HomeMy WebLinkAboutBUTTE CO. PLANNING DEPT . 78-23 54. A staterrien of, overriding (7,onsid(�.xation 7 vills T was not,;
,adopted fob this,, pro j ec
5, P��t ation measures adopted the'Lead Agency to re
• p duce the
impacts of the approved project are; ,
See atta< jedCJ
,
s 1�
C
9
„
}) �� s..� it . , •., ,,
i w y r
,
tUre
T) Nelson, Diroctor
Ie
�.T 6`;l.t'fJ1CiICrJt �'-V�' l'Jtor,
,
DAte
...-......
x ale � e�
11. Submit: road and drainage plans to the public Worcs nepa ent for T
approval, and install, all, the required facilities.
2. Provide 20 foot radius property line retu=s at all street intersections,.
3. Indicate a 5CL Coot building setback line from the centerline of Tom
Polk ;:avenue. indicate a 20 foot building setb'iack line yxom the edge
of thrr_ l roadway on maim interior roads.
si ns sh 1 be
4. street i a� provided by the developer at all street infer-
section. p `�Co.luty t'equirements, Submit four alterative str°ret
mgmes to -'r b � treet to the County address ca-irdivator for approval.
e
5. Street grades' and other street features shall comply with engineering
standards.
6. Provide a permanent solution,for drai:tssge, or drainage requirements
shat`'' -,-be as shown on the tentative map
1. All easements of r") --,Ord to be shown on the final map.
8, S'tract lighting shall be provided in accordance with County' requirements,
accepted design criteria, and PG&E recoLmenda.tions. intersection
lighting is to be installed as indicated, on the developmm,tit piaa4
S. All extaridr lighting shall be shi.eladd directed, and located in
such a mannax as to prevent glare to adjacent properties.
,a
J.O. A 4.10 foot AC overlay shall be placed .on Tom Polk Avenue from lip
of guttdt. to lip of gutter, from the db�elopment to East Avenue.
Com r
ll. Provide a st4lnda:,d driveway approach, at the int enaction of the
interior roe -�,=d Lasian Avenue,
12. All interior roadways are to be, -,a csirrmuxa of 24 feet in width,
2 inch, AC, A1'r with AC ba:rcer curb
l�
134 latatior roads A41.1. be designed and const ` Utted sci as to reduce
through.-itta;ffid ditdtlhtiaa and speeds ollre2', 25 4h. l
Point y shall b,,
l�►. The Dint wi�e>:e the ixtt:eri.or road meets i 1. �ierasic S,Ta e,
used aa'an emeig�:ncy etit only, A bdrttar shall be constrt�ctdd,,
and subject Co approval by the Butte County Fire Depattzent,,
15. Grading plat sh�lll be submitto to tho, Public Tiorks �bepat:tte it for ,
approval, ,arid all the required acil.iti,es sball be installed.
a.,
µ /F
16 S top .signs Ceexltraffic only) "snap, be place: the project
` entrances toPoll. Avenue and Lassen Avenue'
17. 5to= drainage of that portion of the ,deVelopment located iu Shasta '\
Union Drainage 1�4sessnent D`Latxict (SUDAD) to drain to the SUDAD ditch
unless"design calculations indicate that Phe portion of the development
I ".! in the southRasterly part of the SUDAD atstrict can dvain »1t.orth to the
existing storm drain line at Lassen Avenue.
18, An off site sidewalk, construCtIA. to County: stA�,'dards ,L"shall be
pi c6vided on the west side of 17= Polk Avenue 'between the southerly
terridaus of the project site and .East Avenue. All otiIar ,caalkvays
internal td the project shall be constructed of .aspbait ,and developed
shown on the development plain:
19. A -.-seven foot fence be constructed and that ,there be a landscaping
area' behind the fence along property bo,indwrs Of esi.deaces on
Panama Avenue. ha,
20. A pro–lata share Cper unit developed based upon a total. es adnate
�' r
of $25,000) shall be deposited with. the County as the deveY,oper s
share of the cost of a future traffic signal at the intersection of
Torii Polk. AVenue ana East, A,yenua.
21. c,onstructiau acitivities' shall be restricted to normal daylight
1 hours, and all equipment shall be fitted with appropriate mufflers
to reduce constructi.a>x noise.
22,. Dust control measures such as sprinkling shall be implemented during
corns tntcton. .
u '
23. Landscaping, shall be provi.derl as indicated oil the develoPment p?aa to
achieve a visual and acoustic screen from adjacent residences, and-
tna!Ltitained in a living condition.::
24. Fencing shall be provided as indicated on the development plan w3 t:i
the :excep;tlon that the fencing shall not exceed 42 inches in height r
�i t'fttn 50 feet of tFixe ceuterliae of E1 Verano dray aad within, 50 feet
of the centerline of Tori Polk Avenue.
25. Assns., tents shall be segregated or paid.
26. Fixe hydtazits are t',o;"..ae located as indicated by the Butte tte County 'kite
bepar Nantr on the development plan: The hydrants are to be Clow "tii.eh
950 Xt ae' s .or Long 'Beach Iron F7otks 614 2�Odels installad according
to Dapatt ett of public `Vo°rks Standard S,,02i r•�re flow is to be
1000',=' sustAined for a v,etjod of at !At 2 hours, Faci.lit:ies shall
be subject, to.Inal ihspectioa, by the butte County P=ire Depa"rttant „
and ariy o'thtt requite—teats shall be also tier:
21,A letter or other docutnent:ation freta the 0:alifornia dater Service �' S
C'u parry stat itg that they Art unil ang and abbe to supply domestic
t;dter to the: devel�'pmenty arid` sta+tIlIg any prerequisites which they
v# B,avo must be ptovi.ded.
28, The se4age disposal sy9te-ts vitbi.ti theF-Itveloptaeut thalltat the
tigqui.::ementsl Of -,the Coutty 'dealtti bep�_ en ;.,and the Califorai,a
Regional Nater' qur.'Aity. cbaltrdl Bddtd lf� „
°
,F2
F ..
P
} l
29ill�� �" h.o�,.r'bwners agreement that provides for
the insCallatibni, mzintotzi�i�¢,�s,
!�{
Ij�, Vinci repajr of the sewage disposal syst.as
shall be prcov�ded, and b
sEtb i eh to the review of the
Department �i d the
Deartme3oard.
Regional Water Quality Conitrolh
s .,
main, extension shall be required
in accordance with California
ater tu,:erviCe Company Extension Rule ].S.
The facilit�.es will be t
i desi.4,jz d by CaIirornia Water Engineers, and, an easemant the width of;ci�
the 'ir.'veled way through the -development
shall be required.
erg: will be an easement provided for th.e
aor heast: Chico sewer
district before final tip is approved. ,.
J
).i!
(j y
''
i
r
4 24 —2 3
44'-24-23
K , 44-24 -56 6�
44-276-1
Sha Ia.' McClung
�` A. D. F, Lt', M. .Davies"
�`'! 1427 Citrus Ave.((
R. %r.: F, J ?�Y, Perry
2553
2151 Oakland Rd. 596
131 Paso Way�
'Sail Jose, Ca. 9aX31
Chico Ca. 9592G "
�
Chico, Ca. 95926
44.26-2
44-26.,3
l�
44,`,'26--4 1
T S1'. , A. M. Braden
fl. C. & 0, 'Curtis
J. 1,. F J. S. Reed
2559 E 1 Paso (►Vay ��
`L 567 E 1 Paseo Way
2573 E 7� Paso Way
}'
Chino, Ca. 95926
Chico;' Ca, 95926
�,_.
Chico, Ca. 9596
1
44-2.6-5, 42
# 44-26-j
44-26-8 -�
44-32-6
?
i.
Dept of Veterans Affairs
J C. C L. Quo.
E. B. Y.�EE� Peck
2581 E1 Paso Way
;'2592 El Paso 1Vay
Z5ff6 E1 Pad r Way
Chico, Ca. 95926
Ch,`Ico, :Ca. 9592'6
Chico, Ca.t,- 95926
4426-9
a 44-26-10�
44-26=39
E
E. G. Fr L. A. Dawning
Charles E. Bain
,
�
R. I Mc :.>
�, El Cerrito
3 El Cerrito Dr. �
'd E1 t�ffrri.to;, Dr.
Chico, Ca. 95926
Chico, Ca. 95 26
'
Chico, Ca 95926 c:-
�i
r
4t ` 26 - 4Q
44-26-41
w
44 '26-71
c
J. L. Hendrix
Hind .x
F . IV., C. R. collie'''r
Thomas D. Pant
2f� E1. Cerrito Dr.
2(66 E1 .Paso Way
�
2589 El P;x Way
p
Chico, Ca.:) 95926
I Ch>co, Ca. 9592 w'
Chico, Ca. 95926
44.26-72
44'-32-2 -.,. -
�,
44.32-3
R. ,P. & P, A. slayer
Linda Mullnix
E. C. Fi P. C Gettle
2581 E1 Paso Way
2595 E1 Paso
2596 El P,asoR
C-C'h co5 Ca. 95926
C fico, Ca 95926
Chico, Ca. 95926
44,-32-4
44-32-5 ;,
�:.
44-32-7 �
DJ. I�usxe
A. & i
R, AY. Garman
C. E. F, M.A'-, Foley
655 El Verano 1Vay
48 El Cerrito Dr
45 E1 Cerrito Dr.
ch-jco Ca. 95926G
Chico�_1 Ca. 95926
Chlico, Ca. 95926
44-32-9
�
44 -32("11 .
Lester Price
i
T. L F, V. J. Richardson
i'
" Eetty Lewis
43 E1 Cer ito Dr, \
. 41 E1 Cerr'ito
6;58 E1 Varano 1Vay \
o
Chino; Ca. 9926
,,
Chico, Ca. 95926
Chico, Ca6 95926 �\
W-322-12 1,
;4 44-32-13
44-32.14
t r. M. & V. A.c Jackson
�'✓_
R, P. F, N11. Vol,pato
C,5 4 P1 Varafto Way
ar
W6 E . F1 G. Allen
656 E1 Varat c) Way
r1co, Ga. 9592;6
2604 E1 Paso 1?ay
Chico, Ca, 95926
��
x'11
chico, Ca. 95926
,`
44-S2-16 i . «
c
44 -32 19
44-52-22
G. C;t 5 D. T, Gel iepes , Richard L. ilac':man
�r
A, G. & C. Brett
2538'o�ri Polk
I , 2594 Tom Pot Ave,
2546 Tom Polk Ave,
Chicd,, Ca. 9,5926
Chico, Ca. 95926 _::
Ch, o, Ca, '5926
44-32-23
�i
T. S. tj J, ?. Kenn (z ..
44-32-26
�.
1V.,__.E, fit. J. Gate.
�,
J Vit. S� G,. GreEoire
2554 Tom Polk Ave. ��
o tVay
Q 2603 �1, Pa80-M6
�!
409 ICe ra I,
�1iic.b, �a.
Chico, Ca. 95926 JI)/
/!
VI °Chico, .Ca, �� 959 6
044
r{[
4409-
44-09-11
44-00.12'
NA. Ybanez
J. A. F, M. Brattan
f ,
A. lI, � S, Lehman.n>
478 Panama Ave.
484 Panama Ave.
!
n nama Ave . tir
Chico, Ca. 95926
Chico, Ca. 95926
1,
Chaco, Ca. 95926
44-09-13
44-09-13
44`131-4
J. E, B. Al. Bakes,, `
M . . & M. J. Tos' .11.0
i);
"Pa.nama"-;
Richard R. Reid
591 E Lassenr,� Ave.
466 Ave .
J:'
479 Pai;.a;na Ave.
Chico, Ca. x�195926
Chico, Ca; 95926
Chico, 1,
Cq95592
4,4 _ l l,�:C� ;; „
}i
H
44-11-7
r
R. W. F.,;1. E. Clatworthy ;
Billy J. Hill
G. Wd F S. L, Ritc."hie
485 Panama A
Lombard
,
Tom
Chico, Ca, �95926
Ee,ggverto d OR
Chico, Ca2597
. 592olk 6
9,97005
44-11-8
44 11 ,9
t
44-11-10
Tatyana A Lima
V. & S. H ,angling
L. C. 8 C. L.-,Going
` 2591 Tom Folk Ave.
2 Lynnwood Circ,/e
�3 Ly.nn%vood Circle"
Chico, Ca. 95926 i
Chico Ca. 9592
r�; `
Chi'
co Ca. 95926
-44-11.-13
44-11-11 Y
44-11-1.2.f
R. J.'& P. D. Janes
E E Ahola
��
B. L. & B, J. Hilton
4 Lynnwood Circle
P.O, Box 6612'
6 Lynnwood Circle
Chico, Ca. 95926
So Lake Tahoe, Ca.95750 j
Chico, Ca. 95926
44-11-14 14
44w117-I5
;
44.11,.29
Beatrice I�I. Brooks
;l A. J , A}.r L. Adman
D. 0.C. Jones
7 Lynnwood Circle ±
S ,Lynnivood"Circle
2733 11' Say? Carlos
Chico, Ca. 95926
Chico,- Ca. 95926.
'Fresno, Ca. 93704
4Ji,'-21 -2
44-21-39
'x;
44-21-58
John Bakos
T. E, s E. m. CrUmpton
Margaret,`i Vistica
591 E Lassen Ave.
6'07;'E LassenAVe.
111910 Hooper Lane
,Chico,.. Ca: 95926
Chico, Ca.- 95926. )i ''
F '
x� �s Altas Hills, C? �94�22,
r 44-21-59 i
Alma, �`Cxiwe �;1P
44-24 1. _
��,
567 E-, LassenAVoj.
T
Casa De Flores *il
Chico, Ca 9S9'L6
C`
V, T�.. ',�: S. R. jAartin
701 E Lassen9 e,,
�'
2549 .F-i Paso WAY
a
C:ta.co; Ga.
,, �
44 2,;r., 4
a
9 fi
Chico, C.a. 95 2,'6
44-X24-2 a,
44-�4-3
44-24-•4
L . 0 . F ''D . J , We ton
A 0 Penn
W, I, , � A. �' . A ctclret�ts
2543 tl r;aso Way
P.O, B,ox 33-5
2533 E1 Paso WAY
Chico, Cay.. 95926
Dtilthatn + Ca, . __h5938Chito,
'k
i'Ca . r05"D26�+'
44-24-544-24-6
44.24-20 I'
i
RichardV, r.
I�I. J. b. L. Hilgero'
S. P. �, I. Aichholz
Wa
41827 El Pas6lftY l
2521 Paeo Way
.1 I;
�
570 Fl Reno Dr,
Chicoy Ca, x95926
011 co Ca. 95926
Ch��Wo, Ca, ;15Jwt�
4444-21
44 -24 -� 2
',\I, Moorston
p A
Del o: Vet. Efait
SfaSHEl�7
- 11
Ch1i�Ci�, Ca, 959.26
/5�i66 il. Rena Dr'Av�e
Chico, Ca, 55�J26
r
1
,44"3U-3
R. A.i,n
� l
,L. G. & G. F. Ott
'
JAMGs W. Matthews
;
2 Mayfair Dr.
1 Vi1� a Dr,
:,
Rt,_ 4 Box
M
Chico, C ,,, 95926
,
Chino, Ca. 95926
!'
C14 -=j Cay
,612
95926,
j.
44-38-62
a
444'-38-76h4-3-92
C. & K. Rector
H. RI* F G. Jory
��
C. G. F, E
1 . Sosic
Rt 4, Box 612 P
P.0- Box 5307
Rt 4, Box
611
Chico, Ca% 959<26
Concord:; Ca. 94522
1,
Chico, Ca.
95926
44-38-95=' 94
44-40-14
44-4'0�'��.
IV. S. & A. R, Pang
Diocese of Sacramento
J: M, Bagwell
1088 Vii. Verona
P '0. Box 209
Rt Box
612 B
Chico `, Ca, 95926
Chico, Ca 95926
t4,
Chaco, Ca.
95926
r
44-40-18
44-49-22
L, IV. F, E, D. Thacker
S. A. &,,,L. At. Young�,1,,t
Rt Box
'
Durham) Ca, 959S8
�
�
La Verne, Ca. 91750
s
b
r�
.0
i
if
,
1
i
r
p
r
BUTTE COfmTY PLANNING COMMISSION
STAPF ZIi`IDT\r(IS July 24, 7.978
ITEM ON 1VH�CH T;NVTR�Nb1LNTAL IMPACT R PORT WAS 11EQUIRS
Ll
�)
} 1. Ever Clo Inc: - Rezone from "A-2" (General) and "R-1"
(Single -family Resident%al) to "PA-C" (Planned Area
.� Cluster) to allow a condo mz;nium complex, property
located at the north cad of Tom PolkAve., the west
end of F1 Va'rano Wav and on the south s1do of Lassen
Ave. at Codman Ave. identified as AP 44-00-13 (portion),
AP 44-21-02 (portion) and AP 44-32-24, more particul.a.rly
described as:
Lot i of that parcel Map of record;
recorded in Map Book 65 on Page 60
in the of Eice o- the Butte County
Recorder.
Conta •ning 15 a)crc�'s, more or less, Chico.
/Z/1
The applicant proposes a development,o--l.single family dwellings
with garages,-a't�-.` private patios, c� 14.27 acr(: resulting in a
density of 0:18;,.,' The development vr�1-1--�i.nclude three tennis courts
M beth houses.
and two stfimm�.�i pools and..,' '
Access to the p•ro7ect,,.4ill be 1* ited to Tom Polk Ave: and Lassen
Ave: Access to Bl Varano will be restricted to" emergency use only
with a barrier Een
ct chain etc: The development plan includes land
scaping and: inter9;/or lighting,,,,,.
The subdivision committee reviewed the development pursuant ``1\0 IButte
County,"t6de Section 20-15 and submitted the following conditi5ti`ns as
�,A*heir recommendations should the rezoning be approved.
1. ~��'4bmit road and drainage p'' =3 to the Dept of Publio Works for approial
arid:install the rpi�rulred facilities:
Provide 20 foot radius property line returns at all street intersections,
1'
indicate a 50 root building setback line rrom, the aen';erline of Toy Polk:
Indiaate P-0 foot building setbaok line frotri edge of r8adway orl main i.n-
terior roads ,
. , Street s fns ,,shall; be provided }
�, ied b� the '�,et�4loper at all street inters.,r4
tibM8 per requiroiuodts; (Submit 4 alternate u-reet nares fax Each
sheet to the doun.ty addles t oocsrdinAtor fox aPPI'oval of street na~as�
5. Street grades and other features shall comply with the 'Butte Bounty
ardina_�ice�, desi.grl .resol.utiori and atW3r aciaepted erAgitleerin.5 standards~
6. provide pa.rmlftOnt solution for drainage or drainage requirements shall be
as 9hoyra ori tentative mqp.
76 of record to be sh6m. cin tho Pi al tAUP
E COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
S','AFF, FINDINGS - July 24 1978
8, Meet requilrements of &Ittc`-County FirePepartincnt or other
responsblC�, agency.
9. Streot lighting shall be provided in accordance with Butte
of 'PG&E. lOff-site lighting shallbeprovided.
Count requirements accepted design criteria and recommen dations
1J '
10. Submit site, gr ding plan to Dept_: "of Public Works for approval
and construct or inst,-;l the required_ £acili-t-ics.
ll. Segregate or pay off assessments.
12. Where interior road meets at El Verano, this connection shall be
used as an emergency exit only. Type of barrier to be approved'
by Butte County Fire Dept.
13, Place 1 1/2" AC overlay on Tom' Poll; 6e.)m dev616pment to East Ave.
Overlay to be f-,om lip of gutter to liptl.of gutter.
14. Place l 1/2" AC overlay on El Verano -from development to'E1 Paso
Way.) Overlay to be from 'lip to lip of gutter.
18, Provide standard driveway approach at intersection of interior
road and Lassen Ave.
16. Interior roads to be minimum 24 feet in width, 21' AC, AB with AC
barrier curb.
17.
Intersection lighting to be installed as indicated on development,
'
plan. Landscaping to be provided as indicated on development plan.
Fencing as indicated on development plan to be installed with the
exception of thelTence not to exceed 42" high within 50 feet of
centerline of El'V,,Verano and also within 50 feet of centerline of
, elbm Polk.
18. Storm drainage of., that 'portion of '`the development located in
SUDAD to drain to 1,UDAD ditch unless design calculations show that
the portion in the :southeasterly part of the SU.DAD district can
drain north to e:Yist�`ing storm drain line at Lassen A onue:
10. Dust control measures such as sprinIcling will need to be employed
as necessary to control dust during construction phase.
,
20, Eased on ultimate development of lel units, deposit with the
County of Butte $,190.84 per uni-t developed as developer's per unit
share of cost for future traffic signal at the intersection of
Bl1T'l'[ COUNTY PLANK INC COMMISSION
STAFF FINDINGS July 24 1978
The General Plan Idesignates the area as mediuin low density
residential 5-8 dwelling units per acre. ;vio mato General Plan
designates the northern portion Tesidential-lot, u(hsity l -G
dtvelling units per acre, transitioning to Residential Medium
Density 7-12 dwelling units per acre.
The project area is within {' existing Chico ..irban a��ea as
defined by the County Generj �ilan and lies within the Chico
primary Sphere of Influence presently mapped.
,,,The surrounding area to the"Aaorth and the northcast `is developed
as mobile home parks and apartment complexes establishing densities
far in excessof the General plan recommendations. The,pvopexties
adjacent on the south Eire R-1(SingleFamily Residential) having been
zoned in December 1973 with the southeast properties zoned R-1 in
October 1953.
The planning Commission has initiated R-3 zoning for the areas
of ,A-2 zone, but hearingss have not yet been scheduled on 'this
proposal.
The density as proposed exceeds the General Vian recommendations
although the amendment which,states:
'!The scope of urbanization in unincornorated°areas cannot
be pfEectively delineated on the land use map of the General
P1aii�.iieca.use of the map scale and the wide dispersement of
the various urban uses. As a result, numerous isolated
existing urban uses are not delineated on the land use map
In order to facilitate reasonable land use patterns consistent
with `the intent of the General Plein; urban uses nroposod"
which are contiguous to and surrounded by those established
urban uses shall be considered to be consistent with the
land use element. .It is not the intent of the General Plan
to allow urban development radiating from such existing urban
uses. Rather, it is the intent of the General Plan to recognize
existing urban land use which is not depicted on the land use
map, and to allots uneloveloped land, contiguou!A to and surrounded
by such urban lana -use to develop in a logical manner.:11
In vie1q of the surrounding development will be applicable.
i
t_1
fir,
•r ,
1100107
.i
BUTTE COUNTY ,,PLANNING COMMISSION
" MINUTES - �Tuly�+, `998
B. ITEM ON1iICtl ENVIRONMEN';AL SM�A�rRORT 41Ar I�tTD
t�
J r�
rr -, rr Crt"nt'Y a
and
(S�ngl c
co7ox►.o .From A-� to aj. ow
1 . Ever G10 4 Cn ; . r, , l l ax�n��d Ari. x-(1 l t�:�tsz'
lh,,a jy Rosid��liti ,1) to %rt; , ,4 ,at ed' 4ata A;110 rrurtll orad of
oonclomi x1� tion cote ,'I �, �ro� �1x1C� o� tho south
Toni Av<�. , °,;hc� rr�. rat t 1�d of I�,l Vavrit�fx�d s A�' �1--0-1
Sid(, of r,ap, on Avg est Goclm Axl A
41 Moro particul.
A�' �N+-
ryp } t.o.) and A-F4-.,2 -�`
rof Rrwcord, `ccovdod in MRP
gat I of .that Pavcc , Map�4 ,�5 on Page 60 i�� tl- o'fico of Clic+�,�3utf'� V�t�a1t�'
a
0400.��
Contni4il'S 1
�•2>., mora or � , ,.
rL�•—
.
.a
t,
n�
ti
r.,
` o
DUTTE COUNTY PLAN0411, COT
MMISSIO
.' MINUTES - auly 24,1F975
Earl Nelson. explained the project prpposal and ;iaotfitod out the,,
pertxrnnt impacts in the ehvironmen,tal impact POport.' He
alao pointed: out three alternatives to the projec--, those being:
Oh, ange location, develope single -family resl:donctj,s and no
! d(!Volopment,
There were no comments from t'he Commissioners rvgs,,trrding the
environmental impact report.
Ms Blair read staff findings.` She also read a latter ,from
Arthur Yiehman.n, 492 Panama Ave. , Chico, in oppooit-jor, to the
projectii
Ghtx;i.rman Bennett .read a letter received from Armtxnd and Colleen
Brett, 2545 Tom Polk Ave., Chico, in opposition to the project.
keif`ore pormit ting proponents and opponents to speak, Chairman `
Beraiett requested treat they be brief and not be redundant.
P:roponents traffic �.m act-� vas spoken to in the Vis. He discussed
. Russ Cronin er Ringo! & Associate
noise and tz p
3� :C1I, urban improve-
ments and the installation of ..x signal light at Team 'folk. They
have tentative approval of thy' ,�Aealth Departments.
Mr. .Oroninger displayed a map of the site and surxio�in.ding area. He
pointed out nearby existing d`evolopments and gave their deneitties.
All streets in the project; will 1)Y: private and El. Varano will be
an emergency suit.
Xo others spoke in favor at this time;.
Opponents: Mr. Art ljohmanA 492 Panama Ave:, Chico. He read a
letter from lair. v& Mrs. Edward Gettle, 2596 El ;Paso Wavy, Chico,
Mr& Mrs. Bill. Gatos, 2503 El Paso Wavy and Mr: &.Mrs. John. Otto,
25. 4 El Paso ,May, Chico; The letter exrr, ssed concern over
�., increased densities and traffic Mr. Lehman was colic erned Ath
the mme
Mr. till Clatworthy, 483 Panama, Ave,) Chico. He road a letter
' from Richarod Reid, 479 Panama Ave. Chico. M,r. Clatworthy made
comments regarding safety of children and overcrowding of schools.
Sha,roii Lohmann, 492 Panama A°ve., Chicbav
,-1. & 2 Unused.
t
41
T3TjT11B COUNvi PT' IqNl 103,10MMIS131ON
M'CNtIT J ul.y 21.X. q7 �3
Mr. ArmandnP.94-C Tom Polk Ave , Chico. 1-10-npol-r: AP(i0ut
imp'.ic,t;i-oil, of nIelghborl-food school y.
fir. Schoonover, 25P8 Tom Polk Ave., Chico, prase nf;od a petition >'
cox,i't,ra:i,niig approximately 80 signiit,ures in opposition the
Nei YNrt°rte,.
Kathy Bratton, 4 Panama 1wc, : Cla is o . , She
rr. �x(1011 1 E" t
Patx tcia Pihi, � t.,, ..wbod. Circle,Chaco.
John Br.atluon., 4,841 nama ,Av,� , Chico. Ike read a tr„tier from
Gail Ric,,
lel. G. Downing 7. El Cerrito Uriv`�i j Chico. Tic, Wool td like -to see
t}ars zoning P'r;malzn o 11ngL t amily :residexxtial -
n C.1yde Farris, Trim Polk eve:, Chico, operator or a 12--guest guest home:
llF is o,gncetrned v x thr_� safo,ty of tlto elilC xly»
Henry, Cuvt%is, 256'7 B,1 baso tray, Chi.ro.
Davy.] Clark:, P5541 El Paoo Way, Chico.
J
Vebut1; al by, proponen-t�-,- muss Croninger, Itingol.Azsociate;s» Ito
4apin pointed out that the; voado Ji.thia the draw lopmont would he' -;
private .11,cl thrrit 010 t;ra.ffi,c Withat, coming; in and out of
the siibdiviaion,. fle sai ci that Mie schools, had [won noti.:ried.' Any
: tttpact;i(,j, Ht,-,a woul,d o(,,�,,ur would pvobal)l;) bp ovur ra roup year
period.
08�nie Wrya,ji,,h't, TPrVy Lyx.rri Aprartmont,s El parlo WVY) Chido, realtor
andry,yyc�mry+ployo(, o'e cI=)v��lc��:y�i;�.yy f3ltcp, ]rriji �that:yya� lot. .ra,tµ'{yrcn�;.�E�`a�frch h.a�d
b Wien dollO and public, i�' \ `�H1 �,'F ll �. r�l�{.��- �V «4. �la.l ax-,o .1 1�(k,� rj N`T.l is t� afore the
initiation 01' t,laa . l,r '�� r~ 1, 1 t ttioti'. d. havr, boon x,ronomi rally
N 1
uxxl`rasilllr tr,� rlo att ” �-1" i,llt,lr. f+"atni� Ne tidenUal) sttbrJ�vas o +
+ N , +�N l" ezuk�ciav�, irr� t�lity vottdo, wpu°ld havo been
Ii` it had l�e�`tlti UVI' i tJ.,]
pttl J.a c eita .3 not-, I,v Lvca k (, otNwio�l O�zls.
�I
`i;y o��pc�tic�zlt,5 Charles iia n, -t Cex�ri.t�c;, Chica
Bill blaty, rthy, iF85 r,.-iij pm Avg., Chis
Sharon I`{{ tiatltttn, fit. n "anama .Avo-; Cli%.00—'
Oleta Ourt•iR, 2505 Ed Ptu,,o Way, Chico,
Art ; i,ohmant"
t � 4.1)1.2 1'A.rla ma ,A'Ci E'" . , Ck11 c 0,� �/
'0' Y1 Olark, 25 1 El Pala Way, Chico.
0lyde Harris, ,-508 Tom Volk ,AvO Chf-�O
Gary rjamptdx,1,, 4 LyxY.nwoocl Circl,o, Chico.
:6 ! ;'
BUT TE COUNTY MANNING COMNISSION
n
MINUTES - July 241, 1-978
William Evert;; tho developer; said the project
is inonded to
provide affordables homes,,, The community, will
be gov, 'd by a
,,homeowners
association. 11,
The h6aring was c1,or,ed to the public,
r
Mr. Stutz said he `w a .riot sold on the project:
He was concerned
with overuse, of tho roads.
Mr. " Wheeler, commented on the density and the noed
for
on Tom l' oIk Avo,.
,sidewalks
motion was The
Mr., Stutz made a motion to deny`. ..
seconde
` d b
Mr. Whocl.er and pas8od by the 9win6 vote
(fol.l
AYES Gilbert: y ,; Stutz;( Wheeier
NOES Non.o
Chairman Bon- .ott
rABSIPAIN
ABSEarT + Everhav
Puss Oronir;-,er oquested a 1" continuance to make
„
amendments to \
the project.
i
o i?
t
GI
r
i
R •.i
,
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
1978
Ever '01.60 Inc. Monterey. Th', firm appeals the Planning CocYmiission�r, �
denial of,a rezone for the Ebstwood Oaks proposed PAG sub�lvisign,
AP 44.09-13 (portion), 44-21-02 (portion), and 44-32-24, 15 acres
more or less,•located at the north ends:of Tom Polk Avenue,, west
end of P1 V'arano Ways south side of Lassen Avenue at Godman
Avenue:, Chico. Set for -:searing August 22, 1978 at 10:00 a.m.
r ,
`\ it
u
i
$OARD OF SUPERVISORS
August 1
:MINUTES - � 1 1978 •`� ..
t�
�(
8-1412 REPORT TO BOARD RE' EVER GLO.,' INC, DENIED ENVTRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
,SAND "R-1." (SINGLE AMILY RESIDENTIAL) TO i1
AAM REZONE PROM "A-2" iGENERAL) �1 ALLOW CONDOMINIUM COMPLEX, PROPERTY
- ; '
"PA -C" (PLANNED AREA -CLUSTER) TO M F
LOCATED' AT NORT'k END OF TOM POLY, AVENUE
, THE WEST END OF EL VERANO WAY t;1T�
l ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF .LASSEN AVENUE AT GODMAN AVENUE IDaTTIVIED AS -'
AP 44-09-13 (PORTION),z'!�AT 44-21-02) OOR'TioQ) AND AP 44-32-24, CONTAINING
I 15 ACRES, MORE OR LESS,
CHICO
Bettye Blair,; interim planning director, mode,j report t tht
Board regarding Ever Glo, Inc, deniee''envitnnmental impact rep ort an
d 1
;r
1 ,
rezonefrom "A•-2" (gene•cal) and f'R-l" (single fail
;uy residential) to r
tipA-r," (planned area -cluster) too allow a condominium complex, Property
located at the north end of Tobi\ Polk Avenue, the west end of El Merano
p 'i T y (Portion) and AP 44-02-24,tified
containing,
- h
Way'and on the nth s"xde..of vatsen Atienue at Godman venue i en
as a 44-0
or
46. '2Tle0matter;has )beer set for hearing
l5 acres, �' '
on August 22, 1878 at lO:Ob`�V "consider rppeal,
1 f
w: i
BUt,te County .Board. of Supervisors �
Atixu.te w August 22, 1973
78-1598 PUBLIC HEARING. EVER GLO INC;'- ,APPEAL OF DENIED ENVIRO
rrA-2'`> (GENERAL) AM,,"R-1" (SING N 'A°I-, IMPACT
REPORT AND REZONE FROM
TO "PA -0,i LE -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) I
{PLANNED AREA -CLUSTER) TO ALLOW'/A CONDOMINIUM COMPLEX PROPERTY'
LOCATED AT NORTH END OF TOM POLK AVE., THE WEST END of EL VERANa WAY
AND ON THE SOU1;'H SIDE OFLASSI N AVENUE AT GODMAN AVENUE IDENTIFIED AS
SAP 44-09-13 �-ORTION), AP 44-21-02 (PORTION) AND AP 44-32-240 CONTAlkNG
l0 TEENCRES, MORE OR LESS.l CHICO CONTINUED TO SEPTEMBER 26, 1978 AT
.�. 0A.M..
The publi^'nearing on Ever G10 Inc. a
. rE�zone from rrA-2r' ,r ri Appeal of denied EIR and.
0 ►r e (general) and R-1 (single-family residential) to
_... PA -C
(panned area cluster) to Allow a O'hdominium complex, property
located at the,north end of Tom Polk Ave.,`the west end of E1 Verano Way
and on the 8out2; side of Lassen --+Avenue at Godman Avenue identified as
AP 44=09-13 (portion), AP 44-21-02 (portion) and AP 44-32-24, containing
fifteen acres, md'�e or less, Chico was held as advertised. Letter from
Clatworthy in epposition to proposal read.
,ly
Chairman�Winston stated thathe had been Informed thau the
p _p are in the Process of have stated they wished this delayed because
l�. bh+i orients and Opponents ha -
pro,�ert acceptable to the peopleworkini out a compromisethat might make the
`1 Ott the area 11
�1 Hearing open to the public; Appearing; E. G. Downing. Mr,
Downing asked if,,the matter wo•zld be continued.
The matt -or was continued to September 26, 1978 at IO:OI�..a .nt.
with PV
6erty owners to be notified;
9
lI
I
,1
a
UoAM OF SU 121 SORS
r1 Ntl' Septembor 26197
78=1862 PUBLIC NEARING: EVER CLO INC. APPEAL OF DENIED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
REPORT AND REzONE FROM "A-21' (GENERAL) AND "R-V",..(SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL)
TO "PA-C" (PLANNED ARIA-CWSTER) TO ALLOW A COND61INIUM COMPLEX, PROPERTY
LOCATED AT THE NORTH LND OF TOM POLK AVENUE, THE w� ST END OF EL VERANO
WAY AND ON TETE SOUTH S _D9 OF LASSEN AVENUE A'1' GODMAN AVENUE IDENTIFIED
`1 AS AP 4.4-05-13 (PORTION), AP 44-21-02 (PORTION) AND AP 44.32-240 CONTAINING
,15 ACRES. MORE OR LESS. CHICO
entad impact u ort and hearing
on the Ever Glo Inc. appeal of denied environ-
The public hearxing a
m p p e from "A-21' (general) and "R-1" (single -"family
residential.) to "PA-C" (planned area-cluster) to allow a condominium
complex, property located at the north end of Tom Polk Avenue, the west
end of El V'erano Way and 'on the south side of Lassen Avenue at Godman
Avenue identified as AP 44-09=13 (portion), AP 44-21-02 (portion) and
AP 44-32-24, containing 15 acresy more or less, Chaco was held as
continued„
Earl Nelson.' environmental review director, set out the background
j of the environmental impact report.This project involves 131. proposed
townhouse units to be constructer] on 14,,5 acres in the North Chico area.
He set out the layout of the prt�ject. There is siJ�kgle family residential.
i} in the south and east, orchard and freeway to the 0est and mobile home
park to the north, This would result in a change jit the character of the
area from vacant land to 8.84 units per acre. ThetA would be a problem
with noise and dust during construction and on-going noise after due
to the ,traffic situation. There is concern oft the part of the' people.
The Ella traffic study indicates that Tom Poll will receive the gxeater
part of the traffic, El Paso is related to this. Tom Polk Avenue
will have an increase in traffic from 300 cars to 1,06"? cars, which is Y,
a 700 car increase, E1 Paso 'Way presently has 3,100 cars and after
devel&pment have 3,200 cars. Ldssen Avenue will SWow an increase
ofi 1'00",tars• A possible change in alignment to get 'Tom;Polk and Lassen
A4ienues to a direct thoroughfare is not discussed in tete EIR. if the
>o ect is modified the PIR will have to be modiP7Jdd; The indil
ications
from the Planning DeparMont and,the recent changeato the goner` l plan
allows'' conside- tAtion of igle surtoundl.ng areas and ulesb
tot'tye B1dir,"planning director, set out the background of the
rezone. The ge%eral plan designation is 5 to 8 dwelling units per acre,
The atea to the north on the pensula is A4 and the remainder is R-1.
plan is a physical part of the
The po ect is a PAyC development nd the `lois binding on the developer.
toning, If the prodect xs approved the plan
The�-,e dere 2The Plann ns placed q'h Comm ss��onthe deAedJthe project. Theyect by til� sion foundeitew
coumiittee. T g
would be ''consistent with the Eene`i al plan. Even though the 8,84 units
a.ftd the.,Fgenertl plan recommends 5 to 8 dwellings per acre it was felt j
the area was chntig'uous to more intense urilts because of the amdndmetit
��``
TtXe city genereJ plan medium density t3iGh ';l..�to 12 units per acre
if the possible Alignment were to be ddri!A&&ted it would be necessary
for the, project. °to be retorted back to they Mantling CddfMisbibn fax
C4.J
BOARD 4F $UK' 80R3
KINMES — Septembar 26$ 1978
Supervisor Richter stated that the amendment to the general
plan provided for viewing of uses surrounding and that it be shoxrn as
medium dens4y and would be to have higher density around. The east
boundary is all single family residential. The section on Tom Polk
is single family residential. There is freeway on the other side,
The only area that is multi=family is the mobile home park. The largest
portion of the development i
ort s surrounded by single family, residences. ..
Mrs, Blair stated that the yield is 12 units in the entire
14 plus acres. The R-1 designation in the general plan is"l to 4 units
per acre. You are looking at a density of S to 8 units per acre. There
could be an opposite opinion that the R -l. might: not be consistent.
'Hearing open to the public. Appearing:
1. Russ Kroninger, Ringel and Associatesi�-Mr. Kroninger stated
that'he was representing Ever Glo in this matter. This project started
with a parcel nap of three lots to eliminate two existing houses and
came up with 14 acres in August and October 1977. The county was aware
of what was being done. This was discussed with Public Works to come up
with a reasonable economic project to wcrk with. The parcel map was
approved with the Planning'Director`s report that the density was 5 t
8 units per acre. There has beef an environmental impact report on
the project. From El Vdtano to Tom Polk is residential, -and the rest
of the surrounding area is mobile home parks or apartment housing,
Tt;e;circumstante s of the amendment to the ordinan"b was the surrounding area
f and radiating from.
Supervisor Ric'�,tex did not feel that it was the Board; s intent
to use the amendment to dverride�`designated areas.
Mr. Kroninger stared th\; he askecs._for the appeal from the
Planning Commission denial because et that time the Planning Commission
<; meetings -spoke of lowering density and re-routing traffic. He asked
for some time to review the alternate procedures and the C6itdssion voted
to deny the project. After the Planning Commission d,°nial he went to the
Teat Palk Avenue and i;l Pa'so Way residents, This project puts less traffic
on `loin Polk Avenue than thoroughfare would. He asked that Ever Gl.o
be given�,an opportunity to revise the plan so that people would not
j g opportunity approve p project
i,t standsor
r a give themHe an the t ortuni.ty toirevise the plan,
.--�*
14 natty Peal. rasa Peal presented a petition signed by
people in the area,,,, They are opposed to 'any petitions to rezone the ;
area on the grounds that the R.-1 is approptiate, Cotistrue:tion of the
Unit will affect the character of the area, She is concerned with the it
safety of, children and higher traffic problems. There is a home nor
metic,iXiy tetatded children in the ar613. She is concerned foe, their gikidty.
r`
i
M�
BOARD OF SUPEEVISbRSr�
14INUTES --September G6, 1978
3, Marlene Bratin. Ms. Bratin stated than she was the
spokesman for E1 Paso Way residents. They are opposed to the extension
of Tom Polk Avenue for the purpose of relief*`ng the traffic an El Pa
so „
Way. She is atLxious to find a traffic solution. Channeling some .l
traffic on Tom Polk will not eliminate the hazard on El Paso.
4. Henry Curtis. Mr. Curtis stated that this is the view
-point of one family and not the residents"of El Paso Way.
the impact the localnschool Bratin
Partr 'dstated
e. Aththewas
tned about'
imenofrthe Planning
P � y g ng
Commission hearing this was rebutted by,the developer. The school district
was trying to redo the boundaries. Those boundaries have been done and
and the development would still fall within the Jay Partridge School area.
xt if presently operating at 105/o level. This .s a condominium townhouse
deve opment. They will probably be bought and owned by owners and it
will not be a single tAmily type of dwelling. He felt that it could
become a rental type of unit. This will decrease the integrity of the
,,
6. Arthur Leman. Mr. Leman asked to present an denial map
to the Board for their viewing?
RECESS- 10:32 a.m.
RECONVENE: 10:35 a.m.
Iver. teman set out the aerial map f6r theoBoard. The distance
between ,`Coal Polk and E1 Paso is 64.3 yards. If there is an increase
the populati.in beyond the minimum of the 5 to 8 it would mean increased ri
number of -cars and traffic. The only logical solution would be a two-way
p population n
ramp from 'Tom Polk Avenue: The apulati north of Lassen will double i.n
tenears, If the development of the area goes beyond the minimum density "-
y.
it will be difficult on East Avenue.
7/ Sharon Leindii firs. Leman.,stated that the development is
surrounded on three sides by R-1 zoning. The only, place `it isnot is
to the north. There is some doscrepency betwodh the Chico and county
general
p nshe looked up the density it said somewhere between
low and oigghti she felt that the cotnmunity.,had fought for their zoning,
devi us time. The children iti'the north area are using Tom Polk
evzo
and from school. She was opposed to the rezone.
at a p>
to wa
g. Gary Richied Mr. Richie set out ,,the problems the neighborhood
Aids had with a rental unit in the areaa He is'loncetned with the safety
of.the children tt the neighborhood.
94 Clyde�JHarris► Me, Harris asked where the figures Caine
i om oil the traffic count on 'Tom Polk: He folt that the count had not
been tAkoti properly:
C-) 13
,r
rJ cryo i
e
BOA.RA dF SUPERVISORS
MINUTES -- September 26 1,', 8 r
Public Works to check on this 'tliatter.
10. Russ Kroni.n er. Mr. Kronin er stated that <°ubl tc Works,,
0hag files on <about three tentative Parcel maps with R-1 zoW^,njZ,that is
being refuted by the general public. There is':a revised planun the
wall 'to 'Lower :.the density to get into Gyle 5 to 8 unit's per acre. Tite ); 1
developer tried to use the density �.n:, tl,e area and put the higher density
into the nordi area 'of the,.plan. it meets the general plan,
11. Arthur Leman. Mr. 'Lemariljstated that the people in the area
fought to have R-1 zoning.
12. Sally Junglin Ms. Junglin asked which map the Board -was �?
consideringr
g
She as advised that the original map is t,i :r., one,
that is being
used. {>
Boa,c consider
18. William Everett, Ever Glo•ti5 the tvereingask that the
siren send,n :the razone back � fission for
�p y
irk with ;.y..
retiised ma . T,his would be so that the would be, able to w
,_._..)the neighborhood.
14e Arthur T,(man. Mr. Leman felt that the neighborhood had
never worked posit vely,with the developer.
Hpaw in closed to the public and confined to:rthi: Bo
g
' and
f,1 Supervisor Richter stated that the overriding cohsiderat4,on,is
the zonink-a. The general. plan shows higher density. 11owever, the pe'ople
did zd'ne the property R-J. 1t was zoned, to ,protect the neighbarhr6d b
it was `shaved by Supervisor Richtet that the appear bre denied,
,;.�fo�3.on withdrneyn. `,>
and carried, the appedl�was denied and the mattor t�asysent ilor Mahigati
On mo'ftun of "upervisor Richter seconded 5 Ali ery d
' i Y 7 back to the 1
Planning Gomm siori,Yrith iris ttuctiuri-Fthat it the 8oardrs position to`
have no greater den4lty than R-1 iii the PA-0 zone. AYES: Supervisors
'Lemke$ Madigan, Moseley arAd Richter, 140ES Chairman iifission.
A200A't1Ek. 11 l5 a:m.
SupeMsdr Madigah Ab'kod,,that 'Public Work,i cmitact dLTIt g
"t1'
f 3, gr , R ;1
o l.Oq, considdrotioh to an offr.imp for Lassen .Avenue.
'TVT'tr C'f1TT*7Tv PLANINT NIr, r.(VT%4T8ST0M,,
MINUTEF .,October A, 1978 ,)
B ,• EVER-GI.0 PA-C REZONE, 78-23)
Y Mrs. Blair read an
excerpt' from the ;Board o�
. � Supervisors' meeting of:_
September 26, 1978 as') follows
.,.the matter was "sent back to the„'Planning Commission,with
- instructions that it is the Board's position to have no-.greater
density than R=1, in the PA-C zohe.11
Motion ti;as made bv,,Comm;.issib'ner Stutz, seconded her Commissioner W ecler;
to direct staff t� re-fat this matter back' to tl�e Subdivi i,on Commit tocl,
AYES Commissioners. Stutz and Wheeler and. Chairman Bennett:
i o'F.S - No one
ABSENT: Commissioners Gilbert F, Evotha.rai
Mo`'�ion carried.
1
.f
A
y.
IJ
1
r
71, forpuUlic Ihoaring. ilat�tdled earlier., in the meeting.
The firm writes ad "g t:F,lat cable tel"
f.�
Skate Tv Ca , Chico vci visioii
(
I/ pervice rates and charges will be increased by 7.1410, effect! e '
;.March 1., 1981. Information; no action t�ak�tn. o
Butte Ca,3yon rezone. Several letters have been raceived,n..'upport of ;r
`repealing the rezone, but if necessary, that tt a 'IL bue be submitted,
1 / g
earlier ;in the meeting.
to the voters on tlte'.`November ballot.
Information—see
motion
r
Law/Offices of Stewart, Craig, Uumpherys & Burchatt. The attorneys, �on
b.ehalf of Baldwin',Cantracting Cr�iipany,r�lnc'�` write advising' that
it belied the
$. -re .-referendum
petl,t:ion Oris knot filed within
it is their belief the,xefexendu
the timeidered earlier in the meeting.
Oroville Board of
Realtors. The board writE,s offering their services in
fact finding for items relating to dev;lopmont, redevelopment,
/ planning, etc. Informationno action L•ak6n.IJ
recommendir,��, thatdbheSB�rdenotosupport•t�i�e committee writes
h /
Butte Count Emer enc � structure of the.
Northern California Emergency Medical rare Cotmcil Board to
exclude emergency medical care representatives from membership.
to come forward later. „ 18, 1.981 wind a xncominendation
Information; meeting to be held March
.
j' Butte County FIrm,t�;�areau. The bureau writes forwarding its resolution
epposing the liceiising of the Northeq Calif ornia Power" Agency
operate PG&E"s Rock Creek and Cresta power projects (redetal.
f R,Wrgy Regoilatory Commission license project 1962). Information!
I S
o action 'taken.
l Paradis Ambulance Sery ' The fitm writes forwarding i nforimUl on concerning
the cuunr s 'cep
y' report t;ith r�:gard to the ambtzlance:',exvice contract.
4
r ' Y
Informn,,tiotll no actiontalce>;i:,
De' Artfokit of Youth Authority. '`she \a'epartmaht turites fot�oa7cding infbr-
/r Slate g iii}`figh Ong fires and helpa:ng to 7
w.,. ma tion concerning the work done
I��1, odsbyoothAuthrity ards .a,.n „cons e;vation campsi
Info natiactt
y
!�
and Geolo` , Boa'r,l The board writes forwarding information
State i�In�t�g ��;, f� � r can ._
conchirni.ng cer.�ti :L;dation procedures for surface mining and r�LJa
atian ordinani`g Discussion; no action 'taken
art ,rhe de artme't.t whites a
Dep {utent of Housing and T.)"pis' n Uevelopinent. ` p advising
that the Tibx sing Op�,,6ttufilt es Strategy prepared and sub-amtied
for 'Butte County h 1;� been ,approved. ,ti Tnformstibn no act.ioh. taken.
35 CONTINU .. TO 4RCH 10, 1951 AT 10!1` A.M. - PUBLIC HEARING-. WILLIAM EVERT/
1,V'ER-GLO, xNC. DRAFT ENVIVRONMENTAL Da)ACT R8!"ORT AND APPEAL OF DENIED IED REZO TE
t. 101 Ilk- Vf (SINGLE4AMTL'Y kt-stUENTIAL) AND ''R»S'tOtDIbM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) `J
TO IIPA,= .,,,,,(PLANNED ATEA CiN8`LCR)� PROURTY LOCATED NORTH OF 'L0I4 POLI AVIMIP,y
SOUTH OF LASSEN AVENUE An WEST OF EL' PASO WAY, IDENTIF12D AS AV 44-21-b7
ASID 68.-.CHICO (I,')
The public hearing on the 14111iatft Everb/Ever,Glo; Inc.', draft
etiviroivnental impact report and ppeal of &.,nied` reaf ire from '�R ill (siiiglt
re 108.
',,\ Pe ruary 24, 1981
�� i.y
k ;,
February 24, 1981
r 11 c
G =' -8x- family resi isl) and "t30 (me`iuui densi etidentialC;a "PA�C ~klg_a=n
nad _th o --F,' Told Avenue, souh of Las, _n
area cluster property" located 'nor
g, , y ' o a ia8
Avenue and wp`st of El Yaso Wa , iaentified an AT 44-21-67 and 68 Chic
held as ";advertised.
Bettye Blair, planning director, set -out the backgrrzurid on the
appeal.. Several maps had been placed on the board for view,"ing, Orr-, map „
indica ted the modifications of � ,he Planni.�g 'Comml pdion recomm.�ndd tions . .
Conditions of-,appro�Ml ,have heeu reviewe�t by.,, the doveloper. The Board
has copios of"minutes, staff findings and" revised staff findings.
Hearing open ;to the public. Appearing:
]. Russ Gi
::
February 24, 1981
r�risor Lemke stated if there �3 a solutionto the circulation
'
a tterh, held have no problem. He fe1t� le tlolution was an off ramp at
"Lassen Avenues' „
6 y Clay Castleberry, public works director stated
, coii'idexing the
fac't'fCaltrans is not Tannin to fund the Gianeili ,ridge problem he did
planning
not feel there 'was a pos;ti.bility of funding for of�ramps. He agreed` :,
there is traffic problep6 in the are6. Ile felt the Board had wanted Tom
Polk to be a through road to Lassen Avenue. -The off ramp at 20th Street
in Chico was financed by one large property owner in the area.
Mr Cro'+inger had ,.talked with SenatDI! Johnson and he indicate)-,
until there was fondscomirig from these areas there mould be' nd rrture„
plans for` delive7.opme' nt. He itad held meetings with 1�eople in the "�xopn4ed
`
prajeet Wren! and they wrei:e agreeable to the speed bumps to decreas Lspeed.
; 2. Gaxy IUc hey, Flom Polk Avenue, MVI Richey was not aware
of the' 60,16-ioOt wide roadway requirement and'„ he had attended the previous
heaz;irig s ' 1 Ti a biggest concernoof,, owners in ,the area is traffic. He felt
gg
�
'the f't.rst x�' ponAbilIty was f r safety of ,.the people. ' He felt the most
/I
obv'iouo, ansia��r W,�S the off ramp s�� Lassen Aenue They support the project
"
as planned as 'a private road with trafficc� ing out on Tom Polk Avenuei
1. Robert l�cRey'nolds,nE1 Paso way. Mr iicR2yilolds is against
any development or Change it zoning that doesnoL'� �'bti+'`de for a' private
street from Lassen Avonue to Tom 'Polk to East Aveft"a.
'
4, Eric Lehman, Pan6tna Avenue. 'Mr. Lehman has "lived in the
I!
area fox 11 years. They .fought for the "'R -V zoning. He would' like to
see an of`t ramp installed. He wou7,d like 'to see the entranci., to the mobile
me park on white Avenue opened. `le felt the frontage road would eliminate
businesses.
i5. Henry Curtio, El Paso Way.,, Mr. Curtis felt they should put
' have single
Cosd hro�t' h and cons trur, t an off ram . He would rather h
,. 7
it
a
famil 11 residd, is z,r . e area.
fir.., Groniilger stated the 24 foot wide road did not fit the GeneraLl
P2,6n. They d,:d reduce ,the density. They went along 'With the peoples
clif ice for a; private road. He felt if Tori Polk, was going to be a 60 foot
efjiieierit, the density, should go back' to eight.
Tearing closed to' the public and confined to the Boardi,
ler stated could e a do�.i�-ion on this
projec' todaye 5ho w ldor
liketoaddressthe density and res porch the
J
minutes bf,prior teetings before making a decision. .She askew that ,.`fie
matt'e;: be tontuiued for, two weeks. If the density Via:,; the project increases'
or decreases she felt it should be open to the public! to respond,
1�
Hdaring „open, to the public and continued to March 10, 15$1 at
10:15 a,ri.
�\
StiperV], ` 'h the peOplii in the
W ler stated she 'would Meet with
`sot
;area, fir, Richey and tit. totima;n to discuss the matter with Calttans.
Ms, Aldir stated h,sufbaldslchanges.. the les
thi,maps which hadbeen pogitfr tig the g s
.
if
=ChSS. ,
11:5 afm:010
R1aGgN�'1?NE,11.:35 a,u�L llb,
��
j and carr a ;,, finding the provisions - -� WILLI,
the proposed roject could nothavewi.>irez.f a tr ,effAc2 o(generalvitdriment,
m negative d�aration was adopted; rrhe r �� Ir t = 'I . 000
rR-1
(foothill recreational ten acre p `reels) ,*`.., prop ,local;ed appro, imately
3/4 mile northeast of the intersection,of hurl,eton and Stringtown Roars,
F' identified as AP 72-29--1.2, 133, 13!.; 135 and 72-2,6147, 80 and 87,
Wyandotte area was approved; Ordinance'2195 eras adopted and the Chairri%n
. authorized to sign; Ehe Planning staff`Was directed to initiate zoning 1k,
study for the `entire area, -AYES Supervisors Dolan, Lemke., tQheel.er and
'
Chairman Moseley. NOES: �'upervisor Saracen .
410 PUBLIC HEARING: WILLIAM EVERT/EVER-GLO, INC:, -- 17RATTZ EIR AND. APPEAL OF DENIED
REZONE FROM "R-111 (SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENT'rx,I,)., AND IR 3" (MEDIUM DENsrry/
RESIDENTIAL) TO "PA -C" (PLANNED AREA -CLUSTER) , PROPURTX LOCATED +NORTIi OF
TOM FOLK AVENUE,, SOUTH OF LASSEN AVENUE A,,VD WEST, or, ru, PASO WAY, IDENTIFIED
1
AS . AP 4421-b7 & ' 68, CH'4 � r
The �'ubli.c hearing�'on William )✓vert/Ever--C],o, Inc, draft environ
✓.!Antal impact report and appeal of denied rezone from "R --l" �singlp--family
j res a,ential) and "I2-3" (medium density residential) tit,, "PA -C" (planned-
Avenue uster)st o£ er Paso at north of Toa Polk Avenue, south of Lassen
I; f f y identified as 41P 44 -21 -67 -and 68, Chico
f ax`�a-cluster), Property located
was held as continued.
Bettye Blair, ,planning director, set out Che baLkgr&,ind bf the.,
appeal i The 'Planning Commission's minutes reflect the 'a)naersl� for the
area. She had received ')a call from Ellis Rbilis asking about alignment
with regard to.,. the seder line, �
Supervisor Wheeler statedl'she was amazed the City of Chiro i..
They are askin t� They �t�ret e.,,awarc the area teas be n` d:eveloPed,'
did not cont�at the conn y
y g rigthtL ;,-way fol=public utilities easement for
connecting of Pane -`9, -,,nd E1 Verano.
Il rj
>' Hearing `o -pet to the publ.iL_. Appearing: "
r;
1, Huss: Cro�i�:naer. �.nger stated this is a ~ p
menti; with ""the roads be Cng 24 feet. in atxdth
roadplanned �3evej op. vote
� r
Crori. r He,.has
spoke.n with Mr. Polls regarding the seater. The r-Ity has two,,,proposed, route.
TYiere is no way, of knowing whish route mill be chosen. He indicated some
type of1i�i.ght-of-Way to Mr. R011si He telt this could be,,worked out.
This
1, ree, Vas shown to the planning Commission January l,"1981. They
s at
riZIied they would rather see medium density five to eight dwiellings.
This property~ is split by the ;sphere` of influence for the City of Chit.
The zoning for the,,rroperty is '+Tt-l11 zoning: The pazihazr ld area toOara
,L`hsd6n is medium density and "11-34 ran rtg. y
2, Gary Ri.,tchin, 2597 Tom Polk. Ri.tchi.e stated((the residents
of the area had mrt: �i.th Mr, `Croninger and agreed to a loafer density and
agreed to accept the i -vaffic ;load oat: of the.: propoted development He
felt. the issue was cloUdeo by the other isttheoltr m in
p ride tra.ffxc prable ,
the area, It , iu ged that the Board vote ott project, as prdoented, �
+
Supervisor Whaelcr stated she had recejved a memo ft ttt the
Public Wor'°s Director that he would like to make another suggestion
l W
that tkd street be 32'4aet athich woulu. iwti�ttuelve foot traffic
lanes and tw'o bike baf,iis tdithout restrictit�the through ttaffiCW
Mr., yPitclie felt
that
El Pasoa
mrldrtheitotoEast%�
the
rAeuefrom the
� the
north near trar,els to Lasseni
access is through t Ooamah an& the woad it wridened the through traft;ie
\'
tall to All:A. d go dome Tom Polk.trafficy _�...
� 1 take the lesser rout- Ptiage 13�.
s t�1te arou
'�� � L! ,mac A A � i � sS A •, a9 f7!'•..et r# :f s7 !� � � � � pl it f;� .a' � A � � � � ,: A a A. ,:s
81�- 'The residentAWf th, a area can live with. this o f cart. lie Jould like til
see a stree ht at the corner. He was of thpt turniylg ,the 'project
into a"thoroughfare would create a,problem. /
}� Supervisor Wheeldr� stated that thea -major hxobl is with af.f c
r
have not been created from, the single family residetices' bu� from the
mobile home park and apartments,
Mr. Ritchie stated that_ t.ie residents were initially concerned
aboiit the density of the project. This is not the issue at this point.
I'
� 1. RussoCroninget. Mr-. Cioninger stated the road before
t-i-L11
e Board at this time is a 24-foot private road.14hen there is dist'ussion
of a--through road that means a public road. The private road is a tihre�ugh
} roadEut a driveway approach off Lassen.' A through road that is public
would ;be a standard road approach, off Lassen. By using the' proposal"
from, L:Iblic 'Work? fora 32 foot wide road with side'ks, this would
be 'a SO-foot right-df.-taay,, The SQ-foot right-ef-�,Yay" would have building
setbacks 10 feet from the property line instead of j11;0 feet from the ",center
line of the road.;
Ms. Bla:r stated that in the demo dated March �4, 1981 there is
discussion of the two proposals. The Commission had;itr ed to bring the
is for_ ;that ni:!mbar of unz.ts. ! 96 Tit and this p,rogas
number of units down. The Commission,recoal;
ended
4; Art Lemany 492 Panama. ,1r. Leman stake
d.:that during the
time the area was zoned "A-21' there was a use pe1, t for a mobile home
park issued. The neighbors in the, area made the zaning !'R-l" zoning
He was not happy with,,rhe id'ti of 'a through road. He roped, that this
area was :ma' tai.ned res cilose to, "R-11' zoning as posaibl,e
5. c�uss;�!Croning�r, Dir Cro zingdr stated they were :�t ;l,1 speaking
of a private road'%24 feet in'Width; They are spearing of the density of
rhe,- snits and prc;v d�' g>,244-,f oot road onto Tim Po,ik Avenue onto East
Avenue. Those ,people kftow the traffic circulation. an,a public road he,
dial not ,know what the number would be There is no development plan from
� Lassen toato�an
d east to the freeway• They are speaking of affordable
housings 4
StvtRVISOR �HMEA ABStNT AT 'THT5 TTMg
lis. 'Blair stated she would like to clerify the comment there
ff �
was no development,plan for the area. That was part of the north Chico
ti
1 g anon at. the uses. ost: are
e
rtsideA,tial single fa ujly —un tsiand somencottuiereial areas .
5ih' RVx'SOit WftRRL It, P1tEMT AT `THIS TIME
jpervisor boldit stated these is a zonings plan. It seems like
the plan plans evetyonets lives on a cu:l-da-sac. There arc 'two main arLe�ti a.
Tinwe are east-test loads that dreams a greater flow.
Dir, Crortln..ger was speaklftg of a total den. iJt� plan.. It
rtarth-south. Re was thinkin of a development,pIa.n and tirculatt,�n Phan.
They mve . also trhiuk of east-west,
1 g p and confined to the �,oard.
ke�irin closei to the � ub�.ic 1
` SSh
"
�� Ch rman' Moselay stated she�,had received calls from LegGoin-
gl,- ,J
' y
and Sue` Mar a arid % letter from `Bob & Ne10agAdynnlds.
Supervisor Dolan stated that the neighborhood on Tour Polk Avenue`
pp p nti1 their" was a compromiad in the density- and
opposed the development u ,.,
bears an unfair burden,`- 7.he"' devel apex' agreed
the:private rr/ad. El Paso
to the compromise.
J
Supervisor Wheeler stated thn developers would n .agI to V
ci
t
maintain a zoning designation instead of allowing a ))PA-C�, zoning
the
designation. Thai`: is wh�ab has created the problem. She �"�as -afraid
another problem. She would 1�ike to see Che
Board might just be crea,�ing
road open. She was not),jcomfortable with the Tensity propoted.
r g p
Supervisor $araeeri -stated they were talkie about. a" private
g g „
which would match` wita a "PA -C" zoning. The residents a;e agreeing
x`oad
to thecompromi
March -10 1981
51
" wt
. Leman. Mr. , Lemari stated aj?vytraffic flows .are in
�
the ,mvrna,ng3a the evening.. .,
"
Hearing closed to the public and confined to the Hoard.
Supervisor"Lemke stated that regardless of whet�.P.r this is a private
narrow road with speCd bumps or an open road that road effectively is
going to be used to go through-,from Lassen to East Avenue, This might not
be the answer, to El Paso Way. He, felt the 6.5 density had been solved.
Sup,eryi.sor Wheeler stated that the offer for dedication, was
32 feet instead of 60 feet for the road. Mr. Castleberry had suggested
a 50 foot right--of-way.
Supervisor Dolan stated the developer asked the Planning
Commission to make a decision on the applicationaspresented because
had made a compromise. The people on El Pasr-,.,.a do not 1i, a the com xomise. 1
She would be ready to support the project as submitted with a I)rivate- A
road. he would support a 24-foot,, private road with 96 u%iits:
On motion of Su ervisor Dolan, seconded by Supervisor 5araceni
and carried,,a motion of''Intent was made to approved the project with
pp p �
N ��.;
24-foot private roads and 96 unitst" A7fts • Supervisors Da,1
. an Lemke> "
Saracens and Chairman Moseley. NOES. Supervisor Wheel4r
y p
The closed hearing was continued to March 17, 1981,
Supervisor Wheeler felt he Board was treating more problems
for future boards. `i`he ; 'are takingfrom one and giving to anott-fir.
The only way to compromise is to restrict the density,
Supervisor Dolan stated that reducing the density ,and opening'
the road did not compromise either.
41.1:
APPEARANCE • GARY RITCHIE
Mr. Ritc4e asked if there was the possi ility of having a study
regarding the closure of El Paso Way.
Supervidor Wheeler stated th'�toard had made a study and there
was no reason another study could not be done again.
SUP
'.rviso'�tolan stated she would he happy to vote again to
115
close El Paso
Way:
412
REPORT TO THE
BOARD - DENIED _RE2098S
The��following reports to the Hoard were received as informationi.
1 �i ,'teller Covpotatioin draft EIR and denied rezone from "A-k"
(agt�"cultural residential) and"R-C" (highway eotmterai.al) to "IMP-0
(moble home park - four dwelling units per acre) to allow a X09 unit,t6bil e
home park .on property located on the southwest corner of foothill Boulevard
and Oro-Bangor Highway, identified as AP 36-22-3 and 16 southeast of Orovillle
2, R. Grant Cline proposed negative declaration and denied rezone
froth '�Alt<-Mfg-�3" (agricultural residential mobile home - three acre parcels)
tt'S ,'PA"C" (planneA area-cluster) to 1�.11ow a nine unit residential: development
on property located approximately 600 feet west of Skyway at W'oodwdtd
A+�et<e .identified as AP„ 64-67-J.2, north of Paradise.
. ��
) ✓
e 140s ' „
442.
3
1 roed the plans and s ec
,� � p p i:cic onti dor. Durham-Daytoxx
Highway, Pr--I-W#44201-80-1 for reconstruct,Arand widening to 32 feet of
pavement to provide for bike lanes on'each side.,of the road frons Butte
Creek Bridge to Esquon Road, from Esquon road to 0,,.3 miles east, for
constructioand,widening to a 26 --foot wide paved xa:sd; the Chairman and
n
Director,of"-Public Works were authorized to sign the plans; the wage sca':e
April 9, p x
1.981 at 11:00 a.m. ,,in
way adopted; and .,he bbido ening was, set o
the Public: Works Office.:,
ve ".1 the tia ett-Palermo Road --1 ro jec y } 4
t to be iueiaded 3.n
2. Appro "�� gg
the current tildget and work to"proceed with the Braggett--Palermo {,!toad and �>
Broyles Road, Fourth Street/ Ditzler Road Projects by"equipment rental., -and
force accouut labor construction and con„L';tacting f6r con- ,�tructidn materials,
eras authur3zed
ADDT:MNAL MATTERS PRESENTED AY PUBVIC WORKS---yCRE(NIO
-----
��' i;la,T Castleberry; public works director, stated thatf� as a result
of cC�mmuiLty hearings, he will. be asking the Board,, and Chi'6p and BCAC”=to r
consider two modifications in the Chico Clipper operatiot:l� One of those
modifications fs to provide service t*�ro ev`euings� a week aria the other would
�..f L t Ga, r p ids % �..'.' 11'J- to cover 3-t (, +.°r"` �" 1 + Weems., La. sen
w cd an the matte'
;an on R
e("Eatoar3 g
E 4 R— j x \
ADOPT ORDIr1ANG'�'; "1,56: P'�T3L1"C hE,.AR.7.'VC WILLIAM VERT/EVER CLU iNC�: , DRAPT
" 11 ( L
AND APFEA•I. OF pENTED REZO'NE FROM"R-111
PA--CCS (PLAiVt� DAREA�CLiJ5T +R) �P1ta�RTy!�
"� 31' (MEDIUM t)ENSITY` RESIDENTIAL)
LOCATED CRIlI OP '"OM FOLK AVENUE, SOUTH. OF LASSEN AVENUE; AND WEST OF 8L
PASO :WAY IDENp'TMD AS AP 44,,'21=67 &'68
CEiTCO
The loser, public hearing on William Ev�Lt/Ever-rla,,inc. draft
,
environmental ; mpactZ report and appeal, of denied rezone. from "k-1" (single -
17 res dcni;•,�alt' and "R-3" (medium density residential) to "PA -i" (pl'vaed'
j?Voperty Located north. of Tom Polk Avenue, south of Lassen
Avenue at&4�e�t'irf Ea -Paso Way, idea ifLed as �a" 44=