Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout89-23 REZONE PLANNING 2 OF 3i n 'h .i !V. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS ." " .:C' ,, ers attached sheet(s)') ale:required on ons of al! YES and MAYBE answ , (Explanations Ex . lanatf, 1. EARTH. Will the proposal result In 'significant: YES MAYBE NO nstab.lo earth conditions or i� changes in gaologic;sUbstru'ctures7 .. , .... ... • .. , . , .. a:lJ ❑ D �', s laceMtiril6, rompactlon or overcovering of the soil? , , , , .'... , , ..':. b. �Disruptio,ns, d1 p ❑: ❑ Changelb: topographyr surface relief feafures7 ; .:, . F ; ❑_ c. ground . , +; . , :... , , , ,,..,..N:. .:..tD d. Destruction, covering or Modification 'ot any'.unique,geologic or,physical features?`, ,.,,❑ L7` e, increase` In +Wind or water erosion of sails, of then oft or, off site? ., .:. , , , , . , ;­-P + V. ❑ ❑ J, Changes` in deposition o,'reros on of be9a.h sands, or changes in. siltation,.deposition or efosran �.Wch may modify the channelof a river -s ream, or the bed of the ocean orany bay, lni#t or lake? k, .. , ... . , . , , :. 3 . ❑ ❑;:.. g, uoss W prfrhe agrfculturapy productive soil:; outside designated urban areas? ....,,:-.,. ❑ ' h. Exposure of people or;property to geofoglc hazards�`such as earthquakes, `landslides, muftides, ground failure or 41milar hazards? -, , , , . . , : , _ (D ❑ 2. AIR'. Will, the proposal result In substantial; a. Air .emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? :....::', • • . • .... • • • • , • • ,"• , . • • .. � ❑ ' b. The .creation of'objectfonal odors, in or fumes? . ;• ... , .. ...: , : , .... , ... , C1 ❑ . c: Alteration of air movaraent, moisture, or temperature or any change in climate, locally or regionally? .,' .... .,. ,; .,. „•,„ „., ,.,• .. Q ❑' �, 3. WATER. Will the Proposal result ;in substan.tiai: a, CjhyatIg'es� in cjurrents, or the course or direction, of water movements in either marine or frsif water4l.) 0 T. I A,: i. 11l. {..Y{'. . ..:,�..1♦ ,-1 E1.. 1i 1, .1. ❑ �: b. Changes In absorptfoP rates„tlrainage patterns;, or-the rate and amount of surface runof f?, . ❑'' !� c. Need #dr off=site surface. drainage improvements, Including vegetation removal, channelization orculvert instaliallon? d• Alterations to the course or flow of fioad waters? , , . 0 ❑ ChancYe in the amount of sU,rtace water in water body? , , :. , . s :. „ ❑ ❑ e,. ,any « . , , . , , ..:.. f= "Qfscftarge rnzo surface. waters, or in any aIteratiori of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature', dissolved oxygen or turbidity? f:t CI ❑ g, fteration of ihe: dfrctfart or rate of flow of grountl viaters? h; Change;'in the, quantity or quality •of grounei waters, eithE;r tlireiugh direot addJtions or Wrthdrawai"s. or:.through, interce-ption of an aquifer by'!cuts or-excavations Available I._ R;eduction.irt tfii? ainou'ht of water otherwise available; for' public water Supp fes? . ; :`, F ... ❑ ❑ ', j. Exposure.o# people or property to water'rela'ted hazaPds such ,as #looding? k; , , s . r F .. , Q ❑ :. ;­PLAN LIFT: W+III tl�e proposal (esu Itin.sub stanta7l, Chan (including: trees. ge.In lite dive, of species,. or numberbf arry.species.df plant5- �,. - fc la t 4Y : Fa'•i shrubs grass c,aps,andaouas),�r w�,.:,,:. ,. ..,� t f p n, •. a r. .. ❑' ( b, i :eductiOn of tile- nu 'bers,of arty unique rare or entlangOred specles of tilahts c, Introauction of ne:v species b I V 01a6ts into ,an area, dr it ; a bart�elr to the normal ❑ t. .et31er1tslment o'fxrstfng speces7 , . � ; .. d. Redrsctis n in acs eage of any, agrlcutturaf crop?, r . , ..: . , _ . ❑ " Will tho have an effect upon, or result in a need for new orYS J 14. RUBLlC SERVICES. proposal MAYEE NO, altered government services' •,�' ❑ ❑ a. Fire protection? ' • ,.. +, ❑ ❑ l�i b. Poi:ice protection? - , _ •; d Sdhoofsl.,..,:. e1, d. Parks .or other recreational, f adilities? j mi.4jx ❑ ❑ Ma'Cntenarace of oubiic faclttkles,including roads ,+ ❑' ❑ e. ❑!' ❑ gornmental sor' 'Ides? . . , . . „ I, Other, ve ' "` i'S. ENEAPY• Will the propo'sa(' result -fn; of":fuel'or energy? Q U3r of substantia( amounts b.'f3rabstantal increase in' demand upon Q�tisting sources of energy, or require the l < . d ❑ q.pVelopment of n. ew sources .of energy? , ., ..., , ,..., . . ... . . .. ... . ...... , . .. , . 1`8, UTILITIES. +Hill the proposal result;in a neral for rw systems, or substantial alterations to fhe following: a. Power or natural gas? .;.,,.,.:,.,,..,.....,.,., •.,.,.. ❑ ❑' b, Communications systems?". • 0 ❑ a Water availability? . , .: r • .,, . ❑ (7 O ❑ ,;. ,,::,..,rh,,,t,.,y,,. ,. e.Stormv+aterdrainage?�: s ❑ ❑ t. Solid �aste and dfsposai! x- r . . • _•'. ::. , • , HUMAN HEALTH.1Nih the: proposal result health hazard (excluding menW'heaith)? .. ;, ' ❑ a. creation of any health hazard or potential b. Exposure of people to potential -health haiards? .-... .. • • , + °: , ❑ ❑ 18: AESTHETCCS, Will tkie proposal "result in fhe obstruction pf ani+ scenic vista or view open to the i.putilyd. or wait the proposal resuit in the creation of an aestheti6ally aft' $0 site "ope'ri ❑ to Pu ..,.... 19, RECREATI JN .Wtfl the.pl, -al result lh'�an impact upon theAuality or quantity of exisiing 1,,)K. ❑ Xecreationa,l oPPar_tunities 20,:q' 0, q' LTURAf RESOURCES. vi'l'e destructio'of a prhistor,c ar hrstb�iC a, r/?Iill the proposal result rn the:alteratlgn of 4i ❑ ara,raea:logical.'tit ,. w e .� 3,.blrc r r;,4, ets ti.�llUri! the proposal res4ltin ��dverse shy ?ical or aesthetro a#leto a ptehrstorrc orh[storry ❑. �- julldigustructtireq�ogblect? ,�••; , .�.,.E� �, �..7�,f.�,,..9� ,�;� , ,,, ,�w n sal `avathe otantiattb;tausea.physrcaiChangawhioliWouldaffecturlitjUe' floes h P ❑ ❑ :tp Prapo _ c. .I,. d. ,?,.. y . . { ..culturaiY .iSY,aa Ka i,o-�M•,7{,irA=1, ea..vN,: „.�• etrchrth- slues? dt Wlll Ehe'propiisal .restrict exrstlnp rellgiqus or sacreQ uses wrinIn the potentrlii irripact . Applicant• ' Shastan domes Assessor's Parcel=# _ 42-14-15 Log `# 8:E3-12`,.12-tY DATA ;SHEET �. ':Fro ect Description• l : 2: Type Of, prof ect : Rezone B'r$ef Dpscriptiains Rezone •from S 3.. Location:, n the southwest silo of H ghw�iy 3?, app;roxiittately 4. 1100 ft:, nczthwest of Oak Way, Chico. Proposed Density of Developments _ 13' dwelling units per acre. 5, Amount o£ Ynpervious`Surfacing: Extensive. '!dearest Public Rola S) s Frontage on Highway ,32. 6 . 7. Access and method,,o£ Sewage Disposal: Sewer. g. 9, Source of, Water Supply: Cal Water, Proximity of Power Lines: Along frontage. 1p. Potential for. further land divisions and development: Rezone• will permi:t.construction,Of up tO' &5 dwelling units. B. Environmental:SeLting physical Environment: 1, Terrain a,General. Topographic4Character: Level valley land, b Slopes: c, Ehevat'%on: 165-17.0, ft. A.S.Q.' d, t�rnitingi Factors: None: 2t. ;;S611s, a. Typesand Characteristics:'" Farwell loam; chocolate" brown loam of a light sandy,texture, from l-3 feet to cultivate, and retains moisture thick., It is easy Well: Subsoil .is 3-4 ft: thick, friable, loose an granular. Well "suited to fruits and irrigation. b, Lm�.tng Factors:. one. 3 . Natural Hazards of 'the L nd' arthqu arthctiake intensity Zone a. E. ake Zohe: Moderate e" VTZI•. b„ tr.os16h- Potential: Slight, c. i,andslide Potentia]. None, d.` Fire Hazard: Unclassified. e'.; Expansive Sail,Potential:' Moderate. 4., Hydrology site. a.i Surface Water. Noire on= Area of extensive. grpundwat'er.'withdrawl b., Ground Water: and11 nitrate contamination c.' Dsainage.Cha,r.a r'stics: Unknown.: Engineezed drainage, facilities will, need tci' be, installed, d.` Annum Rainfall (normaljs '24 annual average;. FactorsArea of highest nitrate e. Limiting : contamination. S. i;i'sual/scenic Quality Orchard across the street,. 6'.: Acoustic Quality: impacted by Highway 32' traffic. 7, AirQuality!;: Generally good..; - Biological Environment.. 8. ve been removed. Vogeationi Old orchard, numerous trees ha 9.' Wildlife Habitat: Limited by surrounding reeidertial water development, Hi`gha�ay. 32, absence of , and native vegetation. Cultural Environment: 10,' Archaeological and Historical Resources in he area: Area of unknown. potential • 11 Butte County General Mari designation: Medium Density Res'iderYtiah, . 12 Existing Zoning . S.-R 13 Existing Land Use on-site: one house,old :orchard. 14 SurroundingArea : a. sand Uses: N : �ablle home park; E: Orchard; S. Single -family res'identi.al• W-: Single -family - residential, orchard. b. Zoningz A-SR, S-R, A-10, C-1, C-'2• c. Geri. Plari'Designations Medium Density Residential, Low Density Residential. d,6 Parcel Sines: 1/4-10 acres.' - e; Population; Urban/suburban d`erisities 15 charac'.t,;rl of Site and Area: Developed corridor. _- 16,, Neanest Urban Area: City of Chico 1.500, ft,' southeast. ]7 Relovant Spheres of ;Influence;: Chico, CUSD„ CARD. 18. Improvements Standards Urban Area r' Full: improvements required. 13 ; FirePzotection Service•: a. Nearest County ,(State) Fir e"', ,'#44 3 1/2-' mlles southeast, Station 042i)6 miles northeast,; b: Water.AVailabil ty: Hydrants will be ;required:; 0 School in Area. Chico Oftified School District, ik '.APPENDIX F COUNTY OFBUTTE.J ENVIROfVMENTAL HFOAM' (To be completed by ,Lead Aget ry) Log N:o, 88 12-12-01 . AP No, 42°-14-15 I: BACKGROUND i. Name of praponont= Shas:tan Homes � w 1. Address of proponent and repees_antative44 appfieabla)<` F.O. Box;4143: NorthStar, Fnaineering - �. . �TChico, CA, 95927 20 Ded, lratiri Drive Chico, . CA 959,26, 3, project rdescription. Rezone to R-3 II, IVIANDATOR Y' FINDINGS OF SIGN IFiCANC Vtt MAYBE No 1. C7oes he p.rojedt have potential tp degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce tho-habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife populatlon td drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminatea plaht of animal corrlmunityr reduce the numtser or restrlc't the range of a rare orendangered pian;t oi, anlmai or eflmfnaterimport`ant exampfes of rnajor periods of Calif omla history or prehistory? , . , : , , . , , -. O ❑ 2, pons the projeot have the potential to achieve short-term benefits to the detrime'nt of fon;g- telrrir envirorimenta'I goa($1(A short-term Impact the environrnentis ope:+nihichoccurs in a �r tela"tively brief period of time whlle long -farm impacts well ehdure into the future ) .,,.;�ro,, O ❑ �. �, 3, bbes the project. have irtipa,ctswhioh are individuaftylirrllted, butcumuiatively considerable) fA 0dleet,Mt' rtilpat t on two or more separate resdur�ces where the I'mpac, 'on each resource is r'elativaly;stball, but where the ef(Oct of the total of rhos_e impacts tln t6eenvironment'ts ; $r,�ntflCant�.•rr wn .�s.rr .,,.r W�r.. ww .e..a: r..w rw.,. ❑ �, ❑ f, 4; noes tf�ue ptojeci, have enVlranmehfal elteiats which` wrll cause sub5tahtjal adverse 00ts on A MM 1141 Clan,WFi1nL]5.'(th ldlre.f+tiygrIn tr$trtfy .,,r. ..1t. mrar,.xs ta�o v ❑;' �+1 i DETI=RMINATION:: fTsa bo eamptex;arl fry the Lead Agehcy} ori the balls pf thfl; in tiaf evalu&iloh: d f1U1fE fthd' lite proposed •ptojeGt COULD NCST Have a signiif%cant effent ort the envf,ronrxierlf, aoci a NEGATIVE " DEG,LARATiOfV Wil,j ba „pre,pared :r IIVVE find ikrttt although the proposed) prow , could have a ajgrliftG ftt of fact on the onvl,ronment, there wjq.raot baa lghiff antefteo;tinthlscale.becausetfiaMiTiGOWN'MEAS desorfbedbn`the0ttached hoetlieve tSoerr added 16' tfie'f rblecfr 'A.NE.GATI�!E OEOLARATN gill ice prepared. i 11WE flndihoprop000d ro1'ect � AY h a v t. a st �n tfr'cant e ff ee_t on t h e e nvi r o_r. i m r:nn t ,ad n .�VV fRO NMENTAL ImpWr REf?O T is reooired: , COUNTY iCIP 8UTT8� PLANNING t 5PAHTW1 NT ' a AT; A u a r -12 .i . 1989" 9 8 f aura 1 e Pevle'AmgyCi to Rlann IV. tNVjR0NME14TAL IMPACTS !E Mpfs(n3� otts of tf "YES' ant('`tVIAYse? anstuours ark r©gt;ir d: an^att bhs;d sheet(sj,f` 1.. AHTH, Will the,pro(�osaf � esutt iri signiftpanES t: Y'MAYBE'. Nd a. nstable earth condtl.iohs er in changes in guij[bgI substructures?, a. . , . , , , . '� ❑ b, t7isrupttons.i dfs,pCacdmdrrts. Compaction 'or overcovering of ,titin; sail? ., $C ❑ ❑ +r. change -„-in topography Or ground surf �ce relipi features? r x , ... , , , , ,.; . , ... , :, , , , C1'' ❑ �. �l d. Destruction, Covering int rriodiftcatibn of any unique 0Qblagic ar phys'_ features? , .. „ ❑ ❑ e, �incroasa in viind or wa,tef ero'si'on of sol►sr oithar ort or off t.:Chang0s in deposition. or errrsfon of heath sands, ore changes In aittatfon, deposition or erosion which rri°ay rrtodfly thu Qhani,61 Of a river or, stream dr the, bed of the ooean or any bay. into orfaltb?„f,.<.,,.„r..............'.,.,...`,,... ,.,.,.,�.,....,....,.:.,., Q ❑ ; foss of prfn ry agrlculluralfy jlydduCtive so.its outside designated urban areas? ..,, , .., , , , . ❑' ❑ g. h. Exposure of people or propr3rly to goologic hazards such as;'earthquakes, landslides, mudslides. ground fagpre ar sifnilar hazards? , , „....;.. . f ... +. , j” r ❑. ❑ 2. AIJI. V ill the proposal rosuit in sut?sta.ntiat: a. Air emissions Or deterioration Of ambient air quality?*,.., r LJ ❑ b. The creation of ribjecti©nal odors, smoke or filmes? , , ,,, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,,. .... ,,z , . , ,, ❑ ❑ c. Alteration of air ntoveme: ni,moisture, ar temperature, oxen/ ch 'tinge in cllmat.0i locally or 3.'rIa'i=Eg.Will the p�toposaCar;sult fh substantial, ' a. changes iri currents, or the course dr dtrectio� of'WatfO- 1rloVdments in olthet rnanne`�'or - * fresh waters?,....,..,,.. .,a,, ,,.,,,,.,.. ,: w,,,.., C]' ❑ Ei,. Changes in abaarptlr�i~ fates, drQinage pafterns br the rate and amautntaf surfaee runoff?, . ❑ ❑ c'. �teeo far off -Hite- surtaCe drainage 'lmprouQments;. anefud'ing vegetation' removal, � thi nnell,10ibri or duivo'rt installation? � , , r . , �', � ❑� � ❑ 1 d.Ni eationsdta the c.Ourso Or flow of tload %Wert! e.hange, In the ;'rrtottirtf surf, water in"�rAy tNAter li'ady? , .-f .., ..::� , ,....; ... w f . . w , ..C�. ❑; f. C�schargo into surface r�afors, or surfaoewotergudtity indiodiog but e .<... .,. „. ❑ rich tirrfittd to ternporafurp, dissoivedr�tt!g n or turbistity? ... .. , .. , jj g, Afferatiait df, th.g dlreotton at rateof flo'W of ground vrQtor.8 ; . , :. r : , . ❑ ( h, hanga't�t trio qusniity or" gfra.lity of g`r6und Whteks; either through dir, �t at ditibhs,or �rrtl 4(a 8' or through tntercoptlon of an acjuifer' by Guts of 0 0,hd atlons? , . f,, leduCftiSn In the akrl`pult of water otherarise available for publio water stt�rplga� .. , . . ❑ j, E�cposure of pet file or prapertV'fa wa.t refstod hazar;dS suci7 as ffaadlrig?, N . .,. ; , .. , ❑ l 4., PLANT Lith Will she proposal result tri subatorytia'I; a. G a'ngtfo'►n9thCe of 0, nuirnber of any apecies pf plants (rncluding. trees /r�It+rerOsity' yspecierys, aslYrubsLgrass.raps,,ndagl�stiapldnt> fr iX4J.'4„, Y,.4i �t/ Y4'Xd N}wa)M JiJJ }9t ❑ b,1t4ductran eftheumbrs oaoar end t6Mts? r ► . ntrodust ori of new spebtos of ptarits inttr� an areQ�m ar In b barrrer to the normal ' ❑ ❑feXtSt,f m•N+ ,yyA'd4i t� tonrshme 1y,t. o.. , gS eG1eS? ley a • ,A, -. I� i ., . .. � [iy i3ea�ictiYn tn-�creage bf Mn1 Ag ri U{JitUl-a) Vrdp,( . w Y k r t T Y .. 4'1L N «.,^ Y N� 1 e Y A) i f. •+ t r k b N 1 Y 1 ❑� L f3ec o/n e.. {� q/ y� �y ❑ I , , I fi I 14. PUBLIC SERViCES. Will the propria( havta an effgct tapon, orresult m a need for new ar .' =e�toied governrrie.tit services: if�8 `MA1fBE'V0 - ta, Fire prolOctloll? FY.,.�F,. �,flYl,,,�,,, Y4« ,Y,k, ❑ � ❑ I)k PI f to Ctl l✓ n i . i . . i'.; r 1 1 . Y . i« f r i , , .) , i .. i ., , • > , 1: . 1 .'-1 Y ❑ ❑ 4G,rD .1 5 C{ylla�l(A:,i FiFCYk'./Irr i{.,:i f. ,>.F:51F+ikt, 1.7 (rn:.T, l• nii-s. .ii .,tr iYPP• �'! ❑ t NY dif ariYJ Ar�tf i er l�kV.1YNtf_�rnaf faV.(Iitf4i7P11Y ii. i.{{Frsl l'U .,i-i iYrl'I+Y-i tl)f ii", '((Ii.X:4)IIN ©.'. ❑ o. Malraten'ancepf public facilities, ific 1pd lnfl r6iids2 , a:F . , , T, .: , Y Y . ❑ ❑ 1. OthEr goveenmental services?''i . , , 1 „" I I I I I v ," y''1 F r Y . I , i ., I ! t1 @ Y i i 1 1 . } 1e'Y .. f 5 ❑ y `F!A 15. et4ERGI , Will' th - proposal result in: a,rLige of'substaritizil arri9'unts of-fUel or nergy` b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy: or require the I Y,YaXl.YF,yF-.i,f..i;Y.,.f,=� dove lo rylen tL of❑ new sourceso;ienergy? ' 18. UT.fLITIES. �t�Il the prr3Wosal result in �a nerd far newsystem;;, ��r;jub,stantal afterationifolfhe following, a, Power or natural ,gas?' 4lCommunicatioAssystems7.,...,.�.,.Y,F.YF.'..,..",{..,iY}.+w ..F..{' i.. iii':,Y♦,.. .i.,, O ❑ c,Water ava4abifi,ty! '❑ ilk Sevrer or septic system?. ❑ ❑ o-$t6renWoterdr-'ttyege7_„rit9t.rr\Y,.II. Ij,_.:..�,..,ri,_ ,,1..-� rr..,......I"III... I. L7 �; ❑ ('Solid waste and disposal? Y. Y,:,,.,,.,,Ir,,..,frdt,. Y..+r{, .,.k,. 4Y 0 ❑ 17. HUMAN HEALTH': Will the proposal restrft irit a. Creation o any health: hazard,'orpo,tential health`hazaed. (egOluding'tpenkal healtbp- i OI' ❑ bFCxpasur"e-1ptrapteti3pat$hti'Ihealtlihtrzard's7..,..a.v, .:„i,,,:.,•.Y..r.,.e..Pki. ❑ ❑ 1 ”. AESTHETICS. Will tffe prpposal result in the absYructitan a"f any scenid vista , rvlew open to ttte'',public, Or Vjill the proposal resulf Rn the creatlari of art aesthetically r�ffent;iv�t site open � to pybtiq vi,ev� .. ,., .Y.a Y"t •}}' nl.I ,+'f FF irA a, r}• Y.: Ni. .} +.'. ❑ ❑ . i ;,19�. RECRE�7I;ON,�Wtf f fhe propasai respft to �n impaot upon the quetity r5r quantity'af r;xistl,tc�� � _, pQ. .wYF:'1.....FviFi.wY,WY>liPPlvYi„iY.PI}�:Ir,.., ,. � ai 0 bFtul�ttl,eS raoCoatfart I �. 20Y CULTIfRAL. 'ESO CES Otero,066 of ar the destructibo bf a prehiitoria dr hfstoric A, Wil( the prr pdiat rt'sultIrk the a i..,. ,t,lagtcalStf�i +'} I Y F Y .J v r: �.��..! . r 1 Y'i 4 } \ ff f. Y M W / "❑ chaeo . i . , F Y .” r ,', i Y ♦ I Y . IY } r , • , : Y „?y t,l .❑ . b;LViII the prapasaf result:jh adverse physical or.aesthetiv efieats'to a prehtstotic:ar f}istok�c, { y. y �y y{�Y �ryY//, - /JG1/1d�n�lY strteicfure. or`J'itt jegt, }11kkYA1'r/YY,Y •'Y Yf .F. i+YFd {F,+a' A Yf kFikw;� �« ❑ ❑ - C., ea" hystcait*hal� eVrfroich.waultlaff0etunique ,t�oesttwproposa(hav�e}thepotenttaftocau ethiticcultUralVatuesi4lY,}YY, ,YY ,! .�r,F. tY , r,•-�.,I.Y�. 1r•YMMF:F,Y„Yo-.ik, P, iF� CJ., ❑ . d "Wifl the praposM restrict existing reltglous ar+iacred�usei Nilthtn the potentiral impticf ❑ bs+Fw Y w+. Y to A �(ea? YF� A'�X•PYY .F' j yIF YiYF YkwfiYfM ik P. Air -