Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout87-44A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 1 OF 1vr�r,{v gg I illliilll,!!li e 11,, i%III111111111� •CIIIfIIIIC� I�I!IIIII!�,I;]I rinrl�� �liy I I IL i,, `au�i l►i�l� !iII1Jri,li #,,�lllllll!III I �� iI' a t llI 1 , � L r� n iP 1 1, If 4 t I f r alai r il4lnnrili i.l1111 S �a �'R,. °' �m, e- 4:11'. fl � .• !, 'o ... ii, 1, I'11 i1 - fir a ll, 9 _ - _ (jI :'- r i �IHLL/ LIZ r1l. f -ff-� =1 ,p•, s i s ll! r z , I, f,��. l 3 r � . ,II�I►Ih81 IN �II► . — I :,I� .r;►, iris. it rl II 1 ill ;.. � ��,tii11111i1111 11 is c: ' . 1 .11 Illlill�l,;��� In L1 4� S � �lilll Hili 1 IIIII!IIII;;II�� .-0 � llii�ICllll� ; � fir rliil� _._ r w _ _77_._ EE 87-4 2 Pg2U.�' `CT TNi IRRY % � 87-44A Log Log o File' o. Butte Co.• Board of jupervisors applicant _ representative AbDISr 25 Counter renter D=ive Orov3.11e CA '95965 -_ 538=73,7 FDDFtB:• Various property owner ADDRESS: -` PRC3.3FCT IXESC tP. SON r' General Plarr Amendment for the amendment to the .Land use Element of the Butte County Cc-neral Plan: ' on: property zoned' N/t� locatea Countywide identified as AP V1r101I5 town/areas COuI:twide GENERAL FLAN DESIGNMON' PRE-APF'FEE"PAID: � REC13IsryT" NUMBER- DATE APPLICAnOft ACCEPTED; . FINAL APP. PAID: ._ RECEIPT NUiIDER: RE'IONIHC- PETITION SIGNATU)W CHECKED, PERCENTAGE; i : KkU114,LIST- PREPARED MAIL-= WRITTEN:- - NOTICES. HAILED hfUMBERs LWAL DESCRIPTZON :PREPARED' PUBLICATION N=CE- WRITTEN DISPLAY AD'PREPARED' o7SPAPER PIIB: =., 0+ G F G B': R DATE: OF PUBLICIATION:; INITIAL STUDY PREPARED r - FNVRO'"_AL DETERMINATION:, Catisgorical Exeap ion : FTT_iED: Negative-Declaration FILED: Mitigated Negative Declaration FILED: Kwironmental. Impact Report _, Other- CERTIFIED: STATE CLEARINCERMSE NUMBER:: - -APPtIWMjREPREMN=M NOTIFICATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION PTS. IM COMMISSION HEARING(s) s BOARD of SUPERVISORS' HEARING(s): RESOLUTION NUMBER,(GPAs")"` ADOPTED: ORDD1ANCE IWMBER ADOPTED:- NOTICE OF I)ETI 0MUTION ('Appendix H) FILED COMMENTS RECEIVED Date Agency/Person, T APPLICA ON OR GENERA I`1 �M[E�tD EN'T BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICANT: Read and fallow instructions as set forth on last page of this form;. Applicant's name Butte County Board of Supervisors phone number Applicant's mailing address 25 'County Center Drive; ,,Oroville 95965 Applicant's interest in; property (owner, lessee, other) C)wner's name and address Contact person for project (if''other than applicant) Star Brown, Planning 538-7601' Assessor's pti cel humber(s) Various Strut address Present General plan designation N/A Present Zoning_ NIA Amendment to the band Use Element, Open RVQUV.81.' GENERAL PLANT llESIONATION. Space El*e�menty and Conservation Element Location, dimensions andsize of area(s) to be amended Count wide , W tJ Applicant's reasons for amendment , Proposed scheduling ! Associated projects (formation of service district, etc '. Anticipated incremental development (future development pians subsegUent to General pllin r , 'Existing proposed osed sewn a disposal method,- Proximityof power and phone lines*, bistnnce to natural lvatcr course of ,storm drains Water source.: Buffo Cp, Manning APR 17 1987 Orovilla, C41m, MI MeasurOs for protection. of Migratory I)Oor Habitat in Bunte County April 15;, 1987 This report- completes the land use analysis portion of the deer report presented to the Butte County Board of supervisors on December 2, 1986 and identifies: Impacted deer wisher range where developme;nt.may continue With ltl'ltigation measures Deer winter range in need of 'protection. Mitigation measures to offset loss of habitat resulting from subdivision and development. General plan revisions Implementation of the following criteria will 1) provide guidelines for development in migx:�tory deer ranges, 2) create a fund to be Used on projects to improve the quality of the habitat within the remaining deer ranges 'in the county, 3) control free roaming dogs on chez ranges,: 4) allow free , movement ok doer through remaining deer ranges, and 5) provide long term protection to migratory deer in the county Several criteria were used to determine lands where deer use has been or will be adversely affected by present parcel size. Such lands which are identified as Designated Development Zones", may be further developed with mitigation measures (see Appendices A � I) . Implementation of these crit,ena also ' dete.rmitiod winter rah O where development must be cate'eUlly vide basic habitat 'needs (i.?+r food, controlled in order to pro. watery and cover) and ;corridors o.f travel for migratory deer. The following criteria Were Used to determine impaeted`dear rahges and to delineate "Designated Development Zones pazcels are cUrren'tl less than 20 a(.=08- Deer c " . �` res. neer mc`tement (migratory movement or, movement to feeding • arcels of 5. areas thermal. cover, etc.) �.s blocked by p rooter �n acres or less `forming a barrier 1J4 mile or g i avid�h+ �'aml���","�1��►r��.��`�p����i��t.��� ��"�.t f�a`�' a�s"��?�d ��i'�i� �. 'all part ess >yhan Habitat to th rf the parcel is not suitable for migratory deer. APPENDIX J' Deer Mitigation Fee County has adopted a mitigation itigation fee for impacts within lowing descriptive language from migratory deer ranges. The fol their Fpril 5, 1985 Final Environmental Impact Report and their fee schddUle has been modified to comply with the recommendations in this report and the needs of migratory deer in Butte Count„y. The practice of off -setting environmental damage by improving areas not connected to a project site is used at both State and r ite improvements are 'used for many Federal levels. These offs different kinds of impacts, including lass of wetlands, increased traffic congestion, air quality degradation; and increased demandschool,classrooms or recrea 's for schootion space: Mitigation may be accomplished by physically improving deer habitat- or assessing a fee that is used to further study, or improve migratory deer habitat elsewhere in. Butte CoUnty Since most development proposals in Butte County involve relatively small parcels or utilize most of the area involved, p provide for mitigation meesur:es on site or it is impractical top There are a few on other property owned by project proponents. subdividers in Autte County who do own large multiple parcels` and may wish to improve deer habitat on their property elsewhere in the county. These subdividers should be considered i.ndepe ndent-ly and be allowed _to provide for habitat' improvement directly, subject to review and approval by the Department of Filth and Game (OPO). For mast subdividers or builders Who do net own extensive lands elsewhere, there is no practical way to provide sufficient habitat improvements on their property. For these, assessment of a mitiga iah fee for habit. zmproveme_t elsewhere can serve to mitigate impacts from development of their laude. The proposed fee schedule is based upon location of the proposed land division within designated Winter or critical winter range, size of parcels_ proposed arid :estimates) effects of development patterns upon migratory deer. F'ee's increase With requests Erie smaller parcel sizes and the resultant increase in intensity of impact's.Every subdiviince oonstuGtioriyaud occupationeofwauld incur an impact fee. s house increases impacts significantly'more than just the subdivision of land, fees have been divided into two categories The firs, impaled at the parcel map stage and a sedoncl at the buildIh9 permit stago. This ptovides for a distribution of Mt�.gation measures according to the `benefit received, (Seg:' Table x) d TABLE ,z SCHEOU ,E LSE RECOMMr;NDED IMPACT FEES Existing proposed Parcel Map Building Permit 'Parcel size Lot site Stage Stage: Critical, critical Winter Winter Winter Winter Range Ran a :Range._. Range 40+ acres 40.0+ acres 20-39.9 acres $250 $" $250 $_ 10-19. 9 acres $300 $250 $350 $350 .a-9.9`, acres $350 $300' $350 $354 MO -30,9 acres 20.'0-39.9 acres $250 $- $250 10.0-19 .9 acres $300 $200, $350 $350 0.1-9.9 acres' $350 $,'240 $350 $350 5.1-19.9 acres 10-19.9 acres $ 75 $ 65 $265 $265 01-9.9 acres $ 90 $ 75" $:265' $265 *' Fee`s would be assessed ,against each new lot proposed. APPENDIX L Perimeter Fencing ordinance .116: The provisions of this ordinance shall apply to migratory lands identified as "besignated deer ranges Lhat are outside De'velopm+ant Zone" in Appendices A -I (see exhibit available Drive, at Butte County,Planning bepartment, 7 .County Center locations where ordinance applies). oroville for specific 117. Within the areas identified abov,., perimeter fencing shall be a special use limited to smooth or barbed wire`(unless ermit is acquired). To allow passage of deer, the fence p shall:be constructed of five strands or less of barbed wire'. of 16 inches and The bottom, and top wire shall be a minimum of 48 inches above the ground. a maximum 118. The provisions of Sections 116 and 1.11 shell not apply to any of the following: a. Any area within the corporate limits of any city; or any developed rural or residential area with � within sa.zes of five acres or less.�u b. PLoposed fending of gatden areas,, dwellingsi or immediate barn structures. c. Proposed fencing to eliminate deer depredation Losses to -etc., a special use .pexmi.t has swhere vineyard, alfalfa, been obtained: d. Any existing potime'ter fencing: A special use permit may be obtained for a variance to the 117 for agriculture purposes ptovisit�{f of Sections 1.16 and i4,heep grazingi exclosure perimeter Fences to ideer deer de redatian lo'ss'es. to agricrops) prevent p 6culture psi