Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout92-27 JEFF & SHIRLEY FARRAR REZ (6).: �V S 51 J Yr r s!C it i4 1,'}o iat.alJ' resiraate I ii5.iu1. fclit" $� Jt"fl`#"k",w5`i" 'y yyK �y _p Lji ,i; M, L7.44 4 Y ci. 'ii 4f, ,.' �.+,� 4: ` 'L" JJ � l�: ✓iv.G si,ii J, G.r't CS .1 V� ' , li bit joins mme {d,, tots 41 WAS Y] yAd"�X �7 erop'oravy P1 as it! a no } to id a.ee4efta,� lass, � ,y�Y �C31T�xy�)y'��-YPy�TI� �,q�'i lit ren'�'e 'i..r 4'i"' k�'�f:.�4�i X'Z�� 9 c�,P�-'OOV6 tp J./�`l$'�j .tii����. sx. ''LOIS �� 600trtKO by., Dim OouptrO tiUi1 Cfi,v1t;IG' bit lafii ' T omec�rvrer'`s Association"Will bO', zts.iri fhb�i. ratdezee Within aeveEorn;rlE in PWOUif'E The resbmsib laEy end:a'�so�Yat •! pf' S! ,l Mk G4 �J, M i x.43L 54 1i• M 1'f ,i l L 1N liT �y + ' 'AMS Y'M W. _aW0 t a i n sd In the Cie,, aft describe the ba4fdaki.es of the,QnWbjjlrii , r arc% the�,t��irx�� � �}eSPI t�tx ans i lhij t�be gag, _ ' .�Quildiagaf,rpad or No f rr SpQ pub-, a .Ina j or disturbance, tai boart��n��'' t`c#3G�it� ' 1rn h kr, t' C,�f • or- S �tnd& d' .� w +5i R3 #� +c3 � iq ib'� C1 x' ,� 2 �'{� • �l ,ill � C �_ I� s' pe S RI: C:omPI I an e,s CQvi � t��e�' to T teins � aaxci 1.�S�T87 er . e a''quo e �.io�ia fx#' � zc� e r�' tea Nls,tiz''�y3�:�+�yrTx� fyyz��yTi `tRim WO ry�it I i I ] I A4 40 )= w a i rz; I l.y 1 '4: I f I it I v I r r i I I I , r..0 ER t�4.tobae— �i G� 7 tikO UTI Y G c n,t e D rime s _- 6r0vi.�`Z+�a Pr�taciian ,I�l.an I..leninx .Pate f2Ac3 S'ncl.sc� my : sc<�!c Tie,#�4n p:la7�.'a.h� prea�i�vata;r� d'� , _- t sin 'Ol to S'U'b di siv.n. fi f _rhed - Al,s1� ;a.tlifes 44ndns_�'l'7.,; 28::..a�,ti 3x of:m� rzs�, it,ont a,t &We I t�rditxa���; : PI. n. s b.ern in inrorPoa't� Fish; and Came oammpnts mco dtatnclnnes i plan daCPd April 8, 94:2 `( izoulc# he 1992) Jury i 1*01,• anal p0.: ray Phase review th4 attaet;e�?` further.i�ge..: P�#zia A»�3 let k��, 3'f iV.e _ t2ccsi: to t1�111 I.�Ce 04'K3t[tf�l ic%5• 'e�xnt'� - Cnerert xnta• :h3�4t •�..," v0i1ttn1Fr1t: TS, ,i�ke $$ ,$C�pil AS - ;12. fS�i' df Rt'AItate 5•ub: x tai t� - h»p nn/eeF ♦*77 _RA,R _ ch -I cry i Q Vito (916.�.8f�4.-443 I PROJECT DESTGIq The, design o� F'a'lcons Pont has evolved from extensive planning oxrer the past sevPra,l months . Zt. has been the irit'ent of 'the applicant to focus attention ori the. natural resources found within the-` site and, design, the: p,roj,ect around those resources. In addition, the prof- t ha' been`desiot ed around known environmental ,concerns J she lod.«tion of the -private rcau' caithizi the ;proj.ect provides roin .mum -di turbarce to the $2 acre site. 'The location of the gated antzy i .and direction of the private drive off e,rs minimur* visual " s�estruct:ion, cre,ating' �on1y' 'l lot on Chico `canyon Road. The eritr.y . , Y �a ll incorporate natural "rork and eht'r.anc,e landscaping along Chico - u Canyon Road to ide'ntify, and set, the tone of -the project. In addition, the large gavel :areae near they eotranc;e of the pr:ojec,t -s Proposedto he barricaded to unauthorized vehicle travel east ,o,f the, project. Currently, this area i:3 used consistently, Unauthorized dumping, Ote of the most important natural resources on the pralect.site:i`s the'r.idge located on thearorthern �baundaryof the project lying ad ocent' to ,BY g chico Creek The. design; of the, project recognizes th4 ,si.gr ifx04 Ance ..af .this r..esource . and Liaspreserved this resource through the creation of open tpacei Lot ii, on which building is not a.l l owed ;. '. thereby creatyrig an undi.st ur}aed vi�:ual �mpaat. „ An. archeological as well as l' botagcastudy "hav`e, ,been comp le,t'ed �' ` with mi to gaiiori .propo., both iri the �Cc&R's as c�" l as 'project design. Bot"l of ,these reports are included .in. thi s• doCuiinent: Dots 5 and 6 have been. designed to rzcorporate' 75�. of the. s>idalcea. "pore robusta 'popu`lata,.on:the, large szze of the lots will allot ` moxa, ief ic%en, pane ;ement. Arid preservat' ori° of h;e •,spe:cie,., Each .of the' 'o lots "h'"ave :ween ,created .on an ridgidual, basis tai" `r all."nw the natural amenZties located wi.tlin the project to `enhance`' file I ott, as w.'el 1 as pr';ovide an , opportunity through. the; c,rea.ti an oL 1. ti, e "Tots- "to preserves _t"hos,e, aural. amen •ties. r r , 3 , , 41 , I , j rV w � TCAL REP OR'T ` _ MITIGATION, f �I F� I .j I i f ail i � I i• i i n t � t ;f ,if. C C The, f oil I 6-wi,pl, -vordinc! will b n, c 0 rp 6r at L into tine Q - Ct> S R, s and .6rif orced by the Home Association. to, ensutet the immediate ' a nd cant inu'ed t1v to t e, dt ion. of the specie: I N., The leocatibns of the siclalcea tabugta, outsJdd the buy '1 ding envelop 4 e of Lots 4'r 5 and 6 1 11, be xlit,�!atod, on the e: grO44d,, With ,metal. f ehc4 posts-and: the bouhdIaries, sites fia"49-ted. situ e coht t ructtjoli is o6mPlete', . , Th6stikj- ))4upery ,- ihlall e, b,y the, Vibh and, Game.:' : ., 1.11 ora 2qualified. botanist . 'weed control cont undertaken. b un Lot owners WIthin. ent. feet of, site. sh� '15 not occur , ir c P.ri'dr to ;Iuily to allow the pa t s, - to set :seedsNo chemical" ji cont,:rolt, Shall be used in these umpingQn, drivi' throughburnix g 6r SturbancesshalI occur vlhijthe del.iJieated areas of 11-'dillcO K-obusla- vithi, 0 An S". Seed.grill, ddtloh Seed', collection with .-dur. direction fromth Department1 s risI and dame plant ' II t..'1 " .o-.' t ecologist du1maturity and plIa 4 nted'i areas: A -o . , lose,aspossibleO'original site` whic h, provide less po ent,4;4, distur A tiie Ac, I I% future. j t • Ile Iii f,1 I f i — 1 h 1! J l 1 t 1 AIDD . RZ.a R� I , , 1 I I I I� II I� II 2• . a I i f f r t I, I q I � I' I I .._. .... JI, 7 ' Proj�+rt.�l Sp,3 ,F'ztttarss,i'Intfle Pmlect SOtt end SuGsurfac�;�valuadaa Site j - ,Intei�m' u ' - ,INTERIM(. RESORT f ARCFIAEOLDGCAi. SIACE,AND' i7�SURFA;CE.E3�AL UATON SITE #11�1'13T1d'AL`C`t�NS PL;�NNED .POIN?'.E ?' DEVELO.PMF.1�T�; LOCf4 TED NEAR B�1'C ChrICO .CJEEI�; B IITTE CO UN?'Y; CAU, AI;?11IIMI.STRA:'.IVELV CO TDENTI.4.L THIS BEPO:RT C NTAiNS'SENSiTNE IN�FORl�iATIO'N' CONCIERNINC P . , HISTOR7[C `ARCHAEbLt�GTC , AL SITES AND SITE LCICATIONS. DtI IdOT.INCI ODE IN PI7BLICL"Y-AVAXL' ABLE `bOCUMENTS. Prepareal for JeffamdShirIey Faxar Chico CaIifo nna r E fY bYEfiJCC 29s �� (1 RC .. JENSEN d ASSOC C�iIGCi t.4LiI�ORNXA A HAEDGQO�C,�L HISTORICAL ..CULTURAdi RESOUkCL' AC, $A'GE1K'EA/T SERVICES n Cof th C P'I:FIXNf E' C, S; "1"°H APREL1 INARY SITE TCOmm"TioN N ,M Allsix �rchaeologi6a],,siteg'!d6ftti'fid. . within the Falcons Pointe ,project area were , assessed is,potentially .signiipant for FROJtCT 13ACKOROVND ., infbrmaotvalues,, cording to CEOA Guidelines (BdviM 551-7). in consideration ofpotential significance, the pnmax lt October ofthisytat, Mount4in xconimetdatio aT6r all of these sites teas ,ifiat Anthropological Resdarch(MAR) ofchico,,1� , _ be completely byfuture California, co,mpleted,aft archaeological development, and that they be preserved"as inventory survey of d. 32-acre: �2cons '0 �. i (b For four othe six s'it'es, PointePlanned Unit Developm' t project preservation would be ensuredbecause the atea located, in ower8*g chico"*ek I: sites ate located within an areawh6 is tobd canyon, on the southside orBig,Ch c6.Cretk � setasieas a preserve. The sites' iftthis . (Bevil] 1991)., Vr9posed action- involves cat6gory Atepreviously recorded site CA- subdivisionatn`d creation of,-­1serutl o)n I'd,' o,- 80:, 3l: -27d w Y s 7, r.2i Si­t. I, n' e` d.. lots fbilowed by eventual residential home and5. .However; for the rema'i'ning`Q -:i W7 and' access roadconstruction and placement project Areazites (SitesI and4),, 'pdt6ntfal of necessary utilities and other appropriat& im;actscould accompany filturd residential features: This level of development development, :aa bothare located Within lands c i,u,esanun ertaking, according Uo which could be subiected.to ,remidenti ! hohe CountyandCEQA definitions, so that an and. other construction impacts.' atchadologIcar inventory survey was ne ymolder o comPjy.vith:CEQA and! Por these two sites; MAk ,i-a .1,­n_ CountyGuidelines, andeperall wt4 teconihendp4that any jmpaq1t. b 0rq;ede4 , j .l. .'' 1 7' -.4"1'visi Sections.- I06 of" the Naffonal Etsio6c.. 1 I ,of -tJT' bya'r6rnal evaluation ofsignircanc PrescivAtibnAct 1966, Prodeduftesof th' accordancewith 106 Process procedures (3t; Advisory Council, oft_Historic P,tesprvati k�sbb) andCEQ Guidelines, an as , (36 CF1,800Y required�by the Plannip7 evamentoMttte Socfiealln,MAR recommended. that a level ofarehaeolagical evaluation .be "TheM pestpagsutv involved _ , undertaken sufficient to accomplish (4 All "of1h pareind td�u46d in iedcatiftg t. further surface' ':(b)re accurate , 'e"',n ,. one .previously recorded site, recording 5 delineation of site ;Joun,anpsthrough ' vipu§ y urudentifedAichaepogica sites, evaluation o OQLPf4ub "Ire, anis recording; .opg,preNigusyuniden i l'eA t" occurring tultutAl'rAdieial, f c) idettiticaton isolates .naPreviously'kecoidtd:site CA ,t , o` t poqsible ac iviIyI, oci Ni 24the sites, �8UT 7 ­x0sen6A,smait6okshbiter.boun '.' arie det4rminadono thevertical ' iwo othe newly idenitdd saes itso ,-B .dppilj,m trijgr4ph ,an jgtegnty, &W situatedrepresent° small. rock shelters 6ft" ,i de erminatiot,o theage of esitesand. bile `­. rile escarpment overlooking and ih,oveta Isite composiIon An n6h _le'- artifactuald&_cqns�fu6�he,owtall ie,a.'ti' rernainithree sites , (8itds`fj;2' and , C ,a,n objective afsrach a.PrOgT44'Odata CO110c066 —, representsurfaceithid scattersane dw Cbvitas to reach':­ade It conclusion , �S1 is wi madem ng�pismc6- i ign'4 a1n*ceb e,tw,,sties, rr,un i"t, -'. orchard below te with 't 6 16id tifyapyqpeci �ca"butan !quaIides remarning or (Sites ,e, 1C.mjg mightrender oneor -bothofthe sites , bluff or ridge, ifte$withinil projectar ' xroncp1, a ionaRegisterIeligible orsignificant t One Q tqsp. 4tter,two Aes Rd, -a f" '" according to,CEQA0@d arid, ort the , ora�asnalli 'oasis p spect1 findings;, to recomfien-. - ' v tt. in F7 1 a 4 I ,,44, P.r�+jes t 0�-503 �3iOWif 'ut k. Surface Turd Sri dace Evaluat%n, Site i Anterior + 2 apptap'nate ;p[an; o£ fatal, site treatment, , PRESENTPROTEGT on. -stent with CEQA�` and County Guidelines and'pr©fessiona considerations, IziNovember of this year$; tlic. project, propunent.requested'that�ensen 8ssoeiates Tt was ecagn zed as apossibiliry that undertake the! ' commended evaluations nt'tlie ' the'proposed evaluative work. could result. an tivo4 sites=, and prepare an' -appropriate report . the conclusion that one or Izoth of the sites dbtailing specific Endings and; providing =had been so severely impacted,' and site appropriate recomiitendations, ,for ;site Il integrity' so extensively` comptomrsed by ". treatraerit., The, remainder .of a present . previous agriculture# activities or bulldozing; document details the findings, at: one of the that fhe;pe�tentiallysi�,xnbficant mforMatiot ae s2tes-= Site 1, and concludeswth a tstal one or both of the srtes'had been Lost, ar fully srgnif � a et+aluat ,: and appropriate recovered' during the course. of ,the ,final recommendations forslw,Ireafinentr Archaeologrcal't�esting work'. Tn ibis case the findings of the evaluatrori work would Vit ld*ork ryas underi en `.be e ak t, e n conclude that no furtberwork9Vas necessary; IYavember 21 and 28, .and was or that t3ply'mrnunal mitigative -level data ,1991 supervised by the author. Approzaiateiy 4(l. rzcove wool dbej ustifeti, depending on . man-hours of labor were upended in, , 4 spectfic;findmgs . mplementin the 6`eld evaluation, and; an " additional c: 56 man hotit �, Were.Iconsufned wring laboratory work-up of the Irm`ited cultural assem, , z ge recovered, niddifvirig arphaeologrc�l site ritaps,w,ith information concerning'fie, loedti:,on of !';>hovel'; tests"'and excavation units, summarizing. findings, and pmpannB other appropriate documentation,: i � 1 i i it i 1 r