HomeMy WebLinkAboutBUTTE CO. PLANNING DEPT . 78-23 11n
� 4Yf �..l.4 .�: it �r� f.i�ri�t
tf �•.�
'cG
Page
I,
July 31, `l981
I
a,
F tudo;rio heat fromyou Within MA
(_) day".
the
past` (ILle account will lie' e-feived to the
Cou ty
Co l7 ckt:ion
A.Sency Fob` j0p2"QUIR,,'''fi7lq oyt -ilp MOD SL1tc$,
�
u
Thank% oo for yourlprompt atreR1i1* H
is Cqueat.
4
z to
Sipcele1qQ.
(� ,
a
r1 1J. Nelson
EIVI ` MmentaY
TOP06
�
b:� : i� ���, 1��. �Y� G�tt.cl �w�����Z..�4.�w� U
r
✓
7
ci
t10
'.
,r
I�
� �f
�nl I
i( •�F� fl vv/� fir\ fil
f'
—
i
LL �
v '
141Y 14�
l
,
i
n
<'I1
i 4
[3U7TE`;FiTY EiIVIRONMENTA"l. (tEVIEG3�PAf;TMENT
Expense Accounting .Form
For L.I.F.°'Pre pp and Subdivis=ion Init"ial
S` udies
�aration
ezone �S�TZT�T
;
_r77 -da -25-03
QROJEOT; Eastwood. Oaks, AP# 44-32--24, etc.
Log # $0-01-18-02
SUQDIVXSI'0N AV Y�� ..,EXPENSES:
`BT�D5""=Z6
P -r 'fessioval & S`peia',!,Azed S0rvicis :
3
Staff work comp`lete'd�-(.F:ch( 1 hours @x,,.62
�h
=$` 29.Or>
_S AS A o u`,�1 s @
K f hours
,. Inritial Stt d,y Tuta,l X 2
�
34.86 = 69.72
,.
Note• In tia 1Cstudy surpluses cannot refunded,
p
only cre
credited
_.. ,�R. preparation or to General Fund,..
_
ENURONME P'(' -AL IMP, CT REPORTPREPARATION ''EXPENSES:`
Professional & S"pecialized Services: Jolln CV .rt
, , 75.00
Staff work, c`�impl"eted ROAi '' hi i; ours
`171.7
- i
"
Gt,, ho urs @ $fid
= $53
o 1) rs , @ $11.62 ,1 "
�. h0UrS @
hours @ $�"=
hours; @
`tl
E:'I R.Total X 2 °='
573.94 p 1,147.88
MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSES:
,tidyy)
Yypiii'g costs @ X1,82 per�page (Init.ial. Study
Printing 'c o s, is �14NX �UXSXNN � ;,
�o 2'
Typing. CoS�ts @ 1.82 per page (Draft E:I.R:� 21
38:22
Pr i htinq, costs (Dra'ft E I:R,)
Typihq c,vsts @ '$1,8'po-r page Cpihaif E:I R. 10
18, 20,.
P r n:rf'gr�c b�s t s (F 1 h a 1 E
:Legal rho ii"c e;5
16.20
Ci1^cu7ati in (Xnit a1 -Study; brsft or Fi'li'al Elk)
v
Total Mj s E Xj ehses
237 x.37 = 237 37
ACTUAL TOTAL DEPARTMENT EXPLNS.ES:
1,529:
� ota�,.�.I.R: EXpenses
Total Xnitial S'tudp;LXpehse 80:85
' ,
r� 1�0�.2.50
TOTAL AMOUNY DEPOSITED TO DAT!?'
,
"
Amdltnf to be kofunded `
Amo uht Owed by �10p1caht
,46 (rh the case of subdivit,tions{, ihcludes�iactual+�cost
hf� nit al stud�V:}
' QUT1'EPITY .ENVIRON'MEPITAL REVIEI'Ip,ARTMNT
' Expense" Accountinq Form
F'or'E.I„R. Preparation and Subdivision Initial
Studies
Wm. Evert
Af' 44-32-24 etc,,
` Pasttirooci 0�1�'s ,
.._ `7-08 25-03
- -1$-02
Log � 80 07,
SUBDIVISION INITIAL STUDY' EXPENSES:
_
Professional & Specialized a ervi res;
Staff,woek`,icomplete=d: hours @
=S.
' thours @ $_$
hours @ S
�S
Initial study, Total X 2
= '
Note:, Initial study surpluses cannot be refunded,
credited
toward E.I.R. preparation n'r to General Fund,
�
ENVIRONMEJNTAL Ih1PA'CT REPORT, FREPARATIgN, EXPENSES:
Peolfessi ona1= & Speci aA'i zed Servi c.es : John IV rt
� :_ 75.00
work completedc RCN 17 z �:: hours
..
RUN17 hours @ $ L1.0
_,. 1993= �(
—A S 24 hours @ $7 1.
26414,
FLiV� hours @ `7 $�
hours @-5
li°o u r s @ $=
a`
,
la I . R. Total X 2
5573.J44 =� 1,T47,8&
�!
MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSES
Typing costs 0 $1.82"per page (Initial Study),
S
ti „Printing costs (Initial Study) EIR to R. Crorianbex'
S`^'7 4 4Z'`
T . ing coCosts. @ 1`.82 per page (Draft ) _ Z1
Ty, t E.I.R.
S 38.22
Print? -ng costs (Draft E I,R.
$TO9734
Typing c 182p e r' page (Final E 41 Rl i) 10_
$
1_r8i;2_0
_.
rr n�costs ( al E I.R.Add, Rev. Memo
:32.88
'
,o
10-8 -80
L�g�rl P�o�,�i cos z, �
$ 12.0
.
x� ,
C7rcula• t7~lh M (1h t a1 Study, Draft or F7na1 EIR)
5 8.18
, _p
Total Mise Exp
5;226.24 226.24
._.._..4
SACTUAL,. TOTAL DLPARTMP,N`i' WEHISES�
44�ii 12.
,
13
k Total R, Expehses 1,4h;G,12
Total Initial Study Expenses
bEPgS.ITL D TO BATE Nb
TOTAL AMOUNT_
efundL d
C�mount to fie
. ant
Ambunt Owed by Applic$.. 849 1Z
(Io the case of�subdI.-0tiohs0 jno'ludes actual cost of Jh.it al stud�l:) tl
”
4/19/'81
r
�1
tl i
i �r ti
,{ tl
NY Aga me
"
r f "; ' _._.�` [AND OF NATUkAL �l/IAl4i��l 'A�!q BEAUTY,
i�J r `~ _ I
Y
ENVIRONMENTAL REVI.EWPARtMENT.: „
1 ;
.firr } ,'s � �—_---" „
gal.4``"S t �R' EARL D.NELSQh�yDita>r'or`
11 s i,Is4�,
may 27, 1`98l„,
I" 'U Pi ,rW 31 am Evertij
Ever �G;lo Inc.
107. Ca'minoT Agua' itch
., C a� Monterey,. GA 9394.0
k
ry ,.
A
till A
RE Financial - ccourn•ti'ng and Billing
t t
L
Eastwood OaksRezone to PAC and"TSM
AP:'# 44-21-67, 68
44-52-24 etc. o
, r ,
k
d " • `'� ftid
E11D Log # 77-0'8-25 03,, 80�-6'7 -1$-p2 t s"°,
fl Dear Mr : 'Evert:4 }
,
i<< v
t. We have completed the processing( of the Environmental ac t'
�tepor documents -ox our ro ect named above, which `
j Y p. 5
approved by the Board, of Superv� sors on (•?arch 17 , 1981'
subdivision map wase)approved by the Advi$ory Agen, 0w,.,
r,
Processing costs Iate dot
Incurred by this department a
`
on the attached ml�w oice
� ' i" c1Evi` �VS
Since these costs exceeded the P,mount aepos�. ed, eve t,ry N d t+
appreciate yourremitting\,,ilie balance due o $s17,4'7,
7 y; Thank you for your,, attention in this matter. If the c, p-,
of further assxs'Ganee please contact �►i�s departan�tz�, 4�z � �
z, Sincerely
ii j t
earl D Felson
Envy rotimer+f` aI Review Director
Attachlilellt
y, 1
s Itinl,el anAssociates , a
p
r
t .
3 -Ouhty Center" brit'd Ovilld, Cat(tot#11n 0065 rdlephond; 016) O i-4-4
Inter -Departmental Memorandum
.
t,
Tot
Auditv'z• s Office _ Babb Johnson`"
PR,oM: '(1
Enviratlriental Reva eiv - Linda
Trans�er of E.1.R. Txiaslt Funds
DATE:
May, 27, 19 81
� X111
t,.
5:
Please transfer the following funds
from the E4, . TZ. Trust
Fund F-1110 to ;the following 1is"ted
revenue ac,L4ounts
�.7
l;r B1indbury, Tmh'pff` I Stofa Devel;
Co. l�.v, 0
,
Sycamore Grove )q
ERD Log n 81.04-10' 03
„ $ 39A6 to ,F-10"
211151 G�
$37.3 , 4.4 rrant
to Applicant
M1
Kenne'ih\\�'1Dnss = Cat. Exempt
,
k;0n'
"
ERD Log' b� - Q5 - 00 0`� .�� N
180
$180.00 Warrant
to Applicant
u. Lahr r Parker 'Cat . Exem t
tPW Log 0,1:81-05'--13-01
-
130.00 Marrant
to Appl' icarlt
4 Kellytid'e Investments
`"
- 4�
Sunrise Knoll
0
ERD Lo n 803 -07J02
X100.00 , FL10
617202
�
i
J
5, ON Evert
... Eastwood Oaks
ERD Log #0uQ7-1$-OZJ31,"6
S to E-10
6�72'02
6 ��VV' ,v CIO, lnC6
,
1
Eastwood 0alk s
1
ERD Log ' 81<`03»76«02
$ 80. a.5,..!'to p-Ia
71II S1
w. ti -
`
J
t
i
0
,
G♦,
IV. Evert Eastwood Oaks
80-07=181.02
P'A C I2.p z one
\
\
t
f
TotalDept. Ch,arges as of 4/15/8
$1,449.12
,
Total Deposited J
a�
600.00 p
t'
849 il'2 Balance
,
Wat for Approval or 7'SNI`
x
ERD # 81-03-26-0e�
1
`�.." Deposit $412
:1.
di
I
is =+1 1",
f{�„• ,
r
i
,1
�INTY
BUTTE ENVIRONMEPITAL RE`j�`"�4l*PA1tTMEtiT
<,
0 Expense Accounting Form
,
For E'.I:R Preparation and Subdivision Initial
Studies
Vm. Evez�`
7-08-25-03
PROJE CT: E?astWood Oaki AR# 44�-32-24 j etc•.
Log # 80-07-18-02 ,
VISION IN-ITIAL STUDY,EXPENSES:
SUBDIVISION
,
;1 P.rofess1onal,& Specialized Servicps �,� �
$,
Staff 'work completed: fours @ $L�
�$
hours @$
--
r hours @ $"�
b.
Ih'itial Study Total X 2
Note: Initial ,study surpluses cannot be refunded,
on'i,y cred'itied
toward E.I.R. preparation or to General Fu'n'd,
ENVIRONMENTAL 'IMPACT �".iEPORT PREPAkI!AT'ION EXPENSESi
Professirinal & Sood alized Services: John Wirt
75.00
Staff work completed: RCM 17 Z sours Ld $ 9:�8T�
.
f, RUM 1711 hours @ $ 11.08 = 1 3.. Zi'�
�S AS - h o u r s @$71-67—t ' 26.14
EDN 1 hours @ $x`5.20"= —'
hours; @
$
hours @
„
E.I.R. Total E�r.Z
1873i94 =$ 1,147.88
MISCEELLANE,OUS "EXPENSES:
'Typing` costs @ $1.82 perpage.. (Initial Study)_
�
Printing costs (Initial Study) ETR to' R. CroninQer
'$ Tom'
Typing Costs @ 1.82 per page (Draft E.I.R;) 21
$ 38.22
Printing costs (Draft
Typing casts @ $1.82 per page (Filial E.I:R.) _. 10
$ 1.8.20
Priltting costs (FAhal E.T.R.) Add: Rev. M mo
$ 32;-88 ,r
Lega�;a! G�ot.ices 10-8 80
$ 12:0 �!
Crctilatioli(Ihittial Study.l graft :or Filial EIR)
$.. 8.18
Total t1i se.%"t`xpehses
$226.24 �$ 226.2;4
y \r
ACTUAL TOTAL, EXP_EhJSES. 1`f.
1, 4�4�`:iz
t
4 Thal L.1 :R: ExpeP, es $:,49: 12
TotaI initial S'ttldy Exporises $
TOTAL AMOUNT DEPOSITED TO DATE
Amlount to be Refuhde((
APrlo uvh � Ovied by Pippl i cah*t $ 840 12
, :
� _��)
. .
p t C t
(Ili the casae of subdly s7ons incl,pd actual.�os
of Initial sttldv
1
1
✓ Inter -Departmental filemor anhum
r Board of Supervisors
FROM. k� Earl D. Nelson, Environmental Review Director
su E:IR for Eastwood Oaks, Rezone to PAC' (William I, ert/A`ver-Glo, Inc.')
OJ EGT.
f I�
bnrCr February,
,.20, 1981 , p.
ra ,
The EZR for this project is presently a"'I'draft" until Tuesdayi�s';nublic
,hearing has been held and all comments addressing sufficiency the
EIR and concerning any significant environme7ital..factors have b,�,en
responded to in writing, prior to EER certi.,,..;cY tion.
Because of the , ,, project, ,.
n an
n ' 1 nature of �C�as I would expecte
a` lengthy
publicoheir egsand comments w;�, Cly. gill require summarization
and responses. The customary procedure in such, cases is to close"the
public hearing, make a motion of intent (optional) and continue the
}, proj ectQta�our next meeting, to permit a ,formal motion (including all
necessary findings) to ,be drafted along with the final responses to
comments., An indication of ",the Board's intent as to findings would be
helpful.' If Ido not receive--11Roard direction with regard to findings,
the motions the supervisor x , w�.l l work them out later with who is planning to mare
1
A deiiia? of the project can occur without malting ;envi.rr..nmental findings.
H you'decide to approve the project; findings are necessary as Listed `
b e I .ow
yimplementation .. prC3,,IPCt �
. lahe'gni fi cantoh
effec`ontheenvi.ronentll bout
S} 2. if so whether thero are feasible alternatives and/or
mitigation measures which will reduce the adverse
enyironmenta.l effects. These must e'it h'e't be imple-
merited, or fnd�n,gs made as to why not:
3. If there are significant adverse environmental
'effects which cannot be mitigated, ''overriding �
considerations" which justify project approval
in ,the face of lnticipatet[environmental damage
must ,be formulated-:
if you ha ny `questions regarding thI8 p'rbjec�'\, plelse do not
e,sltate to contact me".
Sincore ly,, `'
• uu
�
D.;arl .
Nelson
t t;(yx'
din Review �1 �.ironmentai _ x .. c
'v
william Evert/Ever G10 1Inc. PAC Rezo'nu c
Conditions of Approval
1.
Submit road and„drain'age plans to the public Works
� Tar?nt 4 pr approval., and install all thy; rogiiired,
i
2.`
, property line returns at all s-txeet '
'rovide r20 foot radius
ntersections.
3.
Indicate a 50 foot b ilding setback line from the center-
line of Tom Polk Avenue. Indicate a 20 foot building setback
line from the edge of ,the, roadway on main interior- roads.
4.
Street signs_ shall be , provi,dedll by the deveiper at alb street
intersections per County requirements: Submit four alternative
street names for each street, to the. County address coolydin.atot
for s.ppr0Vai
5
5tre'fet gr'aae'9joand other street features shall comply with
engineer"ing standards
b.
Provide ap ermanent solution 6for drainage, br drainage re-
quirements shall be,,s shown on the tentative map
%.
All ease nents of record to be shown on the final; map;
8 .
Street ght`Eing shall be provided in accordance with County
requirements, accepted design criteria, and:. PG&E recommeidati:ons,
Tntersction lighting is to be installed as indicated on the
development, plan. ?`
9
All exterior lighting shall be shielded, directed, and located,
nne` as'to are to adj cent
a ,� o revert 7 Properties,
�.n such a m p glare
10,
A 0 10 foot AG ove` laV shall be placed on Tom Polk Avenue from
lip of gutter to lip', of gutter', from the development to East
Avenue,
ll,
prokride a standard driveway approach at the intersection of
the interior road and. Lassen Avenue.
12.
All interior roadways are to � a ,minimum of 24 feet in width
2 iznch AC, A13 with AC barrier' curb'.
Iriteiioty roads shall be dosigned and cdnstk'llcterl so <��s to
roduce through -t :. Efic circulation and spoeds over 2" mph4
L
�3
�t
lip
14'.
The point where the :interio'x' ,, oad meets D'I Vcrna Way shall
b.e ,used as an emergency :xi t nnly.. A barr;i,or shall, be con-
c
0 structe-d, and subject t? approval by the 'Bu e to County Fire
Depax tment-, " „
IS
a adin.,g plan 'shall be,,:submitted to the PubUc ti1'orks Department
;Eor appxova,] and a; '1 the rp, uired,,iacil:itic, s shall be i.n-
,
stall; -ed.
16 .
Stop signs",;'etit t ra,,_S5 is only) shall be placed at the pVo j ect
"
entrances t,o Tont ,Tolk Avenue and Lassen Avenue.
17.
development 1 orated
Storm draina e a )that pbrtion of the i in
Shasta Union Draxna e Assessment Distr'xdct (SUDAD to drain. to
the SUP -AD ditch unless design calculations indicate that the
._
po :,tion o! t}le dev,e:lopment in the southeasterly part of the
r'SUDAD district can drain:north to the'exi6ling storm drain ..line
at Lassen Avenge.
4 o .18;
Sidewalks, to County stenda'rds, shall be constructed on the
west side of Tom Polk Avenue between East and k:Lassen and' as
shown in the development plan.
19.
Construct an 8 -foot solid fence or wall along the southern,
eastern and western propeity boundary (�i'�0 f�'eei; total l.eng,th)
where ad j acen.t to tie proposed recreations ih ti es.
20
A prolPrata shai4 (per unit developed eased upon a total.
estimiate of $25,000) shall be deposited, with the County as �
the developers shave of the cost of a :future 'traffic signal
at the intersection of—Tom Palk Aven1v and bast Aven�}e.
I
21,
Const rt� `:t Lon activities 'Shall. be restricted to noxiiial daylight
�nd
} ours, all ,eauipmernt 8mg1,1 be lit -bed with, approptiat,.9
mufflers to reduce construction noise:
22 t
Dus ', t�ontrol 'measly es such a.s sprinklitshall, be ;implemented
during' c"Onsttuetibn ";M
Landscaping Shall provided as indicated on the devey.opment
plsn to achieir��; a isual and acoust�ac' screen from �idjacent
residences;, 4:;a t ma"inta,ined in a• living condition.
24,
Fencing shall be provided as indi;catod oft the dovcl.opment plan
With the exceptioft that the fencing shall not oxcee�l:Y 42 `Y'inches
in height withi i 50' .feet of the centerline of, ;hl Veranb Way and
tvxt tin` S0 feet, al 'tl e c ftterl.ine of Tom Polk A�Feri�ie.
25
r pit°�.d
Assessments shitl,l be segregated o' ` "
26
Vivo t le
lrontt'
d as Indiced hYi
eF ire )bat tmentrdilts
,,O, efevoloo men t platri,, The idt' iitsl�L�a eGtotnbeL
2-
,
0
r
n
Clow Rich 950 Models.) or :Gong Beach l�:,,on Warks 614 Models
installed according to Department of Publ]x, 1;'o,rks Standard
#�27. p:i,ro Flow is to be,_,2000 GP,M, sustained E'ox a period
of at least 2 hours. ` Facilities shall be subject to -final
inspection by,.tl e Butte County Fire Departhe t, and any,_
other require, nts shall.be also met.' -
it
,27.
.� .
1) .. .. Safi;.` (fiY:„f•:},
A letter or otiler documeli.tation from -the California Water,_
"Setvice Company stating -that they are willing and able to sup-
ply domestic water to the development, and stating any pre-
requisites which they may have, must be Prov ded
28;."
The sewage disposal systems with n the development shall meet
the requirements of the .Counity Health Department and the
California Regional Water Quality Control. Board.
Z9.
A Homeowners Ag"teement t -hat provides For the installation,
f'ain•tenance and repair of the sewage disposalsystems shall
be provided, and be,subject to the review of the County Health
Department and the 'Calif'orn,a Regional Water (duality Control
Board.
30.
A water main exten��ion shall be required in accordance with
California Water Service; Company FXtension Rulo 15: The
facilities will be designed by California Water engineers; �-
and an„ easement the width of the traveled way through the A..
development sha'l:l be regtUted:
t>
t,
ht
k;
IS
Ya
- Irl
IV i l�liam tvert/t-yer Clo,
Ire twoodo0aks PAC Rezone
ti „Findings for Certification, of
',the ',Environmental Impact Report
Minding that c�nim ents and recommendations` Eroin the public have
been attached to '-he draft environmental impact report, that
wrttten responses to significant environmental points raised
�y the comments have been prepared andattached to the, draft
environmental 'impact, report and that a list of the persons,
organizations and public agencies who commented has been attached
to the draft environmental impact report, I move to certify the
MP
,p � been Completed in
final environmental Im act•re ort as having„
compliance with the Ca1ifoxnxa Pnv�.rbnmental QLtaliiy .Act, the
state tnvironmental Review Oujdelines and the Butte County
EAvironmental Review Guidelines.
r
ind:i'g n s for A'prbyal of PrdjOtt
p
A
Having, Owed
oaJ owing the nal ngs�onili`6nta1 impact
report I g
(n) Development whl6'h occurs -pursuant to project approval
i
t in s not expected to resulsignificant cumulative
%C_Fects on the environment because pE mitigation mei^lures
..
which will. be attached as con'a tions of project appi6val.
SpocjEle impacts anti them' dis,�iosition include
1 Increased traEic ar�i possible increased ebngestibn,
with associated air`jAality and. traffic nolso im-
pests These impacts ivete mitigated to .a degree
by the redesign Of the project which reduced `the
density from 1�1 units to Jai, Adaitionat].Y,"a
contribution ttwai`cl a tra-I",c siI;na.f at the Last
Av
eiyue Tom Volk i.rttetsectiot3: will be made a cbn
r . diti, on 0f. `pto3' Ott gI0PToVal.. Since, the traffic
pr6blem in the neighbo,t�hooct bxa.stg independently
!: l
e
. 11 tom, 0
'))
w o:C this . praj ect, and s:i,nce traffic from",
this
pro f et will not exceed the trai E� c oEt� r�i1r`
capacity of eithe, Tbm Polk Avenue, fs,wq,l,'�A Onue
M
or Lassen Avenue, and further becau,)e o,R, t}7.h
arJ l
previously mentioned mitigation rmea ha rds ,
r ,•
traffic imna,%ts sre riot deemed sigp t !'.ixUnt.`,
f' f`
2. Potential increased traffic hazards', '1';hfs
��
impact isnot deemed significant for the real,,
, Iyn s
outlined in tom 1 above.
�}}
II
3. Inc- ceased pub.li.c service ,demands, especi6lly
a.n public elementary school facilt;i.cs in thei4
:local area (Jay, Part�r7.dge School) Ibis impart.
�a is not deemed significant, since school ca'pac;i:ty
exists elsewhere within the Chico Elementary ;�
School District, and boundaries can, 1;e' shifter
to equal tze� the' student population dijtributi�5n.
4: Increased land use density, and intens k<� L "
velopment. Altered area land use chaz,,ja'cterf'roR
this mtil:t:.ip].e-family res .dent, a1 us..e, The de�� t
sign change which reduced the density from 13
to 96 units brought the overall pro je-ct de lsiIty,
to 6.5 which is close to the 6 units °pet acre(
specified '=1'or single-family residehtiW!,0 areasi!
in the City `of �Ghico General, P.lai ',' ,i�� 1r rPdu`tl�tiori:
'I
also alloi4ed for more open sp tCe 'and `g"'reater.
building setbacks, therbby redUting I cotnpati�
tl',. - family esidentLa
bit itx. with adjacent s rigl e
f� Reahb� hoe
ri5. `Chis Impact is not d��med `�s:i.6ioant.
r
5. to's of open space and ��ra.cti� tttral'1'y�productive
land to :tntertsxi�e ttrban'use. IThis tsxalect ,�s� sur
�.-:. rounded by" urban developments which have-
`'dititinished the. agricultui°�t'l V"i abs l i ty of the tl,tre�;�,
S i tee the Gone%a Plan Open space ' EJ,cment Ohl �V caI.�15
a
,,tot, preservation of agric;ultural areas o'utsidil
: es gnated urban areas, this impact �:s not d�e rrtted
significant`. I
6. Ove'cortet�ii'ig of and (84-,,) and inerreased drait!gage,af
ked - "' bf waver tivall.ty� i7i` °di'ainage'arttrioffJ;
l riai.nage chdnriels tvhlcll tivill teceive the runo�,
hive ,sukficr�ttt cap�tct"' and the duality of ,stltt'rface
riatjetf w"l.l be no different fromittt'hai runoftwil t4�t�t
siiY 'buntti.n i devolopod areas : �� " hig Impac=t is 1h
'' s3.gnx C:tcatlt�t: L, 4
1
I'Ip �,x
w
19
„
rrYlt�,nr;
M7.1V'k7T8,S h'ovetnber ].?, l9qG c ,
I
1'RCEITs dolma Mendnsa'om l7eid-,llave Boll-an
d
ATa90 P EMMIt: Steve.- Stroeter, Diana Shtzey, Gary ppirt ott, 1;iris C;roningex.�
T,;i,.
Ai. APPROVAL Cllr NLC1V 1 uD jr October 29, 3,98.0 �) �
Ap`�roval of minutes v;as`, pns L•pored Unt ."Ll tht end of the meetitxg , s
A-M) ;� m'."m " Evor Cr10 � nc.Mt}ApC,. a I so known ash Eastwood paha � AP ,,ir gi-611 '
,�� .�l� .r� 1,�
and 6Gs North of Tom .Iol south of I',assezt Ave. ,and west... ctf V
, r. 7t�
Paso. Chico area. Vpgifteer Rangel and Assooiat s .i
Applicant~: William �,Ivert
as y ppincott s clieutt e
' Since Gar I,i � �� far the Paradise pltti'fs 7t�erlini9.riary
d.iv i4ion were not ,ret present, this iteft Vas consn tiered., firm t.
Russ Croi x ager, of klinge L aT.id ;Abs ' e, 4,e8� aslced"Where,,, -the street lighting
is necessary:
r f'
•
Air. Menr�.onsa said oil a ; A�-C si;xeet l.t h{,a.n ta'ould be nect�t;sary oil ' ;tl'ie
public streets. The 111 eribli lidI Bing is loft tip to Clic dovreloper.
`here does noir hrh�`o to he, PO&t type polos. Atiything Pub.1,3.,yc 7thtiuugh 4�yhe;
p � , , a' � v s . - v�itix the" p)i�.L.ic.
roads .
f F
t thc. �n�r�i. sEc�,:�ons
l OJ`eCt'i would htive t0 be lighted � htud Off. a .�
Pair, — cr-6ft .nger said the )ihe stit,reet� thz:ough t ie prajedt vyot;la 'tie a ivat-c!"" {
road
Air. i•iendonsa probab]y, the an1.y tl'ing re tiirecl gir;Yi '1W,%taandpoiu4t- vrotad
be traf tic sa CA l? ghvang at Sit rstct� orfs unto pul,lic poads if i i , not,
a1i.•oady tlhe.c,Lb,
Air. Croangvit 6aia' tahe�e pis alimeady lighting \ari Last Avonv.e and Tom P611z
k-tr. Relidorisa s id,there ryti3 lat.,be ohovigh lighting ther4, But til a PA VC that
is all that ,is;) 5`.^er cited ,
Air: Cfthirlger %4a oc' Coliditioit: #16 clarified.:
11r. Meftab as Otp;la:i.iaod fhb t it vefori ec`i to the PA-0 1.ght;i.tt�;
t4tr, 61 ion nget• said s ;rega.:e�cling crincli to on �',1�, that-, they rio 1 bt �;c�r hav; w 1',0
Ah. Met`td:.f ua ri
�, � � .ay.(l that if theloss :unitsdost �;:or lit'ilt va�ld'l)o
greut cor Ole trtttPid Si, Ct 't,��is, based on. a not ait:uttlit`, � of t'�iskhusp a))CI
'ate said tITO tai) f:Md enjgi ir,OW had )�witteh a ite,�jto to the
I3C1 TV COi11V` I ADVISORY AGENCY MINUIRS mage
NveraLer 1.2, 1980
1�h�viranlne�tnal o iToz -merit about the. feasibility OV putting in a
traffic s' n `1k. The draft- impact report had sa.�d chat, a
traffic signal would probably be un feasible. tTe read the.. -mesio datod
Oct. 7, 1980; written by Bill Cheff sta i.,ag that the developer should:
deposit fuQds for a share ` f the traffic signal. Mr. Cheff did not "agree
r' ii`L'h the�� rents andel^ stem :l L page 13 that traffic c s i. j
;..,1 p g gnals cou3A not
be installed due to the prb:tim. ty of signals at Til Paso and tletsti Ile
felt prey-bilmed signals 'would handle the pro'b_lem
Nr. Croninger said' he had taAed to Earl Nelson
about the property being
turned into a park:
Mr. Streeter said he had na;; heard about that.
w Mr. Cron rlge4 said some _ statementshad been cirob.lated Which were not
ail koshor, ofte''?� ng, the county doesn't have a park q-ysteM� so the properbv
t; 4n''t be a pac k. "pie other.thing vs.8 that: there Was 'local oppon i.on ' to
pra�ject= -orae of the Supervisor' had chocked and that didn't seem to
be the case bit-hex:
Mx Streeter sa d tkie Brivironrrtarltal nev ���r I epai� uient had rete
a
c' petition with signattu2es of 90 peoPld opposod to the project.
Mr.' Cronihg6t AskeaL if t,htit Was trues "
Mr��, ;;tteeter aid it had been received last Week,
Mr. Mendonsa sa%d
Public Voxi1�,1 had also rece!.Ved the letter dated No1r:
' fir. Cronifi et 'sati d he votrld :sake to obtain a copy of pei;it�ioix ant letter.
Mr. Menddhpa ;paid he-had gotten all the co=ents Track .from he- various agencies:.
i�`ix. CroiIi.rI' per asked if he had a colr,tn6ht from Gad. Glatep.
;i 611aonsa said, he had the one on the 'S n� 1;2a1 p;� o jec � , EIe. read tho,ir
` Go1'kti`tl�ritS. ` I/
l+
Mrdtoninger asked if the Fire Dept. hat! co=er►ted.
Mcndbnsa said tie dadnI'Iu'- ItVe that ono:
MJn . �qtreeteri said h(' had 'a 061W.`hell, through the r8l M. he gave a dopy to tit
I
14e110 wsa --ire- sn LSI the tin is still in procosa Witil 14oV, 20„ and ttybe there
hou7.t� boa conl,izzuance of a couple of woeks, dcpolding on ghat colt,tjs in,
16.4. MondoYisa sa;Ld he d;ld Wmi, a coiftei� L fro t)�e V�" est�ry which cam ,�.nt o
tho P tolhiiig �I)ept.; beca�t�se o th.c ' � C raw i�aGcd;the aoitmeri`lisi
1
1ko
s
.
i�l'1'`ltS CCfJN`t'1 Al)V:i' OItY A(l NGY"MxNC, TEES Page 3`
Tdovember 12, 1980
T-:ri Cronlriger said he,hark a memo :From Tqm Reid.
@ Lr. kleid saZd cin the seg'}a�;e I. yout the clllbho'use ana ba'k;hhou.sr., nL�ta ;c
0 �; �
dil"posal would 'need to be shovM. The arra is }Rare and tl o soi.j. is t;oaa.
Areas might haye to be j vgf led.
Kt,, Solland said the density it 8. l.--a,dlh tale higher, Blatt ;l.he %aMUM
Allowable density Mdai the General'''Lan. Currently there is 1171 zoning t
he j -C would saxpercede tnat.�` !� 1
but ti
Mr. Streeter said the opponctts of the. project Vere concerned about
density Grid traffic. They would prefer shale fair�ti ly homes, He said
,
maybe this item should go on the agenda in case any more comments come in.
It can't go fon>~ard to the Planning Corcmissio'n at this point an;lmy.
Mr. IvIendonsa said the avaft document Svoauld hays to be cc rpleted first:
0
Ue said this project would only need to be 'discussed agtlti if betoxz the
c viroru>ieatal doc=ent 'is completed,,., something comes up vhich requires
�
A7vbll r: dis cuss idn.
Street�, said he felt it sho`ull be on the; t"LQnda itl t-wm weeks, and
i�` there `it's nothing to diseuss,�us� pass it on to the 'J,ann ng Cot tislion.
N 41 Vouldt eafor Nov. 26 and it there is
r.
w5i�h�n�13seLs�thestament4�nuc��berwle that a letter
reC:o=enda-Uotl would}!"be sunt on to tile �'�,\ anninrr Commission. /
7. paradise 'Blxi`fs Fr�elatri5na"r'y uLtbdli�asyoh, �1' 51-t3-10, 90 parcel
yl
access off, ooat�h ens of Airian, and South park nriv6, paradipO".
Pines area, Stlrlte or z Lipln..ott Stxrv`eyirtg d;
Mr. MwndonslA asked iP, the intent Was to hall bel Oxo VYater ori t,his,project.
� it
Li surve id "Yes
r
v .
Y
tc note ""Dtds received that theko`ect is not cttrx'�nU
firs uk�intzthesuisaid
t b bait �at �rovild be coiiAdel edpC� ojPi cl'A8ion in ac.cor(l�
Heat,
wl,th all apt''L� cabl,e'� . xo t�ertt1.nixea� tl�e Fixe Dopt . z:itq i ,emery'
t.
1rii. la"ippinco1�,t said ,he hjta seen a copy,of thorn. He Voncl, 5zed lthat wad it:taMt
by #,oen bel.lb area.
1
�t
V-0. Vv)ndululIa w-plI unecl vliat Svaa inewit—a 'Ale! 'weak lilvP, s4ia pli ll
�,tatl. t��:nt t�te;i,5;w ctL�ttxc'ia�'rlr�•�er���,�1t'.tt�;u r Iie d�,�1�' `t hay�c anytltit�{; yu'l; :�x�jlti '�� ��',i.
llllwy L1dv the !.i"allft+-".l r�1�3�:� r�n�rr�` and .t'llG �taftie b)ibig.
1
�Jdrivavy 1981 d
,
l
4
BUtte County Plannin"Commi`ssion
As Gt homeowner. at %ynnwood Circf'l''e Y_�am opposed to any devol,opment such
as T)xo})osefd. S�Or asses., lrcels 4h-21 •-n7 & 68.
�Cdi'
herezoning to.Planne}rea Cluster will create problems this iWe" a is {)
N unable t0 accomodate.
a. Z`rafficr contesti.on on already over travelled; streeta "
"b. F%cess�.ve numbers of chilat6n with little or no open Ot`adt
p for"their recreat3.011. ..> r,>
c. *Potential for; overcrowding existing local schools c> Q
d . Housing units in 4udh large numbers in ,.a small area causes
° severd overload on municipal and utility services: `
C'cnoentrated_ housing units also can caused disputes between
`houveh ld's. �r sreakc f�om experience lig this matte„ having Uved
far OVyears';
� �r
in M61 f ary, 116usih faciliti(�'
, <
t� (/
Z recent y purchased aha Property at 4 ljynhwood Chale a my' family home
for several reasons s
ao tow density, single family housing area
bo Traffic f,,low ata minimum for the sttf0t;j of c�z3ldren
`
c. Close to schools with small numbers of childreei per classroom
xf this rezoning is approved all,',these factors will be ;negated.
t� c,
1 can rind no 101&3 -cal arg Cements. °td the R-1 zoic ng,, Though, r firmly
bel'leve d GROWTH is best. i�ie are buildin far `to many housing units
for o�lt5 Viers. 7n this aer'6isiVe comment about outsiders, let mo Make =
i
it clear ``that I am a thl td generation Californl:a Ratlw`e. Mi � famil" o°a �
oes cesboth sides iass;of ado: years.
California `rias been rtbuse�ci and ,its enviornhent diax,e�arded by
,total.,l:y
'gxuIbt developers and those m� graying here nce the depression
- 11in`�he rocess they have destroyed
searching for the lanaL of milk4nd hrtey.' p <<4'
the Land 0-" els
T am i'irmly and uh tl> erabl,y opposed t;o the xozoniitg this inearing is, to
(� act ub6n � (J
G11XON art 8 I ;
,4 tynnwoi C rcl e
a G
, 1, ,
January 7o 1981
Butte County Piapning Commission
firer ille, CA
Rei Rezonix c► .Property Designated as AP44.21-67 &' d8
U e neighborhood siararoundin tie ;'" o osed
As residents of the im�nediat g
as'ea• o:f'Aevelopmdn,t (d.escribed above) by E�rergla 'Inc. , �i6 x ahpto �
continue our strong objections against the proposed PAC development
of this property. f�
:•'fµW ackn;oxledga tha{; the property will eventually be (lovelapea�„ bate
xa Kioki to$10.,-' ntain our stand. that it be developer) as .;lows density, and • J
Ylot ner r y order housin gaa,.sty of liio in
4 � trsurr undid* nviy rohood�banma maintained* tho
/ feel khat a PAC:develo meat a4 reviadsl y
� r�
strongly � �► �' y P p �' proposed b
if wG
xottld 4i iac�t averselblaffpct thcahtuya] pirtopoo'sed PAC by Eve Inc.
er 1
f 'life.
:f Ke; t J- Ing = S ally atiu101ing
#2 LynniccA Circles #2 Lynnwood Circle
J
�''J
W Yes Going r Caroline Goiog
r
#3 Lynnwood ;CirCl . ,r_ #3 Lyrhxood Circle
�j � J/Iri���.. Cl'� ,�'"�Z ✓•7� L ( - ` ry y�il�� �y�M�V%. �/ V�� ',,t� " i i
Tanya Lila •� / (
2591 Toat !'o,1k Aye hkte �w•1 �vr" t j <
r.
1 � « %%) �✓ � ' /Y 1'C'• �� ���'Y� � L.r_LL�'I � .�`J.ld.rwc`;"',� �..
{• r yy
,,, „ � ! ,5 J '"�'�•'r "!�^ ��1 a ��" �r�� �..�.«"„•fir° �+`��rs,,.r;u��i�,a'.
r'r Y r
11A
� ,�.4 �..; � a � e7r�` , OGS �d►��,
w
i r.t b , "' r ani+.,,,•.,,,# .'
Iter De aErthienta .Metnoron"d m
Planning Cotumiseion 0
aao►�, Planning veparttue+,i (l�:
su �Ecrt 'a'r`af'fic' Impacts and Mit gatjo-a i. i the Area North cf Eaob
„ .,
Av(:nu.e, Chico wy ,
DAT� January14, '198'1
4
Traffa�c ,prabl'ems in the area _uorth of E Aveixue; in Ch�ic`b
have'`been ndersc.ored by�rh.e co`', ideratt� ori of tkxo Eastwood
.,
Oaks PA�ic. Tjje Etxv-ironi!.lental impact=pepo_*tL and TPl.annin.g
Departvient,+ Staff,.Repot^t ;rboth, cite ixcreased tr�Jrc re i
�ated,;to the p,00posed ,r4ev,/+ .opment a°s a plannizx cc7zacern
it the .'� area. Tvaffic, tr<'pt' is on; the residential 'etr`eet��'
_ --1 of t Paso 1�ayy 1 i aran±�� 1'Oy and White A�tenu.� ;xx�e widely
knowzi from , as;L- ,snd,`presbhtf experience. The,4'.,e �i�l awt�' stem
lar el O' d.,
g 5 prom they traf .ic �.r�crated by develbp�'enia no."th of -
Lass;en.. Since Lassen .Ss no 4.,,,c76!� riected to the' frGoWa; and
s;�:nce there,,are no, Collector streets Linking ty�als `�z>p��;`to` 44
East Axrenu� , .�� affiG 4rom these areas is forceU, O, ut,i '-A
the resx bntial streets of El Paso Way, and Whits AT,�enue .rT� z
for nearly all ,se'�uth bound trips to employment etd' commer
y,.
cial centers. s�;affic o o u n t s coaductedl by the Public Works
Dopartment""indica't:e a zte�arlY '1, 000 a Jerage daisy traffic 11
al ;
(AIT) increase do White Avenue, and . commensurate decrease
9't on s,_ Paso 'Way fo110wing, thee closing of El Paso Way. These
ch'S gas are indicative cative of the magYi .tulle of thrd?agh traffic
k, rye
generated' in the area north .of Lassen forced by a ,Iack of
� ot�ho ' 'lter�na°tives to utilize, these resident�a�Z "street:S.
Etrezx Without the,, develoPinerit of the proposed prod act through
�f a c Vii" I Con.,iaue to increase as a rest of W ecently
a;ppro�ved' subd,iva sa;'`ons no t of Lassen The a" taChzd map
dppic s these lots and thy,' `p.. r
s rely �tiori�h�. to the a eas
f; a ' ows that,, a1
`street system this xr� graphically s
these rxe�v d6velopmi.nts Wha.ltr, connected by collector 8t.reets
If sen Piave oni'��y tv�o' means tl paso Way and White Avenue
to Lai
to get'to Last ac sVto thesePlaza and the 'ree aye
"
G,nnse uentl .. ti aroas' Wi l increase
q ' ? ) ;d bmeL , � in th. se
'now
G51 ,Gass yy��
rr FH W
�l
in direct• property n . to she rated ov�
Rather thati add to ;i1e tvjgtjtc itnpadbs of the area, develop-
0
of +,he ,tVer--Glb �ropert`r mci� provide` aft
pportiia�ty5
perhaps tl,z :Last - ub rza '�y tga e these :traffic imlaacta i
ll pr4pbs :d b t;?�e ` 'kiln ,c Works, Dep xttrieftt andt re jecte
Ora g
t g p
I d
'k b the hoard of Superv� softs as a result of net hbearhood o
r May pr 'tion d ma``ocollector through property and, a tr f-
p
' fj& sen it;,,°ve-, Jrosign. vide the "btlyk means of mitigat on
fCprthe site remain Vacant.
o e t were deux ed _,and
v the
�ho�'Publi c Works bepartment also suggested the development
of a 1'.r6ntag? ;road.,, 'king "Lasse�l inr��th Past Awelew ,xYx
)
v
Plann'Inn Commission
-
Page
j January 14 i98'1
addition-, to conflicting with "a major drsi_-nage channel and pro-
ducing , a poorly designed intersection ai',, the ort -ramp, this
proposal would �coIst _ an esbimated three oaarter�s of a million
do lavo." As a consequence; the Frontage road `'al-terrnafelve r,+is,
71 con.sider,ed :infeasible.
Figure` I' graphically deP:i.cts some of the ma jo:r, elements of
j
the development ,of a major collector through the property
t6mbined 0 i th a aff'i c lens 2lvo., design.: This alternative
ii involves the novthexly extension of Tom Polk via a slow
curve to 'an„ aligrimont
1 ap'; roximately oppos te�"ol' Codman S?n
;
'
,.r`�( assn'. The of!
L
set a Godman could be correct,;ed at alater
t
`
�,J date. Develop'(d within a HCl ,foot right -of way, the street
can be designed to accomodate a design s,peed., o;> 30 to 3'S
p
to t.heTstreetcc-anebec' limiaedtbyfthe usef ofcaccesststr psct,
t
the",minimum needed to allow for ingress and egress on the
1-,
property. Res ,denti:sl Unit developed to the Love Density
Residential (1-4 du/ac) density' standards could be "located '
�
on' the eastern portion con'siSting of approximately .4 acres.
These units, could back onto ,ithe exj�ension of fi�atf Poi
and
take their eccess via Pl Varano . ' Access to the�� M ruins
on of
Tom PAk' wotiid be barred, b an a ass str p deedstrtl10
y
;he
Goun.� an sound attenuate �g'wr�
'yy �yd to'e be CC7nstl'l
l Ctd ��11.
the eaot side of this ))prop6%ed 8,, 1 r Residential
units �`;.
C�W.� l'
developed to Mali um p, lns�.-�r`�';�es�u�.1t ial (5 g du/ac)
'�tanda,��,
could, be .,d'e'veloped ora the,;,westeriy ,tWo, portions con,
isting
of 6.5 and 2. � acregs. Abcess to 'these ,clust,�ored t�hA
is 'could
:
be limited to" perhap;�,, twig Locate; tins . ° ,A. site design 1 hi ch
orients the dWel,lin.gs`,�Way From the street should be en.cou�-
aged. A sound "�ttenuat�,�ng wall or fence could be provided r
ft�'r those exp eta i', dwe;iAtgs on the west side of `I.'om P61k
oiide yards whi�4h front on 'tom Polk, _The intersec-
tinn1,�bfPolk and tasty Avenue could he sigtiali�tod and-,
r
Tom
coordinated with; the signal at lad Paso and tact Avenue (or
the =F, signalg The
Paso dGodman
aiiduthispropos,ed.'
eveiatttaFl.reoalEl.nt o rion
-l"
o . ld i acili:tate the .future si alizati b) of this-,
of Tom Polk 'would �
* nt,ersectr ma as we�Lyl.
The oix dt ellattg Itcated on the,) east side )r 'som, Polk aria
" Xvonting on 'BOO :yolk would be, itapacted by the tx'af,`~i c e����
mated to be, in the 6;000 ADT �,Iva'nge at full bui.l.doui (l�;nvi--
`The
ronmental Review estimate) : ,, dwellings ori, the, vresf side
of Toni; Polk frotit.i't g on Panama and l:ryxiwood wo l.d 61s6 be
(: impacted 'tv this al,ternatzve but to a lesser oXteht,i;Since,
they fro xt on other stroe,s� 'fraffi.c impacts in residential
areas are �alWa, s undesia eabl e but nod', O,,ways
t.t
aA
,r J
,
Ila
r,
J
r
Pla
nni.ng Commission r,
,
tae
J u.ary 14 �;, 1981�q
avoid. The impact ori these six dwellings must o balanced'
p _ ti ' 's p 5'
against the e�mnen and �ncreasdin m act t,..lan other
ga�.n�
-- dwellings WitWi th jj neighborroo
r' ,%r }l i1
Wh�ife admit wily, ncAb_ Pexlfzct, the,, Departmbtt:,APelieve s that
tn' s alternative r-�pTesef is LbObest and perhaps only effec-
tive. long term 1,6sol��, ,ion, tb, the traffic problems in this �
r �(; St po�rides for an Auld other�rise ` deeded means
,' `ares-, of Chic . ,
of ` x;t.ducing hro�gh tz r� attractive e and disrupt
ff� a Which' w0, r
µ*
the no ghborhood, by 'px':yvidiTig .4, collector, designed ta, handle
thebe volu s with a minimum of impact." In acldi t�,on,
it
allows the develo me t of the Ever -Gla Pro erty'uncler tL`
Awa
delsity de'signations (Low and Medium DensiyResidential) ,
�
,
sensitive to the, ,se Plan of tadjoining uses, as provided for the propo,s�d,
he Butte Co
Chico Area Land Uunty General. Plan. %/
This alternat' would permit a development with an- bverall '
�oeerisity dfPerhaps 8 �dwellings 'per, acre and could'e
found eonsa atent - th the General Plax : .v
CW:o
Attachments'; Traffic Counts
Figure i i Map Showa ng ,Project 8i;ta and `
2ecent Suladirvi si:bi� = r Fo` the Ptorth
;of �
F lasse�i r,.
, planning IJ,epa'rtmerit 8uC4gested
%Altern6ti4e
.! .i %) I/
`/r
•i i�� - � tit
r
n
d�,
yP
r
TATSl,UAI td 0. L,OCAhON: „�v Lac AS -0 WAV Nom." Or /Ts Iut�n. Wiry �' ��r /�v�. �ROAq<'Ml1MBER
J t.
WEAK HOUR coU iT , TRUCKS - % t k,
DATE 24 HR. COUNT A p i"i s P,9 ------ „ �
MIU DAY, ' !d TOT'XL uOUt� i
,
Z^
ar
�-4 tj K i` w n n
!f(u -'.•,v , s r,47.' �,i '`'v 7-6 1�, tz.-154
33 a
Aj
tiF
TA`i10P1 FiO.,r l-OGATION. D'N l/ir'tirr�,�►��. /`/�. o� lrs' /N�� 1jA/r�N ROAD'�dUNHER �^
ti3 As`r A�%• s a
,
t Ott: NOUR C011t FTRUCkS-
bA'tk 24 HR. COUNT A.D."(: A MID bAY fP m L COUNT
3
,
,
51
1.4
J Ya c'3 :,Rif
46 ,
Z
r�
f Stit � ,1 hf� ..,., � � iJ -�J '� ti f7 ni• .�' c)y �+ I u � 1 �� y �.. ����tt
1 1 �;. .ti � l •e.? � �. F t [�ti n
...._. _ `
U
Cd S
'� � •�
t
• � •N/P
/� � [+.
r :, _ .
�'�tz{' , � � _ � '
}
1
1
(•
„ „ { Lq s:t�r=lit
r
bo' Wrc Rfw
Mryprr�� ,. L:rsc,�.�cy-rcaR
o Pa,eM A rAM?
VA A
4'.jp OES14
,• .�rr', l�r~ � �/ i� � „� r..r �. � :v � �y� /{C. /G �A�t✓'l1Ql;,L�i JY�.'C
�ro ,Pcovr v r '� ��. ✓,� �, ti�
• i1 b� +' � y a n
? i• t
iI.>s'
rW.r
,� 5 intGt F: ar7 r s; R &��iicEr+-r.4`5
e
fiVeer ON YARA%
E•a•57 A Kt'� t Or' "
A.PPA6 X l M7 ) -r&4 Y
S,.'4 ACi 20 0cvay.,Lrnirts
If
�.'
cMirlJr _ �D.,N iJvtrc �: rrvms is 4'
i
I,
'-ro tAL 84 17w�L�irye.. �
11 r .
AL k
u
it