Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout89-11 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 1 OF 2q. B.UTPE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION S�`AF' FINDINGS - November 30, 1988 APPLICANT; Clara Lamb 0; MIR: Same Genera]. Plan Amendment. from Gra,.zing xZEUEST• and Open; Land to Agricu],tural Residential. . A�P X' o. • 28-13': 03 SIDE.' 2-7.5 acres South. side o= La Porte Road; at LOCATION:'; TCings Ranch Road; approximately 3_ miles southvaest .of Bangor y southeast of Oraville: EXISTING ZONING: A-5_ ZONINGHI'STORy: Zoned; A-9 on June 20, 1567 Ord, #937 SURROUNDING ZONING: A=5 SURROUNDING LAND C1SE: Generally open agricultural land devoted to grazing and scattered° other, uses with pitattered single->; family residential uses at zural densities to the northeast. GElT'ERAL PLAN :DESIGNATION': ,: Grazing+ and Open Lands ARPLICABLE REGULATIONS : Butte Coun Y, Code Section 2"4-. 3.80 + and. the Butte. County�General Plan COMMENTS RECEIVED. Purl is Wor�Cs.::- "Residenti;al zoning vaiJ:l Create' an ,i4Crease' in tra££ic; in this .area." ' I I I I + I i I °hereUy' declare tinder penalty' of "� erjury'.thaL I ha�'t reed and under ".emc{ diel �s } uGflons' uriit tllkt kht d ft�re gq'ing sCimertts are true cam lete aii correct to the ti -est Of W;led p :. DatedAppliaanf's signaf"ure " Dated, �42, Property.otvner's signature r Project file number _ R.equesft General Plan Arnendmett( to Location and sizeafpareel(s}; i ' Verify' W A.PNumbe*),, -Location Descriptioll d wnersl ipg � I} Le al'Descrt ip "tion, of iArEa i?rgof of Agency (if needed) 1Vlaps of Area and Reproducible, ,Master � Rresent zoning and, Gerer�l Pi'art Designation j' CSI IZeceiptNo. S77 Date of Application :Received;I Application taken by t' ' I S - I'i I I I\ I, I I I li I I I i •1 I" I li 1 { I t a 28 122 -gyp 3 � 28 1,3 17 Boaitdz�an Drobish Weilan & LillianPotts 172 Drobish Rd. 621'8`Raokwell.St. Mar ;'Ile, CA CA 959.,0"1 Oakland, CA 94618 28-a2'-;04. 28-1-3-22 Stattle Robert Ley�van Don ,' & Bess Meek 866,5:La Porte Box, 207 Mar.sv=.11e, CA 95901 Bangor, CA 95:914 Far i esa Enterprises Hubert & O'udy' Bradbury. 1:72 Dt-obish' Rd . P .O . Box 261 Sams*ille, d 95901 Ba gor,, CA 95914 -IT„ --5 . 28-13-30 ?erirex Inman, e;: al wm. ;& Cecilia Green .0„ 'pox 52, Bat�gc:r, CA 95914 P.O.. Box 173 Bangor, CA 141. 28-13--02 ; etc. Rob&_= -t & Mith Cronin Charles Simmons 858£ 'La Porte.Rd: P.©. Box 1446 Kari? l le, CA 95901 Pacifica, "CA ;9404 liar -0.13. i1.nter Vi$va. Trust, D&B Mar-tineili Edward & Carol Simmons 55 Cz-.eenbtier Box.,, 183 Orat�.11e, CA 95965 Bangor, CA y,914 28-3 x-06 ; 28-1'3-03 r Hal elen 'rosin:. Clar-a LamA 8608 to Porte: Rd,. 4140 Olympiad Dr.` iar�=s�sill;e, CA 959,01 ' Los`:Ange� es*,' �A, 90043' �2 8•=13-'? 1 Charl<,et P:almerlee ” 20"8 ';5un0,e Avenue Berl ey; CA 947'09 , r 28-�Z�il•6 AI'xIl �-or�te'z 1565:~ leasarit, Grove Lane M rys CA 9 5.9' 01• , 'i iF 15 ENERGY. Will the;proposal result, in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? b� Substantial- increase- in demand upon existing sources of energy, or require`the.developmant of new sources of energy; 1b UTT_LT ES. Will the proposal result in a need for, new systems, or substantid' alterations to the following: a. !Power or natural gas'. b. Cormmmications`syste©sI c. Water. availability? d. Sewer or septic systems? e. Storm water drainage?' f. Solid waste and disposal? l7 HL iAN F LS" • Wi�j l 'the Proposal Yes:il:t in: a, i hazard (secluding mental "_ creation of any health hazard or potentia health );'. p o potential health haazdsl b.. E.roeagle to of 18.f AESTF?tC5.- 41£11 she proposal result in the 'obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public,, or will the ,proposal result in the creationof an aesthetically offensive site ooen to'oublic`view?, 'r 19, RLr.& ATMN . Will the proposal result 'in an icpact upon the quality or quantity of ezistng 'recreational opportunities? 20 CLQ=L?t �$OURC_`$•. a. Will *_hd trorosal result in the alteration or destruction of 'e , {� pre:^.isle-ic o :^.=steric arc:aeol6g (!Al site? b. 41111 tte propasa! result in adverse pnvsical L.or aesthetic effects buiidin ' to a ;enAstc £c _, �g, ,o. bmstoic structure or object? c. Does the proop'sal tare the potential to cause a physical change which uculd affect unioue:gthn£c culturalvalues2 d'. N£il the prtposai res,.rict'existing religious or sacred uses vithiz the potential' roac.;-areal r�`� Cy1�TM AL., �= V ' N , 11Z ENT _ .4 YsUA2 CJ N See attached: r� r i , _ 4 77 a. SuraCe Water: Dry Creek at west property line. b. Groundwater: Limited resource Surface rainage west to Dry c. rainage:Oharacteristcs: 'd D Creek at west prop:eryy line d Annual Rainfall. . e, 'Limiting; Factors:' Availability of water thrqugh ,ime Saddle •Community Servo D]St 1ct. 5. Visual Quality: Highly_sc.enic canyon views to west, corridor. .' �- y`i with exception; of road Amus,,ic Qualit Goo 7.` Air Quality: Good. Bioloaical'Environment g. vegetation: Pine, Oak., Manzanita,, Ceanothus, gr,asses', bare anc� rocky ground at lava cap.' No rare or endangered species .are P P tY P iversity known Lp occur on the r�, erg, per Cali�orna Natural � Data Base. Wildlife. Habitat: Good as a result of low residential densities and amp�.e cover, limited water. Outsi,ae or deer migration area. Cultural Frivironment Z(3 Archaeological and ?4 storiic Resources is ,the Arear `F�iah., no evidence surve_i,-bteviously preparec. i, .' R•,:tte C�.sy Ge_rieral°an Designation: e�cia� �•3. ZOn�^C: -A Fxiswing Land t3se cr.`S tee' Single -fanny hone, Shibai gG].lery and . ar schaal, ±sna= outbuiic.rlgs . 14.'. Surrounding Area: a . La.* d Uses : Quai? '.'t ails s tore1.and church to: north,' Quail m. ;ls.,rob, le h::i1e park Lo, eases; open space to west, Coen and singi e-.fam'lir to so, Iwh. b. Zori:nc: Town o= : arad1 se r` K-?�--i �nor`n an south) to the ei sis c,. General Mari Desicna `ons C=m c gal an 'gas mow De ns �y `�e�iae^ Lias .no+ -,.n and sou. Acrzcul°ural-Resoe:xt_a� zrio Caen and Grazing o the wee a C . Farce} 2 . WES r ,C' ►ri0llt «. 84.. E pOD17 t auiOn : LOW, deHs v`; CheraC4er, Of Site ands r' �ea Frir'_aeP�1'8C_Sel;,'�rban 5: NEarest,, Urhz.*i Area: a_aa=_se ,.own i _miss 2iv wes4 prc�e�- y nes' `. Saar a C��� o^ & PaY�c ? E �nprovement Stancarc's Uars�A'rea nl � �rotec�-.or_', - a. Ne.77 _res:W Courity, no 4�+; :5 ( seasaza_ )' Y 4-? /'� '�;��! es' nor 4nwes b.` Wa e A ailazz i _-y 2fl. Sc�oo:.s in,,Area: r cool I r I rS S - APPEND IX F co�.rrrr� o�' $�crr2aE CHECKL-2S' ENV'=RONME�T'A (To be contpletedby Lead Agency)- ILM NO, 88 9907-03 AP No, 28-1.3-•03' a� 0�i ------ CLF`RA LIV4B - 1 Nnmr of proponent (if, applicable): Address of proponon and represeritazive 4L40 Drive .Olvsnviad Los An eles CA 90043 Land to CBI�LRhL pLAT1'AMENDr n�iatrom Grazing & Oven 'ect description 3. F'ro� ACJ side rictiltural Re .._ F`Sl�*IJ2NG c ole' S tGN1V-XCAN CE- Y�5 MAYBE Ti vn 1. Da®s the pra'ject ha4e T1tc po"tertiai to degrade the 'quality of the environment, the, habitat of a fish, or +;ildleve species, caten Iuse ellmih or su15stantially reduce wi'.'dlife population to drop breduceloW Pthe number or"fest jct thearangeaof4 rare plant or anicsal cor=unityR les of major periods a endang.. ore ,moortant.examp rbrngl or ey or of-CaBkornsa h stor y ren U�inate" te:a benefits to the o ect hav!= the potential to achieve short Does the pr. j A shart-te ?...^par on t'e deCriment of lonb-tera env rcrsaertal'goslsl y__e_ pe'fod cf iae '-,i?e' en:iror�ent lacges.siiyendt.reinta thei'vefutuzei}" --- izap long -tetra In, o-, more sepadividUal rate respur esaWhe . thd:project lmvo i#acts c.3tiact 3; Wes onard censiderablel '(' proj r., may. is relatively small :but r+here the effecC of the r the impact on Ea h r"esauzce iavacts, on the enrironsfleitt is sigr:f =cant. )" total of. those 1.. Uoos the' pro jec� have ;e�tvsronmerital effents Imici:- will "cause slab t"sal directly,c irdirectly3 ailverse:effectc on h4v4A.beinas; aititer Ytxr: 'LIV (To be rn-}feted by the Iead' Xgezic�). `On the tissis of" S .ntial evaltsatspn. 1141E e' td the .proposed" prof ect (to NOT•have a st�ificant effect on�"the DECLARATION will be preorred; environment and a hrmxt2'rE 7%v1E find that" althrnlRh L1je propoSPd iirojecC• COU, have a signzficant effect. not'be� a "signant At in this case because the on the 'PnviroJ" . _,, Caere ++11 hLz4St:'P S des'crsbed on the attached "ased."sheet Have been added to Che MII7GATIO,t protect, A "t3whi c AzCLARA 011 W tl be ,p si s Hca. t, ef fect on`theenvisnssen lire find the'^ oaosed pro�act MAY ha LM a R..PORZ is reotss ed. d an &5VtR0h ...,...L<TM AC,.< COUNTX OF BL'iL�. `FI.iNIr"ItiG bEBART".i hi . s 7 : jjaV:id �. Y_ iozkSmuS T i r'1SSOC�t� �•�iJ�n:le" 77, r �V. -rktvx kplanan a1�5' aridMhUYBC answers are required ori, attached sheet(6)". .. �Y 1, EARTH, Will than proposal result in si gnif i 'cant: A. Unstable Garth conditions) ar changes"in geologic"dubstructiires?" b.' Disruption, displacement,,, compaction or overcovering of the soil . c.' Change in topography or ground surface. relief features? d. Destructions covering or modification of any unique geologic"or physical• f eatures? ---- in Kind or, water ;erosion of soils, either on or off site? a Increase E: Changes in,depnsiticn o"r erosion of beach sandt, or changes; in 'siltation) deposition or erosion which may modify 'the channel of a river orstream Take? oY.the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or , g... Loss of prime agricu'ltura'lly productive soils :outside designated urban areas'? h. "Exposure of pHoplesor property to geolosic haterds such as;earthquakes, hazards?' landslidea,:mudtlidas, ground failure or similar 2,IljLRR.: Wilt the, proposal result in substantial: a, Ai,r';Rmissions or deta'rioration of ambient air ;quality? b. The creation of ebjectionable odors, spoke or fumes? a.:- Alteration of air movement, moisture or, tuts or any change in climate, lodally or .regionallyi_ 3. HA Will the proposal result in substantial.' a pints, or the ccuzse or direction of water movements in �.... either, TBSh Water s? b` athges in absorption rtes, dra=nag'pjatrerns", a the rate, and amount of Ne",`for'.off-site surface drainage issprovedenas'; include vegetation, reAoval c hihneliration or Ct11S!9Tt installation) ._..� d. Alterations to thacourse pr fl oe of flood Waters? ac fhange 'in the amount of surface eater in any water bociy7 Discharge into surface waters; or in any alteration of, surface water quality, incTudirig,'but not limited to Cem,�eratitsra, dissolged oxygen or tutb_idzty? g. Alteration of the _direction er rate of flow o ground waters?' x h.. Change in ,1P quant ty or.qua�itF of •ground eaters; eithet.through dries additions o- withdrawals, ar through interception of an aquifer , by cuts, nr, exca3atans7 i. Reduction, Sri the.amount'af water otherwise.availabie`;orpublic eater supplies? -777" .I ., Fitpnsure of peoples or property to 'nate: -r'' 'd hazards such as ,f.;loodi.ng?, L :'�Ati": still file prpa`srtl result in substaitLs2: - - a: Change in ti►e diveroity hf, species ar number.of any''species of plants'. (incieng trees,,s,�ivbs�ressr crops., and' aquatic D1ar.LS�? _ 6. Reduction "of Che bumbers of an, 't��iguBt rare or endangered 'species ns p lasts 7 c. intrcduc..ioi of new speoies of p"tants into an. area",- ortiir►+a, barrier to the normal r'eplenxshnen� of exiscint''fipec3as. ree e a any a i n. iZeductiarl i;t sc? g,`' gr 'cultural crop 1 Will t2io "proposal rexult In •substantial;:M4AXBE in the divdtsity of species, •or numbexs of any species o£ animals a, Gitiatige (birds, land anirsala including reptiles, fish and shellfish, organisms or' inaecta) 3 'b,, Reduction in the m�mtera of any unguei rare or, endangered species of �[ , —G aniraala2: of now species,of animals into an area, or inn barrier to x c.introduction the migration or"movement of, animals? ----' d. Deterioration of "existing fish or Wildlife habitat? " 66 OI W1.111.th6 proposal resulti in substantial: x a. I.ncrsases in existing; noise evels? �V�' b. Exposure of pecpletd""severe nu,ise;'levels? duct si Lficant light' and. lare?` 7. t,Y AND GiARE. Propo.: - .., g Will tlia ral pro `.Will tie proposal result in`a subs tantial_niteration of the or-;platurad land use of an area? present 9 NAT( ��" FSCE5, hill'the proposal result in substantial; it, Increase in the rata of use of Any natural resources? b. Depletion of .any non renewable nnxurai resourees.1 10, $ISK'_OF UPS,c^T. Will the; proposal Involve:', a. A risk of explosion or release ofhazardous substances;(including) but not limited to, Dili pesticides, themicala"or radiation) in the event , an accident o. u set conditions, of- p " 2 .�..._ b. ,Possible interference with zh emergency response plantior emergency avacuatios prn3 11. Moir, k:YO?i Will the prFbcsal alts= location, dist: autidn, density cr x growth rate of t:e,hssaan Population? ' 12:, HOU$I?iG, Will the proposal affect existing 2iousing, or create a demand,�. for additional housing 13.jAH=p9FrtATIOH C?RC�n.A?ZOPi. Will tie proposal result.in: a: ':Generation of substai►tisl add tional vehicle moveme2 b, 5f"facts on ekis�ing 'parY.ing Facilities; ;or dasnand,for 'he,k parlcin3? .__. X c: Substantiai,icipact to existing transportation systems? d. SignificantaIterations�to presesn patterns of c_rculation: for, k movement of people and/or goods? e: Alterations:,to uaterborn6,;raii cr air'traffia$ f: Increase in'"traFis hazards to Aotor vehicles, bicyclists or"`pedestrians3 lk: PtJ??LTG. Snt�'TCES. ' WhI the proposal have 46, of! _t '''upon .o result in need fornew a: altered government services.: a. F'ra rotection; �--- w b.`.'iPolica protection?• c. Sdhoals? , x Parks;`or` other recreational fPe:.li^last x` e.. Maintenance of pulilYc 'facilities, including roads? ;' f,""Other;g6verhental"�'ser;ices3 r Y - 77 Jfi t M7�A�i":QCs Nil ult in 1 the proposal res; flee of substantial nmbunt"s of fuel.oi energy" a, b, Substantial increase'in demand.upori existing sources of enorgy, or p f energ;l�2 require the develo ment o£ new. sources o * r Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or �. 16 e following: suoaca Ml alterations to th X a. power or, natural gasT b communications systems? _ c.. -'Wates availability?' d.. Sofor .pr septic systems?: I e, Stam. 48 tar drainage3 I - , f. Solidrwaste and disposal? tT;t�=moi• Will the, proposal result in: 17 x�tMAH tree tionof .any hual.th hazard or ;potential hazard (excluding ;rental a, heal h)? }( b, Exposure of ',peop'1e'ty potential i►ealth'hazards7 '— i8. rare -off: -{till the nropasa2 result in the obstruction of any 'scenic will the proposal result in the yiata or ,View open to the public, or, of aesthetically Of site open to 'public viewT creat'i'on an 19. ti -_?pt, Will the proposal result in an inpact upon [1te qualify or quancitg of evicting recreatignal opportunities? sc Cc.,S. inn o a Wil«"the proposal result; in the alterat'or- or dest"u, ar a,; pre:. storic v historic arehaeo ogietl site? C• ki`li :he droocsa1 "result in adverse phlisicai,or aesthetic effects y r object? or-l:istgrzc bu�lding,(st-^ucvz"- o �[ to ;a preristor�c the proposal Kaye the potential to,cause; a physcal.elange c Does, the, ethnic cultu could affect.univue existing religious or 'sacred uses withi{: d, Will; the proposal;restrict poteat3al impact area? �-r0 OF• �N'V":1=110 'N1F.NTAI; F.�SON ` Seer` attach ed . I , i I � , I r I I Vii, 4 I I �4t I I I . , I 77 r M applicant; Mara <Lamb AP #28-13--.03". Log X88-.09-07`-03 ` DATA SHEET A. :PROJECT �BEsCRTPTTON 'I. of Project: General Plan Amendment., 2. Brief Description: From Grazing , and Open 'Land to Ag4dultttrel- .- , 'Re'sid`ential 3. Location:- On thesouth side of LaPorte Road at Kings Ranch' Road approximately I miles southwest :of Bangor, ."southeast of Orovilie:: Proposed'Density of Development: 5+ 'acres; per dwelling unit 5. Amount of impervious Surfacing: Minimal 6. Access and Nearest Public Roads:; Property fronts on LaPorte Road 7. Method of Sewage Disposal: Individual serotic systems a. Sburc6L of -`water Supply:. individual wells 9. vroxilnit;y 'of Power Lines : To propert 10. Potential for Further Land Divisions and Developineni:: A subseovent' parcel map .creating 3 -parcels ids 'likely, to result from thisprod eco . (Exist ng A-5 zo l ng ) B .rWIRONM-r=Aj, ;S ETTIaG . ahvsical BnViror-ment 1. Terrain a.G'eaeral Topographic'Character: Rolling oak grasslands b. Slopes. Generally 1.0 to 20 percent sso 1otes w-th me flatter areas scattered within the Droa,erty c.. 3e.vationt Froti 400 to 500 feet above sea level d'. Li:r�iti_ng Fac Vons ; Some atoas of ,steep s -loops �2. i S'ds' a:Tyt>es and Characteristics: riuburn soil seriesgenerally we3 d_ a:.nec wi,tn mode, a �e ae;-meab=lx rt' on ,soils f ran 10 ` to 28 inches° deep: b. T�isnit�ng Factors: Moderate per;nea�il.ity znd I shallow sous 3 . NAtura.! Harare of .the rLand a'. Earthquake, Zone: MoCez4 ea*-tncr. a e iisters i ties zone V T: b. Erosion Potential: High c. Lacndslide Poter_�-Iltial: Lcw F{re Hszard: Moderate. e'.. Ex.ta_^sive .5:0.1 ?oten..ial. Lori I 4: �iydrg:o.gy ,, =Cn Wate4 • t� i Lta�y G`� Wi1' So'� *' t .^ r +- C ee., o ae_s the - prco�r .fir on+ ti"2E nor�x? site o ' La°Pa_te Pcaa ane 'C'_p4s' L Cele rest ns _ewes =e. �y cc neo 0 4�ie prep y w`ae , e I I I ,I' i I r' i t ...... ., ._:, T r north of "LaPorte Road. limited, b Grounc]vaater: Unknown, potentially Characteristics: ptoperty drains°'to the north and c; Daina a west towards tributaries .of W'1.1son Cree?;. to 28 inches pE.r, year . lannua. Rainfall (normal' 26 p,otev mited, wooer supplies' and e. L mit:ing Factors: hIly `e, backs from drainage wag's s t 5_. va"sual/Scenic Quality: Good. 6 Acoustic rJuality. Good 7 Quality: Air Good gioloaical Enviraninent yegetatj.or_a: piXed oak grasslands utith i�1ue aa}c and digger 8. pines. + _ y oak Wildlife Hebitat• SM_ biros and animals common to .:Valley g. ~ grasslands . . cultural Erivitonment Archaeolcgica and Historical Resources in, the ��rea: Lbw 10. sensitivity area. and, C►pen Land county General P].anr'Dculgu�alon5 12 . Butte acreGrazparc�els j Existing zoning._ n 5 (A9 e s i,te on the z op;ert. and - Mobs p v 13 . existing La.�d Us.e `or_ S �`te : ._er_o,<<� anen oak" grass ! ards . 14 . gurrcz.::sr'' ng Area llings at rur3. Scat�ered sncl,e zar��ily dwea aLand Uses:. - dens�yies. b;oziin;g,: A-5 (Agr�cultu_ra S acre parcels j Clrcnar 'and Field Ci raps to ' e. General p an besignatians: r icu ..t>'.�ral-Resic►er t al ' to the and sou�n with Ag_ east; west: no th across LaDo�te Raad . ,== ,. 10 acre to s° �;o the na� ��. across, d. 5 tia �ra L2?orte. Road urith 20 to, 100 acre; 'par^els to the. eas4, wes�. , and, souh'. c e. Pa J4' aLian: $far Se tY, t.1 -. - Charac4eic of. Site and Prea: RL_a- agricu �ura1 (Gra�izgj lane. S; 15. 2�earest Urban Ares: OrOV: i]le, nbproximataiv' Z0 mels "17 . Ralev,anw' Spheres of �ntluence'i hone. 18. Xmlorovement Standards ilri�an A%e'�- No Fiza Protection Service ,-. r y, S r StaLej i. e �:a:�io.. ta�-��on�= S �n a. County _. Nearest arch _ aao� aximat`e�.v , '3 min ms ora volunteer Stat:i,or # 7 5 in yJ 1Tllc'te� rr to J.0 m� es ankert ,only palez*no t;nian' S o-and Orovii 1 e 20:' 5"•hao� in Areac. UrSchoo] tip , NP,GATTVE ADCLARATTON . REGARDTNG, EN'VT}�ONM NTAL IMPACT 1 NOTICE, ;IS IFtEBY ,GTVEN thfled below has boon reviewed pursuant to the provisions ofthe :California Environmental. Quality Act of. 1970 (Public Resources Code 211001et, seq.) .and'a determination has been made that 'it wi1:1 not have a significant effect upon the environment, Lo 88-09-07-03 Loc" AP2$-13"-03 2`< DESCRIPTION or PROJECT: GENE;R i ULAN AMENbMENT ,from orazing & open Land to. Agricultural=Residential 3 LOCAT ION OF PROTECT :.` South, s,i.de o LaPorte Road, at iCir 'gs RanrYt load,, approximately 3 itiile6 southwest of F3angor southeast of Oroyille. ; 4. NAME AND ADM -SS OP PROJhCT APPLIuA14T Clara Lamb 4140 O ympiad Drive; Los Angeles, CA 90043 5 TITTIGATION 'MEASURES:' None 6,. A copy of the 1,rtitial study regarding :the e;nvir nmebtal offodt of this project is on file at 7 County Confer .Drive; O.roville. This study a's: Adopted as presented.. Adopted with, changes. apee'ificImod Iications and I support Ti reasons are attached., T. A pub'116 .hearing on this Negative :Declaration was held• by the, dcFcision Making, bode;. hear, rig Body Butte ,County :'Board of'' St�petvisors Date o£ Determination FeruarV 14, 1989 Determ;nation: On th.e basis of the zn tiaZ;study of:,env ronmer�tal impact, the lilt"Quina. - on presented at hearings, Comments received on the proposa,t.and orown knowledge andridepgndent reearoh: We,:find,the 'pxaposed prc,ject COULD NOT have a significant effect on the onrrirtinmenr ,and a NEGATIVE• 17ECLAkATI0N is, ]7ereby.adopted. {Ye find i that the; project COULD have a.. significant effect an he environment bit will not in this case be-causesOf a,ttached,mit?gation.,measures described in item S above which ax_e by this reference made condit'ions;,o£ project., appro,wal.: A_ co.riQ: l'onal NECATIUB DECLARATIDN is' hereby adopted,: S`iatu,re �t en Ful.tan ,Chairman .3utte. Countlr Board of Supervisors. `rifle .16 Date I r dui 4� CoE Alpnnin Cor�rn,' 0rov;11a,i�t T[7N. H 5 L< 14, D, d..a M. /us ArrR Cnd• r tLJ 52-05 1:,3001 I • i ' !b a x9oAa.: • w. �� �O � � i 69 63nG �N ry` � 29 f 6L (l )Ps 3f9! p Qom` ,�r Fu r /;u 34 r� 5 31 i •rY� , Tali r n iJ AC3 ♦ �' uo a SO o s+ I+ � i CC : I6' Erk Aq as rn, s� 5tO C. rr r` 0?Y 4 O y.ib r, t IIIC 9� a 27 SAG « { wl - $ 1 i {�\ � A C 1 zod Ad 2.94A N n ~ d t iW26+AC.'i ml eqy wle u ab � 9 i a m 6 1 b. ``•�-._._R 4, 52'" i d N ♦ 07 0 , , 1 ti i�i r tv