HomeMy WebLinkAbout90-7 REZONE PLANNING 1 OF 2G Irk 0 1?%q
" `�' PRo�?EGT S :MNI R'Y SuEE 90-1
Log No File No.
WARREN WINIECKE PAG -WEST BUILDERS, INC.
applicant representative
c/a PAC -WEST BUILDER, INC
. P'_0. Box 335, P.O,: Box 335
ADDRESS.
Gridley, CA 95948Gridley, CA. 95948'
Fc7oNEx 800-242-6166 Dennis Clover
Same
property owner
ADDRESS:
PRO CT' DES'CR3PT=0N _ Rezone from. R-3 to R-4
on property zoned R_3; located, on the southwe:;t side sal Hghway 32 approx. 1200!'
South of Sacramento Avenue 043-290-010' Chico
identified as AP to�+nlarea:_
GENERAL PLAN; DESIGNATION high. Density
DATE
PRE-APPFEE PAID: RECEIPT' MMt ER
APPLICATIOM ACCEPTED; `
FINAL APP. PAID-- 487 OO`RECEIPT' NUMBER• 10985 9/26/89
REZONING PETITION- SIGNATURES' CHECKED PERCENTAGE: 7.
MAILING LIST PREPARED
MAIL-OUr NOTICES' WRITTEN'
News
NOTICES: MAILED` NUMBER: Piihl i c':
LEGAL DESCRIPTION PREPPED
PUBLICATION NOTICE- G'RITTEtY
DISPLAY AD PREPARED
MSPAPEt PUBLICATION` 0 C P G B R. DATE OF PUBLICATION:
IMILAL STUDY` PREPARED
LNVIRONF�NTAL. D= MINATIOK:+ Categorical Exemption FILED:
- :Negative Declaration FILED:
Mitigated Yegarsve Declaration FILED:
Env ror=ental Impact Report CERTIFIED:
Other.::
S AI CLEARINGiOUSEMME2:
APP ICANT/REPRE,SE ZAT E. NOTIFICATION OF" F MIRONMSTAL DETE'MIMATIOff
r'E.S.�`MNG COMt'.ISSIOY' r"L4.p.IlG{sj
BOAF.D' AF' SUPERVISORS' ?LR*?tG{s}:
RESOLUTION MMER (GPAs). ADOPTED:
CRLLYAYCE: NI TTM AGOPTT'D
NOTICE OF DE'EMMMATZOtt (Append:bc K) FILED'
r:5
m
APPLICATION FOR REZONING
BUTTE COUNTYPLANKING C;,OMMISSION 'a Co. Ken„tngGomrn:
SEP,�h
APPLICANT: ]lead and follows instructions set forth on last page of this form. Orovlle, California
Applicant's Name ��ARhEcl-1 - iv tui G, _ Phone No.---,
Applicant's Mailing Address
Applicant's Interest in propertsr(.0wncr.J_cssce. Other)
Owner's Name and Address
Contact Person 'for Project (irother than applicant)
Assessor's Parcel Nurnber(s) Q'� _ ZQ Cl 1 Q Present Zonin„ -
Requested Zoning-�--- �`-
Location, dimensions and size,oe;LIga(s) to be rezoned-
Z
...
b-A-_
a
_
h
L
4
IIS k
Street Address (If applicable)
^"
Directions for travel to property (rural and mountainous areas only)-
i7.
21
Applicant's reasons for rezoning _"'BIW-,'us ► "'
Proposed scheduling/Associated projects (formationofservice district, etc,)
e,-
Iu �Uct�T.
Anticipated incremental development (future development plans subsequent to rcxolic)t _ --
l xlstiq T proposed sewagc dispo3ai Method:.-
Proximity of power and photic lines;
. AJ �'
bi5iancetis ttatural tvatcr course of stnrnt dijrain; �._r_y�____W
l' V.J. A�i" �R:o�T �_ol��..w[�O:C.,.�.�L� _�n� �1'to�,_ T�? .�,,,�I�•�.�r�_ ..�..
i
l
r t ,
Describe anticipated on and off-site drainage improvements (VUU, MNp);
1 /2A nJ ySr6*� . TD l t i►J 7`0 1"ortb V9
Describe how on-site and downstream drainage channels will be affected (PUD, MHP)
Water source;
t_ijl1D
Proximity of water for fire fighting purposes (hydrants, ponds, Limb
5� 5:E. �vf'g- r7
Will excavation or gra ad ng be necessary? Cubic yar tis (estimate)? 2r7d 541
List and describe and other related permits and other public approvals required for this project, including
those required by city, regional, State and Federal agencies;
6',4
JAG + /914IN15 A1rA,9Ac44HEW r .' aLpe ap-�-flTS
Z
If residential, include the 'numberof units, whether units arc single or multi-story in height; schedule of
unit sizes, and type of household size expected,
IU • -, r �{.
U rte,ALL Z 1� lJ�ll'i`� t - s a� )�r�H 1 r�Q foo say �•..,
...
If commercial, indicate the type, whether neiabborhood. city or rcaionally orienteii . scuare fnotnae of
sales area, and loading facilities.
If industrial, indicate type, estimated employment per shift, and loading facilities,
It institutional indicate the major function, estimated employment per shift, estimated occupancy,
loading facilities, and community benefits to be dcrivcd from the project,
8NVIRONMC-NTAt. IMP'ACI'S ANU tvl'l i'IGAT, ION t�f CA 11 f 5
,
Identify potcntially significant environmental impacts associaled with (lie rezone, What project design
features or special conditions or approval (mitigation W.ewsutes) are proposed to allcvi• tc potential I
environmental impacts? j�/0 •!/I ,fL �.t'= /�rrP i __-�
I
z
0-4
i-�
z
v
a
C6
C6
ENVIRONMENTALS}-79'INC
I
Describe the project site as it exists before the project, including information on lopgraphy, soil stability,
plants and animals, and any cultural, historical and scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on the site,
and the use of the structures.
Describe the surrounding properties, inJuding information on plants and animals and any cultural,
historical, or scenic aspec � Indicate thc: type of land use (residential, commercial, etc,), intensity of land use
(one -family apartment howcs, shops; department stores, etc.), and scale of development (height, frontage,
setback, rear yard, etc.).
'600-lk grzoaOU4 VO t T k41111. C>4KO,..,
9Uo 251- ��P �- �.►G-�-tr � ►_
I hereby declare under penalty of perjury that 1 have read and understand the instructions and that the
foregoing statemerts ate true, complete and correct to the best of m} r;nowledge and belies,
..4
Dated:.d'7
T
__Applicants Si
Dated, __ Propertytiviner`s signaiueAza-4�11' 1./ 47
Project Pile Number
General Plan Designation's' f t'l.�d _ �'"a:+aJ�('T' J
Request Consistent?_
O Bequest; Rcronc to
.a e `7 Location and sire or parcel(s) .—_i...%� � �j�L �#'. �.
to .
SO t,rr1-i
,
w
r
1
INSTRUC -1 . f'Q REZONING; APPLICANTS
1, If applicant is not the owner, Written authorization by the owner or other proof of agency must
be submitted in order for the applicant to legally sign the application, Application shall be
considered void if'notsigned by the owner or legal agent,
2, All items on 'application shall be filled in as completely as possible. Very few items should
be marked not applicable by the term "N/A':
3, it is very important that the application include an accurate and complete description of the
r property proposed for each requested zone: The applicant will not be processed until we receive
the following inform,+ion about arca(s) to be rezoned;
a. Assessor's parcel number(s) from the tax bills or Assessor's Map.
a. Street addresses (if available).
c. Distances and directions to named streets, bodies Or water or railroads.
d, Litgal description (s,ibdivision lot numbers, fractions of sections or distances and bearings of
perimet rdimensions).
copies of
C. ���" p map with rezoning arca(s) outlined (Assessor's map, subdivision map,
or othzr map parcels):
4, California Government Coder Section 65300 et seq, requires IOCUxl zoning ordinances to be
consistent with a jurisdiction's adopted general plan, County approval of a rezoning request.
must be supported by finding of consistency with the Butte County General Plan. Applicants
may request changes in General flan designations by filing an Application for General Plan
Amendment:
S. The Application for Rezoning is subject to public h ~rings and approval by both the Planning
Commission and Board of Supervisors, The procedures for County action on rezoning
applications are stated in Chapter 24 of the Butte County Code.
x
6. Applicant fees as of r+ C (date) arc_.. �.. 6 `—'
ices may be paid in cash or by check mads: payable to Treasurer or 13utto County,
7. Before submitting a rezoning aliplicatioh, applicant Is requestedto discuss with starf all
questions about application requirements, County procedures, consistency with the General
Plan, and the provisions of existing and requested zoning rlassificatiom,
Veriry;
l
r+
A.P. Number(s) Location Description
Ownership Legal Description of Area
Proof of Agency (i t needed) Maps of Area/Development
Plan for PUD's
W Present Zoning
U Reproducible Master Map or
4 Development Plan (PUD's only)
Q Date of Application received �� - S ` ` 72 Receipt No.—
Application
o. Application Taken By
I
- j
t
c
Y
2.2.0
-- OCA
oO�'r
-008
�-0i
-0
d 43 - 2.4 f •-
02-1
04S -x.90
Ooq
-p/
- 03Z
-044
-052
- 07
6IDWEL L 2ND B
1, 22 N. R / E. M. 0 B. 8 M. 43-29
10
Ski .4.. l , q
RICHFIELD GARDENS
44
93 C
? O \ v.
• � � •saw �, 3.asc gs e� �s 4LF
p .-G- L- t�• 0.ee 'AC 94
r 42- l5 28 zso r.» 4 .! 4T �XF+
d'
to 36
2t'
FT, SA _.PAM Ni' - D
• AVE
509erc cHrca
n '+ CREEK EswEs iJ t: , i t �/� ' ' a AQP •
{ I tw4ir' I+o I' , 27 � .. Q + � a f s , t Pt
. 1' .• 1 3p i."' .+=ars±�tY j. m PN rFi
Z. AC .z r� _
,k, 9
- ,g a o e
B tt k s io : 22
t w�zEtefwo
syn t�acrerroo+c sues_, N x „ +r
3 y crfr_
124
t { k r sti a is c' z" 3 c.
V
s Iet
4 ( 81G. CHICtl CR
14 .... �� T93 Tot
Z E£K ";' 74 A.6AC po
L .
;•Estar£s urvir3 �$ � : ...•° 7a � o A�,
II u
t GIC afico CREEK ESTATES S 'a' .R ,0� A" t a
011r 4.. »,c 'nrrnroty =of Rr z4 Ay
PAR)( ,sue tS
Y- 43
42-20
cr-,
Me 1
a9 L�
r { p,}y„•Z'f . "� �a��,y �'6 ,, x.93 A4.
e
i
' C EK. rN6Jtd+i0'.ue.+,i y,l. 1 N°v4+
CMIC�! 9I ati0 p
Assessor's Ma No. 41-29
County of Butte! CON.
�+ lWA RCN,. 1954
t .r..,
1y
-71
41
/)
Y. ✓ ✓YI Y
y •r
of gutta; state i-
aituat
X11 e in the c.ountY h�i
that certain real POO arty t3ft
uescribed as foalorAass�.
of Cali.ornia� John.B,�aw"I Ran
Cho,
on file ie the aQfico of ofeFiapa,
A �oNtlnn of i.ot 3 of the sseond su0, anion 4sf t in Book 5
to the offlcicf Auttai,errofl C>ii1�16[4$i.A�
according stile t
,.unty _ , de dr as tollo+�ss i 1 A Ott
Raeo�:�r of thee articularly South 116' 15
a e 271 merP point
at P 8 1v lint or said Lot 3+ said
file Easterl o said Lot�t
Point on corner r
BECINNtiQ at feeet from the mast Northerly tha Southeast corner ofL;:y
EaAt r '187 53 �i to Cl vmant �.,.
the dentes of "Jed 11Cno CharlesnL^„in 0 f orficial Records
being in 1 ,1, in Book %40 of t 1,, q.
ein paroal atacribed in pried a got�th 431, 45 !lest$ �•,
thiltrticartled Hay and rUnninE thence to an iron
Schuarti et ux� nt poQe 907 303 Caet last
of gutta CountY+ sA1d schuertL'�arctf 1 fkct a4�7g6Mfcet r:ti
the Sou h 1i.ne of thaned SOUth 172.5 Feat, ; •.I.r
alAng
Of 'said Ldt{ 'e
of the Westeet line 1 e1 thence North tht�nce North 46" 15
1ic1� to Rn iron P�1ne of said Lott to the point dt
toa Poi the F4bterlY
to a point on the l.Qsc tn4ntlone�d liae
Nsetl 11413 feet .1o09
{ .
be�inhl'ng+�''
c* 0000AX.. ,'
alt'.
T
i
4 ..
t
r' and lore 1i+�
"�.' SSi �AYg 11ww 14762
chide# CA 95926
1 � ,
i .�... !s*►barW J
MAct ""S I
lrtdly iw►i 4rsnt
iuie rIN1M eua+�w+�ts av ��++<J1 nvba �►wURtM
IO HI/{�I- IU
T1a w�et*ti+�
�swYla(o) rkc4ce1�1t P�,
(Z 1 eb• p °' f vn1d" +! ProPa+', of U-4 a"A w rur4Manor� t+sr+l It
R i �* full Val" {w� ra uti M-"'-•'
atwt 1 1 City at ...--
(X 1 U�•rY+ra�"i .t �1,leii b ►rr+►y aW`nob+►
FOR A VAt,UANX 0)"OAAT'OM� erc iN ! bio bit*'
g Hir �• and LYS �•
kt y CKAWIS' �. bat+ joist
� Siad er�[s
t4+ (alkvbe3 �asri
twd Taal f' -"M 11l++ r br+ CO, UOM6 t
wt•
Ott XMITAly 14A,11 ATTAMM MAM AMD HAD
• ' i
i f
J
ATAT; Or C,AUfO lA Y'
.
!fit -. , „ � f ii.fr •Y.iw fes.+ ... ..
�. 1 Y i. C'. f. y►.'r�d'rYw. *, 1 .�� .,r MYi ►.�'�. i.I .,
. i,: ,i r,iY • �YNf irv�.r•IY
i ..f i r•rq i ,• i• . r , b �.
i
M for IV,yrw11•.... f�Jr.e+ "so Fi
la trre►a• sJ M la,,t,4 1
Fac—West Builders, Inc.
P.O_ Bos 335
Gridley, CA 95948;
L 043 241 027 kiffft STATW[5 tW FI T-
BECUSTE UARREI1 A x fiNK E JT
60S F ARKWOOP PRI VE
L 043 PRO t l.rf13 000,
r e r 4, rc, :rot"'T t FIF
PURDON t WILLIAN t-1: ?p I M
C,1€TCI? +�t1 g =2
346 114ORD AVE 0114
CHICO CFI
L 043 241 025 0610 STp'r1'U3 At T 1 ; E
EEU.SIF' HELEC1 F
0 Nf;ltt 00-1
L 04HxurKRED
c r'JIJS W-TI.�E
._03 FAR1'WOOG Lr1;19E
SIX FOURTE_E.tr F tt I t3; '
CHICO CALIF
Br C4ittly VA LEY CA
r
1. ii 43 290 010 UN ;sritrEiS, :1 I
MEPIiC1NCA, t•1°ILLLAt1 Y. t.17f]NUir ter•"
L 043 22ti 000 f�i"�ts�� '
`.N1103 ACTI'YE
566 TAFFEE AVEC>Ur
SIX HU14OR'E FOURTEEN t,
+;r;i:F I0.1) L_T11
CF1IC[1 CA :�` 2B
P O BOX 39
LsROWNS SIAL LE` CA
1p
STA F L,r5 AG r E 1E
WIt'1IEC?,c' WARREN' t 4, r:Atil tl 1:_ }
r f4t+a _;I�2ff 007 r400
�_ z.0� US AM IVE
12-22 `4-�rF1IL AUL[
f"IERCE I•IELEN L
CHIM Cry t.r-J , „�
-Cig 14ORD AVE
CHICO CALIF
`71j;gF&
L 043 2 G Y11 00-fwi S' ,, r+rS iW1 I VE
SIA HLRIDR5D FOURT1 Etd - Ct"1Rr= rYLD k_T�1r
IL t3er3 22t s_t1�r t3sl fi
F 17 BOX 395
1,fTLLIF1hE5 MARY x2r►BiIR€+
BROWNS VALLEY --'4 9S7113
6417 CUMBERLAND
VIAGALIA CA
L ii-, 3 217ff i F.-t- OhiP f•• ! TA t-ra '-ELr r '-,
NA zA. I HARMOUD R F`AULt, .1 E IAL if,
1 1343 220 17,21 t_100
-7. 4 TL IS �)G F I VE
1415 CREEI-41AYE4 'L
GRIGG GARY & CORtli- 1. rl'`
}
CHICU Cis S;Ltc *' �
1242 14 1FTH ST
C.111M CA
95928
L �;1t ;_ r .r .t�� WOO<� r€ rc� krf° e1k1
WILL_IMIS RiEUEEt4 d X t=B19CIt_L1r 1;
L 043 EII `aj PR2 tici@-J11'115
ACTIVE
10 ROSE AVE
GRIGG GAR & CAROL 'L th4 ' tt..
CIRCO Cit
1242 W itTH ST
95926
C
p5: 2�1
L 043 2`z0x 05? r=➢400 STATUS A(11V
WILLIAMS REMEht J PRI!)G11,r_1`i I
L tt43 220 022. 000
zJ-'WUS ACTIVE
16 FOSE € VF
RUST LR06 INC
;Hli«J CA
F 0 BOX 591
g59221
HAE YSVILL E .CA
95301 1
F
TRANS PACIFY GAFPEN,
L 043 220 024000
i TATUS ACTIVE
eta€ T STFtEEr E�4dF
FfiRRARfir ANTHONY t: 'IjX�'=
St CRAt'I NTC CAI.1F 95-M
532 NORD FIVE
CHICO CA
95926
t— {itc 4' ± �' ' 7 %'if;es (34t'i E.l2 W-f I (
2 �
TRANS PACIFIC 1nFKITEE Pt-?PTHEtGt-E:P
L 643 P41 05-31 000
.rr rl'S z1.,r'1VE
MANAGEP04ff rSjr GROUP tt'4C i1TTH 1_E1WSE. 111.1
FORD CLAYTON H t 14-'1Fk:t`;`-'i .Y
891 ALMA REAL M STE 205
2117 -UNI AVE
PACIFIC PAL,TSAIIES GA 90,272
CHIC-10 CA
95^=2F,
r ~.` LAND OF NATURAL VWEALTI4 AND BEAUTY
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE= - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397
TELEPHONE; (0,16) 538-7601
October 26, 1989
Warren Wlnlecke
% PAC.-WEST Builders, Inc.
P.O.. Box 335
Grid Ley, 'CA 95948
Re: Rezone, File qO=T
AP 043-290-010
Log #89-09-29-01
Dear Mr. Wlnlecke
r1 An initial Study of your proposed project, a Rezone, Indicates
potentially adverse Impacts t-) the environment (refer to the
enclosed environmental checklist). 7o reduce or ttllmi"nate these
Impacts, suitable mitigation measures are required as part of the
project_: Otherwise, an Environmental Impact Report (E1R) Is
r—lqu'ired pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act.
An early response to this notlflcation, sent to the Planning'
Department,, Will expedite the scheduling of your project. Please
forward your written response Within 16 days frorl the date of
this letter:
Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please
contact this office between 10:00 a.m, and 3:00 p.m,
sincerely;
8 A. Kircher
Director of Planning
Brent L. Moore
Associate Planner
BLM O r
Enc:
APPENDIX T
CO'UN-XY CSF' BUXXE
ENV=RONMEN'T.:AL CHEGXI. =SUI FORM
(To be completed by Lead Agency)
LUc NO. 89-09-29-01
AP NO. 043-290-010
File 490-7
I. BA CKGRaUND
1. Name of proponent Warren Wi.niecke
2. Address of proponent and representative (if applicable):
PAC=WF5T Builders, Inc.
P.O. Box 335
Gr'idleV,, CA- _ 95948
3. Project description: Rezone from R-3 to R-4
II. MANDA,a7OaY F'YNb2NGS eor. sxgN7 Fmc-ANc. i YES. MAYBE NO
1. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment;
substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause. a ,fish or
wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate
a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a .rare
or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of majot. periods V
of California history or prehistory?
2. Does the project have the potential to achieve shzirt-term benefits to the
detriment of long -tarn environmental goats? (A short-term impact on the
environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief period of time while f
long -tet -m impacts will endure into the future.) _ ]�
3. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited but cumulatively
considerable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where '
the impact on each resource is relatively small, but where the effect of the
total of those impacts on the environment is significant,)
4.4 Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial
adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly?
eTII.rDE`rEPM!rNATYON (Tobe completed by the head Agency). on the basis of
this initial. evaluation:
I/'A find the proposed project COULD NOT Have a significant effect on the
environment and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION Will be prepared':
I/WE find that although the proposed project COULD have a significant effect
on the environment) there will not be a significant effect in this case because
the MITIGATION MEASURES described on the attached sheet have been added to the
project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
1
1/wt find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment,
and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
COUNTY of BUTTE) MANNINO DEPARTMENT
DATE; October 26" 19 89 By:
trent Li Moore
Associateal�rler
Reviewed by
IV. ENV=E2v'LA TMPACTS
(Explanations of ail,1wYES1" and "MAYBE"
answers are required on attached sheet(s).
�. EARTH. Will the proposal result in
significant:
a. Unstable earth conditions) or changes in
g geologic substructures?
YES MAYBE _ N�
i. Disruption, displacement, compaction or overcovering of the soil?
_V
c. Change in topography or ground surface relief fe�`+sres?
r-
d. Destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical
features?
e. Increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off site?
E. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, ox changes in siltation,
deposition or erosion which may modify the channel
or the
of a river or stream
bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake?
8. Loss of prime agriculturally productive soils outside designated urban
areas?
h. EX posur,.e of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes,
landslides, mudslides, ground failure or
similar hazards?
2. AIR. Will the proposal result in substantial:
a. Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality?
b. T15e creation of objectionable odors, smoke or fumes?
`� V
c. alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature,
climate, locally or regionally? or any Change in
—�
3. W6M, Will the proposal result in substantial:
a, Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movemet;ts in
either marine or fresh -:caters?
b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage
of surface runoff? g Patterns or the and amount
c. Need for off-site surface drainage i,,uprovements including vegetation
removal, channelizatian or cult', -rt installation?
�G
d. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters?'
�-
e. Change in the amount of surface water in any water bony?
f'. Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water
quality: including but not limited to temperature,
dissolved oxygen or
turbidityl yg
g. Alteration of the direction or rate of flown of ground waters?
h. Change in the quantity
direct additions or witor quality of ground waters, either through
hdrawals,
or through ifttorception of an aquifer
by cuts or excavations?
i. Reduction in the amo�
txt
supplies? t of water Otherwise available for public Water
�..
J�EXP68ure of people or property ;to water -related hazards such as flooding?
y
L. p1.AM LIFE, Will the proposal result in substantial:
a. Change in the diversity of species, or 'number of any 'species of plants
(including trees) shrubs, grass, crops, and a'q'uatic
Plants)
b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare of endangered s
plants? ipedes of
AZ
c. introduction of hew species of plants
the into ah creat' or in a barrier to
e normal replenishment of existing species?
d. Reduction iri acreege of any agricultural crop?
5.
r w`th
ANIMAL 'LIFE, Will the proposal result In substantial;
YES MAYBE NO
a,, Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of arty species of animals
12. HOUSING: Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand
(birds) land animals including reptiles, :ish and shellfish, organisms
for additional '-.',sing?
or insects)?,
V.,
A. Generation of substantial additional vehicle movement?
b. Reduction in the numbers of ally unique, rare or endangered species of
b, Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking?
animals?
present
d, Significant alterations tog resent Atterns
p of circulation or
c. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or in a barrier to
moVement of people and/or
--
the migration or movement of animals?
Vi'
f. increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians?
d.. Deterioration of existing fish or wildlife habitat?
14. PUBLIC, SERVICES, Will Lite proposal have an effect Upon, or result in a need
6.
NOISE. Will the proposal result in substantial:
a. Pire protection?
a.. Increases in existing noise levels?
b.: Police protection!_
b. Exposure of people to severe, noise levels?
7.
LIGHT AND GLARE. Will the proposal produce significant light and glare?
l/
S.
LAND USE. Will tl:e proposal result in a slbst:antial alteration of the
present at planned land use of an areal
4.
NATURAL RESOUR'GE. Will the ,proposal result in substantial:
a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural: resources?
b. Depletion of any non-renewable natural rewources?
10.
RISK OF UPSET. Will the proposal involve:
a. A risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances (including, but
not limited to, Gil) pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event
of an accident or upset conditions?
b Possible int. fe l
rence i an emergency response p an or emergency
evacuation pian?
11. POPULATION, Will the proposal alter location, distribution, density or
growth rate of the human population?
12. HOUSING: Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand
+
for additional '-.',sing?
13. TRANSPORTAVIONICIRCULATION. Will the proposal result in
A. Generation of substantial additional vehicle movement?
b, Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking?
r ~. c, Substantial impact on existing transportation systems?
present
d, Significant alterations tog resent Atterns
p of circulation or
moVement of people and/or
--
e Alterations to waterborne, rail or air tralfic?
Vi'
f. increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians?
14. PUBLIC, SERVICES, Will Lite proposal have an effect Upon, or result in a need
for new or h1tered government services:
a. Pire protection?
b.: Police protection!_
c. Schools?'
do Parksor other recreational facilities?
_ t'
e. Maintenance of public facilities; including roads?.
f. Other governmental services(
.1.
15, ENWill the proposal result in:
YES j4AYnt nuERGY.
- U
a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy?
b, Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy, or
require the development of new sources of energy?
16. UTILITIES. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or
substantial alterations to the following:
a. Power or natural gas?
b. Communications systems?
c, Watar availability?
d. 'Sewitr or septic Systems?
V
e. Storm water drainage?
f, Solid waste and disposal?
17. HUMAN HEALTH. Will the 'proposal result in: _
a.. Creation of any health hazard or potential hazard: (excluding mental
health)?
b, Exposure of people to potential l;rarlth hazards?
18. AESTHETICS, Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic
vista or vittw open to the public, or will .the proposal result in the
creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view?
19, REC1txJ+TION. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or
quantity of existing recreational opportunities?
20; gL`TUF.Al. P.ESOUF?CE'i.
a. Will the proposal result in the alteration or destruction of a
V
prehistoric or historic archaeological site!
b. Will L e proposal result in adverse physical or aesthetic effects
or historic building, structure or Object?
to a prt-istoric
c: Does the p.,oposal have the potential to cause a physical change
r
V
Which would affect unique ethnic cultural values?
d. will .the proposal restrict existing religious or sacred uses within
V
the potential impact area?
DTS':"USSToIq Off' Ir1VVZRGNM�NTAI_. �VALTJATTUN
See attached,
DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION AP * 043-290-010
lb: The proposed rezone from R-3 to R-4 will have very little Impact -
on the amount of overrovering, compaction, disruption, or
displacement of the soli. Both zoning designations provide for
multi -family development. The requested rezone would result In a two
story structure, rather than a one story which would not Increase
overcovering or compaction of the project slta: The project site is
already a developed urban lot with the necessary Improvements
Installed to accommodate the proposal.
Ig: The project site is located within the Chico Urban Area along
the State Route 32 corridor. The State Route 32 corridor Is an
extensive commercial and residential district. The site no longer
has any agricultural value due to Its size and Intense commercial and
residential development which surrounds it.
('h: All of Butte County is within a Moderate Earthquake Intensity
Zone Vill. Construction of buildings to the Uniform Building Code
standards for seismically active areas is anticipated to protect the
residences In case of seismic activity;
3b,c The project site drains Into the storm drainage system along
State Route 32 which outfalls Into Big Chico Creek. Increase density
Which will result from the proposed rezone will not significantly
change the absorption rate, drainage patterns, or the rate or amount
of surface runoff from that which would already occur under the
ekisting zoning. All off-site drainage Improvements have been.
Installed and no new drainage facilities are anticipated as a result
of the proposed rezone.
8: The project site Is designated by the Butte County General Plan
as "High Density Residentlal"• This General Plan designation
requires that prior to zoning a parcel the following factors be
considered:
1 Existing parcel sizes and residential densities
2. Method and capability of sewage disposal.
3. Effects on adjacent uses; water qua,ilt
y air quality, noise,
traffic flow and safety, and
general environmental quality,
4. ProXlm'Ity to major streets, commercial
facilities, services and Public
5. Distance from airports, raliroads, and lndustelal Uses,
6, Existing utllitles, walkways and drainage facilities.
7. Local desires.
The proposed zoning classification of R-4 is cohststent With the
sueroUhding high density resldentlal land Use: A large demand for
Apartment compieXes Is created In thls arta due to the close
proXimity of the California state University Chico camptls
13a,b,c,f: The proposed rezone and developmeht proposal for this
Project site ivlli increase the number of allowable housing Units by
four over that which Is allowed under the R-3 zoning classificatlon.
tiadditional
ptlhousing
units l"aepmicle
rpserdaymorethanthe R�3zoning casslflcatonThe project
site is serviced by State Route 32 which is a major east -west highway
though Chico. State Route 32 is a substandard facility In
relationship to the traffic load that current land use policies
generate for State Route 32.. To make Improvements along this
transportation corridor to accommodate the high denslt>y growth;. the
Board of Supervisors established a Chico Urban Area Street Facility
Improvement 'Fee to mitigate traffic Impacts which result from land
use policy. A fee of $804.00 per dwelling u,-,:I,t has been established
by County Code 'Section 10-32 and-ifloate any
significant transportation impacts C
I4a Approval of the proposed rJ Ice
demands for fire protection service: inty
can expect to meet in the near nts=
Fire protection for the project sit a �' due
to financial dlfflcuttles being ex`,' "a , e to
the
the Intensity of the proposed ,
relative spacial relationship of 't high
Intens1gty land uses, it is cri y ;tion
services are available for theme a
dedicated funding source for st 4 Is
tleVeloed there i
p s considered an i Ices
ell OF
gip•-�-- !�!"l� ��-•-�L�.w' `--7.:- .rt,. ' �" � 'XI'��
DATA SHEET
Assessor's Parcel
043-290-010
Log 4 89-09-29-01
A Protect DEscr I_ _ p_ it
t Type of Project; Rezone.
2. Rrtef Descrlptlpn Rezone from R-3 to R-4.
3. LocafilAn: On the
Location:
southwest side of HlghwaY 32
I�00 feet south of Sacramento gvenUe, In the
Chico Urban approximately 12
4 • Propot,ed 'Density of Deve iopment
acre. 18 dWp. i I I ng Un i
S. Amount of Impervious Surfacing:s per
6. Accu and Nearest Public 'Road) Greater than 50%.
7. Methtod of Sewage Dis oral Chico
State Route
8. Source of Water Su p Cforn sarrlter. Sewers,
S. P"roxlmit Supply: California Water.
. Y of Power Lines: Adjacent to
Potential For further land parcel:
further subdlvisloh divisions and development No
project site, cowld be accommcdated on the proposed
B. Environmental Settln
P_h4s'Lc� Environment-
ITerrain
at, General Topa,'-rxphic Character: level'
Stopes,. 0-2%, valley land.
c= Elevation* +/-
d• Llmlting Factc,rsl75No�e,A S.L.
2. Solis
a. T_'pet and Character 1 st i c; .
l' ' ,iWh Foam 2- Vt i fine sandy loam, rich
3 ft. thick, retains mOlStUre well fair
surface and good subsurface
solls: drainage, VerY productive
b. Limiting Factors:
'� ` N8! turn I Hata Potential subsistence are
rds of the Land a
ai Earthquake Zone;
VMI�locteratc
b Earthquake Intensity zone
Erosion Potehtiai: Sli;g,ht;
Landsllde Pot�ntlal None:
d. Fire Hazard UhciassTfl,e
e. Expansive Soil d.
4 Hydrology Po i�ent� M a l t
Low. to modprdte;
$iroject ct site.Water
t
project 8F9 Chico Creek of
' runs Just off the
b. GroUhd Water t
WithdeaWal. Ovel'Iles area of heavy grouhdwater
ti
e oiun y General Pl
U an designation High Density
Residential_.
12. Existing Zoning: R-3
13. Existingg Land Use on-31te: Vacant and Warren's Drive -
Through Minute Lube business,
14. Surrounding Area:
a. Land Uses: Commercial and multi -family.
b. Zoning: City of Chico, R -S, and C=1.
c. Gen.- Plan Designation: High Density Residential,
Commercial.
d. Parcel S zes: Varlets from 10,000 square feet to ohe
acre
e. Population: High density residential and commercial.
15 Character of Site and Area: High density residential and
commercial.
16 Nearest Urban Area: Chico,
17. Rwlevant. Spheres of Influence: City of Chico
18. improvements Standards Urban Area: Pursuant to Chapter 20.
19 Fire Protection Service -
a. Nearest County (state) Fire. Statlon: Stat.:on o44
located approximately 3 1/2 miles east and Station o42
locatedApproximately4 miles east.
b.
Water Avallablilty: Fire hydrant
20. Schools In Area: Chico Unified School District, California
State University Chico.
C. Drainage Characteristics:
Property drains Into the
Big Chico Creek Drainage
Basin.
d. Annual Rainfall (normal):
20-22"..
e. Limiting Factors: None,
5.
Vlsuai/Scenic Quality: Good.
6.
Acoustic Quality; Good.
7.
Air Quality: Good.
Biological Environment:
8.
Vegetation: Vacant urban land.
9.
Wildlife Habitat: Limited dUe
tr� Urbanization.
Cultural Environment:
10.
Archaeological and Historical
Resources in the area: Low
sensitivity.
11
B 4. 1. C t _.
e oiun y General Pl
U an designation High Density
Residential_.
12. Existing Zoning: R-3
13. Existingg Land Use on-31te: Vacant and Warren's Drive -
Through Minute Lube business,
14. Surrounding Area:
a. Land Uses: Commercial and multi -family.
b. Zoning: City of Chico, R -S, and C=1.
c. Gen.- Plan Designation: High Density Residential,
Commercial.
d. Parcel S zes: Varlets from 10,000 square feet to ohe
acre
e. Population: High density residential and commercial.
15 Character of Site and Area: High density residential and
commercial.
16 Nearest Urban Area: Chico,
17. Rwlevant. Spheres of Influence: City of Chico
18. improvements Standards Urban Area: Pursuant to Chapter 20.
19 Fire Protection Service -
a. Nearest County (state) Fire. Statlon: Stat.:on o44
located approximately 3 1/2 miles east and Station o42
locatedApproximately4 miles east.
b.
Water Avallablilty: Fire hydrant
20. Schools In Area: Chico Unified School District, California
State University Chico.
ENVIRONMENTAL REFERENCE MATERIAL
I, Map II -1, Earthquake and Fault Activity
Seismic Safety
Element, Butte County General Plan revised 1-77, by CH2M Hill,
2. Map II -2, Liquefaction Potential: Seismic Safety Element, Butte
wised 1-77, by CH2M Hill.
County General Plan re
3. Map 111-1,Subsid ence & Landslide Potential: Safety Element,
Butte County General Plan 'revised I-77, by CH2M Hill
4, Map 111-2, Eroslor. Potential; Safety Element, Butte county
General Plan revised 1-77, by CH2M Hill.
5; Map 111-3, Expanslve Soils:
Safety Element, Butte County
General Plan revised I-77, by CH2M H111.
g,; Map IV -1, Noi>e: Noise Element, Butte County General Plan
revised 1-77, by CH2M H1II'.
Scenic Highways:
7. Scenic Highway Element, Butte County
Map V -I,
General Plan rev Ise;d 1-77 by CH2M X111.
8, Map 111--4, hatUraI Fire Hazard Classses: Safety
Element, Butte
County General Plan revised 1-77, _y 2M
g,
Archaeological Sensitivity
Map by James P. Manning, for Butte
County Planning Department, 17+83,
10. School District Map, Butte County' Planning Department.
1l:
Chico Nitrate Study Map, Nitrate Concentration In Shallows ells,
It983i by pepartment of Water Resourct�s,
The Resources Agency, State of Califordia
12, Agricultural Preserves Map,
established by Resolution No; 67-
178, Butte County Board of S
upervisors,
becember 5, 1987.
13 Flood Insurance Rate Maps, National Flood Insurance Program,
Federal Emergency Management Agency. 1388:
l4 USGS Quad Maps, Chico, 1980.-
l5, Soil Ma'pi Chico (1926)%Orovilie (1926) Area, U
,S. Department of
Agricul
16: Solt Survey of Chlco(I025)J0rovlliv (1926) Area, U.s, Department
of Agriculture,
I �'+ Butte Cokan �� F i � e protection jurisdictions and Fac i I i t I es Mao,
r
Blt,tte County fire Department and CaiiPornla Department of
BUtte ►'y: Butte County Planning Department:
► `��' "
Co un
�,,- •. LAND OF NATURAL V..�EALTH AN.D f 4AUTw
FLANNiNu DEPARTMENT
7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE = OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397
TELEPHONE. (916) 538-7601'
December 7, 1989
Warren Wlnlecke
C/O PAC -WEST BUJ I dens Inc
P.O. Box335
Gridley, CA 95948
RE Rezone, Fite 90-7
Dear Mr. Wlnlecke
We recelved your letter I'ZgUesting the withdrawal of
application for a Rezone from R- to R-4 for Your
the southwest side of Highway pr
32 a property located on
of Sacramento Avenue, Identified as AP043-2901010, Chiy 1200 cet soT�h
application Is, therefore; considered Withdrawn-. e
The subJe,,-ct application Was not taken In error. Therefore, the
application fees are not eefUndable.
Should yoU have any quest ons regarding this matter;
contact this of
fp.m,
ice between 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 please
.
Sint,,, 7 ejy
A. k rcher
Director of PlAhhing
BAI<, I r
i
TRANSPORTATION ,AND HOUSING AGENCY
STATE OF CALIFORNIA --BUSINESS, TRA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DISTRICT 3
P.O. Box 911, MARYSVILLE 95901
TDD Phone (916) 741-4463
Telephone (916) 741-4498
October 19, 1989
GEORGE DEUKMEJIAN, GO -110"
03 -But -32
P.M. 7.7
Winiecke Parcel.
q&
Mr, Larry Painter
Butte County
Planning Department
7 County Center Drive
Oroville, CA 95965-3397
Dear Mr. Painter:
Caltrans,
District 3 has reviewed te PAe �mun tyapartment cata for omplex ske rezone on
proposed.
Highway 32 south of Sacramento Avenue
The County's environmental assessment Should
sectioninclude
Highway1321s of near Sacrame;�to
project -generated traffic volumes. Thi
Avenue is currently congested, and additional traffic may further contribute to a
reduced level of service.
The analysis of possible impacts shouldreoi�siere nThe analysiseed for 5should s onto Highway
3?, increased turning movements and vice
orbite parking,
I' rovision of bus Serorequ.redeas aeresult hofpthiscProject tw"ll
any plans far p
TSM measures. Any roadway improvements
be 1,00% locally fundedi
ify ou have any questions, please contact Jeannie Baker, t lephone (916) 741-4498.
Sincerely,
,an dr ith, Chief
environmental Branch
BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION"
7 County Center Drive��
Oroville, CA .95965-3397
ED
(916) 538-7601 OCT .i .'Op
PLANNING OFFICE
TO City of Chico DATE: 9129/89 CITY, OF CHICO
P.O. Box 3420 -
Chico, CA 95927 RE: PROJECT REVIEW &
ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION
Enclosed is preliminary data our office has received or generated
concerning the following project: Warren Winiec ce 12A�onP from R- i fin
R-4 (Residential:)-, located on the southwest side of Hio ��•= rnX7maf c7v
1200 feet south of Sacramento Avenue, identified as AP# 043-290-010, Chico.- .
We Lre making an assessment of possible environmental impacts and will
be preparing an environmental doa%unent, either a Negative Declaration,
Impact Report Negative
Decla ati n with Mitigation Measures or an Environmental
Please provide any factual statements, ;.dews dor investigation, or
opinions you can offer in _your area of concern or expertise that relate
to either physical, social, or economic. impacts that this project may
genesate-
Please respond within 14 days of the above -noted date, if no responsO!
is generated by this inquiry, then it shall be assumed that there are
no significant environmental impacts which are potential from the
project
We appreciate any assistance you can provide
w
►;Sincerely,
October 13, 1989
Comments: It is recommended that the property be prezcned and developed through the
City., Because the property is annexable and will require server connection; development
utilizing the sewer must occur under City Jurisd tion and meeting City standards.
S z�nne Payers, sistant Planner
Does your agency with to receive a copV Vf the envi onmental document
(initial. study for :legative Declaration (with or without Mitigation
MOasutet) or MR for this project)
X
E :i0
U
Comments: It is recommended that the property be prezcned and developed through the
City., Because the property is annexable and will require server connection; development
utilizing the sewer must occur under City Jurisd tion and meeting City standards.
S z�nne Payers, sistant Planner
Does your agency with to receive a copV Vf the envi onmental document
(initial. study for :legative Declaration (with or without Mitigation
MOasutet) or MR for this project)
X
E :i0
BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTM..ENT
PRE -APPLICATION R-7V-TZr,,l FOF.ji
To PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
ATT.N; JOHN MENDONSA
Date_: 0/20/39
R; Pre -Application Review
Information for:
Enclosedis prel mina�y Beta our of ice .has received or c
concerning the following project: Warren Winiecke-ene_r
ated
- Rezone from to
R-4 (Re:3dential), located an the southwest siHe of fii�hwav 32, aDpro�imately
1200 feet south of Sacramento Avenue, identified as AP# 043-290-010
Chico..:
Please indicate your resoonse by decking the apnropr a,,
_
Q' No revurements -for this project;
Mthe projects as proposed can meet this ,evart,nents
reauiPments. Sufficient proof has been given that
the app licar, t can meet the+ followinc conditions
aor0roved -
The project as +-`-rbpo5ed
can/does not ^eet 4i?
reguire!t�ents of this debartment,
Of the A revision
project will be necessary, The applicant
has been contacted with this infor�;iation:
1.
S i c na t ure ,� �1./ DMai Co. P14" (i COMM
V F7 0,, i 0� 18$9
f��� CCttli�di
BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
7 County Center Drive
Oroville, CA 95965-339
(916) 538-7601
'California Water Service Company DATE: 9/29/89
TO: 1540 Esplanade
Chico, CA 95926 RE PROJECT REVIEW
ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION
data our ozfi ce has received or generated
Enclosed is preliminarYt�
concerning the following project: Warren Winiecke , Rezone from R-� rn
R-4 (Residential.) , loca-CeG on L,�G-
1200 feet south of Sacramento avenue, identified as A20 043-290-010, Chico-
----------------
re making an assessment of possible environmental impacts and will
We a either a Negative Declaration,
be preparing an environmental document,
-,> ation Measures or an Environmental
Negative Declarat-��sn Wtn Kitiq
impact Report..(EIR)
i.nT eo-tigat �:-n, c
-deas fo.r
Please provide arl 1acr-ual stacemen.s;
opinions you c�tn offer 'in your area of concern or e.4-ise that relate
t� eitheY 'phys ,a1 social, or economic impacts tha th.�s .� a'ject may
generate.
please respond Within 14 days of hft etabove-nbe�assumed that d datei If nther`epare
e
is generated by t;zs inquiry, the
no significant environmental impacts which are potential from the
pro jec 4
We appreciate any assistance you can `x•ovide.
**,Sincerely,
Bu"6 co, Mhni,inq Comm.
f; 1989
y OM'01lo, California
----------------
Comments.
WATSE28 V7
_ ,.. AiYA C1 �;RT F TCI il'Lt.l1' i Tj��R('S i fi"Ti(
EXISTING FAGILIT198
Does your agency
wish to receive a copy of the environmental document
(ii.tial study for Nega.ti�:e Declaration with or withoutii.tiga ion
Measures) or EIR for thi-s project)
t
BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
PRE -APPLICATION REVIEW FORM
:
To: F��'IROrA�IENTAL« HEALTHHEALTHPEPARDEPARTMENTDate9%2_9
/$9
ATTN., HOWARD SNYDEP.
RE: Pre -Application Review
Information for:
Enclosed is preliminary data our off -ice has received or generated
concerting the following proje^.t: Warren Winiecke Rezone from R-3 to
R-4 (Residential), located on the southwest sidc-, of highway 32, approximate_1v
1200 feet south of Sacramento Avenue, identified as AP# 043-290-010 Chico�
Please-ndicate your response by checking the appropriate box.
a No requirements for this project,
she project as proposed can meet, this Departments
requirements. suf icient proof has been given that
tpie applicant can meet the foiloWing conditions
approved
The project as proposed caft/does not meet the Buff 6Cc. MerfingCam%
ts of this department. A revision
reguremeri
of the project Will be ;necessary. The applicant (JOT � � 19$9
has been contacted with. this information. proville,'Callf=ia
ENVIRONMENTAL HCAL` H
OCT 4 1989
rnAiro 1 e rAi trr Cwl+
.r
Y
.f
Autte cou'a
00;
hAT1)lgAL A Tr At
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE • OROVILLE. CALIFORNIA 05966-3397
TELEPHONE: (916) 538-7601
September 29, 1989
Mr. Warren 'Winiecke
c/o Pad -best Builders, Inc.
P.O. E: 335
Gridley, CA 95969
RE: Rezone Application, API 043-790-010, :File # 90-7
we received your pre -application review request, for the
subject Rezone.
Butte County Public Works and Environmental. Health have
received the information you submitted. The Planning
Department will consider this application complete only
after �•e have assurances from the above departments that
the priiject complies with appropriate oz:r"
,. condit�.or s i•.iposed, can be moc
St is the applicants responsibility to provide any
additional information needed by Public Works or
Environmental Health to meet their requirements
Publ.ic'Works may be contacted by telephone at 538-7266
and Environmental Health at 538-7:61 for further
infbtmat4on as to their evaluation of the proposal
and their requirements.
The Planninr Department staff will also be reviewing the
application for any special conditions or modifications
that are appropriate; Should you have any questions
about the pre"xpplieation reviewplease contact this
Office.
Sincerely,
B.A. KIRCHEIt
Director of Planning
lmv__Pa'L-+
LARRY PAINTER
Planning Technician
LP. rdin
9ndl6turti Reeiept # 10985 $487.80