Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout87-50A AMENDMENT 3 OF 641 77 + 'Z�0'tVC�iAAT O1:' SITE ,P.CCIESX PROC�SS rHABE sxa.Tleic wit'GRtlUND TRArFIC CA=Os 1E I: I sS • a �-MON.r a r I TRAYFIC GNmm ,_ r�tGztleeAt iisibis I •, PLANNIMO.AND/OR CAL " h LO/STATE gUTURJt lACAGRCUND FORI;4AST TRAlFIC'FOR Y -; AGENCIES TRAFFIC- ON STREETS O`a 3ER NEW. ,ADJACENT I' b1ITK0UT 52TE SITUS 1! i, f CO:LHIN.E I. „ I CALCULATE I: I Los COIYPARE +. MASE''Ul s...._ _. I FORECAST TBAFPIC POR �t I' SITE (1EVELii,P: mil — I co�tnlNE' I I I was: K „ u„ I rucDLe►s� cootr�ARE i ' tog 1 . 1+i � � a fr w a r r rf w w r w w•r. d r .r _ r e_ ^— .. �. w PHASE V -- "' I DAVE IAP 71LTERtiATZVE 'ALUJ►TL 406" 61T I I • =` �' SOLUTIONIr SOdtlS7ftlH FIND N Is Fssdbadk. PNA$g VI ` 1 BEGIN HEGdlIATZONB P RFOA!! I 1 I 1,R19IEfit„-LOCAL OFFZCi11L8 , AND 'DEYLIAP�E1. aUPPL EAIENTAL TECHNICAL I ANALYSES _ j Fi'dbc�Gik f ... f� fIf �1� fY' ® q ':.�-Af1 r _♦� � f! Y�rD ! t 1 �rNASE-Vu ,.. As5IST, , IN PREFARINd CONSTRUCTION �'~""�""R"' IliPi LlIENT INPROVk'T!ElITS � PI.JUiS t 5 I f M%' — Ss�,App�ldis C .qr lechnlcal pzoc�iiluz�4 r 77777 Zv/,/y((r�T�va('�d P�,KDUR 7.e,4SAD 47 A �*AlT�Y P�l7Rlr� 3' I E eXIT ('N7,�°y NX1T ;EA1T� in'�C/T ZZ S'//(�L E l�iaMlL j' OiA!L'i 1` 3 46 Ste' 17 9 18 41 P,J, O. 8 4s` 4o iv z 4 TIgTALS 47 /lT 6 Co/�IME�2/Cr9� z,8 sI 41 Z'S 1,74 7TD, T®r.z�S 141`oo 7-38 , ( ( l: j ' r r su8 JECT: �'A�C TERRA Tt l � l ' i to JOB, No �g9OC1AT'ES ' '. C6Ni i PANTY H•ANK ,. COC,vra M cwcuow�w, ,sass. .r _. "'�+.�. r SHEET`. oF:;� � ,SHEE'TS. r 9 �Aft Am 044X &A A� ��!� T4 Fs��t,�c Toru w�Mai ot, - ��' �'.4x7OZc IJ,�'/VC A , N(, 1? p'1, EtirRY 'X1T eivrely e)6T'EXIT. SikGG FA N/4 r�ETgc r 4z 154—z$ ` 7, Nasres zs ¢ 10 8' 45 404. �o 6 9 767"i4G_, Z' Z7' C©MMICAL Z o 1 T l4 14,6 8 ,� 2O ZO TD7"G5 I I 76 'Z 3,6 ' I 4 9 47 , SU®JECTAK: ,Tl5'RAAC.E,., p /� p ' -■J,OB N0. CLUE-14TS NAME � �fl�•••I• � !�+•• � � ..� CC50��+SSOCIATES ,fig ,.. .! WOIWrwWO;-. COWaultwNrs �.�y�'�S swu OWv"R � G►Ll/OMFAA rpaia' ,STATE of CALIFORNIA—EUSIN16S;. TRANSP AND HOUSfNG AGENGY GEORGE' DEUkMB71AN GoYamor a DEPARTMENT OP TRANSPRTATLON lxsrslcT a 6075 911, MARYSVILLE 95901l! iP Tel ephone (910' X41-4498 IT March 31,, 1988 ; 0 4ut462; P . M.. 22 0 Oak Terrace Ranch Mr. Bill Geddis GDA Engineering 220, Grand Avenue 0roviIIe, CA 95965 Deur Mr Gedds: In response :to your transmittal of March` 14, '1988, Caltrans, ,District 3;; ha`s. reviewed the traffic analysis for tfie Oak Terrace Ranch general' plan. amendment. _ The, study should be erpanded.to identify'alternative circulation or development scenarios Which would a i_min°ate the need for traffic:sighaIs at the Highway 162/Api,ca Avenue intersect.il7n. As noted in our letter of February 91 1988, alis is not an ideal location for a signal.I One alternative scenar;a."could"include an overcri�ssingreast of Apica Avenue with elimi`nat on,of left, turns front_ Apica Avenue and Het^ltage ;Drive,. The ana ys.isshould i.nclude, paYaniied devf_lopment south o.f "thecurrent project.. It should be emphasized {ghat traffic signals are not; necessarily installed when min`irr�um`warran s are 1.aet. At this location, Caltrans woujd not recommend signals until the level of �serytce for"left turns roached'LOS E. On `Page 1, Section II,I, tine repori: states that the theoreaical capacity of Highway 162 in, this area is 10000 Average daily traffic, There are many: two: -lane hi h' g ray sections that; carry more than' l0,OQ0 ADT On Page 5, thereport refers to intersection p ans approved by`,Caltrans in. 1982. Since that time, traffic V61lumes Piaveincreased and Caltrans design standards) have; cnanged.. The dans would :needto be ;revised accordingly, including provision of deceleration '.lanes for right and lei t.'t,rdsoo Api,ca Avenue: c00K AssocIA s `, ,, ` ..r - APR.1V08" , JD� ,. tjr1V'JG, v ♦I 1" r I The retard evera;ge daiiy traiffic at these lorati,6ns for sever al;;year s - x 1980 19,814 1985 1986 01 i y.e Hwy. Canyon D.ri ve 5500 5900 6600 6700' Olive Hwy. & Hill,;eres Ave. 3950. 4150 4800 4900 O1 i ve Hwy. �C.' KeI ly+ R 1 'dge. R'd. 340.0 4'150 4800 Also available in this same publicat:.ion are peak houz, traffic volumes istei as:. 1980 1914' 1985 1986 Ol i,ve Hwy. ck LIi I l Cres t Ave. 400t 420 53;0 540 O1 i ve liwy'. ix Ke) 1'Y Ri;dgeRd. 345 4'20 530 540" I V. PROJECTED TRAFF I VOLUME Average Da,i ly `lTr&f f,I c Vo'1 ume;. ]:990 ; 1595 2000 i 2010 , Her i`tage al 01 i ve Highway 1,100 19'00 215 3100 O.live Highway at [ti 1l crest 5`900 71;00 810.0 11500` 01i ve. Highway at ' KeI I R. 4d5600 66:40 786:0 110,20 Peak Hour Traffic Volume 1990. 19'95 2000 2010 , Her i Age ' at Gll i ve H1'gh�way � ] 30 2'30 23;5 300. Olive Highway at Hillcrest; 585 710 80:0 1.03 Olive Highway' at Kelly R. li'd 570 6.607$0 990; V: 1'ROJECTE`R PROJECT TRAFFIC ;GENERATION `The specifii,' traffic` generation rates< utilized' far t,h''is analysis: arl6taWen from the Inst`itut,�e of� TrahsportAt'ib11 E.nginee' s Iri`forma,.t.ionsl. Repan;t; '!Trip;Generation l,-`.... Thi't°d " Edition, 1982. .'T`rtps generated by the diffe.ren;t types, of land Use proposed for 'thi.soject tine ' summarized gas f o l bows ;,SaodUse/`BuiIdi, ng Type. Average Weekday �Yeh i c.l a �Tr i p End s 110 t Retirement; Village';` 363 95Si�ngle'Faroi:ly us Detached Hoing 950 ' 151 Mo;b i 1 e om e's 72 5; - 87 Pl.ann`ed Unit 1)evelapment 67.5 Su6tota;l 2717 36,000 Squa re°feet, Coinmereial 4244 `ha i n Ceenter Under (SP i.00 0 0 G, S F'- T:ota1 A.'D,T. 69'611 2 STATS Of CAIIfORNIA--BU5tNE,S5, TRAIV$QORTATIOND H0U51iJG AGENCY' GEORGE ,DEUNNIAN,: �?E 'AI Tti1�NT OF TONSPORTATIOPI Godmnr DISTRICT 3 P,O., BOX 911, lv1ARYSViftr 95961 B o o.Planri6-9 Telephone (916) 741-4498 4; 'lea`=`` x -A March X31, 1988, 03-Bu -162. P. M. 2240' Oak Terrace Ranch Mr. Bill Geddis GDA Engineering 220 Gra rid Avenue. Orovi 11e, CA 95965 - :Pear Mr: Geddis:. In response to .your transmittal of March 14,°19.88Caltrans, ,Distr3 ict has reviewed the traffic analysis for the ent. Oak Terr, amendmace Ranch general .plan' The study should be expanded to identify a1te'native circulation o^ development sce„iaros which .would eliminate the need for traffic signals at the. Highway 162%Apica Avenue intersection: As noted in our letter 'or February, 9, 1(988, this i`s not an ideal location, fore ,a signal. One: alternative scenario Could,include'an overcrossing east of Api'ca Avenue with elimination of left"turn$ from Apic, Avenue and Her tage.'Orive:; analysis The sho�l,d include planned development south of the'currentproject: It should be emphasized that traffic signals are not necessarily installed when'min'Tmum warrants are met. At this location, recommend signals until the level of service for lefttttirnswreachedtLOS E;; On Page 1, Section III, t_he report states thaf`the theoretical capacity of Highway 162 in this area is'10,000 average daily traffic.: There are manyI. 71: two-lane highway section .thot carry more than 10,000 AOT;,, On 'Page 5, the report refers to intersection plans approved by Caltrans in 1982 Since that time, traffic volumes have ih`-"a'sr ed and Caltrans ;design standards have changed. T,he,plans woui'd r3eed to`be revised accortlinDly,.' including provision of deceleration lanes far right.and'left turns to:gpica Avenue. l , u r � "GEdRGE D� UKMEJIAN4 Govprpor t TATIO'AND HOUSING AGENCY " STATE Or' C,41FORNIA�—BUSINESS, 'TRANSPORN.;_` � D�P,ARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ►, del( � j:; f��rLc� q�t/} + DISTRICT +� P.O..BOX 911,MARYSYIILE 95901 Telephone (916 741--4498 p6bruary 91 1988 `' 03 -But -162 22.0 . Oak TerraceBanc-h Ms. Laura Tuttle•" . Butte County planning Department 7 County Center Dive' oroville, CA 95965 Dear Ms. Tuttle; At the"request of GDA Il�gincering Caltrans .has evaluated the recotrm�ended 'at mitigation measures fur a proposed general plan amendment on 140 :acres, the southeast corner or Apica Way and 14ighway 162. Qur conTiants of July 20► 1987,: are still valid. Tri order to.accurately, assess> the mitigation treasures, a ctmprehensive traffic study needs' to be '.Caltrans' The study should" include ccmnpleted aiid sukuni tted. for review peals hour turning` movement estuTltes at both { he Apica :Way -arid', $addle Drive ntersections'an;Highway 162. Existing tuming.mbvements counts should be identified, with.'est=ates of the volumes added .by the proposed project," . and cumulata ve or, year. nld 'voZs At a minimirn► left turn cilanxielization an: eastbound right tuxn deceleration lane, and widening bf"the''Apica,Way,"approach will red, 'he private driveway dust east 0 Saddle Drive should also be clasad as The dart o this development. Thetratfic study: 'should. identify: if "and when tratfic "signals waLi] d be tht is built." Since this as not an xequired at Apica Way ass>,.un.ng e projec ideal location for sa signal due to sight distance anti steep ?grades, daveZo gTlent scenarios should be addres�� ed. The tlternatave'acces s ardor ultimate build=out scenario could include ,az, overcrbss ng or 1 nte:rchange as of ,the,existing ..Apica "Way ;inter section; e t + .1111, 11 . TRAPPIC AND _ ROADS See accompanying road map of L -he azea xndica,tng tza£fic,eounE's frr,r 198Fi-1987'. These cQut,4 were obtained from 13uCte County YubLi c 4Torks end theCal-ifarriia Departrpenit of �'rarisporta'tian. oakvale SO of 1"62) _ ADT AGENCY DAT$ as"k�rline ,;(East`. of La Mirada) _ - ?670 BCpW 1987 440 La Mirada (So of Uyli,ne) _ 570, 0 Canyon (No, of 162)'' - RivervieS Dr`. 2448 � (No . of Rarltake) Her tage; (S'o. ;West of Rachael). Rachael {So,a8t of 1iertia e) X40 80 Rachael(East of Re11y Ridge Rd.) 80. Wyandotte MR Rl. (S. of 162) No county w ±re available` fot- Apica Avenue. Tslffic volume' on 0lire H'i'ghway is of, concern Cuz°rent leve.l serrtice to° residents in the .of o'n (7l've Highway, enC�e, is level "A!' : as : x•e.,' lona volume, traffic, area. per Caltrans cotres,po:r'k:d- ftee flow with hath speeds, �i ni n Qft 0 fai