HomeMy WebLinkAboutBUTTE CO. PLANNING DEPT . 78-23 4_ NEIGtIBORHO
A OD PETITION
WE THE UNDFRSIC,NED,RESIDENTS WHOSE HOMES ARE ADJACENT TO THE PROPOSED EASTWOOD
OAKS SURTIVISION, PROTEST THE REZONING OF AP #44'-32224, 44-09-15 AND 44-,21-002
�0 FROM R-1 TO PAG, (PLANNED AREA CLUSTER) . ' OUR POSITION IS; BASED U'P'ON THE ;FOLLOW- -.
ING REASONING- (1) THE 120 TOWNHOUSES„ CREATE A DENSITY,FAR IN EXCESS TO THAT
AL6WED IN AN AREA DESIGM&TED R-1,; (2) THIS REGION O.V THE COUNTY HAS ALREADY n
A SERIOUS IMPACTION PROBI:EM, (3) "THE NEIGHB'OPS,PUT GREAT EFFORTS'INTO CREATING
A R-1 ZONE AND THIS ZONING HAS BEEN Ul2i1FLD��3Y ',.IOR COUNTY PLANNING COMI4IS8IONS
II DIAD BOARDS
OFHSUPESVISOAND P:EDESTRIIOUAN � HEADINGS #�1 �b APPEALS ; (4) RESIDENTIAL; STREETS,•
n AT i �
Ic VATTERNS ARE A{L'READY oVERBLfRT►ENED;
(5), LOCAIr ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS ARE IMl?AGTEDNOW; f,6) ADDITIONAL r10ISE AND AIR
POLLUTION WOULD CREATE SERIOUS THREATS T0. THE 'ALREADY DETERIORATED CONDITION
AND'°(7; LOCAL CONSTRUCTION PATTE NS'„INDICATE THAT THE PROPERTY YS HIGHLY SUlT9b
FOR CONSTRUCTION ,OV SINGLEr`,FANZ?Ly RESIDENCES AS PRESCRIBED IN,R-1 ZONING,AND,
TIPRESCRIBED
EXG�:�T FO12 INC1c:.ASED PROT'I'TS THERE IS NO JUSTIFICATION FOR HIGH DENSITY
HOUSING. NAME ADDRESS
DATE
76
2. , �- /�'t ��
„
3' 0
' . /,
L�f
�� 2.7�'�
),c t/
,r
7-7
w
i�• /b
,
sai.C���tra.+ ac)
ib.
,
14
i. .
-
„
Clcni►ng
16,
'17
E•,1
4 ori
18
,
11
-
t'1
u ,
,
C
� � r -o _ fie' 4,. �' .t"•�'"Q"Y,. ;'�5asiii►� .. ._ _, . .
A 'NRIGHBORHOOD PETITION +10v 3 1°a0
1 t3cov4llet Ca iiaraiat
WE, Th� UNDERSIGNED RESIDENTS WHOSE HOMES ARE ADJ`At3 kNT TO THE, PROPOSED 1 AS 'MOOD
OAKS SUBDIVISION, PROTEST 'THE REZONING OF kP #44-32-24, 44-mOO'-]3 AND 44' 21-002
FROM R-1. TO PAC (PLANNED' AREA CLUSTER) OUR POSITION IS,-BASED
UPON THE: ,FOLZQW- r
ING REASONING: (1)' THE' 120 TOWNHOUSES �;R, TE A DENSITY FAIt'IN .EXCESS TO THAT
4 y,
4ti ALLOTJEfl IIv AN AREA, DESIGNATED R-�; (2) THIS'-REGION OF THE Ct7UNTY RAS ALREADY
A SERIOUS IMPACTION PROBLEM; (3);�''THE NEIGHBQRS PbT GREAT EFFORTS INTO CREATING
,J A R-1 ZONE AND THIS ZONING HAS I' N UPHELD BY PRIOR COUNTY PLANO NO COMMISSIONS
AND BOARDS OF SUPERVISORS 1N VARIOUS HtA l' NGS AND APPEALS ; (4) RES xD :NTIt.L STREETS;
E'S( MAJOR THOROUGHFARES A14D PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC PATTERNS ARE ALREADY OVERBi=ENED1
(5) LOC ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS IMPACTED
POLLUTION HOOARE ICTENOW; (6) ADDITIONAL NOISE AND AIR
WOULD CREATE SERIOUS THREATS TO THE ALREADY D1TEAIORATED,CONDITIONS;
AND (7) LOCAL CONSTRUCTION PATTERNS INDICATE THAT THE PROPERTY IS HIGHLY SUITED
FOR CONSTRUCTION OF 'SINGLE FAMILY,ORES IDENCES,�AS PRESCRIBED IN R-1`ZONING, AND.,
ON `R
THAT EXCEPT FOR INCREASED PROFITS THERE'IS NO JUSTIFICATIFOHYO° DENSITY'
�
HOUSMG. NAME t 5 ADDRESS DATC',.
-7
r
✓7
-c
4 • r x j i r / C-� 1 '�!� 7� S'V 7`Cr 7Y U'w
54
t
-6,
o
V , y,, ,, y- l U
��:
P1.4
14,
15 RU IL
16, e4i
, til
17
I S u^�• t ,>rl.Q Q ,t w, prx-�-1 ,
IS" +" jj ti
l tl1
20 K tV'' 'jY✓L % 'Ir
i
foil
V'
� �c ' Ci!1 �ai��tl �,r•�DiY7iTr
1
,,.>t, x ��, aq
1
I
� 7 A "NEIGkRBORHOOD PETITION
i �1� �ra`(axti�iltY(ai� 1
t
WE-rU_NDtr S ICNED RESIDENTS WHOSE HOMES ARE ADJACENT TO THE PROP( SED EAS 3'WC�;�D
OAFS!`, yJAiDIViSION, PROTEST THE RE -ZONING OF AP #44-�32-24, 44-09-13 A�iD 44-2t �fl1W r�
FR(1:rtslt-] TC` i'AC (PLANNED AREA CLUSTE:;) OUR, POSITION IS BASED"UPON THE `FOLLI'?�
IN�� t�,R".,'vs0Z,"N'G "' (1) THE 120 TOWNHOUSE. S CREATE A `DENSITY FAR IN EXCESS WIas
TO T
,I1&142lf AREA DESIGNATED R-1, (2) THIS REGION OF THE COUNTY HAS ALREA]3Y
A SSI;, �'f US, j�;l ACTTON PROB`i8M-- (3) , THE NEIGHBORS PUT GREA. EF1OR'CS INTO CREAT : tG
A :R> f LOK��iIJD THIS ZONING HAS BEEN UPHELD BY PRIORI COUNTY PLANNING 'GOMMaISSIJ, NS
AND GARD svAUPERVISORS IN VARIOUS HEARINGS AND APPEALS' (4) RESIDENTIAtlk. S�L`R8ETS
MAJ� 9 THOi Q UGHFARES AND PIrDc STRIA% `xI AFFIC PATTERNS ARE ALREADY, OVERBURDENEn .'!�
tlGAI;+ c MENT�RY' SCHOOLS
ARE IMPACTED NOW; [�;,(6) ADDITIONAT, 'N07CSE AND AIRS{
Pg�[' 7�+ION�;IV�OULD CREATE SEitIOUS, THREATS TO THE ALREADY •DETER1,oRATEDCONDTT�����i3,�
AN OAL CONSTRUCTION PATTERNS INDICATE THAT THE PROPERTY IS HIGHLY' Su 'fit
FO�� ONSTP CET�ION OF SINGLE FAMILY A STDENCES � PRESCRIBED IN � R-,1 2�ONING' Al! 1�� r r
.,
' PROF ITS THERE IS NO JUSTIFICATION FOR H
Tl�se, EXCEr INCREASED" PRDENSITY
,
bIO�.�SING, r
HIGH
�� NAME ADDRESS r DATE;
� h n'w/'%i�'�kf-t."��,,�,��1I7..,% ,2 5'�Z, E•� �ao.o u L'!! ' 0� "':/ �C!{r� ��� L�'� �' �7
i
y1'2xA&A
�-7
�•� 3 tl1�./�✓i14/ '�f;I�I _ 1.w:�i 1�i� �I r -�i ,•~+`y 40 1
�jt {� ���1�'%�%"""`"' e�e'`� ''✓ (yii�� bye c Z
443
>
,,.
�
G,t
:
,
l5
i4.
I j
181
+
lo
s n ,
o"
„
�'.rGl9 lt#
allCo. C(�rnin
A �NEI(AWd tl OO1) PETITIOfl
WE; THE UNDERSIGNED RESIDENTS WHOSE 'HOMES ARE ADJACENT TO TUB ;PROPOSEb EASTWOOD
1. TO, PAC' (PLANNED AREA CLUSTER r ciUR P081TION4 s 4k . Uutiw`lx3 Ojq 44-21=002
:
FROM lt-. ) �. 32 ~2 IS- BgSED UPOtd Tllr
G
AKS SUBDIVISION PROTEST THE RE -ZONING OF AP ��44— r1
ING REASONING: (I) ' THE 120 TOWNHOUSES GR.EATE A bENSITY FAk 1N EXC�:SS Tp Tkt:#x
ALLOWED IN AN AREA DESIGNATED R-1; (2) THI� R1 GION OF THE COl1NdY HAS ALREADY
A SERIOUS 'IMPACTION PROBLEM; (0) THE NEIf;HB09S PUT' OR.EAT EFFOR'T'S 7N"0
A. R-1 ZONE AND THIS ZONING HAS BEEN UPHELD BY PRIOR COUNTY PLANNING COQ �?` �SIONS
AND BOARDS OF SUPERVISORS IN VARIOUS HEARINGS AND APPEALS; Qj) REsIDENT):Al, STREETS,
R JOR TFtOROUGHFARES AND PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC PATTERNS ARE ALREAbY OVERi3URDENED.'
' POLLUTION WOULANTARY CREATE SERIOUS 'THREATS TO THEf,ALREAD:� D1'ERIOIZATEI) ��COIIR
1 r '-
SCHOOLS ARE IMPAC 3
CW= 6 ADDITIONAL NOISE
„_TIONS ;
AND 7 LOCAL CONSTRUCTION PATTt S: INDICATE C ) RN IN I ATE 'THAT THE PROPERTY IS (�jI�GHLY SUITED
FOR CONSTRUCTION OF SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENC=ES " PRESCRIBED'• IN Riml ZONING` r�AI1Ia,�
THAT EXCCVT FOR INCREASED PROFITS, THERE; IS""NO JUSTIFICATION FOR HIGH ,b8N$"ITY.? �
HOUSING.) 4/ ,
_..
NAMEADD
�
RESS5.
DATE
sly
cm
.20
•
10
alL
J.�i i• yr � 4.� (�x� 1��+,��1� � '� �4
15
s
164
04
I l7 a �.'G"•'NG�"f/v ��i/f��;.� � ! /f y j1� �� � �. y�) .j; %J } / �.."y � ",'. ' (J
t� 4
(� Vic. � i `—�` �,� (�,� `� ,•.
LF1er4+ 1 .�♦ �• _wl ' w xJ6 1. x.....`+xx ✓ .x}w h gfp�a�tif . A.vb'4YRl.
d ., �,,,� �: P•� � Ci3Si{� tif4• ��Oi1AttlCj �1't'if�7%, e
ANCTGl[8ORH( &D—L P9Ti ,ToN (�•
OV
ali i orriai ,.
WE pC� y'tl�i ThE
UNDERSIGNED RESIDENTS VEIOS HOMES ARE ADJAClrNT TO TOC; P(tbk�QSF ' �EASTWOOb
QAl:5
^� SUl DIVISION PROTEST THE REZONING OF AP �>E`A_32-24,1' 44-09 15 AN1�`�
44=21x002
;1�ROhl '-:R-�j TO PAC -(PLANNED AREA CLUSTEEs)�. OUR POS I�TON is BASED UPON HE T'OLLOW�,� s
'' > yING REASONING: (1) THE -.120 TOWNHOUSES` CREATE ,� DENSITY FAEz IN }CCk;SS TO r,THAT
1,
AL"LOW.PO IN AN AREA DESIGNATED [trl; 1(2) THIS REGION``OF THE COUNTY HAS. ALREADY
A SERIOUS 'IMPACTION PROBLEM, (S) THE NEIGHBORS PUT GREAT EFFORTS INTO CREATING
A '-R-1 ZONE AND THIS 20NING HAS DEED. UP�iirLD LY iPkIOR-'0UqTY PLANNING COMMISSIONS
AND BOARDS OF SUPERVISORS IN VARIOUS kEEAiWgGS AND AlWAL5;3J.DEIVTIAL STREETS,
MAJOR THOROUGHFARES �A.ND PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC PATTERNS ARE�`MAE-ADY OV1 3UItDEtVED
(5) LOCAL ELEMENTAR*r' SCHOOLS ARE ].M7?ACTED NOW; (6) ADDITIONAL NOISE AND AIR
POLLUTION WOULD CREr1,TE SERIOUS THREATS . % THE ALREADY DETERIORAT`E'D CONDITIONS
AND (7) LOCAL CONSTRUCTION PATTERNS INDICA THAT TEfE 1'TtOPERT'Y xS HIGHLY SUITED•
FOR CONSTRUCTION OF SINGLE FAr1ILY RESIDENCL�) AS PRESCRIBED'rIN R4 ZONING,
T`ElA'r EXCEPT FOR INCREASED PROFITS, THERE `IS NO` JUSTIFICATION FOTt EixGli DENSITY
HOUSING.
u DAME ADDkES5 lr DATE
1yr ..�''I M'• GG.a✓J, t�-0020
Gee"
ar
}
�x
c
bi Vry ,. \, �✓��V. �� , �,`� � ��/ 1X1
_„
.,r1��
13,
jr
16
1$.
I z 1
. ._ <. .fir'_ .... -:_ . ,... .,,.• r., ... .. ...: .. .. ., .., .. ... .. • -,. . s ,... ... ...
laIn 04M.I.
r L�ufi�
s A NEIGHBORHOOD PETITION �.
WE, THE UNDERSIGNED RESIDENTS WHOSE HOMES ARE ADJACENT TO THE PROPOSED EASTWOOD
OA!S~SUBDIVISION, PROTEST THE REZONING OF AP #44-32-24, 44-09-13 AND 44-21-Uo2 '
FROM R-1 TO PAC (PLANNED AREA, CLUSTER) . OUR POSITION IS LASED UPON THE <FOLLOW-,
ING REAS6PING.'' (1)' THE 120. TOWNHOUSES CREATE A DENSITY FAR IN LX'""`. TO. THAT,/
ALLOAs'D IN AN AREA DESIGNATED R-1; (2) THIS REGION OF THE COUNTY 1-;,,...)ALREAPY
SERIOUS ROkE-!M; (3) THE NEIGHBORS PUT GREAT EFFORTS" INTO CREATING
A R
IZONR AND THIS MS. BEEN UNIELD BY 'PRIOR COU%lTY PLANNING COMMISSIONS
MAJOR ARDSTOOROF SUPERVISORS
ISORS IN VARIOUS ;HEARINGS AND &'PEALS; (4) RESIDENTIAL, STREETS;
A;ND BOARDS OF SUPERV�3
. D PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC PATTERNS ARE ALREADY OVERBURDENEb;
(5) LOCAL, ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS ARE IMPACTED .NOWS (6) ADDITIONAL NOISE AND AIR
POLLUTION WOULD CREATE SERIOUS THREATS TO THEgAEDDY DETER:,fJRATED CONDITIONS
ARID (7) LOCAL CONSTRUCTION PATTERNS MDICATE'TFIAXk PROPCRTY IS KG14 Y SUITED
FOR CONSTRUCTION OF SING AM LY Rj,'IDENCES AS PRESCRIBED IN R-1 ZONING, AND,
THAT EXCEPT --POR INCREAS' R TS, THERE IS NO JUSTIFICATION POR HIGH DENSITY
RoUSINC,:
h ,, ADDRESS DATE
23. �.
Li
it � O '.,. � .• .. ' .
7
r
vi
11 J l
/ r
12:''1 ;
r�
14 i ;>
16, r
17
20.
„
,1 �u
rti -
II T i•.
lii�vi:roiimentaesponse to the letter
l cAev .ew Directors r
,y
from Arthur C. Lehmann, and to the petitions circulated
in the neighborhood.
The identified impacts res=ulting from this RAC level'-
opment of noise, air pollution, increased traffic
cor,gest,ion, ' 3xazards to . pedestrians ; and 'additional
'`
demands on area schocl= facilities have 'been ade4uately
ddressed ixn`the draft EIR on pages 10 through 1$.
1;
,
Basically, the Lehmannr�..�-•a.n'd the petitioners ;have ex-
pressed the existing environmental problems from area
4
urbanization ('particularly thetraffic problem of
"using residential streets for major thoroughfares) and
the desire to maintain the 'prevailing R-1 low density
development pattern.,
: A
J
„
�r
,
.� CI
,r
Inter-D®randuna' -}
To; 4arl ,Nelson, ;Directbr of Env ronm n �a Review<
xnwran'monfa{ ,Royiow ,Doy�t.
' FROM Department of ;'ublic Works �
''- 7, 1980
rj sUBJECT: ' 'StWOod Oaks' Subdivision
DAtrli October Z% 19.8"0
'Pollowing are our c6mments relative to ttie HUR for the ''abovr~-noted deyelopmeknt
1. We nt;de in the list of organizations consulted, thatPthe County Public,, ..
Works-bepartment apparently Wai'not, contacted'for final cnmment5 on this
document. We had previously discussed this projoct"Twith development enginopts
tihen it 'was ccalled Ever`-Glo Pac and advised of some of our rec�uixemen ts. $Ve'
couple of the requiremen.ts ere conspicuously absent in'the ' R
2. We requested q sired that 'Tom Pg7.lc Avenue and El Varano Wad be overlaid with lk; t
'inches 6f asphalt concrete. These roads are old 'subdivision roads and the
additional traffic will cause them to rapidly, deteriorate:,) Some patching
prior to ovoxlay will be required. � ,}, `� �
ttpp
a ,
3. 14e asked the developer to deposit funds for tralfic signals at East Avenue ;
and Tom PolkiAvenue basud on share of traffic generated. We don't agree With
comment's under iteia ll, l691;`e` 13, that traffic signals. cannot be installed due
to proximity to the signal's, at ElPasoWay and est Avenue. Pre -timed signals
can be installed to handle this
n
0 q
a)f:, Clay bastleberty
,
Director af. PPublicWarks-.�
� �, Aia
'William Cheff I 71CI
r Assistant tirect-p+-,.
„ WC:1ts'r
CI
17,
„
I
, t
ED
\tl rry�, o
;\
r�
V. ),
Environmental Review 'Direct o`r's response to the conunents
from William Cheff, Butte County Public Works Department)...`
".'.
The i;ZIZ fob t}ie original 1978 PAC development proposal
has
tieen utilized for this current; px�ojdct, }vit.h some
revisions. The Public Works Department, land development
section wascontacted and the project file ;from Department
of Public Works was reviewed for both propo"sols (1978 '
nd
y
15,80), The lack of reference was" oversi�gilt thF�
,
, .. ..Also.,
EIR- process does not,,no;rmally identify all Public Works
Department requirements,
Z.
The fact, that Tom Polk Avenue requires asp}lalt overlay
ward: in order to accommodate- additional project traffic
further emphasizes the f ,,�•t that the area was not
r
,orig=
inally planned for intensive development and that area
roads wore designed only for local aco.ess only, residential
neighborhood traffic, not forthoroughfare traffic, or' for
collector street traffic volumes.
3,14
The Plik incorrectly identified the traffic signal° site` '
uationon Last Avenue. Signals can. be installed at Tom c
Polk Avenue even � t}rough t}ie lel Pa':so IV ay intersection is
beat d y hundred
e d feet away (developed) with
otrafficesl.�lnal.s
' y e , Signa'lization of, the Tom Polk/
`
existin g
tast etntexsectiori will boneccssar y to re14uoe , txaffi e
rongestion: M
Jr
,
,l
u y1
C)
n
1163 EASTSEVENTH STREE"4
:> CNICO, CALIFO#tMIA
0 AREA CODE S16 r�891= 3000 '
y. A,
Wit August 223 e,1980
come.
Butte Count, Advisory` gency AUG, 2, 61980
7 County Gt: lter Drive
orovi l 1 e, Gal i forni a 95965 tJr�ri i� Safi
Gentlemen.,
.
C1 The Chico Unified School District Administration has received and reviewed
the tentative subdiv sioh map for Eastwood Oaks Subdivision; (AP NO. 81-9
44-21.67 & 68). Students who,reside 7n this subdivision would attend Jay
<LL Partridge Elementary School, Bidwell Junior and Pleasant Malley Nigh schools.
I,toder present Board policy, all of these siudehts would yi alk to the schools s
and no.bus_transportation would be m;ovided.
Becaas'e children living, in this subdivision would be walking or riding bicycles
to school, we strongly suggest the inclusion of curbs; gutters and sidewalks
i'n the proposed developmehti The Chico yni`fTed School District ->-the Board
of Ddueation and the administration of the Distr,,fct-=-7s it favor of safety
for children: We do not oppose any development because of its pard cul,ar;nam
tura,, but only in 'the eventthat it`ihCr-eases safety hazards for, children:
I't should be noted that this area of Chico is eX erienolnq_conside,eable growth`
andf}that jay Partrid e t'lemer,tar' School is e8L-htiv near ca aC�It is
possible that IMI the future the District Will need to cons; er alternate means
of housing any elementary students-who will live in this subdivision, These
alternate means could include such--th;ings as bui`1 ding a new school, es;pahsion
ofpresent schools, or bussing of students:- Any of these alternatives would
obviously requ'�' a,"conSiderable expenditure of funds;
Wo would appreciate your consideration of the above information in this matter`s,
° Very t r U'I'Y yourS3
Robin G'Thom son
f;)
Business„Manager/Comptroller
f✓ for
Robert J, Jeffri.os, Superintendent;
tt-,, Leonard Whi tegon
Noreen Rosso;
Don Abbott
Robert J. Jeffri.ps
P "' ERt��EI'ARTMENTAL REV,IEV!/ � EQUEST '` ;'r•
LANK NG DEPARTMENT' S .INT
��
TOLvtL 1 Vathart -� Enyxr6kmeo.`tal Health
RE66' EST., Heyieta. & Qgmment'
+
NO. X81-9) 44--?'I-6� &, 6�'
_ U
SAP
+r
DE5CRIP ION Or"PROJECT: Rezone from 11R-41" (Si gle-Fam iv, t r ixlenti.al) and
"A-c't
�} s
PI nn Area Clusters
`
_ u
�y
LOCAT))ON: of Tom'&lk south of Lassen Avenue and vt� B bof El 1?aso, Chi co
APPLICANT: X1j7..S.L� n P�vert; (Ever--G1.o
loll..-1„
AbDFESS l''�' to; Morateiy. CA 740
OWNEa
PLANNING COMM 1S510N AG,TION SCHEDULED,
,�ETL' N DATEgREOUESIED: ASAP' �� R
n
A 't
OAT
OATE DISTMOU`r'ED,'
iTTACWMENTS: ;tlpy o"` appilcation $i plot plan. r
RETURNED Z ''c1br
,
commENT' s, 4.q
4 otr `
,ot
rpli�sLy�c� ��� " �L'..sl::st.y. e ._ ,-
.
r•
Ail ,k
:��,t1.i 'i}t.,.Yj�.1,�,4;si� �+ ^'•�§'LHtiZ ,;;Z.�4 , ..1ll�t.t:`!_:��L _il%•f`�C'rG:, li�rt'tt �Y � (R/ 1T..�`Wolr`tk�{ ,
0 C.'
t
NU+
w
r
r
,
r
1 r
9 o Additional informati on being added to the Dr41A DIR,
c,
Eastwood Oak's PAG Divelopment, in response to ima "nts'''
made at the three public hearings of-the Plann'h'g J
Commission on January 7, 1,4, and 28'.
1. An alternative development plan has been designed
and proposed by the applicant in ~response to ,tfhe
0
Planning Commission hearing on Jan�;ar' l4, 1981.
The new plot plan 'has>>(further reducedh the number
o-F residences proposed from 12o to ,9If , reducing,
�1
the overall (density��from 8".1 to 6.°s dwel Zings per
acre (7.8 DU per acre in the R-3 land area near
Avenue and DU per acre within the southern
1asse 6.1
J/() , This redesign to 20t fester
total units`' ill generally reduce environmental J
impacts resulting from the project, including run,o££,
�f noise, traffic, and aestheti& effects. liloweverr,'it
�l
is noted that any developirient in this area (when e
overall densit ,y' ,is generally higher than typical, ,.and
„ where open s ace is IackinzjWlill increase triwffic
P P
j and traffic impacts, patetftially causing add 'cional
congestion on""area St're`ets (particularly on To,m Polk
f Avenue and at East Avenue intersections) .
f
The proposed traffi- co'ntrgl signal on East Avenue
Gat Tom Polk wif')l alleviate considerable congestion
problems, ro os���ili ie ,lb,u bumps across the
P' P
educe
evel,o mentTse
streets through--
,, 1- p.,
1
traffic and excessive speeding: Also, the redesigned
, I
plan�7-ha8 eliminated somi�, o ,) the acc ss roads that
reious ,
�; were previously located imnedriately "adjacent to
h adjoining prties,' thereb " r��ucing
residences oz,.p y
some noise,,.air pollution,, rid aesthetic impacis
and .and use conflicts in ;,e noighhorhood;
:.
�i � ,,. development,
2 Tral£ic increases from this c.ttrtent� PAC o
an are now prof e'"cted to total 720 ADT (850 ADT
p=an
'under the earlier plan), primarily. affecting, 'is'
ff
c� to Tom, Pa.:lk Avenue an East Avenue (500 ± AbT)
with an, estimated 200 ADT increase Lassen.f,
Av6mue"frot the northernr,,developmefit unatse By
comparison, if this 14.8 acre property were to de-
velop as currently zoned (fit- l and R- 3 densities;
an estimated ,;inc'rease of 600 ± ADT mould be ,generated
''
from, the 'Property,. w on1
,hich is 117.0s.0 ADT, (16%) le
thati, the current P:AG propbsal L (See page 2 - top j`-�
Vfiile these specific residepnves that are, .'onst%J-1ctdd
;..
on-site wild. Eincrease area'Arai�£ic« volumes by,,'72"�
ADT. total tr"affic incr-a;`�es on-site aricl on Tom Polk
Avenue will be substantiai�ly greater if the 'route
through the proioct site becomes the mayor north-'
` south collbctor, street :dor this areao accommodating 0
sore e.istx g. Ei; Faso ''ay traffic loads, as well at
additional traffic f.o'm growing areas tUV-ther north.
01 0
Note i" One reason for this J::,ck of substantial
difference between traffic volume increases from
the, two `types of development is" due to different n;
traffic generation rates:
- a.) Multi le -family condominium units typically
are smaller than single-family residences,
with fo-er bedrooms and residents tier' unit.
Avera daily trip ends generated by these
types of units have been calculated to be r>
. _.. 7.5 trips per unit.
ba)' Single-family residences typically are
larger with more residents per home (and
�therefore more vehicles, genefally) . Average
daily` tips generated by these units are 10+
strips per, unit. The `existing R-1 area is'
approximaely 11.4 acres and could accommodate
a.mA d 40 in homes under,
an est ale
Ideal de g ►:, and development conditions.
T'xaff-ic volumes on existing area `streets have increased
c�)nsi' ecira y . over xecentn,!years The T�'affic I=mpact
al sus contai1nec� in `Appendix III oi,) t is ,•I was
yen .p
e wri en�'ar► 1978 for the original 15 un' ti PAC devel.o .
ment and util led 19'7'7 traffxc,,volume data. Figure l
s of that report was modified for the current 1980-81
y proposal :to znclude 1979' traffic data (ttze most recent) ,
i� but gftS not opt°herwise "altored. The tedesign of the
project to 12V.units and thence "again to 9( Unita, re iii
duadd the magnitude and importance of prol`Oct tjraffic '(
duce (p y p Cage increases):
eases artt�+ilarl erten fl
Y . } a .: i Q
E{owevery c increases and dongesti�n
are areh cor.'cerns�since existing area densities are
greater than 'typical . fov single family tesiden•tial
areas ) since lands north of Lassen-Avent:te are rapidly
developng,,and since area circulation patterns are
poor and inajor north south collector streets do not',.,'
eXist in . the vicinity (refer to Planning Detmen ;r s
ntemorandum'ol �7anua•xy, "14, 1981 to the Pilannin:g Com=
mission, the 'Norh''Chaco Rexof,%e EIR; and Appendix til
of this tig where Caltrans notes that Lassen Avenue
acc��s to High -gay 99 cannot be provided in the fore � .
seeable futu'''re)
The following `fable of recent traffic counts in ;the
`area illustrates the Greats rapid growth (reference.,,,
North Ch`xco Rezone, EIR) . Similar .future 'eraf£i.c increases 4
and area growth has the potential for creat:ing;additio nal1
congestion of area ci
rculation roar s and on rr�s deaatial ,,
Streets,, r;
2 ,
r north Chico Area Traffic Volumes
Recent ADT Measup6ment8 17
c:
P Highway 99 - Four olahe - - divided freelsay
South ` of Oohasset Hwy'. 221700 1.9 y 7oO,.;
South of East,Avenue 13,500 11,300
10,0a0
Between +East acrd Eaton 9,00x' 7,300 �,� a0
�ti,;1
Narth, of Traton '�taacl ?13005 1700 ao_
4 -Year
Percent �
1 j T Increase
Oohl�Sse#: Road
S;buth of ,East Avenue (4-�lane 20, 600 1.7, 643 1.z1•, 561 41%
r4orth of East Avenue (�?•�lane3 16,900 131962 8,7816 92%
South or;aton ]load (2-1;'an61100 2,576 None, Taken 200+%
North of Eaton Abadane (2-1 51400 2,073 NoneTaken "�00%
East .Avehue
East of The Esplanade (4 -lane) 18,900 17,'496 31057 45/x.
z
West of Oohasset Road (4�lene ti -,--;13,100 8 445, 9,452" 39/
East it 0ahasset Road l(l.lan8 1.•5,100 11;995 8080 80%Q.
East of The Esplanado ?-Lane) 4,150 , .2,1.796 None Taken 20,0+%
fir West ,of Oohasset Road (2 --lane) 41300, X1`009 11264 240 0
Eaton Road ryJ '
j 00 2�`a2. 1 721 12'71
East of The Es'�anade (2--1.arae 3,.9
21st of Highway 992 (P --lane) 2,050 1.,� 7 1 ,070 9��
West of O
bhasset Road (2Wiane) 1,550 J0 '�86 9�%
1 2Year r
r. 7riorea se i
S'f
E1. ;Paso Wavy!!
Forth of East Avenue 3100-40,50 31126 Nome Taken 30
,9
00 1.921 one Tauten 51%1
:
South of Lassen Avenue + �
;'White ".AVen�.`� °o '4:.�
NortYj, of -'fast Avenue x.27,0-2400 g08 , Ono Taken 40-164%
,,otti of .Lassen Avonue 1,110 4' None Taken 130%
Godman Ave' ue tear Lass .n 690 Nori(e _ None T'skeri
Morsemari A enue near La hen 1,050 Taktjl None Taken .
I,' None
Eurnap Avonu'e SEI 0 Taken None Taken ...y
. North of Lassen .'LI
777
South of Lassen xvenue 1 650 1.1364 None Taken W6
West of Gob.asset'''Road 1'g0O 1:300 None Taken 24%
aiUl Pwk'Av!d u it
(ADT A� erage Daily' Txaff �.c )
~ T1i" hw z capacities fo c' t I' `al two la.no u
r'�an- jmpvoved streots
range,`eotl 801b AbT good se -VV
,ryr,P •'' ,t
h
Note : g ;y / �,�
�.eve1) to 10000 AST (conges��.on),
68 -In fig ttp,Adard strOet Wiaa hs and dosign Oapaaities for lour Lane
er a0b A 4T Good service 1 e�tel) to
u ban mprbVed streets a ange from 13, ` �
P1 yC7t7b ADT (co.n" .est�.bn TeTel on four=Ianes �h 'full jnediari and separate
1:OftµGurri dYles � Ssurool Highway Oa�`ao���� Manual, X965,
1
r,
4. An additional alternative to be considered, and
enc u e ince ori ti
I
`•
'Development of a through-traffic collector" street
as part of this PAC development plan, linking Lassen
Avenue and Tom Polk/East Avenue with;,)' a standard- '�
width public road for thoroughfare traffic (rather
,x
than with the--proposed 24-foot wide, private, access-:
only driveway. This-alternative would improve general -,
area,rcirculation patterns and would help resolve to
_,. an extent some existing traffic_ congestion problems.
~`
(Refer to the Planning Department, memorandum to the
Planning Comm ssii n of January 14, 1981' .
a.) The primary advantage of this alternative would
0 be the improved area-wi,de circulation nu,fth-south,
not only for project residents but also for hung f
dreds of residents in the area to .the north. No
nearby major collector reads provide existing
easy access to East Avenue and to the North Halley,,
.. Plaza Mall for the,,-.) extensive residential develop-
ment occurring north of Lassen Ave(�ue along Godman
Avenue acrd Morseman Avenue i
b.) Another advantage would be the ability for reason
able separation of low density sfftgle-,Family res, -
dences from higher density multiple-family residential
w., development'. In this'transitional land use area
segregation *Of types "'of residences could be :more
easily achieved by this road corridor.
c.) This design wouldreduce traffic congestion:and
° circulation impacts on El para iV,�y (and possibly
° ve
n White Anue) .
llrsadvantages-of this Alternative,i.nclude; =
a.) Substantial traffic incre04ses through, the property
and on Tom Polk Avenue (pt``h4ps up to 800 00 ADT
from traffic horth1\1f the s°,te funneling onto this
Y,collector sttdet)o street)ibis increased traffic may ad-
�4 versely affect Tom Polk Avenue residents (though`
only b homes front on Tom Folk) and future 'residents
of this development (p,articuiarly ,ch'ildren) ,
bl�,) Inoreased looal congest,iori and traffic hazards on
Tom Polk Avenue; An,d potentially within the, Lassen
i-Avenue%Godman. Avenue section.
�.nter
,
c.) Increased noise and air pollution locally.
d) Loss of security and controlo of access on-site.,
and loss of the dead-end local-access-only .
Fcharacter 'on Tom Polk Aven;ue"
e':) . Loss ,of the aesthetic, quiet residential
character of Tom Polk Avenue. (Creation of
a traffic nuisance . )
f.) Increased traffic lights aud glare in this r
residential area.
+r
g.) Lack sof neighborhood acceptance (particularly
Tom Polk Avenue residents)
Most of these disadvantages represent transferral of
existing and increased traffic impacts from the El Paso
Way residential corridors to the Tom Polk Avenuearea,
.,,relieving El Paso Way of solute existing problems. The
advantage would be the creation of,north-south collectorroad
'
traffuavolumeseCcurrentyandsegnec'ted accommodate urban t, `
xp (whicZ� 1 Paso
way has not been designed fox) , and that has better
alignment with; Godman Avenue further north that provides
access to rapidly developing urban lands
;
S, Another alternative is a redesign of the PAG';,devPlopmcnt
unitsihvolvih The uc osalIon oofd1 city and redistx�.bution of
TI units was an earlier re
w51', desa.gn ✓ficin the original i�ttits�a.s . also1eimurrent lementationry
�T ti
28, 1981, propdsa�l for 91 p
of this alternative. ` Such an alternative reduces, but ,
does not eliminate, the identified environmental impacts.
A greater concentration of uni.`cs (7.0 bll�acre) has been
clustered 'within the e-xisting R-3 zoning district, with
fewer units developed in tho eiditting 1t=1 area (5.9 M/
ac ie) , thereby xedcing land us
conflicts and incom-
patibi ity concerns. Also, access dtiVe.way Is along the
property boundarie�,s can be romoved or reduced' ins, length
to..-decrease predicted traffic ampact5 on existing con-
tl guous area to8ldences
6
6� Another alternative type of reduced-ldensity PAC is the
development b Tyree independent cUl-de-sac access roads
Off Toro Polk Avenue, Lassen Avenue, and El Vorano'' way,
respeC4vely, without any connecting streets between
/Tom Polk and Lassen Avenue. Advantages include reduced
hrough=traffie and onsite traffic circulation, di 6
� �� tr�Iuti6h of the __project's total traM ' 1oad�to ,several
w
4
0
v
i
!
4
different streets, segregation'of types and density
oFi development, and rductz"o'n of ciri;ulation drive�+ays
along the edge ,of the property;, theteb'y° reducing
trr.,f;fic ,impacts on adjacent properties. P 11
ea t�'
Disadvantages„ ��include potential loss of� the ��int , grated -��61
character of this plannt'd cluster"development-,— reduced ,�
ability to provide easily 'accessible reere�j, ion fa%JAities 9
and the opening' of El ''Verano May, with`,,,addltional traffic
increase's .,onto- El Ta`s,o Way:
@
Most impacts identified in the ErR a.ra dependent on den
sity of de,velopm� nt and,,will occur whenever the propertyF "
is developed in some fashion. �
r~~
7. Recreation fcac'i'1i ties,, a.§ proposed are "n.ot centrally located,
an may a f:ect`aa j7Enn ng 'resida'nts;. ?►acoxd ng to the app-
t lica'i ,r'ILnd pxoae t engineer, centxa`l�'r'e`crea'tion facilities
are lass desirable and not appr+aved by £inancin institutions.,
Also, they e,ould become an attraCtive nuisance for neig}bor-
hood yhiidren if t,access is"ea:sy and, central (,Ie.: readily c.
a. vailable}
4, Night„ lighting Cil the facalit1, is no propose
the .Future l;ho',meoWners �yassociat an mai wish to provide such
g
li htin however the deli n` for the dual, tennis courts
has-been altered reorienting them, to that one cottxt 'w'11
3 be nebe ar6'rntheoaccessRroad abut, further from th ose�affect��1
�� d A...;
� �Y � s i ,.,
re �, "gid ilts. iL ght: ng of the inner court Could he, p"rovided
with:.+educed impact OnL rotidents (75 to 100 feet'distance
to the residemc'es), 'while the outer co'iirt nearest the pxop-
erty boundary could be'-ro't unlit, since the inner court
would also be located nearer;,the access road and parking,,
area, users would likely, ptofe;r that court if demar
low, Howeve o b6th courts may, be `acti"veiy usea, dep,briding
'ippn the specific residents of the dC"'Vblopiment.,, An 'alterria-
<:'� tive"' ti.voula b construction' of a solid wall or fence lie*teen
the `recreatiblh area .and existing residents -of sufficient
" height to"Block noise and light o£ distutbi g levels'ftoM
F"l
residents on pandmaJIAVenue.p ,rather than resiticting 'hottrs;'of
operatlion. _
5uggeste,d Mitigation Measure Construct an $ foot
�..
solid ace orwa, a�l6h9 the southern; e4", , rriv� aaid'
western property boundary (35Q feed Total `'length)
where a:jacent to the ptdpos�,d tocreation facilities;
p " , tw redue e 'sting' residences "and the
recreatit�riefac�t�.esetwetl
the
„ y . ce the ineeil for Cha s higher
p:
” u
8. Sidewalks along /Tom Palk Avenue are lacking,, and should�
e, installed to reduce hazards to pedestrians, particu-
'k'larly,if� the a'Tom Polk Lassen Avenue °extension is der-
\IoVeloped a4 a piibl'ic accesss collector street. The
.6 rttgznal b•IR stated that zid'ewalks are needed on both "
I
sides ,-Of Tom ,Polk Avenue,; Sidewalks on only one side
woul�'r s,uf,fice, reducing the �renuirements fox tree re*
and e'l,croa-Chment onto exipxing residential pro
;{ andstaping for. the 4 ' to 5`= foot sidewalk
,.ernes and l
Width. However area "children ma be sa�fe'�r With side= "
Y ,- . y
owal,ks on,, both.,.sides of eft -6 street, particularly con '
sida'Iiing the 'through-1tra` fftc 6'irculation, sin' e' mid
block street crossings Would ocour to gaxYr ,;access to r"
these wa1k��•ays . ► !
%totaever most at 'a streets have gidos.
walker along,,a sirnfile side (i l Paso May),.
9. The count ro os`ed collector strgey
l
f .ti g ,Lassen Avenue aad Tom -Toll, ehis xpected
ed
connectin risen t '
\ to partially rel,leve some of the traffic impacts on EY/%
Paso jVay. ` ffille the El; Paso day txaffic congestion /t
problem cannot be, fully resolved in this manner (espe'cially
as the area north of "La`ssen Avenue continues .to fully
develop), the area traffic can b"e distributed to several
streets improving area -wide circulation patterns. ,The
t) ptop osed;coIle ctoto s%roet .would be specifically ae' s- g-ned
to handle,
re traffic (Adequate`°Width; alin
gnmet;
and a� stActed ac;cess en.croachme�nts� and E1' Paso Way, parking) , whereas
.,a s designed for- �o`cal reside'Atidl traffic,
l�. Lass"en Avenue freoway) access is not considered by Caltrans
to be a feasible alternative at thi,is time for relief of�
areacirculation groble•ms '(ref r to Appendix VIb"leiter,,
from Caltrans), However•zurh"acces's would atieviate ',many'
C
prob,'ldws,, and development of �,assen Avenue access ramps
should be pursued by the county.
.I
�r
,j r,
• 7
,
!
r
i r..
•
gist of
Persons Commentn on the
gg
Eastwood Oaks PAG BIk
Planning Commission
Januar► 70 1981
January 2:8, 981
Tom Lehmann
Runs CxonxnRer
Gary Ritchi6
:Arthur Lehman
John Otto
Gary R �chie
Com-
Bill Gates
Richat' 1ko.d
Richard°r Heid
John Otto,
Carol Curtis
Joe Bar ion
°�He'n..iy Curias
'�� Bill Gates
Aletha `CurtiN
Onta Curtis
„
Ed Peck
,
�� Carol pato
Diane" Larr,:�n „
Ann Andrews
Joe beLapp
J
Ed'Gettle .
n e,
Russ Grsninger
Wi„lliam tvott
January �14 19 8,
�
ttW;s Cronxnge
h
Tom tehmunA
Gary kitch'`ie
1
;
NeVa McReynolds
”
to6td o SuperIri,s i\rs r,
t, r�
Pe auaYy 2 .: 198
At"��rch 0, 19$iG marcft 7',
a�
Russ Gion`rige�`
Cagy
fuss Croninger �r�11� G1,osed heari ,g
Gary 'Ra tcha
Ritthie
c ;�r�:P�
Rob'eit Mclte>ynol.ds
Art, Lohman
ntid tohmaii
9111 Gdt6s
v,� t4
c, r,
i} i111 -t;
� II,
„ '0
s,
W ham EvertJEver Glo, ink.
Eastwood Oaks PAC `Rezone
F1nd= ngs for Certi-icat�ionof �
the' Fnvi1{e h t a I Impact Repar°t '
Findring)� thaty commentsand tecommendations ;Groin `the public hive
4,
been attached to the draft en-Vironmental impact report, that ,
written" r6`pen94es, to sign.xCicant epi-Aronirrental pointe tai sed,.)
7 by i je co nients"'have, been prapaxed and attached. to the dx f
envarori:n ntal imj�act veport arad that a list of the porsons, '
�r organi!'ati.ons .ana'�.Vtblic agencies who" comme,tited has been. attached
rt
to the dra+`^ enrixt��nmenttll mpac report, mo sob ce;rtiy the
final envi7onMenta ,, iimpaot report' as l avirig, b cn completed in
compliance with the Cal fornix Envirr.o�S menttr.�. ��wo1ity� Act; the
Mate Environmental Revie�� Gux.de�.x,�es and ;tltc ,] iattc Cou t-y
a
jj r �enmeilta1 pevin�N Cup de 14 nes . �' ' ,<<• ` to
�1
n
„
r
„
i( a
FinAiii{s_tvtr 'A V4erct ,
slaving' i°evietvF�d ani tbiisidered' the flh61 e.nvl-ronmen,tal impact
o
xepoit; 7 rtiovo we :make t1.se fb l9gi6x O"'Ildings
(A) Deve,,lopment which occurs Putstr'ant to PfOt t app ovaic
Is not xpected to resuit,:.xnr,sxgni-xcaiit cii;iixlative
eFcts ofr`' t}ie er,'trii`onnrexit because o Mx tx gtion rrieasures
1\ Jro,j ect a r OV& ,
Which
iciC ill be att,nch0d a s cond1tlazl�$ o� �, pF
,;. iid they.'' dx,sposit ,on, lnc1Ud0
aC� s
t, i 4' Yriere�t ed tta fir- ands,pos ible indr0asn;d congestion;
with associated air quality and tra fii� Iiol - _iM-
pacts, Thoise iPiP6ctsiwete, m�.tiga�-ed to a degii,e06��
th, redesign, ; t�,e project which reduc:
tt�nwity� filom I" units to �� Addit oha, a �'
contrxbuti6h to 4'ard a traflicJ,�ll
8igi�x1' at th0 East
ji Aven��e/`1'oiit :folk' bltorsett yon be ina.do
aj.t�on o� pro,jOct approval 5��nce the tr r iC
fxx�oblbm in the hex hborhiipeden
�
,
,
4 y, rJ
t
i
a� is fr m this`
of this project, and since tr '
pra ie, int will -09t exceed trhe traffic carrying",,�
wa., a
.,,
r capac:tty of either Tom Pelk AVenue, Dust Avenu'f:
or Lassen A ienue and fu;�;ther because oil: je .
previously mentioned mi1gation measures,
traffic impacts Are -ad deemed significant.
2 ; potential ins reasedtr�i fie hazards. This
= impact;is nota deemol lgnificant for. the )roasons
„
outlined in, itoffi 1, aboves:
3A 1'ncreasedipu'blic scrvac.edemands, especially~
r on publid Amenta7y school flat,i+lit es in the
Z�`Ja"}� partridge` Scltodl) 'Phis it'"pact
ilocal 6,; �, ��t
ic, not eleertk ,significant, since, schao<l�� calla-i.ty
A
exists Ils">Y�iwhere within the Ch�.��o rlementaxy
� 7 ghool�`� DiSV,,j,ct, vand boundari g4 an be O h.ifted
4. � s
tt e ua :�ze ��heTtuderit populat ri. dxst�ibtltion'
. ..,,
A i increased land use density Ind ir'itten"sit��;,,,of de-
�relopmpAt, Altered area land use eharaWr �� um
-- r
this Altxpl.e family residential dsd . The" NO ,:
;:,ign change which reduced. `the 'density from
;. �to 96 units bro"ughtl ,:the overall project ,dens;`fy
�. to 6, 5 which is close„ to the 6 units per acre
l
specified for single-family r esidehual a.rgas
in the City of Chico . beneral `Ilam Phis reduction
lso allowed for mare open spacel and, kreater
0
i' �t lding setlaack tfaerehy reducing ;Incompati-,
/ b�.li.ties with adlacont single:faittily residential
nes!",tahboih�+o'ds . `Phis impact is not deemed significant,
S Los, d.r 00 space and agricult`urall.y productive
�) 1nd to intn� ive Li;i`, an use This project is Sur 1,
bV " U -t an devel6f Wants which have valready
dimxivl5lied'the� agricultural viability of -the area,
Sin,at tiic Deft )ra'l Plan Open Space l; ;ement only Is
for t� 'sorva��%.i oni of agricultural areas outside >
, des lit tedQi an az?as., itis impact is note deom� d °
6y `° ClvLi aver ng bf'land, r"S+'a) tired in roared drainage:
sabcii,on of water' quality in .dra.1nage Yuno.�oi� �
brainag� ch�nt`�t:ls t�hR t ill receive the ;un
hsV0 Stiff, cl�.ent; `t;apicity; and, the: duality of sutNate
�;��uhoff..wi��.k be;rno different fromurban run
off .i;�rem„
surrtiundinpoevilope�d areas, , This impact. , i s" in
01
-APPEN61,X H
William Evert/Ever "Glo Inc. PAC°;Rezpno
C tad. tions Of Appro aa' �i
its
� l%
SUbmt'r
dad acid drax�rnage 'plans to the Pubs. c Niorks tr
Department ,C6x .AppT.,Oval, anoll Ja.nstall dIA the required
5 u J
f�
2•a
Provad'; 20 foot adlus property line returns at al street,
inter .?ction.s .,.�
:i.
Indicate a�5Q Coot building setba'cic line from the An-I,or-
linoof Ve, Indicate a 20 fo.6t bu iding sfrtback'
` `
nue.
fromoIthe'ol
lifi'o t " roadi4av �-,oni, main intera or roads +
' 4-4 -"Street
signs shall be provided by the` developer at, all, stYe,:t
intiersections per County reQu►rements: Submit four alternative
°County,,
street names for each street to the address coord indtor,r,
for ,approval,
5,
W f,
" Street grades and other street features s'hati. compXy'`t4ith .
„
en ineer ng standards:
ProV'de4,'a permanent sol.utiori fo`r` "dry, , = g�:, or drama
nuiremehts s}isl be as shotVi� '-D Qthe tentatire gip.
r
I
a
Ali-,easemetitS-of roto {d ;'to 13e sho�in on the �PinaP maps.
8
,d�. `county
Street li htin ,,,shall be i ova, eel' in accordance with
,x
:g
4
, p g 1
1n ,ofsettLoi �ig,htin,g;�i$- to bec ns�taliedeas Iriai at'd onridati�dns.
i � ahs
devlopnrer'it plan. i-� „
9
All ef.-L Dior lir htin sEal_1 'be +�hielded� directed; and located
In
` uch, a manner as`' to preVonteglare ``'to adjacent properties
f,A 10 :
A,0410 fool;, `'AC overja.y shall be pl.actod ori 'tom Polk `Ar�en6o from
lip of gutter to , lip of gutter} from the "develophent to Ea�'t
ll �_
No'vide a standard driveway approach at the of
fibterseo'tion
the lnter�.�.or roael��azid` Avonuc�`
tbash.en
t..
��tterior ru''dway's' are t0 be a If1ini111t1w of c24f:' 1x3'V3dtny
2 inch's AC 3 At With AC ba,r ritr cuib i.
.;
IS ::;
tnterlot roadj, shall be des ,geed: And, cbhs1krUcted so pi's to
reduce throug}i tra:Cfid' cIt'culd.tioi� and,'8,Peeds ,over 2"5`1 Mph.,
,
J �'� ��„ '� E7 ° •1 'J 19
1
14, The paint` whir."E ie interior 'road meet's., E1 Verano �,`dy` sha).d
be used as an` emel gency;i,exit only. A barri.or shaj,1 .be c&`
stxucted and subs ect to appioval.°by`'the Butto County dire' ;
t
�- De artnient
�iS. Grading Plan shall" b,p subm,ct6d to the Public Works Depr,Artment` �
for .approval`; and , all the ,cec{uired f aci.lita es shall be in-'
8ta11ed:
16. Stop signs` `exit trart,ffic{�only� s shall b , plaoc;d at the pxcI
entranoeas to Tom Polk Av'enue�,} and Lassen Avenue.
l", 5 1t drainage
`' � Term of,- that portion- of the development located in
spas+-a Unign Drainage AssessmentDistrict ($UDAD) to _drain to
the Sditch, i,;DAD unless design caIciYiati�ons;indicate �thWt the
he
SUDAD district can dram {,j in the southeaste�,,ly' part ofl�+.he
portion of the devef.opment
"at La..sen Avenue, ,. ,,.: <r , r ar..,
t �� ti'hg storm dram .V�
�o`rth to l h+v exis
or s
� a
t 1 An off site sidewalk, constructed to Co'un� y 'standards shall
�i be pvov:ided on the west side ok Tom Polk js venuc between the
.-outher�y terminus of the pro;i eet site 'a-rid fast Avenue . A],,1
other walkways internal. to' the project` Miall be cofistruct�ec��' f
asphalt,hand developed as shown on the ,e elopment plan:
r+ 19. Construct a 7-foot solid fence or wall along the property boundaries
of ro$idencfs on Pies�a Avenue where ac�jacen,t to the proposed
fend
,. T�andscaping p the
area, to bo provided, behind
26. A pro rata 'l a�r ape}�.. uni developed based upon-a total estlmatDo
of $25;`006 s`hal��� be`' eppsited with the County as the .d'velopei
f ,
share of° the cosi�mf €i future traffic .signal;- a't the inter rsection
o Tom Polk Ay enue ,qnd last Avonue,,
2Coifscton act'vatit,,s shall be retxcte .tonormalayl aght
°hours , i( and all equiptr��Y � ,shall be ' �It cert IV It appropriate mufflers „
to seduce constructs{yin no'8c,, -
sra n „
--i ust%,zontrol measures such as ''; liri shrill be implemented
i g h rated
during')construetion.
231' tandscapxng shall be provided ast,,ndicated on the aeVelopr,eht
plan to achieve a Asual and acou,� tic streer f om adj at6nt
resiclen, es,,, and maintained 1f a li�iilg 'gond ti';6i .;
i 24." Peneing shall be provided as ;indic.rts� abl the develol',ment plan
`} with the exception that the foncing of eakoeed 42 inches'
in height �vi�hin Sn. foet of the centerline of Dj. Vexano Way arid.
".. 1e centortine o: Tom Poll: Avonue:
t��.tll�n 56 Peet o� tl
2S, Assessments ate shall be segregated ' g g dor paid: <<
26: Piro hydrants are to be locate. as Indicated by the tutte'>1CoUnty
Pare Department' sir the devol.opmen.t plan: The hydrants ate:
` e to be
,
Clow Rich 9501�Nodel.s,�or Long Beach -Iron Wo,r.1Gs 614 Models "
installed according 'co DepaYtment of Public Work's Standard
"S#27.,
Fire flow is to be 21000 GIN, sustained : or a period ..�
est �"i
�- 1
of at leash 2; hours to al
Facii-sties shall be sub;j fin
.
, a.nspectyon by the Butte County Fire,, Department, and any
j o'4\her requirements shall be also met.
27.
A letter or otiher documentation, from the California, Nater
Service Compar'iy stating, that they are willing and cable to stip-
ply dopMest"ic water to the development, and stating any pr,e�-
�`
��
r,c u sites which 'they may `have, must be !111
q
28.
The sewage disposal. systems wit-Ii n the devel'opmerlt shall meet
" the requirements of the County Health Department-P,nd the j
California Regional. Water Quality Control, Board
29.
A Homeowners Agreement thatprovides for the 1A8tallatiphI, w�
�1
maintenance, and _repair oflthe'sewage disposal systems shall
be prd` i od ' and'`be subject to 'the to-'viewof the County %Iealth
' Department and the California- Regional ,1�ate.r Quality' Control
,1
Board
`
`3 0.
A Wmain ain extension shall be required accordance wiih
Cali"fornia Nater Service Company F,#ension Rule 'l5. ' The°
"
facilities= will be"designed by California Water engineers,
nd yah easement the width of the traveled way through the ;
development shall be requi. edi" 1
5i,
'There will be an easement provided for,,'`tiit northeast Chico
sever district before final. map is approved;,
_
1
((!1111 ,�, f' 1: ��♦.:�,
Q
�
Nf7TxC9 (7P .011 Bv4INATICiN`, '
'%0. Secrctax'Y Eor" Rsourc
�? a�A 3
To, � -.e u
1416 Ninth Street, Room 1317
95814 Ci ARIC A. NELSON, County Clark
Sac arnentof7A .,
eek. JACINTH
anu
it Countp Clerks ,F -
-County of liu�,t� T'ROx� �.ead ,A ency):��
.: � County, n steer jrILve E;fy� r>o menta] �tey etiv ep77 r
.- G ro,i lle , ' �a. a . oxl a r� U ; Co . � Cente t, Df eve
Calif o:6il adwi 9 965
-.n
CI
r
4h° SiJBTECT t rifat: g,, oif Notiia4`e of `Determination in Compliance VIlLtt
Section 2,1.109, r of-the_Public Resources Code
,ry+.i+as.. f1orY� �11r 07-1V �2
„� �1 t, .H i"r p•^—r-. w i� sS r-.—+ �..,......_w.NPY.r r,+,v s .t. .f., 5..:,
71-3:71:71711--EIV
FSC 7.. x,
PA- Rezone end. Stxbd AP �4 ��, 32 Zzt;> � �c ����irr�raz7 O'd Is
Mate Cleatatth:ouse, Numbe ,�1,t-s+1jmj,:ted to State Li,IKotrse�.; c`
$0100715 „
;ontact Person e `on4t er
Ear rl .vel soil, Di.rec tor;' , r t-
?
:� k?ro;ject location East of Sate Route�'99; sottt 4ra,[ �.ct55ennt1e,
T'r
tv.e. t o;F B1 :,paso tiV' _no)z tl� c�� ��T�anama _A� oiiuc Last Rvcri� IQs anti, Tom Polk
1' eject Deq,oription, Avenue: in the nottlior r arca of Chico,
PA-C Fezone"al1d Subdiv"s>i6' approximatel.'y 1.5 acres to cresta 96.
totvnhouso units `'',,
This Is to a'dv�ise„ t�nYa"t the `rttL k' Cblt"xi;� - Board ot- suporyisors'
« Lei Agency
s., has made' the tollmgine; determ-mation s rega'rdin' the above�dirScr3.,bed
prod r.et ,
/7777'w li�r
1, The pr'o 7 e t h, ve a 10- ni ficant of fec t on the :.!f
n; will not
en'vi ronment
2 / Art tnviLonmenta.l Impact Report was prepared for this project
Puts to the prnV sioris di 68%, and Baas certified a'J'
requited. by Section, 15085 14 California Admir i!trAtive
Code w�
/% A Ielaa\tive t1 clarat .ort was prepared for this project punquatit
_ t� on trta 6e Y e� 7t a�ned at the ttl`V�i �ohmental ReV ew ��part Montt F
to ihero� s nns of C1� e atv Detre ata"
Lunt Center Drives Orovi�lle, t alifot.,ftia �59.65,
1`7` A Mkt t-�.ce o einpt�c�ti «cts fiiecl i3 trki�edt" 8 this project as
.
exompt :-tom ens, ltofmental rev qq o .
Appendix 1-I � pagr-_ 1 o�