HomeMy WebLinkAbout87-50A AMENDMENT 5 OF 65.. Major °Ola;�ecton: 'Conilicta= between high speed
tr.affia £rom
east and turning movements, Same
delays l;eav"in Pre:ject;
are:.
6.;General; This Pilternatiwe
PhYs`ical i provides planning sand
mprovem�.nt flexbi"1ity,
commercially zoned Tfhe 25 acre
PrPerty_north of`01iv e Highway.
will have a significant
r
impact on the total traffic
maveinents> 'and this Alternative
l�
recom prav1des the ,
mended fleXib;y Ehat should `be
the Engineers
provided to
and Planners, -
RECOMMENDATIONS'
Al;ter;native ."E°; is a recommended alternative to
the traffic" impacts that.wil'1 .result form
mitigate
And the
mix' of P the
pro owed land Uses resulting the'refrrmct area
A1,7 "alternat;ives sha:Uld have reserved easements fOr future,.'
grade separatism to connect
this development with.He.rita e
Road. This will alloy this option, i`f g
neces ary
AlternaEive °E° will provide the greatest
��os_sible fbr thee. engineers and flexibility
ti#aa.lth and. safety of the. travellingnnPublicdthrostering the
gtaneral •`ect
Pr'o ugh'_out the
area and allow dis reti.on,ar
future si nal installations
g Y funds for_,
and ciesa n
g Preparations.
It must be: noted that the ac7oPton of the reco
contained herein Will mmendations
s`igni.fi:cantl. Produce Levels off, servi
been' greater than" the Le vel, of Serv100:,that
adopted by
'
the; has"
Tr,anspar'tation. California Depar'trnen;t
the The Caltrans Level.
of Service adoptedOf
Routh Concept' Report. is helie�ed fo, be
criteria; for the an
unac'c'eptak�le
judgment of indzv;dual`
Impact on the traffic capability pr°]ect,s 'that
of 01ive Hig2iwa a
local collector streets
;'herein. ,listed, ThereforeI ', the h'` Y , 'and the"
are ghes
standards
recoinmen(e The Route'"
planning too.1 far , Concept Report iS
Priort�.zing, long
.'rot the CalIforrt a" Hi hwa r
y," .
g' term capital outlay
Levu of Service System. rhe lo,call
"
is ha finer '' tha'n the '°E° Y . acceptab'1e
the r �.�.�S.
h. u.Rl• �, Projected,
..in
r
, ,
.
a.
TABLE 3
r�
TRAFFIC VOLUMESAND SER�I"lCE Ei ELS
c;
STATE ;HIGHWAYS
Existing1.981 °
1985cz�
2005(3)
c
h,
L on
._....,
ADT'
Level of
Service
ADT
Level of
Service
ADT
Level
Service
Q-----
.�
...r
.
`._.....�.e
STATE HIGHWAY 162
West of La'r,'kin
2,550
A3,
300
A
East of Larkin
4,300
A -B
5;600
A -B
8,Og0
B
West of 12th Street
;5,50.0
Aal
7,200
B
10,000 '
B
East of 12th Street :
8,00p
B
9,600
B
14,000
C
West of Highway 70 ,
9, 500
B
ll, 5"00
�B�C
16, 500
D
'
East ofi,.ghway 70 Ij
20,'000
A
24, 000
A
4 34; 000
C
West of Lincoln (,1)
24,100
C-4)28,500
D -E
4I,000
F
West of Olive Highway (1.J
2I,50Q
A
25,5-00
A
36,000
F
West of Lower Wyandotte (1) 17,900
21,500.D
-E
30,,000
F
West ofFoohil (l)
"thi11
12,4:00,B
16,000
C
24,000
D
w
East of Foo
h, 200
C
].4,500
D
22 006
►�
�on
East of Oro Qu ncy
9,000
C
12 000
C-D� �
18 `000
c:
West of Cany Urive;
7 80'0
B -C
10,000
C
�� 16,500
D
ti..
East of Canyon Drive
5,800
B
7,500
B -C
I2,5A0
,
C
H",
West of Kelly Ridge Road
4,150
A=B
5,000
East of Kelly Rid a Road
g
3550`
A -B
4,300A=B
6,900
�'
SATE.HIGHWAY 70
2.6
'O'South of M..illeB?,20
300
B
13,7arYsv
K
Begin Freeway
B"t'- Ski 2 »- Mont ome ry
8,60'0
0 200
A
A
9,00, A
� 1I, 800 �� A,
16,300
` 19, 500 �`
A
A
Between; Montigomery - ` Gran
::
l4, 300
A
16':, 300
A
2�5; 000
° A,
Betwee n Grand ;Nelaon
7, 600
A
8, 600
, A
I3, 400 �
`:A
Igor' tti of Nelson
9, 90.0''
A,
11, 200
A
17; 50u
A
m
(1) Based o: arterial. street criteria - aI1
others on Highway, Vo..lume to Capacity Basis.
(2)'' Level of sexvic'e with existing faclit3 es.
(3) Where marked mproyements requi.red.'
tii prove ►C grad loCk
:leve.l of service.. ;
Approach A B C .,,Y.. VflLllNf�� aNE f%P¢L# d�
Movement Ar Aa 11 Rc tr Br CL ICAI t / 2» 1411? Co o, i n
Volume" g tee`" Z. 'i4o!� A" J;
pCit I.te 7bhk 11 €EYf rj
Step 1 R101 lUrn fOdm C:�
Conflicting Flouts r ,MH m
I/1 An + Ar a
�% rser
Critical Gad from Tabic,2 T
Ci
Capacityftvm Fig. 3 m
Ms. a M� o
_...� Shmd LAM = See §tap j
No Shared Lara Demand
-
Availchte,. Reserve
Detay &'Level of Seavke f 3)'
M,, — CA m. L WA
hble
'!.
Step'2 Left Tarn rmrn 'B
8►, r
Conflicting Flows rII My "a
Ftg,
A� + Ar
" g
' Mrom U
+
Critical GapYrartt' sble 2 t
S sec
Capacity" fmm Fib: 2"
MNo,a (tla;s i�' vea
Demand v
Bs
Criprictty; Used @
160 (Rt/has)
Jmpedancc Fsrtor from
Availabic Reserve
Wq 6r Level of Service fTable`3)
Ale) /'� [,
Step 3 LtR'ftrrn.Ptotn C
C�, 'rl
Conflicting M" n MN
ifrom Fig, 1)
%Aa + Ar + A + "fir
+`1""+ '2.
`Gtitieal,Ciap
' "
from Table 2 Ta'.�
cap;lc►tyrromFig,1.�
..> sec ,
" Ma. 416,��
a 4/b.
Adjilst,for impedance-
Mn. )t' Fs Ms scA
I+io Shared LaneDemand A
Avsilsble Reserve')-
Cs e.
Mi _ CsILE riA
�Deiay
di `Level of Service (!i_ ble
SM{11tT Vffik•'S . .
i'
,
Shard Lsiie Demdtid
ShM' d"Lane wtlh Right'Nrr►
Ga + Cs C.'�
C
+ ,
a C y.
a. s
Ca cit of Shared Lane„
Pa y iiMta
tc
Avaiiible Reseiv'e":�
Mia Gay � ,M
�
'3iiey & I:r vel of $ervica.tTlebla'3)` ,
Q
Oversil iv ustlon ._.
EhIblf D
Approach
A
B
Cx
C �
Uns Waltzed "T"
(g_..
Irlfersection Ca :acct aI Ulation Form
p Y ,
Intersection
Locatlon Plan:.
.I/�°
Ci '1', CA i"
Counts:
Q+
Zlrr
6 '
[)ate
zzSS
—��
My _. M, a Zai rKn
Day — %«a•
p IAA
Control
Prevailing Speed _�
NoLrly Demand Traffic Volurnesjrom to , m
Approach
A
B
Cx
C �
.Movement
A} --Q Aa 1t
BL
Br "
Ci '1', CA i"
'dolUme
Q+
Zlrr
6 '
zzSS
Capacity from Fig. 2'i
My _. M, a Zai rKn
Vuwwt �5 oN�• hf�'L � ofr
Z tdR R4W GmU►�'%
Step i. Right Titrn from G
Cx
Conflicting Flows = M#:_
An + Ar' _
F` = �%
( from Fig. t )!
Critical Gap from Table 2 TO =
wn
sec
Capacity from Fig. 2'i
My _. M, a Zai rKn
Shared Lane —: see step
No Shared Lint Demand Q;
Available Reserve =
CR = kp
Mt -- CR = ,
Delay & Level of.Service (Table 3)'�
DL'L►4
Step 2' iLeR 91irn ftrnrt B
Bt,
Conflicting Flows = MM:=
AR + AT =
/
''
(from Fig, 1)
Critical Gap from Table -2 T,
+
Capacity front Fig. 2 =
MN• = Ms
Bj
Remand =
Capacity Used =
_
100 (Br,1M) _ ____I — 9E
Impedance Faciorfrom,Fig, 3 =
Pi _L51
Available Reserve _
M: — B
Delay & Level of Sery(ci ;(Table 3)
`�" d •��-
Step 3`; Left IUM frprri C
Cr. 1
Conflicting Flows M,r
IhAr, + Ar + B + B�TQ=
(fromFig.
• sec
Critical Gap from Table 2 T.""6
from Fig 2
MN• = z +�.,M
1
Capacity =
/6
Adjust' for (mpodah
MN• iX K -m Ms m ,
No Shared l arie Demarxi
CL Z- kx
Available Reserve ix
Ma _ Ci 46
y�
Dela �& vel if Setvice'(Tab!e 3) �
? Le
�fi'
Shared Lane Demand ¢
CR +• Cr = G 5 xi,
Shared Lane with Right7Um
(CR Ct?
_
_,
Capedy of Sharcd,Lane
Mto = CC' + (C M )
a+Ilr
i
13 �'
v •table }reserve _
M. .: _
to Ce1i. oeA
�-
Dei "ay &"Level oCService'fTablc3);
[�
Overbll Evalttstldn .
�
�xhitiit IE
AI %� B Y Vp 40 Ail E' S ` O AJ
lMovcment Ar "� Ap 1 >Rc % Rr ""-' C� °.1 C F R� W
t'"o u nI 'PS
Volume
,�-CR...rs
pch i.ee T,Me 14
sko. 1, Right,11Wn ftm C
Cp
Conflict! ii Flows m I it-
Ap + Ar >
(from Fig. 1)
+'Q
Cdtkid dip Froin Tabk 2 �Ta •
�=sec
Capacity from Fig. 2
Pired'Lane - 3«e UP -3
No Shand Lane:' Demand
Cp • _ ,�,
Available Reservi, a
-s,lQ
M, - Cp •-L`L__�
WAY & Level of ServiceCiSbk 3f
/l10
swell Ihft''Ilar ftm i3
r
ConAlcting Fbws
amm Flg.
'A +" Ar
Critical Clap Prom 7>.ble` 2 Ta_
tro
Capacity from Fig. 2
Mi,, .. 1`41 _ice rN
EieSrtarld .
Capacity Used
8L
fOb (BrIM,Yr
Impedrrtce Factor from Pg, 3
..�
Available Re •
sew.
M -- Br
s i
Delay ih t evel oPServicc t'lltble 3!
r�
i
5tcg►3 ; L,efi'ibsla.ftrom C
r
Ci
ConAic(ing Flows . M;r a
(from
%An + Ar + Br, +
ZG. 34,�
Critical'
, Ciap Prtrm Tabic 2 T, �
.':[3 s� Iw
Capacity m":F jq, 2 •
Mr,,
''
Adjwt for linpodanct
M* x IN
NO $hated LaiiC i�Jemand �+
C` r �<
a. ad
Availahtt Rucrve � .
Ma,- Cn . X79 ,�,,,
Delay'6c Level of Seevkc t'Ihble'3) '
shared wK.rkma;,e -
_
cp + cR �• cps • a„
Shined Lane with Right iLm
fCp + Ci)
j Capacity of Slared,.l toe o ,
MIm
ie
/M,1
(CON 1 + (Cl777771
4
iyi�'a iM
Avf dote Restave
-IC iti sc�
�-
uelay.dt levet otServlcn
".vi�tuat2oa
A
r
,
• j .
G
1 ` '
.a°
r.
,
r
IkWA
7 ;j
d�li
X y
' .� % err r �1, • . �t RY4'. �� p � r .. i_ p+ e 1 'r: •
S T' a,1'.♦J r+ a� TYtx'\Y' Ji'��fi , '. + r t' ,• > s'�i' r /`
•\ �1k��1�1,,�V.: !�t 'x„�'�`+�f'�si�tr��l7 :� � � .° t'.t.A i.�
,j�����•����{7y1� �i ~rjl�'f4�1 t5,���'�'1N�ki �,%iL� r Ii S
�. �� .�Z.a,;T• �.�`,•, L i � v �. �t �,.. L p5� t%i��"h`t�'�i�,�,�r�. J+`.1, �v ��,,1
®. / �, - �.#�'j1` �f �� r •r •~yt` ° 'd�•l. fY.• ,u � 19,` � �{'t-( r� r�.,+o a :i4.�
Ai . 1j� 1► �i ;'� , •: k l/ �.Gittl►�T.W,�i a R,tis �% (+`�r •j
'r��M1 piE'��1 ,_t. ��i 'f �,� •'�,�r�l�a 4d.��,+#,,l "^A,rr(1 iV,?'r'::� '
� ,�t��',�+1 ",1,�+ tt•��':.�}1''�� 'S, h' � x`# }t}"ice ,. ,�',�.i` b jp'j:� ,. l�jk
.t��� �� �.. ty� } ,iff � 1 � �'i ,�t,ya .yr: �i, tk~ , 1%Y �`fi•S'Y+rpt
lei ,� (nth rf\� j •,) �%rl � "��' ♦. • ;-�rl' i�.e i �a ,Y'4}i!
.ry;. ,� r� .�' !�, y<rr r7 rn �+fr 'i ���, a � • �" �+ • • i 't �, � r t� .., ; , ',',
�+�> w►F � "` �������1G�• ,T� C���.y+�,;'';�k,.r�'+�,5'fp� 'r��y!'14 `�,+ �F `�'` L t . i} -
�� '�`.+r aN.,'•if � �t .1�•11y9 �k J fY*- r y. � M. '�...�ajt t•; �� r, �'
It4/r-t,' I'�+�,'si °r r ��� �''�� � r*i ti� �i'�Ar �r tt � ��•,y+ �rwl [ �'� IST r '!,• ,
! k.tii �i.d/.atir�Ki� �rs[7��!,�i(lr�;,l� s� �kF� � � .ast)' f,,t 4 C,! �r �e;. • �+•
t w '
•
Approach A g 7 C Y'"
Movements CA
olyme sZ zaZ FULL 13111�CJ-4UZ
h iac T. � i 'a * l" c at i
I Available Reserve
Delay & Level Of!
clxi—
step 2, l rt Ti rt frmr,
ervice ('Cable 3)',_,u'
Da L8 Y' ]
Conflicting Flaws
a
9L tf"
(trorri Fig. l)
_
Aii + Ar' _
Critical Gap from'
Capacity from Fig
�.
Demand
Capacity Used+,
lnpedance Factor
Available Reutve
Deby.& uVei of
1 o (kmo - W
seep 3 Uh Vara Prom
rom Fig,fth
Conflicting Flows
M#_9LA�"Q'
•',��]
rvice't(Tibl`e 3)'d
�'�1 i+
Critical Gap from'
M� m.
l6AR + Ar + BL' •F br =
Capacity from Fig,
abI e 2`Tr =
r.
i,
A&"
pSt for Impedai
MNe = "wG PtA
.O Shared Labe.
MN, x pi - a 9 O"
Available Reserve
CL =" � KA
r i
Delay.& Levci of
� Shartd Lane Denli
1d
Shared Lane w►th I
d Laces
Capacity Of Sha
Avrtilible-Reserve
"
Delay & Levet;of:
,;='.
nverrt!! Evaluatlat,",
clxi—
ervice ('Cable 3)',_,u'
Da L8 Y' ]
B
9L tf"
Mk =
Aii + Ar' _
1 o (kmo - W
rom Fig,fth
M#_9LA�"Q'
•',��]
rvice't(Tibl`e 3)'d
�'�1 i+
M� m.
l6AR + Ar + BL' •F br =
abI e 2`Tr =
sec
i,
2 =
MNe = "wG PtA
:e
MN, x pi - a 9 O"
perii7rt� �
CL =" � KA
r i
ce:(4ble 34
1d
oM
CR { CL =CAL mic
d Laces
M i$ _ (C^) +e (CL/M;).
M; a a�
jvfia �- CRL R KA
r
w
a
,
i
LLJ
TERRCE . TRAFFIC
880.1,0
S,CLIR�k�MQ�
�A���� d8130CiATEB,
JOB- NO
OCT, ®SER ��6 1F�8�'.
r
,
allowaawruaw cow��uN viNNrr ''
Vrr3U
Rev.. '� ,; 1
�:•f
SHEET OF 5HhETS`
{
'�
"MVI RONMENTAL �oMPACT5, .i
'44 ers, 4VO, requ te-
TriP inations f. al "Iyels 'and, "O'bo $Iq
Y, S5
MAYOE NO,
, 611,the'Prov t in sigftif-ftahti
TR.-Wx
1. W-
-Unstable earthV I I
cohdt * on$, oaf n, ehan" ges, :in
I ubstructu
id- "Pgie resl
900, S
b4 Disruptions, displ'acemen'ts, tompa,ction or
gvetco,vering of thosoil?
h ac-e,
c. Change In, oplograp, Y Or growi& $A#,.f
el features?
T
covering7 t
if i - t I of any
d. rUCL lon 4,
gebl,6,gic or >physiGai- features?
6* Increase in wind, :or water, e ros, io* of Soils
e i t he, r,, On or off-site"?
sl ;
Changes in. deposition or e r q, . ip ol, beach';
l hd.!5 :or change in 51-, tation 0 deposition,
a
-h
olorerqls,ion. which 3c, a mo di fy Aftel 'channel of
t i or the hodof theoc aLn, -r
ny,, ay.,
b t I
A",
g. loss, ..of prime, ;igTic,iu,lturally'productive '.s-o-'is,,,
outs'ide' designated urban areas?
h. Exposure o peop e or property, to geo, ogic-,
earthquakes hazards �such � a lindslides., mud
'or
slides,;, ground: failure' si-milaT hazards'?,
UA6, Will the proposal result' in,�.subgtantlal-
A
�A ta s.� deterioration ambient a I�Pns or 0
Air' quality?
b. The' treationof b",L,ctioftabl 6odors;OrSAsmoke
or fUMOS?
c. Alteration of air movemp# molst, ure - or
temperature, . oroany dhAnge in climate,
locally ona
WATER. the'prpposdlresult' in'1: 6 an Aa
a,Changes incurrents, or the: caur 6 or`
:movements; in either
idirection - of Water, 4 h
marine or fre,A waters?
b. gIqsin absorption rates, nage
r, ax
or theratand n of surface run
, of
Lan
c. Need .for off_SIto' sUrface drainageimprava
men. . 'nClU,d,'ngVegoLtatrjo n'r-er rm-
-a c'an ej4
1 za: jan, or, 't lation?
i-,.nrs a�
a h '6urger '6 r 110
d 1 r 6 'o 0 t o", c w '
A ti : of -as :,t , kl flood
waters?
e Change 'In the AMO uAt of -s u r, 'a ce water, IA agy�,
water bo, y
'h
®r, l
�rj,,to surf' fo Ce, V
bi st in an.,
t
a era iop o 's
t f water 'qualityLtitj ud
but', not I :L m temperature,
r turbidit "?
gam''A lteta t O�ftL off' ho a or rite of
'i I , OW
'or
gr OW d AltdrJ's
h Change in o�; quant.JL or-. qtA 'Y 0 , d IWA it tltl
oui�
'lit J: t,
tht6tvgh di't th,
5, rawa Sr
I throughj, T�Jt e.rt,' ion,ail
aqui err by cuts or- Ix ati o fv
k U d auc, -t lon 'ante 0, 0 water otherrzse
available- f d t pib, lit water e�rsupplies?.
.
xpwgure opeope,or, �rbportto
wagererPy
related hazsuch as f1dadifti?i I
ASS ,.MAY oda
iml
Wi11 the propos a, result in substa�it.,.y
'FIFE. p p
'.
pANT' .
n the diversity species ortumraer
a:. ange iof
of any, "species 11 o:f plants :aucluding trees;
shrubs , grass , crops , and aqua-,IC plants)
)r numbers ,ay un? que xrare
b:. �teductioli D£ thf an
or endangered "species of plants?
Itttrocluctiort of new species 0', pl a.rits into an
area, or ,in a barriet to :the narma7 rep]en#sh-
men.t of exi'stin species?`
d. Reduction in .acreageof,. any agri cultural crop?
.~_
5. 4NLN(AL L ,FE; Will the �iroposia1 xestalt in s'ubstantia`l.;
numbers.
a.; �'"F►ange in the diversity of species';, ar
o£ animals. (birds., !,and. Ani Al
o£ anysVecies
including repti.leS, fish and shall fish,
benthic orgtill lqo or insects? ....
b. Reauct o,n in tae numbers of any, unique, rare
or endanger_;ed species of ;ani.�na1'' i,
Lntrod, ction oZ new ;species o animals into
an area, or, result in a 1.arrier 'to the migration,
or movement of animals?
. 1�8teTl;DraCiOn to exist].TLgi.sh oY Wildlife .
y
habitat?
5. NOISE. Will the proposal result in substantial::
ncre3ses in e,x*sting noise
b,xposcire of people to severe noise levals7.
1. LIGHT AND GLARE.. Will the proposal produce
sign_ scant lig ht and glare.
7
-�--'
8, �LAND:USE.' Hti11 the' proposal` resii�t
su stantial ,t1ltoration of„ the lazeent ox�lann'ecl
`1 and, :use of. an area?,
9. NATURAL RESOURCES": _411 the pral?osal restx',.t int
substangaW-�
lnsotrcesxn the rate of use _of any natural`
a
b. Deple.;tlon,of any non-renewable ;n4V�ra1
,
resources?
1Q. RISK OF PSET : Will the Proposa?
:,hazard-
explosion or th6: release o
n bait. not ixrh1tod', for „
nus sbst:nres� x,r►udig
adaatinthe
io
oily pest .t hies, chemical n�
e�ient' o£ n ;pct ltlent, o� U')5e',L, .Pon xtl'OnS?' ;
h, Pass,abLe i�te,ic';FcroneeI' I. wvxth an emet'ge?t
y.
response plan or emergency eVaciaaCso'n p1a�n?
.
11, C�OPiJLAT"SQN 1Vx11 'the proposal aJ ter i;the ;focat'nn',
i dens;zty; +or growth tato ai the .human
a st;rz. ution,
opulatiorrf"
P .
HOUSING. Wz 1 the proposal affect e�cYstingot�sing,
dt. `ona"7 hotasing,'?
or create a demanc�or.ad a
,
YE ` MAS.
,. �"�`.
TFWNSPARTATIOI�%QTRC�iLAT;ICi�. , Wi11. t�ie,propa,al..,
r",u t-ans
Generation of "substantial 4d'd2tion al' yehice
movement?
b. Effects on existing par;c%ng acil;it%es or''
G
demand for new parking�7`
�t
Vic. Subsant.ial impact on e' isting transportation
systems'?
oto
d. Signi;i;i:clant 41. 6rat,i0ns Present p4tt6rns
of circulation OL rL movement of '.eq1e and/or
goads?
e. Alterations to wraterborne" raiz ar air"traffic?
Increase in,tra£fio iia arils to' motor vehicles y
y lists or pedestrians?
u i c c
14.
PUBLIC SERViGES, WiSl the proposal have an effect
upon, or resu. 't in a need for new or, altered
gave rnmental services 1.1
a, Fire protection.
b. Police prntectianl
d. Parks or ether recreational facilities?'
e, Maintenance of public tac.alties,, including
roads?
f. other goVerhmeintaI se`rvice.s?
15
ENERGY. Will the proposal zesul4 ift.
a=s`e of sub,'5tan,tial amounts a fuel ,or energy?
b. Substantia]. incr.ea�e in demand upon exi ting
sources of energy, orIr require the devejopmont
of new sources of energy?
16'
UTILITIES. Will the proposal result in a need ,£o -
new systems, o�r subs'tantial<alterations to tl�e
fallciw.ing;.
a,oWer,; Orr natural gas?
�.
b. Canmunica,ions systems?,
c.Nater av�Yl.ib�1tity:
d.5ewer car sept tank?
e: Storm water drainage?
f." Sal,id: Waste and "dispo"sal'?
11.
HUMAf 1IEA'GTH. W,il1 the pr4pnsal result; in'�
a. reat an o£ an; heoLlt i h_az, rd� or Poten:t'ial
,
health haz;aw}d (exclud itg mental #health) ?
b. Exposure of petIple" to potential ltoalCh
hazards 7
l8 .
AESTi{E7'ICS:. �� l'1 the pxo�ios'al , result in the
.,
;.
ntSTF,uct rt of any `':sceri a vasty or viev Open, to
the publa;c, or wi.11 the>;p'�ropos al result xn� the
creat -ion o£ an;' aestlietic,aly" a£ensive sltc tperi
`to lwb;licview?
i
I
i
:44yp
"yl
++IIV11 ,
I l Tk PY'A
N'.
A
_ tie proposal resuiti iso an
ImpaaI:t
upoat tie at ali`tY or . quan'�ity . of s earssting x crl,�atiQri 1.
app¢rt:unxtYes?
20, CULTMA!. `RES OUTfC�S.
a ll t�� prop sal result in the alterai on
Of or the destruction of a prehistoric _or
historic z chaeo�.ogical.
sste7
b_�, Wil] the proposa] result. 1,'n adverse phYs'i,ca .�`
'
ar aestfietic effects to a''preh stor'ic or
hL toxi';c Wilding structure
or o,bj6ct,? ,
c Dors the pxopos.al have th0.. potential
�-
to ,cause
a �physic,al change which c�,rlci afe,c unique
ethr�a:c
.ult:ii,ral values?
d. N�ia1 the proposal; rests .est exis ting, rel g� ous
or sacrad ,ascs within the 'potential imp1.act:
area?
?+, DISCUSSION `.OF NVIRONMEN'TAL E'VALIJAT'IU
-----�------ N
See a't'tached.
I
:
- I
I
-
I.
I
, is
I'I I
1 ,
l ,
I
l
I
I Ij
i
I
6g2-23', etc r
A1pp1 '1 caret; Oak Terrace Ranch GraUP Aµ5
Log'* 87-06--3o_01;
011eNo. $7--50A and B'
DATA .:SHEET
A. �r§
rjmscr* i o , on
1:
TYPO Of Pro jectr Generai.Plan Amendment;. and Rezone.
2.
Br i,ef Description = Gen`era l P l an Amendment ow Dens 1 ty
Res 1 cent is 1 to Comtnerc'1 mal <' 7 sores a' and 'Medium Density
Rns t dont I`a i C 10 acres) ; Rgzooe from ,, PJD ,ta :'C-1 C 7 acres)
c 10 acres > and R..1
3.
il.:ocAt 1 onSoutheast earner of' ;G l i ve Highway` and' ';Ap t ca
Avenue, oUtheast.0r6yl1Je .'
4.
Pro posed iDens lty of ,Development;:
5.
Amount of E�i;psrvi ous Sui i ng.Moderate to.e
- xtens 1 ve .
6.
Ar -1 ss ;nci l4eOrest Pul$f 11. c Road(si3 = Frontage , on 01 1 ve H 'i ghway -
and, Aplca.AV nue. Access from Apica Avenue; Saddle, Drlve.and'
Lam a,t Loap,
�.
ethad of SewageDisposal Community
Nisewer, .North 0 rhan.k
Pubi,fie, Ut_111ty Dittr1a4'.,
H .
Sourca� of'. Water S� pp1 y» �:ommun �y Water, Orov i 1 To -Wyandotte
t-ir 1 gat l on District.
9.
Proximityof ' Power Lines -
- Along area ro;ads.,
1; m .
Pota�rit 1, 6 for furthar l once d T v i,s 1 ons and? deve l opmant : .
GendH41 Pian Amendment and .ketone.. WbUld peri-mit.the cr4ati6n,' '
of 664 R-9 1 oats,. 1=30 Rmi3 1 o-ts-, 7 acres commarc 1"al; ,
a- 1 r o, a9teo'ta1 Sett'i tie
Pb=lrn) Envir.: ro ;
1.
Terrain
a. Genesi Torsograph l c Ctiar•acter « Ra l 1 j ng faoth i l Is
ntersecte,d by�a few smal 1 `swat a"s.
b: Stapes's 2-25 Much of the site consists Q slopes o,f
6 1'09 w i th 1 U 25X along dra i nage
c. ®vat i oei t 70:� ta;, 105 ;` feet above Sea Leve
g 1 .
d. Limlt.ln® Factors:
a. Types anda Character i st i cs « . AUburh , Strang Eardwt=i to
ye wiii,i sh ;:.red•;; 1 d=28"' el'eep . Silty ,1 aaM w i thti as much, as
2090 o.f .O.Tu�me cons,��`st i ra" o f gran :iBobbles ori stone:_.=
r
b- Llrnttnig Factob^s Fi{�ii; rack; content,
latUOA1 Hszar s of tlhe ;Land'.
A. Et�rthquaGCe Zonae Moderate. Survey did` ,no reveal'
•► I .
presence o'f fat
b. Eros i onPot.snt;l si s Mad:erate
c. Landsllde Potentlhls Low.'
d,. F'1red- Hlgh