Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout89-24 REZONE PLANNING 2 OF 6PROPOSED CONDMONS f. Hauaelt, levy, Uptrap H auselt Lev AP 047-440-012 L--� til-' AP 047 .20438 047-=130-003' i, Grant a b0' "Nan -exclusive Grant boo Hauselt and usa easenment eta N LeVyclan easecaent to 'Levy` and. > eat easem n . Uptrap and their Heirs, Hauselt and their .Weirs, Assigns 'and Liptrap and their :3eirs,, Succe�ors and .As"signs and Successors. and Srtccessars and Assign and offer for dedication . offer for dedication:, offer for dedication. . 2. �� Easement to be loG ted on Easement to cpnnect the:"Easement Lipt:tinp to connect to the easement pan" the fevy or adjacent to the southerly lfapselt� and theierro er acid to Cartier Lane, property lir9e.of the Hauselt op estand to provide for The easement is to provide pzaperty at State Hvry. 99 ' p from: St. Hwy. 99 fi:ane, St, HWY 99 and ,.;co connect to fhe on the Levy' circulation to Garner Lane. o Garner emeruent property' . The easenerrt is: to,provide circulation from Str Hwy: 99 to ''Garner sane: All.road ut the: All road. constrtyctron in the All road cons"traction ul the >s to be to Butte 3' canstrvctiorx enda asements is to be'to'Butte easements is to 'd to 'Butte easeu"�ents rand Cauttty Standards Cor ntamtenande and_ offered, mainlenancet4and offered for mantenariSl offered for c de nation. for dedication. dedicatiom tJ�p 'Ln. 20 total lots may be All new lots created must through to 20 total lots may'; Ue ; created rising a single access �j, created using a surgl e access to State Highway q9: take access either tti Ylayselt or the Liptrap' to,,Garner' bane Addxtianal [tits will uue crrculattan Additional lots wilt zequire properties Up to 20 total ; l.`ots may be. cfeated usuig a. {hrcrir i th I-evy and Hauselt circulation: "through the single '; access to State ' rb res .tn Stale Higtzuvay, p ,. P Levy and iaptrap properties ml5iway" or Garner;Lane: 99 to Gamer Lane• " Additional lnfs req ',circulation through. the ''Hauselt and a properttes ,connecting St. Hwy 99 to Garner Lane- 5' Crea tion of the list ,lot Creation of the 21st 1bf via, arty` Gceatiort of the 21st lot taking access any talttng. access Aa any easement v�rll requtre ttie akin access t g etit t will r a on r of a.; require road rho construction of ,a road to „ cortsmuction road to' County standards Cor construct Butte County standards Bitte County standardsfor and' an offer Butte; mair4tenance,, and, an Oto, ritaintenance, and an offer of 'cnnilectrng,�tufe � natrttenance, of dedica�tldn, con�ecfing dedication, ccinnectW g'afate, H� artd „";Garner`° :dedteatioir, " 99 hnd Garner. Hit way State, Highway 99' an gh`aY; [vane I; 'e. Garner Vie., "'share to war pay a pro; ratashare, toward 1. d. at Pay a pia rata .rhr�re tow, . a a nog r ata y . p teeconstructon of Garner . the redonstructidn, ; of the reconstructtorf of Garner � G artier > arie, Z,arie. FfamelC �; All' access to S{ai. te'Highway All access, to State Highway 99 to be via the easement at All! iticcess to State ;Ii�ghway 99 tri be via :the easement at. 90.; to be via the easement at thesouth rn er hne. P P n' i the south ` a ert lma of the Prp Y the south property line of the. '. iauselt ro ert . P. p �' H dweli property, $.. Roadwaystib be designed to Roadways to be ;8esigried to for and Roadways to 6e designed to: pro{ride for culverts and provide for culverts and proper' drainage design to provide culverts proper draiuiage ciesigu to proper drainage design to.. L: insure; that no additional. ` floc ding will :take place: iasure that .no additiapal Rooding'wd1 fake place. insure that no aadltlon'ai flooding'willlfake place.. 9. Finished floor elevations to Finished flair elevations to bean accordance with FEMA - l uu:>hed floor elevations to be:u accordance with FEMA } be in accordance with, FEMA and county and county requirements ani county jrequirements. regntrements+ lU Retention ponds are to be Retention ponds are tc be Retention ponds are to be used that,: stream peak �; used so that: stream peak; ilovvs are increased' used so .that stre-un peak. flows are not.increased above 'L flows are not mcreasea above ,not above existing level's: existing,'ieVeIs existing level;. 11 ]Che retenfiori ponds to be ' with The retention l%onds to be - designed 1n accordance ;with The retention ponds , to be designed in; accoedance with designed'in accordance county standards and county - staii'd ds and county standards and engineering f� s{andard . engineering st'' atd engineering ; standard ,practices, practices: practices: oyrrter::is to "sign an '_ {o a` The owner �s 'to sign an agree "meat to join a drainage Tlie owner is. to sign, agrperaent=to lom,.a drainage agree�ertt jnm drainage assessraent:a', trio,.. assessment district. when one assess>rent'distri.et';w'On one - nd. when one. is fane is. formed., is formed 13: Forru Gopnty Service Farm a County Ste it Area Form a Gminty 5ernce F rei A r ea f i x d r ai n a g, a for drainage maintenance. , for; drainage mauitenance. maintet 14. ' Provide a nadevelopment" Provide' a ,no=develgpinent ' setback from ,. -Keefer. , setbackltom Keefer Slough: S 15. ` Designs for roads annd drainage systems to comply Desigas; for .roads,': and drainage systems to comply Designs for roads and ' drnage systems to comply with Fl✓IVIA requirements. .►th FEivIA xeguitements. , wilh FEMr requirements. r , „. 'INTkODUCTTOAl” This report details the ;results of an archaeological survey of a re»zoning application and subdivision project proposed by William 1lauselt;of Ch��o; California The project will involve developrixent of c 0acres of Gid located north. of .Chico, east of Stale Route 99W, 'and' south of Keefer Road. Developriient" for residential use will follow approval from_ Butte CoYihty' of the`. proposed sutidiv sipn plan re ;Zoning applicatian. According to 'State and County definitions,; the proposa'd project- cnnstrtutes an "n'ndertaldng" wthrch"'could adversely affect cultural resourced which iiaight be located within .the area of potential effect (APE)': Accordingly, a cutll l resources inventory coupled with than assessment of the National Register eligibility status cif any iecorded sites, as well as a review of potential pcojecYAmpdcts and'a list of mitigatiye measuxes, is �re, tpred pursuant to,Butte bounty req►airements, and m compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Pre;>ervatlat%Act of 1966, "as ;amended (16 U.S;C. 470), Anil; Procedures of the Advisory Council: on Historic r Preservation (36CM 1100). Tice remainder of this rdport.;details the results of the archaeological survey and provides, d All f professional assessment of the cultural resources which m�ghf tie affected by the,pirvject eld followed guidelines provided by, the State Historicrdservation Qffice work procedures (Sacrament' anccepted pmfessional",standards. Location The proposed Hauselt Subdivision parcel consists of appi`oximat%ly 94 `acres of land .. located' v+ I hi a pr?rtion pf the north hal f of Section 3 l :of Township; 23 North, Range 1 East, of Tl of the the'USG 'Nord, California (49, 51/069),'1..5' Sends Quad a northern perimeter parc4l is.' orme"d by`Keefer S•IoYrgh;, the western boundary is forrned`by State Route 9 ,wl "the eastern b perrme'ter is marked by the'sectiop line separating Sections3'1 and 32. A single abandoned residence; i.urrently occupies the western portidn of the property, the remainder of hi'' t in almonds. Recacds Search and Project Context p for to`,goirig into 'the field the archaeological records mayntaw b the Northeast y !�alornanfonnation Center at Chco h'ad.lieen examined for any e>�isting recorded prehistoric or histone Yn the National Register of Historic'Place"s Kos also consulted"tJSi1I` it p.: .addtronr 1987)." No sites,were :found to be" recorded within the,proposed sil , ipision properrty; "altho"N'T potential>arch"aeologlcal sensitivity was int3ieated by the preseitee of Keefer Slough. " As regarI d11 s a"tlnographrc affiliation, the project,.area rs 1o'cated "within northernmost Northwestern Maidu or Konicow� Indian territory (Riddell '1978 :Figure 1) ,;'rhe Maidu a;rt: bclaeved ;3 hate occupied„ the dart side of the :Sacramento ;Rivei wrthrn'thrs area, extending southward into and east of Chico and Oro illd ' or the Mardu(wrthm this area, the expected range of prehrstanc steAypes, based on the're5ults ofevrous archaeological surveys and ethnographic ,pr studies,;included (l)',aboriginal rqp _0s�'�'as4ociated kith house pits and' other surface features located to major water�source, (2)�;surface scatters of thic atttfacts''and" cicbrtage: resulting�fron '! shot4 term occupation and/or sp-61alized�' dconomac,activrties, (3) i edrock milling station., and " etre l lis where suitable bedrock ex osure's etist; an` d, (4) isolated f ads of aboriginal artifacts p ,I and flak ;. '' �`� lKW I gg..3 4 i ,a esl c 'the <.-Contin xed; "hd6eing' - Wi .la.aait il3tt5e . Pp '- far an anvii6nm'ai�tal . } equi ement ng C6MM] �SlOri. s r �.mpact repar� on, a ' reWild, �xcm ��" 10 (agricul tura7.>r ted , acre parc'els)`",to' SR `' svburkiar��� residential, be,, acre 'nide of F �t�hway parcel s) pf•cperty 3,ocateci on the east 9:9„ :iaentf"ied;APL3--03; ,yiortri o �hic�, (Fi;Oi�! aCTQBER 3", 1983 AST T1.;�00A �M. V rTE„„ Y 2. Y 3 'Y 4 Y'' X {iln nifi�us3. Ca riec�) - I - i , i J I {I . t 2'1.!71.. i C]�Qq „,,_ • I I ip , e�l3.ng �Pax�iin:'`Cocmas3.on!aregu`eeit°"or.' airi..,xe v'ronmr�t2i; ' �, impact arepoit',,*on a rezoh from A' (ag ' cii trall en, r, ache p rce]. � to� SR 1� r („bizbutban es dent .a�,, one,:. acre a' cels a est ocated on , ;.�a"' t sid' :> �' , p P Y e oaE iiigritray 99 lidamti ied-" 43-X03",I "xorth of 'Chico: >(�23�Aj , fl(�1DT�iI�TLTFJ V Op�TRi, Y !i �•;' t dlv pn 2 .E ,.,., >«� 1 "�� 57, '� �' e :-. i� �A ! { I' l t r I YI I z 1 i, i S I , I I 3 r I, i I I I I 5 i I " i I I iy : :r a• .,..__ __ vim_ to ..,,...- r�; .._ .,., 191, , z 't� ,_. - ate;. �, _•� ..t. -v., _ �. ._ _, . a �Il { w., �,r,r.*a � . , , of •�, ” ,� • - tit _ .,I .11 r li- ��++ -1� ..ee..��pp yypp 1 I dr nfV„ a C� l :", 'j, \�' ,� -� �: , ,1. - J w ,:'' � I ­ 7, r1 , - -Y : I - ,:� , ��, , " , � . : I � � . - Ir� , 1,:, I_p 'I., ,t I j 1. � . �'', '' � I"" � - - " ,{ %� ",TI. - � --:-. -- " ,� ,� . ,'A''. ,� I . � ,; 1: � Ii � " , �: " I t - , �111, . I I �1� I - �. 1 , : � , 11 � I I .1 �:, . I I I 11 �' "Al, �'. ti '� ' 1<J �JIH Abr .1 - 4 ''!"�a I . �� �:- � ,, _ }�� .1 . I . - .�,,.,:,I � , � I 1: . 1� B f_,. iQ � ,'' � � . ll�-, , r - d lY 5 .� yy`ri1 11 �,1� �� -. -- " � �5.11 , . � I . fr. 1.11I ��.� i : r , r ,4 � ��,'. � �erl �y 1. a r - ". �' �f , .4 �� I . �R + i A 4i " � , " � f,� . ." '-', ,�, 4'��!W ,�'I', I � ", : � - ,,r . ,, I I �Y° . , , - I} ; , , � ,�� ", , f"j: . ,� , i, �, �, t! + M r.b7 , ,'' � "" "," ,- 1' �� I , , ; , -�, : 11 � I � � , � � r: �� � � I . I .. i ++�," , . I d Orr �. , I , !.i ✓ r ',' . I I 1'' , . I'�V� � � :1 � � -----' Number�5) �1 o�afidn iYeScr�ptian, "; ` I v ' ,' .1, ,.,{� ,"Z. t'7 9 ,ri71� WI j �. +� i rir yf' '�1�k� .,"K t9 ,+IY -KJ �'e � m' '"ry >1 y�. #' �" 4 J,tvt e�Wp i., 1, I _ "' , P_ i egat'DescPPI JOWU ; ►red �� _ _ �. Prom a g'enpy (i , nee�_led I . � ,s � t � F � � n : rs � r� 1 1 r ¢ e. —wMaps'.o Are'/Deetop Zeit 'tan ior. T�CJIa', . P.resenf.Lon;ng" s 4 _ F',epraluu�bilMastcrMap of �, ISavlopm`ent Plan �':IJ.D's o nl �)'�, . © Dateiii A - ':,at -n E' c I Ived �� $- 4 1 ^` > �. r ; i Receipi"44 I e9 'y , 1 ",° s . `Y 4 i !v + "Application Tal��n i3y 1 s 1 � �. 4� c; ,� i 4 1. xr :� J a, 5 t' _ �11"I y t y ¢�^ J'. t6 i,4 f, �RJF7� _t.i�Jl. �1� t.F t� a,�.++4 �M Ap� �rY y'qm Ada 11 2 }pV.yg ,y M,+w��, pp, 1 1 ! r'S +1 P f,P' i��i�� �' ': � C�i ci rU,' i}x J � b5 l � F.T,-u C{�� , F�'r, J,- i:r 1 l \I I YN'<� i�h i'+r f �' . u 4 '�l 4 t G." L ]�# vr�� i A h��i �l �1 4(s' I g Wr $� t'y rY 4 {l��,� r //I� yV ♦ V�q q 1 #1 1 I I �Y '.:, N ti'�� d P1.'1=�. v 4 . N yy 1 � p'-]/ z� FIS 4" �4'6�R Lf; �A'; , T6A� Yu 1' ,i ,! Ir I , yy '. r �r 4 i` f9�dl dF `1. # I P e.,�� r kq' ,�"L N [ IA.r ry p� a W Wi , y,� Ai 1 II p+ fi+y, 1� G ii Y E - .I f.,a 1' (y ..r II -1 f A Ir� i q"n ; 11,�yh + �t �Tlbh F r, !r pfj- Q )h,P . ..A� L a'1b f'�d A. 1, zr f d .Ai K ;F.� < r �y,� tYd is+ll - �� 4 , x .-+ �i.�,i a . sfi�'�n Fy,}' r a u, is �a+`�`'9.f' , _ ,, ,L;';�kr «�'i'l�.i,i�,��21 :11 It p ;r,�' la i:�..Y� �C �i T��,a. �t�"',, r: FY � z;s i' �a'.. �a�'.� :;1'M'u 'fr �..� 4 I V •,,; ��`,P G�� �I .6 a ,, dl °1. V d p t 1 1 1 .!i, )I '.( it ( " Ij,rq,, '� i 1 I'll 0.i Y A 7 'G' �V tl.b :, ll e 1 �� a� IV �1' f ',: 'I1. 1 !� �• j • y . ry � �n{,� y, r f? 11 :' a- �p 11 � '� ' .., �� ..{rye •i c. :�r �, X "� r . , ,, ^I Y t� ,.I A+ i { n" b al r c v 14: r � ,' �µ - I' 1 �y 1 ,I �,..i6 , �� n r 1' I f 9 l .. .. I l _ I ' :I ':. .. S ' ; 1�. { . _ 1' J h d �. 5t, f l 7-( i 1 i R 1 I�� _ II f t �7 .1 k r ''{� 11 t i I i� ' Y )f r 1 t .. 1 1 1 � I f; �.',7 '.i . k ' ; it II I1� F u C. tl i A .IJ M yi L, 1 I Y� •{ 1, 4 II 4 ,d i I ,�. .>,m.rr, r 9 M RI 'r I'' I �! 7 I b t r 1 ; -t l .' d ,._ ,, i 1 II t ,i_ J '. k iy \ :� l Dart ul' u" T • �i il } ¢ t 1 t " �' , JI I .i ,. '.'. f r - t " tH w I`bt' du �,; ., y II { '.i l V 7 4 �d v Wi 7s A ♦ m e t0. I, q' 1 I', 1 A i " �b� v t"' Ah I, Pn.d .".,� >, I' vNl f 1i v r f ,'!�r� II� IIS I1 o. C.Jr A I' I i�. ) .� 1. ' ', �� . �;.. rl. _ IF 1� '� u: P�f P.. .' ..., . s �. W - • l tr {! CI 47,43-01 47 32'r-34'47-26 1.01.E 10'2 Timothy and Jenice �7ames wara �'rat�oes. 5nelton Hanna Nels1. on• 180 Cohasset 14003 Gre:enberry Mand 34015; 'Highway 99 Chico, ('A 95926 Chico, CA 959.26 Chico;,` CA;;9592;6 ; 47-43-02" 47-32-3547.43` 0, ; Ilrank,.and MArio,n Bc�nriett Michael and Janet Ford - William Hauselt' 4055 Keefer' Raad 14004; G,rO. er�ry lane 1464 "Wind'sor Way , ' Chico, CA 9`:5926 Chico, CA ,959 L,6 Livexma`ze CA 94550 47-43=1.9, 'etc. 47. YBachman and Charlotte, Backiman and Associai-es Butte Swings and Loan c1'aymith 3012 :Esplanade; P:Q Box 2328 14015 turning G or;y P1 . Chico, CA''95926 Chico, CA 9:5927 :, Chica�; CA "95926 1 47-44-Q6 !"44 14 Robert ' and ;Joanne Vann-' Y` q ober and riargue i to . r C/a ;ExoticKiwi Company Mitchell 4 16.30 .Greenhavenlkane 4,588 Vista De ...4 Patria Chico, CA 8.5925' Del Mar, CA 92014' z '�ewr+r�+flWMe'yit ral •F Y^' �-,'e3 m-o rk eR _ :-i--Ju4,�,' +�t,�r�,+?eu,.w, �.,t� f+.auk 41-44-20 41-44-15 w.elvsva.m+nv.- Charles all Doris Turnquist Clare rind A-dr..ey Chase 140,0'1 Gar.rier' bane "' 1'5.92 Hawhor•na;:;Avenue Cn ca, CA 95926 Chaco; CA' 9592,6 F ; a,v. n. nt M Mbh., ,.uy� .i.efean 4.7.32,­15 ;,. •zF .Y, 4'7 446;12 41,ar, W zfag wnl r:< n«n+w. Ml -a Dept. cif Veterans iAff Rolaert 1� Nadine Greyblel Paul and Sade11 e Levy d ` ` 65 Tex ra Bella Drive 364, W. Sari Made] e " Chico,95926`, ,CA,Fresno, 'CA X37;04 y 47-32�14.,� 47 44,-09 George rid Bernice Jol�in & }oati,c"ia Surak N andville ` t523 Box 452p S it: 4, Box Chico, CA 9 59 26 Ch%ca' CA 9 59 2" 47-32-'53, 47=:26-24 Michael and D.'bi�al Co' �gId Patrick 'B1 ack 716 Downin Avenue g. Rt. 1: BOX 45,6` W Chico; CA 95926 Chico; CA 95926 S ,r I 11, Ic t I ; is ORDTNANC NO, ANO1�UINANCR 70NING A PORTION OF T14E COUNTSC S' ATE Op CAIf .IF�7RNIA, AN. SiZ-] (SUBiJ RBAN itESll�l✓NTXAI,)` T ISTRICT, PURSUAN'1. 6 CRA MR 24 29; The Board of Supervisors a the County of Butte; Efate' of California,. under and pursuant to °Chapter Um29 of the Butte Counf y Y - I 1 Cade of said County, 'Dn ORDAIN; as=follows: 4 +ECTION I, The hereinafter described .area, situate in` the County of Butte, Efate of California, shall lie and it is hereby 1.zoned as a.n S12-1 Suburban ,Residential - 1 acre r� 4 ,parceh j District; and11 such, Farea` shall be subject' to therestrictions and restricted uses; 8 ' and reguatigns pursuant to :Butte County Code Section Said area so zoned being , located in, the uni'nearporated �0 1"1 A). of Butte County; Chico, more y�articularly described as follows: 12" All that certain real ' property situate in, the County of , Butte State of Califcsrnia, , descri bed asfollows: _ 13 portion of Parcel 71as shown on that' certain, map . 14 er titled; "P✓Iap Shp ing' lands o.,f rCohlhoff :, & Gacltstetter; in Secfions, �, 30 31, & 32; T23N- R.IE"; 'which 'map vVas 15 recorded in. 'the nffice . of the Recorder of the, ;County, of Butte, State of California, on jure."261, 1911; in B' 1- 7 of Maps, a . Page 35', and being more particularly described as'follovi�"s: 18 Begmnirig. 'at the southeast corner of said Parcel 7 thence along; the ;easterly line of` said. Parcel 7,' N Q' 09 j=g E, 332:39 ft.; to a point dsiant S. 0' Q9'?�1; 207191 ft. from, the NE', corner: o j isaid 'Parcel a 7 nd beiri` a ` g 'm rked by 20 a,'n; �rorii pipe zn the fence' line` on the northerly bank ,of. reefer Slaugh,; thence along said' fence line the following ' 1. 23' courses and ,distances: N 63° 41� , W, a9 69 ftto an. iron pipe, N._44' 7�' W, 11725 ft. to ;an iron pipe, . N 30° 22 23' W, 495.63 ft. f o an iron; pipe; N 43° 50` Y W� 630.71 . ft: 23 to, an `iron pipe; S �84° 37' "W,` ,4.42 $9 ft to an iron. pipe; W:=254 48 ft,o an.� zron' i` e� ' N 321 03' 151.5.0 p P , 24 ft' to an iron e N , 49'' '53' ' W, 52.96 ft, to an iron P P �, pipe; N,''66° d2' W, 4517] ftp; to: an iron pipe; S 85° 17' W;, 89:94 ft, to art iron pipe; S 58°; 11' W; 2$2:`07 ft: to an .iron pipe; S ' 5`6° 9' '4V, 263`;97 ft: to an iron pipe; 'N. $0b 6 1$? 2 a W,;. 93 65 tf.::`ao an izari i e• S 48 32 p•P , W 73.,40 ft: I ) I l an iron pipe; , S 15Q 36' W, 230.75 ft to Oil,iron pipe;; 1 S: 55°. 51'. W, `216.24. ft. to an 'iron pipe; N '85° 1.71 W,. 2 346.77 ft. to as '';iron pipe; N 52°' 14t W, 11.58+ ft. ' to an, iron pipe; S 82' 10' 142.23 ft. to an irron pipe; 5'" 'W, 118.38 ft. to an iron pipe; S 22° 55' W 17445r .£t;' 4 to an iron 'pipe;,, S 81° 1'7' W, 20641 ft. to an iron pipe, 'A' S 22' OS' VU, 2'S:59 It.. 'to the;; centerline' of 5liasta - 'd 5 (td :£eft riv'de) and the; westerly boundary of saicl Parcel ft. to 7 thence along said center'lirie S 41°' 32' t77.7 6 the 'SvV coiner of said Parcel 7; thence along the ,southerly line of said Parcel 7 lam, 3442.7 ft. to the point of �. 7 beginningi,-!".." Containing ,24.0$ acres; more or .less,,'Chico �� C'I"1ON 2. This. Ordinance shall be and r `- is,hereby SE cleclared' to ;lie in lull force and; effect from and rafter 'thirty (30 days after the elate of its passage,, and before the e�cf►iratian of 12 fi£feen (]5) days after its passage, this , 13 tatdinance shall be piiblished once' v�ifh the names of the memliers'- of 4 16 tl7�e Board of Supervisor's voting for' and against it in fhe� Paradise' 16 Post,' a newspaper published iii the Ciaur►ty of.' But"t'e' Stfe of �. �, 18 [PASSED AND' AbOf'TED bytfl�e ,�3oard of 'Supervisors of the Coun}!I' of B;ttte, State of California; on' the tiay of 20 X 90;M1 by tlle� f'0. own voter 21 , ;i AYESs NCS 22 N. 5: 2 3 i ,ABSENT, 24 i NO" a 'INGr• 2S i ' Neil. McCabe � tJgvember 21, 1;990 gage 2 of; _ . (H) Fundamental fairness dictates that the Hauseltsi property should bel rezoned. According to the County's General Plan, the Hauselt property is in an area cles.ic noted as Agrricultural Residential, SR -1 is a condiaaonally` consistent zone within that designation subject to findings of conformity with the conditional zoning and development criterial listed below;: 1. Compatible with neighboring agricultural activities. 2. Evidence of. adequate ,water and sewage disposal capacity". 3. Availability of adequate fire proteetio�l facilities: 4. Adequately mantanew approved road access.with suff3".tient capacity to service area. 5« Reasonable aceessik�,ui;ty to commercial ser rices and schtlols, These conditions, have all been satisfied. The ,ne3.ghbor3'ng properties have largely been developed "a"nd there�iis' nothing to suggest that rezoning the Hauselt `property to SFS=1 would ` , be inconsistent with the agrcitl'tura� activities in the" :area, The: Hauselts have provided complete irrforfiation on hater and sewage and: the 'Planning Departir►entt+has raised nounaddressed concerns.. Letters from : the fire d`.epartment reflects no, fire; protection problems gig%en heaccess wh3 cli the ;iiataselts 'have;;_ - - - agreed to provide. The iiauselts' addressed all traff is concerns ire the .exlhagp .ve traffic study they comm*ssi"oned. While review�.ng this rezone-, the Planning peparrnient ant the PlannirwIL Commissiom repeatedlyasked the Hattselts, for aelditiortal. znforma. on. Tss ies of drainage;. traffic; access, school sit ing, fire -protection, f1 ood pr,eventon," an water" run,of were all addressed at tile. H.auselts expense; Fora'.F trrie, as you know, there'; was requirerriant a that. the Hauselts `: prepare' an EIR but the 'Board of Supervisors determined that this was "not necessary'. In short, all other requests were satzsfib ; The Planning Staff and the Board of Supervisors have previou61ly`determined that all conditions :necessaryto. gain the ,SR�1 honing have been satisf3"ed. You may fecal -1 that you and i reviewed Planning .Staff memos recommending apprbva] of this rezone withi'"'t an EIR. These memos indicated that all " conditions liad been satisfied' and all pot en:tia].'environmental effects could be miti.gat'ed. Please recall also �h�it the;°, Board "of Supervisors determined 'that all issues, had adequa ely addressed and, directed staff, tp !prepare a negatiue` declaration« No other conditions'reman unsatisfied. The ori 7.y basis for denial stated by the County s that Iiia s " property is iii the North' Chico area and public health and , r ', 1- ham io l h - H P July 19, 19.9(7 P2iof3 Cie. aC a with this Cour►tyfs Zoning ordinance, Genera] Plan and the: California Government Code provisions. Frankly%, it-. relevant a s auz opinion that 'the ;County has f ailed to comply wa th' the handbook as well as the: statutes on point. Apparently, Mr. Hironimus indi.ca�:ed that the county, Comimission heal riot taken action position is that the Planning an Mr kiauseltIs application prior to the Board of Supervisors! Deceiti►ber 19, 19;89 meeting. Nume"roux Board of Supervisor.s�'agendas indicate to 'the contrary. Please see the October 3, 1989 agenda and the December t9., 1989•agenda both of which are a.'ttacted 'and Contain the: following languaga in reference to Mr.Hause].te appeal: "--aPPeaa -off the Planning Comiaission xequ�reme'nt ,fc'ir an env ronmentarl impact report an a zezone from A-10 (Agr;icultural 10 .acre parcels) �� to SR -1 (Suburban residentia] one• acre parcels) ► .... Clearly, the agendas and pub is notices regarding this matter G. revea'1 validitj► of Mr,. Hauseltr's position:;, The Planning Commpss on had: taken action.. The ,ac ion on beingtaken by, the ' Boardi' upervisors atthe` D�scember 19i9meeting was a; 1, revxE�w 'of thePlanning Commi ;:ion's action and: 'was in response to ifr. Hauselto s appeal from that action As se+' H'auseIt%t dune `13, 1:990 'letter, the BoardVJ forth in of ,Mr. Supervisors th` upheld that appeal .arid modified 'the 1 y; 9 C requirements imposed bth : anhi ommiss ion _• Accordingly; we respectfil.Ily, request (and demand) that the iiauselt's June 13,,' - a written esponse tci it County issue 'r ` ,2 `time has pa"ssed. dur„„1 ng , A 19:90 letter by , 1990. mple July Mr`. Hauselt`i s next who ch to prepare such a` response opportunity to be earIby the Board of 5uperv'isars s, August 7 it is imperative that we understand the Cc,�nty s , ,and position regarding this matter before that time.. Fay lure tti '5'9a pr©vide a response by July 2i5, 1990• will furtkier complicate: Hauselt! s on l.y the issues. 'arid heighten our, t`eelings tYiat Mr: method of obtaining,asatisfactory respnns.e may be;'throuJ, the institution of°'legal proc,��edi.ngs:; We fear the only resolution; ofthis, matter flay come fr,ora the to filing of a writ of mandamus to compel the County act according toGovernment Code, the Butte County ,Zon�3 Ordinance the ButtefCounty;Env ronfiental Rev O Process handbook and 'the' rescilut�ori' of the $.oard o�, 'S,upervisors of . r ' December 1g,.. "19 R'9 '. whit"e `this. 'would be than most costly and time consuming- — .1 re edy for both the County c'j,nd.,'tYie applicant, �t is quickly' becoriing 'the c►nly .;alternative. f I 1 t 1 1 {I f t 1 1 f '• (y 77, 177777 46'4 Windsor We x Liverhare, Calif ornia, '945.50 June 13, 1990 W.11iain H. Randolph", Chief Administrative Off icer County o_f But"te 25 County Center'Drive drb `1:11e, CaliforM.a : '95965-393;0 . 9-7. .4 RE: Rezone, File; No8 D'eZ:?' Mt'. Randolph: This. leiter is to inform. you of: My position regarding ,the Action taken to date on .my application for Rezdho krb A-10 to SR-"1 for my property, xdei tified as AP - 47--43 43 According to the Butte County Zoning Ordiziance and the GOVP_yni¢ient Code, my application was approved 'by the 'Hoard of Superviscirs, at the 'December'19; 3989 itieetinq and i7ecan�e. fine]: when the Planning Commission ,f'ai,led to make a report wi in forty (f4.0), days of , the date that the 5u ervisoxs' ;action as"refe�=red' fo ,jhe Commission;` p. 1'he 'forty 'day period expired on ar .before Janua��'~`9, 1350: The basis. for my, positzon is,,_discussed below: Butfe County ,zoning Ordinance, Chapter 24:, Szctzan 114-2= , parall.e:l.s G0vernmP , Code Sections 65854--"6�85��: and Prov desj in perti�ient., art, `as fo1'loWs: ;. "Up'on receipt of ,;any .such t6cominendatI on. from the planning commission which'recommenas that the propose amendment ;be �; approved, the board of .supervisors. a;lal? `set the matter for , public hearing. "The board of supervisors may approve, tnoosry ;or disapprovII e rion ox'', the planning commission,provii3eci that the ecommendat an modif icatio'n of Elie pr.oposeci eine' ndmenr- by :the! board' shall 1 tir`st be r,e erzed to" the' planning commission for' report'.and recomiuez dation,. but ��.he p`lanning comma ssi'on sha11 not b r'eguired to ";held 'a public hearing" thereon. - Ailur of the planning coiainission to report vi in, forty (40`) .days afte+- all; be deemed 'tn be the° incdificaticin ,is =eferM,ed td it," sh77, apP=ava1 af' the plcoposed m"ocifi'cation by t'ze planning +' 7 cbmaisson. [Emphasis added]."`` t " f l ;The" County 'received aig' application for re one on tiecember r 1ag81° C`ommissxon 'The_. Plainni ng Depai•tmnint and the °Planning reccimmended ,approval of ,.the rezone subjpdt to'',certain ;con itions xncl.uding one ' r equrZh"`g that I undertake the preparata'on' of-' .7ocused by rarnnental T7npact epgrt ('"FEIR" ), ' to. address „piatent'I, j `problems _.- h' Williams :ii': RarLPh J une 13 ,, 19:9 0 `. Page tl 4 corisidered anti 'Upheld the,,appeal on 1 90,, the Board of ,Supervisors my .px;ciperty alone . that. the many additional re uxrejnents and athe I fde1 strongly "the action on changes attempted to be ` imposed s1nCe Supervisors' a not December 19j. 1589 are moratorium has: been xmpos d+o°fie wholeoa.eae~ These additional. are not only unreasrinable' and . requtirements and recent actz'ons i]:legal acid have caused Vie- signFicant unfair, they are; also damage. ment, within z. est our written acknowledge2. Accor,dingly� I hereby requ Y.. that. my proP.y; .ctentxfzeel as AP 'l7--43= ;ten ,d'ays of this letter;, Ll from A-7.0' to.dministratve ction1990,. I ° 03, Pias been rezoned that you take whatever also .request necessary' to oomplete the rezone. process On. May 24 19the planning Commission voted 2�-2 on the ,staff in t%�e recommendation to app rove the "rezone of the properta,es to been action on my . Aa Z do not consider` that :have praperty haci. alrea ty beenapproved for Area cat on because' my' of January 29 , 1990. To ,the extent the Commission's; rezone as action i:s determined 'to. have been an efecxve denial of my . iri no Tway'„be consxder'ed a 1 request fcir a rezone, this letter- ahauld `may have to, appeal that acts on of May' '2'4 , - waiver of any ri ghts' I e:c rwb5sl resp-'ire the;. rxuht to yzle. an apbeaL of I hereby P slyreserve 1990: action if necessary Thank youfor yourattent�`an t , this matter and °i Took ,for-rard tca receiving YOU response. Sincerely, L, r Wi lsam H. Hause , cc- County Counsel - Planning pxrector ', , , r f.. - ! xil 1 I .-.. . - Dede er .191. .19$9 MOTXON s MOVE THAT" A NEGATIVE DECLARATION HE PiktPARED, ANO THAT TMS ITEM SE REFERR]:;D BACK TO THE PLANNING COW1ISS1QN FOR CONSIDERATIOIJ WITH MIT7GAT,IONS; ONE THROU,GY 1.61'' PROVIDE , To TE BOARD A:3 THE 100I)ITION5 FOR. ZpN7NG VOTE: 1,Y, 2 IN "I t 4'- Y , .5 Y (Matic n Carac. `ed) (SUPERVISOR McJ.AU,GHLIN NOT PRESENT) (NOT AT BOARD' TABm ^ AND NOT PAR'T'ICIPATING TN THE PR(JCEEJ�INGS ON MINLfTE", OZDER 89-55E, i 8S 555 Public hearing - b, tter CountyPlanning ConUi►:issi on `' =- * cons1aerati,61i o adoption cif a pre'ferreci, land use plan alternative for the Duriiazn-Dayton-NElson Area FTarl. P. Planning,, Alt( -natives Study "has been prepared by the ' Durham-Daytoin Nelson Clti.zens ;94s, Ad_committ ee whish will be coris.idered key the,Board of.` Supervisors in adopting .a preferred lana use'p a1ternative RECONVENE; 8 "20 P_.'<M. , 8'9-557 Public hearing =< Butts-Caunty Plzt,ning Commission consideration o adaption:of a '' �r�f°sz�red :arid �tset 'plan ",a1te`rnatve for.` the Dirhain'-Dartoil -Nelson: '1},xea J'l ari: A J?1annirig Alternatives 4udy , kias beenprepared by the . Durham -Dayton --Nelson :C3tizens Advisory Committee 'tahch, mill ` be - consicired,. `bv the Board of . u e' ' :o'= s xn. p r- y adoptirig''a px,eferret ];and use pian alterrtatiie: NlOTI ' MOVE TO": REMAI�bl , BACK ,Tp THE' CITI2EJif5 ADVISORY, COMMIME , E;Y ?�,iJD 'THE: COMMITTEE, S MEMBERSHIP T0- . `TEN, MEMJ3ERS f DYRECT THEM TO HILI) FU C a BLI 'ORUM., AS NEEDED TO ]3EAC1J A r COMMUNITY CONSENSUS , BREAK UTA IIti1' 0 (3ROT7PS THAT ,ARE ` -' GEOGRP.PHIC .%N NATURE ;SO THAT ..PROPETX :QWNERS SURROUNDING CERTAIN';: AREAS AND"> CERTAIN CONSTRAINTS ,C.�N RE�CJ3 .A COJjTSEJJSTJS WITHIN. THEIR" w I, rw AND e'�'' TrrR7 OWN`NEIGHBORHaODS; STAFF SUPPQRL, ARC7tJND TT1�7E :OF 2' 0 TO' THREE: MONTHS S N! VOTE 1 Y 2 Y 3 Y P;J3. 5 Y (Unanimo,usly Cartaiecij 9' S5$' CIt'OSED 'SESSION: The Boar- 6 recessed to cloyed essiori at 8 ? .Pvfm. dor l,t�.tigat~Xq P. rsuani ' to GoveXnmerit: Cride. Sects , o f Organ v. Dolan ,Paga �aS I i Y' yAilliam: H.Randolph Mind 25, 1990 Page: 2 of 2 Because 2 have not yet ;received a response to my June. "13, 1990 Letter and in ; order to presevye ;my r` ght to appeal 'the act.i.on of <` the Planna ng omm Asian oI.n ,`tray 24; 191.9, A:, to the extent it may subsequently be determined to ha .been acta;on' on my application, do, hereby appeal said action. Please, note that. 'the filing of thx appeal sh ould` nest be ,taken as a: 'concession that t2xe. Planning Gominissions� May 24, 1990, '2 2 dote,.oan�,t tutecl action on my;, a licat IT clow at ,constitute a , waiver of any af; ;the rights or arguments asserted in my.-June, 13, ;1990 letter to you: This appeal is filed only to pr:"eserve. wha�rever rights. o'f appeal I' niay° . have and to satisfy the admnistative remedies ayailabe under the Butte' Caunty Code. Also.,, please note that .I am ,sum-M tti.ng the $608.50 'appeal fee: called f6tf in'Ms,. Y,easurejs,;May 24,]990 letter.. My applYcatian was eubm;itted ;prior to the' dopt ,an and imposition of; the new, feel feel ,'stronly that the appropriate fee schedule:;; for the purpose :of this. appeal is the:'Dne in .plac:e at the time of submittal rather than schedules adopted subsequent to that time.;. Tsliauld not he fiaxther, prej.udicsd,'and damaged by the Ccuntys allure to take timely action onmyapplieation and should thera`fore only be required to pay an iappeal fee of, '220:, bb. Please ta 61 this as a request far a 'refund of, the $388,5:A � dif�'erence. Y Took fotaard to .receiving your' response 'to my' request.`_for a zefund and to my June 13,, 199 letEer' Thank you £or your attention to this ,matter, Sincerely; A 0fl' iam H Haius�lt cc: Count .yCounsel; _ j Planning l]ire^tor Bachman &Associates , , , f f f f IJI