Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout90-4 REZONE PLANNING 2 OF 2eit0'NN ` y a 2530 36 31 y, �,. SEWISS ST` y 4 PROJECT A ItSA M1 w ss.;tDb i+ 1 A-5 A� r O W ul `,. � A-5. �F FILE No.l1�a BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING CtaIViWSSION _. HEARIh�G APPLICA,lNT=COBE / Ro�GEY O 1NER: grt�tE �t �I' R�zory �..0AA C" f EUE EXISTING, ZONE '5 S CELE 4• APPENDIX I Co�,rl�r���' c�.� �7..T•s.�.r. ENV=R�NMENTAL, �HE�,=K,,S�' .i ORM (To be co npleted by Lead Agency) LOG No. 89-08-25-02 AP No, 40-28-88 & 89 I. BACKGFC�TJNA 1. Name of proponent Norman Cole/John Robley 2. ,Address of proponent and representative (if applicable): P.O. Boit 625 P.O. Box 1021 Durham, ;CA 959.38 - Ka aheo , xi 3. Project description: Rezone from AR -5 to SR -1 II. MANDA'TURSC ._ F IVDYIVG OF' S:QCNZF`ZCANCE 1. Does the project havethe potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animil community;` reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of major periods of California history or prehistory? 2. Does the project have the potential to achieve short- term benefits to the detriment of long-term environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief period of time while, long-term impacts will endure into the future.) 3, Goes the project have impacts which are individually limited but cumulatively eonsiderabI0 (A project may impact on two or m6re separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant.) 4, Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? III; xEAX I7EthMNA:r=O1- (Td be completed by the Lead Agency), on the basis of is initial evaluation; J. I/WE find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on die envirohment and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I/WE find that although the proposed pr6joet COULD have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the MITIGATION MEASURES described on the attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I/WE find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environmenty grid an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT Jr. required. [TATE, :6 > 1589 YES MAYBE NO . I/ Iy. gN V TYRQ'NMn- NMAI. TM AC-rS (Explanations of all "YESli and 1"MAYBV answers are required on attached sheet(s). 7:. EARTH. Will the proposal result in significant: a. Unstable earth conditions, or changes in geologic substructures? b. Disruption, displacement, compaction or overcovering of the soil? a. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? d. Destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? e. Increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off site? f, Chang de deposition �ion of beach sands, or cha4tgrss in siltation) dify the channel of a river or stream ositi n or erosion which maym orthebed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? g. Loss of prime agriculturallyproductivesoils outside designated urban areas? h. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mudslides, ground failure orsimilarhazards? 2. AIR. Will the proposal result in substantial: a. Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? b, The creation of objectionable odors, smoke or fumes?. c. Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or ai.y change in clima'Ce, hcally or regionally? 3. wAm. Will the proposal result in substantial: A. Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements in either marine or fresh Waters? b. Changes in absorption rates) drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff? c. Need for off-site surface drainage improvements, including vegetation removal, chsnnelization or culvert installation? d. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? e. Change in the awunt of surface water in any water body? f. Discharge into surface Waters, or in any alterAt oh of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? g. Alteration of the direction or Yate of flow of ground waters? h. change in the quantity or quality of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or oxedVations? i. Reduction in the amount of pater otherwise available .for public water supplies? j, ExpoUure of people or property to water -related hazards such as flodaing? 4, PLANT LIFE.. Will the proposal result in substantial) a. Change in the diversity of species, or number of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass) crops, and aquatic plants)? b. Reduction of the humbers of any unique) rare or endangered species of plants? c. Introduction of heW species of plants ihto an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? d, Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? .2 - YES MAYBE NO_ Vr Y v r/� f 5. ANIMAL LIFE. Will t:: proposal result in substantial: YES MAYBE NO a, Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, organisms or insects)? b, Reduction in the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of / animals? — v c. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? d. Deterioration of existing fish or wildlife habitat? 6. NOISE: Will the proposal result in substantial; a. Increases in existing noise levels? _ v b, Exposure of people to severe noise levels? 7. LIGHT AND GLARE. Will the proposal produce significant light and glare? v 8. LAND USE. Will the proposal result in a substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? 9. NATURAL RESOURCES. Will the proposal result in substantial; a. Increase in the late of use of any natu;.al resources? _ b. Depletion of any non-renewable natural resources? - 104 RISK OF UPSET. Will the proposal involve; a. A.risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides) chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? —� b. Possible interference with an emergency response plan or emergency V` evacuation plan? 11. POPULATION. Will the proposal alter location, ,distribution, density or growth rate of the human population? 11, HOUSING. Will the proposal affect existing housing) or create a demand c for add tional, housing? 13. TRANSPORTATIGN/CIRCULATION. Will the proposal_ result int a. Generation of substantial additional vehicle movement?� b. Effects on existing parking facilities; or demand for new parking?C� c, Substantial impact on existing transportation systems? d. Significant alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goodat eo Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic?,i// y f. Inurease in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? 14. PUBLIC SERVICES. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need d t 4 A. 6 or new or altere governmen sere ce . a, l:i.re protecticnt b. Police protection? +� i c. Sehools?�, d. Parks or other 'recreational facilities? +' e, Maintenance of public facilities) including roads? f. Other governmental services? _a 15. ENERGY. Will the proposal result in - –YES MAYBE a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? 16. UTILITIES, Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or substantial alterations to the following: a. Power or natural gas's b. Communications systnms! c. Water availability? d. Sewer or septic systems? 1 e. Storm water drainage? cf f. Solid waste and disposal? V 17. HUMAN HEALTH. Will the proposal result in: a. Creation of any health hazard or potential hazard (excluding mental health)? b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? 18. AISLIMICS. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the publics or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? 19. RECREATION. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? 20. CULTURAL RESOURCES. a. Will the proposal result in the alteration or destruction of a prehistoric or historic archaeological site? b, Will the proposal result in adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic building, structure or object! C4 Does the proposal have the potential to cause a physical change L, which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? d. Will the proposal restrict existing religious or sacred uses within �o the potential impact area? DYS CC.7SS'TON OF' ENVTRONMF-''\N-TAT, V_V'AL.VAn'TON See attached. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION AN * 89-08-25•-02 The proposed project Is a rezone request from A-5 zoning classification to SR -1 zoning classification. The approval of the proposed rezone will allow for a future subdivision of the property into single-family "residential lots at I acre densities. Therefore, per the California Environmental Quality Act, Section 1-5061 (a) (1) the long range potential Impacts are generally addressed In this Initial study. Further discussion and review of this project will occur after submission of the tentative subdivision map or parcel map for this project site. This Initial study will address Itself to the Impacts related to the proposed rezone request.. ib: The proposed rezone will allow for the creation of up to 20 parcels on the project site. Development of future single-family residential parcels in accordance With the proposed zoning will result in minimum disruption, displacement of the soil considering the project site is a relatively flat piece of ground Overcovering and compaction of the soil however, would occur as a result of residential development associated with sidewalks, driveways, and building pads Ic: The project site has Very little relief In the topography. it Is anticipated that minimal earthwork will be required to provide building pads for residential dwellings allowed Under the proposed rezone. Ig: The soil on the project site Is characterized as prime agriculturally productive soils known as Vina-Farwell As,soclatlon. The parcel sizes of the two parcel proposed for the rezone Is 10 acres, which Is not considered large enough to be a Viable commercial agricultural parcel. The Land is utilized for a single-family home and is surrounded by residential development which Would' lmpair the future agricultural Uses of this site. Due to the close proximity of exlsting urban densities; and existing and proposed zoning of the project site and surrounding area, the loss of prime agricultural solis from the. project site is not considered significant. Ih All of Butte County is within a Moderate Earthquake Intensity Zone Vill. Construction of buildings to Uniform Building Code Standards for, selsmlcally active areas, should provide adequate protection to residences In case of seismic activity, 3b.c,j: Drainage within the Durham area will be affected by the proposed zone change request and subsequent residential development, The grading and leve+.ing of the area. could alter percolation rates and the direction of drainage flow. Off"slto drainage :stiUctUres will be neceslary to minimize the off-site flooding. At the time of the subdlVislon a storm drainage solution must be developed that does not rely on leach type, drain trenches. D"eslgn will be subject to the approval of the Butte County Department of Public Works. It is p � requirements end anticipated that the County Urban im rovement requit-eme r drainage requirements of subdiv slons will mitigate all slgnlf'icant drainage Impacts 8d The project site is located within the Durham -Dayton -Nelson (02N) Area Land Use Plan. The D2N Area Land Use Pian has been reviewed by the Butte County Planning Commission and a preferred alternative known as Alternative *5 has been forwarded to the Butte County Board of Supervisors:- Alternative #5 proposes An Agricultural-Residentlal General Plan designation with an A-5 zoning classification. The proposed zoning Is a higher density than the preferred alternative of the Butte County Planning Commission for this site. The Land Use Element of the Butte County General Plan establishes site toning criteria as a guideline for determining the appropriate zone In each General Plan designation. Zoning factors to be. considered under the Low Density Residential General Plan designation are as follows: I. Existing parcel sizes and residential densities. 2a Availability of sewer or suitability for septic tanks. 3. Effects on adjacent uses, water quallty, air quality, noise, traffic flow and safety, and general environmental quality. 4.- Proximity to major streets, commercial services, and all public facilities. 5. Distance from airports, railroads, and industrial uses. 6. Exist -Ing Utilities, walkways, and drainage facilities. 7. Local desires lib `there is the potential for the development of 20 single-family homesltes. Utillzing the star4d'ard multiplier of 2.71 persons per household, there will be on increase of approximately 55 persons 1n the South_ Durham ar +--a. 1'2 i The proposed project would affect existing housing by creating 20 additional homeslte7 In the Durham area. 13-i Vehicular movements will Increase on Goodspeed and Holland Road. Cstimating 10 trips per day per dwelling unit, the project could generate approximately 200 trips per day, Goodspeed Avenue and Holland Road are substandard roadways In relationship to the future estimated traffic loads. Road access and Improvements will be delineated be the Butte County Public Works Department after submission of a tentative subdivision or parcel map; At this stage of the project, i't Is difficult to ascertain the traffic Impacts. Identifying Impacts and the necessary road Improvements and mitigation measures will have to be undertaken at the time of'a tentative parcel or subdivision map. i4a: As noted on the data sheet attached to the Initial 'study, the nearest fire station Is *45 located approximately a half mile to the north, l=ire protection in burham, however, is In jeopardy at this time due to fiscal constraints being experienced by Butte County, The failure to create A Community service Area for fire protectloh by october I, 1880, will result In the c osure of station #45 and leave u6.- the Durham area with no fire protection. Furthermore, the Fire Department may require ntlheeXri�nedc�l�esiWatebelinesannexed theothe pro]ecDtushte am Mutual Water System a p for adequate fire protection. Such annexation and expansion of the water system Would occur at ttle, time of subdividing. 14b: The Butte County Shen �hespt.o�ecttarea.'nt IsRapCdonsible for developmentlan enforcement and protection rural areas and restrictedbudgets have reduced the department's capacity for preventative patrolling and rapid response to emergency calls. 14c -f: The proposed rezone will allow an increase In residential densities in the Durham area which will place a large demand on public services,. The demand facilities, sIncluding eCroads, facilities, dllother maintenance of public Durham Unified governmental se Will be much greater. The Durham Unified School District is rapidly reaching capacity. School District has provided the follo,Ying comments: "The students which would begeneratedby the lower' density zoning can not be adequately housed by the district solely' from the funds generated f, -,m developer fees. The cost of providing classroom space for those children is far greater than the total of the fees Documentation of this can be provided if requested. Therefore, a portion of the housing cost of the children will be provided by the district's general fund: ©n that basis, I am also opposed to the lower density proposal due to the grva'er financial impact to the district". School impact fees In conjunction with the State Local Assistance Fund Is expected to eliminate any s.i gnlficant impact to school districts; 160: The project site Is iodated adjacent to the Durham Irrigation District's boundary. The propos>ed rezoning will result in the need foe additional potable water to the project site. it may be most advantageous to annex the project Site to the Durham irrigation District to provide a public water system. Annexation to the Durham Irelgatlon District should tale place prior to recordation of the final s0bd-1VisIon or parcel map. Applicant,; Cole/Robley Assessor's Parcel 40-28-88'& 89 Log * 89-C-9-25-02 A B. DATA SHEET Project Description 1. Type of Project: Rezone 2 Br i e'f Description: Zone change from AR -5 to SR -1. 3. Location: Approximately 500 ft. south of Servis's Street, between Holland Road and Goodspeed Avenue in the Durham Area: 4. Proposed, Dens.lty of Development: One dwelling unit per acre. 5. Amount of Impervious SUrfacingt Less than 10%. S. Access and Nearest Public Road(s): Holland Road and Goodspeed Avenue, both front property. 7. Method of Sewage Disposal: individual septic ;& leachf'leld. 8. Source of Water Supply: Private wells. 9. Proxlm'lty of Power Lines: Adjacent to property. 10. Potential for further land divisions and deVelooment Rezone Would allow the creatlon of 20 parcels. Environmental Setting Physical"Environment; 1. Terrain a General Topographic CharActeei Flat valley agricultural land b. Stopes: 0-2%. c. Elevationt Approx. 160 ft. A.S.L. d. Limiting Factors: None. 2. Solis a. Types and Characteristics: VIna-FarWell astoclatlont area dominated by excellent agricultural soils. b. Limiting Factors: None. 3. Natural Hazards of the Land a. EArthquake Zonet Moderate EarthtiUake Intensity Zone. villa b. Erosion Potentialt None. C. Landslide Potential,- None. d. F`ire'Haxard: Unclassified. e4 Expansive Soil Potential Moderate. 4. Hydrology 6.1 Surface Water t Butte 01-0ok Is located approximately I mile to the West of the pi*oject site: b Ground water Generally aval'iablelabuhdaht Valley aquifers. c. Drainage Chararteristics Drainage Is good. �8 d. Annual Rainfall (normal): 22 e. LimitingFactors: None. s. Visual/Scenic Quality: Good. 6. Acoustic Quality: Good. 7. Air Quality: Good. Biological' Environments 8. Vegetation: Vacant lot/residential vegetation. 9. Wildlife Habitat: Small birds and animals commonly associated with valley agricultural areas. Cultural Environments 10. Archaeological and Historical Resources in the area: None identified on project site. Low probability of any archaeological significance. 11. Butte County General Plan designation: LOW Density Residential. 12. Existing Zoning: A-5. 13. Existing. Land Use on-site: Single -family residential. 14. Surrounding Area: a. Land Uses: North: residential; South; residential ranchettes East- residential; Westi orchards. b. Zoning: A-5. G. Gen. Plan Designation: LOW Density Residential and Orchard and Field Crops. d. Parcel Sites: Range from I to 10 acres. e. Population Rural/suburban. 16. Character of Site and Area: Rural res i dent l a l 16. Nearest Urban Area; Durham and Chico. 17. ReleVant Spheres of Influence Durham Unified School District. 18. Improvements Standards Urban Area:: No. 19. Fire Protection Service: a: Nearest County (State) Fire Station; Station 045. b. Water Availability: Water tender only. 20. Schools In Area: Durham Unified School District. 5,- ENVIRONMENTAL REFERENCE MATERIAL I Map 11-I, Earthquake and Fault Activity: Seismic Safety Element, Butte County General Plan revised 1-77, by CH2M Hili. 2. Map 11-2, Liquefaction Potential. Seismic Safety Element, Butte County General Plan revised' 1-77, by CH2M Hill. 3. Map 111-I, Subsidence & Landslide Potentlal: Safety Element„ Butte County General Pian revised I-77, by CH2M Hill. 4. Map 111-2, Erosion Potential Safety Element, Butte County General Plan revised 1-77, by CH2M Hill. 5. Map I11-3, Expansive Soils: Safety Element, Butte ,County. General Pian revised 1-77, by CH2M Hill 6. Map IV -1, Noise: Noise Element, 'iutte County General Pian revised 1--77, by CH2M Hill, 1. Map V-1, Scenic Highways: Scenic HI,ghWay Element, Butte County General Plan revised 1-77, by CH2M Hill;, S. Map 111-4, Natural Fire Hazard Classes: Safety Element, Butte County General Plan revised 1-77 by CH2M HILI. 9 Archaeological Sensitivity Map t- James P Manning, for Butte County Pianning Department, 1983. 10. School 01strict Map; Butte County' Planning Department:. Il. Chico Nitrate Study Map, Nitrate Concentration In Shallow Wells, 1983, by Department of Water r The Resources Agency, State of California NorthwesternDistrict, 12. Agricultural Preserves Map; establlshed by Resolution No 67- 178jButte County Board of Supervisors, December 5, 1987. 13.. Flood Insurance Rate Maps, National Flood insurance Program, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 1988, 14, USES Quad Maps, (fill In map name and date), 15. Soil Map, Chico (1925)�Orov lie (1926) Area, U.S. Department of Aor I. ^,U 1 tore. 16. Soil SU"rvey of Chlco(1925)/Orovil a (1526) Area, U.S. Depdrtmeht of Agriculture. 17, Butte County Fire Protect►on .)Urlsdlctlons and Facilities Map, Butte County fire Department and California Department of Forestry. Butte County Planning Gepartinent. September 12-, 1989 . 8a couft D OF NATURAL WEALTH AND 3EAUTY ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965 (916) 538-7601 Norman Cole and John Robley PoOi Box 625 P.O. Box 1021 ,Durham, CA 95938 Kalaheo, HI 967,11 Re: Rezone, FI -le 90-4 Dear Mr. Cole and Mr. Robley: The ButteCounty Planning Department has completed the Initial study of potential environmental consequences anticipated In connection With the above-mentloned project; a copy Of Which is being Forwarded to you. Please P. °W the enclosed checklist, noting particularly any envir I problems which could be minimized or avoided by the cane ier In which the '')roject is carried out. Also, pleas V1( any recommended mitigation measures or conditions "ter reviewing the checklist you may see Ways to Improve the )..roject design. Design Improvements to minimize problems are encouraged. If you note any errors or omissions In our evaluation, please ,bring them to our attention. You will be hof i f l ed of the time and place of the pub l I c hearing for your project. If you have any ouestions regarding environmental review, please contact this office between the hours of 104.00 aim and 3:00 p.m. Sincerely, 8. A Kircher D ector of PlannLng rent L: Moore Assoclate Planner sLM:Ir Enc, y BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given by the. Butte County Planning Commission that public hearings will be held on Thur;;day, September 28, 1989,in the: Butte County Board of Superlrisors' Room, County Administration Center, 25 County Center Drive, Oroville, California, regarding the following items at the following times: ITEM ON 'WHICH A NEGATIVE DECLARATIOJ REGARDING VMVTRf1NMTdNMAT. TMDEnT une 555Kr T3vr1P1 jkXV111.TTT1 10:30 a.m. Norman Cole/John Robley A Rezone from A/R -5 (Agricultural -Residential, 5 acre parcels) to SR -1 (Suburban Residential, 1 acre parcels) on property located approximately 500 feet south of Serviss Street between Holl<nd Road and Goodspeed, identified as APO 40-28-.8$ and 89 Durham. GRACO AG Partnership = Use Permit and variance to the 2 acre maximum to create a 3.5 acre homesite segregation in an agricultural zone on property zoned A-40 (Agricultural -4.0 acre parcels), located on the south side of Nelson. West Road, approximately 1 mile west of Aguas Frias Road, located approximately 6 miles west of the town of Nelson, identified as APO 38-14-09,10,15,& 16, Nelson. The above mentioned applications, maps, and Negative Declarations with/without Mitigation Measures axe on file and available for public viewing at the office of the Butte County Planning -- Department, 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, California. if you challenge the above applications in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the Planning Commission, at or prior to, the public hearing. BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION B.A. KIRCHERj DIRECTOR OF PLANNING To be published in the Chico Enterprise Record on Thursday',, September 14, 1989. •-._.= -1 � '_ LAND 0 NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT 7 COUNTY CENTER ORIVE -- OROVILLE• CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 August 25, 1989 TELEPHONE. (916) 538-7601 Norman Cole John Robley P.0. Box 625 Durham, CA 95938 RE: APPLICATION EOR REZONING AF# 40-28..-_88 & 89 FIDE# 90-4 LOG# 89-08-25-02 Dear Sirs:- This irscThis is to notify a rezone from you that we have received SR -1 AR -5 (Agricultural -Residential your application for ( Suburban -Residential, 5 acre approximatel 500 1 acre parcels on property06 to y feet south of Serviss located .Road and Goodspeed, p Durham. Street between Holland An initial. anticipated in connection with this Of Potential environmental copse '-he Butte Count project is being completed ces you, y Planning Department and will be forwarded tby o Should you have an not hesitate questions regarding P.M. at t3 contact this office btweenthis10a00ea, Please do (916) 538-7601. m. .and 3100 Sincerely, _ /B-Aii KIRCHER Director Of Planning BAR - rcil-A ✓, County Public Works --7;"` County Environmental Health City of Biggs City of Chico City of Gridley City of Oroville Town of Paradise Planning Department State Transportation Department DortEs'r=C wATEFz —�` Butte Water District ✓ California Water Service Co. Del Oro Water Co. OWID Thermalito Irrigation District Other 'CTTZL.ZTIES L./ -PG&E North (Chico) PG&E South (Marysville) �. Pacific Bell ✓ State Tv Cable L7viacom TV Cable F'ZRE Fi2C)TECT=OIC' ,El Medio Fire Protection Dist County Fire Department/CDF MOSQUITO ABATEMENT D2S'TI2ZC2 ✓ Durham, Oroville or Butte County TMOLiCE .. PROTEG'T ON State Highway Patrol' :Zz-/ County Sherif f i�Ci�roOL . »=S�rr�zCx F2�°GREATZOI�T 1�'AC�i:s:LT,^ ES _ ,Chico Area Recreation District Durham Area Rod. & Park Dist. Feather Rsver Rec. & Park Dist. Paradise Red. & Park Dist Richvale Red. & Park Dist. State Parks & Red. Dept. 7t�ESOURCE MANAO EMENT _ State Water Resources Department U',S. Forest Service U.S Bureau of Land Management BQ.ttc• County Mining Committee ~_ St-,ete Department of Fish & Game Cnl::"ornia dative Plant Society _.._ Sta :,e Div. Forestry attention Craig Carter t,"'Regional Water Qual. Control Bd. State Reclamation BoArd S1-wEP, S RiGZvale Sanitary District North Burbank Laub. Uti.l. Dist. Skansen Sub. (CSA #21) Stirling City Sewer Maint. Diss:. _ Thermalito Irrigation District (CSA #26-) SF'.RSG.4TZON C�7ATEF2 Biggs-W.Grvdley Water District Butte Water District ,Durham Irrigation District OWID Paradise Irrigation Distract Richvale Irrigation District Table Mountatn Irrigation Dist; Thermalito Irrigation District Di2ASNAt�$` DSST.R.:r= RECTJkMATZOrr 1:)1:t�,'TR:rC1x oTFMFr , Cove4 MTEESLCOMMTSS'TbNS Paradise Pines Arch.tL c`tural Control Committee Butte County Farm Bureau Community Association: F3U#COUNTY PLANNING COMM ISSI 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965-3397 (916) 538-7601 TO: ENVIRONMENTAL HEATH DEPT.DATE: August 25 1989' ATTN: HOWARD SNYDER g RE: PROJECT REVIEW & ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION Enclosed is preliminary data our office has received or generated concerning the following project: Norman Cole/John Robley - Rezone from AR -5' (Agricultural -Residential, 5 acre parcels) to SR -1 (Surburban-Residential, 1 acre parcels), located approximately 50V feet south of Serviss Street between Holland Road and Goodspeed -identified as AP# 040-280-088 & 089, Durham. .File ff 90-4 Log # 20-08-25-02 We are making an assessment of possible environmental impacts and will be preparing an environmental document, either° a Negative Declaration, Negative Declaration with Mitigation Measures or an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) Please provide any factual statements, ideas for investigation, or opinions you can offer in your area of concern or expertise that .relate to either physical., social., or economic impacts that this project may generate Phase respond within 14 days of the above -noted date. If no response is generated by this inquiry, then it shall be assumed that there are nosignificantenvironmental imparts which are potential from the project. WM Co. Hanning Co:,un, We appreciate any assistance you can provide. O Cl 02 989 Sincerely, OML4 Caf=4 Environment al Hoalth 122 AUG Z 8 1989 �����) ) Oroville, Caiitorwa Comments: lVa ' C r" Q4L)-t 14 -'7w ►►� '-` � r LA e Does your agency wish to receive a copy of the environmental document (initial study for Negative Declaration (with or without Mi.ti:gati.on Measures) or tIR for this pro'est) F.S NO . COUNTY PLANNING COMMIS 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965-3397 (916) 538-7601 TO: BUTTE COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DATE: August 25, 1989 ATTN: JOHN'MENDONSA RE: PROJECT REVIEW & ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION Enclosed is preliminary data our office has received or generated. concerning the following project Norman f'—.4; lohn Roblev Rezone from R-5 (Agricultural -Residential, 5 acre parcels) to SR -1, (Surburban-Residential, 1 acre parcels), located approximately 500 meet south of Serv:iss Street between. Holland Road and Goodspeed,identif led as AP# 040-280-088 _& 089, Durham. File # 90-4 Log # 89-08-25-02 We are making an assessment of possible environmental impacts and will be preparing an environmental document, either a Negative Declaration, Negative Declaration with Mitigation Measures or an Environmental Impact 'Re -bort (ESR) . Please provide any factual statements; ideas for investigation, or Opinions you can offer in your area of concern or expertise that relate to p y ' ial, or economic impacts that this project may �o ezther h s�cal soc g Please respond within 14 days of the above -noted date. 2f no response is generated by this inquuiry, then it shall be assumed that there are no significant ,.environmental .impacts which are potential from the project. We appreciate any assistance you can provide.��� Sincerely, C�3 ,�'��otrOt Comments,...../ S` -h 1 /il f lI YD �d Li /t &&tip % _ "'j, .ef e r awl +r J'44. ' fl AA r Does your agency wish to receive a copy of the environmental document (initial study for Negative Declaration (with or without Mitigation Measures) or EIR for this project) YES.` NO (916) 538-7601 To. DURHAM IRRIGATION DISTRICT DATE: AUGUST 25, 1989 P.O. BOX 98 DURHAM, CA. 95938 RE: PROJECT REVIEW ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION Enclosed is preliminary data our office has received or generated concerning the ;following project: Norman Cole/John Roblev - Rezone from AR -5 (Agricultural -Residential, 5 acre parcels) to SR -1 (Surburban-Residential, 1 acre parcels), located approximately 500 feet south of Serviss Street between Holland xi Road and Goodspeed, .identifled as API# 040-280-08$ & 089, Durham. File # 90-4 Log # 89-08-25-02 We are making an assessment of possible environmental impacts and will bo preparing an environmental document, either a Negative Declaration, Negative Declaration with Mitigation Measures or an Environmental Impact Report (EIR)• Please provide any factual statements, ideas for investigation, or` opinions you can of�ter in your area of concern or expertise that relate to either physical, social,, or economic impacts that this project may generate. Please respond within 14 days of the above -noted date, if no response is generated by this inquiry, then it shall be assumed that there are no significant environmental impacts which are potential .from the project: We appreciate any as:jistance you can provide. Sincerely, �1�.�°�n 4 Y Does your agency wish to receive a copy of the environmental document (initial study for Negative De"'Iaration (with or without Mitigation Measures) or EIR for this project) YES NO BU'11� COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSI� lar PDAGl� � WED 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95955-3397 q �t-;,t �- �s DLPA� ITT 1'1.tff OF ��,f !CS*rRV (916) 538-7601 ; x 'C ' TO: BUTTE COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT DATE: August 25, 1989 RE PROJECT REVIEW & ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION Enclosed is preliminary data our office has received or generated. concerning the following project: Norman Cole/John .Robley Rezone from AR -5 (Agricultural. -Residential, 5 acre parcels) to SR -1 (Surburbari-Residential,, 1 acre parcels), located approximately 500 feet south of Serviss Street between Holland Road and Goodspeed„ -:identified as AP# 040-280-088 & 089, -Durham; Rile 0 90-4 Log # 89-08-25-02 ' We are making an assessment of possible environmental impacts and will be preparing an environmental documentt either a, Negative Declaration, Negative Declaration with Mitigation Measures or an Environmental Impact. .Report (EIR) Please p y or investigation, or .ease rovde an factual. statements, ideas f opinions you can offer in your area of concern or expertise that relate to either physical, social, or economic impacts that this project may generate I Please respond within 14 days of the above -noted date. If no response. is generated by this inquiry, then it shall be assumed that there are no significant environmental impacts which are potential from the project. to appreciate any assistance you can provide. Sincerely, CP r _ , Comments No impact on Fire Department ti Does your agency with to receive a copy of the environmental document (initial study for Negative Declaration (with or with6ut Mitigation Measures) or EIR for this project) YES NO r Buffo Co. Flev,hng CO.. ,AUG 10 1989 25 % 2//Y R.2E.. eJrovtlYbl Cel;{on AC laX Area70-0-,D ^' aoo Tiass �. X524 `0 t Cade 4d C7 Ip r 8T. '.t s ,ialtY 1 1 2OF S` { FA29T.-19 r` 2.09AC0 l _it 46 I '' ` 646,6 J0 Im 50 etr a' ;.r fey ZfJ4c t'J -'` 70�C a _ 35 T 70 for J a 1191,E 50 ,B do T YI atc1 y O t r 4J 72 f6B:fJ 254 JI i:I �' I� 47 kc 54 r6 re .. 8 1.1 N71a'- E W s. 71 AC Eu AC y +i26.T1 � � -tea 50 ' � Pl'd q 62.Zj ----- --Y� z. 6T5 At 4 60.8.1 t a .90 6 S /aAch .c N 624 19 /4 , .... 50- 1 1 7 sl 00.* ti @ !0 ` *� q S,tC . :t a - �..._... td r4�ac! SC7(73, OW5 10 Ra V t... 5rB Ft1 W ` 51e45 a OrdJ5.B6 �y r r.— O ?ti,3c p r_ i_►_ I T� 5� V 00 ' 67 10 \ e O B 1 6 � rz 105Q " _ 84G 1. a? a rZ ?4nC a -7 r _ w x Q� �r n In CL 17 _ F:9.oNXL.'N sUs� L�",NEN1` Nbt�"�tats5bR5 P � r .,rv� Assess7Y`s 11tQfi Bf 2 p?. !43 !i tr1"r ARM atbC.k MOP No, 40-28 NUtiiBFR5 VN �FiU1r,. `� y:•.l CtUllty _ cracrF:s Y of 8Utte, Coif' IHCfCflr i95;. tN ` BU'1.�� COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSIL • 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965-3397 ^^ z onv (916) 538-7601 TO; Viacom TV Cable DATE: August 25, 1989 2128 bIyers Street Oroville, CA 95966 R7, PROJECT REVIEW & ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION Enclosed is preliminary data our ofire has received or generated concerning the following project: Norman Cole/John Robley ..ozone from AR -5__ (Agricultural -Residential, 5 acre parcels) to SR -1 (Surburban-Residential, l acre parcels), located approximately 500 feet south of Serviss Street between Holland Road and Goodspeed,. identified -as AP# 040-280-088.&_089, Durham. File # 90-4 Log 11 89-08-25-02 We are making an assessment of possible environmental impacts and will be preparing an environmental document, either a Negative Declaration, Negative, Declaration with Mitigation Measures or an Environmental Impact Report (E;IR) Please provide any factual statements, ideas for investigation,, or fer in your area of concern or expertise that relate opinions you can of to either physical, social, or economic impacts that this project may generate. Please respond within 14 days of the above -noted elate. if no response is generated by this inquiry, then it shall be assumed that the.,, are no significant environmental impacts which are potential :from t, project We appreciate any assistance you can provide. "¢1ar�n� Cr ��v�11a Comments /�G� cq r til_ i1✓ h`r75 i c>�r� . c- ice-'_' - BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given by the Butte County Planning Commission that public hearings will be held on Thursday, September 2.8 !989,in the Butte County Board of Supervisors, Room, County Administration Center, 25 County Center Drive, Oroville, California, regarding the following items at the following times: ITEM ON WHICH A NEGATIVE DECLARATION REGARDING 10;30 a.m. Norman Cole/John Robley A Rezone from A/R -5' (Agricultural -Residential, 5 acre parcels) to SR -1 (Subu?;,an Residential, 1'acre parcels) on property locate.: approximately 500 feet south of Servi"ss Street between Holland Road and Goodspeed, identified as AP# 40-28-88 and 89, Durham. GRPrO AG Partnership Use Permit and Variance to the 2 acre maximum to create a 35 acre homesite segregation 1n an agricultural zone on property zoned A-40 (Agricultural --40 acre parcels), located on the south side of Nelson West Road, approximately 1 mile west of Aguas Frias Road, located approximately 6 miles west of the town of Nelson, identified as AP,ur 38-14-09,10,15,& 16, Nelson. The above mentioned applications, maps, and Negative Declarations with/without Mitigation Measures are on file and available for public viewing at the office of the Butte County Planning Department, 7 County Center t 1ve, Orovill.e, California. If you challenge the above applications in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in, this notice or in Written correspondence delivered to the Planning Commission, at or prior to, the public hearing. BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION' B.A. KIRCHER, DIRECTOR OF PLANNIbYG TO published in the Chico Enterprise Record on Thursday, rpptember 14, 1989. COUNTY OF BUT'T'E OFFICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE OROVI.LE, cAfavon .% 95965.3397 a n L i`i40i RETf� c 240 058 000 STATUS ACTIVe �'f'fi , FREITAS R08IN SS, F r 4 Thi d : Si86 BENZ ROAD DURHAM CFSso a j 40 t '=r ' r1�°'We