HomeMy WebLinkAbout91-03C• f�
u
90-09-17-05P RO.T E C T SUMMARY SHEET 91-03C
Log No. File No.
Robinson & Sons, a Partnership
applicant reprise tative
ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1620
Oroville, CA 95965
PHONE: 916-534-7616
Dept. of Water Resources,-Attn: Donald E. Owen
property owner
ADDRESS: P.O. Box 924836 Sacramento, CA 94236-0001 916-445-4284
g OJECT DESCR=PTION • .DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
on both sides of an unnamed access road, west of Hwy.
on property zoned U' M-2 located 70, approx. 4500' ; whose intersection with Hwy. 70
is located approx. 500' north
of Power House Hill Road identified as AP 025-230-033, 34 tow,/area: Oroville
GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION Orchard & Field Crops, Industrial
- DATA
PRE -APP FEE PAID: S RECEIPT NUMBER:
APPLICATION ACCEPTED;
FINAL APP. PAID: $ RECEIPT NUMBER:
REZONING PETITION SIGNATURES CHECKED PERCENTAGE:
NAILING LIST PREPARED
MAIL -OUT NOTICES WRITTEN
News:
NOTICES WLED NUMBER; Public: Q' OCTJL
LEGAL DESCRIPTION PREPARED
PUBLICATION NOTICE WRITTEN
DISPLAY AD PREPARED
NEWSPAPER PUBLICATION C P G B R DATE OF PUBLICATION:
INITIAL STUDY PREPARED
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: Categorical Exemption FILED:
Negative Declaration FILED:
X"itigated Negative Declaration FILED:
Environmental Impact Report CERTIFIED:
Other:
STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NUMBER:
APPLICANT/REPRESENTATIVE NOTIFICATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATIOONs
PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING(s): 115
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS' HFARING(s):
RESOLUTION NLTME.R (GPAs) ADOPTED:
ORDINANCE =xBER ADOPTED:
... �......,.,..�, ... n.� . `.. .. 1:.. q\ PTT Tn
Robinson & Sons, A Partnership - proposed Negative Declaration with mitigation
measures regarding environmental impacts, General Plan
Amendment/Rezone/Development Ay-reement/Use Permit/Mining�Permit/Reclamation
Plan, modification of existing project by exchanging approximately 13 acres covered under
the existing plan with 13 acres located nearby, on property zoned "U" (Unclassified) and M-
2 (Heavy Industrial) located west of State Highway 70, approximately 1 mile south of
Palermo Road and approximately 3,000 feet east of the Feather River and 2,000 feet north
of the Wildlife Area access road from Highway 70, identified as AP 025-230-033 and 034,
south of Oroville. (File 91-03 A, B & C)
The Commission waived the reading of the staff findings.
Staff said this project is to exchange 13 acres of existing industrial land for 15 acres of "U" land.
The hearing was opened to the public.
Dennis Robinson said the State wants the land near the levee. He said there would be no change
in the haul road. He said he was there to answer questions.
Harold Galliett said he objected to the original permit, but was not opposed to this change. He
said the change would help stop flooding problems on his property. He had no objections to this
project at this time. He said the State has started the paper work to raise the level of the levee.
Mrs. Koehler asked how the 15 acres was going to be used? She wanted to know if it was going
to be a dredger pond when finished.
Dennis Robinson said there would be ponds when they were done and that Fish and Game would
plant fish in the ponds. He said the slope has to be a minimum of 3 to 1 ratio.
Mrs. Koehler said her property is behind the mobile home park adjacent to this property. She said
there is no visual screen between the mobile home park and this project. She said she would like
to see an EIR done on this property. She was concerned with flooding. She said another concern
is that septic tanks for the mobile home park lie in the flood zone and can fail if flooded. She said
there was a noise and dust impact. She wanted to know how the County was going to re -coup
their costs of mosquito abatement for the ponds, animal control, fire protection, etc. She did not
like to see the removal of the property from the County tax rolls. She said she wondered if the
mobile home park residents were notified of this , hearing?
Staff said that the property is owned by the State and is not on the County tax rolls. Staff said that
the real property owners within 300 feet of the project site are notified up to a minimum of 10
people.
The hearing was closed.
Staff said that the mobile home park is approximately 845 feet from the project site. Staff said
the Development Agreement will require landscaping.
Commissioner Lambert questioned the acreage shown in the Motion under Section D & E being
incorrect.
Staff said to change the "16" acres to read "13" acres on both parts of the motion. Staff said the
Commission, if this project is approved, would be re -affirming the Initial Study and Development
Agreement of the previous project. Staff said they would like to forward the General Plan
Amendment, Rezoning, and Development Agreement to the Board. Staff said they would like a
motion of intent on the Use Permit/Mining Permit/Reclamation Plan.
It was moved by Commissioner Lynch, seconded by Commissioner Ostrowski, and unanimously
carried to recommend approval on the General Plan Amendment, Rezoning, and Development
Agreement as follows:
MOTION: ACCEPT THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF STAFF MEMO DATED NOVEMBER
7, 1990; MAKE THE FINDINGS LISTED UNDER "A", "B", AND "C"; THE
MITIGATION MEASURES ARE TO BE CONTAINED WITHIN THE
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT AND USE PERMIT CONDITIONS; AND
MAKE THE MOTION AS LISTED UNDER "D", "E", AND "F".
A. Find that:
1. An Initial Study was completed in compliance with CEQA.
2. Said study and comments received thereon identified potentially significant
environmental effects that the project may have had but:
a. Revisions in the project plans or proposals made by or agreed to by the
applicant would avoid such effects or mitigate such effects to a point where
clearly no significant environmental effects would occur, and
b. There is no substantial evidence before the County that the project as revised
may have a significant effect on the environment.
3. A proposed Negative Declaration has been completed in compliance with CEQA and
is recommended for approval and adoption.
B. Find that said Negative Declaration together with any comments received during the public
review process have been reviewed and considered; and
C. Find that the proposed General Plan Amendment, Rezone, and Development Agreement
conform to the policies, including the text and maps of the Butte County General Plan; and
D. Adopt a Resolution recommending the Board of Supervisors adopt a Resolution approving
a General Plan Amendment to Industrial reverting 13 acres to Orchard and Field Crops and
designating 15 acres Industrial on AP 025-230-033 and 034 (Robinson and Sons); and
E. Recommend the Board of Supervisors adopt an Ordinance rezoning 13 acres to "U"
(Unclassified) and 15 Acres to M-2 (Heavy Industrial) on AP 025-230-033 and 034
(Robinson and Son); and
F. Recommend the Board of Supervisors adopt an Ordinance approving the amended
Development Agreement for Robinson & Sons.
It was moved by Commissioner Lynch, seconded by Commissioner Ostrowski, and unanimously
carried to do a Motion of Intent for approval of a. Use Permit, Mining Permit, and Reclamation
Plan to allow a surface mining operation for aggregate on AP 025-230-033 and .034 (Robinson and
Sons) subject to appropriate conditions.
Chairman Forbes explained the appeal procedures.
L: 025 .020 027 000
STATUS:
ACTIVE
WILSON RODNEY L & STARLENE
S JT
63 WELSH ROAD
OROVILLE CA
95965
L: 025 020 026 000
STATUS:
ACTIVE
WILSON WILLIAM H
259 ESTATES DR
CHICO CA
95928
•
r.
L: 025 310 012 000
STATUS:.ACTIVE
BOWLES JAY D* & MILDRED
D
5115 PACIFIC HEIGHTS RD
OROVILLE CA
95965
L: 025 310 013 000
STATUS:
ACTIVE
BUSK RODNEY TRUST
BUSK RODNEY TRUSTEE
P 0 BOX 2465
CASTRO VALLEY .CA
94546
L: 025 310 014 000
STATUS:
ACTIVE
SCOTT EUGENE G SS
1338 HOLLY STREET #7
SAN CARLOS CA
94070
L: 025 230 033 000 STATUS: ACTIVE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA DWR
00000
L: 025 230 034 000 STATUS: ACTIVE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA DWR
• 00000 0
L: 025 230 032 000 STATUS: ACTIVE
KOEHLER JUDITH P
1625 STANFORD
• MENLO PARK CA 94025 •
L: 025 230 010.000 STATUS: ACTIVE
KOEHLER JUDITH P 0
GOLDEN OAKS MHP
1625 STANFORD AVE
MENLO PARK CA 94025
L: 025 230 053 000 STATUS: ACTIVE
WHITELEY FERN E TR ETAL
STAR RT
• CLIPPER MILLS CA 95930
L: 025 230 006 000 STATUS: ACTIVE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
00000
L: 025 230 004 000 STATUS: ACTIVE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA DWR 0
• 00000 ' 0
L: 025 230 003 000 STATUS: ACTIVE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA DWR 0
• 00000 •
L: 025 240 095 000 STATUS: ACTIVE
RILES MELVIN JR & BEVERLY JEAN I�
ROUTE 9 BOX 2231
• OROVILLE CA 95965
L: 025 240 097 000 STATUS: ACTIVE
BILES MELVIN JR & BEVERLY JEAN
ROUTE 9 BOX 2231
• OROVILLE CA 95965
L: 025 240 075 000 STATUS: ACTIVE
INTER PACIFIC PROPERTIES INC !�
4-17 TAMAI-2 TOYONAKA
OSAKA JAPAN 00000 •
L: 025 0U561 000 STATUS: ACTIVE
�i HEMSTALK BOB & LILLIAN JT
2900 FOOTHILL BLVD
OROVILLE CA 95965
L: 025 030 057 000 STATUS:.ACT[VE p
EVERETT JAMES M
4950 BIG BEND RD
OROVILLE CA
�. 95966
L: 025 030 062 000 STATUS: ACT:VE
EVERETT JERRY E & SUSAN R�
642 SAN JUAN ST
MANTECA CA I
95336.
L: 025 030 060 000 STATUS: ACTIVE
O DEPT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS. !�
' HEMSTALK BRAD L & JUDY JT 273034482
49 BOB WAY
OROVILLE CA 95965
.h
L: .025 030 063 000 STATUS: ACT=IVE I
BLAKE DONALD J & JOLENE
270 OAKVALE AVE
OROVILLE CA
95966 1�
L: 025 030 064 000 STATUS: ACTIVE
SCHMELTZ SAMUEL W & MICHELLE D 'I
40 BOB WAY '
OROVILLE CA
95966 !�
L: 025 030 059 000 STATUS: ACTIVE 1
HEMSTALK CLAY W & CHERYL JT
29 BOB WAY 4
OROVILLE CA 95965
L: 025 020 033 000 STATUS: ACTIVE j
BESHEARS RAYMOND & PEARL JT
85 GOLD RUN COURT
OROVILLE CA 95965
L: 025 020 034 000 STATUS: ACTIVE j
�. TOURVILLE LOUIS R & BETH F JT
75 GOLD RUN COURT
OROVILLE CA 95965
0 k1
L: 025 020 041 000 STATUS: ACTI-VE� ' jr
SHARLOW BRUCE & MAUREEN JT
16118 MAUBERT AVE
.` SAN LEANDRO CA 94578 ;
L: 025 020 042'000 STATUS: ACTIVE
MITCHELL WAYNE JR & DORIS S JT
7095 HEWITT-
oi PALERMO CA 95968 7
L: 025 020 043 000 STATUS: ACTIVE
VILLALPANDO ALONSO DURAN
90 GOLD RUN CT
OROVILLE CA
95965 w�
J
Ll
-eV7
N
r rF INTER -DEPARTMENTAL MEMORANDUM
•noun• OFFICE OF BUTTE COUNTY COUNSEL
TO: Barry Hogan,. Planning Director
BY: Neil H. McCabe, Assistant County Counselj� "
SUBJECT: Robinson, and Sons Development Agreement
DATE: June 7, 1995
I am writing this memorandum to ask if you can help me find the original Robinson Development
Agreement. The background of this request is discussed .below.
The Development Agreement between the County and Robinson and Sons, and the ordinance
which approved it, were not published and therefore have not become effective. For further details,
please refer to the following documents ,which are attached:. letter of February 7, 1990 from Robinson.
& Sons; letter of January 9, 1990 from William Randolph; partially executed copy of Development
Agreement; Carol Roach's memorandum - to me dated May 21, 1992; my memorandum of June 4, 1992
to Carol Roach; Statement of Decision and a Judgment filed October 19, 1992.
The project in question was for sand and gravel extraction on state owned land south of Orov_lle
and near the Feather River. A mitigated negative declaration was adopted and the original proj: ct
approved in January 1990. On December 18, 1990, the project was modified, and the Board of
Supervisors adopted .Ordinance No. 2893 approving the Development Agreement.
Ordinance 2893 was not immediately published, and a lawsuit was filed challenging .he
Development Agreement. Because of the lawsuit, we recommended waiting for the court's ruling before -
deciding what to do about publishing the ordinance.
In October 1992, the Court issued its Statement of Decision and Judgment determining that the
County had properly exercised its discretion when it approved the revised project pursuant to a mitigated
negative declaration and denying the petition for a peremptory writ of mandate. A notice of appeal was
filed on January 11, 1993, but was abandoned on January 22, 1993. Therefore, judgment is final, and
Ordinance 2893, with the Development Agreement attached, can now be recorded. Unfortunately, the
original of the Development Agreement cannot be located.
NHM/slt
cc: Carol Roach, w/out attachments
(hogan3. mem)
ROBINSON CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.
GENERAL ENGINEERING CONTRACTORS • LICENSE NO. 185051
P. O. BOX 1620 • OROVILLE, CA 95965 • 4714 PACIFIC HEIGHTS ROAD
TELEPHONE AREA CODE 916 - 534-7616
Robinson & Sons, a Partnership
February'07, 1990.
County of Butte r
Chief Administrative Office
25 County Center Drive
Oroville, CA 95965-3380
Attention: Mr. William H. Randolph, Chief Administrative Officer
Reference: General Plan Amendment, Rezone and
Development Agreement, File 89-43 A,B,&C
Gentlemen:
I am returning the signed Development Agreement. Please accept my
apologies for the delay. For some reason, I was under the impression that
I needed to secure the $25,000.00 Performance Bond, as required in Section
XV of the Development Agreement, and submit it with the agreement.
As of this date, my bonding company has not issued the bond. They are,
reviewing all of the initial paper work invoved •in.our lease with the State
of California, and everything that has transpired from that time forward.
Since this is taking extra time, I have been holding up returning the
Development Agreement.
DR/m
Sincerely,
ROBINSON & SONS, a Partnership
Dennis Robinson, Partner
sone cour+�
luua►��saYia QWa
►990
o�
MUFORWA
CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE
COUNTY OF BUTTE
WILLIAM H. RA'NDOLPH
CHIEF AOMINISTRATIVE OFFICER
January 9, 1990
Robinson and Sons
P.O. Box 1620
Oroville, CA 95965
25 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE
OROVILLE. CALIFORNIA 95965-3380
Telephone: (916) 538-7631
Fax: (916) 538-7120
Re: General Plan Amendment, Rezone and
Development Agreement, File 89-43 A, B, & C
Gentlemen:
MEMBERS OF THE BOARD:
HASKEL A. MOINTURF
JANE DOLAN
KAREN VERCRUSE
ED McLAUGHLIN
LEN FU -TON
At the regular meeting of the Butte County Board of Supervisors held
January 9, 1990, Resolution No. 90-07 was adopted amending the Butte
County General Plan Land Use Element from Orchard and Field Crops to
Industrial designation; Ordinance 2807 was- adopted rezoning from "U" to
M-2; and Ordinance 2808 was adopted 'approving the enclosed Development
Agreement for property located west of State Highway 70, approximately I
mile south of the Palermo Road/Highway 70 Intersection; and approximately
350 feet east of the Feather River.
Please sign the Development Agreement and return it to the Clerk of the
Board at 25 County Center Drive, Oroville, CA 95965, as soon as possible.
Should you have any questions regarding this matter,please contact the
Planning Department at 534-4601 between 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m.
Very truly yours,
William H. Randolph
Chief Administrative Officer.
WHR:lr
Enc.
cc: Barnhart -Brown, P.O. Box 1576, Oroville, CA 95965
CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE
COUN'T'Y OF BUT'T'E
tF.
25 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE
.0t!
OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3380
-
Telephone: (916) 538-7631
Fax: (916)538-7120
MEMBERS OF THE BOARDS
CDUht-1
HASKEL A. MdNTURF
JANE DOIAN
STARLYN BROWN
MARY ANNE ROUX
ACTING CMIEF ADMINISTRATIVE
OFFICER
ED MCLAUGHLIN
LEN FULTON
May 21, 1992
To:
Neil McCabe,
Assistant County Counsel
-
C,N
From: 'Carol
Roach,
Assistant Clerk of the Board
Subject:
Robinson &
Sons, a partnership -
Approval of a
Development
Agreement
On December 18, 1990, the'Board of Supervisors adopted
ordinance no. 2893 "approving a development agreement for certain
real property located west of State Highway 70, approximately one
mile south of the Palermo Road/Highway 70 intersection, and
approximately '350 feet east of the Feather River." "
This ordinance was not published in.accordance with law
because the executed development agreement, exhibit A to the
ordinance, was not received' by our office. The Planning Department -
advised us that the agreement was with you for approval prior to
signature by- Robinson & Sons, and the Chair of the Board of
Supervisors.
Please advise our office of the status of this ordinance
and the development agreement relating thereto. Thank you for your
assistance.
INTER -DEPARTMENTAL MEMORANDUM
OFFICE OF BUTTE COUNTY COUNSEL
TO: Carol Roach, Administration
BY: Neil H. McCabe, Assistant County Counsel 1%4
SUBJECT: Robinson & Sons, a partnership - Approval of a
Development Agreement
DATE: June 4, 1992
This memo is in response to your memo of May 21, 1992.
Since the ordinance approving the Development agreement was
not published, it has not yet become effective. Government Code
Section 25124 (c) provides that "If the Clerk of the Board of
Supervisors fails to publish an ordinance within 15 days after the
date of adoption, the ordinance shall not take effect until 30 days
after the date of publication."
The Planning Department advised you the agreement itself was
here for approval prior to signature by Robinson & Sons and the
Chair of the Board. I have not yet determined what happened to
it. However, approval of the Development agreement is being
challenged in the case of Judith Koehler v. County of Butte, Butte
County Superior Court Case No. 109111. This case was argued on
April 21, 1992 and submitted to the court for decision on that day.
The decision has not yet been announced.
My recommendation at this time is to await the court's ruling.
If the.court determines that approval of the Development agreement
by the Board of Supervisors was proper, then the agreement itself
can be duly executed and attached to the ordinance, and the
ordinance can then be published.. If, on the other hand, the court
determines that approval of the Development agreement was not
proper, then, of course, there would be no reason to publish the
ordinance.
We will advise you when we have received the court's judgment.
NHM/slt
(carol.mem)
2
3
4
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
MICHAEL L. BLEDSOE - 124177_
DIEPENBROCK, WULFF, PLANT &'HANNEGAN
300 Capitol Mall, Suite 1700
Post Office Box 3034
Sacramento, CA. 95812-3034
Telephone: (916) 44473910
Attorneys for Real Party in Interest
,ROBINSON AND SONS , •
OCT j. 1992
Gnl:5 S, 5utte '()'Clark
C Deputy
y
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA -
COUNTY OF BUTTE
JUDITH KOEHLER, )
Petitioner, )
V. )
COUNTY OF BUTTE, )
Respondent, )
ROBINSON AND SONS, a general ) -
partnership, Real Party in Interest )
No. 109111/
PROPOSED STATEMENT
OF DECISION AND
PROPOSED JUDGMENT
(Cal. Civ. Proc. Code
§632; Cal. Rules of Ct.
Rule 232(c),(d))
As directed by the court in its Announcement of Intended.
Decision respecting the above -entitled matter, filed July 23,
1992, submitted herewith.for use by the court is the Proposed
Statement of Decision. Also submitted is a draft form of Judgmen-
for the court's use in this matter.
Pursuant to the court's directive, and as.provided in Rule
232(d), California Rules of Court,. Petitioner JUDITH KOEHLER.and
Respondent COUNTY OF BUTTE, through their attorneys, shall advise
,the court and the parties as to their approval of the form and
:PENBROCK, WULFF.
.ANT 8 HANNEGAN 03927488045.PLD — 1
Attorneys
Sacramento. CA
content of the proposed Statement of Decision not later than
fifteen (15) days after service hereof.
DATED: August 11, 1992
�I 03927488045.PLD - 2 -
Respectfully submitted,
DIEPENBROCK,'WULFF, PLANT &
HANNEGAN
i
By:
MICHAEL L. BLEDSOE, Attorney
for Real Party in Interest
ROBINSON AND SONS
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
iEPENBFOCK. WULFF.
'LANT & HANNEGAN
Attorneys
Sacramento. CA
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF BUTTE
JUDITH KOEHLER, )
Petitioner, )
V. )
COUNTY OF BUTTE, )
Respondent, )
ROBINSON AND SONS, a general )
partnership, Real Party in Interest ) a
Case No. 109111
[PROPOSED]
STATEMENT OF DECISION
[Cal. Civ. Proc. Code
§632• Cal. Rules of Ct.
Rule 232(c)]
The above -entitled matter came regularly before this court on
April 21, 1992 for hearing, Honorable Brian L. Rix, Judge,
presiding. Mr. Delbert Siemsen appeared as attorney for
Petitioner Judith Koehler ("Koehler"). Mr. Michael H. Remy
appeared as attorney for Respondent County of Butte ("County").
Mr. Michael L. Bledsoe appeared.as attorney'for Real Party in
Interest Robinson and Sons ("Robinson"). The Record of
Proceedings having been received into evidence and examined by the
court, no additional evidence having been received by the court,
points and authorities in support of and in opposition to the '
03927488050.PLD - 1 -
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
EPENBROCK. WULFF.
:ANT 8 MANNEGAN
Attorneys
Sacramento. CA
Petition for Writ of Mandate having been presented and considered
by the court, arguments having been presented, and the matter
having been submitted for decision, the court, being fully
advised, makes the following Statement of Decision in support of
its denial of.a Peremptory Writ of Mandate:
The principal controverted issue at trial was whether County
prejudicially abused its discretion when County approved the
General Plan Amendment, Rezone and Development Agreement (the
"Revised Project") for which Robinson had applied pursuant to a
mitigated Negative Declaration instead of.an Environmental Impact.
Report ("EIR").
The court has determined that County properly exercised its
discretion when it approved.the Revised Project pursuant to a
mitigated Negative Declaration, County having based its decision
Ion substantial evidence. The factual and legal basis for this
determination is as follows:
1. The Revised Project considered by County and ultimately
approved on December 18, 1990, was a modification of a larger
project in the same general area which .County had approved
pursuant to a mitigated Negative Declaration by its actions on
January 9, 1990 and January 11, 1990 (the "Original Project").
Under the Original Project, Robinson was entitled, subject to
various conditions, to carry out sand and gravel'extraction from
two areas near the Feather River containing approximately
110.acres. The area within which the sand and gravel extraction
was to occur is owned and controlled by the State of California.
After County had approved the Original Project, the Department of
Water Resources of the State of California required that Robinson
03927488050.PLD
- 2 -
1
2
3
4
5-
.6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
IEPENBROCK. WULFF.
'LANT 6 NANNEGAN
Attorneys
Sacramento. CA
'slightly revise the area within which it was entitled to carry out
its sand and gravel extraction by deleting 13 acres from the
original excavation area and replacing it with an area containing
15 acres (the 1115 -Acre Parcel") to the northeast of the original
area. ----Having no entitlements from County as to the 15 -Acre
Parcel, on August 20, 1990, Robinson applied to County to amend
the Original Project to authorize sand and gravel extraction on
the 15 -Acre Parcel.
The court finds that the Revised Project is a
modification of the Original Project.
2. Once a project has received environmental review as
required under the California Environmental Quality Act (Cal. Pubs.
Res. Code, §§21000, et g&q. ("CEQA")), whether by a Negative
Declaration or an EIR, it is not necessary for the lead agency to
prepare a subsequent EIR or a supplemental'EIR for modifications
of the project, unless the changes in the project are so
substantial that they necessitate major revisions to the
environmental document. Cal. Pub. Res. Code §21166(a); Cal. Code -
of Regs., tit. 14, §15162(a); Benton v. Board of Supervisors, 226
Cal. App. 3d 1467, 1479-1480 (1991). The reviewing court is to
determine whether substantial evidence supports the determination
of the lead agency as to the adequacy of the environmental
analysis of the modified project. Benton, 226 Cal.App.3d at
11481-1482.
The court finds that the appropriate standard of review
of County's approval of the Revised Project pursuant to a Negative
Declaration is the substantial evidence test.
103927488050.PLD
3 -
1
2
3
4
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
,EPENBROCK. WULFF.
LANT 6 HANNEGAN
Attorneys
Sacramento. CA
3. Having determined that the Revised Project was a
modification of the Original Project,'County evaluated the
potential environmental impacts that the Revised Project might
cause. After reviewing the mitigated Negative Declaration for the
(Original. -Project and the initial study on which it was based, the
Revised Project, and other evidence presented to it' County
determined that the changes from the Original Project as reflected
in the Revised Project were not so substantial that important "
revisions to the Negative Declaration were required. Accordingly.
County adopted the mitigated Negative Declaration for the Revised
Proj ect .
The court finds that there is substantial evidence in
the record to support County's decision to adopt the mitigated
Negative Declaration for the Revised Project.
4. In its review of the Negative Declaration and the
Revised Project, County considered the possible impacts of the
Revised Project on neighboring properties, including Koehler's.
The initial study, on which the mitigated Negative Declaration is
based, evaluated the potential impacts of the Revised Project,
including those raised by Koehler as potentially affecting her
property. No substantial evidence of potential impacts not
sufficiently considered in the Negative Declaration was timely
submitted to County. County determined that all of the
potentially significant impacts that might be caused by'the
Revised Project were reduced below a level of significance by
mitigation measures imposed by the Negative Declaration and by
conditions imposed on the Revised Project.
103927488050.PLD
4 -
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
is
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
The initial study, mitigated Negative Declaration,
testimony at public hearings on the Revised Project and other
evidence in the Record of Proceedings constitute substantial
evidence on which County was entitled to, and properly did, base
its decision The reviewing court must support County's decision
to approve the Revised Project having first adopted the mitigated
Negative Declaration because there is substantial evidence in the
record to support County's decision. Benton, 226 Cal.Ap.3d at
1482.
The court finds that there is substantial evidence in
the record to support County's decision to approve the Revised
Project pursuant to the mitigated Negative Declaration.
Accordingly, judgment shall be entered as follows:
1. Denying the Petition for a Peremptory Writ of Mandate;
2. Awarding County and Real Party their costs in this
matter.
Let judgment be entered accordingly.
Dated: /&P)
,iEPENBROCK, WULFF,
ILA.,, MANNEGAN 03927488050.PL0 - 5
Attorneys
Sacramento. CA
Brian Rix,
Judge Assigned
Proposed Statement of Decision
Approved as to form and content:
Remy and Thomas Date
Michael H. Remy, Esq.
Attorney for Respondent
Delbert Siemsen, Esq. Date
Attorney for Petitioner
1039274BW50. PLO
6 -
I
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF BUTTE
JUDITH KOEHLER, ) Case No. 109111
Petitioner, ) [PROPOSED]
JUDGMENT DENYING
V. ) PEREMPTORY WRIT
OF MANDATE
COUNTY OF BUTTE, )
Respondent, )
ROBINSON AND SONS, a general )
partnership, Real Party in Interest )
)
The above -entitled matter came regularly before this court on
April 21, 1992 for hearing, Honorable Brian L. Rix, Judge,
presiding. Mr. Delbert Siemsen appeared as attorney for
Petitioner Judith Koehler ("Koehler"). Mr. Michael H. Remy
appeared as attorney for Respondent County of Butte ("County!')...
Mr. Michael L. Bledsoe appeared as attorney for Real Party in
Interest Robinson and Sons ("Robinson"). The Record of
Proceedings having been received into evidence and examined by the
court, no additional evidence having been received by the court,
points and authorities in support of and in opposition to the
EPENBROCK, WULFF.
LANT & MANNEGAN 03927488051.PLD - 1 Attorneys
Sacramento.
Sacramento. CA
1
.2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
EPENBROCK, WULFF.
'LANT S HANNEGAN
Attorneys
Sacramento, CA
"Petition for Writ of Mandate having been presented and considered
by the court, arguments having been presented, the matter having
been submitted for decision, and the court having made a Statement
of Decision, which has been signed and filed,
IT IS ORDERED that:
1. The Petition filed in this action for a Peremptory Writ
of Mandate is denied; and
2. County shall recover its costs in this action; and
3. Robinson shall recover its costs in this action.
Dated:
Judgment entered on
Volume No.
103927488051.PLD
page
in the Judgment Book
IF Clerk
By:
Deputy Clerk
- 2 -
1
2
3
4
6
7
8
9
10
I1
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
EPENBROCK• WULFF.
CANT & HANNEGAN
Attorneys
Sacramento. CA
0 PROOF OF SERVICE BY MAIL
I, Bruce Duncan, certify and declare as follows:
I am over the age of 18 years and not a party to this action.
My business address is Diepenbrock, Wulff, Plant & Hannegan, 3C0
Capitol Mall, Suite 1700, P.O. Box 3034, Sacramento, CA 95812-3034,
:=which= is-= located in the county where the mailing described below
took place.
I am readily familiar with the business practice at my place
of business for collection and processing of correspondence for
mailing with the United States Postal Service. Correspondence so
collected and processed would be deposited with the United States
Postal Service that same day in the ordinary course of business.
On August 11, 1992, at my place of business at Diepenbrock,
Wulff, Plant & Hannegan, Suite 1700, P.O. Box 3034, Sacramento, CA
95812-3034,.a copy of the following document, entitled: PROPOSED
STATEMENT OF DECISION AND PROPOSED JUDGMENT, was placed for deposit
in the United States Postal Service in a sealed envelope, with
postage fully prepaid to:
Remy and Thomas
Michael H. Remy
901 F Street, Ste. 200
Sacramento, CA 95814
(Attorney -for Respondent
County of Butte)
Delbert Siemsen
Attorney at Law
P.O. Box 1403
Oroville, CA 95965
(Attorney for Petitioner
Judith Koehler)
and that said envelopes were placed for collection and mailing 'on
that date following ordinary business practices.
I certify and declare under penalty of perjury under the laws
of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed on August 11, 1992 at Sacramento, California.
03927488053.POA
BRUCE DUNCAN.
Planning Department
JUN 08 1995
oroville, California
AD STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Official Business�Q�
T.
18%
® A\p,
PENALTY FOR PRIVATE
USE TO AVOID PAYMENT
OF POSTAGE, $300
U�
91-03 Print your name, address and21P Code here
�ro v / CA
• Complete items 1 and/or 2 for additional services. I I also wish to receive
• Complete items 3, and 4a & b. following services (for an extra 0
• Print your name and address on the reverse of this form so that we canv
return this card to you. fee):
• Attach this form to the front of the mailpiece, or on the back if space 1. ❑ Addressee's Address y
does not permit.
• Write "Return Receipt Requested" on -the mailpiece below the article number. 2. El Restricted Delivery
_a
• The Return Receipt will show to whom the article was delivered and the date
delivered. Consult postmaster for fee.
3. Article Addressed to:
m
aDennis Robinson
c PO Box 1620
y Oroville, CA 95965
N
W
cc
D
Q
z
cr 5. SignalAge
t—
W
6. Signature
0
H PS Form 38
4a. Article Number
c
P 5U4 145 204
4b. Service Type
❑ Registered
® Certified
❑ Express Mail
7. Date of
m
rr
❑ Insured
❑ COD
❑ Return Receipt for
8. Addressee's Address
and fee is paid)
0
0
if requested Y
c
ro
• L
%
, December 1991 * U.S.G.P.0.:1992-307-530 DOMESTIC RETURN RECEIPT
INTER -DEPARTMENTAL MEMORANDUM
Department of Development Services
Planning Division
TO: Treasurer's Office
FROM: Planning Division
SUBJECT: Robinson's .Construction File # 91-03 A, B and C
DATE: February 3, 1993
A Time Certificate of Deposit in the amount of $25,000.00 from Wells Fargo Bank for
Robinson Construction was submitted to your office for safekeeping for the above
referenced project. Your reference #341.
The Time Certificate of Deposit can be released to this office and replaced with this
Certificate of Deposit. Acct No. Referenced on Bond 1189 018 559 000 in the amount
of $25,000.00 from Wells Fargo Bank.
.AJ -K ii r c ehhe
Director of Planning
m
Received Time Certificate of Deposit from Planning M
Date: /1 o
Signed:
i
BAK:jlo
cc: /Auditors Ofc. Jean Tobin
Stuart Edell
Bill Cheff
Planning File co
rn
- c
o
11 �
E
i o
LL
W
uP-504 145 204
- w
RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL
NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED
NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL
(See Reverse)
Sent to
n-n+s R -e -b3 n-sa
UU lISSOX 16
P,O:, State and ZIP Code
Oroville CA 95965
Postage
S
Certified Fee
Special Delivery Fee
Restricted Delivery Fee
Return Receipt showing
to whom and Date Delivered
Return Receipt showing to whom,
Date, and Address of. Delivery
S
TOTAL Postage and Fees
or Date n
Mark
—
.Z E ,''a6 .x,;i a r < . t .�' - i g T J s7:, ,a��j �%% ..t•. f v
.i4 tr + r1 ` r'�o �%Cy �• �, �� i,,ana�, � .� � 4. .i�'.• k.:.:Z ! �Y .
• y ,•jkr •,t F .:
+
DEPARTMENTALz
�-Department�ofDev`el`m nt'pServices
=Planiung Division;,,
.�
± 3 µ++ r
t Y
+, : 'FROM a t: P 'aiuiiiig 'Invision, a
SUBJECT RoFmson's+s,Cronstruction Filet # .9103
-Or F �' a .a t i ax ry 0 a �cJr-Sr.. v1'rs S
DATE 'February 3; 1993 ,r"r'";}'«,�
.. - r t :E t - 'Cyt h d l•� M `t Z , -
' A Time Certificate ;of De osrt` m the amount of $25 ~
p ,000 00 from :`Wells Fargo Bank for
Robinson ' Construction was submitted to" your,..office for 'safekeeping for the `;`above
y = referenced project: Your, reference- #341 ,
-.The Time' Certificate of Deposit can -be- released. to this_offi&"Ai nd-replaced,with this -
Certificate of Deposit "°Acct No. Referenced on. Bond 1189, 018; $59 000 in "the"amount
of $25,000.00 from Wells' Fargo Bank.
4
A.A. Kirc er
Director of Planning
Received Time Certificate of Deposit from Planning
Date:
Signed:
BAK:jlo
cc: Auditors Ofc. Jean Tobin
Stuart Edell
Bill Cheff
Planning. File
FROM:
Inter De artmenfaC Mem d
orW" um
Treasurer's Office -- Attention: Karen White `
F
`Dept. of Public Works -- Land Development Section
'SUBJECT: /
Robinson Construction Co. -- AP 25-16-1'05,`,25-23-33, 34
DATE: `
September 25, 1992
Attached:is a Certificate of Deposit in the amount nt of $25 000.0
from Wells Fargo Bank Acct. No. 1189018559=000 of Oroville0
California. This Certificate of Deposit was/ submitted to serve
as a Reclamation Bond for the above referenced project.
Please deposit this letter in the safe of the Treasurer's Office
:for safekeeping until the Public WorksDepartment authorizes its
release.
William Cheff
Received memo and Certificate
of Deposit from Public Works:
DATE: y1c,2 //
G p�
Karen -White
cc A-3 w/o attachments
.Auditor's office -- attention:
file '
misc. depos/i/ts and releases file
Jean Tobin
N
February 7, 1991
Robinson & Sons, a Partnership
P. O. Box 1620
Oroville, CA 95965
Re: General Plan Amendment, Rezone, Development Agreement, Mining and
Reclamation Permit on AP No. 025-230-033 and 034.
Dear Mr. Robinson:
Please be informed that the State Clearinghouse No. 89082207 was originally assigned to
the first project processed in 1989 for the subject property. The State Clearinghouse uses
the same reference number when reviewing modifications 'or changes to the same project.
As such, the State Clearinghouse number for the new project is the same as for the original
project.
If you have any questions regarding this mater, please contact this office any weekday
between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m.
Sincerely,
B. A. Kircher
Planning Director
U�AX
-
David R. Hironimus
Senior Planner
DRH:bb
cc: Barnhart & Brown
ffutte Count
_''...
- --'
LAND OF NAT U RA L W EA LT H A N D BEAUTY
'
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397
TELEPHONE: (916) 538-7601
Robinson & Sons, a Partnership
P. O. Box 1620
Oroville, CA 95965
Re: General Plan Amendment, Rezone, Development Agreement, Mining and
Reclamation Permit on AP No. 025-230-033 and 034.
Dear Mr. Robinson:
Please be informed that the State Clearinghouse No. 89082207 was originally assigned to
the first project processed in 1989 for the subject property. The State Clearinghouse uses
the same reference number when reviewing modifications 'or changes to the same project.
As such, the State Clearinghouse number for the new project is the same as for the original
project.
If you have any questions regarding this mater, please contact this office any weekday
between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m.
Sincerely,
B. A. Kircher
Planning Director
U�AX
-
David R. Hironimus
Senior Planner
DRH:bb
cc: Barnhart & Brown
�531 Public hearing - Robinson & Sons, a partnership -
consideration of General Plan Amendment, rezone (negative
declaration with mitigation measures regarding
environmental impacts determined), development agreement,
and modification of existing project by exchanging
approximately 13 acres covered under the existing plan
with 13 acres located nearby on property zoned "U"
(unclassified) and M-2 (heavy industrial), property
located west of State Highway 70 approximately one mile
south of Palermo Road and approximately 3,000 feet east
of the Feather River and 2,000 feet north of the Wildlife
Area access road from Highway 70, identified as AP 025-
230-033 and 034, south of Oroville. .(1374)
MOTION: ACCEPT THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF STAFF MEMORANDUM
DATED NOVEMBER 7, 1990; AND FIND THAT: (A)
AN INITIAL STUDY WAS COMPLETED IN COMPLIANCE
WITH CEQA.; (B) SAID STUDY AND COMMENTS
RECEIVED THEREON IDENTIFIED POTENTIALLY
SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONME`iTAL EFFECTS THAT THE
PROJECT MAY HAVE HAD BUT: (1) REVISIONS IN
THE PROJECT PLANS OR .PROPOSALS MADE BY OR
AGREED TO BY THE APPLICANT WOULD AVOID SUCH
EFFECTS OR MITIGATE SUCH EFFECTS TO A POINT
WHERE CLEARLY NO SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL
EFFECTS WOULD OCCUR, AND (2) . THERE IS NO
SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE BEFORE THE COUNTY THAT THE
PROJECT AS REVISED MAY HAVE A SIGNIFICANT
EFFECT ON THE ENVIRONMENT.; (C) A PROPOSED
NEGATIVE DECLARATION HAS BEEN COMPLETED. IN
COMPLIANCE WITH CEQA AND IS RECOMMENDED FOR
APPROVAL AND ADOPTION.. FIND THAT SAID NEGATIVE
DECLARATION TOGETHER WITH ANY COMMENTS RECEIVED
DURING THE PUBLIC REVIEW PROCESS HAVE BEEN
REVIEWED AND CONSIDERED; FIND THAT THE PROPOSED
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT, REZONE, AND DEVELOPMENT
AGREEMENT CONFORM TO THE POLICIES, INCLUDING
THE TEXT AND MAPS OF THE BUTTE COUNTY GENERAL
PLAN; ADOPT RESOLUTION 90-179 APPROVING A
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT TO INDUSTRIAL REVERTING
13 ACRES TO ORCHARD AND FIELD CROPS AND
DESIGNATING 15 ACRES INDUSTRIAL ON AP 025-230-
033 AND 034 (ROBINSON AND SONS); ADOPT
ORDINANCE 2892 REZONING 13 ACRES TO "U"
(UNCLASSIFIED) AND 15 ACRES TO M-2 (HEAVY
INDUSTRIAL) ON AP 025-230-033 AND 034 (ROBINSON
AND SONS); AND ADOPT ORDINANCE 2893 APPROVING
THE AMENDED DEVELOPMENT AGREE14ENT FOR ROBINSON
AND SONS.
M S
VOTE: 1_Y 2 NP 3 NP 4 P 5 P (Unanimously Carried)
EXHIBIT (A-1)
DL-Mbiarf —_3,rvitdn & Gj_1octcrtei
A California Corporation
Alan Q. Brown
1881 A Robinson Slreel P. Q Box /576 Oroville, CA 9596
CIVIL ENGINEERS . LAND
Richard BemAMn
5 9/6/534- 1911 Thomas Odeklrk
Michael Evans
.SURVEYORS Thome Finlayson
'All that real property situated in Sections 10 & 11 Township 18 North
Range 3 East MDM Butte County CA and being more particulary described
as follows:
Beginning at a point from which the Southwest corner of said Section.
11 bears South 020 07' 00" West 2204.521; thence South 590 21' 41"
East a distance of 203.791; thence South 690 08' 19" East a distance
of 350.03'; thence North 42° 02' 36" East a distance of 318.921;
thence North 220 01' 32" West a distance of 47.511; thence North 01�
37' 49" East a distance of 176.961; thence North 360 33' 23" West a
distance of 287.731; thence North 280 27' 07" West a distance of
258.761; thence North 400 12' 03" West a distance of 138.68'; thence
North 87° 52' 34" West a distance of 123.721; thence North 020 13'
34" East a distance of 154.371; thence North 780 23' 26" .West a
distance of 65.04'; thence South 260 '43' 29" West a distance of
704.03'; thence South 380 21' 31" West a distance of 128..591; thence
South 060 47' 05" East a distance of 119.531; thence South 45` 23'
07" East a distance of 87.111; thence South 72'0 53' 05" East a
distance of 191.02' to the Point of Beginning containing 15.00 acres
more or less.
CE 24578
LS 4202
LS 3991
VP
LS 2900
-Darn4a.'. —_3roon &"Gijociatei
rt
W.iANNE
ro »f ;.
1881 A Robinson Slreel RQ Box /576 Oroville, CA 95965 9/6/534-1911
CIVIL ENGINEERS • LAND SURVEYORS
Alan 0. Brown
CE 2670
Richard Bamhan
L8 •202
Thomas Odsklrk
LB _991
Michael EvansVP
Thomas Flnlsyson
LS ;900
All that real property. situated in Section .10 Township 18 North Range
3 East MDM Butte County CA and being more particulary described as
follows:
Beginning at a point from which the Southeast corner of said Section
10 bears South 390 14' 35" East 1431.121.; thence South 520 51' 56"
East 207.861; thence South 690 28' 11" East 431.461; thence South 540
00' 49" East 479.701; thence South 360.20' 13" East 359.741; thence
North 68° *22' .24" .West 557.481; thence North 78° 53-' 18" West
108.481; thence South 7.3° 35' 16" West.357.511; thence South 70'. 06'
09 " West 556.72'; thence North 110 50' 18" West 392.861; thence North
28° 53' 42" West 221.031; thence' North 880 24' 58" West 138.701;
thence North 010 35' 02" East 91.381; thence South 640 00' 01"
East 145.991; thence North 86° 17' 11" East 125.441; thence North 76�
41' 42" East 125.451; thh�eence'North 630 57' 39" East 149.961; thence
South 880 36' 48" East 81.691; thence South 654 29' 35o East 63.74';
thence South 71 09' 57" East 61.551;. thence North 39 48' 56" West
234.401; thence North '50° 11' 04" East 107.43' to the Point of
Beginning.
Containing 16.01 acres more or less
•
FIELD DIVISION: Oroville
DATE ISSUED: 9100
State of califamia
The DEPARTMENT OF war
Agency
FIREiO6RCE
TEMPORARY PERAIT
COUNTY Butte PERMIT NO.
TIME: �.3p / M- EXPIRES: TIME: "-v � lo, r�M
PerR1i33lon is hereby granted to the undersigned PerMittee to enter upon the property of the
Department of Wator Resources, hereafter referred to as the 'State'%
at
between: See attached exhibit
to:
for the purpose of:
sand and gravel. extraction
1. Equipment to be used on thin property Is limited to:
that equipment normally necessary for sand and gravel -extraction.
o 2. Parmittee la responsible for the Injury or death of any workinan,. member of the public,
fficer or employee of the State, or any other person, arising oat of the exercise of the rights herein
granted, irrespective of fault or negligence, excepting only such injuries or deaths as are caused by the.
Bole negligence or willful ctiscondact of the State, its Officers
or em to ee
and neve harmless the State, Its officers and employees.from all claims sults Or actioar of as nature
P Y s. Permittee shall indemnify
brought for or on account of any such injury or death. Y rite
3. In the exercise of the rights herein granted permittee is responnible for say da e
destruction or loss occurring to the property or facilities of the Stat., itc water contractors, licence es,
permittees, or members of the
such damage, destruction or loss, bor atPthelop onhoflthedState,ypermitteeAnd cshall repairh r State for all
property to the satisfaction of the State. p replace sold
4. This permit Is not valid for any activity that results in permanent alterations to
property nor for a period in excess of 90 days from date of isauence. State
patty. 5. This permit may be cancelled by .aither party upon 3 days written notice to the other
State of Caliiorria
Departint of Water&t es
By �L�J�i.�,
Title «/ S(D.J
Phone S�
OWR 3311 (R.. 3/76)
ACCEPTED:
Permittees
By G,y
Address k ��
Phone.
" stalker California
The R#$o-C16 Agency
i•
DEPARTMENT OF WATER REio6RCC50'
TEMPORARY PERMIT
FIELD DIVISION: Oroville COUNTY Butte
PERMIT NO._ -
DATE ISSUED: g/-/fCQ TIME: �.*3p •/tM EXPIRES: �Z�/
/ � TIME: lb ,'Gf-J /O—m' M
Pcrmi,sion is hereby granted to the undersigned Permittee to enter upon the property of th* .
Department of water Resources, hereafter referred to as the 'State",
at
between; See attached exhibit
to:
for the purpose of:
sand and gravel extraction
i• Equipment to be used on thin property is limited to:
that equipment normally necessary for sand and gravel extraction.
off2. Permittee Ia responsible for the Injury or death of any workinan,. meinber of the public,
icer or employee of the State, or any other person, arising out of the exercise of the rights herein,
granted, irrespective of fault or negligence, excepting only such Injuries or deaths as are caused by the
Bole negligence or willful mlccondact of the State, its officers or employees, permittee shall indemnify
and neve harmless the State, Its officers and employees from all claims, sults or actions of any nature
brought for or on account of any .such injury or death.
3. In the exercise of the rights herein granted permittee ie reaponaible for say dee
deStruction Or 1085 errs of
to the property or facilities of the State, its water contractors, licensees,
permittees, or members of the public. Permittee shall indemnify and save harmless the State for all
such damage, destruction or loss, or at the option of the State,
property to the permittee shall repair or replace said
satisfaction of the State.
. 4, This permit Is not valid for any nativity that results In perrrignent elteratlons to 'State
property nor for a period in excess of 90 days from date of issuance.
patty, 5. This permit may be cancelled by aithar party upon 3 days written notice to the other
State of Cali►°orria
Deport nt of Dater •a " es. ACCEPTED:
By PeeYaittee�
Title Ely
Phone Address
Phone
OWR ]]11 (R.... 3/76)'
EXHIBIT (C)
•+ ° Pit
,Robinson Construction -
--':1 14 Exis tin 1 1�1�
",orvJts 9 P ant .I9 i I' j j —
jUf
t Q a
-, .h
36
AJ -
rte\:. _ :.. s_ � -,. ,,t '- ,�C` i' � - '� '''• /� � � �I �+�
�jl�^.,y �'-_ Ili; 'i t. 6 +�t'// , 1 •'. -� (/()1• I ^
9 'I•
t To be deeded to the =y J �y I "r�well�•' I i�;
! State of California I `�/� �' .l/O Q (�
(% well.tied^
W
170
3.
Proposed
Access
Road
.. N,
P ° I• \ '.• iii, �:
cc
- o
70
_i �• _ r,29 'c .<r_„'• r,-^_• ...—•rr�l_12—_,A�GAl�-1• � ,/sr ROAe..
Area to be rezoned M-2 &
General Plan Amendment to j;liT
1 I I
Industrial
L4 \I )' ti.J` o o r� Park .: i • • �� i” -.
Area to be rezoned Unclassified
& General Plan Amendment to
it I I Uel•
Ant
� , „, !
.:�* Orchard and field Crop
Gi�` Future road development
/ J�. I
C i `/ a
�, • . El. 125.0
i U I i
%'� '• "t. Area for road development j: 1
for Access to Leased Property
Al
P rop osed Lease
EXHIBIT D
q
i ! �- Robinson
Sons
Oroville WLA Exp.: #1
Butte County
(Robinson & Sons)
GRAVEL EXTRACTION LEASE & AGREEMENT
The parties to this lease are the STATE OF CALIFORNIA, acting by and
through the DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES, hereinafter referred to as
"Lessor", and ROBINSON & SONS, a General Partnership, hereinafter referred. to
as "Lessee". The parties agree as follows:
1. Lessor does hereby lease to Lessee on the exclusive and irrevocable basis
for sand and gravel extraction purposes that certain property in the
Oroville Wildlife Area, County of Butte, State of California, together
with appurtenances, described as follows:
(See Exhibits "A" and "B" attached)
2. The term of this lease is fifty (50) years and shall commence
and terminate on
3. In consideration for granting this lease, Lessee agrees to execute and
deliver to STATE OF CALIFORNIA a Grant Deed to a 280+/- acre parcel
described in Exhibit "C'! which is attached hereto and made a part of this
lease. No other payments are due to STATE OF CALIFORNIA.
4. USE. The leased premises shall be used for the purpose of extraction and
removal of sand, gravel, rock and other material located on said premises
described in Exhibit
5. Lessee agrees that any access road which may pass through the Oroville
Wildlife Area to the leased area, or roads developed by Lessee within the
leased area, shall be shared by the public except for such closures as
may be necessary to maintain safety or security of Lessee's facilities.
Lessor will permit.Lessee to construct a haul road within a 60 -foot wide
area on the wildlife area for the purpose of providing access to lease
areas as shown in Exhibit
Lessee will.construct and maintain three metal gates along the haul road
at the locations shown on Exhibit "B". The haul road will be constructed
along the east boundary of the wildlife area between Gate No. 1 and Gate
No. 3.
Material for the construction of the haul road may be taken from the area
adjacentto the road in such a manner as to create a channel -along the
west side of the road between Gates 2 and 3. The channel will be of
sufficient width and depth to prevent vehicular access into the wildlife
area. The channel will be constructed within the 60 -foot wide haul road
area.
No other roads on the wildlife area are to be constructed or used without
the approval .of the Lessor.
6. Lessee agrees, at no cost to Lessor, to match the elevation of the ramp
for the haul road to the final elevation of the levee at the time the
Lessor raises the east -west levee road up to an approximate elevation of
125 feet. DWR is agreeable to allowing Robinson to reduce the eleva-IL-ion
of the tailings in the exclusion area, location "C", (south of the
proposed East-West levee) in order to construct a haul road for access
'into the "south location (Parcel ORO -B -83-B). No material is to be
removed from the exclusion area, location "C".
7. Lessee to excavate during term of lease that area at the south tip of
Parcel ORO -B -83-B in such a manner that water flows will return into the
Feather River.
8. Lessee agrees to maintain the integrity of any levee adjacent to the
leased premises that protects the Wildlife Area from flooding.
9. At the conclusion of the lease term but consistent with the use of the
premises made by Lessee, the extraction area or areas will be left In a
general condition such as to facilitate ponding for wild fowl.
10. Lessee shall not commit; suffer or permit any waste or nuisance on said
premises or any acts to be done thereon in violation of any laws or
ordinances, and will permit the Lessor or its agents to enter said
premises at any reasonable time to inspect the same. .
11. All notices which may be given by either party to the other,. shall be
deemed to have been given when made in writing and deposited in the
United States' mail, certified and postage prepaid, and addressed as
follows:
Robinson & Sons, a General Partnership
P.O. Box 1620
Oroville, CA 95965
State of California
Department of Water Resources
c/o Department of Fish and Game
Region 2.
1701 Nimbus Road.
Rancho Cordova, CA 95670
Nothing herein shall preclude the giving of any such notice
by personal service.
12. Assignment of this lease and subletting of the premises by
Lessee is permitted only the following conditions:
(1.1) The assignment or. subletting is connected with and is part of
a sale by Lessee of all or a portion of its business
operations;
•
•
(1.2) Any assignee or subtenant shall expressly assume all the
burdens and obligations of the Lessee under the terms
of this lease;
(1.3) If any subletting is for any portion of the
devised premises less than the entirety, the Lessee shall ,...
remain responsible for all burdens and obligations
under this lease as to the entirety, as though the
subletting had not taken place.
(1.4) All other assignments and subletting shall be subject
to the written consent of Lessor first being ordained,
which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld or
delayed. .
13. Lessee shall maintain the leased premises in good order and condition
at his own expense. This obligation shall include keeping -he
property in a neat, clean and orderly condition at all times and
Lessee shall not permit rubbish or garbage to accumulate. At -he
expiration of said term, or any sooner termination of this lease,
Lessee shall surrender possession of said premises and its
appurtenances to the Lessor.
14. Lessee shall not make any alterations to the leased premises which are
inconsistent with its use as a sand and gravel plant pit or construct,
hand or paint any signs on the leased premises without written consent
of the Lessor..
15. This lease is made upon the express condition that the State of
California is to be free from all liability and. claims for. damages by
reason of any injury to any person or persons, including Lessee,.or
property of any kind whatsoever and to whomsoever belonging, including.
Lessee, from any cause or causes whatsoever while in, upon, or in any
way connected with the leased premises during the a term of this lease
or any occupancy hereunder. Lessee agrees to defend, indemnify and
save harmless STATE OF CALIFORNIA from all liability, loss, cost or
obligation on account of or arising out of any such injury or loss,
however occurring, unless caused by the STATE OF CALIFORNIA.
16. Neither Lessee nor his subtenants (if subleasing is permitted.
hereunder) will willfully discriminate against any person because of
race, color, -religion, national origin or,ancestry in subletting the
premises or in any public use thereof..
17. Lessee shall pay Lessor or all costs and expenses, including attorney's
fees in a reasonable sum, in any reasonably founded action brought by
Lessor for the breach of any of the terms or conditions contained in
this lease, or to recover possession of said premises, whether or not.
such action progresses to judgment.
18.' Should the Lessee hold over after the expiration of the term of this
lease with the express or implied consent of the Lessor, such hold -hg
over shall be deemed to be a tenancy from month to month, subject
otherwise to all the terms and conditions of this lease.
19.. It is understood and agreed by the parties hereto, that the DEPARTMENT
OF WATER RESOURCES reserves the right to.inundate the real property
covered by the subject Gravel Extraction Lease and Agreement.
20. Lessor agrees to permit the Department of Fish and.Game to allow the
public to use portions of the leased premises when such' use can be
'facilitated without conflict with extraction operations.
Dated:
Approved:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES
By.
LESSOR:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA -
DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES
By
LESSEE:. ROBINSON & SONS,
a California General Partnership
by
Dennis Robinson
by
Spencer Robinson, Jr.
.1
Ricke Robinson
by The Vicke Baker Trust
by
(Dennis Robinson) Trustee
by
(Spencer Robinson Jr.) Trustee
ESRC L r_,YO-3 °^ 3 EM•iI1IT A
=asor c v Of �i:tta, S_ata OL f Caii_orn a, Sa:: 7arcel be:n
7-ortion of thac PARCE:. 7 described in FINAL ORDER SND -u; �RE. OF CONDZMNATIO?l
recorded April 1967, 3ook.11-67, Page 63- Official Records of sai
d C pun" ,
said ?;RCEL ORC-3-S3-3 being shown and deli -ear -ed on that Record of Survev
`!ap, filed on -7„nuary 13, 1899; 1983, Book 114 Page 14 of Surveys, County
Recorder's Office, and further described on said map as follows:
BEGINNINGat ,i Department of W;acer Resources
D,R) monwn2nt stamped
tlta_ bonrs South 11° 04' 39" West 1+25,94 feet from the Norzheasc
cor;.�_r of said Sac:ion i5, as shown and delineated on said mag;
- FROM c
P011`17 , �,�, _
-C_OF BEGINNING _o- .he boundary o said' EL 7
and sa_d PA -RCE -1- ORO -3-83 e a' ^g _ - ?PSC
3' the :oi=owl ?- 2 courses:
,:) )C0" 3' 0111
a5 Ile c CO a D K .monument
:eet to a D::R mo rmen
stam?ad C; C; - 3
anca r-.--, a `oliow ,g 4 :ou.ses alor,� the boundary o` said P, RCEL ORO
• -1-S3-3;
�3 Jv�. iJ° lj ��. ':ESt +37.v� feet t0 3 i%2 i.^:cn iron pin :itn
7 aS:_� cap sz:=:,ed D'.7R*,
,30 ,
l_) ni=Z .J 24 ;Gst ',P6.41
-tet.
.22
a -1 i, -i Zee;. to a concrete monument
nlz the Sn,lt -:esc corner= the Matt
\< Zhe� CGSa C2"�S �CGS�,
t` a s L -he courses.
') S-ucn 35° 16' i7,, 'est 762.0.'-
_eat to a concrete :Worriment;
=' , ^ o L. i 30" cast 1�-.J. E. + feet _ t -o a concreta mo - -Went
r L ;
=) O th 4J =7" ._aSt 1`047.36 feet t0 a concrete TOnument;
�Oih - 1, (�
L '-!O 1 �' 6 NCSL 50.
T _
North 3 .
• _) 6 _ et =o a cor.crace mo?jume-,,*
-%' �7' 'aSt 645. Ji=0 a ioint^on =h? North I -\e
JI said. ?r,RCEL 7 ..^ar!cing ere Northeast corner of said :fat: a s
case
South 89' 53' 071, ;-*----z: _17.8'. feez along said `or
=h iit1e to
^.ar'_c_. - the .`:�:=r: co= =- S== d' L a
cgs' �: o:'_ PA- CE
.;_2 courses alone t'a boundary Of Said PA-RCEL i
•,ase 2_7y__ _eat =o a
0G 30. _ _
�Ol.:tti 7� �+'. ° 'aSt 6 v�, feet t0 the Poin,. 7f 3eginning,
EXCEPTING THEREFROX that 100- foot aide exclusion area along tie
gas _arv
_. Sou_n` erly. and :'e r1 ourf -
s=2 r caries o said ?-ice CRS 3 3. 3
-J .1 •n'�1 .: 1��: l.a __I.CG LCJ Q�; d 1a�
r•
Concai'ing, alter Said exception, an area of 62..10 acres, more or
ass
TOGETHER WITH appurtenant access rights for inress and egress
run-ning Ng
Northerly across Departmant of Water Resources' -lands in Sections 1C,
Ll, and
Townshi 13 North Ran3e 3 East
p 3 S.D.K., the iocacion of said
access rights to be determined by Denartment of eater Resources, Department of
Fish and Came, and the Lessee.
LAU
Bearings and distances used in the above.descri C
th e
Cali_ornia Coordinate System, Zone !I, 1927. p
`} 0.
JA?1 2 G
9r,
F OF C_.-Ev
PARCEL ORO-Bz- -� d 030-3-36-�
All -hat r. arcel of land in Sectior. 10 and Section 11, Township lf:
North, Range 3 'East, N..D.H., County of Butte, State of Califarnia, more
particulary described as follows:
3EGINNING at a point which bears North 02' 07' 00" E
the Southwest corner of sal"d Section 11; ast 2204.52 feet from
THENCE FROM SAID POINT OF BEGINNING the following 16 courses -
(1) South 59° 21' 41" east 203.119 feet;
(2) South 690 08' 19" East 3:0.03 feet;
(3) North 42° 02' 365•' East 318.92 feet;
(4) "forth 220 01' 32^ West 47.51 feet;
(5) North 01° 37' 49•' East .176.96 feet;
North 360 33 23" West 287.73 feet;
(7) Ncrth 280 27' 07" Test 258.76 feet;
(2) North 40° 12' 03" West 138.68 feet;
(9) North S70 52' 34" West 123.72 feet;
(10) North 020 13' 34" East 154.37 feet;
(11) Nc rth —,So 23' 26" West .65.04 feet;
(12) South 260 43' 29" West 704.03 feet;
('-3) South 330 21' 31" West 128.59 feet;
114) South 06° "
•� 4� OS" East 119.53 feet;
(_5) South 450 23' 07" East 87.11 feet; and
(16) South 720 53 06'
East 191.03 feet to the pc.-_ pec_
:ming.
Containing 15.00 acres, more or less.
w
TOGETHER WITH appurtenant access rights for ingress and ecress
running Northerly across Department of Water Resources' '_ands in Sections 10;
i
y -
and 2, Township 18 North, Range 3 East M.D.s
•.. , _:
access rights to be deter,, -pined by Department of 3
the pcatesourcesor. -of said, D.epart-er
Fish and Gane, and the LLessee.Wate_ Rt
Bearings and Q- ances used i the =�C':e
CZ! CCC:.._^ate S;,'s_c.'1, Cne 1 5 _ a'= Ca52C Ji.
1 J;:L
op.o-3-310 • "�r._�TT
.all that parcel of land in Section 10, Township 18 ;forth, Range 3
East, M.D.S., County of Butte, State of California, being a portion of PARCEL
4 described in the FINAL ORDER OF CONDEMNATION, recorded August 30, 1967, :n
Book 1484, Page 378, Official Records of said County, said parcel more
particularly described as follows:
BEGINNING at a point which bears North 630 22' 40" west 1735.40 -eat
C
rom the Southeast corner of said Section 10;
.HENCE FROM SAID POINT OF BEGINNING the following 19
cc;:rses:
(1) North 880 24. 58" west 8_=2.73 feet;
(2) North 03' 48'.41" East 621.70 feet;
(3) :forth 040 38' 55" nest 541.78 feet;
(4) North 180 27, 27" west 604.12 feet;
(5) South 500 56' 26" East 1140.61 feet;
(6) :forth 603 39' 06" East 354.07 feet;
(7) South 530 01' 36" east 673.58 feet;
(8) South 320 09' 20" west 401.06 feet;
(9) South 520 51' 56" East 226.21 feet;
(10) South 50°_1' 04" west 107.43 feet;
(11) South 39' 48. 56" East 234.40 feet;
(12) North 71' 09' 57" 'Test 61.55 feet; -
(13) North 651 29' 35" Nest 63.74 feet;
(14) North 880 36' 48" west 81.69 feet;
(15) South 630 57' 39" west 149.56 feet;
(16) South 760 41' 42" 'Rest 125.45 feet.;
(17) South 860 17' 11" West 125.44feet;
(18) North 640 00' 01" West 145.99 feet; and
(19) South 010 34' 40" West 91.38 feet to the Point of Beginning.
EXCEPTING THEREFROM that 100 -foot exclusion area along the 'nestar_y
_:.undar% of the above described parcel as shown and delineated on -that �ec�rd
_f Surve•:, recorded ,ianuary 13, 1989, in Book 114 of Reccrd of Surveys,
rage 14, Official Records of said County.
nt3ini:,g, after »id excsc -gin =4.98 3Cr=_S, _ra Cr _eSs
TOGETHER WITH appurtenant access rights•for ingress and .egress
running Northerly across Department of water Resources' lands in Sections 10,
and 2, Township 1-8 North, Range 3 East, M.D.M., _:e location of said
a_cess r:Lhts to '`3e deter.;ined b'_J Department of Water Resources, .Departmer._ c-
- :sh and Came, and _he Lessee.
Bearings and distances used in the above' description are based on the
California Coordinate System, Zone II, 1927.
SAN 0
C.
t G
i •� ` ! JUL 2 4 MO
<Sg".moi
OF Ckty
EXHIBIT C
All that real property situated in Section 25, 26, 35 & 36, Township 19
North, Range. 3 East, M.D.M., Butte County, California and being more
particularly described as follows:
BEGINNING at a point on the West line of said Section 35 from which the
southwest corner bears South 000 04' 00" East 150.00 feet;. thence Nor --h 000
04' 00" West 2132.91 feet; thence North 510 43' 00" East 2270.03 feet; =hence
North 680 10' 00" East 833.07 feet; thence South 880 08' 00" West 199.56
feet; thence North 62° 43' 20" East 783.18 feet; thence North 500 51, 45"
East 1779.19 feet; thence North 840 15' 05" East 1048.27 feet; thence South
200 09' 1.9" West 1990 feet more or less to the North right of way of Pacific
Heights Road; thence Southwesterly along said right of way% 4800 feet more Cr
less to a point from which the Point of Beginning bears South 890 151 02"
West; thence South 890 16' 02" West 2288 feet more or less to the Point of
Beginning.
Containing 280.acres more or less.
"0
fit
-Use=
It
to Mfr4.
P"d
AN
I- - - )
N , "
J4 If
off
1, 1 1A
A
Ail "I,
Ile.
W) t*
A
AE,CZ
9 c
� /W
P4
J i✓of �` •% ,v —�
1Y1-5 77
r'~(IL
I
IV
17
42
�.:=..�u•^8• (..,'."7/1, `,•,•1 S7 ,((l4Y '// Q �'?� P j - N \ ��fr
� OE . '�... , �;� per, 'o ,�� � � '^ .... ,\--- Z".--'' `-!�_�
V)
v
J, 1 ' i °.c, _�� �'�' "��_-�,:r4f t: r . r'%JJ r
.AS
C7
Tp I.
'Jill.
r?
r Of, -
G Li
t
U I
44
741
141*11
4V Al
IV
�0 N
N -mvZlrt
d I \---IVdIZ)lNn
j 0 'T fAO80
'N
1.0
r
0 r
i(A iij
Ll'irr
;7, r
'("Mil �uuv)q,t)
0 .6E
011 XE ZE I I
A�3 Aans 'miomoiD
801631N1 �Hi JO IWEV416Vd�G
s 9 1 19 Cl i I N I
ys
41
- : -:;; V
u eCount
L A N D O F N AT U RA L W EA L T H A N D B E A U T Y
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE. CALIFORNIA 95965-3397
TELEPHONE: (916) 538-7601
September 18, 1990
Robinson & Sons, a Partnership
P.O. Box 1620
Oroville, CA 95965
RE: General Plan Amendment File # 91-03A, Rezone File #91-03B;
Development Agreement #91-03C, Mining Permit/Reclamation Plan,
and Use Permit on AP# 025-230-033, 034
Gentlemen:
This is to notify you that we have received your application for General Plan
Amendment to Orchard & Field Crops and Industrial, Rezone to M-2 (Heavy Industrial)
and "U" (Unclassified) from "U" (Unclassified) to M-2 (Heavy Industrial), Development
Agreement, Mining Permit/Reclamation Plan and Use Permit to allow open pit rock
mining, located on both sides of an unnamed access road, west of Hwy. 70,
approximately 4500'; whose intersection with Hwy. 70 is located approximately 3500'
north of Power House Hill Road, identified as AP# 025-230-033, 034, Oroville.
An initial study of potential environmental consequences anticipated in connection with
this project is being completed by the Butte County Planning Department and will be
forwarded to you.
Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please feel free to contact this
office.
Sincerely,
B.A. Kircher
Director of Planning
Craig Sanders
Assistant Planner,
BAK:CBS:jlo
cc: Barnhart -Brown & Associates
Al
r
D = S TR2 BU'T ION LIST FOR COMMENT S
County Public Works
County Environmental Health
City of Biggs
City of Chico
City of Gridley
City of Oroville
Town of Paradise
Planning Department
State Transportation Department
DOMESTIC WATER
Butte Water District
California Water Service Co.
Del Oro Water Co.
OWID
Thermalito Irrigation District
Other
UT T L 2 TT E S
PG&E North (Chico)
PG&E South (Marysville)
Pacific Bell
State TV Cable
Viacom TV Cable
FTRE PROTECTION
E1 Medio Fire Protection Dist.
—7 County Fire Department/CDF.
MISQU1=0 ARAMIET-F'NT DTSTRTCT
Durham, Oroville or Butte County
P L m CE PROTECTION
State Highway Patrol
County Sheriff
SCHOOL D I STRT CT
RE CREAT T ON FAC IL I T TES
Chico Area Recreation District
Durham Area Rec. & Park Dist.
Feather River Rec. & Park Dist.
Paradise Rec. & Park Dist.
Richvale Rec. & Park Dist.
State Parks & Rec. Dept.
RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
State Water Resources Department
U.S. Forest Service
U.S. Bureau of Land Management
Butte County Mining Committee
_ State Department of Fish & Gsme
California Native Plant Society
State Div. Forestry - attention
Craig Carter
Regional Water Qual. Control Bd.
State Reclamation Board
SEWERS
Richvale Sanitary District
North Burbank Pub. Util. Dist.
Skansen Sub. (CSA #21)
Stirling City Sewer Maint. Dist.
Thermalito Irrigation Distri=t
(CSA #26)
I RRT GAT 2 ON WATER
Biggs-W.Gridley Water District
_Butte Water District
Durham Irrigation District
OWID
Paradise Irrigation District
Richvale Irrigation District
Table Mountain Irrigation Dist.
Thermalito Irrigation District
DRAT NAGE D I SIRS CT
RE C T = ON DISTRICT
�33
COMMT TTEE S 1 COMMI S S T ON S
Paradise Pines Architectural
Control Committee
Butte County Farm Bureau
Community Association:
BWCOUNTY PLANNING COMMISSI�,
7 County Center Drive
Oroville, CA 95965-3397
(916) 538-7601
TO • DATE: September 17, 1990
l� e� RE: PROJECT REVIEW &
ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION
Robinson &Sons, a MEPartnership
DEVELOPMENT AGREENT (:File #91-03:,)
Enclosed is preliminary data our office has rec'sivedor generated
concerning the following project: Robinson & Sons, a Partnership - DEVELOPMENT
AGREEMENT - on property zoned "U" (Unclassified) and M-2 (Heavy Industrial), located
on both sides of an unnamed access road, west of Hwy. 70, approx. 4500'; whose -
intersection with Hwy. 70, is located approx. 3500' north of Power House Hill Rd.,
identified as APIA 025-230-0339 034, Oroville.
We are making an assessment of possible environmental impacts and will
be preparing an environmental document, either a Negative Declaration,
Negative Declaration with Mitigation Measures or an Environmental
Impact Report (EIR).
Please provide any factual statements, ideas for investigation, or
opinions you can offer in your area of concern or expertise.that relate
to either physical, social, or economic impacts that this project may
generate.
Please respond within 14 days of the above -noted date. If no rc-sponse
is generated by this inquiry, then it shall be assumed that there are
no significant environmental impacts which are potential from the
project.
We appreciate any assistance you can provide. �tih
ea
e_0\�
Sincerely, C�l���m 1990
1}�+}e Co. Piennin9 �� CO
r?��tQE�\J
0
�po'
Juu y. A A. amer �roville� ca i{onia .
Planning Technician
Comments: _ Ale C
70
Does your agency wish to receive.a copy of the environmental document
zod-
(initial study for Negative Declaration. Ewith or without Mitigation.
Measures) or EIR for this project) .
YES NO
B10 COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSI
. 7 County Center Drive
Oroville, CA 95965-3397
(916) ,538-7601
TO - I wo 11, G Wo V 5 DATE: September 17, 1990
RE: PROJECT REVIEW &
ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION
Robinson _& Sons, a Partnership
'DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT'(�File # 91-03C)
Enclosed is preliminary data our office has received -or -gene -rated
concerning the following project • Robinson & Sons, a Partnership - DEVELOPMENT
AGREEMENT - on property zoned "U" (Unclassified) and M-2 (Heavy Industrial), located
on both sides of an unnamed access toad, west of Hwy. 70, approx. 4500'; whose
intersection with Hwy. 70, is located approx. 3500' north of Power House Hill Rd.,.
identified as AP# 025-230-033, 034, Oroville.
We are making an assessment of possible environmental impacts and will
be preparing an environmental document, either a Negative Declaration,
Negative Declaration with Mitigation Measures or an Environmental
Impact Report (EIR).
Please provide any factual statements, ideas for investigation, or
opinions you can offer in your area of concern or expertise that relate
to either physical, social, or economic impacts that this project may
generate.
Please respond within 14 days of the above -noted date. If .no response
is generated by this inquiry, then it shall be assumed that there are '
no significant environmental impacts which are potential from the
project.
We appreciate any assistance you can provide.
Sincerely,
Ju y A. amer. f '
Planning Techniciai?,, % V '
Comments: /r/�;, =1�rin�wno.Jr-
Does .your agency wish to receive a copy of the environmental document
(initial study for Negative Declaration- Ewith or.without Mitigation
Measures) or EIR for this project).
ES NO
t
A .
COUNiY OF BUTTE
SEP 18 1990
Land Development'Sec.
A
'l
BW COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSI
J,
7 County Center Drive
Oroville, CA 95965-3397
(916) 538-7601
T0: `� DATE: September 17, 1990
RE: PROJECT REVIEW &
ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION
Rob_inso_onn.& -Sons_,—a,Partnership
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (File # 91-03C)
Enclosed is preliminary data our office his ser eived or generated
concerning the following project: Robinson & Sons, a Partnership - DEVELOPMErT
AGREEMENT - on property zoned "U" (Unclassified) and M-2 (Heavy Industrial), locates
on both sides of an unnamed access road, west of Hwy. 70, approx. 4500'; whose
intersection with Hwy. 70, is located approx. 3500' north of Power House Hill Rd.,
identified as API 025-230-033, 034, Oroville.
We are making an assessment of possible environmental impacts and will
be preparing an environmental document, either.a Negative Declaration,
Negative Declaration with.Mitigation Measures or an Environmental
Impact Report (EIR).
Please provide any factual statements,. ideas for investigation, or
opinions you can offer in your area of concern or expertise that relate_
to either physical, 'social, or economic impacts that this project.may -
• generate.
Please respond within 14 days of the above -noted date. If no response.
is generated by this inquiry, then it shall be assumed that there are
no significant environmental impacts which are potential from the
project.
We appreciate any assistance you can provide.
Sincerely,
Ju y A. amer
Planning Technician
Comments:
Does your. agency wish to receive a copy of the environmental document
(initial study for Negative DeclarationEwith.or without Mitigation
Measures) or EIR for this project) .
ES NO
BU4COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSI
7 County Center Drive
Oroville, CA 95965-3391
(916) 538-7601
TO: September. 17, 1990
Cr
RE: PROJECT REVIEW &
; ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION
N"'^ J Robinson & Sons, a Partnership
`DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT -(File # 91-03C)
Enclosed is preliminary data our office has received`or-generated
concerning the following project: Robinson & Sons, a Partnership - DEVELOPMENT
AGREEMENT - on property zoned "U" (Unclassified) and M-2 (Heavy Industrial), located
on both sides of an unnamed access road, west of Hwy. 70, approx. 4500'; whose
intersection with Hwy. 70, is located approx. 3500' north of Power House Hill Rd.,
identified as AP# 025-230-033, 034, Oroville.
We are making an assessment of possible environmental impacts and will
be preparing an environmental document, either a Negative Declaration,
Negative Declaration with Mitigation. Measures or an Environmental
Impact Report (EIR).
Please provide any factual statements, ideas for investigation, or
opinions you can offer in your area of concern or expertise that relate
to either physical, social, or economic impacts that this project may.
generate.
Please respond within 14 days of the above -noted date. If no response,
is generated by this inquiry, then it shall be assumed that there are
no significant environmental impacts which are potential from the
project.
We appreciate any assistance you can provide.
DYftC0-P1annTngCWTMi
Sincerely, OCT 1990
l >
0ro461 Cdfomiai
Ju y A. K amer
.:
Does your agency wish to receive a copy of the environmental document
(initial study for Negative Declaration•Ewith or without Mitigation
Measures) or EIR for this project).
ES NO
t
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this 9th day of
January, 1990, between Robinson and Sons, A General Partnershiy.
(hereinafter referred to as "Property Owner"), and the COUNTY OF BUTTE,
a political subdivision, organized and existing under the laws of the
State of California, (hereinafter referred to as "County").
WHEREAS:
A. California Government Code §65865 provides thF-t
any County may enter into a development agreement with any person having
a legal or equitable interest in real property for.. the development of such
property. Every County may, by resolution or ordinance, establish
procedures and requirements for the consideration of development
agreements upon application by; or' on behalf of, the property owner cr
other person having a legal or equitable interest in the property.
B. County has adopted rules and regulations
establishing procedures and requirements for consideration of
development agreements, and Property Owner has requested County t:)
consider entering into a development agreement pursuant to County's rules
and regulations.
C.
The Butte
County Bonrd
of Surcrvisorshas
found that the development
agreement
is consistent with
the Butte County
General Plan; and
D. On January 9, 1990, the Board of Supervisors
of County adopted Ordinance No. approving the development agreement
with Property Owner and the ordinance thereafter took effect on
1990.
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows:
I. Definitions. In this Agreement, unless the context
otherwise requires:
A.
"County" is the County of Butte.
B.
"Project" is the development approved by the County.
C.
"Property Owner" means
the person having a legal
or
equitable interest in the
real : property as described
in
Paragraph 2 and includes
the Property Owner's successor
in interest.
D.
"Real Property" is the
real property referred to
in
Paragraph 2.
II.
Description of Real Property.
The real property which is
the
subject of this
Agreement is described in
Exhibit " "A" attached hereto
and
incorporated herein by this , reference and
also includes the off-site
haul
roads.
III. Interest of Property Owner. Property Owner represents that he
has a legal interest and/or equitable interest in the real property.
2
IV. Assignment. The rights of the Property Owner under this
Agreement may not be transferred or assigned unless the written consent
of the County is first obtained.
V. Binding Effect of Agreement. The burdens of this Agreement
bind and the benefits of this Agreement inure . to the successors in
interest to the parties to it.
VI. Relationship of Parties. It is understood that the contractual
relationship' between the County and Property Owner is such that the
Property Owner is an independent contractor and not the agent of the
County.
VII. County's Approval Proceedings for Project. On January 9, 1990,
the County approved a rezone for tho property. Said amendment and rezone
are contained in File 89-43A and B, on file in the office of the Planning
Department.
VIII. Changes in Project. No change, modification, revision or
alteration may be made 'in this development agreement without review and
approval by those agencies of the County approving this development
agreement in the first instance.. A change, modification, revision or
alteration in this development agreement is not effective until the
parties amend this Agreement to incorporate it.
IX. Establishing Use and Progress Reporting,
A. Progress Resorts until construction of Project is Complete.
3 1
Property Owner shall make reports of the progress in such
detail and at such time as the Planning Commission of the
County reasonably requests.
B. Establishment of Use.
For the purposes of compliance with this Agreement, the
County's ordinances, as well as the, related Use Permit,
Mining Permit and Reclamation Plan, the use shall be
deemed established, if : within one year of the date of
issuance of said Use Permit, property owner has:
(1) Obtained required State permits.
(2) Prior to Butte County signing the Use Permit and
f
Mining Permit, submitted the performance bond required in Section XV.
(3) Submitted a performance bond to be held until, the
site is completely reclaimed and applicant has applied for a General Plan
Amendment to Public and Rezone to Resource Conservation.
(4) Secured approved of a General -Plan Amendment to
Industrial, Rezone to M-2,' and Development Agreement prior, to validation
of the Mining Permit.
X. Effect of Transfer of Real Property to Another Jurisdiction.
If all or a portion of the real property which is the. subject of
the Agreement is annexed to or otherwise becomes a part of a City or
another County, this Agreement terminates.
4
XI. . Hold Harmless, Property Owner agrees to and shall hold the
County, its officers; agents, employees . and representatives harmless from
liability for damage or claims for damage for personal injury, including
death and claims for property damage which may arise form the direct or
indirect actions of the Property Owner or those of his contractor,
subcontractor, agent, employee or other person acting on his behalf which
relate to the Project. Property Owner agrees to and shall defend the
County and its officers, agents, employees and representatives from
actions for damages caused or alleged to have been caused by reason of
Property Owner's actions which relate to the Project.
This hold harmless agreement applies to all. damages and claims
for damages suffered or alleged to have been suffered by reason of the
actions referred to in this Section XI, regardless of whether or not the
county prepared, supplied, or approved plans or specifications or bot'n
for the Project and regardless of whether or not the insurance policies
referred to in Paragraph 12 are applicable.
Property Owner further agrees to indemnify, hold harmless, pay
all costs and provide a defense for County in any. action challenging th-_
validity of the development agreement.
XII. Insurance,
Before beginning work on the Project, Property Owner sha'1
obtain the insurance required under this paragraph and receive the
approval of the Butte County Counsel as to' form, amount and carrie-.
5
Property 'Owner shall maintain the insurance at all times during the term
of this Agreement. The insurance shall extend to the County, its elective
and appointive boards, commissions, officers, agents, employees and
representatives and to the Property Owner.
A. Worker's Compensation Insurance.
Property Owner shall require Worker's Compensation ° insurance
for all persons employed at the site of the Project. Property ' Owner shall
require each contractor and subcontractor similarly to provide Worker',..
Compensation insurance for their respective employees. Property Owner
agrees to indemnify the County for damage resulting from his failure to
take out and maintain such insurance.
B. Public liability and property damage insurance.
Property Owner shall maintain public liability . insurance in an
amount not less than $1,000,000.00 for injuries (including death) to any
one person and, subject to the same limit for each person, in an amount not
less than $3,000,000.00 on account of any one occurrence; and property
damage insurance in the amount of not less than $500,000.00 for damage to
the property of each person on account of any one occurrence.
C. Evidence of Insurance.
Property Owner shall furnish County before beginning work on
the Project satisfactory evidence of the insurance required and evidence
that the carrier is required to give the County at least 30 days prior
written notice of the cancellation or reduction in coverage of a policy.
6
XIII. Specific Restriction on Development of Real Property.
In addition to zoning classification, the following specific
restrictions shall also govern the use of the property:
A. Permitted uses are as follows
(1) Mining, removal and storage of aggregate.
(2) Accessory uses necessary to support mining ani
removal activities such as equipment storage,
welding and scales.
B. Site requirements. are those listed in Sections 24-33 and
24-117 of the Butte County Zoning Code as in existence on the date of this
Development Agreement.
C. Prior to -commencement of mining operations, obtain permits
from the following agencies and meet their requirements or submit proof
the agency has waived the permit 'requirements:
1. Butte County Mosquito Abatement District...
2. Butte County Environmental Health:
3. State Reclamation Board.
4. Butte County Air Pollution Control District.
5. Butte County Department of Public Works.
6. Butte County Fire Department.
D. Pond wall slopes to be engineered to - ensure slope stability
depending on the material comprising the pond wall, but in no case shall
slopes be greater than 2:1.
VA
E.
Y.
rainfall.
Engineer ponds to carry the design capacity plus 100-
161
a
c
F. No flocculants permitted.
G. Revegetate site with riparian species under
the direction
of The Department of Fish and Game. Various riparian tree
species to be
planted on 25 -foot centers. Revegetation program to he inspected yearly
for at least an 80% survival rate. The plantings for the
following year
are to be adjusted either up to cover non -survivors or down if native
species naturally revegetate.
H. Layout of the ponds to be in accordance -with
the site plan
contained within the Mining' Permit (shows a 100 -foot wide
buffer area i.
In addition, rock, trees, and other vegetation within 50
feet of the
easterly toe of the tailings are to be retained or the extra
50 foot area
will be used for pond dike area and replanted.
I. All' equipment to be equipped with mufflers or
other devices
to minimize noise.
J. All trees and vegetation taken out are to ' be removed from
the project area.
K. The shoreline of the large ponds to be constructed and
maintained in such a way as to prevent any shallow vegetated areas that
would allow mosquito breeding, etc. (see initial study)
8
L ' Hours of operation including maintenance of equipment and
haul road operations from 5:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m., Monday through Saturday:.,
and may be extended if a local emergency is declared by the Board of
Supervisors.
M. No blasting will be allowed.
N. Applicant must also comply with all other applicable State
and local statutes, ordinances; and regulations.
XV. Public Improvements Facilities and Services.
Property Owner agrees to provide the following public
improvements, facilities and services:
A. Prior to Butte County signing the Use Permit and Mining
Permit, applicant to submit 'a $25,000.00 performance bond to guarantee
the conditions of the Mining Permit and Reclamation Plan through the life
of the project. The performance bond shall be reviewed bi-annually and
may be increased or decreased in accordance with the Engineering Nears
Record Construction Cost Index (ENRCCI).
B. Performance Bond to be held until the site is completely
reclaimed and applicant has applied for a General Plan Amendment to Public
and Rezone to Resource Conservation.
C. Access road to be subgraded with appropriate aggregate base
in accordance with the Department of Public Works specifications.
XVI. Effect of Agreement on Land Use Reailations:
9
The rules, regulations, and official policies governing
permitted uses of the property, the density of the use of the real
property, the design, improvements and construction standards and
specifications applicable to development the real property are those
rules, . regulations and 'official policies in force at the time of the
execution of this Agreement.
This Agreement , does not prevent the County in subsequent actions
applicable to the, real property from applying new rules, regulations and
policies which do not conflict with those rules, regulations and policies
applicable to property in effect on the date of the adoption of this
development agreement. This Agreement does not prevent the. County from
denying or conditionally approving any subsequent development project
application on the basis of existing rules, regulations and policies.
XVII. Periodic Review of Compliance with Agreement.,
A. The County shall review this Agreement at least once every
twelve-month period from the, date this Agreement is executed.
B. During each periodic review by the County, the Property
Owner is required to demonstrate good faith compliance with the terms of
the Agreement. The Property Owner agrees to furnish such evidence of good
faith compliance as the County in the exercise of its discretion may
require.
C. During the periodic review at the end of the forty-ninth
year, the parties shall consider an extension of the term of this
10
Development Agreement.
XVIII. Amendment or Cancellation of Agreement.
This Agreement may be amended or cancelled in whole or in part
only by mutual consent of the parties and in the manner provided for ir.
Government Code Sections 65867, 65867.5, 65868, and 65869.5 -as amended
from time to time.
XIX. -Enforcement. "
Unless amended or cancelled as provided in Paragraph XVIII,
this• Agreement is enforceable by any party. to 'it regardless of any change
in the applicable general or specific ' plan, zoning, subdivision o --
building
-building regulations adopted by the County which alter or amend the rules,
regulations or policies governing permitted - uses of the land, density„
design, improvement and construction standards and specifications.
XX. Events of Default.
Property Owner is in default under this Agreement upon th
happening of one or more of the following events or conditions: ,
A. If a material warranty, representation or statement made
or furnished by Property Owner- to the County in connection with the
Project is false or proves to have been false in any material when it was
made.
B. A finding and determination 'by. the County made following :a
periodic review under the procedure provided for, in government Code
Section 65865.1 that upon the basis of substantial evidence the Property
Owner has not complied in good faith with one or more of the terms or
conditions of this Agreement.
XXI. Procedure upon Default.
A. Upon the occurrence of an event of default, the County may
terminate or amend this Agreement in accordance with the procedure.
adopted by the County.
B. County does not waive. by implication any claim or defeat
in performance by Property Owner if, on periodic review, the County does
not propose to modify or terminate the Agreement.
C. Non-performance shall not . be excused because of a failure
of a third person.
D. That adoption of a law or other government activity makin;
performance by the applicant unprofitable or more difficult or mor, --
expensive does not excuse the performance of the obligation by th!
Property Owner.
E. Non-performance shall be excused only when it is prevente l
or delayed 'by acts of God or an emergency declared by the President or
Governor.
XXII. Damages upon Termination.
In no event shall Property Owner be entitled to any damages
against County upon termination of this Agreement.
XXIII. Attorneys Fees and Costs.
12
If
legal
action by
either party
is
brought because
of
breach of
this Agreement
or
to enforce
'a provision
of
this Agreement,
the
prevailing
party is entitled to reasonable attorneys fees and court costs.
XXIV. Forum.
In the event of any legal proceedings of any nature, all
parties agree the only forum with jurisdiction is the Butte County
Superior Court, located in Oroville, California.
XXV. Notices.
All notices required or provided for under this Agreement shall
be in writing and delivered in person or sent by certified mail, postage
prepaid. Notices required to be given to County shall be addressed as
follows:
County Administrative Office
25 County Center Drive
Oroville, California 95965'
Notices required to be given to Property Owner shall be addressed as
follows:
Dennis Robinson
% Robinson Construction Co., Inc.
4714 Pacific Heights Road
Oroville, CA 95965
A party may change the address by giving notice in writing to the
other party and thereafter notices shall be addressed and transmitted to
the new address.
XXVI. Rules of Construction and Miscellaneous Terms.
A. The singular includes the plural; the masculine gender includes the
13
t
feminine; "shall" is mandatory, "may" is permissive.
B. If a part of this Agreement is held to be invalid, the remainder of the
Agreement is .not affected.
C. If there is more than one signer of this Agreement their obligations are
joint and several.
D. The time limits set forth in this Agreement may be extended by mutual
consent of the parties in accordance with the procedures for adoption of an agreement.
XXVII. Duration of Agreement.
This Agreement shall expire fifty (50) years from the date of its adoption.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement has been executed by the parties on the
day and year first above written.
/ROBINSON & SONS
A General Partnership
By: DENNIS ROBINSON, a
General Partner
Approved as to form by `
County Counsel
By:
C22
COUNTY OF BUTTE
By:
ED MCLAUGHLIN, CHAIRMAN
Butte County Board of Supervisors
14
r ATTEST: WILLIAM H. RANDOLPH
Chief Administrative Officer and
Clerk of the Board
By .
January 9, 1990
NO'- SCE OF DETERM=NA'� -CON
0-3
ql' _
. RBft
To = Office of Planning and Re4_ra uorz tte Count
, Y
1400 Tenth Street, Room 12lanning Department
Sacramento; CA 95814 ?, O E C 4016
�GgQD County Center Drive
or Oroville, CA 95965
X County Clerk CANDACE J. GAUC., B;39Co. CIA
County of Butte By Deputy
SUB.TECT : Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance with Section 21108
or 21152 of the Public Resources Code.
Project Title AP # Name
General Plan Amendment,
Rezone, Development Agreement— 025-230-033, 034 Robinson & Sons
State Clearinghouse Number Contact Person Telephone Number
(if submitted to Clearinghouse)
B. A. Kircher,.Director.of Planning (916) 538-7601
Project Location W of State Highway 70, approx. 1 mile south of Palermo Rd.
& approx.. 3000 feet east of the Feather River -and 2000 feet north of the
wildlife area'access road from Highway 70 south of Oroville.
Project Description General Plan Amendment to Orchard and Field Crops for 13
acres & Industrial for .15 acres, Rezone 1.3 acres to "U" and 15 acres to
M-2 and Development Agreement
This is to advise that the
Butte County Board of Supervisors
(Lead Agency or Responsible Agency)
has approved the above-described project on December 18, 1990 and has made
(Date)
the following determinations regarding the above-described project:
I. The project will, X will not, have a significant effect on the
environment.
2. An Environmental Impact'Report was prepared for this project
pursuant to.the provisions of CEQA.
X A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the
provisions of CEQA.
3. Mitigation measures X were, were not, made a condition of the
approval of the project. To adopt the Development Agreement.
4. A statement of overriding considerations was, X was not, adopted
for this project.
This is to certify that the final EIRhwith comments and responses and record of
project approval is available to"the-general public at:
Butte County.Planning Department
7 County -Center Drive '1— .
Oroville, CA 95965,
Date Received for Filing and - ,
Posting at OPR 12/19/90
;�•� X /_
gnature
B. A. Kircher
Director of Planning
Title
NEGATIVh ,DECLARATION REGARDING ENVi—iNMENTAL IMPACT 9/ C
1. NOTICE IS HEREBY -GIVEN that the proj-ect described below has been
reviewed pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental
Quality Act of 1970 (Public Resources Code 21100, et. seq.) and a
determination has been made that it will not have a significant
effect upon the environment. AP 025-230-033 & 034
Log #90-09-17-01
File 91-03A, B, & C
2. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: General Plan Amendment to ORchard & Field
Crops for 13 acres & Industrial for 15 acres, Rezone 13 acres to "U"
and 15 acres to M-2 and Development Agreement
3. -LOCATION.OF PROJECT:W of State Highway 70, approx. 1 mile south of
Palermo Road, approx. 3000 ft. E of the Feather River and 2000 ft. -
N of the wildlife area access road from Highway 70, south of Oroville
4. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PROJECT APPLICANT:
Robinson & Sons Barnhart & Brown
P.O. Box 1620 P.O. Box 1576
Oroville, CA 95965 Oroville, CA 95965
S. MITIGATION MEASURES:. Adopt a Development Agreement
6. A copy of the initial study regarding the environmental effect
of this project,is on file at 7 County Center Drive, Oroville:
.This study was:
® Adopted as presented.
Adopted with changes. Specific modifications and
❑ supporting reasons are attached.
7:-.A public hearing on this Negative Declaration was held by the
decision making body.
Hearing Body Butte County Board of Supervisors
Date of Determination. December 18, 1990
Determination:
On the basis of the initial study of environmental impact, the
information presented at hearings, comments received on -the.'
proposal and our own knowledge and independent research:
• We find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant
effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION.is
hereby adopted.
We find that the project COULD have a significant effect
on the environment but will not in this case -because of
1.0 attached mitigation measures described in item 5 above
which are by this reference made conditions of project
approval, A conditional NEGATIVE DECLARATION is hereby
adopted.
_ Signature
Ed McLaughlin, Chairman
Butte County Board of Supervisors
Title
December 19, 1990
NC_- 21ECE OF - DETERM=N; -_ SON
TO: Office of Planning and Research FROM: Bu Caunty
1400 .Tenth Street, Room 121 P1 r�i�i VD
Sacramento, CA 95814 7 0
or
° . e 959
.�ptV 15 1�91 El
X County Clerk
County of Butte _ ;ANDACE J. i�U866, butte Co. Clerk
ay G. EMERO Deputy
su]3.JE:= : Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance with Section 21108
or 21152 of the Public Resources Code.
Project Title AP 1i Name
Use Permit/Mining
Permit/Reclamation Plan 025-230-033 & 034 -Robinson & Sons
State Clearinghouse Number Contact Person Telephone Number
(if submitted to Clearinghouse)
B. A. Kircher, Director of Planning (916) 538-7601
Project Location W of State Hwy. 70, approx. 1 mile S of Palermo Road,
approx. 3000 ft. E of the Feather River and 2000 ft. N of the wildlife
area access road from Hwy. 70, S of Oroville.
Project Description _
Use Permit/Mining Permit/Reclamation Plan
This is to advise that the _Butte County Planning Commission
(Lead Agency or Responsible Agency)
has approved the above-described project on 1-10-91 and has made
(Date)
'the following determinations regarding the above-described project:
1. The project will,' X will not, have a significant effect on the
environment.
2. An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project
- - pursuant to the provisions of CEQA.
X A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the
provisions of CEQA.
3. Mitigation measures X were, were not, made a condition of the
approval of the project. Adopted Development Agreement
4. . A statement of overriding considerations was, X was .not, adopted
for this project. _
v This is to certify that the final EIR with comments and responses and record of
project approval is available to the general public at:
Butte County Planning Department
7 County Center Drive
" -Oroville, CA 95965
Date Received for Filing and
Posting at OPR 1-15-91 -
ign' uie
B. A. Kircher, Director
of Planning
Title
Revised March 1986
L: 025 020 027 000
STATUS:
ACTIVE
WILSON RODNEY L & STARLENE
S JT
63 WELSH ROAD
•
OROVILLE CA
95965
L: 025 020 026 000
STATUS:
ACTIVE
WILSON WILLIAM H
259 ESTATES DR
CHICO CA
95928
L: 025 310 012 000
STATUS:
ACTIVE
BOWLES JAY D'& MILDRED
D
5115 PACIFIC HEIGHTS RD
OROVILLE CA
95965
L: 025 310 013 000
STATUS:
ACTIVE
BUSK RODNEY TRUST
BUSK RODNEY TRUSTEE
P 0 BOX 2465
CASTRO VALLEY CA
04546
L: 025 310 014 000
STATUS:
ACTIVE
SCOTT EUGENE G SS
.1338
HOLLY STREET #7
SAN CARLOS CA
94070
L: 025 030 061 000 STATUS:
ACTIVE
HEMSTALK BOB & LILLIAN JT/
2900 FOOTHILL BLVD
L: 025 230 033 000
STATUS:
ACTIVE*
OROVILLE CA 95965
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
DWR
00000
i .
L: 025 030 057 000 STATUS:
ACTIVE
j
i
Iw
EVERETT JAMES M
4950 BIG BEND RD
L: 025 230 034 000
STATUS:
ACTIVE
S
OROVILLE CA
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
DWR
�;
95966
•
00000
L: 025 030 062 000 STATUS:
ACTIVE
I
®.
EVERETT JERRY E & SUSAN R
642 SAN JUAN ST
L: 025 230 032 000
STATUS:
ACTIVE
MANTECA CA
KOEHLER JUDITH P
95336.
!�
1625 STANFORD
•
MENLO PARK CA
94025
•
�025 030 060 0013 STATUS:
ACTIVE
,i
DEPT OF VETERANS_AFFAIRS
HEMSTALK BRAD L & JUDY JT 273034483
'
L: 025 230 010 000
STATUS:
ACTIVE
49 A
KOEHLER JUDITH P
�
�
IILLECA 95965
OROVILLE
GOLDEN OAKS MHP
1625 STANFORD AVE
L: 025 030 063 000 STATUS:
ACTIVE
MENLO PARK CA
94025
BLAKE DONALD J & JOLENE
270 OAKVALE AVE
L: 025 230 053 000
STATUS:
ACTIVE
OROVILLE CA
WHITELEY FERN E TR ETAL
95966
STAR RT
CLIPPER MILLS CA
95930
•
L: 025 030 064 000 STATUS:
ACTIVE
,.
SCHMELTZ SAMUEL W & MICHELLE.D
40 BOB WAY;
L: 025 230 006 000
STATUS:
ACTIVE
LE CA
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
•
95966
95966
00000
L: 025 030 059 000 STATUS:
ACTIVE
i
•
HEMSTALK CLAY W & CHERYL JT
BOB WAY
29 9 BOB
E'
L: 025 230 004 000
STATUS:
ACTIVE
LE CA 95965
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
DWR
�
.
00000*
L-: 025 020 033 000 STATUS:
ACTIVE
:
BESHEARS'RAYMOND & PEARL JT
85 GOLD RUN COURT
X
L: 025 230 003 000
STATUS:
ACTIVE
40
OROVILLE CA 95965
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
DWR
00000
•
L: 025 020 034 000. STATUS:
ACTIVE
�.
TOURVILLE LOUIS R & BETH F JT
•
75 GOLD RUN COURT
L: 025 240 095 000
STATUS:
ACTIVE
OROVILLE CA 95965
5•�
BILES MELVIN JR & BEVERLY
JEAN
•
ROUTE 9 BOX 2231
•
OROVILLE CA
95965
L: 025 020 041 000 STATUS:
ACT -VE
SHARLOW BRUCE & MAUREEN JT
}/
16118 MAUBERT AVE
0
L: 025 24 097 000
STATUS:
ACTIVE
SAN LEANDRO CA 94578
0
BILES MELVIN JR & BEVERLY
JEAN
,
ROUTE 9 BOX 22314'
OROVILLE CA
95965
L: 025 020 042 0450 STATUS:
ACTIVE
•
&
MITCHELL WAYNE JR DORIS S JT
S1
7095 HEWITT
e
L: 025 240 075 000
STATUS:
ACTIVE
PALERMO CA 95968
40
INTER PACIFIC PROPERTIES
INC
i�
4-17 TAMAI--2 TOYONAKA
!
OSAKA JAPAN
00000
•
L: 025 020 043 000 STATUS:
ACTIVE
VILLALPANDO ALONSO DURAN/
90 GOLD RUN CT
OROVILLE CA
95965
• r
3s -z5 T. 18NR-3E. M.D.a Ek M. _. 25-23
Tax Area Code
_OT 1 LOT 4 LOT 3 LOT 2 1 LOT 1 LOT LOT 31 I LOT' j LOT 1 LO 4 1 LOT LOT2 LOT 1
----------------------------'---- — — L--- ---- — ---�-- cr
120O1
--- - ----- --1---- - --- - -- ---
LOT 2 '
.95AC. .
626.04AC. W ,
LOT 3 24 I
600 •\ I
,Z. v I
1 BAC - •-
--------i-----••-
_OT 4 v
,• U_ 1
LOT I
1 vi 1. I ( 1. 71 I 1
2314 1 5161 18/0il/1/ —
I . 1 1 S'UQ/7o.*aaAC. R ' 02 6.4 AC. �a
1
z
fAj,4Rv6RSA
--� 400l
\\ • LOT 2 1 6� 1 UNION09 i SCNOOL 5.97 35W2663,64 S85•37W1330
1 N
LOT 3 m ,� �3 1 02 3
I .
10.07ac rn
-n g 5.0 AC .155.07A
%� IF8f.C3 m R,rn9.C54c
, . N 036E I 2650
1 334.7 IF
SEE Nb RG. l321.r J a
r' ^=600' �. 1 ; ` BOB WAY _ 03 _ � ROVER NE 0 = o g 0 2
LOT 4 1 i I 0
k 7 2 -
Ac 1 -3 ��� (a.' 3901 v 1 58 40AC.
J "J i 78.51 fIC. 0 .3Z 3 3�9e6,2.5
4c Z �� f O7y79a� K NE 1 PAGE N99 36E 0 J
+ SC.
6_3. -- _- i---- 1 9Ac V ENLARGEM14T. 654b 38AC
3 I �](2 R131430 (�� �43333�l311;�%� L— I c� 5 — c A11 /OAc l 4 �lg 727.06 2�.19Ac
4C F) u� lot !t 3.-- T n ?
�Lo9IC 2.09AC 2.09AC 1 ( +34) or, ,n / ` O C °c°/ 7 .P 62-92, 165 /ea_ 2 51c S« W
1 S • s
/0 Ac [� (Q N !?.BB3Ac 3 ? 1
TRA N. TO PG. 3 LOT 5 1 161.33AU. /0 - - _
I 95Ae .fie S�0! 7 ! gyp- O — NP 1
BAc 11 NJ AN7E•14 (904-54
1 • 266/9.9/Ac �'7 I 2660.42.
I
0 1
2442 1
zz 3 r g -- G 2 —•- p
CO OFBUTTEa �� • 3i RM 73-l34 6.25AC^ AC J
v% 4 6.25AC
6_ y �" As e'ssor's Mop No. 25- 23
/ oa 4
"7.99 Ac. I
HILGERS SUB. NO. 2 M.O.R. BK. 10 PG. 21 i -7 .i -"` NOTE-ASS>as County of Butte, Calif
�� '{ .. s�. ��� & lOT 1 20 AC 7.32
R YA N S SUB. M.O. R . BK. 7 PG. 31 - MAR. , /,960
.•... Eg•2fAw26s"o —-•---.�
GEIlEf /00 ' SETf3AGK
/204Q
80 A` SECT/ON C - C
Ey ioo' sM�.4cr
r
.i
/20
%/'
W /
tb
1
8 �; OvErZA6 E DEPTf/
8O OF FFA7HE2 ?/VE2
• 3 580'
SECT/ON D - D
+1.
U
f
For: Prepared by
Robinson B ,Sons Barnhart Brown B Associates
Orovi/ /e, COMM*
dGOo4
\
OlI/95/A.144 6/240VA-10
/20
/
•
W
/
T/ZEEs PG4,t/TE/�
_
POS 10
a ' • 41JErI46E /JEPT.�/
�
QF FElJTHE/Z 2/VE/Z
500 '
80 A` SECT/ON C - C
Ey ioo' sM�.4cr
r
.i
/20
%/'
W /
tb
1
8 �; OvErZA6 E DEPTf/
8O OF FFA7HE2 ?/VE2
• 3 580'
SECT/ON D - D
+1.
U
f
For: Prepared by
Robinson B ,Sons Barnhart Brown B Associates
Orovi/ /e, COMM*
dGOo4
w
res Vias
Y"
`F'� IN
THERMALITO
o
r1 lane
IQNw
_
_
lit" OROVILLE` lit =•1.�
ldVAIE
e1 ; ih n AIRPORT tCHQS
,Ix�e
Gtr ReC•t��' 3 T�
{
.,:ORj V1t7tLFE
STAE�f1�
LL,n •
,
_
E. /"
•
Hemilbh�Ra�
•y
r t
Jj
mc
AREA I
'
.
.vs�
w
Welch_,.
e.
'�-mc„ r
71.• Wni»
plead
to RI.
tra.rtln•
r •)
• e
w
'j
r ,
sIG�S uee
tee
Enl
a
H'x n �N• tt'
{ •n. ve R irt. M IV Re
to +C
Rd.
e r
.,4.tM
ly Rel. • ML'A' .•.
73 Vv+ •^
• .. ..
�
'W n
{ A#,
ra«i Ave. Alm
» ae
Ave. � wsr
' ♦
t Ave. `` m
F-
e G'GAT / 47A/
5
t
yIre
ra
r 'f
—1 0 ---
Milk
1 u �z• iso —`?. \\ �t � , 1
51
//o
S4L/,L' ,G7/SGoGD
/00 1 Z5'0.e". W00114
-• P2ono 5�0
90 11,/iL-yp'
d0
70 N N
&o
SECTION. AI - A
/ N= ZD ' 1/E/2 T.
E1CI5T. Gd/o
I I
//O , PG.4i✓T '559a • I
• � ra4G/,e rJ/�SGOGo2
/00
I %• PClsS y h//LLOb✓� I '
EN7//tE ti1/rE
PrzOPOSED 'eawo
90� - 9�
BO
h N
70 a
N
�o
SECTION 8�-B
EX/ST/,t1G /IOA�,TY� I •:�� :::
• � � � ' �� _.� �\ fes..
Iv
o
• a� Ip°, i� / l
I� 1
N lw
EX H1017-
y TOPOGRAPHIC MAIP OF -
t _
POST OPERA 77101V CiONDIT/ONS
AT
FEATHER RIVER Do DOGE TAILINGS
For: Prepared by:
Robinson a Sons Barnhart Brown B Associates
Oroville, California
5CAGE . /"_ !Op'
' tIi Io°
_ F>
0
/59.371
f23.�2'
267.73'
/7G. 9G .
Cuffe CO•'IAnning
I�UG �.� i9;
Orovu* cl&fon
■
■
fv.Snw g Av: ARF,A x7
_u�3--i E,nt " W.I
S r�Y E : 71�.D.nit. j �. �. 1 rm. 'ice Pd
nal. mt nue
a E�8-
r NIR �n N. ry
I/�/1�C tree WY. re. R' E By tR, R..
V V 7 t'k.t.o tdrr�orth R� f." almte�� — «�t�'�n, �— =� r.
'ai i
lo.d °' Ne ti k�i . r7ke Ave. Alm.M 1 Wd nn .e \ \\
.�•`�� a �f,nrth Ave^ .e; 70 w2V
1�,�
Pat t
C'GLI /C�ic.� MAS ►°°'r��� ?•� �`�� f
G T '
e
Ao
it
Ile /90
I-f� f � / �i� • L/•) Q�� � n,�� �� �t�'.� =ii, a1� �.� �-!` —G39, 6f� I I � a^✓1 //I � ���
��• - t�, rL/V,.
it Qom. C / : r
�,_
%°. 6 �� r �. ,,ice 1 __ .tr� ;
JIle
( , n �• I,o �' v I
-e.
/out- I/
11 I I I I
Z,06,a7'1OA1 A10. 2ro El
lrDlgE2T5
MIN®