Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
93-05 DAVID & RUTH MANTHEI REZ (7)
2 ` y e i' f PLANT LIST � C TREES #' uercus clouglas uercus WJslezenii ai_n_us dab_ 'nom SHRUBS AND VINES y Aristolochia ca.lifornica Ceanothus cuneat'us Cercis oc=en't Ka4kella lemmoni7' Lon i cera i nterru�ta r Marah fabaceus - ,�- Rhamnus californica Rhamnus cry S �U)b-U—Cu8 ce ru l ea Toxicodendron diversi lobum `Vitus cal iforni cus GRAoSES, Aira car ooh lie Avena fatua Briza minor Bromus mo'l l.i s Bromus rubehs Bromus did a--- ndrus CVhodon .iactylcn Unasur=us echinatus Des�psia danthonit)ides i� Gastridiuln .Ventricosum HordeUm seniculatum �grdeU .lepc�r7huin Koelelwia�lileoides Lot iurm mQaltiflorurn qe._1 i ca a . l ifoeni ca —PO a annus ioa bu1bosa �� � tenerrima Taensatherumaca�nUt=medusae Vul is mtcrostachYs Vul is m uros i FORBS 61chemilla occidentali Allium ampl ectens Amsinkia in,.'-.ermedia 8nthyriscus caucalisis Ascle6'i'as, eriocarba bthwsanusup millus Blennosperm_um nanum Boisduvalia csleistogama Bo sduyal.ia macrantha Boisduval is stricta Brassica cammestris Brodiaea californica orodiaea el:egans B-rodiaea minor Caloc'hortus luteus Centaurea melitensis GentaureI, sol stiti al is Ce.rasti um s l omeratum Chl orogal um angusti fol, i um Chlorooalum pomeridianum Clarkia purpurea var. guadriyulga G_'1aYtonia garyiflora Crassula mucosa Da+,ecus pusi_lli Del phi hium vagi egatum Dichelostemma multif.lorum D i the l ostemma pu l the Ll um Dichelostemma volubile Oowningia cuspidate Draba verna Eremocarpus setigOrus seri opohum hudum Eri;ophv'i l tim 1 ahatum ' Erodium be-achycarpum 5rodiun c`Lc tarium Er ng i um vase i, Eschsholzia lobbi Ga'1 i,urn apariale Galium narisiensis var. leiocaroutn or.igens var., tenue Ga'l pr Geriurn onium dissectum Geran i um moll e Gratiola ebracteata Hemizohia fi.tchii Hy0erj,cum ahagalloices _ Hypochari s gl abra Jun,--us butoti s ggnu us sari i t tus Lactuca 8et'riola - Lggo, ahy:l 1 a ramos ss i ma Last hehi a cal i fo'rni ca cs Lasthenia fremonti Lpidium nitdum �Lessi nal a vi rgata tiinanthus bicolor _Loaf i a ,gal 1 i ca 1 Lotus micranthus Lupnus bicolor Madia glegans ssp. vernali's Medicago palymo--rs Micro us aal_ _ o fornicus Mi crosteri s grad l i`s MAimulus nasutus Minuartia californica Montia Pl rfol i ata Navar-reti a f i l i cau l i s Navarretig intertexta Navarretia heterandra Navarretig leucocesha7a Nayarretia gutaescens 1' Nayarretia, taaetina. Odontostemum harwai1 Paryisedum pumi tum Penstemoh he XPi°oohY1 l a, Petrarhaga vel,ut`rja Pitvrogramma L iangular s Plagiobothrys Plyptocarnus Plaaiobrothrv-s nothofulvus Plac�iobo<;hrvs stipitatus ssp. micranthus P 1antago Fdaeloyi Plantago ? jec:ta P l ectri tus qj l 08us Pogoayne zi zyphroi des Polygtinum californicum Psi IOgArPhus 'breyissimus Psilocarahus tdhellus �? Pterosteaia drymarioides Ranunculus muricatus Rumex crispis 42 na abetala janicula b%pinnata Sanicula crassicalus Selaginella hanseni Senecioyulgare S erardia aryense 8�ellaria edia B ymbrium officionale Tarilus ngdosa Tri chostemma J aka Tr l fo 1-i um Amp l ecter�s Tr. i±2lium debaUperatum Tri foliurn hietum Tri folium mcrocellalum • Tr.i fo 1 i um vagi ega�U!'r,� Tritel0ia bridgesii 1� a �f I/ r Tritele a hyacinthina Triteleja laxa Veronica peregrina var. xalapensi5 ,Fieri dates: June 7 and June 14, 1991 Survey Locations 4/10 mi SE of Cohass'et and Keefer Roads, Chico - CA.,, eighty acres on east side of Cohasset Road and ,fust north of poWerl ine,. i r t I� i r REFERENCES• CITED. Holland, R. F. 1986. Preliminary Descriptions of the Terrestrial Natural Communities of California, California Department of Fish and Game. Unpublished manuscript. Smith, J,P; and K. Vascular Plk,nts of Berg', 1988. Inventory of Rare and Endangered California. California Native Special Publication Plant Society # 1 (4th ed,) i ; ARCHAEOLOGICAL INVENTOR Y SUR VEY, OAK HIGHLANDS SUBD'IVISION PROJECT A"A, c. 81 at ALONG COMSSET ROAD, .,BUTTE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. Project 92497 {3n ghlands Subdivision • c. 81 4C along Cohassct R Page' I 2. A pedestrian field survey of the INTRODUCTION Property in order to record and evaluate Previously unidentified resources; and, 3. Preparation of a report which identities project effects and recommends This report details the results of an archaeological inventor survey of appropriate mitigation measures for any y y significant sites identified within the approximately 81 .acres of land owned by APE. David and Ruth Manthei and which will be developed as the "Oak Highlands Subdivision;" a planned unit development project. The property is located adjacent to details the results f the eco he remainder of the dsesearcreort h and the east side. of Cohasset Road, a short inventory survey work and provides a distance south of the intersection of Cohasset professional assessment of the cultural and Keefer Roads, and about one mile north resources which might. be affected by the of the Chico Municipal Airport, As noted proposed action involves Subdivision of the Proposed undertaking. All field work cs ines parcel, with subsequent further residential heStateHi toricdPreselrvation vOffice developments to include construction of new access roads, formity storm drains, sanitation, (Sacramento) accepted Professional stanand are dards, with facilities, residences, buried utilities, etc. According to agency definitions, this LOCATION level of development constitutes an "undertaking" which could adversely affect cultural resources which might be located Within the area of potential effect (APE). Project TA e s nearly he Oak i]r cttangSulardi Subdivision Evaluation of project effects to such view and is comprised of two assessp -- resources is thus required by the Count of or's Butte, pursuant to CF y parcels (AP#'s 47-23-59 and -60) containing generally, in complianceQwith S Guidelines 106 oandf situoated ad's enttal Of C. 8L 1 acres, The proper is National Historic Preservation Act and its Road, about one mile orththe east dof the Chi ceo implementing regulations (36 CFRFart 800), Munkcrpal Airport, beinga Section 2(b) bf Executive Order, 11593, Sections 23 and 26 of Township 231North, Section I0l(b)(4) of the National Range 1 East, as shown on the USGS y , Resources protection Act and othe,, Richardson Sp.kngs, California, 7.5' Series Environmental Polis Act the Archaeological regulations Forythe present project, these Arc "Project Location and requirements, r rules and haeologiad (see ctalSu a Pro ,> etranslate into the following YArel4iap ). g neral archaeological study objectives; The parcel is located in an area of low, rolling hills, approximately equidistantbet' the South and Rck Undertake an inventory and evaluate the Creeketo he north, Mud CreektTwo shallow sw le8 significance, according to CEQA dissect the approximate center of the project Guidelines, of properties which may be area from roughly J directly or indirectly affected by Proposed g y nated ast to souhweue future develo menu, i ,` Vegetation , P " , 1 d d blue P Ve etation is dominated b � wade p These general oafs inters interspersed with occasional Digger ol;jectives, in turn, require completing the Pine, small brush fields acid grasses, An following specific tasks; historic -era rock wall borders the east side of ] ifany PQ hsset road in this area,thus forming a portion of the western margin of the project A records search to determine previously recorded sites exist within the area. Much of the land in this area north of protect area, Chico has recently been or 18 currently being Proest 92-597 04 hlandis 5ub&vision - a 81 ac along Cohassct.4 Pagel developed for residential uses, with followed by preparation of a report numerous roads, buildings, and residences containing recommendations for any having recently been constructed in the additional work which might be justified on generalvicinityi the basis of specific fir►dings. Overall, and based upon a review of existing topographic and other .maps, the project area appeared to be one of low to moderate sensitivity with respect to both prehistoric and historic sites and features.. RECORDS SEARCI Prior to conducting the field survey work, the archaeological records maintained by the Northeastern California Information Center at CSU -Chico were examined for any existing recorded prehistoric or historic sites within or immediately adjacent to the project area. These records identify the following existing conditions; Approximately 50 of the 81 -acre parcelwill not be developed or directly impacted in any way by construction or other proposed developments. In consideration thereof, the proponent requested that the archaeological inventory survey be restricted to the actual area of potential effect (APB)'. The APE consists of approximately 22 acres located within the northern 1l3 of the property, and an additional c. 8 acres located within the southern portion of the parcel, The Information Center agreed with this proposal, with the provision that the areas actually inspected be clearly shown on the archaeological survey area map, and that the final survey report (the present document) clearly recommend that any future developments involving the unsurveyed central portion ofthe projectarea be preceded 1, Previous survey: by a_complete, archaeological survey of this area. None of the present project area has been formally surveyed for cultural resources, although a cultural resources PROJECT CONTEXT overview ';for northeastern Chico, involving lands located immediately west of theproject area, has recently been prepared by -Jensen & Associates (1992; 2. Recorded Sites: No prehistoric or historic sites are currently recorded within or immediately adjacent to the project area, Although several prehistoric and historic sites have been identified both to the north and west along Rock Creek and to the south and east along Mud and Sycamore Creeks, none of these previously identified sites will be affected by the Oak Highlands Subdivision, as presently proposed, 3. Recommendation: In view of potentially moderate cultural resource sensitivity, the Northeast Califlothki information Center recommended that an appropriate level of pedestrian survey be Undertaken within the project area:, Several types of information were considered relevant to evaluating the types of archaeological sites and ;Site distribution which might be encountered within the present project area. The information evaluated prior to conducting field work includes data on regional prehistory, ethnography, and early historic developments: 'rehistot The 'earliest definite r.:vidence of human occupation in north; I entral California is from site CA -SHA -475 located north of Redding on Squaw Creek, where a charcoal based C-14 date suggests initial Native American presence around 6,500 years ago, with continuous use of the region iridicated on the basis of evidence from this and other regional sites. Most of the artifactual material dating to this, early time period suggests cultural affiliation with the Borax Lake area -- the presence of large wi& =stemmed projectile points and manos EtiinoHranlThe present project area is located within te,ritory, which was lr) surface scatters of lithic artifacts and debitage, associated with dark "midden " Project 92-5,97 Oakftlandr Subdisdoou - c 81 roc along Coh=ct Ro 1978: Figure 1), but very close to the border shared with the PVC and metas d metates r m nentartifact types ThMostprominent p es being the most. rom � exists that These were usually circular, semi - subterranean this early culture represents Hokan-speaking peoples who were also ancestral to those who rom 15 to over 20 feet nn diameter, ttypically �e excavated in subsequently expanded into the northern excess of three! or four feet below, the surface. Sierra Nevada, the southern Cascade, the associated middens, resultingfrom t occupation Weconomic southern Klamath and the northern Coast Range areas. These people may, represent the As withal] northern California Iridian earliest Sacramento Valley occupants in Tehama and Butte Counties as well. groups, economic life for the 11Taidu revolved around hunting, fishing and d.ie collecting of Sometime around A.D. 100-200' the plant foods. The Maidu were very sophisticated in terms of their knowledge of the uses of these local first major disruption of this presumed Hokan-speaking population by Penutian immigrants animals and plants, and of the availability of raw material sources which could be used in manufacturing occurred, Eventually these later arrivals displaced at least some of the Hokan an - immense array of primary and secondary tools and implements bone, populations who had been occupying the Sacramento Valley floor and the margins of stone acid wood. Unfortunately, only fragmentary of the Sacramento River as far as the 4roville area; time evidence of the material culture of these people remains, due in part to perishability, at the of contact with Euroamerican populations, these Penutian-speaking and in part to the impacts to archaeological peoples were still expanding into areas previously occupied by sites resulting from later (historic) land uses. Based on the results of previous survey work Hokan-speakers. Presumably introduced by the Penutian-s eakin p p g peoples were within the general and immediate project area and similar valley/foothill more extensive use of bulbs, and other plant foods, animal and fishing products .margin contexts (see, for example, Jensen and Wren 1978,• Jensen and Reed 1980; Jensen 1989, Jensen processed with mortars and pestles, and perhaps the bow ,and arrow and associated 1990a; 1990b; 199001 the expected range small stemmed- and corner -notched projectile of prehistoric site types within the present project area included the following: points; EtiinoHranlThe present project area is located within te,ritory, which was lr) surface scatters of lithic artifacts and debitage, associated with dark "midden " occupied by the Yyotthwestern lYlaidu, or Konkow Indians (Ridde.11 deposits .resulting from short- and long-term en ampments along the margins of 1978: Figure 1), but very close to the border shared with the one or both of the shallow channels which Yana to the north. The 'cask social unit for proceed through the approxima., center of the All of the Maida w'as the family, although the project area,- village may also be considered a social, as well as a political and economic, unit. (2) surface scatters of lithic artifacts and debitage without V1116968 were usually located on flats adjoining streams, and were inhabited mainly associated middens, resultingfrom t occupation Weconomic in the winter as it Was necessary to go out and/or secialized activities; into the hills and higher elevation zones to establish temporary camps during food gathering seasons (].e., spring, summer and (3) bedrock milling 'stations, including mortar hole,; and fall); Villages typically consisted of a scattering of bark houses, aumbering front metate slicks, among the numerous bedrock outcrops which occur within the four or five to several dozen in larger Villages , with each house containing a single project area; (n) family of from three to sevett peoplr,. petro"glyphs; and, ,Larger villages, with from twelve to fifteen or more houses, ,might also contain an earth lodge. (3) isolated finds of aboriginal facts art, and flakes, PmJect 91-597 Oa hlands Subdivision - ,. 81 ac along Cohasset.RdO patse d It was clearly not expected that all ;of various non -mining related activities is these site types would be encountered within considered to have been minimal, and itwas the project area, but :rather that these would expected that any major sites which mayonce be the most likely site types to be observed if have existed within the Oak I-iighlands any prehistoric sites were encountered at all. Subdivision project area would be discovered largely intact. Historic Developments; Historic evidence exists to document that some of the Spanish and Mexican expeditions and early furtrappir.q ventures maty have come through and made iv.'ief stays within the general project vicinity. It was during one such expedition that Arguello named the Feather River itself. However, the first major incursion by White men. occurred during the Gold Rush period. The placer lodes along Butte Creek, located to the south, were vigorously mined from the early 1850's:. For a short period in fact, between circa. 1852- 1855, mining grew so rapidly that virtually all, aspects of traditional Native American life disappeared as Indians were either forced out of traditional habitats or, in some cases, conscripted as laborers on white -owned operations. Once the easily extracted gold deposits began to diminish along Butte Creek and elsewhere within the Sierra Nevada, more and more residents turned to farming, ranching, and logging. However, new techniques of mining and new ,sources of labor (Chin -se in particular) ushered in a second mining era which peaked during the. 1880's Exposed quartz veins led to exploratory mining operations along Butte Creek, and numerous adits were bored in search of high quality lodes which could be profitablyextracted. Fortunately, the absence of gold deposits within the present project area spared this region from any direct effects of ;gold raining activity, The absence of major stands of timbep within the project area also spared this region from intensive logging. However, logging was undertaken on it large state at Cohasset, and Cohasset Road, which forms the western boundary of the project area, was intensively utilized from the early days of the gold rush through the period of intensive logging and the present. However, the plhysital impacts to prehistoric and early historic sites of these SURVEY STRATEGY, RECORDING, and FIELD WORX In view of the small size of the APE for this project and the absence of significant brush or other surface obstacles, the two - areas examined were subjected to an intensive -level pedestrian survey. This level of coverage was accomplished by walking systematic, east -west transects back and forth across these two areas, with transect spacing maintained at c. 20 meter intervals. As noted ?41,*ve, these two areas comprise a total of approximately 30 acres, involving the northern c. 0 of the property (c. 22 acres), and a strip of land of c. 350 feet in width within the southern portion of the property. (c. 8 acres). Whenever an archaeological property was encountered, its location was to be plotted onto a USGS topographic map. ;Each isolated find, isolated feature, or site Would. also be assigned a temporary field identification number. Complexes -o f artifacts/features would be identified as sites and recorded on SHPO-ai proved Archaeological Site Record forms. Isolated, individual components (i.e.,, isolated small ditches, discarded artifacts, single artifacts or clusters of 2-5 artifacts or artifact fragments, etc.) would be considered "isolates", and appropriate locational and descriptive, information secured in field notebook form. Locations for both sites and isolates would be docut".1chacu in terms of section quadrants and textual description, and for sites wauld include. UTM'coordinates. Par recorAcd sites, the environmental setting would, 1w described in terms of local geology, landform, slope, aspect, soils, hydrology, and vegetation, while the dimensions of all sites and features would be recorded in metric Units. Graphic documentation for sites Would also include planimetric site sketch PrOJcct 92-597 Osl fr ,w Bhlatl�ix 5ubrflvisian C. g/ ac along Cohe RA Page ¢ R.)t COMMENDAIIOIv 1"n view of the negative findings' achieved during both the records search and field survey work, archaeologicra clearance for the proposed Oak Highlands Subdivision Project area is recommended, with the following provisions: 1) The area ofpotential efTect for the Present subdivision consists of approximately 22 acres located within the northern 1/3 of the overall project - area, and an additional c S acres located within the southern portion of the property. These are the areas inspected during the present survey, and are identified on the attached r"Pr oject Location and Archaeological 1 Survey Area Map" as `Areas t Surveyed",. In the event that future developments are proposed which could affect the surface or subsurfac soil Within the unsurveyed central Portion of the project area, this central portion of the property should be subjected to pedestrian archaeological survey Perthepresent APE, 2) The present evaluation a n d recommendations are based on the findings of an inventory -level surface reconnaissance. There is always the Possibility that potentially significant unidentifiedcuitl ral materials could be encountered curing the coarse of future development and construction activities. In such a situation, archaeological consultation should be sought immediately, ~ MR JOhlPt+pl c+ -t 92.597 4 s Suixliviticirt - C. 8I as along Cvhax.er R*. � artd Page 7 E REFERENCES CtTED AND/OR UTILIZED Clark, William B. 1970 Gold Districts of California. California Division of Mines, Bulletin 193. Sari, Francisco, California. Elsasser, Albert B. 1960 The Archaeology of the Sierra Nevada in Caiifornia and Nevada. Universit}r o f California, Archaeological Survey Report No, S 1 Berkeley. Jensen, Peter M. 1977 Cultural Resources Overview and Recommendations for th ,y Proposed Southeast Chico Redevelopment Project Area, Butte County, California. Prepared for Cook and Associates, Oroville, California, Report on File, Northeast California Information Center, CSU Chico, and C;ty of Chico, California. 1984 Archaeological Survey of 6500 Acres within the Coon Hollow Land Exchange of the Plumas National Forest. Report on File, Plumas National Forest, Quincy, California. 1.985 Archaeological Survey of 7000 Acre;, within the Galen-Campoodie Area of the Plumas National Forest. Report on File, Plumas National Forest, Quincy, California. 1987 Archaeological Test Excavations at the "West Rockshelter Site', California Pack. Subdivision, Chico, Butte County, California. Report on File, City of Chico, and Northeast California Information Center, CSU-Chicon - 1990 Archaeological Inventory Survey ora Proposed 14 acre Subdivision involving the Durham House, Durham, Butte County, California. Report on File - Northeast California Information Center, CSU -Chico. ' 1990a Archaeological Inventory Survey for Betty Simpson's Proposed 750 -acre Subdivision nearHoncut, Butte County, California, Report on File, Northeast' California Information Center, CSU -Chico, 1990b Archacological Inventory Survey of Runge's 406 ac subdivision project near Bangor, Butte County, California. Report on File, Northeast California Information. Center, CSU -Chico. 1990c Archaeological Inventory Survey of the ocatehi Subai rision Prciject near Wyandotte, Jutte County, California. Report on File, Northeast California information Center, CSU -Chico. - 1990d Archaeological Survey for Subdivision Projects Proposed for Segnients of Lower DOC Mill Ridge near Brute Road Chico Butte County- California. ,Lower o Report n File; Northeast. California information Centor, CSU Chico. 1991 Archaeological Inventory Survey of 80 acres nearTable Mountain, Thertnalitoj Butte County, Caltfornia. Report on File, Northeast Californ%a Information Center, CSU -Chir. Prgject 92-597 Oak hlwdt 5ubdiviston c. St ac stun Cvnas,e.L " g -. `` Page B I 1992 A Cultural Resource Overview of the Northeast Cbfto Development Area, c 3,560 acres between State Route 99W and the Chico Airport, Butte County) Cali fomia. Report on File, Northeast California Information Center, CSU Chico. 1992a Archaeological "Inventory Survey of 186 ac in Southeast Chico; Between Brace Road and the Little Chico Creek Diversion Channel- Butte County, California. Report on File, Northeast California Information Center, CSU -Chico. Jensen, Peter M. and Paul R. Reed' 1980 An Archaeological and Cultural Anthropological Overview of the Northern Sacramento Valley and Southern Cascades. SpecialPublication of the Bureau. of Land Management, Redding District Office. Jensen, PeferM. and Diane Wren 1973 A Cultural Resources Overview of the West Side of the Plumas National Forest. Report on File, U.S. Forest Service, Plumas National Forest- Quincy, California, and No,:theast Cali forniaInformation Center, CSU -Chico. Johnson, Jerald Jay 1978 Yana, IN, Handbook of North American Indians, Volume 8: California, Robert F. Heizer, Editor; pp. 36I-36.9. Smithsoni D.C: an Inytitutio, Washington, O'Connell, James F. 1967 The Prehistory of Surprise Valley, Lassen County, California. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley, ri iddell; Francis A. 1.978 Maidu and Konkow, IN, 'Handbook of North American Indians Volume 8: California, Robert F. Heizer, Editor, pp. 370 379„ Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. Ritter, Eric W: 1970 Archaeology of Tie Wall near 0rovillei Butte County, Califomi,a: Culture Historyvs. Culture Process., Center for. Archaeological Research at Davis, Publication No. 2. United States Department of the Interior 1990 National Register of Historic Places. Federa= Register: Washington; D.C. Wilson, Norm, an L. and Arlean H Towne 1978 Nisenan, IN, Handbook of North American Indians Volume 8: California Robert Pi Heizer, Editor; pp. 387-397. Smithsonian Itistitut on, Washington, D.C. r,- 'V 7A, - ✓t w � a �.n 1 ,-'JECT ,LOQ. A�," l�f AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL S .A EY AREAMAP, OAK iliuHLANDS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, COHASSET ROAD NEAR KEEx ER ROAD, BUTTE COU'NT'Y POR. SECTIONS 23 and 26 OF T23N, RIE, USGS RICF0l',,RDSON SPRINGS, CALIF. 7,5' SERIES QUAD. - 'liforr isQG'U QPf�ll ai � lt�l ®uMr 9ERM A��.eological GLENN 's UI GU Department of Anthropology rm,ventory uSSEN SUTTIR California State University, Chico .� uoaor. MAMA� Chico, CA 95929 f vulgus mdy :. SHASTA' (916) 895.6256 " October 19, 1992 Thomas DiG ovann Heritage Partners P.O. Box 3669 Chico, CA 95927-3669 RE' OAK HIGHLANDS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT; IC# D92-30 T23N, RIE, Sections 23 and. 26 U,SGS Richardson Springs 15' and 7.5' quads 81.12 (23 actual development) acres (Butte County) Dear Mr. Diuiovann, In response to your re quest received: October 9, 1992, a record .search for the above cited pro,ect was conducted by examining the official mars and records for archaeological sites in Butte County. RES CMTS p • 7 There ` type known to be located within the ro'ect boundar�,es.. However PRF'HISTORIC RESOURCES • there are no sites of this r lies w1.4 -Mn the Mud Creek Canyon distract, a Na' tha project r at tional Register of Historic places property. This area is highly sensitive for Native .American archaeological resources dating from the Middle Horizon to the Late Horizon time frame (15th -19th C. Many sites of this t;,'pe have been ecorded within the vicinity of the project area. These sites 1hClUde bedrock nlOrtar stations, temporary campsites, occupation locales, midden locales, petroglyphs, and lithic scatter locales The project lies in an area traditionally occupied by the Xechoopda, a branch of the Konkow native American group. HISTORIC RESOURCES: There are no recorded sites of this type known to be located within the project boundaries. However, there are several sites within the vicinity of the project area associate with increased ranching settlement of the late 18001:5 within the e , � p p ` es within the vicinity of the ro ect area ; cobsIst of the remains Mud Creek Can on district �£istoric ro of occu at�,ons � �" occupations, foundations, debrit 8eatters, and rock walls. To the ,,tidrthdast �o± j: the projectarea. is the famous Richardsons Springs Resort. The land and the springs, totaling 5oo0 acres,, were originally purchased by P.C. Richardson in 1971. In :1:8'17, a boarding house was opened in the vicinity of the sprinqa to accommodate those W visitors who came to bathe in the medicinal waters. In 1898, a ,much larger hotel and ;several smaller cottages were constructed to accommodate the increasing influx of visitors to the -springs. In 1903, the springs and the hotel were taken over by one of the Richardson brothers and began the development of the springs, Increasing its popularity. The hotel was destroyed by fire in 1921 but was rebuilt and opened in 1924. The popularity of the resort began to decline after WWII with the doors eventually closing in. 1967. RPREVIOUS,ARCHAEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS': According to our :records, the project area may have been previously surveyed for cultural resources by a professional. archaeologist. The Thelma Lovedahl Tentative Parcel Map for the Richardson Hills Subdivision (IC File #156) was conducted by Keith Johnson in 1977. - However, our records - are incomplete for this file and the project may have not been completely covered. LITERATURE SEARCH: Reviewed were the official records and maps for archaeological sites and surveys in Butte County. ,Also reviewed were the National Register of Historic Places -.Listed Properties and Determined Eligible Properties (1988, Computer Listing 1966 through. 8-90 by National Park Service), the California Inventory of Historic Resources (1976), California Points of Historical: Interest, California Historical Landmarks (1990), A Century of California Post offices (1955), A Collection of Places in Butte County (1917), Mud Creek Canyon: The Effect Of, mineral Springs on Sequent ©ccupance in The Sierra-Cascadian Foothills (Chapla 1973), and Historic Spots in California (1966). RECOMMILP•;DtATIONS: The project iLocated. in an area cons:'idered to be extremely sensitive for prehistoric and historic cultural resources. In view of these findings, we re- emend preceding any development or ground. disturbing operation: hat those areas subject to impact be surveyed by a professional. .chaeolagist. The professional archaeologist will be able to identify, formally record, and prepare appropriate mitigation measures for any cultural resources encountered, if any cultural resources are encountered during, tututa development or ground disturbing operations, all work should cease in the area of the find pending an examination of the site and materials by a professional archaeologist. Thank you for your concern in preserving California's cultural: heritage. ,sincerely Dr. Ma.kbto Xbwta Coordihator, 'Northeast Information center oMCE: (916) 891.8982Heyia 'e Partners ' 426 Broadway. Suite, 305 Chico ,C:A95929 p 799 f'rtrtln and Deveio meat MAIL; r 0, Ik)x 36 Chico, CA 95927-3669 Fix (916) 893-6985' October 3, 1992 Northeast Information Center C/o Department of Anthropology California State University, Chico Colusa Hall 103 Chico, CA 95928 RE. OA Highlands Planned Unit Development Project ATTN. Lisa ,Swillinger, Curator of Records Dear Lisa: Heritage Partners is requesting a record search for the above cited project by examining the official maps and records for archaeological sites in Butte County. Please see the :attached USGS map for reference. Enclosed is a check in the amount of $90.00. Thank you for your assistance. Very truly yours, Thomas DiGiovanni Partner enclosures MAW, 2 =.,L"!."i 1-4 to be completed 'by is . ,pnjCMa NAM AND ADDRESS. rani ?,-O EQ DFSCR=ON; PU _ f c�ZOt sy "171�'ISI ��N hsSEsSOR' S PARC=. iiC M R(S z Dz — C�S� f ' C)& O _ - -- x . MYOM USE,: �c FS t r -113 -Ti t _. fnjloying ite= am t^) be cc=pleted by the Planning Depart=ent: LAND CONSEZ MON AGFA; 1, ►L PiXi DESIGHAMON G u l "E c i2 Prt I E=S l i� /t7 -C 1 t t r tonal criteria, j0ar-l=uRAL-RESIDEr=AL YES NO It is recc=ended that You Perfoz= tho :1,Agricultural Coepatibilityfoo�lcl�oQ-inrgv�cche�Tckeed/yitteems: }�/.p .Mid ARCHAEOLOGICAL RECORDS C� �• Mater 3lld Sever G3paCltj► "-"_"� BOTANICAL SURVEY 3 lac a"ta Fire Facilities, �,/- GEOLOGICAL SURVEY A'.. R d Capacity and ;iaintenanca yg �;,5.. ,Arcesn to comer-.ial and Schools I DFNT OF FISH WICe'3D ASN FED CROPS AND CAME DWELQPET ZONE: 2,. F--vdaminant 5-10 ac. Parcel Size ;2. -Ticinity of Urban .Boundaries WZTFryn FLOOD PLAM ✓ a. AS. Viability not Isrpaired ..--• WIT . &%EA, SPECIFIC OR L »ra r nerat-.lmtioa: 3ubstantWly conforr= to: Iw M USE PLAN: GrMMLAL PLAN- 1. Lmd Use r Yes, i la 1 Ga A&'_E _ 2. Consersation ..r.- Nam of Plan 3- Open Space WI=N URBAN RESERVE: 4. Safety If. Yes, 5. Noise ✓ ._.._.._ Naas of Reserve 6i. Hovaing 7. Cisti slatton '� _ AIRPORT LAND USE Pi.AN ZONMZ �C 5, lc'._ AV i hF pRa �t;CCai t: tt4srLS:� ` v-4" stAl Signature------- -► t— A5 �' APPLICANT FOR IME REQUESTED LAIM 0MI SIGN x M AWARE OF THE ABOVE' 'STAFF DM�t�,{rtta�TION 'REGARDMG CONFORMCE 4M ME GENERAL HAN AND ZG3tL`iG tinted 5igtsatusa ofppiirant T *This report will expire and be discarded si.*� (b) ®onths frmc '''the date of the staff slgrmtum- LD 1000A (ravised 6-81) { TENT"1`1IV ;UI30TVISt0M T1:1111'A't`M PAitl':1 L, MAP 4 PREr�DLINARY IIIJI%rDMUION VIAIVI n AP1 LICATIQr1 i (Illeate chLlck appropriate to box) APPLICAN,r: David & Ruth Manthei 1'11OIlC `1" ( 91 h) 891-8952 C/o Heritage Partners AD[D a',po,: 426 Broadway, Suite 2.05 , Chico CA -95928 WHE : David & Puth Manthei r'I1c,UE 1,10: (916) 361-3878- A�D.RtMS- 9,305 Quesada Way, Sacramento, CA 95826, ZNGITILER OR SURI![?'f Il' _ Heritages Pari ner fllfOl� MO: (916) 893-89$2 ADDP8SS: 426 Broadway, Suite 205, Chicon CA. _ 959.28 I TL NOTICE O1, IU�NRtNG Unt Heritacre Pa ' yers 426 'Broadway, Suit dciC;h;nn, CA g592EL %# WCATIOtl OP PROPC18'1'Y: `r6j j-,lHjp RANGE I x 3 CTION 21 � 26 • ;,O,rAf, CaE 19ndL�i rL`fC);aC. l'R1? allIAR+C TITLE UPORT OR RMENT P)LICY 01- 'J'I'Vt,C IN5UROCC (dated witli ):..1 . - , -,,C months) W1'111 APPUCA'1'ION . , IrIDICA111C T3rLOVI TiM DATE AND RCCORDTD16 IM`-vVA`rl'JN BY WITCH ',PIS PARTIOUL R Mz(,LL WAS Cft ATCD: DA12 _March 5j 1976-_- 1300K 55 PAGE 17 0 o 71, 72 _ 73 UUI, EII AND ;SYS Or, t'ARCLL.'S 131.3110 UFAIVI) any rewir)tler) : PCJ17 Develop- dent. of 16 lots ranging in size from 77 ac i to 2.,3 _�7-,--temarider common area of: 60.86 acs. DISTANCE TO 'NATURAL WA'1'1,R COURSE OR TOIN 101111;Tribut6ny t -n .k0efer 4 ,Ugh >rROPOSCD M ETI.10D CSE ^r.MAOC DIMSAL., Ons ti e + rn 'rn t ant t ''' spostt' . See rezone ap0lication also. (Cherlc with 32,110 Depavtmon,L) PI't'.3i'ti Ln u0U17CC or IlA'l't l;; Onsite well. Common Well and a i r i lLti n .s s 'em. , __._(Check with Ilealth DuptArtit ht) 0 I IjL[l AND V110NO L1rI � C; Zw'1, TO '1111' BOUNDARY OV THEOliIQMA L PARCEL'`_ Yes IF NOT LN,,A rXiWVL! IM 1D.Cly'1l1N ' TIp'Y WILL II.AVO IN JiE' EXII-11DEli, t IIAME OIC MAR,'-vr 'm we [;qAG _ Cohasset Road t3COh'.A is 'rc- urARt,S.T Cb113t�IC ROAD: Adjacent (ror in.f.:)tmatjjn on itcar(211nt public road, check with t"L►blic Works De,- s atnen4) J.,f` ACCESS IG BY PRESCRIPTIVE RIGitT-OI'-WAY, ATTNC1( DOCU1.011TA°PlOII T(? ';81 Al)P'L,ICATIOR'. C' ACG'-M IS BY n RECORDED PRIVA'11� POAD EASUML1,,, ";11"TCA'[1, DEM) REIMEOCE VOLUME PAGE Tf' T11EUT APE PON NQ AMES.*, $TRIPS, THELE KJOT BE SHOWN ON '11(E TENTATIW, MAI' AND aw{ RCCORIM0 DATA It'I UCA11-W t31.TA4C: VOfJ3 m PAGE DIS' AT—ICT; TO civ LII IT3. *1.0 mi. _ north of Chico City limits HAS TI4E OWNER OF THIS PARCEL CREATED ANY CONTIGUOUS PARCELS? No f I01WI'U O XPVTdCANT SM-NAI111ZC . r OW ILR 1:1V Rt COM) FOR OFFICE USE ONVY To Subdivision Conind tier To Ad,ri :orj Agency: Mut TaI,o Action I.ya Appeal to Dwrd of Superiisors 8xpiration. dtt [ince pt Number .. _ Total Received: to 16,10 Aewir^-1 z� -1ft►i I rpt r;itiitSC y f lan►► i ng Oniq 7 t,i►�l t`i, IJ,nIor Irrtivt+ t9ritsv 1 110 CA 95065 1•07 tt116 r, 18 -7 60 1 APPENDIX H FOR U11 USi�t7,'JLY - App 11c AP it ;�...�.._.. Subdivision Name (i rpljl ir;s}ait+) Jrtrt rx !'i i►tri LAND DIVISLON APPLICA'CIONS .5t1Lrm�:nl11 CnCn►.matftyrr far- P.L,xnnirr pc ;3rt.ment lr litit .u►tl dc!;tzrilie ar►y c:%thorL related 1►ernits and otlmr lsuI)Jit approv;,l rr(irr i r"tri for i h i s ('it (, jrset. int Juding those reyu Ired by s tty+ regional, :.i,ctt+ nttd ft�tltr,►I agrnrxt Rezone to Ft1D zone F :e 1�1`(rit(1tic+Li!+(`i.li?tii(�!►�iT�%1'aCfClr3t'e(�' pl"Cl',jF'.(:tS: years fa�win_9 approval 9» A►rt crii►.►ti3►i irit�r(+nor+rtC.3J develonm5(!t (phasing Of .41.1W'Ivis10n units; tt►t►r►i�� (!t?vai+.rfaiirc:nl, f►lans); prised First. phase corn of 9 l ors; second phase, 7 lots '4; Wlier( mrtltu(l will be t►I.ilized to accommadatQ surface_ dra nage? Descrlb,� 111,1Wc►n-s i tt, And 'doWnstreaffi dr.aInage channeIs win hr_ ;tCf et:tt d. 5 ma..l_1`ocks dams will be used kor detention and velocity control. Ther Wil l be sufficient detention to avoid an increase in peak Zl6w 'y• Pvtoximity or 'ttatt:r 1'or five f3gi►ting pt►rposr's lhvtjt•.si�hs J)on(k, etc, 1~r f1o_v__ystem eiesg ped to meet county --& statb gUidelihes to. Wi 11 �rt�;ti;tv'.�t i(itt M i,►•�-rtl,iitg he ntce:;:�al'y'! i�uhic y"ki'ir; ((!iimt►ta')f PUDdes n ni- nimizes w------�—.�...r gracla.ng. i« 11irr�t i inns I`.i► tr.rt�r?�I t.ts Pe(Vt:rt;y CMWal a'nd r►n►►uit.�tincats tir(:as onlyl ..W � F•i.1u.+i1rr..�i1.'ar.1r. rJ +�i..Mi ,. `.. NV IItONMENTAl.:114PACTS AND MCTIGATihIN: l`fEASOPES1t :::arr env1 I�Ic�nt i f'y pint rn( i,tll;y sill;.' rOnmental Impacts associated wl h It, 1.tntl division. 41hat ptoject design feature's or special conditions or, alalircavil (rnitig.3tion aneasures) are proposed to alleviate potential Pnv 1 ronmCnt,,i l impacts? See note below. 11. ENVI HONK ENTA1. 5,'1-rlNG t it) I)vscrlbo 1,he project- site as It exists before the project, i1 AIlding nrormatictn oil topography, soil stAh .iity plants gild attim.iis, rind any cultural, historical ical or scenic aspects. iV5Vr'ihP Atiy exi. ting structures on the site, and the use of thlo 5t,i'liCt.tla'f`.S S: It) os(—riho the surrounding properties, including information on I)lnnt,.s and alriinals and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. 111xlit;ate` the type of land use (residential, comme►'clal, etc.), 1111 rets i t y of land use (one-rami ly, apartment houses, shops, depart- mVttl sLurcq (.tc.), and scale of development (height, frontage; rrhavk rear yard, etc.). See note below. IwItR`I'i hLI . rloql r hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in ..._ ,» diel-.1t t it'hOd OX11111t 1 5 present the data and information required for this iu i t !.i i Ova ilt:it ioil In, Lhe best of my ability, and that the facts, statements And. hiltorwat inn presented; are true: and correct to the best of my knowledge aItol lit, i i of. z Sign'l)Ue± For i�tl: t kWIVIN'thl- suet Fur longer a.-sponses NOTE: Additional inf=ormation available in rezone application r,/g*, and development plan & vesting tentative subdivision mai. SUD1 VTDER' S STATEMENT N'ONO-Dav d Manthei, c/o Heritage Date kioyember 2, 1992 Partners PY'OJect_ Oak Hia -hands PUD A_q'1-230053 & 60 ;Existing use (s,) of the land winter grazing 2 Proposed use (s) of the land sincrie. ,mil residehtza dwellin units • 3 mprovelments proposers (See Ch. 20-21 County Corse) c rculat; bn_, dor,; estic water einer enc 1:'ire flow wnstewa drainage systems 4.Public areas propose underground tins: eiate`r treatment it c� snosal area (-+1.4 Ac.- . *ceclaitned wasteu�3ter, winter storage (i1.5 Ac.), common open space (+56.76 Ac.) 5. Tree plAnring/or removal (approx. number)_ Xt oak trees tri be removed .for road. construction. 90± acorns to be planted. 6, Preliminary copy Of any condition;; restrictive reservations ()r• Covenants existing or Proposed shall be attached to this statement, attached none see notes on snap 7 State type of division i,e. private road, urban rural, etc PUD subdivision for 16 single a it lots and cocoon area C U 1040 w. .pParinIng �P$rfinent 1993 Orovhfe, calitomin � Partners � e,L ,�'! OF 6 Broadway, way, S93-8482 Q 426 ,I3tt�wtlwuy�, Suite 205 Ofico. CA 95928 PI(I ,art trg and Development MAIL: P.o, o. 3669 Chico, CA 95921-3669 PAx (116) 893.8985 TRANSMITTAL LETTER T0: Craig Sanders, Planning Division FROM; Tom DIGiovanni, Heritage Partn 2 RE/PROJECT; Oak.Highlands PUD DATE: January 17, 1993 TRANSMIT: 6bwith under separate cover :nail overnight delivery c 6urierfax tel## #;pages: POR YOUR, approval review & comment US -6 records information signature & return THE F0LLnWIPJ(,, tYpQ des+ceipti 1 original Development plan with str� )'light location N ID TILE NO. 93--05 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING C014HISSION STAFF FINDINGS' - January 11, 1993. "PLSCANT i David and Ruth Manthei UNER Same REQUESTS Rezone from FR -5 to PUD' AP NO.: b41-230---059 & 060 SIZE-. 81.12 acres LOCATION: Located on the east side of Cohasset Road, approximate.Ly 1/4 mile north of Richardson Springs :Road,, north Of Chico ]MISTING ZOAING FR -5 ZONING HISTORY: Zoned FR -5 on Aug. 2, 1988 :by Ord, 2696 SURROU-'NbtNG ZONING: FR -400 SR -5, A-160 SURROUNDING LA39D USF. Rural residential land uses to the West, grazing land in other directions SITE HISTORY The property was rezoned from VR -40 to FR -5 in 1988. Two previoU,s subdivision applications for the, property have been unsuccessful due to physical constraints Of the property regarding seWagd disposal, GENERATj PLAN DESIGNATION": Agricultural Residential APPLICA3E REGtJLATIONB: Butte County Code Sections 24-26 through 24-29, 24•-112.4,, and 24-126 1 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING C0XHIS:rI0N STAPP rINDINGS - January 11, 1993 COMMENTS RECEIVED: Butte County Mosquito Abatement Di�tr:,ct; "see attached letter" Chico Unified School District "see attached letter" C111co Area Recreation and Park District: "The Chico Area Recreation and Park District notes that this project, as proposed, will add to the Cumulative negative impact on park and recreation facilities. CARD, therefore, requests that in Addison to those requirements placed on this subdivision by applicable ordinances and Butte County Codes, that the owner and developer be required to waive, in writing, otst owner/developer now has or hereafter may have, to the fmationany rofean assessmetgt district for the purpose of maintenance and operation of any park and recreational facJJ ity identified in CARD's Recreation and Parks Plan or the Recreation 'Element of the; City of. Chico l s -General Plan that may reasonable serve the area in which the subdivision is located." Departnment of Fish and Game: " The Department of Fish and Game (DFG) has reviewed the Project Description and Discussion of Issues for the Proposed Oak Highlands Planned 'Unit Development. Me DFG concurs with the recommendation, by Ms. Mary Meyer, that a follow-up botanical. surveybe per performed during spring for sensitive plant species.11 (see also .letter dated. July 1, 1992 attached), PG&E: "We have reviewed the subject snap and request that the following be dedicated and/or shown on the map and reserved in future deeds as Public utility easements: I. All private roads. 2. -A 10 -foot strip lying within the lots adjacent to all road. 3. A 5-f6ot strip adjacent to all. side lot lines. Al.l costs associated with the relocation/rearrangement of PG&E facilities will be the sole responsibility of the owner/developer: Additional easements may be required as the lots are developed. There are no natural gas facilities in the immediate area." ANALYSIE3, This is a request to rezone approximately 81 acres located on the east side of Cohasset Road to FIt--5 is 19 a pproXrma.tely 1/4 mile notch of .,Richardson Springs P. 15 from ,FR -5 to PUD. The property was rezoned from FR -40 88. The +property owners made two subse - ision quem. subdf' applications. The ts,(t ap Ica;ion was denied due to .incomplete env�.ronmental documents (the applicant did not want to prepare an ETR) disposal snpcelth�fconventional se ti�4�. of evaporation: ponds for sewage.: Proposed the us p tank and , The second leach ty t park' t could rlotpmeet the �^�:st1n s andards on 5 acre elssoeh tld he tem Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors agreed that this method of sewage 2 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF FINDINGS - January 11, 1993 disposal was not appropriate in the FR --5 zone and the project died.. The proposed rezone to PUD and associated subdivision map answers many or the environmental concerns that were raised in previous projects. By clustering the homes in the northerly part of the property, ,zensitive wetland habitat is avoided, the homes will be located away ,from Cohasset Road which is a noise source, and, given the amount of open space,, the project will meet the requirements of the Department of Fish and Game's deer herd policies. The resulting density of the PUD will be the same as if the property were developed in 5 acre parcels. The use of the PUO zone also solves the problem of using a sewage disposal method other than conventional septic tanks and leachfield systems. Alternativt,! systems have been accepted by the County in this zoning designation. In this instance, the applicant is proposing to install a hybrid system that will util.izc- individual septic tangs, a recirculating sand/gravel filter, shallow subsurface irrigation l r,cp,;, and a pond for reclaimed wastewater for the winter months, This type of system has been used in other areas of the County successfully. A certified soil scientist and a registered civil engineer have designed system. a ' liquid to a recccie septic tanks will retain the solids, releasing the tcUlating gravel filter. The water passes through the filter many times until it is nearly colorless and odorless: Tlrt" effluent is now 'pure enough that it can readily be absorbed intothesoil. To make sure that it does not contain any bacteria or viruses it will be treated with chlorine before it is released to the soil through a series of shallow underground pipes that will irrigate approximately 25,000 square feet of fescue grass during a wot year and 15,000 to 18,000square feet during a normal rainfall year: rescue grass will be planted_ecaus e of it's high evapo-transpiration. rate. This will create a year round green meadow area that can also be utilized by residents for recreation purposes,. During the `�*inter months the grass will not need the water and the soil will nat be :able to accep� it. The water will then be pumped to a holding plond to be located on the southerly 'portion of the property. The pond has been sized to hold the water from the residences and rainfall for a 1 in loo year rainfall year. The area needed it approximately 1.5 acres with a maximum water deptheof ar. 4.4 feet. The pond will probably be dry by MAY or dune of each Since the water in the pond will by treated and cblorinated it will not represent an odor problem. It will, also be -diluted with tip to three times it's amount in rain water, The California Regional Water Quality Control Board and the County Environmental Health 'Department have reviewer.)i the proposed system and agreed to itis concept and design. Water for the project will. be provided by either a community sys inttem of. V'dual wells. Based on data submitted to the Planning Division,e 5'I BUTTE COUNTX PLANNING COMMISSION i STAFF PXNDINGS - January 11 1993 both ways appear feasible. If a community water system is installed it will be a mutual water. system licensed by the Department of Corporations. Maintenance of the water system and the sewage disposal system will be the responsibility of the homeowners association with a CSA being formed to oversee the operations and take over maintenance if the homeowners association fails to provide the required service. This project appears to be well thought out and addresses the physical and environmental constraints of the site, p This map is well planned and is a better propan than either of the two previous subdivision applications. The Prior applications made it Property is to develop to a densit of 1 dwelling unitapex- 5aacr f the Will have to be ,done through a PUD (unless community sewer ,and water are made available, whicdh is extremely unlikely), RECOMMENDATIONS: MOTION: ACCEPT THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF STAFF :MEMO DATED January 11, 1993• MAKE THE FINDINC6 LISTED UNDER "A"; MAKE THE MOTION LISTED UNDER "B" INCLUDING THE CONDIT109S LISTED 1 THROUGH . A. find that: 1. An initial study was completed in 'compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act. 2. Said study and comments received thereon identified potential significant environmental effects that the project may have had, but a• Provisions in the project pla,ns or pl,oposals made by or agreed to by the applicant wcsuld avoid such effects or mitigate such effects to point where clearly no .g environmental effects would. occur. si n�.f�.cant bThere is no substantial evidence before t� - County at the environment. the project as revised may have that signi c�iw", of Qct at -34 The proposed. Negative Declaration with mitigation meatuses has been completed in compliance with California Environmental Qualitthe y Act. 4► Find that the ;rezone conforms to the policies, including the. text and map of the Butte County General: Plan, because and 4 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING CO2.4HI$SION STAFF FINDINGS January 11, 1993 B Recommend that the Board of Supervisors adopt an ordinance rezoning to PUD, that property identified as <AP No. 047-230-059 Ono (Manthei); and 'C. Recommend that the Board of Supervisors approve a Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map on property identified a AP No. 047-230- 059 & 060 (Manthei), subject to the following conditions and mitigation measures (m) 10 Retain the existing rock wall. One section, no wider than 601, may be removed to accommodate the proposed access road. If entry monumentation to the subdivision is installed it shall be aesthetically compatible with the roc]:. wall and utilize the same or similar materials. (m) 2. The following mitigation measure for oak trees shall be incorporated into the project and shall be included as CC&R's: (m) A. individual trees or groups of trees that are retained as a function of project 'design should, be fully protected to the extent possible both during and after construction. in order to protect the root zone during construction a root protection zone (RPZ) should be established using stakes and. flagging material. The RPZ should be an area that is 1.5 timesthedistance from tre trunk to the dripline.. within this protective buffer- no grading, trenching, fill:, or vegetation alteration of any kind should be allowed. B. individual trees that are unavoidably lost due to project Implementation should be replaced by planting oak seeds (acorns)' or seedlings that are obtained from the local genetic .stoc}c of the Same species. A replacement rate of 5:1 shall be used for trees that are two inches or greater in diameter measured at breast; height (dbh) A replacement rate of 1:1 shall be used for all trees Less than two inches dbh. Every effort should be made to retain large oaks. Oak plantings shall be maintained for a period of five years. C. A fiveY ear maintenance and monitoring plan &hall be. completed for all oak mitigation plantings. The monitoring plan should include appropriate irrigation schedules, as well as criteria for success and reestablishment during the five-year period. Any trees planted as renddial action for failure of initial planting shall. be monitored for five year's in a similar fashion to the initial planting. The goal is to an 80 percent success the at the end of e five-earmonitorinperiod Homeowner shall be responsible for re -planting and maintaining oaks removed 5' BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF FINDINGS January 11, 1993 from their lots to .accommodate improvements. 3. F011owing Project ect construction, a fact sheet describing the value. aind care of native oaks shall be distributed to all residents. A11. a minimum, this fact sheet should encourage homeowners to avoid unnecessary pruning, educate them on the water needs of oak tees, and encourage, except where a safety hazard, the retention of snags and downed trees. This fact sheet shall also be referenced, in the CC&R's. (m) 4i Place a note on the Final map stating that Deer Mitigation fees aro �.o be paid at the time of obtaining building permits fees have been .adopted by the Butte County Board o (n) fSupervisorsh =5. The homeowners association hall maintenance of all common area, be responsible for the waste water treatment .facilities, domestic water and fire flow systems and street lighting. A CSA �( shall also be formed to act as an umbrelle homeoa entity to insure that w-nets association carries but ok over those duties in the event that the 'pare no hies and to take y n ;adequately. As long as the homeowners associationeisgadeq-uately maintaining the facilities, the CSA ma on: ��. the coat of reviewing the maint'o nano e dntumentat assess on fees to cover. c�) 6. Include a provision in the CC&R's that limits the amount of- irrigated landscaped area to 5,000 square feet per par-^a, Hardscape suclh as swimming pools. decks and counted as landscaped area. (m) ` patios shall not he 1- Provide for periodic maintenance of the wastewater storage pond to remove emergent vegetation growth along the edge- to help Prevent the reproduction of mosquitoes. Fill in all percolation test pits. Maintain all drainage ditches to keep standing water from forming and to clean out weed growth, (m) g• The drainage system for storm water runoff` shall be designed to as not to increase the peak runoff flow off the site. Erosion. control mc?asures shall be incorporated in all ditches where storm er runoff is o concentrated and where seourg or erosion occurs. ,,rhe Plan shall be approved pproved by the Butte County Department of Public ;Yorks, (m) 94 Storm water runoff shall not be fed directly on site. (in) Into any vernal pools 10. Recordan svigatioil easement for the Chico: (m) property With the City of G r BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION BTA: -F FINDINGS - January 11, 1993 Provide secure fencing around the perimeter of the wastewater pond to discourage unauthorized entry. The fence shall be at least 6"- high. 'high. (m)' ',eublir works conditions: 12. Submit road and drainage plans to the Department, of Public Works for approval and install the required facilities. 13, Provide: 20 feet radius property line returns at all street intersections. 14 Indicate a 55 ft. building setback line from the centerline of Cohassset Road. 1.5. ,Street signs shall be provided by the developer at all street intersections per County requirements. (Submit 5 alternate names for each street to the county address coordinator for approval of street names.) 16. Construct full street section on interior street to section shown on tentative map. Recommend 24 ft minimum paved width. 17. Provide monumentation as required by the Department of Public Works in accordance with,accepted standard's. 18. Provide permanent solution for drainage. 19. All easements or record to be shown on the final map. 20 xieet requirements t�f the Butte County Fire Department or other responsible agency. 21. street lighting shall be provided in accordance with Butte County requirements, accepted design criteria, and recommendations of PG&E. 22. Construct a standard left turn lane at the intersection of access road and Cohasset Road. 23, Construct: standard 5-18 15ublic road approach at the intersection of Cohasset Road and access road. 24. Provide 1 ft. no access strip on Cohasset Road. frontage with opening at access roadr 25. Meet the requirements of the utility companies (i.e., PG&E„ 7 r BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSIOi1 STAFF FINDINGS January 11, 1993 Pacific Telephone, Water, sewer.) 26. pay any delinquent taxes or current taxes as required.. 27. Developer shall provide all required traffic safety signs, including stop signs. Byironmental Health Conditions. 28 Provide community sewage collection, treatment and disposal facilities in compliance with California state Regional Water Quality Control Board, Code of Butte County,: California Health and Safety Code, and other, applicable codes and regulatiolls governing the design, construction and.operation of the facilities. 29. Provide verification of final wastewater plan approval by the Regional Water Quality Control Board prior to construction of site improvements; 30. Provide a legal g (government) entity Adequate to insure the operation, maintenance or repair of the sewage collection, 1' treatment and disposal facilities. As a minimum creation of the entity shall: in a. Insure financing operation, � 5 of o P n, repair and maintenance. Provide qualifi 4 :individuals and operational facility operational., repair and maintenance,proaedures for Co Provide adequate resource to comply with all monitoring and other Regi,uhal Watdt Quality Control Board, Waste Discharge .requirements. d:. Provide adequate resources for facility inspections and reports 1:or a County Service ARea or other maintenance entitty. e. Provide ce;llate resources and/or neahanisM to insure adequate„Lan of a major sewage treatment and d zposal facility replacement 'or reconstruction if necessary. f Service Area y t tilized, provide a li risk assessment for reg dew bability y he County of Butte. Indemnify the County of Butte and County Service Area for claims that May occur relative to the sewage disposal~ far..iIities l► Meet Mosquito Abatement requirements for cahtrol of Mosquitos and. nui `sa,nce insects in the wasteWater ponds. 8 BUTTE COUNTY PLANKING COMMISSION STAFF FINDINGS -- January 11, 1993 32. Comply with all sewage disposal faCility construction standard and health and safety requirements of the Code of butte County, California State, and Federal Law, 33 Provide adequate quantities of domestic !water for each parcel by Provision of a community water supply in compliance with California the state safe Drinking Water Aejc or by the provision an approved individual, well site area fOr, of each parcel.. Od3$: cs Attachments to Commission and Cities; 'Environmental Documents Site Plan Location Maki Letter Department of Fish and Game, 7/1/92 Letter Chico Unified school District, 10/2/92 Letter 'Butte County Mosquito Abatement District, 10/15/92 1 9 ti f _ 'DEPARTMENT N ces Ac" PET�F WILSON co;Vmo, STAT>r OF CALIFORNIA --THE RESOUR OF FISH AD GAME -=— REGION 2 'x1701 NIMBUS ROAD, SUITE A 7!annir, raparxt met l ' A6' ,RANCHO CORDOVA,CALlF ORNIA 95670 (916) 355-7020 _ JUL192 Orovilie, California July 1, 1592 Mr., Craig Sander, Butte County Planning Department 7 County Center Drive Oroville, California 95965 Dean Mr. Sanders The Department of ish 'and Game (DrG) las reviewed the Oak, Highlands Planned Unit. Uevelo tent which 16 residential lots on about 20 acres and: retain e62sAcreslin�open space. Located north of Chico, the project site is in P foothill area of Oak woodlands: Although the site lies in East Tehama deer herd winter r and outside of a Designated Development Zone,its location tinge adjacent to the Cohasset Highway Identified Transportation Corridor (ITC) is acceptable, Considering the open space provision, DFG does not object to the the ITC. placement of lots away from Should the project have the po the attached guidelintential to impact hardwoods, es are recotilmended a, the basis of providing mitigation for that impact. This project site contains the habitat t se}zsitive species types known to harbor:.. plants ecies which have been found in that genera. A botanical_ survey should be made to c ete�:inine if such species do occur onsi << _ plsn�tlrtg �:aaKmont "_ fWON? w OCT 5 1992 io Admirdstrativc Office OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT SUPERINTENDENT 1163 EAST SEVENTH STREET ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES CHrco, CA 95928-5999 ,(3116) 891-3.140 (916) $01-35110 October 2, 1992 Mr. Larry Painter, Planning Taxhnician Butte County Planning Commission 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 Re;"PROJECT RENlIEW & ENVIRONMENTAL'EVAUJATION" - David and R th Manthei Rezone No. (A. F. -NO, 047430=059 ,Deas Mr. Painter. District representatives have revienved tlle information contained in your memorandum dated September 29, 1992 regarding the David and Ruth Manthei rezone for property located on the east side of Cohasset Road,approximately 1/4 mile north of Richardson Springs Road. District representatives have determined that the proposed project will negatively impact Chico Unified School :District and, therefore, warrants ;further envi ronmental' analysis, SCHOOL ;rACILITIES FOR NEW SMENTS GENERATED BY TI.1E PRO. POSED DEVrE'L(?1'i aENT S The David and Ruth Manthei rezone proposes 16 residential lots. Applying the Dis- age children. y P g approximately 7 school trios .43 student yield factor, this develo merit will generate a roxt Utilizing current District actual student enrollment data and projected student enroll- Ment data from already approved new residential development, each elementary, junior high and senior nigh school in the District is filled to capacity; To act�ummodate a 50+ percent increase in student enrollment, in recent years, the District (1) reutilized relocatable classrooms on existing elementaryj existing, school facflities (2)utilized n elementary 'school facilities, (3) placed >= campuses, (4) Instituted multi- track yt;a,r-round education in three e;�istin9 elementary schools; (5) occupied ont; new urban elt;mentaq school on a year-round schedule, (6) occupied one new elementary school on a traditional school schedule, (7) .is in the process of constructing; a third elementary schod, (S) has placed interim facilities on the secondary campuses pending the availability o€ new school facilities, (9) acquired a site and has planned to build a new jun school; ior '-h/middle school and (10) has planned to expand one existing senior high '� h. 1' Mr. Larry Painter, Planning Technician October 2, 1992 Page 2, The District c' , , t 1. continues to be a parttctpanY in the State School Building Program wherein the (;,St of constructingnew school facilities is shared by the Stare; and by the local dis- av:ailablerict in a. pro rata State fundings herefore needed e need to construct new ,schools. far exceeds school facilities have not been provided n'a timely mannerrc Loocnnew allCh coed Sell�Uniffiedool trict School District revenues generated from school impact fees, coupled with the proceeds from the general obligation bonds approved by the voters in April 19881 will meet the student housing needs generated by local birth rates and previously approved residential. developments but will not meet the student housing needs generated by new develop- ment. The District anticipates housing increasing numbers of students in interim facili- ties until funding becomes available to construct new schools. IM act of Pro osed Develo menton Chico Uni ed School l?istrict Schools Since District elementary, junior and senior high schools are filled to capacity, it is evident that students generated from the David and Rutt, Manthei eannot be served by existing facilities. In addition, there is currently no funding mechanism that will enable the District to provide facilities for these students. Based on the District's .43 student yield factor per average (1.,280 square feet) house- hold, the IG residential lots in this development will yield approximately ? students that must be housed in District schools. The District projects that larger residential units Will yield more than .43 students per household and smaller residential units will yield less than ,43 students per household. To adjust for the higher student yield factor in larger than average households and the lower student yield factor in smaller than aver- age households, the District utilizes a mitigation cost based on square footage of habit able space in each household. This project must be consistent with the Butte County General .Plan and the impact on the District must be recognized and -addressed is the project approval process. rlliti�ation of Impact on Chico Uni ed School District Sc1zo��ls The D;strict is opposed to County approval of the proposed David and Ruth Manthei rezone, "application unless the project fully mitigates its impact on the District. Acceptable mitigation measures include: cash or in lieu equivalent (land or school facilities), approved by the District, which is equal to the full mitigation cost as described below; imposition of a controlled phasing of single or miil.ti_f�t ally residential devel- opment to coincide with provision Olt ,adequate school facilities; or * denial of the project. The 1.991/02 per habitable space .square foot cost to fully tnitigatj�6 the impact of each residential unit is $5,29 per square foot. This amount will be adjusted as needed to re flea the impact of inflation school facilities needs, regulator t changes and other cost Inue ivtl . . influencing factors. The full mitigation cost of $5,.29 per square foo[ of new residential developmentl include school Impact fees ('currently $1,58 per square foot),, The school imp,tet fee will be supplemented with an appropriate ainount of cash or in lieu 1vlr. any fainter, Planning Technician % October 2, 1992 Page 3 equivalent (land or school facilities) approved by the'lDistrict. The combination of school impact fees and cash or in lieu equivalent must fully mitigate the impact of the development on District schools: Since the school mitigation cost established by the District is based on habitable square footage of the residential unit and District representatives are not informed of the hab- ita.ble space of each residential unit in the proposed development, it is not possible to confirm the total cost of the mitigation at this time. The following calculation is pro- vided to allow one who is knowledgeable of the habitable space of each residential. unit in the pronoscd development to make her/his own calculations: CALCULATION "1"oral habitable space in residential unit(s) times the current cost for full mitigation in I effect when paid ($5.29 per square fooCiri 1991/92) equals total mitigation. For example; 16 units Lal 1,100 square feettunit x $5.29 $93,104; or 16 units @ 1,280 square feet/unit x $5.29 $108,339, or 16 units @ 1,400 square feet/Unit x $5.29 - $118,496.. Other Allitigating Cons �z�r� ons Cohasset Elementary School currently serves the proposed development, Since the majority of the students will be bused to the school and will need to walic to bus stops, considerations should be given to the constructior► of sidewalks in the azea_ if you have any questions or need °additional information, please feel free; to contact me at 891-3209, Sincerely, Michael Weissenborn Facilities Planner AdministrativeServices MWrmk1 cc Stan 14en5leyi Assistant Superintendent/Administrative So Cid itJ I, BUTTE COUNTY MOSQUITO A , DISTRICT OFMCEAT � �ATEIYRjEN7� DISTRICT d,( N-F-COPNER GFOROVILLE A' RPORT5117 LARKIN ROAD ON I.ARFJN ROAD OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965 TAME A. CAMP PHONE (916) 533-6038 MANAGER 342.7350 FAX (916) 534-9916 October 15, 1992 Larry Painter, Planning Technician butte County Planning Commission 7 County Center Drive drOViile, CA 95965-3397 Vdar Mr. Painter: After reviewing the hanthei rezone, we are concerned with the following items ;and ask that our mitigation requests be required as a condition of approval for this project: 1. Roadside ditches that will be used to collect surface, runoff 2. Vernal ,pools and clay flats 3. Percolation rest pits left unfilled 4. Oak gees within and near the surrounding area 5. Proposedconstruction of a 1.5 acre wastewater treatment. site koadside and cobble lined ditches will be used to collect runoff from this developmett, and will need periodic maintenance. We support the recommendation rhst the :storm drainage plan for this development be included in a County Service Area in order to provide for tteeded_maintenance. We also request as mitigation that runoff water be directed around the central lowland which contains vernal pools and clay flats' by connecting the drainagu. to the existing roadside ditch along Cohassett Rodd; Percolation tes� its that have been excavated to Z p examine the soil depth andpercolation rate will rill from winter rain and breed mosqui-toes. We request that these pits as well as the old te,c"t henorth side of this proposed development be backfillepits d. are located on The Did , t jurr provides a.Sugtablen�tab ta�aEoratreeholeamosquitUnds the proposed development water holding ccvties s• This mosquito breeds .in g , primarily Oak trees And is the primary vector of the dog heartworm disease. land that is subdivided and encourages urbanization into this area will result in an increased risk of this disease., We also request r?i:et the proposed 1.5 acre wastewater :treatment site rho t will be constructed to 'hold water for purposes of irri3ating be constructed and tnatntained with clean steep edges, This will help eliminate emergent: vegetation that occurs along the shorelines of "hallow edged ponds, Add help prevent the produc"tion of mosquitoes. Any use of w,estewater for ire gdtion purposes must not create a mosquito breeding problem. 01 w �^;, m ♦. ltw a �SUd�c.a, t:• a t !_ # Wm`a %•i ��� ��ta - .�tF ran ( I � f 11 Pie IL•.►! a 1 �• �� Mow Road rr r � /f .J I'd S w /f! ^, `----, � � a 11d STREET, y � E.2.• t. sren �¢ i4 .ss" ! c "^ �' 4,1 Y ,n / I a« I frstKt in. � Y .� 103e a rte[ 5d, •raa.e t /J) .. w .n .... .iii t• • '�: i },."»,., . t ' `W.t netAonf. to "'– ! Z p ST .. AST 81h ST, Z. 3 v EST !th � hF.� q EST 9th. SIREET ;las ` ERST... 91h ST„ 1-}e Qo' 5t Av. ind, -131. Fzck C. 1•atea F ✓✓JJ �ps1> °P� 141 IILI Q Rock . tue , I o�' r CT Lo' A►'T` I O N. Z•��t�tt� t+y �1 � � e° 6Gtl� 9T ROA POAO p r (^� v f„ - d..t�etf Sno't t - Isn1m. k W G q.. t+ L w d IiMh RYIIaM. Cl 1r.t. ,, .wr kw -p.p 4 AMA Road f } 4 � d�`c BroCl.. Y D+rve � E ikn duw /1 b t.ndmu► � : Oa Its 001 �} a ..r�..aNlw..�lwi�...ea� VICINI^rY MAP DAVID MANTHEZI�i`'Z.ONE 0X1'1 -23d-059 b,Co4 93-;05 3 F!! EOP-'4 230-2-5", �J ; BUTT: COUNTY' PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING DATES= 7"AN -z8/1:993 �-*- Q.8/1:993- DAV I'lA t H E d f1i,1~:11� R; SAME is APPLICAN 1 - V .1 f ."I . -. - FR -S SCALE00, t REQUEST: REZONE TO. P LID EXISTING ZONE- January 215 1994 Tom Reid Department ,o f Public Health Division ref Envirozment al Health 7 County Center Dr3Lve Oroville, cm 95.96.9 Res Oak Hicihlands PUD Dear Tom Please find attach► d, a copy of a December 13, 1993, letter to Craig Sa.nt3e:rs in the, 'Planning Depaz-tment. The letter was a request to make sbme minor changes to the approved development plan. It is our desire to make these changes At the staff level and to avoid anv additional public h:arings. Per a, su])so quent tele.phora.a conversation with Craig, we find it neces.sar-,r to request your Department's input on one of the requested changes . With your approval, and. the approval of Kater Quality, the. Reclaimed Wastewater Winter Storage Pond will be eliminated.. I'nstectd, an underground storage facility will be constructed 'near thei disposal area. It is our feeling that this could result; in a significant ,cost savings as well as being a huge aesthetic improvement. our' appcation %:o Water Quality for a Waste Discharge permit, Ne noted this possible change and it has been met with approvia.l Ron Dykstra has worded the 'propose8t permit requireme'ats to allow either methad of storage. At t11Lis timet;. we need a written statement from your department approving this change. With this statement, i14. is Craig's belief that we can keep this modification to a staff: l0vel approval with no public het rings required. Please feel]. free to give me a call if; you halve any questions or if you require any additional informsttion. We lock forward to r.ecei.ving your approVal statement as soon aai possible.. Thank you, iMRTHSTAR E1M31tiEERING % Mark Adams cc: Craig ...'andersvo Steve. rjotti WPI, 3 t ()AkHIG1 20 DECLARATION ORM CHICO, CAl IMANIA 959126 916=993-1600 Notification Nb,%.7 - `i `/ THP No; A,G tE �EiVT REGARDING PROPOSEr) ST.R,EAM OR LAKE AL`TERXrILON TM IS ACREEMENT, enterer; lnto`b�tween ti he State of Califbrr►ia, Department- .of Flsh and G arae, hereinafter called the Depa►tnrent, State df�.-�: =L _, liereinaftcr a tilled tl►e operator, is as follows: )YIf},'AEAS, Pursuant to Division 2 Chapter G of California lash and Caine Code, trrc operator, on the no the Departar►ent that he intends to �cia substantially divcrx or obstruct the natural flow of or substantia 1 of ' cf �rtr , ut bank of, or use material i rom the: streambed of, the followir,S water: _ j' 4; 4 �C rte, State of California, S '� Tom• -, ,1 " �,l `? � ,t :s1-r��3 Sr �l � change � bed, ' ha the ►n they County of WJ-18118its the De ' patttDcnf (rEpresented by!'-t�r:C C_ ' �.. .:s ------.�-, _.day of -7 • , , ,, - —-{-- has mhrlea .rr, ireetlon oC subject area on the �uch�rpertrtls�rtsma;rsubstant:allyadversely affect existing %h and wildlife rudini;;—_, esources inclt� �✓ Y=•truer, 1�v i�� `, wid`) hasdet.`.rmirted that ------------------------- 1114U 1EC'OR77, the Department hereby proposes mcasurctto protect fish and wildlife during the ope rator's ivory. The operator agr'',ea; to accept tile following recommendations as part of his work, Numbers ___L _�J 1 ar 1_ - p r hereby ' ifrorr tie itst of recornr aendatlons on the back of this h 3 p.,0„and the following special recommendations; —` f, All work in or near the stream or lake SHiall be confined to the period r f' /i rt P"r r�r r , -------------- it-... ... .. . - .. an-... The operator, as designated by thesignature on t!i!s agreemr nE, shall be responsible Cor the execution of till +» A c-Vpy of this abreeT"Lrit must bi eleme, ofthisagreement. Provided to contractors and subcontractors aurid must be in then iiossession ai the word; site, If the operator's work changes from that stated in the notification specifies! i 1)ov lhis a y rar5tificatiotr shtill be submitted to the Department or Irish and Cati►e. r'uilure ►o.e orn i � with grecrrtettt is ►►n longer valid and a� new Pertinent Code $ectiar s, Including but not limited to Cish and Carrie Code Seetions5MO, 5E+52 and 5eJ�iS rr,a p 5 �� itn the provisions of this agreement and ivitl► oiltcr Nothing in this agreement .authorizes the operator to trespass or► any land or property, nor riot s it relieve the o in Prosecution, for compliahce with applicable federal, state, or lost ��ws-ut' orclinanees operator Of t"espbnstliiltty i '[CHIS ACi1EtWENT IS NOT INTIE;IVDED AS AN APPROVAL, OF A pl1O)tCT oil OF ,, , rlr1'CICiC.S rt1'' `i`PPE DEPAf1TMENT OF F1Slt t1NU CAi�1E CNDCh>✓i\>�j;NT ItP:VtC1;tr r1N1 ltPiC0lvitvi)NIJATr RE PROVIDED 3y THD DEPARTMENT AS AP'pltOPt11ATL ON `[`P3C�dE � Sl>rc,CFiC Pf30J ILL ONS t'�iL,L !�);1)ERAt, P8E1MPT5 O11 OTi4Lri ENVIPt�iNMEN7`,�r, PttP'Ot1T,' APt�, P1Y='QtlfTl�rS, G S'i'ATI;, oEi 7'hisagreemeni Vint -eliveon r ;�. Op ». r tier --- t ) rr IJ.. Dtpariinrrteptc� aathtive Orgrttl�atlon _. _ _, �"D til al tes ti ?< Department Of Fish and Came, State of California `ti trrtctttrrt,wrtr r►otrnnde,rrasstiutwditiswithintiairnth`scs ���� n .. 'Ci.CCON-1331.c ND.1TTOINS i. 1 r>3 •;liirisra w(.- or rcrnoval of vo c,tation shall )tot C;�,Ccucl 5r117 to construct ltarricl'ti or (ills. if work in the lril;o /'ti` 'rnl)�arrtlrnr`xlc.rsstlr�r to compivto opernitiorl!,r i hO N1uI11rnic1;113i�:-tt.cllrl�lin.c�iclosalr(� 4o,llrer•r'tjC siltation djA i;at,t it portious of aiiv strl'ain vhmillcl or 40,%; )n;lr- of d c' lake, beyond' tilt.' inmiedinto working area s11111 o4iii'jhe High +v.6r mark, of the 5tr{. oil or hike 1w distilled. nip "c'josurt:.Jl�f(1 slim Stlppuj,tt1.t) n.11 lal afl.:!nJ lw, apitori'd tct fiv heal' dwir c'1.1g111ol clvditioll rv, drill III, varnoS"ml 11'ivil tilt! 'work is conmpletcd, ' H. Silt bt,tl"Illy; I)kl$Iliti shrill I)r i(lr�,tc'd away from th1; strCllm Regloration, 5(1;411 itaclude� thu )'o'yegetation of stripped Or hik(' to silt4brali"11• was' a' '.or. aa)P',;le(l firstii,,y,. reticlijim, til(' stream fn` Iilkc'. rxoct.1% Iitifop,.or+other erosion proteclion sliall hey placed 15, Pre ariltiull shall be mach so that rw7off jcom steel), In tOwt'c vegotation cannot reasonabty be e.xl)e1.ted (*YOdil)lc sttl'ra-IMN Will he diverted into stable areas with 11�xvWih,. A'astablisbed. ''' ' `' little I'rOsiOn potell 1:11. Frequent water chocks shall be 1r,� .all;itfFr "Y 1) '.. s,lprIr"c+rks, or other �;trl.�ttirps shai,i phict'd can flirt roads. crit tracks, or other work trolls to control plosion. be Wa1c1> fflat.watcr flow is not impaired and upst earn, �. irt);od)crtirn. l,iq ,igc� of I sli is assured. at till timet - 16. AV'1 l) ;rater Containing thud or silt from aggrogate wash- d.;iw> 13ttumo of �prn Mary iulvarts shall lac placed at car ink, or othcl ol)erations shall not be allowed to enter a beai, w strcinl p r,)ttnc:l grAcltl. Bottomr, of permanent 1.21'a or flowing stretill . shall be )l:ml belo%v streim channel gmade. J 7, a) r1 alit catchment basin Afdl bc�, constructed aero$s rtlXtdt'sinl1 of cxallr rGCc sllls • and other fpaturel thu strei m itmnediateiv i)claili tilt' isroJect sitc,, This tl.v, &OulclwtZithilltr iI11pude rish migrations blast bc- "Iteli lle"t bilsill $11,111 6, vollstructed of gravel vvW(l) ,Up 'i14'£r_l by Depmtlnellt engineers. is fre(. from illus or tint. imy ,. t rl Sroction) is l 1l i Upon completion or tilt project Sind rlrtur .ill flowing eGmtW ct�d,t,1 t linfaine(jtll'o placed lit oper: tion, suffl \V;ttt'r Illi tilt, arva ist elvar of turbidit,v, the gravel alon'-.r, with til(. trapped sedmnent sflnll be from tit .'t watcr.shnll at fill tirncs be n1lowe(1 to Dass aoivr-' rernowd the strt'an1, dri.t�,m_r'o mainttlill ;'LOAM, below the dam, Ay: ,:alar uatc- fish )sssup tticilih, must be inc'or orated I I I 18- ff t)11VI'lltiOns recluit'i1 Moving of erluipment across li Malvin,` strenist, Stich oper7hons be �itl ' llltrr t�.r,tit�,tt hltstl�tteks fish p;r ttg+r�� shall Conductedmit: without stibstuntial1v hicre:asiug stream turbidity, Ivor „ Arc, unapolory danl (tile artificial obstruction)port- pcatrd crossings, tbc' operator shall itt.,tall a bridl c, Aall,61v.bc built trurn material stmit :,tS clean, t'1114'C rt,, or ror_-k-Pill CroSslli 'as Sl)eGiil(cj ►11 Cotnillc'nt graw"A whiell will�cry"tscr 111A; or ilii siltation. below. !";O` viluiptnent will be operated Ill tvc Stre'lin chaalnels. I1)• li .t ;,trmrll 011allnel has beim j1tcru.'d during the ol)cr4t. fel; r tlt�; in tit sfirill iiRbe ofsr:rtited in fife a eealn channels ttonr its It)vi' noiv di rnnt"I shall be, eill raled tis n wlk is llos llblc to itsritthlrtil state+i tllatik creating a possible' Of ftrxit~•1n t live,ztvilms^rxcent-as'rr)at"bcs•iiect'sttr�• to frittlrrr 1;7111" t�1'i7cioii'l)robleln, or :i ltit u'idc channel p1 f,.rlriiwl•itra Crossings or barriol's and rills at chalinel os` Slni(:e-like' t1rC,i. 1i it lal.L+ 1-11ari4irl 1111S beerl altered, it '"' N111111 -be 1'C'tuWlC.Cl .fi5.lnearlti a .Possible to ifs natural 11'nrk in 'flp+t bi! sttoam is )mavoidable, the Ct;tt`' +i'it'hlult c'r(SrItillry a future pact{` evosioll problem, 91ltlt" StYt.Iiillfll7ii.,Sl1i111 fail tltV4rti'rl flYuuinrl t11e 11"ori; 71w i�1S1t1{(lit of tilt. St1Crltnhccl Or hike tliaralri Sh.hil bG Jx a ..l?atilnr,,, tc,mppl tr;�; ctlivert, Andfor a 7ie'llr' vis 1101111111V iis riS5lblt the $mink; grre�lienl a5 c+cfSte±l lyrf�ii� lialcm� h� _V c:lp,.l t)f, permi ti urstre;�m rt1151 �1o11nt-� to d Stthr)inpe" >xirt,,t'! �sl; rrsoi�ciiient: Co1i1�+ construction-of of the r)inrrIer vitt �1 � asst)t -ltltcd Inkeralls -}tot deslon cl to Ido lie )l r chalnnel shall norm illy begirt tilt; "' x � ' ' ' ''`' Withstaudrhigli sr:.i,ritlinl Claiis� shall b� rcmar�etl to ai'cas aro:tr�airt:im"arwa Oiid CoWiri iii all t)p1treim direr}. Irhow the high Nvoter mark lloforc sash flows occur. ' —tiom end' the floc;, shall 1ILAivcrtccl c))ilit w1x°n peon- lir, thti diVLtSiOn IS rotr)i ILIcd, dhanuel bank �?I. No cl('11ris, tin;[ tif1t. xalld,� 1);1'1, slash, s�tr�"dust, rub.strllc1iQtt a)rb,:a�`1"3t'r ct)tlsthuCt1o11 shall IJL` .'�!C11LIatC1 fu pita*enk 11IVh emnt`nt o vtu cret(' or ikashi'Y) s thercof, oil or ' �, into tie frrnti ihe ii c;rh ,tr«yi: 01,111nel brinks or )rtrole m trudiicts or taller otganic or enrthen- Ill atNrial Iroln �ragmill!, h.irrfa rs shall ttt►t'lie ))iritic of cin t1t or other illisttt)1Gi: anv C,`oustrtic'tiotl, or ilrsmoiated activity subjc-a to croslot) u111css ffr F cncinsrd by Oluet Pilins;, or 101,Itc�i't'r nature shall lit- allowod to en'tee itito or f ;-_rockl„y ap, nr nt114r protective matcrfal, 'f'h� rrnclos lire ,,.,�1)laepd ic'here it Inav he Wished by rainfall or ritrloll' �� ;7) Vie ;slippoijI tl rn,Itertll slutll be, Ivilloved i�hotl into, w t ” of the *St.ltcr, At'beIl, t3peratimis are coin. c Vt^ r1; is cnlnl��ctetl rind 1ho rritttli'ftl x11,111 i)rxrllt.1- plcl('il', it)i�' c�tt(ssfi in,►tr'ri,ils`rir ilOI is sh.111 be remowd frn)1I �.l rani("' I frotn� ilal��nstrealn I ali upstream direction. ' `lae thw k�'I1ek licca, ern r,lbbish shall be deposited withi)1 1,51) re et of the high ii'a 1`alxirl of ani: st alai 12. �J'i4np( rare fills ~hall of nonerodil)lc , far ,salt c s 5 t zl slitill he rcnic�vO LrQmcdjW0y upon work , i 22, j; iu oponitor will nlotiry 111(' Dcportnivilt ol� fish 'and t�ni Liattn> a Game of tilt* deltic of voil)ltlriwenmit of opeirttion4 and 1:1„�titjuliaAl ctl� sw11�11J not lie Olyx'ratod- i,i dl'e '1akv ;or its tilt, date of lt)mplotioll or Operations at least lire dajs fmirgin (exc(q)ttlnrinl vvcm,,tintt. and aV Intl • he ttt'pe'e• prior to Nueh coinl)letion. d.f ' Zt mv Yin 4;4— Al - '! k ` li �F 4 fil } i t .1 ;•�� { 1 r.. Y f - iT T 1 1 }i ^ ii'" 1 1r s"7 ✓.R.•.+ J r �.! "3C./�rjq. n b• F.i� k� `c. }L.^4L ii-' •V '. ��.':- � 7 • ,; cl u q •(, h, r . r "�� t� 5�.� ` A44.�a�y ,`1 i+F � ��.. �•�'.���Jti1 �� � �A� � Y' a t `YS"f •� 6 .'as .w � � l� f� :, 4 a P,t wi, d + . �. r''C..(. S < �,.ti ' } j ."'! f h•"^.t 'F.iy e^tr �- ^Yw yi � ii 8 �i � ;'��'. y.,�+ .p� (" .f1, ,•�' �.. 4�. J e ..�rpi n •k fYCi.rrye m" I �r r`` • .� y,�h: • 'kr,', * .l yr+ " ,i.:t 4 s � y i _ +�� .�"S�+C;?�.;Z,. h �...,I 1, w.,bt, ,� �� ir!y ��" ��•k•�r..?p'7h; f+� �;rwaq,ti ..J ^4 ;�i e .`�. ,�'.i: r. �'.�iiri����(�:-'it N.d �e �i��t,,,. k,� r^!17, t; A • .1 itf s h wu � f c .;X� .� � �Y'" - • y z'�'(.��s~ �f�r ie ��`,ry�'.T,• i�'�✓ � q,::' t*i t�`;� �t.33n '�G +fit �►��'x}r � I ! k' ��' �� ����t •� i <, '?, P�' � "�{",cyrtA'�, l � w [, f � l •r .v. d't> J .�+� . . b ;� '.w•• C+y,F,'v'}i< �x (��giwr.+� F r -. G i4GT,✓f • �. r � �+ y;��I • \ � ` _ , "Y4 frpyfss �` ..1T7,S,CWX' aJ� .V .+' � Y� ' i ,�. t ' V <� r ���q� .A�'-J ',:"','-'..�M ,4 ,��T+w.-r.-r.<.wat !""�•. - � �r _ �v�. v".F -T .,• y��,ar��{r�`�,.""�<�n ,--• I �'� } 1 }5 y���a.,y4J NrF�F+•4't J,a�•a•—e^ms�.J s _ N-A�' _ S � t 14<j. ? i i�I h b +� i V 3 1 �� Zj Ct • (�� ' a 'ii S 4 1 kat i f a c n ��^ a It�•'w. """^' �Y. wk',-rr, � i�x � x'41 ,.�5 �•�t'" (� j i '" t"n� � ,. . ,4«,i "�� °"y, R� A ..• ��� R1� Y�ilk���� Yr ���.t„�+� ia;y'•j �, _ .u:c ��. .>c�r 'hi��}'F”, s�{ <Y r. � �t�q'.,0.M•�, Yt+.'b".a�rb"�' _ r � aFF`,f'? ty� �'w to _ 1 hJ �' v .y,er' � �'t •�y\': A .�{. +, S , c J'. , ?M?J4•t"a `'gig 1,, a.�� 4 +t�} t t'.ny,� �tu.4r, Yp.�.. \ V AIM �� r ��kt a•�• �S''a. fi � ���' �' � � 94d� wr ".R ',. F _ � � .i ���It<M � � ��J.iµ • � 4. � it ' A , '� �dJ ,%j g � , , � .i d#u Cgy JSA.v� n 1 y"1. •�` % i., ��` J '� 'L( x'r^• \( a m�Y 1`sl � +•• L xi w '� 1� 8 p•. � r IF�`�rr�nrlddgf�tilYr.-. ,•1"�a�,�Rv��•.,: ��F,�. ,.�,+Jp �ia :��r�� �'*ii�"rti�tiE�t .,� tarn Je�,�rt$� i;9t�3ii•".��+4" �'.4 "..�i .� �: i'� �.,4 �? s4 Y .,� > s' � �� � �rn ..� C,T? F„ . , +'t, , �, ' .Yl� l`nJ ° �'7 H ,y ,, t ��� �t � y � t ,,'� 3 C�� , ("' . , ,:.�' . 'i•, i �A i t' h I. ✓r' x .. tr a '!" $ � ,yi'• �5' . • � � •.. M� ,� a °r��"� ^' ? e � ,;e r r 1• >�� u:�+—`"�L'�'rti p *' i'p a:ql, Cyt\ �._,L 4 ""yf -^� i i '. i ne � Tu,'7%�''i,,.,y �'.i �'•�i� � _�' , •nr: +f}r.` i ' ,+' -P� 'Z. � � 'j a 'r'• N w�� ,�'v�„^,,��� i `fit. /�'.. `" -,. , (. � N4'� Itl�.{ . i,y� �. , ti :,✓ ' tv�' a�. '\'.i�Yeik cy +�1�' 'r� �i•r'{rC •,1011 Z F )� ,..:•r( -.c r 41�Y'�"•'�i'1it: F+�r .' '`,i'e. r ! .a Y .��•'(.Y•� ::l n{ J GRAVEL ,AND PIPE Backfill F. 4" Pertorated Pipe, �, Cover Material University studies prove -"' "�--- May allow slit that fe does not give� Intrusion even distribution. ,; Stone or pra vel 5ltpatrv9 y i ifiocg v+iJh - supports sol, and ; 1� provides limited Iornat lorrnatlon storage only, Gravel. provides no treatrr►ent, Slone Masking W% -60 of "111ratNe surface Compaction from grovel emplacement . _ �' Solreduced infiltration rate Native Soil spacespace s betwesolid up to t en gavel, f Ilmiting infiltration PROBLEMS WITH GRAVEL. 111111 Ped=,es inflltration rate 50% tc 60 ciccording to experts )i Blomaf. . N Handling and waste, ® Site darnage Masked Zone- Limited Wiitration ®`sfi Unmasked effective i Intillralive surface �d THERE' J$ A BETTER WAY Ti-{E INFILTRATOR' Infiltrative surface DESIGNED TO SOLVE PROBLEMS 1NHlTRAzO y s A r ;.-, Buckfill units Acilloble in 12" or 16" depth • f � . � N" Vertical silt , iVa v ,votoge volrame 1r ' a u ; .,.. "' intro on 3 or mare times {A.,; r ;„ . ' si w j.+. greaser than "" . �. ✓ �4. t gavel Drench �-... �, �; �h',� q`���, � ; Micro-Leaching Cha mbersry ,(No need for geotextiles) r Side wall designed is �� ' ✓ Native Soil off cif imize masking 1 Entire bottom of french provides f3edect unmasked nfiltrative surtoco Ribs -create additioncl voids for blornat J/ formation. Protective tib prevents STANDARD HIGH'cXOX61TY `soil backfill Intrusion SPE - IFICATiONS INF►_tRAiOV INFILTRATOR" and Creoles voids fot'optirnal blramat $iZE 3.. X 61/4, X i. 3`x bi%lr X i, jt formation. WEIGHT 25 rfis, V," wide open slots 301bs, provide open area ` its ff (y� gal.) 1b.3 ft (122 got.) e'�ual to porosltyof STCJRA�E j - . u— _ - . .. sr i sides of gravel frenell, lt� fP = PATOCa. „flfarnber VATORti" 1, hamber Pipe and s>ravel U i fi.� 2 ft,z 3 ft.1 UNMASKED INFILTRATIVE AREA ft2/11near ft. Documented research has clearly dem- onstrated that the INFILTRATOR" chamber provides an optimum infiltrative surface for leaching systems. Many states have already recognized this and granted system size re- ductions accordingly, The graph shows that INFILTRATORS"" have twice the effective Infiltrative surface area per linear foot, This is based on a 3611 wide trench with b" of gravel below the pipe,. assuming 5C% gravel masking, compared to Standard and High CapacityiNFILTRATORS"' d ff,2 with 50% masking for INFILTRAiOR"sidewali, and no bottom masking, 1, Excavate 3' wide trenches �'jnd prepare Infiltrative surface, 2. Screw the end plates in place and slip, INFILTRATOR'" units together to form desired trench length, 3, Run Inlet pipe thru ire' -t end plate (pipe dua, „a t� xjer°,a 1, re entire length of the system), and backflll' with native material (18" depth for H-20 and 12" for H-10), (Detailed Instructions available) INFILTRATORT" CHAMBERS ARE GREAT FOR MOUNDS AND PRESSURE DISTRIBUTION TOO! MOUNDS IrWiLTPATORSt" can easity replaoe the gravel In mound ✓,, "v "� or fait Systems, in elther a ttench or bed r',OnfiguratlOn. Installation is much ear et with no damage tO t�,e infiltrative surface. The site preparation, design rand construction of the Mound system Is t prescribed by state code, and INFILTRATOR °(5Tf Nl5` Installation instructions, Pressure F" origlhat blsttlbutlon Pipe PRESSURE DI8TRIBUTION INFILTRATOR`' chambers ate easily adapted to pressure distribution, Simply suspend a predrilled pressure pipe in the top of the units with slmpie, fa5iproof plastic pipe hangers, Supplemental Installation instructions are available for cotbplete details, Grode iiNFILTRATOR'" chambers are molded from a high density poly pthelen and are impervious to all components, of wa,*9wotPr.. They have been structurally tested by a Registered Professional nglneer and are avoliable with an AASHTO rating of H-10 (16,000 Fibs./ciAe with 12" of compacted cover) or, H-20 (32,000 lbs. /aide with 18" of cover). M A higVi ,performance, state of the art system, ® Da+ublo the unmasked soil. Interface area compared to gravel) vystems. A Complote system delivered in one pickup truck, FastPyr easy instal►catlon X Reduced labor & machine oasts, 19 Ellrninates compa,ctfon, shadow effect and mess caused from gravel, X P-;,,'rScaec;l9on. W Str..oturolly strong, H-10 ano H220 tocact ratings. !>E Approved by U.S, Deportment of Housing ,rand Urban LIMITED wARRAMY !7evet�tptrent - FederCal Housing-Wthodty `°) �n to n-crw � s c-ach=M IiUvA=c4,tted to iW ¢Gal purcho3er bpnlnst de`ecfie mate It+Snd vx�M1;ibrvtiip ax ht5�1 yea from djte d =r Oactu*. ShoUki o cWecl oppou %tonin ttY) wwantf X Complete technical black -up information Is avallable. rte, �t,�r�rlN«mt�ra fUteen 15)drys. tnnttmtar ystemi v I9 t+aopN b tefatoeefr+t+nt urdt, 4fft IvtorSystams'1{nbintysaccficeayezduiisstt)4 to(tgmr lOndIcr y. Irstollot'ott of the unft fl i a (b) 1M:WMIUMINSJOJ*A RAPFt(a)ISE=Lt%c. I -M AM NO OTHER The INFIl7f<ATOR' is a cornpiete systems approach to stormwoter management that give;; the engineer tremendous design free- dom to meetthe needs of the individual site, the engin arcan use umd► combined with stone for shallow or deep systems that meet any requirement for storage and treatment, require no heavy equipment except a backhoe for Installation, and are highly cost ea ective. A detailed stormwoter brochure is avollolaie upon request. It you have llw4 lal problems or questlont i7lsfiributed' by call INFURATOR' SYSTEMS or your local distributor. �t.-jiE S INC., 123 0m- Sfreet m Sttite 12 m Old Saybrook, Ct GUIS ■ 20:1.388 b Ti1RiHERfA0r&, IN W s SHALL t+:; CO. ~, EE RE9CNSElE FCA R. tY LOSS OR DAA41A To D rt ELMa niE UN'n OR AM, THITh7 PARTY" RESULT tr. MW ITS IP4WLA ON OP 5H>if t"eNT EOER BUIL BE SOLELY NU�F"Al � rxSZIWAA E sSCOM RJUS (C) NO REP05ENtAtNE OP tti_ C.`OM *.Y HAS n4 AUrr.' QI'Y Til OtW 4E RsyffiRRANTY44ANY PIOJ lJ"Liz�+�T+VY�c' JO i�Rt�EktE1v>yTiI1S6vAR. RA GI No "ItI IANT7 '' AOPLFt 55 t.-, A.Nt FARTY ON" THA �J To THE ORIGIt�UV, dU�Eti It,MVATOR"" d6d M100•tEACHINO GH 203 9 38c December 13, 1993 Craig Sanders Department of Development Services 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 Rye i Oak Highlands POD Dear Craig: As you are aware, Steve Lotti i.s purchas?.r, `; rt.« 1g?� lands project prom .David Manthei. Steve iF v-4 r s �' " ¢}���,iitions of ,?,Approval that the project is a,�.,t., F �� }- „- r,, �: ; gal a: c sg to satisfy these conditions in every wWY1-n order to make the project more feasible Md, hope,1 �1 -Y more acceptable to all parties concerned, would like to make a few minor changes to the approved plan: Tt is his hope that these changes can be made administratively and that the time delay of additional publid hearings can be avoided. The changes are as follows - Revise the Phase line so that Phase One consist`,] of rots 1, 2, 5, 6°-.& 7: The remaining eleven lots would by developed in Phase z►ao. All applicable conditions of approval would be satisfied during Phase one. A fire hydrant will be located at Lot one in the first phase aid at Lot Sixteen in the second phase, as approved by the Fire. Department: Enlarge the si:'e of the existing "stack pond" located near the center of th'z property and maintain it full all year with the aid of a ld be an west xet.Jl zind C n.implocated r.-oveme tjacent that is to taccept table hto should everyone:Nato; illy we will obtain all necessary approv't%ls including the Ai.tziy Corp and Fish and Game. With the approval of the Fire Department:, the pond will be used for fire water storage in :lieu 0',1 a 'tC3nk or high output well (the common area well locations would- be deleted) With the approval. of Water Quality, the Reclaimed Wastewater Winter Storage pond will be eliminated. Instead, an underground storage ;Ea.Cj,lity will, be constructed near the di.qlsosal area.. This, should be a 'huge aesthetic improv'e'ment at ceptable to al.l underground storage will be provided In "ttfil.ttx'ator't type units: Li:t.eral�itre describing these units ate att shed. 2n ngrl AI44110N DRIVE NO, GALIMANIA'9026