Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout90-12 REZONE PLANNING 2 OF 3ji �L 1 l County of Butte, State of Calmon the 26th da.; � y of February i' j 1991, by the following votes. 3 AYES: Supervisors McInturf, Campbell,'McLaughlin, Fulton and _Chair Dolan 4 NOES: None 5 ABSENT: None b NOT VOTING No 7 8 .-- JANE DOLAN;'Chai r AButte V' County Board of Supervisors g In AT=T4 WILLIAM H RANDOLPH, Chie Administrative Officer and Clerk of the'Board` BV 14 15 16 17 - 18 19 20' 21 22 23 24 25 _ 26 , BUTTE COUNTY BOARD Or SUPERVISORS Application for !rezone for BRUCEOLIVER AP'W 56-04-27, Forest Ranch Reasons why to approve rezone to TM -5 instead of TM -10, 1 So we can divide into 3 parcels;. - Topography, watery and septic would support it. 2 developed 'house sites with septic and water to both, approved by the county, already existing, County Planning representative identified other area away, from these sites as most suitableforan additional home site includingsept:ic:_ -`Little Chico CreeR would run through all 3 parcels planned,'which could adequately supply ]folding tanit for fire safety year round. II; When we purchased the property it was zoned A2-5 splitable to 5 acre parcels. It has since been classified "U,'. lie, gust dent to regain the land usa e, to same d�Kreo " b_ g that we had originally, III. Our ptircel is not as removed from 'the-- major population. center of Chico as it may be considered: It takes us 16-15 ininuteLsto drive to the Chico stall or Downtown, I1aedIy "Romote" as it was referred to at the planning commiss3.azi meeting: IV, There are ether 5-9 'acre parcels in the immediate vicinit�� (one 5+ acre parcel that boarders nay property' on one side) There is al�sa � large eluste:i•ed housing project very close; to our property, that is nes closet` to the chino population center than we are, 4�. I have: ngreod to all Piro Protection, road requiretnents erosion control oto, . , that the, Public and . Planning Departments dee- concerned with,, in ordue to proceed with parcel division.. VI. please decide on the merits of this particular property instead of "setting precedents" for converting Ui)tlassified Zoning. CHIFS ADMINIS TRA:TIVEOFFIC COUNTY OF t3UTTE QUTi'Fo 25 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE o OROVILLE. CALIFORNIA 959G5.3380 ToIephonp (916) 538-7,631 ar o , F,a.( (DI11) 538-7120 MEMSENS OF THE 130ARD: oc0U�S� HA$KEL A. NICINTURF WILLIAM H RANDOLPrI JANE DOLAN CHIEF ADMINISTNAtIV4 OFFIC N KEVIN CAMPBELL ED MCLAUGHLIN LEN 'FULTON March 6, 1991 CORRECTED LETTER Mr. Bruce Oliver P.O. Box 361 Chico, -CA 95927 RE: Rezone, File 90-12 Dear Mn Oliver: Atthe regular meeting of the Butte county '.Board of Supervisors held February , ordinance no. 2913 was adopted Which rezones from "U" i to TM -40 that property located on both sides of Blackberry Road, approximately 800 feet North of Crown Point Road and approximately 1/2 mile East of Crown Point Road and State Highway, 32 intersection, identified as AP #056-040-0�7, Northeast of Chico. Resolution No, g1= 25 Was adopted approving A Conditional Zoning Agreement. - r Recently enacted le islation g (AB' 3158, Chapter 1706, Statutes of 1990, effective January S; 199 0 requires that the Department of Fish and Game imp, and collect filing fees as specified to defray the cost o� managing and protecting fish and wildlife trust, resources, These filing fees are collected during the environmental review process and are to be paid at the. time the County files a "Notice of Determination" with the County lerk of the county in which the project is located. This procedure is required pursuant to section 21152 of the Public Resources Code, To ol[ectionreof e Piling i fees rative efficiency, the statute delo,g'Iated the g to the County Clerk and provided' the County authority to collect a $25.00 documentary handling fee. `r ie fee' for a k Negative Declaration is twelve hundred (iffy dollars (;�1j250.00). Checks submitted to the Countyb " March 4 1991. f $1,250.0(1 4hei $25,00 should be made payable to the County to the amount o Y io Project a applicants PP should be any Section 21089(1�) of the Public o erative vested or final u. J nder the CEQA is not P ; de provides that an ro'ect app oved u fees re uired 'wide Resources o t until the filttt� _ q r Section 711.4 of 'the Fish and Gamc code are paid. CHIOADMINISTRATIVEWFT C COT TNTY OF BUTTE gUTtF 25 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3380 Telephone: (916) 538.7631 MEMBERS OF THE BOARD: Fax: (06) 538-7120 HASKEL A. McINTURF C0 lui M1 ' JANE DOLAN WILLIAM H RANDOLPH KAREN VERCRUSE ED McLAUGHLIN tmji , AtfAIN,9TRAT:wE OFFicER LEN FULTON December 18, 1990 Bojee Oliver .;0 Box 361 Chico, CA 95927 Ret. Rezone, File 90-12 Dear Mr. Oliver: At the !regular meeting of the Butte County Board Of Supervisors herd December 18, 19)0, the public hearing was Icontinued to February 26, 1991 at 9:45 a.m. , to consider your request for a rezone from "U" to 'TINE -5 for property Iocated on both sides of Blacl<herry. Road, ldpntified as AP 056- 040-027, 'northeast of Chico * The meeting will'be held in the Board of Supervisors' Room, County Administration Center; 25 County Centee Drive; Oroville. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact the Planning Department at 53$-7601 between 10:00 a.m, and 3:00 pan. Very truly yours, William A Randolph Chief Administrative Officer a WMLI-Ir couni '-�- LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY j PLANNINGDEPARTMENT « 7 rC 11yTY CENTER DRIVE- OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-33a7 y TELEPHONE: (916) 638-7601 August 101 1990 9 Bruce Oliver .. P.O. Box 361 Chico, CA 95927 Re: Rezone, File 90-12 bear MT, Oliver: At the regular meeting of the Butte County Planning CommissiO n held August 9, 1990, your request for rezoning from "U" to TM -5 for property located on both sides of Blackberry Road, identified as AP 056-040-027 oheast of 'TM Chico, was :recommended for -10 zoning subject to the following conditions: 1. Limit new driveway. grades to 10.°0. 2, Install culverts where roads and driveways cross natural' drainage channel. �A 3. Install rock riprap and man-made roadside dr aiviage to mtzimixe Water velocity aril trap sediment: This shall include existing draifiage channels 41 Designate a 100 foot rno=development froth .iw top of the. bank of Little Chico g , ot« sail disruptiol> «'ill be allowed. in this Creek Na structures" Vegetation re moval zone: 5. Automatic fire suppression sprinkler systems shall be installed in all new residential structures in accordance with the rational Fire Protection Assrsciation Standards as outlined by Article 13d to aid in the detection and control of residential fifes ono` thus provide improved protection against anjury, life lots, property damage, and reduce the demand for County fire protection Services= 6. Applicant must also COmPlY with all other aPPlivable State and locW statutes ordinances- ar 4 regulations. « A report of this matter will be made to the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors. Pursuant to the provisions of Butte County Code Section 14-281, an estimated publish'rig fee of the p the Board prior to the Board 'setting rezone ordinance shall be de osited with, the Clerk of ., • �I ' fr 1, U v r i r h � l,r 24 Icl_ . 00, 2448 r` FILE No. BtJT'TE COUNTY _ PLANNING. COMMISSION HEARING .'DATESzl A PPLICANT +�. •,. O�1lIER• E ExiST1iG O(�E3 SCALES AUBRDIX :C COY.. NI Y 0V :BUX L ENV 2RONMEN.'�A`C. CHEC��'.L,�S2' FORM (To be completed by Lead Agency) LOG NO. 89-12-20-0;L AH NO. 056-•04-0-027' FILE: 9.0 -12 I. BACX0,n tTNb 1.. Nameof proponent Bruce Oliver 2. Address of proponent and representative (if applicable); P.O Box 361 Chico,.,CA. 95927, 3. Project description: Rezone It. MAISMATORY FSNDTwN 'S OF' S C:GND F CANCE Y$5 MAYBE No 1. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment,, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish .or wildlife species, cause a.fis4 or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate i ap cant or animal,, community, reduce the number or restrict the range of it, rare. or endangered plant. or animal or eliminate important, examples of of California history or prehistory?P ma periods major V 2 Does the project,iave the potential to achieve short-term benefits to the detriment of long-term environmental goals!' (A short-term impact on the l acts ;will endure into the future.) p ' environments one which occurs in a relatively brief period of time while- long-term 3. Does the project have, impacts which are individually limited but cumulatively considerable? (Ar project may impact on two or more separate resource's where impact each resource senvironment isasigtnificantut r, the effect of bid otalfthose impacts ' 4 Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? 111. DF'TER:M LT A__'T:KON (To be completed by the Lead Agency). On the basis of this initial, evaluation; 1,/WE find :the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment and a NEGATIVE bEGLARATION will be prepared. I/WE kind that although the proposed project COULD have a significant effect on the environment;) there will not La a significant effect in this case because the MITIGATION MIA§MS described on the attached 'sheet have been added to the project, A OGATIVE DECI'.ARATION will be prepared, 1/WEMA the proposed project MY have a significant effect on the environment, rt ti and an IMPACT WORT is required. CO'UN'TY OF BUTTE, PLANNING DEPARTMENT ATE: 24 r. 1990y -. ' Cr ig sanders ssi'. anis Pianller Raviewed by: aula Leasure Senibt PIahrie> 77, ' iv. E.g.7V dNMEN'XAT-. L' "MAYBEt' answers are. required °n attached sheet(s). and d (Explanations of all YES MaYTtE NO y gARTR, Will the proposal result in significant;- / V a Unstable earth conditions, or changes in geologic substructures! _AL P p Or overcovering of the soi17 --- 1y. Disruption) . displacement, compaction, Y Change in topography °�ground surface refeatures? c. unique 'geologic or physical d. Desrction, covering rmodxfx:at3on'of any features7 increase in wind Or water erosion of soils, either on or off site? .---- , e, erosion or which sionof bemodifyathech s hannu�rof�r veres nnr�streamn� f. Changes in ✓ dr deposition ba inlet or lake. or the bed of the. ocean. or any y, Ve soils Lost of prime agriculturally p is outside designated urban roductf g. areas3 hazards��. h, Exposure of peopleproperty toge(Jlogrxsimilarhazards7s earthquakes landslides, mudslides) ground u� AIR. Will the propusal teslAt in substantial: Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? _ J a, b, The creation of objectionable odors, smoke or fumes? Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature) or any change it c. climate,. locally or regionally, 3, rATER, Will the proposal result in substantial: of water movements in a, Changes in currents, or the course or direction waters? either ngeeS�iabsorption fates, drainage p r - t atterns ox' the rate and amount b. Chang ,� of surface runoff? drainage im rovements, including vegetation p c. Need for off-site surface g removal chanriel•izat3.on orCulvertinstallation?s7 d. A1tex.... `,�= to the course Or of flood watetvert e. ci>rar+.e in then .s " of surfer a water in any water body Discharge into surface trnterll, ,tt t, any alteration of surface wase, f. 1'imitt•:, a.o temperature, dissolved oxygen or but not quality,,' including --- turbidity? Alteration of the direction of rate of flow .ri ground tnaters7 g� r through in the qutity or quality of ground waters, ibia an aquifer h, Change an intercepttion n direct additions or withdrawals or through by cuts or excavations? for public water i. Reduction in the amount of dater otherwise available sup plies? 7 hazards such as flooding rt td water-relatt?d y �• 'Exposure of people or property �1>'; Will the proposal result in substantial: 4 s pLANT tS any species of plats s ec Change in the diversity of speciesy of number of and aquatic plants ? a` hkubs> grass, dropsy (includa.ng trees, s endangered species of b, �teduction of the numbers of any unlquer rare or - �.---- plants'? of new spe dies of plants into an"area, o in a barrier to d.. Introduction the normal repldhighi ent of existing species! d. Reduction in acre$ge of arty agricultural crisp? Y .:, " . YCS MAYBF. 1v0 5, p AL LIFE. Will the proposal rasttil; to ubstatr;ti�+lt sec n the diversity of specimals a.: Change iies, or 1jumbers of any p• ies of an including reptiles) fish and shellfish, organisms (birds, land an or insects)? or endangered species of b. Reduction ' the. numbers of any unique, rare animals? Introduction of new Speoies of animal.,; 1111 J an arE J, Or In barrier q C. the migration or movement: of animals? d, Deterioration of existing fish or wildlife liabitat? 6, NOISEWill the proposal result in substan4ial ; a. Increases in existing noise levels? b. Fxp P noise leti�els? Of people to severe ND GLARE. Wi l the, proposal prOducs sigIllficant l.ivttt and glare? LIGHT AND 7, I:l+ND VSE. Will the proposal result in a substantial alteration of the B. present ,or planned land use of an area? NATURAL RESOURCES. Will the proposal result 3n substantial: q, in the rate of use of any natural 'resources? a. Increase b. Depletion of any non-renewable natural resources? W 10, RISK OF UPSET- Will tl:a proposal involve: bstz urad ithe event ation) Inces a. A risk of explosion oresticideslease �fchein%als ordOus limited top , P n not sOt accident or of an ac P emergency �, emergencyr Possible interferencey espouse plan or Nith an 1 b. evacuation plan:? alter location) distributions density or / 11: POPULATION, Will the proposal growth.rate of the h Population? delcand f g or create a saI affect existing housin , r 12. HOUSING. Will the prop for ad?�iti.onal housing? TRANSPORT�(N/CSR�- C-- U'TIH• Will the ptopos;Al result in: 13+ Generation of substantial additio"a' vehicle movement.? fy a. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for neW parking? b, p systems? c. Substantial i�up act on existing transportation d. Sxgnifictnt alterations to present._p circulation or and/or goods? ,.. movement of people Alterations to waterborne) 'rail or air traffiCbic e, Increase in yraffie hat4kds to motor vehicles, y clists or pedestrians? f. PUBLIC SERVICES. Will the proposal have an effect aping or result in a need' 14 ,for new or altered government services: a4 fire protection? t%, -- b. Polite protectioh? -�. c. ,Schools d Parks or other recreational facilities? V Maintenance of public facilities including roads e. f. other governmental ae -3- 15. ENERGY. Will the proposal result.in; a Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? YES MAYBE Ngo` b:, SubstantMl increase in demand upon existing sources n£ energy, or require the development of new sources, of energy? 16. UTILITIES; Will thr,4 proposal result in a need for new systems, or substantial alterations to the following: �� a. Power or natural gas?. b. Communications systems?' / c. Water availability? d Swwer or septic systems? e, Storm water drainage? ` f. Solid waste and disposals �+ HtM 'HEALTH. Will the proposal result in: a. Creation of any health hazard or potential hazard (excluding mental health)? b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards 1.8,,. —. AESTHETICS•, . Will the proposal result in the, obstruction of any, scenic vista or view open to the public, or Will the proposal result in the creation of an ae$thetically offensive site open to public v i dw? lew? 19. RECREATION, Will the proposal, result in an impact upon the ty or quantity of existing recreational Oppo,rtunities`? 20� CULTURAL RESOURCES: a, Will the proposal result in the altoratioll or destruction of a reliistoric or historic archaeological p tg, si b. Will the proposal result in adverseppoysic al or object7££ects to a prehistoric or historic building, structureIor c. Does the proposal have the potential to eaus Which would Affect ea physical change unique ethnic cultural values? d. Will the proposal restrict existing religious or sacred -uses Within.- the po Potential impact Area? -` bY5CT7.�i:�YOIV OF' IV�'NIIrI��'AL �:VALi]'A��OlSf See attached,, -� to project is a request to rezone 18.87 acres from(Unclassifiedrezone will open the way fora Parcel This pr J A roval of the (Foothill Recreation 5 acre minimum)• pp in 1980 for a rezone on a nearby application to create 3 parcels. An EIR wasprepared Map app Some of the information in the EIR is applicable Parcel (Parr -Terrill rezone, 063-01-10I; 102). to this project: D ISCUS IOI I OF'ENVIf ONWNTAL EVALUATION AP # 056-04-0-027 b. This project cosi uld result in the creation of twoaaddolt of soal ilsrelatedto constructing Ib,c,e,3 p be some disruption, displacement, overcovering and comp and homesite preparation. The amount of slooil des.upOvercoverang result g from two driveways signifivr.ant if homesites are located in areas o steeper ecau ff a dditional homes is not expected to be significa ctould significantly additional y inc�easeeeros on on site. sThe overcovering; compaction and vegetation remove gecause of the as having a high erosion potential and a moderate f thesparcel {revealed evidence of site is ratedg precipitation rate. A site ipspec steep terrain and ii h p p erosion and siltation resulting from the'construction of the cutsand andfills,driveway Mitigation measures to reduce eroston are necessary istallation, etc. reve etation program limitingdrivewayslo es, culvert traverses th g P affect Little Chico Creek which tr a property. soil l as Increased erosion on site may free appears to be beavers. er will increase the sediment load in the creek. The creek has been washed off the property . dammed approximately 300' downstream from of the sediment and may eventually fill in the stream The resulting impoundment will trap most el. Some pesticides and oils associated with residential uses will also be 'washed into the charm._ creek. County is within a Moderate Earthquake Intensity Zone VIII• The subject 1h. All of the Butte C tY property is located approximately 6 miles northeast of the Tuscan Monocline, a fault system of, •vi . Construction of homes to uniform building eof seismic$ act vitt' smieally unknown acts ty . caI active areae should provide adequate protection to residents in `es in the canyolls May todu n e the bottom are uncertain, and additional Terrill EIR for Cmore 311,10c. Water supple S the Par amount of water available to the existing wells in#th�$ area,' 8 detailed information, (AP #63-01-101, 102 -Log ` Cation along Tattle Chico Creek must be preserved., A 100' no development 4a. All riparian vegetation p op of the bank of the creek, ovide ideal habitat for a number of rare or zone should be adopted from the 4b The terrain and elevation of this parcel pr , _ parcel. A complete ltlnt species, Butte fritillaria has been identified on a nearby p o dations that may exist on site. ; endangeredp gy n to protect botanical survey is recomrnnaed to rate ntit ation measures will have to be taken If any populations are found, pp 1? and preserve the plants: 7 t,- � _ 4, _ I6 5d. The subject property is located within the Critical 1i iti",,Or Deer Range of the East Tehama Deer Herd. The Department of Fish and Game has recotry€bended 40 -acre minimum parcels in order to preserve viable habitat. The existing dwellings located in the bottom, of the caity0h, and; similar development to the north, have already impacted the. area to a certaindegree. 7Th;198:/ the Department of Fish and Game adopted Designated Development Zones within Critical. Winter Deer Ranges. This parcel is within a Development Zone. Land divisions below 40 acres are consistent with Department of Fish and Game policies subject to the collection of deer herd I, mitigation fees. Butte County has not yet adopted these-; mitigation fees however, development I of these lots will be subject to the collection of fee if a fee schedule is adopted prior to building permit applications. 8,11. Approval of this project could lead other property owners in the area to request similar projects, thus further impacting this remote canyon land. The Butte County General Plan designates the entire' area as agricultural residential. The Agricultural Residential General Plan policies require that certain conditional; criteria be presetnt before zoning less than 20 acres can be consideret:. '.Me criteria are: 1 Compatible with neighboring agricultural actu,rities. 2. Evidence of adequate water and sewage Idispcnrial capacity. 1 Availability ofa yquate fire protection facilities. 4.. Adequately ma d approved road, acce.�s w'th sufficipnt capacity to service area: 5; Reasonable accessi.naity to commercial servicos and schools. The proposed rezone clearly does not meet criteria 3 thro-,.w h 5 and is questionable with regards to criteria 2. Should this rezone be approved it will set precedent for the area, inducing growth and encouraging a higher population concentration away Y,rom existing urban areas. 13a,c,f,14e. The potential will exist for the construction of two additional dwellings which will generate between 12 and 16 vehicle trip. per day. This is, not, by itself, significant. However, the Crown Point Road is in such poor condition that an, additional traffic will impact the road. The condition of the road poses a safety hazard particulad v during winter when muddy and icy conditions exist. No additional land divisions orsmaller zoning should be allowed until the road is improved. 14a. The project is located within a high firel hazard area.` As more people move to the canyon. the chance of man made fire increases and the potential for property loss and human injury, from natural fires increases. Butte County's ability to provide adequate fire service is in question due" to the County's; financial situation, Even given that Count}, funded fire service will continue the project is located 4 1%2 miles away from the Forest Rana, .Fire Station and the condition of Crown Point Rd. will hamper fire response times, On site -ovater storage should be required for all future residential development in the canyon.: 14b, The Butte Coun p Sheriff Department is at minimum staff. Routine patrols should be p ty p �r�ill be limited to emergency or life expected in the rural areas of _the co��n and responses b threatening situations: 4 r 14c. The project is located within the Chico Unified. School District. Students living in the Canyon will have to be driven to 'school or take a bus if available: 14f. This project, when built out, will represent an 'incremental increase in demand for government services. 16d. The location of additionalseptic systems may be1i mited by slopes over 30010 on site. In addition, some areas may hive shallow soils; ldf. Trash pickup is not available in the canyon.heir, ownldual dum Broperty on theiaprc,►pe � or a neighwner must haul boring own. trash. This sometimes leads to people making t p boring parcel. 18. The future addition of two more homes to the property will affect theof the scenic value canyon which is visible from Hwy. 32: 20a. The project is located in an area of high archaeological, sensitivity. An archaeological records check will be required to determine if a survey is needed. The applicant should contact. the Northeast Information 'Center at Chico State to make arrangements for a records check. If a survey is performed and cultural resources folind mitigation ation measures will be necessary yo protect them. Mandatory Findings of Significance 1. Thep j y impact both' rare botanical resources and archaeological; resources. Surveys project may i must first be performed to, see if these, resources exist on site. tential to set a precedent for S acre apa cels ntheea. Taus will add 3. This project has the po botanical and to cumulative impacts on erosion, road capacity and main protection, archaeolo tca , g _ 1 1 resources -: and government services. Suggested Mitigation Measures t 1 A botanical survey MuStL be performed to determine if mitigations are necessary to protect rare or endangered plants: 2. The a licant must act the Northeast Information Center to determine if an archaeological surve�, essary. ' con p is c ne �3. Limit driveway grades to 10%. 4, install culverts where roads and driveways cross natural drainage channels. 55. Install rock tip rap in man made road isde drainages to minimize water velocity and trap , sediment. Applicant: Bruee Oliver Assessor's Parcel #056-04-0-027 Log #89-12-20-01 DATA SHEET A. Project Description 1. Type of Project- Rezone 2. Brief Description: Rezone 18.87 acres from U to FR -5. 3 Location: On both sides of Blackberry Rd. approx. 800' north of Crown Point Rd. approx. 1,5 miles east. of Hwy. 32 10 miles north of Chico. 4. Proposed Density of Development: 1 d.0/6ac 5. Amount of Impervious Surfacing:, Minimal 6. Access acid Nearest Public Rbaid(s): Access to Hwy. 32 is made via Crown Foint Rd which is maintained by the County for a portion of its length. 7. Method of Sewage Disposal: Individual septic systems. 8. Source of Water Supply: Individual well. 9. Proximity of Power Lines: To property: I0. Potentialfoir further land 'divisions and development: Potential will exist for the creation of 3 parcels if rezone is approved. B. Environmental 'Setting Physical Environment: 1. Terrain Ai General Topographic Character: Rugged canyon land and canyon bottom,` b. Slopes: Mostly 30 to 5001c slopes and ;greater. Some areas of more gentle' slopes exist along the; canyon bottom that may be suitable for homesites. C., Elevation: 1200 - 1480 feet A.S:I. d,, Limiting Factors: Steep slopes on much of the property. 2. Soils a. Types and Characteristics; Steeper areas: Cobleigh, Los Gattis, Supan, Supan (IAnd Flow) soils; goneraliy moderately slow to slow permeability and well drained: Canyon bottom: Gaviota and collayial lands (mixed rock and soils); generally moderately rapid to rapid permeability; well drained. b. Limiting Factors: Slow permeability on steeper slopes, 3. Na' Lural Hazards of, the Land a, Earthquake Zone: Moderate Earthquake Intensity Zone VIII. h. Erosion Potential: Generally moderate to high: c ,Landslide Potential: Moderate. d. Fire klazard: High, e. E&pansive Soil Potential: Low. e. 4.' Hydrology. Surface Water: Little Chico Creek traverses the property from north to stw. a. a. b. Ground Water: Potentially limited. C. Drainage Characteristics: Land drains to Little Chico Creek. d. Annual Rainfall (normal): '55-60" e, Limiting Factors: Potentially limited water supply, some flooding potential: 5. Visual%Scenic Quality: High. 6. Acoustic Quality: High: 7. Air ,Quality: 'High. Biological Environment: 8, Vegetation: California Black Oak, Blue Oak, Canyon live Oak, Big;'leaf Maple; Douglas Fir, Digger Pine, Ponderosa. Pine, and grasses. Riparian vegetation along Little Chico Creek 9. Wildlife Habitat: Critical Winter Deer Range. Cultural-Envkonmentt 10. Archaeological and Historical Resources in the area: High sensitivity area. design don: Agricultural - Residential 11 Bntt.. County (ens 12. 13, Existing Zoning: unclassified Existing 'Land Use on-site: One single-family dwelling. 14 Surrounding Area: Land Uses: Open land and single-family dwellings at, rural densities. a, b. Zoning: 7:vf-20, TM -40, Unclassified Plan Designation: ,tl-Residential and Grazing and Open Land. ce Ag d,' Parcel to 40-e paresls 15. e. Population: Sparse. Character of, Site and Area: Sparsely inhabited canyon land. 16, Nearest Urban Area: Chico, 10 to 12 miles away. 17. ` Rol vane Spheres of Influence: None. - - 18.. Improvements Standards Urban Area: No. 19. Fire Pru:ection Service: , y ) 4W Nearest Count (State) Fire Station: Station #24 in Forest Ranch, Station a. in Chico. b. Water Availability: Fire tanker and Little Chico Creek.' 10. Schools in Area: Chico UnifiedSchool District. ENVIRONMENTAL REFERENCE MATERIAL 1. Map I14, Earthquake and Fault Activity: Seismic Safety Element, Butte County General Plan revised 1-77, by CII M Hi 11. 2: Map II -2, Liquefaction Potential, Safety ement Butte County General Plan Seismic Safe El revised 1-77, b . CIS Hill. 3. Map III -I, Subsidence & Landslide Potential: Safety Element, Butte County General Plan � revised 1-77 by CHX Hill. 4. Map 'III -2, Erosion Potentiali Safety Element, Butte County General Plan revised 1-77, by CHx Hill. 5, Map 111-3, Expansive Soils: Safety Element, Butte CountyGeneral Plan revised 1-77, by CHX Hill, ,!V-4 Noise- Noise Element, Butte County General Plan revised 1-77, by CHzM.,Hill. 7. Ma V - Scenic Highways: Scenic Highway Element Butte County General Plan revised I- 77, by � CH .r1_.. "ill. 8. Map 1114, Natural Fire Hazard Classes: Safety Element, Butte County General Plan revised 1-77; by CH2M Hill. 9, Archaeological Sensitivity Map by James P. Manning, for Butte Count,;; Planning Department; 1983• 10. School District Map, Butte County Planning Department. 1L Chico Nitrate Study Map, Nitrate Concentration in Shallow Wells, 1983, 6y Department of Water Resources, Northwestern District, The Resources Agency, State of California. 12. Agricultural Preserves Map, established by Resolution No. 67-118, Butte County Board of Supervisors, December 5, 1987+ 13, Flood Insurance Rate Maps; National 'Flood Insurance Program, Federal Emergency Management Agency: 1988. 14. 'USES Quad Maps, Paradise West, 1980, 15. Soil Map, Chico (1925)10roville (1926) Area, U.S. Department of Agriculture.- - 16. 8611 Survey of Ch1co(1925)/0rov16lle' (1926)1,Area, U.S. Department of Agriculture. 17. Butte County Fire Protection Jurisdictions and Facilities Map, Butte County fire Department and California Department of Forestry. Butte Cot inty Planning Department. 18, Parr -Terrill Rezone Elk. AP 063-01-101,102, Log# 18-08=31-01, February 1980+ B 10= PLANNING COMMISSION NOTICE QF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given by the Butte County Planning Commission that public hearings will be held on Thursday, August 9, 1990, in the Butte County Hoard of Supervisors' Room, County Administration Center, 25 County Center Drive, Oroville, California, regarding the following item at the following time: ITEMS ON WHICHA NEGATIVE DECLARATION REGARDING ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT HAS_BEEN RECOMMENDED 1:30 pm, Butte County Planning' Commission - Rezone from ASR (Agricultural Suburban Residential) to SR -1 (Suburban Residential 1 acre parcels) and A-5 (Agricultural 5 acre parcels), on lots located on the north side of Bidwell Avenue, east of Glenwood Avenue, and on the west side of Glenwood Avenue, south of West Sacramento Avenue, identified as various Assessor Parcel -numbers, Chico. (File #90-31) 1:30 p.m. John Schiil Variance to allow the creation of a 30 acre parcel on property zoned A=40 (Agricultural - 40 acre parcels), located approximately, 1 mile west of US Hwy. 99E on the south side of Cana Highway, identified as AP# 047-100-012, Chico area: ITEM ON WHICH A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WITH MTC'IGATION MEASURES -REGARDING ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS HAVE BEEN DETERMINED 1:30 p.m. Bruce Oliver "Rezone to TM -5 (Timber Mountain - 5 ,acre parcels) on property zoned "U" (Unclassified), on property located on both sides of Blackberry Road approximately 800 'feet north of CroWn Point Road and approximately 1/2 mile east of Crown Point Road and State Hwy. 32 intersection; identified as AP# 056-040-0270 northeast of Chico. (File #90- 12) The above mentioned applications, maps and Negative Declarations' with Mitigation Measures and Environmental Documents are on file and available for public viewing at Planning Department, 7 County Center Drive, ONAlle; the office, of the Butte County Pl . California. Comments may be submitted in writing any time prior to the hearing or, . orally at the meeting listed above or as continued to a later date. If you challenge the above applications in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written p he Planning Commission, at or prior to; the public- hearing. correspondence delivered to t BUTM COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION' B Ai KIRCHER DIRECTOR OF PLANNING To be pubiished in the Ctuco Enterprise Record on Thursday, July 5, 1990. - --- Buffft ca, Pinnni ig Comm MAY 2 9 1990 Orodillo CoUforalas Butte Cpunty Planning Dept, 7 County Center Drive May 2'2nd 1990 drovil.le, CA 95966-3397 Attn. . Craig Sanders Dear Iir;tte Gounty Planning Department, Thain; you for beim' patient. botanical and :archeologicalI have been c'tzortlnatir,��r the as you ?ravsurveys of aur Parcel #056--04-0- e} required. This response should include co 0 7 reportir if You have not received them already. Pies of the The findings show that there are historical{Prehino cz end,aang�re�l habitats or astorical sites or remnanon ouram c,�x brig to address the other mi tigatxon measurest operty. So 1 Regarding driveway y grades rip rapping draitia.or and that is steeds You know, there is already an existing driveway P ( ma be more than 10,a in some places never had ? rape drainage d'i.tches. 7t does have adequate culverts; to handle the volume of ate 1982'4 Thiit 11 driveway serves My housens off and gnothc�s hone sinoe that has been preparad since 192 use site anri ,rater installed compla�te with approved septic }• I dory t think it Would be nclvrrn�trigeous or o e.pect rn'e to redevelop the various grades Of the eri-.. driveway since at wzuld fort existing do `feel it is fair to Would hpr disturb Sail sand Gr'4' r g pest ane to improve the drainagatdotlr-`T with rip r`aP hurl c:it-oh basins for culvnrts* that Iteef th requirements of - 8titte-Cizunt > p e sPecificat:Lons, at t.l e t ane zl' further dd development, pe ar �nt� Regarding Eire Safety., rttczragc tanks is an excellent idea and xkth arn e Suggestion to installing ane tanlr gestion of water (minimum 800U r comPl r by existing house =sites and, one tank gallons) to serve the two third thet�.mereel, lo l believe the tank ityatallatzonsaaud600 lbend) ala a of development of, futu; e one r.at par "'Is. ,he l ydr ant. Placement and tank izxstrrllatxan would be done in re uiremririts, recc�mrnendations an+d accordance with the belzartMent Of Porestry, a the rMulifornia _ approval n tte,gardirag improvirz ; c`rrzwry Pit toad. to improving CroWn Point Road as I ant ver;v tigk�eeabtc PlIoperty. any furthorr r'e uirem�.nt tt7 dividing p��r the gaffe countyt, ];arid Development beparprove itladon't Voquired by fair to expect I tri imp ros e it beyond thosrequir�ekiterlts, According g to what T uI derstgrad l Would, be responsible t. grade Rthe road' t,sicle f"m the vourrt y maintained road. to wher e ,n oaperty hturtst rrtad t�t'ovitie the ttS� lb 2 standard on Dlt�dklzerr�w Ctoacl as i 1 galone I�us's�s �ltrau. !t or my property, Cn the DISCUSSION OF ENVIPONMENTAL EVALUATION, I reel the safety hazard is overstated :by sayir' when muddy "Particularly during winter acrd icy conditions exist," While the road does get rutty and bumpy, mud and ice has ae.en posed a Probiem for getting to and from Highway 32, from my property. The sail itself is naturally very rocky and hard, t ofeg`arding the Designated 100, No Development Zone, from the fhe bank of Little Chico Creek: I completely 'agree with; protecting vegetation and sail from disruption of development within lr0' the bank of the creek-. like to address are as follorgs� to m that 1 Other concerns that have been bra.ught y attention would teUsonable ncOcssibilitY to commercial servi.cesr xttakes - us approximately 15 minutes to drive to any of the new mega,, shopping centers in ;southeast ChChico such as Raleys, Home Club, Mall, etc— Not only that; but we can drive to the Forest Ranch stores and services in approximately 7 minutes., x taoul like to point out that it takes the saAl" time f'or people from the North, Chico area and West Chico ar a to roach these major shopping areas as it does us,. l would like to bring to your ettentirzn that when 1 purchased this property I 1851 the zoning was AZ -5 acre minimum, Since that ti'Me the property has been placed in the. Unc'laas fxed' zoning• r am simply askingto the property as, it was previously designated Usepossxbxey proceed, g this t°ezoning so that l was. €�ci; pl ease rant xrie Sincerely, Bruce 'Oliver Project 90-339 INTRODUCTION This report details the .results of an archaeological survey of a three-way land split project proposed by Bruce Oliver of Chico, California. The project will involve approximately 19 acres of land located in Little Chico Creek Canyon, immediately north and west of Crown Point Road. Land use change, involing frtture residential development, will follow Butte County approval of a, proposed pat -cel map. According to State and County definitions, the proposed project constitutes an''undertaking" which tcould adversely affect cultural resources whichmight be located' within the area of potential effect (APE). Accordingly, a cultural resources inventory coupled with an assessment of the National Register eligibility status of ;any, recorded sites, as well as it review o f potential project impacts and a list of mitigative measures, is required pursuant to County requirements, and in compliance with Section 106 of the National" Historic Preservation Act of 1966; as amended (16 U.S.C. 470), and Procedures of the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (36 CFR 800): The remainder of this report details the results of the archaeological survey and provides a professional assessment of the cultural resources which might be affected by the project All field work procedures followed guidelines provided by the State Historic PreseNat on Office (Sacs mento) and are in conformity with accepted professional standards. Lir cation Theproposed Bruce Oliver land split parcel is roughly rectangular in shape, and:. consists or tipprOimately 19 acres located` within a portion of the southeast quarter of Section 14 of Township 13 'call, Range Page East, of the USGS Paradise West, California (1980), 7.5' Series Quad. The parcel is located immediately north of Crown. Point Road's crossing of Little Chico 'Creek,; and involves lands located on both sides of the creek, although c. 806/6 of the parcel is located on the creek's west side. The land is currently undeveloped, and has been only moderately, disturbed in conjunction with past fire suppression activities, minor access road grading, and recreation, Records Search and Project' Context Prior, to going into the field i.he archaeological records maintained by the Northeast California Information Center at Chico were examined for any existing recorded prehistoric or historic sites. In addition, the National Register of Historic Places was also consulted (USDI 1989). No sites were found to be recorded within the Oliver property, although clear archaeological sensitivity was indicated by thu presence of Little Chico Creek, as well as oil the basis of the positive findings which have accompanied previous archaeological survey within this general area (e.g., Jensen 1985). _ As regards ethnographic affiliation, the project area is located 'Within northernmost Northwestern Maidu, or konkow Indian territory (Riddell 1978: Figure 1): The Maidu are believed to have occupied the cast side of the Sacramento River within the vicinity of Cliico, extending southeasterly into and east of both Chico and OrovillrFor the Maidu within this canyon area, the cxpeeted range of prehistoric site types, based on the results of previous archaeological surveys and ,ethnographic studies, included (1) Ismall, aboriginal middens, occasionally associated With house Pits and other surface features located close to water soirces; (2) surface scatters of lithic artifacts and debitage resulting frcm short= term occupation and/or specthlized economic activities (d) bedrock hulling stations acid petfoglyphs where suitable bedrock exposures exist, (4) tock shelters and small caves assowiflted'With eXposed layers of lava ` within both Big and Little Chico Creel% Project 90439 Page 2 Canyons; and, (5) isolated rinds of aboriginal for bedr()ck mortars and/or metate slicks. artifacts and flakes. Nevertheiess, the water has not been elevated to the point that it has inundated habitable Regarding historic development benches and flats adjacent to the creek, and wlihiri t in seneral project vicinity, the region thus the, presence of these beaver dams is not has not been affected by many of the other likely to have resulted in loss of significant major historic events which so greatly archaeological information, influenced the course of events elsewhere within :California: Isolated on a minor The: field survey involved walking drainage, the area never experienced the non-systematic transects back and forth Spanish colonization, rapid urbanization or across i the 19-acre parcel, maintaining extensive agricultural development. The average tiunsect spacing at c. 20-35 meters, absence of significant ore deposits also meant None of the project parcel was excluded from that the area did not witness the major influx examination, and no significant obstacles of gold-seekers which had, such impact on were encountered during the course of field other nearby areas (e.g., Butte Creek), work. Mr. Oliver was present during the Finally, the absence of major stands of timber entire field survey in order to ensure accurate has also meant that the area has not been on-the-ground delineation of the project area subjected to government land management by pointing out corner stakes and parcel activities or logging on a large scale. As boundaries. transportation improved following Bidwell's original settlement in the area, particularly in the decades near the turn-of-the-century, the project vicinity became more accessible: The primary impact of this increased contact was ; not so much modification to the physical PROTECT FINDINGS landscape, but. rather a decrease in the local Native American population. Comparatively, ; the physical impacts to prehistoric and early Prehistoric Resources: historic sites resulting from historic activities has been generally 'minimal, and it was No evidence of prehistoric use or expected that any major sites which might occupation was obst. reed within the project once ha,.,c been located within the present area: projt.ct area would be discovered to be generally intact. Early Historic Resources:, Field Work No evidence of early historic use or occupation was observed Within the project Field work for the present project was area. undertaken on May 12 1990 b Jensen & A:Ssoczates, ' Ground Cover consists or Canteniporary Elements: vat'rety of brush and tree species, including irltcriOr 'live oak, digger pitre, manzanita, rCeanothus, and poison oak. A minor Eviderce of contemporary use and riparian association is maintained along both activities was observed in the form of sides of Little Chico Creek. This association existing fences, contemporary structures in has in tum been influenced by substantial the general area, accpAs roads, and &easiotial beaver dards located downstream of theCOntentpOCal'y trash Iten15: None of this Oliver parcel, 'These dams have raised the material represents poteritially signiAeant level of the Water within little Chico, Creek, culturAl resources, howbvers and these And covered several bedrock outcrops which retituCes were not recorded during the, present may: '111 prehistoric times, have been utilized project, NMr i "\ ,,.0-�,y •�.• S'". '.��� i ! � .�. 4'.�* \,Iji � !t nidi i I � "• 1 �� � ''\ 1' 1 ., zi o ts4W��ffifltl '�,ta �� j/� ...n .n-.. n �+-." '�.`�'-..� x'Y- -+'. y�� ^"'+1" �°''+,•.Ir' • .� "il{r�K R1. � «'Y:Y4C'.yh2C P.#Y55'3.'A3.Y Raa.ytr 1+1 Rk![ aRy "1.c s. ° r` I ` `r `` oil 5��°;." �t�;♦ �. F I bFE'r 'aqr� 'r ���? M U fj 7 l„_„yl' r�4a"�1 � syr ��,�y I � +• t � ,� r A _. _.. , •�,.� +,� y �e" pry - : � `� yN ��`9 � � �� .I �`—="' �,'�` I„yd' 4.,,.` Fi, � " a.. �'i1 F f ,� 1,Y • i 'c�il' t xl `'-<<..,•.� .y ' �`` '� �. I y. N\ , 18�� �� (jJ � i�.• tr`r Y F`•� '+. A y x y 1 w a I A cil n ! ara b a�� 4- 4 aka o I^�Q Project and rvey .Area �. J SU ' I 1 yt, I p- � n v� ,,,� y�+,.�> "O %' ~ q p qtr. ,' 1�r irr✓ .. 1 .a. .1� �� i •-,.:ar o . w�`�, - �� �s.. � �°fi. ry * '�,..1 xNy"wr'� a �.Y t� v 1 . w ° Y n r e y ! s• p ' • • �' ""•"q , ��r Y `f m •� � J ,+ .y �% F rr tCl Q �h� •�k as .yo -r �� �V. "" �'”. � h at o' �� YJ 1! a L 'r w ���`; � ,'✓`�: �a ,'� ^� ..ter t•.. � .r .» ti�� 1 "� �` � n� � . t r �` it . �v,� � "�'}X r .��°®� � � ,� t $� sr tD � n �� !.r�iE^ ,t•rr.��M-�.�k� ��v �.�..,..,,�.� �.,��t t�nr�A�xi �asx�rJr�� !x W 1t °8 �� ''.,. 1 " � h�x���,ii+* k nC ` • X . � "`u`e..� «r.,,�, arX � ,�, x,,.r�� \ s, 0,�, N. r .�) � w ,N $�. t BOTANICAL SURVEY BRUCE and SHERRY OLIVER 14441 131:ackber;ry Lane Forest Ranch, California Project Description: The Olivers propose to :split their eighteen acre parcel into three separate parcels. The property is located at the above addree,3 on ,Blackberry Lane, off Crown. Point Road and Hwy 32 in Butte County. The clients did not provide a partel map, and wall append a map to this report, Legal p '. p Le al Descrzpti.ans Township 23 N. Range 3E, Southeast onion of Section 24 Seton The extends from both sides of Little Chico. Creek with a Large Setting: propetty bench between the creek and Blackberry Lane. It then extends upslope, encompassing the existing homesite and a proposed homesite._ Most of the parcel ;is generally east facing, and at. about 1500 feet in elevation. ` e ' plant communities: The s predominantly FoothIll Woodland with elements of Chaparral and Mixed site i Y ek. Y transition between several tan ..,..Chico... re The prope�t �s in an area, of tr P Conifer Forest. Riparian forest dominates the floodplain, of Tittle C Two draws form the boundary of the upper portion of the site, ,carrying 'water intermittently. A large disturbed clearing is present off Blackberry Lane. No" springs or seeps were located in the study, area, A general map showing potential house sites and vegetation types is attached. Survey Methodologyt. The field survey was conducted on April 15, 1990. 3JoritY of plants found onsite were identifiable at this tithe. The site was systematically examined on foot with all species encountered identified to determine whether they Caere rare of endangeted.. Most of the site was accessible, except some extensive areas along the creek with dense blackberry thickets, and occasional dense patches of manzartita, Potential Rare Plants) Several rate plants could poEentially occur in (11e study area, including Sida;wcea ,robust) (Butte County cheeltei`mallow) i Clarki.a mosgainii ssp, mosgtiin i and sztp xerbphila Hibiscus ealifo; nicus, Jtiricus bufoniifs var leiospetmus riimulus 1aLtcesceiis, congdonii, J l qe gppermus var, ahartii and vat. , g polyp biidwelliae, and tthvnchospora californica. Most of these species are found in wet areas, either seeps, springs, marshes or along streams? Both Clazkias occur in grassland habitats, but have not been located since the 1940is.hlikely plant to e found in the study area, . as it>occup liescOalt Woodlanddand loothillWoodland .areas�, PLANT LIST: Bruce and Sherry Oliver 14441 Blackberry Lane Forest Ranch, California TREES Shrubs Alnus rhombifolia Acer macrophyllum Arctostaphylos manzanita Fraxinus latifolia A. viscida Salix goodingii Cercocarpus betuloides Quercus wiz?ezinii Ceanothus cuneatus Quercus douglasli C. integeirrimus Quercus kellogii Rhus trilobata Pinusponderosa Toxicodendron diversilobum Pseudo`tsuga menzi'esii _ _ Reteromeles arbutifolia Calocedrus decurrens Ribes roezlRi Umbellularia californica Cercis occidentalis Platanus racemosa Sambucus cerulea Populus fremontii Symphoricatpus albus Pinus sabiniana Ironwood (planted) Aesculus californica Cystisus m0n8Pessulanus FORBS Lonicera so. Calochortus monophyllus Lotus humistratus Dichelostemma valtbilus: Lotus subpinnatus Triteliea multiflora trodium cicutar um Lupinus,albifrons Erodium moshatum Lu pinus bicolor Rrodium brachycarpum Lupinus vallicola Geranium dissectum Sanicula bipitnata - Geranium molle Sanicula bipinnatafida Euphorbia peplus Ranunculus californicus HyPericum anagaloides Iris hdrtwegii tilium huinboldti Ceii,taureau soltitialis Claytonia perfoliata Bromus mollis Attemis3.a dougl.as;i:i Bromus diandrus Cardamine oligospermum Avena barbata' l+fi crapes cdlifornicus' Shdtardia arvense Linatithus bicolor Galium sPP• Aristolocbia californica TrifoliUm g'jacilentum Lomatium humile ' TrifOlium tridentatum, Plantago lancoolata .iuticus balticus G] arkia quadrivulneta' Lunula subsessili.s Agoseris heterophylla Adiantum jordarnii Perron agi California aura SIEAPA Department of Anthropology C Archaeological GLENN $IsKIYOU p ogy Inventory C S d,p LASSEN SUTTER California State University, Chico MGGoc TFHAMA Chico, CA 95929 FLUMA9 TRINITY ,r SHASTA (916) 895-6256 .:. Ma r c h 2 , 1°lar9 Butte County planning Department MAR #7 C o u n t,y Center Drive Oroville, Califomi� Oroville, CA 95965 RE: AP 056_04-0_027/Oliver;I.c. # L90-10 T23N, R2E, Section 24,; USES Paradise West 18.87 acres 7.5tquadi Dear Caunt;y Planners; In response to the above request, a record search for the above ci4ed Maps was' conducted b examining the official project Ma s and records for archaeological sites in Butte Coo ty RESULTS: of RESOURCES: There are no previausl f this type known to be located with Y recorded sites thin the project area. There are two recorded sites (CA-BUT-287 and q81) known to ba located within ohe-half to ane mile of the h project area. These sites are botrock shelters. CA_B T-287 is a prehisto:^i e rack shelter �iith numerous bedrock mortars associated with it, and CA-BUT-81 is a prehistoric s'zelter with historic trash and graffiti associatedt,►ith rock iti nHISTORIC RESOUPcESt There are no prev ous]y recorded sites of ote type known to be located within the noted above; CA-BUT-981 hss some histuria traghe andarea.s associated with this graffiti pre;�istoric s',tei Additionally, the historic site of FoUrteenmile House mile north of tiis located, less than one e project area. F'ourteenmile House i L s listed but -0 6 ints of 'Historic Interest property. Its number �,, and it is described as an histol^ic Toll Station and W`ayside Inn: PREVIOUS ARCHAEOLOGICAL UrESTIGATIONS According to otr "records; the pro jec,t area of been 1 resources. prey aisly surVeyed for cu, The nearest .survey conducued is located apptt7ximately 1/2 mike north of the project area and resu tura, in the recordation of CA-1�UT-9'81 i s lted LITERATURE SEAAcHi. Reviewed were the official records and traps for archaeolog:icaLL sites and sUeVeys in Butte County, Also reviewed wer other atio a Register of H1. toric PYaces CaJ:i foir>nia i"nia the Ca�.xfo� � .� _� .. r _ . 'Y a.s L,oric Resources (1978) �iistdt7ica] Landn;aelO (1982), _Califorhia l'oznts - of M1 Re uRrem s for De�relopers Butte County Department. Water � Parcel Number Developer c r a,. ,hhtl w Location Requirement Class in lieu of a pressurized water system, the following options wilt satisfy the Fire Department requirements for water: BUTne TE coUN Y (A) fyor each bt cxeated a Water storage tank With Call, DaP1 m FoleslrY o a capacity of 2,500 gallons or more equipped With And Fite,ba1a �led Flieone ptolaCl'of1 A F direct all weather access orf ire department c»n- nectan meeting standard S-29.The bmtions of hock- ups ookups shall be determined by the Fre Department; or, � �� DAVID R. MIt�iTON Apaymehttrrwtheappropriategvatertenderfurxlt. r+t i , a �K _E Battalion Chiet at X200 per lot' `ora total fee of S �_ a meet shall be (A) Construction of storage facilities or (B) p` y� F�va smeer done at the time of construction of habitable buildings as de- cN4 rAjR+uTRtFTA 95928 fined in the Uniform Building Code. Payment shall be made ori- (919) 091.2781 at to the issuance of building permits for habitable buildings. 0 Requirement Class 2 A pressurized water system with an approved numbers of hY cants s strongly flow,-,--- hydrant Averaggrequired his is nOtteChnpacing _ feet, hydrant sizebnsorsnoreequippedvrithd'erectallweatheraa ss o,fire department ically#feastble, the following options will satisfy the Fire De, artment re wrement tot water: connection (A) Water storage ianfcs With a caps* of io,soo gal meeting Standard S-29. The brali%s ci-hooit'upG shall be determined by the Fire Department; or, the Fre srwt, or, (13) Irtgrcwnd swimming pools equiipped with a dialling connection or drafting axess as by h bepa�m (C) A dry standp*Pe sYst calm ed the Fre D meat Such a std ndp'�pe system Will not exceed am plumbed to arefiable watersourCe a,5 appinv by ' 1,000 feat in lengthod for Liach Of, 10 and There must beat least 10,000 gallons of attwo separated strategically t Provision , s must be madeto insure that tens thereof (Example: 9 i dwellings wouldrequire water stored is always available and accessible for use under all weather condition 3, 0 Requirement Class 3fleet, A pressurized community water system lot fire prole idevelrequired. developer, required hydrant fspacing h. �tt be mde by the Fire department fn consultation with thep by.dtal it slze hes, and reslduat flow 9ptn. _ enc O Requlrement Class 4 ,ecomthended ,system is a hydrant system capable of Meetingthetdhe Water for fire protection is required. The strongly " p fire flow requirements, Average required hydrant spacing feet, hydrant size _ t involving Independent Pemabie water m If this isnot technically feasible, a system e ` residual` flow - 9p is A to the water storage may be substituted. •�auoh a re mfremenjts.tF'rovlapproval �ons satisfacto�ry o the FirenDepartmentmired when tlnw from such a system must meet the filo q ortirtg their ovun systeM. If so, made to insure the systemppn8e{otst- � e evelopmenls may a capable o asupp i a G`!� or CSb is rem, the system I'erves more than ertch lot could have an independent systeri. eliminating the need' for a GSA/GSD Requ'irome c C-0- hit waters stem for fi re protectiari is required. In lieu of bearing the cost of tnstailing a flee i° A pressurized " ; y y hydrant funffr At $1,72 per foot of street frontage the hydeant(s) the developer may pay into the _ _ y total W, is St8 t_ TYto OCCUPANCY nNGNQF THBUILDING IINt MAPF IS THE T116 N ND ifJANrtAt��R S_ --- TH5=SS RSpUtpPtNENTSMUST 6DE I��T 13t: MET H �Fi TO THE FILING PAt 051_S, THE CONDITION NBA CASE, THE DEV8LOpSR MUST SHOW PROC 8 A 5QUIEMENNTS� BAND QR OTHER I=INANGIAL ARRANt-EMENT'TO COVEII THE COST OF 'THE R Cl Additional CornmetlteRequtrements Fre Department Signature division Code 5ectl6n ��i;qb� Cotnpeto requirements 'ln 806 County Sub. �'. TI DSSTR=BUTSC?N LSST Yon COMMMNIrS County Public Works Health RESo'URCE M_,kNAC;ETIMrT State Water Res(.:urces - Department Count Environmental y City of Biggs L.S. Forest Service _ U.S. Bureau of Land Management City of. Chico City ofGridley Butte Count; Mining Committee City of Oroville State Department of Fish & Game Town of Paradise California Native Plant Society r Planning Department State Div. Forestry - attention State Transportation Department Craig Carter_,ZRegional Water Qual. Control 3d. State Reclamation Board DOMESTSC WATER.. Butte Water District S EWERS p California Water Servid. - Richva Sanitary District r� Del Oro Water Co. North Burbank Pub. Util. Dist. OWID� Skan:,en Sub. (CSA #21) Thetmal.ito:Irrigation District Stirling City Sewer Maint. Dis*. other Thermalito Irrigation District (CSA #26) PG&E North (Chico) �B ggs W Gr dley Water District PG&E South (Marysville)l Butte Water District Pacific Bell Durham ,:irrigation District State TV Cable Viacom TV CablParaise e OWID District Richvale Irrigation ion District Table Mountain Irrigation Dist. - %"TRE PROTECTTC3N' Thermalt�a IIrrigation District El Medio Fixe Protection Dist. County FireDepartment/CDF' DRAYNAGE D7'SiTRa: MC�SQLT=TO AFSATEMErJ� D=STR2CT _ _�_. Durham; OY'rwille or Butte County ?ZECL.AMATZON'-; DY6TR=CT POL-2}CE PROTECT=c'�N State Highway Patrol c unty Sheriff OTI-�ER SC]FJOC7x:, DYSxRT�'T corms=sTF�S � cat�mtZ s s�car,T FZECREA'rYC3N - �'AC�:C;TTZES Chico Area'Recreation District Paradise Pines Architectural Durham Area Red. & Park Dyst: Control Committee Feather River Rec: S Park Dist. _r BUtte County Farm Bureau Paradise Rea. & Park Dist: Coti�munt' Association: Richv& .e Red. & Park Dist. State 'Parks & Rec: Dept: _:.