HomeMy WebLinkAbout88-6 BCPC GENERAL PLAN (3)' r`•
to.a consistent zone or a cand1tionaIT)" consastent zonA, as,
'10b samz Ive're listed ,asvf �l:irch 1, 1�S?.; in the Agri�cutu��al
Residential Land U_se� I7es�.gno i.on� of the Butte County Genes -a1,
Plan. Fczonxng.sh'�tll be aec;omptis'ned by the Butte Couiity
h,
Board cif Supe,ry s.oxs in r.he manner p.rescr? becl by,,.later.
3;j After 'the UFfec.tave date oE` this policy, except as speci-
f.ed in this subsection �'a.) , nn propert;• `on the Agri�ultu'ral
Side of the 'Chico area Grzenline' shall be 7reLo'ned to an
g district; ca1'ssifica _%on.
d) All Ilands Xocated, .on the Agricul Lural 51de osf the. Ghxco
`
Area Greenl ee that are, no �, �a f Eecte.d L;' the above
hereafter b: zoned or 'rezone.d, cansx..Cent i��ith this polx.c
{
Such zon to or rezoning sha71 be dome by the Butte �oir�ntr: Board'v
oF,;uperyiso.rs thc•ough the exercise o£ its discretion ani` in
Y�,,.
the nran�ner rescribed, by' lai�ti.
b) 'A11 references' to r-2,�5, Alp, "A-ZOt 4-'1 Qand A-'�tEO
zoninu districts, a u�el1 as reterences to the consistent and
conditionally cbnsist'ent dasxgnaions�tapuli.cable to the
Agricultural Residential LAa�d Use Designation, shall be deemed
�'k!
to mean those ,same zoning district designations and terms 4Rs}
defined in ;shaper 24 'oE the Butte County Code as thy: sane
read on Me -TO, 1, ,92 and as ame:n.ded from time to,. time.
{°
):,Any es:;a sting legal lot o record bested on ;she Agri-
"
r
c�r,;tura Side o z the Chico Area .Greeti.line which, as a! result
o£ the adaption: bF 'this pols�cy, "cfines' not conForm Aq th the min-
iimtam site rec{Lti,red by the district designation ass'ig`ned'
sha11 be a.nonconformirig lot and shall. be
this posey _
ent'itled.'ta the bene £its and the restrictions of nonconFa'rmin
'lots .as, established,, by �ai��., `�
d� N''6thirig contained in this 'PQlicy sha]l be deemed to
prahi,bi"t the app l is txan o£ the aQ,ricul.tura1. nui..sance ordinance
w
�BLtte Cou`tly Oxd i nance Numbe`x 22.i3�, ox the .a`gricultLlral
se ,re ati.on otd nance (S'ect• ons 2�-5 ani 24-55 of Chapter.
t
24 aurity Coeie) 0 as.. the='s.00 stay- riotv', exi .ox
hereafter b'e �amerkded,
H
-0I" CANSIs'i'BN;Gr AND TIM NG
1. 1' he Chico Ares. Land Use Plan establi,shos land use
less nations t h� c It o iot. dcs•r.able Future land use patterns.
g. p
p p
State; law rec�uixes co'nsrstpncy between genexal lan ola G t s;
and 2oni.ng. In 0 dor tor encouxag'e an ordorl' transition o5
,
1 and use .from -the existing to tji;e clesixetl„ pattern, the: County
shalX; .unclert�xiC'o to: rezone those jand con;sxstently' 'wi tli t}ie
F
Chico Axea Land U5c Plan. Zoningn these axeas sha11 be
:o nce(i,.
ipgr,a�,ed hr0L;gt% time �4�'t}i ;nommehS'urate s1�ow3"ng :F
de�{hate services,; dxaina,go,; etc. 14,5 ptgklled;'�o� in the i3�ttte
County },and Usek 1 meiiC. jZoning in, 't}rose areas „to 1es's tliarr
shl1 tics
k
the rn�ixa�num p.xo�ad'ed"n� in; Lhc,pi��rt's cle.sagiiat�ons
consider,eti cots sten `� It Mi t}ie1 I3��,utte Gaurt�ty's' Gene��ral, Arlan':by ,
girder ly Do-�el�amettpge.. ,
i;
atu;e 0, P.0 polio les d� rccted at
anti it'esitipnta al De,uo�,opmen,t.; (ages 3�) , pry or>ty , s}ta11'
be given to diose a eas wit}1 zni.rast;xuct.urc opacity.
r
T.
�
,
,
I
I Yk
c
"
4
fine present line is as fair as" could; have beeTi
desig:ed.,
x The greenlinet is`not straight, but property boundaries
are not straight and land uses .are not" confined by
traisht Eines. 'The greenline reflects land uses,
* The greenline reflects a natural boundary go the city,,
given land use patterns, dredger tailings, and
orchards'.
" Moving the'greenline would,` not rasu.t i.h Increase or
equivalent public benefits as; 14 ld contixiu ng to
jjrototei develapinent 7 in the urban area.,
Development of agricultural, land far urban purposes
would not increase county tax revenues.
No increase in public benefit would result f-torn' the
conversion of agricultural lands, to non agricultural
uses 0, through creation of a buffer zone, or moving the
line.`
The findings required b, the landuse-�eleMent can not be made
on the basis of facts " ,contained, ` in the administrative°
record.
E. (Lambert) I heireby make. motion to -reconurend the Board of
Superviso%s maintain thO green]ine" in its ptesent 1ocatioii
excepting for that pod as:
Beginning""at that point „where the greeriline intersects.Ghico
river road, thence Ieat.erly along Ghaco river road to Nortih
Graves avenue, thence' Southerly a`longNp"rth Graves avenue to
Butte "avenue; thencer'.Eastetly Along.,St:tte avenue to Miller
aveniue, thence tVoi„therly along Miller avenue to the paint
g' isle leaves Miller" in a Bastexly direction; `
W here; the reenl
Find'ing,: "that;
Commission not found public benefits of
_has
eanvertang'the agricultural lands, and would
substanti ally " outwieig} thio ';public, ,► .4 ^ . °",- of coiitin�ied.
agi .icultural proiuctian, arti'd
n finds that there: ur`
2 The Cimissio " tan and
`suburban lands, reasonably avfa,r
e" "prnpo�sed iievelopment:"
F. ("aters�" " her"eby make a motilin to recommendhoard bf' '
Supervisors maintain the gree 3,n in Sts prese*it location'
as..defrned `tiy, the fo�lotriitg" lifie::
4
I"
I i
yr,
j
t
6
i
ti-
,,�
1
. II.
,,
._ 1 ,
i..
`�S.
�0
i
�w
. II.
Z✓
�-
,,
. II.
._ 1 ,
o .
.. � _,'
I
�.
� •.
s
-. A
•�li .. 'ld ^ti i Qi.,'k t
1
OFFICE OF
•; TFIF NIAYOI% _
po Sox 5420 (3wt a � i�► ntlia
C6fCa, Cn 9597' g
C-TY01EHICO
YZ
I9Y61 i3 4815 "
A7554594$i6 bEC 16. 19.87
I�±CAViQ9 Cid�J�Af'!�$
December 11, 1967 vriuv�LlS"'CALIFORNIA
FEZ 14 19a"1
Board pf Supervisors, SUPRVjdf1S
County, of Butte nORBp iJF
25 County Center `UrWe
orovilie, CA 9,5965
I2B. "Greanline" lReview
• meeting .held, 'Tuesday December 1, 1987, the City Council Was.;
At its
advised that at the Board's 'direction,` the County; i�ltnnirig Gommissiot"r
was conducting hearings to determine if it.lrra appropriate to initiate
any rriodif,ications to either t l)e location of the "Greenline, o,
Policies relating to the Crecinla rie.'�
in adopting the ''Greehline" in 1g132, the County included a ptovision
xequ,iririg review of the "Grobn4ne" location in 5 years; ano also required
that; the following findings `be maga pra or to modifxing the "Greetalirie"
]ocption
Via) 'ihr�t the public benefits of converting .he agricultural. ,Land to"
urban land substantially outweighed t'e public benefits of
conting, agricultural productions and
('b) That ttore are no other ui bait' or suburban lands reasonably
avail a)1e andiut'able dor the proposed development
At its, December 1 meQtcig, Ilia Council ` adopted the Ga ty' Planni"rig
commission's recammandation to op-ose a,jy nioc�ifxci tion ,to tho
I'Gkt6nline!' off' 6ihen _ ant of t ►e, policies relating to tl Q "GrQc+nlino" , on
tfie basis Of -thee factup s, ilata'i n that theirtl, are subst., a, 'lands
xeasonabl�r available anc� set:able` for c7e�relopment .on the urban side of :
the 'Green iqe,. u
;t wain d seem appropriate for the ,'-ou'hty Pl ann� rig-CommiaSiori an oar ,
of Supervisors t4` to Its determano�'thovaila3 h ty; of lands reasonably
cosi] able ,a`id suitable £car . developmeht on the urbanr side' ai< i~he
reeny ine:!'!f .the. Commission ar►d'3oard' detexrtii ne that sui'.table` 'land`.
3s reason4i va la' le, thou there would appear,to be .no need foie'
iurtkiex' pyblic hearings or a'ny inadificat�n� to the "GrdenlinPTO
�
i1+ N
L...
Z", �r,