Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
BUTTE CO. PLANNING DEPT . 78-23 3
t1 Chico area were also obtained trc,m that stud. Motor vehicle pollutants directly attrikiu.table to the proposed development represent only 0.2 per cent of''the estimated total current mobile c source emissions. The contribution of ,,the above quantities of carbon mon 11 `' oxide pollutant to the overall area air quality,was also esti- mated. Traffic attributed._, to tt,h-) development would increase, the carbonmilloonde eoncen,(tratior,,br the'Chico,area by 0.0004 Y par pet This concentration incrPase was based on peak-hour traffic anc? a mixing area 'six M i'r--�'4 in diameter. The �iY p height of` the. mixing layer was assumed, to be 500 feet. Under Sortie circuIl Aances a mixing layer of only 50 feet is possible. Under this circumstance the concentration would'be,increased by a. factor_.6f 10. Internal: Traffic and Parking Y - The preliminary geometrcs of the internal roadways of the development were revi: i�-_'ped. Internal roadways are planned to operate i,,':l two directions with no perking They are 24 feet wide cu-rb"to"w"curb. Maximum traffic Will occur at the ,Tom Polk Avenue access,' point if the'access at El Paso Way is closed, f' Traffic there is estimated to be 750 vehicles per day.:with 70 vehicles during the peak travel, hokar', The pavement width is adequateto serve the estiri'ated traffic. mekit 1l6cause the roadways will be open f <at', ',`g as a street system ,.s;erving the residents of the develo p , geometric design ;Aa7ridards should be instituted that are equal to those required for subdivision streets. Care w°hould be taken to ensure that adequate sight distalice exists on horizontal curves] at inter (J sections and access minimum si ht distance in feet is the recommended g d Practices for Subdiv 'sion Y� Streets of the znsitute of Transpor.t'aton Engineers. The exit from the development onto Lassen Avenue will ' need to be controlled by a STOP sign. Other°prQject intersec- tions and aca,s points may require similar controls, depending upon the acttdistances available upon construction; The development ;plans call for two reserved parkin spaces fo:.each unit and an additional foL 60 s aces p `" general use by residents and visitors. Each space is off the 24-foot wide ;pa`vement at right angles to the travelL-i roadways. Space size (10` feet X 20 feet) will c'tllow vehicles »o maneuver ii A°and out of the parking space, comfortably. Overall there are spaces per unit. This is considerab' above the 0,5`,'to 2, , 0 i ) f treet s aces normally required form 1.t le fain'!)dwelling,' , dwellin P y q P Y' g units. ` 2ht nexcess over the normal. regU1remen'&s should adegL, tely meet 'the 'hoods. of the development. 6,,)A,cKaON FAUtNAN p dbNtULTI't�bTkArFid ktNr-1NE:eA y Summary and Conclusions U Eastwood oaks is estimated to generateadditional 850 ,an motor vehicle tri ends per da The effects P Y- of this traffic � on traffic flow will be most noticeable 011 �El Paso Way if direct development access is provided to that street.. That effect may be minimized by closure of the Fl, Paso Way access. Noise levels due, to traffic will be increased, on the residential streets of Tom Polak Avenue and El Paso `Way by the development tr/Affic. However, levels are expected to remain below commttl, accepted standards for the exterior of _residences. pollution levels will also increase with the addi- tional traffic. This .increase M'11,11 not be noticeable by residents and probably w ll'hot be measureable. Air Pollutant levels due to motor: vehic:-'e traffic will p.-pbably decrease in the long term E due to more rigid standards for!*ehi'c a emissions 1) r , Y t r "- tJ, JACKsW �AU6.�TMAPV ` z o { CO��SUY.TIIV�,i12��FiC�Nr3IN��12' EASTWOOD OAKS Traffic Accident History 1973 - 19 810 ` � Year Location of Accident Ty of Accident ' Total 0, Location' I. 1980 1. Toni Polk Ave, ' East Ave. 1 Tnjury l 2. 17.1 Paso °Way F7f East" Ave. 5 Inj : /S :Non-Inj . I 3. P1 PasoWay (be64ee1 Lassen €, East Ave.) 2 Non-nlj. z 4. El Paso Way & Lassen Ave. 1 Inj ./2 Non-Inj, 3 16 TTotal IT 1�J79 1 Toni Polk Ave. 81. Last Avc. t.y l Inj ./3 iron-Inj . 4 2. la 1. Paso & nasfi; Ave.. y 3 Inj Nritt-Itlj ; 8 3, Ll Paso Way 1 Non-Inj; ]: 4. b1 Paso {Jay F Lassen Ave. 2 Inj , 2 Is Total TIS. 1V-7 8 1, Tom folk Ave,. � East. Ave. " p 2 ` B1 Paso Way �r East Ave. 3 I,ij./6 Non-Inj J 3. 81 Paso Way (between Lassen East Ave,) 3 Inj . /l Noll" Ind,. 4 El Paso Way. ��t Lassen .�l � 2 yan-In 2 �... `1 �^ 15 Total SV+,: 177 l Tom Po 11. Ave ► €, East Ave: i 2i I'll Paso Way ._& Last Ave 4 Inj : %4 NonwIn jg lr 3 E1 Paso 14�1). (between !t Lasson 4 East Ave,.) 3 IAJ /I Noir"Inj 4 E! Paso Way Lassen Ave.., 2 Inj :%3 Notelttj � i J � ,j,}•} l y l� i� t it l Appendi,4 .I Y "67 .rc -VM Y;o of j1; J �@ Inti �'Y,j,` qr ACCIC1eIlt Al C/fof Accid'eat TOtalb. 6cation ��zLI' ' �gGatX011 V. `�1��7Er'rrr.i 1. TomPolk Ave_ P, � ,i East Ave.l Nwn-I nj,. { h� �' ip 2. 1131 Paso Way t 3f, east Ave. 2,fInj ./3 Non-ln ,. 6151 �k. 3 �l Paso 1 - , t Vay (between „ t "r' r Lassen �; Last Ave.) %1 I j ./2 N1on=Inj ' 4. E1 Paso Way & p Las s etz Ave . 2 Non- lnj -. � 4� , 'Total C! p V1. i 19V 1. Tom Polk Ave. I Lest Ave. 2. Il Paso F, Past f Ave. �don�ltija; y I .:X14 � � �-•,.,>� � � � i t� 3. L1 Peso Way 1 i 4.. .tl Paso Ouy r I p Lassen � f 1 /',�yyy� .y 1 1.IQs ��/.�{ Av�-.r i � 3 Ngtl"Iit )_Y 2p , ' V1,1 . IR174 l . Tom Polk 4 East Ave e , i, 2, El Paso tast Ave. 3, El Paso Way h 131 Paso Way Lassen AvoG btal I: 1I i.07 5 Ll Paso Way F, Past' . t Inn Total rp 1 , 0 N . til A-2 (General) 106ne ri (A) Uses permitted All uses except thosd for which a use permit: is required under 118" below are permitted. (8) The following uses are permitted subject to securj ;;x` , a use permit in each case: f, (1) Junk yards, secondhand stores, auto wrecking yards, used car lots', tra.ir6r safes and equipmer�.t sales; (2) Commercial distillation of bones, �battoi-8, auction yards, commercial livestock feed yards, commercial r'nill- ings, canneries, lumber aid lumber processing] tanneries, fat rendering, garbage fed commercial. hog raising, f?od and agriculture product,priboessing plants; (3) count" qy\ clubs, golf ooilrses, race tracts, ative-ins, ball parks, riding a,cademieI'�_bowling alleys, cofimercial amusement enterpribesj taveriY9, dance halls and.other places of recreation of a si,milar,, ,:haracter; (4) Kennels and small animal hospitals and crematories; (5) Trailer courts, construction labor camps; (6) CoMmercial airports (excepting individual or private airports and those operated exclusively for agricUltura] Purposes), " (7) Cemeteries, crematories, mausoleums; or other places The t`Ao burial or other disposal of the human dead; (8) Storage of inflammables (excepting for agricultural purposes); `' (h) Dumping and disposal areas �l a (10) Manufacturing' o acids, explosives, fertilizer, glue gypsum-, lime j plaster o,'P; par's j pulp and paper j beet -5 ga crushed "rock] sand and graVe-lj cement; concrete and/or f �..✓ asphaltic batdhing plants] boncrete and clay procluctL,; and (11) lndUf, ,riai _uses which might` be objectiohal by reason of em�isgibn" of noise, o fens.ive odorj smoke] dustj bright light,, vibration or, involving the handling of explosive or'dangerous materials* � .,1 I fi�sPEt�7xX Vim,• � � I� . .y rr C"l (Light Commercial) Zone (A) Uses permitted �� u (1.) Dwellings and dwelling groups subject to the building area, lot width and yard requirements specified for residential. districts. 0l (2) Hotels atnd motels, clubs,'lodgo'halls, hospitals, sanitariums and clinics. (3) F.etail stores and shots of Light commercial character and conducted within a buiy:ding . includingapplian ce stores,, nbshops, blaunderettess,.ttbess shops, druganer orlaundryagents and stores, fond stores, furniture storeb, millinary shops, professional offices, restaurar:ts,' s'hbL� ry ops storage garage's, studios and tailor shops, public utility corn mercial' offices, and other uses which are of similar character to those Enumerated and which will not be detrimental or obnoxout;;to the neighborhood in which they ,: ;:ce to be located. (4) qutd4')or advertising signs, new automobile :;ales and theaters. g perm (B) The following uses subject, to secur-th i : a use t n each case (1) Automobile courts and mobile home parrs. (2) public and quasi-public uses, in(. ?Iue ing ohutohes,, a (3)'" small animal hospitals, dance academ�iies, pet shops, mortuaries, used car sai�:s!, used or secon'l. wd gc,odsi, refreshtttent stands; service stations, dr��r�-ih re5tat�rai�ts and othor uses which are of similar charactet.6 C Tilt require,menUC of 5ec,r4on 2483 of this code azo modified � in 4_he following pa�rti culars for building Cites in C"l. zo c-.,S riot width required; s y , Minimum of width hall not be J.es.� than�7twen�t 1 3%,v i (2 5) feet. 'l The lot width requirements for res�,dential dwellings: iIghall. confbtm to Cho requirements for any residontial Zone (2) 8].de yard requiv-me is None excei.`� when the side of a lot abuts upon the side of a lot ''z'n an "R" District, in which case the abutting side yard shall not be less than five (5) feet; and except where the side yard on the street. side of a corner lot :4 7; abuts on a "R" District, in which case the side yard on the treetside"shactsbe one-half the front yard `quired in,) sR The side yardrequirements for residential dweyl'ings shall conform to the requirements for any residential zone. (3) Rear yard requirements.o Twelve (1.2) feet or fivo '".',5) feet adjacent to an alley. R-1 (Single.Family Residential) Zone (A) Uses permittede (1) One single -family dwelling per parcel, not ,includi g tents', trailers, or mobile homes; '(2) Accessory buildings pertinen`� to the permitted u"ses. (3) Household pets (but not incluain"ii livestock, poultry .LL or poisonous reptiles). 1: ,..e'(8) The following uses subject to securing a use pe'cm t in r: ' eak case �. (1) Golf cour •es and country clubs. (2) public and duas�.-public uses including churches, fir4`aou8es, hospitals, parks, playgrounds, schools and (� public utility buildings:, ._ r(3) Sa1�: tract. office. MQ` The provis'idns of Section 24"33` shall apply. _'c')PA--C (Plahned Area "Cluster) Zone !J (A)> Pu„;pose: Tho, 'IPA-C-11 Zone i.§ intended to facilitate the � ” i1 � e development of centers of residential or light comriercial activities or a combination thereof and related uses4kithout regard .to the traditional l,imitaLions on. .lot site, road f3,'ohtaga, setback, side yc-irds and rear yards;! L, Said° : ohe is to be applied only to areas determined tol ` be suitable for such utsest as evidenced',�,�by a development plan to be sbmit+.-ed by the applicant to whc Planning Commission an; to bt,' 44aluat� iby toe orence to exis Lij�g and proposed land uses, the bounty Gener1=al Plan and any'4�Applicablo, precise plans' The f,ihal development plan., as apprby ed by the Bdta rcl L � r �� G „ J u of Supervisors, shall be binding on the developer or subsequent owners as regulations for land uses within the zone: Deviations from the said plan (except minor deviations which do not increase the density &r intensity of any use, change the character of any use or introduce any new uses) shall require re-zoning in accord- ante with an amended development plan. Further; said zone should be applied only where its peripheral boundaries oan be adequately integrated with tre surrounding public road system and surrounding zones withoua creating nu anceat from, noise; fumes, congestion or other' causes. r (B) Uses permitted: if (l) Those uses which are permitted in th(. C-11111 (Light Commercial) District without the necessity�.,=secur.ng a use permit, ((2) Servrcd"' Stations (C) Uses prohibited: All other uses of land not specifically authorized finder Section 24-126 ('A) ',`/above are prohibited. (D) Lot regulations,, There, -shall bee n Width or frontage no setback, ,.y side yard, rearard; or lot ui_rements 1.n zeas zoned "pA-Cu. PtbVidedj, however, that where aCi'PA-C'' zone abuts a single ox,,multiple family residential- zone; the setback requirements of�',lie abutting �l ?'residential zone in existence at the time the "PAC" `one application is acted upon by the Planning Commission shill apply to that portion os the cluster zone along the boundaty,%',Common 4 w, to the cluster andlatesidenttial zone: provided further, howeverr �`; that no structure Within a "PA-Q11 zone shall. be located within `tcn--(0j feet of a common property lane between "PA=C" zone and an abutting single or multiple-residential zone: i� (E) Access requirements. " Access to each lot or to the common airea serving said lot e, shall be providec:in sccordande with the requirements of ,Chapter '20 of the Butte dbtAt-y Code i,ndluding the improvement .1ltandards set for,h in the resolution o3; standards adopted puts ua'a11 IL, thereto vehicular and pedestrian movement in said dluster parcel adequate for the use intended shall be evidenced by rights-Of way or easements granted on a final subdivision map or rit3hts- of-Way or easements granted by separate instrument pursuant to approval of the toard of supervisors, bdgirabl:e minimum width of any such easement a.s twenty (20) feet. f (F) Lot coverage. u , No lot (when considered together with its proportionate sharO, f any common space) shall be permitted building coverage greater than that permitted in the "C-1" zone for an equal size loc used for the same purpose, l , (G) supersession. Tn: the event the'regulations for this zone clearly con- flict with the t>cM's of any other, applicable ordinances of the County of Butte except Building, Electrical, Blunbing, and sewage codes, the provisions hereof shall. control. The provisions of this ordinance shall be construed to; be in harmony with all such ordinances unless clearly in conflict therewith. Any subdivision established in a Cluster zone after the effective date of this Ordinance shall be deemed to be an "open Space subdivision" for the purposes of .Section 20-30.2 of the Butte County Code. (n) Tmpi ovements, All improvements within said zone shall meet the requirements of 'Chapters 191 26, 27 and 28 of the Butte County 0,10de (1) Minimum area. The; minimum area of any "PA -C" distript shall be three (3) acres. „ �- (J) Off street parking. Off-street parking shall be required pursuant to the following fo mula (a�) Residential 08es: Two (2) parking spaces 'for each living unit. (b) Offices: One (l) parking space for each 400 square feet of gross floor area. (d) Retail `stores: One (1) parking space for each 3'00 x square feet off:` gross floor area; said parking area may be owned individually by the owners of more than one lot in common (K) Procedural { Any application for rezoning to Planned Area -Cluster shall be�laccompaniecl by a preliminary development plan to be submitted to the subdivision committee for review and report p0,6�suant to Section 2013 of the Butte County Code. As to form and eontent`> 5 „ the preliminary development plan map and the revie�•t` process shall conform to the requirements of said Code for a tentative sub- division map.. Upon receipt of the recommendations of the Committee, the Planning Director shall set the application for hearings as in the case of other rezoning applications. I S } tate of Cgl�f�tni�i � us6ness and Transportation Agency mEm1Mo*rpndun ,event Smith Date; ";ay ` 22 , 1980 � Denuty, Division Chief bCTP Department 95 Coo.r.-U,� i! .tor File �;. Chico Rezone From DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTAvoN c, Subject: , i tx�ict '-!as revie' wod the .raft Eli nor tie �rot�osr�a rezone off` 6 5 acres in the n.orthe=—, Chico area to Porn The c;locument` reco�...n.i.-es an existing •traffic circa;Iati,on 1?�_o'nl em., Alae touse o:"' locA7 access �Y ��� vs for orimaryr-a:�-ea' ciw culat or_ oorridors; .�.o',ielrery �.t ;�.o'es not -ssess tho impact o� tz� r aQdle .. an ,.he 9-,ir_t.�rc.ian.�,e rw'u�,�. �,.ac:c_ �:.cnosal -�Yepa'� �ancJ. ��_e Of t�.i u,-joe :fie relo „ a. mibsta.:tia.l Increase in ` 3P �YeE'I1 at ��{, ,1'!E �IeT?ue I" ortG ibounr-1 o t�." 'c'1'T1'? T�!� a .e �^ i Vp11Ltp �.. W t1t 1�701J2! �?_lxa�Ili a i 7r :l •fir, n -r 't Fes? f acali tl e;^, that acla clot-er ? o operating car'icit-Y. ,b t; a nould be not'?t 'flat direct acces8 at ..asae revae is not liwkel;v ',o be a l- gIII wriority nor Ca.itra'ns:, `` Wt ; inclusion gra t: o8 ;ate L: ansp ortaL !gin r_,o rare i s t Y wZ'�t {'Il -t 3i�`1 `^l1 �.-uxe� ; Je suggest- -.-? ; Ocm tr ,—an,����`r tip: ii t c6A;3id1er local -tuad 1--l.18norlea.U:..on Ooibmis s,.iop � Cs also r�-"Jui:'y',ed .'o,,! ne,v G.-,4;�C"�. con— t�. �"r S` „,�v......vi .;�e +aC+.i.nU-'t'r ..:xlw ce�.t`�.'Ct Tlr• ,•?s..,�.,,31 .o...�i1T]:i J,..S�.,r..:....,. �.rS1.�I,. ..._�G,;..._.w�; , ,.,.. �..� ., ,.1 w 1, a _ �.. �1. m o � W , , Fes.: Ss i nvironr ohtnl IR6yiuw Not, ,.: JUIN °, 1980 ^" Bui'ita Gcuni VEpr t 1 1 2 . Address and Phone Nuns; er, or 2roponent i 101 Qamino"Aguajito Mon •erey.7 a'orn, a 939.40 Ringel & Associates 3. Date of Checklist Submitted` 4. Agency Requiring Checklist `•to 5. Natne of Proposal, if aoplica a +astwoc�a Oaks-w-!Jr-ezone . PAO '14. 2 creating 12G DU on acres. Il, tgVIRONMENTAL TMPA J EEx p all "yes" and "maybe,:. answers are required ( of all (Explanations on attached sheets. YES MAYBE NO 1, Earth, Will the proposal: result in significant; a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures! " b, Disruptions, displacements,` com- paction or overco'vering of the soil? , c, Change in topography or ground sur; face relief features or :removal t.f' topsoil? d, Dest`L`uction, covering �r_-mod x�Ga� tion of any unique geolog3C or physical featutto? fl e. rnci'eese in wind or water erosion of soils) eithor oil or off the site? �. f, Cf-ianges it), deposition or erosion " of beach sands, or changes in silta= tion, deposition or erosion vWhich may modify the channal of a river or straam or the bed of the ocean or any, bay, inlet or lako? g. Loss of prime 6 t, ii1tuta.11y prc" dtictive soils outside designated' `? urban a,reasl C, At�i�'e d ix ., ' `. page cif 7,-737,',NO YES it ;�� h. Exposure of `people or property to geol6�gic hgi::L ds such as earth.quakea , landslides, mudslides, ground failure`,t or�-simUar hazards? N 2. Air: Will the proposal result in , a, Substantial deteriorvtion of ambient or local air quality'?- '' 0 b. The crdation of objectionablei odors, smoke or fumes? c:. Signifi� ant alteration of aid movemenIL, moisture or temperature, or any�change in climate, either, locally or,: regionally? 3, Water. W111 tho� roPosal result in substantial: p „ s.. Changes in currents ; or the course or direction of water. ,,movement s? �--- --- ,, b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage `+ patterns, or the rate and amount o surface water runo,Ff? ' C' drainage c. T7eed for, off-site surface .-�.: improvements, including Vegetation removal, channeli.zation dr culvert ; installation? 'd, Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? C) e, Change in the amount of surface0. water in any water body"t J,.., f , Discharge into surface haters ; or in any alteration of surface 1kater, quality, including but not tt , limited to temperature; da solved oxygen or turbidity g. .Alteration of the direc'tio'd or rate of flow of ground wat�ys? h: Change it the quantity or quality of ground waters, either tliroiigh direct additions or withdrawals, or through i.nterce'pt�.on of 4 an aquifer Vy cuts or excavation.s? ..: o F1 Appendix F page 2 of 9 ,i ft �.,. YE8 MAYBE `A 10 `-- til V i.. is Reduction in the amount of watn`r otherwise available for publicAe- water supplies? E,'posure of people" or property to water related hazards such as flooding? � I ; 4.Pla—nt'. ife, Will theproposal p ro osal result in ~bstayi�.,aal I- a Lass of vegetation or chane in. the diversity of species or number of any species of pl�.rts (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, .; microflora and aquatic plants)? b. Reduction of the numbers of any u -t qu&, rare or endangered species opl; C. introduction, of new species of plants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenisment of exi8tiing speciesE� 1 { r d. Reduction in acreage of any a.ri- r cultural. cro ` ?, 5. Animal Life, Will the proposal result in subst,,`ntiza-I �`. a,, Change in ; he ,dlversa t orf species, or tiumbei�,."`hof ally species of ;> animals (birds, land animals {L including reptilos, fish, and shell= fish, benthic "�orr;ah8ms) insects or micro fauna) ? b: Reduction of the ftLtmbells of any . r..� unique, ra.ro d.. endangered species • A .D a rntro��� uction of now Sj�eci,eS ' f II 4r..iim4s Otto an area, oM �, result A barn et t - I C.lie m,.'i;ra ` .,c-�p o � movome. t cf anliaal s?,0 Vj, n_ d, Redd'ct ;,on of, en' roachmerit upon,., T deterio`i r n, to exi'sta.ng fis�;.- 5 ,,, .k ,,.,�itat? ,r ,. ;, y Ainpen�i.c k' Page" bf 9 jj '? IV r 'SES MAYBE NO h( 6. Noise;. Will the proposal result ifi) subs t ia1. i a, 'Increases In noise level b. Exposure,�of people to severe noise levels? 7. Lif,,h__t and Glare, Will the proposal sig—n!Tlicant light prod ce or glare? �f 8. Laid Use. the proposal result\ ro 'Willy in a significant a; Alteration of the planned land use of an area; or establish a trend whicwill h .lead to such alteration? r� b. Conflict with uses on adjoining �1 properties, or conflict with establ„ had recreational; ed.uca- c j. tional. rel3 ious or sciiLntific 4' rr l uses of an area? 11 J „ 9. Natural ttesourccs. IJilll the proposal : result in substantial., Demand for, or tncresse in the rate << �J of use ofany natural resources? b. "Depletion of any nonrenewable natural"resource'( .._.. , 10� Risk o U set•. Does the prnposal f. , involve a,tiskofanexp , l.osi� hOx r� j the 're ea a'8 Of haZar:dOus Sub Lances (Includin�, but not limited to, oil) -; pesticides, chemicals or radiation) � in the ,event of an accident or upset conditions? ov ' ll Po ulation � Will the proposal signiticantly altos ..the locati.onY - distribution density, or growth ra,t: u of the human population, of an r axe or, phyically divide an �, i' �ey� t+�blisl�eti ObMmunity7 �. ; r I 2 , 11e� 8i.ii . , Will the proposal �. „ s'w icarttl.y Affect eki:stiWI hoi-sin�`, ` or o�.os:be a �,emand dor additional �, �`�, , ., A Itibus X11g? Appendr.x r -page 4 of L IVB YDS MAit3 NUJ' 13. ,:. Trans ortati6n/Circulation... Will, the>,. � �} p-oposa ,j result in; , A. Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement.,? b. Significant e£fect•.s on existing parking facilities, or demand for c new parking? ` C, Substantial .impact upon existing,'' }' ;. tra.nsportaton;�systerrs? = , d.: Significant alterations`to present , patterns of circulation or movement of peoje and/or goods;? e. Alterations to waterborne, rail orf , air traffic? �.. f. lnc.:rease in." traf fie hazards to motor vehicles., bicyclis'%oredestrti ans? �.y,, 146 ` Public Services. Ill the proposal have ; ane upon, result in a substantial ect or�i ' need for new or alt: eyed governmental services in aiy of the following areas „ a. PVire p'ioteGttionl, l C_.� b , Po1 ice protection?' _ F..� } " o Schools? � d, Parks or other recrea.t tonal" �' �-f,acil,ties7 e, Maintenance A public facilities`; including roads? f, Other governmental services? P OW C: 1.5 tnerg , Will the propo8al result in; a, t1se of substantial amounts of -fuel or ettergy? �, _...0 0r,:, b, Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy, or �t require the development of new sOurc.eS of energy? 16, utilities.,. W�il tho proposal result _ " in a need for new s: sttM8 or sub" stantial altOrt.tions to the following utilities i> ,, Ap`, r di:k 'r -- page 50f g , „ YES MAYBE NO \. a , Power or natural gas?113 b, -Communications systemst.. c. Water? d, Seger (will trunk ;,ine be extended, providing capacity to serve new development) ? e,. Storm,,,�water drainage? 4� 17 Human Health, Will- the p7;oposal result in a. Creation of any Health hazard,. or + �in ,,potential health,'hazard (exclu: mental %alth) ?i 4� b: ixp osure �df people to potential health h4axds? 18, So1.id Wsste, Will the proposal` result-} ;� any significant impacts -associated ` (� s disppsgl or, l,iLUt r(i S.�itholid traste control? �7 19, Aesthetics. Will the proposal result UctiOft of any public t�`o.o& des d recognized scenic vista de g Hated., o�; j ` open to the public, or will the ptop 6sal rest tin the creation"of an aestheticallyol:fensive site open to publicview?, 20 Recreatiwi, Will the proposal¢;, result iron impact upon the duality or quantity of existing public recces.- tion. facilities? „- 21. , Archeo—l--o-I7 /Historical , { Will the proposal a tt F alteration of 1/ -it 7J - .caµ archeological or hi8 toti�. , structure,, l 7 i al s.lt,o structure fib, ect or ti,�i' lding? 4 , 22, Mandatory Vindingp Of siStiifitatce a. Does thepro j ect have the potential ' to degrade theualit of the ezivironmetit, substant allyreduce �1 the habitat of a fish o� wildlife spec -,es,,, cause a :fish of wildlife „ Jry U GtiVLto drVp below GJVWs elf ' � Appet dix b - page 6 of 9 y YES MAYBE NO sustaining levels threaten tqw, 'a eliminateplant or animal com= munity,'reduce the number or restrict �i the rattge of'a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate impoa.'tant examples of the major periods of California history or prelhistory? � b : ' Does1i the project have the, : potential to ach'eve short term `ben'e;. its to the detriment of publicly adopted s long-term environmental goals? c, Does the project have' impacts which are individually limited, .�but cumulatively considerable? (a project may impact on two or move separate resources where the impact ,on each resource is relatively small, but where ,the effect of the total. of t,hosd(iinpacts on the environment signa; , icant , d. Does the project have env ro�,6entai effects which will Cause sub taftt aJ. ' adverse a££ec;i.s on human beii�igs, / ' either directly or, indirec 'l? _ !� c_•, J , „a t J t� App�endit r page 7,b£ III. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENfiAL EVALUATION Summary: The Eastwood Oaks PAC (planned area cluster) proposal was origio'nally proposed in 1977 (ERD Log # 77-08-25e-03) and proceeded through an E.I.R. requirement to eventual denial`when it was sent back to the ,Planning Commilssion for consita.;eration of a modified. ro osalAt the time of this denial the .�._ .., p p � project was withdrawn. Denial was based primarily on significant traffic pro- blems and the very, controversial nature of the project. This pro i,,Ject is only a slightly modified version of that 7.977 proposal.. Vhere before there was to be 1131 Du/14.27 acre..q-;, now there is to be 120 DU/14.87 acres. The subject project has become no less controversial. as the interim years have passed. in 19177-78 when the previous pro ject�,was under consideration, hundreds of letters vehemently opposing the planned area olus,ter devel.opmext were received fro.' residents on all sides of theprojec-V ite, These people became organized at this time, and after conversations with various residents this past month�it is evident that opposition to the projects stronger that ever and that these residents will fight to the end'to block the project. Several years bofon) the .residents of the area successfully had the subject pz''ooperty, .rezoned to R-1 & A-2 so that the project site would develop 1along lines which they felt were compatabl.e with their singlef.�mily residential: neighborhood. Since the PAC was proposed reoidents of the .area have even got together and made a reasonable offer to buy the subject property, to no avail.. Area residents, r area due to the approval point andconstructo the lproblems which arose ionofthefieriLyn Garden �Apartments ' along El Paso Way near Lassen Avenue, The extension of El Paso Way as traffic h. condition of pro je 't approval. unleashed one of the most severe problems that been C,°'�( ountered in the Chico area. (The El Paso Way traffic problemo have,.,aeen yell documented in the reoent past.) Theoe• problems led,\ to a temporary closure of the street at the Lassen intersection. The extension of 'Tom Polk Avenue, as a winding roador so l to thePaso a local oay, and the addition of an esti- mated parallel traffie volumes from the Eastwood Oaks project, would have serious, :far-�reariing si8n.ficant envih- ro meh' al effects for the entire north Ohioo area, Envie onmental impact, concerns and oomments t l:. b. Approximately 7-8 acres will be overcovered with 1z6erv3.6i s j materials. This representu' about 50 of. the total lb�nd, area in question.. `\ A,ppLandik F pager :�3 of 9 Discussion (cont) 2.a. Increased vehicle traffic will result in a reduction of local air quality. (See 13.a for traffic info'rmat�on) 3.b. Over covering with impervious materials of the soils will result in increased storm water runoff. Runoff will need to be accommo- dated by project drainage faca.J.i.,r"des. The Shasta Union Drainage Assessment District ?itch 3.s locG!ted nearby to t1le west. A drainage plan" needs to be fInal zed and approved with the assistance of the Butte County Department of Public Works, 4.a. About14 acres of prime Irina loam soils which are currently in (5, the open land state wil'i "be placed under urban 'residential uses The land has been used ;for agricultural purposes in the past. Mae to the valuable soils onsite1one of the reasonable alter-- S natives would be for the county to aquire the:land and develop'e it as a park for north Chico residents. There is a lack of available recreation 'space in the north Ohico, area for adUlto and small. children). G.a. There will be Increased noise from '�7esidential use and from increased traffic. proposed. dwelling units and proposed road- ways are very near existing residences in some spots. Any r:�'oreational facilities will also contribute noise which�7 , cumulativel,v result in a decrease in privacy for existing residentsT lncreased`'noise is an unavoidable impact; if the project is ap�1:oved. 7 There w-111, be increased .l.ight and, glare which s -rill result in a decrease in privacy to nearby residents and may become a perma- neat nuisance if dit-beted toward sleeping quarters." a.a,b. The proposed development does conform to the �3utte`t;ounty 4eneral Plan. The pro,poSed density of development is about Z U/ -s,cre. The area is within the Chico Urban area and is a developing residential area. The site Lies within the Chico Sphere of Influence. The Chico' general plan designates the area for re8laen- low->densi Yth most of designatiotlh( southern iZoningthe in thearea sive being In their IS' primarily R-3. Zoning of the northern portion r,f the site and, lands fur;cher north is R-3 subsequent to the North bhico Rezoneapproval.. NIEP zoning occurs along Lassen Avenue to the northwest:' grid t!j the northeast: The proposed., re tone and subdivision development may conflict with exi:`sting R-1, single-family residential uses in the area: The resultant popul.atlon increase from the development will be in the 1.0-400 people range, based on 2,6 to 3.3 persons per dwelling unit rates for urban residential area's, Population density in the area will, increase considerably; potential density;,, :1 Of development is 8:1 dwellings per acre, �13,a,c,fTraffic increases and ttaffic-relOed impacts will occur.jadding to the existing area traffic problems congestionand situations, circulation is heavy, often congested $during peak traffic -flow periods, impacts -from the devel.optipnt' would be long` -term, Considerable, and .unavoidable, page 8a liven the restricted access ca abilit the ex'istin traffic congestion and poor circulation (El Paso Way traffic probloms), the lack of turning- lanes on Fast Avenue' iand the increased de•'Jelopment._ north of Lasser Avenue (with resultant south -bound traffic 1 Toni Polk Avenue currently is a dead-end,local-access residential; s reet of short length. The project wfal utilize this streetf for its primary' access route, thereby causing most project impacts`t"on ghat street and at the., Toth Polk -east Avenue intersection. Some o'f the more considerable and important potential traffic ,. impacts from this PAC development inc+.ude: hazardous 10'ft turns (n.o turn pockets) from fast Avenue ontorJ�o�th.' Bl Tarso and Tom Polk., --speeding vehicles along these winding roads :..cause acoidt its and e pose severe traffic safety„ hazar�do to resId,;nts inclu, children at play and the elderly. k -the circulation pattern for. the whole area, i"I totally inadeg,uate. The traffic problems on Ll Paso Way - vra 11 be magnified as PAO resideAts use El Paso to get to the Lassen Avenue entranc'ei. if the Dl' Varano' exit ;1`'s o'pened up jtraffic' problot8 in the residential areA ifil l i omen still. 7 E � Traffic counts need t6 'be ,up dated with current a.nformaul� P., . traffic study, should take into donsideration oche entire L,uly-ta Ohico area and the existrig'.development trends. 'increased development in the area i -till cer ta:inly warrant an off'�ramp at the Lasben Avenue- - 3, h ay 99 intersection. l'he traffio to, be geriorated wil be in. the r�3 ;L,000-1,200 ADT range. Aaci.derit statistics are needed, an ;assessment ! f the speed- ing problem should be made, ote>., etc. services � . ,. .,• � , 14. The PAO proposal tdli be growth �ndu.eing to the various pulb:lic l4. ai, �� A, .Bi#. to Ootirity F`irc: bepartment station lies within abdat one m�y�.e from the site, oilOohasset toad. the devej-opmeiit .� . mu.stl comply - th -tht-,Butte County Vire Departmeht, vequjremen'tsI for kiydrant lo'rat.ons''. >'2ie buildiris must meet the Ctounty` s code ser �iriu�.'tip�e»�amil.y structtilres. c�, 14.b ie Sh',6tiff's Department`tr].11 need to include this deveJopmon.t's St` roetS .,fin itttjr6aular patrol. Schedules for the area,. D � 14.o,, S', npe the PAO residthoes a` ll be Wo and predbftlhu�lt'17 '�,hree b C,dz oom' dwel,lins y 1liany of the an'f lcipated X00 residers l� s will be 6hildren (a factor o� ,0,'S childreh.., e'er dwelling unit is a staadar4 measuro,usea by the l�ico Schobl ]district to ebtima'te the student ,population ' nerat a by subaivInion Area ,,Oohool use fi"em approximately '0 children is anticipwted, Area scheolo are rearing enrollmen-4 capacityQ ca Ap-15endi:t F -,I page �b cid .r .°Dis cup'si.on (cont') V) l 4. will be lmpacted,3 t„ ' ;� ` d Recreational facilities, . �•- ,;, .f, Other governmental services to be required rare building«,:`n- spoction, public0heal.th 3nspec'tAion, etc, 15; The developmP tt ,, frill result in increasedenergy demands rand consumption a�n 'the northeast Chico area. 1. oc., She fix,'olp,erty lies within .the California grater Service Company distr ci ,''near its northern b=idary. An 8 inch main water utl „11 e :files along' 21�?aso Viay and a 6 incX ,mama, line lies on Tom ..Polk; 'venue. Extension of these rec�rby line throughout the PA develop- ment will. be 'required, 1 . a.. the �Y pf�ent wig oa 8.1 cwev 3 ng units per The '�sail�;is of r acre., 7 �' p pervious, withgood drainage. mhe septic tank/l.pael�„ f1e7,d ys'tems for the developn'.on't mast be approved by. the Butte County nv3ro'nmental Health ;bt,partment. 0 p� 21.c. The ro ect'has .the fo'l�ofring'impacts iv`hiah, taken togethet maybe, cumulatively considerable: i. Covering of the soil by impervious surfaces (0 of°'tic total. tired.) _ 2. Localized decline La air quality from traffic, 3. Generation of increas6d surface water runoff. 4. Generation of residential and traffic noibe. 5 Generation of light (residential and recreation facilities.) 6. Increased use of ;;natural. reoouroes r 7. Orea'tion of o, higher density of population than --ca :1,; A -tor by the General. plan of Butte Countyi 8, S�abstant•ial. generatibn o,+' traffic onto existing 'residential ' „ '. streets: :�� Alteration of the;, a�^ear s cii•cul a't3 cin vatte�°iis and impact on,.area intersections, 10, increased demand for public services, „ 11 lnore'ased demand fo'x util:tties) energy. The existing 2'. S. R. for the previous 8as'twood Oakes development pro- poral. is iaadequate and outdated. A new VD.WI. should be „prepared using updated info!Omatl.on be Fore determitk+Aor is 'lade on the pro.poued project. t.. 4eftaix P �r ,Pagd $c of �►' ,; .� 1 , IV.: DF'''?-RMINATION:.. t. `'' completed by the Lead Agency) On the iasis of this initial pvaltiat�ion. I find the proposed ro ' dct COULD NOT h `J P P p a ,_ � ave- a significant; effect on the envirohme�ntr and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION ` ;; s ruc ommenaed fraI find that although the prAposeu;,projest could have r, 1 significant effect on the environment, t,her iii l,,,nbt':s be a significant effectrAn this case because the it mitigation measures des�iribed on an attrached' sheet hate been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION 1S RECCOMMFND8 ,a nitic \. find the proposed project IBX ha, a s� g ant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. f'\ • Y , Date `. *•� f .,� (.S (' E , nature icefar: ENV nNNiEN�I'ALiriE,J AI:PAE3C��iCh"P� _ 4 \ ReVi'eWorb by ✓. , fir . 2, Earl Nelson �d NiivJ.•ronfnenta]., 13evieW Di.rsatoIr 11 t1 • AppOhdi.x r? �- page s�i ,rr 1 .J 5 '-Comments received pertaining to" the drat environmental impact report on the Eas,twon'd Oaks Planned. Area Cluster dey,l,�pment, \. and the Vnvixonmentafl. Review nireejtor's res"'Ionse tot'th ' comments received. �( 1. Lefiter of Certification From the Glearinghouse, Office of Planning end Research, Mate of. California. L, a. fetter from Cali forma- 8htc {Vater ltesnlaces Control b . Memorandum from "Tom Reid of theButte County j ]hoard. a-.. my Dnviron- mental Health Depl,ytmen't in response to the Water +' Resources Control,'Iioard letter. C. better -from the`,,)C'alifornia Regional Nate -=r Quaff i.ty- Control Board= requesting the applicant to file a Report of Waste Disch&rge with R.IVQCI31. 3. ,La,t td l i . ' d Mrs. -i sep i from Arthur C . Lehmann, l�lr an a. I e,tCor itions from • 9U ne �.ghbcxs Rem I? Review Director. l. ` a. ,,,�' Response of. the hnvi�onmenta 4. ay Mem6tandttm f�-omJgil.liam '1`eie,�lSutte CountyT�iri Warden, b. No response necessary: . a. Memorandum _from nil.l,iam Chaff, Butte! County Public ,Works department, :: b. hravironmental Rbview Diro-cto s ::response, n b. IJetter from Robin C,, Tl oinl5son, 1 co Unified SClto;ol )lis�,trict. Mejnorandum fromhe City 'o ,f. Cljco Plannip, Commis ion; Oce of ;P:lanIIIft , � 8 ..• it mo ran titin t r „ ��nn Vnnhart P " I! ° om 1, \, 'lute Cou}%,tj� Rrivirdnitiental �( IIea1t11 lle`partment. �. Additional Informations 8ftvironmontal Review bepartment „ 4 f 11r;ix#8 �L�,l�l1�iC�Y 11 Jv GOVERN,.0k'S OFFICE OFFICE OF PIAN IeiiNG AfJlb. RESEARCH `� r .; 1400 TEN'iH STREET Y„ ! 1 y SACRAMENTO 9581 3 �: ,-• s: dpi{ul, .f BROWN .IR �.l�MUr�fD G. , GOVERNOR, U.) 1,<4ovember 24, 1980 RUIN cou"Myi Mr: marl D. Nelson , c, ' Butte County Environmental Review Departffient ; 18-E County center Drive drovil].e; CA., 95965 SLT, O'h,tT. S6A1# 6010.0-l5 EASTiT00POAKS SUBDIVCSION, AS D .RE2ONE�r Dear Mr. Ne15oxlr I State �;rencies haSTe�;commented on your, draft environmental izmpact 0 �eppz,t (.see atta'chct) . if_"You would like "to discuss the d n,cer,ns anc >>_�ecommend a�,Ions in th.e'].r chminents i contaci`, the staff from t'z j agencies those names and addresses appe,�r nn `the comments 1 " You'may.. formally rasrond to the agencies'comments by writing to, them,. including the State Clearinghouse n1..mber on all such co�..ro_ s ponaence." When filing the flLftal EIR you must include all comments 1 an!: responses (State> EI,R Guidelines � Section 15146)6. S tate review 0,r' your draft document will then be complete, To aid in pre oar in q,,env';ronhieneta1 assE:asments on future projects, you s'r.tu� d, seed to at- aEf encSies and the Office o Pl ar tying and Y�-�P s -,p � ,ecl b;r ia_i3 884 and P.esearh u\ur Nc�tic gra, 'P.c . arat,` ' n a� escr�.k. Seut:Ii.on iso 6,6 or the E..,R Gi14 dela. � s it If yriu would care for ast � , .. � �'`�..cj�,�sibl��aw,e�c,iasanorc.�a ire coon- -ch Y3'istanr , o ane' Reseal is a' a1,1tJ-jI' togheI ^� �i C1 \ti ��r',y4 .n 16 q , Y ILn� z y� d na�aon rneetin inNdal,� di u os an hold consolidated heatift Tu P leap " r contact Anna Po� ,vo o s W. (9 i6) q 5-0 C14 3 'ou have any questions r 1a � 4IItsbft ,,�1�he VL, Y t Sete C�tea�inrihouse t4d at l.:dchmem,s cc- Von ellows, WRr F� I STATF; WATCR RMURCW:'gNTHOL 00ARCI 1 INTERNAL 11IiEiJi(� yr� , T©:16hId Ifuddleson PROM: , J1'm Parsons HydriigE�16gic/Ueotcchnit a:I Section, �; Tech , . q.ry,f eeQ division FFv ti ATESIGNATURE; SUBJECT, I%TR Cast;wo,6d Oaks Swbdivision, near Chico, Butte County (SCH .80100785) L Ci.r►d ti�,d subjc�et document does not con�Laa►i at adecjuati� d3scuss�on of the envitonme'htal,,impact�s� I 0-v'thc,vproposedl use of septic tank,�'•leachfield sewagw �r t', 8 argil The d toted anP 5 t1.c tank etflueat from 1270 dwelling; uric C6, on „ di s >-esa�.. 'l'Ite d,Ls os� 1 0 ,, n tut 1 200, lbs/year nitrate per acre. This quantity �jT':lits that frtsm alae` s�irrounding sul.rdvisions could have a serious cumulative, effect on the Greats groundw!arer :1., "lncre`7se in TOS, C1., :end NO3 co�irentratinns •�, liaise the groundcaater �cvels, perl aps to an elevation at Which effluent surfacing will occur. (jltigaLxve m`eesut.;es should loclude s�wering the project and�iy�ahr�.: construction 0L' a i.reai mens pla nt for �Lhd� p'roject,A the p,", , ect to�''ether wi4LJr� the surroundifi` „ 1 ( VOSident.ial a'rE1'aa, ut �.OnTICCt' .ng the s.y:gEe�,• c the (; I ell r' �✓ r�nX�ronm�rA�ol ffwta� p�pi. Inter -9u Mem'nrandum artme4fal DEC 5 1980 i TO' Butte Pounty Environmental Review � � r x' FROM: 'Pon Reid, Chico,Environmental Health Eastwood Oaks Subdivision$ RerAy to State Water Resources;Con)rol Board Comments _suerEcrc 4DATE! f. December 5, 1980" + ii The comments express a conce: that ,the: development will ��ncrease ground 'water r ntaminants Since the troVosed development represents a sn'iall percentage ;. 1af total. area devei^.�..eeibt on -syeptic Mani k systems, We do not expect,, a measurable Icl ound `.dater contaiainants . : A cumulative increase area round �' gr g waterac'e,r�am1.' p , � i with l �;, y` 'This , s with .p , ....t to ` ' . The,2 R®gional 'Water 'Qua13,,.ysCe;n�,rol BbardlSecollecting data:.with ground water quality, It is expected that an extendedperiod of, data eoilection ' and review will be required to determine i£ therevare any local ground Water Tf quality trends. The second concern expressed is that sewage, sug °rfacin could occur-: Septi d tank �,rstallation miist comply with local and State {Vater Quality Control Board „� requirements.. Sewage surfacing is not expected to occur except due to norma!' I'l aging oz abuse of the septic. system. Health 'Codes"require repair o£ any system failure. TR/les cc: Tbny Landis , 2� , i a STATE OF CALIFORNIA --RESOURCES AG 1 rNCY VDMU,PIp diiOWN JR., G1�VERh1bR -CALIF6R.NIA REGIONAL WATER?- UALITY' CONTROL BOARD--� , CENTRAL VALLEY REGIO 3201 S STREET < SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 95016 r PHONE& (916) 445.0270 21 November 1980 ) ° Ringel & Associates 331 Wal ), 'Street Chico, CA 95926 _ \\ EASTWOOD OAKS 120 UNIT `PAC, NOTH CHICO, 80TTE,, COUNTY Z., ge our di�scNlacou'Id affect.the water Since d� s o� the state, ,you .are requested to ` y r. f 1 e a "Report Waste bi sch arge with this. off ce. �.�; f ,>>FThe Cali forn i Water Code re ui res any person proposing to discharge; waste to ,,,JM with thee' Regional Board !la report of ,the discharge containing such i nforma- � tion as the 8o`ard requires, Each report shallobe accompanied by fili"ng fee. The Water Code further provid4s that no person shall 7 discharge ate��ahthe e Oirements, the expiration of wast'e prior to the issuance of waste discharge requirements, of 120 days after filen a, completed Report of Waste y g p p ischarge, or the Regional Board's waiver, whichever occurs first, Enclosed are: w Cx] Instructions, filing fee schedule;, and, blank Report of Waste 0 1 scharge form , [X] Additional information requirements -\Land Developments f' When we receive ,the complet6d report contain!ing�,t,e additional information, if required, along wy;th the apppl'cable filing -Tee, we,�wil'l formul,,ate waste discharge n eequi remdhts , ar9. The anon,sid"redcomplete until I of ias oCi onmerital traltAall provis "'. ' . within 20 ng fee should be submitted to Iii s off 7 cP All information and the fi l � � - days from the date of this letter: Please contact me at (916) 322-1552 � `!f you have any questions. 0 ANTHONY J. LANOIS, P,E= zJ Area Engineer Sacramento Watershed # Enclosures ASL/cis,. cc: gutto Health ben f, ta'l Peview Butte County Environment �1 a , , ��t,✓�� C.���.�'7LGt� �r�l/�'LG.�f'L/�7' �7Zi"'.��+,+�rl.L4 !t./ J t:> �}� �z��� ,��,�';.� ,�� ^ ��.� � .� y , �� d�-�.� ��� •may �,� l� �� C�Gd:+J ,,�,•'C� �✓jCi�GG-C:-e"�� ,iL� LX � (_,C:�'��..t+C�f..G (/�r^'''r' I �,G �� ���` • �� �,`�'/�Gt � cam" .� �,�:�- ',�'fd���..�..� 4/ , i Mr. �a�+,d �Mre. thu r C t" h" ? 1 492 Panama Avenue `Chico, California 95921 November 2%, 1980 1,3 ilt�Y�h Ca lai1(iino ti~iljCl w Butte County Environmental Review Depar._tmep.t 18-F County Center Drive fJ�ovill Caiiinrnli Oroville, California C"') Ge dUeme n: Enclosed,-you will find the s gndture,s of ninny (90) neighbors whose concerns v regaraing the proposed Eastwood Oats • subdivision and rezone ott parcels AR,`-9, �. l 44-09-13 and 44.421-002 have been expressed on the, attached fl P pe t `tions My wife and .:Z share the concerns of our, neighbors, and feel, that the cleercera o 11;, ,tion of the area in, terms of'�noise-, ,-photo--chemical. pollutants, traffic, school U imp�!ci i:on-; dangers to pedestrian dnd,,bicycle movements have gona beyond the lkmit;s of good planning -and endanger what should-- (under, ordinary conditions) be ani expected lifes ter t e ; d) 7 r � �� 1.. � ,!t _.;e � � � r-,G i +._. ,-' /'-.. �aC 4 .�..: •oi ^` rte^' �. f''Kr h1f. \ -,,. r a.�y �t.«.•f? wg. b� t:5 �GtL'' C1�S.i kl .L?. �:,>� * 1. �i:l e t jTo-{ r:olitAmu];1�}-ill ac ,_L 3j �l�r safe ect of l dstwood Oaks Ever low Co, ". ,,,.We do' rezone attd h pro- Ir and uncongested enviroft mens pro- is , hall,enged by the propos J ( g �� � do hops, that the cels listed above will, be developed. accord ,,: Lhe tonin il; 3. ''`�nich' par- op g .. now is essi'�nod the, proper y, , t I the market for 'blies . t e.� �f houses' I'd the b- Vii' «at ahroug.hout the >Chicc urea single family r6tidencesJare being constkucet� at latest rePorts are thato yp t t,h it has beon'in years, Furthermore, profits are high;?enough for developers to insure continued cons trucbion,,of these Lyp2rs of�\hom,�`s. In short ,the high denslt su es ted b , 1Jver low Gonstrucl:aon? Co. fir/'exceeds the R-1 des` nation Y ` g$ Y g- � n g and would result an a heavy burden on lova ,eesiuents along the eaviron'mental lanes set out abovd, ��.; It is our sincere hope that your departmeri`t will re;jecr, the p'xoposed pro-, ,sect scundly on the basis set out above and others which your dei — tilleiht no doubt ordinarily evaluate proposals. While we are not pxofe5saohal p1,an net$, we have witnessed the damage' t6 our heighborhood over the past few years through impact oft, running heavily traveled toads thrk\�ugh resi.dPntia`l area'; and a wide variety of oLh'er causes, t`]e.are ilireat.ened�and angry at finding ourselves in this situation, and We dl'pea.l to you to help us re�ive the threat of a high density development and all that goes with, it. 8i.'ncere] Arthur 'C+ tahtann t~tsr;r�n�+ei 4ci( )iwviaw U*:)t. „ "y' I t'i s