HomeMy WebLinkAbout90-11 REZONE PLANNING 9 OF 10v San Bernardi►ir C unty (1954) 1.45 C,A.3d 738.) 1n the instant rnatter, petitioner
2
admits t4at the c, unty has not made a final decision on rezoning the subject parcel or
J
land. (Petition to preserve evidence 1:27-2$.) Given that petitioner's cause of action
5
f under C:EQA has not accrued, and indeed may never accrue, the requested discovery is
6
{ at least premature, and at most irrelevant and abusive.
Additionally, petitioner states that it dcsir�e s to perpetuate the requested evidence
j
in order to make it "part of the administrative record," However, the CEQA statute sets
9
out its ov,n tinctable `
t
and procedure
P urc forre �artn� re
P- 1 c a turd or proceedings relating to the
10
subject ;)f the action. In section 21167,6 of CI QA, the legislature has provided that a
11
petitioner stay request a record of proceedings within ten days alter the action is filed.
12
13
Tile public agency then must prepare and certify the record of proceedings within sixty
14
days. These periods may be extended only by stipulation of both parties. By
15
establishing such limits, the legislature has created a presumption that the "discovery"
zs
petitioner, here seeks can be obtained only through the avenue of section 21167,7.
7
Petitioner has stated no reason that premature discovery is warranted, sufficient to rebut
1$
the presumption establisher) under the statute,
.l 9
20
Given that petitioner has sj,,AjL l rto reason for its hasty request, the facts indicate
that petitioner has no iG ritintMe pur)yose for its endeavors under Cal. Code Civ, Prod,
22
section 2035. More likely, petilioner is si'tttply uttetlipting to unduly pressure the county
23
into making a particular zoning decisions 'Section 2035 creates an exception for early
24
discovery, not a rule. The code should not, be applied to order the premature discovery
25
requested in this matter,
26
I ta'FIC `S A. 2
fiN Mit C'
c5 YvdRMA4
AVOUt 98
C�, CA6FdfiNlA
�5oxti
5d��5ti�1
1II, THF_iNI=ORIvIATIIN I'rTIT1ONial�
S CAIVIVOT Er CJSll7 11V A GF A
A CTI QN
5
If the anticipated action were not under CEQA, petitioner might indeed have use
6
for the discovery it has requested, A CEQA action, in contrast to most civil actions, is
7
structured to require a responding public agency to prove that it complied with the c -pie.
8
A petitioner files an action, and the public agency must show it complied --period. At
9
no time does a petitioner carry the burden of showing that the public agency dill not
10
comply with CEQA.
11
12
A brief discussion of how CEQA works should prove illustrative, Patterned after
the federal national Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), CEQA, requires ,the preparation
14
of an :Environmental lntpact Report (EIR) before a public agency approves a proposal
15
'which may affect the environment, (Selmi, The Judicial Develo meat of th": G ores
16
Lnvir nme�u !jy Act, l5 U. C. Davis flaw Reveiw 197, 198 (1984),) Although a
17
useful statute, CE QA. is easily subject to abuse, (d. see iso California
4�— aviation
18
___ _
Coin'.. County of Antn& (1988) 200 Cal,App.3d 337 (affirmed trial court's t s denial
20 "
Of petition for a writ of mandate to set aside a county's negative declaralit
n on file
21
round that
g t petitioners had fiailcd' to exhtrtist their administrative remedies) )
2..2 .
Under Public Resources Code section 21177, a perst�n must exhaust his
23
administrative remedies before COnllllen'ttlgti action under CEQA, (Pub. Resources
24
Code section 21177, Ca1> Aviatiorr�C'.ou,f' il, 200 Ga1,App,3d at 337. Ti
)le requirement
q �rcntett
2.5
of exhaustion is a jurisdictional pre=requisite, not a matter of judicial discretion.
26
Gal
JV OFME5 A,-
• *iN MERLO 27
3ANV AT LAW
yi5 t%AhiXAL
AVENUE 28
x7. GALCKc�iiNtA
o3izB
�itihoi+a'iai67
s
Aviation tincil, 200 Cal.App:3d at 341.) Here, petitioner has neither alleged that is
2 has exhausted its administrative remedies nor clammed that it Conies within i
y an exception
3 to the exhaustion doctrine. Thus, petitioner is prematurely requesting discovery
5preceding an anticipated action, which action Petitioner may be jurisdictionally barred
�
G from bringing at all.
�i
Moreover, once a court gains jurisdiction over a CE -QA action it must ,apply a
8 strict standard of review of the public agency's actions. The reviewing court applieda.
9' "substantial evidence" test., whereby it asks whether the record of proceedings contains
10 r substantial evidence to support the public agency's gets or, determinations. (public
1:1 �
Resources Code section 21168.) A reviewing court shall
12 not make an independent
13 determination of whether it would have acted dif"erently than the public agency. (See
14 Bowman verity of potnlunia (1956) 185 Cal,App.3d 1,065 (appellate court reversed a
15 ruling to favor of petit"tGntT, on the grounds that the trial court had applied an improper
1 standard of review),)
7 ' Given that the proper standard of review is whether substantial evidence sup
1$ ports
-�i
19
1110 county's actions or determinations,; no reason exists to grant the discovery here
20
requested. Petitioner has no reason to show the County did not comply with CEQA
rather, .it an action is brought the county will tic; required to :show that it tiirl con�ply.
t
22 petitioner's role is merely[ to sliow that it has standing to sue udder CE -QA, and to
23 attempt to rebut Whether the evidence is substantial,
24 111 recente _ y
jars, warts and tate legislature have censi
25 derabl broadened thee. scope
of discovery. (Cal. Cod[; Civ, Proc. section 2017; see al sa C�reyliound Cort> _. j, Sltiierior
26
N OPFICES A.
nHn MEALO
OPNV AT LAW
US NOAMAL
AVENUS 28
%, CALiP041A
9028
3i7 X513
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
10
11
1.2
13
14
15
16
17
18
119 1
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
w OFFICE$ A
't7W4VAPLAW 7
W NOAMAL
AVVW5 28
'Cb, CAUPOANIA
054x9
pl*on 19
s13a519
Court (1.961) 56 C,2d 355.) Before an a� ion is even commenced, however; discovery
shall be ordered only if it will prevent a failure or delay of justice. (Calif. Code Civ.
Proc. section 2035) Case law has established that discovery under section 2035 is not
a "matter of ,right," and should be denied if there is no opportunity to use perpetuated
testimony on a legal action. (Ff nt-Wesson Foods,. Inc v Count oy f StaniSlatis (1969)
273 C.A.2d; Campbell Chain Co v, Dunt r of Alameda (1970) 12 Cal.App,3d 248.)
In both. Hunt -Wesson and Campbell Chain, taxpayers attacked determinations of
county assessors. In bout cases, plaintiff taxpayers needed to pursue their claims through.
administrative hearings prior to seeking judicial review. In each case, the appellate colirt
denied discovery .requested ,under Calif. Code Civ, Proc, section 2017 (precursor to
section 2035) because plaintiffs had not shown that they would have opportunity to use
perpetuated testimony in a legal action
This matter similarly involves a claim against a county, Which claim is untimely_
until administrative remedies have been exhausted. Like in Hunk -Wesson and Lampbell
Chain, tite discovery herr requested by petitioner has _no use in an anticipated C8QA.
action, In such an actiOil, it is the county which must show it complied with CEQA, riot
vice versa. Therefore, the requested discovery i5 beyond the intended scope of Cal,
Code of Civ, Proc. section 2035 and should be denied,
le i l) LS C?W,RY .ltE(Q�11�,�Cn. 13Y ►�l �l'ITtOIIER NVI T NOTgl--_Vl~lq'r A
FAILUIa� 198 AY r 1Tr r
Cal. Code of Civ. Proc, section 2035 specifically mandates discovery preceding
7.
Filing of an action only when the discovery requested will prevent a failure or delay of
justice. Here, the reclUcsted discovery is not only unnecessary to prevent a failure of
justice, but also is irrelevant and useless to petitia cr, Yetirioner, has offered no
explanation. of what facts it seeks to discover and why it desires to preserve the evidence
before an action has been filed. Petitioner's, silence as to its motivations indicates that
Petitioner seeks discovery merely for the improper purpose of harassing file county into
making a particular zoning decision. The legislation has established astep=by-ste
p
process for bringing, a CEQ,y action, if the legislature wishes to authorize premature
discovery it can broaden the scope of CCQA to do so.
v. CONCLUSION
In stun, Cal. Code Civ, 13roc. places it within [die discretion of this court to order
or deny discovery, as the court sees fit: In this matter, justice requires thatIj etitioner
at least await the county's decision, before it requests discovery in support of an
anticipated C8QA action, 1t) the context of'
this rase, �t is proper that petitioner's request
o preserve evidence be denied,
DATED December 27, 1990.
r�, JD1•Ci\I �-CCft� tJ `,'
A170RNEY,, p01Z E. rel,
0011Nr1Z0
m�- - ---,
I
i
2
3
4
5i
6�
7
$t
�9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
0 �
i
21.
22
23
24
25
26
Ndr r.ts A.
014N 1AFR .
'N'--teALtAW
Gzb40AM,4
AVENUE
28
AW. Citi IFORN?A
$53H
Filing of an action only when the discovery requested will prevent a failure or delay of
justice. Here, the reclUcsted discovery is not only unnecessary to prevent a failure of
justice, but also is irrelevant and useless to petitia cr, Yetirioner, has offered no
explanation. of what facts it seeks to discover and why it desires to preserve the evidence
before an action has been filed. Petitioner's, silence as to its motivations indicates that
Petitioner seeks discovery merely for the improper purpose of harassing file county into
making a particular zoning decision. The legislation has established astep=by-ste
p
process for bringing, a CEQ,y action, if the legislature wishes to authorize premature
discovery it can broaden the scope of CCQA to do so.
v. CONCLUSION
In stun, Cal. Code Civ, 13roc. places it within [die discretion of this court to order
or deny discovery, as the court sees fit: In this matter, justice requires thatIj etitioner
at least await the county's decision, before it requests discovery in support of an
anticipated C8QA action, 1t) the context of'
this rase, �t is proper that petitioner's request
o preserve evidence be denied,
DATED December 27, 1990.
r�, JD1•Ci\I �-CCft� tJ `,'
A170RNEY,, p01Z E. rel,
0011Nr1Z0
m�- - ---,
I
1
PROOF OF SERVICE BY MAIL
(1013a 2015.5 C C.p
I am a citz
en of the United States and my place of business
is in Butte County, California. I am over the age of eighteen years
and not a party to the within above-entitled action; my business
address is 645 Normal Avenue, Chico, Butte County, California
95928,
On December 28, 1990, I served the within MtMORA.NDUM OF POINTS
AND AUTHORITIES IN OPPOSITION TO PETITION FOR ORDER AUTHORIZINC
PRESERVATION OF EVIDENCE
on the interested parties in said action, by placing a true copy
thereof enclosed ina sealed envelope with postage thereon fully
prepaid., in the United States post office mail box at Chico,
California addressed as follows:
SEE .ATTACHED LIST:
I, MEDIA E. SOUKUP, declare tinder penalty, of .perjury, that
the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed on DECEMBER 28, 1990, at Chico, Californ.'.a
.'REDIA E. SOUKUP
BARRY MARC MEYERS
ATTORNEY AT LAW
555 EAST AVENUE
CHICO, CA 95926
SUSAN MINASIAN
BUTTE COUNTY COUNSEL
25 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE
OROVILLE, CA 95965
CLERK OF THE BUTTE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
25 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE
OROVILLE, CA. 95965
HASKEY McINTURF, SUPERVISOR, DISTRICT ONE
COUNTY OF BUTTE
25 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE
OROVILLE, CA ?7,965
JANE DOLAN, SUPERVISOR, DISTRICT TWO
COUNTY OF BUTTE
P. 0, BOX 3700
CHICO, CA 95927
KEVIN CAMPBELL, SUPERVISOR, DISTRICT THREE
1031 VILLAGE LANE
CHICO, CA 95926
ED McLAUGHLIN, SUPERVISOR, DISTRICT FOUR
COUNTY OF BUTTE
P. 0. BOX 880
DURHAM, CA 94958
LEN FULTON, SUPT : 30k, DISTRICT FIVE
COUNTY OF I3UTTr-
P, 0. BOX 100
DURHAM, CA 96967
13UTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE
OROVILLE, CA 95965
RICHARD OSTROWSKI, COMMISSIONER, DISTRICT ONE
17 OAKCRE8T DRIVE
OROVILLE, CA 95966
NINA. LAMBERT, COMMISSIONER, DISTRICT TWO
164.8 RIVER ROAD
CHICO, 'CA!95926
ALLEN FORBES, COMMISSIONER, DISTRICT THREE
1400 KENTFIELD ROAD
CHICO, CA 95926
BOB LYNCH, COMMISSIONER, DISTRICT FOUR
2116 LARKIV ROAD
BIGGS, CA 95917
W. J. MATSON, COMMISSIONER, DISTRICT FIVE
13573 WITCHITA DRIVE
MAGALIA, CA 95954
REGIONAL. AND ECONOMIC SCIENCES
Applied .A-Wicy'Studies for the Public and Private Sectors
1
THE ECOITOM,I C IMPACT
OF FAIRWA ESTATES ON BUTTE COUNTY
by
F'REDERICA SHOCKLEY, PK.D,
AND
JON S' : EBEL ING, 'PH . D
REGIONAL AND ECONOMIC SCIENCES,
(916) 342-9043
r,
1/28/1951
r
1
1
1 ,
1
1788 Wates My Ohldo, CA 95928 + (916) 895-3338 A (916) 342=9043
THE ECONOMIC IMPACT
OF FAIRWAY ESTATES ON BUTTE COUNTY
by
FREDERICA SHOCKLEY, PH.D
AND
,JON S, EBELING, PH.D.
REGIONAL AND ECONOMIC SCIENCES,
(916) 342-9043
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This report summarizes the economic impact on Butte
county of Fairway Estates, a proposed residential
development and golf course. The analysis covers a 4
period during which t'o
he investment is made and Year
membership expands to capacity. Estimated salesdata and
other data provided by the prospective developer were used
with Implan_, an input -out model, to estimate the impact.
During the first year the golf course with its private
club house as well as other proposed on-site and offs -site
'improvements are made and sixty new houses are sold. In the
second year of development the golf course and club house
begins operation with 270 members and another 60 houses .are
sold. In the third year of development, golf membership
expands to 350 and the last 80 houses are sold. During the
last year of the developmeht, golf membership expands to
6.00. This fourth year represents the on-going impact of the
development.
The cohstruction and sales data were used with Implah
to estimate total changes in the private sector of Butte
county that would result from the development of Fairway
Estates. Total changes include the initial expenditures for
the development of this project as ►yell as subsequent
changes in spending due to the multiplier effect. These
changes, which are a prodtict of I mp l an, are surnmar i zod in
the following table.
Total Changes 'in Population, income, Output, and .Jobs
In Butte County
Due to Development of Fairway Estates
(1990 dollars in million's)
_-----_.._
Year 1-- -Year-2-Year�3- - Year -L
Population 211 26C� 364 4
165
Output $ 60 $ 2.4 $ 8.2 21
Income $ 24 $ 2.4 $ 3,4
No. of Jobs 70 85 118 54
The data from the above table and other pert h6ht
ihformatioh were used to estimate incremental revenue and
1
.0
2
cost for Eutte county government that would result from the
development of Fairway Estates. The following table shows
the ekcess of revssnues over expenses for Butte county
government,, it is apparent that the revenues from this
Project exceed the expected costs to Butte county
government.
Net Income And Expenses Expected for Butte County
From the Fairways Project
(in 1989 $'s
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4
Revenue 216,110 233,201 344,993 206,489
Cost 60,977 73,060 102,284 46,365
Net Revenuu,e 155,133 160,141 242,709 160,124
This study concludes that the development of Fairway
Estates will result in a positive flow of income to the
county. These estimates are based on conservative
assumptions. For example, it was assumed that only 22
percent of the initial expenditures 'resulted in a net
increase in demand. However, this study does not examine
the impact of the change in population on infrastructure
c .pac i ty of county services.
1.
THE ECONOMIC IMPACT
Or FAIRWAY ESTATES ON BUTTE COUNTY
by
FREDiPICA SiOCKLEY, PH.D.
AND
SON S: EBELING, PH.D,
REGIONAL AND ECONOMIC SCIENCES
(916) 342-9043
Introduction
This report summarizes the economic impact on Butte
county or rairway Estates, a proposed residential
development and golf course. The ana%ysis covers a 4 year
period during which the .investment is made and golf
membership expands to capacity.
, Estimated sales data and
other data presented �n Tables 1 through a were provided,
by
the prospective developer.
In the ne:i.t section an overview of the proposed
development will be presented with the data used to analyze
it:t impar, After that section, a brief dP-"--pt:ion ofthe
inpu; -I%put morel used to analyze the of developmen
on p tion, output, in -come, and jok to county will
ba rented. hen the results of the -Utput model
will be presented. The last ma paj _ e report will
suramarize the impact, of the de'), e n t ,,n cost and revenues
for in Butte county.
Overview of Proaosed__Deve ooment
Year One
Iii the first year o development, 60 .houses at an
average price o: $259 , 000 are sold, The t.,al f course with
its private club house and all of the proposed cnsite and
or= smote improvementare also compieed, l he Iat�teY
proposed amenities which +will be paid fot by the developer
are summarized ajft the following table.
TABLE 1
Fairway Estates
On Site and Of Site improvements
Paid for by Developer
(i 990 dollars)
"r'.icks Lane improvement $233,000
24,000
Traffic Signal 713,700
Interior Road 820,000
Sewage Treatment Plan - 2yp,000
Wa%er Supply System
100,000
Security Gates and in::' Yr�ays 200,00,0
Utilities
$ 2,340,700
TOTAL
Economic activities proposed for the first year of
development are summarized in table.The
the following
percent spent locally was estimated by the prospective
developer, It was necessary to separate the amount spent
locally from the total amount of expenditures because only,
7e portion spent initially in Butte county will impact the
county's economy.
Table 2,
Fairway Estates
Economic Activities During Year One,
Golf Course CoI2's'trClC ".L
On Site SadeOff
oLSite
DlewpY;ousesnts i
an
190 dollars) _
'--_ _ -==--=-- -- - ---'-_--_=
Total Spent
Sector
Ekpendtttre Locally (1)
}
Co"nstracton $4,000,000 060,000
t3alr course
15,000,000
1.1,100,0011
60 New Rouses
Highways & Streets
970,700
718,3?E3
1,370,000
1,013,800
Ether Improvement
year Two
DurilYg the second year anotherb0
houses
are soeratio
begins o�7
average price Or $250,000 The
r '510
golf course
dine pay $y,104
per year
j�a , �}}yy ��jj�1 y members
Miff.4♦1 an average o•4 ii
of t"is
dtve1.opment,
Additiona
I the seconc ywar
by
4,500 guest
rounds at $20
revenues are also generated
eaC: and 3,4QC cart r :Ytat. at $i2 eac ,,
A Ar0"$,hOp
mark-up
r
S2 000 n grossrevenue With an
receives $;w,000
average
of 40% to yield local expenditures of 64,800. The private
club with its food and beverage sales bring in another
$337,500.
3
1
Table 3
Fairway Estates
Economic Activities During Year 2
First Year of Golf Course Operation (270 Members},
and Sales of 60 New =souses
(1990 dollars)
-^- -'---- ------ ---=---- - -=-=5pe..t
Sector= Total
Local y (`)
Food & Ikiverage Sales (i) S 337,500 $ 337,500
608,580 608,580
Membersh.0,, Dues, Guest Fees;
& Cart, %ental s� )
Pro Shops) 1.62,000 64,800
60 New houses ( ) $ 15,000,000 11.,100,000
Year Three
During the third year, the last 80 houses are sold at
an average price of $250,000, Goli inembersr,ip expands to
420 members. Pro -shop and other revenues increase
'
proportionately as shown in the table below.
Table 4
Fairway Estates
Economic Activities During Year 3!
second Year of Golf Course Operation (420 Members),
and Sales of 80 New "rouses
(.3.990 dollars)
Sector Total Spent
Locally (�)
t
Food & Beverage Salves '500 $ 525,500'
(} $ 525
946, 680
Membership Dues, Guest Fees, 9,}6, 680
Cart Rentals (1)
(to) 0
Pro -Shop
�, $ 20,000100014,80000000
80 New rouses ( )
Year Four
During the fourth year of this development, golf clue
jerr,,bership expands to 600. Pro -shop and other revenues
J,nc-,rease propottionateiy, Activities of the fourth year are.
summarized in the table below.
1
A
t
0
Table 5
Fairway Estates
Economic Activities During Year 4
Third Year of Golf Course Operation (600 'Members)
(1990 dollars)
--=---- -- ------------ ----- - Total Spent
Locally (S )
Food and Beverage Sales (z3) $ 750,000 t 750,000
Membership Dues Guest Fees 1,352,400 1,352,400
& Cart -Rentals (=4)
Pro -Shop (0) 360,000 144,000
The Input -Output Model
The data presented in the previous section was analyzed
with the use of Implan, an input -out model developed by the
U.S. Departme:lt of Forestry. 1,pu't-output models are unique
in that they are the only method of analysis that permits
the user to determine the impact of a change in one industry
on all other industries in the market area. With the use of
such models it is possible to trace the impact of an initial
change in net expenditures through other industries in the
economy to determine the ultimate _change in population,
output; income and joins. The specific model used contained
data on ou'put and purchases of over 500 industries in Butte
;ounty. Data from Tables i through 5 was used with Implan
to generate estimates of other dirE„c changes as well as
indirect and induced changes that. are summarized in Tables 6
through 9.
DirectIn order to use the model to estimate economic impacts,
it is necessary to estimate the amount of direct changes in
expenditures (or output) that are generated by the
development, Direct changes occur when there is a change in
spending for final goods and. services such as purchases of
new houses and golfing membership dues, Estimates for
direct changes in expenditures (or output) were made with
data presented in Tables 1 through 5. This data Was
provided by the prospectiveto evel oper , V. `11 owing
'.t:e fo
restrictions were applied his data it in ensure'
that only expenditures defined as direct s that impact
net spending in Butte county were uaed to y fmplan:
(1) Expenditures must be for newly produced products) such
as houses, rather than ekisting property, such as land.
Thus, the ;purchase price 'of ;souses 'ou" not the land is shown.
in the Table 6,
i
0
D
0
n
1
In
r
(2) However, not all of the purchase price is included in
direct changes since only expenditures made in Butte county
will impact the county's e+.;onomy. Thus, only 74% of the
price of new houses is included in Table 6 since it was
estimated by the prospective developer that 264 of material
and Labor was purchased outs-`-, the county.
(3) Furthermore, only those purchases that represent a net
increa,F,Jn spending in Butte county are included in the
following table. For example, expenditures made at Fairway
Estates rather than Butte Creek Country Club should not be
included because they are substitutes rattier than net
changes in spending. since thn developer estimated that 22'%
of the houses would be sold to people moving into Butte
county, only 22% of the portior of the labor and materials
purchased locally was counts -I 'a the analysis. (it is
,assumed that the other 78% of rouses were purchased by
people living in Butte county who would have bought other
houses or goods in Butte county if they had not purchased
houses at Fairway Estates
For a single house, the amount of direct change would
be ,calculated as follows:
$350,000 - Price of New House and Lot
�100,000 = Price of Lot
$250,000 = Price of New House
x .74 = Materials & Labor Purchased in Butte county
185,,000 0 of House Pu. -chased !t But .e County
9 .22 of, purchase that rp,atesent,s net change in
4.0,700 _ Net Change in Direct Expendi,[ •re New House
Esti�.tes
ther categories (j direct eXpendi, ur were
madeina similar
Result:, of the input -Out Model
Direct changes summarized in the following table,
Direct change in spendin or output that were estimated with
data supplied b the developer are shown in the third row.
This data comhined with county data that it a part of the
implan model was used to estimate changes in population,
income and Sobs, The changes in population, income and jobs
are a produ6t of implant
5
Table 6
Direct Changes in Population, Output, Income, and Jobs
In Butte County
Due to Development of Fairway Estates
(1990 dollars in millions)
-- �- _-=--==Year 1Year 2 ----Year 3� Year 4
Population 81 110 134 gn
Output $ 3.2 $ 2.8 $ 3.$
Income $ 1.0 $ .9 $ 1.2
No. of Jobs 26 86 5q 29
Indirect Changes
Indirect changes occur when firms buy inputs from firms
within Butte county in order to produce the output needed
for direct purchases summarized in the previous table. For
example, a local contractor may be hired to do the
electrical work. Indirect changes are estimated by Im;plan
with the use of the data presented in the previous table. A
summary of these results. is shown in the following table.
Table 7
Indirect Changes 'j-. Populations Output, Income, and Jobs
in Bunte County
Due to Development of Fairway -.states
(1990 dollars in millions)
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4
Population 48 45 60 8
Output 9 9 $ -I.2 $ 2
Income $ .4 $ •4 $ 6 $ .Z
No. of Jobs 16 15 20 2
Induced Changet
Induced changes occur when people spend the additional
income that is generated by the direct and indirect
expenditures. For example,
at, electrician hired to do the
wiring mayeat more meals at e
,F rstaurants in Butte county'
.,
Induced changes that were produced by the input-output table
are summarized in the Table 8,
t
G
1
1
1
1
1
Table 8
Induced Changes in Population; Output, Income, and Jobs
In Butte County
Due to Development of Fairway Estates
(1990 dollars in millions)
Year i Year 2 Year 3 Year 4
Population 88 105 149 67
Output $ 1.9 $ 2..3 $ 3.2 $ 1.4
Income $ 1.0 $ 1.2, $_1.7 _ ,8,
No. of Sobs 29 34 48 22
Total changes are the sum of direct, indirect and
induced changes. These changes, which are a product of
Implan, are summarized in Table 9.
Table 9
Total Changes in Population, Income; Output, and Jobs
In Butte County
Due to Development of Fairway Estates
(1990 dollars in millions)
Year 1 Year 2Year 3 Year 4
Population 217 260 364 165
Output $ 6.0 $ 2.4 $ 8.2 $ 2.1
Income' $ 2.4 $ 2.4 $ 3.4 $ 1.1.
No. of ;,obs 70 8`5 1.18 54
This project will impact Butte County tax revenuos and
other sources of income over the four year period of
development. It will also increase the total cost of all,
county government services. The tables in this section are
presented to show, the estimates of those impacts.
Table 10 presents the major sources of revenue to the
county of Butte from this project: The sources are property
taxes, building permits, sales and use taxes and engineering
fees for the project's amenities;
7
i
t
C�
Table loll
Incremental Revenues For Butte County
Due to Development of Fairway Estates
(_in 1989 d's)===- -_- _--__---
TAXANDFEE
SOURCES Year 2 Year 3 Year 4
a Property
Sales and Use
Year 1
I0
57,500' 5,90a 173,489 176,559
5,512
0 5,477 7,516 1,975
6
CHARGES FOR
CURRENT SERVICES
Construction 61,667 66,000 88,000
Permits 43,682
Engineering ,Serv' s15,200
11,400
Water & Sewer Znsp's1111,590
OTHER MISCE,LANEOUS" 36,239 43,420 60,788 27,555
all Other Sources
�
2.16.,110 233,201 344,993 206,489
Total
Table 10 shows the incremcnt;al income to the county
from the implementation
government alone which would result from
'Thus total proper tax revenue generated
of this ptojec� . ]
by Fairway` Estates would exceed the amount in23the
percent.
table since the county government keeps only is
77 percent of property tax revenue
'Butte
(The remaining county.)
distributed to other local governments in
Table 11 shows the incremental cost of Butte Coisnty
the implementation ofthis
services which would result from this
in cost imposed on the county ha
project. The change nge in
development Caere estimated by taking the cha
per capita casts of
proposed
population and multiplying it by the
county government services.
This method assumes that the county etpendi tures
e. te of
divided by the county population
se uacesnfnrves
th.eane tdPersonstimaadded to
the costs of proviaing derived. from
in
The estimated change population
the county the
multipliedsbyth�inpTableita �ll=st tThiseprocedure
implan was
total cost of,sery presented
in county 'popu1e'�ian due to the
ncrease
assumes that the increase
development of Fairway Estates does not require the county
to increase its capital expenditures-
Butte County: The revenues are derived from Table 10' the
Table
v
revenues from this project exceed the expected costs to
t
Incremental Costs
of County Services
Table 12
Due to Development
of Fairway
Estates
Butte County: The revenues are derived from Table 10' the
Table
110
revenues from this project exceed the expected costs to
t
Incremental Costs
of County Services
Table 12
Due to Development
of Fairway
Estates
(in 1989 $'s)
(in 1989
$'s)
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4
__��---------
- -------Year
- ------ - ---
-Year
--- --- --_-
-Rear
-- ---- -
Net Revenue 155,133' 160,141 242,709 160,124
l-
2
3---
Year 4-----
Will result in a positive flow of income to the county,
Per Capita
These estimates are based oil conservative assumptions, For
example, it was assumed that only 22 percent of the initial
Cost
281 281
281
281
population on infrastructure capacity of county services,
Number of
New Residents 217 260
364
165
Total
60,977 73,060
102,284
46,365
Table
12 shows the excess
of revenues
over expenses for
Butte County: The revenues are derived from Table 10' the
expenses are derived from Table 11, It is apparent that the
revenues from this project exceed the expected costs to
t
Butte county government.
Table 12
Net Income And Expenses Expected for Butte County
From the Fairways Project
(in 1989 $'s)
---___-� -=------=-------- ---------------- --- ------ --
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4
Revenue 216,110 233,201 344,993 206,489
Cost 60,977' 73,060 102,284 46,365
Net Revenue 155,133' 160,141 242,709 160,124
These data suggest that development. of Fairway Estates
Will result in a positive flow of income to the county,
These estimates are based oil conservative assumptions, For
example, it was assumed that only 22 percent of the initial
expenditures resulted in a net increase in demand: However,
this study does not examine the impact of the change in
population on infrastructure capacity of county services,
®
■
10
APPENDIX A
All of the following items are from the State of
California Controller's
Office publication, Counties of
California Financial Transactions, Annual Report, 1988-89,
Table 6, Pp. 14-15. The
listed items were summed, and divided
by the total population
for Butte County estimated for that
year.
TAXES
188,"89 $'s
Property Transfer
444,984
Transient Lodging
46,102
Aircraft
28,689
LICENSES, PERMITS ETC
1,831,11;7
FINES', FORFEITURES ETC
821,813
REVENUES FROM USE OF FUNDS 11004,422
ALL STATE SOURCES
EXCEPT WELFARE
AND HOMEOWNERS PROP
TAX RELIEF
19,827,184
ALL FEDERAL SOURCES
EXCEPT WELFARE AND
FOREST RESERVE REV08
11210,243
ALL CHARGES FOR
CURRENT SERVICES EXCEPT
PLANNING AND ENGINEERING 3,396,331
ALL MISCELLANEOUS
REV `S
718,571
OTHER FINANCING SOURCES
107,102
TOTAL
$29,436,558/176,738 population
Per Capita RevenUe
$167:00
li
1, The amount spent on new construction was estimated as follows:
60 t $250,,000 = $15,000,000
where 60 = number of new houses sold
$250,000 = average price of new house
2, The percent spent locally Was estimated by the prospective developer,
3. The restaurant's gross revenue for the first year is estimated as follows:
Gross Rennue = 270 1 $1,250: $337,500
where 270 = number of members
$11250 = annual expenditures for food and
beverages pet member
4, Fees are calculated as full a;,
Hembers' Fees - 210 1 $92 x 12 : $2"A,080
where 270 = number of members
$92 = monthly dues
12 = number of months per year
Guest. Fees-- $25 ; 4,500 -- $112,500
xhete $25 - cost per round
40500 = numbet of guest rounds per year
Cart rentals = $22 x 9,000
shere $22 = rental fee pet cart
9,000 = numhet of carts rented per year,
s, pro -shop revenues are estimated as follows:
Gross revenue - 270 t $600 -- $162,000
where 270 = number of meobets
$600 _ annual expenditures per member
since almost all goods in the pto-shop hill be purchased from ,outside Butte County, the only
portion of this spent locally will be the mark-up -01oh is approximately 46% of the $162,000;
spent locally = 409 of $1621000 = $64,600, -
i, the amount spent on new construction Was estimated as f011ous1
60 x $1500000 = $15,000,000
where 60 t number of new houses sold
$250x000 = avetage price of new house
2, The percent spent locally Was estimated by the prospective developer,
The private club's gross tevenue from the sales of food and beverages for the third year is
estimated as follows.
Gross Revenue = 90 z $1,350 = $525,500
12
where 426 number of members`
$1,250 = annual expenditures for food and
beveras,► per memksr
f. Febs are calculated as follows:
Xembers' Pees _ 420 x $92 z 12 = $463)680
where 420 - number of members
$92 z monthly dues
12 = number of months per ;year
Guest Fees z $25 i 7000 = $175,000
where $25 = cast per tound
7,000 = number of quest rounds ; r year
cart rentals = $22 1 14,000 = ,$308,000
where $22 = rental fee per cart
14000 number of carts 'rented per year,
10, pro -shop revenues are estimated as follows;
0rosa revenue t 420 i '$600 = $252,000
where 426 z number of members
$600 = 'annual expenditures per member
Since almost All goods in the pro -shop will he purchased from outside Butte County, the only
portion of this spent local!;' will be the nark-np which is approxiaately 40% of the $100)800:
Iii The amount spent on new construction was estimated as follows.
80 1 $250,000 = $20,000,000
where 80 = number of new houses sold
$250,000 = average price of new house
The percent spent locally Was estimated by the prospective developer,
�}. The private club's gross revenue from the solos of food and beverages for the fourth year is
estimated as follows.
Gross Revenue = 600 x $1,260 = $750,000
where 606 number of nemhers
$1,250 = annual ependitures for food and
beverages pet member
t4, Fees are calculated as follows;
}embers" Fees $000 1 $92 1 12 = $662,690
where 600 - number of members
$11 = monthly dues
12 = number of month's per year
Guest Fees $25 x 10,000 $175;000
where $25 = coe�' per round
10,000 = i nber of quest rounds per year
Cart rentals $22 x 14,000 n $308,004
}there $22 = rental fee per cart
20,000 = number of carts rented per pear,
It. Pro -shop revenues are estimated as follows;,
Gross revenue 600 1 $600 = $360,000
where 600 number of members
$600 = annual expenditures per member
It
14 This table assumes that
property tax yields .for this
Project will produce 23% of the total assessed value :yields
from the construction projecl(Is`discussed here,
i
11 This assumes a per house site visit taking slightly less than four hours per house, Telephone
discussion with ms, Betty Critter indicated that the fees for inspection of this type of construction
by the Butte County Environmental Unit is WAG per hour, Ne were not able to obtain the 'estimated
costs of this activity directly from the Unit, and Ns. Critter asked that those be considered only
tentative costs fut this inspection activity,
Li This section is derived from the Counf;ies of California Financial
Transactions, Annual Report 1988"19891 Gray Davis State Controller; State at
California, Table 6, pp, 14-15, "he effort is to identify the average amount of income to the County
As a result of the increment, in the County of hew residents. The average change in outside sources of
income is estimated by snmmiay all the items not in the following list and then dividing by the total
population That value is then multiplied by the expected number of new residents to the County from
the project ?s estimated with the input/output model, hppehdii A lists the items 'excluded and. the
amount of revenue from those eiclusions,
it, These pet capita average costs liege calculated without the eipenditures of state and federal
welfare payments, This was done to ensure that the average costs did hot include these other sources
of income and outgo to the county, It is assumed that the people moving into this project 0111 not be
in need of welfare payments over the four period of the project examihed here, According to the State
of California Controller's Office, counties of California Financial transactions Annual Report 110-
1989, Tabip 6, pages ,14.151 Butte county received $52,352,653 in public assistance program support and.
Administration, This amount liar subtracted from he operating budget of the County as reported in that
document, S1O1,970,410; the redaind :r is $40,617,T57 which is estimated to be the operating Udget of
Butte county in the fisc; year i98W09 exclusive of welfare operations, This amount Was divided by
the estimated ,population of Butte county in that fiscal year as reported in the document, 17i,I38, The
average per cafita cost of all caunty services exclusive of 'velfare is 5281,
13
Notice is hereby given by the Butte County Planning Commission that public hearings
will be held on Thursday, November 15, 1990, in the Butte County Board of Supervisors'
Room, County Administration Center, 2; County Center, Drive, Oroville, California,
regarding the following item at the following time:
9:00 a.m. E.H. Ochinero - Rezone from SR -1 (Suburban Residential - 1 acre
parcels) to PAID. (Planned Unit Development), to allow a 200 lot
residential development, a golf course and sewage disposal facilities,
located on the west side of Hicks Lane, approximately 1 mile north of
Sycamore Drive, identified as APS# 007-010-057 and 058, 007-550-046 and
047, Chico. (File x#90-11).
ITEM DETERMTNED TO BE CATE *nRICALLY EXEMPT
FROM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
9:00 a.m. F a mend M. NorbY - `variance to allow holding bins for walnuts on the
side z)roperty'line on property zoned A-10 (Agricultural 10 acre parcels);
located on the northeast corner of Meridian Road and Oak Wavy,
identified as AP# 042-,120-039, west of Chico.
The above mentioned application; maps and Negative Declarations with Mitigation
Measures is on file and available for public viewing at the office of the Butte County
Planning Departrnlent, 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, California. Comments may be
submitted in writing any time prior to the hearing or orally at the meeting listed above
or as continued
y minto a later date. If you challenge the above applications in court, you
may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public
hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the Planning
Commission, at or prior to, the public hearing.
BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMIyfI_ SSION
B.A: KIRCHER. DIRECTOR OF PLANNING
To be published in. the Chico Enterprise Record on Thursday, October 11, 1990,
JOHN W. HA14BY
w
LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR
P.p BOX HH -- 5437 OLIVE STREET�
PARAMSE.CAUFORilA95969
CAUFORNIAdNEVAPA
P.O. I < - 65 NO ill CKWC(H
�..' OLA, CAUMPNIA 96122
October 27i 1981 PHONE(916)025571
PHONE (916) ®77-6253
1
DR. HORNING
PACE PROPERTY
East to
"lest
1164E
Dept
So/L pl3r i/so..rr A44 0 6'
r 1
8+
181,
soil, Remainder, cemented rock & gra 7-2 fo
2
8't
3..
Clay loam,rocky and gravel 4 8'
�3
81
74
1�
soil, 3>f clay loam, 2f silt, 31 rock;,, .& gr, vel
!{
81
�►
4�
, clay loam, 1.�'�-s loam
A 5
8f
3 �clfiy
loam, 4 � rocky x041
6
81
3
clay ! oari 4L clay and silty so'
r 7
7
Iz
3`
clay loam, 4'clay "soil (same as 6)
r�r 8
8
3�
clay loam, 2� silty soil,, 3 clay sE,il (silty 8 1 )
zy a
8
8
clay loam 8 ►
i`10
8
5
clay loam, 3�sandy-silty gravel loam
#11
8
1
clay loam 1 to 5 med. clay loam, 5 layer mineral
51to f-Istiff zlay loam
Nbrth to
South
Tr 11 A
8
>b 6l
clay loam, 1 I loam sand gravel
#12
8
tD
5`
stiff clay loam, 3' clay cobble tight
fi 13 =#8
7-ru!4
7
7v
3'
stiff Clay Loam, 41 loose grave?.
n 15
8
stiff clay loam, 4) gravel and silt
7r/6
7
7,
4 5-
compacted surface cobble ana clay loamylooser
#/7
g
P
18n
play loam, 51 tight clay lout, J" compacted cobble
n is
7 L
Tt,
2
clay loam, 5t dense cobble and tii It
X20
7
3
i
clay loam, 4 loamy sand gravel,
m21
8
6
stiff clay loam, tight sandy clay fo a
x`22'
$-,
3
,stiff clay loam, ki silty clay, 4troelty sandy loam
#23
7
rr
5
heavy clay, 2%Z cobble tight
n24
? -
4`
clay loam, 2rtight gravel cobble 1�'cobble gravel
-x`25
75-
5
clay; loam, ?. cemented rock and gravel
n26ti
g y ht 'cla s g ' g 1 light clay, 3'sand ravel cobL4e
mixed tight and loose
Dr. Hovning
Pace Troperty
Page .'
October 27s 1981
North 'bo Tpi,4L
` South Depth
r27 8
a
3
tight
clay,
5 silty clay
7#28 8
so
3121
heavy
clay,
2"silty clay, 2�,S rocky loose cobble
Tr29 $
To
8
silty
clay
tight (some perc)
73.0 8
To
jar
heavy
clay,
1' silty clay, 3rocky cobble
#31 7
7-z
heavy
clay,
23�f tight clay cobble
r32 7
3
heavycla
y,cobble
clay
5
m33 �' �'
7b
3�
heavy
clay,
�
,; silty loam, 1 clay cabbie
x`34. 7 � 7a
7 � r
silty
son dy
,clay
a
it
y
.4:
HAMBY SURVEYING INC.
LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR
CALIFORNIA NEVADA
P 0 BOX HH . 5437 BLACK OLIVE
PARADISE CALIFORNIA95969
P 0 BOX 842.65 N BECKWITH
POSIDLA CALIFORNIA 1)01 2,
PHONE' (91G11877 -(i253
PHONE, (91GL8323571
PACESETTER ESTATES
Soil
Observations made 4-28-82
Hole No.
Total Depth Soil Description
X35
�'t
Of -21 clay loam
21-81 silty clay loam
36
81
0-21 clay loam
2-811, sll.•ty loan,
37
81
0-2t alay loam
2-6t Pandy loam
6-81 cobble
38
81,
0-21 clay loam
2-61 sandy loam
6-81 cobble
81 water
39
7"
0-3kt clay loam
3�-71 rocky, sandy cobble
71 water
40
71�1
0-31 clay Loam
3-730 sandy gavel and _Roam
7?�s1 dry
41
729'
0-21 clay
2-W clay loam
6�--7) rocky, sandy cobble
7k dry
42'
Vg
0-21 clay loam
2-631 looser clay loam
78"I initial water level
68" final water level
43
7.11
0"?' clay loam
2-7' looser clay loam
82'" water
P
Hole No.
Total. De2th
Soil
Description
#44
61''
0-2'
clay loam
2-6V,'
looser clay loam
77"
water
45
6'
0-4'
clay loam
4-61
cobble
70"
water
46
4'r2'
0-2'
clay loam
2-131
looser clay loam
' 43:g'
water
47
41z-'
0-2'
c/ay loam
2-4]�'
looser clay loam_
31�2'
water
48
4] '
0-2'
clay loam
274Y
looser clay loam
4.9 1
water
49
5'
0-21
clay, loam
2-5'
looser clay loam
811
water
50
71
0-2'
clay loam
2-7f
Looser clay loam
79"
initial. water Level
70"
final water level
51
V
0-3'
clay
�-5'
silty clay loam
5-7''
mottled silty clay loam
7'
initial water level
80"
final water level
52
7'
0-2'
clay
2-51
silty clay loam
5-7i
tighter silty clay
71
water
53
6'
0-2'
clay
2-4'
silty clay loam
4-61
siltstone-silty clay with
mineral layers
6►
water
54
7'
0-2t
clay
2-4), r
silty Clay loam
siltstone
R31-
�
water
..2
.i
Hole No.
Total Depth
Soil Description
#55
73 t
0-2' clay
2-4-ig' - silty clay loam
4 -9 -'VO siltstone
7' water
56
W�
0-2' clay loam
2-4!f-;' looser clay loam
1.10 watzr
57
5�
0-41 sandy loam
4-5�9 clay loam
51�gi water
P,O. BOX HH - 5437 BLACK OLIVE
PARADISE. CALIFORNIA 95969
PHONE- (015) 677.8253
0204
3'+
--;`205
767W 4
#206
f>�G�
Depth
'201
31
,202
2 e
A-203
3t+
0204
3'+
--;`205
31
#206
2t+
n2 7
4�t
A.
209
4,-
IT
31� r
X2117
212
41
;;'213
r
4. .
MAF►4$Y Slef ;'V 4 INC.
LICENSED L ? -'!OR
P,O, BOX lug - 65K b; _KW,ra
PORTOLA. CALIFORNIA 04122
June 4, 1982 PHONE (918) 82.5571
DR. HORNING
PACE PROPERTY
•9UD�r/o.ei aL .S'o /L o Bs.GrC VA
O t -3 t brows dense silt hrith clay - dry and hard,
some gravel at 3f-
01 -2f
t0t-2t brown dense salt with clay.compact- hard
to dig by hand, dry. _
01-3t Gray el -cobble at 3 1 . silt in gravel pos-
sibly looser & sandier.
lighter color
07-2)g° brown dense clayey silt
1,_04.3f+ lighter color, chalkier salt; not much
clay.
7.t-s3t brown dense silt- slightly lighter and
less hard with depth; sane clay conterit.
P-21 brown dense silt with clay.
:-"-2f+ cobble id' h lighter silt matrix. Cobble
is dense.
)-43g' brown clay loam. Not much change with
depth.
)-3;:0 brown clay loam.
3:�-4 t+ gravel and cobble at 4 1+
-3e brown clay loam— fairly dense clayey soil
at surface; Hitting gravels in perc holes
t+
-4)nt bro-Wn clay loam about like 7#212, f airly
careact. C+ ay somewhat lower content
4-4 p t
)-31 brown clay loam - clayey silt. Clay con-
tent lower than area surface soil..
0_41 abort same clay cot:- ,
tentpossibly lighter color brown A3
)-21�t black clay loo ni
-4t brown clay loam with small amount of cob-
ble - clay content lower than surface
and drier.
Dr.
Horning
Pace
Property
Page
2
June
4o 19$2
Depth
b-31
-#214
clad' loamn' bl,acka
Ibr-wn
32g+
3-3�t
clay loam -- drier than surface about same
clay content apparently,
-L'2150-3
► black clay :loam -- clay is fairly dense and
stiff. Clay content fairly high- can ball.
3-61+ brown clay loam - drier. Fairly high clay
content - ball can forme Clay content be-
coming lower with depth,- some cementation -
of soil noted.
6'21
6-6�0 cobble and gravels$ fairly dense. Stopped
at 53�5t. Dug perc test hole adjacent- 20
away at 41 depth.
n216
0-31 black clay loam
4�
31-4tbrown clay loam. Still fairly high clay
content.
;r 217
0-31-33:0 black clay loam. Same as above`- slightly
drier.
4'
3 -3'•g -4t+ lighter brown clay loam with some gravels
and cobbles.Gravels didn't amount to
much in perc hole - seepage into hole@ 5z.
7218
0-611 black clay loam.
brown clay loam, less clay than black soil
and drier
or
•
L: 007 010i 00B 000
STATUS:
ACTIVE
-
- KEMP ORWIN LEE SS
'PACE DEVERE &'MILTON
D TRUSTEES
l�
FOREMAN LENA ESTATE OF
178950372
0
3820 HICKS LANE
95926
45926
95926
*
r CHICO CA
95926
.�
STATUS: ACTIVE
10' FAIRWAY DR':
STEWART TIMOTHY D &
READV CORTLAN & NANCY'
L:_ 007 010 036 000
STATUS:
ACTIVE
.GARNER
JAY ETAL TG
L: 007 010 058 0100
ff+�
Ell SYCAMORE DR
PACE FAMILY TRUST
95926
95926.
CHICO CALIF'
95926
0
3965 KICKS LANE
STATUS:. ACTIVE
CHICO CA
95926
J
PACE DEVERE TRUSTEE
4367 CABALLO WAY
L: 007 010 053mx
STATUS';
ACTIVE ;
CHICO' CA
CURRY GERALD V & AUDREY
D
CH ICO' CA
95926
3415 RODGERS AVE
'
CHICO CAS
95926`
�a
L: 007 010 056 000
STATUS: ACTIVE
�+
PACE FAMILY TRUST
WOOD MICHAEL D & DIANA
'PACE DEVERE &'MILTON
D TRUSTEES
k
3965 HICKS LN
CHICO CA
CHICO CALIF
95926
45926
95926
L: 007 010 057 000
STATUS: ACTIVE
L: 00-7 230 007 000
REIMAN CHARLES B MD TRUSTEE
STATUS: ACTIVE
10' FAIRWAY DR':
STEWART TIMOTHY D &
READV CORTLAN & NANCY'
CHICG CA
h
95928
L: 007 010 058 0100
STATUS: ACTIVE
PACE FAMILY TRUST
95926
95926.
f
'PACE DEVERE
0
3965 KICKS LANE
STATUS:. ACTIVE
CHICO CA
95926
J
L.,l 001 230 004 000 STATUS: ACTIVE
RICHA►7DS WALTER lirc 5
:4355 CABALLO WAY
CHICO CA 9592-6
® L: 007 239 005 fd00 STATUS: ACTIVE
GEORGE STEVEN W & JODI L (CB DVA)
4345' CABALLO WAY' r
CHICO CA
95920 ,
.
L: 007 230 001 000
STATUS: ACTIVE
WOOD MICHAEL D & DIANA
LYNN.J'f
•
4333 CABALLO WAY`
4395 CABALLO WAY
CHICO CA
CHICO CALIF
95926
95926
L: 00-7 230 007 000
L: 007 230 002'000
STATUS: ACTIVE
STEWART TIMOTHY D &
READV CORTLAN & NANCY'
L
h
4383 CABALLO WAY
CHICO CA
CHICO CA,
95926
95926.
0
L: 007 230 003 000
STATUS:. ACTIVE
PACE FAMILY TRUST
NELSON[ TERRY L & SALLY
J
PACE DEVERE TRUSTEE
4367 CABALLO WAY
3965 HICKS LN
CHICO' CA
95926
CH ICO' CA
95926
L.,l 001 230 004 000 STATUS: ACTIVE
RICHA►7DS WALTER lirc 5
:4355 CABALLO WAY
CHICO CA 9592-6
® L: 007 239 005 fd00 STATUS: ACTIVE
GEORGE STEVEN W & JODI L (CB DVA)
4345' CABALLO WAY' r
CHICO CA
95920 ,
.
L: 007 230,006 000
STATUS:. ACTIVE
BROWN CHARLES & MARGARET
4333 CABALLO WAY`
CHICO CA
95926
L: 00-7 230 007 000
STATUS: ACTIVE_
STEWART TIMOTHY D &
LESLEY E
4235 CABALLO WAY
CHICO CA
95926
L: 007'550 046 000
STATUS: ACTIVE
PACE FAMILY TRUST
PACE DEVERE TRUSTEE
3965 HICKS LN
CH ICO' CA
95926
L 0107 550 047 000 STATUS: ACTIVE
'
FACE FAMILY TRUST
`
PACE DEVERE TRUSTEE
3965 HICKS LN
a
CHICG CA 95926
L: 007 550 061 000 STATUS: INACTIVE
f
MINTO PRESTON K & CAROLINE rL
`!
P DI BOX; 1735:
!
CHI,CO CA 95927
L:: 0075501062 000 STATUS: INACTIVE
MINTO PRESTON'K &<CAROLI'NE M
P 0 BOX 1735
CFI CO CA 95927
L: 007 550 097000 STATUS': INACTIVE
MINTO' PRESTON' K& CAROLINE hi'
P'0 BOX 1,735
CH CO CA 95927
:•
L-.1 007 550 098 000` STATUS': INACTIVE
MINTO` PRESTON' K & CAROLINE M
"
P' 0 BOX 1735
CrlICO CA 95927
L::007 550' 099 _100 STATUS: INACTIVE
TUTTLE JAMES-A & JANICE CP` "
P 0 BOX: 2172
CHICO CA 95927
L 047 250 038 000 STATUS: ACTIVE
'
SACRAMENTO & SAN JOAQUIR DRAINAGE DIST
'
00000
L:. 047 250.046 000 STATUS:: ACTIVE
t _
SACRAMENTO & SAN JOAQUIN`DRAINAGE DIST
CIORECLAMATION BOARD
1416 9TH ST
y
SACRAMENTO CALIFORNIA 95014
L: 04.7 250 141 f00'91 STATUS': ACTIVE
STEPHENS ROBERT L & ANN' G "' r
3621 CARMEL VALLEY ROAD ,
SAN DIEGO CA 9213
L: 047 250 17&000 STATUS: ACTIVE
BI.CKLEY PUBY L ETAL
165E FRANCES WILLARD AVE
CH'ICO CA
95926 `+
,
Sierra West Surveying
5437 Black olive Drive
Parad3 se, CA 95969
E.H. Ochinera
<<
2811 Bechell Lane
Redding, cA 96,002
ENDED
INITLAL STUDY
.for the
FAIRWAY ESTATES
TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP
BUTTE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
�1!
Prepared for:
Butte County Planning and Building Department
7 County Center Drive
Orov.11e, California 55965
at
Prepared byt.
ECO -ANALYSTS'
1025 village Lane
Chico, CA 95925
Revised July 1950
® INTRODUCTION
Fairway Estates, a
develoj�rtic-tett , s s located ono 221 acres in
idental and golf course
Lane between Keefer Road northwest
boundary is Mud Creek. ,and Nord Highway.Chico, on Hicks
58 and 44-02-72 Zhe Assessor s The pro•ect,s
and -73, Parcel Numbers are esrn
small he Property is 44-01-
Currently
grain production in fallow, but has been used for
exist on a small Prior years. A home and outbuilding
subdivision existsasauthaof adjacent
to Hicks Lane. ,
Hicks Lane. Intense residentee PrndeSOmel�o A established
Hicks Lane near the mmerci access to
r Lands to the east and with Eaton erc�-al exists on
Chico north are Road, and on Eaton Road.
Airport IS over 3000 feet/ vacant east o
developers will sign an avi atio The active f Hirunway of the
traffic. g n easement for `CP" flight
Ion alks Lane. The
A tentative subdivisima
and individual wells p for 48
, was a parcels, on septic tanks
approved in 1983 but never developed.
The developers Ped.
on lots averaging Propcsse to build 200 sin
ging 10,800 s single-fa
the golf course. ` quare feet with most homes Y residences
and puttin It addition to the golf course adjacent to
g green, there will be a clubhouse • driving range
courts and recreation. are
homes wind rac a as, and 2.3 acres and pool, tennis
$250,000 in 1990 dollars e' when completed from Parkin
memY�ersh , from g: The
p in the All homeowners - $200,000 to
also be Golf Course Associaton,w��n1 be eligible for
able to elect one ''guest member"' . Eachthe house old will
association.
.A community well and water s
Individual septic systems will be stem will be
treatment facilit linked to developed.
gravel filter. The system Proposed is an on-site sewage
Y•
storage The effluent will be a recrct;latingg
g in the water hazards for chemicall
community well or a Y sterilized before
water su Separate well golf course irrigation. The
etfluentpplY in the ponds ciurin will be used to su
will be used for g the summer months, PPlement the
golf course irrigation. Treated
There are three access
Each will be an electronics gates t° tl'
Entrance wild be projedt on Hicks Lane.
gained b Y oontro11ec1 security gate .
The north and south of "garage doors'
y use
by a different fro-gates will be for members and�.be cnntrolded.
The north uency from the gate nearest the
gate will be USed for guests of the clubhouse.
A homeownersr homeowners..
hands association will be established to rove
for maintenance of all co
interior roadsnnit • Provide
hydrants i sewage treatment s Y facilities including
and the golf ,course„ Ystem, well hater matins and
IfF.
PROJECT
ATIONJ,
lni 1 F •6Yil llnf CIit 1
� � �.•r ! d al. �
r t
•rFn♦lila en. � MInFR"fir / -�+•
♦ r•
• Penal.• a
! � • t.. � Pln• � 114.0.11.
L
�YI�Ci'{�CQi♦ � .als• '� w�r��dio' tia �} 1
' n
n.w 1 ,/,ilt • } i tt{ MIII � 65•6141.
60, I � 1
7 D.,I.a.. �' I �+;. a%i%�•-�.."A� .r.. R. /J
y r c ae�es�,. +. 1//'yy`,,.1 o i.. t. Y�•
1 t V, yr ;. ��� •aii� t
L
i ki
w..IFr�V J t text 4 r r•.Il..t
1 d.cYlttt � "'a FY11F i �1
F rf•ta♦.1 ♦ t " ... SO t I, IIF.
I
TY.q..lti t+ `T tl•tm��
s r
o•,, i ^ie
t�,t�Ilno.
a call [li.a
p� X � F, drtnl•y x : �'
y .
to 4 BUTTE [ a
oi.. r �r 6.A U
Witv
FE9ure
0`
0
•
•
A0
I azo ; e
'h•A ®RRma a>3i YtC I `� � •r� •�•a\\ r ,•r r +� l�
%yell Jsp I _ ,Q ���o MS 1
r - it
4 q•..
gvam, 7awet`'_ d ?q
J 'S,k +1 +
f )Lore
N Trek-
�4
,
� ll
WO
r.
I :+ Sl,i inn ` 1
• „„
BDY
i
a a•
i v
• ti
_Is�
. 1
Figure 3
SITS' PLAN
� N
r- fx.z� �g t_j
r�14 �1f7 4121171 tfYltl•' Y:! 1{blit d tP r�1 MGA
0x! rY .:� V+ �n
1lT�t �IIr lit 3,t� j1U�� Wy I r
IC7 y„ w rll is 'rw V V I
J(/ .(P�`,'r, J fa! <• { A ? It7 iL to Iw t� r I rrt2 `'
J 11
a ..... � r tai �i°` •�/' 11r Y,e�Y Q % � 5.... oe!wc R.r�
al b
c 1]1 . to
..t y • . -d i 'ts SY N � t eu Yu zt.
It, tii M.a' to t,,.. I co
t
f • -
-
n,w n
t
"• ,� } ^'1...� .. � i1 � it �'! � •. ° c. � :. 1! M .1� �.� ' � DI n y : ... uxa�c�i trvad,tt
it
12,
V p v L
Cr
�t
J 'r
AV- lttf Il l��
r Flay Eiidles
i S'�2i ia� Entry
FAIHWAY ESTATES
L LAS Jo o ft
V
PROJECT SUMMARY ;SHEET
A. Proiect
Proponent
Y
Ed Ochinero c/o Tom Wrinkle
Sierra West Surveying --
5437 Black olive Drive- Paradise- CA 95069
B. Project nescrintion
1.
Tvpe of Project: Residential and "golf course development
2.
Brief 0escriotion A 200 -unit residential develoument with an 18 -hole
golf course including clubhouse and related recreational amenities ..
3.
Locationt Off Hicks Lane between Keefer Road and Nord Highway, northwest
Chico
�.,
Assessoros Parcel Number(s)- 44-01-58. 44-02-72. 44-02-73 _
Proposed Density; Less than I unityer,acre
a.
Access and Nearest Public koadfsra Hicks Lane
'.
Sewage Disposal: Cin -site community sewer system and treatment facilities
L'.
Water Supple: Community system utilizine on-site wells -
9.
Prokitnity of Power Lines,, To property _
C. .Physical Environment
I.
terrain
a. Topography: M_ostiv.flat. _
b. Slopes t 0.,62 :.
c. Elevation; 180-200.1 _...
2.
Soils _
a: Types and Characteristicst Anita Clay Loamj, Aiken Clay Loam, Vina,
Clay Loam
b, Limiting Pac orii t 'Slow percolation; shallow soil_s____ __ .
3. Natural Hazards of the Land
a• Earthquake %one: Moderate Earth u.-1 a Intensity Zone Vi
ll Eros,.on II
Potential- Low
C. Landslide potential; None
d. Fire Hazard: Unclassified
ec Expansive Soil Potential; Limited
4; Hydrology
`-
a Surface Water: N-2 active drainaQeways on site.
Two venal nook 100
yds. E• of. Mud Creek '
and 10.0 v8s. N. of Svcamore Creek.
b. Groundwater: Chico area aouife�.s
C drainage Char,acterist,c-
--s: Land drains
e..to west toward Mud Creek which
mot es into Svcamore Geek _
d. _
Annual Rainfall: 22"
Visual/kk o lic Oualit�r: Good --------
t: AcoustYc oual,ttz Fair,
..
D. Biological End+ironment
1; Vegetation: -4 eCtzed V.allev Grassland
ha. has been
small
bYshted to
___� grairhe4Y% Star Thistle
---- - concentration
2. Wildlife:
a
8 ki,,mls Common to V&I
5ma11 bird_s_anci Y Crr`ssland ,areas:
:Jackrabbits
---.�.�pheasantG. bJackblrats
--- _- mea+.to-dWIarks y br het s ,
E. Cultural Entry ronhtent
iy 7 metal Ptah Desirknation:
A 'ric"Ruta]-Residential
ting:,SR�1 lSUbulrban Residential.L �`�
� 2: Zoe 1 acre)_..
Eais; ing' Land Use.. "
bsllr�w
•
d
06
4- Surrounding Area
a. Land Uses: Scattered subdivisions vacant land
b• General Plan Designations: Agricultural -Residential
c. 20ningz SR -1
d• Parcel Sizes: Range from veru large to 6500 souare #'eet
e. Population: Low density
5. Character of Site and Area: DeilelobinQ urban fringe of
Chico
6. Ne4res"t Urban Area: City of Chico
c. }ones of Services: Full urban services
Public Services
a Fire Protection: Butte County Fire/CDF
b• fo rce Protect -'In; Butte CO 5heriffts Department
c Schoolsz Shasta Elementa"rv, Bidwell_.ir. Hi h,
. Pleasant Va11ev _iti-h
F.
Other
The addition of_a olf
course and associated recreational amenities -will
increase the steaks recreational opportunities.
0
0
ENVIRONMENTAL SIGNIFICANCE CHECKLIST
I. BACKGROUND
1. Name of Proponent 'Ed Ochinero
2. Address c/o _Tom Wrinkle. tSierra West Surveying, 5437 Black Olive Drive,
Paradise, CA 95969 Phone ( 916 ) 877-6253
3. Name or Proposal, if applicable FIairwav Estates
4. Type of Project 200 -unit residential development and i8 -hole golf course
5. Location of Parcels) Off Hicks Lane between Keefer Road and Nord Highway, in
northeast Chico
6. Assessor0s Parcel Numbers 44-01-58 and 44-02-72 and -73
7. nate Checklist Submitted .October. 1989
EFFECT? SIGNIFICANT?
Yes Mavbe No Yes Mavbe No
II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS s�
1. EARTH. Will the proposal result in:
a. Unstable earth condit±,ons ccr in changes zn
geologic substructures? X
b. Disruption, displacement, compaction or
overcovering of the soil? N
c. Changes in topography or ground surface
relief features?
d. The destruction, covering or modification
of any Unique geologic or physical features? y
e, Any increase in Wind o water erosion of
soils either on or off site? N
f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach
sands, or charges In siltatioh, deposition
or erosion tahich may modify the channel of
a river or stream or the bed of the ocean
or any bay; inlet or lake?
r
EFFECT? SICNIFICANT?
Yes htavbe No Yes Maybe No
2. AIR. Will the proposal result in;
a. Substantial air emissions or deterioration
or ambient air quality?
• The creation of objectionable odors?
C
--� X
C. Alteration of air movement, moisture or
�-
5
temperature; or any change in climate either
locally or
regionally?
X
3. WATEP. Will the proposal result in:
a. Changes in currents, or the course of d'rec-
tion
1®
of water movements, in either marine or
fresh
waters?
s?
t. Changes in absorption rates, drainage
patterns; or the rate and amount of
surface water :.runoff?
c- Alterations tothe course or flow of flooa
waters?
X
d. Change In th,e amou.�k of 5uriaCe water In
an
water bode? t•
S
C
e', DI-scharg Into
e surface waters, or in
-- _
any
alteration of surface water quality; includ'-
ing, but
hot limited to, temperature'
dissolved
Oxygen or tUrbid'it+r?
X
S
f' Alteration of the direction
or rate of flor«=
Of ground water?
gf Change in the quantity of ground waters;
either through direct
additions or With-
drawal.s, or through interception
of an
aquifer by cuts or
excavations?
h. Substantiae reduction in the amount of
Wate.r otherwise aVailable for public water
supplies?
i. EkPdsure of people or `property to water,,
related hazards
such as "looding 6r Lzunamt?
k
EFFECT? SIGNIFICANT?
Yes Maybe No Yes Mavbe No
4. PLANTLIFE. Will the proposal result- in:
� -"`
a. Chances in the diversity of species or num-
ber of any species or pl�j.nts (including
trees, shrubs, grass, Crops, microflora and
aquatic plants?
h
b. Reduction in the number of any unique,, rare
or endangered species of plants?
S
c. Introduction of new species of plants into
an area, or in a barrier to the normal
replenishment of existing species?
X
d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural
crop?
C
�.
5. ANIMAL LIFE. Will the proposal result in;
a. Change in the diversity of species, or num-
bers of any species of animals (birds., land
•
animals including reptiles, fish and shell=
Fish, bentnic organisms, insects or micro-
fauna?
b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare
or endangered species of animals?
X
e
`., introduction of new species of animals in.ta
an area, or result in a barrier to the
mi,ration or movement of animals?
X
d, Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife
habitats
}:
6,. NOISE. Will the proposal result in:
a: Increases in existing noise letie'g ?
X C
5. Exposure of people `to seVere noise level's?
X
7. LIGHT AND, GLARE, Will the proposal produce �i6
light or glare?
X:
8. LAND liSI . Will the proposal resuXt in a sub"
sta►itial alteration of the present or planned
land use of an area?
X
4
9.
NATURAL RESOURCES. Will the proposal result in
A. Increase in the rate of use of any natural
a
resources? - x
C
b. Substantial deplex:ion of anv nonrenewable
natural resource?
x
10.
RISK OF UPSET': Will the proposal involve':
A. A risk of an explosion or the release of
hazardous substances (including, but not
limited to,, oil; pesticides, chemicals or
radiation.) in the event of an accident or
upset conditions?
x
b. Poasible interference with an emergence
response plan or an emergency evacuation
plan?
x
11.
POPULATION. Will the proposal alter the loci.-
tion, distribution, density or growth rate of
the human populatlon of an area?
12.
HOUSING. Will the proposal affect existing
housing; or create a demand for additional
housing?
x
.13.
TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATI ON. Will the Vroposa
result in;
A, 'Generation of substantial additional
vehicular movement?
b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or
demand for nein part o,hg?
x
c: Alterations to present patterns of circula-
i
tfan or Movement of people and/or goods?
d. Substantial impact upon 01,isting trantporta
tion systems!
C
e, AW!rration's to water'bornei rail or air
traffic?
x-
4
EFFECT?
SIGNIFICANT?
Yes Mavbe No
Yes_ Mavbe No
f. Ir.crease in .raffic hazards to motor
vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians?
X
C
1.4. PUBLIC SERVICES. Will the proposal have an
effect upon, or result in a need for new or
altered governmental services in aoy of the
following areas:
a. Fire protection?
C
a. Police protection?
k
C
G: Schools?
x'
C
i. Parks or other recreational facilities?
X,
C.
e. Maintenance of public facilities including
�a
roads?
h
•'
f other governmental services?
x
15. ENERGY. Will the proposal resultin:
a. Use of substantial amounts df fuel or ,energy?
_ }
�~
b. Substantial increase in demand upon exi:.•tins,
sources of enetgy, or reauiri the de+ elophent
of new sources of energy?
X
16. UTILITIES. 1411 the proposal result, in a need
S
:.or new systems, or substantia' aitera,y:ons to
the following utilities?
a, Power or natural gas?
x
C,
j. Commun catior*s systems?
x
C
�
c. Watw-,?
k
Ii Sewer or septic tanks?
X
C
ce Storm water drainage?
X
i. Solid waste and "disposal?
�
5
EFFECT? SIONIFICANT?
Yes Mavbe No Yes Mavbe No
17
'HUMAN HEALTH. Will the ,proposal result in,
a. Creation of Any health, hazards or potential
health hazards (excluding menyval health) s
X C
b. Exposure of people to potential health
hazards?
18.
AESTHETICS. Will the proposal result in the
obstruction of any scenic: vista or view open to
the public., or will the proposal result in the
creation of an aesthetically offensive site
open to the public view?
1.9.
RECREATION. Will the propossl result in an
impact Upon the quality or quantity of existing
recreational opportunities?`
b C
20.
CULTURAL RESOURCES.
a. Will the proposal result in the alterati,3n
or' :,r the destruction of a p'rehistoric or
h,�storic archaeological site?
� X
b. Will the proposal result in adverse ph'ytical
or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or
historic building, structure, or object?
t. Does the proposal have the 'potential to
cause a physical change -:hich would ai ect
Unique ethnic cultural valuea?
d Will the proposal restrict eXisting rdlig+-
nous or sacred uoes withf3 the potential
214
MANDATORY' FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE.
a. Does the project have the potential, to
degrade the gQdlity of the environment,, sub-
stantially reduce the habitat of a fish or
wildlife species, cause 4 fish or wildlife
Population to drop below self-sustaining
levels_, threaten to eliminate A plant or
animal community, reduce the number, or
restrict the range of a rare or endangered
Plant, oY animals or eliminate important
6
1
EFFECT? SIGNIFICANT?
Yes Maybe No Yes Maybe No
2xar.,ples of the major periods of California
history or prehistory? K C
b.
'Does the proiect have the potential to
achieve short-term, to the disadvantage tr
long term, environmental goals? (A short-
term impact on the environment is one which
occurs in a relatively brief, definitive
period of time while long-term impact's will
Si
endure. well into the future.) � X --
c..
Does the project have impacts which are indi-
vidually limited, but cumulatively consider-
able? (A 'project may impact on two or more
separate reso-rtes where the impact on each
resource is relatively small., but where the
effect of the total of those impacts on the
environment is significant.)
de
Does the project have environmental effects
which will cause substantial adverse effects
on human beings] eithr.r airectly or
indirectly?
IIT.
DETERMINATION
On the
basis of this initial evaluation;
I find
that the proposed project COULD NOT have a sign'i'ficant effect on the
ahvironmen,t;
and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be peepared
I iinti
that, although the 'proposer' project could have a significant effect
on the
environmeht, there will not be a significant effect in this case
because
the mitigation measures described on the attached sheet(s) have been
added
to the project: A NgGATIV_R DECLARATION will be prepared: x
1 find
the proposed project may have a signiiicarrt effect on the environment,
and an
ENViRONMENTAI, IMPACT REPORT is required.
Late Signature
•
1b. 'EARTH. The proposed project will create 27.6 acres of
impervious surfacing. Since on site soils are heavy clay loams
with an underlying hardpan, no significant effects upon grouilr
water recharge are effected.
2a. AIR. 200 units plus guest members at the golf course will
add 23.9 pounds of organic gases, 174.6 pounds of carbon monoxide
and 7.5.1 pounds of oxides of nitrogen per day, based on Urbemis 2
model calculations. Because of the distance from Chico, most of
the reactive organic gases and the oxi-des of nitrogen will be
produced outside of .the urban area.
3bd. WATER. , The project will cover approximately 27.6 acnes
with impervious surfaces. Since the soils aref clay loams, no
significant effect is expected for the amount of surface water
reaching underlying aquifers.
The alternative to 27.6 acres of impervious surfacing, plus
the golf course which will be designed to rapidly drain surface
waters to Sycamore creek will double the rate and volume of
runoff from this property in a 1.0`- year store event (See Figure
1)
The developer proposes to use the golf course ponds as
retention/detention, basins for stotm water runoff.
Recrured`M.t ictation
1. storm water runoff ,from impervious surfaces shall be
directed over landscape areas and into the ponds whenever
possible.
2. The engineers shall provide the County with a monthly water
balance analyses to establish the capacity of ponds to hold
runoff on excess of that currently flow ngr from the site in
a 10 -yeas storm.event.
4btdi ;PLANT LIFE. Botanical 'surveys concluded during the late
summer did not reveal the presence ofarty rare or endangered
species. Although the intensive cultivation carried on for many
years prob8tbly eliminated any rare and endangered species, a late
M
spring survey of the vernal pool area should be carried out in
the laic spring.
The land has been used for small grain production, but has
been fallow because of depressed agricultural prices; The dense
soils and encroachment of residential uses limits tho future
agricultural potential of the site.
TABLE 1
STORMWATER, RUNOFF CALCULATIONS
PROJECT:.
FAIRWAY ESTATES
LOCATION:
BUTTE COUNTY
SIZE(ACRES):
221
TYPE:
RESIDENTIALIRECREATION
LAND TYPE
FALLOW AG LAND
LEVEL
le
CC'EFFICIENT
TIME OF
OF RUNOFF:
0.12
CONCENTRATION:
183 MINUTES
RETENTION/
0.45
DETENTION
ST9ulh EVENT:
10 YEAR
100 YEAR
1.60/6 HRv
2.52%6 PIRS
INCFESL1'R:
0.30 0.42
2.52
P --AK RUNOFF
S*.od +1"s
I' Ic Ct
RL"; aFr 'VOLUME
i8 :0 A
50 r
PROJECT CHA11 ES
0-UILCCU7
A-
RUNO=F
RET/
PEW RUNOFF
AND
VOLUMES
ACREE C0E,F
Ot'
10
Yc�R
100
YEAR:
f r
�4'�GiZY�IUUS-
L i•
SURFACES
27.60 E.05
0.10
r C.
;.?3
10.r�'
5.22
GOLF COURSE
's
LANDSCAPING
89.00 0.25
0.50
6.68
6.66
9.35
9.;s5
OPEN SPACE
104,.40 0.12
0150
3./6
7.83
5,26
10.96
TOTALS
221.00
18.31
18.24
25,04
25.53
----- --- ___
.. -__ - ----- ----
----- ---
-- -
- - - --- -----
--
- ---- - -
T b I e,%
project Name fairway estates Date 10-18-1989
Analysis Year 1995 Temperature = 75
EMFAC7 VERSION EMFAC7C ,,, 1/4/87
Unit Type Trip Rate Size Tot Trips Days Op,
+ 10.0/Unit 200 2000
Residen'ial Commercial
Home -Work Home -Shop
Home -Other WoYh Nan -Work
Trip Length 10.9 8.0 9.3 10.6 9.0
% Started Cold 86.2 40.1. 58.4 77,2 2710
Trip Speed 55 55 J5 35 35
Percent Trip 27.3 'x112 51:5
Vehicle Fleetmix
Vehicle 1"ype Percent: Type Leaded Unleaded Diesel
,D -jt " : utos 1218 11.E 95.9 2 i 6
LXCiii'"• 1'-".i. Rs"Llc}'$ 14.3 22.4 91-.6 2.8
Light�� _�
5.9
Medium Duty Tricks 4.3 33, 3 6n 17 /
Heavy Du;y Trucks 3.9
,ieaVy Duty Trucks 319 N/A N/A 10010
MaLotcycies 21° 100,0 N/P IQ/A
Project Emissions Report in Lb/Da.y
Unit Tape TOG. CC174.6 N075,1
r
i
•
i
0
M
•
i
•
0
Required Mitigations:
3- A survey for vernal Pool during the period these punts are flower shall be carried out
May.. March. through
4 • The vernal pool and a buffer of 50
feet
be left on part of the undert-ah-le rough, from its edges shall
6a. NOISE. Occupation of the site by �.r�
recreational activities will increasresidential and
site. ambient noise levels on the
9a•'NAT`M�A RESOURCES. Full development of the site will. cons
wood and other building materials during construction
Will increase use of natural resources used to consume
space heating and cooling,phases and
lighting and landscape maintenanener-,for
11a. POPULATIONo The development of 200 dwelling un'
significantly increase the density g its will
Hicks Lane. The population increase of residential uses along
500 and 650 individuals, --ase at buildout will be between
13a, d, f . 2'R"SPORTATION/CIRC
�long� Hicks Lane, approximately halfway
The project has a frontage
south and. Keefer Road to the north.
y halfway between Eaton :Road to the
roadways will provide access to Three security -gated
entrance will Serve as the Hicks Lane. The southern
The northern ent prunarY access point for residents.`
wwll serve the clubhouselanderecrefor atie`onal fA ei
A central entrance
interior roads will be built to county standardstand•wi11,.11
maintained by the homeowners association.
The
the Eaton Road Primary
s traffic on Hick's Lane is to
Traffic P and Highwa 95, and from
(ADT) volumes measured in A The Overage Daily
weekday for a point gust X989 were 270 per
point just South of Reefer 'Road and 2790 for a
just north of Eaton Road.
traffic volumes is the subdivision just south e thy+
A major source oi. current
site. As vehicles _reach Eaton Road - project
99 onrainps for ,southbound trips to Chico,
use offramps at. Eaton Road rips
s t t the majority use the Highway
Evening traffic flours
and Hicks T.ane. Traffic in the vicin.t
in the grown n Eaton Road
north of
10 yearn. The differencedtY-hasmgro osignificantl
f Eaton Road to north of in tj.affic volumes from Y
AbT in 1978 to 4900 ADT in 1989 °.ast Au'?n1 r� increased from 1100
Ricks Vane is a two-lane rural'. road in relative
conditlan. Each travel lane is a:
relatively
goad
front of the project and for Most Pofottealeng7 to th of t feet wide in
he road.
A
Potential impacts:
The proposed project will add, an additional 2000 weekday
trip ends to Hicks Lane and the Eaton Road freeway ramps. Peak
P.M. traffic would be 2.00'vehicles. Of these, 120 would be
moving from the freeway to Eaton. Road and Hicks Lane, while 80
vehicles would be traveling in a southbound direction.
The traffic data were re -analyzed by Dr. Thomas Ferrara
(Traffic Engineer #413) to include a golf course open to a wider
membership than the homeowners and az equivalent number of
guests. According to the Institute for Transportation Engineers
Manual; an average gold course will generate approximately 800
trip ends per average weekday. Since the homeowners would still_
be members and use the course, Dr: Ferrara deducted 800 trip ends
as internal traffic movements. The PM peak hour movement �.oald
increase from 200 trips to 240 trip ends with an open golf
course.
Discussion with Dr. Ferrara reinforced the assumption that
tbF ma j ar 4.ty of trips would be to ; h- t-oLut!- , -.:1-ou b .-he Eaton
Roau interchangF.�211e nunwer or trips Lo Xeefar Road, north o
the the ReefertRc>aduadtlat�avel
every mall and might represent residents of
ng to and from the golf course.
_Reaued Mit Haat .ons
5. Hicks Lane shall be improved t, '3uiF-te County Standard RS -•3A
from the northern boundary of tlz�� project to the Sycamore
Creek Bridge.
6. Left -turn pockets shall be provided on Hicks Vane for
northbound •traffi.c at each access point of the subdivision,.
7. Entrance transmittertes dev ceacceptableotot e an County
Fire De
shall 15-o
the County Fire Department..
8. The developers shall pay their proportionate share of the
traffic signal for the intersection of ,dicks Lane and Eton
Avenue
9.
developers
the pay
traffic
of Cfico9ation foes equivalent
tothosecharged
14. VUBLIC SERVICES
14a. Fire Protection. The project site is served by the Butte
County Fire Department through a contract with the California
Department of Forestry. ThF.nearest fire stations, #41 and 042,
have a 4-5 minute x(tsponse time, which is considered long for an
urban -type setting.