HomeMy WebLinkAboutBUTTE CO. PLANNING DEPT . 78-17 1A
x r�
r A �rL ! sal✓, h1"e dg 6���tt�4�Yev
A' -P 9 I `� Y� ��Lf✓ h� r � a ',t �� [ ct, 4 �+jr 1
04
yl � !' :1 wTx •lily lr ��'rl �+s,i (�i; ( •<u 3••
,ly{ �. r' clic .x!' S, �,I K F'/ x�Y - 4 i F �'.: � .. ✓r•
•. L r � � � ! � [a lkil'ti.. 1 f � Yr 11. +' ¢
�Y,lj a fit 4 ! ,�.��•
It/
P�lv k
i �� s Y��p'✓ ��{ f i �i~• V�tY�I � 1
IT
v LL
I ) l
N.e
r rf
5
iq i 1 s
.Y'
t 7!'
C t
i l�-t`%7r tirty
b d
1
� A
P
�r✓;r,� r `#s fir' ''. .
......
l4
�', Y �^K ✓��4t Y�1 1+ " r d r 1!� <� y`>���b t !tit � 51" ^ISG t '� ':� l .;
111}! ? 3
4= k i � d h' � a s r I t a�"✓ i �.11��p dr �1 ! �r
dr �. � xi t a yi Ajl �.yr�r SIC arri :�1dd 1n r �'�r 1 � �.� �5 7 f51 �L�1� £r �' L �� ; •r�
r , r • a. `� ^+ } r ern xt 2 , Ir..' i ,! . f YtP Y .. � - ; t5 a ;
✓ r ! CI : y � � a b, ITi e� �' � �• ki'# 1 t 1 y,t
r 1 I � Yr ,� 1r;.a! a �Nt t1,�t ���r �✓ r51. 7} r. '
}� 1 A •1 � M I L� E 1 1 1 r�l V$ r 1 i �� 1? �' 1 �' h .'.
` J I _� e Sj � t"+ y; "^ fi +� t tn� ti .r ya 11 1• � a L H , �:
S t 4 1T �; .,.rrv� tY ✓y� a Y Y }. ✓4 t y j
I
U
g. Exposure of peopleat property to
geologic hazards such as earthquakes,
landslides, mudslides, ground failure,
or similar hazards?
2, Air'. Wil ` . e proposa] „resul:t In.'lr
a. substantial det:erloratidn of ambient
air quality?
-h. The creation of objectionable
-odors?
Significant alteration ofa r movement,
mol.6ture or temperature,, or any change in Cl�iMate
either locally or regionally?
3. Water. Will the proposal. result in substantial.:.
a. Change's in current,, or the course
or direction of Wat6r m'i;vements?
b. Changes in absorption rates
drainage patterns,,, or the,,rate and
t,
amount of surf ace wat6r rwioff?
Co. Alteratl.oins to the course or
flow of flood waters?
d .r� change .in ,.the amount of surface
'mater in any water body?
e'. Discharge into surface Waters, or,
in any alteration of SllrfaCP Water Y a
quality, including but not limited to
temperaturer.dissolVed oxygen or fps
t'urbidity ?`
til
f� Alteration of the direction or
rate'' of f lowof ground Waters?
11
,c
g Change%n the quantity of ground
I
wtes s, either through direct adclitiosis
or wvithdraWal.s, ori,.)through interception
�
h
of, ari.:aquifer by ruts or excavations
t
Appendix F- page 2 Cif B
1
f
U
Abh
1
YES
MAYBE NO
h. Reduction in ,Ehe amount of water
�k
otherwise available for public 4,
vrati�rnsupp7 ies
U
Exposure of people or property to
0
water related''hazards 'such as floodings
4.
Plant Life, Will the proposal result
Y-
in substantial:
a. Change in the diversity of species, °or
4
number of any species of plants (including
trees, shrubs, grass, crops, microflora
and aquatic plants)?
_
Ir
b . Reduction of the numbers of any unig0e i ;,,
rare : e'ndan ' ered ` specie s' plants?
�1
or `� of
=; t
,-
ji
c . Introduct.on of new species of plants
into an area, or in a barrier to the
yid
I�
+ nclrmal replenishment of existing species2
.
s
Reduction in acreage of any agricultural
?
crop: ,
-
5.
�
Animal Life,. 11 the pasoposal result 'in
pUbs tantial
hahge in the diversit of saeca.Ps,'or
'
n4imbers of,zty sped es of animals (birds,
bind animals including reptiles, fish and'
shellfish;'.rbenthic organisms, insects ox
mi;croi'aun, ?
b. Reduction of "the numbers of any uni#)t i,
rare or endangered species of ,.animals"
c. Introduction of new species of `animals ,
into an area, orresuit in a barrier to
the`'migr.ation or rnovernent of a, .n ls.?..
di 1Detdrioration to existing fisrh or
wildlife habitat?
6,
i
Nois« will the proposal result in
e
substantial:
�a : increases in noise levels�'>
�
b. Exposure of people to severe noise leirels?
Ili
Apgendk V`
page
3 .of 8
t
1 Y.;.
if
t
0
I�aAYBE` NCS
"anr d Glare . Will ll the p o�osa1 hroduoe
T
slynx�ficant la.ght. or glare?
8 i.
Land Use, Will the proposalresult 1�1n a
subptantial alt -,ration of the planned land
'of
usan area?
9,�
Natural . Resources . "Wily the proposal restilt
isubstantial:,,
,
'
a Increase in the rate of use of any
natural resources?
r.�
b. Depletion of any, nonrenewable
natural resource?
10.
Rask of Upset, Does the proposal i,�nvolV
a risk- o an explosion or the release of
ha,tardous substances (including, but not
1imit4d to, 03.1 pesticides, chemicals or-
,.
radiataon} in the event of an accident or
upset conditions?`
r
ll.,
Population, Will the proposal significantly
alter the location, ist't�butian, density,,
or growth .rate of, the h6s ',�n population of
an area?
j 2 .
Housing . Will the proZ 6sa1��\,signi icantly .
affect existing tYous,i n; or OVeAte a
demand for additionalhousinr)gl?
l3'.`
Tran�ortation/Cirdu ion.;,?` Will, the
proposal result in:
a G6n enation of subs7antiaS additional ,
vehicular movement.
bb Significant effects on existing parking
facilities,, demand for
or new' paxki,ng?
c»` Substantial impact upon existing
transportation
systems?
d. Significant alterations to present
patterns of' ciroulation,or movement
of: people: and%or goads?
e., Alterations to waterborne, rail or
JI air traffic?
� Appendix F
page 4 of 8
4
��
YES
MAYIBE
NO
f . Increase in trat kic hazards to motor
vehic�:es, bic ,cl�.s ts or,
y pedestria'n's?,
14. Public Services. .Wall the proposal 'have,
an effect upon, or result in. a substantial
need for new �or altered governmental services
in any of, the following areas:
a. Vire protection?
b. Police protection?
C. IS oo . a?, ..
O
d. darks or other recreational,,facilities�
e. Maintenance' ofpublic facil.ties,
including roads?
f, a_herg overnmental ,services.
15. Energy. will the proposal result in:
a. Use of substant:ia'l amounts of fuel 'or
energy?
b. Substantial increase in demand upon'
existing sources of energy, or r:quire
the" development~ of new sources of energy?
16. Utilities, Will the proposal result in a
need for new "systems, or substantial
altexati.ons to the following u.t iii es:
, a. P`ower',or,,.natuiral ga's?
Q
b . Communicati6ns:; systems?
e . Water
x,
d . Sewer?
FS
l7 . Human Health . Will the proposal result in
1
a. Creation of any health hazard or potential
l health.?
health .hazard (excludingmenta, )
b. Exposure of people `to potential ,health
hazards?
4
Appendix E
psg�
5 of '8
t,
r*
MAIDEI,��
1$ • Aesthetics the- pro osalgr t:he
obstruction oflan y p ublicfde.si nafed"'oic,in
rt
r:
- "
recogni zed„ scenic ,'Vista open to the r ublio,
or will the proposal result in the czeatioll
of an aesthetically offensive site open
to public views ,
19. Recreation. Will the proposal res; in
an impact upon the quality or quantity of
existing public, r-6creational facilities?
Ztl., ArcheoocicallHistorical. WiYI the proposal
Xesult in an alterat'i.oi of a significant )
archeological or historical site, St r,,
hb'ect or building? \ -
2l. Mandatory F'indin s 4f signiZ'zcance ,
a. Does ;•thee project have" t:h'e potential I:o
degrade the quality of the m
environent,
substantially
reduce the habitat ",of a
fish or wildlife species, cause a. fish
or wil:d.life population to drop below ;
self sustaining levels,' threaten ,to
eliminate a plant or animal comniuni.ty;
reduce 'the, number or restrict the range
!t
of a rare or, endangered plant or animal
oreliminate important ex—, 'pies of t:!hc
r periods'
major o£California History 'or
"'reha.s tory?
p 7.
tt -
b. Does the project have,the potential i:o i 41
achieve shot terns benefits to the
detriment of publicly!; adopted long
'
environmental goals?
c. Does the project have impacts which.
are indi.viduall,y limited', but cumv,la�-
Lively considerable? (A; project may '
impact Lon two or ;pore separate resources
where the impact ori each resource is
reIati ve.ly small, .but where the effect
of the total of those impacts on the
'
erivi rozmefit is significant.) '
d. noes the project have environmental'
exfects which twill cause substantial
adverse, effectson, human beings, '
either directly or, indi
u
c
IV,", DETERMINATION
(To-be.completed by the LAad Agency)
�{
On the basis of 'this initial evaluation:
Al
rI find ,the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant
effect.on the environment, and a NEGATIVE. DECLARATION
s reo6mmeridad,
I find that although the proposed pra3ect could have a
significant effect on the enVironmeftto there will not
be a significant effect in this case becat se the
mitigation meastares described on an attached sheet
have bean added: to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION`
[� I find the proposed project MAY have a significant
effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
('
REPORT ' is required
Date September 213 _'1977 c .
1:
(S1CfilatUu e
'or ENOL.{LR.ONMENTAL REVIEW DEPT.
Earl D. Nelson, Divec-tor
r •
r
VN
(lp
9r v
P1f
I' en ix' -=' a e 8 o Q
PP, A g.. r f
09
34-5'2 -13, l
34 52°'2n ;" y
q.
Woods 3� 6
F;abert a Irma Woods
James •& Bonnie Fugate
57 Meadow View Drive
Herman i7osaYie Quntej ,
320 GI 06 Drive ,4
2466 Dordgo Ave -
O'rovi l l e , CA 95965
Orovi 11 e, CA 95965'
Pinola; CA 94564
1'
34-52;14,24
34-57-01
34=06-10
Waldo 'h1argaret Wagner
(;-
Footn 111 B1 vd ..Church
Stage 6-F Cal i fo:rn i a'
P 0 Box 413
2295 Foothill Blvd
Orovi'l 1 e, CA 95065
Orovi 1.1 e, CA 951365
34-06-57
34-52-1 5
David £. Carolyn SohoDonal
d & Barbara Bowen
f:>
139, Pinedale Ave
5,723 Hill Bright Circle
�.•,
•
Oroville,, CA 95965 -
San Jose; CA 95100
34-66-58
41f
34-59-18
F
i
"Rona i d u Joan B i'gf awd
'Barbara Lockwood
i
15 Leslie Lane
Lassen Savings �i Loan
q
Orb v'1lle.; CA 95965,
200 Broadway
Ch ico, 'CA 95926
1
'
34-19 -51 .70
34-0`7-42,50,106
34-5.2-19>
Pac i f i c Cas & El ec,tr c Co
Tommy Deman. ;
77 ileal e Streeti
969 Reed Ave .
SanFran'ci�sao, CA 9,4100
unilyVale, CA 94000
i
34-07-10:5
34-52-20
T.R. 6Carmen, Henry.
Wm & Juanita Morris
5301 E1 Parque
38 Mbadowv i ew Drive
Dong Geach , CA 90800 p.
O.r ovi l l e , CA 95565
34-1 6-JQ
34-52-21
Chart es Rutherford
Ray & Mary Adams
37451 W.Valle Blvd 174
44 ,fleado0view Drive
Wal n ut; CA 91789
0r.o,ville; CA 95965
" a
-
r> f
M
34-101»00
34w`52.-22
'
Hazel Hough
DUane a Dorothy Fau1
t
3745 W.Val la;y Bl vd 174 ,
1008 St,
1
Walnut, CA 91789:;
•Rickenbackel^
San' Jane, CA .95100
w
34-52-09; 34-52-23
�
J R ? flr`pha Roberts
Robert#t. Shib1ey eta 1`
310 Glenn Dt-14
401 Avenida, "1anzano9
y' '
Orov l l e , CA 959`65
San' Jose; CA 95100
t�
3n:-2-1'0``
3452-25
;Dept of Veterans'Affairs
Arthur D. DeVol
;
a lti
t
v
.. ... �
.,F a ..
Fi
BO.�RD OF 8-11 ERV•ISORS
M NU1'ES '— Xbvmmbkr 01977
1q?7
.,
,
i
, 7 � Zl84 itl rOTtg, ZOXXXG Y 101AL R10001I G WDERV
& um C oom 1tia%oNmr�'j
xo YARI H"
(,. IWTU� t�t;1t , , xlt Nlbra�a'� A
Tiq;3IL Ilt;ifi;); 1'C'.Qx'0�?'.l'Y&OCs1'J,HO OS TUC MAST SIDE WAR L1'.{:VS_API'OX. 100
dgnX Cxfi tt', X13%.V"f,'T1. } i} i1"a 4AP
A{t 0670 j Ct)v`f,"A'CHING 1,82
�t /P"L.",tit cif �"M�I :ng denial vegard i ng
Roto o, I ej51 7rnvi ruvanp
:Elam "kk-��''
i�usidt�rivia`1 to "7s�t..m'01mobi
;jaricultuval
�! HOW130.0 edy 1.4%Ca1- d uu th Cos! side,
i :' Gloa J�Y ��,�L� ��1fi F°tn. ..9'•ly'Y tM. �.���
700 feet ,eauoh of all, Chale, i.dCq ijqd .as
AP 1.82
scres, more n'r lesaQ Obville, wet 4i.von at
thio pipe.rC tarintiqu; na t
act;Q taken,„
t
'
:
,
�
. , ,'• :
.
�Afi`411
�{' `
fJ
alt
1;
�} Board of
Supervisors
Anutes -,-November 15,
t ,
1577
X
Robert and
x tr s 1'i�nole The Wood Pp
�n�e•,"�laods + s a e he PlaOning
d��rtY3�.
Co►7m issi an's
x-
of rezoning dor bhei,r gropext�y`�locared on the
of Glen brive, approximately 700 feet south
,
t,
eis, scT.�,
Set for hed ring
of G,ler►
November 2�; 1977 at 1,0:00 a.m. '
Circle, Orovi.,le.
.r
4
-4
I,
I
:
Y