretion n, f rya l T cans, _ . to a Pr'c r imp. . i f tF1e Mate i dent the ePP signals t:hrot,tgh err dor, i Capt shai 'i rarltr i bu the e rata shareo Mont the aA I road 14 1. Fire p e to a statl on t,ructure can be ehgul in forestry• lhe!Y do not now bP r"a intersect Fed r >=edemai guidelines allow a train to bIc�C1t �n Intense track -� • However` • a standard Qnrslaf 15 minutes • F t r^e protect i on i n the Wrist t".h I ca 69 ew as 6 minutes : The i aci< Of th i s Prob I epi p t.bF has r eoUeStk�d a i n order to acidr'es � nd hydr�r�t� Wet TFie Area issevere. �1d also scry© tram a1'i devaMoPcrs located West o pro rata Contributionwater” s sP 1 anade : I-r'6V i s I on bit comihrari i ty to off set f i ie�'r`�3l a�tbd 1 inpects, 1 lk , e Iaeve 1 olt)ment and occuPancY of this property w i 1 I resu I t i n I nf.t C?%,ai?d ca i 1 s For Po l i ce protect i on aM'td demands For road ma i n terrance . Because 'this property is within ,: he urban area, a i bo i t on ,ts fringes, this Impact is not considered significant', I `i i-: ' Lonstruct i on w', I 1 be subject to school improvement fees. 16d: Individual septic systems have been proposed to serve development on these lots. Use of septic systems will be subject, to, the approval of the Environmental Health Oepartmcnt and the requirements of the Nitrate Action Plan, Sewage will be limited to 1,000 gaIIons per acre per day. High-water land uses wilt not be, permitted on septic tanks under the Nitrate Actlon Plan. Uses which may be considered include retail and general offices 17b. The Regional Water Quality Control Board has tested wells l M thQ srna-and fount! them to be containinate.d with nitrates,. g n By not axteradinp (:alifOrn ia Water Srrvice Company lines, future tenants and ocrupant:tr of the property wtiI be exposed to potential health hazards,. 20a A records search w i l l be requ 1 red from Ch i co State Uh 1 Veirs. , to determine whether or not an archaeological survey should be Pre The applicant should contact the Unlv�arsity directly at the eddrassdM Included in the cover letter and request that a copy of the results be sent to the County Planning Department �I. MANDATt1Rl7 FTPIDTP3f`' QF Rirtti3'icrrnn,r a: there 18 a p,otertt i a l for Impact to archaeo t o records search w I I 1 be re g'i �=a t resourrrys . q shall be oterm i no whether_ tst" not- a- -survey prepared; quiredto d APP i i can't Jere E3o1 stet aa q2 1'a^"I Asse�r::or s Prco 1 L,oD Ci 87�0�` 1 3-b2 rile No. 87-38A and B A. c r D©SGription 1 l Ype of Project: Gentler -al Plan Amendr+ ant and Rezone, 2. Brief Des criP b dna General Plan Amendment from Medium OR Residentsa1 tod otmal>tto Cn22CGeneralnCommercial)oON 1A6 (Suburban -Res acre .2 8pprox 1 tilate 1 Y 3 Location. On the southwest side of Highway � C1d Eesti north of Oak Way, Chico. ank 4. Proposed Denslty of Development: Lowbpercentaties. b. Amount o f Impervious Sur- f ac i ng: 2. 6. Access and ier�r-est Public Road(s): Frontage on H t �j edea a Disposal: Septic tank proposed - 7. C ? ) ?. Method of S g _ Galifornla Water Servide Company s. Source tof Water SupP1Y' 9. Proximity of Polder Litres' On site. 1 O Potential for further" land divisions and dove 1 optuertit 4 Extensive. B. Envlrot>: 1'•: ' Scat(lnn Ph 'S cafes^v4-' 1 Tetra l h a Gendra. Topograph i a C Level vi71 1 ev land. haracter- c. E10vat f on0-2% ApproX 1 mate 1 Y' 173 feint above Sea Leve t d. Limiting Factors. Notle 2. S6i1s era and Character i st i cs Farwrk 1 l Loan, 1 -3 feet y a• granul rr friable. rstains moisture We11, subsraii to 6 feet, le�iel end smooth surfacer good surface and subaurfaGe dratriaeee weir suited to agriculture: b, Limiting Factors,: None 3 Natural Hazards of the Lund a. EarthqUaka Zone': Mcsderata b Erasion Pmtantial: Slight Lands l 1 der potent i s i: None: d.6 l= i 1-o HAz�ird t Unclassified' e1 EKjang i've4 1;01 i i'otent l of = `od.�rate . 4 Hydro a rfb gone i heevY1.,t.11 a .lG vet, vicinity n i ty a. Surface iw`att�iw; w 1 tildrmwa i r b Gr6uhdwator Ar nitrate d0hcerrn l . -. _ Dutslde ow"',urbon dr�ine�e c. Dra 1 nage Ir"h�aradter r st r cs' di.^�Wr'1 w d.. Annua i Ra 1 n F a'1 1 (normal): - e; Lim I t1t'tti Factors: Lack of drai,na�o. 5. Visual/Scenic Qualityt Urban. 6. Acoustic Quality: Poor-. !. Air Duality. Fah- to poor. �Lg1s2Q.iSs�.L.Fnv i ronment = d�Vegetation= 3, old orchard on Urban ornamentals on, AP 4��14-7 AP 42-14-114 . 9. Wildlife Habitat: Limited by development in area. �,1 ra1 Envirdnm®nt:= 10. Archacyo oglcai and Historical Resources iro the area: Records sea^ch required. 1 1 . Butte CCAArity General Plan des i 3na-!on.- MQd l t,im Density Residential. 12. Existing Zoning*. C-2, S -R. 13. Existing Land USO on --s i to one parcel vacant, one Parcel developed with single-family residence. 14. Surro�unc i ng Area orchards. NorthOast. residential and Land Usti:= North: commercial, East• commercial. South; vacant. West- residential. b. Zonino: C-=2 S -R, A-10, M-2. c.,Gen. Plan desipnotions: Medium Density Residential: Commercial, Low DarlsitY Residontia d. i''srcm i Sizes: 6*500 sq. ft. to 10 acres. e. Population= Medium densit-les. Charracter• of Site and Arent. Urban I zed torr i dor a 1 Dnp 1- i ghway 32. 16. Ndairest Urban Area: Ch 1 (20:i Relevant Spheres of Influence" CSA a24t City of Ghi�o. 18. jmprovd ts' Standards Urban Area= Fulf Improvements required. 19. Fire Protraction Services a• rost=Coon 3+ Y miles (State) Sti.at i on t �t44� S-1 /2 mi IeS soui 20. Schools in Area' Chico Unified School rJittrict. Inter-aepairtmental Memoran lural r Planning Commission PROM Planning staff supJEM COOK ASSOCIATES R EZONE AND GENERAL PLAN A14ENDMENT, FILE 87-33A & $ OATL MaY 18, 1987' The attached initial ;study was prepared for the Rezone for Cook Associates File No. 87-33A, on various proerties in te Kelly Ridge area east of Oroville. The applicantprequested rezoning' from AR --1 to R-1 ',n order to recognize existing .lots in Kelly Ridge Estates Unit 8. The ,easterly carries a General Plan desgnationofoLowoDensityn of eReszone area The vested Residential, y portion, however, is designated Agricultural Residential, which requires zoning with at least a !-acre minimum lot size. As a result of the initieLl study on the Rezone: phase Of the project, the applicant has app liQ�� �,. , Amendment. from Agrictalttiral�-Residc:axt L LL.JuYJt,,GesytylResiden- tial for the westerly _rtion of Kelly Ridge Estates Unit 8. ' If approved, this action would bring the e.ldsting 1ot size, the. Zoning all into conformity. General Plan designation a nd the of rezonin to the smaller study addressed the al impacts: since the Otigiftal initial g properties and suggested the potenta. Plan Amendment', tine �origina.l initial. study is suffica etGforral considering the General plan An►endment and a is recommended, Negative Declaration D�� s cc: 'Gook Associates a y., t"gillMfi 1 �' tir� t1 t i i i vI itONIk1t?int",hl I�c;1CJ; I,01, 87-0.2 01 ', r , 1t �t^r�IJItP�Ir��;t1 AIS _ Et o us. v;ari, �1e No 8733 ��li,l�ll�� raft ryirlrralrxrt3�i co6K A,$_ OCXATES A 0 d IIrl;lll ltit All 11ica11,1ta _ Cook Associates t, Abri t Paula e� t'e . 2d6;n P�arkl Avenue Oroville=, C 95 65 w N ol Ift' i+r,t Rezone... ,kIANOA"IORY i JtOi NIill; tt'i .,II "N1 (iI "A1,t.l Y'i 4 hl�lYliit Nit — - :�, povs flit« larI)1('vI b+Ivc,113i� I;i�)Ir+tllrw31 r�ir r �rr� ;ir1;1 r 1E;" rt I I i�"Il u i r I)r►rl,r t t �t�rr)�+`I rrt1l i a l lti w">~�fu4r. llt;� Irtt3it.1i Ira ,3_ Iatilt 1x11 1K,ilk11Ifv lii"r`v,:1w;V ,i1ok 11 1.I'sIt ry t to i 1 d.I I i v 11111)11,.1!.,1 i -I• - r)dt t fltir i' r I�xYf11(11111 1 )' 1't"I» V 8+4 rY iittlltr)4'i i ?i IZ Sl i'1ir"1 11it0 13,rh+. .Ix I :r '��i ,t r I t� 1` t�,ltrr3 n�+c� 1"z�iN� ,I) l «i n i t)r ;1Ir i tiizi 1 r) i� 11041 rt l l t1hil I ov, r t� 'f�: ll0 Ili 6, J e3�t t';rlld+xlitI I i1I,lurr� l3t'rijoc"t .r1�lt�iw �s'Itt .r)f1 1. tits 11tsIjI c � °t;lliit�t�:t�rtiI t!te;ictrl l�ttt �t" t �_ ��` ti t im � _ �a�, s r�h++i r•r)-tltrlt,ttl'1tt II13tI;.r'+� 'rA :4i�M11f4't^�r�tw't'tt1 ItI11)1rt't"�'t1t1 �'1r�" � t'!bv l I'r3GiI31twit! , � *. 331,1'C I,rl1 t c. i) r.i.'tt1 > � l 1) ii t"-c i ,11 I'1r�a r �v 111'�i�i rt�a1 1t3t) i3I 1nit, It v tot At Ih%t'zf+ _ _ _ r t"rliilil'L�'1tt111_tr►r," I:tltlllix_;� _ _ ar lv rr�rrllil�rr, rle3t � W►►n1�1,tt/Sre�l 1-0h j)t+iFll't"t May I'111i3iwt on $tVx3 MPJ" mtlY'r31+6I)AtaTc'�stigt"��� ;+`rlcrt� tillfY irttl);SkIa11 i•,r At rs,kss,3Sticck-, 1� - — r�11►ilytxl� 411111 i r , �s3i1 t l)'c�r � tr1 � t,i't�c t `e1T� 11ir� trxt 11 r)I°f itrIic $Ij11tr33^t �� SSrt—i��rr+ r�r9��.ti° i 1^rxtfilr(�1tt ti v j,. SIS 1 i. " WVVI I i►rklt�ili iW111 Y ytrS�.t' �,t-111�.►,I�rt I r) ,ilr,iwtµ i x I`Iw+t•t4 t1rt� rtirlgl�Iti i 4_ r G i11r,1, i rtrl,tI ilrr.t+ i lir)f rkhiPti�k11�" �,,� l i i", 11a.l IT'RI#.°a1`I'( r:t'itr it"r� 1�'tltni3lz rr� t r1 � 1J1e+�'I,rt►sI Ay'vlivy) 1 I rV1' 11i�i31 t►r, IStiSitrt,l�li )1 cttiC l`r11'1r1;pit'# hiItits o',yi'go. rL"irrrni, t�IiarI t Ili^ `.l "11t, rtrtti 1"t «+'tlhlt'il t �, tlti�i' �r f„1 ! ! vI. `11 "rva,Re1'i'l"fsK1V i 11 i)t ) i iX.t rail x I t`rvl r I rill I it.t1 11 i I)I>tt lr1 k.1r,. M ,, ryix., . . a �. x,1 r � � r I;'ii i R t t' t t�11 i x) 111) t t�� 01 :: 1'g i1 i i' i t'ifItI o11v1vI �il'rI IIty. 1.•itl I'POM 1s tit t1i1"t RSI I i 1 �g# K ' 3 rt Irl ,1 I j,.t.1 11 t'„1111 i c{ I II, vt i I,11 I rr l y i t1 x1' I,t°t'iall at r rrf tll.'1`jtf,11 ►+/i"� NIrlll �1 1ic��t l lit+t) ,i° i tlir I ltr dl' I's k rt#Itil �,,1iII�,i rt�tvtx'it3t�.K.�i ,r.t,P��IL, ki: �r1s• I�.:yfoi' I A Ntot11h'i iv1, r1r 1�r �I '�I tt1,,, ►w1 I r I=T� i3p fYr3,rt i��rw T,`ih"i 1P rare --r Itra> � .r I; ���Illt �1'I e�t� t ;rtn, tit �� y 'x t r )rMi YI 4 t 4 1 r,t►iif It r I p"[' X111 xis 1 ��t 11'tix4i� i ' ikr,.tlK11 i i 1`I.�x)itl"i;IIii. �t1r� r i KI l' fl IN } Mj� �p t11 i4 r 1 ; PAT`I r��r Iii rti �1"rl , bav d' •R 1iir,6hA. utr..Asstia3 ate 1a i'tfer