HomeMy WebLinkAbout91-12B RANCHO ESQUON PARTNERS GPA (4)Tl45, A, C 1 '7,7"F r . , u • off
CP Nt�COMMISO
RON
ST'Al�'1F' nNxI►il�' GS September
a�
response' ne: developers of the property would be entirely reslionsible,for, impro'vements,onc-
site and ofd sate' for cfe development of;th�s property. �to burdeaa on'the existing public v��ould`
iiur
accur ng .the deyeioprnent cif the site,. I�Co�wever there is still' some questzau vt!hether or ,,iot
the lonly tet'ni
.revenue„, wYll'pay for the needed, services for this property. 'Flus proposal wvuld
%r;corniniunity shopping needs providing for a basic:
I
J
ra►�ge of retail services desired
by the corn�rruni_ty, Vit; would also provide for' puf�lic and quasi-public uses ;near residential ft
couses.
N-CCL!Ipui N �Pt7LIC�ES
The, provision for` of grdabic -�uSirg..
il
l`tespon;e .- This proposal wCO d Inose likely not pird4tide affordablehousing
an comparison to
the ne4-ds of .they Butt& Coun r resident..
Goal IV' pull - Deyelo : a "ro`` am of owth h
:. cy P P bn' p asina, where in only those lands which are .
adjacent tcj existing. urban densities and facilities and
public servic(rs,, available will be ;able to
develop at; urban densities Ll and standards:
'
Responser - d, :
�i cu ban d
that oal and polcyr, onflict:
with, g ensI, es or services currently exist' in the area. s represents a c
Gva�l VI T?iscu:;s�spzatectin agrcuYtural lands which curentljr` rvcluce or have the
p potential:
to produce, from encroaching urban uses: ,
response - `development would rencroach; into ar ct turall oducuve ;laizd and that
could. Ieacl to in Y 'p
.conversion and urban uses cou101e ad to .additional iequests to canvert adjacent .
agiricultural lands; to urban uses.
Goal `VITT -,Discusses concentrating' future residentzal uses within, Witthe existing, developed
camilunirie.
Response` -''his project would not accomplish that goal,
'alicy 13 tender Goal %III requires tihat all Generar� Flan Ainendrients which allow" densities of
less than aae acre dwelling'uhit be incr�'iporated
per shall :Rnto ;urbunn. boundaries
,
responseirrently no wiian boun lanes have: been.formall e5fabhslied uY the planning area;
but it'°is unlikely this �..:
'
That area would be.cransidered ut the establishment of sUch boundary for
any of the, coinixiunities
,
f.
YI
a
1,
If,
-
� l 14"
k i
`4