Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout89-11 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2 OF 2Attached sheens) +arc require • � l utatians of all '�1LS'� and "MAB " anstiers d oii tmm N� P caa1 Yasu�lt in pign . ifscant: the prop } _ i. Wi1I ar changes 1tY geologic substructu.,rcigY .:..- nstatilo earth, candtionf►; overin of the soil? -- -~ �5.,� Disruption, .�digpiacenontt•`compAc_tio» Qr`overc B topography or &round surface zelief feature_s1 d, Change in or:ttwdificatian of any unique gedlogic or physical covering L, d.: Destruction,~ featuros? _ on or,o£i site4. -- Sncrease in Wind or water exason a£ srii7sr either, changey'in siltation 01 f �banges 3n deposition a>= e> osinnmodifthef boidi �cnhfinnel cif a river or stream k► cdpositiori or pros a� wb' 'nay- inset .ar lWe:? bad of the ocp.64 or any bay., o>: the soak outside designated urban_ gr Lass of grime aricu'ltur_,ally.productive areas? ea to or. proparty.lo g ealogie hazards such As aarthquaIces, Expnaure of p p zards7 failure ter siro'ilar i►a ' landslides. mudnliOds� grownd Will 't}►e proposal Yestllt. -in E;ubstantial: —'`'" t�. Air omissions or ;detorfbratio3t of ambient air quality? b, xho; croation of objectionable cdors, smoke. or ft>mec2 "- or nny change its araturn Alteration of air ma'vem+antt moister© oY temi , regionally? c1'matb, locally•or 3.A: Wi11 fhe propogal result in 'substantiate movemo°fts 'i» in or the courst� or direction of. ytater �a. Changes currents either marine or.�fresh waters?, t or the rate and amounit yin absorp tion,ratas, drainage patterns] Ck�ang as Of surface runofffi Win vegota"tion '�M x surf c, Need for 'off-site surface drainage imPro"vdments,, or cylvert:•irisllationl �+ h re>novalt'.cha:►nelization d. AXtorations to the dourse or flow of flood b, Change in, the atnaunt ni± surface watt3r inany Water, body?' f,- bischazge aurface'waterst or in any.aLeration'of surface Waenror limited to temperatuYe� dissolved oxyg '( 777- grialitY,; including but'not w� turbidity Al,teratian of the direction, or nate of flora o£ g round Waters? g.� e in the quasttit� or q. ility of grodrid Wafers, either through h. Chang oz through interception bf an aquifer wt di>:ect, additions or W�thdra�f tY _U 11 or.exCavationsl for Water in' tiie amaurit `,af Water otherwise available, public i. ,iRedurtion les 1 i pP � in 't ood Fa}posuYe of g9dpe or property to utater->+elated hazards such as fl g - .. 4` + Ohl the proposal reouTt'`1n gubstahtial'- es.,of plants s e Chnn a in the diversity o'speciea or ritimher of any P ,_. zeas, 'crops, and agtic pl�entsj4 ;.(including ticdest shrubst g eted species tirtique rare or endang bReduction o£ tk►e-trumbera of Any , �.- �W Iani s into arbk�"�iir'ei5barrib�e` to t�ei'' species of p, ' — o. ; Tnfradtctirrxs 'of the nortiti�l, replei►isfnment of existing P , ,� of tura' a cu t, crops d: Reduction acreage€ will tho proposal result in.subt.tantials a• (-birch' n the diversiky of bpecies or numbers of any species of animals (tiirds, land anneals including reptiles, fist: and shellfish, ar insecta)7 organisms i b. Reduction in the numbers df is:iquo! mire or endangered species of anir�als7 c, ,Intrad�sctiari of new Oecitd of animals into an area, ,or its a barrier 0 the migration ormovement of : animals? k 4 d, Deterioration of, Wr-ting fish or wildlifi~ habitat? , _ < brtw Will; the proposal rusult i1.n suostautia,i: �� ~ a. Increases irk t�kis'ting noise .levels?` bb Exposure of peapie'to;Severe.xsoise le"v"els? —�-- ._ Will the;propasb,l product significant light and glarey 8« D � Wi;il the proposal result in a, substantisl alae;•atian of the prosenty er planhed land use. of an, areal, 9' ARL c "5, Will the propcsai result in substantial: A, Incrioasa in the rate of use'ot any natural resources? ' b, Ueplationni any ngn_xeneWabic-natuzal roourcesT' 10. $ K QF UPSET, Wild the proposal involve! n.A risk of axplos; on or eeloaga d httmrdous'substances ( s lu'd" but not limited to, oil, posticid0s, chemidals °or > adiatiotij'n the event of an accident or upsat conditiarts,? b, passible''interference %lith an emargeney response plan or emergency evacuation planl ll`bmmzw, Will the proposal AlterloOeafion, distribution, density ox• w Vpwth rate :of the hwia;i popirlakio t? - 12. icor add Will Che'pr,""opasal.affeat'exiating dousing, dr' create a demand fo>- add�ltiona�l:ousitt? Will the p r oral result oP r f a Geners[tian of, f fiuL?,stantialaddit onAl rrehiale rnovenent7 b, Effects on a#is ting parking facilitiesL , or demand for naw parking3 e. SuisstantiAl ifitpact on ex'stirig transportation syskeins'! d.. gignfixa atara�ions to patterns of circulation ;dr ' movement' eo ,le and/or goods?,, P P tiltotatiofti t cl tkitsrborhe; rail',or air traffic?. f. irtcrse0 i rs'traffio hArariis to motor veliitles, bicyclists or pedestrians?`, ,X CEg �i.l 1. the' prgposa] have 'an. effect upon, orressl :iri ,a. need. fnr intik Qltereci' governmen. sarvice's s a. Fi;e protection? polio ;di Parks. or, otlt'erreareational faciikie$? e` Mairitdn+iht u publ'lc faci'litie s; id�clu8111 a rd'a ag? f� Cl e - a o v' p r g rnm rttal servinOs? YIN r - 15�: Wi1`1 t7777777777; he proposal result <iri.. a, .Ijbty of :aubshantiixl aufount of fuolor onergyF b. .SUbstantial inc.raase in demruid upon existing sou>•ces of ehorgly or souro f onergy4ion requr°te epo, no I, 16,,5. Wiil the proposal result in a need for new systems, or subBCar►Gial alt aretion6 do the .£allowing: 5t n, 'power or, natural 9697 b, .Comn,ni'c.Ations' systems? o, Water nvailability�- �, d, Sewor or septic systems ®. Starm Nater drainagel .-�Soli,d waste and disposal? } F{l AN iibUTll. ill l the proposal result in,. a. Creation of any heal ',th hazard ar potenti'al hazard (gxciading:inerital' �( health)? b. Exposure of people Ea potential health hazards? 1:8. Asa 7 r � Will the proposal" result it► the obstruct ai► o any scenic .. , or, Will ths� proposal resirlt n'. the to tbG Cl rr,V public, vista or y,iew open craation,ai an sesrhatiCally offensive site open to public v,iGo , me T9.0 Will the proposal result in an impact'upon the c)vey:1Ly uant t of exiQting raga estional oppartunitiasT q. y *--- `-` 10 rtt•,':TCtRai R�.SOUR S• af' Will, the proposal result in the alteration or destruction of a ical alto p xohistoric orlxistoric archaeolog b. Will the proposal result in advgrse physical Orraesttt3tic effects or gbject?` to a prehistoric Q.r historic building, 'structure Daas'tE►a proposal kava the potential to cause a physical.oflange valued �. which would 'affoct:unique othnic-cultural di:, Will 'the proposal reatrict 654sting religiou&'or. sacred uses .within he 'potential impact areal , Sae attacher, ,, I r I i t i -4' s ,