HomeMy WebLinkAbout91-12B RANCHO ESQUON PARTNERS GPA (14)l syy,�i i
a �
•,tia yr <
X'age . -2 to' "$-9
Cauti'A
an should be used- when using
current CO services cos to' antzclpated
revenues from the development. Current C;�unty cosi provide
max"i
g. Wally 'adequate or
! inadequate services to the Population,' New'prrjects
sho uld" be reviewed based upon
generation .of adequate revenues for
ad equate cervi c-es�
Page 1'X-6
f
The.;mt,gation af'urban runoff' impacts
I�
-should inc
back co Pa e, 8- lode ,ares nsibl
g_ Z� and the Iea Pv . e ,entity and refer
bol entity requirement.
Wage 16-2
Refer to comments Page 2 ti.101 A rtm tib
Qatiari of !i
not be written to adaus materials i mpac s should
M dge? trounty
pr'ogramsw ;.
"age i7:2
The Iower den"city alternative
may a1'so reriuire rbvis�
.. and des sal;
treatment P , ion: of.co
Area, :. mmunity wasie��ater`
Po i
systeins.
soils arc generally unsurtate far individual septic' tank.
TRlmlf
'
rr
1
'
i
i
iI li f
:,�:
,�: t � ,.
V
c 4 i I I'?
�
20,ZeResp,anse-
Payment of, Williamson Act v�ithdrawal,penalncs is required by exxstin
Istatf;
g statute8 and
Would occur regardless 'of any other'action;y the Board of Supervisors tri mitigate the"
4" !
i�mpacts,of the,,project: Inclusion aEtheselpaymPrits as a gation rneasure"t, "the imp ct
identified ttnder'Land Use,zssue 7 would note consistent the
with niettiod of analysis
utilized'ihroughout the EIR, `l;he issue thscU -kd "itt, the ,EiR is the inconsi°stency of '
ccellation of existing contacts with the critceria
CPset forth 'in the it atutrs or a1loWing"
contracting cancellation, As a
p ytnent of fees''would oidinanl be °re 'iir
y qt ed under any
`theeidentified
circumstances, this does nothing to elevate inconsistency,
? 06:2f Com' menE #13-Z2
f
The buffer zone should be to"entionesl as a. mitigation measure for the influence on
conversion on of ocher itgricultural lands. ;'it buffer can. be used. for nparia'n habitat, a nature
park and, trails. The recently created wetlands
establish a precedent for,°the coexistence of, agriculture and natural habitat:"
y
�.'
2X6.1f ' Response #13-22:"
Influence on conversion of other. •
agrir`ultural lands "is in reference to growth inducement.
The commenter is confusing this issue With the issue of agriculture vs urban. land use,
conflicts for which one mitigation ineasurt" suggested in: the" IR is a suffer zone to proS!ide
tranSipOn between conflicting land. uses. ',Che coexistence of agriculttnre and natural' habitat
is' not in . iisputeT nor 4M the created vreda.Ak ds precedent 'setting in thi's regard,
J
2.06,3a .Comment #07-1
p
".Public Water supply construction tand'ards are essenfiall State Standar
y ds for County Qr
State inspected systems. For less than COQ services the,Co, currently is' the permitting
agency and the State far over 200.serviees:"
2. C3a Response 711
Revise the last sentence underFroposM Mitigation M&0sure#1, Domestic Vdatererviee,
"page2-6.3 and 6-1.1 as follows:
Alt aspects of tf e s}�stem shou'd.be designedto conform with ffie applicable require»tents
of the State Stacdards for County ar State ifzspectecl systems, Butte Colu:ry' inipro�eme�iz
stat:dards, Butte �ouny Health Deparrmeiu regulttttpns; the Calf�rjtia-Safelrurki�i
g " 6�ater
Apt,,, and the Bune 'Cot' YT Fee Depak>rnent sta�rdurds.
, 06,3 'f ornment #67-3c y
"'Nater,
r ieters are currently req�aired',�b State law for new servic e ooruiecnons
IA6.7
3b . Re'sponse #0-3t
Replace 1 tinder, #5 2 6 with
on' page 3 thefallowing:
AcCordliig to Slate. lad, the c miritt� ity water, system,'Injist be` me#erect i�itl: ►voter, slervice ' {
charges basest r�ri voltune itseef.
`
,2.06.Sa �otnment #07�4%'
"Development that does not. significantly increas6 mosquito population will contiinue 'to `
allow sigritficarCt, mosquua hutnari conracts xo occur.niay not ne, xnitig* d' o as, ong as
Wetlands and rice land exist;p Iuisanee irtipacts anis a sigiifi�ait,increase in vecror;; '
conacts may oceur'r humai>, .
I
I I.
I
'
liar�c Esquon
-6 Final EIIt Section IY,Responses to Commenu,,
I ,
I