Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout89-16B REZONE PLANNING 2 OF 3Irc i1xo`,1100: TC T c' 1I0 lloo 10 min; 1.80: 2,''52 28 1.04 1". 4.6 O"A2 11 2 4z :.73 1.42 :4 7' 0 B r. 12 1.6,-6 231 0,98 1:.18 48 80 13 o 2.10 2 0,96 1.35 t'O 0 4 2.00 33 0,95 1.33 51, 0 771 34, 0,94 1.�Il3 52 0:76 1.08 91 35 0.93 1:31 53. 0.75 1.67 IS' 1..35'' 140 54 0 4 1.05 330..; OJ;91 L2 7 -1 3 1.04 -20 1,29 1.2T 56 0.72 1.62 ag 57 22 1,21 1. 71 4,a 0.88 , 1.14, 0:30 1,00 23 4'1 0.87 1.121' 0:'S9 24 10 3 42, 0. 0 448 'OLI�'§I'l 13, Ag. 4 1 0 2. �o 9 26 �44 0,84 1, 3 411 0.58 2117 -07 Y.50 45 0.. $3 0.21 FIP�IRE 6 81t4&0Ab 0=-1 1.7 !' W There des:.an criteria ` shows tt�e are ?--2: r Figue 2-1 �' xDF curves based Resouzces rainfall, data., an �alraciiza Deartraent of Water' Recommended Surra Driainage Design Cxiterza Runaff c,offic,ient Land Use �4aridscaped area L Residential _ :,: , 0.25'. Rural Low-density 0.35 Mod ,um-densi y Righ-density Public Schools hospitals` 0.4p-0.70 CommeCal 0.35--0.70 inz3ustri 0.70.-0.;90 Highway, 0.70-0.;90 0,80-0. a0 Time o`f Cori 61. xat%an Tc, _ t, o p x to = over laid Flow time „ t - g.u'tter flow 'tJtne q tp PiFe Elow 'ti.me t1 Se, a rxnUmura T� at -.the most; upstream�i.nle� o� �.0 Oibutes., Rai, nial7.'_1 ntnsit i Use EDF carves shciwn" an kigure 2-1. based on California De artn� ' of Water Resources tva en,t ;rai,ri,fail data: K Sevicei. Lege" f 2- .ear y ,� Use, or Y. storm d,;' lines less than 1.Q xncli4s in diacaeter.° Use 5wyear storm Eor lines Use' l0-yearato,cn 11 18 l,,ies greater to,27 inches in diameter. than ' or equals 72"' inches. 2;7 inches, and ,less than +yeah use l� storm nth 2 : f:eet neater t�i',an 72 inches. oEfreeboard ,for apen channe'1 o , '° FiGItR� 8 Regised 1�=13 07 N ,I w�.L „•'iYe Mi w m 4+.�:L. egress pc' nt 01'1, r L �as 4 :venue anc ceanot:~�us : 2. Pag �3 f ragraph 7, regarding 7 ump t g �t'hP s Mden yeis ten enc; l.1 - 'ThIs: appears ' to tq un the rc-t and should be .i.dentif eci as the rEoort. ssub uch or be d�leted�froo m. 3. Page 3 - The report states than levels calculated using the 1985 Hicrhwav catacit� of seraguavice were Method. ' The _levels were' retorted as letter, planning. • ,' does not use letter. rati .gradesl :should be reported sim l ngs in the planning method. The'HCM' P Y as undernear, yr over capacity1s 4• Page 15 - The; Paragraph at thea to 0 the development will redtre the P f the page implies that nearby outlets high school. amount of tri s Zt, is staff! s opinion that a�av from the:area. them food are now. will remain as at as they The availabil�it development food at will divert some trips ,from Proposed' not a' significant amount. The x 1 cations ,but attract additional studen' development will more likely, is who cannot reach ons. 1 :attraction the farthe Page 24 - The first that .si RaragraPh states that figure 4: gnats are not shows warranted.I An inspection of the ra Y ciearl shows that warrant na. ], is g ph :met.: • Page' 25 - The fi gore on page 25 does n "reflect the same westbound right turn movements page 24• There�should'be a minimum of 33 Aldicated r the fi the 'last gur,e on p ragraph. right ,. figure turns. 2n does not correspond to tiie text ed, t°' .?but the fz.gure I ,ot the paragraph.. 7 . Recommendations r �- • The deve'Zoper to instal: fully actuate signal at the intersection of 'Mar.iposadandpEast AVeifc � nue. 2_• �� Developer. ! tq contribute a sgnal�aton of, thQ intersection rafaEastare to , the, Ceanothus� h Further Avenae arid, ir%tersection' of East and .Ceanothushould analyze the to determine' the pro-rata'share from', this development., 3. The awehoper' to north, of East, A� ' to' the..nartherly aim is of the deve lo,pment. lenue r 4 Thi developer to install continuoustwo;�...� lane',on East Avenue between'Marposa Y Zeit`--turn and Ce an',, ; The sir le g access point on East .Avenue to' the, shobziing c`enter;shatl be `.designed a as curbed zetzn entrance, ,77 777 report w ,. address towing' movements ofM cf ,yam Avenue to�p :zg Center as well as at and Ceanoth xs, todeterRIAO, ;Whether or not surricient , gapping ocu^^,s to a11oW the : eas4bound maneuvers in an d' rec t' ora f=am the comp { The tri " generation rates sho,4,d ' r' p. �a revised to reflect a fast food outlet` as part of the project. • R ones Arer o public Works CSD A.DPW-Eftgr,, , .. 4 aY nal Y �. 1. .{•.� • ♦ f. R i hr %• � � � r r w , I I I � 1i I h`, I w ! I, !I 7 7 -7 a' Am I I - celri-,-�!711.in6, Z� age e eet, in ch� s trc�r 210.­ tulax�I� " - tje ­1 1 ,, f ces==ecl Zoll v =S q.,v. s cc=lencingat soUtI7 'ej hn�'Bidwe.jj corner, ; 0 =e- Ranc. t4t 21 jo I F":-- teenth Su& 1 40, as f6r record 4-7714104 imn, 40(5k of Th StZ�t- of CAI' e: - U4" sa 'at Page 48Co Dint center I L , pbini�­ of unty is 6- Cc of Z t so along 0, thence.,_ the, *Sl 641 25 Azeet mr6� or less to said C! mot, 2, 1, point in angle z -uthe-,l PC - 1 sc of, 1$. is y dist�iht­ 22 of said, be from t�-je��sbUthwet4� P TRUE IT, OF BEGL',u-4jZr Comex' On legal description j,, A­ I Nor`! 32a. 140 West more or le :he LOt 273;S 15 t v steel sA;q ��=03.n 'Nort�.j 2 'distant SaA4 Zot 17 f6et, dis of said and bei =CM rc Zne SOU �J also the tt�� tivest, corner "o L of this legal f es cr Ption, For pur�-pos es of, const-ruction an�­fti� ��ta, -10 ;,jan have the rii:fIlt, Ot ingress'' alnage.�'easer�n hall ard/o#, ecall- and egr-ts- of, constmction t 't I*riodi --Cajlv� as �d enant e VeIiic es. conditions �t onC14 equ,a affecting t said, Lot 27 . ;Billy' J Lard L ury IrVe­ "'r 43,95, . State of qaifol Q J� .,,A I v A -,b iej ­87- PIF r5 i vt�� x �� s w yf � • i tt 't,." y ih r r t APPENDICES bISTING IF A. Typ-i Cal 'Site,Plan L. ?rimary. "Draw" Area for prcpo ed Center rC. Existing P.C;. Peak Hour Traf,£ic 13. Park ' or' R i F. La�.atio E. Existing PaM,.f TraffichPlusrR�a%nchopArroEhIl1yo Specz£ic Plan '` Traffle F. Mitigations Required Under E"Xisting Plus Specific. Plan G. Conditions. -= aeons He u lus Axa.sting Ma.tgat' Rancho Arroyo P U-. q red.t7nder Cumu'1at>rve Conditions„ H, Rancho Arroyo Plus EX sting lntersec+-ion Geomet;rics Required Under Cumulative Conditions.' i. Calculations for. SingJle Uses T. Calculations for Multi -Use Tables l; 2. .Level of Service Definit~ dns Current Levels -of -Service 3. Levels of Service w tin Existing lfaflie Plus Specir.c Plan I)eveloppnen,t+ 4. Rancho Arroyo' Specific, P1a�n External Trip Distr c�ution. 5. E istirig Tra€fic Plus SpecEifYc Plan Mitigated.Fje.veln of Sery►ice el 6, Rancho Arroyo Plus. Blx,isting/Cumulative Traffic Conditions Miti tend Levels of Service 7. Compar.ison.of Trips Geher81te,d by Proposed'.Shopping Crl enter; Single Use vs. Mulse Figures 1. ,East venue Specific Plan Regional Lobation A 2.. r East A,uenue Speci£1, Plan ,F oilndary 3. Pro jec<tea 196 7 Traffic Count's . Pr:ojected 'Traftic w th $'h'oppnge,nter i 1�F 1 �1 1 1 . The firm of GoAk As"socia'tes Engi;nee'r,ng C;onsu.tants was retained py Mark Gregoire of Coldwell Banker- aria John Ochipint' of; Azt:e.c Real Estate to prepare ' a trafc in analyses .of a pro�poeed shopping. cen er` to be' I,oca'ted northeast Chico. ;The, relat.ionsha.p between Cook �� As8o�diates and the prciject proponents is,con an]y, tvi`th no. other rel;at PAs AP existing 1 u ,� Ir a i tr "J , 4 TABLE OF 'CONTENTS Preface' ® �■I T. Description,of,the Proposed Project _ _ TI. Description of the Existing Area - - - - 1 TZT rut;ure! Approved _U.Ses IV. ` AreaWide Projected Road 'zmproveme'hts V. Projected Impacts - - - - - - - - - - - 21 VL. Conclusions- ;and, Recommendations Bibliograph 29 Appendices - - - - - - - - - -30 is t ..I, •p i - Yt 7777 d = t Table 1 Level of Service Definitions t � �cwel of ` p?�9 1ty 'Relationship Grade signaLixed Intersection anl i �� la Intersec~tinn A Capacity,queues operations, all _ Little or no clear in a single- dela "�" wasted operat.bns� all, 9 s clear in a single.. Start traffic, delays.:' signal cycle.. g Light cn9esticm, occasional backups critical Avezage traffic ,. ,ori app�ztaaches delays,;. Dear "D" Cap�icaty i ,cant ccaiges£i on of tical Lang bra ffic an=oaches but Ys %mcEional , Cars' ired 372W,4,. to waist 1 than cue cycle - � �,;,e � �` peaks,. M _ lcrr �T77 .-,. — " E y Severe with some, yam. t'' V t raf f' Ic crit 1 -, proaches Block--, � 'failure, . age iris may oc-9.: cur if traf£io` signet does ® not. proiride for pratec� ® turtling ts.affic queue may -Icck try � intersect.an psi; of cxtit.cal. al�roach(es) . Above Capacity 'Ib ta.7. b stop"'90 rextee��; cperatsmireakdown� b causes: 'rak a 2 Current i cels77777777 -6k-Service Warrants Si ed zSezv.ce unsigna.Lized Lodatim %vel-off- Level-of=Service Met? ,East. Avenue ;and �" SS SR 99 Raps �tEro DID M' 99 Ramps YO 'Cog3a,5Set °Dp N=th Ave=e "Aro r Avenue Floral. AvenueroE" 90 Nlaaepasa Avernle ` Marigti].d At%pri:i,a V 7�y.. No and ' � roA" No ' Fla��l Averna+e 1�taa�posa Avg r Mar3.gOld Avwm/M rare Avmm roA" Na WU&ood A roCn NO �i ro B vbdl�3 AV+At1llB '" i'A�ta33E't . a6ad and �E� No SS SR 99 Ramps � ' SR 99 Rams Y es. =6- o ni -M 3b�. l0 3 r.yg of Sexyic�a With4 With Plus Ttafiia Plan Dent ,, io ata an Sic�n, ,Zed Unsig:nal izexi Wa�.zarits Level-n:E-Serti�.oe ;Met? East Avera Ind S8 SFt gg Ramps, rt8SR '99 s iyes Cohasset Ppad Yes N�'th AVpzu2ei ,,. CES Flor-a Avem "E° IJo ®Pnsa RyeAt Yea mold A vetwe E ro Yes M&=aiijtaAveriu: ® I''Ja�cal Avenue i Ma�.pasa Avenue Ntjn Nc�' L9nld Vmueftdt�ori� Yes . Avg .. �anad Avenue ltp No " VaLI Avet�uc". _ Map Yes uV1 No iasset Road and ., SR. I , 'Yes n i 4 1 , I. 7777777 r- 2`�bleRancho Arr"oy© specific P]asl Trip Distribution Vital total ' bckez al Ts ' Land Use, Daily ?APs Exte %a Trips 1 _ . Distri bum 2 3 4- S (3.'S ec rSite) 4,480 2,240 1;120 1",.I20 .., ' (65 ac Site) 5,806 4,064' 1.,625 1;625 812 260 N Bush/FYtifessianah 1,559 1,169; 260 260 260 _ 129 ., 260' 260 r` F#1e tarY, 500 250, 105 104 15 I5 15 J r. Si93x Sclxbol 800 500' 220 220 ZO 20 20. Al2 23, 845 4 000 7,350 895 70350 4,000 Galt CCUZSe 472. 729 ` 145 145 145 145.: ® p a� 145 .r � ........... 42,987 32,554 7,478 10,823 2,016, 7,740 41440, r i23) (33%) (,6$) .: ` (24$) (14;$}, Distribution "Zone �f2 is the l.ocntion Shopping 'Center, of` Che ro " posed i i r r I C 1 of 2 �R r _ - 77 7-7- 1' 1 I has assufie:d the The -assignment of, spe cific Plan t"rips between Marigold Avenue and cons ruction. of Eaton'Avenue Manzanita Avr�nue,' and, the presence'of this `roadway diverts use East Ran°chojlArro�o traffic which would otherwise some Avenue.Witt� the; Eaton Avenue extensipn,� Rancho Arroyo 1,,500 vehicles pe.r day to East Avenue east would add aba!It of Marigold Avenue. If, the Eaton Avenue,cci.nnection Was not :Erips would constructed, - an additional "2; 600 Rancho Arroyo the. addition,of Rancho UseEast, Avenue.In :either case, traffic alone Would not create the need for East ;Arroyo Avenue widening; in this area and would be a less-than-significant `impact: Devel- opinent of the Eaton Avenue connection viou;ld require Avera.''', than theintersection oF. Vast be reconstructed and ignalized, Avenue/Manzan3.ta Avenue The improvementsrcould reduce impacts at this' location to less-than significant levels. If the Eaton Avenue rojects developed, connection were ;not made., and no ;other p11 the W,ildwood Avenue/East Avenue intersection Would require tg sig:naliz;ation and would have to, be reconstructed 3. and to accommodate the accommodate left-turn channelz"ation planned `Eaton Road extension. the-following'un'signaliz6d intersections'theyaddition of At Rancho Arroyo traffic would result. in in significant impacts. to certain inters'ectian movements.: East Avenue -and "southbound $R 99 ramps: East Avenue" and-northbound SR 99 reinps' East Avenue and F,lar, al. .Avenue , East AvenuA''and Mariposa Avenue Manzanita Avenue and Mariposa'Avenue. Cohas$ t Road and northbound Sit 99: ramps The, installs+tion of traffic signals at each,intersect,ion would reduce impacts' o a less -than--sig nif-cant level. rChico, Urban.. Area Transportation Study. (CATS And.,Eas, ` yen ue` ,S pe Gia The object-ve of the Chita urban Areal -specie Plan'" vras to."; ' predict future' traffic levels .in the" Chico area and improvements that will be identify the transport:a-ioii necessary to accommodatethe future demand► 1 T Westbound a pproach; three through, dual le five lanft (es) Nor't.hbound approach:'right� three thrau9h, dual le"f� (six lanes) Eastbound approach;fright► three through, left ( f Ve° lanes ) To provide the seintersect ' .through -`lanes should' be ex t'endedeOme`rics, all auxiliary outside of ttie� intersee'tion, at least 1-0 Widen East Avenue EastAvenue would require widening to five lanes With center turn fr: h .lane. om SR99 to Marigold Avenue., a Marigold Avenue ', int;ersection At t -he lanes would be. bOund required. The RanchoaArroyotdeveloper.;n contribute to these improvement should' Eaton Avenue Extension The Eaton Avenue extension to required,` The extension would be 0li five -lane; roadway with bicycle lanes, a.s a developer should contribute td this 'zmprovementancho Arroyo ,I East Avenueyceres Avenue Signa,lizatian would be leveloger should.contribute Arroyo t.ogthisd mpro,vementancho I,m%�O;V_ @...teff S to ___ East Avenue/Widwoac� Avenue' Manzahita A enue Intersection Westbound' Wili�waod Av entre: left ;turn.. one ,thraggh (twn Ganes) Northbound Na'nzanita: lett turn,, tWd rd'u" ('three laves I . Eastbound, East Avenue; thr (.three lanes) lett ;turn, �oug�h right ` Eastbound Eaton Av t;, two th (three lanes;) z;°ugh I =17» r 7777777 Table 5 Exiiati:gg Traffic P1 ..p�x:3fiC Pian !litlgaCed Lwo]s cf Servica Mltlga+ted Oasitigated Level, of Service Mikiyatioa Leve►1 of S�9rice Locatioa �" Last Art�so aad 58 SRL, 99 ramps Signalization HS Sft 99.r=p Signalization ..Ca' "]E" Coastsuct third S5 Ube Cobassat'Road floral Xveauo nS"+o Sigaalizatitin NaM pCnl MatlPasa Avemse wgw*' Sigtializatiiin Avenue "E"* Construct l��ft turn lanes dCm `. Masi ld 4° ,ze :.:signal:, Sanzaaita Avenue and, Marigosa•Aveaue" garliiati:n "A° Last AvenutMildwood "+► Can9trnCt Ea left taro Avenue laae and signalize Coh&as td8 -S8 raarps. "E"* 5ignallzatioal "A" *'Onsip lized,10"1'of SezviCei varsants mek for 92gshliznt oe. r u. .' Rancho Arroyo 'P-lbs existing ?able. Cueulativ0 �Trai£ic Conditions Mltigr„ted gavels of Sorvice �, Qnmitigated MiGigatr,�d faocatlan Legelrof-SArvica. M tigrition� Laval-o£ saoico East Av*mue and. MIR 49 snaps "8"�' 5lgnalizatior� "Cd mdi S& 59 ramps "E"* isignalization rrBu. Co6assaC Road "E°"' Auxiliary` lanes 6WrrCro signalization Cozy 'Avenue' "1'" Three through lanes + turn lanes on all alp proaches;and sigaalilation Floral Avenue "E"* taft turn lanes;; right, "C" turn Ian" NB and S8, and signalizaticn lsasipoa& Avraua ftow Tdo through lane3, left turn and right turn hares, and.aigualizal'all Masigold•Aveaua"E"* Two through lauds on Ult "C" Avenue,left tion lanes on, : al approachas,'dual EB left tura, and sigaalization Maasanita 'llveaue:and Floral A"=a , r "�:"a'' SigDalizatitm hC° ltarlposa Avemie. "E"* Tun through lanes on Mariposa "C" Avesunm and slgnalization iiildvood Xventaa; "E"* L�£t tNG through lanais an Eaton Avenue and Maa�saaita Avernie, right turn lane on EastAVehua COha t Pard and ' N8: S� 99 Tamps "y"* Signjail ' jori nCa _ 4iRSR 99 `zarrps nE�r §ignaliiatioa "C" '311 varFauGs mst at tmsignalizad latarsectian. Y r r I h I I r 1 v i Fgu're 3 s a graphic, signal warrant analyses: .,fro:m the -i Ma'nuai on Uniform Traffie Control bevices, for,"the intersection of East Avenue and Mariposa. It can be seen ak he "arra time 'that: a signal i`s not warranted under warrant #11 MinimUm Volume o,f,8 hours for an average day, Warrant #2, Interruption of 'Continuous Traffi-c and Wa,Y-rant #6", Accident Experience To meet War ran6, volume of vehic°ular traffic should not be less than 80$"of the requirements' in Warrant #1, Minimum Volume and, Warrant ;42,, lnter'ru'pt on of C;ontinu0usTraffi"c;, as I well as other regUiremehts. Figure" 4 is a graph "' signal warrant :f or the East Avenue/Mariposa intersection assuming the; full build -out or ' r and not in,ciudng other the. riropo ed sho' pping cente planned area developments. The graph shows that Phase I of this proposed'"project does notmeet he Warrant 1, minimax, 'of' ,8 hours fAr an "Volume -average-day to, Warrant a traffid, signal. , E I f; I I -21A- I r i' ✓, r `tr The projected illustrates peak. hour kraf.Eic dist.r:ibut` a Avenue/Mariposa significant intersection ion shown below the East intersection.`. szid�iEast Avenu /lea nothus Avenue c, - 99. 91 ` 28 43 East S 04'7`x%' Avenue: . 180 2,,63 l X00 x,86 198' ar , -2 5