HomeMy WebLinkAbout88-42 BLAKELEY SWARTZ GPA (10)04 777771
u (6 i
V
S ,I;t O ' N
�c
I' y
1.
, r L ,i
jam`
jGr!1
w �
jSC�SJ'
W
Lu
uj7}r4Y1
Y
11. Qispacemeht cif ,people or :ausines
- s actrvrty
:vl,
.
Basis: There are c4urrently no residence:, or businesses,
�G,:, t`//
on the site, though `►t t currentiy.us--d-fibr winter and
`
spring grazing b the', ro er
T
--_ ,Y p p _ ty owners.__ Most:ot' this-
grazing use w-frmost ilikely'be discontinued, on aborit
half the site as urbariizationIS
occUrs there; but this
not considered significant due to 'the marginal value of
the soils for ,agriculture andgrazing; 'Haweiier, the
State Department
of Faod-and figr`iculture respcu�tled to
the previous appileation wrth a leiter statin is
ev
g era;)
concerns- The EIR should'
addressing? these concern's.- provtle documentation
,
Further
h11
Stud+' EI.Rclocumentetion should include information on 'the.
site's I -soils, its historyof-`agriculturaa activities;
the importance of farmlaritl sass, a'rad
.,
conflicts between
the urban land Uses end the grazing which still may,
`s
occUr oh the
'
1Z. f,`Rtier (state' �
T
G ' tr SEihtl%ItES, Describe 'the projects effects on
the following governr> entaI, s°arvicesz
X
1. FI re protectio�e
[3asistl' `ihe increase: ;in urbart Uses lull) c"ratite a
demand for addttlonal : flre rotection,
P
presence of- . Also; the
ne W residents ih the area
likeli ', WIIi I crease,the
hoot) of wlldland f ices
ripstope.. This, is a ar-
ocular' concern in upper l�lahce Cahyoti
�
'
coultl ca ryhere Winds
rry :fire to the';oUtsk ets of .Paradlse. ' 71P,
Califarhid Div: of Eorestryli3Utte
Ca+uhty pile"Departe
tri;eht submitted comments on the
preuioUs Biaieiey
Swartz Ranchr app) -I c41t6M which:requestea enalysls of
the foil scope of ser�rrces "hat
Eurtt�er Wlll be require,
Study The need for on-site fire protection feel lines must be
deterr;(Ined: This depends 'partiI
al)
lndu;:triel t�sesanthe site y an the nature of
Staff and +�quiprnent
needs
should be iri�luda�j in thea `
estltnatied na lysrs and dost',shouid be
for
inptt:td the fiscal' analysis. The eictent
offi�creased w� 1 .d frr"e�hear
� i ld i��' ct shou;id be determined
'
ehd he fee ,
sh`illt and adequacy of the
y
emer proposed
gency access road should be,, evatuatei,'
„
,
v L.
IRE"
.
I�'.
VI , l,A c
.N7 '�7.
1� l<
„
c]
4.�- C
�I�
W {i7 (AW
UJ to
u
Study
A full needs analysls should be provided as a basis for,
tletermining impacts on the affected Ork districts
"
(.Parad"s6i,.`Chico and Durham) as well as identifying,
-'-requ'ired on s0 fact/ ities The. updated Energji
Natural Resourde,s, and Recre,'ation'fiementof the.Butte
County C,eneral P lbnl thou ldbe used to guide the needs
assessment. Impacts to City of Chico parks should also
be evaluated. Mi i,gation measures'should include hot
:'Only ` the needed favi jities,'..but also the means of
for
funding development'and maintenance:
5. Traffic and parking ('ncreases in conylestion
X Unkh-
hazard)
',. Basis: TJKM Trins Consultant`s iter prepared a
'Traffic Mode jin,g Analysis for the Blakeley Swartz
1988) under C
Ranch'" (May, 9,� ori.tract:: to Blakeley
Swartz. T)is analysis=idenffIds-a--numier of signs-
— -
ficant impacts an the existing roadway 'networi�, and
needed improvements.to mitigate these impacts'inclu-
dih, „
g 'Wideh:ing of Highway ,99, improvements to the.
skyway !►hterchange, end 'a new interchange: Addition
iy; ' Ca I`trans,� iri respof ding to the' Notice .of
—
Preparation; on the p,�evious Blakeley Swartz 'Ranch
application, colt entetl on,the Foads and Issues heeding'
analysis. Th, se.commen,ts'are4reflected in the
Further
Study section belovv.
Study
IF the TJ, kM an •i` s s .'is
�) used" a5 a
Y. � basis,for ` CrrQA
,
'e,iialuetionthe folloiuing'taslts should"be conducted;
:I
The assumptions, data, and aha'ly�is of,the 'report
shoi�id:`:belerifi`eid
Conciuslbhs "should be frairied t+n CEC2A ternii"
hology Evia ation of impacts shouicl.l a gUlded"
bjt the Butte Couh'ty circ'ulati`on Eieinent'
Mitigation~ recommehdatibns should include a
disCusslon 0f the feasibility of identified
�° rryeasiires,
pawticularly re�atetl�to funding;;
sy The ahalysis of alternatives should include bath
a,itekna:tiire ian0 uses. oh, the sifeon d alternative
I
street patterns. `i`he. 1980 TJKMe- t floes
I
I
l
I
r "
a� m C c
:
w
....:w..Ills. 3r. it
_
b V) 'ch
N
Z A v
evaluate the 'need for a second Highway 99 inter-,
change from an :extension of the. Skyway, but the
EIFi should a so include an evaluation of a.lter,.-
native sites for the proposed interchange At: Neap
Road;
a lysis be basedVon
The ccarnula"tive impact an l should
-T
protections Which are consistent With those of
applicable plans;
The traffic. analysis should estimate traffic
generation in` phases through at least theyear `
20.10. It should identify impact's to Highway 99,
the SlzyWay and its i.`nterchange With Highway 99;
and the Pentz/Durham and Neal Road inter-
changes,:
The analyses should'assume a 4-"lane expressway,
from the Durham highway to Skyway: .
The .area of detailed ana:lysis.'sh'ould be suffi-
ciently ':farge to uncierstan6 impacts to, the Chico
Ur-ba.� area;
— - -
To tha extent possible, 'impacts to- lands ''from
interchange construction, should be ,identified;
, '
The effectivene"s5 of fea"sibi l ity of T8m t tea
'
sortation systemn management) artd TDM (,traffic
demand measures, should be evaiiiated,
_- ...
Mitigations shoul��'be, scussed by phase: For
example; it is likely that to (Jeal Road wily be `
necessary before a full interchange is biji)t and
these should be identlfied;
General 'cost'es tfrnates shoold e provided for al i
I
street improvements so that they can be used in.
the fiscal impact analysis;
,�
SafE�ty impacts should be locluded in `the impact
aha lysis. The; Durham Unified 5choo'` distript is
concerhed Withthe Niazards of school bUs eros-,
i 'h. a' 99 at Neal Road unit' l the: time
S. 5 o:f N W
g g y
ri�c.te
that a 'new n erc , ange can be const d'
.,1
I.-
I
I:
I
i
i
..
i py t
A
"
"L
CI
�4
N C t1 5' 1 O' N' S
i'
�
60C N w
r0 ... - C
ww Ct W V M ,
LI
Z` M
6. nerfgency response or evacuation dans
X Unkn
$asis "/ Further 'Study
The General an Map submitted by the applicatlon
r cad (Parkway) traversing the western
sort
an of-t he site and conneetln Nea'� Roan and thee
g
Skyway: It also shows an emergency access '.road' ,
connecting NanceCanyon to Neai Rgad. This combi-
nation ,of roads should. be evaluated by ti}e ,Butte
County Fire bepartment' and the Sheriff's DeParbnent
for its adequacy for emergency response.
L Maintenance of put 'lic facilities (roads, channels,;
etc.)
X" Unkn
;Basis; An extensive hetwoek f new'pub! is roads wi i l
;� require on-going ,maintenance. The roject concepti
p 1,
includes the formation of a community Services district,,
'which would be responsible for maIntelance of on-site
-__-
faci.lit--les; howeve.r_, this 'ts .not_a formal :part-o'f-
applicaton_
study
This subject shoulcl'be cbnsldered";it the fiscal analysts
partictrlariy with Iisgar•d to offsite m�ainten'anceneeds
(roads and landfill: The feasibility of the proposed
--
land uses I, o sup ofi"��InG,j hlaintetlanceCOsts Si10ulCi
'
be eXplored
t
,`8• Public matt tf`an5P orfattora, or alternative '
transpart�tion in iipree�rapt ng of some)
X Unkn
r r �� +'
basis No 'aSs tE-ans. t� s ko oaed on 'the s`
m 1 Ite.
_ p _p
'f�urKh�r
i#ery
The feasibility of extending piililic mass transpertatibn
�.
to the site s{ouid be cbnsidered in the traffic analysts.
It also should evaIUa'te the feasibility and desirabl,
o(`parkarid w de faallltles� and`bicy�ie and'pedes�trian ,
:
9Othea .state
Cor>�meiwtsk
i
i
r,
I+^ n
i`
s
N U
CL
r
0
0-4
iso
a
U, u
U
UJ
w
iii ^'
A
z
-` 'N. PUBLI,CAtri UTIES. Describe the'projects effects on
i z
the fo;ilow,ing util_itle5.
"Sewer or septic systems
X
l)ilcn
T - BaSITIFlCFur"ther.Study: The-proj !m concept 'includes the
reaiment of sewage by a package treatment plant and
spray dispos�al of 'the treated, effluent over'the_ golf,
courseand pasture.. (CWC -HDR, 1988 IiWasteWater '
I`
Reuse; Afte►-natives for Blakeley Swartz Ranch.).';
Treatment levels envisioned are: secondaryfor spray';
to pasture and tertiaryfdr spray to the golf course..
Separate wtnter� storage ponds would be provided
. secondary and tertiary effluent. These facilitles raise "
the following `issues which should be evaluated;
The LL se11 wage flows L feon the project - shou ld be ^
confirmed. The CVVC, I DR report assumed low ,
flows from R_&D type Lleve, opment as well asprei-
_ treatment. 1'te.Lh-potential for'F,rtgher flows and for==
unanticipated, unpre-treated flows from the '
Industrial''area should be assessedo
Healthhazards stio.uic be evaluate"d;: with
discussion of case histories. Potentjal health
- _ — etfects during a malfunction of the system "should
be included in the decision;
.
-� The means 'of providing for operation maintenance'
and regulatory responsibilities 'should{be
evaluated;
r
i
lar
I
r
' I
r
i
i x a
as r
n
S
i
cx
!
c
� S 10
v r%1
eon.
yy
y
.� .Sh
y. .0
ss
+�
QQ vi
Z
Poterrtiai impacts to drainage channels and
groundwater shiyuld be described Including effects
on peau stormfloWs; additions of chemical ton.-
stitt�ents in sprayed effluent, and accrdentai
releases o.f cheh�cals�
- - "" Potec trap odor^from siorage fPacil1tles should be
-
evaluated;.
The capacity of the soils' to accept spray
irrigation shoulc!',be assessed. if existing ooh-'
�
toUrs are to tie mairitalhed in the: spray areas,
then infiltrometer tests sii.outd be performed.
Soil 'borings cir other tests, may tie also
a r oprrate.
µpp
Alternative;disp6tal rmkhods shouidi�e discussed,
;`including use.of Elie City of Chico'Water pollution
Control 'Plant.
2. Water for dli*O, Otte use, and fire protection
- — -- _ - - t3asis/Ftarther Study; 1liater isp"roposed-to-be supp,lled"
llnkn
by on site, downslope ,peals and upsiope storage
p Icant
facilitres.' I t�ponsoretl' studies shorting
"uA
atle" vete :'
q q ntrty and''q�lality of effluent should be,
confirmedi Adequate fire flow for industrial facilities
- should be' -demonstrated. Potential drawdown
_ _
-
.o.f
groundwater leve`Is 'at fectIng 'neigiibortng wells should
be evaltaatetl. Also some evaluation rs .needed 'of the
possiliility'that,a cone or cones„bf depression atthe
roduction° ac
p w Il(s) ct�ufd lead. tocpntaminatron frtixn the
landfill site. Flna{ly, only cine wo rsshown,on the;
applicant's maps, and this shouicilbe clarified.
3. Naiiral g;es or electricity
7 unitn
Ba,sist frlectricity would ,b' tertd_ed to the various ..
Uses eti the:,site by owe site or ne�►rby PC lines: A',
significant "'tlemand ;for these utilities Wlii' 'resuit,
It is Unicrto4lii� 'at this 'time Whether ow not-,u,jiii'lative
�
tiemand,,wilimpact the' etist`ing system.'
Furilser
study” umuiati e demend ?bn; the`se ficiii'tles should be
addressed; as should {the' 0�1 site need for.substations,
trahsmr'ssion fine's, aid ot�rar~' ti+s.
994
�t
fS Y
I
II ,t
C
d.
A'
•� :�',� �.4i
1C
�
W Lu W �
b. �, CC
pp ®
I. SOCIO-ECONOMIC. Descrihe any adverse physical
effects which could resultfrom the following socio-
economic ,factors:
1. Expendi4ure, of public funds 1n excess 'Cif 1puislic
revenues 71geraerat_ed �y :private Rrrt)ects Ir
T
Basis; The project as proposed is a mix of urban Land
use designations: Though theL,r packet submted'by the
'It
applicant includes a potentiaj phasing program, th1 is is
not formal jy part of the project descr pti.on Thea
phasing plah Is based on the applicant's expectations
of development potential. The applicant is aIii1,h or
buildout of the Industrial area over a period' of 2.5
years, the residential area over 20 'years`;at a rate Lof
210 Units per year, a7d the commercia`I
area as a
market is generated, A fiscal impact study based onl.
these and other applicant: assumptions Was prepared by,
Angus McDonald and Associates (June, 19Q8j..
,The
results showed a positive fiscal outlook to the County
-.- ;both %earl `' =
y- antl at protect bei Idouf
--- - -= - -:
Amix bf jahci uses are proposed by the applicaht. In
gehera,l,'from a (`and use.'planriing standpoint, a mixof,
land uses has a greater poteht;i:al. to_ipay its way! thah =
- -
T -
exclusively residential land uses. If a'ba'jahce' not
achieved, ,adequate revenue to the "County'''may not be
ge,heratetl. to cover Increased costs of providing ser"
vices-- �' However, ;whether 61- not this bal'a'nce Gari be
achievetl is highly dependant on market conditions and
eitpected growth rates and not on land Use designa
tiohs alone. Tris Issue 'nee' S to be'explored further.
For instance; thoUghla mix of Land uses Is proposed itLJ;
IS uiic fear whethor or not the market exists for the
enera l l ,
g y positive revenue generating industrial Uses.
Contrary to the conclusions of the Mcbanald report;
tie potential exists for a negatjve fiscal irrspact to the
County if iridestrlal beiIdout does no occur as eipec_,
ted 'and if rejativel. high.,06eaII Ihcome Levels targeted :;IL
for the,resid6ndaj area popu,ja'tidh do hot result:
Md n .1 L yj
'the potehtial exists for fjscal`I pacts to
thd, touh,V 1f the site incorporates or Is ahhem, d to
Chico: A gtial3tative ,descriptloh .of these lrripacts
should be provided.
l
1
I
r a
0
r
f'
I'
y
1: CMf.Rit1. PL ANS �I�D "PLEWMIlt" Pf1LIC Y.l the,
Yes No Maybe
prajeo't:
r.
% Incons"istent' with the County General PianT
X
Basis. The project renu_res an amendment to the: Land`.
Use Map and may be inconsistent with eerra�n General
Pian policies. The. EIR needs to provide an analysis of
the projecta consistency with the. policies of tk a Land`,
Use ElLment and other elements 0f the General 1`110h.
r
inconsistent -with cific Plans?
_ X
8a* sis.' There are ria specific pians affecting this area.
3.' InR:or►sstent-with',bther"adopEed polities?
- X
�Basis.: See discussion under Item 1, above.
# �,
9.. Inconsistent "with adopted plans oi:.ottier agen§I:
Bads: Evalvotion,ssh6p' K, be prby.idecl+af the peoj;e,ct's
.Con sl st ency wit z the G ico Genera i P fan, and polices
e
State De ar_tt nt df . P'sh'
-- - -_St'
of the p _and Game-- the'-.
-- - _
Regions'( Vater *Iuraljty Gontrbl Bozrcl; local school
dis'tr'icts, and aiiy other affected agencies.
si Ponti
teally growth'-inducingT
X `1
Bas is: The project' would provide' urban service's where
hone currently 'e'xis`t :and i"li have,' the effect of
mtanity
ct'eatin,g a no, w'sateiiite Co :, ? ebb h lilduCe-�'.'
ment concerhs'related to: creat ln!j-, neLV urbaiit center
nciud thepotential too future general pian amerrd�
menu, near tite area, offs -setting of the jots jhoutlhg l
b a Janco.,' and a change ln'.the growth patfern of nearby ,
cities lnclpol Paradise 'and Ghicoi p xialiy, the
Cases roe
project propflses st of Highway 99 creating the
poteh fla: F 'for growth Im cement ort agricult�iraliy
valuable lanris nearby; as WO as near Durham.
,
7777777i�
-.. 777
v•
Further
�y ;5tiudir
Consistency, with ``Adopted Plans4 The Elkllreeds to `
the p ject"s consiistencY With;
provide an analysis,,of
the policies, 0.9 the Land.'Use Element aad other ele-
ments: of the General Plan. For example; Neai Road is
currently unclassified rt'the, CircPlation Element. The;
potential need for reclassification of the road should
be eVaivated.
„in general, the of the Butte County General
"
.policies
Plan should be .used as a criteria to assist in the
the -'level of impacts. 4rty inconsistencies'
evaluation'tif
noted in various;chapters of the EIR should be "sum-
-
-=��arixed iri:a discu1. ssion of the project"s consistency -
vjifhthe General plan.,
Evaluation should also be ,pro�id�a of tote proj'ect's
consl`stenc .w'ith the Ghico General Plan,'and policies
of h-6 State [7epartmetit of Fish and Ga►rie, tthe
Water'::Quality Conte6l 19 :ard,' loca17 scHoo'I s r
Regional
"districts, and any other affected agencies. ,
Growth Inducement
r'
potential for fUture general plan amendments'
beluated r- this should incl:ide alt
onsite should e4-
analysis of the ;potentialjor proposed jobs -housing
ti . should ibe1. tied
ba.'ance to bd offset and this a- 1, .�s
Into ; tiie fiscal analyis.-
Pd$s effects an the planned, p"01 ern of growth
analysis.
the. ':cities of Chico and Paradise ,steeds.
'
`t he'pote'ntiat for growth lnducerrient on agri,ctlturally
�ialua1.b le lands nearby, as Well as in flUrham,, snotllcl e
piiWated.
i
of the land use �iaMety proposed r,>
'
rn riatehes§
The app p
lnclUding the,demandlor `supporting land uses sUch'as
ublic-quasi-public�ctittUral,and recreation shoUldine
p the
assessed. 7hls discussion' shou'Ici be.baset� on
'
d economic stud
tnahket 'ar► y' rr
y
.;. fEO1F t C TO PR O E+CT
K' OTHER ROl`ENTIAI. IMPAG`T�
�,'doscribi
f=,
,
9 t,
' "' /'!vJ rj �
i '6r�0A ,'Horn lly.arcitloy.
ttod 'uses sbbi iticliide the follbtting types, ot.
ias,supp
c, �j"; Q
, pol,ic#es of the Ouki
5
1iteAS! A. lEtded in tl
tha Ganorr,q
"•
.'rcirri'a prop asc App
. ;'
;: plahi}ing s.tin. ardto :,
all include'such•Uses as alectric arid eleCt2oriic
be aatabl£ehnd bcR�o
ateuiaants and devics}'s, but excluding' bicrochip
A; iL�4
'
1. �Tt
r
°h `ark n
:ers P thei
h arc
o p
,n,
qy.u�'vel :for .anti
ex Y
'J
`�at:�lities, rest:arcl
AJ
or{yeniratiol,s:5�� Tera
sal Plans btst' h1t h' shall trot. be peizAtted 1n the
Utica
a,rk, are lis'ted 1'n achsaoh
Attt A. -
Itatkltrlireir Vfldiny;'rhaps
ign and" usei;ill be: controlled by a apecitfc. pian
iby
Conditichd and lid strict ions which til; 'define
`
r bu£lditg si a ,arid`height, parking, 1'oading, .
�I
aryl -
h
-
,t
'
"rYFrraW 9':.hsF rtth,5�ry2' t!l' ir,lplti txtIp
� ` =t'su•'kr iu►1tir1 teat ijeKiiyr4,
q I•
tho butte County :rel
u
end
uniycrs£r �,�et;aarrrh'.
I
`
Ootltienp
`rr4H rtfrrr rr'enkts bt rtahlnw�,t pldsti
Orr taizorded Ccvdnanl
brtehln-plirtEs;: "tbrtttati
ids* I
hfldnca ii11g,, setbac)
��
ekteriar�r3igl ting at
osflrif rntl dporfs. #rLYrderi
ttarr+tiseff:r! 6hd, tha,
'a. TR
ricluding oar "q ai
tet rlUbihuii
, ♦ktrirrleni ,
-;�iarcely �ata'1 built
2a rammna
G, anti alabora a on, uie 1and ;gaharsl ''county i±i¢s }
u`nty Cene`ral Plan for each •af the 'planni)tt�. , ik
aVgley 5`Uat;tz Rbtleh II
d
n lkoendr�ent � 't�e fi'rs`t step ih thriyptlblit', � �
b1a oniiig, and° ldivision approvals ,and sitec
aa.'�avenants, Conditios andteskrlctions tt'iii
y 00111lin t)evelopmnn't ,ntill bq perm%tted,.
dUstria1 Area wi'1l be used for h un V4l.rit�lR,
o a� which Is tnrrnvitlo an environment 1t. 11
ihatitukiorYs'—and specialized mahtifactur ng y ''
�'" � ,y�4
ttod 'uses sbbi iticliide the follbtting types, ot.
I
z+iniatrStiv'e., educational,''and executive' offices
AtttrFit taaEerla,r, i.8
let e't weTki�'Irre�qHit aha R[isei ,
'k3ha[r8tutidyr tuii'dtbsa ;bFkfrlAlr�e
d Caciltrles.,
Iranr� tfGtllTihij. bi'itir4tofkrni<Y m2 rivtAt
I
acaitch racii'itias, or- iaboratorics*
�t3t�papat� h3hC[tPltt'tue4 YJk 6nitkrriiM)y
teat Rt, tdir, naltr lot aahitthee�� 6n4
I
ecinli^ed hanufact'sin
ug organiabe£ons, �+hia#t '
4,40atturitc
all include'such•Uses as alectric arid eleCt2oriic
,
ateuiaants and devics}'s, but excluding' bicrochip
� ANMri� ririra�sr'Eihk,gt
nufaCturers. '
t
vrit?rrd rlrragi�e;t,irlti��tr
ciiytiinf W-dti necessary anqappropriate to a
y' ,
isbrslty Aescarch dark such as cafai6ria acid
r�ir+t.ritiwtlab nt;
r�tlfiw��dtyri`iha'� Tnllt'edlt,
t ;i "
'
s permitted:undei the'industriA designation of
hh�, .ariF1'R. bnd WtiA @tXnp�rwr
sal Plans btst' h1t h' shall trot. be peizAtted 1n the
'tepf
a,rk, are lis'ted 1'n achsaoh
Attt A. -
Itatkltrlireir Vfldiny;'rhaps
ign and" usei;ill be: controlled by a apecitfc. pian
lira rtrp� il+i 11idr5ttY r it Ito Iii n tWKati
oft, be 6bnbf' Ab tttErir•'ip
Conditichd and lid strict ions which til; 'define
`
r bu£lditg si a ,arid`height, parking, 1'oading, .
4�h
t4sid6hii i !Ott.. toreaotetA!
vitri�rr`a-rr sr..rs+. )f�f„irt,rtrtrY�t+,;t' at Res
��, ti: oc+thhla areaesidehtfalr, The t
itcsideticidi id £ntertded for golll"tiourse And rc
0 a
us consistcitk frith', tiir rbothill i4eda AOr Idtir
, Yeixidaiatial tfsa a�i2'16c nni`tki!°t•e�'`
"•
tirttyv net,i-'60tI M uft Ori -i
.uidkbq
I
P
� I �
AtttrFit taaEerla,r, i.8
let e't weTki�'Irre�qHit aha R[isei ,
'k3ha[r8tutidyr tuii'dtbsa ;bFkfrlAlr�e
,
Iranr� tfGtllTihij. bi'itir4tofkrni<Y m2 rivtAt
�t3t�papat� h3hC[tPltt'tue4 YJk 6nitkrriiM)y
teat Rt, tdir, naltr lot aahitthee�� 6n4
�kpt'lnq:
4,40atturitc
siutF trill t taa+ie�+� eer
,
"nYrriyrirEi�NiN�:
� ANMri� ririra�sr'Eihk,gt
h Gftfil rit11r Sbundrifs
,itirigs laspblrbk'
t
vrit?rrd rlrragi�e;t,irlti��tr
tsA'iNR na�tbr+tCt
y' ,
' v.rYut+z:r<s31i twst;t�'trrpryn
' tpritstixr�i rert�
r�ir+t.ritiwtlab nt;
r�tlfiw��dtyri`iha'� Tnllt'edlt,
t ;i "
'
'.m31�trF yup
Mfi���
hh�, .ariF1'R. bnd WtiA @tXnp�rwr
r
0
'tepf
`bli�rtt tltrk�rlt. Vt�+l Iri}ti�lYs+t rl'll
,. Illtrtida� tatnrtkPirl'o, tiyn,9rl�a�a�tl'.t�h
Itatkltrlireir Vfldiny;'rhaps
af—a
lira rtrp� il+i 11idr5ttY r it Ito Iii n tWKati
oft, be 6bnbf' Ab tttErir•'ip
�t``
,,.,J
'
Fki�f Y+Mot Wraetiria t' i}I1 lain., 'eMr
1N id't'7f`'tnh. dhhb'klitd tit rendrrl'
]rt�rfrr4�� ,�wtMl.,risrt errlT�2wt'trYT�k'bladya
4�h
t4sid6hii i !Ott.. toreaotetA!
vitri�rr`a-rr sr..rs+. )f�f„irt,rtrtrY�t+,;t' at Res
'
"rYFrraW 9':.hsF rtth,5�ry2' t!l' ir,lplti txtIp
� ` =t'su•'kr iu►1tir1 teat ijeKiiyr4,
q I•
loobiit AKNilor
vAed* iii Aut,b v�'t''d*
u
end
Ithii NrntatActitring9, b
«, brEir�tgp.r; 'tbtoer Yhd 'prtib
I
`
Ootltienp
`rr4H rtfrrr rr'enkts bt rtahlnw�,t pldsti
t�retttrbiin?j tiAt'stl ihy `p83 iiChihy` aRIrl
d
brtehln-plirtEs;: "tbrtttati
ids* I
tsrtblrihq+ .btaHer Sy%d btr
dolt patitsdtrr,,� deAIyth7, harv� 40011ii
��
pl►f hJ tlYtCdik`Lt'S+j�T illlMirtl t'9�9 rdR'r Etwkk te,
osflrif rntl dporfs. #rLYrderi
ttarr+tiseff:r! 6hd, tha,
eyfdne•Ahd, rur� G1GFi4kMt t+4h}�tkr xfto
dh&4tYt `ienl bhhrtl,irih rnhntis� 'taaJhr
tet rlUbihuii
, ♦ktrirrleni ,
,
Iii Indd9tt ail ,ArOA
linited to 10 of tach
t eiieeeid, S�dQCS;`OOd ` r
r. !
t
stt in,the-tabEhil1 Area
lhted uses, and other
t
ti V, desigtiat ion , No
tsall be `those .est 1si 1beth in''Yil
nrge
.oxcept' that>the avera
ial Areas shat! be n.C#paten
e'i t ial. Arbti "till prima -ily ;: 7.
'is no ` interidbd for t.a
bhal trill. Yr till :hcludts;, ,�
0 "such dkl ar public anis goasi�
tlrti
.uidkbq
at
is!lrstb's,r,ririyiirgi;
s� '�
ebndlf
trlriirt6tttttiridw.esraah
�kpt'lnq:
thilri
Arid tablf
Irdtt kiln;ir fmAcytibth Ahd.>
!
h Gftfil rit11r Sbundrifs
,itirigs laspblrbk'
'
hh�lrrFttiYhlKrj, Nath
�.
et LLhaldUmirAriutFtthtln„,'
papbt< 6e,t'MAlrwtbctuTingr
'piyubb+i YnA>SU[btttfFt'nq.
c;,dtl.raundhbwsfs
'tepf
v ft
Itatkltrlireir Vfldiny;'rhaps
af—a
trft�brklrtrj �tIintra yarit
.li And 6Ehai� rgrlt:uiturrl
t4sid6hii i !Ott.. toreaotetA!
ysrdr, ea:sikeirl il�fftbtk:
r'. lilrahA>t�'l14d' 14,mAire
A7• rid,bghmfttlrE'hbq
rksihe'pl�irtit+
a Cfrtl
.owirptriq
Y•
sUl}rrrt�urtr
u
end
tovl brit
�trti
i 4It
brtehln-plirtEs;: "tbrtttati
ids* I
ni} hail ass�kliliriq at
C, � tai �: , ; ;
�
osflrif rntl dporfs. #rLYrderi
ttarr+tiseff:r! 6hd, tha,
.i p
tet rlUbihuii
, ♦ktrirrleni ,
,
niytxtt4tIht►r
pilttrltij:
!?
�,,j�rkj+
l ptsh►if,4
and
Wtlnq, 44
*p thAde
t.irtd dukthrUlinq
rtiepsF
ttbrptttlil'tit1id 4h lilt
:+wj
4ptdrtbEkiWq shopi�'
J � � '�U�
l4� a I � ) yj�'L �
� 1 j!� � i� `' tt � �y � �r I�s It ' ���
'!Y- ' , u."� T1anrAtivea,cimt�at.eeyi
r
at It 10 .general I plan level, itfact should ',e I paihted but and appropriate
r� reconmefidati4ns made. it'�jili algid be impGxtanE to cliseuss holy proposed.m tigatibn
fiABuS ti►l71 fit iftBUte.CbUrit's eXxsting xealatory sr'stem. Capt the prapased
measure' � z�eadil un lembnted? In ►nand dews', ` tin zaniri re nations':Ma be
Y p� xxs €1,Y
r
expected to tniti ato irnp cts, will they tie Atte' ad e.
,
{ ,
5 I J
Speciftrstudies w+ch will by tteec��ci dt�iring future tiered ekzvim iifiental revietiw
j
should be:'outl ned &o tha °tW
level of erivironmen'tal cle�a Ahee affatded 'th •�Iit
is; red''I y apparent.
I
,'
t
i 11
11 W
�I
°•s „l .l
t ,
I
Y
(
l
I
,a
,
i
a �
t
J: V,
�.'
�^..,
t +
Jtd;
Y u I y
4' u
Xmpaat
and ixtigatxon e.a egomes shoul�t ;inZlude heals x faetors r
M
sa,fetywirid), energy°;oosts�; ar�d �;aesthe t''�
xes.
,
, '..
Ara�r appropriate recarifquratian of land use designataris
t
should
eF pr6poser3. '
E'NERG ;
alustion of curnulativa energy �t5e. and mems of mftiga.tion,is. needed:-
utilit}r and feasibility .of parr and °ride "facility ,should be assessed.
AESTf tTfc FACTORS '
>
A viewp ,e, an"& ysis of the ares-shbuld be' pe"rfozme .: tc� form constraints maps.
y'
SpeCii'c analysis .should include:
tT
IdetiEiaation of sensitive irie.Wirig;'areas 1, "
to
F`uture' view s of the site from sUt"undin'g` zreas;including thy,
kyCvay. ,
c�
�
i L
Uxscussian of ni-ghttfm,e views ''and appropriate mitigation
meetsures �
katbxllty
n
The, of e�ustin zonxn . t
g' g o mitigate pptentfal visual impacts should be ,.
eneritlly di`seusseci. A�Tditiatial` measures shbul,d be t�ecommerided as'
cvhich�l`Cauld 'inc,zude; w: recessa
,
1#equired phasfng program to promote brdelypeararxee of�,
wth
n'
Mffbr strips
k4tiizes
�}
Visual ebnstraxnt areas where development she ��d riot 6ccu.or!''
where• spec'xaj development tschniquo, s ai+ez reqed a
tAdditional ,re' Mations wliicix "
CneY tie necessa tb , out. ` ,
u
a
,c
90nei�al' pl.'an ;`aesthetic " oal§ and ` y
ai patxbxes �xY1 the area
A :slope '� nal}�sis shoMd he rep .6 .6 `to identify cliff IV. g an �lppes5 over 1��
in appro'prxat slopeategb,ies to fbrm ,a devetbpment banstx°sints kiap. '> he M�
should
ien't%fy trey visual do straitxts and bsit ve future'"
p. si
'the alaili�ty
of impYementxng xbtiing to ensure pt citerction o,P th'ese f store §hddld "
ber explored.
ixii anon me'ast�i 's'shbuld then be .ikeb0Yri 00idett 'i�iliich could iriblude
fieri+e
such ah.
Rdw-hfigtireci land `else de'affmati i
ons,
�i
' " 'Actdiibrial regiitntions +hich stouid apply 'ta l{ey
'foatures;
dud+gid` den§i`de's ih e
It y.`are as
u
s
I r
it e'i �� r o ' d, •
, Y•
C I i •I .a
1 i'
I
I 1
I, G
, t i I
tentxi l odor frori storage Pa YliEies should 1 e ev lusted'
'folloiti'ih sl5ec `al stil les ;should be, prepareo
s
Alilibadt sponsored stticids" showingdeivate 'quantity ahs
M
_ ;
UA 'of a flue- , sulci be conftrjw
i quate fire . to for uidustrldi fabil ties:Should oe demonstrated.
po. en la drawdown -of"' "Undwat+ r.'Ievels affecting ne ghkior ng
y ells. shb c °b"; eValt�ated. '
.„ biIrG e�ralue.tYbh Ys rieedecl of'th bs517i1't t t r
Wil?, ebn�;b�. cb�es
_
,
af-clepressio o.t ttie prodictiori ,we11Cs`i bbuld .lead 'Ea contarninatc�n
o
ro'm� the landfill sttea
only,, one, tvel is sfiown bill the a libantrs Ana s �tid this �}f�iuld
p. ►
j3(: ClBrlfxed,
`
i44itigatibri nnexsure"s shotiYd S(" SSW
1
dit hal.,u86S t' hil' h sttoi�Xi snot be a l�iwer lu tt a ustri�l
��1tlw
'area re�lt►tive tb `speoYfie surfab.e ehcl grburYci4�tateY? concords iii
Thalibilit :if e.l,iStY�i t M 5 } " s ,yo
g g. o YtYgte con+ce ns e�ate'tb
r Ir'
`.r�ltiZtidl7u
,t�"ulatlbitS
y
, SU15ttiCS lYl tl1Ys
r'Y
�I • � ' ���11y�5(
� 1 `�i 15 I
k '
1
A
i I M
",,.,1,•
y I{,
° ', irn
cif an for;various off��s�.te-public facil}ties utrpacted to ,y
fir,
;atloft P�:
OF
redUC#,:-canal COSt5tJ.
-
; �g
,�
Appropriate :mechanisms ar publid entities to provide public `,�
,
ecAiities suc#� :xs a'gency 'inSormation, ar�neicaton,� or
i,
incorporation,
�
�•��
O �,:•r
tV
.D 'Vie opnnen , impao
Ila
appropriate off site General Flan atinendments including related'
� r
t inging sup i1 ' '61 p .es.
Impacts of. acry recomrrrended mitigation hieasutIes. 5haiild also beevaluated.
�.
it LAND, t1SE GONCERI
Q
-
�` The„ Issuesf conformsrice tivxth the charact1.er of the surrounding area ar}d
coinp8itibility of internal land uses need: to be .. studied r in ,further, depth and
G
a propriate tiitigatiorl Measures or alternatives recommenced as necessary Which
imay,,includes,
I
duffers between.,;interior conflicting land use's
k .
�} s ecial. design Rheas implemented
�l ,equire ��nents rat* future p
it
i
t�rrrough existing or nein zoning regulations;
G�hahges s proposed land use corifigurataon,
n� incl
"' Iatric leiate these potenti&1 conflicts sho
titin zo in to al
'fhe of imp g
til
adequacy
be addresses ano ''a ro' riate:! `commendations made::'
pp p
_
irre specific rorlsistenc► assue, involves the presence o'f publi0 lrsnd on the site. The
Bureau of land MMI has stated that'about fiJ acres of lana iii the rrorttiwiest
w ; ,
"''brner' of Section G CZfownship 21 `ortli,.:Range ,East) is tinder its jurisdiction.
The EtR stioulcl e�plore the proiponentIs intentions jvitYireg rd to this land, tf txs
�1 yr"i+
tomglrr iinciex the BGi1i- the analysis should +evaluate the `compatihUity of proposed
E
uses with tfie objectives and, polic%s of the 13r4 i,
�N
'the EItt needs to xavb a an ana ysis +�f the project's consistency with the policies
I�
,
i�
.
'Land Ude Element and other elements of. tihe.Ceneral plan, and other adopted
plans. Analysis should- ineltidet
Y�.
The. potential need. for r�:clasaxficaton of teal Roa Cl should 'be
evalutecl., �Zt is currently` urtclassifid xn the Circulation
.. to general, the policies of the F3ut�e! Coii ity` General Llan should
be used as a eriter+ia to assist zn the a*4ali anon a the 1Pvel of
i
Impacts« Ali incnsstencieg noted in iotas chaptersvof the
I
tR shoul+� be stlmtaared iii a dsciissor! of ttie project's
cailsisteYio r ith ''th General 'palati. 11
'
Isle tend'
„ valuatfoii should also Lie provide i of the ,praJeot s eor y.
„ t
dvlth the Chdo General Plans aS�d policies tiff the Mats Depl
d' Game t�7t` Re lonral, Write crallty Co n
;Ment Fieh an g.
affected
.of
'!soard� l0 cat"school distrlcte. find ariy- other igeixcies�, ,7
i
t n I
9f 6,
wi
Q
rx 1` 'PACT
Analysis ,o govah Iridupempnt, thef'c4t:):WfiIg 1torli,
14,
11orfutitrelgone'a-i plananend,
ments shbiIcValtabid
be - this should ihie F4n analysis 6f the ;potential
Pori` proposed h
JO b, s- 04,81balance b I
1, to
, 9 be offset and should
bq�I1' ct, P ,,in 6, the .
PJasIbI& eff6dtibir the p1'aftft d pattOr, of 'aro in the, cities
Paradise. 'needy
�r T
he Pdiehtialfbr_growth ii
inducement ement on agriculturally" validablel
�.andi 0,00b its wqil, hAl 61'j,k's
ds-1h Dur jh IA b
4, 1
qu, e
0 Thel appropria, emzss, f eixproposed
shobe eva1j'
luatedtAkilig account ,the domajid torSuP66kihg land uses'
SuPb_dg� public -q ublici be
reatian,sh6it)'d
a,,`Seq�edase
'. ThISdisctj8si6ft,,I ci �b --d the market l, an
economic study.,
LTERNAt V
A I ESI,
J4
_�J A projdd _
Given a''general plan 'ame-fidi- -�nt'
. analysis
me0
e
t alternatives
taii
an�:in integral h' t
_miniMt�lMIterha Wes-
n
shbb b'd
Non' e.V616
D ppMV A Wdstfit," lfthduse desi t
gnEL ions,
,
o un er�reqjIdged esigna, 1611s,
At least - " , 1�-
rl-:one !a nd Mix dbtL "k -t
nell y at te isca
d
�"O .11
ysis,
'i1 MlT. `Alternative site dedIghbased oh envronfilO jo nStrai t
AAnalysis. n�OA6 abt6i6
d :e,: "rf
I d
'Aln4 Idda ions
IV t
'' '
As socm as the 9, tOrnatiVe's_ tip be discussed '', 6�61 ulated.;
1".. , ge.n, ra formulated.; the, gAtt <j
1 :e
0 uperVIs6rs,,w*1l,,j) trI p_,Ihput�. As�a,
t SU
ani" S�'I a erna Wes,
:identified.
21
GAt;'
Ireil
prdj;ozd t", h 6tild indludd ii 16Wy special ing Ohl OtQA id t
dit rev new thea
, ,_.
or.legal ,jeu hcoonfmifty wj'jh CIA jtil�6iih,6a
n �w: Q t
vNva.w 'tne t3utte cbuht-,
a;n
�onStiltants ,re"spp
tnQ. 'comments prxortvotnl3e�a�
'EIA tided on,.;; ,.: .
of
(the revs 16t � the elrra ft t~'fiu
?' Attend pubiia heal'7intsras 17AftAG'a�i+sr n w.i1
?IL or the t2rLs.1; °EIR.
A
1
a,
I
`< The
e work ancludMg
ainal consultant X11 pe orm� all rise ssaiy x�esearrh
ara
required it order to cors�plete a iiraft ami fin,nal
A requrred will not be deemed completa until the'final
Etatsecepted by tie
<lCount;� 9oa of Supervisors.. ,The corist�l an,t twill provide fixe
ronmental final Bits in ;a fom t t en'vf �
�' a hit outlines existing conditohs end1J
General P1 ri+ pol
c:tos,.` proL—rject imPact ,Aqd 'reletiansiijp to Generel Plari
pnlicios, tnxti94 10fi tbisures, &hd . cientifieatiori of rtt`psets cvhich
�ie 's
mitigated as deli Is cnht of
s the approat described i n t1ts It.p.,
�• The c nsults�Yt will W,-, t Tel , fob preparing sll nese !
the lues
`maps.;
r
ineXudin!'Y cirri
C� base
a
I
�
I
S�
u
.�I
f
6 j
• iiif`ty five C55) copies ►� t�te ctrei`t lR - 'I
� as �acce�3tpti. b� the
uG4
the WiVL1-[{14twig ^'� •`� --+.aw �.Vaa1.GLlL I
noaie�g ;Director
} 7ected `by C'lannin
I
`< The
e work ancludMg
ainal consultant X11 pe orm� all rise ssaiy x�esearrh
ara
required it order to cors�plete a iiraft ami fin,nal
A requrred will not be deemed completa until the'final
Etatsecepted by tie
<lCount;� 9oa of Supervisors.. ,The corist�l an,t twill provide fixe
ronmental final Bits in ;a fom t t en'vf �
�' a hit outlines existing conditohs end1J
General P1 ri+ pol
c:tos,.` proL—rject imPact ,Aqd 'reletiansiijp to Generel Plari
pnlicios, tnxti94 10fi tbisures, &hd . cientifieatiori of rtt`psets cvhich
�ie 's
mitigated as deli Is cnht of
s the approat described i n t1ts It.p.,
�• The c nsults�Yt will W,-, t Tel , fob preparing sll nese !
the lues
`maps.;
r
ineXudin!'Y cirri
C� base
a
I,
C.onsulttirit i3lidl l�
vada
! �coprns uErie'�if�s l`cillow�hs«�
)'eopfes d' f the Adi
m r'astrative draft L, tRto 6e
t
pre ;entecl to tris plallhfng l?irectc5i+ in cook nee°
the sc}te.ute of tntb
etlarruindeti
• iiif`ty five C55) copies ►� t�te ctrei`t lR - 'I
� as �acce�3tpti. b� the
Iilanning f)t
ire tot%# d
I I:
�
I i I
,' � ,' ,I Ick � �'i.f�y fiY� :b5 �� �.. � a�, ,;�, l •�� �'�°
i uncL cr�pies and one +tl� rep, €ltt Bible �copy�,rif
I tile' pYi�posed Bina# E'p�
,M '
> k
'
rF IY I.
/
J�Q,y
p
U
lift hound_ 66and on ."
zee roclucible
tie final
___ ?� 101
pip
.p _.....
co
, . _ of
PY
__.
� �i14 L�
� I t' • f, a u� 'Yi ' s c'� I r i q k
M
In order to evaluate all ,submiltais corisisrentl
y' l pro oq* sh6uld
umngo, the following c rganization
" General ;App,aeh rrr
f 4
6c�rk Program
Cshould address each of the MOA`reciujred
elements with,
r emphasis;on proposed agreater
pproaeh too each, of ` l'' key_
n , t RF:P�$ issue'_discussed
Coss by-
• �hedule �sI
�l
CA statement of date of l a8ministratiye
craft completion ,and' . ;.
estimated Final EIR preparation 'time will lief sufficient:)
,
The Prod ec t Tears tl I
lee Wildger' and `ho
g urs do�nmitted,l to'pjeet
3
Summery uf;key per,�rinel and subdonsultariks;n
pare the EIRE will pre
Briof somina ofcl 4 a,
'Y recti" .x�l
Y ated experience udirig Mils
on o erg ,nzcl
g plan ,amendments asci pli�nirig doctunents ias
`as'
well actual preparation orf Gener` z1; Plans an area P,in_ns
- ltefe
n
,r
'ice schedule
ld Re
�k nes of Pro'eet T eam
Lf
1so� please Sub' mit at least one copy
related do
of a rel oument p pfd }� Y 'o a- flxtn.
��'1
I I i' I I✓•
I
i
I I
1 t �
I I
I I,I
i
r
d
f1
I.• u f � I, f•
fl I 1
.9 'k,
14
f k: r i
f �
1 1 1
�r
9. f�
I
f I 'S i� I
� I
�, �•
tW'� 1 �1� S � f I`
1�
b
- i
L. J
B:
r
se and Government Code Section 65950 et seq.,'and.Developer
;
hereby requests, pursuant to Public Resources Code Section ,
3
21.52.6, that County engage, on a temporary ;basis, a person or.
I
4,
ersons to erform 'tht services, necessary to permit, the County, to
P p
,
meet, the specified time limits.
E. County desirescharge to-Develops r the "fount
_ 6 .
_to
- - - -
necessary to defray the costs directly attributable to the
g
services; performed, pursuant to Government Code Section 659501 et
seq'. and``Pub 11: Resources Code Section 21151.6.
'10.
NOW, VHZREFORE, in consideration of tiie mutual covenants
a- _ a ee as fo3.lows;
and.' promises' 16 f. she par..ie's, the .parties hereto gr
12
1. Engagement 0f,Services. County 'shall engage, on a
l
temporary basisyar� independent, qualified planning consultant
iznelud�ng riecessaty. clerical or secretarial support)
14
15
approximately edulva1 rit to one fu;-j-time "Go"unty employee
-
t+►Manner"' tii perf6 t all services ne^cessary to process
17
Developer's a, Icati'cin or,,,a General Plan Amendment.
I
2. Payment of Costs. developer sh'&11 deposit with the
18
,
lg
Oourtty ah amount' estimated to ,cover the coast of services 'of the
2n
P1'anner for a peYiod o not less than 'six months; estimated to be^"
•-' 555, d00) Dollars. County shah. p ice to
f2.fty five thbusanci ( rov
.21,
Detieloper a. `statement at the end of each month with s breakdon of
the ttable to P'lanner's ser vices necessary tb
costs directly attrib
24
process Developer sGenerai E].artttnendment dor that month..;
Developer tYralle rii:tified in the' event that the em&ihintj
p'' 28
deps%t or 'cast o services necessary ito procirss Deve1 beer i s
4ti
I I 1'
I
. ,,.
k _ iy n �•,
43,1
1 t-project is,"ioss than eight thousand eight Hundred Dollars
2
is8,g00.00j, and Developer ;shall, within thirty (30) days of said
notice, ;deposit an additional amount equal to SQ%. of the initial
deposit specified. above to cover ,continuing costs directly
att ibutabld to �lanner`s, services:; including County's cost of
:. contract.
admin�.sterir g plans:er s c
7
3..^'Termination of Agreement+ Developer's obligation "to
8
Court rsuant to this ASseement shall not. extend beyond
pay Y Pu
thsrty-one caays`' after, a Notice of Determination (NOD,) .is filed
1C
pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act'; Public f
1.1
Resail�ces CQcie Section 21 5.2, by% the Board of SuPervSors •of the
1:2 ,
y
covin or disapproving the General Plan
County of: Butte app g.
l
A.manoment. In thd� event.'that Developer; for `ani* reason
r
i
14
whatsoever; withdraws, in t►ariting,, afl of its apply cat oris;
the County, beveloper's oligatio to pay County pursuant to
6 .
Paragraph,`-shale= terminate as of-thirty war)c days from the date'
17'
ope's written notice of
upon wii�ch County receives Develr
�.
withdrawal. ( 'Notice`' ; except in th'e ;event : that an NOb has been
lg
fled;ithen'in that event the Developers obl.gation to pay ,County
2rJ`
. 's after
pursuant to this Agreement shall terminate thirty-one..d y.
21
said, NDD t4ingi terminate the services proideci: by
2
Planner at any EA me, In "the event that''County,,so terminates,
23
County'shadi provide writter. netic F,�o beveloper, and Deve�.opex's
2
and Cattnty' s obigat.xons- under the s `Agreement shall: 'ha e as'
2-
of the date tn my tezminates vfanner i`§ servicds .
25
Q. Refund of Depos 'ti. cc umy shall refund t EeveZ'bPer
:
a
Ij
.
any remaining .monies, deposited in accordance with Payment of 'Cost
2 `
provisions of this Agreement,;;` no less . , an thin y -one `days after '
3
the Notice of Determination (NOD)!is filed pursuant to the
4
califoxnia Environmental Quai'ity Act, Public Resources Cade
5
section.2"1152 In, the event that'Developer withdraws all its
6
applications or 'County terminates the services provided by Planner
7
in'accordarie ParagzapYt 3 above, then fin that event any^remaining'
$'
,,moriie,,s `steal., be refunded with`wri sixty ;days,:
g,
Responsibility of, services; by .Person or Persons,.
101
i County ,and .I)evel open acknowledge that Planner, iahile ;performing
ll.
cervi€ces pursuant to.Planner'c contract with, County`; shall work
y2
E .solely on the General Plan. Amendment anc,`related'environmental
1z,
review. County and Devel.bpef stirther acknowledge that Plattner
14
-for County; tYiatr`Developer-
shallr be engaged on a temporary basis
15
.shall have no obligatiozi to Planner and no responsibility for'
Sgt
Planner's actions; and that ail procedures-requ,re,c, by bounty _
g Shall, 'be followed . C6Unty 'and Developer fur- ier aeknowledcre an
�,g.
agrees that 'Planner %s riot now and will no, behile .this agreement
inj effect; an employee of Developer:
This agreement shall be perf.orrited in accordance with
2l•
i e provisions of public Re'sio n. x� 15.1: 6
t urces Code Sectio
22`
I24WITNESS WHEREOF, the partie's he have execute"d one
2
Ott`, more copies lob th"is Agreement :effeq. ive as of the date first
24
above written.
25
I'
l _
t
l
r
2 ,,
Pr=eoar a i on o Not i de"of Pregarat 'i ori ,. Consu tan t Ufa 1 i i�
prepare and; circulate a proper Notice. of pre parat"ion of°the.,
'I
'Ithv i ronmentz 1 rnpact Report on fi:h i s project".
3
Corsfa_r�_nce ofi:�nterested Commenters. Consultaht spial1,,, i"f
of rected W t'he' P 1 ann i ng: I rector'; arrange for > i n teretted
parties to :ho lci; a scop i n cess i, on after the i ssuance sof ;the
�to'ti"ce or Preparation to, rece"lve"commen.ts and summarize'
issues: prior to the 'preparat;on of the RFP for the
Env i"rorrmetita 1 S'tsspact Repan .
4:
P suet t 1_
for Pro, s r fc�Fny i ronmenta t i moac;Al Repo_
Ccsnsu t tont. spa l- l prepara the requ,i red Regtaest forf'ropos;a l'S
forthe Env'ironnental Impadt 'Report for th 1 s projedt. .
Ra'soonses td r�estions. 'Consultant shall arrange to -answer
guest i.-,W . ".a:bout.: aYa i-l.ab 1 e "i n format-i ^on ar"td other -de"ta i 1-t
potent i .6l p'reparers requ re pr i or, to the tubi � -he 1 of
proposals:
6
Setectl'on Gommt'ttee Consultant shall part, Icipate on a
`
doarimittee to select and recommend_to: the Board of Supervisors„
a., const r tart to, prepare the End i ronmentampact Report.'
7:..
Cdtract, Consrll tacit spat 1 regoti ate, on beha'l f of the,
Itounty, With the `sol ected consul tii ng f t
rm and recommend the
terms :of a ,contract'' #`or 'profess i ora t services beti�een the
County "acrd" the independent Environmental" IiPact Eepc�rt
cesrasu1tant .=tn "pr•epar•e th;e required Envi1^onmarita'1 Impact'
Rdport i•or the Rra jest .
T
.Gcsritract. Aboro a i s. - CcsristJI taht shat 1- 0— bii^c an agenda '. i tem'
_ - 5":-
-. 1..
for the ,Board of Supervisors agenda r"ecommeniding the award
of the cQrit;ract' to the f cin sei ectad 6jr the committee. As
reiuq fed by County procedure,
_.
the consultant contract 'must ba
-
approved_ as to ,_form '_by Cbunty_,
C"Uh$ l,- and approved as to_
+
budgetary4 and fiscal control ,by the County Aud r toi~,i J6,
addition to,revlew acid approval by the .Plani�Ing.Director',
p,r't or toapproval by the C3oar�d 0' Superv'i ,-ors
9
K i 1Ca"f t ort i na:. Cot�su-i tacit sha 1 1 arrait9e; fc o a k i ckof#
ri3e4ttn"9 with the Environmental Impact `Report preparer and
sEia i l 5ubaacqu:eri t t ,y mon i to th scnedu ] e . for the t i m l ji
I-
per•forirance o f ''the Cnv l ranmen,ta 1 l ;mp.act Report,.' prepa`rer^
a'
AdmI n. stra t:.ryp� braFt:� Consul'°tacit: spa l' l raVil
a�{
Adm i n i strat l ve Cra'f.t co`t 1 act coirirlients Econ' agencies and
pe -"sons' p4h& Have nevi ewe' ' the dra f t f' conso l 1 date sudh
doinmeh�s; and .redirect _tie EnV i ronmental Y,it►aact Report
preparer s as rrd , reri", , a prepare' the `;nra#t Env' i,ronment ,l
ItnOacpor';
G I
1.
I
i
+ 1
t