HomeMy WebLinkAbout89-16B REZONE PLANNING 3 OF 3r Y
Gl 5
CQNCLU;SIONS AND Od"MENAATIONS'
seha ping center will create a significant
This proPo prl
ache
impact' on the area wise thatcumostQno.f trarfac Will
be seln
study, it can
approach this shop pi centeC '£ram the west.
I is tedomrnen;d0d that'
l.; The `develope"r should contribute toward signalization
at East Ay;en,ue and' pjariposa Avenue.
2. The devel.ope;r should contribute toward signalization
at East Avenue at Ceanothus Avenue.
3. Thus, contribution towards
fees fromnthe'dmount
shoukd be an equitable method, su chaos
gene,rat;ed instead of ;an arbitrary condition such
of tra£f.ic
as installation of signal by developer.
4. The deytelopqr'be require, a to, upgrade Mariposa Avenue
tihe site to .City
nortH o£ :East;; Avenue adjacent to project
standa:rds..
5 The -developer be required to upgrade i:he intersection
by repainting East Avenue with
of Mariposa and'East Avenue
lane to,go'South on Mariposa Aven ue.
a eft turn
l
The,develaper be,required to widen East Avenue
into thi development.
loca'Eions to,cre..at;e right turn lanes
7. The develoXer be required to install one driveway
the �cent,erline of
approximatelya30. feet, west, £"rom
400 £ee'k eaai:
Ceanothus Avenue, one` driveway"approximately
ofMarposa.Av'enue and one driveway in
o"f the ,centerline
the middle of .the. black. '
$. The clew"eloper be required to' con's`truct ,concrete curb
ant traffic `from
at the east and west driveway to pr.
g. The developer be required to'wid'en Est. avenue t0, 6A
face". Ad,ditional widening. for the
feet from the sa;ath curb
'turnLng lanes ment�oeed above.
lb. Th'e developer be required.to imptiove Ceancthus Avenue ,
site to City
north of East Avenue.',ad;jacent to; pro,jecti
a
s tand ar .
-28- r
1
1
A
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
� ,:....ate .�
Calcul atio.hFor Sin:glc: Ilse
Drive -In Restaurant. - (LU=833)
It is anticipated' that a dative -fin or a,st foodestau;art
'Will occupy prml4,501Te scatirrg cap ac.i;ty or,
specific type of facility .is unknoFm,.
The,,,peak hour .is` typciallybetween, 12 Noonand 1;00 P.M,.,
with, with an estimaLed ;trip end aver ge of 35.4.
P. M. Peak Hour Directional Split
44'.4 = (44.4 + 41.9); _ .51 Enter
41'.9 - (4404- +' 4l . 9 ) =:,49:' W T.Enter
Avera'cje Daily Traffic is estimated at 5$3 vehicle trips pe!r
10,00$ floor
gross area - or, for this ;pate:cula.r project;
pprcimately-2,48.8 ADT.
Tt should be T noted that this estimate is based on oriday
through Friday averages as week -end gen`erat oa rates are
not available. Additionally, the proximity o this to Oct
-
to Pleasant Valley High Sz:hoal and a large numbek o
.
ehutches could; significantly skew the existing data.
r
Appendix I
r.
Pa
,9'e 4 ,. g
-38-
7777
d
Shopping Center' (L.U• 82,0)
for
ro osed shopping center 1,d, e,,slgn jncludes'plants
Thep P Generation £actors; are n
specialty:stone. Since Trip
available =for specialty` stores, the
26,500 t� allocate.d` has
footage of 3;6,9'75
been .added to the shopping center square
for a, total 6f 62,975 sq.�ft.
The esti,nated' average daily, trip rate
is 8"2 per 1000 ;gxoss 11
does not yet
square fee -t. The shopping center area,
spe,ci£ic use, could
which
generate approximately
accommoaat;e a
4, ADT .. ,
:p. MPeak Hout Airectional,Split
3.2 (3.2 + 3.4) m., 48%
Enter
:- (,3 .2 # 3.4) - "52%
Exit �
P.M. 'Peak Hour Rates
48 -_' 3.74/1000 =
4..06/100'0 =
255.4;3 peak hour enter
2'55.68 peak hear exit
®I
i
:Appendix `T
4. 4
,. `Pack . of _.
�41-
-
Caldulations, 'for 14 1ti-Use.
Shopping G:enter.(LU 822)
GSF o£` 100,000 - 199,000'
P.4 Peak Hour `Directional ,Split
3.1)
3 + 3. 1.) = 52 Exit
$;
Peak Hpur Rages`
5.9 x .-48 ='2.83;/1000, = 328.93
Peak hour enter
07/1000= 356.3
.52 =;"3. .8
P eak hour exit.
Average Week Day', rip, Ends are; 7,752.,
a
't
Appendix J'
,
=4:
,
,
:Gt
r,
i
Calculations for
tiUse
phopping tenter (I,U ;8'21) (Phase. II),.
GSP:of X0,000 - 99,999
P:M. peak Hour D,ire�ctional,
SpIlt
(3..2 + 3.4) = 52
Exit°
$
P.M. Peak 'Hour kates
.9'8 = '3.74/1000--
253.00''
Peak hour enter
.5`2 = 4.06/1000 _
27=3.60`
Peak hoer exit
5,510
Average Week Day Trip Ends
a;re
i
r
,
Appendix 'K
''
j
D2'.S'TRT.BL7T ON ' LIST` F'C>R COMM S
unty Public Works
���oount,yi2nviron,-nantal Health
s 'o cRC�'' titANAGE.MENT
State Water` Resources
City of Biggs
t//City Chico'
Departirent
U.S. Forest Service
of
Cit�r of Gridley
U.S. Bureau of Land Management,
City of Oravill`e
Butte County Mining Committee:
State Depar.tment;of Fish &
Town of Paradise
Game
California Dative Plant Society
Planni rg Department
S�.ate �ranspo_ �� :.zon.
1ta- ` Department
State Div. Forestry - attentirri
Craig, Cart°er
Regional Mater QuCon— gd.
State Reclamation Board
r)OM:SST=C wATEr
butte coater Dist "riot
sE*.a��zs
aliforria Water Service Co.
Richvale sanitary Dist
1 rlct
Del Oro Water Cos
North Burbank'Pub. Util. Dist.
OWID
Therma?it.o Irr,gation D'istri'ct'
Skansen Sub. (CSA2l)
Stixling City Sewer Ma'Di.'t.
Other
.int
Thermali.to xrrigat�.on Dxstr.ict
(CSA #26)
LJ'TZ .Ti
T ES
2
ZF2RZGAT0N WATER
-PG&E North (Chico)
PG&E . South C`Piarysvi:! le)
Biggs-�W,Gridley Water District
�;__
Butte ter !District
Pat Sell
Durham Irrigati{n District
State a'�I Cable
OWD
Viacom TV Cable'
Paradise Irrigation District
Rchva],e.Irrigation District
Table Mountain Irrigation Dist
r=RE n:OTECT=O*r
Thermalito Irrigation` District
1 Medio Fire Protec:tien Dist.
ounty.Fire:Department/CJF
IDRAZNACE :r ID
T20SQL72T0 ABA'Ei'iENT .D7S'L'RZCT
Durham; Orovxlle orutte Count
RE(t NIATZON I73STT�'ZCT
POLICE, YF20TECTTON
Mate Highway Patrol
_tf Co,inty Sheriff
SCHOOL . b
oTHErr
COI" WE'17TEES / COMMZSSZOIVS
t
R C
E REA 0 c,
TZ N A
Chico Area Recr.eatian Di -strict
Paradise: pines Ar;c"hitecttiral
Du ham' Area Rec. & Park Dlst.
Contro]. Committee,
FeatherRaver Rei: &. Fark Diet:
Butte County 'Farm Bureau
Farada se Reg. & Dist:
.!Park`
Richval'e Rec & 'Par:)t{ D� st.
Commuity nAssociation:.
.Parks, D
State R
& e;c . ent ..
:.
�
TE COUNTY PLANNING CQKMI
Center qwo za: pim"Ing
7 County Drive J
oroville, �A 95965-33.97
�OMAlloyrlifpmia
TO: Environmental Health DATE: October 10, 1938
Lynn Varihart
RE; PROJECT REVIEW &
ENVIRONMENTAL- EVALUATIM
Enclosed is prel�urinary data our of{.ice has recezvec7 or, generated
nark Gregoire pP r48-A6-]-Q9 .038,
concerr►ing the follo�ainq project:
0 39 , 0 4.0 , 0 4;1 - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT from Loci Densty Residential to
Commercial and REZONE fxom R (Resident,ial-Professional) to C-C
(Gommunit-Commey. rical);„loca:ted on the north side of "East Avenue
between Mariposa a'n eanot us, ico':
eve are.makriq an assessment of possible environmental itlpacts and will
document either a Negative Declaration,
be preparing an environmental
ion with rliti ation Measures or an Environmental
Ne ati;,re Declazat g
g
inpact L Report L (EIR) .
Flease.provide any factuL al statements, ideas for investigation, or
or expertise that relate
oninjons you cin offer in your area of concern
to either physical; social, or ecanomac impacts that this project may
generate,
please respond. within 'l a, days, of the above-noted date. If rio response
is generated by this inquiry, then it shall be' assumed that there are
no significant. environmental impacts which are potentia] from th`e
pro j ea
`e a t�rec ou:can rovide.
P� fate ,any assistance, y P
inceeJL:
y,`n18i1161'1�4��tt�!
'
rrvie
`ob
Ot '
rGrag tinders;
Planning TeChnzclan.
S0� i ASA
Comment! :
u 41,
kbt .1 War
jC o� t b �. Suri, ?�o "�.• ' rt-�y.
i
I
Doha yaur agency wish to,e'ceiv a'. copy of th,e envkJ
ironmental document
'(With tai thout Mitigation
ial ?stuely for Negative Declaration or .
Nleaszres.) or ;EI.�2 fox this project)
r _
YES Nth
S'" ^ i r •l�ii t S
�,'�T
. a
''w", .COUNTY PLANNING` LON I3u Fo lahning
n.
r 7 Count; Center Drive.,y
+ 88
CA 95965--3397 OOT
{
Qrovil'le, ,�J
( 9. ' Orovillo, � 0110004
{�
Ci ty o f Chico DATE i - October 10 , 19.8
COUP.IER, MAIL
RE., PROJECT REVIEW
ENVIRONMENTAL EVAL AT-TbNI
Enclosed is preliminary data our office has recei"ved or, generat.,
"
concerning ;the follow nc t�roj;ect: Mark Gre,goite -� AP1148-06-.1--0"9,038,
3191 04'0 , 0 A -. C'ENEa2iaL PLAN .AI`1E.NDMENT :from Low Density Resi,.denti,al to
ornmercial and 'REZONE from A-V (ReSidentiaJ�-Professional) to:: C -C
(community --Commerical), located on the north side off East Avenue
between Mariposa and Ceanot u,s Chico.
we, are'.Making an assessment cif possible environmental impacts and will
,be preparing an environmental document, either a Negative Declaration.
Negatiue Declaration with Mitigation Measures or an En�ri;ronmEntai
Lm6act, Report (EIR)
Tease provide any factual statements, ideas for investigation, or
obini,o:nsyo"u can offer in your area of concern or expertise that relate
`o either physical,' roc? al, .or economic impacts that this project .may
generate.
.—ease respond within 14" days 6'f the above-noted'"dateno response'
is generated by; this inquz ry then it slial'1 be, assumed that 1 there are l
n significant environme'ntal.impactswhich arepotential;,from"the ,
��oject.
We appreciate` a,ny :assistance 'yoti :ca'n provide.
Sincerely,
,
5 2'� 8 8 .
Craig ' angers "
Planning Technician
Co_ €Inien;ts : Tlie` "City o Chico opposes the proposed Gener'a1 Plan amendment and rzgne.
A similar request was considered by the City and denied by the City council in.April`1988
Additionally,,, City recast, , servioe is. n6t a a 4lable to uses,' inconsistent with the Cit~y�
General P1ari. -'
C1i ' ellers jPlanning Director
Does" gout' agency wish t:o receive', a copy cif theenvironmental document'
(in%tial study for Negative Declaration, (with"pr without gation
Measures) it EIR fog this project) .
X
YES NO