Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutADM 95-196-CLOSED AUNT MINNIE�i I'lluiE ; I bUNUVI/11 t'i ;�i IL -L- I «; FIf. v: y4O. 95-196 TYPE: M LnDLr—XL" Permit Planning Deparline-n! APPLICANT' Short, Sheryl ADDRESS- 4261 Keith Lane, Chico, CA 95926 OWNER: Same ADDRESS- Same REPRESENTATIVE; ADDRESS; 6L - PROJECT DESCRIPTION; Minor Use Permit Second Unit - - - PROPERTY ZONED; AR LOCATED: On the south side of Keith Lane approx. 800 ft west of Garner Lane, at 4261 Keith Lane, Chico, CA APNO.:- 047-_300-034 TOWN/AREA; Chico GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION; A G /RES I 1. Application Complete: 6/22/95 Amount: $1258.00 Recelpt No.: 14907 L Commsntseenito: E.H. /CDF/CAR/PGE/CalTrans/PubWorks./Pacific Bell/ 9. Comments received from: 4. Rezone Petition Signatures Checked: s. Mailing listItAnd-In Sheet: , 6. Assigned To: 1. Enrlronmental Determination: Categorical Exemption-CEOAOt State Clearinghouse No.: Negative Declaration __--,Mitigated Negative Declaration Subject to Fish A Game: Environmental Impact Report Gen. Rule Ex. -CEOA #13061.(b)(3) Other 6. Staff Report: Project Video: 9. Clearinghouse circulation required: Yes No Date Sent to SCH: 10: Publication Notice Written:Dleplay Ad Prepared: 11. Notices Mailed: Number of Notices: 12.. Newspaper Publication Date: pO C P O B R 16. Planning goresnintiA on Hearing(s):_ ��`— / �� xa ' OD 4 �7 Action taken: Special Conditions:_ Commission Resolution 14. Board of Supervisors' Hearing(*):, Action taken: Board Resolution No.: Ordinance No.: 15. Type Use Permit/Send for 16. H.O.EJH.O.DJAPPENDIX O: Fish b Game Fees Paid: Yes 17. Send validated Use Permit: 16. Asssasor'e Memo: 19. Copy of Use PermlWarlance to Piannina Technician: No J BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING SERVICES MEETING MINUTES - August 14, 1995 The meeting was called to order at 10:00 a.m. in the 7 County Center Drive Conference Room, Oroville, CA. Present: Stephen Lucas, Associate Planner, Lynn Richardson, Record Secretary Also Present: Mr. and Mrs. Short, Mr. and Mrs. DeBock ITEMS FOR CONSIDERATION A. Staff recommended approval y Sheryl Short - (Item determined to be categorically exempt from environmental review) Minor Use Permit to allow a second unit on property zoned A -R (Agricultural Residential) located on the south side of Keith Lane, approximately 800 feet west of Garner Lane,. at 4261 Keith Lane, identified as AP 047-300-034, Chico. (SL) (95-196) Mr. and Mrs. Short were present. Mr. Lucas said this project conforms to the A -R zoning and requirements of Butte Code Section 24-280. Laurie DeBock said she is opposed to this permit. She said the mobile home was brought in without permits and faces onto her property from above. She submitted and read an opposing letter from Melissa and Edward Hardesty. She submitted a signed petition from the neighbors opposing this permit because of inadequate leach field, increased stress on the local aquifer, increased density, precedence set for rental units, decreased property values, and inadequate notification of neighboring residents. Mrs. DeBock said the mobile home is an eyesore. David DeBock said the neighborhood is opposed because this can lead to a rental and was placed on the property before obtaining any permits. He said the window of the mobile home is above the fence line. He did not want a 2nd unit next door. He said he wants Mrs. Short to meet septic and water requirements as required for a new dwelling. Mrs. Short said she contacted Planning, Building, and Environmental Health for over a year. She said the County has been to the property and there were no problems with septic clearance or water clearance. She said the second unit will be for her in-laws and is not intended for a rental unit. Mr. Lucas noted a memo from the Health Division stating the property can accommodate this unit. He briefly discussed the difference between a temporary second unit and permanent second unit. He said this application is for a permanent second unit and can be used as a rental. He said this requests meets the Requirements in the County Code. He said staff's recommendation will go to the Planning Commission on consent agenda. He recommended the neighbors attend this meeting to voice their concerns. Mr. DeBock requested the County require a 50 ft. setback from the property line. ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING SERVICES MEETING ■ MINUTES ■ PAGE 1 ■ Mr. Lucas suggested recommending visual screening with landscaping, trees, etc. He told Mr. DeBock that the law requires a minimum 5 ft. setback. Mrs. DeBock said she wants a visual barrier and she wants the mobile home set back further on the property. Mr. Lucas suggested a 30 ft. setback. Mrs. Short was not in favor of, this, she said she has plans for her yard. She said she would have to go home and measure the distance before agreeing to it. Mr. Lucas said he was just trying to find a solution to the conflict before this goes to the Commission. Mrs. DeBock did not think there would be sufficient room within 16 feet to have an awning and trees. Mr. Lucas said he will recommend a condition that the carport be placed on the side of the mobile home and that the applicant plant a visual barrier of trees. Mrs. DeBock said she would still like the mobile home moved further away from the property line. Mr. Lucas said the application meets the requirements for a second dwelling unit and he confirmed the action recommended ighe staff report and requested this.item be set for the next Planning Commission meeting of August 24, 1995 on consent with the addition of the following conditions: 1. Applicant to plant sight obscuring'. landscaping. 2. The garage ;and carport.are to be placed -at the side of the mobile. 3. Require a setback for the mobile home at between 16 and 30 feet with the final determination to be made by Planning staff. The purpose of the setback is for screen ing/visability. II. - ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 10:30 a.m. STEPHEK LUCAS Associate Planner Prepared by Lynn, Butte County Records Secretary. c Aw pdoce\xninut e9Vn inor.min ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING SERVICES MEETING ■ MINUTES ■ PAGE 2 0 Mr. Lucas suggested recommending visual screening with landscaping, trees, etc. He told Mr. DeBock that the law requires a minimum 5 ft. setback. Mrs. DeBock said she wants a visual barrier and she wants the mobile home set back further on the property. Mr. Lucas suggested a 30 ft. setback. Mrs. Short was not in favor of this, she said she has plans for her yard. She said she would have to go home and measure the distance before agreeing to it. Mr. Lucas said he was just trying to find a solution to the conflict before this goes to the Commission. Mrs. DeBock did not think there would be sufficient room within 16 feet to have an awning and trees: Mr. Lucas said he will recommend a condition that the carport be placed on the side of the mobile home and that the applicant plant a visual barrier of trees. Mrs. DeBock said she would still like the mobile home moved further away from the property line. Mr. Lucas said the application meets the requirements for a second dwelling unit and he confirmed the action recommended in the staff report and requested this item be set for the next Planning Commission meeting of August 24, 1995 on consent with the addition of the following conditions: 1. Applicant to plant sight obscuring landscaping. 2. The garage and carport are to.be placed .at the side of the mobile. 3. Require a setback for the mobile home at between 16 and 30 feet with the final determination to be made by Planning staff. The purpose of the setback is for screen ing/visability. II. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 10:30 a.m. STEPHE LUCAS Associate Planner Prepared by Lynn, Butte County Records Secretary. cAw pdocalm inutea Vn i nor. min ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING SERVICES MEETING ■ MINUTES ■ PAGE 2 0 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING SERVICES MEETING . MINUTES - August 14, 1995 The meeting was called to order at 10:05 a.m. in the 7 County Center Drive Conference Room, Oroville, CA. Present: Barry Hogan, Planning Manager, Lynn Richardson, Record Secretary Also Present: Mrs. Sheryl Short I. ITEM FOR CONSIDERATION A. Sheryl Short (Item determined to be categorically exempt from environmental review) Administrative Permit to allow a temporary second dwelling on property zoned A -R (Agricultural - Residential) located on the south side of Keith Lane, approximately 800 feet west of Garner Lane, at 4261 Keith Lane, identified as AP 047-300-034, Chico.. (SL) (95-196) Mr. Hogan stated the original application was for a Minor Use Permit to allow a permanent second dwe The Planning Commission directed staff to re -notice the application as a request for a temporary seg dwelling and hold a Planning Services meeting and set conditions for a temporary second dwelling three additional conditions beyond those normally required.l Mrs. Short asked about Condition 10 regarding the sight obscuring trees, do the trees have to be approved by the Planning Division prior to being planted? She said the trees have already been planted. Mr. Hogan said there are.different kinds of,Eucalyptus .trees and it would depend on which kind Mrs. Short planted. He,said:if the type planted does, not meet the screening requirements, she could be required to re -plant another type of tree. He said she could bring in leaves from the trees to allow staff to determine which type they are or a planner could visit the site. He noted that there was no one present in opposition to this permit. Mrs. Short said with the requirement for screening, why do they have to put the carport at the side of the house instead of in the back? Mr. Hogan said this condition was in response to a concern by the neighbor and is a matter of visibility. Mrs. Short said she set the mobile home back 16 feet from the side property line so she could. have the carport at the rear of the mobile. She said with the requirement for screening, she did not understand why she can not have the carport where she wants it? logan explained that placement of the carport was settled on at the Planning Commission, with the ibor present, where the neighbor is not present today, he did not feel it was -appropriate- to remove this ition. Mrs. Short asked what right the neighbors have to dictate conditions? She said four of the five complaints by the neighbors were adopted as. conditions. Mr. Hogan said in approving a Minor Use Permit, one of the findings is compatibility with the neighborhood. He said if a request is made by neighbors and the request is reasonable, staff would probably agree to make the change or add a condition to make the use compatible. ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING SERVICES MEETING ■ MINUTES ■ PAGE 1 ■ Mrs. Short said if a temporary permit had been applied for in the first place Conditions 10, 11, and 12 would not have been added to this permit. She said when she first came in an applied for this permit, she was told she could no longer obtain a temporary permit. Mr. Hogan said if this were a temporary permit and staff did not have the neighborhood concerns, conditions 10, 11, and 12 would not be required. Mr. Hogan explained the bond procedure for removal of a temporary mobile home. Mrs. Short asked about what happens if they do not remove the mobile home within the 120 days Mr. Hogan said staff will work with the applicant and if needed extra time can be allotted. II. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 10:30 a.m. Prepared by Lynn, Butte County Records. Secretary. c:\wpdocs\minutes\mi nor.m i n ] ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING SERVICES MEETING ■ MINUTES. ■ PAGE 2 ■ V. CONSENT Consent items are set for approval in one motion. These items are considered non- controversial. No presentations will be made, however, some questions may be asked. The Chair will ask if any commissioner or member of the public wishes to pull a consent item for discussion. Brief questions may be asked on any item. Sheryl Short - (Item determined to be categorically exempt from environmental review) Minor Use Permit to allow a second unit on property zoned A -R (Agricultural Residential) located on the south side of Keith Lane, approximately 800 feet west of Garner Lane, at 4261 Keith Lane, identified as AP 047-300-034, Chico. (SL) (95-196) Mr. Hogan explained the consent calendar procedures. He said if the Commission wishes to remove the item from the consent calendar and discuss it, they can do that. Notices have been sent to adjacent property owners, and a meeting was held with the Planning Manager. He submitted a letter dated 8-24-95 from 5 neighbors in favor of the project and a letter dated 8-21-95 from 2 neighbors who do not object to the request. Commissioner Seegert asked if the Commission has the option of making this a temporary permit? Mr. Hogan said no, the application is for a permanent second dwelling. He said the Commission can discuss this application, allow the public to speak, and can remove the item from the consent calendar and direct staff to publish and notice this item for a public hearing at the Commission. Commissioner Lambert said she was willing to pull the item from the consent calendar and publish for a public hearing. Commissioner -Seegert asked about the State requirements allowing second dwellings? He asked if they were allowed in all zones? Mr. Hogan said the County has to allow for second dwellings in acceptable zones. He said they are not allowed in the ag. zones. He said they can not disallow State second dwellings, but they can restrict it to particular zones. Chairman Nelson said one of the letters states this dwelling is for the care of elderly parents. He asked if on this basis the Commission can grant a temporary use? Mr. Hogan said the Commission can not change the application. They can take the item off the consent calendar and advertise it for a public hearing. The item was opened for discussion. ■ Butte County Planning Commission Minutes - August 24, 1995 ■ Page 2 . ft % Gloria DeBock submitted pictures of the second dwelling and how it relates to her property. She said if this permit is granted the dwelling could be used as a rental in the future. She said she talked to real estate agents and was told this will bring, down the value of her property. She submitted a letter from her husband. She said this permit would set a precedent if allowed. Sheryl Short, the applicant, said at the Manager's meeting she agreed to lower the mobile home, agreed to plant trees to screen it from the neighbors view, and to move the carport to the side. She said she is not willing to move the mobile home further into the property. She said she has plans for landscaping her back yard. Chairman Nelson asked if she would have a problem making this a temporary use? Ms. Short said she was told by the Planning Office that temporary permits were no longer being issued. Commissioner Lynch said if the applicant received misinformation over the phone and is willing to go to a temporary permit, there should be no extra fees. Mr. Hogan said a temporary mobile home permit is an Administrative Permit issued over the counter and does not come before the Commission. He -said there normally are no E nditions other than those minimums required by the Zoning Ordinance, for furtheback requirements or screening. Commissioner Lynch. said he is hearing that the objection is the unit will be permanent and could become a rental. Mr. Hogan said normally temporary uses do not require conditions that a permanent dwelling would require. Commissioner Lambert said she was in favor of pulling the item and ask that this be held as a public hearing. Ms. DeBock said if this was a temporary use, with a condition for screening, then she would not contest the permit. Mr. Hogan said -the Commission ca an pprove the permit today or pull this item and publish for a public hearing, or they can send it back to the Planning Manager to consider a temporary permit, if Mrs. Short would change her_application.' Ms. Short said she was against the suggested 25' setback. She said the setback in the zone is 5' and she has already agreed to a 16' setback. ■ Butte County Planning Commission Minutes - August 24, 1995 ■ Page 3 ■ Chairman Nelson said this item needs to go back to the Planning Manager. Commissioner Lynch ,recommended. this application be -handled _ asa tempt and the applicant should not be charged further fees) Commissioner Lambert was concerned with this going back as a temporary use because, it does not give the neighbors any notice. Ms. Short said she has talked to a lot of her neighbors and they were not opposed to this request. Chairman Nelson asked if Ms. Short would object to this going back to the Planning Manager as a temporary dwelling? Ms. Short said no, she would not object to making it a temporary use. She said the only problem she has is moving it 9 more feet into her back yard. Chairman Nelson said this is one of the problems because of the size of the lot. Commissioner Lynch asked when the application was made? Ms. Short said she talked to staff about it one year ago, and the application was made in April 95. Commissioner Lambert said the, -problems with an over the counter permit is there is no notice, no hearing, no appeal, and no recourse. She said she wants this to go to a public hearing. She said an -Administrative Permit does not give both sides a chance to be heard. It was moved by Commissioner Lambert to pull this item from the consent calendar and direct staff to hold a public hearing. The motion died for lack of a second. Commissioner Lynch said to avoid red tape, send this back to staff for a temporary second dwelling, because staff knows the concerns and it would be the simplest way to handle this. Mr. Hogan said this item could go back to the Planning Manager as a temporary permit application, the Commission could direct staff to notice property owners and hold a hearing with added conditions. It was moved by Commissioner Lynch, seconded by Commissioner Seegert, and ■ Butte County Planning Commission Minutes - August 24, 1995 ■ Page 4 ■ /un-a-snimoulycarried to send the application bacH temporary permit, send notices to the surroundi hearing in front of the PlanningManager: to the Planning Manager to., io orooerty owners. and hold VI. DISCUSSION - Ted Crawford with the. Butte County Fire Department to discuss fire safe regulations. Mr. Crawford handed out Fire Safe Regulations 4290. He said he is the one that sees the applications and recommends the conditions.. He said he would like to see all new dwellings as fire safe as they can be. He discussed the 30 ft. clearance regulation and where it is applied. Commissioner Lynch said on a lot 90' x 500', with a 1-5 ratio there would not be a very large building envelope with a 30 ft. clearance requirement. Mr. Crawford said this is true, but he hopes these lots are few in the County. Commissioner Seegert said a quarter acre lot in the Oaks Subdivision could not obtain a 30 ft. setback clearance. He asked if the fire danger was considered the same for a d_. subdivision as it is for a rural parcel in the wildlands? Mr. Crawford said yes, the danger is the same. He said they try to apply the regulations to the subdivision, boundary. Mr. Hogan discussed the General Plan revisions that are in progress. He said they are trying not to plan for land uses that would compromise fire safety. Mr. Crawford said it has been determined that a 30 ft. setback is what is safe. If you keep a 30 ft. setback from your house and it is maintained as a fire safe area, a fire can not burn from the wildlands right up to the side of your house. Commissioner Seegert said the backyard is not usually the problem. He said it is usually the side yards that need the clearance. He discussed putting in hydrants as often as possible. Mr. Hogan discussed spreading the cost of hydrants among the people who will benefit from the hydrants. He said he thinks the General Plan update will allow the County to 0 target areas where hydrants should be required up front. Commissioner Lynch said they need to look at site requirements in the zones. He said they need to be concerned with areas in the foothills that are not served by public water. . Butte County Planning Commission Minutes - August 24, 1995 ■ Page 5 ■ -, • BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING SERVICES MEETING MINUTES - September 11, 1995 The meeting was called to order at 10:05 a.m. in the 7 County Center Drive Conference Room, Oroville, CA Present: Barry Hogan, Planning Manager, Lynn Richardson, Record Secretary Also Present: Mrs. Sheryl Short I. ITEM FOR CONSIDERATION A. Sheryl Short (Item determined to be categorically exempt from environmental review) Administrative Permit to allow a temporary second dwelling on property zoned A -R (Agricultural - Residential) located on the south side of Keith Lane, approximately 800 feet west of Garner Lane, at 4261 Keith Lane, identified as AP 047-300-034, Chico. (SL) (95-196) Mr. Hogan stated the original application was for a Minor Use Permit to allow a permanent second dwelling. The Planning Commission directed staff to re -notice the application as a request for a temporary second dwelling and hold a Planning Services meeting and set conditions for a temporary second dwelling with three additional conditions beyond those normally required. Mrs. Short asked about Condition 10 regarding the sight obscuring trees, do the trees have to be approved by the Planning Division prior to being planted? She said the trees have already been planted. Mr. Hogan said there are different kinds of Eucalyptus trees and it would depend on which kind Mrs.. Short planted. He said if the type planted does not meet the screening requirements, she could be required to re -plant another type of tree. He said she could bring in leaves from the trees to allow staff to determine which type they are or a planner could visit the site. He noted that there was no one present in opposition to this permit. Mrs. Short said with the requirement for screening, why do they have to put the carport at the side of the house instead of in the back? Mr. Hogan said this condition was in response to a concern by the neighbor and is a matter of visibility. Mrs. Short said she set the mobile home back 16 feet from the side property line so she could have the carport at the rear of the mobile. She said with the requirement for screening, she did not understand why she can not have the carport where she wants it? Mr. Hogan explained that placement of the carport was settled on at the Planning Commission, with the neighbor present, where the neighbor is not present today, he did not feel it was appropriate to remove this condition. Mrs. Short asked what right the neighbors have to dictate conditions? She said four of the five complaints by the neighbors were adopted as conditions. Mr. Hogan said in approving a Minor Use Permit, one of the findings is compatibility with the neighborhood. He'said if a request is made by neighbors and the request is reasonable, staff would probably agree to make the change or add a condition to make the use compatible. ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING SERVICES MEETING ■ MINUTES ■ PAGE 1 ■ r L Mrs. Short said if a temporary permit had been applied for in the first place.CondKlorns 10,}11,"and 12wouki r a:an not have been added to this permit. She said when she first came In an applied for_this permit, she -....told she could no longer obtain a temporary permit. Mr. Hogan said If this were a temporary permit and staff did not have the neighborhood concerns, conditions 10, 11, and 12 would not be required. Mr. Hogan explained the bond procedure for removal of a temporary mobile home. ...... Mrs. Short asked about what happens If they do not remove the mobile home within. the 120 days Mr. Hogan said staff will work with the applicant and if needed extra time can be allotted.. if. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjoumed at 10:30 am. BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING SERVICES MEETING ■ MINUTES ■ PAGE 2 ■ Sheryl Short - I(Item determined to be categorically exempt from environmental review) Minor Use -Permit, to allow a second unit on property zoned A -R (Agricultural Residential) located -on the south side of Keith Lane, approximately 800 feet west of Garner Lane, at 4261 Keith Lane, identified as AP 047-300-034, Chico. (SL) (95-196) Mr. Hogan explained the consent calendar procedures. He said if the Commission wishes to remove the item from the consent calendar and discuss it, they can do that. Notices have been sent to adjacent property owners, and a meeting was held with the Planning Manager. He submitted a letter dated 8-24-95 from 5 neighbors in favor of the project and a letter dated 8-21-95 from 2 neighbors who do not object to the request. Commissioner Seegert asked if the Commission has the option of making this a temporary permit? Mr. Hogan said no, the application is for a permanent second dwelling. He said the Commission can discuss this application, allow the public to speak, and can remove the item from the consent calendar and direct staff to publish and notice this item for a public hearing at the Commission. Commissioner Lambert said she was willing to pull the item from the consent calendar and publish for a public hearing. Commissioner Seegert.asked about the State.requirements allowing.second dwellings?- . - He asked if they were allowed in all zones? Mr.! Hogansaid the County has to, allow for second dwellings in acceptable zones. He -- - -said-they are not allowed:in the ag. zones. - He said they,can not -disallow State second dwellings, but they can restrict it to particular zones. ` Chairman Nelson said one of the letters states this dwelling is for the care of elderly (,- ...parents. -He -asked if on -this -basis -the Commission --can grant -a- temporary -use? - Mr. Hogan said the Commission can not change the application. They can take the item off the consent calendar and advertise it for a public hearing. The item was opened for discussion. �T Gloria DeBock submitted pictures of the second dwelling and how it relates to her property. She said if this permit is granted the dwelling. could. be used as a rental in the future. She said she talked to real estate agents and was told this will bring down the value of her property. She submitted a letter from her husband. She said this permit would set a precedent if allowed. Sheryl Short, the applicant, said at the Manager's meeting she agreed to lower the mobile home, agreed to plant treesto.screen it -from the neighbors view, and to move the carport to the side. She said she is not willing to move the mobile'home further into the property. She said she has plans for landscaping her back yard. s �- Butte County Planning Commission Minutes August 24, 1995 Chairman Nelson' asked if she would have a problem making this a temporary use? Ms. Short said she was told by the Planning Office that temporary permits were no longer being issued. Commissioner Lynch said if the applicant received misinformation over the phone and is' willing to go to a temporary permit, there should be no extra fees. Mr. Hogan said a temporary mobile home permit is an Administrative Permit issued over the counter and does not come before the Commission. He said there normally are no conditions other than those minimums required by the Zoning Ordinance, for further setback requirements or screening. Commissioner Lynch said he is hearing that the objection is the unit will be permanent and could become a rental. Mr. Hogan said normally temporary uses do not require conditions that a permanent dwelling would require. Commissioner Lambert said she was in favor of pulling the item and ask that this be held as a public hearing. Ms. DeBock said if this was a temporary use, with a condition for screening, then she would not contest the permit. Mr. Hogan said the Commission can approve the permit today or pull this item and publish for a public hearing, or they can send it back to the Planning Manager to consider a temporary permit, if Mrs. Short would change her application. Ms. Short said she was �againsf the suggested ' 25' � setback: She said the setback in the zone is 5' and she has�already agreed to a 16' setback. , Chairman Nelson said this item needs to go back to the Planning Manager. Commissioner Lynch recommended this application be handled as a temporary permit and the applicant should not be charged further fees. Commissioner Lambert was concerned with this going back as a temporary use because it does not give the neighbors any notice. Ms. Short said she has talked to a lot of her neighbors and they were not opposed to this request. Chairman Nelson asked if Ms. Short would object to this going back to the Planning Manager as a temporary dwelling? Butte County Planning Ca®ission-Minutes ..... M . s -August 24;_x-1995.... Ms. Short said no, she would not object to making it a temporary use. She said the only problem she has is moving it 9 more feet into her back yard. I _ _ -- Chairman Nelson said this is one of the problems because of the size of the lot. Commissioner Lynch asked when the application was made? Ms. Short said she talked to staff about it one year ago, and the application was made in April 95. Commissioner Lambert said the problems with an over the counter permit is there is no notice, no hearing, no appeal, and no recourse. She said she wants this to go to a public hearing. She said an Administrative Permit does not give both sides a chance to be heard. It was moved by Commissioner Lambert to pull this item from the consent calendar and direct staff to hold a public hearing. The motion died for lack of a second. Commissioner Lynch said to avoid red tape, send this back to staff for a temporary, second dwelling, because staff knows the concerns and it would be the simplest way to handle this. Mr. Hogan said this item could go back to the Planning Manager as a temporary permit application, the Commission could direct staff to notice property owners and hold a hearing with added conditions. It was moved by Commissioner Lynch, seconded by Commissioner Seegert, and unanimously carried to send the application back to the Planning Manager to consider a temporary permit, send notices to the surrounding property owners, and hold a public hearing in front -of the Planning. Manager.-- t , "&itte `County_ Planning C6mmission-Minutes -August-24-,-1995 — �- w BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING SERVICES MEETING MINUTES - August 14, 1995 The meeting was called to order at 10:00 a.m. in the 7 County Center Drive Conference Room, Oroville, CA. Present: Stephen Lucas, Associate Planner, Lynn Richardson, Record Secretary Also Present: Mr. and Mrs. Short, Mr. and Mrs. DeBock I. ITEMS FOR CONSIDERATION A. Staff recommended approval Sheryl Short - (Item determined to be categorically exempt from environmental review) Minor Use Permit to allow a second unit on property zoned A -R (Agricultural Residential) located on the south side of Keith Lane, approximately 800 feet west of Garner Lane, at 4261 Keith Lane, identified as AP 047-300-034, Chico. (SL) (95-196) Mr. and Mrs. Short were present. Mr. Lucas said this project conforms to the A -R zoning and requirements of Butte Code Section 24-280. Laurie DeBock said she is opposed to this permit. She said the mobile home was brought in without permits and faces onto her property from above. She submitted and read an opposing letter from Melissa and Edward Hardesty. She submitted a signed petition from the neighbors opposing this permit because of inadequate leach field, increased stress on the local aquifer, increased density, precedence set for rental units, decreased property values, and inadequate notification of neighboring residents. Mrs. DeBock said the mobile home is an eyesore. David DeBock said the neighborhood is opposed because this can lead to a rental and was placed on the property before obtaining any permits. He said the window of the mobile home is above the fence line. He did not want a 2nd unit next door. He said he wants Mrs. Short to'meet septic and water requirements as required for a new dwelling. Mrs. Short said she contacted Planning, Building, and Environmental Health for over a year. She said the County has been to the property and there were no,problems with septic clearance or water clearance. She said the second unit will be for her in-laws and is not intended for a rental unit. Mr. Lucas noted a memo from the Health Division stating the property can accommodate this unit. He briefly discussed the difference between a temporary second unit and permanent second unit. He said this application is for a permanent second unit and can be used as a rental. He said this requests meets the Requirements in the County. Code. He said staff's recommendation will go to the Planning Commission on consent agenda. He recommended the neighbors attend this meeting to voice their concerns. Mr. DeBock requested the County require a 50 ft. setback from the property line. ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING SERVICES.MEETING ■ MINUTES i PAGE 1 ■ Mr. Lucas suggested recommending visual screening with landscaping, trees, etc. He told Mr. DeBock that the law requires a minimum 5 ft. setback. Mrs. DeBock said she wants a visual barrier and she wants the mobile home set back further on the property. Mr. Lucas suggested a 30 ft. setback. Mrs. Short was not in favor of this, she said she has plans for her yard. She said she would have to go home and measure the distance before agreeing to it. Mr. Lucas said he was just trying to find a solution to the conflict before this goes to the Commission. Mrs. DeBock did not think there would be sufficient room within .16_ feet to have an awning and trees. Mr. Lucas said he will recommend a condition that the carport be placed on the side of the mobile home and that the applicant plant a visual barrier of trees. Mrs. DeBock said she would still like the mobile home moved further away from the property line. Mr. Lucas said the application meets the requirements for a second dwelling unit and he confirmed the action recommended in the staff report and requested this item be set for the next Planning Commission meeting of August 24, 1995 on consent with the addition of the following conditions: 1. Applicant to plant sight obscuring landscaping. 2. ' The garage and carport are to be placed at the side of the mobile. 3. Require a setback for the mobile home at between 16 and 30 feet with the final determination to be made by Planning staff. The purpose of the setback is for screening/visability. II. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 10:30 a.m. STEPHEK LUCAS Associate Planner Prepared by Lynn, Butte County Records Secretary c:%wpdocs\minutes\minor.min ■ BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING SERVICES MEETING ■ MINUTES ■ PAGE 2 ■ • MEMORANDUM C� TO: Honorable Chair and Planning Co Sion FROM: Barry K. Hogan, Planning Manager BY: Stephen Lucas, Associate Planne SUBJECT: Minor Use Permit 95- 196- Re est for a second unit for Sheryl Short on APN 047-300-034 DATE: August 14, 1995 SUMMARY: The Planning Manager held a public hearing on this project on August 14, 1995 at which time public testimony was heard. There was concern expressed both verbally and by petition, that the neighbors of the applicant feel that the proposed second unit would create a visual impact to their properties. If the Commission feels that no further hearing is warranted, then approval of the application with the suggested conditions is appropriate. DISCUSSION: As the Commission may recall when discussion of changes to the second unit ordinance occurred late last year, the main point that was raised by staff and County Counsel was the pre-emption of local control by the state. In brief, the state law indicates that the jurisdiction must provide locations where second units would be allowed. The law provides for requiring a permit process and strongly suggests, if not require, approval of all permits. The surrounding properties are large lot residential units with considerable space between houses. The neighbors felt that allowing a second unit to be located 16 ft. from the rear property line would invade their privacy and lower property values. After much discussion at the Planning Manager meeting, tentative agreement was reached that the proposed use would be acceptable if the following conditions were added to the Permit. Applicant shall plant and maintain sight obscuring landscaping along the rear property line that will reach a height of 20 ft. within a period of two years of issuance of permit. The type of landscaping shall be approved by the Planning Division and be planted within 30 days of issuance of the permit. 2. The setback from the rear property line for all structures shall be 25 feet. 3. The proposed carport shall be constructed to the side of the second unit and not be within the 25 ft. setback. Attachments: July 26, 1995 Agenda Report, August 14, 1995 Minutes k:Amemos\short.mem ■ Butte County ■ Department of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ • AGENDA REPORT TO: Barry K Hogan, Planning Manager FROM: Stephen Lucas, Associate Planner DATE: July 26, 1995 AGENDA ITEM REQUEST: Minor Use Permit -Sheryl Short (applicant/owner). APN 047-300-034, File 495-196: Minor Use permit for a Second Dwelling on property zoned AR (Agricultural Residential), located on the south side of Keith Lane, approximately 800 ft. West of Garner Lane at 4261 Keith Lane, Chico. RELATED ITEMS: None FOR: Administrative hearing for August 14, 1995 ABSTRACT: This request is for a Minor Use Permit fora econ Ihut The propos co ones to the zoning and the General Plan. Staff recommends approval of this application. PROJECT CHARACTERISTICS: This request is for a Minor Use Permit to allow the placement of a Second Unit pursuant to Butte County Code Section 24-280 as amended by Ordinance 3176. The property is currently developed with a 1400.-+/- square ft. single-family house. The second unit will be a 840 square foot mobile home, and will be located approximately 160 feet west of the existing dwelling. The property is a .59 acre parcel, and is located on the south side of Keith Lane, approximately 800 feet east of Garner Lane, Chico. The property is zoned AR with a General Plan designation of Agricultural Residential and is located in the North Chico Specific Plan area Surrounding parcels are primarily in residential use and are zoned AR Domestic water for the second dwelling will be provided by a private well and sewage disposal will be handled by individual septic tanks and leachfields. ANALYSIS: This project will allow a second unit of approximately 840 sq. ft. This request is consistent with the intent and requirements of Section 24-280 of the Butte County Code. Upon review of this second unit application, staff has determined that the proposed second unit will not significantly impair the integrity of the zone in which it lies, nor will it be detrimental to the health, safety, and welfare of the intended occupants or the immediate neighborhood. ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION: This application has been determined to be categorically exempt from the provisions of CEQA under a Class 3 exemption. PUBLIC NOTICE AND COMMENTS: This application requires that a public hearing be held. Notices of the hearing will be mailed to the nearest 10 property owners. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services - Planning Division 0 • • AGENDA ITEM RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the Minor Use Permit on AP# 047-300-034, subject to the following findings and conditions contained in attached Exhibit "A". ■ Butte County Department of Development Services - Planning Division ■ 2 EXHIBIT "A" AGENDA ITEM MINOR USE PERMIT BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION DATE 95-196 PERMIT NO. AP 047-300-034 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. Pursuant to the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance of the County of Butte and the special conditions set forth below: Sheryl Short is hereby granted a Minor Use Permit in accordance with application filed: 6/22/95 to allow a second unit on property zoned A -R located at 4261 Keith Lane, Chico. 1. Failure to comply with the conditions specified herein as the basis for approval of application and issuance of Permit, constitutes cause for the revocation of said permit in accordance with the procedures set forth in the Butte County Zoning Ordinance, including Butte County Code Section 24-62. 2. Unless otherwise provided for in a condition to a Minor Use Permit, all conditions must be completed by the permittee within 12 months of the delivery of the countersigned permit to the permittee. 3. If any use for which a Minor Use Permit has been granted is not established within one year of the date of receipt of the countersigned permit by the permittee, the permit shall be come null and void and reapplication shall be required to establish the use. 4. The terms and conditions of this permit shall run with the land and shall be binding upon and be to the benefit of the heirs, legal representatives, successors, and assigns of the Permittee. Section 1: Environmental Findings. A. The _application for a Minor Use Permit to allow a Second Dwelling Unit is Categorically aempt from environmental review; and Section 2: Zoning Ordinance Findings. A. The proposed location, size, design, and operating characteristics of the proposed use is in accordance with the purpose of Chapter 24 of the Butte County Code, the purpose of the zone ■ Butte County Department of Development Services - Planning Division ■ 3 LJ • AGENDA ITEM in which the site is located, the Butte County General Plan, and the development policies and standards of the County; and B. The proposed location, size, design, and operating characteristics of the proposed use will be compatible with and will not adversely affect or be materially detrimental to adjacent uses, residents, buildings, structures or natural resources, with consideration given to: 1. Harmony in scale, bulk, coverage and density; 2. The availability of public facilities, services and utilities; 3. The harmful effect, if any, upon desirable neighborhood character; 4. The generation of traffic and the capacity and physical character of surrounding streets; 5. The suitability of the site for the type and intensity of use or development which is proposed; 6. Any other relevant impact of the proposed use. C. The proposed location, size, design, and operating characteristics of the proposed use and the conditions under which it will be operated or maintained will not be detrimental to the public health, safety and general welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and D. . The proposed use will comply with each of the applicable provisions of Chapter 24, Section 280, of the Butte County Code. Section 3: Action. A. Subject to the findings indicated in Sections 1 and 2 of this report, move to approve the Minor Use Permit for Cheryl Short on APN 047-300-034 to allow a Second Unit. Approval shall be subject to the conditions herein. B. Minor changes may be approved administratively by the Director of Development Services, or designee, upon receipt of a substantiated written request by the applicant. Prior to such approval, verification shall be made by each Department or Division that the modification is consistent with the application, fees paid, and environmental determination as conditionally approved. Changes deemed to be major or significant in nature shall require a formal application for amendment. 1. The Second Unit shall not exceed 1200 square feet. 2. Provide two additional off-street spaces. 3. An attached or detached garage or carport with a maximum exterior dimension 20' by 24' is permitted. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services - Planning Division ■ 4 AGENDA ITEM 4. Adequate sewer and potable water facilities shall be provided under permit as determined by the Butte County Environmental Health Division. 5. Either the existing single family dwelling or the Second Unit shall be owner occupied. Certification of ownership shall be required prior to permit issuance and annually thereafter by submittal of a declaration in a form specified by the Director of Development Services or designee. 6. No permits for any additional dwelling may be approved unless the Second Unit is first removed. 7. All structures must meet the Fire Safe Regulations of Butte County and PRC 4290. 8. Construct standard driveway approach at safe location on Keith Lane if one does not already exist. 9. Applicant must also comply with all other applicable State and local statutes, ordinances, and regulations. NOTE: Issuance of this Minor Use Permit does not waive requirement of obtaining Building and Health Department permits before starting construction and their approvals prior to use or occupancy, nor does it waive any other requirements. CC: Land Development Division Building Division Health Department Department of Forestry k:\dre\short.stf Butte County Planning Commission Chairman ■ Butte County Department of Development Services - Planning Division .■ 5 Proje Vicinity Map AP# 047-300-034 SHORT cation G BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Applicant: Sheryl Short Owner. Same Hearing Date: August 14,1995 Q 9:00am Existing Zone: SR -1 (Suburban-Remi&nflid, lacre) A 1 Request: Minor Use Permit to allow a second dwelling unit. I No Scale I I Assessor Parol No: 047-300-034 1 File: 95-196 1 0 p T FILZ j 50 Day Review period Eads SCH. Rear=env Period Ends CORREEP0NDE:dC CCMM�`TTS RE DIVED Short, Sheryl "Minor Use PArmir11 047-300-034 95-196 Data Agenc r erson I iPlanning Department JUN -271995 Oraville, Caiiicrnia 0 - PROJECT Nj*C Short. Sheryl "Minor Use Permit" S C.: i 047-300-034 95-196 30 Day Review Period Ends Sal Review Period Ends OUTGOWG A=,MTY Daze Agene;�� �e:-son 0 Z J J LL F• - Z Q U J C_ a- -cc C/6 APPLICATION FORA S' P ER.M'T PlannlTM '%�­arirnent BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION J U N 2 2 1995 APPLICANT: Head and follow instructions as set forth on attached sheet. oroVille, Applicant's name_ .��Pr�OL //o/°G Phone N(0 / U13 -6 3o_�J Applicant's mailing address `"12ef ��I} � �j �, "LST I a�p Applicant's interest in property (Owner, lessee, other) --6 Lo H ICr Owner's name and address • 5 AM P Contact person for project (if other'than applicant) Assessor's parcel number(s)---q-7 `.;,00 —M Present zonin r 1d tet' fi 0 o Location and size of paroel(s) Q j f"t� ® Q�e Street address /�1, D' ections for travel to proper (rural and mountainous areas only):: -W �1 /� � — Y (C hf- 6 f/l Descriptio��``of proposed development and use VM Description of existing land use La= S (6 e* -\T I6 .(. S Proposed scheduling/associated projects lap V Anticipated incremental development Yl� Building construction (state dimensions, square footage and materials used) a. Existing buildings b. Proposed buildings Hazardous materials to be used (inflammables, explosives or strong chemicals!, Daily hours otoperation __� Number of employees Number of off-street parking spaces provided Existing/proposed sewage disposal method: sc/-S � �/ (�W► Proximity of power and phone lines: _'W!L� Distance to natural water course or storm drain: Anticipated on and off-site drainage improvements: Water source: Proximity of water for fire fighting purposes (hydrants, ponds, etc.) ! Planning Department a J - Will excavation or grading be necessary? Cubic yards (estimate): ®r�Vfi6;, vrwc�ivfiiY� � s List and describe any other related permits and other public approvals required for this project, including those city, regional, State and Federal agencies: . +quired by IF RESIDENTIAL. include the number of units, whether units are single or multi -story in height, schedule of unit sizes, anc type of household size expected. IF COMMERCIAL, indicate the type, whether neighborhood, city or regionally oriented, square footage of sales area, anc loading facilities. IF INDUSTRIAL, indicate type, estimated employment per shift, and loading facilities. IF• INSTITUTIONAL, indicate the major function, estimated employment per shift, estimated occupancy, loading facilities, ? and community benefits to be derived from the project. —� ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES' Identity potential) significant Y g environmental impacts associated with the' use permit. What project design features or special U_ conditions of approval (mitigation measures) are proposed to alleviate potential environmental impacts? HI Z ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING' Describe the project site as it exists before the projectincliudiri y , g. information on topography, soil stability, plants and ani- mals, and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on the site,.and the use of the structures. J tZ Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants _ and an and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. a- Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.) intensity of land use (single-family, apartments, shops, depart- ¢ ment stores, etc.), and scale of development (height, frontage, setback, rear yard, etc.). ' Use separate sheet for longer responses. I hereby declare under penalty of perjury that I have read and understand the instructions -and that the foregoing statements are true, completeandcorrect to the best of my knowledge and belief. Date q- ft -ab Applicant's signature Alt Date r ( `- Property owner's signature a(h' Use Permit Number �- Request: Use permit to allow Z Location and size of Parcel(s) O VERIFY: LJ cn A.P. Number(s) - Project Description Ownership Zoning and Requirements Proof of Agency (it needed) Location Description }Copies of Plot Plan U Date Received 5 li Receipt Number O Application taken by (� INSTRUCTIONS TO USE PERMIT APPLICANTS 1. If applicant is not the owner, written authorization by the owner or other proof of agency must be submitted in order for the applicant to legally sign the application. Application shall be considered void if not signed by the owner or legal agent. - 2. All items on application shall be filled in as completely as possible. If an item is not appli- cable, please indicate by the term "NA". 3. It is important that the applicant supply an accurate description of the location of the proposed project, including the foilowing: a. Assessor's parcel number(s) (from the tax bills or Assessor's maps). b. Street addresses (if available). c. Distances and directions to named streets, bodies of water or railroads. 3s co ; �s 4 of a detailed plot plan of adequate scale to clearly show proposed build- ings and improvements, folded to 8'1i x 11 inches, shall accompanv and be made part of the "Application for Use Permit". If the use permit is approved, the plot plan becomes the ap- proved development plan for the property -The plot plan shall include the following information: a. A scaled drawing of the parcel(s) boundaries. b. Location and dimensions of all existing and proposed improvements on the property, including buildings, driveways, parking areas, wells, septic tanks and leach fields. C. Location and name of bordering streets, access roads, nearby crossroads, streams, bodies of water and railroads. d. North arrow and scale of drawing. S. The "application for Use Permit" is subject to public hearings and approval by the Planning Commission. Any special conditions of approval shall be made a part of the approved "Use Permit" and shall be binding on the applicant. The procedures for County action on use per- mit applications are stated in Chapter 24 of the Butte County Code. 6. The Planning Commission, on the basis of the evidence submitted at thepublic hearing,mav grant use permits when it finds that the proposed uses of the property wiil not impair the integrity and character of the zone in which the land lies and that the use would not be un- reasonably incompatible with or injurious to surrounding properties nor detrimental to the health and general welfare of the persons residing or working in the neighborhood nor to the general health, safety and welfare of the county. 7. In approving a use permit, the Planning Commission may include such conditions as are deemed reasonable and necessary under the circumstances to preserve the integrity and character of the zone and to secure the general purposes of the Butte County General Plan and Chapter 24, of the Butte County Code. Such conditions may include, but are not limited to: time limitations, development plan approval, hours of operation. fencing, dedication of right-of-wav, and street and drainage imorovements. Conditions imposed upon issuance of a use permit must be reasonably related to the use for which the permit is requested. 8. Application fees as of '42-t l g5 (date) are $ 1258 0' . Fees may be paid in cash or by deck made payable to "Treasurer of Butte County". 9. Before submitting a use permit application, applicant is requested to discuss with staff all questions about appiication requirements, County procedures, zoning provisions and possible conditions of approvai. Planning Department J U N 2 7 1995 LAND OF NA TU RAL `.,\/EALTH AND 3'A� r �-= A CLEAN INDOOR AIR ENVIRONMENT FOR A HEALTHIER TOMORROW DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH E3 18-B County Center Drive 1469 Humboldt Road 7 County Center Drive 747 Elliott Road Oroville, CA 95965 ER Chico, CA 95928 Oroville, CA 95965 Paradise, CA 95969 (916) 538-7282 (916) 891-2727 (916) 538-7281 (916) 872-6308 FAX (916) 538-2165 FAX (916) 895-6512 FAX (916) 538-2140 June 13, 1995 Sheryl Short 4261 Keith Lane Chico, CA 95926 RE: Pre -Application Review,, Second Dwelling - 4261 Keith Lane, Chico, AP# 47-30-34 Dear Ms. Short: We have now received sufficient information to determine that your proposed 2 -bedroom second dwelling can be satisfactorily serviced with water and a septic system on your parcel in accordance with the plot plan and floor plan submitted to our office. If you have any questions, please contact me at the Chico' office between 8am and 9am, Monday through Thursday. cer 1 , Doug F el, R.E.H.S. Divisio of Environmental Health DF/gl/septic/short cc: Planning Encl. Planning Department JUN 271995 Or®vili,;, �",;wrnia • 0 P,'snn',-r,v nomartment J U N 2 2 1-995 , �► ; - _, cu l.u`, v ► 0_ CSC �'- no�-1 i tCn t h�T �{_ ; _ :� , � � .� �—�h er_� �v-�- r OP - f1ieal, An -45.0'1 I - 61 - _ �_ 1 t b e--►-1 see rwor_ h Ib-r' el_ �-w ►rho � ice_-I _- —fin-fir . I— I ..- - v,T i s o_v v _ _ _ - - - rrt�ed�I--�lol_�- pool_ _ I -Planning-l3f'1e1't J U N 2-7 1995 - 0r0vi1l, • SIERRA NEUROSURGERY GROUP William N. Dawson, Jr., M.D. Joseph R. Walker, M.D. John 5. Davis, M.D. Diplomates American Board Neurological Surgery 85 Kirman Avenue; Suite 401 Reno,Neuado 89502 702/323-2080 v' 4i ,r George Barakat, M.D. 1.70 D. Russell Avenue, Suite A Susanville, CA 96130 • Ritchie P. Gillespie, M.D. Diplomate American Board Neurological Surgery Diplomate American Board Psychiatry and Neurology T. Thomas Wilkinson, M.D. Eligible, American Board of Neurological Surgery November 28, 1988 75 Pringle Way, Suite 1009 Reno, Nevada 89502 702/323-7410 n. RE: Betty Short Bear Dr. Barakat: Thank you for referring Betty Short. She is a very pleasant 57 -year-old housewife with a chief complaint of pain in the 1¢ow back and down the left lower extremity with numbness into the sole of her foot that she has had over the ,past eight or nine months. Her leg hurts more than her back. Thank you for sending along a lumbar myelogram, with CT to follow, that is consistent with a ruptured disk on the left at LS -S1 which is rather large. There is decreased disk space at L5-S1. She has no difficulty with bladder control. The right leg is okay. Sjnce her myelogram, the pain has been slightly improved. She has a lot of trouble getting around and can do none of her housework, and often has difficulty sitting for long enough to urinate. PAST MEDICAL HISTORY: She has had a tonsillectomy, gallbladder operation, incisional hernia repair, and hysterectomy for benign disease. She says she tends to get pneumonia after general anesthesia. She has hypertension, gout,and arthritis. Medications include Xanax, Kaon, Meclomen, Allopurinal, and Aldoril, also Robaxin and Vicodin. She has no drug allergies, but codeine makes her sick to her stomach. PHYSICAL EXAMINATION: She is obese. The low back has no deformity or tenderness to light percussion. Gait is somewhat planning Department hesitant. Straight leg raising is positive on the left at 60`= 'George Barakat, M.D. November 28, 1988 RE: Betty Short Page 2 I asked her again about leg pain at this point and she says that occasionally she will get some pain down the right leg, but not very much. +'. Motor examination shows no weakness in hip flexors, quadriceps, ankle dorsiflexors, or EHL, but there is weakness in the left ankle plantar flexors in that she cannot get her heel up off the floor in toe stand testing. This test is normal on the right side. Deep tendon reflexes are 2+ at both knees and the right ankle, 1+ left ankle. Plantar response is flexor bilaterally. IMPRESSION: Left S1 radiculopathy, possibly with some also on the right side. I recommend that we do an operation to remove the mass effect on her nerves, probably a ruptured disk. We discussed this and she will call with any further questions. I will keep you posted. Ve trµl yours , 1John ais, M.D�/ • JSD: dy cc: M. Whitney, M.D. Planning Danartment JUN 271995 orovirP,;,, vc:r 2 s5's'113 0 PATIENT NAME BIRTHDATE DATE SHORT, Betty 7-22-31 11-03-88 REQUESTING PHYSICIAN MEDICAL RECORDS NO. X-RAY NO. BARAKAT 53179 88-3619 PMO PATIENT STATUS HISTORNLow back and left lower extremity pain. LUMBAR MYELOGRAM: OUTPATIENT Lumbar puncture was performed by the undersigned at the L3-4 inner -space without difficulty. 15ml of Isoview 200 was instilled. Multiple fluoroscopic spot films and over head films were then performed. FTNDINCS: There is good visualization of the lumbar subarchnoid space. The L5-S1 disc is markedly narrowed. There is a fairly prominent and moderately lateral left sided extra -dural defect at the lumbosacral level. There is amputation of filling of the first sacral root sleeve on the left. There is a rather mild central bulge at L3-4 consistant with a slightly bulging annulus. The rest of the study is normal. IMPRESSION: 1. Probable left sided disc herniation at L5-S1. 2. Mild central bulge of annulus fibrosis at L3-4. Following completion of this study which was well tolerated, patient went for a CT study. This will be separately reported. 1s MBL:eb P/T: 11-03-88 Matthew Ben -Lesser, M.D. Plannina Depallmert JUN 2 7 1995 •S REPORT IS BASED SOLELY UPON RADIOLOGICAL EXAMINATION. CORRELATION WITH THE CLINICAL EXAMINATION IS ESSENTIAL. X-RAY REPORT LASSEN COMMUNITY CT PATIENT NAME BIRTHDATE DATE SHORT, Betty 7-22-31 11-03-38 REQUESTING PHYSICIAN MEDICAL RECORDS NO. XRAY NO. BARAKAT 88-3619 REQUESTING PHYSICIAN —7 PMd PATIENT STATUS OUTPATIENT HISTORY low back and left lower extremity pain, severe in the last week or so. Past history of diagnosis of HNP? CT LUMBAR -POST MYELOGRAM: Following a proceeding lumbar myelogram, 5mm columinated images were performed at 4mm intervals from mid L3 down through the posterior portion of the lumbosacral disc. Some additional orthogonal views were performed with gantry angulation. FINDING: There is.long standing degenerative discopathy at L5-S1 with a narrowed disc con- taining considerable amount sof gas. There is bulging of the annulus and in addition there appears to be a herniated fragment which contains a pocket of vacuua. disc gas this is either a free fragment or there is subligamentous herniation in- feriorly below the disc level. There is obliteration of filling of the first sacral root sleeve. The thecal sac is flattend anteriorly and mininmall deformed a long its left side. At L4-5 there are minor degenerative changes in the zygo apophyseal facets. Spinal canal and thecal sac appear normal. At L3-4 there is minimal bulging of the annulus fibrosis but no signs of any sig- nificant pathology. IMPRESSION: Long standing degenerative discopathy at L5-S1 with left sided herniation of a disc fragment which contains gas and with evidence of either subligamentous ex- tension inferiorly or this could be a free fragment. ic MBL:eb D: 11-03-88 T: 11--04-88 Matthew Ben -Lesser, M.D. Planning Depaatmi ent J U N 2 7 1995 HIS REPORT IS BASED SOLELY UPON RADIOLOGICAL EXAMINATION. CORRELATION WITH THE CLINICAL EXAMINATION IS ESSENTIAL T'� X-RAY REPORT 0 0 PlanninP Denartment JUN 2 2 9995 ®rovii ,,, „,,,iiornia L: 047 300 048 000STATff ACTIVE L; 0,4 4900& STATUS: ACTI»E LINDQUIST KEITH D ELIZAA RAMIRE5E THOMAS & MARIA ELENA 4250 KEITH LANE -' 4266 KEITH LN CHICO CA 95926 CHICO CA 95926 L 047 300 034 000 STATUS: ACTIVE ' : L: 047 300 050 000 STATUS: ACTIVE � SHORT WILLIAM J & SHERYL L - BIEDERMANN GUNTHER J H & THERESE J K 4261 KEITH LN _-- �_- _ 4258 KEITH LANE CHICO CA 95926 ' CHICO CA 95926 L: 047 300 032 000 STATUS: ACTIVE _' - �� --- -_� �� ` L. 047 300 041 000 ' STATUS: ACTIVE BLADORN HERBERT W & CHARLENE L KENNETT l ALLARD & DEBBIE L 4269 KEITH LN 4234 KEITH LN `~ CHICO CA 95926 . -�' CHICO CA 95926 - L: 047 300 033 000 STATUS: ACTIVE � -- - ----- .� L: 047 300 042 000 ' STATUS: ACTIVE �LOOMlS RANDOLPH W & MARIDA (CB DVA) BELL DANIEL F & ALISON L p O BOX 1313 '4242 KEITH LN .. � CHICO CA 95927 ` - CHICO CA 95926 - L: 047 300 035 000 STATUS: ACTIVE PRESLlK JAMES E .� 4245 KEITH LN ' ' ^ CHICO CA 95926 � ` L: 047 300 044 000 STATUS: ACTIVE . ° ! `~ WHITE KlRBY LEE & KAREN LOUlSE JT . . 4237 KEITH LANE CHICO CA 95926 ` --------- ---' ' -- '------------- L: 047 300 045 000 STATUS: ACTIVE i �^ � ' WALKER DENNIS R & BARBARA J 4223 KEITH LANE `-/ CHICO CA 95926 L: 047 300 047 000 STATUS: ACTIVE ��' i �~. L: 007 420 009 000 STATUS: ACTIVE ALAMEDA ELDON E & CAROL J OLlVERl BlANCA A ETAL OLlVERI ALDO 4231 KEITH LN ^^ � 4243 MICHELL.E CT � CHICO CA 95926 CHICO CA 95926 L 047 300 058 000 STATUS: ACTIVE : �- - � �~ L: 007 420 010 000 -' --� �-- -- --- STATUS: ACTIVE � . � LEVULETT NEIL C & CINDY DILORENZO FRANCESCO & GAYLENE 4275 KEITH LN ^- ' 4227 MICHELE CT `^ CHICO CA 95926 -/ CHICO CA 95926 '- - ! - - -------' � L: 047 300 059 000 STATUS: ACTIVE L: 007 420 011 000 STATUS: ACTIVE HAMMOND BERT H & MARILYN A GREENBERG RONALD E & DONNA L ' '4283 KEITH LANE `~ 4211 MICHE-LE CT ` - CHICO CA 95.926 ' -----'- ' `~ CHICO CA �� , 959266 ---'-------'- L: 047 300 069 000 STATUS: ACTIVE | ! L: 007 420 058 000 STATUS: ACTIVE FERGUSON THOMAS & SANDRA CP . HARDESTY EDWARD & MELISSA � 4276 KEITH LANE - 4282 MICHELLE CT - CHICO CA 95926 ' ' CHICO CA 95926 L: 047 300 070 000 STATUS: ACTIVE .~ L: 007 420 059 000 STATUS: ACTIVE ` HEATON ROBERT B SS ` - DEBOCK DAVID E & LAURIE E ` ' 4284 KEITH LANE - 4261 MICHELLE CT ' CHICO CA 95926 `' CHICO CA 95926 .'. PlanningDepartme k � �N� � v ��^" , 0«nmnw CaU%�miw -•ems— ---�.. AI'-# OWE-fav- 0-19 9 - I9 Lp ..04.1 "7- 00_10 3 �i s►�m��" '� o- 3L1PosaN VA 101-1 y,�,�� r Al bh.-�1�A G i0� l �C2FiV�SON T' _ . `� iC� NCp-roN n� 10'�� L� �►�Q�,ST l®sO 1Q H 1 k c�'�' GI-T rj 05� 1 i f , i -..- +^ r • � .. J • ` Y ^ �.� . 4, �� . , � �... ►. �} r t+ 1 .. - ... ._� � y 1'� t, ., y• t _ + �L ` � � t 1 f ,, �� l 1 i.,; - __ V ,� � - • ,r � � �� � r � .f - 1 � .., - � � _ �. �' • h 11� � 1 I _4! �+ _ l� 7/26/2010 Butte County Page 1 Project Activity History DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Project Number ADM 95-196 Applied 3/15/2010 DEL Project Name Minor Use Permit to allow a second unit p roved_5 DEL Type. ADMINISTRATIVE PERMI Closed 10/3/1995 CLG Subtype TEMP MOBILEHOME Expired . 9/28/2001 CLG Status WITHDRAWN Status Owner Applicant Sheryl Short Site Address City State Zip 4261 KEITH LN CHICO CA 95973 Subdivision Tract Block " Lot No Parcel No 047-300-034 Zoning General Plan A -R AR Action Date Completion Date Action Type Action By / Action Description 9/28/1995 3/20/2000 APPROVAL DATE - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 11/7/2007 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 11/7/2007 Note to File - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Tiffany Upton (11/7/2007 14:31 TMU) Action Created (11/7/2007 1 :3-1-TNtLt) Bond s c'wa—" anceled on 164/2002. Per notes in Access, the TMH was removed on 878703as verified by CDurling_ n Prosect Activities Report By: Maribel Fairbanks CR SYSTEMS Jones, Wendy From: Lewellen, Diane U Sent: Monday, April 05, 2010 4:11 PM To: Jones, Wendy; Hoekstra, Nicholas; Wallis, Roy Cc: Springer, Nancy; Thistlethwaite, Charles Subject: APN:047-300-034 ADM 95-196 Attachments: ADM 95-196 PLOT PLAN.pdf Could you please verify if Mobile is on property. I have included a Plot Plan to show Mbbile location on property. Thank you, Diane APN:047-300-034 ADM 95-196 4261 KEITH LANE, CHICO SHORT Diane Lewellen 4 -� Account Clerk, Senior Administration Division Department of Development Services (530) 538-6869 Fax (530) 538-2140 email: dlewellen@buttecounty.net COUNTY OF BUTTE E-AiA1L DISCLAIMER: This e-mail and any attachment thereto may contain private, confidential, and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any revieiv, copying, or distribution of this e-mail (or any attachments thereto) by other than the County of Bane or the intended recipient is strictly prohibited. /f you are NOT the intended recipient, please contact the sender immediately and pernhanently delete the original and any copies of this e-mail and any attachments thereto. 4 1 k-, c" cm IU cr. Vr k-, COUNTY OF BUTTE Oroville, California GENERAL CLAIM CLAIMANT: Sheryl Short ADDRESS: 4261 Keith Lane CITY & STATE: Chico, CA 95926 DATE OF CLAIM: October 3, 1995 SIIRMIT CLAIM TO DEPARTMENT RECEIVING GOODS OR SERVICES IMPORTANT.• SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE DATE DESCRIPTION OF CLAIM (DESCRIBE FULLY TO AVOID DELAY) AMOUNT 10-3-95 Administrative Use Permit, AP#047-300-034, File No. 95-196 - REFUND $678. 00 TOTAL $678. 00 I, the undersigned, declare under penalty of perjury that the services or articles claimed have been performed or delivered, and that this claim is true and correct ag stated. Dated this day of D w• 19 6J, at , Calif. 4L4 — Sig4fiture of Claimant I, the undersigned, hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the services or articles specified above h e been performed or delivered and that there is a Budget Appropriation [M or Specific Board Approval [ j (Check one) for the same. ` Dated this I I day of CT �' . , 19—fat CD2-es�J. %-A F- , Calif. M Department Head or Authorized Deputy Dept. Code 480001 Exp. Code 4210900 PAYABLE FROM GENERAL FUND DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE - AUDITOR°S USE ONLY ' DEPT. & SUB. PROD. SUB. OBJ. CLAIM NO. INV. NO. INV. DATE ENCUMB. GROSS AMT. 0ft Date 10/11/95 Development Services Department Time 9:13 am Applicant Billing Worksheet 95-196 AUP * Sheryl Short 4261 Keith Lane Chico, CA 95926 In reference to : Minor Use Permit, AP#047-300-034 Rounding : None Full Precision : No Last bill / / Last aging Last charge 10/05/95 Last payment / / Amount $0.00 Date/Slip# Description HOURS/RATE AMOUNT 06/19/95 Linda / C 1.00 34.00 #5964 Clerical 34.00 06/19/95 Larry / P 1.00 59.00 #6004 Processing 59.00 07/03/95 Craig / P 0.25 14.75 #6172 Processing 59.00 07/17/95 Lynn / C 1.50 67.50 #6284 Clerical 45.00 07/17/95 Craig / P 0.50 29.50 #6300 Processing 59.00 07/17/95 Luke / P 3.00 177.00 #6324 Processing 59.00 07/31/95 Luke / P 4.00 236.00 46364 Processing 59.00 07/31/95 Larry / P 2.00 118.00 #6417 Processing 59.00 08/12/95 Lynn / C 4.00 180.00 #6506 , Clerical 45.00 08/26/95 Lynn / C 1.00 45.00 #6555 Clerical 45.0.0 09/11/95 Paula A. / C 0.50 17.00 #6631 Clerical 34.00 09/11/95 Lynn / C 1.50 67.50 #6739 Clerical 45.00 Page 1 TOTAL l Project No. ,. .. Type.of Project Administrative ' 4 P, LANNING'PERMITS' - - v IDR TRACKING MENU v'3.0' M I ` '� Initial Study 4 AgendaReport 3 Hearing Date Received = __-i-=--- --- s 30 Day Comp Deny Date Mgr Rev p -. PC Mgr Rev ❑ Hearing Date-� Date Assigned j — - ...... _ Incomp ❑ Staff ❑ Counsel Rev ❑ a PC Counsel Rev ❑. Approved ❑ Denied.,[]. . Project Planner _ _ - — n«� Deemed Comp � ,. % Date Signed , — Final IDR Date __ Date 9/28/1995 .: - Planner'sPhone j� Gen Rule Exm t, ❑ CAT ❑ p Date 30d Rev P ublishin Date .�� g Cont Cont Off t ❑ ❑ -- Date Circ Comm �� x r Stat Exmpt ❑ `NEG ❑ EIR ❑ --- — — — Report .j Comments Pre-set _File Locatit . -:. _..:. - BOS T; • p _ Bond cancelled 11/14/02. Second mobile home is not on the property �pOuick Status Withdrawn �� - — --- — — Schedule Hearing ❑' — - Verified by Carl Durhng 8/8/03 APN No..047-300-034 Appeal PC Det i Total $0 00 ( To board. Pro' Descrip tion, Minor Use Permit to allow a second unit Mgr Rev AR ❑ p� Recei t No Notes. Second mobile Home-,removed.y Counsel Rev AR ❑ ATR No' 8/8/03 Prot Location on the south side of Keith Lane, approximately 800 feet BOS Heann ` Permd Issued ❑ Chent Billing ❑ Plain ng $0.00 it - Applicant --Last Name" Short .First Name Sheryl Mailing Address' 4261 Keith Lane M City:,Chico State CA Zip.Code 95926 ,Phone Number Owner -Address Engineer/Rep Eng/Rep Address El Date 10/11/95 Development Services Depart• t Time 9:13 am Applicant Billing Worksheet 95-196 AUP * :Sheryl Short (continued) Date/Slip# Description HOURS/RATE 09/25/95 Paula A. / C 0.25 #6766 Clerical 34.00 TOTAL BILLABLE TIME CHARGES TOTAL BILLABLE COSTS TOTAL NEW CHARGES 20.50 Page 2 AMOUNT TOTAL 8.50 $1,053.75 $0.00 PAYMENTS/REFUNDS/CREDITS 06/22/95 Deposit - Receipt #14907 (1,000.00) 10/11/95 Refund/Claim Form to Auditor 678.00 TOTAL PAYMENTS/REFUNDS/CREDITS NEW BALANCE New Current period TOTAL NEW BALANCE 731.75 Appl� wQ4u ail 50--)ry I $1,053.75 ($322.00) $731.75 Mll IV`-. K DATE 0 0 OFFICIAL RECEIPT COUNTY OF BUTTE STATE OF CALIFORNIA OFFICE OF PLANNING "T —Twlal.5 Valued Gu:5tomer Ince 1943' 'WELLS FAH00 BANK.' Tod"— CC 12 2 10 1, 19 Li: 2 5 2 3 03'7L 466889115 0 RECEIVED FROM RECEIPT 16635 ISSUED/BV • 0 Project #: ADM 95-196 APN: 047-300-034 Applicant: Sheryl Short Issued: 9/28/1995 4261 Keith Lane Renewal Date: 9/28/1997 Chico, CA 95926 I -MIN Me gmmuf met smm", • :: s ins -- LICENSE PERMIT BOND KNOWN ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS' • BOND NO.; 1R?971C_..... .._..._.. ,:.. PREMIUM' $ 7S-(-)()**** ANNUM That we, _ SHERYL L. SHORT and WILLIAM - J. SHORT as principal, and the INDEMNITY COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA, a corporation duly licensed to do business in the State of California as Surety, are held and firmly bound unto_COUNTY OF BUTTE , Obligee, in the penal sum of _ FIFTEEN HUNDRED ------ 00/_100 ------ -.----- Dollars ($ 1 F ,00 _ 00***** 1. lawful money of the. United States, to be paid to the said Obligeo, for which payment well and truly to be made, we kind ourselves and our legal representatives, jointly and severally by these presents. THE CONDITION OF THE ABOVE OBLIGATION IS SUCH, That whoreas, the said Principal has been granted MOBILE HOME USE PERMIT BOND by said Obligee. NOW, THEREFORE, if the said Principal shall faithfully perform the duties and in all things comply with the laws and ordinances, including all amendments thereto, appertaining to the license or permit applied for, then this obligation to be void, otherwise to remain in full force and effect. The liability of the Surety hereunder may, however, be terminated by giving thirty (30) clays' written notice to the Principal and Obligee, and upon giving such notice, the Surety Shall be discharged from all liability under this bond for any act or omission of the Principal nocurring atter tho expiration of thirty days from the date of receipt of such notice. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, WP have hereunto set our hands and seals this 26thday of SEPTEMBER '19-9.5-. SHERYL L. SHORT & WILLIAM ,T_ SHQRT INDEMNITY COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA PRINCIPAL bkAha 9A�&u-t Sheryl -L. hort William J. ShoA I D 016 REV. SR= By.. �,\ Ni'kk' Brundin Attoenay•In.Fact 17780 Fitch Irvine, CA 92714 (714)263-3300 l CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of CALIFORNIA County Of BUTTE On 9/26/95 before me, MARJ-c1RIE L STEPHENS , DATE NAME, TITLE OF OFFICER - E.G., "JANE DOE, NOTARY PUBLIC - No. 5907 personally appeared NIKKI- BRUNDIN NAME(S) OF SIGNER(S) © personally known to me - OR - ❑ proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and ac- knowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), �,,,,Q,1„II,IUII,I,III„uIII,U►,11:UII,I,IIII,,,II�,,,,I,IIIq,llle or the entity upon behalf of which t h e aOPF;0/A S SEAL person(s) acted, executed the instrument. &� MARJORIE L. STEPHENSM M a NOTARY PUBLIC - CALIFORNIA (A w COUNTY OF 6u"m WITNESS m hand and official seal. �My CommissionEllplroe January 18, 1998 � y 11111@111111 II UIIIIIIIl11U11111111U1111Ut I1111111ttUlUllllllltltl,t 1 SI ATURE Of NOTARY /d OPTIONAL Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form. CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER ❑ INDIVIDUAL ❑ CORPORATE OFFICER' TITLE(S) ❑ PARTNER(S) ❑ LIMITED ~ ❑ GENERAL ® ATTORNEY-IN-FACT ❑ TRUSTEE(S) ❑ GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR ❑ OTHER: SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: NAME OF PERSONS) OR ENTrrY(IES) DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT USE PERMIT BOND TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT 1 NUMBER OF PAGES DATE OF DOCUMENT SIGNER(S) OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE ©1993 NATIONAL NOTARY ASSOCIATION - 8236 Remmet Ave., P.O. Box 7184 - Canoga Park, CA 91309-7184 4KPOWER OF ATTORNEY OF MNITY COMPANY OF CALIF16IA AND DEVELOPERS INSURANCE COMPANY N° 232738 P.O. BOX 19725, IRVINE, CA 92713 • (714) 263-3300 NOTICE: 1. All power and authority herein granted shall in any event terminate on the 31st day of March, 1996. 2. This Power of Attorney is void if altered or if any portion is erased. 3. This Power'of Attorney is void unless the seal is readable, the text is in brown ink, the signatures are In blue Ink and this notice Is in red Ink. 4. This Power of Attorney should not be returned to the Attorney(s)-In-Fact, but should remain a permanent part of the obligee's records. KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that, except as expressly limited, INDEMNITY COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA and DEVELOPERS INSURANCE COMPANY, do each severally, but not jointly, hereby make, constitute and appoint ***NANCY LUTTENBACHER, NIKKI BRUNDIN, DENNIS J. LINDO, JOINTLY OR SEVERALLY' the true and lawful Attorneys) -In -Fact, to make, execute, deliver and acknowledge, for and on behalf of each of said corporations as sureties, bonds, undertakings and contracts of suretyship in an amount not exceeding Two Million Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($2,500,000) in any single undertaking; giving and granting unto said Attorney(s)-In-Fact full power and authority to do and to perform every act necessary, requisite or proper to be done in connection therewith as each of said corporations could do, but reserving to each of said corporations full power of substitution and revocation; and all of the acts of said Attorney(s)-In-Fact, pursuant to these presents, are hereby ratified and confirmed. The authority and powers conferred by this Power of Attorney do not extend to any of the following bonds, undertakings or contracts of suretyship: Bank depository bonds, mortgage deficiency bonds, mortgage guarantee bonds, guarantees of installment paper, note guarantee bonds, bonds on financial institutions, lease bonds, insurance company qualifying bonds, self -insurer's bonds, fidelity bonds or bail bonds. This Power of Attorney is granted and is signed by facsimile under and by authority of the following resolutions adopted by the respective Boards of Directors of INDEMNITY COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA and DEVELOPERS INSURANCE COMPANY, effective as of September 24,1986: RESOLVED, that the Chairman of the Board, the President and any Vice President of the corporation be, and that each of them hereby is, authorized to execute Powers of Attorney, qualifying the attorneys) named in the Powers of Attorney to execute, on behalf of the corporation, bonds, undertakings and contracts of suretyship; and that the Secretary or any Assis- tant Secretary of the corporation be, and each of them hereby is, authorized to attest the execution of any such Power of Attorney; RESOLVED, FURTHER, that the signatures of such officers may be affixed to any such Power of Attorney or to any certificate relating thereto by facsimile, and any such Power of Attorney or certificate bearing such facsimile signatures shall be valid and binding upon the corporation when so affixed and in the future with respect to any bond, undertaking or contract of suretyship to which it is attached. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, INDEMNITY COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA and DEVELOPERS INSURANCE COMPANY have severally caused these presents to be signed by their respec- tive Presidents and attested by their respective Secretaries this 1st day of April, 1993. INDEMNITY COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA DEVELOPERS INSURANCE COMPANY �r , eY By � Dan F. Vincenti, Jr. pAM> Dant F. Vincenti, Jr. President o° pPOR o, resident Py\NSUp r91 4�- nQ� ra P 0?, �^ ATTEST OCT. S, �r w kR. 2T, o ATTEST I 1678 i By w""' By �(ro �</F00.�- *? Walter Crowell Walter Crowell Secretary Secretary STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) On July 15, 1994, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared Dante F. Vincenti, Jr. and Walter A. Crowell, per- sonally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the persons who executed the within instrument as President and Secretary on behalf of Indemnity Company of California and as President and Secretary of Developers Insurance Company, the Corporations therein named, and acknowledged to me that the corporations executed it. WITNESS my hand and official seal. OFFICIAL SEAL J. ALVARADO BY - �• COMM. #1023169 L.C. Fiebiger I NOTARY PUBLIC - CALIFORNIA Signature ORANGE COUNTY r Notary Public My Commission Exp. Apr. 17, 1998 CERTIFICATE The undersigned, as Senior Vice President of'INDEMNITY COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA, and Senior Vice President of DEVELOPERS INSURANCE COMPANY, does hereby certify that the foregoing and attached Power of Attorney remains in full force and has not been revoked; and furthermore, that the provisions of the resolutions of the respective Boards of Directors of said corporations set forth in the Power of Attorney, are in force as of the date of this Certificate. This Certificate is executed in the City of Irvine, California, this 2 6 t hday of SFPTF.MRF R , 1991 . INDEMNITY COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA �,pAMy "� — `44"POR4 f � o' OCT. C 3%. BY s d o4 Isu4 4 r/F L.C. Fiebiger Senior Vice President ID -310 REV. 1/95 DEVELOPERS INSURANCE COMPANY 9 �N S Uq4 � p; � p By�c0 AR. 27, W MR. L.C. Fiebiger leis /ir0a+��*� Senior Vice President m SENDER: I also wish to receive U) • Complete items 1 and/or 2 for additional services. 4) • Complete items 3, and 4a & b. following services (for an a 90 •• Print your name and address on the reverse of this form so that we can fee): 0) return this card to you. > • Attach this form to the front of the mailpiece, or on the back if space 1. ❑ Addressee's Address 1 does not permit. • Write "Return Receipt Re nested'=on the mailpiece below the article number. p a p 2. ❑ Restricted Delivery • The Return Receipt will show to whom the article was delivered and the date c delivered. Consult postmaster for fee. -0 3. Article Addressed to: 4a. Article Number _m Sheryl Short P 298 037 853 E' 4261 Keith Lane 4b. Service Type S Chico, CA 95926 ❑ Registered CA)a Certified y W ❑Express Mail Administrative Permit 95-196 5. SignVr� (Addresye) J � q f \ AA 6A / 1 A/ [� j/n ,t 0 y PS Form ❑ Insured ❑ COD ❑ Return Receipt for Merchandise 7. Dai of Delivery w /' 8. Addressee's Address (Only if requested Y and fee is paid) C M , December 1991 *U.S. GPO: 1993-352-714 DOMESTIC RETURN UPW STATES POSTAL SERVICE � "ti F .� J _ Official Business SE! rt, ":, /qac, J ar 0 PENAM FOR PRIVATE N USE TA AVOID PAYMENT �)F—ROSTAGE,- $300 Print your name, address and ZIP Code here SERVICES r,. p 7 Cuunty Ceo,'ar L"rive Orov:JG, CA 95965-3397 ✓�� ,y `r NOTIC OF CANCELLA N. I INDEMNITY COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA 17780 FITCH SUITE 200 IRVINE CA 92614 OBLIGEE'S ORIGINAL Date of Notice Bond Number Type of Bond Premium Expiration 10-15-2002 182973C MISCELLANEOUS BOND LICENSE PERMIT 9-26-2003 Obligee COUNTY OF BUTTE 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE OROVILLE CA 95963 Gentlemen / Ladies: The above company hereby notifies you that it has elected to cancel said bond in its entirety. Such cancellation to become effective 30 days after receipt of this notice. This notice is given to you in accordance with the cancellation provision in above mentioned bond. Principal SHERYL L SHORT AND WILLIAM J SHORT 4261 KEITH LN CHICO CA 95973 TYPE OF CANCELLATION: GENT'S REQUEST Producer # 415198 INTERWEST INS SERV INC UNDO HANNA & ABBOTT INS AGCY 1357 E LASSEN AVE STE A CHICO CA 95927 B Y 0p 00 15 0 Y. mot ANVV760REY-t NN -FAC CALIF� - 'r l - �. LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH A,ND BEAUTY PLANNING DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (530) 538-7601 FAX: (530)538-7785 September 5, 2002 �-5 3 Sheryl Short 4261 Keith Lane Chico, CA 95926 Re: Temporary Second Dwelling AP 047-300-034, ADM 95-196 Dear Ms. Short: On September 7, 2001, the Butte County Director of Development Services renewed your permit for a temporary second living unit on your property. Section 24-304, as amended, of the Butte County Code provides that your permit shall be only for a term of one year, and must be renewed annually if the use is to continue. Effective July 12, 1993, the Butte. County Board of Supervisors adopted an annual renewal fee of $50.00 for temporary second dwellings. Inasmuch as your renewal expires on September 12, 2002, you are hereby advised to apply for a renewal. Please complete the enclosed renewal form and return it to this office with your check in the amount of $50.00 made payable to the Butte County Treasurer. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this office. Sincerely, (DICL� �2c�'--; Diane Lewellen Office Assistant III LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY PLANNING DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE • OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (530) 538-7601 FAX: (530)538-7785 January 22, 2002 Sheryl Short 4261 Keith Lane Chico, CA 95926 Re: Temporary Second Dwelling APN: 047-300-034, ADM 95-196 Dear Ms. Short: On September 7, 2001, we received your renewal fee of $50.00 and completed affidavit. The Director of Development Services reviewed and approved your renewal request for a temporary second living unit on your property for a period of one year for Stanley Short. This permit is only good for one year and must be renewed annually, if the use is to continue, prior to its expiration date of September 12, 2002. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this office. Sincerely, Diane Lewellen Office Assistant III AFFIDAVIT OF RELATIONSHIP FOR A TEMPORARY MOBILE HOME The Board of Supervisors has found that for the health, safety, and welfare of the people of the County that it has often become necessary for the care of persons who by reason of old age, disease (either mental or physical), infirmity or other cause, are unable, unassisted, to properly manage and take care of themselves, or would benefit from familial assistance, to allow mobile homes to be placed on smaller parcels than present County Codes or Ordinances permit, so that such persons will not have to be institutionalized, but rather can reside near their close relatives who can help care for them. The ability to care for one's close relatives will not only result in better care for citizens, but will also negate in many situations the necessity for public assistance which many citizens find degrading and damaging to the pride of the persons concerned and their immediate relatives. This will also provide privacy and dignity for the relative as well as independence, of which these people are deserving. Please state the yrcprmstapces that apply: 2. Please state the nature of the relationship between the resident(s) of the existing dwelling and the resident(s) of the proposed mobile home: (describe relationship by blood or marriage. In cases involving close friends, describe nature of friendship, number of years known, etc.) M3.- ' " `Resident(s) of household of existing dwelling on the property: 2 Name ��,(L( sV l U "'L Name Phone # Jk) q'1,3 D3 Z5 Address L 'ef K6�h 4. Resident(s) of mobile home proposed to be temporarily placed on the property: Name _SilA36>4 Name Phone # Address —i L( 16 t 4_1i 5. Number of persons residing in existing dwelling: in proposed temporary mobile'_e_. 6. Assessor Parcel Number on Property: 047-300-034 Renewal Date September 12, 2001 We the undersigned state that no rent will be charged to the occupant(s) of the mobile home by the owner or occupant of the real property. In the event the requested Administrative Permit is granted, we also agree to and do hereby give the County of Butte, its officers, agents, and employees, a right to enter upon said real property and to remove the mobile home from the property and to store same at our sole cost and expense in the event the mobile home is not removed from the property within one -hundred twenty (120) days of the expiration of the Administrative Permit pursuant to Butte County Code Section 24-295.10. We Declare under penalty of perjury that the above is true and correct. Executed on the day of at Cep , California Head of Household of existing dwelling Head of Househol f proposed D or� r►i�bii�hc�Q (� J:I templaffidavi. wpd i -SEP 7 2001 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING DIVISION CA August 30, 2001 Sheryl Short 4261 Keith Lane Chico, CA 95926 Re: Temporary Second Dwelling AP 047-300-034 Dear Ms. Short: y _ '6'attv counN L A N D O F N A T U R A L W E A L T H A N D B E A U T Y PLANNING DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE • OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (530) 538-7601 FAX: (530)538-7785 On September 7, 2000, the Butte County Director of Development Services renewed your permit for a temporary second living unit on your property. Section 24-304, as amended, of the Butte County Code provides that your permit shall be only for a term of one year, and must be renewed annually if the use is to continue. Effective July 12, 1993, the Butte County Board of Supervisors adopted an annual renewal fee of $50.00 for temporary second dwellings. Inasmuch as your renewal expires on September 12, 2001, you are hereby advised to apply for a renewal. Please complete the enclosed renewal form and return it to this office with your check in the amount of $50.00 made payable to the Butte County Treasurer. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this. office. Sincerely, Diane Lewellen Office Assistant III J:\temp\temp 1 n August 18, 2000 Sheryl Short 4261 Keith Lane Chico CA 95926 Re: Temporary Second Dwelling AP 047-300-034 ,�3uite C L A N D O F NATURAL WEALTH A N D BEAUTY PLANNING DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE • OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (530) 538-7601 FAX: (530)538-7785 Dear Ms Short'' On 479r7, the Butte County Director of Development Services renewed your permit for a temporary second living unit oiiyour property. Section 24-304, as amended, of the Butte County Code provides that your permit shall be only for a term of one year, and must be renewed annually if the use is to continue. Effective July 12,.1993, the Butte County Board of Supervisors adopted an annual renewal fee of $50.00 for temporary second dwellings. II Inasmuch as your renewal expires on September 12, 2000', you are hereby advised to apply for a renewal. Please complete the enclosed renewal form and return it to this office with your check in the amount of $50.00 made payable to the Butte County T reasurer. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this office. Sincerely, Thomas A. Parilo ;Di ector of Development Services .Roland. Parks_ Office"Assistant III AFFIDAVIT OF RRLATIONSHIP FOR A TEMPORARPTOWOBILE HOME The Board of Supervisors has found that for the health, safety, and welfare of the people of the County that it has often become necessary for the care of persons who by reason of old age, disease (either mental or physical), infirmity or other cause, are unable, unassisted, to properly manage and take care of themselves, or would benefit from familial assistance, to allow mobile homes to be placed on smaller parcels than present County Codes or Ordinances permit, so that such persons will not have to be institutionalized, but rather can reside near their close relatives who can help care for them. The ability to care for one's close relatives will not only result in better care for citizens, but will also negate in many situations the necessity for public assistance which many citizens find degrading and damaging to the pride of the persons concerned and their immediate relatives. This will also provide privacy and dignity for the relative as well as independence, of which these people are deserving. Please state the apply: Please state the nature of the relationship between the resident(s) of the existing dwelling and the resident(s) of the proposed mobile home: (describe relationship by blood or marriage. In cases involving close friends, describe nature of friendship, nu -*n> er of years la;o;vn, etc.) 3. Resident(s) of household of existing dwelling on the property: Namey/ �h /_/.� J �/ Name Phone # ) V Address l b] Uu-ll..b , L.(:l_• 4. Resident(s) of mobile home proposed to be temporarily placed on the property: 2 Name ^+'�' ![J' � Name Phone # Address 1,[ c l�3 KfA4, �4 l . R r ( _• 6/6111 �I 5. Number of persons residing in existing dwelling:y in proposed temporary mobile 6. Assessor Parcel Number on Property: 047-300-034 Renewal Date September 12, 2000 We the undersigned state that no rent will be charged to the occupant(s) of the mobile home by the owner or occupant of the real property. In the event the requested Administrative Permit is granted, we also agree to and do hereby give the County of Butte, its officers, agents, and employees, a right to enter upon said real property and to remove the mobile home from the property and to store same at our sole cost and expense in the event the mobile home is not removed from the property within one -hundred twenty (120) days of the expiration of the Administrative Permit pursuant to Butte County Code Section 24-295.10. We Declare under penalty of perjury that the above is true and correct. Executed on the S;6 day of at C�LL�� , California Head of Ho'dsehold of existing dwelling Head of Household grproposed temporary mobile home J: Itemplaffidavi. wpd FILE COPY August 18, 2000 Sheryl Short 4261 Keith Lane Chico CA 95926 Re: Temporary Second Dwelling AP 047-300-034 Dear Ms Short On August 7, 1999, the Butte County Director of Development Services renewed your permit for a temporary second living unit on your property. Section 24-304, as amended, of the Butte County, Code provides that your permit shall be only for a term of one year, and must be renewed annually if the use is to continue. Effective July 12, 1993, the Butte County Board of Supervisors adopted an annual renewal fee of $50.00 for temporary second dwellings. Inasmuch as your renewal expires on September 12, 2000, you are hereby advised to apply for a renewal. Please complete the enclosed renewal form and return it to this office with your check in the amount of $50.00 made payable to the Butte County Treasurer. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this office. Sincerely, Thomas A. Parilo Director of Development Services Roland Parks Office Assistant III - -Suffe, ount _i"" LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY September 8, 1999 Sheryl Short 4261 Keith Lane Chico, CA 95926 Re: Temporary Second Dwelling AP 047-300-034 Dear Ms. Short: PLANNING DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE • OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (530) 538-7601 FAX: (530) 538-7785 On August 7, 1999, we received your renewal fee of $50.00 and completed affidavit. The Director of Development Services reviewed and approved your renewal request for a temporary second living unit on your property for a period of one year for Stanley Short. This permit is only good for one year and must be renewed annually, if the use is to continue, prior to its expiration date of September 12, 2000. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this office. Sincerely, Thomas A. Parilo Director of Development Services Teri Bridenhagen Office Assistant III /pa j:\temp\temp2 0 - 0 AFFIDAVIT OF RELATIONSHIP FOR A TEMPORARY MOBILE HOME The Board of Supervisors has found that for the health, safety, and welfare of the people of the County that it has often become necessary for the care of persons who by reason of old age, disease (either mental or physical), infirmity or other cause, are unable, unassisted, to properly manage and take care of themselves, or would benefit from familial assistance, to allow mobile homes to be placed on smaller parcels than present County Codes or Ordinances permit, so that such persons will not have to be institutionalized, but rather can reside near their close relatives who can help care for them. The ability to care for one's close relatives will not only result in better care for citizens, but will also negate in many situations the necessityfor public assistance which many citizens find degrading and damaging to the pride of the persons concerned and their immediate relatives. This will also provide privacy and dignity for the relative as well as independence, of which these people are deserving. 1. Please state the circuTstancgs that apply: 2. Please state the nature of the relationship between the resident(s) of the existing dwelling and the resident(s) of the proposed mobile home: (describe relationship by blood or marriage. In cases involving close friends, describe nature of friendship, number of years known, etc.) 3: Resident(s) of household of existing dwelling on the property: ^� Name Name � Cc "G Phone #%W— Address- L1211 l I'1"_'iC/� 4. Resident(s) of mobile home proposed to be temporarily placed on the property: Name Address Name Phone✓ Number of persons residing in existing dwelling: Z in proposed temporary mobile I- 6. Assessor Parcel Number on Property: 047-300-034 Renewal Date September 12, 1999 We the undersigned state that no rent will be charged to the occupant(s) of the mobile home by the owner or occupant of the real property. In the event the requested Administrative Permit is granted, we also agree to and do hereby give the County of Butte, its officers, agents, and employees, a right to enter upon said real property and to remove the mobile home from the property and to store same at our sole cost and expense in the event the mobile home is not removed from the property within one -hundred twenty (120) days of the expiration of the Administrative Permit pursuant to Butte County Code Section 24-295.10. We Declare under penalty of perjury that the above is true and correct. Executed on the L day of - , 19 at % �/� , California Head of House old of existing dwelling Head of House d of proposed temporary mobile home J: I templaffidavi. wpd --- July 7, 1999 Sheryl Short 4261 Keith Lane Chico, CA 95926 Re: Temporary Second Dwelling AP 047-300-034 Dear Ms. Short: �[ltte counti/ ' LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY PLANNING DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE • OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (530) 538-7601 FAX: (530) 538-7785 On September 10, 1998, the Butte County Director of Development Services renewed your permit for a temporary second living unit on your property. Section 24-304, as amended, of the Butte County Code provides that your permit shall be only for a term of two year, and must be renewed annually if the use is to continue. Effective July 12, 1993, the Butte County Board of Supervisors adopted an annual renewal fee of $50.00 for temporary second dwellings. Inasmuch as your renewal expires on September 12, 1999, you are hereby advised to apply for a renewal. Please complete the enclosed renewal form and return it to this office with your check in the amount of $50.00 made payable to the Butte County Treasurer. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this office. Sincerely, Thomas A. Parilo Director of Development Services h� Teri Bridenhagen Office Assistant III J:\temp\temp1 September 15, 1998 Sheryl Short 4261 Keith Lane Chico, CA 95926 CounSuite LAND OF NA.TUR.AL WEALTH AND. BEAUTY ' PLANNING DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE • OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (530) 538-7601 FAX: (530) 538-7785 Re: Temporary Second Dwelling AP 047-300-034 Dear Ms. Short: On September 10, 1998, we received your renewal fee of $50.00 and completed affidavit. The Director of Development Services reviewed and approved your renewal request for a temporary second living unit on your property for a period of one year for Stan and Betty Short. This permit is only good for one year and must be renewed annually, if the use is to continue, prior to its expiration date of September 12, 1999. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this office. Sincerely, Thomas A. Parilo Director of Development Services Teri Bridenhagen Office Assistant III /pa j:\temp\temp2 AFFIDAVIT OF RELATIONSHIP FOR A TEMPORARY MOBILE HOME e Board of Supervisors has found that for the health, safety, and welfare of the pedple of the County that it has often become -essary for the care of persons who by reason of old age, disease (either mental or physical), infirmity or other cause, are unable, assisted, to property manage and take care of themselves, or would benefit from familial assistance, to allow mobile homes to placed on smaller parcels than present County -Codes or Ordinances permit, so that such persons will not have to be ;titutionalized, but rather can reside near their close relatives who can help care for them. The ability to care for one's close atives will not only result in better care for citizens, but will also negate in many situations the necessity for public assistance which any citizens find degrading and damaging to the pride of the persons concerned and their immediate relatives. This will also Ovide privacy and dignity for the relative as well as independence, of which these people are deserving. Please state the circumstances that apply: Please state the nature of the relationship between the resident(s) of the existing dwelling and the resident(s) of the proposed mobile home: (describe relationship by blood or marriage. In cases involving close friends, describe nature of friendship, number of years kpown, etc.) s of hous hold�oft existi� dwelling on the prope Resident ame ( � ok:h h Name Phone # ��7 ) ddress Resident s) of pi ile h me proposed to be temporaril lace pe Phone # on t% :ame Name .ddress i. Number of persons residing in existing dwelling: — in proposed temporary mobile l i. Assessor Parcel Number on Property: t'i i '��CY�'3 Renewal Date Ne the undersigngd state that no rent will be charged to the occupant(s) of the mobile home by the owner or occupant of the real )roperty. In the event the requested Administrative Permit is granted, we also agree to and do hereby give the County of Butte, its )fficers, agents, and employees, a right to enter upon said real property and to remove the mobile home from the property and to store same at our sole cost and expense in the event the mobile home is not removed from the property within one -hundred twenty 120) days of the expiration of the Administrative Permit pursuant to Butte County Code Section 24-295.10. Ne Declare under penalty of perjury that the above is true and correct. Executed on the - day of f� , 19 C1 40 at California Head of Household of existing dwelling Head of House of proposed temporary mobile home iNemp%afl7davimpd �•,3i;��;;�`D�i>?mss::?: -- - , _. July 1, 1998 Sheryl Short 4261 Keith Lane Chico, CA 95926 Re: Temporary Second Dwelling AP 047-300-034 Dear Ms. Short: �iutte Count, LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY PLANNING DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE • OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (530) 538-7601 FAX: (530) 538-7765 On August 5, 1997, the Butte County Director of Development Services renewed your permit for a temporary second living unit on your property. Section 24-304, as amended, of the Butte County Code provides that your permit shall be only for a term of one year, and must be renewed annually if the use is to continue. Effective July 12, 1993, the Butte County Board of Supervisors adopted an annual renewal fee of $50.00 for temporary second dwellings. Inasmuch as your renewal expires on September 12, 1998, you are hereby advised to apply for a renewal. Please complete the enclosed renewal form and return it to this office with your check in the amount of $50.00 made payable to the Butte County Treasurer. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this office. Sincerely, Thomas A. Parilo Director of Development Services Teri Bridenhagen Office Assistant III J:\temp\temp I AFFIDAVIT OF RELATIONSHIP FOR A TEMPORARY MOBILE HOME The Board of Supervisors has found that for the health, safety, and welfare of the people of the County that it has often become necessary for the care of persons who by reason of old age, disease (either mental or physical), infirmity or other cause, are unable, unassisted, to property manage and take care of themselves, or would benefit from familial assistance, to allow mobile homes to be placed on smaller parcels than present County Codes or Ordinances permit, so that such persons will not have to be institutionalized, but rather can reside near their close relatives who can help care for them. The ability to care for one's close relatives will not only result in better care for citizens, but will also negate in many situations the necessity for public assistance which many citizens find degrading and damaging to the pride of the persons concerned and their immediate relatives. This will also provide privacy and dignity for the relative as well as independence, of which these people are deserving. Please state the circumstances that apply: //e _ _ 1 . . c n — _ _ 1 / �._ . _ /S �1 1_ . 1,y) MA 2. Piease state the nature of the relationship between the resident(s) of the existing dwelling and the resident(s) of the proposed mobile home: (describe relationship by blood or marriage. In cases involving close friends, describe nature of friendship, number of years known, etc.) 3. R,eident(s) of household of existing dwelling on the prope Namel� {-�ytG�NLI i' ��j'IDY"f" Name 1Y Address `f Zte Phone 3.. . 4. Resident(s) of mobile ho`�m��g proposed to be temporarily lace on the &r9,p,e,M1rty:� Name 5t4,�''i 9 �l �Y"G' Name �� v� Phone # .0),3g3',q.tiL6­ Address _Lc-1UJ G tC: -Cy\ tJI > ­', 10 < <J 5. Number of persons residing in existing dwelling: in proposed temporary mobile 6. Assessor Parcel Number on Property: "1 � � _ Renewal Datk S _i File#9,5-/9(S We the undersigned state that no rent will be charged to the occupant(s) of the mobile home by the owner or occupant of the real property. In the event the requested Administrative Permit is granted, we also agree to and do hereby give the County of Butte, its officers, agents, and employees, a right to enter upon said real property and to remove the. mobile home from the property and to store same at our sole cost and expense in the event the mobile home is not removed from the property within one -hundred twenty (120) days of the expiration of the Administrative Permit pursuant to Butte County Code Section 24-295.10. We Declare under penalty of perjury that the above is true and correct. Executed on the day of , 19 at California *0)hJ6__ A G� Head of Househ ld of existing dwelling Head of H sehold of proposed temporary mobile home I iNemplaffidavimpd �s S g� ►5.213 50 00 ,: So 005 . Shork Sarv�< y,' GATE RECEIPT NO. TOTAL RECEIVED PUBLIC WORI(S LgFCO��.•,r_. usE T'ERSTiITS VARIANCES PU-LIG DOCUMENTS ZONING ENV MEALTN OTHER . `^APPLICANT c1 RECEIVED FROM OFFICIAL RECEIPT COUNTY OF BUTTE STATE OF CALIFORNIA OFFICE OF PLANNING RECEIPT 15 213 ISSUED BY s& .. utte Count L A N D O F N A T U R A L W E A L T H A N D B E A U T Y PLANNING DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (916) 538-7601 FAX: (916) 538-7785 August 5, 1997 Sheryl Short 4261. Keith Lane Chico, CA 95926 Re: Temporary Second Dwelling AP 047-300-034 Dear Ms. Short:, On August 5, 1997, we received your renewal fee of $50.00 and completed affidavit. The Director of Development Services reviewed and approved your renewal request for a temporary second living unit on your property for a period of one year for Stan & Betty Short. a This permit is only good for one year and must be renewed annually, if the use is to continue, prior to its expiration date of September 12, 1998. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this office. Sincerely, Thomas A. Parilo Director of Development Services Teri Bridenha9 en Office Assistant III /pa j:\temp\temp2 July 2, 1997 Sheryl Short 4261 Keith Lane Chico, CA 95926 Re: Temporary Second Dwelling AP 047-300-034 Dear Ms. Short: ucrrkn I MIMI I yr vcvcwrnnov 10cnvn.w . 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (916) 538-7601 FAX: (916) 538-7785 On September 12, 1995, the Butte County Director of Development Services approved your permit for a temporary second living unit on your property. Section 24-304, as amended, of the Butte County Code provides that your permit shall be only for a term of one year, and must be renewed annually if the use is to continue. Effective July 12, 1993, the Butte County Board of Supervisors adopted an annual renewal fee of $50.00 for temporary second dwellings. Inasmuch asY our renewal expires on September 12, 1997, you are hereby advised to apply for a renewal. Please complete the enclosed renewal form and return it to this office with your check in the amount of $50.00 made payable to the Butte County Treasurer. Should you have any questions regarding this. matter, please contact this office. Sincerely, Thomas A. Parilo - Director of Development Services Ten Bndenha gen Office Assistant III J:\2emplempl ADMINISTIVE PERMIT for TEMPORARY MO1' HOME "TOY Sheryl Short FROM: Barry K Hogan, Planning Manager DATE: September 12, 1995 PURPOSE: Administrative Permit on AP#047-300-034 for a temporary second dwelling to be located at 4261 Keith Lane, Chico, in the A -R zone. PERMIT REQUIREMENTS: Approval for a temporary second dwelling is subject to the following requirements. 1. Occupancy of the mobile home shall be limited to Mrs. Short's Father-in-law and Mother-in-law. 2. No rent is to be charged to the occupant of the mobile home. 3. Meet the requirements of the Butte County Environmental Health Department for domestic water supply and sewage disposal. 4. T he mobile honne is to be a temporary use on the property pursuant to the requirements of Section 24-304 of the Butte County Code. 5. The Temporary mobile home must be placed a minimum of 30 feet away from the existing structures. 6. The Use Pemmit shall expire two years from the date of issuance of the Use Pemmit. Upon application, the Planning Commission may grant an extension of the Use Pemiit not exceeding one year. 7. In the event that the applicant who is residing within the mobile home or -the conventional residence, for any reason, moves to another location or is deceased, then in that event, the Use Permit granted herein shall automatically expire and .the mobile home shall be removed within one hundred twenty (120) days.. In the event the mobile -home is not removed within one hundred twenty (120) days pursuant to the temps of the Use Permit, the County shall remove the mobile home and store it at the owner's expense. 8. The applicant is to pay a deposit or post a bond to cover the cost of removal in the amount of $1,500.00 for a single -wide mobile or $2,000.00 for a double -wide mobile. 9. Meet the requirements of the Building Division of the Department of Development Services. 10. Applicant shall plant and maintain.sight obscuring landscaping along the rear property line that will reach a height of 20 ft. within a period of two years of issuance of permit. The type of landscaping shall be approved by the Planning Division and be planted within 30 days of issuance of the pemnit. 11. 'I , line- for truck! shall 6 ,mne setback frc..; .lma rear i':oi�rt'i :re albs...,.., res be 1 feet.. 12. The proposed carport shall be constructed to the side of the second unit and not be within the 16 foot setback. 13. Applicant must also comply with all other applicable State and Local statutes, ordinances, and regulations.' NOTE: "Minor changes may be approved administratively by the Director of Development Services upon receipt of a substantiated written request by the applicant. Prior to such approval, verification shall be made by each Department or Division that the modification is consistent with the application, fees paid and environmental determination as conditionally approved Changes deemed to be major or significant in nature shall require a formal appl�ation fo amendment." - Apa Z&&It -?,IV�qZ0� Pemmitt Signature Date Barry K gan, Planning Manager Date P 298 037 853 Receipt for Certified Mail No Insurance Coverage Provided FEZ, Do not:use for International' Mail ODSTIL SENVICE - (Seef R.eversel { 'Sent; Co Sheryl Short 1 -street a4dAl Keith Lane P.O., State and ZIP Code e Chi6o CA 9592 Postage A Certified Fee - Special Delivery Fee Restricted Delivery Fee ' r Return Receipt Showing to Whom & Date Delivered c T 7: C& Return Receipt Showing to Whom, Date, and Addressee's Address TOTAL Postage _ Fees Postmark or Date 9-18-95 0 M E o ILLa e r utte Co LA1\iD OF Ni? -1,- W;:.-..-1' ,",SID 3E,4U . PLANNING DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (916) 538-7601 FAX: (916) 538-7785 September 19, 1995 Sheryl Short 4261 Keith Lane. Chico, CA 95926 C�1�N111�1�1�7r/_\I� Re: Administrative Use Permit, AP 047-300-034 Dear Ms. Short: Enclosed are the original and one copy of your conditional Administrative Use Permit No. 95-196 to allow a temporary second dwelling. Please sign and return both copies to this division within 30 calendar days from the receipt of this letter. We will then have them validated by the Chairman of the Butte County Planning Commission and the original will be returned to you for your records. Please be aware that failure to return the signed copies within 30 days will result in the use permit becoming invalid. Re-application to this department would then be necessary to proceed with the project. The Use Permit is deemed granted when this permit has been signed by the applicant, with the counter signature of the Chairman of the Planning Commission; a bond or deposit is made, and said permit is received by the applicant by registered mail. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this office between 8:00 am. and 4:00 p.m., Monday through Thursday. Enc. j:\temp\up6A BUTTE COUNTY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION NOTICE OF PROPOSED MINOR USE PERMIT APPROVAL Notice is hereby given that the Butte County Planning Manager is proposing to grant a Minor Use Permit to allow a Second Unit for Sheryl Short on property zoned A -R, identified as AP 047-300-034, located at 4261 Keith Lane, Chico. The permit will be granted subject to the following conditions: Occupancy of the mobile home is limited to Mrs. Short's Father-in-law and Mother-in-law. 2. No rent is to be changed to the occupancy of the mobile home 3. Meet the requirements of the Butte County Environmental Health Department for domestic water supply and sewage disposal. 4. The mobile home is to be a temporary use on the property pursuant to the requirements of Section 24-304 of the Butte County Code. 5. The temporary mobile home must be placed a minimum of 30 feet away from the existing structures. 6. The Use Permit shall expire two years from the date of issuance of the Use Permit. Upon application, the Planning Commission may grant an extension of the Use Permit not exceeding one year. 7. In the event that the applicant who is residing within the mobile home or the conventional residence, for any reason, moves to another location or is deceased, then in that event, the Use Permit granted herein shall automatically expire and the mobile home shall be removed within one hundred twenty (120) days. In the event the mobile home is not removed within one hundred twenty (120) days pursuant to the terms of the Use Permit, the County shalt remove the mobile home and store it at the owner's expense. 8. The applicant is to pay a deposit or post a bond to cover the cost of removal in the amount of $1,500.00 for a single -wide mobile or $2,000.00 for a double -wide mobile. 9. Meet the requirements of the Building Division of the Department of Development Services. 10. Applicant shall plant and maintain sight obscuring landscaping along the rear property line that will reach a height of 20 ft. within a period of two years of issuance of permit. The type of landscaping shall be approved by the Planning Division and be planted within 30 days of issuance of the permit. 11. The setback from the rear property line for all structures shall be 16 feet. 12. The proposed carport shall be constructed to the side of the second unit and not be within the 16 foot setback. 13. Applicant must also comply with all other applicable State and local statutes, ordinances, and regulations. NOTE: "Minor changes may be approved administratively by the Director of Development Services upon receipt of a substantiated written request by the applicant. Prior to such approval, verification shall be made by each Department or Division that the modification is consistent with the application, fees paid and environmental determination as conditionally approved. Changes deemed to be major or significant in nature shall require a formal application for an amendment." Persons wishing to comment on the project may submit written comments to the Butte County Planning Division any time prior to September 6, 1995. The Planning Manager shall consider all comments in determining if the application meets all of the above conditions and criteria. Upon finding that the proposed use does or will meet all of the conditions and criteria, the Planning Manager will hold a hearing on September 11, 1995 at 10:00 a.m. Any interested person may attend this hearing. The decision of the Planning Manager will be submitted, to the Planning Commission for final approval. county L A N D O F N A T U R A L W E A L T H A N D B E A U T Y PLANNING DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (916) 538-7601 FAX: (916) 538-7785 August 28, 1995 Sheryl Short 4261 Keith Lane Chico, CA 95926 Re: Use Permit, AP 047-300-034, 95-196 Dear Ms. Short: At the regular meeting of the Butte County Planning -Commission held August 24, 1995, the public hearing was referred back to the Planning Manager to consider a temporary - second dwelling permit, to hold a hearing, and to notice the neighbors. This meeting will be held in the Development Services Conference Room, 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, California on September 11, 1995 at 10:00 a.m. Should you have any questions regarding this matter,. please contact this office. Very truly yours, ar . Ho n Pla ng M er BKH:lr • MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Chair and Planning Co 's' FROM: Barry K. Hogan, Planning Manager BY: Stephen Lucas, Associate Planne SUBJECT: Minor Use Permit 95- 196- Re est for a second unit for Sheryl Short on APN 047-300-034 DATE: August 14, 1995 SUMMARY: The Planning Manager held a public hearing on this project on August 14, 1995 at which time public testimony was heard. There was concern expressed both verbally and by petition, that the neighbors of the applicant feel that the proposed second unit would create a visual. impact to their properties. If the Commission feels that no further hearing is warranted, then approval of the application with the suggested conditions is appropriate. DISCUSSION: As the Commission may recall when discussion of changes to the second unit ordinance occurred late last year, the main point that was raised by staff and County Counsel was the pre-emption of local control by the state. In brief, the state law indicates that the jurisdiction must provide locations where second units would be allowed. The law provides for requiring a permit process and strongly suggests, if not require, approval of all permits. The surrounding properties are large lot residential units with considerable space between houses. • The neighbors felt that allowing a second unit to be located 16 ft. from the rear property line would invade their privacy and lower property values. After much discussion at the Planning Manager meeting, tentative agreement was reached that the proposed use would be acceptable if the following conditions were added to the Permit. 1. Applicant shall plant and maintain sight obscuring landscaping along the rear property line that will reach a height of 20 ft. within a period of two years of issuance of permit. The type of landscaping shall be approved by the Planning Division and be planted within 30 days of issuance of the permit. 2. The setback from the rear property line for all structures shall be 25 feet. 3. The proposed carport shall be constructed to the side of the second unit and not be within the 25 ft. setback. Attachments: July 26, 1995 Agenda Report, August 14, 1995 Minutes k:\memos\short.mem • ■ Butte Comay 0 Department of Development Services 1i Planning Division ■ AGENDA ITEM • AGENDA REPORT TO: Barry K Hogan, Planning Manager FROM: Stephen Lucas, Associate Planner DATE: July 26, 1995 REQUEST: Minor Use Permit -Sheryl Short (applicant/owner). APN 047-300-034, File 495-196: Minor Use permit for a Second Dwelling on property zoned AR (Agricultural Residential), located on the south side of Keith Lane, approximately 800 ft. West of Garner Lane at 4261 Keith Lane, Chico. RELATED ITEMS: None FOR: Adn nistrative hearing for August 14, 199S ABSTRACT: This request is ora Minor Use Permit fora Second Unit The proposal conforms to the zoning and the General - Plan. Staff recommends approval of this application. PROJECT CHARACTERISTICS: This request is for a Minor Use Permit to allow the placement of a Second Unit pursuant to Butte County Code Section 24-280 as amended by Ordinance 3176. The • property is currently developed with a 1400+/- square ft. single-family house. The second unit will be a 840 square foot mobile home, and will be located approximately 160 feet west of the existing dwelling. The property is a .59 acre parcel, and is located on the south side of Keith Lane, Approximately 800 feet. east of Garner Lane, Chico. The property is zoned AR with a General Plan designation of Agricultural Residential and is located in the North Chico Specific Plan area Surrounding parcels are primarily in residential use and are zoned AR Domestic water for the second dwelling will be provided by a private well and sewage disposal will be handled by individual septic tanks and leachfields. ANALYSIS: This project will allow a second unit of approximately 840 sq. ft. This request is consistent with the intent and requirements of Section 24-280 of the Butte County Code. Upon review of this second unit application, staff has determined that the proposed second unit will not significantly impair the integrity of the zone in which it lies, nor will it be detrimental to the health, safety, and welfare of the intended occupants or the immediate neighborhood. ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION: This application has been determined to be categorically exempt from the provisions of CEQA under a Class 3 exemption. PUBLIC NOTICE AND COMMENTS: This application requires that a public hearing be held. Notices of the hearing will be mailed to the nearest 10 property owners. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services - Planning Division ■ - AGENDA ITEM • RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the Minor Use Permit on AP# 047-300-034, subject to the following findings and conditions contained in attached Exhibit "A". AGENDA ITEM • EXHIBIT "A" MINOR USE PERMIT BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION DATE 95-196 PERMIT NO. AP 047-300-034 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. Pursuant to the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance of the County of Butte and the special conditions set forth below: Sheryl Short is hereby granted a Minor Use Permit in accordance with application filed: 6/22/95 to allow a second unit on property zoned A -R located at 4261 Keith Lane,. Chico. 1. Failure to comply with the conditions specified herein as the basis for approval of application and issuance of Permit, constitutes cause for the revocation of said permit in accordance with. the procedures set forth in the Butte County Zoning Ordinance, including Butte County Code Section 24-62. .2. Unless otherwise provided for in a condition to a NViinor Use Permit, all conditions must be completed by the permittee within 12 months of the delivery of the countersigned permit to the permittee. 3. If any use for which a Mnor Use Permit has been granted is not established within one year of the date of receipt of the countersigned permit by the permittee, the permit shall be come null and void and reapplication shall be required to establish the use. 4. The terms and conditions of this permit shall run with the land and shall be binding upon and be to the benefit of the heirs; legal representatives, successors, and assigns of the Permittee. Section 1: Environmental Findings. A. The application for a Minor Use Permit to allow a Second Dwelling Unit is Categorically aempt from environmental review; and Section 2: Zoning Ordinance Findings. A. The proposed location, size, design, and operating characteristics of the proposed use is in accordance with the purpose of Chapter 24 of the Butte County Code, the purpose of the zone ■ : Butte -County Department of Development Services - Planning Division ■ 3 AGENDA ITEM . • in which the site is located, the Butte County General Plan, and the development policies and standards of the County; and B. The proposed location, size, design, and operating characteristics of the proposed use will be compatible with and will not adversely affect or be materially detrimental to adjacent uses, residents, buildings, structures or natural resources, with consideration given to: 1. Harmony in scale, bulk, coverage and density; 2. The availability of public facilities, services and utilities; 3. The harmful effect, if any, upon desirable neighborhood character; 4. The generation of traffic and the capacity and physical character of surrounding streets; 5. The suitability of the site for the type and intensity of use or development which' is primed; 6. Any other relevant impact of the proposed use. C. The proposed location, size, design, and operating characteristics of the proposed use and the conditions under which it will be operated or maintained will not be detrimental to the public health, safety and general welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in`the vicinity; and D. Theproposed use will comply with each of the applicable provisions of Chapter 24, Section 280, of the Butte County Code. Section 3: Action. A. Subject to.the findings indicated in Sections 1 and 2 of this report, move to approve the Minor Use Permit for Cheryl Short on APN 047-300-034 to allow a Second Unit. Approval shall be subject to the conditions herein. B. Minor changes may be approved administratively by the Director of Development Services, or designee, upon receipt of a substantiated written request by the applicant. Prior to such approval, verification shall be made by each Department or Division that the modification is consistent with the application, fees paid, ' and environmental determination as conditionally approved. Changes deemed to be major or significant in nature shall require a formal application for amendment. 1. The Second Unit shall not exceed 1200 square feet. 2. Provide two additional off-street spaces. 3. An attached or detached garage or carport with a maximum exterior dimension 20' by 24' is permitted. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services -__Planning Division ■ _ AGENDA ITEM • 4. Adequate sewer and potable water facilities shall be provided under permit as determined by the Butte County Environmental Health Division. 5. Either the existing single family dwelling or the Second Unit shall be owner occupied. Certification of ownership shall be required prior to permit issuance and annually thereafter by submittal of a declaration in a form specified by the Director of Development Services or designee. 6. No permits for any additional dwelling may be approved unless the Second Unit is first removed. 7. ' All structures must meet the Fire Safe Regulations of Butte County and PRC 4290. 8. Construct standard driveway approach at safe location on Keith Lane if one does not already exist 9. Applicant must also comply with all other applicable State and local statutes, ordinances, and regulations. NOTE. Issuance of this Nfinor Use Permit does not waive requirement of obtaining Building and Health Department -permits before starting construction and their approvals prior to use or occupancy, • nor does it waive any ' other requirements. Butte County Planning Commission Chairman CC: Land Development Division Building Division Health Department Department of Forestry k:\dre\shorkstf • _ ■ Butte County.Department of Development Services - Planning Division ■ • � �, � Proje Y � • vicinity Map APIA 047-300-034 �cbcation J C-2 P -Q 1 n R-1 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION plicaut: Sheryl Short Owner. Same A I Date: August 14,1995 8 9:OOam Eriating Zone: SK -1 (Suburb= - R aideatial- lacre) N Request: Minor Use Permit to allow a second dwelling uniL No Scale Assessor Parcel No: 047-3004034 Air --95-196 AUOus� 20, /q�.r mho i� CM UA , U �,�. 4o O'V "a � a s� end 4 Y(�- P)A. %o . S Z.oyu u . u�d ave alma G,��S arse 40 % �V\ C1 sQ �au►� 'W0.�.r 4&(Sgv\ t/o - CX- V\o, r*' 4262 Mi de Ct. Chico, Ca. 95973 August 13, 1995 County of Butte Office of Planning Department 7 County Center Drive Oroville, Ca. 95965-3397 Dear Sirs, This letter is submitted to you in response to the proposed grant of a Minor Use Permit to allow a second unit on property identified as AP 047-3004)34, located on the south side of Keith Lane, at 4261 Keith Lane, Chico. We object to the granting of this permit with our objections based on the following points: 1.) The building which is the subject of the permit is an eyesore to those who live in the wdsiting residences on Michelle Court. It is placed cirectly next to the fence which faces all of Michelle Court's homes, making it obtrusively visible to residences on that street. 2.) If allowed to remain at the present site, such a regulation will allow, and encourage, other residences of Keith Lane to move mobile homes into similar positions on their properties, thereby changing the neighborhood to one equivalent to that of a small mobile home park. 3.) The new residence would improperly impose on the existing septic conditions, even with the required, proposed changes. Given that this is a newly:Naced residence, it should be required to meet those stands set for nm housing, i.e. several hundred feet of leech line per residence. Otherwise it would have a negative impact on the environment, which is an event that is prevented with the current new - housing septic requirements. 4.) When splitting the lot equal to 2.5 acres at 4262/4261 Michelle Ct., the ownerlbuilder was required to spend thousands of dollars to meet the soil engineering and water monitoring standards, as imposed by Butte County, so that that a second residence could be built on the second half of the property. All of the strict requirements were met to place a new residence on a 1.2 acre lot, and yet the building which is the subject of the proposed permit does not need to meet these standards to co-e)ast with another house on a similarly- sized lot. Please weigh the above objections heavily when you consider granting Vol a Minor Use Permit to Sheryl Short for the above-mentioned property. While appearing to be a simple request, this proposed building would . have a severly negative impact on the neighborhood in the ways. that are outlined above. We thank you for your time and effort in the careful consideration of this matter. Sincerely, Melissa M. Hardesty Edward Hardesty 0 Petition to stop a Minor Use Permit to allow a second- unit for Sheryl Short located at 4261 Keith Lane due to the following concerns: - Inadequate leach field, increased stress in local aquifer, increased density, precedence set for rental -units, decreased property values, and inadequate notification of neighboring residents. Name Address Phone# 240 3. /"1►C. It el% C. -1-7)S'0 .3 1'%' %e G r 3 � 71-1C) e,� s Ct Liztor m)'- ct((Z / " - Wa- C/- - . 40"? r6(zlK (It'll- ���,�� y3ls." ,Ce,J�i 6v ICc� Cb. , g�3-87y(� 3 V3- y�i �-/ 3`,3 —<:13./L1 3g3g7OV gy,^ o36y x _:.0. 3.., r'.. .>.. • '..��>\}rY �(C�..✓� ,.a7�f�/�.//�1 Yom. •.`x-11' Y.tl 11 % r r� - -� - ; i 1, "F 1y,���--' l V j• �! v .L�' ••--i..,,8v •� ! a�� \ t ... } i _ ..? ? .. Y.7-:s }... t _ '. �. � •. . 3 � :� c,3 •,: a'1 f3.3 • ,7 y � . r. .: a u � + � �? �.� i _39 � E.::.. r.. �.,� �� n .. ...1.1 : � « � 1:` . r.'•���o�i���J..: . �? e eru_ ��.3..e�p. i,d.. 3:��u �..:'. ..x _.���_3v'� ! S?�' !......•.._ .;i..i .. ,_,9.. ._ �.---.. .�_�... E eY.i �,��'.. _.! _+ fir.: �i,.,i ..�.✓,�. a. J-.: -�'_ .a•• :'�.. .._� •i °.�.:; .�1•...:�'?:l, ,d ?_'� .:3�. 0 August 21-7 -1995 Butte County Planning commission: In reference to the permits being applied for a second residence at 4261 Keith Lane please take into account the. affect that this mobile home would have on the surrounding residences. , It -is -inconsistent with the rest of the neighborhood. The increased density will - cause a deterioration of neighborhood -atmosphere and reduce values of adjoining properties- Increased density flies.in the' -face of the nitrate action plan. ' There. are two existing, lots between Keith and Kathy Lanes that are unsalable due to being slightly less than -1 acre. - The addition of a second residence on a -1/2 acre lot. seems grossly unfair- to .these . owners.. Directly behind. and adjoining 4261 Keith- Lane; we split 2.5406s into two: lots: This process took, nearly three years to complete and required the hiring of a -hydrologist to satisfy the perk test requirements. Again allowing a second residence on a 1/2 acre lot adjoining the previously referred to lots is inconsistent with area policy. The . current permit applicationvould allow the second dwelling.to be.a rental. This may happen with a property ownership change or the applicant may do it herself. Most of my. objections would still stand, but I could understand the applicant Wanting to get a limited use permit for a designated family member due to illness, but requiring removal when the designated person is no. longer inhabiting the- dwelling. he-dwelling. -s _ In addition to.the previous objections it would "set a bad precedence for the rest of the KeithLane property owners leading to - increased density and decreased property values and standard of living for Michelle Court residents. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. _ i'av4ideBock .- - - 4261 Michelle Ct. 893=8746 MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Chair and Planning Co Sion FROM: Barry K. Hogan, Planning Manager BY: Stephen Lucas, Associate Planne SUBJECT: Minor Use Permit 95- 196- Re est for a second unit for Sheryl Short on APN 047-300-034 DATE: August 14, 1995 SUMMARY: The Planning Manager held a public hearing on this project on August 14, 1995 at which time public testimony. was heard. There was concern expressed both verbally and by petition, that the neighbors of the applicant feel that the proposed second unit would create a visual impact to their properties. If the Commission feels that no further hearing is warranted, then approval of the application with the suggested conditions is appropriate. DISCUSSION: As the Commission may recall when discussion of changes to the second unit ordinance occurred late last year, the main point that was raised by staff and County Counsel was the pre-emption of local. control by the state. In brief, the state law indicates that the jurisdiction must provide locations where second units would be allowed. The law provides for requiring a permit process and strongly suggests, if not require, approval of all permits. The surrounding properties are large lot residential units with considerable space between houses. The neighbors felt that allowing a second unit to be located .16 ft. from the rear property line would invade their privacy and lower property values. After much discussion at the Planning Manager meeting, tentativeagreement was reached that the proposed use would be acceptable if the following conditions were added to the Permit. 1. Applicant shall plant and maintain sight obscuring landscaping along the rear property line that will reach a height of 20 ft. within a period of two years of issuance of permit. The type of landscaping shall be approved by the Planning Division and be planted within 30 days of issuance of the permit. 2. The setback from the rear property line for all structures shall be 25 feet. 3. The proposed carport shall be constructed to the side of the second unit and not be within the 25 ft. setback. Attachments: July 26, 1995 Agenda Report, August 14, 1995 Minutes k:\memos\short.mem ■ Butte County 0 Departnwnt of Development Services ■ Planning Division ■ AGENDA ITEM AGENDA REPORT TO: Barry K Hogan, Planning Manager FROM: Stephen Lucas, Associate Planner DATE: July 26, 1995 REQUEST: Minor Use Permit -Sheryl Short (applicantlowner), APN 047-300-034, File 495-196: Minor Use permit for a Second Dwelling on property zoned AR (Agricultural Residential), located on the south side of Keith Lane, approximately 800 ft. West of Garner Lane at 4261 Keith Lane, Chico. RELATED ITEMS: None FOR: Administrative hearing for August 14, 1995 ABSTRACT: This request is fora Minor Uie Permit fora Second Unit The p_roposg conforms to the zoning and the General Plan. Staff recommends approval of this application. PROJECT CHARACTERISTICS: This request is for a Minor Use Permit to allow the placement of a Second Unit pursuant to Butte County Code Section 24-280 as amended by Ordinance 3176. The property is currently developed with a 1400* square ft. single-family house. The second unit will be a 840 square foot mobile home, and will be located approximately 160 feet west of the existing dwelling. The property is a .59 acre parcel, and _ is located on the south side of Keith Lane, approximately 800 feet east of Garner Lane, Chico. The property is zoned AR with a General Plan designation of Agricultural Residential and is located in the North Chico Specific Plan area Surrounding parcels are primarily in residential use and are zoned AR Domestic water for the second dwelling will be provided by a private well and sewage disposal will be handled by individual septic tanks and leachfields. ANALYSIS: This project will allow a second unit of approximately 840 sq. ft. This request is consistent with the intent and requirements of Section 24-280 of the Butte County Code. Upon review of this second unit application, staff has determined that the proposed second unit will not significantly impair the integrity of the zone in which it lies, nor will it be detrimental to the health, safety, and welfare of the intended occupants or the immediate neighborhood. ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION: This application has been determined to be categorically exempt from the provisions of CEQA under a Class 3 exemption. PUBLIC NOTICE AND COMMENTS: This application requires that a public hearing be held. Notices of the hearing will be mailed to the nearest 10 property owners. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services .-: Planning -Division ■ --- – — - AGENDA ITEM RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the Minor Use Permit on AP#047-300-034, subject to the following findings and conditions contained in attached Fxhibit "A". ■ Butte County Department of Development Services - Planning Division ■ EXHIBIT "A" AGENDA ITEM MINOR USE PERMIT BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION DATE 95-196 PERMIT NO. AP 047-300-034 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. Pursuant to the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance of the County of Butte and the special conditions set forth below: Sheryl Short is hereby granted a Nfiinor Use Permit in accordance with application filed: 6/22/95 to allow a second unit on property zoned A R located at 4261 Keith Lane, Chico. I." Failure to comply with the conditions specified herein as the basis for approval of application and issuance of Permit, constitutes cause for the revocation of said permit in accordance with the procedures set forth in the Butte County Zoning Ordinance, including Butte County Code Section 24-62. 2. Unless otherwise provided for in a condition to a Knor Use Permit, all conditions must be completed by the permittee within 12 months of the delivery of the countersigned . permit to the permittee. 3. If any use for which a Nfinor Use Permit has been granted is not established within one year of the date of receipt of the countersigned permit by the permittee, the permit shall be come null and void and reapplication shall be required to establish the use. 4. The terms and conditions of this permit shall run with the land and shall be binding upon and be to the benefit of the heirs, legal representatives, successors, and assigns of the Permittee. Section 1: Environmental Findings. A. The application for a Minor Use Permit to allow a Second Dwelling Unit is Categorically Exempt from environmental review; and Section 2: Zoning Ordinance Findings. A. The proposed location, size, design, and operating characteristics of the proposed use is in accordance with the purpose of Chapter 24 of the Butte County Code, the purpose of the zone ■ Butte County Department of Development Services - Planting Division ■ _ 3 - AGENDA ITEM in which the site is located, the Butte County General Plan, and the development policies and standards. of the County; and B. The proposed location, size, design, and operating characteristics of the proposed use will be compatible with and will not adversely affect or be materially detrimental to adjacent uses, residents, buildings, structures or natural resources, with consideration given to: 1. Harmony in scale, bulk, coverage and density; 2. The availability of public facilities, services and utilities; 3. The harmful effect, if any, upon desirable neighborhood character, 4. The generation of traffic and the capacity and physical character of surrounding streets; 5. .The suitability of the site for the type and intensity of use or development which is proposed; 6. Any other relevant impact of the proposed use.. C. The proposed location, size, design, and operating characteristics of the proposed use and the conditions .under which it will be operated or maintained will not be detrimental to the public health, safety and general welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and D. The proposed use will comply with each of the applicable provisions of Chapter 24, Section 280, of the Butte County Code. Section 3: Action. A. Subject to the findings indicated in Sections 1 and 2 of this report, move to approve the Nfrnor Use Permit for Cheryl Short on APN 047=300-034 to allow a Second Unit Approval shall be subject to the conditions herein. B. Nfinor changes may be approved administratively by the Director of Development Services, or designee, upon receipt of a substantiated written request by the applicant Prior to such approval, verification shall be made by each Department or Division that the modification is consistent with the application, fees paid, and environmental determination as conditionally approved. Changes deemed to be major or significant in nature shall require a formal application for amendment 1. The Second Unit shall not exceed 1200 square feet 2. Provide two additional off-street spaces. 3. An attached or detached garage or carport with a maximum exterior dimension 20' by 24' is permitted. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services - Planning Division ■ 4 • AGENDA ITEM. 4. Adequate sewer and potable water facilities shall be provided under permit as determined by the Butte County Environmental Health Division. 5. Either the existing single family dwelling or the Second Unit shall be owner occupied. Certification of ownership shall be required prior to permit issuance and annually thereafter by submittal of a declaration in a form specified by the Director of Development Services or designee. 6. No permits for any additional dwelling may be approved unless the Second Unit is first removed. 7. All structures must meet the Fire Safe Regulations of Butte County and PRC 4290. 8. Construct standard driveway approach at safe location on Keith Lane if one does not already exist. 9. Applicant must also comply with all other applicable State and local statutes,. ordinances, and regulations. NOTE: Issuance of this Nfinor Use Permit does not waive requirement_ of obtaining Building and Health Department permits before starting construction and their approvals prior to.use or occupancy, nor does it waive any other requirements. CC: Land Development Division Building Division Health Department Department of Forestry k:\dre\short.stf Butte County Planning Commission Chairman ■ Butte County Department of Development.Services --Planning Division _■ Project cation vcin'ity Map AP# 047-300-034 SHORT C-2 P—Q a2 i6n R - BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Applicant: Sheryl Short Owoer: ' Same Hearing Date: August 14,1995 0 9:OOam tdxtb* Zone:. SR-.1(Suburban-Reaideotisl, lacre) Refined'. Minor Use Permit to allow a second dwelling uait. No Scale - Amemor Parcel No: 047-300-034 File: 95-196 11 • Chico August 20 1 1995 TO: Butte County Planning Commission, Oroville in behalf of Applicant Sheryl Short, at Keith Zane.Chico: We.' the undersigned neighbors of Mrs: Sheryl Short, living across, next to; and or in the immediate vicinity of her property, DO NOT.' OBJECT: to the issuance of a permit for installation of a mobile home and pertinent. appurtenances,, in order to provide living quarters for her_ aging and medically/physically impaired parents+ in law, asi provided.. for by STATE AND COUNTY REGULATIONS DAte . In:Mct, we feel , applicant should be commended Vr making the sacrifice and willingness to provide, for the elderly, instead of placing them in, the confines of a nursing home. Name!: Address 1,,/ 7 _ _ A _ . it r / n /<a 94,P dj /07 ' G G tL )L114N A-) I L Sil 0 • wiz, no —I rn!4/) Ctz-,- A4d a�# ��-300-��.. a�� yz69 �{� 2-4, le �a�--�\�--Q I&-. q? -q2 Ke.i � � L t -i J - _46uttvCount ..ice•,.:. 'r :.:: - ... LAND OF iINATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY PLANNING DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (916) 538-7601 FAX: (916) 538-7785 August 16, 1995 Sheryl Short 4261 Keith Lane Chico, CA 95926 Re: Minor Use Permit, AP 047-300-034, 95-196 Dear Ms. Short: Your request was approved by the Planning Manager on August 14, 1995. An approval recommendation by the Planning Manager, has been forwarded to the Planning: Commission as a consent item for final action. on August 24, 1995 -at 9:00 a.m., in the Board of Supervisors' Room, 25 County Center Drive, Oroville, California. Consent items are set for approval in one motion. These items are considered. non- controversial. No presentations will be made, however, some questions may be asked. The Chair will ask if any Commissioner or member of the public wishes to pull a consent item for discussion. The Minor Use Permit will be issued after approval by the Planning Commission. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this office. BKH:lr Petition to stopa-Minor Use Permit -to allow.a:second'unit.for Sheryh-Short-located at 4261 Keith Lane due .to _the following. concern:- Inadequate leach field,- imreased's6ress in local aquifer, increased density; precedence set for, rental -units, decreased property;_ values; -and inadequate notification of :neighboring residents:. _ amp - ry Address - - ~ Phone# �2�,z. Me_� e[ If S, 71'c ke//e- � C g9 -T /, 5- �21��i- �Izt�lCf- �� tItA_ Ks, t1, L'.' 3`13 --�3 /'I 3q(5g7oe/ .. _ . • Cir--�` e,--, '�'L�-�O �.e.: �-��,r� 4262 Michelle Ct. Chico, Ca, 95973 August 13, 1995 County of Butte Office of Planning Department 7 County Center Drive Oroville, Ca. 95965-3397 Dear Sirs, This letter is submitted to you in response to the proposed grant of a Minor Use Permit to allow a second unit on property identified as AP 047-300-034, located on the south slide of Keith Lane, at 4261 Keith Lane, Chico. We object to the granting of this permit with our objections based on the following points: 1.) The building which is the subject of the permit is an eyesore to those who live in the exisiting residences on Michelle Court. It is placed directly next to the fence which faces all of Michelle Court's homes, making it obtrusively visible to residences on that street. 2.) If allowed to remain at the present site, such a regulation will allow, and encourage, other residences of Keith Lane to move mobile homes into similar positions on their properties, thereby changing the neighborhood to one equivalent to that of a small mobile home park. 3.) The new residence would improperly impose on the existing septic conditions, even with the required, proposed changes. Given that this is a newly -placed residence, it should be required to meet those standards set for nM housing, i.e. several hundred feet of leech line per residence. Otherwise it would have a negative impact on the environment, which is an event that is prevented with the current new - housing septic requirements. 4.) When splitting the lot equal to 2.5 acres at 4262/4261 Michelle Ct., the owneribuilder was required to spend thousand of dollars to meet the soil engineering and water monitoring standards, as imposed by Butte County, so that that a second residence could be built on the second half of the property. Al of the strict requirements were met to place a new residence on a 1.2 acre lot, and yet the building which is the subject of the proposed permit does not need to meet these standard to co -exist with another house on a similarly- sized lot. Please weigh the above objections heavily when you consider granting • \l ..1 'S � ' �C_ � .Q:i- it v _ � 1 i )li`�''' t.. '.�1 t `� 1'ili{?�. ~. � • ,�� 4,. 4- , ? �> uy��• .. IC r . . til � - .:J Yi {� �1�� I r'� ir�.'i�F1 �.i f ,'�, - a•'I.. w�+ J•:. ,.� '�. �' . _ � � 1!•t1 .. �� Y til r .v rJ{�:' ..i - 1 rJl• t �i'.a ..J' .. 3 7 � li� �'+n �4 is .., .. 1+ J �'�� int _ N a Minor Use Permit to Sheryl Short for the above-mentioned property. While appearing to be a simple request, this proposed building would . have a Beverly negative impact on the neighborhood in .the ways that are outlined above. We thank you for your time and effort in the careful consideration of this matter. Sincerely, Qom%% C•'��� Melissa M. Hardesty Edward Hardesty r I I w 1, f I -A Ei 1,4 w 1, f w G] E, July 27, 1995 Sheryl Short 4261 Keith Lane Chico, CA 95926 Count LA`JD CSF ,iNATU3AL WEAL T H AND BEAUTY PLANNING DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (916) 538-7601 FAX: (916) 538-7785 Re: Minor Use Permit, AP 047-300-034, 95-196 Dear Ms. Short: Your request has been scheduled for hearing in front of the Planning Manager on August 14, 1995. The meeting is scheduled.to begin at 10:00 a.m. and will be held in the 7 County Center Drive conference room, Oroville, California. An approval recommendation by the. Planning Manager, will be forwarded to the Planning Commission as a consent item for final action. Consent items are set for approval in one motion. These items are considered non- controversial. No presentations will be made, however, some questions may be asked. The Chair will ask if any Commissioner or member of the public wishes to pull a consent item for discussion. The Minor Use Permit will be issued after approval by the Planning Commission. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this office. Very truly yours, Barry K. Hogan Planning Manager Stephen Lucas Associate Planner SLAr Enc. V AGENDA ITEM AGENDA REPORT TO: Barry K Hogan, Planning Manager FROM: Stephen Lucas, Associate Planner DATE: July 26, 1995 REQUEST: Minor Use Permit -Sheryl Short (applicant/owner), APN 047-300-034 File 495-196: Minor Use permit for a Second Dwelling on property zoned AR (Agricultural Residential), located on the south side of Keith Lane, approximately 800 ft. West of Garner Lane at 4261 Keith Lane, Chico. RELATED ITEMS: None FOR: Administrative hearing for August 14, 1995 ABSTRACT: This request is or a Minor Use Permit for a Second Unit The proposU76iToims to the zoning and the General Plan. Staff recommends approval of this application. PROJECT CHARACTERISTICS: This request is for a Minor Use Permit to allow the placement of a Second Unit pursuant to Butte County Code Section 24-280 as amended by Ordinance 3176. The property is currently developed with a 14001/- square ft. single-family house. The second unit will be . a 840 square foot mobile home, and will be located approximately 160 feet west of the existing dwelling. The property is a .59 acre parcel, and is located on the south side of Keith Lane, approximately 800 feet east of Garner Lane, Chico. The property is zoned AR with a General Plan designation of Agricultural Residential and is located in the North` Chico Specific Plan area Surrounding parcels are primarily in residential use and are zoned AR Domestic water for the second dwelling will be provided by a private well and sewage disposal will be handled by individual septic tanks and leachfields. ANALYSIS: - This project will allow a second unit of approximately 840 sq. ft. This request is consistent with the intent and requirements of Section 24-280 of the Butte County Code. Upon review of this second unit application, staff has determined that the proposed second unit will not significantly impair the integrity of the zone in which it lies, nor will it be detrimental to the health, safety, and welfare of the intended occupants or the immediate neighborhood. ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION: This application has been determined to be categorically exempt from the provisions of CEQA under a Class 3 exemption. PUBLIC NOTICE AND COMMENTS: This application requires that a public hearing be held. Notices of the hearing will be mailed to the nearest 10 property owners. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services - Planning Division ■ -"�"--- AGENDA ITEM RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the Minor Use Permit on AP# 047-300-034, subject to the following findings and conditions contained in attached Fxhibit "A,. 10 ■ Butte County Department of Development Services - Planning Division ■ EXHIBIT "A" AGENDA ITEM MINOR USE PERMIT BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION DATE 95-196 PERMIT NO. - AP 047-300-034 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. Pursuant to the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance of the County of Butte and the special conditions set forth below: Sheryl Short is hereby granted a N inor Use Permit in accordance with application filed: 6/22/95 to allow a second unit on property zoned A -R located at 4261 Keith Lane, Chico. 1. Failure to comply with the conditions specified herein as the basis for approval of application and issuance of Permit, constitutes cause for the revocation of said permit in accordance with the procedures set forth in the Butte County Zoning Ordinance, including Butte County Code Section 24-62. 2. Unless otherwise provided for in a condition to a NEnor Use Permit, all conditions must be completed by the permittee within 12 months of the delivery of the countersigned permit to the permittee. 3. If any use for which a Minor Use Permit has been granted is not established within one year of the date of receipt of the countersigned permit by the permittee, the permit shall be come null and void and reapplication shall be required to establish the use. 4. The terms and conditions of this permit shall run with the land and shall be binding upon and be to the benefit of the heirs, legal representatives, successors, and assigns of the Permittee. Section 1: Environmental Findings. A. The application for a Minor Use Permit to allow a Second Dwelling Unit is Categorically . Exempt from environmental review; and Section 2: Zoning Ordinance Findings. A. The proposed location, size, design, and operating characteristics of the proposed use is in accordance with the purpose of Chapter 24 of the Butte County Code, the purpose of the zone ■ Butte County Department of Development Services- - Planning Division 0 AGENDA ITEM in which the site is located, the Butte County General Plan, and the development policies and standards of the County; and B. The proposed location, size, design, and operating characteristics of the proposed use will be compatible with and will not adversely affect or be materially detrimental to adjacent uses, residents, buildings, structures or natural resources, with consideration given to: 1. Harmony in scale, bulk, coverage and density; 2. The availability of public facilities, services and utilities; 3. The harmful effect, if any, upon desirable neighborhood character, 4. The generation of traffic and the capacity and physical character of surrounding streets; 5. The suitability of the site for the type and intensity of use or development which is proposed; 6. Any other relevant impact of the proposed use. C. The proposed location, size, design, and operating characteristics of the proposed use and the conditions under which it will be operated or maintained will not be detrimental to the public health, safety and general welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and D. The proposed use will comply with each of the applicable provisions of Chapter 24, Section 280, of the Butte County Code. Section 3: Action. A. Subject to the findings indicated in Sections 1 and 2 of this report, move to approve the Nfrnor Use Permit for Cheryl Short on APN 047-300-034 to allow a Second Unit. Approval shall be subject to the conditions herein. B. Nfinor changes may be approved administratively by the Director of Development Services, or designee, upon receipt of a substantiated written request by the applicant Prior to such approval, verification shall be made by .each Department or Division that the modification is consistent with the application, fees paid, and environmental determination as conditionally approved.. Changes deemed to be major or significant in nature shall require a formal application for amendment 1. The Second Unit shall not exceed 1200 square feet 2. Provide two additional off-street spaces. 3. An attached or detached garage or carport with a maximum exterior dimension 20' by 24' is permitted. ■ Butte County Department of Development Services- Ran*g_Division ■ .- 4 __ - 9 0 AGENDA ITEM 4. Adequate sewer and potable water facilities shall be provided under permit as determined by the Butte County Environmental Health Division. 5. Either the existing single family dwelling or the Second Unit shall be owner occupied. Certification of ownership shall be required prior to permit issuance and annually thereafter by submittal of a declaration in a form specified by the Director of Development Services or designee. 6. No permits for any additional dwelling may be approved unless the Second Unit is first removed. 7. All structures must meet the Fre Safe Regulations of Butte County and PRC 4290. 8.- Construct standard driveway approach at safe location on Keith Lane if one does not already exist 9. Applicant must also comply with all other applicable State and local statutes, ordinances, and regulations. NOTE: Issuance of this Nrnor Use Permit does not waive requirement of obtaining Building and Health Department permits before starting construction and their approvals prior to use or occupancy, nor does it waive any other requirements. CC. Land Development Division Building Division Ikalth Department Department of Forestry k:\dre\shortstf Butte County Planning Commission Chairman U ■ Butte County Department of Development Services -Planning Division ■ 5 BUTTE COUNTY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION NOTICE OF PROPOSED MINOR USE PERMIT APPROVAL Notice is hereby given that the Butte County Planning Manager is proposing to grant a Minor Use Permit to allow a Second Unit for Sheryl Short on property zoned A -R, identified as AP 047-300-034, located on the south side of Keith Lane, at 4261 Keith Lane, Chico. The permit will be granted subject to the following conditions: 1. The Second Unit shall not exceed 1,200 square feet. 2. Provide two additional off-street spaces. 3. An attached or detached garage or carport with a maximum exterior dimension 20' by 24' is permitted. 4. Adequate sewer and potable water facilities shall be provided under permit as determined by the Butte County Environmental Health Division. 5. Either the existing single family dwelling or the Second Unit shall be owner occupied. Certification of ownership shall be required prior to permit issuance and annually thereafter by submittal of a declaration in a form specified by the Director of Development Services or designee. 6. No permits for any additional dwelling may be approved unless the Second Unit is first removed. 7. All new structures must meet the Fire Safe Regulations of Butte County and PRC 4290. . 8. Pay $200 into the Battalion 2 water tender fund. 9. Construct standard driveway approach at safe location on.aL•ilas4toad-if one does not already exist: 10. Applicant must also comply with all other applicable State and local statutes, ordinances, and regulations. NOTE: "Minor changes may be approved administratively by the Director of Development Services upon receipt of a substantiated written request by the applicant. Prior to such approval, verification shall be made by each Department or Division that the modification is consistent with the application, fees paid and environmental determination as conditionally approved. Changes deemed to be major or significant in nature shall require a formal application for an amendment." Persons wishing to comment on the project may submit written comments to the Butte County Planning Division any time prior to August 7, 1995. The Planning Manager shall consider all comments in determining if the application meets all of the above conditions and criteria. Upon finding that the proposed use does or will meet all of the conditions and criteria, the Planning Manager will hold a hearing on August 14, 1995 at 10:00 a.m. Any interested person may attend this hearing. The decision of the Planning Manager will be submitted, to the Planning Commission for final approval. 0 1 0 BUTTE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION COMMENT SHEET TO: Calif. Department of ForegU-DATE: June 27, 1995 AP NO.: 047-300-034 RETURN BY: July 27, 1995 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Minor Use Permit APPLICANT: Short, Sheryl ENGINEER: CONDITIONS AND/OR COMMENTS: LD 1170(6/92)BY: Chico Unified School District OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT SUPERINTENDENT ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES (916) 891-3140 June 29, 1995 Mr. Larry Painter Planning Technician Butte County Planning Commission 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965-3397 Re: Minor Use Permit - 047-300-034 Sheryl Short Dear Larry: Where STUDENTS are the FIRST Priority District representatives have reviewed the information contained in your memorandum dated June 127, 1995 regarding the"Short Minor use permit which will allow a residentail dwelling in a commercial project. District representatives have determined that the proposed project will negatively impact Chico Unified School District and, therefore, warrants further environmental analysis. The District recognizes that Senate Bill 1287 (SB 1287) may adversely impact the County's authority to impose the following requested mitigation measures by rescinding court precedents established via the Mira, Hart and Murrieta cases; but that issue is yet to be resolved. Based on this information, the District requests that the following comments be included in the project approval record and requested mitigations imposed to the extent allowed by law. SCHOOL FACILITIES FOR NEW STUDENTS GENERATED BY THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Setting The Short application proposes 1 additional residential unit. Applying the District's .43 student yield factor, this development will generate approximately one school age child. Utilizing current District actual student enrollment data and projected student enrollment data from already approved new residential development, each elementary, junior high and senior high school in the District is filled to capaCounty. To accommodate a 50+ percent increase in student enrollment in recent years, the District (1) reutilized existing school facilities, (2) utilized interim elementary school facilities, (3) placed relocatable classrooms on existing elementary school campuses, (4) instituted multi -track year-round education in three existing elementary schools; (5) occupied one new urban elementary school on a year-round schedule, (6) occupied one new elementary school on a traditional school schedule, (7). is in the process of constructing a third elementary school, (8) has placed interim facilities on the secondary campuses pending the availability of new school facilities, (9) acquired a site and has planned to build a new junior high/middle school and (10) has planned to expand one existing senior high school. Administrative Office 0 1163 East Seventh Street 6 Chico, CA 95928-5999 i (916) 898-3000 Planning Derartrnent J U L 6 1995 Oroville, Ca�isoornia The District continues to be a participant in the State School Building Program wherein the cost of constructing new school facilities is shared by the State and by the local district in a pro rata fashion. The State-wide need to construct new schools far exceeds available pro rata State funding; therefore, needed new Chico Unified School District school facilities have not been provided in a timely manner. Local Chico Unified School District revenues generated from school impact fees, coupled with the proceeds from the general obligation bonds approved by the voters in April 1988, will meet the student housing needs generated by local birth rates and previously approved residential developments but will not meet the student housing needs generated by new development. The District anticipates housing increasing numbers of students in interim facilities until funding becomes available to construct new schools. Impact of Proposed Development on Chico Unified School District Schools Since District elementary, junior and senior high schools are filled to capaCounty, it is evident that students generated from Short Minor use permit application cannot be served by existing facilities. In addition, there is currently no funding mechanism that will enable the District to provide facilities for these students. Based on the District's .43 student yield factor per average (1,532 square feet) household, the 1 residential unit proposed in Short Minor use permit application will yield approximately one student that must be housed in District schools. The District projects that larger residential units will yield more than .43 students per household and smaller residential units will yield less than .43 students per household. To adjust for the higher student yield factor in larger than average households and the lower student yield factor in smaller than average households, the District utilizes a mitigation cost based on square footage of habitable space in each household. This project must be consistent with the County General Plan and the impact on the District must be recognized and addressed in the project approval process. Mitigation of Impact on Chico Un'if'ied School District Schools The District is opposed to County approval of the proposed Short Minor use permit application unless the project fully mitigates its impact on the District. Acceptable mitigation measures include: • cash or in lieu equivalent (land or school facilities), approved by the District, which is equal to the full mitigation cost as described below; • imposition of a controlled phasing of single or multi -family residential development to coincide with provision of adequate school facilities; or • denial of the project. The 1993/94 per habitable space square foot cost to fully mitigate the impact of each residential unit is $4.45 per square foot. This amount will be adjusted as needed to reflect the impact of inflation, school facilities needs, regulatory changes and other cost influencing factors. The full mitigation cost of $4.45 per square foot of new residential development will include school impact fees (currently $1.72 per square foot). The school impact fee will be supplemented with an appropriate amount of cash or in lieu equivalent (land or school facilities) approved by the District. The combination of school impact fees and cash or in lieu equivalent must fully mitigate the impact of the development on District schools. Planning Department J U L 6 1995 Oroville, Oaza:ornia Since the school mitigation cost established by the District is based on habitable square footage of the residential unit and District representatives are not informed of the exact habitable space of the residential unit in the proposed development, it is not possible to confirm the total cost of the mitigation at this time. The following calculation is provided to allow one who is knowledgeable of the habitable space of each residential unit in the proposed development to make her/his own calculations: CALCULATION Total habitable space in residential unit(s) times the current cost for full mitigation in effect when paid ($4.45 per square foot in 1993/94) equals total mitigation. For example: 1 unit @ 1,200 square feet/unit x $4.45 = $5,340; or 1 unit @ 1,532 square feet/unit x $4.45 = $6,817; or 1 unit @ 1,800 square feet/unit x $4.45 = $8,010. If you have any questions or need additional information, please feel free to contact me at 891-3209. Sincerely, Michael Weissenborn Facilities Planner MW/dm cc: Ken Petrucelli, Assistant Superintendent/Administrative Services E Planning Department jui, 6 I,QQ5 Oroviu-.-, BUTTE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION COMMENT SHEET TO: Public Works Director DATE: June 27, 1995 AP NO.: 047-300-034 RETURN BY: July 27, 1995 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Minor Use Permit APPLICANT: Short, Sheryl ENGINEER: CONDITIONS AND/OR COMMENTS: i r LD 1170 (6/92) BY: J_zc�_ :F SRP` . .i ji- I Lo.. j•, • '3aSJu8wdoj9naa pue-1 SM 8 Z Nnr Sun® do um BUTTE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION COMMENT SHEET TO: Environmental Health DATE: June 27, 1995 AP NO.: 047-300-034 RETURN BY: July 27, 1995 - PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Minor Use Permit APPLICANT: Short, Sheryl ENGINEER: CONDITIONS AND/OR COMMENTS: LD 1170 (6/92) BY: UGI Environmental Health Planning Division J U N 2 9 1995 'JUL 1 U lye Chico, California 0 I!e, California Environmental heait. JUN 2 7 1995 Oroville, CaWornia elujottm^ `amho1Q nerl / 7. Of awlieda® buguu"d - Zvi' awn, :W'-'-ZJID t`2, I&-b-� Ivo 75-V CLa (-,73a .:oimW= E)=. M-: 0/1 M W -i -I V -1,'1 --1 c n. ON • W.�Gil��i G :I: R KD . (la3HS NI ae31) COMAMNT DISTRIBUTION LIST APPLICATION: C1 S —) 9 LP ® x-11- 300 ` 6's Li MVP, DATE: County Offices and Cities: Chief Administrative Officer — �� Environmental Health Director — _ Sheriff _ _ LAFCo — Biggs — Oroville — Irrigation Districts: _ Butte Water — _ OWID _ Table Mountain Irrigation — Domestic Water _ Butte Water District — OWID Sewer _ Butte Water District — _ �Skansen Subdivision (CSA 21) — Fire Pryrtection -=Pti California Department of Forestry Recreaf%n Districts Chico Area Recreation — Paradise Recreation & Park — Ufiliti _ PG&E North, - CRuco _ PG&E South - Oroville State A des �" CalTrans — Forestry (Attn: Craig Carter) _ Central Reg. Water Quality Control Department of Conservation — Federal Agencies US Forest Service Other Districts, Agencies, Committees, etc. _ Lime Saddle Dist — Drainage — Reclamation — Butte Co. Mining Committee — Develop. Services Director Planning Manager BCAG APCD Gridley Paradise Biggs/W. Gridley Water Paradise Irrigation Thermalito Irrigation California Water Service Co. — Thermalito Irrigation District Public Works Director Building Manager ALUC Butte Co. Farm Bureau Chico Chico Airport Commission Durham Irrigation Richvale Irrigation Other Del Oro Water Co. Other Themalito Irrigation — Sterling City Sewer Main L.O.A. PUD El Medio Fire Protection District Durham Area Recreation . — Feather River Rec. & Park Richvale Recreation & Parks c/ _ Chambers Cable TV _X Pacific Bell Viacom Cable TV Dept of Water Resources — Dept of Fish and Game Dept of Parks and Rec. — Highway Patrol Off. of Mining Reclamation _ Off. of Governmental & Env. Relations US Bureau of Land Management Community Association — Mosq. Abatement OrovilleButte Co Butte Env.l Council _ Paradise Pines Com. Cal Native Plant Society � Planning De artMent PlanPlanningDenartroaec�t I�!��/� ��"'V ,� U N 2 7 1995 JUN 2 7 1g95 Orovllie, Latta.-UYi,ia; Oro�r..:.. :. slia BUTTE COUNTY, DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION COMMENT SHEET TO: DATE: June 27, 1995 AP NO.: 047-300-034 RETURN BY: July 27, 1995 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Minor Use Permit APPLICANT: Short, Sheryl ENGINEER: CONDITIONS AND/OR COMMENTS: LD 1170 (6/92) BY: P RT ON OF PARCEL 2, Pf?lES/NG LANDSTau A� cod. 62 - 32 47 AlVP P t C, I`1oC� kIc�� 1 N89024�E 107.92 1 107.93 1 /07.! 1 2 3 ! 100 100 too T 100'1 208.38 l2 0.47AC 90.40 12 0.93 AC. 4 �I - c W 89 88 85 86 84 92 95 94 O l`- ! I 78 79 80 77 104 10.3 ( ce 0l� 1!0 I 109 iiw ( 290.40 J�. 0.887AC 0.887AC o.88z'AC V' ARI P/M 4 9 - 100 via ?a -16/.88' 161.88 KAHY TL A N E / .' PAM 46-32 121.73 12 1. 73 121.73 118.13 /18.14 /18.14 243.!9 121.73 12 1. !2!.73 110 /10 I10_ _295.94 ! ' 1 2 3 4 1/ 2/ 3/ 4/ 1 2 3 4 Tr. Ip O96 97 98 99 I 105 r0 ►0-(02 O O O I //9 /20 c 111 112. 113 114 I 2 3 115 116 I17 I18 m p/ 62- 3 P/!01 55-58/ in re 97AC . 97AC. 97AC. 2.0AC. ° 1.0 AC. I. 0 AC. 1.0 A 1/.75 1.245 AC 1.248 4C 1.248 AC 1.249AC 1.O AC LOAC 1.0AC 0.8340 0.834C 0.83AC 1.924C f 27 I 2 3 4 U 32 [ .151.79 151.89 15/.39 ►52 121.73 12/.73 121.73 PM89-4 a ?M 67-35 243.19 !21.73 121.7 3 12 r,7 NO 110 110 173.52 c_ 2 240.08 /0391 /a3r.8r. /03.87 /03. 7 /03.81• --3� /03.87 /o3.e� /0o i roo /00 /00 /oo /5O - I 5 36 ti I 93 � ! '_ O 62 66� 67 (66 72 / a�^roo --O,� 65 U 7/ ATO 69 . �D9 50 48 4c 041. 0,vq 139 JUR 295.61WY219 col - - - - - J T 42 - Z96.7-0 - - - 236 54- - - 1--�- - - - - -KI-ETH - 1- O - - -- - - L A E - - foo - - - ;oo /oo /00 - / - - - !` - Z - - 3 4 /03.67 /03.87 /03.97 /03.97 106.87 100.8? /03.8% 98.00 9 •t'f/ _ "= 125 , N 126 127! 128 O a - - - !28 ! - 1.02 / 91 a 133.63 2.27AC v 2.0640 1.64 AC �+ o 55 •,6 (75 73 ' 10 I 100' 59 58 a 32 `4) 33 35`, 44 47 45 - X30. \ n PM 102-89 I _ 295.31 296.70 1 236.54 io .ems j 103.37. i23.87 ./03.87_106.87 100.8 /03.81' se : 90• v�1-�s6 00 -- 96 00 _ i MOUNTAIN VIEW SUBDIVISION � N � 07-42 Assessor's Map No. 47- 30 County of Butte, Calif. SE'P7 i LIA r4t 11 P.3 0 3 Ln P-1 0 C-3 w :14 0 LO 9 PSI? !J Planning Dgwrtment JUN 2 2 1995 OP®Ville, Caili'jonia 11 0 0 0 0 s IT I Will (41��.� I 40 ilk r4.-, RL ,3 LO I Will (41��.� I 40 ilk I Will (41��.� I 40 A