HomeMy WebLinkAboutBUTTE CO. PLANNING DEPT. 75-84 4a
March 23, 1976
George Brown; Mr. Brown stat<d that he,lives on Bay Avenue_, on the ed, --e of the
Drainage -District, He `'eels that the dra.ina.ge d:'trict has not done hi'm any good.lic
insist that because of high taxes and low return on his almond crops he cannot support
himself and his family-. He is in favor of the proposed "rezoning.
Jerry Schuller He felt that the drainage district was a mistake. He wouldlike
it to Be one house per acre. He stated' that if the zoning goes to S -I his:props-;ty
value will go down_ Would like it to be kept in low -de ,ity_ In response to Super-
visors Richter's question of the cost of the drainage district, he said thaf.;� it should
be done away with.
Br-lef discussion bet`—an County Counsel -and Board members; regarding devel-
opment in that area.
Tour McCrady appearea'for Wes Dempsey, who lives in west Chico and is a pro-
perty owner.-. fife. is opposed ,to the rezoning he feels that the valuable_ Vina Loam
should be preserved. Stated that there were better areas for. development. The good
soil in that area is very important. When asked by Supervisor Richter how he felt
about the people in that area being assessed and not getting the benefit, he respon-
ded that as they were, speculating they tock their chances. Land value had to take
preced`ence�
Jim. Jessie; He lives. on Y-obart street he discussed the soil island in Chico..
Stating, that it was the extent on the valuable Vina Loam.. He said the Bartram pro-
perty is on this:: island. High density is note in the general plan for the city of Chico
1✓r,.Jessie stated that the agricultural land is the. heart of the valley. He said
-_that we should plan: our growth very carefully.. If they_follmx the recommendation of
general plan,; the Board will deny this rezone. He felt that the home owners had been.
sold a bill of goods of the Drainage District, And they have bad to pay for the -
speculation.
_ Frank Busell; He lives at 950 Coustic Ave. Chico.: He addressed himself to
the County Cour al., saying that there. were indeed'gcounds to bring suitg quoted a
case, iii Palo A-zo.; He said: that the day is gone when the farmer could live off Itis
crops, He is lor the rezoning.
Dickenson; Dconomif st living in Chico. He showed the. Board slides of the
area---e--explained tLe land value and the Appraisers value-.. Their -has already been
zoning don: -iia this area. Went on to discuss taxes and stated that they wanted to
take the pressure off the agriculture. farmer.. Would like to see Vina Loam island
go into Williamson Act..
Leslie Jones; 3.73 Lassen Avenue, lie is against the rezoning, he stated that
92 per-7en,of the peoplM are against more density ronin;. Further stazeing that
no one -can be assured: of a profit andy-the people were speculating. Is in favor of
saving the farm lands.,
rave 1-3ddis,, Oak Park Way., Mr Laddis read' a statement to the Beard and a copy
was,,glife.c to --each Board member. He is against the rczoning,- saying that we must
save"I gricizlturaZ lands._
Lucas,. Mr. Lucas discussed the economic aspects of the rezoning„ He
At _chncerned with th;e Environmental effects of the rezoning and is opposed
'to th''& 3�ezoning.-
RECESS. 4:05 P.M.
RECONVENED 44:20 P.N.,
HEARING CONTINUED
John: Steads,. Is against the rezoning, does not abject to other growth, just wants
to preserve the farm land's. Would' like. itto be zoned R-3 Is concerned about lack of
public interest.
John Luvass; lir. Luvass is concerned • about taxes in respect to urban sprawl
stating that taxes will go up if this zoning is allowed. He suggested that the line be
drawn at the existing periphiry.-Strongly suggest that a consultant be engaged to study
the economic effect of the proposed; rezoning. Is opposed to the_rezr-ning_ 11r. Luvass
questioned why there was no hearing set for the appeal. of the SIR re commendation..
Chairman Cameron: stated that there is only a hearing if the EIR dencies the
applicatcn.
Mr. Blackstock read, from the County Code rega,cing the FIR. .Mated that - hear-
ung is recommended only ina: case of denial_
Supervisor McKillop said that they should continue to a later date and place
the appeal of the EIR on the agenda..
Mr.. Blackstock stated that -'there is no provision in. the County Code fore such
arl appeal.
- Supervisor Richter asked Counsel if he would advise an appeal of the EIR
Blackstock Blackstock stated, that there is na requirement for such.
- nage LII` March- 23, 1,976
On motion: of Supervisor McpillgD>secouded by Supervisor Madigan and unanimously
carried cite Board voted to continue t" hearing: to April 27, 1976 @ 2i00 P.M. �'
Carey Rd inson, C ico. Mr. Rr�b nsan subrr�i,�s his ep ositian to the appoal of Bartrarn,
✓ etal, for zoning of 200 acres west of the Esplanade in north Chico. Hold
until meeting: of April 27, for public hearinq.
.a
Bd.v of Supervisors Mihutps - 4/13/76
\f
7
76 -664 PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUED - VERN M. BARTRM3, ETAL - APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION
DENIAL OF REZONING FROM "A -2t' TO "C-1" AND "R-4" PROPERTY ON THE
RE WEST SIDE OF ESPLANADE
BETWEEN EATON READ AND SHAS.tA AVENUE, CONTAINING 200 ACRES, MORE OR LESS, CHICO
THIS Public hearing was continued from March 23, 1,976.
Hearing opened to the public. Appearing:
Dr. Enloe , In favor of the rezoning.
Arley Housen, In favor of�the rezoning.
Glen i�andall, In favor of the rezoning. Later presented summary.
Bob Mannix, Opposed to the proposed rezoning.
Dave Murray, Opposed to the proposed rezoning.
Leslie Jones, 0-'�bsed to the proposed rezoning.
Michael Luca6s, Opposed to the proposed reznneing, concerned about the
environment,.
Mrs. Turner, Opposed to the 'proposed rezoning, would like the land to stay
in agricultural use.
Betty Smith, Alice Mayor of Chico, Mrs. Smith is opposed to the proposed
rezoning. Would like to preserve the agricultural land.
Jim Jessie, opposed to the proposed rezoning.
John Stutz, is in favor of the proodsed tezoningi.
Raymond A. Leonard, speaking in behalf of the Bartram:%party) is in favor
of the rezoning,
,Joe Ellington; is opposed to the rezoning*
lrdnk Grimh-lo is opposed to the proposed rezoning. Suqgest that wo
Put More money in the mans pocket that raised thas food that we eat,
Barbara Copeland, is opposed to the proposed 2bnjhF
was to much zoning and not enough plannitg.
Stated that there
Jim Lawson, Planning Director stated that the commission had voted to
go ahead with the original proposal., they had tried to dome up with a proposal
that would satisfy all factions.
Chairman Cameron refeted to Dan 131nckstotk, County 0 -,tinsel.
Supervisor Richter made the motion to place a motion of intent on the
ball,pt of Butte 0oun"Ey to re, 31-mburso these people for principal, inter6'st and maintenance
cost,.
Motion died for lack of a second,
UPOtVisOts MihUte8 April 77t 1576
A % r
J
�i 'l i ..
�.�� , h J"
ii Supervid'orV%40,3 +fin asked thattkAx matt,t. Ue resolved. Supervisor Richter
stated that in „vice,, o�..�he tact that thea., is no Yah to resolve the problem of
compensation they.*#,ouV1`'ftave to take alternative action. Chairman Catd ron stated that
the people of 8utteC8+ my probally would not, and he could not, support this measure.
On motion ln ;§upervisor Madigan, seconded by Supervisor Richter and carried
the Board voted to over'rulp. the Planning Commissions denial of the rezone from "A-211
(General to 11C-1" (Yd it 66mmercial.) and 1IR-4" (Maximum Density Residential) of prc'-
perty located on the wi,st side of Esplanade, between Eaton Road and Shasta Avenue,
containing 200 aczes,itiote or less, Chico. NOES: Chairman Cameron, and Supervisor Laid.
Dan Dl.acksgoM°k, County Counsel read from page five of number 1,5143 of
the EIR. Stating "A-2" would be consistant with the general, plan. Said
the proposed zoning is iipt ccnsistant with the general plan. Said that this project
although expanding the;Ch d' area would be a more restrictive zoning.
tII
t
L �
4 "�
4R
� � �
76 -i 02 MINUTES OF APRIL 27, 1976 CORRECTED
TO REFLECT THAT AV
44- 0
Oa^14Q BH DELETED
Fk(fm THS "R -G" ZONING. ADOPT ORDINANCE 1715
CORRE-CTING ORDINANCE 1712. 4
y McRlllop
of
motion Superv3 nor: ncliter,
secondedari Supervisor
and unani4tously
carried the Baird corrected the minutes of April 27, 1976 to
reflect that AV 44-03-
��
140 be deleted from the 11R-411 zoning,and adopt
ordinance 1715
correcting ordinance 1712
' and authorize the Chairpy�n"to sign.
`q
'i Bci. of. Sup¢ty-soxs MinuLo;s
'lay
76-2193 DISCUSSION: REAL ESTATE PROBLEMS IN BUTTE COUNTY
Ron In off appeared to discuss the realestate problems in
Butte County. He stated that 61t�sically there is a slow down in the creation of
dots i,-_'Lhico.. The value of loth is on the increase. There is a shortage of home
sites in, Chico,.nd the area relat;vely close to Chico. Mr. Imhoff stated that he had
one through, rough the multiple list incl. and found that the price of Tots was alarming. A
homesife is c`�5-acre parcel with, 61 average price of $18,000. The second thing is the
inventory of existing property in Chico.
Supervrst�iRichter felt that some of the lots that are computed
coold be divided up. P,'ice for these lots Get out. Septic system requirements_
discussed. It was stated that the average person cannot afford the lots that
are available.
Mr, Imhoff said he would like to see they hard adopt a resolution
of"encourage ment to the developers. He felt;,the' Planri:ng Department should helm
the 13,-wd and relieve them of pressures, people feel that they have to appeal to
the Beard on any building requirement as most, -of them.ore'furnoid down by the
.Planning Commissiori;`i He would like to see it y, encourageme;�it from the
Plar, ting Comm istioner; `
(Sewers in northwrrst Chico would be a great help. The lot
sizes should 6- .made smah' r in size. Additionalbuilding lc,>ts are needed of
this time
�u!.+t rvisrit' t•J Killop felt that Mr, Imho'�f`s presentation has been
very good,�but it Should be given to the City of Chico. They are the ones that
wuld havo° to kulI�ply the r,ewnririg for the urbon area. When the e"pis a revision
of the General Pltn, the d'•eveiopers should haver some ins -put to it as their in -put
( would be helpful, �
C %:nes ire ti:. r Ch"co tlro'f 3d 'hol tke mischief CJ the , shutwdovm
I�JG witF'r tlrra 'Cr!r'_• 't,' .� x.^. "'.. tirl4a • 11 wii'r i)L +efl cl"�'ti "n r~V21"y�irles taxbills
for �ll'� to some time
'` hirs; r lratr. � r,,,= a, f'r,.°adise :1 -Wed she was try ti to live i;i Paradise
She has t4,�,
, rgpbile homes ,eo i; to move ;}n the prbpeoy. One of ilie r^ �..°;: ,homes
is for her rnotkee Their fp.t, r,e is in i•iie warehouse, Approval of a lot split is
needed, Hey property, co, Ar: or six °trcr:as, The property , is on Pentz RoFd above
Yui r 5twft, Sh.-, is n h in $,+" drG'a ►
S,,pervjsor _-(i, Dated 1,,; -,pin0 down i'o Sacrdmento to talk
is people fher,a ookiin. ' f� r'� u,�hy<'s port � Ire t Nd until the agreement is changed,
,w work out somethingorian o-mergenc lev�-I. p will try
will 'look intoIrs, Cooper's problem and
Y ,
sliut-dowel.
Joiiios Hanson, Oroville, tot out his,opposifion to fho. banding
E �
Bbard of Supervisors
lgxri�aires .::� 1 c, �l1976
t
Jim Clanton,' Chairman, Butte property Owners Association. Yrites coi cerning
Uppenrrance of two men at the Beard meeting of December 14, 19i�( ,
relating to shutdown of development in the County. Read and discussed;',
Yin t.otivson, Planning Director, is aware of this letter, He sfarea
that the allegations made in the loner was not based on Fact.
Mr. Hellmer worked unher the C.E.T.A. program.
Board of Supervisors
1linutes Dec. 21, 1976
1
1
1
r..
U
`a 76-2195 APPEARANCE, PATRICK P ORC3,INS CHICO, RB FAMILY SIZE LOTS
PafricR PoGins, CM -CG, s owed c arts setting out building
development in the County. The graph indicates single family residents.
Building peek explained. Forecast by California Bank of overall increase in
population, in Butte Cou ty explained. Mr. Porgins said he was questioning
the validity of the Iass t'�seIf due to the shutdown.
Supervisor McKillop Felt this matte!- should have been plar,zd on
i
the agenda for discussion.
No ac0onjaken .
John Luva as made a brief statement on behalf of Friends of Butte
County. He stated he lives on the east side of Chico. The organization has been
lobe led as a `ho -growth " organ ization. They do not oppose the growth of this
County but feel it should be planned. Point of the moratorium in building set
out. He said 'there is a shut :lawn because the County has Failed for years to
comply with the law. It is his feeling that the law hod not been followed by
the County. He felt that it was tragic that people could not afford to purchase
homes because of the increases in prices,, The problem could be eased by making
more land available for building.
The west side of Chico cannot be oped to developments, Tl -,e
restx)nsibility is wj"-� the Lc,- for the i?oo-d to find sewerage disposal
sy i '3rn For "ka S'.. ;t "
M -11,
0
76-2229 ADOPT ORDINANCE 1780, REPEALING ORDINANCE NOS. 1711, 1713 1713,
AND ADOPT RESOLUTION 76-190 SETTING ASIDE CERTIFICATION OF THE
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR REZONING OF AREA K�'IOWN AS
A
BARTRAM PROPERTY, CHICO
On motion of Supr:rvisor Richter, seconded by Supervisor Madigan and
unanimously carried, the following action was taken:
1. Adopted Ordinance 17,90 repealing Ordinance Nos. 1711,
1712 and 1/713, an urgency ordinance, and Chairman authorized to sign.
2. Aclopted Resolution 76-190 setting aside the certification of
the Environmental Impact Report prepared,-lrd considered in connection with fhe
adoption of Ordinances 1711, 1712 and 1713 and the Chairman was authorized
to sign
Board of Supervisors
Minittes - Dec. 21, 1976
A2-01-4842-34-30
���
42-34-60
kya�
Colal,'L-. ' cf�, BubbA
I- Raymond & FranciG Brown
0 Box 22
�
.?'tjtnps Collum
Ut Box 409 L
Nplgon, CA 95958
,
, 1
Chico, CA 95926
t
'
42-01-53
42-34-31
42-34"61i 62 & 63
Wm. Robprt BarGtow etas,,,
Martin & Darlenp Jeffrips4,
- verd & lona McCain
4090 Bay AVP.
Chico, CA 95926
r, 1907 Man rove Avp.
C tco, CA 95926
P•
y
21!25 orth Ave.
Ctt.,co)' CA 95926
1
.,�'f,
}a "
42 34-64, 65 & 66
. M fid, ,»'
r• .. r� �; ,.06
.
Richard & H. M Snydpr Jz* f,
Rt. 410
c'. .
� ;►
A 4
A �=, �.. ��
�1
1 Box
Chico, CA 95926
;
r2rra-01l
�',G;�rald3&
4
& Bprnicp Drake
Dolores-Schullar
,
Howard &Ellen Hamar
Rt. 1 Box 409D
�'Rt. 1. Box 412 A
Rt. 1 Box 409 W
Chico, CA 95926
4�4` Chico, CA 95926
Chico, CA 95926
p�''
L
'
42-01�-59
�b
42-34-39
44,44 03-61 /.Johri Fabian
�.
.lack & Batty PowP11
Paul & Angie CavasRa
I ,
4�
Robert & Jane Fabian ptaJ,+
Rt. 1 Box 09 B
Chico-,, 'CA 95926
Rt. 1Box 409 H
Chico, CA 95926
��`
''
808 Arbutus Ave.
Chico, CA 95926
.1
Ij
x,
Mptip 61
4-44
~ {
MprlP CarvAr
Ray Kprnahan
y
Countyhof Butte
At. 1 Box 409 B ..,i
Rt. 1 Box. 407 k
�
Chico) CA 95926
1' Chico, CA 95926
}+ 42-34.46
Y'
� `
44-03-83 Sc 1:20 & 139
Lowoll & Ida Wangbprg
John, & Gpnpp Stam pi, "
' P
Raymond Krumrtvieda
Rt . l Box 51 A
�'' -
" Rt. 1 Box 41l .K
Rt. 1 Box. 427 . AA .,.;
Durham. CA 95938
Chico, CA 95926
"..
Chico,- CA :, 95926
,145 ,1.49
r,>
42-34-5
' 42-34-47
'
44-0 3 -121 1440
t
Wallin & Alice Carlson
N
e'Glpntl & Susan Kendall.
T Incsr,oratpa
Rt, 1 Box 410,. C
o Rt, 1 Box 409 K
369
Chico, CA 95926
' Chico, CA 95926
'
San Fraftci8cos CA 9411.0
y
42134-27 ' 42-34-48 44-03-146
GPorggA & Mary Brown
Rt, S Box 408
Chico, CA 95926
4234-28
Richard & Margarpb Brown
Rt, l Box 408 A
Chico, CA 95926
42•-34-29
Tvin & Dolorp Davie
�� Surra
Rio Vista, tvg` 94571
Carl & Carter RobtSchalk
Rt. 1 Box 409 R
Chico, CA 95926
N
' 42-3453
"*,Franklin & Dora Brazpll
14.'Po 0, Box 1666
Chico, CA 95926
Fleaor4Gud�Ipbac
� k
Rt. 1 tb'x 407
}, Chito, CA 95926
Glenn & Susan Xpndall
Rt. 1 Box 409 K
Chico, CA 95926
p1
44-03-1.47
G1pnn & C,> col to Kendall
1.115 Dl Monte Dr.
Thoufiand 'Oaks, CA 91360 .2
Y
44-08-148
County of Butte,
t
«.�. .rte
44-04-16 &:,17 44-052-03 ' 44-053-1b
Thome q Srhyram `Enloe etal ob'zrt & Maria Itostello ` iql -Aire Contr. of Chico
3651.• Golly"Pn; Lpaf Dr. t. 1 Box 416 ' 0 Box 886
Westlake village,, CA91366',* Chico, CA 95926 � Chico, CA 95926
! ,
44'=0418 > �� 44-052-42 �' 44-053-19
v. M. & PhylliG, -Bartram I . Oa,q Town & Country Inc ChFarlpq & Dorothy Woad,,
Rt. 4 Box 544P. 0. Box ,'1540 3034 Esplanade
Chino, CA 95926 Chaco, Ci,� 95926 Chico, CA 95926
44-04-109 �' 1a4-052-62 i 44-055-20
Clare A. Denh . Tarr & Judy Joneq etal
H. H. Peterson &,Sons Inc Clare
W. 4th Ave. yy•
Rt. 4 Box 546 Rt. 1 Box 410 G
co,
ChiCA 95926 `'
Ch-cos CA 95926 Chico � , CA 95926
44-04-i10 44-652=67 �i 44-053-27 & 28
J.D. & Bpatricp Brayton Robert & Lela Johnson �
County ofButtA + 1085 E. 5th Ave.
sk4l& Broadway Chico, CA 95926
t Chico, CA 95926
44-051-1 44-052-68 ��� 44-053-34 , . k;�y
C.R. & BprnPica DaciouG Jeanette 'White
1240 Park Ave. John &Carla Brayton 79 FairwayDrRt/.
Chico CA 95926 r'' Chi 1 Box 417 B 1.,, Chico CA 95926
� Chico, CA 95926 ,d � s w
44-051-2 44-05':-70 & 71 etal
w. r 71 44-053=01 r .
Lorene Wa'lkpr Bob & Joyce Carroll ptal I Fu ono' & Gladys Hylton
At. 4 Box 548 1668 Manzanita 2990 Nianade5926Chico, CA 95926' �� co, CA 95926 Chico,
r
NorthlState Aluminum Ra mond & Ursul'Chambers r John
►r,
44-053-02 44-4
�,. ; A. Mpk a
P. 0. Box 3497 Rt. 1 Box 419 P. 0 Box 3178
Chico, CA 95926 j Chico, CA 95926 Chaco
'' ^" , CA 95926
.
Rob05'1-04 44
` _5 i �-053 •-12
44w43-02 w '
�r rt Donn,-llP t' Walter & Nancy Pool
y �= Roy & Helen BaughridgP g61y l,orinda..T�arap
Rt. 1 Box 421 2118 North Avenue i 8 r
Chico; CA 95926 r"Chico CA 95926 ,.
Chico, CA 95926 C, r y>�4
J 44.053-.1:3 ' _
44�-05�,-�1�: I` ,, � A. Stern Co.
03
Robort & AnneMaddux ,
Urias Thompson
Rf 1 Box 415 A 801 East A�+�e. C'�t
Chicoi CA 95926 2914 Eg Aa�95926 �� Chico, CA 9592E
Chico,
Y
44-051-1-6 &'' 17C F` 4/4,43-04
McCain & AsGoc
44-053-15 ! C. L. & D. M. YandPll '
Richard & Nancy Ray �.
Gprald Compton �, Rt. 1 Box 4� 9 D �' ; 1010 Arlingbot !"
555 East ,Aw.-. 926 El Cerrito, CA 94530
Chico, CA 95926p Chi co CA y5
44-0-08 44-055-16�ugane & Julianne MedarrP�oGPphinQ Crum �.G.WillIaMs 0n Prop ett�11.ott
k
1.063 Woodland tib lit. 1 :Box 41:8 A :.255 1. 4th st
Chico, CA 95926 r: Chico, CA 95926ti 10 Chic' o, CA,- 959261
{' { 44-1+3--11 K,
Char"es Barrett 4
1211. C�ectriut; St, `
Santa Ana, CA 92700 i
44-43-13,
C1 de & FanniP Haltom
290 Irwin Rd. ,.
Redding, CA ,96001
44-43-16
Robprt & Diana PPtersQtt
P. 0. Box 2.78
Kettleman City,CA 93239
44-46-04 }"}
Myrl StammprJ' ohan etal
P. 0. .Box 1228
t.
Sacramento, CA 95813 '
44-46-44"��
Carl & Iris Wa ter:
Rt. 1. Box 426 A
' Chico, CA 95926 ! ,,
44-46-146
M & T Inc
%Dkinn Realty, t.
P. 0. ;Box 1608 req
• Chico, CA 95926
" 44-46-47
M & T into. {{
369 Pinw. St,
San Francisco, CA 94110`''
Carl & Iris Watapr
Prpgton Minte*
1239 Sb ngrove Ave,
Chit:o, CA 95926 I
FO
j . ;fir..
,Alop
,
Iqr '" +•a
i,/7
v
DANiEL v, 8LACKSTOCK
County CoUht.01
I
i
Honorabl o Members of the J�
Board of 5uperv'isors i
Butte County Adm-inistratid!n;;
8u11ding
Orovi l l e, California
RE: STIPULATION - _ATTORNDY OB
LAtI�i Cif tu:.TURA! W AITF1 AMD BEr`.UTY
OFFICE OF THC: cout.t `r COUNSEL
1849 ROBINSON STREET 01`0'111 LC, CALIFORNIA 95465
Telephonol (71) 5311.4621
DeCeli1beY'9176 JAMES R.GRIFFITH
1 D LBERT M. SIEMSEN
BRIAN L. RIX
{
Gopg4ies
Cp
A
31 1976
ERAL, INTBRJBNOR CTTY''
I
� �' ' OF CHI
-----, n�: as rt+vi sed
l.
Y. uU1V I r ur au I I u,
Gentlemen:
y e 'o you o'i
This letter 'i5 to modify my letter l., QctobElr 27 ; 1976
and to advise you in do -tail relative to the revi�,;ed extension of time
which T signed on December 22, 1976, and which w are informed was
:signed by William Press, Director of Planning and Research on
December 24, 1976. The revised application, a copy or which is
s r_� y
' attached hereto, had previously been reviewed in detail with rep
% res entativo$ of P1 at'►nin9, Public 4tor'K, and Noalth Department on
December 27, 1976, and it is my understanding that the hearings on
certain parcel and subdivision inapt set for that day were coma of eted
in conformance with this revised extension, As of the date of
writing this letter, wo have not yet, reoei ved our signed dopy of the
extension, 'titch is apparent 1V due to tate holidays and illnesses
_
i
J�
M m b,',, - the Board Page Two December 29 1976
'0
in various offices in Sacramento holoiever, we have bf,!(sn assured
that ve w i I I have the signed copy by the end of the wrick.
Th e _,,Ir e v 1 S''li 6 n only modifies Condition Nurtiber 3 , therefore my
comments t o�_,yo u dated October 27, 1976 shal I stand as to all
except Conditio Limber 3 My comments bo'fovi are numbered in the
ti
same manner so as to coincide with the numberings in the attached
revised extension.
CO,NDTTION NUMBER 3.
A ( I We may now approve a tentative or final S Ll'bd i V i S i;,f) n�
pap or parcel map of whatever sizeandnumber of par' cels that are
located within the residential -urban area as designated oil the Butte-`
County Land Use Map (Butte County Gene ,Il Plan, page 5.31a) provi,�,�j
such developments are located Contiguous to existing compatible uses
of similar type indensity and also, I�of co'Grsei otherwise comply w i,t h
the existing elements of the Butte County General Pl� n. The term.,,
cont igl.IOILIS iS later def ireed in the agreement as not r e q LI i r i t h a t,
it actually be touching 'such a similar devol opment$ but 'be iln' close
proximity, Thi scondition also '611ows us to approve a 1 !',(of the f inal
subdivision maps previously submitted to the Attorney Goneralls C`fice,
which I believe consisted of all subdivision maps that public works
had on rocord, going back as far as
A(2) This condition is the same as what we were previously
working under f Or the entire ,county, and applies, outside of the
ros i dent i al -urban areas a s' d!,,,s '19 n a t e d On "t,h e Land U,3 u Ma 1)
Members of the Board pacje Three [ d.�ember 29, 1976
B. Tris condition defines minor subdivi,1on and is no
chango from the original agreement: except, of cour11,0, that it
only is applicable outside of the residential -urban areas of the
Land Used; Map.
C. This condition dpfinos the term hard,,ilip and is the
sar,�,e as the p. ,evious agreement.
D. This i s a new paragraph and defines the term contiguous
to mean in "close proximity, but not actually touching." This
conditionli further makes reference to a pn.zrtion of thrl Butte County
General plan, specifically the subdivision section,.I.of the ex';sting
Land Use ,Element and , equires` that the county apply the po>l iiy
q �
Sot forth, therein. Although this requirement is not chAnge froml'
the previous ;requirement, whore a rouuirement that did 6ist
notwithstanding any conditional approval in that all subd`yi,,,,�ions
most be affi rmati vele% futind to be consistent with the entire General
'plan; this particulear portion of o,,ir General plan impro,�sed Planning
i
= and REsearch to the extent that they,,insisted that spo fic reference
be Made to it. This condition also re uires that the findings
ridings
reflect that the approval of a subdivision or parcel man will not
forecl.,bse planning options pending final adoption of all mandatory
1,
'n This condition pertains to subdivision"' maps that ay^e
b;i�,:; .`din or,�ier td cure a notice of violation and is of no
o°t:a m the previous agreement
til ,
i�
Members of the Board' page Four Docomber 29, 1976
F. This condition is new and prohibits specAficdlly r
approval. of any tentative or final subdivision or parcel maps in
areas designated agricultural-orchard and field craps on the land
Use Map. This would not affect the final subdivision maps previously
referred to in Condition A(l). The condition goes on to except'
divisions of land necessary tosocure financing or owner occupied
housing or for financing of other agricultural purposes, thus,
as to the exception to this condition, it is the same as that,
previously existing.
G. This condition is the Same except that our notification
to the Attorney General must also contain the s'1,�', density and
location of the proposed subdivision Ili that any office will continue
to handle the necessary requirements under tile extension of time, our
office will take care of this additional requirement.
I had previously sent,,to the Attorney General's Office all of
hive outstanding parcel ,maps and tehta•ti ve subdi V i,si on maps that were
when on file with us: As ;,to these parti cul ar ma`ps, I halre worked
'out an agreement with 'the Attorney General's Office that no addi-
tional notices need be sent. Ther,cfore,'as to al;,l tentative and
subdivision maps that were previously'.,s,eni to the Attorney General's
Off"Ice these can be taken cage of at the Subdivision Committee's
earIest convenience. In that regard I wOUld lii.r, to Suggest thot
poss %1y the Subdivision Committee might want to review and
M
p
0 `"�.,
1
Kembers o FAW Board Page hive De amber 29,, 1976
decide 6p all said maps presently bef re it commencina Monday,
and continuing said meeting until all are resolned.
�1 Yurs truly,
I DANIEL V. BLACKsTOCK
Butte County Counsel
DVB/pk
Encl osur,
cc Clif Mickeh0h, Administrative Officer w/encl
,,-Jim Lawson, Director if Planning w/encl
Butce County Health Pipartment w/encl
Environtental Review Committee w'encl
Members of the Butte County Planning Commission w/encl
Agricultural Commissioner tip!/oncl
Butte Goui:`ty Alossor w/ encl
q
Butte County Treasurer -"fax Collector w/encl
Butte County Auditor w/Oncl
Butte County Personnelto/encl
Butte County District Attorney w/encl
Clerk of the Board of Supervisors w/encl s (2 )
Butte County Libraryw/encl (10)
1) ANIT C L V. BDKKSTOCK�
Coulity Counsel
.21 F)"It to. county
.4Z..O.nistration Building
oi:o-,rlle, California 95905
Tvlophoae: X916) 5.34-4621
ii '
BEFORt THE PM -r, ti Or'
PLAM11-NMG AND RIE"ISMCH
ti
11 CO"M OF BUTTEX
12 ti
REVISED APPLICATION
FOR EXTENSION OF TDIE
14 The County of Bittte hereby requests, purse-iant to__
15 Govarnmenc CodL, section 65302,.2, that, the DiLractor of
1G 1
171
21
22
24
"2
20
27
PjAn.ft'irig, and -Research exteerLJ, f -he date for the County of
tutte'8 adoption of thy. ini5radatOrY 010ments Of its geriertLl
plan up tD and iticlitding March 1.5, 1977i. The request for
this extension of time is base . d on the extrmne hrdship that
v-,roxitd resuIt ftc= thle i?.e)ntinued proser-ution of -actions ,filed
agaiAst the, County b),,-ithe city of Chico and the People 9f
the State of California in that the requested judicial,
remedy would stop the adoption of all zoning chan&e8 and the
C 0
approval of sub8i'visioti'aad parcal maps until adoption ot-
all wiai,Iatory clex"011ts of the general plan.
request sets forth the LCtl ; hS and cotidilt ; ioris
t4hich tdie -County of tut to bol-iolVes will ii'�s.tlre prompt aad
4
8
9
10
11
12
L 3
15
1..7
18
19
20
21
orderly co,ipliance with state 7 and Ltse plan -riding requireriomts
while allo%,7ing vi.nor land us<e decisions to br, made t-;hich `
would mitigate hardships and iirt in.terfet e WJ t:h the
necessary planning currently tndertday. Tbo County of Butte
believes than ext hie hardship will. result: J -r, it may not
lawfully approve vo•i.x-Lor subdivisions, i:t.eeded for new housing.'.
,
prodect8 in that: bigh Ltnemplo „ent and a horsing shortage
presently exist iii Butte County. The possibility exists �
that the Superior Court would nor, 'al�ow even minor proJ
ec-s ! i
to be approved, by the County in the absence of a complete:.
and adequate general. plan. !
Extreme uncertainty will result if continued.
litigation occurs in. Butte County. The County is ronceri�6d
that the pressures of such litigation and resul.tin& hardship '.
i
would force it to adept its miss -.1 -ng mandatory elements
s
=vlithout the amount O pu'Olic parti.eipation. and sy5temat' .
interdistiplinarY and comprehensive - pl,annin6 effort 'it: would
ottarwise des..trLj tjhi:c:h would be contrary to an orderly, and
proper planning processo public interest t4ill be served and
.ti.
hardslaip avoided by tll-o granting of an extension ,ell time to t
the County of B�Utte on the following 't�rrns and cori, ; tions ,
22 11 Cond i.,ion N06 1
23 `� A. The County shall devote the equiv*Mont 'full time
. 2�; ,� x it effort o1' � ,��e,�bers of- the lanni.x7g department in
25 ? evaluati.n" and ilovi8ing the propopjed olements ap,;8
P.G
pp
` ; comp�.5 i.ng t��it�� other applicable stage statutes. .
7 B. rhe County Vlant itig,.Co imiss`4.on, or �-, s- bcd:itmittLie
i
CWJAF F'AF+ F2 J f
s ��-e t,r
k•v ti9 ,Hr� u;r:r
ti?
I
2 �
r�
5
6�
8
9
10
11
12
L 3
15
1..7
18
19
20
21
orderly co,ipliance with state 7 and Ltse plan -riding requireriomts
while allo%,7ing vi.nor land us<e decisions to br, made t-;hich `
would mitigate hardships and iirt in.terfet e WJ t:h the
necessary planning currently tndertday. Tbo County of Butte
believes than ext hie hardship will. result: J -r, it may not
lawfully approve vo•i.x-Lor subdivisions, i:t.eeded for new housing.'.
,
prodect8 in that: bigh Ltnemplo „ent and a horsing shortage
presently exist iii Butte County. The possibility exists �
that the Superior Court would nor, 'al�ow even minor proJ
ec-s ! i
to be approved, by the County in the absence of a complete:.
and adequate general. plan. !
Extreme uncertainty will result if continued.
litigation occurs in. Butte County. The County is ronceri�6d
that the pressures of such litigation and resul.tin& hardship '.
i
would force it to adept its miss -.1 -ng mandatory elements
s
=vlithout the amount O pu'Olic parti.eipation. and sy5temat' .
interdistiplinarY and comprehensive - pl,annin6 effort 'it: would
ottarwise des..trLj tjhi:c:h would be contrary to an orderly, and
proper planning processo public interest t4ill be served and
.ti.
hardslaip avoided by tll-o granting of an extension ,ell time to t
the County of B�Utte on the following 't�rrns and cori, ; tions ,
22 11 Cond i.,ion N06 1
23 `� A. The County shall devote the equiv*Mont 'full time
. 2�; ,� x it effort o1' � ,��e,�bers of- the lanni.x7g department in
25 ? evaluati.n" and ilovi8ing the propopjed olements ap,;8
P.G
pp
` ; comp�.5 i.ng t��it�� other applicable stage statutes. .
7 B. rhe County Vlant itig,.Co imiss`4.on, or �-, s- bcd:itmittLie
i
CWJAF F'AF+ F2 J f
s ��-e t,r
k•v ti9 ,Hr� u;r:r
ti?
thereof, shall ertd(,'�avor to schedule ptib') tc: hearings so 4
2 t
as to obtain nax-irm.)m pul,)lic r),Irticipat jots. At least
3
throo- heari.t7.gs will be held yin the va.r.h)us population
w
centers o,C ti -Le cotLttt.y to obtain pu.c• Input. q- the
5
proposed elements zYad draft environment al, impact
E;
report:.
C . I'llot;i�ces of the timc� and p:Lace ' of such hearings !
g
shall be publicized in the appropriate newspapers and ,
j
g
sent to all interested parties requesting such notice. I
"gyp
t). efforts shall be made. to obtain the assistance of
11
the State Office of Noise Control. and State Department.
12
of Mines an4 Geoloigy in .the preparation of, the noise
113
and seismic safety elements. 'She County should also
14
seek the assistance of the state and local agencies
15
with expertise in the subject matter of the ele.-nerrts
_•
Ira
being adopted,
17
E. The timetable for .adoption,of the missing Elements
18
shall attempt to insure maximum disclosure and '
1.9opportunities
for, public input. The County shall.
25
proviau a minimum of 30 days for public revi. w of ,the
21
proposed elements and draft enviromnental impact; report
l'l
22
before final. adoption.
24
A. rTo zoning ordinances ,shall 1)c enat,Lcd until such '
2;
��
time as all n►ando-tovy elements have been adopted
2G
accorcI L11g, t:: y state law with the exception of ,the
!?'f
��
ft7llotri.t5g:
yti {L=UY'C44MFURNIN j
34
Tn,L't'_rjm ordinances adopted Vursua nt t0 t
2 }
Govern, anent Code section 65858. c i
I
(2) IYlor_ e r es tr.i.ct Lve zoning need r,d t;o rr►a nLain G
`t
the ex:isting and planned uses in in,,area folloWing
5
expiration of an inter--m ordinance and pending
final. adoption of, all -mandatory elements o` the
7 I�
General Flan. d
8
(3 ) Any zoning,- actLe ns required to be taken by
9
;
stats. 1976, ch. 1:76 to establish timber7.=nd
10
preserves and'",to malce existing zoning coitsistent
. rr�•
with the General plan's Iand use el e~ent s
12
deli nation of tiYnb er-mountainous terr
ti.. 13'
:.
-
(4) Zvlinor rezona,ngs Which- Are.less ess restr:i ct ue.
C
14
but where the 'maintcnancL of existing zon:.rrg would
15
creato a hardship and the new use is c.onti,�u.ous to
, 1
e,tist:ing ccm�3L-ib:t e. uses such �'ero'rt�.nas .shall be
I
I
1.7
accompanied by, a .ng cif hardship � etting' for h. '
isa�.
those social aftd econ=ic reasons justif-y'itg
10
ixmDediwt e Vezonino pending the, final a option of
20
x.17. mandatory dlemn'nts, and se ting forth 'the '
• •
21
Ili1
i
.. b Y
.. express f7.Tl.d X11.,s of
.r onsstertcy o the Hera zort.�,ng
:
ordinance c��ith each of the existing -elements=;af
25
i
t1i' But:to County Geaera7. , Piaci. Such minor
i
24
..(10) ".crop �ay�
rezon n- shall not, e4.cee"d
.ton
2
P�Fi
tiSURTTPArfvt
Condition'iso:.
3'
2
A.
(1.) No tentative or final. subda� 1,1()n m4Aps or,
3
parcel naps shall be approved by t l,r, Country ,which
-4
lig oukai.c.]c the residential-urban j)raws ars
,3
des gnato-0 on the existing BUtt:(-, C:r7unL-y IjaAd Use
6
r;
map until ;,-such time• as all mandaLory clements have
been GdopFed puts uant to statelaoi except:. as
l
I,otherwis* provided in this application.
I
9,
Subdivision and parcel maps may be approved, within i
X10
the. residential--urban areas if they are located
11
contiguous to, existing compatible uses of similar,
CI
typf, and density and are othervize expressly found
13
to be consistent with each of the exisHing
14
elr-pents of the Butte County General Plan, 'the
l
,above limitation's shall not apply to the final
,
subdivision maps pi evious.ly submittLd to the
17
li'
ttoLnoy General's Office ant the Offico "of
18
planning and research..
I
l
(2) Notwithstanding the above limitations, the
i
I
y
I„ 20
'
County may approve r 5minor subd�.vi i.or� , as d'efinea '
21
herein, located out:si6e the reside.-, ,tial ur=ban
22
areas if' I,hey are cor`tt gLIOUSr to exxstincJ
2v)
compaHble uses of Sirnil.a; type and den8ity at'r1 �
I
24 �
are okher�..`s at expressly tound to b6 don8iGt�nb
.,
Wi Lh e�ac[1 o f the exisLing c].e;nertus of 0)e 5uttc
P,O
County G,,netal lsl-In.- J by sul�diviav,'On ok parce1
r
i
I
rr
i
{�
S lfa r�� p suant to this oxcephicn sltal.l be
tllrP.� a r. n ecd u C
!
a
I�
Lt>,51 lLtiS'i4lh
twou �,:, ";J411A 11.911
i
IlSN
l f
.. ; .. .,.._...
r
j/t I
...... ;. .. .. a . .,...,. ,. , , ._.:. ,,,, -.. t .. _gar r - .. ... .. .. „ .,.. ryw•Yh^�L:; .
accompxitcl by a finding of htrcl 'hap ss't;ng
� Tforth
2I
expressly those social and ecoMie reasons,,
just:ir-y.,'.ng immedi:.ktc approval or :such projects
petzding they final„ adoption of all mandatory
elements.
G I
B. The term "minor subdivision" -as used in this
71
application means a division of land into nob,, more than
81
40 parcels for residcn' ia1 use and covering an area of
9
not more than 10 acres, Furthermore, s'6ch sr bdivisions
10
shah, not have rc- e dwelling units per, acre than shown.
1.1
on the existing Butte County 'Land Use Eleement: Any-
12
approvals of minor subdivisions pursuant to this
�
1.3
r i a specific :(=a:tldn as ro the '
section sha,4 , contain g {'
14
applia'able number of dwelling units per acre.
5
C Tlrr
ie term"hardship" as used in this application
'1.s
�.�h;�Y1 not incl j e 'any planriY g , engineeritlg, finLa. ing,
1`7
(.or Land auqul'siti.on casts obligated or e'xp,ended prior ,
1.8
to the obtain tag or approval. of a tent.. tivp subdivision
.1.9
or parcel. nap. County .ham T a my shall make an express,
�
20 i
� d�wtermir,�.tior of what~�cas�s,
finding in an Iia'rdshi
g y' .
1
21
were obli, ated at�,51, E:`xp'ende6 atter ob'taini.ng the
22
previous ap0ro`vals�
25
D. The term "conbigu,�uk" a� se.d in th'a,s application
2
�f
shall: illean in close 6roxamity but''not o~ actually
t,
touching. The County shrill endeavor ';t.r good f� a.th to
2L3
iclentlf7 and conaidor the e'/istin�l use's, publicfacil
a.taos, ir���r.otemertts "ItId spec.s distr,1cts in thl
tot.! PrT PAS s
Sit+ 11! .x40 %1 t.;I �I
,
01x• 11
,: ,
u.
N; O
..
l l• f'
; of th:e Li I
c�enezal v i,na 4 y and apply, the c�1. iC IQ end
jr ,'
subdivision flection of the eXi.sting Bu1,LL County, nand
`f
'�1 • \
� r
:lwe Element. The findings supportiric� ll7e appro-�al of
I
I
t:he subdivision or parcel shall map ir:Ir=nLify those
5 !
factors %ghi.ch in•Ii cate that such approval will not
6 +
foi16close pIarini'ing optlons pending final adoption of
7 !
al1 manda,,ory elemants.
g
E. Condition No. 3 shall not apply to any subdivision
9
maps approved dor parcels wlere a Notice of Violation'►
10
of ;'-he' Subdivision Rap Act has been recorded and where.
<:.11
roads, housing, or other substantial hnprovements have
12
been constructed.
1S
No tentative or final' subdivision or parcel maps
1.4
shall be approved :in areas design=aLed Agricultural- �
"lb
orchard and, Vield Crops on the Butte County l:,and use(
15
map. with the eatc.�.r?Lien of � division O'C lend necessa�. j
1.7
'
• ' ing for clic � construction' of h�usinc� to;;
to secu r d ;i iiianc 1-construction'
18
be occupied by the appl.lc:ant or, for the`;financing of
l
1.q
i
other agricul,Lueal purposes necessary for the contiriued
agricultural u ae of- the r ,
i
211
L• fornia
G� The Couny � of Butte shall give- ave th�Cali
22
II
�.
Attorney General's office ten (l0) day�;.a,�v:�nce noLace
?3'�
of all' 11(-arzhgs to be conducted.'by rhe 8!11 e` County
trx
p��r.sutinL ''Lo this application,; Such no'tIce shall
i
r�
2:;
1
canraan kho si.7e, clensiLy�' an6 location of the proposed
2 I /j�,.'I
subdivi:�ion k
1
tOUMt'.PApEftj
px�IrdwHit�1
1.
-it+ Ili ItAy u•tifr .j
�l
�` `•' This ap.p'licGa.tioa for extension of L Inle is granted
,i on the express concl,i;tioa that the County or l�,tt;tc� will al�ade
tlt�
end en c o f L -he
try ���e above terms and coed" tions slur n �, , y..
4 II1 c tct sion'. The failure of the County -Eo ,ab'-* by these
1� ',t "-t the. t`7ri�tte�i coy °ar c: f .the
5 {! (:0rws and rondi:ti_c�� s �1;, �ioia
�
'.t � ence of the
California Attorney Ce��eral s office and cortic�urr
i ng and 8 earcl- sl -tall b e d eettied viola "
7 0Pfirie of plain T. t4on
.8 rr tla� rms ,arid condl�i.ons upon wil�.ch � he c&ten.sio� of
9 has' -beer ranl_ed and said extension shall' te:i-tn rite upon ten
10 (10) clays r,bti,ce to the County by the °offi cc of Planning and
1 P.esearch. R
DATED:' Dederr►b er 22; 7.g 7G
COUNTY OF BUTr
1
DANIEL IEL V .
gouty Counsel17 t.�,� .y f Butte
18
15 `11 Ext en.si8ri 0.4 Lima granted this day of
2 Dpe;:nbx``9 i6 y to the County of butte pursuant to the teras
i
-21 c1d.8 conditions set forth above.
. 4r
WILLT'ANL t FR'ESS
24` I Director, Planning and fiesea, h
2
215
I i
27
wu �
Na�Y1•M w ♦ � '. .
I DANIEL V. BLACKS`.COCKI
County Counsel \ ���ntv CC)W1!n I
2 Butte County
Administration Building
3 O ov 11e,California 95965
Tele Bone: 97.6 534-4()21 p
ry
BEFORE THE DIRECTOR O1+ �
9 PLANNING .AND RESEARCH
i
it COUNTY OF BUTTE) )
REVISED APPLICATION
12 FOR"EXTENSION or TfD4E
i
13
14 The County of }Butte hereby requests, pursuant to
15 Goverment "Code ser.ti on 65302:2, tl,,4t the ]director ,of
16 Planning and R,08'r�i; '.! extend the date for the County of
Butt 5 adoption of
17 he manddEory elements of Its general
18 plan "up to and incyl.udi.ng March 15, 1977. The reques'c for
19 this ext~ensiori of time is based on. the extreme hardship that
20 would res'�lt from the continued prosecution of actions filed
}i
21 against the Cot-ilt y by the City of Chico and the People of
2 the State of California in that: the requested judicial
25 remedy would stop the adoption of all zoning phanges and the
24 approval., of subdivision and parcel maps vintil adoption of
!85 all mandatory ,el6'ments of the general, plan.
20 This request sets forth the torts and conditions
P,7 which `'the County of Butte bali8ves will insure prompt and
s.
COUNT PAP0
r jo
,
I
orderly compli.anc .with state land use ialomang requirements
' l 2
while allowing mr 11ior land use decisions Lo I9+,e' made which.
3
would mitigate{ hardships and not `'interfere wi.ti-ithe
4
neces, ry planning ctixrer tl.y underway. The County of Butte
,
5,{
believes that extreme hardshiIIp will result if it may not
6
lawfully dpirove minor subdivisions needed for new housing
7-
,ro7 ects Ln that high unemployment and a housing sh ortage
S
presently exist in Butte County. The"possibility exists
than the Superior: Court would not: allow even minor projects
10
to be approved .,�
pp ved by the County in the absence-of- a. complete
1L
and adequate general plan. �
14
Extreme uncertainty will result if .continued
13
litigation occurs in Butte County. The Co:xnty is concerned
1.4
that the pressures of such litigation and,, yesultin hardship
15
would' for4e it to adopt it: missing matidatory elements
16
without the amount of public participation and systematic;
17
interdisciplinnr.y and comprehensive planning; effort it would
18
otherwise ,desire whii h would be contrary to an orderly and
19
lannx,t
proper p p � �g process. Public interest will he served and
20
hardship avoided by the granting of an extension of"/time to
21
the County of Butte on the following terms and conditions
-; 22
Condition No, 1
23
Ai' The County shall devote the equivalent full time
24
effort of 2 vembers of the planning department un
2,5
evaluating and revising the proposed elements and
t
�26
complyitig' with other applicable 'state Statutes.
i
7
B. Ilia County Pl.atitting; co mission, or a: subcommittee
COURT PAM4
t3yCi lri Y. CV «i
i
thereof, shall endeavor to schedule.='
pub`I .ic hearings ,,so
0-
as to obtain maximum public pad ticipaLi on. At leaSt
three hearings will. be held in the various population
4
centerw;�of the county to obtain public input on the
5
}�� � c�l�`���nts and draft environmental. impact
propose i
1
a
report'.
7
C. Notices of the time and place of such hearings
i
8
shall be publicized in the appropriate newspapers Aod
9
Sent to all interested parties requesting.such notice.
10
;�D. Efforts' shall be made to obtain the assistance of
].�
the State Office of Noise Control and State Department
12
of Dines and Geoloy' in the preparation of the noise-
C)
13
and seismic safety elements. The County should also
144
seek the assistance of the state and local agencies
15
with expertisry in the subject matter of the elements
6
being adopted
17
1, E: Tho timetable for adoption of the rissi;ig elements
18
' Shal.l, attempt to insure maximum disclosure and
19
opportunities for public input: The County shall
20
provide a minimum of 30 days for public review of the
21
proposed elements and draft environmental impact report
22
before final adoption:
23
b�
Condition N, 2
24
A. No zoning ordinances shall be enacted until such
25
time as all: taandatots elements hav6 been adoptod
28
according to-state lav wibh the exception of the
21
following
COURT PAPER
5tAtlt 00
2
3.
4
6
7
10
12
13
14
15
ii 18
20 ti
212
24
2
21
P MA
5tAT9 JF, W a
11
(1) Interim ordinanccats adopted pul',18LIant to
Government Code SOCLion 65858.
(2) More restrictive' zoning needed Lo maintain
the existing and planned uses in an areai,�following
expiration of an intoe. m ordinance (Atid pending
final. adoption of,all mandatory clOments of thel`
General Plan.
(3) Any zoning actions required to -be taken by
Stats. 1976) Ch, 176 to establish timberland,
preserv68 and to make existing z6ning consistent
with the General Plan's land us.Ie element's
designation of timber -mountainous, terrain:
"(4) Minor rezonings which are-,-, 1e9b restrictive
but where the maintenance of, existing zoning would
create a hardship and the new us e. Is contiguous to
existing compatible uses. Stich rezoaings shall be
accompanied by a finding of hardship setting forth
Ing
those social and economic reas:,,,D7,s justify'
Immediate rezoning pending the final adoption of
all mandatory elements and setting forth the
express fin , iiitgs of -consistency of the new zoning
ordinance with each of the existing eiement8 of
the Butte County General Plan, Such minor
rozonlng shall not exceed ten (10) acres in site.
coij'rtr 0APVA -
WfAtt! OP t:WtORNIk , " -
car 54
I
Condition No. 3
2
No tentative or' final-, subdiV,huion maps or
3
parcel maps shall be approved by Uir-- Cou`,zy which
4
lie outside the residential -urban areas as. -
5.
designated on the existing Lutte County Land use
o
6
map until such time as all mapaatory elem-,nts have
7
been adopted �pur 5uant, to state .law exqept as
8
otherwise provided in -this -application..
9
-Subdivision and parcel maps may oved,within
be 6.pi(c
les
6i11,.-,,aieas if tht:y .-,i ir
8 Ci o:Ll
the A, 00'a
ti"11
contiq,��our- to ra-3.ist'ing compatible u*�As of simila-,
1:8
type and density and are otherwise expressly0if6und
13
to be corisisterit with eacii;, of the existihg
14hV
elements of the tt uue County Genetal Plan. The
15
above limitations shall not apply to the final
16
subdivision maps' prL-vidu+ply submitted to the
101
Attorney General's Off., e' and the Office of
18
Planning and Research.
II
1�
11
(2) _,tiotwithstandi,ng !,,he above limitLt�tijon8t the
20
County may approve minor Subdivisions, as defined
21
herein, located outside the residential -urban
22
if they are contiguous to existing
23
compatible uses of sJ ilar type and dohity and
24
a.re,.,,ohherwise expressly found to be consistent
5
witieach of the exi6i,tihg elements of the butte
P_6
county,Gerietral Plan. Any subdivision or parcel
J,
maps approved putsu"Vt'to this exception shall be
coij'rtr 0APVA -
WfAtt! OP t:WtORNIk , " -
car 54