Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutBUTTE CO. PLANNING DEPT. 75-84 71 4 Increased, demands, upon,,j!be public ser- Vice area for projected net?tls, T 3 5. toss of ambientair, nd41`' a se 'and 4 waiver quality. :G ncreasoa traffic generation. 6 (_a 7" 7. Non `onforr , ;ice w th the :butte County " General Plari an' l Open ,Space Ii�lement of the 8 General Plan ana" non--coriform�nce with the ' City Of Chico General. Plan - 10 SIV. -� „ 11 Rei,`pondent has a clear, present and ,m ., �iister.ial `duty to 12 13 prepares certify, and consider a final environmental impact 14 , report in'compliAnce with CEQA prior to amend' r is coni ng ordxnanc4", `to adopt a ' P general plan conta�.r�a:n�� .,pacified and 16 ., 17 �t mandatory elements, and to adopt zoning ord.il,i6r.ces :only if con- 18 ,, sisLer.t with its. general plan. XV, - 1 24 Pei +t_v )net has no adequate remedy at law,. Unless Ftesp+orxdent 22 is restrain c`1 f roni granting , develo meIt a S rovals p `' t, p . pursuant to, 2 y g + zonwactions ctions w..�ch are. inconsistent With j is general `pl,,an [ and _.. 25 "riot to aad uatre consideration of the si� `- ant envix:onmentai P q gn:�fic ,.; 26 consequences thereof; Petitioner , will sutfet irreparable inj airy 27 in than ant " ;if' ed , devolo ment coft ti uoias to the city- will have p g , •_ , �5 adverse economic and soc,ia,l im acts on tkte City and the demands p C n for City services; ob,strt ct and preclude "il4p5lementation of the � Cit s General. Plan; result. in art irrEtroe� Y ' r,,! logs of pxirne - Page 11. Petition ( MebONOU6H. NOL ANb, Sf:HWAR7Z b AlUN , i. rntlatsS+ON�I $bwiilFA4NYH ! 7 , 1 I�Or cu] Lural land and ,open space, and , render nugatory t11'e compre-- he:nsive planning efforts of, the Cj,.t..,v and Counttl% and the Local, 3 _ Foundation Agency y on Commission of bhe County. 6 WHEREVORE, Petitioner prays as to. all causes of action: , �fi 6 1. That, after hearing on a ,motion by Petitioner for 7 8 „. Peremptory r' it-, r.. Yid I a peremptory writ of mandate issue compelling p" h Ja 9 Eeupond�' .' rto 10 (a) stet aside' its certification of the final environ- 12 r,2�ntai impact report' and:,Ir is action rezoning the Bartram 10tb ,k pe rt i es .:, 15 adopt a op t Co mpte (k.1) henstve general plan.. containing all' 1Ci Mandatory elements and meeting the requireme nts for agen- 17 eral plan" as prescribed by statute;, 15 (c) prepare and con t ; cider an ens*iro»mental Impao-t , 20 repoft in compliance with the . California thvironmental 21 Quality Act prior to any rezoning of the Bartram properties; 22 (d) respond to the significantt environmental points 23 24 raised in the comments on tie ,draft OhV1,ronmentai. impact 25 ' report for the project,- roject;26 26 (e) amend its zoning ordinances to achieve consistency 2 withits general plan within a reasonable ;time. IA ' ,, 20 2. That the Court ,issue a preliminary and petman,ent injunc- tion enjoining Reupendetxt, and all persons, +officers, employees l 32 agencies, boards or,commissi.ons acting under authority of Respond" Page 12 Petition �1 F-tOON 3UCN, HOLLMIU, 1 SCHWAAtZ 6 ACIEN , YiOfiBs104A1 l.CrONAT10q ,. - 1 ant, from grantin�4 or issuing any development permits, approvals, or entitlement.§of use, appl ,cable to the BExrUt am properties, 3-i 4 until such time as Respondent blas coilrplled wJ, h the order of this 5 court. G 3. For Petitioner' s -costs and ,attorney l s . fees in this 7 8 action." 9 4 For such other relief as may 'be just and proper. 10 �. DATOD ; .. 19764 11 12 7 3 C MoDONOUGH, HOLLAND, 5CHWAM; &.ALLEN - 14 William G. Holliman, Jr. Attorneys fr,r Petitioner , ; 18 1g 20 21 22 23 _ v 26 ;1..._ . 27 2$ 29 30 , � cbbNOUG4, HOLLANb ' 8GHWA02 A ALUM 6kbl46SliiWll i:tla►UpAktbN .. ., <;d i I�a j 11w{.. . tiN3 fir VERIFICATION t fPI %.. �`. tr`l'¢f'i3i' CATixZ'�,11� 4 �' i ss 'OUNTY �OP BUTTE 1,� Tithe undersigned, say: 7 '' a'm th`City Manager for the City of Chico, the petitiorYc 8 � .... �{ in { tha action(. I have r read the above Feta tion for Writ of }{;' f 1 ' ' '1 'aida aPr,t�se and } n��w its contents, and the same is ;rue of -my 1 l know]�dge, except as to those mat#ers which axe stated in it 12 } {pla y inrfor�ination and belief, and as to those matters I believe z.`£-> 1 \fJ,m 14 T ' to b,4`.triieii ^ 15 c ti;Executed. on Lune 24, 1976 at Chico, California,_, 16 'X declare Under penalty of perjury that the above is true,' i 17 and; correct. 19 , 20 J • ., City , Manager, City�of`Chico ,;, cls 22 k' 234,f + C`f i v .4, Page 1.4 •- Petition WOONOUGH. HOLLk,:O, 5CHWAAQ ? ALLEN It !`,Pd1tiSIt�A6 COpiggltY'I�+i. ... F \ .a .. ^ � 1 s PROOF OF -,S ICE ra 2 3; I, the undersigned, say: !� �.. 4 I am, 'and was ' at the txmoP = nth, e service of the,document 5 herein referred to, a citiz`�� :,- �`'`'*' �4-ed 5tate!i� over the. age_ 6 ' r,, of eighteen (19) years, and,;'nr'+�- : ,,., 4 � �a � � No the �,I�with�r'.n entity' -a action. 9 On June 24, 1976, I served ti'ECbecltion for Writ of Ma�ldate 10 1 i and Injunctive Relief, a copy of which is attached hereto, upor'l _ i2 the Coun.l.:y Clerk for Butte County, al.' oroville, ,,California, by 13 personally delivering to and leaving with said person# gersonal.l.y, 14 15 1859 Bird > atr- . _ County` of Butte, Orciva'lle, 16 Callfotniaj the aforementioned document« 17 I declare ii7i .. r penalty cjf perJury that the iS 18 'j true and Correct. "19 4 20 EXECUTED on dune,) 24, 1.976, at Orovil.l.e California. 21 22 23 Carol Ai, Brink 24 2 26 27 ;•. 28 29 80 32 sCHWAAt? i ALLAN < 1 +t3pekirWONAtconroNAiloN <> A. TO: -4t � J EKeil MickelsonY Sheriff's Dept: RF,;OUP,ST Review and comnien AES NO*._,, " u. DESCRIPTION OP PROJECT: LOCATION 2 PROJI;(2T NO 75-84 t.o C-1 (Light �Conunercial ;? atop M: and Sh.a8ta. Aye.., I Ap�x,xCATETAT,�i ADDRESS : CAS'97 6 QC�TER s C010118STON ACTION SCC. B ,' B'n ' �.. � .. '.YY,r� -' •• .•� . '�r..rrlirL.,+ I �:...+ww�rYr�.w�'.YiI.w.Ya..i.Y�ia•-a (sJ I, PMTURN DATE R.EQUDS'XED: Bei ore Commission schedul n I I , DATA DIS`sRTPsU*T'BD °.�,,,..„...�..,%,��...�........:::: ��.�...r....�.V.....:..:.,,..........».,.,. ATTAC101ENTS Ccs d allolicatia11 GOn', 8 AL`I.D cob''lU'LUJ ITS .OR - �',�....,.;..,....:,......'.».....:._.._.............��.:.ti'....is��.-.1.w...,,.,car..«;...:....�.+,a...�.:..-.:...,...,�,e:r �.e .. I , t ,1 - rr 1 ,. n1.�-i+... _...y...wy.J..�..+a.�:,,V.ltr:..��. - .,..:..-—.....: ...- .� ....r'.c...�r•,,;�-. _,', . .•r...r.. .:. _ t...: ' ...w.+wr++......J'w.�:�.r+wr},rw... 1.Y+,N.::.�w..-w..r.;:�.,....Wl �7.. .-... _„�,-.:. w.-. .: .::Yr��.......�,i.K.�.....'w'i.«.-.A.a...rJw.....i..�.0 ,.::..� : _..,: _-.,-.w;�•.�i.n. - 0 -., ...-+wrw.-.r+nrK ,+.r....rr.�.:w:i.�+.w...r.rw -r.w.�++..r✓:�wna: ,. ..__ ,.....- 'y .,�...iw....+r.,/y:,.,.:... :�.Lrw+r rr.�++��.y.....w..i.. ...,w+�w..wi�:x:♦ 1 � I � iti�wswJ --.- ._. -. '1Yrw+ri,if Y+�«�ai.Y %. <•• :wVa.w.�.. .�aNir+-iA+�w ....,.. �4Lw+wlw.irwi':w•Yrt.iiY - -�;_ ,_........_m.»�.�ywWl ,.•_. ._ --L+�.MLuIYt� ++w �.w.a�+wMiii.uiwunw.irr..rur.�.rw1:.1i.1ky,•' Y.-6 uAa..Y,..r,.4.i.a,+r.» YIiW:n.:u,...rYMnM+,w.+.�1� �.wwwiw.wW.i��wir `•: -,.. �WUWn«r+r,r�,r.•-. .. .. J,y...r.'�iw��]wn�,'.n 1 I � I - ” jl rL i , j �.«_ . M.��._ �%1':d'E� � si a �� $�'" �'w`Grflin fa'�.'�1 Santa � quest.* �4v'tr��ow! krom IIA bra (General) to "C-11, Loctatiom: West side of Bi3panadoe' Doty can Eaton toad Shasta Ave., l I y yAr3tqon 3, Dat.,- 9 6 .w:...i+M.,w+. ...waww..w..Awa....,«..irw.'.w���.�w.,�W..;,.,,.,..,r. -.,�- ....-� .w:: 200 aox-es, move or r+wr.+•+'�....y.w+.w+.n..r4.r y T 3 ` P�.C%nn t �a � ��+.,i.�s .�,dn.'i ccili] ,r]�' C "�d]E' o! jiy r'7 v.,4 wr'1 lih s a , Plan YJ 3. CC1llili. of the f3�w11� e � P i n -�s t a �+ c� . a ks P c»�]k �7 C�1�S Ci GeIn. P.a `r' itl? C'�'f/ f? 1 + � i CIV ,�7(' yam. L.+L' _. �^ �a loop �Eid dOeS x�4.. � reS)egl-- p°'� /ry t to intef x n. U"Vi,= , +..........mow.. �.w Cit CE '� PLAlgt�1lult Cbz 1ISSION ACTS ON: Mp- ion was made to recmunoxid } 3tazoni- n� �. I JCi�ne: wr�...ww�....aJ.w;�+.,wM..t a�.. _� _-.�'.-.�w.�..., ww.l s.ww...�aurw....w.....- -- .....:wv,nr.P.wwr«.................,�.. '.....+.w.:w,:.. _ '_w,n.w.:.+.............w+..au A, d yE i id .. 1s , 0 NOL A13SE- tl.G a i15 Il 4, _ V r1 1` V i 1, ,I /�` ,, < Inter -Depart' em®randum a1• 'rot file <: rb FROM: ,,Ma:ry dson r clerk SUSPECT, Bartram E. s . R. - r'f 4 DATEi No`J, 1975 (i Drart E.I. t.s were d stributeed to: `\ 1. City of Chico, Planning Dept., 4 coples j 2. Butte Co. Aariculture Commissioner's,`'Of fice p, ? 3. Butte Co.' Farm Advisor's Offirj' I..; Calif. Div. of Forestry, Oroville S. chino unified School Dist. &. Calif. WAter'Service Co., Chino office fl 7. Calif. Regional Water Quality Control Board 8. Chico P.C. & E. Office 9. Jahn Luvaas, Chico 10. State Clearinghouse 11, Butte CallE�go Library, 2 copies 1.2. C.S.U.C. Library, 2 copies 3Chico City Library, 2 cop'ie 19. Butte Co Di•brary, 0 copies I tt/�A1 (J✓1'r t1i ,. r i{ • !� r• ..... .. . .._. _ ...-. _...,,, .. ��:. :..... .. , . ...,4i... .xu.,..,_,... _.........,ova..x.�.._avu...y..•.,•w...i i.0 T�:i3 t1? emen , rude and. en,.e ed into c:xi� day 0-%6 17 e. by and between she State of Calif orni 3, acti by and, through the fapartmen of Public Work3, 3i,.r1alon. of Highways, ha drafter Lai l- d. the State, and the County of Butte, a political sub- G -1213 on, herainaf ter calied- he County. WIFEE EAS, th lv* provenent of a portion of S a nigr=,gay known as Leg-z'I outs 3 by the e' truct'lan of a ff'rga:vay s'33'>ng new a� � �23TII�Ilt x:0 � th o the C y of ' ChiC gs: sYY an r13Q1` .31 if3 &rlT'.nge c�'ondIt on exIat's .1n t^e � C't'3 ererally be-t-we-aLip-do Channel and Vlud Creek thsrouI which the afoI proposed at.3te highnmy pas3esJ uh- ch'. co ndst`-4-on subjects the ax—ea- to f' -re ponding and flooding during periods of moderate to heat/ rainfall; rd 1=111MS., t±m County, contEimplates he cons tr uc-tion of, a stomia dry na;e= system iii, the a foremen ti' oned area between Undo Carmel and Mutt Creek to improve the existingunsatisfc.ctor7 dral:nage condition a -rd to provide adequate drainage facilities for development within t away and V7AE % Vne County contemplates the construe --tion of curbs,, gut and rix-aimge on the e misting, Route '3 bet #een Undo Channel and SYsasta. a Avenue- and '61MRr.AS', after the County- constructs curb and gutter it will be necessary ta- w1denz the existing pavement for the drainage to function Yoonerly and � S'., she Stateacid the County will. mutually benefit rain the a ae e t orod stogy; drainage s3rstem and desire to specify here -In the k reporisb3it of each of tre respec viae parties; _ NGY ITTIMR-E70RE31 in consideration of the: premises aad -the mute l rJ=nzati'ts' to - derl-ved f � the perFr� arce of the wor c � are- nder deacri c � a 't lh pai `vies a rae aa fol rJ s V - !lR'f'pc:Lz 1` In c^Tlsideratlon, of the covenants of the Count hex - na z r contained and ;.he faiL:�Vul pLT ,.o.^manaa thereof, ti 3 State az, I- `zo causer, to be con3 t;rua'' tBd: 'tumdar S to to con %Qct those drainas ,s+4r..,vt-g- --K. .eu-,oua- :�aer•=,.. a.:...+,r,-----•--�a.w.,.-,•v�.•er..o•.c•„--is-r--•rr--,...m,r.y-r1---`--_.--`v-7-z--�..,� h* ;-, y-rj,.:'. - .. ...,• ..r....- y�0 c _ Yom: r G r `'` ... v, '--•/` t --•s . ✓ _ - x� '.+• -. ,.iLR"s1 .° s,. ,t. .�.r `s 'lc+t - ..-t' �'' s -- _ lr nat �Hi Y cos-?? - _ • , f Inter -Departmental Memorandum ' To: Butte County Assessor's Office FROM; Butte County Planning Department SUBJECT' Vern 14. Dartram, ettal Pezone (75-84) DATE, May 17, 19 76 � Pursuant to Section 65863.5 of the Government Code, the following parcel/parcels identified asp Nee attachedl legal t.description) , was/were x Rezone front_ "A72'' to R--4,C-I,Zoniing district. Granted a 'variance to allow Issued a co;,ndata.onal use permit for Comments e /v«I cc.. Property owner r i CID U b A, �\0 . l AN ORPIWIdE AM ING ORDINANCE NO. 995 ZONING f .A POjtTI� OF` E CtyifiN'. Y OF Berg, STATS OF � C, LCF' 1�2I3LA � mltls (LIGHT COW121 IAL) DISTkICT fry �1 si a£, Supervisors o€ Vh County of lluttoo StAte- 'The;&3e'zd 0 2 ' . 4f Calif0 'L°Ai,Q�,. undp�',ana u �u�nt to Ordintitic:e' NO. p �y 5v of ;otd t, atng the joning ",i�dbling, Otdinahae a4 amo-odmd DO , gRItAIN . a 4 E6,110,vr °. 0-4i,narrep Noel,) 995 (A".nOing C-1 -Light Commnrc. el 4 T i ter tet, ' �°yet an 3. �9. q- horpby.-ampaded to includo this followring# �. 7 ocatoa on t:h', trot, !ido of r"planm6' bntW ±on F..aton koad and ` a : sho8ta Avo., Chico, mdro particularly dwacribnd 1 follnww 9 'A" portion of Let 1 of ll.ly n, Tractti er W' of Jq si R �c�rd in MSF Book 3 on pop 67 of Bute County 10 tRco, dpx. . �cc ptir� thlrpfrom the reoxthorl.y 9d ft. gg of tho Pa gt:prl: 363 ft fi :. ona Lotq 2 and of a 1]� paxef"l POP "rocorctr*& i:iit Map gook. 44 on pogp 59, di 4 the Butts County Rncordewr, 12 contal'bi,ng 4.6 4drolo ;moro or Inns a�,� `t��..t: � t -t:hia %�dinancn 0ha�.�, ��tn nff�.thi.xt�' r ,3tJ) days 15 after the data, ox its >'40pt+i onj � and boforn tho r xpiration ,of � 16 fiftmnn (1.5) ftpr it»a l-,)Aq'�►pgA. it 0hali by pubs. ghs=,c� wiJ1i 17 ` tj1¢ namna of ;thn• m�•,i�prg vdtibg fnr grid ,gag+ in§t, fho nwAfu in tho, " chtuQ Sri �e�,i�i.��-Rc;cord e a no0pa,por pdbli4hod in tho,..: ' 10 County of� $nttp o stator of Col i fdrnja 20' 'Aa5' AND AD0 TPll »b7 t<he "13oord of `4 'apprVi.aor� caf t:hz 2i CoUnt y of ,, Buttp o !atn of CblifoAd on thn! - Y ay 6 1.522 inn :i.1 . _ . 19761 by the foll.otti,ng Witi-1. 23 7AXvs dupetvi'eote 94gong Mexillop uad Pacht.er 24 . NUF.v SuperVisot taad and Chaman Camerdn .6 i•, ADSIM . mita ff « . "A �.9 20 • 1 ORPIROU Ob. q G AN ORDINANCE ;AM DRG ORDINANCRNO, 928 ;7,OI4NQ A k"ui2 xDN 010 THE COMPLY CF- BME9 STATE, 00 CALIFO NIAO AN411 '(MAXIMCTtd)ENSITY WaLOQS RV,$TRICTED 1� 1 The Board of Superviaoxq of the CoLinty of Butto:?v State, 2 of Ca1;1'fornia,: under and purau�nt to Ordingnat No., 475r Of 14aid 3 County, besibg 4 the Zoning Enabling ,Ordinance ivt ..arr�phd�i3, Da 4 gftA;I N at foll.c,tr� i 5 " ding 1IR, 4s' ?qpximum�-ll�ngity, t'��i;xaaric� X�Tq d° 928 (.gym .. r Biis hnrob)t 7 ampndr-O _,to Inciudp thei f`a1lowing�, located on 'the wp;t Ridp of B p�,an�ad' t�F�t `rain ton, toad and "ha-- to Ave-, k Chute gni �� 9 part3.ctslarl.� d��cr:i:"�r.:� as foliow�: ° , 10 `h,- northorly 00 ft. of tho PaatPrly 363.. it. of �,ot� o 1�4�eri °mart" per ip of Ao�td lr� r,p it Boz) rte. / w� s � on �a�. �7 of th '��tttr, CauM', eco o•� 12 That partl.ort of ,th�j following &gcrib,md rorom1 locatncl C it a n.. 300" ft. of th'g iia'"t„ r18lit-of-my . 14 Boginning at th, 147 corrior of Lot 5 of I'Day, :'bract pr trap rely ordbd in 1,kip Book 1 on, ilv, 42, 15 of ih- tut;tr+ County R6cordor; the nco northVw-,tprly alon th11"I boundary of quid "Bay 'Tract No. 111 $i ' ft « ; tit nc N 52�' :.' 40`1 2�.4i 1 Vit, ; thonco a 37" 54' 10'1 � 561 ftb thmanc� M 520 �.3r 7 " 5017 ft, 'to thost ri.tlxi�ft�ayrtrof toplanade; t1 onap qoo.th+�a to ly along til to tho moat northmtly `cornor of Lot 1 of Tract" pot Map of gpoord to 1abp Book 3 onpagn 67 19 of tho Butte County Aoeordpr; thomp tlouthwp4tpriy t; n'ions the novthwO�tPr1y ling of paid " r, winq Tract" 90. to tho hiogt Oa�itorly coa.bpt of Lot 1.) of Oaid '',Btay Tract No. 1" thr?nc6 horthwp:ttorly aican, � the' , 21 Rn ,�bot�ridary cif lard Bad' Tract t6 ti.xr. point, o 22.- 2 cdntaining 20 aerie-l'i m6rj! or 24 That thio Ordihanco ohall, `taako. off+ -at thirty (30) d+ay4 25aft#.. .•hy+ dato of tq adoptions 'oqd; bofor� Atli, OAptratiori of � t fit: Aii (15) dayo aftx a aag it �ia11 b�+ pub�.� tihod With ; •iia _� •. - � � 11 •. �� � p t i if `,1 +s 1. toe names of thfF members votiagr foz and agaihot the' s ,. in thin, L� ,hi.a gii:z r3 sQ-Rl4,o�rci 2 e a nwpipex published nh 3 County of 8Ut4-p ` stat;te of 9a1 ifornia PAMOD AND A'bOPTED by the Board cf Sup',irvisors cif the County 4� Butte, state of Califotni on the .27th day of April:d < <y 6 1976 ., by Il fixe folloiin vote: tib., 41 AYES.''Supeirvinorb Xndi8#n* Moxillop: lad Ait to g N0SS • SopetvLsir add dad CiCatiro*n C&mbroa c� 9 AII83ENT none 1vNOT VOTING: nova Waxd Cpm, exon �.,.�..�� �. » .� ,,. � �• WARD CAMEi�OUI C i4 titian 12 Butt,e Couirity8oard of Suns+rviso.xs ., 13 AT2L""ST a CLARX A. NELgW t , Couhty CIOzk 14 Eu d 8X -officio C Ierk of ahe BOar(� t w . C]erx 6r Deputy ,I 4s y J I, I w 24 FiU O Cl CJI 13 Cail'�� Al OIITNANCk; NOS�a ,. ..,.�.. L.�---....«,..w• AU ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 1078 ZONIM A i P09TION 60 THE ,C60M OF WTTEA STATE OF 'CALIFORN AA RH• " AN. a'S„ o ;� 178UAW �3ISTRICT i ,The Board Ok $uporvi.sorCiof thm County of, Butte,' 'Stet" af,. e1.�E0xni,a undo , . , and pursuanxt, 'to Ordibmac�a Nc�a' 475� of a�i bc tobl,i n Ordi Co6.at~ _ n"thm, � m ama+nd€�d l'�U n �'1� I1�.II�, $ Gain n _ OAWIH {ag f0110w, ,. r; int X Suburban) Dii3triLct Ordinance No. �"�rD. 1�%8 'Cbn�nrii, �•„ ga .tioxi i i hs%s+%,by a -d :nzdod to includo. thm f=o7lloving, Jooate4d of tiaA 't , xd� of T ivpllzaS .1 +�atwnon ton Rued and Shafts Ave., s', Chico ;inter portion uxly dp.cz'ibmd aq fa :�,+z�v$� l�Ota etad 3 ofat ppazrc�], ma rneordQd in, map Book i 44" on Pa 59 "Of the Botta atixnt»y RAcorci��re mpi.z�nin� at t:irz. o7rcix''��f Lot 5 cef= i�Bay Treat_, 14 1" p�t � racnr�-1.)d in ' nook 1 on n � 42 tt Il . a P P J Of the. Hutto County'Anaord6r thonco port ,wz�q,'�+s`rlyj` � %� r' 6r g the IVB bbund6ty of g8id, "Bay Tract No. 111' _ 817.54 ft: »�othq��aao H 52 13 �to ���� 4�.�i1 �t. � o �,r�«ri . x th6nt6 , 37 54 i.U, 551 ft , t:henno X 52 154011 r: SOn ft. to the `Rgst right~-of-v y line% or, `POP1017ade; 14 t~hnndo oorathpa Qtorly ai.olig Thi �ruaplax adO to the moot 7J notthm-ely tbrnor of Loft 1 of "nvap-i Tract" per md-q df Ro*cord In Map Book i_ on page, 6-7 of the Butto County aordot tfi, h`tht�aat�r aY_ a1Grgthea; �rotck t© the18 aid aiy r1 ' thoot-Pagotarlyr aorn4r of lot; 12 of '.aid "Bat Treat i '{ Np. ''; th nOc xsarth 6ant+�xly axlo o% lit k+oundary of Raid Bairy Tract, 'to tho. point ofEbt za 1s o ' t.itC1 .th�:i�o prom all that provorty locratod taws thin Go t;p t�f tha kr��* ri htwof� ey„ �.�n of 1ap1bxWdo* it 20 Oontaiiiing 220 acr'Al® mot4 or 10,046 `d ht'' a � f9+<` �,'�' '�i'ICtli,l?�n��rfi !ihs�.�, t:8��a� effoot t"t'zirty . C30) dl!i { r i of~ta r, thr� ��rS;�sa ., v I adopti:oio,L atir3 bpforo tho oxpi.ration of �r i,t 44 a wngAe f't phr 11 b pUbli"lied with �. t 'P tho, fiei�a r' C u `� r votijkq foci, b.\d iagdiWltth(s, Oomo i th �.. ; hito ��t t ..........:...... , .w ply+ p p � tho iacc�r a ci hr tirbli; hid,n 1 County of tut�too . vt '10i Of Ca3:'� fob b►i<a PIMED AND ADOPTED by thy: BPard of Supervisors, of thO 2 County ©f Butter Stalze of Californian , oO th;e 27th, dAy of April.. v� 3 1476, key the folloxlinw vote AY`ES: Supervisors Wdi"ans MdKillop, Richter � h�C?l a Supervisor Lek & Chairman Canieroxf°l q g ABSENTI ABSENT_non 7" MOT VVOTxNr none Ward Cameron �rMi--... WARD' CAt;i pQfii Cltl al mitte County Board of JSUr`)erViSo 3 10 ATTtS�r : CLARY A. N ,,Lc;OlN, County C:"l�x`l � d x� of dip Cl ri . o �� e Boar r? 3 �4-t, . ll ut Clerk or. Deputy f 14 << 1� 19 ,- 20 ( \, 21 22 23 „ 24 s OPPXNPNCE do 1715 I �,7PJJINANCE CORp,�1CTING IMPROPER DESCR;GVTION 1 The Butte County BOata of Sun4rVS sora; State of Calif- 1� oxn .d, bO QRDAI`X, as follows: SECTJO�. Pe ference is hereby made'1'.to ordinance 171.2 whir>h zan-'s certain' within the unincorporated area o the County of 8utte. �i Through clerical error the description of 4:ha property that th Board of. Supex'Visors intended to zone was in error.' The-,descri''Aion of the lands that %yere intended to be included within ordinance 1.712 is set' forth below and Ordin: g is hereby amended by d.el...tin tti... d�scr�pt�:I 1 deleting o e on of the. proper - 10 l0 t" herein and -,is to xza- ud ds follows: .affected 1 ]L' Sas,d area., so zoned being located on the west side of 12 Esplanade r Chic o; more particularly do.scribed as follows ; " 13 � o � y e easterly 363 ft . of The northUrl 50 ft of tbF Lot 1 of" "Evajn8 'Bract" pei;, Map of Record in reap l.4 Book 3 on page 67 of the Butte County`` Recorder. 15 That portion of, the following described parcel located withi,ri �JO'._ft, of the west right-ot-way 16 line of Esplanade 17 g corner of Lot S of "Bay Tract naN[ perp orded in Map Book l on. Page 42 Noel" recE S of the Butte County Recorder, ,thence northwesterly along the Nt boundary of 's .d "Bay Tract Nb o 1" 19 817.54 ft; thence N 520 131 40,' 1 E; X146:61. EIC; thence S 370 54' lo" B, 561 ft, thane: v 520 131 20 40" Bt 500 ft. to the west right-of~%,,ay line of Esplanade; thence sou :heasterly� along the Esplanade 21 t0 the most northerly corner of Lot l of 11Evans 22 's~ract'` per Map of P,ocord in Map Book 3 on page 67 of the 8titte County TtQcarder; thence southwesterly 23 along the northwesterly line of said "EVans Tract" "13ay to the most easterly corner of Lot 12 of said, 2 Tract No 1",, thence northwsstej:ly along the 148 boundary of. said Dav rtact'lto �,he point of beginning, 2 E.:cepting therefro�`al 1. of Parcel A of that farce l 28 map recorded in Map, b,rok 50 on �aqe 8 of the Butte 0ounty 1,iecordet v 1. Containing 18 Gores, more or Lass. 2 That this OrdinancQ shall tak8 of ff!ct th- rty (30) d` y a 3 aft. %thp- data of its adoption, and before the nvpiration of �� fifteen . (15) days after its Massage, it shall h�: published ��.�tZ 5 the names of th s ,mP-,tib�rs. voting for and against the same in the 6 t a newspaper published in the 7 County of Butte, State of California. ti 8 PASSED AND AbOPT8D by the Board of Supsrvlsors of the 9 County b ME Butte, State of California, S,i1 the 4th day of May ,-'1976, 10 by the :following vote -. ,t,, 11 AYES »,) 2 r, 14 NOT 'VOTING: i y 18 WARD CPNERON, Chairman Butte County Board.of Surjgrv? stirs 1.7 A ATTEST; ' County Clerk Ci`::rk� A. NL50rIClprk of the Board 18 19 20 Cle ~k or Deput+ 9i 22 24 2 �� Or 4 K4nce No. 1780 ANS ORDINANCE REP"Lt1LTNG, ORDINANCE NOS. 1711, 1712 AND 1713 The Board of Su ery soxs of the Count b. utte. State o\ 1 p Y 2 California) DO ORDAIN, as follows 5 Section 1. Ordinances No. 1711, 1712 and 1713 each, zoning 4 a portion of the>County of Butte shall and are hereby repealed. 5 Section 2, This urgeacy ordinance 'shall taker effect ,6 immediately upon its passage,'" and before the expiration of fifteen. 7` (15) days after its passage shall be published once with the names S of the metabers of the. Board of Supervisors -Voting for and against 9 the_ Same in the Chico enterprise Record a newspaper in general 10 circulation in the County of Butte, State of California, The 11 facts constituting the urgency on,whi.;�h this ordinance is based 12 ar. e . 13 1.. Thai Writ of Mandate issued by the Supe-fi6t Coy tt of 14 the State. of C-a.lifo:rn.ia for the County of Colusa in action Pio. 1455 15 entitled City of Chico, 'petitioner vs. County of Bunte, Respondent, 16�, directs Ordinance Nos.. 11111 1112 and. 1713 to be set aside, lir I�) 'PASSED AND A DOPTED this 21st day of December n.,,j 19 76, by the Board o Supervisoi`s by the following vote: AYES : Supervisors !Lada i �iadigat , McKill6p, Richter !rid Chairman Camey 'Ic)c NOES Norie ABSENT : None NOT VOTING ;. t Chairman o 22 the Board of Supervisor 23 ATTEST: 24 CLARK A. NELSON, Coit ,inty Clerk and ex -officio Clerk of the hoard 25 �l 26 By N AU BY.I'7.TV, COUNTY PLAI ING CCIILdI 3SV)1t' Notic^ .-i hr roby givon Vii) tzap Butto County Planning Cocnmi"'don that public hvar:lnF; ! tirij:1. b1� lvhld on Tlruxatdayt, .TaYluBry 3>, 1976e at 7:30 pori p n the vi 4tr. 'G1►'. t2�,,r loud o SuparVisorcl, Room, ButL•r% County Admtnigtrattox ti ..d a ,j" 7xovL G o , s n ragarding t -hat following HtAR:i:Ir, ON DVAFT MV I:ROLVI NTAL I AC'T Vit; I: OBIT A'°b Rlilzbn m CN Jo1w Merlo - Vzom oe, from IIA -211 C(Y1t.araral) to X10-211 (Gon,s•ral Commorc •ral) pjo �,ty '.�ocatad cm tho r -2,4t 4idp cf VmUlanade, approxinultrLy 150 :4td north of Com r rcial 43 ;,oar,tt id1a tIfi1'd as AP 44-43-01more par t;iedlarly A portion o Ranolxa Arroyo Chico locatt_-11 in tha County of I3�xt`tc�b ntat�tl + t 09 thn City of Oldco, dwQ p•ibPd a"n Com ;.;naing at tjhm :I nt,%rgllction oar: th- I#I1Y lint- of Loi 4 of "Nmera:l.do Tract p, -r Hap of Racord 3.n Aap :Cook q on page 33 of t:hm Butt- Cnun�y Rpnordpr as,. the on of x iglzt - of -I-ray 1106 of V'gpianadl" t1lonce"' .N 371 "Y.1V rll 930 Eta along �;at.ct right �a ••�;rny litty, to the t x ij`< point of b�ginnin,g ofPtfla hr -Timm '3 d1a vcri&h trove -41-2, tbAncr­ 520 171 3611 p;� `� WO ft. more w Imiw to `�:?��> r� r %�Ixt"�ot w�r8y �.in� o� roto Iwp Htt b tlimmao Il 4 0 43" 3411 I =.,07 .:q o on tnm If r of Stato ! i7 ° 561, M If 1335 .Rtd i'1o%-- or less 'to th- tsn_�t r: r� a'� �rat���ray .I_Inra of r,Qp7.sanado; thAnrrs q 370 201 "1 350 fl*;II 'I g y„ Y" right- of-way � a `, ,a n tl7�a , x �. 1 f -way line of aplanade to tbo t a� r., point of taAgilining, Containing 10'0 nor--., mora or. l"Qq t:Ze� V.mrni M. b-srt e1 � ..�a.�JEi'y fi:o a ,rj,r� �j.'I �'^'� " {° Libutban to ; 1iC„,�,r1 pf(��roip�h Cr�mm�ti:c .a ) # '�'R t{•1 C3�r�t� 1rr, yti� �•� doh iaS.y., and ` y1 ., 7.11 L S .i i7 i vlb6 n 1 r pm *0 ....ti o ; V j1.1 :,Y' Y j. i.�o .',� t;�1 �')+�♦ M7 d' *11:1tt m.."AZI twl,yy`L�yy `. •'r T'll-ra,n f"v to 11100, °pa T-'s,""m"I a`�`��y d��w"ir 1'1 alV a • tl K1.2 �1 l I2 �r', � '�� � � ++11; Y 4�,. 1�.'r i R'aZ4nr- to C -1 aj iC f y.0 -L. of 11 "c� q�+ » w� °a i�a fy Oa ?�:+'�1�ot'tI it1 I'J -Ion t7 4 wt � Gi1 '�+�i ��V�r¢ iii ° 1i '} I-Wp Book 3 on raga 61 of tha Butt 6 County, 'Rmaordorx `oxcapting tlaav,trom the northrariy 90 ft. of tha pagtnrly, 363 ft, and Lotq 2 and 3 of a portAl mmpr600rdo4 in Map Book 44 on Pag4 59 of th- Bulti�, County 116dordor. Cohtoining X4.6 ac'rw*,1 more or, a.Pq,4 Rozona to Rm41 Tl6 no.rt:hmrly 90 ft,, of the aaotos,,,Iy 363 ft. or' Lot I of Ytvanq Tpac°t11 per Ilbp of- RI dotd i`M�•ip Book 3 ort page E7 of th6 Butto Caulet y I%I Covii^ta 7M18,t Portion of th f0116 t�pir`i� d1*ditp within 300 9t. of th s wplot ,�1sright1 6,-%Afay iihis bf ""I'V Onadna t :B6gjnni.ng at thr, IN comer. Of Lot 5 of "Bay Tract No. 111 por I•bp tacordad in P,Iap Dook 1 on pag- 42 of t))6 B:ut:ta: r County R -corder; thonca nor.`thwe mtnrly along the x�r houndaryr of oma .d "Bay,.:Trac•t No. l." 817.54 ft,; thenen N 520 1.34 40", ' 2146.61. ft; �:h�ncn " 3�° Son 1.0" "ra 56� ft,tl�� nc,� Is �� 520 1.3° 40" 500 ftt. to the: w-st right-of-way I.:txao of ` opl wwde thnnCA g0UthI-IWQ :mr y along t%n 13opInnade to t.I , mo --t northhrly cornr�r of Lot 1 of Tract" Per map of R -cord in Ibp Book 3 on nope 67 of # hn Butts County Rocor daa'`;` thnnep �tt"�a :h�T+�ic:�3:orly t-Aong t northlme4tritl•y lion Of kaid 11"0 8nl q Tract" to the mo,4 . ,� a � tprl.y comer of Lct -12--ff as id "Bay Tract No,, V t:hanen northweAgta�l.y along, the I� boundary of grid Bsy''Tract to the point: of br ginn117g. Containing 20 acrPR, mor p o,'r 1dgq� R,.zonn to 1-1. 1Jat~3 2 and 3 of a pard map rncordad 1.1 Abp D601, Iki� On page 59 of tho Butte County ���cordara Bagimling at thin I4', coa:oek ,r of Lot 5 poi,, "Bay Tr act lb. 1.1l'' sr Ibp r^cordp-d in I,bp Book I on palm 42 of tbn 11titta Coli ►ty +eco •d r; �:hn rr� zaryri Ylg7p"�L�t `1 �" al.ox' ar°inn 117, 1--mindnry of., said "lay' Tract `No, '1." 817.54 ft,, - �th-sid� 11 SP -1314011 � 2146 6l ft � ; 'thericn .' 37 54 1011 a61 ft,- tIvgnca II 52013 40 500 :Cis to the cost: right-io:C--way l iia of ",,gpIwmdog •thanca aouth6a rrtorly nl.ong th-t *.„pl,anade-� to saza most northarly cora rbr of Lot 'l+ of 111%vanq Tract” por I'bp of R -cord in Map Bo6k 3 on prig/,ria / cif th- `,A—ut e. County I2ncotodor; � honca goclth- t104t�+�.ly X1.10 g tjl x,tk ll r::tir+ y l� Jjrs I�I '4014 MI rte. anq Tract" to Iles mo—,t" e3w',t. -k :`ly + ornor Wa�b I.-ut» 12 of ucaid iINy 'D. -act No, V tlxnnc neer :�ttr 'tryrl Narlane t�tt,Pn v boundaa y o� s a W Bay Tract to the point of bngiraral,ng,, the epting til-ro-from a:l.l that prop"r ty locatmd within 300 :E*t o Containing 220 � trraq, mar-, or , C3 CAT—VY QR.t.r rs lX,. i t' °io9T%"Xr t�a 1"� tk"l�P r �aih?Ai"t irtys�.YJ �tx ; "Cp Lie 1:'4 ri%Py' Iola ".',� la4 U'l,f i:8; Pwjar��M;'.R•t'"` unr� r1 p .`NP `7 d,L",Y �P�?:� �ylt�." u•4'r .x dl. �. �m th^ contorlines of Avt-, wnd '`i V'flku", Iny on zoom . tiC-111 (W0.ght C'Cimf•Y3or �Wo andyl ' 1,"� « 7�`'' � 'i' .r't' M 'M 4 $ ..wpb: $.+j�ez �,l' W'+x "';�.4 � k►. g'A' co. C' Y,IILA, x��'� fit:` (4,) ON 'wA jOU,tIM , 1"eclr;mRr,R I G� C, " .)b.. June 2301.975 u Vern A. artram, Rt. 4., Box 54g ChicO:r CA, 95926. c Res ReZohe, 75--84 ` Dear ft. Bartranrn Etal ,, At th'e regular meet-in o the 9 �Utt county l nvirorwmeza atl Review CO rittee head thisc mornin .�� _ r .your t�pplication f�,'r a reiQeane from, d�-2 � eneral) to C�-1 Miu ht commercial R•-4 (Maxim Rcsic�sntial) ', and swl `�($uburban) , , bo ser eor,�Lj,tjs i .,io-- Bated on the west side of Esplanade bet�reen. k"aton Road and Salta gn Avenue,_�Chieo; wae'ceterinined :to have a "ai ifieant effect ora th.;�, t Environti ent anti an l nvi-r6nmental xmgact Report-, I(ETR) is,, re ui est. c, You Way 'file a written , prc tt� a t�, the Commi+ tee a adetermbiation to t4�e Planning Cor�iisaion wilotiY fifteeza (l� days from receipt oft? thus lone tf no written prote et is timely , filed, an FIR mill, be ih ordaxb your aseista infarmation sheets' hotline the contents oil BIRO for ie enc] osed race In preparing the i.� tOtI litioh which int at he s�jd muted aloha` with, the i fee of $100.00 beitore tha xIR can Tae vor y teri'� Ten =copi ds of this infojjR&tion are regui,ra-d. This �� t10; p� fie is an bUtial deposit 'which ooul:d bei increased ttpivyiare,paratl©n the dsraf tr.ybxQ i f. ,costs of prepating the IEIR exceed Y q sc .raax gmy ; ' 3hvuld you heVe an � �tention. > fre ;o' to conta�t, thus of#3ce,. this iva�ttexr iea a fdel" „ PATIt1Ck A. *A0,11 u EiMI2cMR MAt eG1(JADINAIK) t, pAM/md' Mary bo song ,cl er . cot,, Realth apt, , l#ir Qc�ali,^ Sze w; k.y'. Sheriff' a .Dept►r' �* f ,.•., : i kI, �; rad cx ti Al 3�o9 Sept 754 Mr, b vel etice J. "t#aVz obl, ' Direr -tor r: 8utto ' CoUnt ; DJv-jsion of. PIann'a 7 C.- Attn: Mr. PaL°,rltk McAchren. .o IY ~i, ar. TAWSont Ott xes r�s+e to the 1,,otte.� of, eine �3 from the rnvirommentaj, Cpo.rdinator, We .,tlGltase thar�l vvJin'.` nlae xa1 'A eh,,�ck,.foe 'tIOO' r: ' tin,3�o.pji; s c a draft of 'ail 1ESR , RE,. Rezone 7 --/84 !au Wil '.'trete that one tap ,re nested b ou has not been completed- a.nd only, ane cu of that ms $.s jnrrlitiietll. _Y �Y p'' , We are�noi;.�inCi�Udidq 1:.;;ct�pir�s - 11 :1rCj{ x Iup this map ;airzce' WC' a. upcertaih aboU where to 'P—. aflong the tsplana, n r ]tot the onintaebcial areas are bath at ,the 5� 6' a wr�lez and aloht�s lde Ve r•dmmerc�,, 1 Lon%n5 at the N y F We bol idV,4 Mre Betty glair has, the orig`,,)al request'' attd Would b --.'able to cl,arii" the points. tie hta e yon►r`` o � ce wS it indA I r ' ate thei'appropriate itarkirngs. oa � e copy �r;be Lt sent.' anti tion .ropzduce t}t. oo.pis to eachdraft . '. e Z C �y ' � 4 Cir the re�aOxt, si►�ce �.�� w5 �l.t" �a{'�i'�,�-� ;. �Vc� hive rat s. eared a never a e; � ptand-ing That .-eus will be dine by yolise,Oe t i t S eta �Y 544 k + 5 „ , f , , , ff .4, Inter -Depart , Mlumorandum TP -r` .at Mc chren, ,.nvYrc�nmental Cgord,inato FP.om: Environmental REview Committee 4uedECTs Eart,falli, etal 75-$4 �� r Sept. 722, x.975 ,g c) g ; At the. regular meetn 1the. ERC,held this morning, the information cn submitted by the��ppl%aion towards preparation of a craft EIR on his rezonF'�was accepted'" , It was found to to 'sufficient for you to prepare the draft EIR and the Committee awaits review of the drat► If ,( : x : 4 1� Ij 0 J „ell - 0# (( STATE OF, CALIF.RI4fA—RESOURCES AGENCY !l CtaMUND G. BROWN JR., GOVERNOR CALIFORNIA REGIONAL. DATER QUALITY"'%ONTROL. BOARD-- CENTRAL VALLEY REGION 3201 S STREET SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA95816 -- PHONEi (916) 4454270 4524M'- �r `25 November 1975 Butte !Department'-.r nuntPlanner Cd67- ing O ovi lle, C6. 95965 , _ �: Attention: Jay McKeeman, EnvironWental: Coom'inatoi = Subject: Tern H. Barkraw,,et al Rezone; - l Gent lemon: `J he s!,h ec t Draft l���n;4:.8. sta�:es tnat degradation of water quality could ocdux piith the a` de!,, developed tc+�Che potentials ,allowed under the Ice- zone proposalsy but' dors irAot discuss such degradation or proposed emit- igatidn maeasures. j li . si,ucta, Che propiw d i"omone would expand development into an, area con- t t;�. u�ous to foie Lar,.. +sn ze,�l g, zi area off Chico we believe that the areit should be sewea:ed to th;; ci.t s s ewera e system unless it can be demonstrated = . ` Ckalfit an alternate system or systems will not adverse - Y y �� *,l'y aifect wester ; qua li ty, Please contact: Hr. Crx„rfard bk this o <tf fics you have quautions+" Sincerely, W1111AH B. 'MLDWX! Seni.ot Engineer Saceamefito ,watetshed Ery :8 cc: 'BuS t eafoCanii�bg�alth `dept �t `� ,� �,I <: II �� II 11 � PETERS, FU LLER, RUSH. Sc10oLING 8 LUVAA5 ArtoRNEYs AY A AW JCROME D.PETERS,1891"19". - TELEPHONE i 4-1.4 sAL�M 5TRCk.T r- q. iaOX 3509 ;ARCA. Corm 916 JCROMEDPETCIi�„IR 4�AVIb R HULLER CH ICOM CALI PO 1..14 IA 959226 ” 342.3593 -y. - OAVILI H. RUSH r __,... JoHNW.sCHOOLINu,INC. December 1., 1975 .. ,JOHM L.LuvAAS,JR ` .. b LJi;Vji, ri IliHt ccQjK Pro P, � {I 40v) f. Mr: Jay McKeeman Environmental Coordinator Butte (ounty. Planning Departn,.:nt � {r" Co%lrttlouse Orailyle, CTS 95965 _ �,, pe ; Vern M. Bartram, et al,Rezone I) Gentlemen; We wish to respond, as requested', to your November:: 20th letter pursuant to the above rezone. z have had:. an opportunity to revi LL W 'the,--draft environmental report and, wish to submit sever�Al comments on it-. Although the,, report contains much of the'),required .information► x noli.eve it has , short-comings which .`hould be corrected in the final docu,- merit w 1 ySectio n 15191 . (b) 3. The ElR mentionl; pr`u- posals that the 1 and be left in agr :culturalY use and zo,iod accordingly . _ The-toport indicates that "this does nmt appear realistic" because of the drainage district. 1 strongly disagree wit)-,t the iri.clus' on of that,' language in the nh� This would permit poor, p,Lanning in the past to dictate ,future bad Lannin Permitting a drainar e district is not a (°tom-� mitment to ug'evelopmentt is not a redone, Is not a use pa.rmit approval, and at that tiunte did not requite environmental review—If that argument is included in the rezoning consid- erations, it would make a mockery and a futility of the present environmental review process: The drainage district would be users°dI for ten or twenty acre agricultural, parcels, or for attractive minimum density resideiitial use along the esplanadei if the land owner cost of the drainage district is a consideration, the County should consider reimbursement of property owners for these expenses, such. reimbursement, \� Wolld a be considerably loss4ostl.y to the tax payers than the ct)sts of incretatod governmental servi,dGs for leap-frog devel- o�Tent "Into that area. i r , Mr. „Jay McKeman December 1, 1975 Re: Vern M. Bartram, et al kezone ' „' Pacja Two 2. Section 15.142. The introductory 'sen,1Once that 11 the area is "within the semi-urbanized area to'the north of Chico" is inaccurate. This lana is well to the ,north "; f f the semi-urbanized area, and„ is beyond the fringe,"of any c, �ti fir' urbanization. The EIR state,,neint contradicts the ,►>tat4Ment under Section 15143 (a. 2. that this development wo'uld`expand, the urban complex ttther north from the presently developed area. . 3 As acknowledged on pages 4Vnd 5, the proposed rezonl"q is contrary to the Butte Coun'tj? General Plan an6 the present and proposed Chico'Genezal Plan calling for i; agricultural uses in the area. This requiresyreject on of- fthe therezoning prOposa7.• the a 4. Section 151.1 . (a). I suggost addition of number 5. "expansion of the Chico tirban Complex further north i will cr,eato,•developmental pressure still further to the north." < `1 y I also<`s'aggest the addition of nu4rber 7 "Development of apartment and subdivision density is _inconsistent with rural development ea, of Shasta aThis nd aiseincon- �1 i &vonaes, whichate closer toht•herurban area. sis,tent with the rural residential l ifestyles of',those living, closer -'to Chico and will,,create additional pressure for mote intense residential development in the area of Shasta and Lassen Avenues", 5. i'�ertion ].5143 (b) . I disagxee with the statement' that d,�''►velonmeift is con tiguous`'°to the urbanized area of _this Chicio: It is corit.jyuouz only to a rural �tesidential area and not an urbanized area. This would create ,an urbanized area well to the nor?:h of present intense urbanization and will surroundexistif'� Agricultural Bands to the south of the _prow poral. The etttire portion /of the area proposed for ►'S-l" zoning is agricultural and not merely ",a good portion" of it. 6, soction. 151.43 (c) . Th.Ls section fails to discuss it It ►I � ►1 y ma.t� ati,3n measures for S 1 incl , anyg q R^resent"R c 4 11 1► cusp 1 m:�.ty at�.on measures fob the. 2" zono. only g s �.. The )31R must discuss mitigation measures for the proposed rezonnin , and not for_p resent, zone. The proble,t�s with g resent "A"121' zones are obvious, but this is an unlawful . zones and the County is obligated to redone the area. At Most, 'this sectiondiscusses alterliatives pfevi':ously consid- eredAlternatives are to be disuLtssed in ;subsection W., 1 suggest a contple'to re-writing of this subsection to discuss t� measures which will mitigate (minimize) the impact of OR-411 , Decambdt ' 1, 1975 Jay McKeman Pavy: Three Ue: Vern M. Bartrar,(, et al Rezone ` and S 1;" zones. , 7 . Section 15143 (d).. Here you may 'Wish to add som ,- of I t 1 thEgalternatives incorrectly placed under subsection (c gT s est the addition of another alternative, w1hicht 6lAd be \\\, agricultural zones With a parcel arcel size than l`0 acre As earlier indicated with respect to your introduc- tory comments on page 1, emphasis of the drainage district is inappropriate . nappropr ate. This ignores the fact that the drainage trict was inadvisab.,ly established, wit-bout environmental're,., view; and that growth expectations of thea, Chico area are- far less than anticipated at the time the e .;brio was established. Creation of the district does not obligate"the county to allow development in the area and creates no development rights ,��or the owners., x Understand that one resident 'offthe drainage` t )di..s- trio, Jack Kohlbus,h, believes there were mis�;`opresentat1E�i and improper p` esstares brought on some of the 6ropert,,,t ewx�`wrs to go alor',g witl^ the proposed district. • Ile intends to submit his comments on this point. 8. Section 1.5143 (e) The relationship between short and :Long term.,Uses is not adequately discussed. Reference to Section 151.43 (c) is inappropriate, since that subsection is quite inadequate and does not discuss this point. For ade- quate discussion of this subject, details of long-term agricu],- tural production estimates are necessary. The economic produc- tion expectations from the Land should be discussed so that the full impact of the agricultural Loss may be determined. That- impact hatimpact should be contrasted with the adverse taxation impti'l�t from increased governmental services to this outlying area. I suggest substantial detailed study on these points and inr"lu._ sion of them in the tIR Under this section. As presently writtenr tnis section does not comply with legal. requiremr-rots., . ff 9. Section • 15143 �' f) 4. The nature of the lncreaill,5 ed demands should be specified and some monetary figures est -fated Xnowledge o3• the full tart impact of this proposal may of it- self be pers;tzasive that the public interest would be adversely served by th','is proposal. � Subse6tion 6 also should ,be conside3tabl.y more detailed. The increased traffic oil the Esplanade may require road im ji prov6ments and may Lead to major traffic jams extending to downtown Chico. Traffic needs may require new road construct' titin, at considerable casts. The growth-inducing impact on presently rural areas closer to town may ci-eate a multa.plier effect end further compound the traffic problem. 10. Section 15143 (g) . The growth-inducing impact of N M M Mr. JayN1cKeman December i, 1975 Fie: Vern M. Daz:tram, et d LRezone ;r` Paye Four the proposed action on ad,jac6'nt lards must be discussed and this section fa,il:s Fo do so. (I` Ther'( will be �,t growth inducing impact f closer to town, as well as further north The $cumulative com_ mercial growth i.nducing,`tendenc";i.es� --to which this' section makes general reference should be, more spee�itfi cally discui4sed. For example, what will be the impact on e* example, businesses within the urban area. if .further commercirildevelopment is allowed -on. 'the outskirts? Will -his ;;cause f,dr E: her problems for downtown businesses? 'Mill this ,.:._hte`nsify,/i traffic problems? Will this create further undes.i.rable "stripon," o commercxalizati and ,,in-- duce more commercial development even further north. ll. I,f the proponents, of the rezone lihve formulated specific development plans, the law requires consideration of r those plans in tho EIR, as a pdttion of a phased deve opment. Such considerations would take„ the EIR out of the purely theo- re tical realm and would allow more concrete cons i<dorations The planning staff should review that possibility. I do�i not int.6nd to be unnecessarily "picky", but this - is one of the largest and most potentially damaging develop-� trent proposals for the Chico area. p4 The BIR must be complete and legally adequate or it,:,wil.l no doubt be subject 'to legal challenge.' Purtl7ermore, without the re?,uirOtd information, the County cannot have a rational and knIl6'dgeable decision- „ making prodess, which is the purpose of the EIR. l urge far more detailed study and major revisions of this document. Very truly yolurs 12 SCIi0bLI1VG & LUVAS T ,7OiN L. LUVAAS, JR. JLL/ kk ` To Jay McKeeman Re; Bartram EZR i� ce t our appreciation ,f'or the,,�,pporVunity'to review and commend on this' l' Please air p matter, µ Sincerely.; Plan-P: Hoo'l e'. Hing Director BY: Ric and C.`Wilson a Planning Technician RCW.,p6 'j l e