Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout89-12B REZONE PLANNING 3 OF 3M Ty ..:C �i��.w �.= aF v y T: sw �.PPEWTX i'+ , S 'CHECALS'I'"Vk�Z"Y , ENVTF2cI*TMTL�i7C,A.S� by Leaency) be COI 'I#'e d, Ag (Ta aP Loal,w "SS -091.2-01 AP No 55-29.44 file �So. 89-12A"'& B 1. BAviCGRC7TJNl7 ,; BAF.NEY BA�tNET - l» flame of proponent (if P' icabla): Address of` praponant.and representative � ons project dascriptzon: c�e a YrS. MAYsE.-A0 '"�""CN'I7TNCS Off" S�F�C '-..-- D,Po.TG3res to degrade the, of the environment) 'project have Eklp p Cepti'al Doss ,the e t_ause f1Sh or s�tb§tarit ally reduce the }ia'. i of 'a fish or wtil life, ,sp cies,r OW self-sustaining 1avels; Neaten "eo¢eliminaee W2ldlife population to drop be a `plant nor animal com: iihity) reducer -the number ori restrict the 'Yang aIm' important examples" of majc� periods t '_�_ or eridanor plant or: animal; or, al urinate e rali,fornia history or prehistory? have the p6idntial`to achieve short -.term benefits to he ' -Germ impact ort the o project Z. bo..s the p J, A short c ' o time+hi1e detriment oi",long-term environmental goals3 ( brief 'period eilvironsrenC is one wllcendure into Cneefuture!) Wi long-Cerrti impacts .. project have impacts.whieh"are indually limsted but dwitul�tively Does tt1e Vic - impact on two or male separate xesaurdt' whpre effect of ttie onsideralel. (A project.60 the impact on each resource senvironmen� isasignificantY -' _otal of those impacts on the, W111use 'aubstaritial is ect have envizozuaental efsets Wr>x Does the p' j— on human beings, either d x ctiY lir indirectljrt &4Nerse' effects, �. � fln the. basis. of (To be tnmplpted by "the G� ad Ay+ency).. LTI. ,D'ETtv1INATTC�N thin 3»,�j�ial evaluation:" haves a'signz%3can t"effect on the /SaE find tha,proposed' projett cOtLO N0 TIO Will be, prepared. DECD M ep irpnmept and; a ill �'iATZYE ot�osed "roject COULD have a $lgnsficait effect I W1 find khat a1thO,iI9A the; pt p be a sigtl�i"ibant effect in thisasebeoau�� n ;ane„nnvurosvnent, 'there hill no MEA 'd desi:r'bed'on ,lie,; attactt4d sheet have been ended to the t41TYCrt2lO"1 ed °!t&t3ATIV DEGIriRAIb13 wifl be orepar project f a proposed pra}ect MAY have "a 51911 Icant..etfec.t on the envi>'onment. TISiE nd ari;EHil%RONMENT¢T. IMPACT REPORT is Ye'4uixed and —U;ttl` 0 BL�i, �?I�ANP�1�1G bEPAR,MENT .�--^e""' a '.,.• ' nr��. ocQiP:zr 1--= sura AssoGa.a� , Flanne"r " '� , pevawed by: rimit. , a. r j • y IVs �hTV�7`RC'aNMF1V�..4.T_s . �D'[�'AG'�:S (Explanations of all'f'YES-I find "MAYBVr anser$ are,, equiiad• h► attached sheet(s).'' is EAR1ti., `Will the ,proposal result in s gn:�£icant: YE5 MAYBE NO . e Unstabie earth 'conditions,,; or changes.in.geulogic substructures? � b. bisruption,i displacement, coiapaction or oyercoyoring of rhe Soil? c. Change 'in topography ar ground surface relief:feature;. d. Destructiaon, , covering or modification of any unique. gogloga,c or physical , features? ei Increase in wind or:4ater erosion, of soils, either on: or off'„site? f, 'Changes, in deposition or erosion ;of beach sands, ox changes::in siltation; deposition or erosion which may modify the chaai±el'of,a rive ar stream s` b.' or the; bed of the ocean 'o r any bay, inlet or lake? _ g: Loss of prime agriculturally productive soils outside designated urban -areas T h. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes,- landsUdest ,rcgdsliddes',, ground failure or' similar hazards? . 2. AtR. Wi11 the Proposal 'result in substantial: a, Air etpssittns or .deterioration`of''ambient'Air duality? b. rs s The creation j , 'moke or €umes7:. of ob ectianable odors,, A C. - Alteration of, air jnoVeMentr moisture or temperature, or 3riy'change in climate, locally ar';regionally? 3 tF1.4TEft. �Iiil the'iproposal result in sttbstahi'iai: a.. Chards in currents, of the course, or direction of water movements :in` either” mine or fresh Waters? ChangeN' in absorption -rates_ ,drainage ;patterns,;, or the rate andamount of surface runoff?'- v c: Need for'off-site surface drainage zmprovemems, including vegetation' removal•, chasuteiizatian• or :,invert installation'! d: , 'filterat:ori5°o the course or flow of flood• Waters? F+ •. e. ' Change' isi he_ rrraunt of suieface,� nater in;' any Water iiody? f. 'Discharge iritc surface waters$ or in any alteraO on af,surface, water quality, ncl'udiiig but no'f Aimited _to temperatures dis`so'lved;6ky ry ar turbidity. � g.• AlteraGJ.on of the directian or 'rate of floe of, round g Haters?, h. change in the qu=. ti'ty or quality of gi:ound Waters, eitjtet through direct additYor}s or withdrawa1s4 ox 't!-xough interce t on of an aquifer by cuts _or extavations2 i. -Reduction `n'the' amount'of Water atherwiye available for public WateL sii liiQs2 Pp ';: � Ir 'Exp'osure,oi.people.,o> property, to water=related'hazards such •as flaoding2 t�, PLANT iIF'E.,' Will; the proposal .result„xn substantial a' u-heft n_ ;he dxversits of ''species, or number of any species of plants �.:. (incicidin$ 't"sees, shrubs sass crop's,. and aquatid Plants } r $ a ants 7 b. :Eebuction of the numbers`of.any tktique', fare ar endangered species of ;plants? c,• ltitrodoction of new' species° crf plus into fan area, or- in a barrier': ;the 6orma'1 regienishment. 'o existiitg.:.pecies? d.Reductian iri acreage- of anyagricultuual �.c ap2 �.; �� ' �� t?°i .....4 t a tt e 'rr:E"^(e�r., ^�u^ +u rl r'' <"t,a�u'r� r -� "••."M'�IE1 '.Y�.fi/f�6Y2" ��5' NSCi�,KL25M1iY u.�.uwa..au.U..,..ua�V • ..... .... ..... i+ •. . _ S„ �jJiMAT� I;`IFE j Will the proposal result in substantial: YES A. Change in the diversiS y of specieci, or numbers o£ a:iy species o£ anis:ial"s (bird,s, bold animals including reptiles, tii,md shellfish organisms_, or inse,ctl)? w b lteductdbn in, 'the- numbers of any �uniquej rare Or en.langered`,speeies of animals? c j1ntrbdUctio0e of new species of animals. into an or in, ;a barrier to ,areei; the migration or, movement;.Of; anmalsY d Oeteriorati,on of >>xistin; fish o,r wildlife habitat" 6: NO -S Will the proposal result insubstantial„'” 11: Incrsases in exist ng noise lavers? y p b, .E:: Qsure oil `,people, ta severe noise levels] �� x 7. t,1LV, tivD"GLARE: W21 1:1 the proposal productsignificant lfight and glare] 8. ligtJogg, Will the proposal tdsUit in a stttsfantia7 al"teratioi► of the present or, planned land use of "an Ari=a:' -,, 9. NATURAL RE50URCE5. Will the proposal 'resiilt in substanta'1; Incregse y A., In the rate of Use of ,an natural resoi irde,, ? Y b Depletion of any nein-tonei40le ha kal reiioUrcis? ' 10. RISK OF.UPSET. `Iii 11 the proposal involve:': a: A risk of explosion or release of hazardous substan+iesincluding, but . not limited to, Qii� pesticid,s;'chemicals or in 'the event .ra3iatzon) of an 'accident or .upset conditipfisl b. Possible interference With.pin imergency,rec;onse plan or emeegendy evacustfon;plan? 1.1 POPULATIaN. Wil']' the groposal alter`location, distrxjzit;oa, density or .growth rats of the hien population: i, : 12 HOUSING.`�lill. the proposal a£'fect ecisting'housing, or creatq demand far addit oval housing? S TFANSPG A i0N CIRCULATION. Stili the piapti5zl result In: a. Generation of substantial.` additional vehicle movement;? .{ b.; Effects an ,existing parking fecilitiosor demanii 1'0 tie ,.park .i c: Subs'tarttial 'impact on existing transpor,tatinn ,systemic:? d. L' Sil;ni£rcaint alterations to present patterns ol,'circulation or, t movementof, people andjor ;goads? , e: : 4lteration Lto Waterborne; rail oz air traffic?: f. 'Increase in .traffic."hazards. to gator vehicles, rUicvcl,Ists Qr pedestxians?1' : lt,. PUBLIC StkVICRS,' Will the proposal have, an effech upon 'or resrylt in a need or new or alte ed governme.n serviires_': Dire pzotegton? _ b. `Folice protection" Schao,ls? d. ' Par'ks or other rec;r"ti3nal facilities? eMaintenance b'f u61 c facilst_einclud%ng.roads,. f , OtileY governrtenY,al services? J 4 7=7 Y4 I i. F 15. ,ENT Rnc7'' Wile pzaposal: result in, K 4. 'Use, u€ substuntid, jano4nts of fuel or eneTl,y't y ; b. S�ttistantiml incre se in tlpmani upgri existi:g""sources o hnezgy, or ' . _ .. .. require the development of new, sources. 'energy?'' A/ ib. 'UTILITIES. Will the p'ropasal result in •.a need. ,;for new systems or substant.ai_,alterations t6, the fo; l lo�iing;. - a: Power or ;nature;! b, Comr-nuhications 'systems? el SVatez ave lsbili;ty? �, rl . Sewer dr" septic :sysi ems?" ' e. Storm water drainage,? i. 5ol;i+i haste and disposals 1�• �► i ALTH� dill ,the proposal result I a. Creation of any hei�lth In ed or potclntial hazard (e5�clud ng men a! 'heal "th)? b. Exposure of"people to.potential heafith bazakds? r' Tfi, i1ES;HETIr's. Will, the proposal result ifri `the obstruction 'of any, scenic ` vista or view open to the Public, or wikl'the proposal sesult;in"the creation of an aesthetically offensive lste"olien to public view?, tG. Fi1;CREATZON, Will the proposals result 1`n 'an impact" "open the +ltiali"ty or , y q uantit, o. ek y :fisting !recrc�stioral oppoi;tunitie? to Cti1,TVRAL RE50URCE5'. Will'the proposal result fist the alteration or des.rzuctiein.of a prehistoric: or historic archasclogical site? try Will fine proposal result in adverse physical or aesthetic''effhcts t4 a prehstoruc cr biAtoria.liulding" structure or abject;" c; Doesthe propasai:hdve the potentia.I to cause a physical ctartge`" Which 'could affect unique ethnic cultural values? �+ d 'ail1:the proposei testrict existing religious'.or'sacred ores within the, otential iinoxi p ct area? , 5 71V C)F E'iVVZ'C20x�II+4;ENTA! >vV'%►Lt?f`iTYC�1�T See attached. i i , NNW Applicant: Barney Barnett" File No., 89-12 Log #88109-12-01 DATA SHEET ;.. A. PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1. Type of Project: General Plan M614r]ment and AezohO , 26 BriefDesoripti.on: ,, General 'Plan Amendment from Commercial to Low Density Residential; and Rezone from PUD t'O AR-NH--I 3. Location* On the west side ;off Pentz Road approximately' 500 feet smith of Wilderness Way, Paradise'. Proposed Density of Development: L9_ density residential.,' approximately, 6 dwelling,units per acre. 5: Amount of Impervious Surfacing:, 2.+ acres or:1,8%. 6. Access and,?earest Public Roads:' Frontage. on Pentz Road, 7.. Method of Sewage Disposal: Septic tanks and leachfiel.ds. 8. Source of"Water' Supply Lime Saddle'Cominunity Services District., , 9. Proximity of Power Lines:, To original parcel.. 10. Potential for F"urth6r Land Divisions and .Development: Assuming developed ,property is divide i' into a 2-1/2 acre` lot' and; no rieW interior roads are built,,. 5 or 6` lots'. arIe ;possible: _ B . ENVIRONMENTAL "SETTIN'G' Ph sy ical':Environment 1." Ter, mist A. General Topographic Character: Foothill ridge ;top, dropping off inti steep-walled canyons to the West. b. Slopes:. 10-30k on 'east half.•,of the property, 30--50% on west half.' c.: Elevation: 1250: to.;'1650' feet above Sea Level. d. Limiting F'ac'tors: Slopes over 30%., .Soil s= a. Types and Characteristics. Aiken'60-140"'deeps yellowish-�. red, loaMjclay,'moderate to slog permeab: ity, well draining with ..permeabili'ty on soil from 4to 2.0 pmoderate deep: b; Limiting Factors. Lava cap, lack; of gnr,colation�.steep; slopes on 'Wes te'r].y' portion of, property. 3. Natural, H6zatdsl of the Land A. Earthqual�e`Zone: Big Bend Vault 2000 feet: east Erosion. Potential: :slight along Pen t . Bo'l'd,. high We s of ,..,! building rtes. c. Landslide Potential: i;ov to ;moderate. d'. Fire Hazard: High'. e. Epansi,ve. Soil. ;Potential;; Moderate along Pentz Road,- low west of building sites.- 4. Hydrology " �8- �� j 1 �� - _ :4 � '"'� i JA required .on attached sheet(s).rs are ro on of all YtSII and, "M. answers 1 the proposal 1. EARTH,sikhif �YES a s ar c i eo s ruc 6r Unstable ;e earth conditions or than es n g, logic, sob t, t es? b. '`Disruption, displacement,' cb##ction or �Pver'overihg of the soil? di Changein tbpogkaphyor grouted, surface - relief :features,, d. 6 ino i r h icAl any. 4niquo DestkUctioh��doverin r di­M�Atiofi of geologic, 0 PI's featureAT. e_: n wind water erosioo:, solls'll, the on or off site!, Increa,qeA in or f. changes' in deposition, or erosion o�each gdsi or' changes in s�iltaticn ...1beach or-'erosion whkh may modify the, channel, of a ,riv'e r'jbr_ stream .:I , , or � the' bed Of the ;ocem'or any bay, inlet or1.&W g. Loss. of prime 4gtjc4lt0rAjjyprdudti 0 soils outside designated urban areas 7: hi geologic iehazards ds such as , earthquakes, Exposure of people orproperty to s, landslides, es groundfailure or similar hazards? proposal result, -in substantial., a.. Airemi St L ", Sr r eri0 lons, o d Of 'Ambient air: quality'. ' 1 b'. The creation ;ofobjectionatJ'ar ddOeSIj - smoke or fumes?,, a. i Alteration,: of air movement; moisture :or tempera�ture aAYr change or I climate, JoCally. o - r :regionally? - ' 3'j; L '14A i q proposalrGSU - In substantial: Will t�j course or direction f water movements Changes in c�rrents orL e cour e in either Mar or hL' waters? b. Orangesger ,inLabsorption rates' Lr driihage patterns or thO� rate 'And amount of surface runoff r- Need for vu-sitesurfacedrainageimprovements', including u in&v itation.yqj removal, 0 ''charinalizatiori os culvert installation? d� Alterations to the course or flow; of 'flood whjgPtSj ..... e. _ Clian the amount i" of surface Water in any water body? � Discharge rinto surface waters,L or in'Lany alteration of surface water - quailtyj �Wt not.Ijmito&tempera temperature, 4i4solved x�gen 6 r turbidity!: Alt6tAtibli d red, ion -p r r rA ee, of flow of grotind 'Waters i b Change the quantity or of gtotind �'vatdrt,, dither I iroUgh' L angle in e �c 'd Or h into f, U_� t, 0 aquifer itdct, additions"or L r ' 341�4drawa. s thtoUg interception an I , , 0 y otr, , ­ 11 1 V t, is ? bL cots or exca r a. IPT 1. ';Reduction amountof`W ater otherwise available L fo pu_blia water 7 O_rd P, P t JE p :Wre,_0f...LLP46p�,'e� dr as 'f Iclooirig? k 'd r- y o water -re a. e azardt,� such_ pt'�jjf tf'A ropota,l re'sU t 1n sulstaittial. A Change in the- divers; Y'of species., 0t a k any 5pedies o trees, js ru sgrass, Cropsaquatic ,01 s b Redtidtioft 6j the number's of 'ajjy' uniqtid,,, irAf or .endangered I fidaing Te. species of P an S. ,L,jyj) ;an Area:, O�,t Thtrddudtibn­o bk.pjanjtt t6 SW "SpeeleS in & bjarr Pr ,to rt tete , in speqies? norMa replenishment of existing g dr� j 'acr 6 ,any, agri4tu� tura o d u cit Inr 'eeg 0 crop?. r S. ANIdAL %TXE. Will the proposal result in substantial; 7 ES. A. Glia, In the diversity of species, oz numbers .o£ any species of animals birds; kind animals including; reptiles,, f1wi�and shellfish, oFphlrns or insects:)j, r b. Reduction :in the _number's of any unique, rare or entlangered species of animals? c,. Introduction of iew species of animals into art area, or in a barrier to therpigrato� or. 'movement of animals? d, Deterioration of ''existing fishlor wildlife habitat? 6. NOISE,'Will the proposal result in:substantial::. Increases in existing noise levels? b. Fxpostu a of people to severe noise levels? ?1 tilcFtT e1ND GI ARE, WI1 the proposal., product signfican> light and glare?, 8: IAND USE. Will the proposal result in a substantias alteration o£ the present or planned land use or' an area? 9. NATURAL RESOURLtS Will the;proposal result in substantial: A Increase in the rate of use of any naturalresources? li. Depletion of any non-renewable natural 'zesources._? 10« RISK OF UPSET. 411 the proposal involve: a, A risk of 'explosion or release o£ hazardous substances (including,, but not lLnited,to oilp ,, event or, radiation) in the of an accident�or u,setsconditionshemicals b: Possible interference with an emergenc evacuation. plan? y response plan otr emergency x .. I1• POP._ ULATIdg-. Hil"l the, proposal alterlocation, distribution, Density or, growth- rate of the htmran, population? 12. HOUSING: ,Will the proposal affect existing hous%ng or create a demand' Tor additional housing?; ,. : I 13. fRANSPORT�ITIO�GIRGUL.4T30N. Will the proposal resulk int. ,�;• W a a. Generation of substantial additional vekiicle movement? a b: E eets-ort existing parking facilitieS,,'ar demand for neW parking i� Substantialmpack on existiing transportation systems3- d:Significant.alteratIons 't0 present patterns of circulation movement of people andJor goods? e. Alterations'' to waterborne, rail p'r air traffic?',, ' f. Inc: ease in fsaffic'hazards to motor 'vehcles','?biCyalists or?'pedes, Frians? , 14 PUBIZC SgVFGESr . .Will t2te proposal have �n effec4 upottr aC relit -3n a need £or new or al,terei3 goverrunent 5ervioes. I zi. Fire prates tiny b. Po 1-' , ice protection, C « Sohools? d« .Parks or other recreetibnal faci3a;tfes?-� etaintenance o public ,faciiies�' inclit3ir roaiin? f« bthei governmental Cervices'$ -3- 14, 1S. ;FhtERGY. i4ll the proposal'result {in: ;-5-- --ND ' .j of ;£ueT or anerpj? a. Use of, suGstarttiai am -- b.. Substantial increase in demand existing sources. o£'energy, or re_uire the,develo meet of new sour q p es o energy? . ?5. UIILiTIES. Will the presult inia heed .for new systems; or 'rLroposal } '.the follcwi.n ubstanCfal alterations a B a. power or`natural gasl b. communication's systems? C, Water avdilabilit�? a r d. SeNer or`sepcic_systems? e: Stowater Ora nage? f. Solid waste and',dispasal. 17 , ° ,iIUMAN 'I{EALTH: 14 1 the proposal resU1.t ins Czeation'of any"health hazard or potential :hazard (excluding mental heal th)1 b. Exposure of people, to potential health hazards? i _ ;'kESTHETICS. Will the, proposal result in the 'ofstruction of any scenic vista; or view o em to the:;public; or will the, proposal result in 'the, - ,- ,_- . . , creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? � I9•. RECREA TON. Vi1,1 the proposal result in an impact upon the:gtUality or quantity of skirting recreational: opportunities? Y 0. CULTURAL RE50URCES.; a" Will"the'jproposal result, in the alteration or destkUction of ar "- pr"ehis"toric or historic archaeological site? Il"the'proposal result Anadverse physical or aesthetic eifegts`, to a prehistoric of ,Storic,building, structure or, object?. c. Does the -proposal have the potential to cause a physical change .� which would affect uni7jue ethnic cultural ;values?' Ji Will the proposal restrict existing religious.or'sacred uses, within � the Otentrial impact area L7'TSCTJSSTO F. -0F .�2�tV=RC�IVMEN'TAL 'EVE�LL7A�YON See attached.: v i , r Applicant: Barney Barnett File No..89-I 2, Log #8:8-09-'12-01 DATA, SHEET A.. PROJECT,'' DESCRIPTION 1..�� Type of Project: General Plan';Arriendm ,nt and Rezone.; 2:'L flrief Description• General Plan F.mendment from Commercial to Low Density Residential, and RE zone,i from PUD;; to. AR MH 3. Location:. On the west side of Pentz`Road approximately 500 feet south of Wilderness Way, Pa.radise,..`. 4;, Proposed Density b Development: Low, density residential, approximately 6 duelling units ,per acre. 5. Amount of Impervious Surfacing: 2+ acres or::18%.. 6.': Ar;�ess and Nearest Public Roads Frontage .on Pentz Road.- 7 : ds McAChod of Sewage ,Disposal t Sept,„c tanks and, leachfiel. 8. Source of Water Supply: Lime 8addlei Communi tyS'erViCes >; Dietrich. _, 5. Proximity, o£'Power Lines: To original 'parcel:. Potential. for Further'Land Divisions and Development: Assuming developed property is divided into a'2 -1/2 acre lot and no new interior, roads are built,, ;5 or 6 lots are possible., H .. ENVIRONMENTAL ,'SETTING I. s 'calEnwij:onment 1, Te:rrairi� a... General Topog"iraphc Character: Foothill ridge, top,. dr.oppin'g`off into steep--walled canyons to the west.'. b,. Slopes: 10-3QA on: east half of the property; 30=-`50% on West, hale.. c. Elev'ationi 1;250, to 16;50 feet. above Sea bevel. .^ d . . Limiting Factors ::; .Slopes over, 30�s 2. Soil s a, Types and,.CYiaxacteristics: Ai:keri; 6'0 1x,0" deep, yellowish- red;. loam/clay.; moderate to slow permeability; we1I:. draining, with moderate perMeaIity on ,soils .',from:4�f to 20” deepdl ^, b. Ditnting'Facors: Lav'a e,ap, .lack cif percol at:3on, ;ste'e'p slopes .on westerly, poI tion' of properEty: 3 Natural hazards . of the Land. , a. Earthq1uake Zone: Bi'g Bend ,Fault 2000' feet east. b:. Erosion Potential Slight ;along Pentz Road�.highwest of ' c. Landslide Potential: Low to moderate. d Fire Hazard : High e: Epansive Soil Potential.Moderate along,Pentr Road,lo west` of build^ ng sites;. 4. Hydrology a. i a. Surface Water:. -Dry Creek at west property line. 4 Groundwater: _�,imited. resourco c. Drama e Characteristics Surface drainage West to Dry g Creek at west property line. A. Annual Rainfall (normal):: 50-551.x. e. Limiting Factors':' Availabilityof aater.'through Lime Saddle Cbm unity Services District.. 5. visual /Scenic dual„ity Highly., ceftic canyon views to'west, 6. Acoustic. Qualityt: Good, cv%th exception of road corridor. 7. Air Quality;' c;ood. Biological Environment 8. Vegetation: P.in2, Oak;. Manzanta°°,'Ce.anothus grasses, bare`a.nd rocky ground zt lava cap. No rare`or endangered ;species are known. to occur on the property per California Natural,Dive:rsity Data .Base. 9: Wildlife Habitat: Good as a result of low residential densities acid ample cov4r,'limited water; Outside of deer migration area. I Cultural. Environment Aichaeological and Histdrical: esotirces in the Area: High, no = evidence survey previously prepared. 'Butte County' Geiieral,�.Plan 'bossignatibfi. Commercial. 12 ExisWing Zoning: PAC. 3. Existing Land on'Site: Single-family home, Shibui gallery „Use and school small-outbuildihas_: Surrounding:Area:` a: ,Land Uses: wail Trails store and "church to north.; Quail Trails mobile hUme park to east, open space to west; open and single-faMj.ly,;to south. b. Zoning. Town of Paradise, AR=M1.1-I (north and south)., H -C C_ - Genera]. PlariDesignatons: Commercial north ,.and l parcel . on east, Lor�:Dens ty 8esidential north and sout h, Agr ulturai-Residential and Open and ,Grazing to the west: "c d. Parcel Sizes: North: 1,1.3:East: 8.' Went.: 1g. Southi` e. Popul%ation :Low density: , Character of Site and'''irea, F,ringe'of Paradise urban,'area:r 16. Nearest Urban Area:' Paradise 'town at"west property line. t 17,111.Relevant Spheres `of Ihfl:uence: Lime'Saddle Community "Serv:ices District; Feather' River.Re;creation &Park District`: imp°rovement .� Stand;ard's', Urban ,Area ; -n a dire Protection Service: y�;19. a. Nearest bounty (Stated Fire St6tion:3,-1/2 miles: north;" #'35 (seasonal), 41/2 miles northwest. b.. V7atei Availability 2q. Schools'in Area: Paradise Unified'School Distric;t;,. i,MT�sjs �, � _ . . �, y. Yp " ��', g7k r '` i . .. i �'/ ��� �• � ��t a 111 ��R' r :. ,X � � '�' •.I nra...n- �/11 � y 5..� Y' i. ; �d1 \` i � f : rn 1 `, Fu "Al • ,er fir: n.,� � � d.�8 ��...��, Rea � �',-✓�t y sM Ba" ol r , s �t Tne �f•r d tm y�