HomeMy WebLinkAbout90-19A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 3 OF 5til
1
c. DrainageCharacter�5tics Drains generally to the - west to Hwy: 99,d rainage
ditches and other, Ilocal drainage `0ays.
d. Annual Rainfall (normal,): 20 to 22 inches per year.
V4 Limiting Faetoa's; Area of high ground water withdrawal, potential subsistence
area.
5.
Visual/Scenic Quality: Good.
6,
Acoustic Qualih: Comprised by State Hwy. 99 traffic.
7.
Air Quality: Good except during perkods of stagnant valley air.
PioTogical Envtr:.►nmei�t:
8.
vegetation: Oak Orass Lands and: Orchards.
9.
F'✓ildU Habitat: Small birds and, animals corn non to galley orchards and grasslands:
aYltural timenf ;
Env4ro
l0.
Archaeological and H storicaT Resources in the areae High Sensitivity area.,,
11.
._ .. .,
Butte Ceunty General an desi anon: Ag ricultural Residential.
_ gn
it
,
Existing Zoning: SR -1.
it
Existu�`j Land Use on-site: ;Single; family homd,- a barn ,and a flint stand.
14.
Surrounding, Area:
a. Land Use's: Agricultural to the `vest and north, suburban residential dwellings
to the east and co`mznercial to the south.
b. 2;oning: ,SR4 to the norih , A 20 to the west,: A -R to the east, and O=2 to the
south:
gr ion. (orchard and 'Field Crops` to the west, agricultural
Plan Desi .ati
��
residential to the nr�rth and east,-Othnierci , to the 'south.
d. Parcel Sites, Ranging in sire from 1/4 acre, to 50 + acre parcels.,
p Population: Suburban densities. to the' east, 'Mural, densities to the north and
west,
15.
Character of Site and''Area: interface Uetween agricultural and urban uses.
16:
Nearest Urbani Areai5 Chico.
17:
Relevant spheres of Anfluence: Chico, Chico area Park_ and. Recreation District,
Keefer Road/Rock Creek Drainage D' tnc�� and Rock Creek Reclamation District•
18.
Improvements Standards Urban Area: 'N
19:
Fire: Protection Service• .
I., Nearestr County (State) Fire Station• ttitord.Station1, approximately
h. 'eater AvailabiIit : Fire' Tankers onl .;
Y Y..
i0.:
Schools it Ares; Cauco Unified School District
F
h L
ink
ENV RONME , TA L .REFERENC8 MATERIAL
1.
lvlap i1 -I, Earthquake and, Fault Acfivity: Seismic-,5afety Element, $tine County General Plan
revised 1477 by 'CH�'1%f. Hill.
2.
Map 11-2 , Liquefaction Potential. Seismic Safety Element, Butte County General Plan
revised 177; by C'M Hill.
3.
Map lil-l; Subsidence & L-andslide Potential: 'Safety Element, Butte County General Plan
revised 1-77, by CH��1 Hill.
4,
Map`IIT=2, Erosion Potentiate Safety`Element, Butte County General Plan revised 1-77, by
GH�M Iiill "
5:
Map ,III- , tvansive gods: Safety Element, Butte County General Plan revised 1-77',.b.
CHjM 1'Lll',
Map IV»l, oise; Noise Elemient; Butte;'County General .Plan revised by CHS 1 Hill.
�.
Map'V-I, Scenic Highways: Scenic Highway Element,` Butte County General Plan revised 1-
77, by CHrM Hill.
8. °
Map`iI!-4, Natural Fire Hazard Classes: Safety Element, Butfe County General Plan'revise d
1-77,,'by CH, 4M Hill.
9�
Ascnaeolc�gical Sensitivity Map by James'P. Manning, for Butte County Planning Department,
1983.,
10,
School District Map, Butte County P,laii Department.
11.
Chico Nitrate Study iVlap, `Nitrate Concentration in Shallow Vells, 1983`j6parfment of
Water Resources; Nbrtivw6stern District; The Resources Agency, Stateof California.
l2
Agricultural P, reservesMap, established, by Resolution Noy' 67-173; Butte County Board of '
'Supervisors, December 5, 198:
13:
Flood Insurance Rate Maps; .National Flood Izisurance Program, '; ederal 'Emergency
Management .Agency. 1988.
14, USES Quad. Maps, Nord, 1969.
15
Soil IVfap, Chico (1925)%OroI�lle (1926) 'Area; U S ,eparttnerlt of Agriculture
16. Soil' Survey of Chsco(1975)/(Jroville (1926) Area, U.S Department of gncu'lture.
17..
,
B utte County' Fire. Protection Jurisdictions and Facilities 1Viap, Butte County Este' department
��
and California be artment'of Fo'restry.! Butte County Placuung Llepartmeritw'
p
Bufte to. planning Comae,
AP 2, 019,90,
oroville,, California
April 115 1990
David Hironimus
County of Butte
1
Planning Department
7 County Center Drive.
Oroville, CA.. 95965
RE :'° Anderson Btos. Corporation
g ge Rd.
Forest, Ranch, CA:
AP'tt047-2.70: 6277 & 023
;LPC SURVEYORS, INC;
Log # 9 0- 0 2 ,0 9- Q Q
Da
'R
As ,per :our numerous conversations on subject
property; the following are written comments 0h
c„
behalf ;of my client in response to potential
adverse impacts.
Srde The Archaeological letter from uslwas sent out
Last week to the Department of Anthropology as
331 WALL STR)~ET
per your comment's on item 20A.
CHICO, CA, 95:928
0&343.5841, -
� Items 1 b, l c:,, if lg & lh i
Comment"s to.� tkm.e above items are that aY�y 3'evelop-
merit ori. the. 12"acre+ site wat13 cause disruption,
displacement"ana compaction as a result of
construction of buiJ.ding roacis and dziveways,: ,
Being that the request i to rezone anal develop
property under. a commercial development this
would allow "forlandscape plaiininS, which 'would
mitigate erosion and silting of drainage areas:
r
Being the soil is Class II, very rich and ;deep'
of
wino• loam would' inarease'percolaton runoff;
waiters ;fromthis detielopinent:
Buildings' will.be constructed; as per Uniform
Building Code aria will be .siib,j pct to ;se isma d
loads and foundaatioi standards .
,
„
1
April 16, 19.90
David ji'ronimus
,page 3
Being that there arO no public sanitary sewer
orpublic water supplies'wi1l, directly. :elate to
building permit process and reduce the high
'' '
commercial user.•
fiwy. 99E at'Wil`s.oft Landing Road has �xistirig left
'
turn north onto Wilson,, Lancing and this
,po,ck'et
project: will create a lef t turn pocket for traffic
movement souuthboixnd into project sits: for b" sically'
one entrance to subject property, with minimal
traffic entering existing uses which front:iiwy. 99E
today.
This property sUme time Ago gave ac�dxtion, right
of way Cal-Trans far the ,frontage length of
said px'operty for future widening' for right and
left turn giovements .
stems 1.3a,.13b, 13c
The otarier uandersltands. that this project evil increase
trafr'c and traffic hazards, `:but with, the ingress
i
and egress,f t one poiAl shculd control and
minimize trarfic. hazards: and--maybe` in the ..futze
- : , s :ma re tiire., addit Ltna1. widening :along
-til
Cal T-,a Y req
g r property;.
the as scent fronts "`e o�
to
2f you 'Piave, 'a.ny clues tions, Tease! feei free `
contact us..
Y,e;rY ;uruly yo ,
r
/ I
b
RUSSEL A: ROI�INCER
RAC/bas
ob�
• e
m
AtIlk
RESOL UTION-91-.r3
A T.ESOL.UTION ,OF THE ,PLANNING �OM1l11SSIOlY' OF 7'FIE
.
COMP, F BUTTE APP,RQ'VINE°ANLL RECOAIMEIVDIIyG TO THE
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS TI -JE, ADOPTION OFA GENERAL PLAN
1
AMEX TO TIE BUTTE COUNTY "NERA.L PLAN
YYHEREAS, Artdersart Bratit Cor araban; a larivate-cont an has, petitioned „
P p Y
4
the Butte Courtly Planning Cornrnissiot througfi an appropriate u�plication, to attreiO
the Butte County GeAerdl Plan Land Use',Element, fora change ftotn Agricultural -
Q''
Reside ttuil o Comtrterciat for that property 4enfifted itt Exhibit A-1 aildched hereto;
7
and
_ 8
VVHEREAS .the proposed Generali Plan Ainendment „has been reviewed and
9;
studied by the Butte C6amyPlain zg Cartatnisston arid, a public Iteat'ing held Pursuant:
1Q
to la U at wit h 'lime all interested •persons:" were heatla and
11
WHERE, AS,: the Butte County ,Pldnning Comrriiss on has revietued and considered
12
;
the caittents'af tltc rtvirontnefttal rewe lsludy checklist; (Exliibtt A-2) prepared on the
14
curiertdnteitt ntirsuartl to the California. Ertvirortmental Quality.Act; urid
15
oartly aYVHEREAe Butte. �nzhe prop, se
1�
agteitclment i ontpl es,ivith aU elentertts of tltQ Butte County General Plan and comprises
17°
ztrt overall irttentally consistent whole; specifically:
„
1�
L. The Project cotnpkes withthe policies' of the Butte G'otnty Getteral'Plari:
2: Tfie amend)nent provides for' compatible developrnenl with existutg land>io'
uses
NOY�THE'REFORE, ,13E ,.Ifi ItESQL%Eb .AS .FOLLOWS.;
�5nn
1 The ,General Plast Airnettdi�ietit tiff Contntercial as shown on the�attaclted
23
Z4
Exhibit A-1 ''are herehy'incorporated,by reference
2 6
,
N
X51
�OMTR
REG IPT'"
,,Tdt}AL
T!UDLiE
111FC0
R
USE: S/AR�ANGBS
f(� p'U DTIC
OOG
Z4IIIINIS
-...
6N {/
NBA LT �'f
�d 711BR
'A FPLtCAN7
•:
' Fi EC k'��V ED Ffi•0� - •''i
CI,
WORK$
P'Q RM:1T5
VM BNTS
I J
i
OFF ICIAL. RECEIPT
CO, NT'Y OF BUTTE
raTAT9 CSFB CAL'IFURNA,
-
,''
OF�IG+� IDF PLANNING
I
I
r �-,
x
I
`I
r
i
i
d:
-i
4
r
�
r'
i
1
t
I
�
M77-
_ , 7,77,
April 8, 199.1
J1m Brake
Cal Trans;
,
T'raffc viwision"
Box 9,11
May 5901
r sva.11e,;, CA. 9
,
GSt1RMORS,INC,
RL: Anderson Brothers
Traffic Stud�t
00
R
Jim'i
Please f i na att:ached one (1) copy of T12AF`E'I'C.
STUD prepared by Th"omas C4,'Ferrara
IMPACT
State Un v rs t�"; Chi co..
through California
two
SiJRVf YORS;ING
The ownet 'and ny5el.f have reviewed the study
and have met W, th Tom E'errara and we feel:
that the re?�or.t has covered all the County
331 WALIsSTREET
GHICO, CA592�
and Cal-Trans concerns .
916.393.5841
`the document an d 'if you have
Blease review
any eamments ,:;lease fee'. free �o contact -the
[.nivers.ity and or R,. F . C. Surveyors .
RUSSEL A. CR I!` GER
I
'RAC/bds
I
,I
r I
t' h
a
r
P
r'
rr
y
�i
try y; ,i ad I
,prei
February 15,. 1991,
lav ':d Hiroftimus
s ouity of Butte
illanning' Department
_, County Center Drive
_
r'rov 'llet CA:' 95965
PE.• Anderson Taros. CPA & Re one
AP 047-270-027 & 023
AM8URVEYORS.TNC
Log r90-;0�-09-"04
-
bavic�
�.
This letter is in ��espan"se a.fter ourmeeting"
Jarivary ,31, 1991 at 4:,00 pni: at protect' area;,
cis
I will attempt in this letter t- cover air ea o:f
concern by our latest con�rersaton.
SUM-YORs,n1
ITEM I TRAFFIC & ''CIYZCIJ,ATIpIV
331 tIJALL SFl2EEt'
In response, to cal-Trans letter dated;
916 U.3CA1,
9T6.343.5t341
December 20, 1',990, we are proceeding
tri sign contract with . Chico Tlniversity
a'x,�d 2'prn Far.rara 'to proceed with tra£tic
analysis. Wwill te
e c,. V. e firs >dr'a
within 4 weeks -;
Im�'M IT D1C>'TLC�PMENT AGREENZENT
The Planning" Depart ent has received,
,
a draft of oUr DeVeippmeiit Agxeeznent
fc>r stbj ect prod"ect which relate to
a'
tape of'" isses proposed attd a schedule
Of de"velopment pcopsed.
# ,
xTEM Z"IT COMMUNITY SERVI',CE At2EA "
We cou'1 a ro"
ceedwith a�.
P - C .'S . A tlixot�gh
LAFCO to cover drainage
potectiorr .
1
David.Hironimus
page :2
ITEM IV C".S.A. n8.7:
The. Counter of $utte Board of Super
visors have hired Heritage Partners
,
to pr�oceed�� with ditto frame f.or' a short
range and a long ,range plan to set up
to confer fixture concerns .of
County to provide fire protection, storm
drainage, s11 treet lighting, road circa.-
latian lan and establish fee "structure.
P
ITEM'V
REZONE & GENERAL PLAN
At our last meeting.with the Board o
Supervisor'` we talked about amending
the rezone app7ibat on' After the
meeting the owners and ,myself reviewed
the original application: and, decided to
amend',the. rezone to` approximately8 acres
and,lea 've a 2 acre buffer, strip of
property adjacent to the eising; S-)2-1 G
a ngle farm ly Jots °`,(see exhibit "" )
and riot. to develop at this
ITEM VI"
.' 'SR-1, PFtOP:ERTX NORTH ;OF F!:ROJECT
T.he Pl,annirig Department has concerns
regarding agr.i'cultural groperties,ad3acent
to's414project. The proporties to th6,'
North are zoned SR-1 and"' th;;open n has
decic;td, to plaod a 4' (ft.) high herr;
within a" '20'' kiui, dinq,,setbackarea along
said northerly property line to buffer
development see.E, HIBI° ''B�' .
,
t -04
/6
r
W
G 1
r
(
17J�90 os
iIs UiAt
r
o•3sAC
`
141,59:
Nv
c
20
30451
42aC 23
130
i7
is
n
w, "b13AC 1
"42
C,
9s..rb
1
zem.rz
zeac22
�,
,
WA. -SDN
LAN'07NG ROAp •
Fr'To'S I%1
t n. ,a/ SEG 3t�+
—
10 6707,
a
41131 +
4sSQssar's MaP No
Caunfy' of Bvf�e; Cglrf
:
r