Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
90-13C ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS GPA (6)
ra i Alr ea do Under the Cotanty Sewer,System.Aiternative, Butte County would prepa , pt, ' p , 'And implement a sanutary sewermaster plan for the unincorporated portion of the ' , Chico SCSI. �! m ..a'i Under° ;the.. Alternative . Technoloies� Alterxiatve;alternative .,technologies :to. conventional gravity wastewater collection and `wastewater treatment Would >e used to serve .buildout of the SOT, such as ,satellite treatment plants/land c ! w. t +ar t rrx+ i i.l`' �� +'f f a'¢ 'a 4 irdo6ent `off �efflUent and cotnpostirtg toilets/gr. ywater sysfems§ p r $ C w:>trtiF. 'to" h� dr`airiap, fihealternative dfAftstorm' q erlp�lai pare ,, ,x Under `the Puxistmg Conditions No -P 'ect,Altema6ve, no changes would occur. 1 nati�ie, the master plan would not be adopted; m Under, the Future No -Pro pct Alter however, this plan would likely be used as a guide by the city and courit}t far incremental. stormdrainage extensions 7 Under the Mitigated Design Alterriatiye, the master plan would be implemented in eonluncrion with those measures such as detention basins reten ion basins, �a °��i r@ {l' tv . 'y D ::1 x •`f' !j x y �. � �, 4 ��<. Vl w��! landscd�mg areas, increasing hhiYnel 'size; z`emoval o£ bi"49s vege mon,or channel Obstruction, or SOME COrrmbanat On thereof) required to control runoff rn the SOI such that -postprpject peak flows and runoff volumes are, of similar'ma�gntittie�fo'osrdlecttait`fla�ivs�ariia'iitnooldmes`f"���u1''; 1A The alternatives to the proposed annexation are as follows t - Uind4r the Existing Conditions No -Project Alternative, no changes would occu . _ ,'s i ire NoPro'ec't Alternative the'S21pa�c�re ro'ect°site vt�ouid not be Under the Ft t P J ,. ; annexed ,to the' City of Chico anddeveloment would be constramecl, b}� toe' p�s4 Y+ it d �d:r.r AI P. sidn , of the nitrate actlbn plab $ Oi !i J'f Yf. L'- ' � r �F�:Zi k4 it S�Lr Y �x } Undez� t e'A" d�it d Annex 16'' Ahm,Aiternatrve approxrma ely 4` 0 acre_ s woo d ,u? Gryr lr�;'4Co-lYM .4`�. be 'anne et to #fire c�rt}r and city s6mces provided tb thls area rtq c 'Under the Expanded Annexation,Area Altc;rnative; all'lands within the Chico S;OI north of theindo Channe] would' be annexed`, The alt"ernatives to the proposed general plan amendments are as�foilows N 'C.Tnder tate h�kistttig Cdhdit�ons �o-l�roaect Alterna,ve, no. changes wo rld occur � . , , y ', ■ 1 w, hr{1.l SdL �I 1"' Fi �rik' M1/JI �TA"N `�$� Y a�4 �({ it�der tliir future l�ta`'roject Alternatx�e, ,they existing resrdehtral' iand use designations for, undeveloped, unincorporated lands north of t1ie,Lindo !Cllazarel p o33�V F..�J' �p �" 'ianli'f+9 :<'d, di f'tf'' �' a. r7`9 $ �Yr a�, 9' srs a qtx u a i a would be: etaine°c� aril ode elopm iii Would by nsfr ned the futr to actaen .liy� f 4r�� " u`5' 'rl 1 r ` w (biro � 1J[ .; � Y x a�, I plan. , ll� TCebicr34�r Summaryof l'ro oscd Pru c t P j c Impactk and Miligt,tianMcasures „, age ] of 31r, impaa"Topic: ProJcct.Imact Signtficancq I#cforc-Mitigafiou Mitignlion Measure SigniGcancc. A ftG'r Mitigation 00-AFTMItTAttY 5EWEli AlVfi SIOM TlitIIVAGG MASIit pLtS %,wd use and wth [n Brn ducement" +'• s �' it said con+�crs on Potential conversion of up to 9;316 acres Nq of -undeveloped opcnispacc within"the No mitigation as?ava,lablc' Chug SOI fo Urban uses z , id U50:00 [lists Potential for g a coniticts, bCtwcen agricultural land uses and futu[ct�g S 41 `The rtq ahoulii ado"tan t tafarm p �', residcntiai uses orrlmanec;' ?5 -• - » u. 3 k S city, should -require onsite buffers " kf Tt �r: ot9tWecn rest�ential uuagn" c,iltur d al uses R n Y a3� thaicnsirf nT6 et*, sh>6Wiseds d�len agricutyltuorelntc dja@'ontto c rr l a l� 'a'},"' .fit y !.-a c� - ' `• , R°.''i $, 44 ;The sty s6ouldkdcveloji an`d implemcnta ;'�` T� r �prograro toil the purchase or transfer of y; , urtld „� r d ve lapmen ,t� o a 4 Potentlal'for:eonhicts between residential r= r"' r_^ ": aA >�i0 `egliir uses and industrial uses Alt, tion is .r , eY610n"'O1�iIgrlCUltnrai land 7 T t p .,,r t ..,„ I'ofendal wityersan PA19 to 2,430 acres'' S is pis Of Mind farniland (CI ass 1 aud'1_ soils) �i •; No mlGgatiop {„ Mable witli n' the'Ch'ico•SCIf: to urfaan :uses azul 1 associated loss of rode p ellen t �� t ' „" f" Cirrrfrthinduccmcnt Potential growth inducement" l y ,, m aY z, r f"•Y� 4Yithin the Co i , t n.b h ilomiligatiopisn'lilicd ,a? T'K Y Att'k 1.-ltp,, F; Ip.fPd 4 V r Potential growth inducement outs Ax» t�Y'�.��eJ Y4,.r wY i r,4 l YY t �^ CluCb $CIL - 4 i " k }�4 p «! b mit, on, is fcq n.,e w a,, uit'Cd� f�' a• ,:! ` Potentto t al future cont+craion of hritnc^" ]✓ T, ` r �`» " s , «. agri6 turat land ad acgnt to thu Ch, a - ,'' No roitip is awulable gaila. P � " d i SOC, 1. CO ; ;" }� c*. K'� Z ° A ;r ` t ;k I t U ' t�d1,. li I a p I �ktl dY♦ ti 't. � A T YI 1 �: i t'.n ' II f4..�"�.� I g } �, �.4 Fly "� 'I,y ", Ic`b Alli s� rte, p. 0.r 411 1. ^kf'A„ ♦H. •�.�p M , d, . _'p �1 ,� I IV hiyinF W' t �ujrt� 'i� A". e f 4 ! li.'J' 'GF' •h ryry � �� � P I I � f J ®® 1 t { 1 V f. „I,� _ Table 3.1 Continued t� 2 of 3i S�gmticancc lvtitigatton S�gaificsijec " Impact; Topic Project Impar# Be Md�gauon-, Measure AfleSlyiitigaUan, Poky consistency Consistency with City of.0mco growth and;' 1S Nb mitigation is required agric i6ra1 prescrvadoii policids , Con3wtanc}r wifh'i3utfe County orderly' D- NU mitigatipn is required �I dcvol'bpmeat l►oiicias Consistency with Out, County policies on No mitigation is required resource aanag mcnf = agriciiltural and cropland potiacs Coti3is(enry with IIufte County pubGe B No m�Ggation >s reyured' �eC1httC5 C�nisteacy= nth Chico; Area Grrenlinc 13 � iti ation is, requited No mS policsest r:1 w . Caulat►vc, impact; Cumulative loss of prime farmlacd S No mitigation �s available U (da$s I' and I1 so'ds) FwbiiaRervfcea Alco facill'tlas for inadequate S 51 The at}� should adopt and �mplemeat Water C6,Potential groundwater. supply to accuatmt�dategotal darnand tad ,' g%�neral phth policy`atafurg 2 ;m d of water. at;buildout Q 6 g Adi�slopmenf project approval t a t 6e condiddRd',bi'the finding #ha# iviiter supply ss suifinicnt to�erve hew;%tt r'eVclopmcd2r �Co implc'medt this policy' effecftvely, the aty; CalWater;land the SWR(M, should pfu#icipate m preparing a water supply study for'the Cluai'}}SAI �deguate affraslructure;to accommodate IS Tlo mitigation rs rcqurre iricirtased"dea'pnd for.ayater serviF.E � tKpt ted to bet avndabl aE budddLt s r , I''� stn j F y j L t ,. f." I. `. �; ,v �'a y I t �.A , �. i1a a � �. � .,;t t q' W4 VA of '� n p n s {u 14 f -+T y K f .np r I �1 x4�d `H vxi t m.rwN � t N++ uN oa: � � , ! . ..L _ rPs ! .+ a Y.. +16✓_ , .atl�>!M*..riN �Vx «.,n.cl tJ 'M1 <+Mt iY TMM""+KnN,I 4JY.�+.. -uM W Y+ 1 M ti.�. _ I I iSa3PbLL. I 4v"N.u't �' wy'rdvA'x,rN4 b.ANim+m'md Mrs;' 21 6W, AMjm a of 37� qW ad I'a�d Signdicnnx Mrtigation StgtWirant e Baforo Mrb anon Afts cr aUon easur pie Prbjcct Tmpgef . T,S Flo n►iugation is required Adequate funding to Accommodate i�crcased demand [or recreatioti;programs _ II at buildout 5.7, The bbunry should uprlAta iho �so11d waste [7 Solid +rte Ate mAngeiuentInadequateS landfill capacity, I ko accommo• wanagemcnt`plan every 3 years Co lair, JnCCc= in demand fbC bO11ti WaStC ld'66fy neCdM landrdl. Altos (C'ailfbraia, disposal at buildoutGoYecnmcnt; Code, 3cctiou 66280 5) s $, n edccrc o� d . devcPty men sc o l6vide s i p p ' viasto colleaion. ycbicles mid Apse; for recycling rcccptacics r qq... bas add electrics ry,` Adequate rnfrastructure expcdcd4o ba 1S No mitigation is iequired avolabl0 toraccommodatcliocrmcd I aem'and for gA.t anti cicctnary at buildout ,Cransporkn -90" rp eS .. 6 tncreascd �towa A.Venu .- No miti Uon4it rcqugcd Rpadwa sc dnk b rat y gm pc Ions - traffic along'Eat't Pnturc troth Pra)cct,iteruativc east bf tlae lEgpLwade; a��h IAS' rem,ammB at A on.this segatenka; iV� Increased �trafIIc 1lovrs. Alon$ tile: . 1S. No Ml 1:0on w "1'14 ci .1 ,1 th n ue wi EAP � de ao � a 1;C3S remarcing at Aro nl WS1,00-64V � 'r � �� � x yYs � i r d1 a - TACCCaSed tYallte WOWS alodg l"ohdssCC •T.5 �:�lo m�hgaUon �t requ>rc� I Road no'rtWoF State Roufe+49i°vtnt TAS , I remalruag t: A on this se$menk ' °Tacre rnitigafJoa is t uuc, ased_trafiic (lows alo Feist lsfw Menne' 0 Of $tate' Rt1utC �I, with IAS re"maimna atA bu this segments n 4 j yy 'A A sY I I I I f V I I t I ' ' II fit Aub 'i fro'' '.I q I i it 1 TlVN - urn d l y a i {Jtp m� ✓r 4e'{ A I e i P a F .� , q.� J r f a . r. ke .�4 1,•T ,.aJ Y�� a'�u_ u..'�a !, »sx..l I L r fi i uk MIA'MN ea r 4 .I,w�,w.+ � , . .r dor.. . ,.s I I ;, r . i - i+✓•i, try,y ra 1 h Y+r �� wfWn Tg vMy ^'S'µ.' ` f7 �. .�kjr , ,4 1 L '! afilu 3•lr Continued, `Page tiof 37 ` , 51goiGcaeca Niitigatiod. 'SiO06ned Impact To' is p Pro'cct Impact J Bcforo IvGugation 1Keasure After Mot on increased traffic hdws'Along Walnut'Street: k LS No mitigation isrequited north' orwcst ]sf Strecy With -LIDS rcmaming A A on this. segment Iacaeasdd traffic flow along $ih/9th LS I o nit'igatton is toc�uited Streets cast of Cypressr with IAS.S° remaining MA on.thisjscgmcpt inacascd tta(tic flows on State"Iioutc 32 S'; t.i Caltana shouid.widen Sttife,Route 3l to, IS II tirucd itoad, with I.OS degrading siaS lanes north of 5th Street to F Od this t'doppt Incrotlsod traffio (lows on State udte 99 - LS No mitigation is rcyuued soulii;ti6.Statc �Routd`32,-;Wiih•LOS dcgradmg to Ann this acgm8nti - a,(i . 7 d 0 .` Jt r„ fnaeased traffic flows East 20th Street ' e bi! 1:S i o mIttgaf ioa is required ,on, cast 4Swd!Routb 0 #ft. - 1 r tP; j� ' ,Sj(Ve. e ( • '" k ._ Cnacascd traffic Cows 'on the S -JMay cant e ' l.= ,St= ,"78z vd� rd Tik,a' Wit � No mitigation is requited. df,SWtd ROutc,'9$ w1th'iWIS'fernatning tit A on;3his sego}cot 3 » f y ;'Fr AOI;men operations �....5, cr,. hq�t�l' �T,,.r,a;.,.�; Caaeased tra 1. ows nn Sta a Route 32 No mtGaGon asrequtrdd Futurcl4cAlro cct Altcrn ttvc O J a` north'o t 4lvcau6;, th LO$ f - ro 1�' ^ � rcmaining aC A on this ill cn` .wl l:.l �, a.s . Increased trafCc'fiQWs 64;q d Wi'ttening of iS I+Tq mit,gatioA is"requircdl "I Frri�rltrF=r� r,.,.+r East Avenue Wesa of Guyon Avenue, with y r IAS rcmmning;at A on,ihis segmcaIt v. Increased traffic flows or Avcaue . 1S, Nomitigation is requue wP.as't east of the f33planade,kwth LOS _ 1 remaihing"tit A''on nils cgnidfi V Tncrcascd traffic flO* op the Esplanade LS.' q No ollhg5tion is roquircd northof East Avcriue, ji remaunn at A'od g this sCgmcnt. to g lrt d t i W 1' k 1 J srt� itt �N 14,ar f f r gt 1 I , dl ?;4't"'firj'tl.6vt 1 C A fkil "• f �' 1�; Ud U: 1 I @ 1: .�r. ^i ":ly 'k- rtn '+"!'fi'+'p a1u-..k�r'a+r ,.y r ,i^'..w w r •^s W'-a'N+k�d a �'F.u�i,+L LL h -m ary ^ ' ' „ gatiod 5�gaificancc . S�gdiflCance Afttt Mitigation' Project ImpactctorEMlkigaGdn. 141casure Impact"Topic 71 'fhe �ryry should ptcpare a eordprehcnsive. fnasascd no'iso levels;gcnerated oy traffic S noise el:mant;:for the gcnaral plark ;Y+Sulsc _ assotiatEd with buildout. of the SOI and - tncreaacd Exposure of,ao�se•scnsitivd land uses'iu cxccssive traffcm61se the, Potential, carbon monaxide problems S 8.1, 7111 aty aril Bounty should.work'wlkh Dutfe Counry'Aa FaUgtion t^ontrol i5�s qtr qucllty produced by'traffic assocratcd with trio to develop a cneclianism or ib locate buildout of the SOI 1 �, exilu}g source to Cued an. indirect, `that Would' �t� source control am row etcr- whElilCt trafGC iroddASOO are CattS- Idh1C :mg or contnt}utmg to 4i0laUoas of the CO�standards andfhat ' would.davelo.'p and�impLlcmcot appro= other' prtatd congestion managemw Or action whentver pofcntlal corredrve roblEms aMAILea- Ic ' _ Ilia aty�catnty should work t+nth they Ozone, ernisslons,'gencratrd by r S g 2 13dttt Cbutity Alr Pollution �'oat?ol I)> = C associated tyith.bulidoUt of the 5pI, lrld to'deyrlop hd' iM ttndut traru porgy t a making compGanec with "the Cicaa Au fatfbn anlrol prograiYls add uid'iigct- difficult to.aclueyo 3'olico Cdl&fhi"dfoml that v ould pro= ne r u, moc rsdr emrssrdtiY;edudlons d N p Ci coilsrstent ti{nth tha rcgUirerhcaCs iif the° i y:.., t-�ahfbrnlaGcan 11 AtMd' i rc"tti�"t }�.; <�kSF'�a m•} .�K Y) iP 4J t „"1.� ISL dnd tiortgtng ' 1 m tha'� 1 ltefet to the'cokrespondiag , , _ opulatton '4 Idcrcase is Chico SbI popolatiou S li`dfer o.mitigat i�inaa pa IdenWicd t 4 I. other impact oreas �9 + ppostii►it'►gatioa CEQA cod-' Population ci the other , unions rn impact areas M Y ; i IS Na Initip tion lb,li �R iiousia I`. log -stb clt Increase ra'h1co SOI.hous, . „ , 111 iFk.f;1 iti'+�✓�"�' ",,f.:,,��i' 7 kll „�1^ 1' 7Yt+ryIhRJ��' '4rRG:�S.t1k9�"yatrlt �x .x' lull ,1 1 g ; r � '� d t.S.�r ✓ a Y -I Qti h IJ %6ble14i Cdntinued � pagn7 of37 �,. Im t 'Topic ' . I'ro'ect'Im act J p Significance ire Euro Mittgalidn 1Vfitigatios Measure , . Sigaifrcanco iftdr`Mitig+ition Hydrology dnd wntcr qualtry , , gydrott c oondidons and draioagc iticreascil peak Clow from the SOI Cor S 10.1, The Cary of Chico should require theta LS Comanche Creck and i:ittic Chicci Creckproject pmppnents control runoff from proposed deYelopment'byincorporating. (lopd control techniques (e.g, detention basins, retention basins, landscaping areas, ini rdased cbanael sizer removal of access channel vegetation, or, sonic combutWon,of such teelhniques),into project desipts avoid 4 to having a cvmtilaG "ve ctteet on peak kow q y .,` 'r �Q 2 between a c i tl = t , a L'v ' It',',: `v �, 4 i': 1 To'avo1d conflicts individual ShOuld ! ICfUtlOff C(IntIOI mCaSlnes� thetyls f 1$ r < ' -"41v— impIement 9 region a roa t0 runoff[ pP '0c r v, �I Lle ] 4 °tu;l analysis and beak runo.tf eontrot [ncrcascd'sircam erosion from pcalcSOl„;,' „ , 5 10.31 It>gryrequired assessments oEerosioa IS °0potcntlal m open channels indicate that lite%charuieIs'are unstable beeause�of runoff froVIVO posciirs�evclo h'en °We :1. p J .. YT. i '"_should , Li ! � r u re thaf:' io p � 9 J f ! proporenta �nielttde meiisnrha t; � x h• � iiiai net alte"ratioat; cb2ugca'ift elianael l roughness'chunncl roraforcemebt, i to p'r_oJect dosius to sabihzc' 44P Mend al effec,an Qood candiG'`ow near S; Refer to initigatton'measitres:10.1 and ib 2 IS �� the:$acramento ttrvcrfrontincreased• . LAC, C, volwfie ofrunoff from the SOI' ,�� a �,�� f k �,��J,e ,, ` �' , i Rcdpxd chanficl tl capacity in Ltta Chico, S 'a�.,m.111ka�tr ltefce tolm ttgatton tueasures 10,1 and3�02 u, 1 L$ Creek and m d ctiannei capaaty.ia a equate d o0' Comanche Creek from SOY runoff Cumulative inY a ' .. p ct of mcrcascd runoff S i .� .fir Icfer a iat ton:mchsures i 0 Xan 1012 � From the SO,on the Sacramento 12it er I , , , , t en + w °, f 3 J T G. , t �i�, l n 4" f, !-.D t�r�r.?; . �. , v , A - , ` 11 Wf Ay ll r d�i'.A SRUJ f«i ,v ], i fob{ ” ' vw �,,� ,� �'. �I w �,,f �`• �� ,' i , 1 I int ;': ,.,'.,11,ti1 i ..� +k._�r v J ""'�"arr, I �Y , SCSDiy�;';1'''My a I I I, , 7 ^1 f , u ago , ,�' TaGlo 3-14' Cgntinu�i ,...,r�:.,.�... , :5ignificanui Mitigation SlantGc2nce cfore'Mitigation Measure Atfet Mitigation r ,e Impact l'oP Project Im ad' P , '� No ctigation is required C"rroundwatea quality Deacase in groundwater quality degradation attributable to removal of scpdc systems; , No mitigation is required �u g1'oundviatcr rCdq attriiutabl0 to' aemovai of septic sysfcins No mitigation rs rcqutrcd Decrease in groundwater quality+ degradation atU'ibuta6lc: to rembvai of ¢ mfdtration wclht hon is r equucd 5urfacc water quiihty doNo Increased water quality gradation in. tFie, m►ti ga I cramcn o River attnbuta a to mcseased tl stewatei di3ehar a 5 10 q In,m�lemeuimg Gtic scdunent end t )w7 Shoat= crease ui call S tc rW _ cros<on control laa for thelmastcr tans'` p P nutrient loading attribii I to sewer:�ipe'; oonstructiou activltios,;the citysbould and storm daam outfall construction hire a qualified engineer, geologist, ac atlrVttfe + r„ t,r.1 ' pecalizcd ltnowted o -: C i oC'cratton prowmes andwatcr'qualiry , 3 im'pads to'mon,tot' cbnsirutttan' activities; E ; .ifcrosiod�of,aoils ariir''ietoa�e'of'sr,�I=` t4" J''," ° t tneots mto creeks could occur, cons ruct Pion should''be fcrminated uncorrective >t. � measures are t .i 10S The sty should imploment n combination 15.. Lr 1. Surface tgatc'qualiry degradntioA idcreased leading i ' 4 of BMPs to'cautrol stormwater rune detention' 4tttihotablc'.tu •pollufaat ducLargeYYs pollutants,.incfudmg the use of t sF fiorit urban ritnotf t* � basins and/or landscaputg area§ Rcfcr, to mitV.troa measure OS l V.— cls t m a �`" undwafcr rcchair e S .i ecrease ui �` o $ � A,, i Cumulative toter quality p t, Ue,rA- to ba ELS � atfntablc to loss' p � � Wat et i 10 G. 'C'lic�ary shoirldlunplement a4waste , ,;r „ Me eased imperyious surface arc...and P a lu a l �t s rCelamatioa ro am,ki, 1 removal oft surface wafers by storm daaid s s p I f _ .•u I, s — 1 1•,fret' �I.7T,4. f .�f �'�, !' A{ , r, ail- 1 , i C .>� +Y` i I 1 9 ' i I i.. p" p Af �,.0 �ra,4 �• .;t Yn�Qrl tw lift , , � Y• xnb .3-1 ,t onfintied l'ago . of.37 signifiutned Mitigation 'S�uficaneo Xrripa&T'opic Project Impact Before Midgatiort • Measure After 1�hti�ntion Geology aod, sails - Get) Gebingc hazards` Potential for ex, of people and _posproperty L5 No, mitigation is required to goolove hazards - ' Patcntial for stibsidencc S` S.I. 't hercity should,adopt. and implaineat a gcucral plan polity"stating Wt.now devetopincnk project approval wili be coa UGoned oa the Grading that water IS aupp[y is auffic�ent to agtvc new ` dcvclopment;'WIMP [ecneat'this polity effectively, the city, �Al�1Va"tcri and We �t.+' ahotild'pardelp'ate in preparing a , �, r �1 '� � vyatersupplyst}:+1y,,for'Yhc,Chico„SOI,As., Saila hotcntial for iotrenscd eibsion"al od'"I hS No ming !tion 4 required - ,sh ,,,CS �..J v,4 ,f Y�, t;o � r- • I.k'rY- .i:_..,: G,.. ,.n v� s:9dimentatrbd, M tl � G' R w . � _ , i19 I Canvcrs,an of pr►mc•agricultural.Bods S; No m[hguiion is avalatilo Il; Poteahal far�prapccty damage;attt,b9tabla ` LS No miti&dOil gp[rdd; �. ..', Table' 3-1. Continued Page, Signifiu►nce Mitigation. Significance , Ympad'Copic Project Impact Before mitigati er:Miilgation. 123, Thia city. shouid,adopt a genera] plan policyi ttiat would require, where applcablC,surveys foractive raptor nests and moasores'to protect nest trees, of . foun,,as a condition of project approval Vewuil pools and, oIher sra�fonal an n' ols d other seasonal' foss of V617 hal po S Refer to mitigation measnro 122 1.5 ` wcUm.ds. wetlands Ubgradation of valubs and faindlons of Si Itefer.to t�iitigation mcastue 22 "'Ciao] pools And other seasonal wetlands Blue oak"woodland- EhuiinaUon oC4bino,,, woodlands in the S `' RCtcr to mitigation. measure 123 is :124. The: ctty,-and'ciounty should revicd their general plans`to adopt a conservation plaq And anitigatign°banking program for , blue'oak woodland habitat Y �z ,i' 12 5 ThC, ty shoWd!9 theij ply la>is a a crit�C'he'c p ; o dopt ' goheral o di'nurlCe thaE d i cs bn� �dudtfi 'a,F' mal4[d tr�CS0 bbr profCCtOd estabilahes regulations' for their Pot cctioil, removal Valley Calc savanna Eha►iaation<aE;valleyro3lc savangai� C S FtCfcr to mitigauon;ineasures X323 and 12 5 lS , 12 d. They city and county should revise their general plans'to adopt a conservation Plan and mitigation banlung program for sO vahciibalt`yadna'?iatitat' a �. .I I'btenDal lussofNu n anon vvoodlands'' �' IS' a127t The"aryl should'desi` se°fir and storm '''' l..f 1vintcdnpanazt woodiands;and atreaai anlr ha6�tats , W; i and,creekbanks from conslructioo of, a �draia facilittes,to, avoid and nammim ,; dower imes at;'stream crossings and storm disturbance of mu<Cd npanan woodlaad elinin outfall sfcudures'at drainages PandlstrLeambartl, ha{�i[ats and special f $tarn$ dpee{Zs'"t� 7 1 F U t � I I I 4 a I r I�pAia 1I4r y wl° I•' i, ''ll 'C. rvdL*d•;kd1,�7 q"�3 �a ���Y :�S,arV �kl"t.qq�"`..1 aid. I (tY Y"ie%ary i+dia+, ir�a ,j �l`Ct _ !3 ., ;pc VI �r •,:•b*. k.aq,`rtra m.,il-.'wws�, .ata: h'.0 A Y'w t p n I1=h S M•+n rT.,ap. � 1"m.+11 m'ii4.w b'-." 1i ml q"'h^"_i`-tea'" 1 } Y. txN�l Ji,k u:.R- fe+lYH. ..ila ♦!!/ lwl; ( «:I A .�'I> It *'drx a-Ki�d,-` 1 .1,: '� tlN n•r } (y5••p 3 ''�'tt �� t t)� 8gl 3% Impact Topic Projcd "Impact, Bc gigmH i l�!dii icastlro ,._. .� AftSlgtulicanc�� er Iytitigatilrl n Creek and tn6utariclt sitiain 111c Potential.tgr acute'and chronic toxicity 9 Chico SOI fisheries associated `with, decreased arnter Rcfcr to mitigation mc asute 10.5 IS 4ualiiy axtn'hutable. to Increasedurban runoff IA d'Geka'and tribniarle6 within the ' " Chico SOI Poterilial (or dcgrndatlon of Chinook I.S No mitigationiscquircd prim. at eelheadtspawning habltatlo Big CW`ca Crtidklmd iLdo Channel as.,a r, suit of incareaaed peak storm runoff. 1)egradad6u,,of ju;vtOd ehlnook saf non S and,ateclhead rearing habitat iii little Rcfcr.i Mitigation;mcasu cs 10,1, 10.2,,and > Chien Creck ak a" resid of is«cased peak 103 F, I lr ry storm rulnofl _ Incxcased turMdiry and sedimentation in S Rcfcr to mltigaflon 1r14 and 126 ,r creeks and crib Ltancs,wlth,n (il^s Chico roca�ures �,_ , 9 k + 2aI SOI from: construction of Acwcr,, linea at + stream dosship and storm draw, outfall„ 1210 L , '°' constructiaa activ,t,cs w or along; crUks tnbatarics ;w structures and to tttesaummer „ I _ I � ), , . ,, fo minimize unpacts;on spaw�g, x reanng; and egg stoges gf'a�adromoua J 111I xhe (cast daroaging cons4ructloa tech nigttes inr treani Should lie 'lit 12 ciuccd,bxrik cover and lnurased water' S o as Refer t �.m,tigatltin me are+127 �,, I tempefature in Big Chico ("reek and i), �I,�,rla ' F'' n,N ; I5 trlblltaAtl5from CtlnStYUCUUntlf-bCWCr +a ,�„ [`_ leµ]L•.� Fg. - �Mr g y ,- uY' �: 1' �nea at� cam ddmings and storm drain, 9utfall struc�rs + ` I ;;1 � i � , LPIi I Sptp I-status'ri I R acs, 'c of ntlal for degradation of Sacfamcnto 1 S f �` lY J • tr. ',.� Marc River halyltat;for winter-run chfnQ' No msti Eton ,a r � uacd " " q r p, II 6alnlon y,w! 7" e n en .A II F"'' 7 { . i. '7 4 � 4 �i� I .i .'yl {.V w+ d � 'i'7• a t �'l -,T 7.. A } 1 1•! �. ).y I �{ ) f ti NJi�'Y f re I ' ��� �' I(" �r1 t ", P I ' � u :�+a' 1}e: �"YF "} S• n I;� � tl' ! + 1t3 �4 ' 'h�, S'. 4, rd ,� t'a r �awr'� t., Y � 1 4 I I' ., i , NH)r,• a.j � 1 2 > d .l. ,a...«.ti �...� wan ur,.y S - ��. - I 41 �1,pq i P.dwi Xlu4e F MR N1 - , I hil rl� J 1 = Tabic 3.1. t^ontinued iynga,13 of 39 � $igniiicancc ' Mitigation Sigaificanca Impact;Topic Project Impact Beforo M�tigatidri Mcasurc After MUlp.Goq pot1'ntial for degradation of habitat for sprtg•run rhndok salmon in f3ig Chico $ Refer to mitigation; measure l0 Sis �uatulaGyc impacts Cretit, Mud, Crock! and` Linda .Channel Cuni aladva loss oLanntial' esslad I �' . , � S Ref tniti do measures 12.1 12. 124 cr to ga rim , 2, ! LS Ycradl pcigls And other{seasonal +Hetiands, X1.51 12.$; i7 8, an f 12,9 valleyroak savannas, add misted riparians planE;and 12.12 T�6 ednnty-shduid adopt a gcner'al Pu woodlands-and.dcpcddent Gfc S in this Sacramento Valie ' [ Y cecekside greenways zoning policy and " , ,'es adjacent 200466t'6pen spacebuffer reiiuurcmont 1213. The city and countyshould adopt .. r1.ys r r•.. s��. i �. 3 ;, geperal ptag'pohaes cadorstng private, state, and federal efforts to acgiure and r �•. a,W-,�r� preserve natural habitats in`l'iuttc County And'�adiacent'countiCS �.� Cumulakvb,loasjo[ pea W4 S 1214 R lie county should revue its general"iS team pdfiulations thio >l;hquflhc, agccies, ! <plan to adopt,a„conscrvauou pian and mitigation banking program suntlar to range. %he Crty�of':Chico plan for Buttc'i"ounty &i2d foam k ie ky1 , tt.. , lYnf •._lu I - w.iaatluaatl resources potential �4arriagc to Cu urtes' ltural f o Wl 131 `06 «ly should require that developers t ; rch vicludelnnarchealdgcalydcurds�scar I t ��.2 thejingi LuppLeaUdnia d,ai�fz�' w� �,t, �� �('„1 Jt b Z,'Ubmtltals„i'y is, �i t 1��., fi�R•x7i% The gtybhould rcgtl�rc that daVelOppccrs' �h, ” L Y � a, archeiilogtcal autvcys°pcit�o m d by ' piofessional'archcolojsts of utsurveycd lapels, identified as 'a result of the Cfdre Cwahng s n 1(' m,rCfdrds:6eaf*h 3 f+ �, cdcveld mCgt;slta, l�nSB P. p ;,:;1}' _ II , u11�"w�lt4J SRM "`t" "'al ( 1Q VJA1, 1 i� ,XW iPEY. $ (y% 41t.',,�.f ®r, iF. l :{ f ,,q. yya1 k y, fF; 4� '� T FkM'4W�' - IF 'i��. '4( ,.. Q�. .F �.,, JI•I,i I' I rY.. ��' y 1-0 , »,e .arwJu.�� t.Y.l _xw.k ,a+Mw '.r "wn < ,w,ao; ... `.+fi1,: i k+i � �«+Mw»rw:;, µ .,i,, {. v -R A a�tl Yla x�,s 'A ��lali ✓.ja'u^” p., u,. r.p �, s., t du, �w.0 w, f .• ry Vow , ,,r ,:rWmwlnRw , , lYA `r ut, df. 4fx y ria•' {,, § V .., .. , �; �I I I y,!,.�t�dk'f�t.�� �� ,_ , .� •iiE +. a �a'�'r 1t ". ,x - 41ir"'�I"l�rgf M,r 14° I4111,frvx .,. i... ...,. .... 1. r, �: r .,. .. -. ,,. .. .. .'. .. .'.I.. ... .:_; .. .. .�. _ . Tabid Continued Significance Mitigation: Sigmficanse Icnpact;Tppic Project fmpad; Hcfore MtGgatic+� mm re Aftcr Mtttgadaa a33 'T}c sty shouldrequiio that developers halt umatruction, adMtjcs and notify We apPropriatc authontics in the event any _ suspected #p. eq op resources arc` i_ " .barthed dund g coos tructtan, I. tY i .a li 6:. MY ,�y, 1 E R r,l d e�� r Y C;.r uaJ „4 ray lawa.4a 1 i1( � r`^�� •'����. I X�. V: 1 cr F YS. 1f.' .fid' r :w �' �.. t °;?u �`� �,a��i� ^7 rI 3a d�.i# .Va .'i �.�8st>',:�� r � � .>t r.�, l "tl l+,t� Qsgi; � .u•.� '� n%14t �' ,YI de ��.1�r�N1t�" F;=r y� E:..�' I;,, � k i ,' ;ia7�i.�rt� io { �t ut i'f n �Id i7�t'r r, r I .•I , ar - ' .I � �, .� ,�.� r �. Yfr rd i�j tib �.t.r'7 r. �ai� �' t.�R,9N "r( � { 1 „ _I to qx.1 t I r: IT � ... 1 1 r .m t� I � • -.� r .. A„_....��w e�A=Rtlhi 4�.f r .ns�N4;fh: ,,(! '•nM ,'xwFty-..M+Ca�«ttIbTN`:rk .uai�l .fs uuycatu SwF .., , � �n r-rk •w R l �45LR+•S H+ y.Y” { t�,.rd.i�+ ..til"+: TV�rN � �+1 .i 4l,,,C MN '>jl,.r ice#'+ R�ri � �,' moi' .' .�c, rr � rtNr, .ntG• N u x.rYervin+esy+• .n�lf�•^ �M 4 Ir`I"� I A�.�./�:C�'Ck a °i 4A T -4+— J" , _ti �. �..y.b.•w.,w�.u.rK. �m�ra yJ roar �2�� rrr w e M�waw3w s,: r,� w�� , W I Uble`34 Cont;nticd age :of 37 Trniiact Tapia: 2'roicct >m act P SigniGcan`a r i Beforo MiUgatiod Mitigation Measure Si �caced d "ti ' ga on After�Ivti . „ N0RT11W P A"kAbO i�nr!`use it d ge"Ifi ndticcinent Izn coI 1-11 n Conversion o(upproxiroatcly 2h3 +iacs of SNo mitigation is aGic aYall q6n' spaca.lands to urban uses �a U' Land usaconnicGi 1Potcntlal for conflicts;bcttvecn adjaced4 S 4.1, The a "stipuld ado t 4 �' r t=to•farm agncu, ural;find ii Q LS, LS; residential: fixes, ord3nancc 4.2, ' The aty should Fequ ie onstto' `tiuffeis ` : hetweon rcaidenfa1;,#d agria tgrr, nsc_s 4:3. The aty.should restrict th6, density of residcntial`,'uscs 9djaCcnt to, agricultural r'.i lends 414.The city sho ! devciop and unplement 1 : @°program or,the purchase or'transfcr culand of a urtt tr Pofcncacodvermon ofappro imatcly, S , of, Amp misfarmtgndl ".No is _Coa,�,--roon 120'acres �� primo farmland (Class T and" mti- tion evadable tj C II gods) to Yirban.uhes'and us6ciated loss` I of producUori I Gsth inducement potcntial futorc aynvcrsion of pimc farmland'(Clasa $'and:ll soils) north of SNo mitigation fs,avail4416 Ilia annexation area , -�i-_.'CAnSIStCn cY T - Cgnsistcncy vpt6 Crty of Chico gcovttli agd ' 'cultural :No mitigation rogp d preservation pohaes. Consrstency vnth ,13dtte'County orderly B No rnitigaUoa is icguuod dcvelopmcnt,;poliacs I E I I i I � I I L, ;;♦ I I i I I E, iv, QxNr Elva fj IY t NM 'i f t I E�CS,Y4 I eO b��":; 1'��,dxn ti i�fiJl f. 44 kJ ' a+ �l b.Eik ,y�,kag7kL,JE+e, n..w,»: 'I +a. ,L i�%'.'�W I. r `� ,tit, ,.. ..� y � �' f�wa P 1?z t ]' yx✓. s .i-> �whri.r ai. 'I °t +"`IY.14'fi y aA I"��y �r za lift io TAbla 3«i.. Coatihued: • 60 PagC 1 3 $Im Call ,` Ivfitigation $iguificnncc Almpact'i<tipic Project Impact Before Mitigation Mbasur'crMitigtttirin Ahe ' 1 ^^ : s Consistency_' %'. Butto County policies on ix No mitigation is required resource management . ngriaultOral and 5 adpiand policies Consistcnry wi(h but t6 B No mitigation is required facilities policies Consistepry vrith' Chico Arca OTeen linc B No mitigation is required ptllicies Cumulative impdctlt CurnuladVe loss of primc'farmland S Ntl mitigation is available Gas's I an It soils Public semcea and factlitlet „ water 6c v* ` Adequate �groundwa2eY supply e><p'eeted` lo. S 5,1. The city, should adopt and impiemenf a J ' LS bd availablcfo nccdminbdatc demand for a 'j'.general Ojai 11"*-' policy stating thdl hew an additional OS6G tngd of wat t m2000 rM l p .,. P J PP deVcln merit ro'cct a rnw 'ill bq .t r > 4 r , + k,0 : conditioned tln, the, findurg tlult water 6UPPiy >s &Nfticient to serve new i- 'dGYel ltlpnlentR To'bplemcnt dila policy` -. 1efiectively, the aty; Cal Walet, and the "v SWRCBr sh6uld par"tfupalto fd preparing Na� al p�dter suplsly Study' for the'Chjai SOh Adequate. infrastructn o to rQmaio�atc is iVo tig�tlon i'. rw qu�red r incrrased d6hil d for waters' ".1-vi'; r, ru , - cx lected to bG available m 2ilU(f' 5 to 1 1 ! Wastclvatcr SC CC Iria dcquatC V astcwatcr troatmcf t capacity S 2 Tttc aty should adopt a for to nrcomniodato gcnoraGtln of uq 'eddit,tlnal plan, Incremcpfal r<xpp - loilL of the Chid 432 mgd is-2400, CP to,aieet demand the Olin shoul d han i]1Clud8'a,Utlt�At $mCeL5ti1,�O�fminCG' ;sucL expansions bef ore plant r fr f� 4^nstntcL94 it oF•..iall�i .} ,I- Adequate wasttwat r ,flection fac�Lt,es' IS 1 No mitigation is required t + d' to be avaitiible in 10(10 t r. , n s,.44 1 I i ! 1�F :, .radar. u. ,ia,. z t,,: .-�:•. � I :.t ,;,N �, I n.+.:, ! .it 7�^wr�wrr wzkln.. `�..,�' ,�.! r r,, ,� ,.I rrsk'z�;: `.e, �r,„ru ih, 1..,rr ,,!. `� u4;h•`+' .-r, ,w'41u,4.yh.�wa I , W."'r I AA w IN ,. � n : ,,• r -„ e 4 I "1wr n ra i'eUFlK -waY +<,r 4m a xx.- v y n' A .fi r tc An l<.ra •.r- ,, a na,.r f ,,. 1 ill jjjjW Table 3-1 Conlinucd' pagit,l8 of 37 ' ImpacF Top3a' , Piojcct Impact SigniGcaticc 13efore Iytiugation Mitigation McastiroAi{cr S3guficancc Mitigation' Inconsistent with_ proposed park a3tes $ 5.9. Ttie project;appl3cantshould dcdIcatc LS, d ated in fhb CARD=Mastera'lab antl- im lS:aacs of 'Par in the anao n►twn Ci of Chico General Pian area ut acca + nuance with the locutions 6ho�Ma m the CARD Master plan and city gcncral,tilan' fid =waste roann thbn4 Inadequate landfill capapty to' S Sj7'r Ttie couniy.ahould epilate tha solid LS - tlA "Lnacasc in demand. for solid' wasto waste management:plan.eYcry` 3,:ycars tp. disposal in'20()0 identify nodded laridfdl sates (California Government,,t:ode, Section 66780.5) 5A Th pty and=county should iegi ire nepv � de`etopments to provide acccss'for aotid wastb collection YchiCleSL and space for eecycling�rece�ptacles JM and cleMricit Y .. Ad' ante mfrastructuro`dx cctcd e9 p to,be I.S r x 1 .4 1`10 mdlgation is regWr�h available to acromoda(e increasb in ,�tMz,rl F a .,. ' atr t „ , t,y c. �, �. demand for gas and clectncrty in 2000 tis>a �4.;� bi,,a1 �cikti r ` - . t, Ftrsa$rvay s ®rept operations 20071 r No' inaeasc id;tlows ori Stale ikoutd,32 '• i*N� :$ep�y l,N�h 191r �, JiFi�r { n;�fi F� No faitjga4Unn i5 rcgturcti cv 6.annem ton north of Fast Avenue, with no'impact and LOS tdmaining a(A oa;this, scgmdnt E l5 �A3l� f i s is t;fir Ir; t�1 44R.� y"� n fr. , Ina "" eased traffic f[otivs t�'n.and'ividcning of ; �is r ..1 E l�d.mitig�tion is ire�uirod ,vis �l � �"t �' sEl � ^. East Avenue weshof Guyon Avcnlie, wiEh 1 LOS'remauvng at L On'ihlS SgmCnt Iu.�rcused traffic !lows on East.Avcnuc 1!lo mlbgafJoa �s ccga3rcd east of the Fs lanad With IAS: 6 r U rt degrading to 8son flus segment i ,,;Ix fL n�1T� Ia&cased'�raffic (lows nn the Esplanatle IS No miugationkis tequuoci ' north:of frast`Xdenuc, vrit�t W`8 i� r dcgr'aitng'to 'On i , I I d„rr , s I 1 I �, •t, _ a � r,�.�, � r+�l ;� t ; F4° � +.:�. I, E �Yaa,�''� 3�' �, I I� t �r t.r ti,^ lll,,l n +yx:Mawl .,nJ, 11 h .nit Table 3-1, 'Cofilmodd Page 19 pf 37 ' Iinptict To Project IIII Pnct SigtufieunCcMitigation Acforc Mitigation Mea4ure Signiticsynec After Mitigation... Public transit operatioQs Poteatkimcrease is dcinand for CATS'x L5 No mitigation hs PUbhc transit service from dcgclopmcnt of _required the annexation areas' Net" -!nor increase in noise Icvels,olong East, IS No mitigation is rcquirccl Avenue, the Esplanade, and State Routes 99 An 32 generated byanu`exallon area developmcat incicasd in cumulntivc tidisc Icveh; gcnell r_* S 719 The sty, should require afod liy'tc assoS�afed rk,th anncxation, project applicants ttnthm the Chico SOI to C deft opment't 4m an )o, unplement`nockeiicduciion r►iaiamum aece�Utble nous standards measurce; such as site plawiag; architectural Jilt rri to a . v� td, 9 ,'+ layout, noise barriers and construction vtiPit, Mo;&I ttObSr tLCC5Safy (SCB me£i51U, , - - i0 ut1T i' A1r quallty Piitea6ai� for focat)r icd •CO rablems' p ' The a'ty`and'county 'should "work ;p r ,rr ; , e,t with: iiie Butte County Airy Pollution,Control i S' Distrioto ievcl6p a"mcehaniLal OC EO �� a' +°ts� say+�d�A.,, .:, =y ��wi';r� I�• �t „��i� locate exuliag sources to fund an inalreet•sonrcz control program li)at' determine whb'ther traffic inacases are causing.or caatcibuting to, vi3laUoas'of fhb sfate.'or federal CO a3�sy c , P 1 t;j" a1 a °E has, St2ndardS'71gc1 that would'devclop and imPlemont.appropriatc congestion >r � rur<C't X61 0 w syr .�Y ;.+ i t ,;. � , f t or othCr cortecdvc a 'on wiencer�pptcaflal poblenis'are '' identdieds-. y r r: � •. 7 � r �..a» t �. � r ;ry .•ea �v �ki,'J �: N�Bkl;}� ir+ 4i lrw� In' 1 us. w q 1B„+�":I' St qL �W✓,! 4 i I 4i �.' aP1�7 .{,EK - x' i rt:.'u Jy 1 4V G. . ° �UlP tui :,iii �. ul3Fidr��f�1b ttv�. 44 �rltCe i0 -a9 j"'1 i 14 !-C' �'. A Ll fi Aq`Nd+ ^f.-. Y f,,•.=}w.R"f ui I x. v'!i M" i 1 M .uue�Leis i 'sKl ,.f.� �AtYow*4WN�+Vcu1 �p J-py+4='FVi+S✓ Mm w raw.. rls�, C •I:: I a x41 V+.i xg'�i L* ib g rr17 ➢1 ll��r.ir �. kid ��'N 4�Vit �4�� fi}�. iGtl G # 1alrX f K:vY{X 1 i'G„ �n-1Mvsvw+: :.Nrenu, a*xF� hY` :.w i Suv+t l �Ei.i'i; "Can�tin A , u age 20 of 3l I®pact Topic' Pralect Impact. S�gmtica°C0 �cfore Mitigation Sigaifi - Mitigation Metisure After.' canx; , idgatiod^� TratGe•ielated emissions associated with S degclopm-ent in the annexation area, "Wi*ich t3,2 The atyi;and county shouldsvork with ) $ would coatributa to;currcnt and hitttrp to Rand on ution C,0teol ozone problems in,thc Ch3ctJ pred District dcvclo p plement trans partatioa control programsiandlndirect- 6 sburco control - . measures thuf would pco- ,. VidC070 a prCCUI'Cso, CmISS10n, redudlohs eon5istent With.tlt0 requirements of the Caiiforuin Clean Air Act i'dpulatfoa.find hoasing �( Pr�pvlatian Increase in annexation arca population li S Rcfcrtbto the ma gallon measures idcntiGcd in' the 6 er imp : areas Ref nd'Itng Gtot enoC pos, nt elusions cn thcrat6et fibusi tlg g N aCfl r i s y t+ v e r t rN Ja«case m, app areal.11nusinglstock " impact areas -*ion " No mitigaUod is `scgwrccl x ° „.i ,fir i Iacnnsisteacy with "regional and focal hoLLsing plans S 9,1, 'The G, throw a deVelopmcnt agrco- `Y� Bh tncnt ac t rough adpption of faa Inciu•' I ' sionary zoning ordinance, should rcquiris { ' r' project developers to construct an, t adequate amount nffordnble housing ,o !qr taw and �W' ry low mcomc'famdtcs„t I �' v Hydrnlrigyanii water quill{ty Al Al 1 ologie codditiorm and drains It � ,41 Cd 6, chandct capncity;,w ' Suhbusin'6"G m anti a tsxation'rtrea peak S 10,7 The prolcct PP cad should" provide I S (lows aal,ttcs (e:g, detention basins, reten tion ladosenpm8 areas, or some rom' �+ s s' butahott of but h iecquesto contirol ';::flltlaff from the' anx i d pF:.air a n hon area that st tolcct” ws and rung ,per o Off Ew Ip r�, r I h+" r .r, ,k YY Fktp No Urn' afe et ? iJitila nlagnI tide f0 prepraiect'ITows , , I�F �.,.c r�.�,�,..-7,; :� A.k�c �;�I! f Xai�. �dS.Ht � 4 �:,I. 1 - i r t .�. -gym J,,.�ri•' i, .I I II Ill+rf"..>~. I I � 4 Y f . Y d J F Yt I' I ,X. I F I, x rsNr�t . n. w 4 4 T.alift Contin bla 3-1. uyd lift: 0 37 ' Cm act To tc� P, P i'rojcct Im"ad P Significance' Beforc Miti att 'oa Mdi 804 6a S' Cance g Mcasuro AfterMiGgation Potential for subsidence S Sit The dVsh6Wd adopt ' and,implcmcat a general plan, policy,stadng.t6at new, develo mens ro P p Jett ap Iowa! wdl be conditioned on `the findinS that water supply is sufficient t_o acrv!e ntsw'deveiop� IS Sui1t< Potential for ifideaQ oroston and IS' mcnt; to.fmplcment tus policy cffcctiveiy, the'cityi Cal watcr,'and.fhc SWRCB should participatc in water preparing a stip y study for the Chico SOI; No miti gall on is xcgwrcd aedimentatia'a Cpaversion of primo ogrtcnituial aoiis, S No mitigation fs SVailablo _ Potential tor`'- property ,damngc a,ttdbutable L5; No mitigation is U, CXpansimsoii.4' ,required 'l�folOglcal CeSpurccs t7rchard, habitat +Convdcsion of approximatciy ISA acrc$ of", LS IYo mitigation egiiircd - orchard habitat - - Sniautson s h awk r Br!: raging hnbttat:for Loss a[ a 'cultural fo 5, wainsop'ahawlr" here fo'mtttgat;on measurcS .iZ l and f2,9 is; 'Crtattlative imp ads Loss of e a s ace 6abttat far Sivamson°s Ix._ p r S I X Rcfcr to mtttgatiort mcasures 121 and ]2,9. CutturaQ resources ' PotenUai damage to cUltucnl r ourcrs'" I I S I31 The sty should regtiim that d6clopers Include ad archcologital records tcarrh - f, isipart of the Jnt in application- suhmittals q J r &� i V, I '•y"1 r'. i` I 'I nx�gt>- i I + ifZ tr t r Nz>x F it i � r r `,a t•,Y , i I kL,, �' 1 Tahld 3»2. GsntlnUcd , ` f'ngo 23_ Of 37 _ of act Too p _ S griifici3rice Project Yntpacf Before Mitigation, 3'grufcn" Mitigation MCaMirp Aftor Mitigat T f3 'fide dty sfiould rdgwra that dcvctopers. havo arcti`Wooeal eumysperformed by prafcaslonal archeologists of;uAsurye ands, identifiedAs a resulf. df it records search; before tinflliing 1 devclbperient site plans..: " 133Y 160Y should,rrAWe Uiat deval*rs' halt Constr w6h flCilVItICS find Aotify the approRriate authorities in thc',cvcat'any suspected-archdological.rdsour ccs arc ' t° `unearthcd;ilurinp.copstructiop Y a i, rAY� MYdp5%ttF(x I.fttMry xi S i�l� ¢��i { u 1A�,J4lni�yF�,:a ,F i 'a i� 146s pfl Ydw F ll ��;1 i •,�� fR a' e`, 1 1 ;i 6 s I ro "1�ry°tt�K i$6'p�Y�N wYll�t4�,x?' ���4iN ��4Gtyltl� � w;p �I 1 � ,, i���kl �' p�'�a`���?i>� �A �:.V:'x. ���"'�F.�S.�t✓, �'- I R 1 '�� ��1 vA��1 {{3{,"9 A : I � I ' p, i - ', ,,., .w+r� W �..r:fxixs Y �, � aMi•-„*w+a'9 � -w�-'�, m+w �n;:w,w_ nr„Mw.-ti �,1 I N ^"mr.+ tl1+M +.?Mr4f rq�k Sc 11..'�rt r 1.�:w,b— N mp1GY�}rtn wahG4•Fpt,m:'J�aiF.•iw na=4`Mtiw �M T,P*'+n�Nartx.. , kxftp . �-,�f, 1! �i a. •uM, r I�1Aw !F T+tble tinned --—=---.-=— -ago 24o f 37 . Innpatt.Topic Project ImpaG , Si uance 13cforcMitigation Measu on 5igniticance After i4fi08ation G�Nl;Ri1L I'%AN-AMt'sNUMENTS N012TII,Ok TIIF:-CI-00 CIri1PIPiE[r 'Lat4d;Us/r' And:�gcnwtli �niluccment: 1 3nd;'cotver$i(Slt Conversion of 6n spate lands to Urban: $ No + mft' adon is a usesyailablc I aad usaconQicts Potential for wnpicts.,bctwecn adjacent S agricultural land uscs.ond futµrc: 4,z. The city should adopt a-relit+to-fatm. residential uses ordinance a; '' 4 2 T1ie aty' should src!quio onsitc'�tifieis � dcn between retitial.abd agricultural �• uses 'Tho d Qboil rastr ' tt the dona�ty of, ,tY ra'sldcntial uses adiacant to agricultural lands J rh i i f', z u•i r( 44 p The Giyt should deyclo and im lament ' a pro gram"fur the ptichase on'tpransfer „..4, ofl�uVclopmcnt"r10.09 'onfaimland' r CoaversiAn of ri cultural land • + L -,.' Potenfral conversion of'prime farmland Ea a tir ., v a.,,.bi .� t a J , [K, e , (Class I`and•l soiC$ tA'urban'Us'es and mitigation is available tl ' as`sna`atcd'%�S`ofliroduttida �''"` �% ov+th induccimcnx PAtenbal future cnnvcrs on'of;primc, {� t farmland (Class.l and I['soils) pica, $ No mitigation �s available i} i d A consistcnrf r ,' r tr; n4 Cons�stcncy with City of Chico hand ' hlo mitigallad iEgwrcd agricultutaL prFservaPon policies Consistency With Suttc County, oidcrly i3 l i.' �'•'! ,tt`' No mdigq u ucl( 9 �i �leveiopmeat policies P � WT { CAn$istCnty With) BUtld Goiinty ppIpes or LS 't '� resotYcce mad3gt=..agricn['tutal and hlo mU;gation�>StreilUucd ai cropland pocs i i � a a n 4 , �r i �, xNa.{ � ,�rIJ I k ;� B 1Gew,1✓ s� i, '�I jl Y h w i {, kT,iYtt�nS °+:r" CJI�k' 66 4^A I . 13y`�'1 �:� Aµ Y N]�`� tir{l � • e 1 'fgblc 3.1,' Continued 'ap 26 007, lmpnciTopic, , Vrojectlmpa-d' Significaam " Befor Mitigation Signiliciurco M�casurco After Mltjgation Fire proteciton Adcquatc an expected to ;1:5 TJo mitigation is required be availablc;toserve in {ncrea .in demand for fircfightc s,in 2010: lnadequate facilitics to, adeommodate anS S.4 The shquld increase iri students i,i,20i0 . , city adopt a general plan policy that that the city 'il4 Cods approval of rezonings, pre- zonings, (i and gcncral plan, amcndmcnGs,, to the erdcnt allowed, Uy law; on stipulation:S by the Applicants,'and their successors in interest;fo coordinate 'building constide ioa=;and.occupancy .f C VVI In, the CUM tolprevcnt-or romimizc "ogcrcrowding in "thd-ehools Tho city should adopt a �cner d plan <� { 3; ' ��t u a y't d , policy that slates that` the city shall �.Y ebsum to hyw, at dhqu`ate'khool;;fno'nong;wM be cs µg t v available to; crve now deirelo'"`meat P before fhat-now deye, lopmcnt is, Parks;nnd retreatian (nadcquate'.funds,to,maintain pew pAtk= 3? approved by. the city ,; land needed to accoZoodate demand w � ., 56 a {ai:I'po eityrand CARD ahoufd adopt F-+ fu anang m`uchanisuis, to ensuro �ldcguate funding to maintenaurc of peeded parklaad agcontmodate lS �To mitigation is r`equ'ired rl increated ac sed dem and f or recreauonprograms: t Solid iyasfc'nianagemont 1and,equatcllaadCdl capaaty to accomma S,y r S}7 is 1C COU1dy.SilQnld Ui1dAtC'the so dat0`mQCASC In demand for Solid WAStC.: 1, disosal'ui 2010 ' " vraste mtmagemcat titan every 3;ycats to 1• r'' f ; 1! $aY t a k �dentJy{aecded iandfili,-06s Cahforma Government Co'k Section;66 80 .. , jm. ,sa ik,�;�•� Al 1111 FL. I d { I' t,' 6vt,�-,1 xr° 411o s y e'✓✓If..".'F .n,l f w'�,kA� ;'a �" {,' , C°a, '>t •.^y �. J I I � ia.el Tull t,f..�l �.q it i r rill W�'! y $ F� X :{'F K� .j, �i� .I rt �t�bi I it ttif p i I{ x' li I � { f��,''r I�'�$ 'aa13F 7�ta a � �y �, ,�r•tiu�l #�e tY I tour-�.f.Y3. w.a ^ 'fit wrzs I V .0 r rtiti t..,, � . �: I �, xw-P a» .. - ��r"i. wwwk Id xbb,r,.., ..� v„xl�yra. wl, �( i mrti +,v.a. •I':us �,-, : r,. A. +s.�x,1'HIk6 ,ting,.. -„c , i. a zdl ,rr.�::. r.�. ,n,1. I �, s � ,� � i1 � f,r' �ti, ��� m , ✓Jv "� "u7#'+�+ ! `� tq � a a I V ', , , I {l r I , w,. i r ,asci a c �a gun ..�g, �,we rw^�, „I .1 able 3-L Cotttindbd PrtgC 'I or 37 Impact Topic Project Impact Sip�aiftcancc'; $Cfote Mitigation Mitigation Mcosuin is Si'"' �cancc '`After tigatiori S.g. The itily, _arid county should requiro new devolopments to Or"dc access Cor solid wasto co1lCCtiori vehicles and Blind for dad and ciccteicit, rcrycting ;cccptacles Adeuafc i lfraa q tructdre expected to bc' ' No mitt " is Gon rf ' m nYailaBlo to agcomodatc increased. ga eq ugyred demanfoe d gas and clectricity'in 2010 , r PO Oil ItoaskWay segment operatioris-,2{?p7 Lnerc ased traffic flows on Siatc Route 32 V/tfi amendments. naith of EastAvOnuC with I.OS IS No m ti ot�on a tcgmred, , 75,, 'degradinkto, Moil, this segment �.�+ �, w S"rdPrA 6.. ty'r 91 G �':: �• p rt' r 4' mw �, . r i-ncs,re�at sed tralliC lowa' on+ East Avenue �,• GS .,., A)t .t",7>li .� rr.i u:T µ'est of Guyna AVenue� with LOS Na m-6 ttan� ia•rcquiflla, a. f b remalnmg at. A on this scgmcof' p Incrcas ,Wrmnows`oa EWAvenuc east of the 1 splanadc,,',vNi LAS o mitigoVon �s rcquved remaining at A on this sCgmcnt 5 7 y fbY:.F r Y,� «,r•r {"iiei,,, Iacroa"se ttaffiq [loWa,on the F.spl nndc: . north of East Avcnti With L.OS No 1111-190 104 is'tequitcd,St# WITc; rerrimn►ng;at:Aan this.segmCnt. ` p, ,� ,,i jr,h • - O1S�' �`L{rgaiid k` ia4 tar 41 w Y # Minor increm in noise levcLS alongj„S , p ,��l�b+vr,';, yl 1,"l;: kS.�1J„S,Ys: r,(r �,1.• ” No'miUgaGou>>s Avenue, the Esplanade ond, Stgtt Rqutcs � rc�c�uired ;t t ts� 99 and`32 encrated11 8 by deYelopMent rn 6' i th,- amendment arcus d �tk t? dpi ��� r i t V , , I w;l i� i�, Sal b u:A°ij 'r a„dx'usaj_;Gi . e p w ,P ±d :bkK q �, �� ttiib9y Fr Itr r fY, Pry r4 tr':l��Pntti” l , : r.�i bKaS�d�H ','•bi .,, .r a�' ,I,ar,1l fr'E�Frik:'.P G�r''M . a ? 1° � t« ;, r,,�,.�a�� �a�,.�.l.�isa� ,,., q�,+; Y al�xurt C ,�•,; ,�'+ a 4��1 3 r: it I ��: -rrx �" +.•a �71,�rw'll�" � { °'S J 11 4. i ` , ,.:. ..r,a4.i ,r ..;i � m a .+,. i - : , LL 1 :.:. I cttt• �-mr; J7{. { 4 av ub ,.y,v,�.� Y „.A.•wYwU ,yux� ,y I `�' I ..,•A'MC.h„A ..1 i XR.eal4b�s �•Y I.11 n ile — . Table 3-i; Cbed� k'08628 of 37 I ium :ad Tb to P P Project Itripaet Significance, Bcforo Mitigation Miti ation SignifCante Mcusure Aker M�tigaGoa - fncrcasa in. cumulative noise lavclkgcncr4,S atcd by traffic associated with amendment-' 7 2 Tha aky`rSrotild iegture:projed. areas dcvolopmaat and rn excccdances oif,implcm appl�caat*vsnthm the Chico SOI'to rnax,mum acct tablo noise standards P anise roouction measures,, such aso_plaunrit architectural Y la ou aroisc'l#am..eX and constructioal i�iatl0ns4as +V r,CC mCaSUI'e ., �ilr quailtY . Obtendat for localized CO pro6lcros S 8.1. The city'and Oun :should ---k.with the Boat County Air Pb'Judon Control. District io develop a mcn sin chaor to' rotate existing sources'1,b 11 d an ndirc�t=sotircc conGol".program that wouldiletcnnine whether traffic incraascs nra causing or contriiiuting to' I violations of the staVi or federal CO siaddards and thatryould'dcVelop and 1[mplmen( ;nppropriatc congcstron tmadagam cnt of ofhe� carroctrye acUorit I � tVhenever (wtcatifd problems"aro+:'; `. idenhficd ) ,, .1 •h,. �*,, � 1�(r Flit°(l mow' • ' relatod emissions as�ociatcd with , Traffici 71. leve opment` n the geacral plad ameHd- T 5 8.2; Thelaty arid,eoitnfy�ShetildaWork with' mints arca , would cantnhutc to e Butte S;ounty Ait. Pollutiod"Control cu`ncnf and future ozone problcws m tha; D�slnd to°ilw� top and ifnplcaiedt trans'- Chico area ortaGoa ttiHt of r o$rams and itfchrcct sours ebnt>o maa3ures that Would pro=: i�iile ozone p�ecursbfkm�ss�od`k �� i (odudlbtts Chnsi5tCt�t'�Nlth the '� r 1 � ' +CCjUttCmCOCS pf the Cahf0r[aa l I '«b�t,p `1yk�Y�yf•';f I ai 1 d ,rnk:;�4 � � i.. pis• I r I I 1 °d'� ir�;•'ii; �f � ,�c )1;:" F i R.�r: �! �.,� ��, � .r; � X14 n(' ( I I F v A w 1 � sl 1, , f�� . C � " "' �� I. _ ,�ti . E` : I! 'o-rl 1 r ` ! ' f t«-. ) �� �a�', k 1 i1..N +SW .ul � +11it �-dy M•r 1 ( ... # Yi .U^ i'.7� 'r �w'i. 4 U, � sxtfq4p. W`+ v4r +✓, * +»h..n iM nil+ )++� + 1 A I k1' II ��' .`I� ,j,. N*F �.i � Fltl�;p� v tAY(li�•(�'� r.aLr> ul ,f �: I ' {I rl, A �%t�}kd�i �..,�It A 4 � � � t ) + +i Ji +yy yg� q I I • -. r I t , ablo 3=1 ContinuedAn Paga,z8 of 37_, Impact TootcProject Impact. Signifcancd Mitigati on, Heforo Mitigation MeasureSign►Gcance After;,Mttigalion . I ;, Increase in cumulative noi$c levels gcnor- 1 ` sled by frafftaassciciatcd v�th amrridinent S 7 t The pry should rcgwrc project areas dcyclopment: and in~excccdances of applicants within, the Ctuco SQI to maximnni acceptaE�lc noise standards, tmplcmcnt'noiso rcduc�ion'mcasures, such as site planning, archtrr�turat r layout,'nOIse'shiers, and construction ►n j ificaGons • a€n �cessary'(aco measure _ A10 -quality Potent for ioratizcd CO, probicrsis S sa The sty and county shoWdwith ,work ls the Duttd CountyAtr Pollution Control - Disfrict'to devdlop a mechanisai or to locate ezisting souI to"fund an indirect -source control program would'iletermint,whether traffic " increases are causing or coritributtng;to violations of the state or federal CQ" standardA and that would dcVeiop and �� ! P pprnpnata coag_baGon maaagemcnt or other CpKCiirya aCGb&it it tvlaancver;:potent;Jl•'probltms Traffic -related emissions afis_oc atcd MendIIcd'� dcyclopmegt to tito general plan amend-, g? n he aty�ahh county should tHork w' mcnfs area, wlucb wbWd,conlriburt to '; with the Nit" `County:Atr PoputJon�Control' LS currcht slid fnture ozone problems irf the nd fnipidmdnt trans:• DistttM lo' cop;ivacs portaion cbntrtCho progrditis'nndruidaect-. , source control measures that'' vpWd pro; r vtdc Ozone"prccutsgfi emission red ucGods consisttttif wrth the" 1 ;,�'_ , , " �< < rcquu'ements of they Cal�orm$ Clcan'r Act. " :,h • �, �' �I rl , n z a r " , 1 ff �1 1 Y T I 1 ' �,e �; "I 1 I �� � A a • „� • �.0 t �.4V c t !y txe*'aaJ r lj I 1 I �. f ,... rll .A a " 1 , X`t-1 .. W r� is x r rr 6 . Tablo 34. C ontiqued ig6 3d. pf 37 - , Impar Ta ic;SigniGCaricc p` Project Impat# 13efo re Mtt3gi;;ion, Mtti tion Measiue Aft crM t n. -*i tnixeascd sUeam e fl ri a &m;pcak SOI ry cued _ runoff W - assessments of erosion potential ln.opca thmels indicate thaE'' the channels arc L9 unstable because of ruaoti from propos ed,dcvciopmcnt, the,; city should. require that prajecf propo- m = dents include easures (c,g,� channel Alterattona; cttanges'in channel Foudbncss Potential effect oa flood corad�tions near; S . channel, rcinforr„anent, and culVcrts)'ia project dCsigns to atabilizc'. the channel or, reduce (low Refer to mdigation measures 14.1 tlicSacramentoRiveraron increased; ` and 10.'2''LS ', ttolume of runoff fromcthe sof _ ' Rcdueed channel capadty n Little Chico;- Creek and inadequate channel capacity in,+ Refcr tb mitigatiop measuros 10.1 and 10.2 IS Comanche Creek fromSOI runoff _ , l G% lip' 4J✓ l l CumulaGVe impact bf increased :. runoff , fro_. m t1ieSQl.on klie Sacrament S, Refer tt irnill, on mcasur4s 1U.2 adct: l0 2 . o Rive_ _ S Crranadwatcruali q. ry bccreasc in groundwater quality; B Nq tnittgadoa is'tequire C?1- dcgs dation atuibutable; to removal opt ry, 4i t✓1 saptic systepts L %�e"�:M T� °' '1;+w.r r, i,•c ,lyr., .Cw` i.4 li. pinC Decrease ingrouadtvafcr"rrch t' rhe Nd mitiattotl �s irgWrcd + autibutsble t&t6aovallof scpveiysi(cm u bccrease iq groundv{atr quality i3 No mitigation rs re<tuucci k degradation. Wablc to temb'Va.l of inliltin Gon wells t , Scrrfaec water quatity Inaeased,waterlqualihj ftadatiodin the„ rfiujla Saerumcato diver attrlbuiablc to'ineieased" IS No mita t,o �s'r aired t r "wt:, °� f 'a d` wasfa a _ � t r �schargc i St I „ y Ulfi'41.�'d I I + l' i � I �v¢ .: I ' X+aA'N J -+. rY, I kh , I „ - I � I 11�• +r v J.-Itli Y ' 1 ' .I ) a+ .,ry ! ',. . r.0 f. IIM�i xk, i� % , e f t..a„+, I �• I I � r S f 9� �i S�� x'�Y t F�� W i'� ' I � ��.�>$"rµ'7<'S.' � � .I • , � 5 . 33 t WINN ry�..I,. a Tabte 3.1. t"vntinuad--'pe, , 31 of 37�a SigniGcancc ' Mtttgatioa Sigai[icarice Bcfore',Mitigatiop Met+.sttre Afar Mttigauon v To ac Irripactp Pra ect I. n apt J p ncat and N IOC. In implctncnting.lht'Zcdtmcdt In Short teem ' trosl—n control plan for the master nu ncnt lose%6g bui1 jble to cower ptp 'end dr�iu outttall �:anatruCtion plana eo115trud on actitntles, the ntY storm should htfe a quafied enginceir, ¢dl<nues ,ge41Opt, Of soli 60ttnt15t spcctalized knowledge of erosicln p'eocomes and water guahty itupaets to, monitor construction acGl4ticsl' it eres1pn of soils and,tclease,09 sediments into creeks could occur, construdion'altauld be tcrminatcd until,corrcctivc ticastirO _. - ort cartes,- 014 i - t%hC city LllOnid lttipiCment $ is $iti{.'IC,L.7'dtCrtiOuality'C�Adatlpn ,. r al,tt;A$cd g I r b ;zombmatibn of BMPs "to eoatrnl .. u tabla"i poilutartloadm stotntWater, runoff. pollutants, including from nrfi�tn k,6 distfiar 6 � g th tilt o oa;Uasitu and/or o f dctcntt P Iantlscapmg areasp it recharge 5 Rt fcr to m mc+surc 1OS libgaaon t�tmutatrvc water quat'i'ttnpgds Dccxcase gioundwater tittribnfable'"to lads of septte a�stems;`-' � ° olid' `Cliff' uify i�loiili� �aQlemcnt tt',w+ufcWater ! i tiscteastd iMP. rvioiC4''stirld�.' area, and ecclamatinn program re naw of;surfacc p jtcis by storm drala tl� s I GwtOgyandsolts �i tr Ott tri¢ ePji., Y i ,adi"- v1 vc.-t t1J,'i 'Ns v <, + y .x r s x w� a s ! 1?dcntlal _or Of and .. t. LS' NO mltigatlOn i9 [CC(ulrCd " �ieplpglC hazard& cxpOaUtO pC0(fIe paperty td g ogt r � .G F "D8fl i 114 Y " , n Y, �i , , I 'I Y t r yy Y, �lr t lNw G a.li WVy' / }5c i t YY l "� �i 17 rtY x}), n alar th :i N'iN"rill, F4 �'pd.�u i6�,1•e�i'Y �.i�'(.�,.Vlv.�t�`.,ItC'W_lr �`IYinSyl�p; a{ i 1k,�dl x + t iw"Pad 4 d t4k :til e" `�. ry 1 1 .1 5�,lla 6\4, itarc.. ➢ +ml.. f4s .-ii 5' j� k ,'t �k YY,irs3k'q t ,,.ti 1 �'' txd ry{�F. 5M14 ,W'1r1 , �i. GY tq �, ( i w7 �r sa Iv.1� � k stn d rdi , i�•.d E ' h '.I r^R�.11{.y,: � fl. 1 J A .tf't � '.; h4 �, dv p 4iv M rM• 1M"Y'Puun Iwtk' Mac" ictal .t ,:: i Y, , F I I � , :�6ak .y abia 3-L :Continued,Pagc :..__ <. 32 of _ impact 1Popia; Project impact Signifieancc' I�efora Mitigation Mili n Meaau on Sigui6cance _- ACterAdd _.. �._ Potential Cor subsidence S 5.1, Th. city should adapt and iinplcmeiit n,. iS gancral plan policy stating that acW.' iia�clopnicnt projcct.approval; wdl fie ' conditioned db the:.finding that •water Supply is s{ifficicnt .to scrVa new leve opment; to implcmcnf thus policy; CffcctivalYi; the city,'Cal Water, and the' . SWR Cl should partwome in preparing a Water u'' I t;df t r th P e c Chi PY Y co SOT � "tchOHIO"W Pp hareas`cd erosion is .. No mitip,�hon`is requtrcil " ;col' rid: w- 7Yt ij si so luncntatldn f b t _i r rti d ! i { I! �1 RiF h 0. Si g` t ynvarston, at,pntn rah so c a�ncultg S , No mitigaUop s available . ` Potential Cor, ro p pert}j'damagc,attnbtttablc IS No mitigation is reguircd b. t0 a%VanS,4 SOBS fSicl:ogtcal rrsont'CGY z r , ' �.arntiai grassland''' x � f oss' otra Eotn tin' ' and' fora n P A g g n � S l 9 ", x r , The aty"and county a habitat, seasoaal wcdaed atatcrshcds, tmd' ' should revise ti,cir '' apcctal•status plant spacics as a;reault dC genertd'plans.to adgpt'a catisczvation v .7, urliaa development and conversion.oE Oak,and mitigation b'anl°in Be am for annual' grasslands in, fila Chico SOT atinu9l grassland wildltfa habitat a m tr ' f 32�. The ply, And county shpiifd revise, t6F gcncral piaifs to adapt a conscivition I� pl_aa acid ttiltigation h'aitkin r am Corti ? �! y rnal pools and'scakoaal Wctlbi a ,w. 6abuats, sigh a program would prov,dc ' ° ' ` d 9 a omprchensiva'tipproacti,fo�'protetting" 'f ., , Vernal pools, and seasoaal Wctlaads. y d r M1 •� w' ilk iq,,.*� f v1I 4I� 1 F 1 /if Y t I I I i Yi J s i AR t' - I I ,Y t •1�i ,� 'C{4�,,,f � vij AP.1? . r �i.k { 1 - I I til V r i .�A rr i ! prF r au�x3u"a i �,�F/ �! >.e ! .a+w+ m✓ v.' � ��--•,• w ui !C t 1 i -•i �,wywe a,«. r y i y'i, 1 It .Y�. 1! Table 3.1. Continued, Pagtl 33 of 37 Significance lvlitigation Sigaificn+ico Impact Tapic Project Impad, Before MitigaEion Measure After Mitigation � 123, The city ahould,adoptr a generat plan' policy that Would require, wlinrc applicable, surveys forL adivd raptor nests and measures to protect nest trees, il; if found, as a condition of projetr , 'I flpproval i. iiernai p4ois`and_other sdasonal l.s+ss of Vernal pools and other st,.�soi+al �; s ft far to `ill ation,mcasuto 12.2 g IS ' v,�ilands wGGands D gradation of values°and fundtona of S Refer io mitigation mnasurc 122 v qual poolsand otber:seasonal "Vbtl=4 ,. in the : 5 Ctcfer "to `m+ligation,. measure 123 1 I B w. oak Woadiand Bhipmation;o( blue oak Woodlands J 1 i i ^ x y 1 ChiF.o SOI ( 112.9, The aty`aad county"should,�evlsc their " gcneral7plans to adopt a conscr ahon,w plan and'mittgabon''bahWng program for blue oak Woodiarid habitat• r 4 ;n p p The 4 and county should fuse U?�ir general plans to adopt a l+cnlage tree 4J aorto°� I ordinanco•that def+ries, and identifies I mature irecs to bc,protcctr�,arid t4 -,j.1�4.>I bstabliahes�regulat+ons far thea' 5 protewoa'and removal t rt "t Yaltcy oa+k'sava,nna El'+mu�fa�+an of val�cy nett sava+ma Rcfez to'"mitigation measures 12 and 12,5 {' 1 .. d I, reise tLeir 12,ti. The aty ancounty`should v �1 general plans to adopt a conservation i plan and mt+gaGon' baalcin� program for �i feta r � 4 lwt valley oak„savanna habdat Ivtnoed r►panan Wa>diands and Y,aati llrl�� p; r!. ,1s ion w an ds PneaUfa dost oL m►d npac oogl . $, 12,71 The aty.,should design sewer” and, storm i 1S atrcumbank'habltats ?; ,+� aqd arcj�kbanks from coastiaet+on or� 'dram fheilittes to evoid,and raWmi tie ii3turbaucc' of mu<edl npanan• woodlan$'. y aetr hliCs',°at stream It and storm• iisaLi'bt3tfohatnidii"r`r "si 2iraiii&g +, 1V d finsttemV,tip habitats and speGat �� sfatus spccic�� f e i u n w .., , t 4, t. ,. r 2 I 3 I a is <,y�: b �I,'!! S^ i>• d 1 'Fk nG"yd tt(1� Ap ,. a ,-RSI , 1 t I I •I I I I r^a�r WY.t�WI'r1tKrJv�M•`AFnh+,k�l4 nf�.a: �+yb I R�--•d,.k' r�IYYNJU,:� Wf,. �i1,. � I I m M+wv N MP<i F';N t7 R. Wire h N Iw, .� r+M ^ e. 1 tk ipe1N tir.mrw�r..l Gr�A .>"'•'�� 4 •,4 g�� 7 Ill r � '34';iti. S aC ' ^.`7• , p A,�t1 ! Ir "x.M^ l� F y� 7� M NI u r @@ kya.��t"�¢+,t'Cat.!��,E.f, N r'U.14 'Y 7�,1�l� ' _ 41—;14 - i . r ap:&w�.n. w�ywu.x�r..m. r�an.1•.y.mc ' ,s.,rK s a »rr� , I .:.irY_h�•urob.,rpwk lMR -a,.- yrvr. vs. IwN � .•*.Wrn•I,Y ,. 'A v.,Sn.Plk MYn ,.sLLa+Wa r. s'+A K.uv--,','?M 419Lb'i,*"??V VUk Jn rW l9 SIG ..t tri+-,:P - 1 r I Y TablR 3.1; Cctratlnucd ' i IN 34;of 37 Ympact Topic; Project Impact BSignrficAncc ' Mitigation ef drRl�IltlgAtlRn glga n cc . IYICASQre After Mi t lgati0n;' Inaoaiscd rate of loss of mixed riparian' idoodlOn, and acekbaaks from bank' Refer .to mitigation measure crosignAnchitz, by iriaeased rcak runoff ,10.3 for ComanchR Crcelt;and Uftle Chico' i n6turbance to wildlife rri"rips lad habitats ! reEulting from proximity to development: mitigation mcasute 12.3 f L$' 12,8. Tho city shduld revise tha;ge taral plan ereckside-gr ways pphcir to extend , protcctrod to all riparian'and sgricuhural and old field habitats Lris i of t+gncultara� and ald field habitat3 ` habitats habitats in the SOI t?r 2rd hAbilais 5. icfcr to mttigatioa tncasutc,l2• � I:S foss of orchard habria 1 vc ctation_: Odlde� � No mitigation tscq*cd r g and los., ot• ttcgadat 0.n of Butte E ounty IS sl-ttafug mcado}yfoam Populations critical to the ^' r No a'drlitiontil in ti 1 c g at4oq nicaaures ale rci"uir d species` survival in thea. Chico 5CJi I oss40f open spacc.foragmg habitat for .� .yW8lnStln�$ ha'A ni the Ch1C6 $QI S. Refer td'rniUgafibn rric� 3llrc 1 1 l ; r P. LS a^ ti i. E. F l A �1J l-,ayf p l TEic elty sliourd Ye' Wrcf md,v�dual uci0 sato urchnSc � P preserve, and7' r , s �F +d 1 ,r , ahaaccvi aac of StVau�son'sdh habltY. °at ' t ry ic'con rt �,t :� or e e ac .. vc c rban I dc�clopment according to the bFG miti�i g, In gu�dchnas forthc Swainson's . hawk Loss of+d(her apcual,'s�tAtus larff'� P , top•ulaGons and special status fdh(o Refer to mitfgataq' tueasures habitat fro 1 m urduced land coaversrons k25�.120, and 1281 x as 71 D r is I ✓ { i l r 1 :� fi 4.. � F Ali 7 Yr ° � ' i i �. i� yi r, �vfiaM bk�f.'r S -K � �4 , � r� pat ,u_, � , �� % }" •.rt1 ,, �r . �4„ a, y � � 1 � � �W,^ warn. y..» �: � 41 I q!• P t, n �I` A � � I � � .v wa '. �S I , I � J'F} J �.i "C� Ike M � � �• r a4 I '. � x:19" 11%' Hr'.Si+u {P Y iN i L. r.,Yr: rr..�Pd «k. 1 z»ML. �t'W �JI�'- a. 4`1 c x�r,da4;, Ifib, k 4 , 1"t'n �r4fti�1.1� tj h..wr ^�.^u. r4aT d .4rr.Gx �.�•- ' " r�}I ti Y rfrp. TAblo 3:.1. Continued' -- age 35 o 37 'i Ympaa Topic 12rolect Iinpac2 Srgm(icancc Mitigation Jiefore Mitigiition Measure Signiticanct — After tvfitigatlon' aI ani0to Woo Pdtcntral-for acute'and chronic toxicity to � lrsbenca as a resulk'of decreased watts No mlligatioa is rrquued 'quality,, ifil :the Sacramento ftVer attributable to incrc;§sod wastew to a discharge }✓reek Arid iributans w,thtn the Chico i'otentiai tot aeutc and chronic taxicity'to S Sq[ Gsliedes aasociattd with. decreasctl vVatcr Refer 'to mitigation rneasure ipS uaGtyattra(tutable.to increased 'urban;' ivnaff in peeks and `tfibutarics WithintGc (ttico SOI; Pattntiat for dcgradatioq,'of ell 4166k, salmon and stetlhcad spawning habitat ri N6 mitigatian is required � !S 60 - Creek andl Ia do Channel as a r It of increased: �. ri Gn kstnr%rya us rY-q �>yeg?adatton aE�We„aile chrnoo.� aalmori. V 'r andatcelhtad rcanng habitat in tattle ; • S Reeas ier�th'mitigrition mures 10 Chico Crtek as a result of increased peak ',i 10 t; rr v . t r som runoff "• Increased turbidity and l f*; z r sedimentatton,ul ka and fnbdtar%a Withw tlia Chuen S Rtfe tot mtyga r t tion mcasure4104t of SO trucUon cif sawef. meg'at, atfoam anujn gs and atone Braid outfall` 1�'itl, itw torlstruction!si`cGhtiesin'or�'atong;, „ aslriYcturrs h3: 'fh ' °' �ciee, :an- rliutari�s to thd'suminer ,� n � � � � t� �� '��toFmi`eim IaW flow �JWy1-Septo�tkr3O) � � pact,°onspawnia J�� 'r ' gij t►n egg stages of anadromous salmonids WI 41IMil t �, s- 1211✓ tti7to I�c3st damaging t re :1 �rwrrl i ='�t t ' �,,K Awa,• RedUtcd bai,wver and ma c � war It eonstrUcUon reel✓` niqucs mtNrambeds'`shauld be utilired r tcperahirt in 13ig Chico Creek and S c(er t Q-nBatiota nlca�.Wc2 7 crib ttarres ffnmCons, fiction of sewer lints at streatn. &"in rand attitm drain i� ,5 outfall structures ri l AA ii I y V 4;11 r.,�w Rye I yVex �' I 1 • wi,w, i 1 k yfirsarV& aF y M �, 1 nw,,. _ ��, I �e,, r I I I l � ' o Iv, � �''-i � v�wCti iV..a Q�a rt.0 rye, 0.• ��"�,. nip �y I l � a 1 jl"r4w. nIM � G V� ,� ••wl., y k 1 ; I � '� 1� , •� �g r��t�'� � � ip�� I i Table 3-L ion ue d rage 3( 01 37 Im act Topic. p pi sit ificanCG Mlt at10n Pro'cct im a 1 pct Defore`Mitigation Signilicanco Measure A@er Mitgatiad Spcc3al�status tisk spccic3Potential Coridcgradntion oCSacramento, . IS NC mitigation is icqutred River habitat foK wlntcr-run Chinook . ealmon Potential Cor-dCgradat on tiC habitat fp"r s RcCcr to mmgapon measure. ibS spring -run clinook salmon in Dig Chico Crec Mud ks � Cres and undo Channel. Cumulative, impacts Cl.�mulative loss of annual grasslands, S Refer to'mitigatiori measures 12,t, 17;2, 12 4, LS, vernal pools'and othcu.6 06ri wetlands,, 12,5, 12.4, 12.8, and 12.9 WIoak savannas, and mixed riparian woodlands and dependent plant..and 12,12; The county `should adopt a general viildlite species, in the.Sacramento vailcy plan crcekside greenways inning policy and adjacent 2 O foot open space tpfter requirement 12.13: The city and county should adopt general plan policies endorsing private state, and feddral effort tq acquire and preserve natural habitats, in tutte County anii:adjocent counties Cuinuiat.ve ions OButte County'meadgw S 12A4, The county should revise its ge;aeral 1„q j, foam populations thrqughout the species' plan to adopt a coascrvatian,ptan and h aingcl „.F - m tigadoa banking program smi ar to sa. dhe City oC Chico Pan:lor Butte County, iricadow mam C 111taKu1 rtsourcee a` :Potential dagiare to cultural'resourcgs S ;a31. Tl c sty should requ�rc.thai'devclopers. iS°!` litdude an archeological red rds search `4+ ,..;. t P r ,,.a r t t.t + 7 , as'part of the initial apphcal,ion. vt 1 , , fF A I I� 1 x 1 # I a _iM',tr? t� v •tr+.=wr rd''s+n+q ^MNwro-pN +1 wk+ .vyeryNr 'an' Y ,-+ ww- .b x.rn.naP,_V9#1 a14WS S, w .`Hyi 1 F r,.1. L 1, . my„k rpd _ ,y.u,... u. m 1 cf -. f•.F , . 1 1 i _d,... 1 t I rl qq - r TO ,,F n;., I _..... , JIM, 'lift Table 3-1, contieued I'ago 3G of 37 i jt Signifi..aoa Mitigation SignffiCanw, Impact; Topia �'ro ect Impecf f j iicfore MiGgr�tion Measuro After Mitjgsition 'Sp cciid-St atus fish apccics i'otanGal for deOaditGan of Sac ramnnto LSNo midgation is required It ver hob{tat for Wmiee� Uft Chinook _ salmon i r Pott#dial for degradation of habitat Rcfcr to'm{tigadon mea urC 10 S spring rue Chinook salmon in Big Chao ck, Mud d Gree anLindo G�bannof Crc4mtllatire impacts Cumulative loss of iuinual,grassiands; � S Rcfcr to mitigation g measures 12.1; 12.2, 12,4, IS t. rndl pool$,nd' othcn seasonal wcdands, 12 5, 12:6, 12,$, And i2,9 y oak savannas, and mixed riparian Woodlands anti dependent pan and, end ` 12,12 The county should adopt a gcne�al plan Wildlife species xa the Soaamerito Valley '_ aeckside gecntvays tonin i1' and Zoning Po. i POLICY adjacent 2011 -foot open apace bulrcr reguirciricnt. - 12,13, 71c 'city and ,county should adopt general pladipolicics cndorsing'ptivate, state;, and federal efforts to acquire and; preserve natural.habitats in Butfo Coualy and adjacent counties Cumulative hiss of Butte Coiauty meadow- $' 12.14, The county should ievise its genetal I S foam popuialions throughout the spwcs' .plan to adopt a consarvation plan and F r ran&e initigahan llanWng program similar to (T' y ,,�� , 3 wY i:�i .t�r� r 1, a .��. t'c Gity".nf Glv, plaii�'[or Butte:Comfy Ir m'c'adowfoa�l� G"arlturai rgsources „{�, "7�r� Potcanal,damagc to cultural resourc6s, S' 13`.1, The sty should rcgpirc that developers ' LS include amaichcol4cal records:rsearch, i° asapart:of thb initisl iipphcltion w 1 xiF w"^>F 1 u �' l }" r �.w•r f �� "SlibtlfittaLs i , a. w r I q i i f 1 J �4 - I r I' y , , i — Y+ h+wih':.o .� F, �• ,f ,.,yr uA i{5 h yF x+.ws,.NtiJlrihWNb'�XAI M1+F'N+V++W M�'R h Ua.kt Yl.+i ..l.0 I. 4�w^"V4 I" ... .. a ...,e. .... -. .. I , .. r .. .: ,. -. Offen Space: Open, space irepresents the; indwell Park, other cammtinity parks 'and desgt rc:Preserxt X9.5% (2462 acres) of the existing de "N�v'' ioip x �. wSR - av, anti t� a„ 4publ�c/(�uaso�'ablle.�A,pp'roximatelyt716 acres�(6�v of the ta►tal developed acreage) i�Y'the SGI are developed for public and quasi=public �aaA,d uses. Uses on these lands Ynclutle Chico L)';nified Schoal District,wkC.U! schools, Cal £o�rnia:State `University, Chico (CSUC1; tla+ Elver Dollar F`a.rgrauds'ar the U.S. P1ant'Introductiori Caardensi ��r ti ��. Vacant Lands. Approxlma6ly x431% of fhe .lanes within the �S,QX are vacant; { ?igure`2-3).r Generally, the Iarg pard'ls''Q '"vac"arit"l� n�cl'e; sf of State Rauto 99 are used'� i,r grazing livestock' while. large :parcels west of State Route. 99 are irrig;4ted agricultural j lands Planted primarily Tri almond ordhards jManyA strialln orchards 39f � 0� 2S,,acres .are lot ispdr ed v ith Wral residences around the v estern urban £imge ,rfp P 7f� 4��a .� "?., �i ruin k' rs�i�vrcx A i Proposed Land Uses and General 'Plan Des gnati©ins ;Propoppd land uses;l'ornvac�ant lands' in the SOI -4re�those laricl uses shown on Ckuco C:eiteral. Plan`land use .map, as amended throtii fia 23; `199'."A cig=aril preerat ; rr•�, i .,-'•!'�t Of a �t V' a .�x 1 0 �' ing ttiet'la d use Iiia r is xncllrAd `at t e Abd t 'r�V� is rop,r i ,Tigufe" h,3 shows�,st i g vach ,t lands in wn in the r. Table 21. the Chico S61- designated open space' lands are goijs11 gu presents esturiates, by, general Plan land use designation, of additional acreage to 13e p, s" "a4q� Fy develoliccl4v+tYun `t%�� S�7OT b'e�oild 20 q 4 u 1 k �r,ef ��. ." s �.i �Butte,'Couit��Lanls Apace''T,o the Chico Spher. of Influence C G i A fadh rl � ., fi (j � :w 6i td�q, i f,i��`I .w 9. ✓.,. s r4, rc Qr i� �.ati` TJses ani `egxal Mari Desigmatons al , �k� al �w.. P, �,I, r.x. i4 ���,...j,..A w ,.���R' pe,Yfi9��7� '•j Exiting usF on `lands outside; tie °boft dapes cif thye,,kSOI. are prim is y ^,y.g!•�, .� i.�t� .h4 ' � &¢,%�' f�'1.2}d t;�v M��4J tTM� A r anctilt i� 1 ai d Yti ;al reside ttia�l. Gerier`a f plan' land'' iYse desigi dtions are. sl a �rc �lglire, ,( �• � !�� a s +r^a g ''`' p u p r t �t r' w i � p f y I� J."di $;1 YS�:Y ;c� �A i 2!1 lyt Y A I�il� Ltt� t .B g s �P�F 1 �F S+t�'4 T1ii" R.:�YYf •{1J�'i it ^Y`� LYIJyy :� I t,J.airs ciarthest ani east°of the OIC are usedor °sesnl raii�g oi~ivestdc Tete Eutte Cuunty;ChicoArea.'T.anif jfsP flair designates the area as Cira<"n'aid �pr%'I',ari's ,r (Q acre minimuin, arcel size d p 4�Jtgf i i', 8 .�p b' �.++{�t.rcgn1� They re nor�t � air' e,,!, 0 , "east i£ Male 'Rdal' �;�Q, antl� sou ihof qAw :g. :. un •.,'� r ,"1 . <e U ,�k . y'. �dii.a.e•e °I �. ,.cr. k i dev to ed .tooir:' `tesidedlial land uses intUTersedwithec�htdsi;'field i%nps;N and gratin ' (�ff ,� rami°�� fe= k,: � .a t e. � s G � � E is lands TteBrtle sutthica{,AreaiY Pian dsgign�ats they:rezt as.gri£dZtura'1 { • R P+i J k e', Ih„`�r p.iJ." i w� y§i 9 7k� "w A �M , 4� A �6r r [ i _ �.. i r k � � i i e 3 9 ,,.'PAL•.9 acre 'ars els pity call Residen0 a : `-aGre� Ce C nsiStent ani ra,yro # t ,w' Cul srs enp )° afids alrong`flie east to bouiidarsr or tlxe'portton ii�ithe� �OI�th�at uri��ude9 Chid Municipal ,Fiirpar`t are, alsr designated`Agricultural Residential: t II. 4