Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout90-4 REZONE PLANNING 1 OF 2''I•10, � ^I - '. ail �i r��� � � z V / lima . a a F Mitigated Negative Declaracion Environmental Iapact Report FILE CERTIFIED: Other: STA= CLEARINGHOUSz NUMBS: i APPLTCdN1TlRFORESa9T.-%TIVE: NO=-ICAT10Y of ENV_TRON1MFiM—,L LSE .14,0ATIONi FLA-WrIG COKAISSION HEARING(,1 Z'$ -- %tom, -BOARD' OF SUPERVISORS' HEARING(s )r. RESOLUTT-ON `+uz'SE: L (G?.43) kDOPTED-. ORDINANCE ="MER ADOPT: N:Cx= Cy ZS.-'ZNiI:;Ai,ON- (AppendLx- H). 5-08-25-0? pIZ;,;OJC`LT1`+Si�IAR"Y SHEET 90-4 Fila :'io. - Log. NO., � 11 s NORHA9 COLE[ JOHtr ROR?.EY applicant representative 4-41 )4oi;,,Ao rc A 5 P.O. Box 625; . ADDRESS:: NT- Ctta-76— ' DURHAM; CA 95938 PKONr SAME AS APPLICANT' property owner ADDRESS' -- 7 TZ,0 CT 7DESCRZPTSONc REZONE TO SR -1 F" -W Q — S " : located' approximately 500 feet south. of Serviss Street eAR-� on prooerty : of between Holland Road and dentiFed as AP & 89 town/area: DURHAM Goods eed.. ,4G-28-88 GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DATE PRE -APP FEE': PAID: $ ., RECEIPT NUMBER; APPLICATION ACCEPTED;' FLNAL. APP'. PAID:: $ 487 . Ota RECEIPTNUMBER: 10919 _ 810/89 Pf_ tt'f�1i CTAGE:. ! Q� 0 1 1REZONING PL=,)N' SIGNATURES CHECKED HAILING; LIST' PREPARED' — %Lul-OUT NOTICES FRITIP2t News: NOTICES' MAIC` NUMBER= Public - ublic-LEGAL- LEGAL DESCRIPTION— PREPARED (Q $FST- ?UBLIC2IOR NOTICE` WRIT Ni' DISPLAY AD PREPARED NE.4ISFAPER. PUBLICATION 0 Go P G $ R, DATE OF I-0LICATION : INITT-kL STUDY` PREPARE ENVIRONMENTAL DL ERMINATION: Categorical Exemption FILED: 'Negative Declaration FILED: _- Mitigated Negative Declaracion Environmental Iapact Report FILE CERTIFIED: Other: STA= CLEARINGHOUSz NUMBS: i APPLTCdN1TlRFORESa9T.-%TIVE: NO=-ICAT10Y of ENV_TRON1MFiM—,L LSE .14,0ATIONi FLA-WrIG COKAISSION HEARING(,1 Z'$ -- %tom, -BOARD' OF SUPERVISORS' HEARING(s )r. RESOLUTT-ON `+uz'SE: L (G?.43) kDOPTED-. ORDINANCE ="MER ADOPT: N:Cx= Cy ZS.-'ZNiI:;Ai,ON- (AppendLx- H). y 5•- Repo37t to the Board - Norman Cole/John Robley proposed negative declaration and denied rezone from AR -5 to SR -1 for property located approximately 500 feet south of Serviss Street, between Holland Road and Goodspeed, identified as AP 040--280-088 and 089, Durham' - action requested ACCEPT VOR INFORMATION. Norman Cole f John Robley - proposed Negative Declaration regarding environmental impacts and Rezone from: AR -5 (Agricultural Residential - 5 acre parcels) to SR -1 (Suburban Residential - 1 acre parcels) for property located approximately 500 feet south of 'Service Street, between Holland Road and Goodspeed, identified as AP 040-280-088 and 089, Durham. (File 90-4) (Continued closed from September 26, 1991) Staff said this hearing was continued closed -subject to the results of the D2N Plan hearing. Staff said this area is proposed for A-5 zoning in the D2,,,NPlan previously recommended by this Commission. Staff is recommending this proposal be denied. Commissioner Lynch asked what happens to this proposal if the D2N Plan is not approved at the Board? Staff said, if the Commission is comfortable with their recommendation to the Board, there is no reason to hold this project. The applicant will have the right to appeal the decision if denied. If the project is approved it will go forward to the Board. It was moved by Comnussioner Lynch, seconded by Commissioner Lambert, and. unanimously carried for denial as follows; A, Find that the requirements of tb,e California Environmental Quality Act :have been completed; and 13 Find thatprojects within the P2N Area Land Use Plan should be evaluated against both the existing and proposed land use plan as just recommended by the Planning Comn.ission in order to avoid compromising the ultimate land use plan; and C, Find that the requested rezone would increase the service demands of governmental services beyond that which can be provided due to the County's fiscal situation and inability to fund governmental services such as police and fire protection. D, Deny without prejudice the tole change request for that property identified as AP` 40-28-88 ( / y) V� co`vt�T °�Arrr�r� yc�o .rsxr� iNtr�s 2 , Norman Cole/,fohn Robley - environmental impact, and Rezone from �PAM (Agricultural osed �Resive dents regarding al parcels) to SR-1 `(Suburban Residential 1 acre parcels) for property located approximately 500 feet south of Service Street, between Holland Road and Goodspeed, identified as AP 040-280-088 and 089, Durham, (File 90-4) (Continued closed from August 22, 1991) (CBS) Staff recommended the Commission hear this item after the D2N hearing later this afternoon. It was moved y��_ ynchj urian mously earned omove this item. to .,.seconded by Commissioner Lambed,. :and the end of the agenda after the D2N hearing, The Cole/Robley hearing .continued from earlier in the ineeting wits taken .at °this time. If was ,. wed by Commissioner Lynch, seconded ]by Commissioner Lambert, and unanimously carried to continue this hearing closed to October 24, 1991 at 1:30 p;m. after the D2N hearing. $kTh�x�E COtfNT p1ViNG +,C01HMSS10N MiUT� Sfernber 2 Norman Cole John Robley-- proposed Negative Declaration regarding environmental impact anti Rezone from AR -5 (Agricultural Residential - 5 acre parcels) to SR -1 (Suburban Residential; - 1 acre parcels) for property located approximately 500 feet south of Service Street, between Holland Road and Goodspeed, identified as AP# 040-280-088 and 089, Durham. (File 90-4) (Continued closed from February 14, 1991) (BLM) Chairman Matson said we have received a request to continue this project from staff. Staff stated that this project has been following the Durham Dayton Nelson project and needs to be continued with the D2N project until 10:30 a.m. on September 26, 1991. It was moved by Commissioner Nelson, seconded by Commissioner Ostrowski, and unarumously carried to continue the Norman Cole/John Robley Rezone to 10;0 a.m, on September 26, 1991. BUtTE- COUNTY PLANN1110 COM1+t SSTON lt4IN.UTES At gals -b 22; 199 Norman Cole/John Robley - proposed Negative. Declaration regarding environmental impact and Rezone from AR -5 (Agricultural Residential - 5 acre parcels) to SR -1 (Suburban 'Residenti'al 1 acre parcels) for property located approximately 500 feet South of Serviss'Street, between Holland Road and Goodspeed, identified as AP 040-280-088 and 089, Durham. (File 90-4) (Continued closed form December 13, '1990) Staff said this project has been continued waiting for the determination on the D2N plan. Staff said the Plan should be coming to the Commission in August and requested that this hearing be continued until then. R was moved by Commissioner Ostrowski, seconded by Commissioner Lynch, and unanimously carried to continue this hearing to August 22, 1991 at 9:00 a.m. BUTTE O ofty PLANNTNO CONM±8810N M114t SES =- 'eb tte y �4 � 199 Norman Cole%John 'Lghle- - proposed Negative Declarativa .regarding environmental impact andRezone from AR -5 (Agricultural Residential - 5 acre parcels) to SR -1 (Suburban Residential - 1 acre parcels) located approximately 500 feet south of Serviss Street, between Holland Road and Goodspeed, identified as AP 040-280-088 and 089, Durham. (File 90-4) (Continued closed from August 23, 1990) X", Staff said this hearing is waiting for the results of the Durham -Dayton -Nelson plan. Staff said the D2N ETR is being written and will provably go into hearings by the end of January. Staff requested that this hearing be continued to February 141, 1991. It was moved by Commissioner Lynch, seconded by Commissioner ]Lambert, and unanimously carried to continue this hearing to February 14, 1991, at 9:00 a.m. Norman Cole/John Robley - proposed Negative Declaration regarding environmental impact and Rezone from AR -5 (Agricultural Residential 5 acre parcels)to SR -1 (Suburban Residential 1 acre parcels) located approximately 500 feet south of Serviss Street, between Holland Road and Goodspeed, identified as AP 040-280-088 and 089, Durham. (File 90-4) (Continued closed from July 12, 1990)' Staff said this hearing was continued forward, waiting the outcome of the Board's decision on a preferred alternative for the Durham -Dayton -Nelson area. Staff said the Board approved a preferred alternative on August 7, 1990. Staff said this application is in conflict with the Board's preferred alternative. Staff asked that this hearing be continued to December, and with the waiver on the CEQA timelines from the applicant, the Commission can continue this hearing to coincide j with the completion of the Enviromnental Impact Report for the D2N area. It was moved by Commissioner Lambert, seconded by Commissioner Lynch, and unanimously carried to continue this hearing, closed to December 13, 1990 at 9:00 a.m. i Ait�z! Ctt�I' t 23 9 d P�AZ�N�I�tG' GOMM�SS�dN A��'NG�ES Au�xus r Norman Cole/John Robley proposed, Neaa.tive Declaration regarding ,'' impact and Rezone from AR-5 (Agricultural 5 acre g g em ironmertsaI Residential -1 acre parcels) located approximately 500 feet south of Serviss Street, betWeen Holland Road and Goodspeed, 'identified as AP 040-280-088 and 089, Durham. File 90. 4) (Continued closed from April 26, 1990) ( 90= Staff submitted a memo to the Commission dated July 11, 1990 requestin acontinuance the Board of. Supervisors has made their determination on a preferred alternative for the Du after Dayton-Ilson area plan. Staff said the Board should make their decision on Jul 24 1D99ham- Y 0. It was moved by Coinillissloner Lambert, seconded by Commission Ostrowski, and unanimousl carried to continue this hearing closed to August 23, 1990 at 9;00 a.m. Y s, b , .i 4 Norman Cole/John Mobley - proposed Negative Declaration regarding environmental impact and Rezone from AR -5 (Agricultural - 5 acre parcels) to SR- (Suburban Residential - 1 acre parcels) located approximately 500 feet south of Serviss.Street, between Holland Road and Goodspeed, identified a5 AP 040-280-088 and 089, Durham. (File' 90-4) (Continued closed from January 11, 1990) Staff said this hearing was continued pending a response from the Board of Supervisors on a preferred alternative for the Durham -Dayton -Nelson. Area Plan. Staff said the D2N Committee met last Wednesday. Staff said they have prepared a rough draft of the alternative to go to the Board around May 2, 1990, Chairman Forbes said the project needs to be continued. Staff said the Commission needs to know if the project will conform to the recommended preferred; alternative. Staff said the Commission could continue this item or act on it today without knowing if this project conforms to the preferred_ alternative for the D2N area. Commissioner Lynch said he hates to seethe applicants delayed any longer than necessary. He said staff might wish to contact the a.plicants and let them know the circumstances and ask them to waive the time lines. He said the Commission could deny the project and allow the applicant to appeal the decision to the Board of Supervisors. Chairman Forbes :aid if the Commission denies this project and, the Board denies the project, if the D2N Plan is later adopted the applicant would have to pay new fees and, start the process all over if he did agree with the adopted Plan. Staff said this is correct. Staff said there is no way of knowing,at this time, if the application conforms to what will 'be adopted by the Board as a preferred plan. missioner Lynch ed to he an EIR dome on this area along with the IVIE k thathas that been done and if the EIR, Will :lengthen the process. Staff said the MEA is the basic data that will be used for the EIR and it will speed up the process considerably. Commissioner Lynch asked if the time, lines for the.INN alternative were December at best and staff said yes. Commissioner Lambert oggested this hearing be continued to July which will be before the August CEQA timeline deadlines. Yt was moved by Commissioner Lynch, :seconded by CoMmissioner Lambert, and unanimously carried to continue this hearing closed to July 12, 1990 at 900 a,m. Btt tk COtOtYA?LAi�IN NC., CbN i ,S .Tt�k� k�i Nth S ,�.nr ] 2 6 , 19 5: 0 " Norman Cole/John Robley, - proposed Negative Declaration regarding; environmental impact and Rezone from AR -5 (Agricultural - 5 acre parcels) to SR -1 (Suburban Residential -1 acre parcels) for property located approximately 500 feet south of Se'rviss Street, between Holland Road and Goodspeed, identified as AP 040-280-088 and 089, Durham. (Continued closed from January 11, 1990) (File 90-4) StaDayf on -Nelson d this tem was area. Staff requed uest d a� continuance nuance to April 26the outcome of an alternative plan for the Durham Yt q, It was moved by Commissioner Ostrowski, seconded by Commissioner Lynch, and unanimously carried to continue this hearing closed to April 26, 1990 at 9:00 a.m. � T� dotrNT)t p" a'Nt XMl rt:ObtbM Mt14t1th8, March 220 1996 Norman Cole/lohn Robley - proposed Negative Decl f°ai iotl regarding environmental impact and -Rezone.- from .,kA -5 (Agricultural - 5 acre parcels) to SR -1 (Suburban Residential - lacre parcels) for property located. approximately 500 feet south of Serviss Street, between Holland .Road and Goodspeed, identified as AF 040-280-088 and 089, Durham. (Cotiii hued closed from November 9, 1989) (File 904)` Staff said the hearing was continued so that the Commission would l a e the benefit of knowing the. Board of Supervisors' preferred alternative plan for the area, ,ff ,�iid unfortunately, the alternatives were referred back to the Citizens Committee by the Board to develop a revised plan, this could take 2.3 months, to come back to the Board from the Citi ens Committee. Staff recommended that this :hearing be continued to March, or April It was moved by Commissioner Lambert, seconded by Commissioner 'Lynch,- and unanatiously carried to continue this hearing closed to March 22, 1990 at 9:00 a.m. w r • Norman Cole/John e Declaration re ardin Robley proposed Negati�rr g 9 environmental Impact and Rezone from AR -6 (Agricultural Residential 5 acre (Suburban Residential - I acre pr prop j to ate parcels) for property located approximately soo feet south of Servlss Street, between Holland Road and Goodspeed, Identified as AP 040-280-088; Durham. (Continued closed from September 28, 1989) Staff said this hearing was continued closed In order for the Board to hold hearings on the 02N Pian. Staff said at the Board's hearing in Durham on November 7 1989, there Was no quorum for the hearing, There was no action taken, but tie Board said they Would on November 14, 1P89, schedule another hearing and date for the D2N Alternatl,Ie before them. Staff spent approximately an hour after the Board meeting talking With the citizens of Durham answering questions. Chairman Lambert said this Will probably have to be continued. She said she Was not able to approve this, she sal'd If it is denied the applicant can appeal the denlal or the Commission can continue this hearing. Commissioner Ostrowski said at the last meeting the Commission discussed the James Black rezone to SR -1. He asked What the relationship Was between the Black property and this property. Commissioner Lynch said the Black property is across town from this property, Chairman Lambert said the Commission needs to know the outcome of the Durham hearings before approving this Project. CommlSsioner Lynch said If this hearing Is continued It will be Christmas or after, but If the request Is denied It would be up to the applltant to appeal the decision to the Board. Chairman Lambert said the Board might like t4 know that this project Is In the mill While Working on the D2N alternative, Staff said that if the 02N Plan is a o back through the Comtliss,lon for the General Plan Amendit mentliAndmAezone I' Bar i ngs Commissioner Ostrowski `,eked about a proposed Alternative 6, Staff said the proposal was Withdrawn Chairman Lambert said that the present applicatioln does the Goals and Objectives as approved b,y the Board, not meet Norman Cole/John Robley - proposed Negative Declaration regarding environmental Impact and Rezone from A-5 (Agricultural - 5 acre parcels) to SR -1 (Suburban Residential 1 acre parcels) for property located approximately 500 feet south of Serviss Street, between Holland Road and Goodspeed Avenues, identified as APo040-280- 088 and 089; Dunham. (File 90-4) The Commisslon waived the reading of the Staff Findings, Staff noted the correspondence received from t s )Urham Unified School District. Staff said that they had talked to the 'juperintendent of Schools and relayed the telephone conversation in the Staff analysls; The hearing was open to the public„ Norm C�.Ie said that the depth of this lot was approximately 150 feet south of Servlss Street and not 500 feet. Mr. Cole said in regards to the Durham Unified School District cc.,nments, the last few years, there has been a housing development, Goodspeed Commons, that has been recently built and numerous duplexes, which he felt would Impact the school district. He said that on Durham Dayton Road, across the street from the school, they are building several homes, which would also be an impact on the school district. He said that he thought the school accepted children from out' of the district, and that If the district was really concerned about Impacts and overcrowding, they should not be accepting children from out of the district Mr. Cole said in regards to the Durham Irrigation District, over two years ago, When he was building his home, he asked the District If he could obtain 'water for his home, and they told him that he could not have the service. Mr. Cole said that now that the homes and duplexes a're being built, they are getting their water service. Mr; Cole said he did not know what the Durham Irrlgatlon District's secondary sources of constant potable supply of Water Was. Mr. Cole said that his impact on the County for the amount of money that he Is !;saying In taxes to the County Is negligible, He feels he Is not Impacting seeVlces: Mr'. Cole said thatthere Was a concern with flooding and the he)has.lnoting seenhahy^�grounrlsurface uld eWas Wateback in 1939. Hesandtthat flooding ,in 19.39. In that area since the John Rb l ey, a0i5 l l cant -, said that he does not know of any storm drainage In the Durham area Mr. Robley asked that 1f they Were going to the address the drainage, where 'Would they dealn the water? Mr. Robley said that the property Is not reliable for farming and the size makes it Impossible to lease and that the e!x,sting homes are vacant, Chairman Lambert asked If there was more than one house on Mr. Rob -I ey's 10 ,acres Mr. Robley said that there was a mobile home and a house that were both Vacant. Chairman Lambert asked If Mr. Cole had one house on his 10 acres and If someone was residing In It; Mr. Robley said yes Mr. Cole said that he understands that his neighbors on Serviss Street complain because of his farming operatiol. He agreed that his equipment Is noisy and causes dust and sprays tensa to drift. Mr: Robley said that the situation Will area develops. only get worse as the The hearing Was closed Chairman Lambert said that the preferred. altrhat(b Durham are through the Citizens Comittee plana m the Planning Commission and have been forWarded to the Board of 8UPervlsors for their consideration. a hear"ing In Durham for November '7, 1989' said the Board has set Commissioner Forbes said that he Would rather not see the Commission take action on arty projects In the Durham area until after the meeting In Durham in November takes place; COmmiStIoner 0strowskl asked If the General Plan desighatioh in the proposal that the Commission sent to the Beard Is Low benslt:y Residential. Staff said AgrlcUltural-Res dential Was What Was being proposed, but how Is currently Low Denslty Residential: Commissioner Ostrowski asked what sizes were permissabie, Staff said that they could go down as far as 60600 square feet if there was a sewer or Water system. Chairman Lambert said that she felt they Should know what the Board's recommendatlon on the proposed plan for Durham and What the Board`s View WIII be before agreeing to this project,, Commissioner Matson agreed: 'CQU1�1T'St P1A IN G COMM TS9bl MTNiJ SS ' ul Sepimbe8- �$9 Commisslon::r Ostrowski agreed with waiting to see what the Board will decide.. Staff said that If the Board agrees With the Commission In this area, It should be AgrlcultUral-Resldential on the General Pian and perhaps a 1 acre minimum size parcel; Staff said that It Would be appropriate to hold the project at this and see what tlevel to Wait the response Is from the Board and the meeting in Durham. Staff said that when the 1979 Pian was adopted, It was Intended to go back and do the area plans. Staff said that it would be appropriate for the Commission to not make firm recommendations until they know what the Boards alternative will be. Chairman Lambert asked if the Board was also going to decide on the Urban Reserve Issue. Staff said that the Board should give direction b6ok On Whether Urban Reserve should be considered. Staff said that the Commission could continue this November 9, 1989 agenda: project to the itwas by Commissioner Forbes, seconded by Cr�mmissioner It was mo and unanimously carrled to continue thf:.Rezone application closed for Norman Cole and John Roble to November 9, 1989 at 9:6o A,M. X11 �1v atl i V�At`1MIN CO�NI�S�xt�I�� �tf�t� V t ,< FILE No.: 90-4 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING CMM ISSION STAFF FINDINGS - September 20 198`9 APPLICANT: Norman Cole/.john Robley OWNER. Same REQUEST: Rezone from A-5 to SR -I APNO.: 40-28-88 & 89 SIZES Approximately 20 acres LOCATION: Approximately 500 feet south of Serviss Street, between Holland Road and Goodspeed Avenue In the Durham Area, EXISTING ZONING. A-5 ZONING HISTORY; SURROUNDING ZONING Zoned A-5 Aug, 14, 1973 Ord. 1385 A-5 SURROUNDING LAND USE: North: Residential- South Residential rahchette: East. Resldentlal; West; Orchards. SITE HISTORY: Project site has been under consideration for seVerai land Use deslghatlons In the process of developing the Durham -Dayton - Nelson GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION. ..Area. Land Use Plan; Law Density Residential APPLICABLE''REGULATiONS: Butte County Code Seotlohs 24-29, 24-24, 24-26, 24-27, 24-28, 24-29, 24-162; and 24-72; Callfornla Government Code Section 65800 seiq et, <' 0 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF FINDINGS September 20, 1989 COMMENTS RECEIVED: Butte County Public Works: "This proposal will cause traffic impacts In the Durham Area. Disposition of storm drainage Will be a problem." Durham Unified School D"istrlct "The proposal Is Inconsistent with the recommendations of the Citizens Advisory Committee appointed by the Butte County Board of Supervisors as part of the Durham -Dayton - Nelson General Pian Study. It is a,so not consistent with the current General Plan. 1 would not be opposed to the proposal if it was consistent With the current and proposed General Plan. The students which woul-d be generated by the lower density zoning could not be adequately housed by the District solely from the funds generated by developer fees. The costs for providing space for those children is far greater than the tota.1 of the fees. Documentation of this carie be provided If requested. Therefore, a portion of the housing costs of the children will be provided by the District's general fund: On that basis, I am also opposed to the lower density Proposal due to the great financial impact on the District. Thark you again for the opportunity to comment on the conservation with the District Superintendent), proposal. (phot; Durham Irrigation District., "As a condition of approval recommend annexation to Durham Irrigatlon District for the following reasons; 1. Will provide a State regulated governmental organization for monitoring of valuable ground water for Pollution and depletion. 2. Prevent proliferation of private wells that pose the greatest hazard to our aquifer. 3. Will provide adequate flow and pressure for fire Protection. 4. Wlii provide primary pan y constant d secondary source of Potable supply of water. 5. Will vide experienced water quality management and administration. All subject of course to the Board of Directors of the DUrham Irrigation Dis'trlct approval," Butte County Flre Department/Californla Department of Forestry Fire 'Protect )on, "Rezone will Increase servicedemands on the Fire Department." (Phone conversation With D1vlslon Chief) ANALYSIS This Project Is -a request for a rezone from A-5 (Ag acre parcels) to SR -1 (Suburban Residentlal I acre (Agricultural - 5 parcels): The Project: site Is located within the The (02N) Area Land Use Pian. The 02N Area Lana Use Plan has teen reviewed by the Butte County planning Commission and a preferred alternative known as. Aiternative *5 has been forwarded to the Butte County Board of Supervisors: Alternative *5 An 0 General Pian designation Wlth anoA"5eSZoning classification ifortIathe 2 r BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION' STAFF FINDINGS - September 20, 1989 project site. The proposed zoning Is a higher density than the preferred alternative of the Butte County Planning Commission for this site. The Land Use Element of the Butte County General Plan establishes site zoning criteria as a guideline for determining the appropriate zone in each General Plan designation. Zoning factors to be considered Under the Low Density Residential General Plan designation are as follows: I. Existing parcel sizes and residential densities 2. Availability of sewer or suitability for septic tanks. 3: Effects on adjacent uses, water quality,, air quality, noise,, traffic flow aiid safety, and general environmental quality. 4i Proximity to major streets, commerclal services, and all public facilities. a. Distance from airports, roads,, and Industrial uses. 6, Existing utilities, walkways, and drainage facilities. 7 Local desires. Approximately two years ago the Commi-scion approved the Jones rezone and General the Commisslonabasedhdm��t flnd(n the Durham common ty. At that time g e County's General Plan, adopted p Goads and Policies for the D2N Area Land Use Plan and the recommendation of the Citizens Advisory Committee, Today, however, there are five alternative land ,use plans which have been developed for the Durham Area. The proposed rezone is not consistent With four out of the _five alternatives: The most receant rezone request In the Durham ea was James Black which was denied by the Planning C'e5Mm I ss l onlue to no plat! beIng In place at this time for Durham. Re -designation of this property at this time may hot be appropriate In view of the cUrrent work occurring In developing a new area land use plan for DUrha;,,, This zone change request may be consistent with the existing cionera I RI—In, however, it may not be With the final plan approved by the Board of SUporv1>ors, The Commisslon may prefer to Wait Until the Board has determined the preferred alternative plan for D2N Without a cotnpredensive landUsk; plan which designates the Proposed general distribution and general location extent of land Uses It Is Impossible to evaluate the future sptir„Ial relatlonships, In additlon, the Uncertainty of the County's ability to provide vital governmental services now and in the future must be cohsldured when approving zoning requests which Increase the service demands. The County's General plan requires that availability of adequate fire Protection eXlsts. In ac^ordance with an agreement with the State to defer the contract payment with GDF, the CoUnty budget has left fire protectlon service Unfunded.. Again With the Uhcertalhty of fire 3 n _ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF FINDINGS September 20, 1989 " Protection In the future It may be premature to recommend approval of rezones that Increase density. RECOMMENDATIONS: Find A. Quality that Act have beencompleted; rements the California Environmental _, and B• Find that projects within the D2N Area Land Use Plan should be evaluated against both the existing and Proposed land Use plan In order to avoid compromising the ultimate land use plan; and C. Find that the requested rezone would increase the service demands of governmental services beyond that which can be provided due to the Coun,ty,s fiscal situation and Inability to fund governmental serelces such at Police and fire protection. D. Deny the zone change request for that 4CI-28-88 & 89 (Norman Cole/John Robley)property Identified as AP BLMIr Attachments to the Commission and Cities . - Environmental Documents Site Plan Location Exhlblt 4 r, lip. il- . �7 x APPLICATION 1 1T'r A,� �1,� FOR REG ro �nnningC ONi��� x ()19gg BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING OONJMISSIOp�roY&, Calif wal APPLICANT: head and rollow instructions set forth on last page or this farm. x Applicant's Name p��':.C"rt �'r•r /.f �� . .� ------------ r Cryry Phone No. Applicant's Mailing Address Applicant's Interest in property (Owrter,I-essee, Other) 1,1 tt' • : rz Owner's Name and Address _y 0 f'K ie 2 -n de-e.�. Contact Person ror Project or other than applicant) Assessors Parcel Number(s) 019 o -• Present Zonings Requested Zoninj'r`*9i'�""- z Location, dimensions and size orarca(s) to be rezoned .Z Z Street Address or applicable) --2-11r9 b N Directions ror travel toerl ro t p P Y (tura, and mountai0ous areas only)c V*rWe* r J' tr`s� �A w aF' s"G�r Applicant's reasons for rezoning p r thr--A,1-0 21. � f' � � a' fr�,� ��C �."N i�' �. ,,,'�"'r- rS✓fa 7` !r"` ic^ �" rt.' p. � �' . ,�,� � t' "¢� 1` �` +"'�.� r � � ._..4 ` Caw `%� ,i`� id�',,d,'��_ ,a►�,.t �"�+ /r (i �C� � rf? '� ��" ° R r7<°C i� �, i T d7 '� 4� (c +P' � � k�*P� r a�'x , } :i t iS'� dr�`� �Y�•+,%� A';Mii 'C'`', e r Proposed scheduling/Associated projects( 7 ormatiOnrorservicc district,r� is Anticipated Incremental development (ruture development pianssllbsequcnt to rezone ; ) —., Extstin / r g proposed sek'age disposal methods' Proximity orpokver and phone lines: Wf e 4)A) Distance to rt;ttural �vatLr course or stCtrm drain; „_,,/ i'�=�r4 / ,�.., �L ��r, l f Mnnntng calm& Describe anticipated on and oft -site drainage improvements (PUD, MHP': _A_Ue Describe how on-site and downstream drainage channels will be affected (PUD, iviHP): Water source., x, Proximity of water for fire fighting purposes (hydrants, 'ponds, etc,' _ 661 A%./2L?� 'lee VA -r r- C- O N` k'.a"j��,tzYY- ( o0 t+'GL�.F'V 0dam* +.�£�to;yr°,���'(5) t Will excavation or grading be necessary? r Cubic yards (estimate)? List and describe and other related permits and other public approvals required for this project, including those required by city, regional, Slate and Federal agencies: If residential, include the number of units, whether units are single or multi -story in height, schedule of unit sizes, and type of household site expected. If commercial, indicate the type. whether neiabborhood'. city or reaionallv oricntrd..tauyre fdotnee of sales area, and loading facilities If industrial, indicate type, estimated employment per shift, and loading facilities;. if institutional indicate the major function, estimated employment per shift; estimated occupancy, loading facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the project, I ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS ANDMITIGATIONMI✓ASURES Identify potentially significant environmental impacts associated with the rezone, What project design features or special conditions of approval (mitigation measures) are proposer! to allcviatc potential environmental impacts? l 4 a i - PIP'""T69 Comm j90N. ✓N V I MFNTA t_SFTrINc AUG 10 19 89 Describe tine project site as it exists before the project, including inforrmnioo lin 1aiY§V0 Y;a1q bility, plants and animals, and any cultural, historical and scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures city the site, and the use of the structures. 7 H N4-0 . I-ire>'�� r ! t? d�Sr� " - A' dr'jG'`r -22""M e Latt 7 A:s A "5 ani �+°Srrc �+'r t W4 Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical, orscen C aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use (one -family apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc.), and scale of' development (height, frontage, Z setback, rear yard. etc, 41'*, �efr'". I hereby declare under penalty of perjury that I have read and understand the Instructions and that the foregoing statements are true, complete and correct to the best of my knolviedge 4 nd bei; -,f, Dated: __..Applicant's Signature a /Ile,t"e 4 Dated, Property oWfier's signaturNw e/�� 's. '"C�•c�?x; fi 'ca: +d�jV' �,-�;r r 1 Bu}}e Co. mayining AUG 101989 Verify: Orowllo, + t^,,nitfornia A.P. Number(s) i � " Location Description C---.LL---Qwnership -Legal Description of Area tsl Proof of Agency (if needed) Maps of Area/Development t // Plan for PUD's W - —V— Present Zoning u Reproducible Master Map of Development. Plan (PUD's'only) Gw i� Date ofApplication _received � �a�L$ ` Receipt No Application Taken By 4 . -aa 1 Buie Co. {'iennfng INSTRUCTIONS TO REZONING APPLICANTS AUG 101989 Orovilly, Galifornla i . f applicant is not the owner, written authorization by the owner or other proof of agency must be submitted in order for the applicant to legally sign the application. Application sha;' be considered void if not signed by the owner or legal agent. 2. All items on application shall be filled in as completely as possible.. 'Very few items should be marked not applicable by the term "N/A". ' It is very important that the application include an accurate and complete description of ,the I roperty proposed for each requested zone. The applicant will not be processed until we receive the following information about area(s) to be rezoned:. a. Assessor's parcel numbers) from the tax bills or Assessor's Map. b. Street addresses (if available). c. Distances and directions to named streets, bodies of water or rail; t N d. Legal description (subdivision lot numbers, fractions of sections or distances and bearings of perimeter dimensions). el copies of map with rezoning area(s) outlined (Assessor's map, subdivision map, or other map showing parcels)., 4. California Government Code Section 65300 et serf. requires It al zoning ordinances to be consistent with a jurisdiction's adopted general plan. County ;.pprmal of a rezoning request must be supported by fmdii,i of consistency with the Butte County General Plan, Applicants may request changes in General Plan designations by filing an Application for General Plan Amendment, 5, The Application for Rezoning is sub,iect to public hearings and approval by both the Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors. The procedures for County action on rezoning applications are stated in Chapter 24 of the Butte County Corte. /g 6, Applicant fees as of "` '� (date) a c $ '`t" ' - Fees may be paid in cash or by check made payable to Treasurer of Butte County, 7, Before submitting a rezoning application, applicant is requested to discuss with staff all questions bout application requirements, County procedures, consistency with the General Plan, and the provisions ofexistinl and requested zoning classifications. Inter -Depart C en�^��ndum TOS FROM: SUBJECTS DATE, ,=v -S -off' -03/ ow /P�% �b L 040 280 089 Q100 STATUS ACTIVE R09LEY JOHN S tt SUSAN I JT 4706 HOOMANA RD LIHUE HI 96766 Lo L 040 880 08B 000 STATUS ACTIVE COLE NORMAN L & ERIS H JT r R O BOA{ 685 DURHAM CA 95838 L 040 800 Oil { 150 STATUS ACTIVE RICHTER 108EPH M TESTAMENTARY TRUST ETcAL RICHTER LILLIAN E & SHAMBAUGH kATHRYN TRI 5757 CYPRE85 #248 CARMICHAEL CA 45601 L 1J41i1 28r� 072 ? llr ' STATUS ACTIVE WEIGLEIN JOHN & ANNA 9x797 60005REEO ST DURHAM CA 95988 L, 040 2211 —018.4 000 STATUS ACTIVE KNOTT RICHARD A ETAL JT t SCHOLES CHERYL 9174 GOODSPEEt DURHAM CA i s S UFS 2407 f€41 t%1C+6ff STATS ACTIVE U -� _----. t T A1:_Lti FRANK PAULINE tt ---'. G BOX 11 L 03416 24f?€ sSS f%1f,& .. - DUF•HAN CALIF STATHIS VICTOR JOHN STATUS AC,TrVE 4538 NANCY CATHERINEJ7ERVISS STREET DURHAM CA ! 1!f4M 24k1 9592B ref€ STATUS ACTIVE FULTZ FRANCIS A 4 HELEN Y TRUST FCIL't FRAtdCIS + E: HELEN 1` L€3g 2S'136I€l1€ STATS i! R O BOX 43c TR P1ETZGER ELIZABETH 1.1 SS ACTIVE URHA4 CA F O' 1 OX 412 95958 DURHAM CA L 0411 24ki ; 9593o t�2/� cf€t STATUS ACTIVE AMATOR AUBRY & CLARABEL ETAL JT SLINrARU LARK JEANNIE L f139 25t1 t13! f1(Jfl 9438 TROXEL ROAD KONYtq PETER, J ALICE LS.€ATUS ACTIVE CHICO CA 95925, 2212: DURHAM DAYTONH1.,Y r,�U�H�rr CALIF L 049 249 %625 1=fr sr.1 95938 ANATOR AUBRy STATUS ACTIVE BENNETT CUF lS CL OSEtgA ETAL JT ROSEMARY L €1411 250 ri11 ggry STATUS ACTIVE 9731 PIMPLE ROAD CHICO ca, COLBERT PARKE D & DARLENE 95928 9160 GOODSPEED STREET . L P340 240 1124 -00or STATUS ACTIVE DURHAM CAL95138 KYES KIMBERLY r` r-gi & 'F"i`.ICf G 2400 sEPVISS S.1. L •ff41r 25f'e€ G DURHAii CA12 tis€tl STATUS ACTIVE 95,738 FREEMAN DALE EJULIE J JT 9194 GOODSPEED ST L 040 240, if653 fir4p DIJFHAt1 CA 95936 WOLF GARS` LINi4 & TAt�NYSLYNN' ATUiflCTIVE P O` BOX P75 L fJ,'Fo 2 i7 �€1S �frW r DURHAtt CA COOPER LARRY J STATUS ACTIVE ,9593E3 9I9€1 GQODSPEED ST TFIERESA A r DURHAM CA L j``f 24>J t15C i€t�s?i STATUS ACTIVE 95936 MIGHTENGALE VERNON G & LORRrtIN1_ C RS85 SERVISS STREET L fJ4f1 25ex i DURHAt" CALIF - J24 fftllt STATUS ACTIVE 9 9'36 SAKELY MANI• C '& PAULINE 1.1 P O BOX 116 I L 04PT 24f10,6!5, tl1 EtT STATUS 95938 EGBERT JOYCE E SS ACTIVE DURHAh1 CALIF 123 HENSHAW AVE SFr 517 L €139 460 €125 j - Urlfl STATUS ACTIVE _r CA f;ONYN PETER J �=�:`2b is ALICE C CP 2H12 DURHAM DAYTON H14Y 1fa ^wrHAM CALIF 41i 24t1 iT6� 1:i1iiH 95936 CASWELL JEFF SCOTT 2 STATUS ACTIVE P` 0; BO 796 CINDY CF DURHMr Cf 95938 L 044, 24J%1 058 �1LhO STATUS ACTIVE FREITAS ROBIN' SS aIE6 RENZ ROAD DURHAM CA; 95933 L 040 24i_1 f121 fstl'r;f HORN HOWARD H'&BETTY STATUS ACTIVE 237k- SERVISS STREET DURHAff CALIF ' 9593ET L !:1411 24cT 1l2€% f3tlt 6` HUNT JOYCE E STA•rU3 ACTIVE ECBERT JOYCE E HUNT 123 HENSHAW AVE SP 517' CHICO CA 95926(eA L 040 28kC 085 13,00 STATUS' ACTIVt GAUER WILLIAMt. 0 SS 1753 SPRUCE D` WOODLANDCA 95695 L 040 2813 096 i4art STATUS AG FT V8 L 1740 240 051 011fi STATUS ACTIVE GAUERt WALTER F[ $r JESSIE C JT Y SOVINREY I VAN D & CARALEE 2683 HOUSE A,L2409 SERVISS ST DURHAM CA 9593` DURHAM CALIF 95?38 L 040 289 039 000 STATUS ACTIVE L 0413 240 050 000STA TUS ACTIVE HISLOF ['CICHAEL E x KATHRYN L JT MARTIN DORIS A SS 9136 GOODSPEED 5T R 0 BOX 91 DURHAM CALIF 95988 DURHAM CA 9--38 L 040f E80 035 1300 StATUS ACTIVE L 040240 #732 !191'1 STATUS AC;TIVi FANNELL JAMES R is DOROTHY TC 1` BARREL hCIRAC•' 8: ROSEMIARIE OR 15145 LITTLE RON ROAD 491AYLOS 2 O CHZCO CA` 95926 DURHAM CALIF 95 3B L 041.4 289 061k 1700 STATUS ACTIVC C; 1,340 24F_9 7733 17'191 STATUS AiCTIVE CULLER WAYNE F & ROSE MARIE FERGUSON RALPH V tis FO` BOX 238 F [I BOX 194 DURFIAM' CA 95938' DURHAM CA 95938-17194 F N L 17409 290 6344 1r91?i0 STATUS ACTIVE L 0413 240 034 009 STATUS ACTIVE s DEFT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS CRETE THOMAS t1ICHAEL ETAL JT K, NEGUS MICHAEL L SS 853378900 ASHLEY EUGENE & MARGARET 9104 GOODSPEED 23139 SERVISS ST DURHAM CALIF 95938s DURHAM CA 95938 L 134!1 2893 055 0,09 STATUS ACTIVE L 13413 2417 0135 01149 STATUS ACTIVE FULTZ FRANCIS A & HELEN Y TRUST DfiINES' RUSSELL L CAl'NERINE t1 JT FULTZ FRANCIS ft 1& HELEN Y TR F 0 FOX 00B1 9098 GOODSPEED STREET CHICO CA 95927 4 DURHAM CA 95,739 L 09411 2BO 054 000- STATUS ACTIVE L 040 240 036 09311 STATUS ACTIVE PARKER LEWIS A & KATHLEEN' M -CLItdE ,ROY L & CRETA F OFOX 475 2379 SERVISS ST DURHAM CALIF 95938' DURHAM CA 95938 L 040 280 0793 000, STATUS ACTIVE L. 040 240 037009 STATUS ACTIVE PARKER LEWIS: A p KATHLEEN M _. BRINES- RUSSELL LEE SS FO BOX 47 ,' FO SOX 30181 DURHAM ,CALIF 9593B CHICO CA'_ 95927 L 040 28L9 104 0010' STATUS ACTIVEC 0409 2401 03B f,103 STATUS ACTIVE PARKER LEWIS. A= & ttiA'ttILEEtd 7I FERNANDEe CHARLES A Z SHELLEY ti' CE FO PDX 475 2369 SERVISS STREET DURFCAt1 CALIF 95939 DURHAM CA 95938 L 440 240j' 1,328 17010 STATUS ACTIVE_ L fT4t1 249 037 000 STATUS ACTIVE FALLER HERCiAN' JEAN Ft JT _ FONSECA DANIEL A & CATHERINE I JT FO BOX 223 2365 SERVISS 'ST 3 DURHAM' CALIF 95938; DURHAM. CA .. 95938 L 9340 240 1729' f997s!. FY. STATUS ACTIVE L 1%940 240 040 000 STATUS ACTIVE CALLER HERMAN yf JEAH M JT MURRAY SCOTT" DOUGLAS & BETH LYNN F O' BOX 223 2359 SERVISS' ST DURHAM CALIF 9573E DURHAM CA, 95938 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given by the Butte County Planning Commission that public hearings will be held on Thursday, September 28, 1.989,in the Butte County Board of Supervisors' Room, County Administration Center, 2- County Center Drive, Oroville, California, regarding the following items at the following times: ITEM ON WHICH A NEGATIVE DECLARATION REGARDING 1.0:3.0 a.m. Norman Cole/John. Robley - A Rezone from A/R --5 (Agricultural -Residential, 5 acre parcels) to SR -1 (Suburban Residential, 1 acre parcels) on property located approximately 500 feet south of Serviss Street between Holland Road and Goodspeed, identified as AP# 40-28-88 and 89, Durham. GRACO AG Partnership - Use Permit and Variance to the 2 acre maximum to create a 3.5 acre homesit`e segregation in an agricultural zone on property zoned A-4.0 (Agricultural -40 were parcels), located on the south, side of Nelson West Road, approximately 1 mile west of Aguas Frias Road, located approximately 6 miles west of the town of Nelson, identified as AP# 38-14-09,10,15,& 16, Nelson The above mentioned applications, maps, and Negative Declarations with/without Mitigation Measures are on file and available for public viewing at the office of the Buy;%:.e County Planning Department, 7 County center Drive, Orovil.le, California. if you challenge the above applications in,court ybil may be limited to raising only those issues You or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the Planning Commission, at or prior to, the public hearing: BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING CnMMISSION' B.A.KIRCHER, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING To be published in the Chico Enterprise Record on Thursday, September 14, 1985.. NF dy CO, U) 7 '= PLANNING DEPARTMENT 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE; CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE, (916) 538-7601 October 25, 1991 Norman Cole and John. Robley P.O. Box 625 3149 Hiraoka ,Street Durham, CA 95938 Lihue, FE 96766 Re: Rezone, File 90-04 Dear Mr. Cole and Mr. Robley; At the regular meeting of the Butte County Planning Commission held October 24, 1991, your request for a rezone from A-5 to SR -1 for property located approximately 500 feet south of Serviss Street, identified as AP 040-280-088 and 089, Durham, was denied without prejudice. A report of this matter will be made to the Board of Supervisors on November 19, 1991. If you desire to appeal this decision you must do so in writing, with an appeal fee of $608,50 plus publishing costs of $100.00, to the 'Clerk of the Board, 25 County Center Drive, Oroville, California, prior to 5:00 pim,, Monday, November 25, 1901, the end of the 5 -day appeal period from the date of this ,report. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this office between 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Sincerely, .A. .cher Director of Planning BAK:Ir REZONE REPORT APPLICANT: Norman Cole/John Robley OWNER: Same REQUEST: Rezone from AR -5 to SR -1 LOCATION; Approximately 500 feetsouth of Serviss Street, between Holland Road and Goodspeed, Durham. DATE ACTION REQUESTED: 9/6/89 AP NOS.: 040-280-088 and 089 ACREAGE: 20 acres PLANNII\'G COMMISSION FINDINGS: A. Find that the requirements of the California. Environmental Quality Act have been completed; and B. Find that projects within the D2N Area Land Use Plan should be evaluated against both the existing and proposed land use plan just recommended by the Planning Commission in order to avoid as just compromising the ultimate land use plan; and',C. Find that the requested rezone would increase the service 4,emands of governmental services beyond that which can be provided due to the County's fiscal situation and inability to fund governmental services such as police and fire protection. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: D. Deny without prejudice the zone change request for that property identified as AP 040-280-088 and 089 (Norman Cole/khri Robley) VOTE 5-0 AXES. Commissioners Lynch, Lambert, Ostrowski, Nelson, and Chairman Matsk n NOLS: No one ABSENT: No one ABSTAINED! No one DATE OF LAST HEARING WITH PLANNING COMMTS,43ION Octobcr 24, 1991 COUNTY OF BUTTE --- AGENDA ITEMS TO; Board of Supervisors FROM: planning Board Agenda 11/19/91 SUMMARY OF REQUEST; DATE: November 6, 1.991 INFORMATION ONLY Norman Cole/John Robley - proposed Negative Declaration and Denied Rezone from AR -5 to SR -1 for property located approximately 500 feet south of Serviss Street; between Holland Road and Goodspeed, identified as AP 040-280-088 and 089, Durham. Additional information attached: C� YES NO Describe Previous Board action, Date r— : _ .. Minute �rder� Summary of -_ Current year cost Annual cost �r`'Ydgeted 0 YES ❑ NO Funding sources Y OTHER_____ Will Indposaf require additional personnel! CO YES cl N0. IF YES, STATE NUMBER PERMANENT TEMPORA �:� WEF ADMINISTRATIVE. OFFICER`S RECOMMENDATION: 0 APPROVE D APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS COMMENTS (IF ANY Mo / 7nu AM) nuca „u., REZONE REPORT APPLICANT: Norman Cole/John Robley OWNER Same REQUEST: Rezone from AR -5 to SR -1 LOCATION: Approximately 500 feet south of Serviss Street, between Holland Road and Goodspeed, Durham. DATE ACTION REQUESTED: 9/0/89 AP NOS.: 040-280-088 and 089 ACREAGE: 20 acres PLANNING COMMISSION T*'INDINGS A. Find that the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act have been. completed; and P. Find that projects within he WN Area Land Use Plan should be evaluated, against both the existing and proposed land use plan as just recommended by the Planning Commission in order to avoid compromising the ultimate land use plan; anti C. Find that fhe requested rezone would increase the service demands of governmental services beyond that which can be provided due to the County's fiscal situation and inability to fund governmental services such as police and fire protection. PI:ANNING COMMISSION ACTION: Di Deny without prejudice the zone change request for that property identified as AP 040-280-088 and 089 (Norna.n Cole/John Robley) VOTE: 5-0 AYES Coimmiss oners tyntchs,Lanibert, Qstrowski, Nelson, and Chairman Matson NOES: No one ABSENT: No one ABST'V :ail: No one DATL 111 iLAST HEARING WITH PLANNING COMMISSION: October 24, 1991 Ea He Count PLANNING DEPARTMENT 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE- OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965.3397 TELEPHONE: (916) 538-7601 September 27 1:991 Norman Cole and John Robley P.O. Box 625 3149 Hiraoka Street Durham, CA 95938 Lihue, M 96766 Res Rezone, File 90-4 Dear Mr, Cole and Mr. Robby: At the regular meeting of the Butte County Planning Commission held September 26, 1991, the public hearing was continued closed to October 24, 1991 at 1:30 p.m. to consider your request for 2 rezone from A-5 to SR -1 for property located approximately 500 feet south of Servss Street, between Holland road and Goodspeed Avenue, identified as AP 040,280-088 and 089, Durham. This meeting will be held in the Board of Supen cors' Room, 25 Couaty Center Drive, Oroville, California. Should you have any questions regarding this matter; please. contact this office between 10:00 a.m. and 3;00 p.m. 4 Sincerely, 13. A. Kircher Director of Planning Paula S. Leasure Assistant Planning Director PSLIr ry wout PLANNING DEPARTMENT 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE- OROVILLE, Co,,UFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE. (916) 538-7601 August 23, 1991 Norman Cole/John Robley P. O: Box 625 Durham, CA 95938 Re: Rezone, File 040-280-088 and 089 Dear Mr. Cole and Mr. Robley: At the regular meeting of the Butte County Planning Commission held August 22, 1991, the public hearing was continued open to September 25, 1991 to consider your request for a rezone from A=5 to SR -1 for propertylocated approximately 500 feet south of ' Servss Street, between Holland Road and Goodspeed Avenue in the Durham area. This meeting will be held in the Board of Supervisors' Room, 25 County Center Drive, Oroville, California. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this office betWeen. 10.00 a.m. and 3:00 pm Sincerely, cher Director of Planning BAX!bd i .,I 7 i AOPI :.bae - `- LANA OF NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY ` -X* ;,- PLANNING DEPARTMENT 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE- OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (915) 538-7601 February 15, 1991 Norman Cole/John Robley P.O. Box 625 Durham, CA 95938 Re: Retone, File 90-4 Dear Mr. Cole and Mr. Robley; At the regular meeting of the Butte County Planning Commission held February 14, 1991, the public hearing was continued closed to August 22, 1991 at 9:00 a.m. to consider your request for a rezone .from AR -5 to SR -1 for property located approximately 500 feet south of Serviss Street, identified as AP 040-280-088 Arid 089, Durham,'., This meeting will be held in. the Board of Supervisors' Room, 25 County Center, give, Oroville, California. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contar' +his office between 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 pan, Sincerely, r r r A. 'rcher Director of Planning BAK:Ir - Butie caunfq LAND 4F NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY PLANNINGDEPARTMENT 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 85968-3397 TELEPHONE: (916) 538-7601 December 13, 1990 Norman Cole/John Robley P. O. Box 625' Durham, CA 95938 Re Rezone, File 90-4 Dean Mr. Cole and Mr, Robley; At the regular meeting of the Butte County Planning Commission held December 13, 1990, the public hearing was continued closed to February 14, 1991, at 9.00 a.m. to consider your request for a. rezone from AR -5 to SR -1 for property located approximately 500 feet south of Serviss Street; Durham, This meeting will be held in the Board of Supervisors' Room, 25 County Center Drive, 'Oroville, California. Should .you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this ofi;ce between 10,00 airm and 3100 p.m Sincerely, . /rcher Director of Planning BAK+Ir Butte Count LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH AND BrAUTY 2^- PLANNING DEPARTMENT 7 COUNTY CENTER D81VE - OROVILLE. CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (916) 538-7601 August 23, 1990 Norman Cole/Jahn Robley P.O. Box 625 Durham, CA 95938 Re: Rezone, File 90-4 Dear Mr. Cole and Mr. Robley: At the regular meeting of the Butte County Planning Commission held August 23, 1990, the public hearing was continued closed to December 13, 1990 at 9,.00 a.m. to consider your request for a rezone from "AR -5" to "SR -'1" for property located approximately 500 feet south of Serviss Street, identified as AP 040-230-088 and 089, Durham. This meeting will be held in the Board of Supervisors' Room, 25 County Center Drive, Oroville, California. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this office between 10,00 a.m, and 3:00 p.m Sincerely, A6Aircher Director of Planning BAKilr couak LAND QF NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY ,- PLANNING DEPARTMENT J 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (916) 538-7601 Y July 12, 1990 Norman Cole/Tohn Robley P.O. Box 625 Durham, CA 915938 Re: Rezone, Pile 90-4 Dear Mr. Cole and Mr. Robley: At the regular meeting of the Butte County Planning Commission held July 12, 1990, the public hearing was continued closed to August 23, 1990 at 9:00 a.m. to consider ,your request for a rezone from AR-5 to SR-1 for property located approximately 500 feet south of Serviss Street; identified as AP 040-230•'088 and 089, Durham: This meeting will be held intheBoard- of Supervisors' Room, 25 County (enter Drive, _ Oroville, California. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this office between 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 pm. Since; ely • h c er r Director of Planning BA�TC Ir Inter-Departmental Memorandum TO Planning Commission FROM: Planning SUBJECT: Cole/Robley Rezone, File 90-4 DA'L'E: July 11, 1990 The purpose of this memo is to request the Commission continue this item until the Board of Supervisors take action on a preferred alternative for the Durham-Dayton-Nelson Land Use Plan. A sixth alternative has been developed, that will be pt•esented to the Board on July 24, 199('. Currently, Alternatives 2 5, and 6 recommend 5 acre Toning and 3 and 4 recommend SR-2 1/2 acre zoning. Since this request is not conmtent with any of the alternatives, it is recommended that tr'`,is he ,.ring be continu,I until, 'the Board takes action on a preferr-d alternative. TAL lr l counN LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY x PLANNING FPAHTMENT 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE • OAQVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE. (916) 538-7601 April 26, 1990 Norman Cole/John Robley P.O. Box `625 Durham, CA 95938 Re: Rezone, File 90-4 Dear Mr. Cole and Mr. Robley; At the ,regular meeting of the Butte County Planning Commission held April 26, 1990, the public hearing was continued closed to July 12, 1990 at 9:00 a.m. to consider your request for a ,rezone from 'SR -1 to AR -5 for property located approximately 500 feet south of Serviss Street, identified as Ap 040-280-088 and 089, Durham This meeting will be held in the Board of Supervisors' Rooni, 25 County _ µ - Center Dri ,e, Oroville, California. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this office between 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Sincerely, 1 , h . A. 'reher Director of Planning BAkilr - Coun LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH AND 8EAUTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95985-3397' TELEPHONE; (916) 538-7601 March 22, 1990 Norman Cole/John Robley P.O. Box 625 Durham, CA 95938 Re Rezone, File 90-4 Dear Mr. Cole and Mr. Robley; At the regular meeting of the Butte County Planning Commission held March 22, 1990, the public hearing was continued closed to April 26, 1990, at 9:00 a.m. to consider your request for a rezone from AR -5 to SR -1 for property located approximately 500 feet south of Serviss Street, between Holland Road and Goodspeed, identified as AP 040-'280-0813 and 089, Durham. This meeting will be held in the Board of Supervisors' Room, 25 County Center Drive, Oroville, California. Should you have any questions regarding, this matter, please contact this office bets=teen 10:00 ami and 3:00 p.m. Sincerely, B: A. Kircher Director of Planning 7 Paula S. Leasure Senior Planner PSLI.Ir September 18, 1989 �tJRHAM UfR1IF11=C) SC CL DISTRICT DONIALI t`. +ti1(ti'I 11`,, C)mri(i .Stit) ("'uilNt C"t ��,C) fiC)?, tC1IF • i)l't:hA M 11 C )I�ti1':� • g �)it� . +tlltr ,ttl i-�Ct� x r.. nu•rnt5•iur—FA. leo L- VUSWif) '",' i wyr. .� r.,r.rtitlti"e Sl7itYet. i-Ni'itdtd L a. rnrsyw� F (., M Judy Cramer , Butte County Planning Commission 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 9596.,-3397 Dear Ms. Cramer: The purpose of this letter is to respond to the proposed rezone of AP# 040-280-088 and Oz>, -in Durham. This proposed rezone would modify the zoning on these parcels from five acre minimums to SR 1. I would like to go on record on behalf of the Durham Unified School Di -strict as indicating tnat we areopposed to tdtsiiieconrurrenceiwithtthethe countydistrict ge:ieralhas been opposed to rezones which are n plan,_ In this particular case this proposal is not consistent with the county 4 consistent with the proposed new general -plan which will general plan, nor is i' be reviewed shortly by the Board of Supervisors. The 40 acres in question currently dcapacitytf approximately hointrs. If this q mately 40 homes. We proposal Were approved, the capacity feel that the students generated from this new growth would natat vely trn ofct our school district: We are currently experiencing a g 8-10% per year based on the current general plan. We feel that modifications of the current general plan to higher dent-ities would negatively impact our school district: Thank you for the opportunity to express our concerns-. Sincerely, Donal d C. McNe1 i s Superi ntehdeflt GbU4!�`� DCM� jl � a *&0989 i I tr bURHAM bURHAM DURHAM s>�NDOL INfiLINDA HIGH SCHOOL ELE&A NTARl SCHOOL l WILLIAMM. Ir<!�S�N Not 1. uc^tNl 9 M. 9 Lh:U.'� Ai. �RO�'�'�+ PRINCIPAL PRINCIPAL ir><rl�� Ir l ptSnr,r µtl, art4i pilrsdtt ti,).z•ib4r rholnQ 84=4W) r (I iin� ,titM �rrYtirr� "I�r r, Cl t�tla 4tlr *DURHAM UNIFIED SC Owl D STR,IC`T DONALD C. McNELIS, District Superintendent P.U. BOX 300 • DURHAM, CALIFORNIA • 95938 ^ (9,16) 895.4C/5 BOARD OR TRUSTEES— Richard L. Anders©nw Ruby O. K1rnmelshue-6{y1es L. Pustedvsky—Ed Ryon—M, Anthony SWIMS September 18, 1989 Judy Cramer Commission Butte County Planning, 7 County Center Drive Orovilie, CA 95965-3397 Dear Ms. Cramer;.. The purpose of this letter is to ressondtosedthe rezonesed wouldrezone modify the zoning on 040-280.088 and 089, in Durham. This pro p these parcels from five acre minimums to SR 1. I -could like to go on record on behalf of the Durham Unified School District as indicating that we are opposed to this rezone. Consistentlythe district has been opposed to rezones which are notoposalconcurrence consistentcounty 'thegeneral county plan. In this particular case this prop general Plan, nor is it consistent with the proposed new general plan 'hien will be reviewed 'shortly by the Board of Supervisors. The 40 acres tY question currently have a capacity for eight homes. if this We proposal were approved, the capacir�mwthis neuld wQIrowthto awouldinegativel0yhimpact feel that the students generated f our school district. netheececurrently generPerieaning�a feelzthat modifications of general plan. A 8-10 per year (cased o the currant general plan to higher densities would negatively impact our school district. fhank you for the opportunity to express our concerns. Sincerely, OP Donald G. McNel i s � Q `� 1� 4� Superintendent DCMJI'� E a:judc0989.'Itr =OUaHAM i DURHAA1►N _ I r �I.IEDIAt� �CHc30L DUMAM HIGH SCHOOL CL' M 'v`�rt{IY Sr NOC3l LlKf7� d1t, i! ()1iN WILLIAAi ,4i. IMLN tir,)FL 1- I§t Li1li>7 10M10MIPAI PltiC�hunp CI`s•AL PRINCIPAL !rC PRINCIPAL Phnnu 441»100 lithov%q t1,O. Rix Sit) tie Fount _ LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT 7 COI It-ITY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE; (916) 538-7601 January 11, 1990 Norman. Cole/John Robley P.O. Box 525' Durham, CA. 95938 Re: Rezone, File 90-4 Dear Mr. Cole and Mr. Robley: At the regular meeting of the Butte County Planning Commission held January 11, 1990, the public hearing was continued closed to March 22, 1950 At 9:00 a.m., to consider your request for a rezone from A-5 to SR..1 for property located; approximately 500 feet south of Serviss Street, between Holland Road and Goodspeed Avenue in the Durham Area: This meeting will be held in the Board of Supervisors' Room...i`55 County Center Drive, Oroville, California. ' Shouldou have any y duestons regarding .this matter, please contact this office between 10:00 a.m. and 100 p.m. Sincoely, A: rcher Dire, for of Planning BAKar y t LAN OF NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUT`! PLANNING DEPARTMENT 7 COLINYY CENTER DRIVE- OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE (916) 538-7601 November 9, 1989 Norman Cole/John Robley P,O. Box 625 Durham, CA .5938 Re: Rezone, File 90-4 Dear Mr. Cole and Mr-. Robley: At the regular meeting of the Butte County 'Planning Commission held November 9; 1989, the public hearing was continued closed to January 11 1990 at, 9:00 a.m,, to consider your request for a rezone from •R-5 to SR -'I 'for property locatedapproximately 500 feet south of Serv`Iss Street, Identified as AP 040-280-088 and 089, Durham. This meeting w I I I be held In the Board of Supervisors` Room, 25 County Center _Drive, Oroville; California, Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this offlce between 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Sincerely, Director of Planning BAK.,Ir f y� COUNTY PLANNING COMM Isslt BTr county Center Drive 7 C CA 95165-3397 �, r z env Orovillet (916) 538-7601 DATE: August 25, 1989 Gable PROJECT REVIEW & O!: Viacom street RE: �,VALUATI�N T 2128 Myers ENVIRONL MENTAL Oro�'le CA 959th enerated office has received or Pgene zone from A �'x-- data our Orman Oole/John poble' " is preliminary project: al acre ,closed Following Res; dential r ing the to sR_l (stirburban- concerning onc e, n arcels) ReSide�ntal� 5 acre between Holland. (AQx�ultural- fa't south of Se_ Street located approl"Lf--- & 089, Durnam. parcels) 040-280-083 identified as API Will Goodspeed,. impacts and Road and 02 onr►ental atop Filed °0�4 Log 11 gg-08.25- ossble enviz a Negative Declar assessment of possible either an Environmental t�7e are making an ssesnmental ation Measures or be preparing an with Mitig atiVe Declaration or Neq vIR) • ideas for investiga�� that relate impact Repor=t (� ertiSe factual st temea Of concern cr expertise project may rovide any ;c impacts that offer in your area please p you can Or ecbnom, opinions Y hysical, social► response o either P nOLed date. if no t there :are generate• l4 day - t,'r above- ed that ` s °r it shall be assumed respond within , then aotential from the.. Please this inquiryr, acts tahich are is generated by no significant en�rironmental imp C.01 project- rovide e o tb#1 o ou c;an p as Y °.' W�• We apprecate any 1� S incerelY�\p► Comments: • 2, of tKe environmental document receive �a(PYor withouton wish to reiIlth r agency 1t e Declaration C 'Does you stud'y for Neg (initial Or SIP Lor this Pro3ect) (in-- N �easuxesi --- Y—ES Sattle coaft '. L A IN D ,'n^./ F i'j A T U 9. A I, V I F: A i H A P.' D S r �. 1,.� ? •1{ PLANNING DEPARTMENT 7 COUNTY CENITER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFOR NIA'95965-2391 TELEPHONE: (916) 538-7601 September 29, 1989 Norman Cole and P.O. Bck 625 Durham, CA 95938 John Robley P.D. Box 1021 Kalaheoj HI 96141 Re: Rezone, File No. 90-4 Dear Mr. Cole & Mr Robley: At the regular meeting of the Butte County Planning Commission held September 26, 1989, the public hearing was continued closed to Novembei 9, 1939 at 9:00 a.m. to con�ilder your request fog- a rezone from A-5 (Agricultural, 5 acre parcels) to SR -•1 (Suburban Residential, 1 acre: parcels) for property located approximately 600 feet south of Seev i ss Street, between Holland Road and Goodspeed Avenue, Identified as AP#040-280-088 and 089, Durham. ThIs meeting wIII be held 1n the Board of Supervisors' Room, 25 County Center Delve, Orov'IIIe CaIIforhIa. Should you have any gLeitlons regarding this matter, please contact this offiice be%%ween 10:00 aim and 3:00 p.m, Sincerely, y . K rcher Director of Planning BAK:jmc coun PLANNING DEPARTMENT a COUNTY CENTER DRIVE- OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965 3397 TELEPHONE, (916) 538-7601 September 20, 1989j' Norman Cole and John Robley P.O. Box 625 P.O. Box 1021 Durham, CA 95938 Kalaheo, HI 96741 Re; Rezone, File 90-4 Dear Mr. Cole and Mr. Robley. Enclosed is a cagy of the Staff Findings concerning your r,cat�f� application for a rezone from A.-6 to SR --1 - or -. y 1 P approximately 60o feet south of �ervlss Street, between Fioiland Road and Goodspeed, Identified as AP 40-28-88 & 89, Durham. A public hearing has been set for September 28, 1989 at 10:30 a,m.. The meeting will be held In the Board of Supervisors' Room, 25 County Center Drive, Orovlile, California. The Planning Commission recommends that the applicant or their allthortied representative be present at the hearing to respond to any questions the Commission may have. In the event that no one will represent the applicant, please contact the Planning office prior to the scheduled public hearing: Should you have any questions regarding this mater, please contact this office between 10:0o aim. and 3:00 Pott. Sincerely; S. A. Kircher Director of Planning Vent L, Moore Associate Planner BLMIr Encs V. DATES